FINDING 2024-005 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listings Number: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-046-PN01, 22611-046-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF BOONE TOWNSHIP SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context The School Corporation is a member of the Porter County Education Services (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2023-2024, the Cooperative operated the special education program and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure nonpublic school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 22611-046-PN01 and 22611-046-ARP grant awards could not be verified for the individual member schools. Total grant expenditures were posted as expended. The nonpublic proportionate share expenditures were determined by applying a percentage to the nonpublic school budgeted expenditures. As such, we were unable to identify if the minimum amount per the grant award was expended and properly reported to the IDOE as required. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 22611-046-PN01 and 22611-046-ARP grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF BOONE TOWNSHIP SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause Through inquiry of the Cooperative management, they were unaware of the requirements to track nonpublic proportionate share expenditures directly for each member school. While the Cooperative did implement new processes and procedures to ensure expenditures were tracked by member schools starting in July 2022, all of the grant awards had been allocated to the member schools based on a percentage of the budget. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the School Corporation was unable to ensure the Cooperative compliance with earmarking requirements and the Cooperative was unable to track expenditures for nonpublic services for each member school. Consequently, the amounts requested for reimbursement were not supported by actual expenditures, but rather a percentage based on the budget per member school. Because of this, expenditures were not accurately reported to the oversight agency. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure nonpublic proportionate share funds are appropriately allocated to the member school based on expenditures charged directly on behalf of the member school. Supporting documentation for these expenditures should be retained for audit. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-005 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listings Number: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-046-PN01, 22611-046-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF BOONE TOWNSHIP SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context The School Corporation is a member of the Porter County Education Services (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2023-2024, the Cooperative operated the special education program and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure nonpublic school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 22611-046-PN01 and 22611-046-ARP grant awards could not be verified for the individual member schools. Total grant expenditures were posted as expended. The nonpublic proportionate share expenditures were determined by applying a percentage to the nonpublic school budgeted expenditures. As such, we were unable to identify if the minimum amount per the grant award was expended and properly reported to the IDOE as required. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 22611-046-PN01 and 22611-046-ARP grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF BOONE TOWNSHIP SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause Through inquiry of the Cooperative management, they were unaware of the requirements to track nonpublic proportionate share expenditures directly for each member school. While the Cooperative did implement new processes and procedures to ensure expenditures were tracked by member schools starting in July 2022, all of the grant awards had been allocated to the member schools based on a percentage of the budget. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the School Corporation was unable to ensure the Cooperative compliance with earmarking requirements and the Cooperative was unable to track expenditures for nonpublic services for each member school. Consequently, the amounts requested for reimbursement were not supported by actual expenditures, but rather a percentage based on the budget per member school. Because of this, expenditures were not accurately reported to the oversight agency. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure nonpublic proportionate share funds are appropriately allocated to the member school based on expenditures charged directly on behalf of the member school. Supporting documentation for these expenditures should be retained for audit. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-005 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listings Number: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-046-PN01, 22611-046-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF BOONE TOWNSHIP SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context The School Corporation is a member of the Porter County Education Services (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2023-2024, the Cooperative operated the special education program and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure nonpublic school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 22611-046-PN01 and 22611-046-ARP grant awards could not be verified for the individual member schools. Total grant expenditures were posted as expended. The nonpublic proportionate share expenditures were determined by applying a percentage to the nonpublic school budgeted expenditures. As such, we were unable to identify if the minimum amount per the grant award was expended and properly reported to the IDOE as required. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 22611-046-PN01 and 22611-046-ARP grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF BOONE TOWNSHIP SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause Through inquiry of the Cooperative management, they were unaware of the requirements to track nonpublic proportionate share expenditures directly for each member school. While the Cooperative did implement new processes and procedures to ensure expenditures were tracked by member schools starting in July 2022, all of the grant awards had been allocated to the member schools based on a percentage of the budget. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the School Corporation was unable to ensure the Cooperative compliance with earmarking requirements and the Cooperative was unable to track expenditures for nonpublic services for each member school. Consequently, the amounts requested for reimbursement were not supported by actual expenditures, but rather a percentage based on the budget per member school. Because of this, expenditures were not accurately reported to the oversight agency. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure nonpublic proportionate share funds are appropriately allocated to the member school based on expenditures charged directly on behalf of the member school. Supporting documentation for these expenditures should be retained for audit. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Finding - The District charged Federal programs for health insurance program premium costs totaling $496,203 for several Federally funded employees who did not participate in the health insurance program, resulting in Federal program questioned costs of that amount. Criteria - Title 2, Section 200.403, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), provides that, for an expenditure to be allowable under Federal awards, costs must be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and must be adequately documented. Title 2, Section 200.431, CFR, provides that the costs of fringe benefits, including employee insurance, are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and required by law, District-employee agreement, or an established policy of the District. Condition - For the 2023-24 fiscal year, the District provided an employee health insurance program as an employee fringe benefit for program participants and the Board authorized District contributions for individual and family coverage, including contributions for Federally funded employees. The District recorded health insurance premium expenditures each pay period for each employee; however, several Federally funded employees did not participate in the health insurance program. Consequently, the Federal programs should not have incurred health insurance costs for those employees. Based on our discussions with District personnel and examination of District records, we found that the health insurance premium costs for Federally funded employees who did not participate in the health insurance program totaled $496,203. Cause - District personnel indicated that they did not monitor the health insurance program participants and related expenditures to ensure that the premium costs were only recorded for health insurance program participants. District personnel also agreed with the questioned costs calculations. Effect - The District did not comply with Federal regulations that require all Federal expenditures to represent reasonable and necessary charges. Consequently, the CNC incurred questioned costs totaling $306,926, the SEC incurred questioned costs totaling $108,444, and the Title I Program incurred questioned costs totaling $80,833. Recommendation - The District should establish effective procedures for monitoring the health insurance program participants and related expenditures to ensure that premium costs are only recorded for program participants. Also, the District should document to the respective grantors the allowability of the questioned costs totaling $496,203 or restore these moneys to the appropriate Federal programs. District Response - The District agrees with the finding. We will work with DOE and other district finance officers to ensure processes going forward are accurate and appropriate with no programs being overcharged.
