FINDING 2023-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 21611-046-PN01, 21619-046-PN01, 22619-046-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Earmarking Audit Findings: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards:… (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and earmarking compliance requirement. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the earmarking requirements. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Porter County Education Interlocal (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2022-2023, the Cooperative operated the special education program and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 22619-046-PN01 grant award could not be verified for the individual member schools. Total grant expenditures were posted as expended. The nonpublic proportionate share expenditures were determined by applying a percentage to the non-public school budgeted expenditures. As such, we were unable to identify if the minimum amount per the grant award was expended and properly reported to IDOE as required. The lack of internal controls was isolated to the 21611-046-PN01, 21619-046-PN01, and 22619-046-PN01 grant awards. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to monitor the Cooperative and ensure non-public proportionate share funds are appropriately allocated to the member school based on expenditures charged directly on behalf of the member school. Supporting documentation for these expenditures should be retained for audit. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2023-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 21611-046-PN01, 21619-046-PN01, 22619-046-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Earmarking Audit Findings: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards:… (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and earmarking compliance requirement. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the earmarking requirements. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Porter County Education Interlocal (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2022-2023, the Cooperative operated the special education program and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 22619-046-PN01 grant award could not be verified for the individual member schools. Total grant expenditures were posted as expended. The nonpublic proportionate share expenditures were determined by applying a percentage to the non-public school budgeted expenditures. As such, we were unable to identify if the minimum amount per the grant award was expended and properly reported to IDOE as required. The lack of internal controls was isolated to the 21611-046-PN01, 21619-046-PN01, and 22619-046-PN01 grant awards. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to monitor the Cooperative and ensure non-public proportionate share funds are appropriately allocated to the member school based on expenditures charged directly on behalf of the member school. Supporting documentation for these expenditures should be retained for audit. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2023-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 21611-046-PN01, 21619-046-PN01, 22619-046-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Earmarking Audit Findings: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards:… (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and earmarking compliance requirement. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the earmarking requirements. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Porter County Education Interlocal (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2022-2023, the Cooperative operated the special education program and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 22619-046-PN01 grant award could not be verified for the individual member schools. Total grant expenditures were posted as expended. The nonpublic proportionate share expenditures were determined by applying a percentage to the non-public school budgeted expenditures. As such, we were unable to identify if the minimum amount per the grant award was expended and properly reported to IDOE as required. The lack of internal controls was isolated to the 21611-046-PN01, 21619-046-PN01, and 22619-046-PN01 grant awards. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to monitor the Cooperative and ensure non-public proportionate share funds are appropriately allocated to the member school based on expenditures charged directly on behalf of the member school. Supporting documentation for these expenditures should be retained for audit. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2023-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 21611-046-PN01, 21619-046-PN01, 22619-046-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Earmarking Audit Findings: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards:… (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and earmarking compliance requirement. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the earmarking requirements. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Porter County Education Interlocal (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2022-2023, the Cooperative operated the special education program and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 22619-046-PN01 grant award could not be verified for the individual member schools. Total grant expenditures were posted as expended. The nonpublic proportionate share expenditures were determined by applying a percentage to the non-public school budgeted expenditures. As such, we were unable to identify if the minimum amount per the grant award was expended and properly reported to IDOE as required. The lack of internal controls was isolated to the 21611-046-PN01, 21619-046-PN01, and 22619-046-PN01 grant awards. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to monitor the Cooperative and ensure non-public proportionate share funds are appropriately allocated to the member school based on expenditures charged directly on behalf of the member school. Supporting documentation for these expenditures should be retained for audit. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2023-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 21611-046-PN01, 21619-046-PN01, 22619-046-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Earmarking Audit Findings: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards:… (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and earmarking compliance requirement. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the earmarking requirements. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Porter County Education Interlocal (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2022-2023, the Cooperative operated the special education program and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 22619-046-PN01 grant award could not be verified for the individual member schools. Total grant expenditures were posted as expended. The nonpublic proportionate share expenditures were determined by applying a percentage to the non-public school budgeted expenditures. As such, we were unable to identify if the minimum amount per the grant award was expended and properly reported to IDOE as required. The lack of internal controls was isolated to the 21611-046-PN01, 21619-046-PN01, and 22619-046-PN01 grant awards. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to monitor the Cooperative and ensure non-public proportionate share funds are appropriately allocated to the member school based on expenditures charged directly on behalf of the member school. Supporting documentation for these expenditures should be retained for audit. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2023-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 21611-046-PN01, 21619-046-PN01, 22619-046-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Earmarking Audit Findings: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards:… (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and earmarking compliance requirement. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the earmarking requirements. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Porter County Education Interlocal (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2022-2023, the Cooperative operated the special education program and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 22619-046-PN01 grant award could not be verified for the individual member schools. Total grant expenditures were posted as expended. The nonpublic proportionate share expenditures were determined by applying a percentage to the non-public school budgeted expenditures. As such, we were unable to identify if the minimum amount per the grant award was expended and properly reported to IDOE as required. The lack of internal controls was isolated to the 21611-046-PN01, 21619-046-PN01, and 22619-046-PN01 grant awards. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to monitor the Cooperative and ensure non-public proportionate share funds are appropriately allocated to the member school based on expenditures charged directly on behalf of the member school. Supporting documentation for these expenditures should be retained for audit. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2023-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 21611-046-PN01, 21619-046-PN01, 22619-046-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Earmarking Audit Findings: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards:… (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and earmarking compliance requirement. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the earmarking requirements. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Porter County Education Interlocal (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2022-2023, the Cooperative operated the special education program and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 22619-046-PN01 grant award could not be verified for the individual member schools. Total grant expenditures were posted as expended. The nonpublic proportionate share expenditures were determined by applying a percentage to the non-public school budgeted expenditures. As such, we were unable to identify if the minimum amount per the grant award was expended and properly reported to IDOE as required. The lack of internal controls was isolated to the 21611-046-PN01, 21619-046-PN01, and 22619-046-PN01 grant awards. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to monitor the Cooperative and ensure non-public proportionate share funds are appropriately allocated to the member school based on expenditures charged directly on behalf of the member school. Supporting documentation for these expenditures should be retained for audit. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2023-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 21611-046-PN01, 21619-046-PN01, 22619-046-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Earmarking Audit Findings: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards:… (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and earmarking compliance requirement. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the earmarking requirements. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Porter County Education Interlocal (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2022-2023, the Cooperative operated the special education program and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 22619-046-PN01 grant award could not be verified for the individual member schools. Total grant expenditures were posted as expended. The nonpublic proportionate share expenditures were determined by applying a percentage to the non-public school budgeted expenditures. As such, we were unable to identify if the minimum amount per the grant award was expended and properly reported to IDOE as required. The lack of internal controls was isolated to the 21611-046-PN01, 21619-046-PN01, and 22619-046-PN01 grant awards. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to monitor the Cooperative and ensure non-public proportionate share funds are appropriately allocated to the member school based on expenditures charged directly on behalf of the member school. Supporting documentation for these expenditures should be retained for audit. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
2023-001 ALLOWABLE COST, CASH MANAGEMENT, AND PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE - SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY Federal Program Unaccompanied Alien Children Program ALN 93.676 Criteria Part 3 of the Compliance Supplement indicates non-federal entities must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the US Treasury or pass-through entity and disbursement by the non-federal entity for direct program or project costs and the proportionate share of allowable indirect costs, whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer, or issuance or redemption of checks, warrants, or payment by other means (2 CFR section 200.305(b)). Part 3 of the Compliance Supplement indicates a non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308 200.309 and 200.403(h)). A period of performance may contain one or more budget periods. Condition/Cause In July 2022, the Home requested reimbursement and received funding to cover costs that had not yet been incurred or paid for as of June 30, 2023. Effect The Home was reimbursed for costs that were not incurred during the budget period. Additionally, the Home has held onto grant funds for twelve plus months. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs are $52,841. Context The Home budgeted to have new fire alarms installed in the cottages during the July 1, 2021 - June 30, 2022 grant budget period. Due to supply chain issues and labor shortages the alarms were not installed until the Fall of 2023 at which time the Home paid the contractor. Repeat Finding No. Recommendation We recommend the Home contact the funding agency to inquire about returning the funds and any interest earned. We also recommend that the Home revisit and strengthen internal controls over allowable activities, allowable costs, cash management, and period of availability related to grant programs. Management Response See corrective action plan included in this report package.
