Allowable Costs/Activities Allowed Material Weakness, Noncompliance 2024-002 Strengthen Controls to Ensure Compliance with Allowable Costs Requirements Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation; Passed-through Mississippi Office of Highway Safety ALN Numbers: 20.600 State and Community Highway Safety 20.616 National Priority Safety Programs Federal Award: M5TR-2024-MD-22-51 Repeat Finding: No Questioned Costs: $1,432.84 Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.403, costs charged to a federal award must be necessary, reasonable, and allocable. Further, per 2 CFR 200.303, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the federal award. Condition: During our evaluation and testing of the grant, we were alerted to improper payments totaling $1,432 made to employees as the result of misrepresentation of reimbursable expenses. The payments were processed and disbursed; however, internal controls subsequently identified and alerted officials to the improper payments. The employees were terminated, and no additional payments were made. Cause: Fraudulent requests for employee expense reimbursement for travel were submitted and not independently verified. Although controls were in place to verify such requests, the fraud attempt bypassed initial detection. The City’s post-disbursement review controls detected the issue, but only after payment had occurred. Effect: The City disbursed $1,432 in federal funds to fraudulent reimbursements. Although no additional losses occurred and corrective actions were taken, the incident reflects a breakdown in the preventative control environment over disbursement verification. Recommendation: We recommend that the City implement additional internal controls to ensure that proper and substantiated travel reimbursement payments are made. Views of Responsible Officials: The City concurs with the finding. While our internal post-payment review control ultimately identified the issue, we acknowledge the breakdown in the preventive stage. We have since revised our procedures to require independent verification. We also reported the incident to proper agencies as required.
Allowable Costs/Activities Allowed Material Weakness, Noncompliance 2024-002 Strengthen Controls to Ensure Compliance with Allowable Costs Requirements Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation; Passed-through Mississippi Office of Highway Safety ALN Numbers: 20.600 State and Community Highway Safety 20.616 National Priority Safety Programs Federal Award: M5TR-2024-MD-22-51 Repeat Finding: No Questioned Costs: $1,432.84 Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.403, costs charged to a federal award must be necessary, reasonable, and allocable. Further, per 2 CFR 200.303, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the federal award. Condition: During our evaluation and testing of the grant, we were alerted to improper payments totaling $1,432 made to employees as the result of misrepresentation of reimbursable expenses. The payments were processed and disbursed; however, internal controls subsequently identified and alerted officials to the improper payments. The employees were terminated, and no additional payments were made. Cause: Fraudulent requests for employee expense reimbursement for travel were submitted and not independently verified. Although controls were in place to verify such requests, the fraud attempt bypassed initial detection. The City’s post-disbursement review controls detected the issue, but only after payment had occurred. Effect: The City disbursed $1,432 in federal funds to fraudulent reimbursements. Although no additional losses occurred and corrective actions were taken, the incident reflects a breakdown in the preventative control environment over disbursement verification. Recommendation: We recommend that the City implement additional internal controls to ensure that proper and substantiated travel reimbursement payments are made. Views of Responsible Officials: The City concurs with the finding. While our internal post-payment review control ultimately identified the issue, we acknowledge the breakdown in the preventive stage. We have since revised our procedures to require independent verification. We also reported the incident to proper agencies as required.
Condition: HOPE has elected to use the de minimis indirect cost rate of 10%. While billing the federal grantor on a monthly basis, HOPE applied this 10% rate to the direct costs. However, there was no clear documentation demonstrating how this application related to the organization's actual indirect costs incurred to support the federal program, beyond simply adding the percentage to the direct cost billing. Criteria: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Subpart E, § 200.403, states that costs charged to Federal awards must be allowable, allocable, and reasonable. While § 200.414(f) permits the use of a de minimis indirect cost rate of 10%, its application should serve as a mechanism to recover a portion of the organization's actual indirect costs. Cause and effect: HOPE experienced turnover in the CFO position during the year. In prior years, HOPE recorded all costs, including indirect costs, in the cost center (“class”) assigned to the funding source. During the year under audit, this practice wasn’t consistently followed. Recommendation: I recommend that HOPE continue to use “classes” consistently in the accounting software to capture program expenditures by funding source, including indirect costs. Views of Responsible Officials: This discrepancy resulted from a lack of understanding by the CFO in processing grant related funding. Grant policies have been updated, and personnel trained to direct and understand the role of independent accounting by funding sources through class codes.
Condition: HOPE has elected to use the de minimis indirect cost rate of 10%. While billing the federal grantor on a monthly basis, HOPE applied this 10% rate to the direct costs. However, there was no clear documentation demonstrating how this application related to the organization's actual indirect costs incurred to support the federal program, beyond simply adding the percentage to the direct cost billing. Criteria: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Subpart E, § 200.403, states that costs charged to Federal awards must be allowable, allocable, and reasonable. While § 200.414(f) permits the use of a de minimis indirect cost rate of 10%, its application should serve as a mechanism to recover a portion of the organization's actual indirect costs. Cause and effect: HOPE experienced turnover in the CFO position during the year. In prior years, HOPE recorded all costs, including indirect costs, in the cost center (“class”) assigned to the funding source. During the year under audit, this practice wasn’t consistently followed. Recommendation: I recommend that HOPE continue to use “classes” consistently in the accounting software to capture program expenditures by funding source, including indirect costs. Views of Responsible Officials: This discrepancy resulted from a lack of understanding by the CFO in processing grant related funding. Grant policies have been updated, and personnel trained to direct and understand the role of independent accounting by funding sources through class codes.
Condition: HOPE has elected to use the de minimis indirect cost rate of 10%. While billing the federal grantor on a monthly basis, HOPE applied this 10% rate to the direct costs. However, there was no clear documentation demonstrating how this application related to the organization's actual indirect costs incurred to support the federal program, beyond simply adding the percentage to the direct cost billing. Criteria: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Subpart E, § 200.403, states that costs charged to Federal awards must be allowable, allocable, and reasonable. While § 200.414(f) permits the use of a de minimis indirect cost rate of 10%, its application should serve as a mechanism to recover a portion of the organization's actual indirect costs. Cause and effect: HOPE experienced turnover in the CFO position during the year. In prior years, HOPE recorded all costs, including indirect costs, in the cost center (“class”) assigned to the funding source. During the year under audit, this practice wasn’t consistently followed. Recommendation: I recommend that HOPE continue to use “classes” consistently in the accounting software to capture program expenditures by funding source, including indirect costs. Views of Responsible Officials: This discrepancy resulted from a lack of understanding by the CFO in processing grant related funding. Grant policies have been updated, and personnel trained to direct and understand the role of independent accounting by funding sources through class codes.
Criteria – The Agency is required to follow OMB Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards contained in 2CFR Chapter I and Chapter II. One of the general criteria contained in §200.403, costs must be “necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal Award and be allocable thereto under these principles”. Condition – The Agency has a contract to purchase bulk cable services and is required to pass these costs to the tenants who are the users of the service. During our audit we noted the Agency did not have the fees charged to the tenants high enough to cover the cost incurred for the service. The amount of costs not recovered was $4,503 for the year ended September 30, 2024. Cause – This finding was repeated from the prior year. The Agency did not increase the amount charged to tenants during the year ended September 30, 2024. Effect or Potential Effect - The cost of the cable service does not meet the “necessary and reasonable” criteria and resulted in questioned costs of $4,503. Subsequent the fiscal year end, the Agency has increased the fees charged. Recommendation - We recommend in the future that the Agency consider the basic criteria of being “necessary and reasonable” before incurring costs in a Federal Award program. The costs of the cable services need to be paid fully by the tenants and should be monitored by management to ensure the Public Housing Program does not incur any of these costs. View of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the Finding.
Capital Fund Program Grants Draws Condition: During our audit procedures over revenue recognition for the Capital Fund Program (CFP), we identified drawdowns of federal funds for which the client was unable to provide adequate supporting documentation. Specifically, the expenditures associated with the draw requests lacked invoices, contracts, or other substantiating records to demonstrate that the costs were allowable, allocable, and incurred in accordance with applicable federal requirements. Criteria: Per 2 CFR §200.403 and §200.302, costs charged to federal awards must be adequately documented and supported by source documentation. Additionally, 2 CFR §200.516(a)(3) requires auditors to report known questioned costs exceeding $25,000 for any federal program, even if not selected as a major program. Cause: The deficiency appears to result from inadequate internal controls over documentation retention and grant compliance monitoring for the CFP. Effect: The lack of documentation impairs the auditor’s ability to verify the allowability of expenditures, resulting in known questioned costs exceeding $25,000. Questioned Cost: $90,149 Recommendations: We recommend that management implement procedures to ensure that all draw requests under the CFP are supported by complete and accurate documentation. This includes maintaining invoices, contracts, and payment records that clearly link expenditures to the approved scope of work under the grant. Management Response: Today’s Marlboro County Housing Authority management acknowledges the auditor’s finding that documentation to support certain CFP drawdowns was incomplete or missing and concurs that this represents a failure to comply with Uniform Guidance documentation requirements under 2 CFR §200.302 and §200.403. The Authority recognizes the importance of maintaining complete and accurate supporting records—such as invoices, contracts, and payment documentation—to substantiate costs charged to federal programs and ensure allowability and allocability under the Capital Fund Program. Effective October 1st, 2024, all draw requests under the Capital Fund Program ARE supported by: Approved contracts or purchase orders Invoices or other source documents Proof of payment (e.g., canceled checks, ACH confirmations) Documentation clearly linking each expense to an approved activity in the CFP Annual Statement
Finding Number: 2024-009 Prior Year Finding Number: N/A Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Program: U.S. Department of the Treasury COVID-19 – Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund ALN: 21.029 Award #: CPFFN0167 Award Year: 02/09/2022 – 12/31/2026 Government Department/Agency: Office of the Deputy Mayor for Planning and Economic Development (DMPED) Criteria - The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Per 2 CFR Section 200.403, “Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. (f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period. (g) Be adequately documented.” In addition, the U.S. Department of Treasury, Guidance for the Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund For States, Territories & Freely Associated States (CPF), Section D. Eligible and Ineligible Cost: states that “Allowable costs are determined in accordance with the cost principles identified in 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E. Federal funds committed to an award may only be used to cover allowable costs incurred during the period of performance and for allowable closeout costs incurred during the grant closeout process. Cost sharing is not a requirement for the use of these funds” Section C. Project Eligibility: also states the following, “Capital Project or Project means the construction, purchase, and installation of, and/or improvements to capital assets where the costs of such assets are capitalized or depreciated, including ancillary costs necessary to put the capital asset to use. Examples of capital assets include buildings, towers, digital devices and equipment, fiber-optic lines, and broadband networks. Examples of ancillary costs include project costs related to project planning and feasibility, broadband installation, and community engagement, broadband adoption, digital literacy, and training associated with a planned or completed Project funded by the Capital Projects Fund program.” Condition – During our examination of Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, we observed that the agency used federal funds to reimburse their subrecipient for lease rent of $3,242,953 invoiced from August 2023 through May 2024. This amount was reported to the Federal agency as ancillary costs. However, upon reviewing the supporting documentation, it was found that the rent charged to the grant pertained to the period following the substantial completion of the capital project's construction. Additionally, the leased rent does not appear to align with the definition of ancillary costs as outlined by the CFP guidance mentioned earlier. Furthermore, the agency was unable to provide documentation from the U.S. Treasury approving the leased rent or indicating its knowledge that it was included as part of ancillary costs. Based on the procedures performed and the review of relevant guidance, BDO notes that these costs do not meet the requirements to be considered allowable under the program. Questioned Costs – Known amount $3,242,953. Context – This is a condition identified per review of DMPED’s compliance with specified requirements using a statistically valid sample. Total subrecipient expenditures reported as allowable costs were $14,400,000. Effect – DMPED was unable to demonstrate that the rent charged was approved by the Department of Treasury and was an allowable cost under the guidance. Cause – DMPED did not have proper internal controls and policies and procedures in place to identify allowable costs and activities. Recommendation – We recommend that DMPED evaluate its procedures to ensure only allowable expenses are charged to the program as required under 2 CFR Section 200.403. Related Noncompliance – Material noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – DMPED does not concur with the auditor’s finding regarding the allowability of rent per the CPF guidance. The District’s corrective action is described in the Management’s Corrective Action Plan included as Appendix B of the attached Management’s Section. BDO’s Response – We have reviewed management’s response and our finding remains as indicated.