Finding - The District charged Federal programs for health insurance program premium costs totaling $496,203 for several Federally funded employees who did not participate in the health insurance program, resulting in Federal program questioned costs of that amount. Criteria - Title 2, Section 200.403, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), provides that, for an expenditure to be allowable under Federal awards, costs must be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and must be adequately documented. Title 2, Section 200.431, CFR, provides that the costs of fringe benefits, including employee insurance, are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and required by law, District-employee agreement, or an established policy of the District. Condition - For the 2023-24 fiscal year, the District provided an employee health insurance program as an employee fringe benefit for program participants and the Board authorized District contributions for individual and family coverage, including contributions for Federally funded employees. The District recorded health insurance premium expenditures each pay period for each employee; however, several Federally funded employees did not participate in the health insurance program. Consequently, the Federal programs should not have incurred health insurance costs for those employees. Based on our discussions with District personnel and examination of District records, we found that the health insurance premium costs for Federally funded employees who did not participate in the health insurance program totaled $496,203. Cause - District personnel indicated that they did not monitor the health insurance program participants and related expenditures to ensure that the premium costs were only recorded for health insurance program participants. District personnel also agreed with the questioned costs calculations. Effect - The District did not comply with Federal regulations that require all Federal expenditures to represent reasonable and necessary charges. Consequently, the CNC incurred questioned costs totaling $306,926, the SEC incurred questioned costs totaling $108,444, and the Title I Program incurred questioned costs totaling $80,833. Recommendation - The District should establish effective procedures for monitoring the health insurance program participants and related expenditures to ensure that premium costs are only recorded for program participants. Also, the District should document to the respective grantors the allowability of the questioned costs totaling $496,203 or restore these moneys to the appropriate Federal programs. District Response - The District agrees with the finding. We will work with DOE and other district finance officers to ensure processes going forward are accurate and appropriate with no programs being overcharged.
Finding - The District charged Federal programs for health insurance program premium costs totaling $496,203 for several Federally funded employees who did not participate in the health insurance program, resulting in Federal program questioned costs of that amount. Criteria - Title 2, Section 200.403, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), provides that, for an expenditure to be allowable under Federal awards, costs must be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and must be adequately documented. Title 2, Section 200.431, CFR, provides that the costs of fringe benefits, including employee insurance, are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and required by law, District-employee agreement, or an established policy of the District. Condition - For the 2023-24 fiscal year, the District provided an employee health insurance program as an employee fringe benefit for program participants and the Board authorized District contributions for individual and family coverage, including contributions for Federally funded employees. The District recorded health insurance premium expenditures each pay period for each employee; however, several Federally funded employees did not participate in the health insurance program. Consequently, the Federal programs should not have incurred health insurance costs for those employees. Based on our discussions with District personnel and examination of District records, we found that the health insurance premium costs for Federally funded employees who did not participate in the health insurance program totaled $496,203. Cause - District personnel indicated that they did not monitor the health insurance program participants and related expenditures to ensure that the premium costs were only recorded for health insurance program participants. District personnel also agreed with the questioned costs calculations. Effect - The District did not comply with Federal regulations that require all Federal expenditures to represent reasonable and necessary charges. Consequently, the CNC incurred questioned costs totaling $306,926, the SEC incurred questioned costs totaling $108,444, and the Title I Program incurred questioned costs totaling $80,833. Recommendation - The District should establish effective procedures for monitoring the health insurance program participants and related expenditures to ensure that premium costs are only recorded for program participants. Also, the District should document to the respective grantors the allowability of the questioned costs totaling $496,203 or restore these moneys to the appropriate Federal programs. District Response - The District agrees with the finding. We will work with DOE and other district finance officers to ensure processes going forward are accurate and appropriate with no programs being overcharged.
Finding - The District charged Federal programs for health insurance program premium costs totaling $496,203 for several Federally funded employees who did not participate in the health insurance program, resulting in Federal program questioned costs of that amount. Criteria - Title 2, Section 200.403, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), provides that, for an expenditure to be allowable under Federal awards, costs must be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and must be adequately documented. Title 2, Section 200.431, CFR, provides that the costs of fringe benefits, including employee insurance, are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and required by law, District-employee agreement, or an established policy of the District. Condition - For the 2023-24 fiscal year, the District provided an employee health insurance program as an employee fringe benefit for program participants and the Board authorized District contributions for individual and family coverage, including contributions for Federally funded employees. The District recorded health insurance premium expenditures each pay period for each employee; however, several Federally funded employees did not participate in the health insurance program. Consequently, the Federal programs should not have incurred health insurance costs for those employees. Based on our discussions with District personnel and examination of District records, we found that the health insurance premium costs for Federally funded employees who did not participate in the health insurance program totaled $496,203. Cause - District personnel indicated that they did not monitor the health insurance program participants and related expenditures to ensure that the premium costs were only recorded for health insurance program participants. District personnel also agreed with the questioned costs calculations. Effect - The District did not comply with Federal regulations that require all Federal expenditures to represent reasonable and necessary charges. Consequently, the CNC incurred questioned costs totaling $306,926, the SEC incurred questioned costs totaling $108,444, and the Title I Program incurred questioned costs totaling $80,833. Recommendation - The District should establish effective procedures for monitoring the health insurance program participants and related expenditures to ensure that premium costs are only recorded for program participants. Also, the District should document to the respective grantors the allowability of the questioned costs totaling $496,203 or restore these moneys to the appropriate Federal programs. District Response - The District agrees with the finding. We will work with DOE and other district finance officers to ensure processes going forward are accurate and appropriate with no programs being overcharged.