Improper Payroll Calculation Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425F Federal Award Identification Number: P425F200181‐20B Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Internal Control – Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non‐Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non‐Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Compliance – Per 2 CFR § 200.403, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award to be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award regarding types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally‐financed and other activities of the non‐Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. (f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally‐financed program in either the current or a prior period. (g) Be adequately documented. Condition: The University incorrectly calculated payroll costs charged to the grant. The employee’s position changed from hourly to salary, and the change in pay was not reflected in the payroll calculation resulting in an error of $47. Questioned costs: None Context: This condition occurred for 1 out of 40 samples selected for testing. Cause: The interface program looked at the employee's status on the day of upload, as opposed to their status on the last day of the pay period. Therefore, the program uploaded hours to the new job instead of the former hourly job. This error was not caught by the department during or after payroll processing resulting in an overpayment. Effect: Expenditures may be incorrectly charged to the program. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the University review policies and procedures to ensure that changes in pay rates are being reflected in payroll calculations and reviews are in place to detect any errors on a timely basis. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Information on Federal Programs U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: AL No. 93.498 Provider Relief Fund; Award Year: Periods 5: January 1, 2022 to June 30, 2022 Specific Requirements/Criteria The terms and conditions for participation in the Provider Relief Fund (PRF) specifies that the relief payments provided will only be used to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus, and that the payment shall reimburse the recipient only for health care related expenses or lost revenues that are attributable to coronavirus and “not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period” (2-CFR Part 200.403). Condition During our testing of the internal controls and compliance over the Activities Allowed and Unallowed process, we noted controls that were designed to ensure that costs reported as Other PRF Expenses on the PRF report were not previously included as a cost in another federally financed program, were ineffective in certain circumstances. To test the compliance with this requirement, we tested a total of 60 expense transactions to ensure the expense was incurred and attributable to coronavirus as per the terms and conditions. Of the 60 expense transactions tested, 7 related to depreciation expense. We noted 5 of the 7 depreciation transactions were previously submitted as a cost of federal program FEMA (ALN 97.036) and were therefore not allowable under ALN 93.498. Depreciation related to these 5 transactions totaled $4,335. Total depreciation expenses included in the PRF report as Reportable Other PRF Expenses for Payments Received During the Payment Period for the year ending June 30, 2023 was $162,489. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Cause The above finding was caused by the control not being designed with sufficient precision to ensure a detail level of review was conducted to identify whether or not the depreciation expenses included in the PRF report as Reportable Other PRF Expenses for Payments Received During the Payment Period were previously submitted for reimbursement under another federal program. Effect The line item titled Total Reportable Other PRF Expenses in the PRF Period 5 submission report is misstated as of June 30, 2023 because unallowable costs were included in the PRF report as Reportable Other PRF Expenses. Given the Association’s balance of Lost Revenues per the Period 5 submission at $27M is sufficient to absorb the balance of likely and known unallowable costs reported in the period 5 submission as Reportable Other PRF Expenses, this finding would not cause a remittance of federal funds received, and the SEFA does not include unallowable costs in the aggregate. The effect of this finding is the classification of the use of Other PRF Payments Received within the PRF Period 5 submission report is inaccurate. Questioned Costs $0 Repeat Finding from Prior Year Yes – Finding 2022-001 Recommendation We recommend that the Association implement procedures and policies to ensure that the amounts reported as Other PRF Expenses are not claimed for reimbursement under other federal programs. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Management agrees with the finding and recommendation. Internal controls will be strengthened in future periods to ensure that ledger details for reimbursement requests will be filtered to exclude depreciation for costs already considered during the review of capital expenditures. The Director of Finance will review ledger details prior to submission to ensure only appropriate ledger accounts are included.
Department of Health and Human Services FFLA #93.087, 90CU0090, 9/30/2020 – 9/29/2023; 90CU0095, 9/30/2018 – 9/29/2024 Enhance Safety of Children Affected by Substance Abuse Matching Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. In addition, 2 CFR 200.306 establishes that matching funds be verifiable from the non-federal entity’s records and are allowable under Subpart E – Cost Principles and 2 CFR 200.403(g) establishes that costs be adequately documented. Condition: In our sample of expenditures selected for testing, we noted the following items: a) The number of hours an employee worked per the approved timesheet vs. the hours claimed in the match claim workbook resulted in a clerical error. (1 instance) b) Per review of the supporting timesheet and paystub, an employee had mobile crisis pay which was not accurately reduced in the calculation for match in the match claim workbook (2 instances). Cause: The secondary review of match claim workbook did not identify the clerical errors. Effect: The Center’s controls did not detect or correct the errors identified, which results in a reasonable possibility that the Center could submit disallowed costs under the federal awards and would not be able to detect and correct noncompliance in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: None reported. The program was underallocated. Context: A total non-statistical sample of 25 match transactions were tested which accounted for $97,208 out of $488,366 of federal match direct program expenditures. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: We recommend management review the procedures and control processes involving the match claim workbook to ensure compliance with the federal grant. Views of Responsible Officials: Management is in agreement.
FINDING 2023-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425C, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425C200018, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The American Rescue Plan - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP ESSER) Fund provided funding to states and school districts to help safely reopen and sustain the safe operation of schools and to address the impact of the coronavirus pandemic on the nation's students. States were required to subgrant a portion of its ARP ESSER allocation to local educational agencies (LEA). Prior to LEAs receiving its respective subgrants, LEAs were required to complete an application for ARP ESSER funding, which was submitted to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE), the pass-through entity for approval. The application included a district level budget identifying how the LEA intended to spend program funds. Per the School Corporation's approved application, program funding was budgeted for salaries and respective benefits for the Director of Student Support, Title I Aide, Career Coach, Summer School Positions, and a Social Emotional Academic Learning Liaison, as well as for equipment as classified under the facilities acquisition and construction expenditure account. The School Corporation noted on its application that the funds budgeted for equipment were strictly for the costs of the equipment and did not include any costs for labor. A sample of 31 claims charged to the ARP ESSER program for which reimbursement was received during the audit period was selected for testing to verify the expenditures were in conformance with the applicable cost principles. Of the 31 claims tested, 4 claims totaling $693,454, each of which were paid to the same contractor, included costs for labor and project management related to air handling units in multiple buildings. Due to the magnitude of the exceptions identified, all remaining payments made to this contractor for which the School Corporation received reimbursement during the audit period were abstracted and reviewed. Upon review of these claims, additional labor, and project management costs of $306,745 were identified. The aggregate total of $1,000,199 expended for labor and project management costs are considered questioned costs as they were not approved by the IDOE prior to being expended as required by the terms and conditions of the federal award. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 CULVER COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) In addition, the School Corporation submitted twice to the IDOE, four different invoices for expenditures related to the ARP ESSER program. As a result, the School Corporation received duplicate reimbursements for the expenditures on each of the four invoices, resulting in the School Corporation receiving $50,000 more than its approved allocation of ARP ESSER funding. The management of the School Corporation was aware of this error; however, did not contact the IDOE to resolve the issue, nor did they return the funds to the state. The $50,000 is considered questioned costs. Lastly, the School Corporation submitted to the IDOE a request for reimbursement for expenditures totaling $12,113 for the Governor Emergency Education Relief Fund (GEER) program. The School Corporation received the reimbursement of $12,113 twice from the IDOE. This resulted in the School Corporation receiving an extra $12,113 of GEER funding that they should not have received. The management of the School Corporation was aware of this duplicate payment received from the IDOE; however, did not contact the IDOE to resolve the issue, nor did they return the funds to the state. The $12,113 is considered questioned costs. The ineffective internal controls and noncompliance was limited to the items noted above for the S425C200018 and S425U210013 grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 34 CFR 76.700 states: "A State and a subgrantee shall comply with § 76.500, the State plan, applicable statutes, regulations, and approved applications, and shall use Federal funds in accordance with those statutes, regulations, plan, and applications." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 CULVER COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Indiana Department of Education ESSER III Application Walk Through states in part: ". . . Please budget the appropriate items in the district budget. Be sure to include all requested items or activities in the budgeted total and include sufficient detail in the narrative boxes below. Be sure to provide sufficient detail for IDOE to determine the reasonableness, allowability, and necessity of the proposed activity. You may include additional documentation in the Attachments section of the Summary Page. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, costs not approved in the budget were reimbursed and costs requested twice were reimbursed. In addition, reimbursements received twice were retained by the School Corporation. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $1,062,312 were identified as detailed in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure costs are included in the approved budget, are only requested once, and are not retained if received in error. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425C, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425C200018, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The American Rescue Plan - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP ESSER) Fund provided funding to states and school districts to help safely reopen and sustain the safe operation of schools and to address the impact of the coronavirus pandemic on the nation's students. States were required to subgrant a portion of its ARP ESSER allocation to local educational agencies (LEA). Prior to LEAs receiving its respective subgrants, LEAs were required to complete an application for ARP ESSER funding, which was submitted to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE), the pass-through entity for approval. The application included a district level budget identifying how the LEA intended to spend program funds. Per the School Corporation's approved application, program funding was budgeted for salaries and respective benefits for the Director of Student Support, Title I Aide, Career Coach, Summer School Positions, and a Social Emotional Academic Learning Liaison, as well as for equipment as classified under the facilities acquisition and construction expenditure account. The School Corporation noted on its application that the funds budgeted for equipment were strictly for the costs of the equipment and did not include any costs for labor. A sample of 31 claims charged to the ARP ESSER program for which reimbursement was received during the audit period was selected for testing to verify the expenditures were in conformance with the applicable cost principles. Of the 31 claims tested, 4 claims totaling $693,454, each of which were paid to the same contractor, included costs for labor and project management related to air handling units in multiple buildings. Due to the magnitude of the exceptions identified, all remaining payments made to this contractor for which the School Corporation received reimbursement during the audit period were abstracted and reviewed. Upon review of these claims, additional labor, and project management costs of $306,745 were identified. The aggregate total of $1,000,199 expended for labor and project management costs are considered questioned costs as they were not approved by the IDOE prior to being expended as required by the terms and conditions of the federal award. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 CULVER COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) In addition, the School Corporation submitted twice to the IDOE, four different invoices for expenditures related to the ARP ESSER program. As a result, the School Corporation received duplicate reimbursements for the expenditures on each of the four invoices, resulting in the School Corporation receiving $50,000 more than its approved allocation of ARP ESSER funding. The management of the School Corporation was aware of this error; however, did not contact the IDOE to resolve the issue, nor did they return the funds to the state. The $50,000 is considered questioned costs. Lastly, the School Corporation submitted to the IDOE a request for reimbursement for expenditures totaling $12,113 for the Governor Emergency Education Relief Fund (GEER) program. The School Corporation received the reimbursement of $12,113 twice from the IDOE. This resulted in the School Corporation receiving an extra $12,113 of GEER funding that they should not have received. The management of the School Corporation was aware of this duplicate payment received from the IDOE; however, did not contact the IDOE to resolve the issue, nor did they return the funds to the state. The $12,113 is considered questioned costs. The ineffective internal controls and noncompliance was limited to the items noted above for the S425C200018 and S425U210013 grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 34 CFR 76.700 states: "A State and a subgrantee shall comply with § 76.500, the State plan, applicable statutes, regulations, and approved applications, and shall use Federal funds in accordance with those statutes, regulations, plan, and applications." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 CULVER COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Indiana Department of Education ESSER III Application Walk Through states in part: ". . . Please budget the appropriate items in the district budget. Be sure to include all requested items or activities in the budgeted total and include sufficient detail in the narrative boxes below. Be sure to provide sufficient detail for IDOE to determine the reasonableness, allowability, and necessity of the proposed activity. You may include additional documentation in the Attachments section of the Summary Page. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, costs not approved in the budget were reimbursed and costs requested twice were reimbursed. In addition, reimbursements received twice were retained by the School Corporation. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $1,062,312 were identified as detailed in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure costs are included in the approved budget, are only requested once, and are not retained if received in error. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425C, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425C200018, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The American Rescue Plan - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP ESSER) Fund provided funding to states and school districts to help safely reopen and sustain the safe operation of schools and to address the impact of the coronavirus pandemic on the nation's students. States were required to subgrant a portion of its ARP ESSER allocation to local educational agencies (LEA). Prior to LEAs receiving its respective subgrants, LEAs were required to complete an application for ARP ESSER funding, which was submitted to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE), the pass-through entity for approval. The application included a district level budget identifying how the LEA intended to spend program funds. Per the School Corporation's approved application, program funding was budgeted for salaries and respective benefits for the Director of Student Support, Title I Aide, Career Coach, Summer School Positions, and a Social Emotional Academic Learning Liaison, as well as for equipment as classified under the facilities acquisition and construction expenditure account. The School Corporation noted on its application that the funds budgeted for equipment were strictly for the costs of the equipment and did not include any costs for labor. A sample of 31 claims charged to the ARP ESSER program for which reimbursement was received during the audit period was selected for testing to verify the expenditures were in conformance with the applicable cost principles. Of the 31 claims tested, 4 claims totaling $693,454, each of which were paid to the same contractor, included costs for labor and project management related to air handling units in multiple buildings. Due to the magnitude of the exceptions identified, all remaining payments made to this contractor for which the School Corporation received reimbursement during the audit period were abstracted and reviewed. Upon review of these claims, additional labor, and project management costs of $306,745 were identified. The aggregate total of $1,000,199 expended for labor and project management costs are considered questioned costs as they were not approved by the IDOE prior to being expended as required by the terms and conditions of the federal award. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 CULVER COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) In addition, the School Corporation submitted twice to the IDOE, four different invoices for expenditures related to the ARP ESSER program. As a result, the School Corporation received duplicate reimbursements for the expenditures on each of the four invoices, resulting in the School Corporation receiving $50,000 more than its approved allocation of ARP ESSER funding. The management of the School Corporation was aware of this error; however, did not contact the IDOE to resolve the issue, nor did they return the funds to the state. The $50,000 is considered questioned costs. Lastly, the School Corporation submitted to the IDOE a request for reimbursement for expenditures totaling $12,113 for the Governor Emergency Education Relief Fund (GEER) program. The School Corporation received the reimbursement of $12,113 twice from the IDOE. This resulted in the School Corporation receiving an extra $12,113 of GEER funding that they should not have received. The management of the School Corporation was aware of this duplicate payment received from the IDOE; however, did not contact the IDOE to resolve the issue, nor did they return the funds to the state. The $12,113 is considered questioned costs. The ineffective internal controls and noncompliance was limited to the items noted above for the S425C200018 and S425U210013 grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 34 CFR 76.700 states: "A State and a subgrantee shall comply with § 76.500, the State plan, applicable statutes, regulations, and approved applications, and shall use Federal funds in accordance with those statutes, regulations, plan, and applications." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 CULVER COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Indiana Department of Education ESSER III Application Walk Through states in part: ". . . Please budget the appropriate items in the district budget. Be sure to include all requested items or activities in the budgeted total and include sufficient detail in the narrative boxes below. Be sure to provide sufficient detail for IDOE to determine the reasonableness, allowability, and necessity of the proposed activity. You may include additional documentation in the Attachments section of the Summary Page. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, costs not approved in the budget were reimbursed and costs requested twice were reimbursed. In addition, reimbursements received twice were retained by the School Corporation. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $1,062,312 were identified as detailed in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure costs are included in the approved budget, are only requested once, and are not retained if received in error. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425C, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425C200018, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The American Rescue Plan - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP ESSER) Fund provided funding to states and school districts to help safely reopen and sustain the safe operation of schools and to address the impact of the coronavirus pandemic on the nation's students. States were required to subgrant a portion of its ARP ESSER allocation to local educational agencies (LEA). Prior to LEAs receiving its respective subgrants, LEAs were required to complete an application for ARP ESSER funding, which was submitted to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE), the pass-through entity for approval. The application included a district level budget identifying how the LEA intended to spend program funds. Per the School Corporation's approved application, program funding was budgeted for salaries and respective benefits for the Director of Student Support, Title I Aide, Career Coach, Summer School Positions, and a Social Emotional Academic Learning Liaison, as well as for equipment as classified under the facilities acquisition and construction expenditure account. The School Corporation noted on its application that the funds budgeted for equipment were strictly for the costs of the equipment and did not include any costs for labor. A sample of 31 claims charged to the ARP ESSER program for which reimbursement was received during the audit period was selected for testing to verify the expenditures were in conformance with the applicable cost principles. Of the 31 claims tested, 4 claims totaling $693,454, each of which were paid to the same contractor, included costs for labor and project management related to air handling units in multiple buildings. Due to the magnitude of the exceptions identified, all remaining payments made to this contractor for which the School Corporation received reimbursement during the audit period were abstracted and reviewed. Upon review of these claims, additional labor, and project management costs of $306,745 were identified. The aggregate total of $1,000,199 expended for labor and project management costs are considered questioned costs as they were not approved by the IDOE prior to being expended as required by the terms and conditions of the federal award. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 CULVER COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) In addition, the School Corporation submitted twice to the IDOE, four different invoices for expenditures related to the ARP ESSER program. As a result, the School Corporation received duplicate reimbursements for the expenditures on each of the four invoices, resulting in the School Corporation receiving $50,000 more than its approved allocation of ARP ESSER funding. The management of the School Corporation was aware of this error; however, did not contact the IDOE to resolve the issue, nor did they return the funds to the state. The $50,000 is considered questioned costs. Lastly, the School Corporation submitted to the IDOE a request for reimbursement for expenditures totaling $12,113 for the Governor Emergency Education Relief Fund (GEER) program. The School Corporation received the reimbursement of $12,113 twice from the IDOE. This resulted in the School Corporation receiving an extra $12,113 of GEER funding that they should not have received. The management of the School Corporation was aware of this duplicate payment received from the IDOE; however, did not contact the IDOE to resolve the issue, nor did they return the funds to the state. The $12,113 is considered questioned costs. The ineffective internal controls and noncompliance was limited to the items noted above for the S425C200018 and S425U210013 grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 34 CFR 76.700 states: "A State and a subgrantee shall comply with § 76.500, the State plan, applicable statutes, regulations, and approved applications, and shall use Federal funds in accordance with those statutes, regulations, plan, and applications." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 CULVER COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Indiana Department of Education ESSER III Application Walk Through states in part: ". . . Please budget the appropriate items in the district budget. Be sure to include all requested items or activities in the budgeted total and include sufficient detail in the narrative boxes below. Be sure to provide sufficient detail for IDOE to determine the reasonableness, allowability, and necessity of the proposed activity. You may include additional documentation in the Attachments section of the Summary Page. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, costs not approved in the budget were reimbursed and costs requested twice were reimbursed. In addition, reimbursements received twice were retained by the School Corporation. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $1,062,312 were identified as detailed in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure costs are included in the approved budget, are only requested once, and are not retained if received in error. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425C, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425C200018, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The American Rescue Plan - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP ESSER) Fund provided funding to states and school districts to help safely reopen and sustain the safe operation of schools and to address the impact of the coronavirus pandemic on the nation's students. States were required to subgrant a portion of its ARP ESSER allocation to local educational agencies (LEA). Prior to LEAs receiving its respective subgrants, LEAs were required to complete an application for ARP ESSER funding, which was submitted to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE), the pass-through entity for approval. The application included a district level budget identifying how the LEA intended to spend program funds. Per the School Corporation's approved application, program funding was budgeted for salaries and respective benefits for the Director of Student Support, Title I Aide, Career Coach, Summer School Positions, and a Social Emotional Academic Learning Liaison, as well as for equipment as classified under the facilities acquisition and construction expenditure account. The School Corporation noted on its application that the funds budgeted for equipment were strictly for the costs of the equipment and did not include any costs for labor. A sample of 31 claims charged to the ARP ESSER program for which reimbursement was received during the audit period was selected for testing to verify the expenditures were in conformance with the applicable cost principles. Of the 31 claims tested, 4 claims totaling $693,454, each of which were paid to the same contractor, included costs for labor and project management related to air handling units in multiple buildings. Due to the magnitude of the exceptions identified, all remaining payments made to this contractor for which the School Corporation received reimbursement during the audit period were abstracted and reviewed. Upon review of these claims, additional labor, and project management costs of $306,745 were identified. The aggregate total of $1,000,199 expended for labor and project management costs are considered questioned costs as they were not approved by the IDOE prior to being expended as required by the terms and conditions of the federal award. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 CULVER COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) In addition, the School Corporation submitted twice to the IDOE, four different invoices for expenditures related to the ARP ESSER program. As a result, the School Corporation received duplicate reimbursements for the expenditures on each of the four invoices, resulting in the School Corporation receiving $50,000 more than its approved allocation of ARP ESSER funding. The management of the School Corporation was aware of this error; however, did not contact the IDOE to resolve the issue, nor did they return the funds to the state. The $50,000 is considered questioned costs. Lastly, the School Corporation submitted to the IDOE a request for reimbursement for expenditures totaling $12,113 for the Governor Emergency Education Relief Fund (GEER) program. The School Corporation received the reimbursement of $12,113 twice from the IDOE. This resulted in the School Corporation receiving an extra $12,113 of GEER funding that they should not have received. The management of the School Corporation was aware of this duplicate payment received from the IDOE; however, did not contact the IDOE to resolve the issue, nor did they return the funds to the state. The $12,113 is considered questioned costs. The ineffective internal controls and noncompliance was limited to the items noted above for the S425C200018 and S425U210013 grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 34 CFR 76.700 states: "A State and a subgrantee shall comply with § 76.500, the State plan, applicable statutes, regulations, and approved applications, and shall use Federal funds in accordance with those statutes, regulations, plan, and applications." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 CULVER COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Indiana Department of Education ESSER III Application Walk Through states in part: ". . . Please budget the appropriate items in the district budget. Be sure to include all requested items or activities in the budgeted total and include sufficient detail in the narrative boxes below. Be sure to provide sufficient detail for IDOE to determine the reasonableness, allowability, and necessity of the proposed activity. You may include additional documentation in the Attachments section of the Summary Page. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, costs not approved in the budget were reimbursed and costs requested twice were reimbursed. In addition, reimbursements received twice were retained by the School Corporation. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $1,062,312 were identified as detailed in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure costs are included in the approved budget, are only requested once, and are not retained if received in error. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
2023–030 ACTIVITIES ALLOWED OR UNALLOWED AND ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES Federal Program Information: Federal Agency and Program Name Assistance Listing # U.S. Department of Education, Education Stabilization Fund (ESF), ESF Section 1 – Elementary and Secondary Education COVID-19 84.425D/84.425U; Grant Award – S425U210036, Grant Award – S425D210036, Grant Award – S425D200036 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the West Virginia Department of Education must “(a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the comptroller General of the United States and the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.403 requires that costs “be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award.” Costs should not consist of improper payments, including payments that were made to an ineligible party or for an ineligible good or service or payments for goods or services not received. Condition: The West Virginia Department of Education (WVDE) paid a Local Educational Agency invoice amounting to $566,340 for which the good or service was not received or was only partially received. Cause: WVDE paid invoices to a Local Educational Agency that has not followed the appropriate procurement procedures. Effect or Potential Effect: Unallowable expenditures may have been paid with federal funds. Questioned Costs: $566,340 Context: Total federal expenditures for the Education Stabilization Fund program were $323,733,675 for the year ended June 30, 2023. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend that WVDE strengthen its internal controls over subrecipient monitoring to ensure that all invoices are accurate and that costs are for appropriately procured and eligible good or service under the federal program. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
2023–030 ACTIVITIES ALLOWED OR UNALLOWED AND ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES Federal Program Information: Federal Agency and Program Name Assistance Listing # U.S. Department of Education, Education Stabilization Fund (ESF), ESF Section 1 – Elementary and Secondary Education COVID-19 84.425D/84.425U; Grant Award – S425U210036, Grant Award – S425D210036, Grant Award – S425D200036 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the West Virginia Department of Education must “(a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the comptroller General of the United States and the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.403 requires that costs “be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award.” Costs should not consist of improper payments, including payments that were made to an ineligible party or for an ineligible good or service or payments for goods or services not received. Condition: The West Virginia Department of Education (WVDE) paid a Local Educational Agency invoice amounting to $566,340 for which the good or service was not received or was only partially received. Cause: WVDE paid invoices to a Local Educational Agency that has not followed the appropriate procurement procedures. Effect or Potential Effect: Unallowable expenditures may have been paid with federal funds. Questioned Costs: $566,340 Context: Total federal expenditures for the Education Stabilization Fund program were $323,733,675 for the year ended June 30, 2023. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend that WVDE strengthen its internal controls over subrecipient monitoring to ensure that all invoices are accurate and that costs are for appropriately procured and eligible good or service under the federal program. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
2023–057 ACTIVITIES ALLOWED OR UNALLOWED AND ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES Federal Program Information: Federal Agency and Program Name Assistance Listing # U.S. Department of Homeland Security Disaster Grants – Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) 97.036/COVID-19 97.036, Grant Award FEMA–4273-DR–WV, Grant Award FEMA–4331-DR–WV, Grant Award FEMA–4359-DR–WV, Grant Award FEMA–4378-DR–WV, Grant Award FEMA–4455-DR–WV, Grant Award FEMA–4517-DR–WV, Grant Award FEMA–4603-DR–WV, Grant Award FEMA–4605-DR–WV Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the West Virginia Division of Emergency Management (DEM) must “(a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the comptroller General of the United States and the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.403 requires that costs “be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award.” Costs should not consist of improper payments, including payments that were made to an ineligible party or for an ineligible good or service or payments for goods or services not received. Condition: The West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources (DHHR) paid invoices to a third party vendor that were approved for payment without verifying the invoices for accuracy. Cause: DHHR does not have proper internal controls in place to ensure that invoices are verified for accuracy prior to payment. Effect or Potential Effect: Unallowable expenditures may have been paid with federal funds. Questioned Costs: $3,464,213 Context: Total federal expenditures for the Disaster Grants – Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) program were $123,949,127 for the year ended June 30, 2023. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend that DHHR implement proper internal controls to ensure that all invoices are accurate. and costs are allowable under the federal program. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
2023–057 ACTIVITIES ALLOWED OR UNALLOWED AND ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES Federal Program Information: Federal Agency and Program Name Assistance Listing # U.S. Department of Homeland Security Disaster Grants – Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) 97.036/COVID-19 97.036, Grant Award FEMA–4273-DR–WV, Grant Award FEMA–4331-DR–WV, Grant Award FEMA–4359-DR–WV, Grant Award FEMA–4378-DR–WV, Grant Award FEMA–4455-DR–WV, Grant Award FEMA–4517-DR–WV, Grant Award FEMA–4603-DR–WV, Grant Award FEMA–4605-DR–WV Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the West Virginia Division of Emergency Management (DEM) must “(a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the comptroller General of the United States and the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.403 requires that costs “be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award.” Costs should not consist of improper payments, including payments that were made to an ineligible party or for an ineligible good or service or payments for goods or services not received. Condition: The West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources (DHHR) paid invoices to a third party vendor that were approved for payment without verifying the invoices for accuracy. Cause: DHHR does not have proper internal controls in place to ensure that invoices are verified for accuracy prior to payment. Effect or Potential Effect: Unallowable expenditures may have been paid with federal funds. Questioned Costs: $3,464,213 Context: Total federal expenditures for the Disaster Grants – Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) program were $123,949,127 for the year ended June 30, 2023. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend that DHHR implement proper internal controls to ensure that all invoices are accurate. and costs are allowable under the federal program. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.