Finding Number: 2024-028 Prior Year Finding Number: 2023-033 Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Program: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Opioid STR ALN: 93.788 Award #: Various Award Year: 09/30/2020 – 09/29/2024 Government Department/Agency: Department of Behavioral Health (DBH) Criteria - The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Per 2 CFR Section 200.403, “Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. (f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period. (g) Be adequately documented.” Condition – During our testwork over nonpayroll transactions for the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, we noted that for one (1) out of sixty-two (62) samples, the transaction was charged twice to the program. Total amount of nonpayroll transactions is $19,095,189, and the amount of exception is $122,311. Questioned Costs – Known amount is $122,311. Context – This is a condition identified per review of DBH’s compliance with specified requirements using a statistically valid sample. Total amount of samples selected for testing amounted to $5,633,513. Effect – Lack of proper review of expenditures could result to unallowable costs charged to the program. Cause – DBH does not have adequate controls in place to ensure that only allowable costs are charged to the program. Recommendation – We recommend that DBH strengthen internal control procedures to ensure that expenditures are allowable, and that sufficient documentation is retained to support that allowability. Related Noncompliance – Noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – DBH concurs with the finding. The District’s corrective action is described in the Management’s Corrective Action Plan included as Appendix B of the attached Management’s Section.
2024-002 – Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance – Allowable Costs/Cost Principles: Indirect Costs Identification of federal program: 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Criteria: Uniform Guidance 2 C.F.R. § 200.414(f): Any non-federal entity that does not have a current negotiated cost rate may elect to charge a de minimis rate of 10% of modified total direct costs (MTDC) which may be used indefinitely. As described in § 200.403, costs must be consistently charged as either indirect or direct costs, but may not be double charged or inconsistently charged as both. If chosen, this methodology once elected must be used consistently for all federal awards until such time as a nonfederal entity chooses to negotiate for a rate, which the non-federal entity may apply to do at any time. Condition: As defined by the Uniform Guidance, the determination of MTDC excludes equipment and capital expenditures, in addition to various other categories of expenditures. The Council properly elected to utilize the 10% de minimis rate, however, improperly included amounts related to capital expenditures in their determination of the MTDC base. Cause: The Council was aware of the proper method to be used in calculations but the inclusion of capital expenditures was overlooked in error. Effect or potential effect: The Council charged indirect costs to the federal program that exceeded 10% of the MTDC. The overage that was charged to the federal program does not exceed 5% of the total program expenditures over the lifetime of the award. Questioned Costs: $121,838 Context: Over the lifetime of the award, the Council had various capital expenditure purchases totaling approximately $1,350,520 that were improperly included in the calculation of the MTDC. Identification of Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendations: We recommend that the Council works to improve processes and controls over the calculation of, and monitoring of, indirect costs charged to federal programs. We also recommend that training be provided to ensure that all parties are aware of the proper methodology and processes. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.
Federal Program: AL 20.237 – High Priority Commercial Motor Vehicle Grant Program, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) Cluster. Compliance Requirements: Period of Performance. Type of Finding: Material Noncompliance and Internal Control Over Noncompliance. Criteria: Per guidance provided by Section 7.5 of the Motor Carrier Safety Assistance Program – Grant Comprehensive Policy, 49 U.S. Code § 31104(f)(2), and 200 Code of Federal Regulations (“CFR”) Section 200.309, only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance specified in the Notice of Grant Award may be charged to the related federal award. Condition and Context: On September 30, 2023, IRP prepaid $174,465 for data repository hosting and maintenance services that were not incurred until the quarter ended December 31, 2023. IRP reported this expenditure in Reports SF-425 and requested its reimbursement on form SF-270, for the quarter ended September 30, 2023, and charged the amount to federal award FM-MP- 0580-21. As expenditure occurred during the fiscal year ending September 30, 2024, it should be charged to federal award FM-MHP-0762-23, which has a period of performance from September 1, 2023, to September 30, 2025 per review of the notice of grant award. Questioned Costs: $174,465. Cause: Management lacked the appropriate knowledge of the period of performance requirements specified by the federal awarding agency and Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect: This error resulted in a $174,465 charge to award FM-MP-0580-21 for services that were incurred outside of the period of performance. Recommendation: We recommend management implement pre-submission controls, such as requiring date validation for all expenses against the award's period of performance and providing training to educate staff on 2 CFR requirements and period-of-performance limitations. We understand management has alerted FMCSA to the error and intends to work with them to correct the reporting of these expenditures, upon submission to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse of the data collection form and single audit reporting package for the year ended September 30, 2024. Views of Responsible Officials: Management acknowledges the finding and concurs with the recommendation. Grant management procedures have been revised to verify that services are received and costs incurred within the authorized period of performance in accordance with 2 CFR § 200.403 before the costs are charged to a federal award. Staff involved in grant management will receive targeted training on 2 CFR requirements related to period-ofperformance compliance and allowable cost timing.
Finding 2024-003: Unsupported Payroll Charges and Improper Drawdown of Federal Funds Compliance Requirements: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles; Cash Management; Reporting Type: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) AL Numbers and Titles: 93.809 – National Organizations for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Federal Award Number: NU58DP007562 Questioned Costs: $423,094 Repeat Finding: No Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.403 and §200.405, costs charged to a federal award must be necessary, reasonable, and allocable, and must conform to the terms and conditions of the award. Per 2 CFR §200.430(i), charges for salaries and wages must be supported by records that accurately reflect the work performed and be supported by a system of internal control. Furthermore, 2 CFR §200.305(b) requires that non-federal entities minimize the time between federal fund drawdown and disbursement, and limits advances to amounts needed for the immediate cash requirements of the program. Condition: During our testing of payroll-related transactions charged to the 93.809 federal program, we identified a significant reallocation of personnel costs from unrestricted funds to the federal grant that occurred late in the audit period. These charges related to multiple employees whose compensation was not included in the originally approved budget for the federal program. At the time of our testing, no formal budget revision had been submitted to the awarding agency, and the names of these staff had not been recorded in the federal grant reporting system as required by the award terms. Additionally, the auditee was unable to provide any documentation, such as certifications, labor distribution reports, calendars, or other records, to support that these employees worked on activities allocable to the federal program. We further noted that the auditee drew down federal funds prior to the recording of these payroll charges, at a time when the costs in question had neither been incurred nor documented. This resulted in federal funds being drawn in advance of need, contrary to federal cash management requirements. Cause: The auditee did not have adequate internal controls to ensure that only appropriately budgeted and documented payroll costs were charged to the federal award. In addition, the organization lacked procedures to confirm that federal funds were drawn only for costs that were allowable, incurred, and supported at the time of drawdown. These weaknesses allowed significant payroll reallocations to be processed retroactively without timely budget amendments or sufficient documentation of allocability. Effect: As a result of these control deficiencies, a total of $423,094 in personnel-related costs, including direct salaries, fringe benefits, and associated indirect costs, was charged to the federal program without appropriate budget authorization or time and effort support. These unsupported costs were also used as the basis for a drawdown of federal funds that occurred before the expenditures were recorded or substantiated. This resulted in noncompliance with both cost principles and cash management requirements and exposes the auditee to potential disallowance or repayment of federal funds. Recommendation: We recommend that the auditee enhance internal controls related to grant budgeting, payroll allocations, and cash management. These controls should ensure that payroll costs charged to federal awards are included in the approved budget or are formally revised and submitted to the grantor, are supported by accurate time and effort documentation, and that federal funds are drawn only when actual, allowable costs have been incurred and documented. We further recommend that the auditee consult with the awarding agency to determine whether any retroactive budget revision or corrective action is available or whether repayment of questioned costs will be required. Views of Responsible Officials Corrective Actions: Management agrees with this finding. Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services - 93.432 Center for Independent Living 2024-005 Lack of Written Allocation Plan for Shared Costs Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.405(d), any cost allocated to a federal award must be allocable, reasonable, and based on a method that is supported and consistently applied. In addition, 2 CFR §200.403(g) requires that costs be adequately documented. A written allocation plan is essential to demonstrate that the allocation of shared costs is equitable and in compliance with Uniform Guidance. Condition: During our audit of federal award expenditures, we found that the Organization did not maintain a written cost allocation plan to support how shared costs, such as payroll, health insurance, and retirement, were distributed across programs, including federal awards. While costs were charged to various funding sources, no formal documentation existed to describe the basis or methodology for those allocations. Cause: The League relied on informal practices, but did not document or formalize the methodology in a written plan. As a result, there was no consistent or verifiable support for how shared costs were distributed. Effect: Without a written allocation plan, there is an increased risk that shared costs may be allocated inconsistently or inappropriately to federal awards, potentially resulting in noncompliance with federal costs principles and questioned costs. Questioned Costs: None noted. Recommendation: We recommend that the League develop and implement a written cost allocation plan that outlines the basis for distributing shared costs, including the allocation methodology, the types of costs involved, and the programs affected. The plan should be reviewed periodically and updated as necessary to reflect changes in funding or operations. Supporting documentation for allocations should be maintained and readily available for audit purposes. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan on page 50.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior - BOR Federal Program Name: Providing Water to At-Risk Natural Desert Terminal Lakes Assistance Listing Number: 15.508 Federal Award Identification Year: 2024 Pass-Through Agency: National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Award Period: 7/1/19-9/30/24 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403(a) - When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition: For eight procured vendors that were selected, verification of subrecipient's suspension or debarment status was not performed. Context: A nonstatistical sample of 21 out of 173 procured vendors were selected for testing for the above program. The condition noted above was identified during our procedures over WBC's procured vendors. Effect: WBC did not verify suspension or debarment status timely, which could result in procuring a vendor which is potentially suspended or debarred. Cause: WBC did not consistently ensure that Suspension or Debarment status was verified timely before naming procuring the vendor. Repeat Finding: The finding is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that WBC strengthen its current policies and procedures to ensure that Suspension and Debarment Status is verified for each vendor subject to verification of suspension and debarment verification according to WBC's Procurement policy. Management’s Views: See separate corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior - BOR Federal Program Name: Providing Water to At-Risk Natural Desert Terminal Lakes Assistance Listing Number: 15.508 Federal Award Identification Year: 2024 Pass-Through Agency: National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Award Period: 7/1/19-9/30/24 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403(a) - When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition: For eight procured vendors that were selected, verification of subrecipient's suspension or debarment status was not performed. Context: A nonstatistical sample of 21 out of 173 procured vendors were selected for testing for the above program. The condition noted above was identified during our procedures over WBC's procured vendors. Effect: WBC did not verify suspension or debarment status timely, which could result in procuring a vendor which is potentially suspended or debarred. Cause: WBC did not consistently ensure that Suspension or Debarment status was verified timely before naming procuring the vendor. Repeat Finding: The finding is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that WBC strengthen its current policies and procedures to ensure that Suspension and Debarment Status is verified for each vendor subject to verification of suspension and debarment verification according to WBC's Procurement policy. Management’s Views: See separate corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior - BOR Federal Program Name: Providing Water to At-Risk Natural Desert Terminal Lakes Assistance Listing Number: 15.508 Federal Award Identification Year: 2024 Pass-Through Agency: National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Award Period: 7/1/19-9/30/24 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403(a) - When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition: For eight procured vendors that were selected, verification of subrecipient's suspension or debarment status was not performed. Context: A nonstatistical sample of 21 out of 173 procured vendors were selected for testing for the above program. The condition noted above was identified during our procedures over WBC's procured vendors. Effect: WBC did not verify suspension or debarment status timely, which could result in procuring a vendor which is potentially suspended or debarred. Cause: WBC did not consistently ensure that Suspension or Debarment status was verified timely before naming procuring the vendor. Repeat Finding: The finding is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that WBC strengthen its current policies and procedures to ensure that Suspension and Debarment Status is verified for each vendor subject to verification of suspension and debarment verification according to WBC's Procurement policy. Management’s Views: See separate corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior - BOR Federal Program Name: Providing Water to At-Risk Natural Desert Terminal Lakes Assistance Listing Number: 15.508 Federal Award Identification Year: 2024 Pass-Through Agency: National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Award Period: 7/1/19-9/30/24 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403(a) - When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition: For eight procured vendors that were selected, verification of subrecipient's suspension or debarment status was not performed. Context: A nonstatistical sample of 21 out of 173 procured vendors were selected for testing for the above program. The condition noted above was identified during our procedures over WBC's procured vendors. Effect: WBC did not verify suspension or debarment status timely, which could result in procuring a vendor which is potentially suspended or debarred. Cause: WBC did not consistently ensure that Suspension or Debarment status was verified timely before naming procuring the vendor. Repeat Finding: The finding is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that WBC strengthen its current policies and procedures to ensure that Suspension and Debarment Status is verified for each vendor subject to verification of suspension and debarment verification according to WBC's Procurement policy. Management’s Views: See separate corrective action plan.
