Finding 1224815 (2025-021)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
AB
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2025
Accepted
2026-07-28
Audit: 408033
Organization: City of Mission (TX)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The City failed to consistently document purchase order approvals before incurring costs for the CDBG program, leading to potential noncompliance with federal requirements.
  • Impacted Requirements: The lack of effective internal controls over allowable costs increases the risk of unallowable expenditures being charged to federal awards.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Implement procedures for prior approval of purchase orders and establish a review process to ensure documentation is complete before charging federal expenditures.

Finding Text

Allowable Costs/Activities Allowed (Significant Deficiency) ALN No. 14.218 - Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires non-federal entities to maintain effective internal controls over federal awards that provide reasonable assurance that federal programs are administered in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Costs charged to federal awards must be necessary, reasonable, allocable, adequately documented, and consistent with the applicable cost principles and program requirements. Effective controls over allowable costs and activities include documented authorization and approval of expenditures before costs are incurred, including issuance and approval of purchase orders or equivalent documentation when required by the City's policies and procedures. Condition: During our testing of expenditures for allowable costs and activities allowed within the City's Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program, we selected a sample of 17 expenditures and noted that, for 15 of the 17 selections tested, the City did not consistently maintain documentation demonstrating that purchase orders were issued and approved before expenditures were incurred. Specifically, purchase orders were not consistently issued and approved prior to invoice dates, indicating that authorization of certain CDBG expenditures was not documented prior to incurring costs. Effect: Without documented purchase order approval prior to incurring costs, the City may not be able to demonstrate that federal expenditures were properly authorized, allowable, and consistent with applicable program requirements. This increases the risk that unallowable or unsupported costs could be charged to federal awards and may result in questioned costs or noncompliance with federal award requirements. Cause: The City did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure purchase orders for federally funded expenditures were prepared, approved, and retained prior to incurring costs. Procedures for maintaining documentation supporting authorization of federal expenditures were not consistently followed. Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the City implement and enforce procedures requiring purchase orders or equivalent authorization documentation to be prepared and approved prior to incurring federally funded expenditures. Evidence of approval should be retained in the grant expenditure file, and after-the-fact documentation should be limited to exceptional circumstances with documented supervisory approval. We further recommend the City implement a review process to verify that purchase order documentation is complete before expenditures are charged to federal awards. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Views of Responsible Officials: See management's corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action: The City will implement and enforce procedures requiring purchase orders or equivalent authorization documentation to be prepared, approved, and retained prior to incurring federally funded expenditures. The City will also implement review procedures to ensure supporting documentation is complete and maintained in grant expenditure files. Responsible Individual(s): Michael Elizalde, Grants & Strategic Initiatives Director; Crissy Cantu, Purchasing Manager. Timeline: In Progress. Estimated October 2026.

Categories

Allowable Costs / Cost Principles

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 1224806 2025-017
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1224807 2025-018
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1224808 2025-019
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1224809 2025-020
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1224810 2025-021
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1224811 2025-017
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1224812 2025-018
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1224813 2025-019
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1224814 2025-020
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1224816 2025-013
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1224817 2025-015
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1224818 2025-016
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1224819 2025-013
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1224820 2025-013
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1224821 2025-013
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1224822 2025-013
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1224823 2025-014
    Material Weakness Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
20.205 HIGHWAY PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION $399,522
15.916 OUTDOOR RECREATION ACQUISITION, DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING $282,591
16.922 EQUITABLE SHARING PROGRAM $231,969
20.600 STATE AND COMMUNITY HIGHWAY SAFETY $137,787
81.128 ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM (EECBG) $137,278
16.745 CRIMINAL AND JUVENILE JUSTICE AND MENTAL HEALTH COLLABORATION PROGRAM $110,207
97.067 HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM $104,934
97.029 FLOOD MITIGATION ASSISTANCE $68,013
16.609 PROJECT SAFE NEIGHBORHOODS $49,640
16.710 PUBLIC SAFETY PARTNERSHIP AND COMMUNITY POLICING GRANTS $48,611
14.228 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS/STATE'S PROGRAM AND NON-ENTITLEMENT GRANTS IN HAWAII $37,792
14.218 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS/ENTITLEMENT GRANTS $34,407
16.738 EDWARD BYRNE MEMORIAL JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT PROGRAM $12,134
16.575 CRIME VICTIM ASSISTANCE $11,036
20.616 NATIONAL PRIORITY SAFETY PROGRAMS $3,966
16.607 BULLETPROOF VEST PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM $2,251