Finding - The District charged Federal programs for health insurance program premium costs totaling $496,203 for several Federally funded employees who did not participate in the health insurance program, resulting in Federal program questioned costs of that amount. Criteria - Title 2, Section 200.403, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), provides that, for an expenditure to be allowable under Federal awards, costs must be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and must be adequately documented. Title 2, Section 200.431, CFR, provides that the costs of fringe benefits, including employee insurance, are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and required by law, District-employee agreement, or an established policy of the District. Condition - For the 2023-24 fiscal year, the District provided an employee health insurance program as an employee fringe benefit for program participants and the Board authorized District contributions for individual and family coverage, including contributions for Federally funded employees. The District recorded health insurance premium expenditures each pay period for each employee; however, several Federally funded employees did not participate in the health insurance program. Consequently, the Federal programs should not have incurred health insurance costs for those employees. Based on our discussions with District personnel and examination of District records, we found that the health insurance premium costs for Federally funded employees who did not participate in the health insurance program totaled $496,203. Cause - District personnel indicated that they did not monitor the health insurance program participants and related expenditures to ensure that the premium costs were only recorded for health insurance program participants. District personnel also agreed with the questioned costs calculations. Effect - The District did not comply with Federal regulations that require all Federal expenditures to represent reasonable and necessary charges. Consequently, the CNC incurred questioned costs totaling $306,926, the SEC incurred questioned costs totaling $108,444, and the Title I Program incurred questioned costs totaling $80,833. Recommendation - The District should establish effective procedures for monitoring the health insurance program participants and related expenditures to ensure that premium costs are only recorded for program participants. Also, the District should document to the respective grantors the allowability of the questioned costs totaling $496,203 or restore these moneys to the appropriate Federal programs. District Response - The District agrees with the finding. We will work with DOE and other district finance officers to ensure processes going forward are accurate and appropriate with no programs being overcharged.
Finding - The District charged Federal programs for health insurance program premium costs totaling $496,203 for several Federally funded employees who did not participate in the health insurance program, resulting in Federal program questioned costs of that amount. Criteria - Title 2, Section 200.403, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), provides that, for an expenditure to be allowable under Federal awards, costs must be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and must be adequately documented. Title 2, Section 200.431, CFR, provides that the costs of fringe benefits, including employee insurance, are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and required by law, District-employee agreement, or an established policy of the District. Condition - For the 2023-24 fiscal year, the District provided an employee health insurance program as an employee fringe benefit for program participants and the Board authorized District contributions for individual and family coverage, including contributions for Federally funded employees. The District recorded health insurance premium expenditures each pay period for each employee; however, several Federally funded employees did not participate in the health insurance program. Consequently, the Federal programs should not have incurred health insurance costs for those employees. Based on our discussions with District personnel and examination of District records, we found that the health insurance premium costs for Federally funded employees who did not participate in the health insurance program totaled $496,203. Cause - District personnel indicated that they did not monitor the health insurance program participants and related expenditures to ensure that the premium costs were only recorded for health insurance program participants. District personnel also agreed with the questioned costs calculations. Effect - The District did not comply with Federal regulations that require all Federal expenditures to represent reasonable and necessary charges. Consequently, the CNC incurred questioned costs totaling $306,926, the SEC incurred questioned costs totaling $108,444, and the Title I Program incurred questioned costs totaling $80,833. Recommendation - The District should establish effective procedures for monitoring the health insurance program participants and related expenditures to ensure that premium costs are only recorded for program participants. Also, the District should document to the respective grantors the allowability of the questioned costs totaling $496,203 or restore these moneys to the appropriate Federal programs. District Response - The District agrees with the finding. We will work with DOE and other district finance officers to ensure processes going forward are accurate and appropriate with no programs being overcharged.
Finding - The District charged Federal programs for health insurance program premium costs totaling $496,203 for several Federally funded employees who did not participate in the health insurance program, resulting in Federal program questioned costs of that amount. Criteria - Title 2, Section 200.403, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), provides that, for an expenditure to be allowable under Federal awards, costs must be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and must be adequately documented. Title 2, Section 200.431, CFR, provides that the costs of fringe benefits, including employee insurance, are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and required by law, District-employee agreement, or an established policy of the District. Condition - For the 2023-24 fiscal year, the District provided an employee health insurance program as an employee fringe benefit for program participants and the Board authorized District contributions for individual and family coverage, including contributions for Federally funded employees. The District recorded health insurance premium expenditures each pay period for each employee; however, several Federally funded employees did not participate in the health insurance program. Consequently, the Federal programs should not have incurred health insurance costs for those employees. Based on our discussions with District personnel and examination of District records, we found that the health insurance premium costs for Federally funded employees who did not participate in the health insurance program totaled $496,203. Cause - District personnel indicated that they did not monitor the health insurance program participants and related expenditures to ensure that the premium costs were only recorded for health insurance program participants. District personnel also agreed with the questioned costs calculations. Effect - The District did not comply with Federal regulations that require all Federal expenditures to represent reasonable and necessary charges. Consequently, the CNC incurred questioned costs totaling $306,926, the SEC incurred questioned costs totaling $108,444, and the Title I Program incurred questioned costs totaling $80,833. Recommendation - The District should establish effective procedures for monitoring the health insurance program participants and related expenditures to ensure that premium costs are only recorded for program participants. Also, the District should document to the respective grantors the allowability of the questioned costs totaling $496,203 or restore these moneys to the appropriate Federal programs. District Response - The District agrees with the finding. We will work with DOE and other district finance officers to ensure processes going forward are accurate and appropriate with no programs being overcharged.
