1. Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Finding Number: 2023-006 Assistance Listing Number and Title: AL # 84.425 Education Stabilization Fund Federal Award Identification Number / Year: 2023 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Pass-Through Entity: Ohio Department of Education and Workforce Repeat Finding from Prior Audit? No Noncompliance and Material Weakness 2 C.F.R. § 3474.1 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Education for 2 CFR 200.403(b) which requires, in part, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items in order to be allowable under Federal awards. Further, Section 18003(d) of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act provides a list of allowable ESSER I activities. Section 313(3) of the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2021, includes additional allowable uses of funds under ESSER II. The District was awarded $405,474 of COVID-19 Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (ESSER I) grant funding (AL #84.425D) in 2021 and $1,448,106 in COVID-19 Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (ESSER II) grant funding (AL #84.425D) in 2022 and 2023 by the Ohio Department of Education and Workforce. The District maintained Education Stabilization Fund (AL# 84.425) activity in a separate fund to allow for accountability of federal expenditures. However, the District posted expenditures to this fund in excess of available Education Stabilization Fund funding of $238,050 pertaining to ESSER II and $847 pertaining to ESSER I. As such, the internal controls relating to monitoring the fund and transactions to ensure reasonable assurance that the charges were accurate were not operating effectively. The lack of effective controls resulted in overspending of the grant and overstatement of expenditures on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. Noncompliance with grant requirements could have an adverse effect on future grant awards by the awarding agency in addition to an inaccurate assessment of major federal programs that would be subjected to audit. District management should review all grant and loan award documents in order to execute policies and procedures which help ensure compliance with grant requirements. The District should implement a system to track all federal expenditures and related information separately from other expenditures and report federal expenditures with proper support including, but not limited to, grant agreements, calculation of the expenditures, and any federal reporting requirements. This will help ensure the District is in compliance with grant requirements and major federal programs are accurately identified for audit. The District spending more grant funding than was awarded also resulted in adjustments to the financial statements to move the expenditures in excess of the grant award to the General fund as reported in Finding 2023-005. See Finding 2023-005 in Section 2 above. The District spending more grant funding than was awarded also contributed to errors in the Final Expenditure reports submitted to the grantor. See Finding 2023-010 below.
1. Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Finding Number: 2023-006 Assistance Listing Number and Title: AL # 84.425 Education Stabilization Fund Federal Award Identification Number / Year: 2023 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Pass-Through Entity: Ohio Department of Education and Workforce Repeat Finding from Prior Audit? No Noncompliance and Material Weakness 2 C.F.R. § 3474.1 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Education for 2 CFR 200.403(b) which requires, in part, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items in order to be allowable under Federal awards. Further, Section 18003(d) of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act provides a list of allowable ESSER I activities. Section 313(3) of the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2021, includes additional allowable uses of funds under ESSER II. The District was awarded $405,474 of COVID-19 Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (ESSER I) grant funding (AL #84.425D) in 2021 and $1,448,106 in COVID-19 Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (ESSER II) grant funding (AL #84.425D) in 2022 and 2023 by the Ohio Department of Education and Workforce. The District maintained Education Stabilization Fund (AL# 84.425) activity in a separate fund to allow for accountability of federal expenditures. However, the District posted expenditures to this fund in excess of available Education Stabilization Fund funding of $238,050 pertaining to ESSER II and $847 pertaining to ESSER I. As such, the internal controls relating to monitoring the fund and transactions to ensure reasonable assurance that the charges were accurate were not operating effectively. The lack of effective controls resulted in overspending of the grant and overstatement of expenditures on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. Noncompliance with grant requirements could have an adverse effect on future grant awards by the awarding agency in addition to an inaccurate assessment of major federal programs that would be subjected to audit. District management should review all grant and loan award documents in order to execute policies and procedures which help ensure compliance with grant requirements. The District should implement a system to track all federal expenditures and related information separately from other expenditures and report federal expenditures with proper support including, but not limited to, grant agreements, calculation of the expenditures, and any federal reporting requirements. This will help ensure the District is in compliance with grant requirements and major federal programs are accurately identified for audit. The District spending more grant funding than was awarded also resulted in adjustments to the financial statements to move the expenditures in excess of the grant award to the General fund as reported in Finding 2023-005. See Finding 2023-005 in Section 2 above. The District spending more grant funding than was awarded also contributed to errors in the Final Expenditure reports submitted to the grantor. See Finding 2023-010 below.
Lack of Supporting Documentation for Non-Payroll Disbursements - Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles (Significant Deficiency) AL Number and Title: 84.362A - Native Hawaiian Education Program Award Number: S362A200024 Award Year: 2023 Federal Agency: Department of Education Criteria: Under 2 CFR § 200.302(b)(3) and 2 CFR § 200.403(g), non-Federal entities are required to maintain documentation to support costs charged to federal awards. Costs must be necessary, reasonable, allocable, and adequately documented to be allowable under a federal program. Internal controls should ensure proper retention of records for audit and compliance purposes. Condition: During our testing of compliance and internal controls over compliance for Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, we selected a haphazard sample of 40 non-payroll disbursements. The auditee was unable to provide any supporting documentation (such as invoices or receipts) for five transactions totaling $200.19. These transactions were for program and class supplies from various vendors. Cause: The lack of documentation appears to result from weaknesses in the Organization’s record-keeping practices and non-compliance with established documentation retention policies. The Organization’s internal controls did not ensure that all supporting documentation for federal expenditures was consistently maintained Effect: Without adequate supporting documentation, we were unable to determine whether these costs were allowable, allocable, and reasonable in accordance with federal grant requirements. This noncompliance increases the risk that unallowable or unauthorized costs could be charged to the federal program without detection. Repeat Finding? No Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization: 1. Enhance internal controls to ensure that all federal expenditures are properly supported and retained for compliance purposes; 2. Implement a centralized documentation retention system to track and store invoices, receipts, and other supporting records; 3. Provide staff training on documentation requirements for federal grant expenditures to ensure compliance with 2 CFR § 200.302(b)(3) and 2 CFR § 200.403(g); and 4. Conduct periodic internal reviews of disbursement records to verify that required documentation is maintained and readily available for audit purposes. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Mana Maoli agrees with the finding and the recommendation. See Part V, Corrective Action Plan.