Criteria or specific requirement: Per the 2024 OMB Compliance Supplement, "A non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h))." Allowable costs must meet the standards set forth in 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E. Condition: Costs were booked to incorrect program codes, resulting in unsupported charges being booked to the federal program. Both payroll and non-payroll expenditures were charged to the Federal program prior to the period of performance start date. Questioned costs: Known $1,098 Context: In period of performance testing, the majority of samples tested for beginning period of performance (31/40 samples) related to June 2024 payroll. In all of these tested samples, time was booked to the Federal program prior to the program start date of June 20, 2024. Similarly, there was no adjustments for other charges that are normally booked for the full month at a time, including: per diems (2/40 samples) and fuel (1/40 samples). One additional error was related to time booked to the Federal program when no time was coded to that program during the pay period tested. The final error was related to February amortization that was not processed in time and therefore mistakenly booked to the program. In payroll testing, 2/40 samples tested were booked to a charge code that was not reflected in the supporting timesheets. The amounts booked incorrectly to the major program are considered unallowable costs. Cause: MTI payroll is run monthly. Time should not have been coded to the Federal program in question until the program start date of June 20, 2024, however as most programs begin on the first of the month (not mid-month) this was overlooked by the supervisors and finance team who are supposed to review timesheets and make correction to ensure allocations are booked to the correct programs for the correct dates. Additional errors due to human error. Effect: Costs incurred outside of the Federal program's period of performance and costs that are not supported by underlying documentation are not allowable under the program. The organization may be required to submit reimbursements for these amounts. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: Management should review its existing control structure and ensure that there are adequate processes and controls to ensure only expenditures incurred during the period of performance are booked to Federal programs and that the correct program codes are charged, based on the underlying supporting documentation. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Per the 2024 OMB Compliance Supplement, "A non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h))." Allowable costs must meet the standards set forth in 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E. Condition: Costs were booked to incorrect program codes, resulting in unsupported charges being booked to the federal program. Both payroll and non-payroll expenditures were charged to the Federal program prior to the period of performance start date. Questioned costs: Known $1,098 Context: In period of performance testing, the majority of samples tested for beginning period of performance (31/40 samples) related to June 2024 payroll. In all of these tested samples, time was booked to the Federal program prior to the program start date of June 20, 2024. Similarly, there was no adjustments for other charges that are normally booked for the full month at a time, including: per diems (2/40 samples) and fuel (1/40 samples). One additional error was related to time booked to the Federal program when no time was coded to that program during the pay period tested. The final error was related to February amortization that was not processed in time and therefore mistakenly booked to the program. In payroll testing, 2/40 samples tested were booked to a charge code that was not reflected in the supporting timesheets. The amounts booked incorrectly to the major program are considered unallowable costs. Cause: MTI payroll is run monthly. Time should not have been coded to the Federal program in question until the program start date of June 20, 2024, however as most programs begin on the first of the month (not mid-month) this was overlooked by the supervisors and finance team who are supposed to review timesheets and make correction to ensure allocations are booked to the correct programs for the correct dates. Additional errors due to human error. Effect: Costs incurred outside of the Federal program's period of performance and costs that are not supported by underlying documentation are not allowable under the program. The organization may be required to submit reimbursements for these amounts. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: Management should review its existing control structure and ensure that there are adequate processes and controls to ensure only expenditures incurred during the period of performance are booked to Federal programs and that the correct program codes are charged, based on the underlying supporting documentation. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Per the 2024 OMB Compliance Supplement, "A non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h))." Allowable costs must meet the standards set forth in 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E. Condition: Costs were booked to incorrect program codes, resulting in unsupported charges being booked to the federal program. Both payroll and non-payroll expenditures were charged to the Federal program prior to the period of performance start date. Questioned costs: Known $1,098 Context: In period of performance testing, the majority of samples tested for beginning period of performance (31/40 samples) related to June 2024 payroll. In all of these tested samples, time was booked to the Federal program prior to the program start date of June 20, 2024. Similarly, there was no adjustments for other charges that are normally booked for the full month at a time, including: per diems (2/40 samples) and fuel (1/40 samples). One additional error was related to time booked to the Federal program when no time was coded to that program during the pay period tested. The final error was related to February amortization that was not processed in time and therefore mistakenly booked to the program. In payroll testing, 2/40 samples tested were booked to a charge code that was not reflected in the supporting timesheets. The amounts booked incorrectly to the major program are considered unallowable costs. Cause: MTI payroll is run monthly. Time should not have been coded to the Federal program in question until the program start date of June 20, 2024, however as most programs begin on the first of the month (not mid-month) this was overlooked by the supervisors and finance team who are supposed to review timesheets and make correction to ensure allocations are booked to the correct programs for the correct dates. Additional errors due to human error. Effect: Costs incurred outside of the Federal program's period of performance and costs that are not supported by underlying documentation are not allowable under the program. The organization may be required to submit reimbursements for these amounts. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: Management should review its existing control structure and ensure that there are adequate processes and controls to ensure only expenditures incurred during the period of performance are booked to Federal programs and that the correct program codes are charged, based on the underlying supporting documentation. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2024-009: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) Information on Federal Program: United States Department of the Treasury. Federal Assistance Listing Number 21.027 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds. Compliance Requirements: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: Per 2 CFR § 200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented. Under 2 CFR § 200.403(a) and § 200.405(a), only costs that are necessary, reasonable, and allocable to the federal program may be charged. Condition: The County overpaid the vendor by $25,170. The full amount of the invoice, including the overpayment, was charged to the federal award. The overpayment was not identified during the normal processing and payment of the invoice. Cause: The overpayment was due to an oversight during invoice processing. Effect: Federal funds were used to pay an amount not allocable to the program, resulting in $25,170 of unallowable costs charged to the federal award. Questioned Costs: $25,170 in Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds. Context: We randomly selected tested fifteen (15) expenditures charged to the SLFRF program in the amount of $1,241,980 from a population of $1,292,822 and found one (1) instance of noncompliance totaling $25,170. Recommendation: We recommend that the entity seek reimbursement for the $25,170 overpayment and make appropriate adjustments to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) and the accounting records, as needed. Management should ensure final payment amounts are fully supported by invoice documentation. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We agree with the findings and recommendations. This was an isolated incident whereas the payment amount was mistakenly pulled from the wrong line on a contractor’s pay application. This overpayment was missed in the subject fiscal year as the program was still active. Once the overpayment was identified, the county sought reimbursement from the vendor for the overpayment and has since received the funds. The reimbursement will be included as program revenues in the next audit report. The County will reconcile contract values as each pay application is processed in lieu of awaiting program/project closeout in the future.
Finding 2024-043 - Use of Federal Funds to Satisfy Required Local Match Without Prior Approval Summary: The City of Batesville substituted federal Delta Regional Authority (ORA) and Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC) funds for required local match obligations under two federal grants-ARC (ALN 23.002) and CDBG (ALN 14.228)-without obtaining prior written approval from the awarding agencies. Although CDBG was not selected for audit testing, the questioned costs originally exceeded the $10,000 threshold and are reported in accordance with 2 CFR §200.516(a): Total questioned costs of $800,406 were initially allocated proportionally between the two programs; These costs have since been resolved through formal amendments to both grant agreements. Federal Programs 23.002 _; Appalachian Area Development (ARC) 14.228 - Community Development Block Grants/State's Program and Non-Entitlement Grants in Hawaii· (CDBG) Note: ALN 14.228 was not selected for audit testing under the Uniform Guidance compliance requirements. However, a finding is presented in accordance with 2 CFR §200.516(a) due to the materiality of the issue and its connection to ARC grant MS-20699. Award Numbers ARC: MS-20699 CDBG Subgrant: 1137 ~21-111-PF-01 Federal Agencies U.S. Department of the Treasury (via Appalachian Regional Commission) U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Compliance Requirements Matching - 2 CFR §200.306 Allowable Costs/Cost Principles - 2 CFR §200.403 Internal Controls -2 CFR §200.303 Audit Finding Threshold - 2 CFR §200.516(a) Type of Finding Internal Control over Compliance - Material Weakness Compliance - Noncompliance Questioned Costs Based on actual net expenditures and proportional match requirements: (TABLE) These questioned costs have been eliminated following receipt of amended contracts from ARC and CDBG approving the use of ORA and CDBG funds as match. Criteria The following federal regulations and grant conditions establish the requirements violated in this finding: 1. Matching Requirements - 2 CFR §200.306 Federal funds may not be used to meet a required cost share or match unless expressly authorized by the awarding agency. Matching contributions must: Be verifiable from the recipient's records Not be included as contributions for any other federal award Be necessary and reasonable for accomplishing program objectives Be allowable under the cost principles Not be paid by. the federal government under another award, unless authorized 2. Allowable Costs ... 2 CFR §200.403 Costs must be necessary, reasonable, allocable, and conform to limitations in the award terms. Costs must be adequately documented and consistent with policies that apply uniformly to both federally financed and other activities. 3. Internal Controls - 2 CFR §200.303 Recipients must establish and maintain effective internal controls to ensure compliance with feqeral statutes, regulations, and award terms. Controls should provide reasonable assurance that the organization is managing the award in compliance with applicable requirements. 4. Audit Finding Threshold-2 CFR §200.516(a) Auditors must report known questioned costs that exceed $10,000 for a federal program, even if the program was not selected for audit testing. Condition During the audit of ARC grant MS-20699 (ALN 23.002), we noted that the City of Batesville substituted $569,600 in federal ORA funds for the originally budgeted local match of $341,784. Additionally, for COBG grant ALN 14.228, the City substituted $569,600 in ORA funds and $553,000 in ARC grant funds for the originally budgeted local match of $901,784. These substitutions were made without prior written approval or executed amendments from the awarding agencies, as required under 2 CFR §200.306 and the respective grant agreements. Resolution Following the audit fieldwork, the City obtained formal amendments to both grant agreements: On October 24, 2025, ARC approved the substitution of ORA and COBG funds as match under ALN 23.002. On November 7, 2025, COBG approved the substitution of ORA and ARC funds as match under ALN 14.228. These approvals eliminate the previously identified questioned costs totaling $800,406. However, the lack of contemporaneous documentation and prior approval reflects a breakdown in internal controls and remains a material compliance issue. Cause The City lacked adequate internal controls to ensure changes to match sources were formally reviewed and approved by the awarding agencies prior to implementation. The substitution of federal funds for required local match was not documented or authorized at the time of expenditure. Effect Although questioned costs have been resolved, the City was in noncompliance with federal matching requirements and allowable cost principles at the time of expenditure. This reflects a broader control deficiency in the City's grant management process and increases the risk of future noncompliance. Recommendation We recommend the City strengthen its internal controls over grant compliance, including: Formal review and documentation of match sources prior to drawdown Written approval from awarding agencies before substituting federal funds for required match Staff training on federal match requirements and Uniform Guidance compliance Views of Responsible Officials Management concurs with the finding. The City acknowledges that federal ORA and ARC funds were applied toward required match obligations without prior approval or amendment to the respective grant agreements. ARC and CDBG representatives have since approved the substitutions through formal amendments. The City will implement procedures requiring written authorization for any future match substitutions and establish a formal review process to verify match sources prior to drawdown.
2024-042 - Misallocation of Expenditures Across Federal Awards Federal Program 14.228 - Community Development Block Grants Program 23.002 - Appalachian Area Development 90.210 - Delta Regional Authority (not subject to audit under Uniform Guidance) Award Numbers ARC-20698 ARC-20699 CDBG Subgrant: 1137-21-111-PF-01 Federal Agencies U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) U.S. Department of the Treasury (via Appalachian Regional Commission) Delta Regional Authority (DRA) Compliance Requirements Allowable Costs/Cost Principles - 2 CFR §200.403 and §200.405 Internal Controls - 2 CFR §200.303 Type of Finding Internal Control over Compliance - Significant Deficiency Compliance '- Noncompliance Questioned Costs (TABLE) Per 2 CFR §200.403, costs must be necessary, reasonable, and allocable to the federal award. Under §200.405, costs must be assigned to the federal award in accordance with the relative benefits received. Additionally, §200.303 requires the non-federal entity to maintain effective internal control over federal awards to ensure compliance. Condition During testing of 13 disbursements totaling $1,541,660 charged to the above federal programs, 11 invoices were not allocated in accordance with the approved budget percentages. This resulted in over-reimbursements across multiple federal awards. Known Over (Under) Reimbursements by Program and Fiscal Year (TABLE) *ALN 90.210 was not subject to audit under Uniform Guidance. Amounts shown are for context only. Cause The City did not consistently apply approved budget allocation percentages when charging expenditures to federal awards. This resulted in misclassification of costs and excess reimbursement from federal sources. Effect The City received federal reimbursements in excess of allowable amounts under ALNs 14.228 and 23.002. These errors may result in repayment obligations and indicate a broader weakness in internal controls over grant accounting and drawdown procedures. Recommendation We recommend the City strengthen its internal controls over grant accounting and reimbursement procedures. This should include: Formal review of allocation schedules prior to submission of reimbursement requests Periodic reconciliation of actual expenditures to approved budget allocations Staff training on federal cost principles and grant compliance requirements Views of Responsible Officials Management concurs with the finding. The City acknowledges that allocation errors occurred across multiple federal programs due to inconsistent application of approved budget percentages. To address this, the City will implement a formal review process for allocation schedules and establish reconciliation procedures to ensure expenditures align with approved budgets. Staff will receive training on federal cost principles and grant compliance requirements. The City will also evaluate prior reimbursements and consult with awarding agencies regarding any necessary adjustments.