2024-003 Controls over Payroll (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance and Material Noncompliance) Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency, Federal Award, Agreement Number, Award Year, Assistance Listing Number: National Science Foundation, 2122108, 2024,47.049 National Science Foundation, 1953487, 2024,47.076 United States Department of Education, P031C160248, 2024, 84.031C United States Department of Health and Human Services, 1R16GM146669-01 & Q02067J, 2024, 93.859 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013, 23-DG-11030000-014 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Title: Foster Care-Title IV-E Funding Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Agreement Number:N/A Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:93.658 Pass-Through Agency:CYFD Pass-Through Identification Number:23-690-500-25581 Condition: In testing 25 payroll items from each program listed above, CRI noted exceptions as described in the following table. No exceptions were noted in the items tested for the Foster Care program. (See table in report pg 120) Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $4,547 and $506,209 are associated with the R&D Cluster related to discrepancies in time and effort documentation. No questioned costs were noted in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Program or the Foster Care program. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR section 200.403 – Factors affecting allowability of costs – Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: paragraph (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles; paragraph (g) Be adequately documented. Per 2 CFR section 200.430 – Compensation – personal services, paragraph (i) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Cause: The University does not have sufficient controls in place to ensure the accuracy of the amounts paid to employees nor include appropriate approvals documented to be allowable to be charged to the federal grant. The University has deficiencies recording and processing payroll as described in finding 2024-001. Effect: The University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency.
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency
2024-003 Controls over Payroll (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance and Material Noncompliance) Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency, Federal Award, Agreement Number, Award Year, Assistance Listing Number: National Science Foundation, 2122108, 2024,47.049 National Science Foundation, 1953487, 2024,47.076 United States Department of Education, P031C160248, 2024, 84.031C United States Department of Health and Human Services, 1R16GM146669-01 & Q02067J, 2024, 93.859 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013, 23-DG-11030000-014 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Title: Foster Care-Title IV-E Funding Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Agreement Number:N/A Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:93.658 Pass-Through Agency:CYFD Pass-Through Identification Number:23-690-500-25581 Condition: In testing 25 payroll items from each program listed above, CRI noted exceptions as described in the following table. No exceptions were noted in the items tested for the Foster Care program. (See table in report pg 120) Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $4,547 and $506,209 are associated with the R&D Cluster related to discrepancies in time and effort documentation. No questioned costs were noted in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Program or the Foster Care program. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR section 200.403 – Factors affecting allowability of costs – Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: paragraph (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles; paragraph (g) Be adequately documented. Per 2 CFR section 200.430 – Compensation – personal services, paragraph (i) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Cause: The University does not have sufficient controls in place to ensure the accuracy of the amounts paid to employees nor include appropriate approvals documented to be allowable to be charged to the federal grant. The University has deficiencies recording and processing payroll as described in finding 2024-001. Effect: The University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency.
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency
2024-003 Controls over Payroll (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance and Material Noncompliance) Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency, Federal Award, Agreement Number, Award Year, Assistance Listing Number: National Science Foundation, 2122108, 2024,47.049 National Science Foundation, 1953487, 2024,47.076 United States Department of Education, P031C160248, 2024, 84.031C United States Department of Health and Human Services, 1R16GM146669-01 & Q02067J, 2024, 93.859 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013, 23-DG-11030000-014 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Title: Foster Care-Title IV-E Funding Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Agreement Number:N/A Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:93.658 Pass-Through Agency:CYFD Pass-Through Identification Number:23-690-500-25581 Condition: In testing 25 payroll items from each program listed above, CRI noted exceptions as described in the following table. No exceptions were noted in the items tested for the Foster Care program. (See table in report pg 120) Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $4,547 and $506,209 are associated with the R&D Cluster related to discrepancies in time and effort documentation. No questioned costs were noted in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Program or the Foster Care program. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR section 200.403 – Factors affecting allowability of costs – Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: paragraph (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles; paragraph (g) Be adequately documented. Per 2 CFR section 200.430 – Compensation – personal services, paragraph (i) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Cause: The University does not have sufficient controls in place to ensure the accuracy of the amounts paid to employees nor include appropriate approvals documented to be allowable to be charged to the federal grant. The University has deficiencies recording and processing payroll as described in finding 2024-001. Effect: The University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency.
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency
2024-003 Controls over Payroll (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance and Material Noncompliance) Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency, Federal Award, Agreement Number, Award Year, Assistance Listing Number: National Science Foundation, 2122108, 2024,47.049 National Science Foundation, 1953487, 2024,47.076 United States Department of Education, P031C160248, 2024, 84.031C United States Department of Health and Human Services, 1R16GM146669-01 & Q02067J, 2024, 93.859 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013, 23-DG-11030000-014 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Title: Foster Care-Title IV-E Funding Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Agreement Number:N/A Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:93.658 Pass-Through Agency:CYFD Pass-Through Identification Number:23-690-500-25581 Condition: In testing 25 payroll items from each program listed above, CRI noted exceptions as described in the following table. No exceptions were noted in the items tested for the Foster Care program. (See table in report pg 120) Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $4,547 and $506,209 are associated with the R&D Cluster related to discrepancies in time and effort documentation. No questioned costs were noted in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Program or the Foster Care program. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR section 200.403 – Factors affecting allowability of costs – Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: paragraph (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles; paragraph (g) Be adequately documented. Per 2 CFR section 200.430 – Compensation – personal services, paragraph (i) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Cause: The University does not have sufficient controls in place to ensure the accuracy of the amounts paid to employees nor include appropriate approvals documented to be allowable to be charged to the federal grant. The University has deficiencies recording and processing payroll as described in finding 2024-001. Effect: The University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency.