Reference Number: 2023-019 Category of Finding: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency and Instance of Noncompliance State Administering Department: California Department of Social Services (CDSS) Assistance Listing Numbers: 96.001 Federal Program Title: Disability Insurance/SSI Cluster: Social Security Disability Insurance Federal Award Number and Year: 04-2204CADI00; 2022 Criteria Title 2 – Grants and Agreements. Subtitle A – Office of Management and Budget Guidance for Grants and Agreements. Chapter II – Office of Management and Budget Guidance. Part 200 – Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Subpart D – Post Federal Award Requirements. Standards for Financial and Program Management. §200.303 Internal controls (2 CFR 200.303): The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Title 2 – Grants and Agreements. Subtitle A – Office of Management and Budget Guidance for Grants and Agreements. Chapter II – Office of Management and Budget Guidance. Part 200 – Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Subpart E – Cost Principles. §200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs. Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following criteria to be allowable under Federal awards: (g) Be adequately documented. See §200.300 through §200.309. Condition The documentation for one of forty samples selected for testing did not agree to the payment disbursed to a provider for medical evidence of record (MER) services. The provider was overpaid by $5. Identification as a Repeat Finding This was not a repeat finding from the immediate prior year. Cause CDSS has represented that the cause was an input error in the Midas subledger when processing the vendor payment. Effect CDSS did not have appropriate oversight controls to ensure that the data entry was accurate. Accordingly, there is an increased risk for data entry directly affecting the amount reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards to be inaccurate. Questioned Costs Questioned costs are projected to be $54,398. Context The total MER expenditures for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023, were $4,432,781, which represents 1.8% of the total program expenditures of the Disability Insurance/SSI Cluster of $242,946,482. The sample was not a statistically valid sample. Recommendation CDSS should strengthen its controls over the review for accuracy of the provider invoice amounts input into Midas. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan Management’s response is reported in “Management’s Response and Corrective Action Plan” included in a separate section at the end of this report.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2022, FY2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context A cash reimbursement is provided to the School Corporation based on meals served under the School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, and Summer Food Service Program for Children. The cash reimbursement is to be used for the benefit of the food service program. An effective system of internal controls, which would include segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance should be designed and implemented to ensure expenditures charged to the food service program fund (fund 800) are for the benefit of the food service program. The School Corporation's process for payroll disbursements included a segregation of duties; however, no individual reviewer or approver was provided detailed payroll information that would have allowed them to determine the expense was being paid from the food service program. Due to the lack of internal controls, the School Corporation paid $23,682 of administrative salaries based on fixed percentages without supporting documentation to indicate how the percentages were determined or time records indicating time spent on the program by the applicable administrators. The amount paid, $23,682, is considered questioned costs. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 SHENANDOAH SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. The noncompliance was isolated to the salaries identified above. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430 states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non- Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; or two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 SHENANDOAH SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, administrative payroll was charged to the school lunch fund without appropriate supporting documentation. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $23,682 were identified as noted in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure costs are adequately documented. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2022, FY2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context A cash reimbursement is provided to the School Corporation based on meals served under the School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, and Summer Food Service Program for Children. The cash reimbursement is to be used for the benefit of the food service program. An effective system of internal controls, which would include segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance should be designed and implemented to ensure expenditures charged to the food service program fund (fund 800) are for the benefit of the food service program. The School Corporation's process for payroll disbursements included a segregation of duties; however, no individual reviewer or approver was provided detailed payroll information that would have allowed them to determine the expense was being paid from the food service program. Due to the lack of internal controls, the School Corporation paid $23,682 of administrative salaries based on fixed percentages without supporting documentation to indicate how the percentages were determined or time records indicating time spent on the program by the applicable administrators. The amount paid, $23,682, is considered questioned costs. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 SHENANDOAH SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. The noncompliance was isolated to the salaries identified above. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430 states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non- Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; or two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 SHENANDOAH SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, administrative payroll was charged to the school lunch fund without appropriate supporting documentation. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $23,682 were identified as noted in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure costs are adequately documented. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2022, FY2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context A cash reimbursement is provided to the School Corporation based on meals served under the School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, and Summer Food Service Program for Children. The cash reimbursement is to be used for the benefit of the food service program. An effective system of internal controls, which would include segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance should be designed and implemented to ensure expenditures charged to the food service program fund (fund 800) are for the benefit of the food service program. The School Corporation's process for payroll disbursements included a segregation of duties; however, no individual reviewer or approver was provided detailed payroll information that would have allowed them to determine the expense was being paid from the food service program. Due to the lack of internal controls, the School Corporation paid $23,682 of administrative salaries based on fixed percentages without supporting documentation to indicate how the percentages were determined or time records indicating time spent on the program by the applicable administrators. The amount paid, $23,682, is considered questioned costs. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 SHENANDOAH SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. The noncompliance was isolated to the salaries identified above. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430 states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non- Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; or two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 SHENANDOAH SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, administrative payroll was charged to the school lunch fund without appropriate supporting documentation. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $23,682 were identified as noted in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure costs are adequately documented. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2022, FY2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context A cash reimbursement is provided to the School Corporation based on meals served under the School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, and Summer Food Service Program for Children. The cash reimbursement is to be used for the benefit of the food service program. An effective system of internal controls, which would include segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance should be designed and implemented to ensure expenditures charged to the food service program fund (fund 800) are for the benefit of the food service program. The School Corporation's process for payroll disbursements included a segregation of duties; however, no individual reviewer or approver was provided detailed payroll information that would have allowed them to determine the expense was being paid from the food service program. Due to the lack of internal controls, the School Corporation paid $23,682 of administrative salaries based on fixed percentages without supporting documentation to indicate how the percentages were determined or time records indicating time spent on the program by the applicable administrators. The amount paid, $23,682, is considered questioned costs. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 SHENANDOAH SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. The noncompliance was isolated to the salaries identified above. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430 states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non- Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; or two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 SHENANDOAH SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, administrative payroll was charged to the school lunch fund without appropriate supporting documentation. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $23,682 were identified as noted in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure costs are adequately documented. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2022, FY2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context A cash reimbursement is provided to the School Corporation based on meals served under the School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, and Summer Food Service Program for Children. The cash reimbursement is to be used for the benefit of the food service program. An effective system of internal controls, which would include segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance should be designed and implemented to ensure expenditures charged to the food service program fund (fund 800) are for the benefit of the food service program. The School Corporation's process for payroll disbursements included a segregation of duties; however, no individual reviewer or approver was provided detailed payroll information that would have allowed them to determine the expense was being paid from the food service program. Due to the lack of internal controls, the School Corporation paid $23,682 of administrative salaries based on fixed percentages without supporting documentation to indicate how the percentages were determined or time records indicating time spent on the program by the applicable administrators. The amount paid, $23,682, is considered questioned costs. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 SHENANDOAH SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. The noncompliance was isolated to the salaries identified above. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430 states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non- Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; or two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 SHENANDOAH SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, administrative payroll was charged to the school lunch fund without appropriate supporting documentation. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs Known questioned costs of $23,682 were identified as noted in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure costs are adequately documented. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-010 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context The Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund provided funding to states and school districts to help safely reopen and sustain the safe operation of schools and to address the impact of the coronavirus pandemic on the nation's students. States were required to subgrant a portion of their ESSER allocations to Local Educational Agencies (LEA). Prior to the LEAs receiving their respective subgrants, the LEAs were required to complete an application for the ESSER funding, which was submitted to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE), the pass-through entity for approval. The application included a district level budget identifying how the LEA intended to spend program funds. A sample of 25 claims charged to the ESSER grant program for which reimbursement was received during the audit period was selected for testing to verify that the expenditures were in conformance with the applicable cost principles. Of the 25 claims tested, the following errors were noted: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 32 SHENANDOAH SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Two claims, totaling $983, were for payments to a teacher for part-time tutoring. However, there was not a School Board approved contract or Salary Ordinance that showed the approval of this position or the rate to be paid. Two claims, totaling $318,922, were for payments for playground equipment; however, the related contract supporting the purchase was not provided. The lack of effective internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non- Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE's definition of IBS); . . . INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 33 SHENANDOAH SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by the School Corporation's management. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, expenses were paid without adequate supporting documentation. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure costs are adequately documented. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-010 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context The Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund provided funding to states and school districts to help safely reopen and sustain the safe operation of schools and to address the impact of the coronavirus pandemic on the nation's students. States were required to subgrant a portion of their ESSER allocations to Local Educational Agencies (LEA). Prior to the LEAs receiving their respective subgrants, the LEAs were required to complete an application for the ESSER funding, which was submitted to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE), the pass-through entity for approval. The application included a district level budget identifying how the LEA intended to spend program funds. A sample of 25 claims charged to the ESSER grant program for which reimbursement was received during the audit period was selected for testing to verify that the expenditures were in conformance with the applicable cost principles. Of the 25 claims tested, the following errors were noted: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 32 SHENANDOAH SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Two claims, totaling $983, were for payments to a teacher for part-time tutoring. However, there was not a School Board approved contract or Salary Ordinance that showed the approval of this position or the rate to be paid. Two claims, totaling $318,922, were for payments for playground equipment; however, the related contract supporting the purchase was not provided. The lack of effective internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non- Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE's definition of IBS); . . . INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 33 SHENANDOAH SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by the School Corporation's management. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, expenses were paid without adequate supporting documentation. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure costs are adequately documented. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-010 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context The Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund provided funding to states and school districts to help safely reopen and sustain the safe operation of schools and to address the impact of the coronavirus pandemic on the nation's students. States were required to subgrant a portion of their ESSER allocations to Local Educational Agencies (LEA). Prior to the LEAs receiving their respective subgrants, the LEAs were required to complete an application for the ESSER funding, which was submitted to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE), the pass-through entity for approval. The application included a district level budget identifying how the LEA intended to spend program funds. A sample of 25 claims charged to the ESSER grant program for which reimbursement was received during the audit period was selected for testing to verify that the expenditures were in conformance with the applicable cost principles. Of the 25 claims tested, the following errors were noted: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 32 SHENANDOAH SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Two claims, totaling $983, were for payments to a teacher for part-time tutoring. However, there was not a School Board approved contract or Salary Ordinance that showed the approval of this position or the rate to be paid. Two claims, totaling $318,922, were for payments for playground equipment; however, the related contract supporting the purchase was not provided. The lack of effective internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non- Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE's definition of IBS); . . . INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 33 SHENANDOAH SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by the School Corporation's management. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, expenses were paid without adequate supporting documentation. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure costs are adequately documented. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-010 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context The Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund provided funding to states and school districts to help safely reopen and sustain the safe operation of schools and to address the impact of the coronavirus pandemic on the nation's students. States were required to subgrant a portion of their ESSER allocations to Local Educational Agencies (LEA). Prior to the LEAs receiving their respective subgrants, the LEAs were required to complete an application for the ESSER funding, which was submitted to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE), the pass-through entity for approval. The application included a district level budget identifying how the LEA intended to spend program funds. A sample of 25 claims charged to the ESSER grant program for which reimbursement was received during the audit period was selected for testing to verify that the expenditures were in conformance with the applicable cost principles. Of the 25 claims tested, the following errors were noted: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 32 SHENANDOAH SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Two claims, totaling $983, were for payments to a teacher for part-time tutoring. However, there was not a School Board approved contract or Salary Ordinance that showed the approval of this position or the rate to be paid. Two claims, totaling $318,922, were for payments for playground equipment; however, the related contract supporting the purchase was not provided. The lack of effective internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.430(i) states in part: "Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses (1) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non- Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE's definition of IBS); . . . INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 33 SHENANDOAH SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by the School Corporation's management. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, expenses were paid without adequate supporting documentation. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure costs are adequately documented. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Name: Community Service Block Grant; Community Development Block Grant Assistance Listing Number: 93.569; 14.218 Pass-through Agency: Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development; City of Bethlehem (CB); Northampton County (NC) Pass-Through Number: Contract #C000067069; Contract #C000082084; B-22-MC-42-0003 (CB) Award Period: April 1, 2020 – September 30, 2022; January 1, 2022 – December 31, 2027; January 1, 2022 - December 31, 2023 (CB); July 1, 2020 - December 31, 2022 (NC) Type of Finding: • Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria: 3 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of period of performance. The Organization should have procedures and controls in place to ensure expenses are charged to a federal program within the approved period of performance. In addition, in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.403, allowable costs should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), therefore payroll accruals should be appropriately reflected when recording program expenditures. Condition: During our testing, we noted there were several salary expenditures charged to the grant based on the payroll period ending date, however the costs were incurred for the period 12/24/22 - 1/6/23, which the first eight days were prior to the start of the period of performance. There was also one transaction selected for testing where no supporting documentation was able to be located and one transaction that was incurred after the period of performance for the program. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs above the $25,000 threshold have been identified. Context: During the review of community service block grant costs recorded at the beginning of the approved period of performance (January 2023), seventeen transactions charged to the federal program in January 2023 for salary and related payroll taxes were observed. A portion of these expenses was incurred before the start of the contract period, specifically covering the payroll period from 12/24/22 to 1/6/23, with the first eight days outside the approved period of performance. The total amount of these transactions was $11,606. Additionally, one transaction for facilities maintenance totaling $2,625 lacked supporting documentation. Furthermore, during testing of costs recorded towards the end of the period of performance (September 2022), there was one transaction for outside computer services amounting to $1,125, with the invoice indicating services performed in October 2022. During the testing of community development block grant costs recorded at the beginning of the approved period of performance (January 2023), seventeen transactions charged to the federal program in January 2023 for salary and related payroll taxes were noted, with a portion incurred prior to the start of the contract period. The total amount of these transactions was $1,079. Cause: The Organization recorded the transactions into the general ledger based on the payroll period ending date and invoice date rather than the date the transactions were incurred by the Organization. In addition, the Organization experienced turnover within the finance department and the missing supporting documentation was likely misfiled and therefore unable to be located. Effect: If the Organization includes expenses either incurred before the start date or after the end date of the approved period of performance, it could result in funds being required to be returned to the funding agency. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2022-005. Recommendation: The Organization should work with the federal agency to provide additional documentation or justification for the expenses, or to adjust the budget or funding limits to ensure that all expenses are within the approved period of performance. It is important to address any period of performance findings as soon as possible to avoid potential penalties or repayment obligations. The Organization should also review its process of entering invoices and payroll related expenses into the accounting software to ensure the correct period is used for federal expenditures. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Please refer to Community Action Committee of the Lehigh Valley, Inc. and subsidiaries’ Corrective Action Plan.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Name: Community Service Block Grant; Community Development Block Grant Assistance Listing Number: 93.569; 14.218 Pass-through Agency: Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development; City of Bethlehem (CB); Northampton County (NC) Pass-Through Number: Contract #C000067069; Contract #C000082084; B-22-MC-42-0003 (CB) Award Period: April 1, 2020 – September 30, 2022; January 1, 2022 – December 31, 2027; January 1, 2022 - December 31, 2023 (CB); July 1, 2020 - December 31, 2022 (NC) Type of Finding: • Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria: 3 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of period of performance. The Organization should have procedures and controls in place to ensure expenses are charged to a federal program within the approved period of performance. In addition, in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.403, allowable costs should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), therefore payroll accruals should be appropriately reflected when recording program expenditures. Condition: During our testing, we noted there were several salary expenditures charged to the grant based on the payroll period ending date, however the costs were incurred for the period 12/24/22 - 1/6/23, which the first eight days were prior to the start of the period of performance. There was also one transaction selected for testing where no supporting documentation was able to be located and one transaction that was incurred after the period of performance for the program. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs above the $25,000 threshold have been identified. Context: During the review of community service block grant costs recorded at the beginning of the approved period of performance (January 2023), seventeen transactions charged to the federal program in January 2023 for salary and related payroll taxes were observed. A portion of these expenses was incurred before the start of the contract period, specifically covering the payroll period from 12/24/22 to 1/6/23, with the first eight days outside the approved period of performance. The total amount of these transactions was $11,606. Additionally, one transaction for facilities maintenance totaling $2,625 lacked supporting documentation. Furthermore, during testing of costs recorded towards the end of the period of performance (September 2022), there was one transaction for outside computer services amounting to $1,125, with the invoice indicating services performed in October 2022. During the testing of community development block grant costs recorded at the beginning of the approved period of performance (January 2023), seventeen transactions charged to the federal program in January 2023 for salary and related payroll taxes were noted, with a portion incurred prior to the start of the contract period. The total amount of these transactions was $1,079. Cause: The Organization recorded the transactions into the general ledger based on the payroll period ending date and invoice date rather than the date the transactions were incurred by the Organization. In addition, the Organization experienced turnover within the finance department and the missing supporting documentation was likely misfiled and therefore unable to be located. Effect: If the Organization includes expenses either incurred before the start date or after the end date of the approved period of performance, it could result in funds being required to be returned to the funding agency. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2022-005. Recommendation: The Organization should work with the federal agency to provide additional documentation or justification for the expenses, or to adjust the budget or funding limits to ensure that all expenses are within the approved period of performance. It is important to address any period of performance findings as soon as possible to avoid potential penalties or repayment obligations. The Organization should also review its process of entering invoices and payroll related expenses into the accounting software to ensure the correct period is used for federal expenditures. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Please refer to Community Action Committee of the Lehigh Valley, Inc. and subsidiaries’ Corrective Action Plan.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Name: Community Service Block Grant; Community Development Block Grant Assistance Listing Number: 93.569; 14.218 Pass-through Agency: Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development; City of Bethlehem (CB); Northampton County (NC) Pass-Through Number: Contract #C000067069; Contract #C000082084; B-22-MC-42-0003 (CB) Award Period: April 1, 2020 – September 30, 2022; January 1, 2022 – December 31, 2027; January 1, 2022 - December 31, 2023 (CB); July 1, 2020 - December 31, 2022 (NC) Type of Finding: • Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria: 3 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of period of performance. The Organization should have procedures and controls in place to ensure expenses are charged to a federal program within the approved period of performance. In addition, in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.403, allowable costs should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), therefore payroll accruals should be appropriately reflected when recording program expenditures. Condition: During our testing, we noted there were several salary expenditures charged to the grant based on the payroll period ending date, however the costs were incurred for the period 12/24/22 - 1/6/23, which the first eight days were prior to the start of the period of performance. There was also one transaction selected for testing where no supporting documentation was able to be located and one transaction that was incurred after the period of performance for the program. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs above the $25,000 threshold have been identified. Context: During the review of community service block grant costs recorded at the beginning of the approved period of performance (January 2023), seventeen transactions charged to the federal program in January 2023 for salary and related payroll taxes were observed. A portion of these expenses was incurred before the start of the contract period, specifically covering the payroll period from 12/24/22 to 1/6/23, with the first eight days outside the approved period of performance. The total amount of these transactions was $11,606. Additionally, one transaction for facilities maintenance totaling $2,625 lacked supporting documentation. Furthermore, during testing of costs recorded towards the end of the period of performance (September 2022), there was one transaction for outside computer services amounting to $1,125, with the invoice indicating services performed in October 2022. During the testing of community development block grant costs recorded at the beginning of the approved period of performance (January 2023), seventeen transactions charged to the federal program in January 2023 for salary and related payroll taxes were noted, with a portion incurred prior to the start of the contract period. The total amount of these transactions was $1,079. Cause: The Organization recorded the transactions into the general ledger based on the payroll period ending date and invoice date rather than the date the transactions were incurred by the Organization. In addition, the Organization experienced turnover within the finance department and the missing supporting documentation was likely misfiled and therefore unable to be located. Effect: If the Organization includes expenses either incurred before the start date or after the end date of the approved period of performance, it could result in funds being required to be returned to the funding agency. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2022-005. Recommendation: The Organization should work with the federal agency to provide additional documentation or justification for the expenses, or to adjust the budget or funding limits to ensure that all expenses are within the approved period of performance. It is important to address any period of performance findings as soon as possible to avoid potential penalties or repayment obligations. The Organization should also review its process of entering invoices and payroll related expenses into the accounting software to ensure the correct period is used for federal expenditures. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Please refer to Community Action Committee of the Lehigh Valley, Inc. and subsidiaries’ Corrective Action Plan.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Name: Community Service Block Grant; Community Development Block Grant Assistance Listing Number: 93.569; 14.218 Pass-through Agency: Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development; City of Bethlehem (CB); Northampton County (NC) Pass-Through Number: Contract #C000067069; Contract #C000082084; B-22-MC-42-0003 (CB) Award Period: April 1, 2020 – September 30, 2022; January 1, 2022 – December 31, 2027; January 1, 2022 - December 31, 2023 (CB); July 1, 2020 - December 31, 2022 (NC) Type of Finding: • Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria: 3 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of period of performance. The Organization should have procedures and controls in place to ensure expenses are charged to a federal program within the approved period of performance. In addition, in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.403, allowable costs should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), therefore payroll accruals should be appropriately reflected when recording program expenditures. Condition: During our testing, we noted there were several salary expenditures charged to the grant based on the payroll period ending date, however the costs were incurred for the period 12/24/22 - 1/6/23, which the first eight days were prior to the start of the period of performance. There was also one transaction selected for testing where no supporting documentation was able to be located and one transaction that was incurred after the period of performance for the program. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs above the $25,000 threshold have been identified. Context: During the review of community service block grant costs recorded at the beginning of the approved period of performance (January 2023), seventeen transactions charged to the federal program in January 2023 for salary and related payroll taxes were observed. A portion of these expenses was incurred before the start of the contract period, specifically covering the payroll period from 12/24/22 to 1/6/23, with the first eight days outside the approved period of performance. The total amount of these transactions was $11,606. Additionally, one transaction for facilities maintenance totaling $2,625 lacked supporting documentation. Furthermore, during testing of costs recorded towards the end of the period of performance (September 2022), there was one transaction for outside computer services amounting to $1,125, with the invoice indicating services performed in October 2022. During the testing of community development block grant costs recorded at the beginning of the approved period of performance (January 2023), seventeen transactions charged to the federal program in January 2023 for salary and related payroll taxes were noted, with a portion incurred prior to the start of the contract period. The total amount of these transactions was $1,079. Cause: The Organization recorded the transactions into the general ledger based on the payroll period ending date and invoice date rather than the date the transactions were incurred by the Organization. In addition, the Organization experienced turnover within the finance department and the missing supporting documentation was likely misfiled and therefore unable to be located. Effect: If the Organization includes expenses either incurred before the start date or after the end date of the approved period of performance, it could result in funds being required to be returned to the funding agency. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2022-005. Recommendation: The Organization should work with the federal agency to provide additional documentation or justification for the expenses, or to adjust the budget or funding limits to ensure that all expenses are within the approved period of performance. It is important to address any period of performance findings as soon as possible to avoid potential penalties or repayment obligations. The Organization should also review its process of entering invoices and payroll related expenses into the accounting software to ensure the correct period is used for federal expenditures. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Please refer to Community Action Committee of the Lehigh Valley, Inc. and subsidiaries’ Corrective Action Plan.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Name: Community Service Block Grant; Community Development Block Grant Assistance Listing Number: 93.569; 14.218 Pass-through Agency: Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development; City of Bethlehem (CB); Northampton County (NC) Pass-Through Number: Contract #C000067069; Contract #C000082084; B-22-MC-42-0003 (CB) Award Period: April 1, 2020 – September 30, 2022; January 1, 2022 – December 31, 2027; January 1, 2022 - December 31, 2023 (CB); July 1, 2020 - December 31, 2022 (NC) Type of Finding: • Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria: 3 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of period of performance. The Organization should have procedures and controls in place to ensure expenses are charged to a federal program within the approved period of performance. In addition, in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.403, allowable costs should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), therefore payroll accruals should be appropriately reflected when recording program expenditures. Condition: During our testing, we noted there were several salary expenditures charged to the grant based on the payroll period ending date, however the costs were incurred for the period 12/24/22 - 1/6/23, which the first eight days were prior to the start of the period of performance. There was also one transaction selected for testing where no supporting documentation was able to be located and one transaction that was incurred after the period of performance for the program. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs above the $25,000 threshold have been identified. Context: During the review of community service block grant costs recorded at the beginning of the approved period of performance (January 2023), seventeen transactions charged to the federal program in January 2023 for salary and related payroll taxes were observed. A portion of these expenses was incurred before the start of the contract period, specifically covering the payroll period from 12/24/22 to 1/6/23, with the first eight days outside the approved period of performance. The total amount of these transactions was $11,606. Additionally, one transaction for facilities maintenance totaling $2,625 lacked supporting documentation. Furthermore, during testing of costs recorded towards the end of the period of performance (September 2022), there was one transaction for outside computer services amounting to $1,125, with the invoice indicating services performed in October 2022. During the testing of community development block grant costs recorded at the beginning of the approved period of performance (January 2023), seventeen transactions charged to the federal program in January 2023 for salary and related payroll taxes were noted, with a portion incurred prior to the start of the contract period. The total amount of these transactions was $1,079. Cause: The Organization recorded the transactions into the general ledger based on the payroll period ending date and invoice date rather than the date the transactions were incurred by the Organization. In addition, the Organization experienced turnover within the finance department and the missing supporting documentation was likely misfiled and therefore unable to be located. Effect: If the Organization includes expenses either incurred before the start date or after the end date of the approved period of performance, it could result in funds being required to be returned to the funding agency. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2022-005. Recommendation: The Organization should work with the federal agency to provide additional documentation or justification for the expenses, or to adjust the budget or funding limits to ensure that all expenses are within the approved period of performance. It is important to address any period of performance findings as soon as possible to avoid potential penalties or repayment obligations. The Organization should also review its process of entering invoices and payroll related expenses into the accounting software to ensure the correct period is used for federal expenditures. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Please refer to Community Action Committee of the Lehigh Valley, Inc. and subsidiaries’ Corrective Action Plan.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Name: Community Service Block Grant; Community Development Block Grant Assistance Listing Number: 93.569; 14.218 Pass-through Agency: Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development; City of Bethlehem (CB); Northampton County (NC) Pass-Through Number: Contract #C000067069; Contract #C000082084; B-22-MC-42-0003 (CB) Award Period: April 1, 2020 – September 30, 2022; January 1, 2022 – December 31, 2027; January 1, 2022 - December 31, 2023 (CB); July 1, 2020 - December 31, 2022 (NC) Type of Finding: • Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria: 3 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of period of performance. The Organization should have procedures and controls in place to ensure expenses are charged to a federal program within the approved period of performance. In addition, in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.403, allowable costs should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), therefore payroll accruals should be appropriately reflected when recording program expenditures. Condition: During our testing, we noted there were several salary expenditures charged to the grant based on the payroll period ending date, however the costs were incurred for the period 12/24/22 - 1/6/23, which the first eight days were prior to the start of the period of performance. There was also one transaction selected for testing where no supporting documentation was able to be located and one transaction that was incurred after the period of performance for the program. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs above the $25,000 threshold have been identified. Context: During the review of community service block grant costs recorded at the beginning of the approved period of performance (January 2023), seventeen transactions charged to the federal program in January 2023 for salary and related payroll taxes were observed. A portion of these expenses was incurred before the start of the contract period, specifically covering the payroll period from 12/24/22 to 1/6/23, with the first eight days outside the approved period of performance. The total amount of these transactions was $11,606. Additionally, one transaction for facilities maintenance totaling $2,625 lacked supporting documentation. Furthermore, during testing of costs recorded towards the end of the period of performance (September 2022), there was one transaction for outside computer services amounting to $1,125, with the invoice indicating services performed in October 2022. During the testing of community development block grant costs recorded at the beginning of the approved period of performance (January 2023), seventeen transactions charged to the federal program in January 2023 for salary and related payroll taxes were noted, with a portion incurred prior to the start of the contract period. The total amount of these transactions was $1,079. Cause: The Organization recorded the transactions into the general ledger based on the payroll period ending date and invoice date rather than the date the transactions were incurred by the Organization. In addition, the Organization experienced turnover within the finance department and the missing supporting documentation was likely misfiled and therefore unable to be located. Effect: If the Organization includes expenses either incurred before the start date or after the end date of the approved period of performance, it could result in funds being required to be returned to the funding agency. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2022-005. Recommendation: The Organization should work with the federal agency to provide additional documentation or justification for the expenses, or to adjust the budget or funding limits to ensure that all expenses are within the approved period of performance. It is important to address any period of performance findings as soon as possible to avoid potential penalties or repayment obligations. The Organization should also review its process of entering invoices and payroll related expenses into the accounting software to ensure the correct period is used for federal expenditures. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Please refer to Community Action Committee of the Lehigh Valley, Inc. and subsidiaries’ Corrective Action Plan.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Name: Community Service Block Grant; Community Development Block Grant Assistance Listing Number: 93.569; 14.218 Pass-through Agency: Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development; City of Bethlehem (CB); Northampton County (NC) Pass-Through Number: Contract #C000067069; Contract #C000082084; B-22-MC-42-0003 (CB) Award Period: April 1, 2020 – September 30, 2022; January 1, 2022 – December 31, 2027; January 1, 2022 - December 31, 2023 (CB); July 1, 2020 - December 31, 2022 (NC) Type of Finding: • Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria: 3 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of period of performance. The Organization should have procedures and controls in place to ensure expenses are charged to a federal program within the approved period of performance. In addition, in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.403, allowable costs should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), therefore payroll accruals should be appropriately reflected when recording program expenditures. Condition: During our testing, we noted there were several salary expenditures charged to the grant based on the payroll period ending date, however the costs were incurred for the period 12/24/22 - 1/6/23, which the first eight days were prior to the start of the period of performance. There was also one transaction selected for testing where no supporting documentation was able to be located and one transaction that was incurred after the period of performance for the program. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs above the $25,000 threshold have been identified. Context: During the review of community service block grant costs recorded at the beginning of the approved period of performance (January 2023), seventeen transactions charged to the federal program in January 2023 for salary and related payroll taxes were observed. A portion of these expenses was incurred before the start of the contract period, specifically covering the payroll period from 12/24/22 to 1/6/23, with the first eight days outside the approved period of performance. The total amount of these transactions was $11,606. Additionally, one transaction for facilities maintenance totaling $2,625 lacked supporting documentation. Furthermore, during testing of costs recorded towards the end of the period of performance (September 2022), there was one transaction for outside computer services amounting to $1,125, with the invoice indicating services performed in October 2022. During the testing of community development block grant costs recorded at the beginning of the approved period of performance (January 2023), seventeen transactions charged to the federal program in January 2023 for salary and related payroll taxes were noted, with a portion incurred prior to the start of the contract period. The total amount of these transactions was $1,079. Cause: The Organization recorded the transactions into the general ledger based on the payroll period ending date and invoice date rather than the date the transactions were incurred by the Organization. In addition, the Organization experienced turnover within the finance department and the missing supporting documentation was likely misfiled and therefore unable to be located. Effect: If the Organization includes expenses either incurred before the start date or after the end date of the approved period of performance, it could result in funds being required to be returned to the funding agency. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2022-005. Recommendation: The Organization should work with the federal agency to provide additional documentation or justification for the expenses, or to adjust the budget or funding limits to ensure that all expenses are within the approved period of performance. It is important to address any period of performance findings as soon as possible to avoid potential penalties or repayment obligations. The Organization should also review its process of entering invoices and payroll related expenses into the accounting software to ensure the correct period is used for federal expenditures. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Please refer to Community Action Committee of the Lehigh Valley, Inc. and subsidiaries’ Corrective Action Plan.