2024-041 - Unsupported FEMA Reimbursements Federal Program 97.036 - FEMA Disaster Grants - Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) Award Numbers PW No. 51 (0) and PW No. 34(0) Federal Agency Department of Homeland Security Compliance requirement Allowable Costs/Cost Principles - 2 CFR §200.403 and §200.405 Type of Finding Internal Control over Compliance - Significant Deficiency Compliance - Noncompliance Questioned Costs: $10,254 Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR §200.403 and §200.405, costs charged to federal awards must be necessary, reasonable, allocable, and adequately documented. Reimbursen,ents based on estimated costs must be reconciled to actual expenditures, and any unsupported amounts must be excluded from final claims. Condition The City received FEMA reimbursements totaling $99,548 under PW No. 51 (0) and $5,704 under PW No. 34(0). These reimbursements were based on estimated costs submitted to FEMA. However, during the financial statement audit, the following discrepancies were noted: PW No. 51 (0): Claimed: Labor $1,048; Equipment $1.8,811; Materials $76,559; Contract $3;130 - Total $99,548 Documented: Labor $1,048; Equipment $8,874; Materials $78,966; Contract $3, 130-Total $92,018 Unsupported costs: $7,530 PW No. 34(0): Claimed: Labor $2,374; Equipment $3,330 -Total $5,704 Documented: Equipment $2,980 - Total $2,980 Unsupported costs: $2,724 Cause The City did not reconcile estimated FEMA reimbursements to actual expenditures incurred and failed to maintain adequate supporting documentation for all cost categories. Effect The City may have received federal funds in excess of actual eligible expenditures, resulting in potential noncompliance with federal cost principles and risk of disallowed costs. Recommendation The City should implement procedures to ensure all FEMA reimbursements are supported by actual, documented expenditures. Management should review the unsupported amounts and consult with FEMA regarding potential repayment or adjustments. Views of Responsible Officials Management concurs with the finding. The City acknowledges that FEMA reimbursements were based on estimated costs and that documentation for certain categories was incomplete. The City will strengthen its procedures for reconciling estimated reimbursements to actual expenditures and ensure that all future claims are supported by detailed documentation. Staff will receive training on FEMA cost principles and documentation standards, and the City will consult with FEMA regarding resolution of the questioned costs.
Criteria: As noted in finding 2024-002, an effective internal control system should be designed and clearly documented. A key part of the documentation is the use of documented policies and procedures. The policies and procedures should cover general accounting and operational processes as well as compliance with State and Federal regulations as applicable. Federal regulations impacting the Organization include Title 2 CFR 200.318, Title 2 CFR 200.302(b), Title 2 CFR 200.313(d) and Title 2 CFR 200.403(d) (Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs). Condition: As noted in finding 2024-002, Every Woman's Place, Inc. did not have effective policies in place over payroll cost allocations, non-payroll cost allocations, procurement, gift cards, equipment inventory and other indirect program cost allocations. Cause: The Organization did not develop, design or implement adequate internal control policies over key required processes. Effect: As part of the audit, it was determined that indirect costs listed in the Financial Status Reports (FSR) for various programs passed through from the State of Michigan Department of Health and Human Services may have been erroneously calculated leading to questioned costs. The lack of internal controls could also lead to misstatements of financial activity and related program reports. The lack of such policies and procedures increases the risk of error, omission, fraud and abuse in financial statements and related activities. Context: A program audit was performed by the State of Michigan’s Department of Health and Human Services for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2023 (dated November 21, 2025). Based on additional items noted by the State of Michigan, it was determined that indirect costs appear to have been incorrectly calculated. These items were directly related to the lack of clarity and/or policy of the direct / indirect cost methodology being utilized Questioned Costs: Indirect costs presented on FSRs for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2024, that represent questioned costs is $83,141 Recommendation: The Organization should review accounting policies to ensure that the policies are up-to-date and, if applicable, in compliance with the State and Federal Regulations. The Organization should also adopt a proper allocation methodology for direct and indirect costs and require board-approval and annual certification. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions:
Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.403, for a cost to be allowable under a Federal award, it must be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the award. Furthermore, 2 CFR 200.430(g) requires that charges for salaries and wages be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must be supported by a system of internal controls which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition Management's calculation for allowable temporary labor costs charged to the Disaster Grants – Public Assistance program (ALN 97.036) included an error in the data file used for the calculations. Total temporary labor costs charged to this award were $12,770,434. This error led to using incorrect wages for temporary workers who worked standard hours and overtime hours on the same day. This error occurred only for workers from one temporary labor vendor based on the formatting of the invoice information from that vendor. As a result, the temporary labor costs claimed for reimbursement for these workers were overstated by $353,420. Cause and Effect Brown Health’s control for reviewing the allowability of temporary labor invoices was not designed to include a detailed reconciliation of vendor provided data. Specifically, the review process did not verify that the wages for workers that had standard and overtime hours were consistent with the underlying invoice, which allowed the error to be undetected. The control deficiency caused Brown Health to claim temporary labor costs in excess of the actual amounts incurred. As a result, the claim was not in compliance with the Federal cost principles, which require costs to be accurate and based on records that correctly reflect the work performed. The overstated portion of the labor costs claimed for reimbursement are considered questioned costs. Questioned costs $353,420 Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation We recommend that Brown Health management strengthen its internal controls over the review of temporary labor costs to ensure compliance with Federal regulations. Specifically, Brown Health should revise its invoice review procedures to include a detailed reconciliation of hours and wage calculations for temporary labor. Additionally, Brown Health should work with the granting agency to resolve the resulting questioned costs. View of Responsible Officials Brown Health management concurs with this finding. We have already initiated a detailed review to identify and quantify the total amount of the labor cost overstatement. We will report our results to the granting agency and work with them to resolve the questioned costs by May 31, 2026. To prevent recurrence, management will revise our review control of project applications to reconcile the calculation file to invoice support to verify accuracy.
Finding No.: 2024-013 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior AL Program: 15.875 Economic, Social, and Political Development of the Territories Area: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Area: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Questioned Costs: $4,594,214 Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403(a) states that federal program expenditures should be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award in accordance with allowable costs/cost principles requirements and 2 CFR 200.403(g) states that costs should be adequately documented. 2 CFR 200.439(b) states that: (1) Capital expenditures for general purpose equipment, buildings, and land are allowable as direct costs, but only with the prior written approval of the Federal agency or pass-through entity. (2) Capital expenditures for special purpose equipment are allowable as direct costs, provided that items with a unit cost of $10,000 or more have the prior written approval of the Federal agency or pass-through entity. (3) Capital expenditures for improvements to land, buildings, or equipment that materially increase their value or useful life are allowable as a direct cost, but only with the prior written approval of the Federal agency or pass-through entity. 2 CFR 180.300 requires entities entering into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier to verify that the person with whom they intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. Such verification can be made by (a) checking SAM.gov Exclusions, or (b) collecting a certification from that person; or (c) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. 2 CFR 180.220 (b) (1) states that a contract for goods and services is a covered transaction if the contract is awarded by a participant in a nonprocurement transaction covered under 2 CFR 180.210, and the contract amount is expected to equal or exceed $25,000. Finding No.: 2024-013, continued Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior AL Program: 15.875 Economic, Social, and Political Development of the Territories Area: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Area: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Questioned Costs: $4,594,214 Criteria, continued: 2 CFR 200.302 states that each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with State laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the State’s funds. All recipient and subrecipient financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by the terms and conditions; and tracking expenditures to establish that funds have been used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Moreover, the recipient’s and subrecipient’s financial management system must provide for maintaining records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. Conditions: 1. For four (or 11%) of thirty-eight items, aggregating $7,792,207 of $11,505,805 in total non-payroll expenditures subjected to allowable costs/cost principles compliance test, deficiencies were noted, as follows: See the Notes to the SEFA for chart/table. For item #s 1 through 4, there is no Authorization to Proceed (ATP) document on file to support that expense was approved prior to being incurred. Finding No.: 2024-013, continued Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior AL Program: 15.875 Economic, Social, and Political Development of the Territories Area: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Area: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Questioned Costs: $4,594,214 Conditions, continued: 2. For seven (or 88%) of eight items, aggregating $4,061,890 of $4,681,768 of expenditures subjected to procurement and suspension and debarment compliance test, we noted the following: See the Notes to the SEFA for chart/table. For item #s 1 through 3, the General Services Agency (GSA) represented that it performed verification of suspension or debarment from SAM.gov. However, no formal documentation is kept on file to demonstrate compliance at the time of procurement. For item #s 4 through 7, no procurement file was provided to substantiate whether the Department of Administration (DOA) complied with applicable procurement and suspension and debarment requirements. 3. Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) was revised subsequently after expenditures were initially determined and tested for suspension and debarment. Based on the revised SEFA, the number of items tested were insufficient to satisfy the minimum required number of items to test. Cause: The Department of Administration (DOA) did not obtain ATP documentation from federal grantor agency as they represented that it is not required since the requirement to obtain such is not explicitly indicated in the grant award. Finding No.: 2024-013, continued Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior AL Program: 15.875 Economic, Social, and Political Development of the Territories Area: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Area: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Questioned Costs: $4,594,214 Cause, continued: DOA’s new financial management system implemented during the fiscal year has no capability to generate a report of all expenditures procured during the fiscal year and expenditure information from the old financial management system are not completely evident from the migrated expenditure information in the new financial management system, hence, there was difficulty in establishing population that will be subjected to procurement and suspension and debarment test. As there was no efficient alternative way of identifying whether or not costs charged to the program were procured during the fiscal year, and due to the timing of the audit and lack of staffing resources, DOA was unable to provide the procurement files of selected transactions by the agreed audit timeline. This limitation resulted to repeated replacement of sample selections to meet the minimum sample size required for testing. DOA also does not have a formal policy requiring documentation of procedures performed to verify that the person in a covered transaction with whom they intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. Effect: GovGuam is in noncompliance with applicable allowable costs/cost principles and procurement and suspension and debarment requirements. The reportable questioned cost related to allowable costs/cost principles requirements based on the items identified in Condition #1 above is $3,850,177. The reportable questioned cost related to procurement and suspension and debarment requirements based on the items identified in Condition #2 above is $4,054,514. Only $4,594,214 total questioned cost is reported at this finding as $3,310,477 is reported and included in both Condition #s 1 and 2 above. Identification as a Repeat Finding: 2023-012 Recommendation: DOA management should obtain clarification from federal grantor agency regarding ATP requirement and/or exemption of capital expenditures of the program. Finding No.: 2024-013, continued Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior AL Program: 15.875 Economic, Social, and Political Development of the Territories Area: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Area: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Questioned Costs: $4,594,214 Recommendation, continued: DOA management should ensure that financial management system in place permits the preparation of report of all expenditures procured during the fiscal year. Responsible personnel should ensure that documentation is adequate to comply with the applicable procurement requirements. Specifically, documentation should indicate the history of procurement, including the solicitation process and rationale for contractors or vendor selection. DOA management should establish formal policy requiring retaining documentation of procedures performed to verify that the person in a covered transaction with whom they intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. Views of Responsible Officials: Agency disagrees with 2 out of the 3 findings. • Condition 1 regarding the Authorization To Proceed (ATP), as per the Grant and Cooperative Agreement and the Grant Terms and Conditions, it did not state that an ATP is required to begin work on the grant for D20AP00048 and D21AP10145.The Government complies with ATP requirements for grants which mandate such compliance. If the grant is silent, no ATP is required.. • Condition 2 GSA will continue to verify vendor eligibility through SAM.gov prior to contract award. Documentation of the verification will be retained in the procurement file for each transaction. • Condition 3 The necessary controls will be strengthened when the updated Federal Grant module is fully implemented. Auditor’s Response: Our finding remains. Although no ATP may be required, the selected samples did not demonstrate compliance related to obtaining the required written pre-approval as mentioned in the criteria above.