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency
2024-003 Controls over Payroll (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance and Material Noncompliance) Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency, Federal Award, Agreement Number, Award Year, Assistance Listing Number: National Science Foundation, 2122108, 2024,47.049 National Science Foundation, 1953487, 2024,47.076 United States Department of Education, P031C160248, 2024, 84.031C United States Department of Health and Human Services, 1R16GM146669-01 & Q02067J, 2024, 93.859 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013, 23-DG-11030000-014 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Title: Foster Care-Title IV-E Funding Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Agreement Number:N/A Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:93.658 Pass-Through Agency:CYFD Pass-Through Identification Number:23-690-500-25581 Condition: In testing 25 payroll items from each program listed above, CRI noted exceptions as described in the following table. No exceptions were noted in the items tested for the Foster Care program. (See table in report pg 120) Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $4,547 and $506,209 are associated with the R&D Cluster related to discrepancies in time and effort documentation. No questioned costs were noted in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Program or the Foster Care program. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR section 200.403 – Factors affecting allowability of costs – Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: paragraph (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles; paragraph (g) Be adequately documented. Per 2 CFR section 200.430 – Compensation – personal services, paragraph (i) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Cause: The University does not have sufficient controls in place to ensure the accuracy of the amounts paid to employees nor include appropriate approvals documented to be allowable to be charged to the federal grant. The University has deficiencies recording and processing payroll as described in finding 2024-001. Effect: The University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency.
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency
2024-003 Controls over Payroll (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance and Material Noncompliance) Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency, Federal Award, Agreement Number, Award Year, Assistance Listing Number: National Science Foundation, 2122108, 2024,47.049 National Science Foundation, 1953487, 2024,47.076 United States Department of Education, P031C160248, 2024, 84.031C United States Department of Health and Human Services, 1R16GM146669-01 & Q02067J, 2024, 93.859 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013, 23-DG-11030000-014 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Title: Foster Care-Title IV-E Funding Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Agreement Number:N/A Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:93.658 Pass-Through Agency:CYFD Pass-Through Identification Number:23-690-500-25581 Condition: In testing 25 payroll items from each program listed above, CRI noted exceptions as described in the following table. No exceptions were noted in the items tested for the Foster Care program. (See table in report pg 120) Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $4,547 and $506,209 are associated with the R&D Cluster related to discrepancies in time and effort documentation. No questioned costs were noted in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Program or the Foster Care program. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR section 200.403 – Factors affecting allowability of costs – Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: paragraph (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles; paragraph (g) Be adequately documented. Per 2 CFR section 200.430 – Compensation – personal services, paragraph (i) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Cause: The University does not have sufficient controls in place to ensure the accuracy of the amounts paid to employees nor include appropriate approvals documented to be allowable to be charged to the federal grant. The University has deficiencies recording and processing payroll as described in finding 2024-001. Effect: The University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency.
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency
2024-003 Controls over Payroll (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance and Material Noncompliance) Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency, Federal Award, Agreement Number, Award Year, Assistance Listing Number: National Science Foundation, 2122108, 2024,47.049 National Science Foundation, 1953487, 2024,47.076 United States Department of Education, P031C160248, 2024, 84.031C United States Department of Health and Human Services, 1R16GM146669-01 & Q02067J, 2024, 93.859 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013, 23-DG-11030000-014 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Title: Foster Care-Title IV-E Funding Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Agreement Number:N/A Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:93.658 Pass-Through Agency:CYFD Pass-Through Identification Number:23-690-500-25581 Condition: In testing 25 payroll items from each program listed above, CRI noted exceptions as described in the following table. No exceptions were noted in the items tested for the Foster Care program. (See table in report pg 120) Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $4,547 and $506,209 are associated with the R&D Cluster related to discrepancies in time and effort documentation. No questioned costs were noted in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Program or the Foster Care program. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR section 200.403 – Factors affecting allowability of costs – Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: paragraph (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles; paragraph (g) Be adequately documented. Per 2 CFR section 200.430 – Compensation – personal services, paragraph (i) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Cause: The University does not have sufficient controls in place to ensure the accuracy of the amounts paid to employees nor include appropriate approvals documented to be allowable to be charged to the federal grant. The University has deficiencies recording and processing payroll as described in finding 2024-001. Effect: The University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency.
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency
2024-003 Controls over Payroll (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance and Material Noncompliance) Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency, Federal Award, Agreement Number, Award Year, Assistance Listing Number: National Science Foundation, 2122108, 2024,47.049 National Science Foundation, 1953487, 2024,47.076 United States Department of Education, P031C160248, 2024, 84.031C United States Department of Health and Human Services, 1R16GM146669-01 & Q02067J, 2024, 93.859 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013, 23-DG-11030000-014 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Title: Foster Care-Title IV-E Funding Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Agreement Number:N/A Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:93.658 Pass-Through Agency:CYFD Pass-Through Identification Number:23-690-500-25581 Condition: In testing 25 payroll items from each program listed above, CRI noted exceptions as described in the following table. No exceptions were noted in the items tested for the Foster Care program. (See table in report pg 120) Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $4,547 and $506,209 are associated with the R&D Cluster related to discrepancies in time and effort documentation. No questioned costs were noted in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Program or the Foster Care program. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR section 200.403 – Factors affecting allowability of costs – Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: paragraph (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles; paragraph (g) Be adequately documented. Per 2 CFR section 200.430 – Compensation – personal services, paragraph (i) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Cause: The University does not have sufficient controls in place to ensure the accuracy of the amounts paid to employees nor include appropriate approvals documented to be allowable to be charged to the federal grant. The University has deficiencies recording and processing payroll as described in finding 2024-001. Effect: The University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency.
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency
2024-003 Controls over Payroll (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance and Material Noncompliance) Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency, Federal Award, Agreement Number, Award Year, Assistance Listing Number: National Science Foundation, 2122108, 2024,47.049 National Science Foundation, 1953487, 2024,47.076 United States Department of Education, P031C160248, 2024, 84.031C United States Department of Health and Human Services, 1R16GM146669-01 & Q02067J, 2024, 93.859 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013, 23-DG-11030000-014 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Title: Foster Care-Title IV-E Funding Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Agreement Number:N/A Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:93.658 Pass-Through Agency:CYFD Pass-Through Identification Number:23-690-500-25581 Condition: In testing 25 payroll items from each program listed above, CRI noted exceptions as described in the following table. No exceptions were noted in the items tested for the Foster Care program. (See table in report pg 120) Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $4,547 and $506,209 are associated with the R&D Cluster related to discrepancies in time and effort documentation. No questioned costs were noted in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Program or the Foster Care program. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR section 200.403 – Factors affecting allowability of costs – Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: paragraph (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles; paragraph (g) Be adequately documented. Per 2 CFR section 200.430 – Compensation – personal services, paragraph (i) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Cause: The University does not have sufficient controls in place to ensure the accuracy of the amounts paid to employees nor include appropriate approvals documented to be allowable to be charged to the federal grant. The University has deficiencies recording and processing payroll as described in finding 2024-001. Effect: The University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency.