FINDING 2023-001 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Number: 84.425U Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF MARTINSVILLE SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context The COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund established by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, and further funded by the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act and the American Rescue Plan Act, was for the purpose of preventing, preparing for, or responding to the novel coronavirus. A sample of 25 claims charged to the program was selected for testing to verify the expenditures were in conformance with the applicable cost principles. Of the 25 claims tested, 6 claims totaling $1,650, each of which paid an individual for work as a contracted security guard, were identified as not being in conformance with the applicable cost principles. Payment to the security guards was made based on an accounts payable voucher signed by the contractor; however, there was not an invoice, time sheet, or other supporting documentation that accompanied the accounts payable voucher. The ineffective internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF MARTINSVILLE SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, documentation could not be provided to support amounts charged to the grant. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure time charged to the grant is properly supported, recorded, and approved.
FINDING 2023-001 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Number: 84.425U Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF MARTINSVILLE SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context The COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund established by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, and further funded by the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act and the American Rescue Plan Act, was for the purpose of preventing, preparing for, or responding to the novel coronavirus. A sample of 25 claims charged to the program was selected for testing to verify the expenditures were in conformance with the applicable cost principles. Of the 25 claims tested, 6 claims totaling $1,650, each of which paid an individual for work as a contracted security guard, were identified as not being in conformance with the applicable cost principles. Payment to the security guards was made based on an accounts payable voucher signed by the contractor; however, there was not an invoice, time sheet, or other supporting documentation that accompanied the accounts payable voucher. The ineffective internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF MARTINSVILLE SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, documentation could not be provided to support amounts charged to the grant. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure time charged to the grant is properly supported, recorded, and approved.
Finding Number: 2023-001 Prior Year Finding: No Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing: 21.027 Pass-Through Entity: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Entity Award Information: 211874 (3/3/2021 – 12/31/2024) Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: Compliance: 2 CFR section 200.403 states, in part, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. (f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period. (g) Be adequately documented. Section III – Findings and Questioned Costs – Major Federal Programs (Continued) Control – Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition/Context: For one of sixty transactions selected for testing, Anne Arundel County Board of Education (the Board) was unable to provide documentation supporting that the payment was allowable under the program. The invoice supporting an employee reimbursement for summer baking/cooking camp could not be provided. Questioned Costs: $31.93, the amount of the unsupported employee reimbursement. Cause: The Board’s procedures were not sufficient to ensure that it maintained documentation supporting employee reimbursements. Internal controls did not prevent or detect the error. Effect: Unallowable costs could be charged to the program. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure that it maintains documentation supporting employee reimbursements and that this documentation is readily available for audit. There is no disagreement with the audit finding. AACPS acknowledges that a receipt supporting the $31.93 purchase could not be located. AACPS made several attempts during the single audit's development phase to procure the receipt from the employee, but without success. Throughout the audit, the teacher furnished a detailed account of the purchased items and the purpose behind it. Nevertheless, the supervisor had sanctioned the purchase, the teacher provided a valid reason for the missing receipt, and the amount was negligible. The principal had initially approved the purchase, and supervisor authorization is standard procedure for all purchases, either before or after the transaction. Therefore, AACPS believes this finding should be considered immaterial and requests its exclusion from the single audit report. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.
Finding Number: 2023-001 Prior Year Finding: No Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing: 21.027 Pass-Through Entity: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Entity Award Information: 211874 (3/3/2021 – 12/31/2024) Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: Compliance: 2 CFR section 200.403 states, in part, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. (f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period. (g) Be adequately documented. Section III – Findings and Questioned Costs – Major Federal Programs (Continued) Control – Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition/Context: For one of sixty transactions selected for testing, Anne Arundel County Board of Education (the Board) was unable to provide documentation supporting that the payment was allowable under the program. The invoice supporting an employee reimbursement for summer baking/cooking camp could not be provided. Questioned Costs: $31.93, the amount of the unsupported employee reimbursement. Cause: The Board’s procedures were not sufficient to ensure that it maintained documentation supporting employee reimbursements. Internal controls did not prevent or detect the error. Effect: Unallowable costs could be charged to the program. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure that it maintains documentation supporting employee reimbursements and that this documentation is readily available for audit. There is no disagreement with the audit finding. AACPS acknowledges that a receipt supporting the $31.93 purchase could not be located. AACPS made several attempts during the single audit's development phase to procure the receipt from the employee, but without success. Throughout the audit, the teacher furnished a detailed account of the purchased items and the purpose behind it. Nevertheless, the supervisor had sanctioned the purchase, the teacher provided a valid reason for the missing receipt, and the amount was negligible. The principal had initially approved the purchase, and supervisor authorization is standard procedure for all purchases, either before or after the transaction. Therefore, AACPS believes this finding should be considered immaterial and requests its exclusion from the single audit report. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.
Finding Number: 2023-001 Prior Year Finding: No Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing: 21.027 Pass-Through Entity: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Entity Award Information: 211874 (3/3/2021 – 12/31/2024) Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: Compliance: 2 CFR section 200.403 states, in part, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. (f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period. (g) Be adequately documented. Section III – Findings and Questioned Costs – Major Federal Programs (Continued) Control – Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition/Context: For one of sixty transactions selected for testing, Anne Arundel County Board of Education (the Board) was unable to provide documentation supporting that the payment was allowable under the program. The invoice supporting an employee reimbursement for summer baking/cooking camp could not be provided. Questioned Costs: $31.93, the amount of the unsupported employee reimbursement. Cause: The Board’s procedures were not sufficient to ensure that it maintained documentation supporting employee reimbursements. Internal controls did not prevent or detect the error. Effect: Unallowable costs could be charged to the program. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure that it maintains documentation supporting employee reimbursements and that this documentation is readily available for audit. There is no disagreement with the audit finding. AACPS acknowledges that a receipt supporting the $31.93 purchase could not be located. AACPS made several attempts during the single audit's development phase to procure the receipt from the employee, but without success. Throughout the audit, the teacher furnished a detailed account of the purchased items and the purpose behind it. Nevertheless, the supervisor had sanctioned the purchase, the teacher provided a valid reason for the missing receipt, and the amount was negligible. The principal had initially approved the purchase, and supervisor authorization is standard procedure for all purchases, either before or after the transaction. Therefore, AACPS believes this finding should be considered immaterial and requests its exclusion from the single audit report. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.
Finding Number: 2023-001 Prior Year Finding: No Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing: 21.027 Pass-Through Entity: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Entity Award Information: 211874 (3/3/2021 – 12/31/2024) Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: Compliance: 2 CFR section 200.403 states, in part, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. (f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period. (g) Be adequately documented. Section III – Findings and Questioned Costs – Major Federal Programs (Continued) Control – Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition/Context: For one of sixty transactions selected for testing, Anne Arundel County Board of Education (the Board) was unable to provide documentation supporting that the payment was allowable under the program. The invoice supporting an employee reimbursement for summer baking/cooking camp could not be provided. Questioned Costs: $31.93, the amount of the unsupported employee reimbursement. Cause: The Board’s procedures were not sufficient to ensure that it maintained documentation supporting employee reimbursements. Internal controls did not prevent or detect the error. Effect: Unallowable costs could be charged to the program. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure that it maintains documentation supporting employee reimbursements and that this documentation is readily available for audit. There is no disagreement with the audit finding. AACPS acknowledges that a receipt supporting the $31.93 purchase could not be located. AACPS made several attempts during the single audit's development phase to procure the receipt from the employee, but without success. Throughout the audit, the teacher furnished a detailed account of the purchased items and the purpose behind it. Nevertheless, the supervisor had sanctioned the purchase, the teacher provided a valid reason for the missing receipt, and the amount was negligible. The principal had initially approved the purchase, and supervisor authorization is standard procedure for all purchases, either before or after the transaction. Therefore, AACPS believes this finding should be considered immaterial and requests its exclusion from the single audit report. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2022, FY2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context Direct costs charged to the Child Nutrition Cluster are to be allowable costs made in compliance with the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. In general, to be allowable under federal awards, a cost must be necessary and reasonable, conform to any limitations, be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to all activities, be accorded consistent treatment, not be included as a cost or used to meet cost-sharing or matching requirements of another federal program, and be adequately documented. A sample of 40 food service program claims were selected for testing to verify the expenditures were in conformance with the applicable cost principes. Of the 40 claims tested, 10 claims contained errors. For these 10 claims, the invoice section in which the purchase price did not match the bid price was abstracted for further review. Upon further review, it was determined that 59 individual items were not charged in accordance with contracted prices. As a result, the School Corporation was over-charged $523. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, cost must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, the School Corporation was overcharged for multiple items. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure costs are adequately documented and charged and the approved or agreed upon rates. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2022, FY2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context Direct costs charged to the Child Nutrition Cluster are to be allowable costs made in compliance with the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. In general, to be allowable under federal awards, a cost must be necessary and reasonable, conform to any limitations, be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to all activities, be accorded consistent treatment, not be included as a cost or used to meet cost-sharing or matching requirements of another federal program, and be adequately documented. A sample of 40 food service program claims were selected for testing to verify the expenditures were in conformance with the applicable cost principes. Of the 40 claims tested, 10 claims contained errors. For these 10 claims, the invoice section in which the purchase price did not match the bid price was abstracted for further review. Upon further review, it was determined that 59 individual items were not charged in accordance with contracted prices. As a result, the School Corporation was over-charged $523. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, cost must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, the School Corporation was overcharged for multiple items. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure costs are adequately documented and charged and the approved or agreed upon rates. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2022, FY2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context Direct costs charged to the Child Nutrition Cluster are to be allowable costs made in compliance with the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. In general, to be allowable under federal awards, a cost must be necessary and reasonable, conform to any limitations, be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to all activities, be accorded consistent treatment, not be included as a cost or used to meet cost-sharing or matching requirements of another federal program, and be adequately documented. A sample of 40 food service program claims were selected for testing to verify the expenditures were in conformance with the applicable cost principes. Of the 40 claims tested, 10 claims contained errors. For these 10 claims, the invoice section in which the purchase price did not match the bid price was abstracted for further review. Upon further review, it was determined that 59 individual items were not charged in accordance with contracted prices. As a result, the School Corporation was over-charged $523. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, cost must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, the School Corporation was overcharged for multiple items. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure costs are adequately documented and charged and the approved or agreed upon rates. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2022, FY2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context Direct costs charged to the Child Nutrition Cluster are to be allowable costs made in compliance with the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. In general, to be allowable under federal awards, a cost must be necessary and reasonable, conform to any limitations, be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to all activities, be accorded consistent treatment, not be included as a cost or used to meet cost-sharing or matching requirements of another federal program, and be adequately documented. A sample of 40 food service program claims were selected for testing to verify the expenditures were in conformance with the applicable cost principes. Of the 40 claims tested, 10 claims contained errors. For these 10 claims, the invoice section in which the purchase price did not match the bid price was abstracted for further review. Upon further review, it was determined that 59 individual items were not charged in accordance with contracted prices. As a result, the School Corporation was over-charged $523. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, cost must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, the School Corporation was overcharged for multiple items. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure costs are adequately documented and charged and the approved or agreed upon rates. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2022, FY2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context Direct costs charged to the Child Nutrition Cluster are to be allowable costs made in compliance with the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. In general, to be allowable under federal awards, a cost must be necessary and reasonable, conform to any limitations, be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to all activities, be accorded consistent treatment, not be included as a cost or used to meet cost-sharing or matching requirements of another federal program, and be adequately documented. A sample of 40 food service program claims were selected for testing to verify the expenditures were in conformance with the applicable cost principes. Of the 40 claims tested, 10 claims contained errors. For these 10 claims, the invoice section in which the purchase price did not match the bid price was abstracted for further review. Upon further review, it was determined that 59 individual items were not charged in accordance with contracted prices. As a result, the School Corporation was over-charged $523. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, cost must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, the School Corporation was overcharged for multiple items. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure costs are adequately documented and charged and the approved or agreed upon rates. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2022, FY2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context Direct costs charged to the Child Nutrition Cluster are to be allowable costs made in compliance with the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. In general, to be allowable under federal awards, a cost must be necessary and reasonable, conform to any limitations, be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to all activities, be accorded consistent treatment, not be included as a cost or used to meet cost-sharing or matching requirements of another federal program, and be adequately documented. A sample of 40 food service program claims were selected for testing to verify the expenditures were in conformance with the applicable cost principes. Of the 40 claims tested, 10 claims contained errors. For these 10 claims, the invoice section in which the purchase price did not match the bid price was abstracted for further review. Upon further review, it was determined that 59 individual items were not charged in accordance with contracted prices. As a result, the School Corporation was over-charged $523. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, cost must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, the School Corporation was overcharged for multiple items. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure costs are adequately documented and charged and the approved or agreed upon rates. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-002 Subject: Special Education Cluster - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years: 20611-043-PN01, 21611-043-PN01, 21619-43-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2021-001. Condition and Context The School Corporation is a member of the Northwest Indiana Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2021-2022, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 20611-043-PN01, 21611-043-PN01, and 21619-43-PN01 grant awards could not be verified for the individual member schools. The non-public school share funds for all member schools were comingled and the aggregate amount of expenditures was then allocated to the member schools on a percentage basis. These allocations were the amounts reported to the IDOE. As such, we were unable to identify which expenditures were for each school in order to verify the minimum amount per the grant award was expended and properly reported to the IDOE as required. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 20611-043-PN01, 21611-043-PN01, and 21619-43-PN01 grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal control, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, it could not be determined if the School Corporation expended their required non-public proportionate share. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that the required non-public proportionate share amounts are spent as required. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-002 Subject: Special Education Cluster - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years: 20611-043-PN01, 21611-043-PN01, 21619-43-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2021-001. Condition and Context The School Corporation is a member of the Northwest Indiana Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2021-2022, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for non-public school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure non-public school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 20611-043-PN01, 21611-043-PN01, and 21619-43-PN01 grant awards could not be verified for the individual member schools. The non-public school share funds for all member schools were comingled and the aggregate amount of expenditures was then allocated to the member schools on a percentage basis. These allocations were the amounts reported to the IDOE. As such, we were unable to identify which expenditures were for each school in order to verify the minimum amount per the grant award was expended and properly reported to the IDOE as required. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 20611-043-PN01, 21611-043-PN01, and 21619-43-PN01 grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal control, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, it could not be determined if the School Corporation expended their required non-public proportionate share. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that the required non-public proportionate share amounts are spent as required. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-006 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listings Number: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 21611-048-PN01, 22611-048-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 26 LAWRENCEBURG COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2021-006. Condition and Context The School Corporation is a member of the Ripley-Ohio-Dearborn Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal years 2021-2022 and 2022-2023, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money for earmarked expenditures on behalf of three of the six member schools. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and the member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure nonpublic school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 21611-048-PN01 and 22611-048-PN01 grant awards could not be verified for the individual member schools. The nonpublic school share funds for the participating member schools were allocated based on the yearly budget for certified staff instead of time charged to the nonpublic schools. These allocations were the amounts reported to the IDOE. As such, we were unable to identify which expenditures were for each school in order to verify the minimum amount per the grant award was expended and properly reported to the IDOE as required. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 21611-048-PN01 and 22611-048-9N01 grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 27 LAWRENCEBURG COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed, . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure Non-Public Proportionate Share funds are appropriately allocated to the member school based on expenses charged directly on behalf of the member school. Supporting documentation for these expenses should be retained for audit. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-006 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listings Number: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 21611-048-PN01, 22611-048-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 26 LAWRENCEBURG COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2021-006. Condition and Context The School Corporation is a member of the Ripley-Ohio-Dearborn Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal years 2021-2022 and 2022-2023, the Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money for earmarked expenditures on behalf of three of the six member schools. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and the member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the earmarking requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met for each member school. The Cooperative did not have effective internal controls to ensure nonpublic school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. The Non-Public Proportionate Share expenditures for the 21611-048-PN01 and 22611-048-PN01 grant awards could not be verified for the individual member schools. The nonpublic school share funds for the participating member schools were allocated based on the yearly budget for certified staff instead of time charged to the nonpublic schools. These allocations were the amounts reported to the IDOE. As such, we were unable to identify which expenditures were for each school in order to verify the minimum amount per the grant award was expended and properly reported to the IDOE as required. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 21611-048-PN01 and 22611-048-9N01 grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 27 LAWRENCEBURG COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed, . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure Non-Public Proportionate Share funds are appropriately allocated to the member school based on expenses charged directly on behalf of the member school. Supporting documentation for these expenses should be retained for audit. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 20.507, 20.525, 20.526, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - COVID-19 - FL-2020-054/FL - 90-YO68 - CARES Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 48 CFR section 52.216-7(b), reimbursing of allowable costs includes recorded costs that, at the time of the request for reimbursement, have been paid. Per 2 CFR 200.403, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards, including (e) be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and (g) be adequately documented. Condition - The billing submitted to the awarding agency on September 7, 2023 for the months of May and June 2023 expenses included $1,653,326 of costs that weren’t allowable. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The draw submitted on September 7, 2023 totaling $6,235,737 was submitted with details stating that the reimbursement request was for May and June 2023 expenses which included $1,653,326 of expenses that were not allowable. Those expenses were erroneously classified in the general ledger as operating expenditures when they were truly capital in nature. Once the cash was received for this draw, the Authority identified the classification and drawdown error and noted allowable expenses in August 2023 in excess of this $1,653,326 that could be used to replace the capital items that were previously submitted for reimbursement erroneously. As a result, there are no questioned costs since there were allowable expenses prior to the next drawdown request in late September 2023. Cause and Effect - The internal control procedures relative to the identification of total costs incurred as of June 30, 2023 for this award did not operate effectively. The Authority has a control in place in which general ledger accounts are reviewed and identified for all expenditures and classified as either operation or capital and then a second review of that classification is performed by accounting, but the timing of those reviews was not prior to the receipt of the drawdown. This resulted in the Authority's cash draw reported for May and June 2023 costs including $1,653,326 of costs that were not allowable as they were capital in nature. Recommendation - The Authority should review procedures and processes and related timing to ensure the proper expenses are being requested for reimbursement and are submitted with the proper support. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - SFRTA uses its CARES funding to meet operating shortfalls as allowed by the grant. Human error caused a payment in the amount of $1,653,326 to be misclassified as capital revenue instead of operating revenue which caused our operating shortfall for FY22-23 to be overstated by the same amount. This led to a draw of the incorrect amount for the May/June 2023 period on September 7, 2023. This error was detected and corrected prior the subsequent drawdown of July/August 2023 expenses which occurred on September 27, 2023. At the time of both draws, SFRTA had incurred allowable expenses in excess of the amount drawn down but not for the period being reported. SFRTA has internal controls in place for the creation and review of draws. The order of the processes successfully detected and corrected the error but did not prevent the error. The corrective action has been implemented to modify the order of our preventative internal controls. SFTRA has changed the order of review so the electronic drawdown is not completed by the Budget Office until the Accounting Office has reviewed and approved the draw. This step was previously completed after the drawdown was initiated. Additionally, during review by the Accounting Office, the general ledger line detail will be reviewed to ensure accuracy