Finding No.: 2024-018 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury AL Program: 21.023 Emergency Rental Assistance Federal Award No.: COVID-19 Section 501 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 Federal Award No.: COVID-19 Section 3201 of the American Rescue Plan Act, 2021 Area: Eligibility Questioned Costs: $20,769 Criteria: Pursuant to section 501(k)(3)(B) of Division N of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, and 2 CFR 200.403, when providing ERA1 assistance, the grantee must review the household’s income and sources of assistance to confirm that the ERA1 assistance does not duplicate any other assistance, including federal, state, or local assistance provided for the same costs. Per Emergency Rental Assistance Frequently Asked Questions Revised July 27, 2022, in all cases, grantees must document their policies and procedures for determining household eligibility to include policies and procedures for determining the prioritization of households in compliance with the statute and maintain records of their determinations. Condition: For twelve (or 30%) of forty participants tested, aggregating $53,639 of $7,141,800 in total participant benefits, deficiencies were noted, as follows: See the Notes to the SEFA for chart/table. For item #s 1 through 2, no documentation was on file to support eligibility determination. For item #s 3 through 10, no documentation (e.g. check stubs and/or 1040 forms) was on file to support whether the participant met the income eligibility requirement. Furthermore, for items #s 3 through 8, documentation that determines the eligibility period (e.g. Approved Financial Assistance Form or Continuance of Assistance Approval Form) was not on file. Finding No.: 2024-018, continued Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury AL Program: 21.023 Emergency Rental Assistance Federal Award No.: COVID-19 Section 501 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 Federal Award No.: COVID-19 Section 3201 of the American Rescue Plan Act, 2021 Area: Eligibility Questioned Costs: $20,769 Condition, continued: For item # 11, supporting documentation on file to support whether all members in the household of the participant met the citizenship requirement (e.g. government issued identification card) was incomplete. For item # 12, inconsistent information was identified in the supporting documents such as the date of birth and familial relationships. Cause: The Department of Administration (DOA) could not locate records while physical files are currently being scanned and saved electronically due to the closure of the program. Effect: GovGuam is in noncompliance with applicable eligibility requirements. The reportable questioned cost is $20,769 based on the items identified in Condition above. Recommendation: Responsible personnel should enforce monitoring controls over compliance with applicable eligibility requirements, specifically, retaining sufficient documentation to support eligibility determination. Views of Responsible Officials: The Agency is reviewing the management of Federal Grants to ensure robust handover and succession plans are in place for future programs. The sudden passing of the ERA Program Coordinator directly impacted overall management of the program.
Finding No.: 2024-021 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury AL Program: 21.026 Homeowner Assistance Fund Federal Award No.: COVID-19 Section 3206 of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 Area: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Area: Allowable Cost/Cost Principles Questioned Costs: $7,874 Criteria: In accordance with the applicable activities allowed or unallowed requirements, institutions must demonstrate that costs incurred are allowable under the relevant program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award and consistent with the purpose of the grant. 2 CFR 200.403(a) states that federal program expenditures should be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award in accordance with allowable costs/cost principles requirements and 2 CFR 200.403(g) states that costs should be adequately documented. Conditions: 1. For one (or 3%) of twenty-nine items, aggregating $24,864 of $554,280 in total non-payroll expenditures, vendor invoice was not on file: See the Notes to the SEFA for chart/table. 2. For six (or 55%) of eleven items, aggregating $11,179 of $200,650 in total payroll expenditures, deficiencies were noted, as follows: See the Notes to the SEFA for chart/table. For item #s 1 through 4, there were no supporting documents (e.g. timesheet, payroll register, personnel action file) on file to substantiate whether such expenditures were allowable cost of the underlying grant. Finding No.: 2024-021, continued Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury AL Program: 21.026 Homeowner Assistance Fund Federal Award No.: COVID-19 Section 3206 of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 Area: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Area: Allowable Cost/Cost Principles Questioned Costs: $7,874 Conditions, continued: For item # 5, there was no labor cost distribution report on file to substantiate whether such expenditure was allowable costs of the underlying grant. For item # 6, payroll register was not on file. Cause: The Department of Administration (DOA) did not enforce monitoring controls over compliance with applicable activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles requirements, specifically, retaining sufficient documentation to support transactions and ensuring expenditures are necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award. Effect: GovGuam is in noncompliance with activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles requirements. The reportable questioned cost is $7,874 based on the items identified in Conditions above. Recommendation: Responsible personnel should enforce monitoring controls over compliance with applicable activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles requirements, specifically, retaining sufficient documentation to support transactions. Views of Responsible Officials: The Agency disagrees with this finding. Please refer to a letter dated March 31, 2026, regarding Reports on Compliance September 30, 2024. Auditor’s Response: Our finding remains because we were unable to determine compliance with applicable requirements.
Finding No.: 2024-025 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury AL Program: 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Award No.: COVID-19 Section 9901 of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 Area: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Area: Allowable Cost/Cost Principles Questioned Costs: $5,617,888 Criteria: In accordance with the applicable activities allowed or unallowed requirements, institutions must demonstrate that costs incurred are allowable under the relevant program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award and consistent with the purpose of the grant. 2 CFR 200.403(a) states that federal program expenditures should be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award in accordance with allowable costs/cost principles requirements and 2 CFR 200.403(g) states that costs should be adequately documented. Conditions: 1. For fifteen (or 33%) of forty-six items, aggregating $11,525,386 of $36,042,947 in total non-payroll expenditures, deficiencies were noted, as follows: See the Notes to the SEFA for chart/table. Finding No.: 2024-025, continued Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury AL Program: 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Award No.: COVID-19 Section 9901 of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 Area: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Area: Allowable Cost/Cost Principles Questioned Costs: $5,617,888 Conditions, continued: For item #s 1 through 13, there were no supporting documents (e.g. purchase order, contract, invoice, payment advice) on file to substantiate whether such expenditures were allowable cost of the underlying grant. For item # 14, except for payment advice, there were no other supporting documents (e.g. purchase order, contract, invoice) on file to substantiate whether such expenditures were allowable cost of the underlying grant. For item # 15, payment advice was not on file. 2. For three (or 30%) of ten items, aggregating $16,236 of $11,409,253 in total payroll expenditures, deficiencies were noted, as follows: See the Notes to the SEFA for chart/table. For item # 1, job order number was not indicated in the timesheet, hence, we are unable to ascertain whether such expenditure was allowable cost of the underlying grant. For item # 2, payroll register was unclear or illegible. For item # 3, there were no supporting documents (e.g. timesheet, payroll register, personnel action file) on file to substantiate whether such expenditure was allowable cost of the underlying grant. Cause: The Department of Administration (DOA) did not enforce monitoring controls over compliance with applicable activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles requirements, specifically, retaining sufficient documentation to support transactions and ensuring expenditures are necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award. Finding No.: 2024-025, continued Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury AL Program: 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Award No.: COVID-19 Section 9901 of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 Area: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Area: Allowable Cost/Cost Principles Questioned Costs: $5,617,888 Effect: GovGuam is in noncompliance with activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles requirements. The reportable questioned cost is $5,617,888 based on the items identified in Conditions above. Recommendation: Responsible personnel should enforce monitoring controls over compliance with applicable activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles requirements, specifically, retaining sufficient documentation to support transactions. Views of Responsible Officials: The Agency disagrees with this finding. Please refer to a letter dated March 31, 2026, regarding Reports on Compliance September 30, 2024. Auditor’s Response: Our finding remains because we were unable to determine compliance with applicable requirements.
Finding No.: 2024-032 Federal Agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency AL Program: 66.600 Environmental Protection Consolidated Grants for the Insular Areas - Program Support Area: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Area: Allowable Cost/Cost Principles Questioned Costs: $11,154 Criteria: In accordance with the applicable activities allowed or unallowed requirements, institutions must demonstrate that costs incurred are allowable under the relevant program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award and consistent with the purpose of the grant. 2 CFR 200.403(a) states that federal program expenditures should be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award in accordance with allowable costs/cost principles requirements and 2 CFR 200.403(g) states that costs should be adequately documented. Condition: For 16 (or 67%) of twenty-four items, aggregating $19,823 of $3,526,794 in total payroll expenditures, deficiencies were noted, as follows: See the Notes to the SEFA for chart/table. For item #s 1 through 15, there were no supporting documents (e.g. timesheet, payroll register, personnel action file) on file to substantiate whether such expenditures were allowable cost of the underlying grant. Finding No.: 2024-032 continued Federal Agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency AL Program: 66.600 Environmental Protection Consolidated Grants for the Insular Areas - Program Support Area: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Area: Allowable Cost/Cost Principles Questioned Costs: $11,154 Condition, continued: For item # 16, we were unable to trace the amount tested against the provided supporting documentation. Cause: The Department of Administration (DOA) did not enforce monitoring controls over compliance with applicable activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles requirements, specifically, retaining sufficient documentation to support transactions and ensuring expenditures are necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award. Effect: GovGuam is in noncompliance with activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles requirements. The reportable questioned cost is $11,154 based on the items identified in Condition above. Recommendation: Responsible personnel should enforce monitoring controls over compliance with applicable activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles requirements, specifically, retaining sufficient documentation to support transactions. Views of Responsible Officials: Request to DOA will require immediate collaboration between Guam EPA and DOA to gather, reconcile, and provide all documentation supporting compliance of allowable costs incurred during the federal award period of performance as specified in the terms and conditions of the federal award or in the approved extension.
Finding No.: 2024-040 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Service AL Program: 93.575/93.596 CCDF Cluster Area: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Area: Allowable Cost/Cost Principles Questioned Costs: $3,005 Criteria: In accordance with the applicable activities allowed or unallowed requirements, institutions must demonstrate that costs incurred are allowable under the relevant program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award and consistent with the purpose of the grant. 2 CFR 200.403(a) states that federal program expenditures should be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award in accordance with allowable costs/cost principles requirements and 2 CFR 200.403(g) states that costs should be adequately documented. Condition: For four (or 11%) of thirty-eight items, aggregating $45,527 of $32,818,949 in total non-payroll expenditures, deficiencies were noted, as follows: See the Notes to the SEFA for chart/table. For item #s 1 through 3, these pertain to transactions migrated from AS400 to D365 system. We were unable to determine whether such expenditures were allowable cost of the underlying grants. We were unable to trace the selected sample to the supporting documents since selected samples could not be traced to AS400 due to insufficient identifier in the migrated information. For item # 4, there was no vendor invoice or other supporting documents on file to substantiate whether such expenditure was allowable costs of the underlying grant. Finding No.: 2024-040, continued Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Service AL Program: 93.575/93.596 CCDF Cluster Area: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Area: Allowable Cost/Cost Principles Questioned Costs: $3,005 Cause: The Department of Administration (DOA) did not enforce monitoring controls over compliance with applicable activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles requirements, specifically, retaining sufficient documentation to support transactions and ensuring expenditures are necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award. Additionally, migrated information from AS400 to D355 was incomplete. Effect: GovGuam is in noncompliance with activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles requirements. The reportable questioned cost is $3,005 based on the items identified in Condition above. Recommendation: Responsible personnel should enforce monitoring controls over compliance with applicable activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles requirements, specifically, retaining sufficient documentation to support transactions. Views of Responsible Officials: The Bureau of Child Care Services (BCCS) disagrees with this finding. The questioned transactions relate to a major system migration from the AS400 to the D365 system, which temporarily impacted the traceability of certain records. During this transition, some data identifiers were reformatted to fit the new system's structure. However, this was a synchronization issue rather than a lack of oversight, and BCCS maintains that all costs are allowable, necessary, and reasonable under CCDF requirements. Supporting documents exist and were provided after a subsequent request on February 9, 2026, via One Drive link. Auditor’s Response: Our finding remains because we were unable to determine compliance with applicable requirements. We did not receive subsequent submissions or other documentations to resolve findings cited in the condition above.
Finding No.: 2024-049 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Homeland Security AL Program: 97.036 Disaster Grants – Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) Area: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Area: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Questioned Costs: $65,621 Criteria: In accordance with the applicable activities allowed or unallowed requirements, institutions must demonstrate that costs incurred are allowable under the relevant program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award and consistent with the purpose of the grant. 2 CFR 200.403(a) states that federal program expenditures should be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award in accordance with allowable costs/cost principles requirements and 2 CFR 200.403(g) states that costs should be adequately documented. Furthermore, 2 CFR 200.431(c) states that the cost of fringe benefits in the form of employer contributions or expenses for social security; employee life, health, unemployment, and worker’s compensation insurance (except as indicated in 2 CFR 200.447); pension plan costs; and other similar benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are permitted under established written policies. The recipient or subrecipient must allocate fringe benefits to Federal awards and all other activities in a manner consistent with the pattern of benefits attributable to the individuals or group(s) of employees whose salaries and wages are chargeable to such Federal awards and other activities and charged as direct or indirect costs following the recipient’s or subrecipient’s accounting practices. Conditions: 1. For one (or 8%) of twelve items, aggregating $900,119 of $1,109,001 in total non-payroll expenditures, there were no supporting documents (e.g. contracts, vendor invoice, payment advice) on file to substantiate whether expenditure amounting to $61,799 related to federal award no. PA09GU4495PW00061-54 and with voucher no. IJE0027179, was allowable cost of the underlying grant. Finding No.: 2024-049, continued Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Homeland Security AL Program: 97.036 Disaster Grants – Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) Area: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Area: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Questioned Costs: $65,621 Conditions, continued: 2. For three (or 33%) of nine items, aggregating $13,103 of $833,788 in total payroll expenditures, deficiencies were noted, as follows: Item No. See the Notes to the SEFA for chart/table. For item # 1, personnel action file was not on file. For item #s 2 through 3, there were no supporting documents (e.g. timesheet, payroll register, personnel action file) on file to substantiate whether expenditure was allowable cost of the underlying grant. Cause: The Department of Administration (DOA) did not enforce monitoring controls over compliance with applicable activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles requirements, specifically, retaining sufficient documentation to support transactions and ensuring expenditures are necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award. Effect: GovGuam is in noncompliance with activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles requirements. The reportable questioned cost is $65,621 based on the items identified in Conditions above. Recommendation: Responsible personnel should enforce monitoring controls over compliance with applicable activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles requirements, specifically, retaining sufficient documentation to support transactions. Finding No.: 2024-049, continued Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Homeland Security AL Program: 97.036 Disaster Grants – Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) Area: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Area: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Questioned Costs: $65,621 Views of Responsible Officials: Guam Homeland Security (GHS) will make sure that proper supporting documentation is available. GHS will also identify department personnel responsible.