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency
2024-003 Controls over Payroll (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance and Material Noncompliance) Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency, Federal Award, Agreement Number, Award Year, Assistance Listing Number: National Science Foundation, 2122108, 2024,47.049 National Science Foundation, 1953487, 2024,47.076 United States Department of Education, P031C160248, 2024, 84.031C United States Department of Health and Human Services, 1R16GM146669-01 & Q02067J, 2024, 93.859 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013, 23-DG-11030000-014 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Title: Foster Care-Title IV-E Funding Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Agreement Number:N/A Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:93.658 Pass-Through Agency:CYFD Pass-Through Identification Number:23-690-500-25581 Condition: In testing 25 payroll items from each program listed above, CRI noted exceptions as described in the following table. No exceptions were noted in the items tested for the Foster Care program. (See table in report pg 120) Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $4,547 and $506,209 are associated with the R&D Cluster related to discrepancies in time and effort documentation. No questioned costs were noted in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Program or the Foster Care program. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR section 200.403 – Factors affecting allowability of costs – Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: paragraph (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles; paragraph (g) Be adequately documented. Per 2 CFR section 200.430 – Compensation – personal services, paragraph (i) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Cause: The University does not have sufficient controls in place to ensure the accuracy of the amounts paid to employees nor include appropriate approvals documented to be allowable to be charged to the federal grant. The University has deficiencies recording and processing payroll as described in finding 2024-001. Effect: The University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency.
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency
2024-003 Controls over Payroll (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance and Material Noncompliance) Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency, Federal Award, Agreement Number, Award Year, Assistance Listing Number: National Science Foundation, 2122108, 2024,47.049 National Science Foundation, 1953487, 2024,47.076 United States Department of Education, P031C160248, 2024, 84.031C United States Department of Health and Human Services, 1R16GM146669-01 & Q02067J, 2024, 93.859 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013, 23-DG-11030000-014 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Title: Foster Care-Title IV-E Funding Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Agreement Number:N/A Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:93.658 Pass-Through Agency:CYFD Pass-Through Identification Number:23-690-500-25581 Condition: In testing 25 payroll items from each program listed above, CRI noted exceptions as described in the following table. No exceptions were noted in the items tested for the Foster Care program. (See table in report pg 120) Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $4,547 and $506,209 are associated with the R&D Cluster related to discrepancies in time and effort documentation. No questioned costs were noted in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Program or the Foster Care program. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR section 200.403 – Factors affecting allowability of costs – Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: paragraph (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles; paragraph (g) Be adequately documented. Per 2 CFR section 200.430 – Compensation – personal services, paragraph (i) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Cause: The University does not have sufficient controls in place to ensure the accuracy of the amounts paid to employees nor include appropriate approvals documented to be allowable to be charged to the federal grant. The University has deficiencies recording and processing payroll as described in finding 2024-001. Effect: The University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency.
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency
2024-003 Controls over Payroll (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance and Material Noncompliance) Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency, Federal Award, Agreement Number, Award Year, Assistance Listing Number: National Science Foundation, 2122108, 2024,47.049 National Science Foundation, 1953487, 2024,47.076 United States Department of Education, P031C160248, 2024, 84.031C United States Department of Health and Human Services, 1R16GM146669-01 & Q02067J, 2024, 93.859 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013, 23-DG-11030000-014 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Title: Foster Care-Title IV-E Funding Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Agreement Number:N/A Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:93.658 Pass-Through Agency:CYFD Pass-Through Identification Number:23-690-500-25581 Condition: In testing 25 payroll items from each program listed above, CRI noted exceptions as described in the following table. No exceptions were noted in the items tested for the Foster Care program. (See table in report pg 120) Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $4,547 and $506,209 are associated with the R&D Cluster related to discrepancies in time and effort documentation. No questioned costs were noted in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Program or the Foster Care program. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR section 200.403 – Factors affecting allowability of costs – Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: paragraph (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles; paragraph (g) Be adequately documented. Per 2 CFR section 200.430 – Compensation – personal services, paragraph (i) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Cause: The University does not have sufficient controls in place to ensure the accuracy of the amounts paid to employees nor include appropriate approvals documented to be allowable to be charged to the federal grant. The University has deficiencies recording and processing payroll as described in finding 2024-001. Effect: The University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency.
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency
2024-003 Controls over Payroll (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance and Material Noncompliance) Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency, Federal Award, Agreement Number, Award Year, Assistance Listing Number: National Science Foundation, 2122108, 2024,47.049 National Science Foundation, 1953487, 2024,47.076 United States Department of Education, P031C160248, 2024, 84.031C United States Department of Health and Human Services, 1R16GM146669-01 & Q02067J, 2024, 93.859 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013, 23-DG-11030000-014 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Title: Foster Care-Title IV-E Funding Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Agreement Number:N/A Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:93.658 Pass-Through Agency:CYFD Pass-Through Identification Number:23-690-500-25581 Condition: In testing 25 payroll items from each program listed above, CRI noted exceptions as described in the following table. No exceptions were noted in the items tested for the Foster Care program. (See table in report pg 120) Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $4,547 and $506,209 are associated with the R&D Cluster related to discrepancies in time and effort documentation. No questioned costs were noted in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Program or the Foster Care program. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR section 200.403 – Factors affecting allowability of costs – Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: paragraph (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles; paragraph (g) Be adequately documented. Per 2 CFR section 200.430 – Compensation – personal services, paragraph (i) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Cause: The University does not have sufficient controls in place to ensure the accuracy of the amounts paid to employees nor include appropriate approvals documented to be allowable to be charged to the federal grant. The University has deficiencies recording and processing payroll as described in finding 2024-001. Effect: The University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency.