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Allowable Costs/Costs Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers: S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund provided funding to States and school districts to combat the effects of the coronavirus pandemic, help safely reopen and sustain the safe operation of schools, and to address the impact of the coronavirus pandemic on the nation's students. States were required to subgrant a portion of their ESSER allocation to local educational agencies (LEA). Prior to LEAs receiving their respective subgrants, LEAs were required to complete an application for ESSER funding, which was submitted to the Indiana Department of Education, the passthrough entity for approval. The application included a district level budget identifying how the LEA intended to spend program funds. Per the School Corporation's approved application, program funding was budgeted for salaries and respective benefits, counseling services, and supplies. A sample of 40 payroll claims charged to the ESSER program for which reimbursement was received during the audit period was selected for testing to verify the expenditures were in conformance with the applicable cost principles. Of the 40 payroll claims tested, 21 payroll claims were determined to be for payroll adjustments into the ESSER II fund. For all 21 payroll adjustments, totaling $1,509,248, there was not adequate supporting documentation to determine to where the payroll was originally paid, to whom the original payment was made, and at what amount the original payment was made. The total amount of the 21 payroll claims/adjustments, $1,509,248, was determined to be questioned costs. Due to the lack of documentation for the payroll adjustments into the ESSER II fund, all adjustments were reviewed. A review of the additional adjustments resulted in an additional $114,353 of payroll charges in which there was not adequate supporting documentation to determine to where the payroll was originally paid, to whom the original payment was made, and at what amount the original payment was made. The $114,353 was determined to be questioned costs. In addition, the School Corporation requested a total reimbursement of $3,342,940 in payroll costs from its ESSER allocation during the audit period. However, expenditures per the ledger for payroll and benefits totaled $2,995,014. As a result, the School Corporation over requested and received $347,926 for payroll expenditures that cannot be substantiated. The $347,926 was determined to be questioned costs. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. The noncompliance was isolated to the payroll adjustments and additional payroll noted above. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 34 CFR 76.700 states: "A State and a subgrantee shall comply with § 76.500, the State plan, applicable statutes, regulations, and approved applications, and shall use Federal funds in accordance with those statutes, regulations, plan, and applications." Indiana Department of Education ESSER III Application Walk Through states in part: ". . . Please budget the appropriate items in the district budget. Be sure to include all requested items or activities in the budgeted total and include sufficient detail in the narrative boxes below. Be sure to provide sufficient detail for IDOE to determine the reasonableness, allowability, and necessity of the proposed activity. You may include additional documentation in the Attachments section of the Summary Page . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, costs were reimbursed that did not have adequate documentation to ensure compliance with the compliance requirement. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $1,971,527 were identified as detailed in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure costs and adjustments are adequately documented. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Allowable Costs/Costs Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers: S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund provided funding to States and school districts to combat the effects of the coronavirus pandemic, help safely reopen and sustain the safe operation of schools, and to address the impact of the coronavirus pandemic on the nation's students. States were required to subgrant a portion of their ESSER allocation to local educational agencies (LEA). Prior to LEAs receiving their respective subgrants, LEAs were required to complete an application for ESSER funding, which was submitted to the Indiana Department of Education, the passthrough entity for approval. The application included a district level budget identifying how the LEA intended to spend program funds. Per the School Corporation's approved application, program funding was budgeted for salaries and respective benefits, counseling services, and supplies. A sample of 40 payroll claims charged to the ESSER program for which reimbursement was received during the audit period was selected for testing to verify the expenditures were in conformance with the applicable cost principles. Of the 40 payroll claims tested, 21 payroll claims were determined to be for payroll adjustments into the ESSER II fund. For all 21 payroll adjustments, totaling $1,509,248, there was not adequate supporting documentation to determine to where the payroll was originally paid, to whom the original payment was made, and at what amount the original payment was made. The total amount of the 21 payroll claims/adjustments, $1,509,248, was determined to be questioned costs. Due to the lack of documentation for the payroll adjustments into the ESSER II fund, all adjustments were reviewed. A review of the additional adjustments resulted in an additional $114,353 of payroll charges in which there was not adequate supporting documentation to determine to where the payroll was originally paid, to whom the original payment was made, and at what amount the original payment was made. The $114,353 was determined to be questioned costs. In addition, the School Corporation requested a total reimbursement of $3,342,940 in payroll costs from its ESSER allocation during the audit period. However, expenditures per the ledger for payroll and benefits totaled $2,995,014. As a result, the School Corporation over requested and received $347,926 for payroll expenditures that cannot be substantiated. The $347,926 was determined to be questioned costs. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. The noncompliance was isolated to the payroll adjustments and additional payroll noted above. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 34 CFR 76.700 states: "A State and a subgrantee shall comply with § 76.500, the State plan, applicable statutes, regulations, and approved applications, and shall use Federal funds in accordance with those statutes, regulations, plan, and applications." Indiana Department of Education ESSER III Application Walk Through states in part: ". . . Please budget the appropriate items in the district budget. Be sure to include all requested items or activities in the budgeted total and include sufficient detail in the narrative boxes below. Be sure to provide sufficient detail for IDOE to determine the reasonableness, allowability, and necessity of the proposed activity. You may include additional documentation in the Attachments section of the Summary Page . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, costs were reimbursed that did not have adequate documentation to ensure compliance with the compliance requirement. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $1,971,527 were identified as detailed in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure costs and adjustments are adequately documented. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Allowable Costs/Costs Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers: S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund provided funding to States and school districts to combat the effects of the coronavirus pandemic, help safely reopen and sustain the safe operation of schools, and to address the impact of the coronavirus pandemic on the nation's students. States were required to subgrant a portion of their ESSER allocation to local educational agencies (LEA). Prior to LEAs receiving their respective subgrants, LEAs were required to complete an application for ESSER funding, which was submitted to the Indiana Department of Education, the passthrough entity for approval. The application included a district level budget identifying how the LEA intended to spend program funds. Per the School Corporation's approved application, program funding was budgeted for salaries and respective benefits, counseling services, and supplies. A sample of 40 payroll claims charged to the ESSER program for which reimbursement was received during the audit period was selected for testing to verify the expenditures were in conformance with the applicable cost principles. Of the 40 payroll claims tested, 21 payroll claims were determined to be for payroll adjustments into the ESSER II fund. For all 21 payroll adjustments, totaling $1,509,248, there was not adequate supporting documentation to determine to where the payroll was originally paid, to whom the original payment was made, and at what amount the original payment was made. The total amount of the 21 payroll claims/adjustments, $1,509,248, was determined to be questioned costs. Due to the lack of documentation for the payroll adjustments into the ESSER II fund, all adjustments were reviewed. A review of the additional adjustments resulted in an additional $114,353 of payroll charges in which there was not adequate supporting documentation to determine to where the payroll was originally paid, to whom the original payment was made, and at what amount the original payment was made. The $114,353 was determined to be questioned costs. In addition, the School Corporation requested a total reimbursement of $3,342,940 in payroll costs from its ESSER allocation during the audit period. However, expenditures per the ledger for payroll and benefits totaled $2,995,014. As a result, the School Corporation over requested and received $347,926 for payroll expenditures that cannot be substantiated. The $347,926 was determined to be questioned costs. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. The noncompliance was isolated to the payroll adjustments and additional payroll noted above. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 34 CFR 76.700 states: "A State and a subgrantee shall comply with § 76.500, the State plan, applicable statutes, regulations, and approved applications, and shall use Federal funds in accordance with those statutes, regulations, plan, and applications." Indiana Department of Education ESSER III Application Walk Through states in part: ". . . Please budget the appropriate items in the district budget. Be sure to include all requested items or activities in the budgeted total and include sufficient detail in the narrative boxes below. Be sure to provide sufficient detail for IDOE to determine the reasonableness, allowability, and necessity of the proposed activity. You may include additional documentation in the Attachments section of the Summary Page . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, costs were reimbursed that did not have adequate documentation to ensure compliance with the compliance requirement. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $1,971,527 were identified as detailed in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure costs and adjustments are adequately documented. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Allowable Costs/Costs Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers: S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund provided funding to States and school districts to combat the effects of the coronavirus pandemic, help safely reopen and sustain the safe operation of schools, and to address the impact of the coronavirus pandemic on the nation's students. States were required to subgrant a portion of their ESSER allocation to local educational agencies (LEA). Prior to LEAs receiving their respective subgrants, LEAs were required to complete an application for ESSER funding, which was submitted to the Indiana Department of Education, the passthrough entity for approval. The application included a district level budget identifying how the LEA intended to spend program funds. Per the School Corporation's approved application, program funding was budgeted for salaries and respective benefits, counseling services, and supplies. A sample of 40 payroll claims charged to the ESSER program for which reimbursement was received during the audit period was selected for testing to verify the expenditures were in conformance with the applicable cost principles. Of the 40 payroll claims tested, 21 payroll claims were determined to be for payroll adjustments into the ESSER II fund. For all 21 payroll adjustments, totaling $1,509,248, there was not adequate supporting documentation to determine to where the payroll was originally paid, to whom the original payment was made, and at what amount the original payment was made. The total amount of the 21 payroll claims/adjustments, $1,509,248, was determined to be questioned costs. Due to the lack of documentation for the payroll adjustments into the ESSER II fund, all adjustments were reviewed. A review of the additional adjustments resulted in an additional $114,353 of payroll charges in which there was not adequate supporting documentation to determine to where the payroll was originally paid, to whom the original payment was made, and at what amount the original payment was made. The $114,353 was determined to be questioned costs. In addition, the School Corporation requested a total reimbursement of $3,342,940 in payroll costs from its ESSER allocation during the audit period. However, expenditures per the ledger for payroll and benefits totaled $2,995,014. As a result, the School Corporation over requested and received $347,926 for payroll expenditures that cannot be substantiated. The $347,926 was determined to be questioned costs. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. The noncompliance was isolated to the payroll adjustments and additional payroll noted above. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 34 CFR 76.700 states: "A State and a subgrantee shall comply with § 76.500, the State plan, applicable statutes, regulations, and approved applications, and shall use Federal funds in accordance with those statutes, regulations, plan, and applications." Indiana Department of Education ESSER III Application Walk Through states in part: ". . . Please budget the appropriate items in the district budget. Be sure to include all requested items or activities in the budgeted total and include sufficient detail in the narrative boxes below. Be sure to provide sufficient detail for IDOE to determine the reasonableness, allowability, and necessity of the proposed activity. You may include additional documentation in the Attachments section of the Summary Page . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, costs were reimbursed that did not have adequate documentation to ensure compliance with the compliance requirement. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $1,971,527 were identified as detailed in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure costs and adjustments are adequately documented. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2022, FY 2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2021-001. Condition and Context The School Corporation did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that wages paid to employees were in conformance with the allowable cost principles and only for the benefit or operation of the food service program. A portion of the wages for the CFO/Treasurer, the Director of Operations, the Director of Finance, and two school secretaries were paid from the School Lunch fund. The wages paid from the School Lunch fund were based on fixed percentages and did not provide adequate information to determine if the percentage charged was appropriate. Total wages charged to the program for the above noted employees was $31,617. This amount was considered questioned costs. The ineffective internal controls and noncompliance was limited to the items noted above. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 NORTHWESTERN SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non- Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, costs charged to the food service program could not be substantiated. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $31,617 were identified as described above in Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure costs paid from the food service program are adequately documented. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 NORTHWESTERN SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2022, FY 2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2021-001. Condition and Context The School Corporation did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that wages paid to employees were in conformance with the allowable cost principles and only for the benefit or operation of the food service program. A portion of the wages for the CFO/Treasurer, the Director of Operations, the Director of Finance, and two school secretaries were paid from the School Lunch fund. The wages paid from the School Lunch fund were based on fixed percentages and did not provide adequate information to determine if the percentage charged was appropriate. Total wages charged to the program for the above noted employees was $31,617. This amount was considered questioned costs. The ineffective internal controls and noncompliance was limited to the items noted above. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 NORTHWESTERN SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non- Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, costs charged to the food service program could not be substantiated. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $31,617 were identified as described above in Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure costs paid from the food service program are adequately documented. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 NORTHWESTERN SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2022, FY 2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2021-001. Condition and Context The School Corporation did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that wages paid to employees were in conformance with the allowable cost principles and only for the benefit or operation of the food service program. A portion of the wages for the CFO/Treasurer, the Director of Operations, the Director of Finance, and two school secretaries were paid from the School Lunch fund. The wages paid from the School Lunch fund were based on fixed percentages and did not provide adequate information to determine if the percentage charged was appropriate. Total wages charged to the program for the above noted employees was $31,617. This amount was considered questioned costs. The ineffective internal controls and noncompliance was limited to the items noted above. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 NORTHWESTERN SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non- Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, costs charged to the food service program could not be substantiated. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $31,617 were identified as described above in Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure costs paid from the food service program are adequately documented. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 NORTHWESTERN SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2022, FY 2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2021-001. Condition and Context The School Corporation did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that wages paid to employees were in conformance with the allowable cost principles and only for the benefit or operation of the food service program. A portion of the wages for the CFO/Treasurer, the Director of Operations, the Director of Finance, and two school secretaries were paid from the School Lunch fund. The wages paid from the School Lunch fund were based on fixed percentages and did not provide adequate information to determine if the percentage charged was appropriate. Total wages charged to the program for the above noted employees was $31,617. This amount was considered questioned costs. The ineffective internal controls and noncompliance was limited to the items noted above. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 NORTHWESTERN SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non- Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, costs charged to the food service program could not be substantiated. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $31,617 were identified as described above in Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure costs paid from the food service program are adequately documented. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 NORTHWESTERN SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2022, FY 2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2021-001. Condition and Context The School Corporation did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that wages paid to employees were in conformance with the allowable cost principles and only for the benefit or operation of the food service program. A portion of the wages for the CFO/Treasurer, the Director of Operations, the Director of Finance, and two school secretaries were paid from the School Lunch fund. The wages paid from the School Lunch fund were based on fixed percentages and did not provide adequate information to determine if the percentage charged was appropriate. Total wages charged to the program for the above noted employees was $31,617. This amount was considered questioned costs. The ineffective internal controls and noncompliance was limited to the items noted above. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 NORTHWESTERN SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non- Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, costs charged to the food service program could not be substantiated. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $31,617 were identified as described above in Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure costs paid from the food service program are adequately documented. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 NORTHWESTERN SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-002 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Number: 84.425U Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Central Indiana Educational Service Center Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context The School Corporation was the subrecipient of an Explore, Engage, Experience (3E) Grant from the Central Indiana Educational Service Center (CIESC). Per the award letter received from the CIESC, the School Corporation was allocated $200,000 to hire a district coordinator for 3E initiatives. As only one reimbursement covering the period of August 1, 2022 to September 30, 2022, was requested from the CIESC for the 3E grant, all expenditures associated with the grant were selected for testing to verify the expenditures were in conformance with the applicable cost principles. Expenditures totaling $41,193, were for the salary of the grant lead and a secondary salary. No time and effort documentation was maintained to support the salary amounts charged to the program. As a result, these expenditures were determined not to be in conformance with the applicable cost principles and were considered questioned costs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 3E Grant expenditures noted above. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, costs were not adequately supported by personnel records. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $41,193 were identified, as detailed in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure costs adequately documented. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-002 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Number: 84.425U Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Central Indiana Educational Service Center Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context The School Corporation was the subrecipient of an Explore, Engage, Experience (3E) Grant from the Central Indiana Educational Service Center (CIESC). Per the award letter received from the CIESC, the School Corporation was allocated $200,000 to hire a district coordinator for 3E initiatives. As only one reimbursement covering the period of August 1, 2022 to September 30, 2022, was requested from the CIESC for the 3E grant, all expenditures associated with the grant were selected for testing to verify the expenditures were in conformance with the applicable cost principles. Expenditures totaling $41,193, were for the salary of the grant lead and a secondary salary. No time and effort documentation was maintained to support the salary amounts charged to the program. As a result, these expenditures were determined not to be in conformance with the applicable cost principles and were considered questioned costs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 3E Grant expenditures noted above. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, costs were not adequately supported by personnel records. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $41,193 were identified, as detailed in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure costs adequately documented. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-002 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Number: 84.425U Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Central Indiana Educational Service Center Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context The School Corporation was the subrecipient of an Explore, Engage, Experience (3E) Grant from the Central Indiana Educational Service Center (CIESC). Per the award letter received from the CIESC, the School Corporation was allocated $200,000 to hire a district coordinator for 3E initiatives. As only one reimbursement covering the period of August 1, 2022 to September 30, 2022, was requested from the CIESC for the 3E grant, all expenditures associated with the grant were selected for testing to verify the expenditures were in conformance with the applicable cost principles. Expenditures totaling $41,193, were for the salary of the grant lead and a secondary salary. No time and effort documentation was maintained to support the salary amounts charged to the program. As a result, these expenditures were determined not to be in conformance with the applicable cost principles and were considered questioned costs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 3E Grant expenditures noted above. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, costs were not adequately supported by personnel records. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $41,193 were identified, as detailed in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure costs adequately documented. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.