Finding 2024‐005—Period of Performance—SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY IN INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER COMPLIANCE AND NONCOMPLIANCE Federal Program: COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Year(s): 2024 Federal Agency: US Department of Treasury Pass‐Through Agencies: City of Modesto, Sacred Heart Community Service, and Second Harvest of Silicon Valley Criteria—A non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h)). A period of performance may contain one or more budget periods. Condition and Context—During testing of the Period of Performance (POP) requirement, 5 selected payroll expenditures totaling $7,983 of a total of 40 selections were incurred prior to the grant's start date as stated in the grant agreement with the pass-through entity, Sacred Heart Community Service. These 5 selections were related to payroll and benefits expenditures and were for the pay period May 19, 2024, to June 1, 2024, whereas the grant start date was June 1, 2024. Although the Division paid for those expenditures after the grant's start date, the underlying expenditure was incurred prior to such date, resulting in noncompliance with the POP compliance requirement and the associated control. There were a total of 42 payroll and benefits transactions totaling $43,861 that were incurred before the grant’s start date. Cause—Management focused on ensuring that the underlying costs were paid for within the grant's approved budget period rather than ensuring that the underlying costs were incurred within that period. Further, management did not obtain authorization from the grantor to charge costs that were incurred before the grant's approved budget period. Effect—The Division will be in noncompliance with its POP compliance requirement and there is risk the grantor will not reimburse the costs incurred. Questioned Cost—$43,861. Repeat Finding from Prior Year—No. Recommendation—We recommend that management take steps to ensure that only costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance are charged to the grant and any costs incurred before the federal award was made was authorized by the pass-through entity. View of Responsible Officials—See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding Number: 2024-018 Prior Year Finding Number: 2023-019 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles – Payroll Activities/ Period of Performance Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture Government Department/Agency: Department of Human Services (DHS) Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Cluster (SNAP) ALN: 10.561 Award #: Various Award Period: Various Criteria – The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303, Internal Controls, requires that non-federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish, document, and maintain internal control designed to ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of internal control that should include controls over its activities allowed or unallowed, allowable cost/cost principal process. CFR 200.403(g) states that for costs to be allowed under federal awards, they must be adequately documented. Additionally, salaries and wages charged to Federal awards are subject to the standards of documentation as described by 2 CFR Section 200.430(i) and must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: • Be incorporated into the organization’s official records. • Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated across all grant-related and non-grant related activities (100%); and • Support the distribution of employee salary across multiple activities or cost objectives. Condition – We noted the following: • The SNAP participation report was not properly reconciled to accounting records. • One grant award was overspent by $391,000. No adjustment was made to the SEFA. • During our testing of allowable costs for payroll expenditures incurred throughout the year, we sampled and selected 60 of the 1,806 payroll disbursements and noted the following: o 19 instances in which DHS did not consistently apply the funding allocation. The hours that should have been split 50/50 between federal and local or that should have been 100% local were charged 100% to the program. o 3 instances in which the project code on an employee’s Notice of Personnel Action (NOPA), which is used to record time and effort to the appropriate grant, were expired and had not been updated. o 9 instances in which payroll costs were charged outside of the award’s period of performance. Further, we noted that internal controls identified did not appear to be operating at a level of precision to ensure compliance with the above-mentioned requirements. Cause – DHS does not appear to have adequate policies and procedures to ensure compliance with applicable cost principles and ensure that an appropriate level of review and approval was completed prior to charging costs to a federal program. Effect or Potential Effect – An ineffective control system related to review of transactions to ensure that only allowable costs are allocated to federal programs can lead to noncompliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the provisions of grant agreements that could ultimately lead to disallowed costs for the major programs. Questioned Costs – Not determinable. Given the nature of the finding (e.g. unavailability of supporting documentation), we determined that projecting estimated questioned costs to the entire population was inappropriate. Context – This is a condition identified per review of DHS’ compliance with the specified requirements using a statistically valid sample. The total payroll expenditures charged to the program in fiscal year 2024 were $4,207,231. The amount sampled is $159,098. The known amount of inconsistencies noted is $38,462. The total food stamps expenditure charged to the program in fiscal year 2024 were $72,308,337. The known amount of unreconciled information is $355,108. Recommendation – We recommend that DHS reevaluate and improve internal controls to ensure adherence to federal regulations related to the fiscal administrative requirement for expending and accounting for payroll and to ensure proper and accurate funding allocation of payroll cost. Views of Responsible Officials – The Government concurs with the auditor’s findings and recommendations. DHS has enhanced the internal control policies and processes to ensure compliance with federal requirements and has adopted an electronic system for payroll, replacing manual processes. The planned corrective actions are presented in the Government’s Corrective Action Plan attached as Appendix B to the Single Audit Report.
Finding Number: 2024-025 Prior Year Finding Number: 2023-029 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles – Payroll Activities Program: U.S. Department of Defense Government Department/Agency: Office of the Adjutant General (OTAG) National Guard Military Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Projects ALN: 12.401 Award #: W9127P-23-2, W9127P-24-2 Award Period: 10/01/2022 – 09/30/2023 10/01/2023 – 09/30/2024 Criteria – CFR 200.403(g) states that for costs to be allowed under Federal awards, they must be adequately documented. Additionally, salaries and wages charged to Federal awards are subject to the standards of documentation as described by 2 CFR Section 200.403(i) and must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: • Be incorporated into the organization’s official records. • Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated across all grant-related and non-grant related activities (100%); and • Support the distribution of employee salary across multiple activities or cost objectives. The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR 200.303, Internal Controls, requires that non-federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish, document, and maintain internal control designed to ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition – We selected a sample of 60 out of 3,696 payroll transactions and identified the following: • 3 instances where the timesheets for the pay period selected were not provided. • 1 instance in which total hours worked on the employees’ timesheet did not agree with total hours worked as recorded in the payroll register. Further, it does not appear that the controls in place are operating at a level of precision to ensure compliance with the allowable costs/cost principles compliance requirements. Cause – OTAG does not appear to have adequate policies and procedures in place to ensure compliance with applicable cost principles and the required period of performance stipulations. Effect or Potential Effect – OTAG is not in compliance with the stated provisions. Failure to properly review and support expenditures can result in noncompliance with laws and regulations along with loss of funding. Questioned Costs – Below reporting threshold. Context – This is a condition identified per review of OTAG’s compliance with the specified requirements using a statistically valid sample. The total amount of payroll expenditures charged to the program during fiscal year 2024 were $1,669,934 and the total amount of our sample was $52,772. The known amount of the exceptions totaled $11,469. Recommendation – We recommend that OTAG strengthen internal controls by developing and implementing policies and procedures to ensure compliance with Federal requirements related to payroll expenditures, including applicable cost principles and documentation standards. Views of Responsible Officials – The Government concurs with the auditor’s findings and recommendations. OTAG has reviewed the payroll transactions identified during the audit and has initiated corrective measures to strengthen controls over payroll documentation, appendix charging, and period-of-performance compliance. The planned corrective actions are presented in the Government’s Corrective Action Plan attached as Appendix B to the Single Audit Report.
Finding Number: 2024-030 Prior Year Finding Number: 2023-033 Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles – Payroll Activities Program: U.S. Department of the Interior Government Department/Agency: Department of Planning and Natural Resources (DPNR) Fish and Wildlife Cluster ALN: 15.605, 15.611 Award #: Various Award Period: Various Criteria – The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303, Internal Controls, requires that non-federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish, document, and maintain internal control designed to ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of internal control that should include controls over its activities allowed or unallowed and allowable cost/cost principal process. CFR 200.403(g) requires all costs charged to a federal award must be adequately documented. Additionally, salaries and wages charged to Federal awards are subject to the standards of documentation as described by 2 CFR Section 200.430(i) and must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: • Be incorporated into the organization’s official records. • Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated across all grant-related and non-grant related activities (100%); and • Support the distribution of employee salary across multiple activities or cost objectives. Condition – During our testing of allowable costs for payroll expenditures incurred throughout the year, we sampled and selected 60 of 620 payroll disbursements and noted the following: • 1 instance in which the approved timesheet for the pay period selected was not available for review, and there was a variance between the hours reported on the payroll register and the Detail Check History. • 13 instances in which the employee assigned project code documented on the Notice of Personnel Action was not associated with the grant. Additionally, the payroll register reflected a different project code for these transactions. As a result, it does not appear that the controls in place are operating at a level of precision to ensure compliance with the compliance requirement. Cause – DPNR does not appear to have adequate policies and procedures to ensure compliance with applicable cost principles and to ensure that an appropriate level of review and approval was completed prior to charging costs to a federal program. Effect or Potential Effect – An ineffective control system related to review of transactions to ensure that only allowable costs are allocated to federal programs can lead to noncompliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the provisions of grant agreements that could ultimately lead to disallowed costs for the major programs. Questioned Costs – $43,593. Context – This is a condition identified per review of the DPNR’s compliance with the specified requirements using a statistically valid sample. The total payroll expenditures charged to the program in fiscal year 2024 were $1,704,442. The amount sampled is $181,084. The value of transactions with exceptions totaled $43,593. Recommendation – We recommend that DPNR reevaluate and improve internal controls to ensure adherence to federal regulations related to the fiscal administrative requirement for expending and accounting for payroll and to ensure proper and accurate funding allocation of payroll cost. Views of Responsible Officials – The Government concurs with the auditor’s findings and recommendations. DPNR will enhance internal control procedures to include reconciliations and increased review and approval requirements. The planned corrective actions are presented in the Government’s Corrective Action Plan attached as Appendix B to the Single Audit Report.
Finding Number: 2024-032 Prior Year Finding Number: N/A Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles – Payroll Activities Program: U.S. Department of the Interior Government Department/Agency: Department of Planning and Natural Resources (DPNR) Economic, Social, and Political Development of the Territories ALN: 15.875 Award #: Various Award Period: Various Criteria - The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303, Internal Controls, requires that non-federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish, document, and maintain internal control designed to ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of internal control that should include controls over its activities allowed or unallowed, allowable cost/cost principal process. CFR 200.403(g) states that for costs to be allowed under federal awards, they must be adequately documented. Additionally, salaries and wages charged to Federal awards are subject to the standards of documentation as described by 2 CFR Section 200.430(i) and must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: • Be incorporated into the organization’s official records. • Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated across all grant-related and non-grant related activities (100%); and • Support the distribution of employee salary across multiple activities or cost objectives. Condition – The payroll expenditures recorded in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) agree to the payroll expenditures recorded in the accounting system. The summary level payroll transactions recorded in the accounting system could not be reconciled to the transaction level detail obtained from the payroll system. When comparing the two populations, we identified multiple differences that net to a variance of $38,439. Cause – DPNR did not adhere to their internal policies and procedures to ensure the accuracy of the SEFA. Effect or Potential Effect – The SEFA may not be completely and accurately stated. In addition, the lack of established internal control policies and procedures to ensure the SEFA is completely and accurately stated can lead to noncompliance with federal statutes, regulations, and provisions of grant agreements. Questioned Costs – Not determinable. Given the nature of the finding (e.g. unavailability of supporting documentation), we determined that projecting estimated questioned costs to the entire population was inappropriate. Context – This is a condition identified per review of DPNR system’s population completeness over the compliance requirements for the program. Total payroll expenditure charged to the program for the year is $16,218. Recommendation – We recommend that the DPNR develop policies and procedures and enhance existing their existing reconciliation process to ensure completeness and accuracy of the SEFA, and that amounts reported on the SEFA are supported by transaction level detail. Views of Responsible Officials – The Government concurs with the auditor’s findings and recommendations. DPNR will implement enhanced internal control procedures to ensure that payroll expenditures reported on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) are complete, accurate, and fully supported by transaction-level detail in accordance with Federal statutes and regulations by implementing monthly payroll reconciliations, by developing and enhancing internal controls and procedures, and by providing training to relevant personnel. The planned corrective actions are presented in the Government’s Corrective Action Plan attached as Appendix B to the Single Audit Report.