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency
2024-003 Controls over Payroll (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance and Material Noncompliance) Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency, Federal Award, Agreement Number, Award Year, Assistance Listing Number: National Science Foundation, 2122108, 2024,47.049 National Science Foundation, 1953487, 2024,47.076 United States Department of Education, P031C160248, 2024, 84.031C United States Department of Health and Human Services, 1R16GM146669-01 & Q02067J, 2024, 93.859 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013, 23-DG-11030000-014 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Title: Foster Care-Title IV-E Funding Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Agreement Number:N/A Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:93.658 Pass-Through Agency:CYFD Pass-Through Identification Number:23-690-500-25581 Condition: In testing 25 payroll items from each program listed above, CRI noted exceptions as described in the following table. No exceptions were noted in the items tested for the Foster Care program. (See table in report pg 120) Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $4,547 and $506,209 are associated with the R&D Cluster related to discrepancies in time and effort documentation. No questioned costs were noted in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Program or the Foster Care program. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR section 200.403 – Factors affecting allowability of costs – Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: paragraph (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles; paragraph (g) Be adequately documented. Per 2 CFR section 200.430 – Compensation – personal services, paragraph (i) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Cause: The University does not have sufficient controls in place to ensure the accuracy of the amounts paid to employees nor include appropriate approvals documented to be allowable to be charged to the federal grant. The University has deficiencies recording and processing payroll as described in finding 2024-001. Effect: The University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency.
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency
2024-003 Controls over Payroll (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance and Material Noncompliance) Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency, Federal Award, Agreement Number, Award Year, Assistance Listing Number: National Science Foundation, 2122108, 2024,47.049 National Science Foundation, 1953487, 2024,47.076 United States Department of Education, P031C160248, 2024, 84.031C United States Department of Health and Human Services, 1R16GM146669-01 & Q02067J, 2024, 93.859 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013, 23-DG-11030000-014 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Title: Foster Care-Title IV-E Funding Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Agreement Number:N/A Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:93.658 Pass-Through Agency:CYFD Pass-Through Identification Number:23-690-500-25581 Condition: In testing 25 payroll items from each program listed above, CRI noted exceptions as described in the following table. No exceptions were noted in the items tested for the Foster Care program. (See table in report pg 120) Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $4,547 and $506,209 are associated with the R&D Cluster related to discrepancies in time and effort documentation. No questioned costs were noted in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Program or the Foster Care program. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR section 200.403 – Factors affecting allowability of costs – Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: paragraph (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles; paragraph (g) Be adequately documented. Per 2 CFR section 200.430 – Compensation – personal services, paragraph (i) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Cause: The University does not have sufficient controls in place to ensure the accuracy of the amounts paid to employees nor include appropriate approvals documented to be allowable to be charged to the federal grant. The University has deficiencies recording and processing payroll as described in finding 2024-001. Effect: The University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency.
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency
2024-003 Controls over Payroll (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance and Material Noncompliance) Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency, Federal Award, Agreement Number, Award Year, Assistance Listing Number: National Science Foundation, 2122108, 2024,47.049 National Science Foundation, 1953487, 2024,47.076 United States Department of Education, P031C160248, 2024, 84.031C United States Department of Health and Human Services, 1R16GM146669-01 & Q02067J, 2024, 93.859 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013, 23-DG-11030000-014 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Title: Foster Care-Title IV-E Funding Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Agreement Number:N/A Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:93.658 Pass-Through Agency:CYFD Pass-Through Identification Number:23-690-500-25581 Condition: In testing 25 payroll items from each program listed above, CRI noted exceptions as described in the following table. No exceptions were noted in the items tested for the Foster Care program. (See table in report pg 120) Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $4,547 and $506,209 are associated with the R&D Cluster related to discrepancies in time and effort documentation. No questioned costs were noted in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Program or the Foster Care program. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR section 200.403 – Factors affecting allowability of costs – Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: paragraph (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles; paragraph (g) Be adequately documented. Per 2 CFR section 200.430 – Compensation – personal services, paragraph (i) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Cause: The University does not have sufficient controls in place to ensure the accuracy of the amounts paid to employees nor include appropriate approvals documented to be allowable to be charged to the federal grant. The University has deficiencies recording and processing payroll as described in finding 2024-001. Effect: The University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency.
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency
2024-003 Controls over Payroll (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance and Material Noncompliance) Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency, Federal Award, Agreement Number, Award Year, Assistance Listing Number: National Science Foundation, 2122108, 2024,47.049 National Science Foundation, 1953487, 2024,47.076 United States Department of Education, P031C160248, 2024, 84.031C United States Department of Health and Human Services, 1R16GM146669-01 & Q02067J, 2024, 93.859 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013, 23-DG-11030000-014 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Title: Foster Care-Title IV-E Funding Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Agreement Number:N/A Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:93.658 Pass-Through Agency:CYFD Pass-Through Identification Number:23-690-500-25581 Condition: In testing 25 payroll items from each program listed above, CRI noted exceptions as described in the following table. No exceptions were noted in the items tested for the Foster Care program. (See table in report pg 120) Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $4,547 and $506,209 are associated with the R&D Cluster related to discrepancies in time and effort documentation. No questioned costs were noted in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Program or the Foster Care program. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR section 200.403 – Factors affecting allowability of costs – Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: paragraph (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles; paragraph (g) Be adequately documented. Per 2 CFR section 200.430 – Compensation – personal services, paragraph (i) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Cause: The University does not have sufficient controls in place to ensure the accuracy of the amounts paid to employees nor include appropriate approvals documented to be allowable to be charged to the federal grant. The University has deficiencies recording and processing payroll as described in finding 2024-001. Effect: The University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency.
