Finding 1224813 (2025-019)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
N
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2025
Accepted
2026-07-28
Audit: 408033
Organization: City of Mission (TX)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: Lack of proper approval for pre-rehabilitation inspection documentation, with housing staff signing both preparer and approval sections.
  • Impacted Requirements: Internal controls over federal awards must ensure segregation of duties and documented approvals to comply with federal regulations.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Implement clear procedures for inspection approvals, assign distinct roles for preparers and reviewers, and retain evidence of review in project files.

Finding Text

Rehabilitation (Significant Deficiency) ALN No. 14.218 – Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires recipients to establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the award is managed in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Effective internal controls over CDBG rehabilitation activities should include documented review and approval of pre-rehabilitation inspection documentation by the designated approving authority and appropriate segregation of duties between preparation and approval functions. Condition: During testing of internal controls over compliance for CDBG rehabilitation activities, we selected a sample of three rehabilitation projects and noted that pre-rehabilitation inspection documentation was not consistently approved by the appropriate level of authority. Specifically, housing staff signed both the preparer and CDBG Director approval sections based on instruction from management. Effect: When the same individual signs both the preparer and approval sections, the effectiveness of segregation of duties and of review controls are weakened. This increases the risk that errors, omissions, or noncompliance related to rehabilitation activities may not be prevented or detected and corrected timely. Cause: The City did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that inspection approvals were performed and documented by the designated approving authority. Additionally, management’s instructions allowed housing staff to sign both the preparer and approval sections, which weakened segregation of duties. Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend that the City implement procedures to ensure that inspection approvals are performed and documented by the designated approving authority to strengthen internal controls and maintain appropriate oversight of rehabilitation activities. The procedures should clearly assign preparer and reviewer responsibilities, prohibit the same individual from signing both sections unless formally approved as an exception, and require evidence of review to be retained in the project file. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action: The City will implement formal procedures to ensure pre-rehabilitation inspection documentation is reviewed and approved by the designated approving authority. Procedures will clearly assign preparer and reviewer responsibilities, maintain appropriate segregation of duties, and require supporting documentation to be retained in project files. Responsible Individual(s): Michael Elizalde, Grants & Strategic Initiatives Director. Timeline: In Progress. Estimated October 2026.

Categories

Internal Control / Segregation of Duties

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 1224806 2025-017
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1224807 2025-018
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1224808 2025-019
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1224809 2025-020
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1224810 2025-021
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1224811 2025-017
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1224812 2025-018
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1224814 2025-020
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1224815 2025-021
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1224816 2025-013
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1224817 2025-015
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1224818 2025-016
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1224819 2025-013
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1224820 2025-013
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1224821 2025-013
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1224822 2025-013
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1224823 2025-014
    Material Weakness Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
20.205 HIGHWAY PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION $399,522
15.916 OUTDOOR RECREATION ACQUISITION, DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING $282,591
16.922 EQUITABLE SHARING PROGRAM $231,969
20.600 STATE AND COMMUNITY HIGHWAY SAFETY $137,787
81.128 ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM (EECBG) $137,278
16.745 CRIMINAL AND JUVENILE JUSTICE AND MENTAL HEALTH COLLABORATION PROGRAM $110,207
97.067 HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM $104,934
97.029 FLOOD MITIGATION ASSISTANCE $68,013
16.609 PROJECT SAFE NEIGHBORHOODS $49,640
16.710 PUBLIC SAFETY PARTNERSHIP AND COMMUNITY POLICING GRANTS $48,611
14.228 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS/STATE'S PROGRAM AND NON-ENTITLEMENT GRANTS IN HAWAII $37,792
14.218 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS/ENTITLEMENT GRANTS $34,407
16.738 EDWARD BYRNE MEMORIAL JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT PROGRAM $12,134
16.575 CRIME VICTIM ASSISTANCE $11,036
20.616 NATIONAL PRIORITY SAFETY PROGRAMS $3,966
16.607 BULLETPROOF VEST PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM $2,251