Finding Number: 2024-049 Prior Year Finding Number: N/A Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles – Payroll Activities Program: U.S. Department of the Treasury Government Department/Agency: Office of Management and Budget (OMB) COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN: 21.027 Award #: N/A Award Period: 03/03/2021 – 12/31/2024 Criteria – The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303, Internal Controls, requires that non-federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish, document, and maintain internal control designed to ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. CFR 200.403(g) states that for costs to be allowed under federal awards, they must be adequately documented. Additionally, salaries and wages charged to Federal awards are subject to the standards of documentation as described by 2 CFR Section 200.430(i) and must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: • Be incorporated into the organization’s official records. • Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated across all grant-related and non-grant related activities (100%); and • Support the distribution of employee salary across multiple activities or cost objectives. Condition – During our testing of allowable costs for payroll expenditures incurred throughout the year, we sampled and selected 60 of 20,245 payroll disbursements, and noted 1 instance in which the fringe benefit calculation did not agree to the fringe benefits reported on the Detail Check History. Further, we noted that internal controls identified did not appear to be operating at a level of precision to ensure compliance with the above-mentioned requirements. Cause – OMB does not appear to have adequate policies and procedures to ensure compliance with applicable cost principles and to ensure that an appropriate level of review and approval was completed prior to charging costs to a federal program. Effect or Potential Effect – An ineffective control system related to review of transactions to ensure that only allowable costs are allocated to federal programs can lead to noncompliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the provisions of grant agreements that could ultimately lead to disallowed costs for the major program. Questioned Costs - Below reporting threshold. Context – This is a condition identified per review of OMB’s compliance with the specified requirements using a statistically valid sample. The total payroll expenditures charged to the program in fiscal year 2024 were $72,688,940. The amount sampled is $68,113,730. The known amount of instances of noncompliance is $7,155, which represents the fringe benefits charged to the program that did not agree with the calculation. Recommendation – We recommend that OMB reevaluate and improve internal controls to ensure adherence to federal regulations related to the fiscal administrative requirement for expending and accounting for payroll and to ensure proper and accurate funding allocation of payroll cost. Views of Responsible Officials – The Government concurs with the auditor’s findings and recommendations. OMB will coordinate with the Department of Finance to communicate the identified discrepancy and will work collaboratively to strengthen review procedures over payroll cost allocations charged to federal programs. In addition, OMB will reevaluate its existing oversight controls to ensure that payroll expenditures charged to federal awards are supported by appropriate documentation and reviewed for compliance with applicable federal requirements. The planned corrective actions are presented in the Government’s Corrective Action Plan attached as Appendix B to the Single Audit Report.
Finding Number: 2024-053 Prior Year Finding Number: N/A Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles – Non-Payroll Activities Program: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Government Department/Agency: Department of Public Works (DPW) Department of Planning and Natural Resources (DPNR) Construction Grants for Wastewater Treatment Works ALN: 66.418 Award #: Various Award Period: Various Criteria – The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303, Internal Controls, requires that non-federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish, document, and maintain internal control designed to ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, per 2 CFR Section 200.403, Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs, “Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria to be allowable under federal awards: a. Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. b. Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the federal award as to types or amounts of cost items. c. Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally financed and other activities of the non-federal entity. d. Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the federal award as an indirect cost. e. Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. f. Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. g. Be adequately documented.” Condition – Expenditures in excess of the award amount totaling $67,068 were reported on the 2024 SEFA. Further, it does not appear that the controls in place are operating at a level of precision to ensure compliance with the allowable costs/cost principles compliance requirements. Cause – The Government did not adhere to their internal policies and procedures to ensure the accuracy of the SEFA. Effect or Potential Effect – The SEFA is not accurately stated. Lack of established internal control policies and procedures to ensure the SEFA is completely and accurately stated can lead to noncompliance with federal statutes, regulations, and provisions of grant agreements. Questioned Costs – $67,078. Context – This is a condition identified per review of the completeness of the non-payroll expenditures population for the program. Recommendation – We recommend that DPNR develop policies and procedures and enhance existing reconciliation process to ensure completeness and accuracy of the SEFA and that amounts reported on the SEFA are not in excess of award amounts. Views of Responsible Officials – The Government concurs with the auditor’s findings and recommendations. The Government’s Audit Committee is leading the development of a structured, three-tier policy and procedures framework under the Public Finance Management project. Regular training sessions will be provided to staff involved in grant management to ensure they understand and adhere to compliance requirements with monitoring and evaluation occurring by the OMB Compliance Unit supported by the Government’s Audit Committee, to assess and improve the effectiveness of controls. The planned corrective actions are presented in the Government’s Corrective Action Plan attached as Appendix B to the Single Audit Report.
Finding Number: 2024-054 Prior Year Finding Number: N/A Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles – Payroll Activities Program: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Government Department/Agency: Department of Public Works (DPW) Department of Planning and Natural Resources (DPNR) Construction Grants for Wastewater Treatment Works ALN: 66.418 Award #: Various Award Period: Various Criteria – CFR 200.403(g) states that for costs to be allowed under Federal awards, they must be adequately documented. Additionally, salaries and wages charged to Federal awards are subject to the standards of documentation as described by 2 CFR Section 200.403(i) and must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: • Be incorporated into the organization’s official records. • Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated across all grant-related and non-grant related activities (100%); and • Support the distribution of employee salary across multiple activities or cost objectives. The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR 200.303, Internal Controls, requires that non-federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish, document, and maintain internal control designed to ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition – We sampled 6 out of 55 payroll transactions, and noted 4 employee timesheets were not available for review. Cause – DPNR does not appear to have adequate policies and procedures in place to ensure compliance with applicable cost principles and the required period of performance stipulations. Effect or Potential Effect – DPNR is not in compliance with the stated provisions. Failure to properly review and support expenditures can result in noncompliance with laws and regulations along with loss of funding. Questioned Costs – Below reportable threshold. Context – This is a condition identified per review of DPNR’s compliance with the specified requirements using a statistically valid sample. The total amount of payroll expenditures charged to the program during fiscal year 2024 were $44,751 and the total amount of our sample was $5,086. The known amount of the exceptions totaled $3,029. Recommendation – We recommend that DPNR strengthen internal controls to ensure adherence to federal regulations related to the fiscal and administrative requirements for expending and accounting for payroll expenditures. Views of Responsible Officials – The Government concurs with the auditor’s findings and recommendations. The Government’s Audit Committee is leading the development of a structured, three-tier policy and procedures framework under the Public Finance Management project. Regular training sessions will be provided to staff involved in grant management to ensure they understand and adhere to compliance requirements with monitoring and evaluation occurring by the OMB Compliance Unit supported by the Government’s Audit Committee, to assess and improve the effectiveness of controls. The planned corrective actions are presented in the Government’s Corrective Action Plan attached as Appendix B to the Single Audit Report.
Finding Number: 2024-058 Prior Year Finding Number: N/A Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles – Payroll Activities Program: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Government Department/Agency: Department of Planning and Natural Resources (DPNR) Capitalization Grants for Drinking Water State Revolving Fund ALN: 66.468 Award #: Various Award Period: Various Criteria - The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303, Internal Controls, requires that non-federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish, document, and maintain internal control designed to ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Management is responsible for establishing, documenting and maintaining a system of internal control that should include controls over its activities allowed or unallowed, and the allowable cost/cost principle process. CFR 200.403(g) states that for costs to be allowed under federal awards, they must be adequately documented. Additionally, salaries and wages charged to Federal awards are subject to the standards of documentation as described by 2 CFR Section 200.430(i) and must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: • Be incorporated into the organization’s official records. • Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated across all grant-related and non-grant related activities (100%); and • Support the distribution of employee salary across multiple activities or cost objectives. Condition – During our testing of allowable costs for payroll expenditures incurred throughout the year, we sampled and selected 10 of 91 payroll disbursements. For each of the 10 samples, the employee pay rate documented in the approved Notice of Personnel Action did not agree with the pay rate reflected in the payroll register. As a result, it does not appear that the controls in place are operating at a level of precision to ensure compliance with the compliance requirement. Cause – DPNR does not appear to have adequate policies and procedures to ensure compliance with applicable cost principles and ensure that an appropriate level of review was completed prior to charging costs to a federal program. Effect or Potential Effect – An ineffective control system related to review of transactions to ensure that only allowable costs are allocated to federal programs can lead to noncompliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the provisions of grant agreements that could ultimately lead to disallowed costs for the major program. Questioned Costs – Below reportable threshold. Context – This is a condition identified per review of DPNR’s compliance with the specified requirements using a statistically valid sample. The total payroll expenditures charged to the program in fiscal year 2024 was $132,646. The amount sampled is $18,936. Recommendation – We recommend that DPNR reevaluate and improve internal controls to ensure adherence to federal regulations related to the fiscal administrative requirement for expending and accounting for payroll transactions. Views of Responsible Officials – The Government concurs with the auditor’s findings and recommendations. DPNR will conduct a comprehensive internal review of the payroll transactions identified in the audit sample to determine the cause of the discrepancies between the payroll registers and the Notices of Personnel Action provided during the audit. The planned corrective actions are presented in the Government’s Corrective Action Plan attached as Appendix B to the Single Audit Report.
Finding Number: 2024-062 Prior Year Finding Number: 2023-049 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles – Payroll Activities Program: U.S. Department of Education Government Department/Agency: Department of Education (VIDE) Special Education Cluster ALN: 84.027 (84.027A and 84.027X) Award #: Various Award Period: Various Criteria – The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303, Internal Controls, requires that non-federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish, document, and maintain internal control designed to ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of internal control that should include controls over its activities allowed or unallowed, allowable cost/cost principal process. CFR 200.403(g) states that for costs to be allowed under federal awards, they must be adequately documented. Additionally, salaries and wages charged to Federal awards are subject to the standards of documentation as described by 2 CFR Section 200.430(i) and must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: • Be incorporated into the organization’s official records. • Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated across all grant-related and non-grant related activities (100%); and • Support the distribution of employee salary across multiple activities or cost objectives. Furthermore, CFR 200.113 requires that an applicant, recipient, or subrecipient of a Federal award must promptly disclose, in writing, whenever it has credible evidence of the commission of a violation of Federal criminal law involving fraud, conflict of interest, bribery, or gratuity violations found in Title 18 of the United States Code, or a violation of the civil False Claims Act, in connection with the Federal award (including any activities or subawards thereunder). The disclosure must be made to the Federal agency, the agency's Office of Inspector General, and the pass-through entity (if applicable). Condition – During our testing of allowable costs for payroll expenditures incurred throughout the year, we sampled and selected 40 of 3,392 payroll disbursements and noted the following: • 6 instances where the approved timesheets for the selected pay periods were not available for review. In addition, in 1 of these instances the check detail payment was not available for review. • 1 instance where there was inconsistency between the project code reflected on the check detail and on the NOPA for the selected pay period. • 1 instance where the hours per the timesheet did not agree to the check history detail. As a result, it does not appear that the controls in place are operating at a level of precision to ensure compliance with the compliance requirement. Cause – VIDE does not appear to have adequate policies and procedures to ensure compliance with applicable cost principles and ensure that an appropriate level of review was completed prior to charging costs to a federal program. Effect or Potential Effect – An ineffective control system related to review of transactions to ensure that only allowable costs are allocated to federal programs can lead to noncompliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the provisions of grant agreements that could ultimately lead to disallowed costs for the major programs. Questioned Costs – Below reporting threshold. Context – This is a condition identified per review of VIDE’s compliance with the specified requirements using a statistically valid sample. The total payroll expenditures charged to the program in fiscal year 2024 was $6,233,846. The amount sampled is $88,200. Recommendation – We recommend that VIDE reevaluate and improve internal controls to ensure adherence to federal regulations related to the fiscal administrative requirement for expending and accounting for payroll transactions. Views of Responsible Officials – The Government concurs with the auditor’s findings and recommendations. VIDE is addressing audit findings related to payroll activities by enhancing internal controls to ensure compliance with federal regulations and by providing mandatory training. The planned corrective actions are presented in the Government’s Corrective Action Plan attached as Appendix B to the Single Audit Report.
Finding Number: 2024-063 Prior Year Finding Number: N/A Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles – Indirect Cost Program: U.S. Department of Education Government Department/Agency: Department of Education (VIDE) Special Education Cluster ALN: 84.027 (84.027A and 84.027X) Award #: Various Award Period: Various Criteria - The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303, Internal Controls, requires that non-federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish, document, and maintain internal control designed to ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of internal control that should include controls over its activities allowed or unallowed, allowable cost/cost principal process. CFR 200.403(g) states that for costs to be allowed under federal awards, they must be adequately documented. Additionally, indirect costs charged to the program must be supported by a valid negotiated indirect cost rate agreement or applied using the de minimis rate, and must be allowable, allocable, reasonable, and adequately supported. Condition – During our testing of allowable costs for indirect cost expenditures incurred throughout the year, we sampled and selected 4 transactions out of 13 transactions and noted 4 instances where the check payment details and other related supporting documentation were not available for review. As a result, it does not appear that the controls in place are operating at a level of precision to ensure compliance with the compliance requirement. Cause – VIDE does not appear to have adequate policies and procedures in place to ensure compliance with applicable cost principles and maintenance of underlying documentation. Effect or Potential Effect – Failure to properly review and support expenditures can result in noncompliance with laws and regulations along with loss of funding. Questioned Costs – $94,264. Context – This is a condition identified per review of VIDE’s compliance with the specified requirements using a statistically valid sample. The total indirect cost expenditures charged to program in fiscal year 2024 is $390,164. Total amount sampled is $94,264. The known amount of the instances of noncompliance is $94,264. Recommendation – We recommend that VIDE improve internal controls to ensure adherence to the Federal regulations related to the fiscal and administrative requirements for expending and accounting for indirect costs. Views of Responsible Officials – The Government concurs with the auditor’s findings and recommendations. VIDE will reinforce its procedures for tracking, compiling, and storing documentation related to grant expenditures to ensure compliance with federal regulations. VIDE is scheduling mandatory trainings for all relevant VIDE staff. The planned corrective actions are presented in the Government’s Corrective Action Plan attached as Appendix B to the Single Audit Report.