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency
2024-003 Controls over Payroll (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance and Material Noncompliance) Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency, Federal Award, Agreement Number, Award Year, Assistance Listing Number: National Science Foundation, 2122108, 2024,47.049 National Science Foundation, 1953487, 2024,47.076 United States Department of Education, P031C160248, 2024, 84.031C United States Department of Health and Human Services, 1R16GM146669-01 & Q02067J, 2024, 93.859 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013, 23-DG-11030000-014 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Title: Foster Care-Title IV-E Funding Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Agreement Number:N/A Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:93.658 Pass-Through Agency:CYFD Pass-Through Identification Number:23-690-500-25581 Condition: In testing 25 payroll items from each program listed above, CRI noted exceptions as described in the following table. No exceptions were noted in the items tested for the Foster Care program. (See table in report pg 120) Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $4,547 and $506,209 are associated with the R&D Cluster related to discrepancies in time and effort documentation. No questioned costs were noted in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Program or the Foster Care program. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR section 200.403 – Factors affecting allowability of costs – Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: paragraph (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles; paragraph (g) Be adequately documented. Per 2 CFR section 200.430 – Compensation – personal services, paragraph (i) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Cause: The University does not have sufficient controls in place to ensure the accuracy of the amounts paid to employees nor include appropriate approvals documented to be allowable to be charged to the federal grant. The University has deficiencies recording and processing payroll as described in finding 2024-001. Effect: The University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency.
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency
2024-003 Controls over Payroll (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance and Material Noncompliance) Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency, Federal Award, Agreement Number, Award Year, Assistance Listing Number: National Science Foundation, 2122108, 2024,47.049 National Science Foundation, 1953487, 2024,47.076 United States Department of Education, P031C160248, 2024, 84.031C United States Department of Health and Human Services, 1R16GM146669-01 & Q02067J, 2024, 93.859 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013, 23-DG-11030000-014 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Title: Foster Care-Title IV-E Funding Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Agreement Number:N/A Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:93.658 Pass-Through Agency:CYFD Pass-Through Identification Number:23-690-500-25581 Condition: In testing 25 payroll items from each program listed above, CRI noted exceptions as described in the following table. No exceptions were noted in the items tested for the Foster Care program. (See table in report pg 120) Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $4,547 and $506,209 are associated with the R&D Cluster related to discrepancies in time and effort documentation. No questioned costs were noted in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Program or the Foster Care program. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR section 200.403 – Factors affecting allowability of costs – Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: paragraph (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles; paragraph (g) Be adequately documented. Per 2 CFR section 200.430 – Compensation – personal services, paragraph (i) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Cause: The University does not have sufficient controls in place to ensure the accuracy of the amounts paid to employees nor include appropriate approvals documented to be allowable to be charged to the federal grant. The University has deficiencies recording and processing payroll as described in finding 2024-001. Effect: The University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency.
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency
2024-003 Controls over Payroll (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance and Material Noncompliance) Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency, Federal Award, Agreement Number, Award Year, Assistance Listing Number: National Science Foundation, 2122108, 2024,47.049 National Science Foundation, 1953487, 2024,47.076 United States Department of Education, P031C160248, 2024, 84.031C United States Department of Health and Human Services, 1R16GM146669-01 & Q02067J, 2024, 93.859 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013, 23-DG-11030000-014 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Title: Foster Care-Title IV-E Funding Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Agreement Number:N/A Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:93.658 Pass-Through Agency:CYFD Pass-Through Identification Number:23-690-500-25581 Condition: In testing 25 payroll items from each program listed above, CRI noted exceptions as described in the following table. No exceptions were noted in the items tested for the Foster Care program. (See table in report pg 120) Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $4,547 and $506,209 are associated with the R&D Cluster related to discrepancies in time and effort documentation. No questioned costs were noted in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Program or the Foster Care program. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR section 200.403 – Factors affecting allowability of costs – Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: paragraph (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles; paragraph (g) Be adequately documented. Per 2 CFR section 200.430 – Compensation – personal services, paragraph (i) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Cause: The University does not have sufficient controls in place to ensure the accuracy of the amounts paid to employees nor include appropriate approvals documented to be allowable to be charged to the federal grant. The University has deficiencies recording and processing payroll as described in finding 2024-001. Effect: The University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency.
2024-005 (2022-005) Procurement, Small Purchase (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance with Questioned Costs Greater than $25,000) - Repeated Title: Research and Development Cluster Funding Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Agreement Number: 1914463, 1953487 Award Year: 2024 Assistance Listing Number: 47.076 Title: Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Funding Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Federal Award Agreement Number:21-DG-11030000-020, 22-DG-11030000-013 Award Year:2024 Assistance Listing Number:10.694 Condition: During our review of procurement testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University did not follow small purchase procedures and did not have an annual self-certification election to follow micropurchase procurement for professional services. In our procurement testing in the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, no support was provided to test the procurement methods used for small purchases. Progress on resolution of prior year finding: No progress was made. Questioned Costs: Known and likely questioned costs of $78,063 and $30,975 in the R&D Cluster and the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention program, respectively. Criteria: Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.303a, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.320(a) sets the micro-purchase threshold at $10,000 and requires purchases over the micro-purchase threshold to use small purchase procedures, whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) states the recipient may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the auditors which includes a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation. Per Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Cause: The University was using a $50,000 threshold for professional services to utilize micropurchase method of procurement in the Research and Development Cluster. In the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention grant, the University was not retaining the supporting documentation to ensure purchase is allowable. Effect: The University may unintentionally use a higher-cost vendor when failing to obtain price or rate quotations for items over the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the University may unintentionally charge expenses to the program that do not qualify and in turn lead to questioned costs and/or repayment of funds to the Grantor agency