Finding Number 2024-068 Prior Year Finding Number: 2023-052 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles – Payroll Activities Program: U.S. Department of Education Government Department/Agency: Department of Education (VIDE) Consolidated Grant to the Outlying Areas ALN: 84.403A Award #: Various Award Period: Various Criteria – The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303, Internal Controls, requires that non-federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish, document, and maintain internal control designed to ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of internal control that should include controls over its activities allowed or unallowed, allowable cost/cost principal process. CFR 200.403(g) states that for costs to be allowed under federal awards, they must be adequately documented. Additionally, salaries and wages charged to Federal awards are subject to the standards of documentation as described by 2 CFR Section 200.430(i) and must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: • Be incorporated into the organization’s official records. • Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated across all grant-related and non-grant related activities (100%); and • Support the distribution of employee salary across multiple activities or cost objectives. Condition – During our testing of allowable costs for payroll expenditures incurred throughout the year, we sampled and selected 60 of 3,236 payroll disbursements and noted the following: • 4 instances where the approved timesheet for the selected pay period was not available for review. In addition, in 1 of these instances, the NOPA/per diem support was also not available for review. • 1 instance where the project code was not reflected in check detail and NOPA. • 1 instance where the payment support (check detail) and the NOPA/per diem support were not available for review. • 2 instances where recorded timesheet hours did not agree with payroll register. As a result, it does not appear that the controls in place are operating at a level of precision to ensure compliance with the compliance requirement. Cause – VIDE does not appear to have adequate policies and procedures to ensure compliance with applicable cost principles and ensure that an appropriate level of review and approval was completed prior to charging costs to a federal program. Effect or Potential Effect – An ineffective control system related to review of transactions to ensure that only allowable costs are allocated to federal programs can lead to noncompliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the provisions of grant agreements that could ultimately lead to disallowed costs for the major programs. Questioned Costs – Below reporting threshold. Context – This is a condition identified per review of VIDE’s compliance with the specified requirements using a statistically valid sample. The total payroll expenditures charged to the program in fiscal year 2024 was $6,052,527. The amount sampled is $128,721. Recommendation – We recommend that VIDE reevaluate and improve internal controls to ensure adherence to federal regulations related to the fiscal administrative requirement for expending and accounting for payroll and to ensure proper and accurate funding allocation of payroll cost. Views of Responsible Officials – The Government concurs with the auditor’s findings and recommendations. VIDE is addressing audit findings related to payroll activities by enhancing internal controls to ensure compliance with federal regulations and by providing mandatory training. The planned corrective actions are presented in the Government’s Corrective Action Plan attached as Appendix B to the Single Audit Report.
Finding Number: 2024-069 Prior Year Finding Number: N/A Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles – Indirect Cost Program: U.S. Department of Education Government Department/Agency: Department of Education (VIDE) Consolidated Grant to the Outlying Areas ALN: 84.403A Award #: Various Award Period: Various Criteria - The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303, Internal Controls, requires that non-federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish, document, and maintain internal control designed to ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of internal control that should include controls over its activities allowed or unallowed, allowable cost/cost principal process. CFR 200.403(g) states that for costs to be allowed under federal awards, they must be adequately documented. Additionally indirect costs charged to the program must be supported by a valid negotiated indirect cost rate agreement or applied using the de minimis rate, and must be allowable, allocable, reasonable, and adequately supported. Condition – During our testing of allowable costs for indirect cost expenditures incurred throughout the year, we sampled and selected 4 transactions out of the 16 transactions and noted 4 instances where the check payment details and other related supporting documentation were not available for review. As a result, it does not appear that the controls in place are operating at a level of precision to ensure compliance with the compliance requirement. Cause – VIDE does not appear to have adequate policies and procedures in place to ensure compliance with applicable cost principles and maintenance of underlying documentation. Effect or Potential Effect – Failure to properly review and support expenditures can result in noncompliance with laws and regulations along with loss of funding. Questioned Costs – $229,560. Context – This is a condition identified per review of VIDE’s compliance with the specified requirements using a statistically valid sample. The total indirect cost expenditures charged to program in fiscal year 2024 is $801,866. Total amount sampled is $229,560. The known amount of the instances of noncompliance is $229,560. Recommendation – We recommend that VIDE improve internal controls to ensure adherence to the Federal regulations related to the fiscal and administrative requirements for expending and accounting for indirect costs. Views of Responsible Officials – The Government concurs with the auditor’s findings and recommendations. VIDE will reinforce its procedures for tracking, compiling, and storing documentation related to grant expenditures to ensure compliance with federal regulations. VIDE is scheduling mandatory trainings for all relevant VIDE staff. The planned corrective actions are presented in the Government’s Corrective Action Plan attached as Appendix B to the Single Audit Report.
Finding Number: 2024-074 Prior Year Finding Number: N/A Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles – Indirect Cost Program: U.S. Department of Education Government Department/Agency: Department of Education (VIDE) Office of Management and Budget (OMB) COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund State Educational Agency (Outlying Areas) (ESF-SEA) ALN: 84.425A Award #: S425A200004, S425A210004 Award Period: 06/22/2020 – 09/30/2022 01/13/2021 – 09/30/2023 COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund Governors (Outlying Areas) (ESF Governor) ALN: 84.425H Award #: S425H200003, S425H210003 Award Period: 06/29/2020 – 09/30/2022 01/13/2021 – 09/30/2023 COVID-19 – American Rescue Plan – Outlying Areas State Educational Agency (ARP-OA SEA) ALN: 84.425X Award #: S425X210004 Award Period: 04/08/2021 – 09/30/2024 Criteria - The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303, Internal Controls, requires that non-federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish, document, and maintain internal control designed to ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of internal control that should include controls over its activities allowed or unallowed, allowable cost/cost principal process. CFR 200.403(g) states that for costs to be allowed under federal awards, they must be adequately documented. Additionally indirect costs charged to the program must be supported by a valid negotiated indirect cost rate agreement or applied using the de minimis rate, and must be allowable, allocable, reasonable, and adequately supported. Condition – During our testing of allowable costs for indirect cost expenditures incurred throughout the year, we sampled and selected 3 transactions out of 16 transactions and noted 3 instances where the detailed project expenditure report was not available for review. Further, it does not appear that the controls in place are operating at a level of precision to ensure compliance with the activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles compliance requirements. Cause – VIDE does not appear to have adequate policies and procedures in place to ensure compliance with applicable cost principles and maintenance of underlying documentation. Effect or Potential Effect – Failure to properly review and support expenditures can result in noncompliance with laws and regulations along with loss of funding. Questioned Costs – $637,951. Context – This is a condition identified per review of VIDE’s compliance with the specified requirements using a statistically valid sample. The total indirect cost expenditures charged to program in fiscal year 2024 is $2,539,845. Total amount sampled is $637,951. The known amount of the instances of noncompliance is $637,951. Recommendation – We recommend that VIDE improve internal controls to ensure adherence to the Federal regulations related to the fiscal and administrative requirements for expending and accounting for indirect costs. Views of Responsible Officials – The Government concurs with the auditor’s findings and recommendations. VIDE will reinforce its procedures and controls over grant expenditures and indirect costs and will coordinate to facilitate trainings for all relevant VIDE staff. The planned corrective actions are presented in the Government’s Corrective Action Plan attached as Appendix B to the Single Audit Report.
Finding Number: 2024-078 Prior Year Finding Number: N/A Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles – Payroll Activities Program: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Government Department/Agency: Department of Health (DOH) Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Disease ALN: 93.323 Award #: Various Award Period: Various Criteria – The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303, Internal Controls, requires that non-federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish, document, and maintain internal control designed to ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of internal control that should include controls over its activities allowed or unallowed, allowable cost/cost principle process. CFR 200.403(g) states that for costs to be allowed under federal awards, they must be adequately documented. Additionally, salaries and wages charged to Federal awards are subject to the standards of documentation as described by 2 CFR Section 200.430(i) and must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: • Be incorporated into the organization’s official records; • Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated across all grant-related and non-grant related activities (100%); and • Support the distribution of employee salary across multiple activities or cost objectives. Condition – DOH was unable to reconcile the payroll expense include in the SEFA with the payroll expense in the payroll register. As a result, we were not able to establish the completeness of the population and were unable to perform testing procedures. Cause – DOH does not appear to have adequate policies and procedures in place to review and reconcile program expenditures. Effect or Potential Effect – Lack of proper reconciling information can result in noncompliance with laws and regulation along with loss of funding. Questioned Costs – Not determinable. Given the nature of the finding (e.g. unavailability of supporting documentation), we determined that projecting estimated questioned costs to the entire population was inappropriate. Context – This is a condition identified per review of DOH’s compliance with the specified requirements. Recommendation – We recommend that DOH improve internal controls to ensure program data is reconciled, monitored and retained in order to facilitate adherence to federal regulations and compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials – The Government concurs with the auditor’s findings and recommendations. The Government’s Audit Committee is leading the development of a structured, three-tier policy and procedures framework under the Public Finance Management project. Regular training sessions will be provided to staff involved in grant management to ensure they understand and adhere to compliance requirements with monitoring and evaluation occurring by the OMB Compliance Unit supported by the Government’s Audit Committee, to assess and improve the effectiveness of controls. The planned corrective actions are presented in the Government’s Corrective Action Plan attached as Appendix B to the Single Audit Report.
Finding Number: 2024-091 Prior Year Finding Number: 2023-074 Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles – Non-Payroll Activities Program: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Government Department/Agency: Department of Human Services (DHS) Social Services Block Grant ALN: 93.667 Award #: Various Award Period: Various Criteria – The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303, Internal Controls, requires that non-federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish, document, and maintain internal control designed to ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of internal control that should include controls over its activities allowed or unallowed, allowable cost/cost principal process. CFR 200.403(g) states that for costs to be allowed under federal awards, they must be adequately documented. Condition – We sampled 60 of the 362 non-payroll transactions and noted 1 instance where the benefit date and payment are outside of the period under audit. Cause – DHS does not appear to have adequate policies and procedures in place to ensure compliance with applicable cost principles and maintenance of underlying documentation. Effect or Potential Effect - Failure to properly review and support expenditures can result in noncompliance with laws and regulations along with loss of funding. Questioned Costs – $29,985. Context – This is a condition identified per review of compliance with the specified requirements using a statistically valid sample. Total amount of non-payroll expenditures charged to the program in fiscal year 2024 were $2,642,402. Total amount sampled is $918,181. The known amount of the exception is $29,985. Recommendation – We recommend that DHS improve internal controls to ensure adherence to federal regulations related to the fiscal and administrative requirements for expending and accounting for non-payroll expenditures. Views of Responsible Officials – The Government concurs with the auditor’s findings and recommendations. DHS will update policies and procedures to ensure all costs are properly documented and comply with federal allowable cost principles. DHS is committed to addressing the identified issues and maintaining ongoing compliance with federal regulations. The planned corrective actions are presented in the Government’s Corrective Action Plan attached as Appendix B to the Single Audit Report.
Criteria: 2 CFR §200.403 and §200.412–.415 require recipients to utilize consistent and equitable methods for allocating indirect costs to Federal programs. Condition: The Organization was unable to provide adequate supporting documentation to substantiate its allocation of indirect costs to various Federal award programs. Cause: The Organization has not established written policies and procedures regarding the methodology and allocation of indirect costs to Federal programs. Effect: The absence of a formal policy leads to an increased risk of inconsistent or non-compliant cost allocation practices, which may lead to questioned costs, audit findings, or indemnification of Federal awarding agencies. Questioned Costs: None Context: The Organization does not have formal or informal procedures in place to allocate indirect costs to Federal awards and other activities using a specific allocation method set forth in the Uniform Guidance. While performing testing over indirect costs, we proposed adjustments for allocated indirect costs based on rates approved by Federal awarding agencies. Recommendation: We recommend that management establish and implement a comprehensive indirect cost allocation policy that aligns with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. The policy should clearly define the methodology for calculating, allocating, and applying indirect costs to Federal programs and other activities. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s view and corrective action plan at the end of this report.