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Name: Community Service Block Grant; Community Development Block Grant Assistance Listing Number: 93.569; 14.218 Pass-through Agency: Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development; City of Bethlehem (CB); Northampton County (NC) Pass-Through Number: Contract #C000067069; Contract #C000082084; B-22-MC-42-0003 (CB) Award Period: April 1, 2020 – September 30, 2022; January 1, 2022 – December 31, 2027; January 1, 2022 - December 31, 2023 (CB); July 1, 2020 - December 31, 2022 (NC) Type of Finding: • Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria: 3 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of period of performance. The Organization should have procedures and controls in place to ensure expenses are charged to a federal program within the approved period of performance. In addition, in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.403, allowable costs should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), therefore payroll accruals should be appropriately reflected when recording program expenditures. Condition: During our testing, we noted there were several salary expenditures charged to the grant based on the payroll period ending date, however the costs were incurred for the period 12/24/22 - 1/6/23, which the first eight days were prior to the start of the period of performance. There was also one transaction selected for testing where no supporting documentation was able to be located and one transaction that was incurred after the period of performance for the program. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs above the $25,000 threshold have been identified. Context: During the review of community service block grant costs recorded at the beginning of the approved period of performance (January 2023), seventeen transactions charged to the federal program in January 2023 for salary and related payroll taxes were observed. A portion of these expenses was incurred before the start of the contract period, specifically covering the payroll period from 12/24/22 to 1/6/23, with the first eight days outside the approved period of performance. The total amount of these transactions was $11,606. Additionally, one transaction for facilities maintenance totaling $2,625 lacked supporting documentation. Furthermore, during testing of costs recorded towards the end of the period of performance (September 2022), there was one transaction for outside computer services amounting to $1,125, with the invoice indicating services performed in October 2022. During the testing of community development block grant costs recorded at the beginning of the approved period of performance (January 2023), seventeen transactions charged to the federal program in January 2023 for salary and related payroll taxes were noted, with a portion incurred prior to the start of the contract period. The total amount of these transactions was $1,079. Cause: The Organization recorded the transactions into the general ledger based on the payroll period ending date and invoice date rather than the date the transactions were incurred by the Organization. In addition, the Organization experienced turnover within the finance department and the missing supporting documentation was likely misfiled and therefore unable to be located. Effect: If the Organization includes expenses either incurred before the start date or after the end date of the approved period of performance, it could result in funds being required to be returned to the funding agency. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2022-005. Recommendation: The Organization should work with the federal agency to provide additional documentation or justification for the expenses, or to adjust the budget or funding limits to ensure that all expenses are within the approved period of performance. It is important to address any period of performance findings as soon as possible to avoid potential penalties or repayment obligations. The Organization should also review its process of entering invoices and payroll related expenses into the accounting software to ensure the correct period is used for federal expenditures. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Please refer to Community Action Committee of the Lehigh Valley, Inc. and subsidiaries’ Corrective Action Plan.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Name: Community Service Block Grant; Community Development Block Grant Assistance Listing Number: 93.569; 14.218 Pass-through Agency: Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development; City of Bethlehem (CB); Northampton County (NC) Pass-Through Number: Contract #C000067069; Contract #C000082084; B-22-MC-42-0003 (CB) Award Period: April 1, 2020 – September 30, 2022; January 1, 2022 – December 31, 2027; January 1, 2022 - December 31, 2023 (CB); July 1, 2020 - December 31, 2022 (NC) Type of Finding: • Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria: 3 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of period of performance. The Organization should have procedures and controls in place to ensure expenses are charged to a federal program within the approved period of performance. In addition, in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.403, allowable costs should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), therefore payroll accruals should be appropriately reflected when recording program expenditures. Condition: During our testing, we noted there were several salary expenditures charged to the grant based on the payroll period ending date, however the costs were incurred for the period 12/24/22 - 1/6/23, which the first eight days were prior to the start of the period of performance. There was also one transaction selected for testing where no supporting documentation was able to be located and one transaction that was incurred after the period of performance for the program. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs above the $25,000 threshold have been identified. Context: During the review of community service block grant costs recorded at the beginning of the approved period of performance (January 2023), seventeen transactions charged to the federal program in January 2023 for salary and related payroll taxes were observed. A portion of these expenses was incurred before the start of the contract period, specifically covering the payroll period from 12/24/22 to 1/6/23, with the first eight days outside the approved period of performance. The total amount of these transactions was $11,606. Additionally, one transaction for facilities maintenance totaling $2,625 lacked supporting documentation. Furthermore, during testing of costs recorded towards the end of the period of performance (September 2022), there was one transaction for outside computer services amounting to $1,125, with the invoice indicating services performed in October 2022. During the testing of community development block grant costs recorded at the beginning of the approved period of performance (January 2023), seventeen transactions charged to the federal program in January 2023 for salary and related payroll taxes were noted, with a portion incurred prior to the start of the contract period. The total amount of these transactions was $1,079. Cause: The Organization recorded the transactions into the general ledger based on the payroll period ending date and invoice date rather than the date the transactions were incurred by the Organization. In addition, the Organization experienced turnover within the finance department and the missing supporting documentation was likely misfiled and therefore unable to be located. Effect: If the Organization includes expenses either incurred before the start date or after the end date of the approved period of performance, it could result in funds being required to be returned to the funding agency. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2022-005. Recommendation: The Organization should work with the federal agency to provide additional documentation or justification for the expenses, or to adjust the budget or funding limits to ensure that all expenses are within the approved period of performance. It is important to address any period of performance findings as soon as possible to avoid potential penalties or repayment obligations. The Organization should also review its process of entering invoices and payroll related expenses into the accounting software to ensure the correct period is used for federal expenditures. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Please refer to Community Action Committee of the Lehigh Valley, Inc. and subsidiaries’ Corrective Action Plan.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Name: Community Service Block Grant; Community Development Block Grant Assistance Listing Number: 93.569; 14.218 Pass-through Agency: Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development; City of Bethlehem (CB); Northampton County (NC) Pass-Through Number: Contract #C000067069; Contract #C000082084; B-22-MC-42-0003 (CB) Award Period: April 1, 2020 – September 30, 2022; January 1, 2022 – December 31, 2027; January 1, 2022 - December 31, 2023 (CB); July 1, 2020 - December 31, 2022 (NC) Type of Finding: • Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria: 3 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of period of performance. The Organization should have procedures and controls in place to ensure expenses are charged to a federal program within the approved period of performance. In addition, in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.403, allowable costs should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), therefore payroll accruals should be appropriately reflected when recording program expenditures. Condition: During our testing, we noted there were several salary expenditures charged to the grant based on the payroll period ending date, however the costs were incurred for the period 12/24/22 - 1/6/23, which the first eight days were prior to the start of the period of performance. There was also one transaction selected for testing where no supporting documentation was able to be located and one transaction that was incurred after the period of performance for the program. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs above the $25,000 threshold have been identified. Context: During the review of community service block grant costs recorded at the beginning of the approved period of performance (January 2023), seventeen transactions charged to the federal program in January 2023 for salary and related payroll taxes were observed. A portion of these expenses was incurred before the start of the contract period, specifically covering the payroll period from 12/24/22 to 1/6/23, with the first eight days outside the approved period of performance. The total amount of these transactions was $11,606. Additionally, one transaction for facilities maintenance totaling $2,625 lacked supporting documentation. Furthermore, during testing of costs recorded towards the end of the period of performance (September 2022), there was one transaction for outside computer services amounting to $1,125, with the invoice indicating services performed in October 2022. During the testing of community development block grant costs recorded at the beginning of the approved period of performance (January 2023), seventeen transactions charged to the federal program in January 2023 for salary and related payroll taxes were noted, with a portion incurred prior to the start of the contract period. The total amount of these transactions was $1,079. Cause: The Organization recorded the transactions into the general ledger based on the payroll period ending date and invoice date rather than the date the transactions were incurred by the Organization. In addition, the Organization experienced turnover within the finance department and the missing supporting documentation was likely misfiled and therefore unable to be located. Effect: If the Organization includes expenses either incurred before the start date or after the end date of the approved period of performance, it could result in funds being required to be returned to the funding agency. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2022-005. Recommendation: The Organization should work with the federal agency to provide additional documentation or justification for the expenses, or to adjust the budget or funding limits to ensure that all expenses are within the approved period of performance. It is important to address any period of performance findings as soon as possible to avoid potential penalties or repayment obligations. The Organization should also review its process of entering invoices and payroll related expenses into the accounting software to ensure the correct period is used for federal expenditures. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Please refer to Community Action Committee of the Lehigh Valley, Inc. and subsidiaries’ Corrective Action Plan.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Name: Community Service Block Grant; Community Development Block Grant Assistance Listing Number: 93.569; 14.218 Pass-through Agency: Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development; City of Bethlehem (CB); Northampton County (NC) Pass-Through Number: Contract #C000067069; Contract #C000082084; B-22-MC-42-0003 (CB) Award Period: April 1, 2020 – September 30, 2022; January 1, 2022 – December 31, 2027; January 1, 2022 - December 31, 2023 (CB); July 1, 2020 - December 31, 2022 (NC) Type of Finding: • Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria: 3 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of period of performance. The Organization should have procedures and controls in place to ensure expenses are charged to a federal program within the approved period of performance. In addition, in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.403, allowable costs should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), therefore payroll accruals should be appropriately reflected when recording program expenditures. Condition: During our testing, we noted there were several salary expenditures charged to the grant based on the payroll period ending date, however the costs were incurred for the period 12/24/22 - 1/6/23, which the first eight days were prior to the start of the period of performance. There was also one transaction selected for testing where no supporting documentation was able to be located and one transaction that was incurred after the period of performance for the program. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs above the $25,000 threshold have been identified. Context: During the review of community service block grant costs recorded at the beginning of the approved period of performance (January 2023), seventeen transactions charged to the federal program in January 2023 for salary and related payroll taxes were observed. A portion of these expenses was incurred before the start of the contract period, specifically covering the payroll period from 12/24/22 to 1/6/23, with the first eight days outside the approved period of performance. The total amount of these transactions was $11,606. Additionally, one transaction for facilities maintenance totaling $2,625 lacked supporting documentation. Furthermore, during testing of costs recorded towards the end of the period of performance (September 2022), there was one transaction for outside computer services amounting to $1,125, with the invoice indicating services performed in October 2022. During the testing of community development block grant costs recorded at the beginning of the approved period of performance (January 2023), seventeen transactions charged to the federal program in January 2023 for salary and related payroll taxes were noted, with a portion incurred prior to the start of the contract period. The total amount of these transactions was $1,079. Cause: The Organization recorded the transactions into the general ledger based on the payroll period ending date and invoice date rather than the date the transactions were incurred by the Organization. In addition, the Organization experienced turnover within the finance department and the missing supporting documentation was likely misfiled and therefore unable to be located. Effect: If the Organization includes expenses either incurred before the start date or after the end date of the approved period of performance, it could result in funds being required to be returned to the funding agency. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2022-005. Recommendation: The Organization should work with the federal agency to provide additional documentation or justification for the expenses, or to adjust the budget or funding limits to ensure that all expenses are within the approved period of performance. It is important to address any period of performance findings as soon as possible to avoid potential penalties or repayment obligations. The Organization should also review its process of entering invoices and payroll related expenses into the accounting software to ensure the correct period is used for federal expenditures. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Please refer to Community Action Committee of the Lehigh Valley, Inc. and subsidiaries’ Corrective Action Plan.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Name: Community Service Block Grant; Community Development Block Grant Assistance Listing Number: 93.569; 14.218 Pass-through Agency: Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development; City of Bethlehem (CB); Northampton County (NC) Pass-Through Number: Contract #C000067069; Contract #C000082084; B-22-MC-42-0003 (CB) Award Period: April 1, 2020 – September 30, 2022; January 1, 2022 – December 31, 2027; January 1, 2022 - December 31, 2023 (CB); July 1, 2020 - December 31, 2022 (NC) Type of Finding: • Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria: 3 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of period of performance. The Organization should have procedures and controls in place to ensure expenses are charged to a federal program within the approved period of performance. In addition, in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.403, allowable costs should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), therefore payroll accruals should be appropriately reflected when recording program expenditures. Condition: During our testing, we noted there were several salary expenditures charged to the grant based on the payroll period ending date, however the costs were incurred for the period 12/24/22 - 1/6/23, which the first eight days were prior to the start of the period of performance. There was also one transaction selected for testing where no supporting documentation was able to be located and one transaction that was incurred after the period of performance for the program. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs above the $25,000 threshold have been identified. Context: During the review of community service block grant costs recorded at the beginning of the approved period of performance (January 2023), seventeen transactions charged to the federal program in January 2023 for salary and related payroll taxes were observed. A portion of these expenses was incurred before the start of the contract period, specifically covering the payroll period from 12/24/22 to 1/6/23, with the first eight days outside the approved period of performance. The total amount of these transactions was $11,606. Additionally, one transaction for facilities maintenance totaling $2,625 lacked supporting documentation. Furthermore, during testing of costs recorded towards the end of the period of performance (September 2022), there was one transaction for outside computer services amounting to $1,125, with the invoice indicating services performed in October 2022. During the testing of community development block grant costs recorded at the beginning of the approved period of performance (January 2023), seventeen transactions charged to the federal program in January 2023 for salary and related payroll taxes were noted, with a portion incurred prior to the start of the contract period. The total amount of these transactions was $1,079. Cause: The Organization recorded the transactions into the general ledger based on the payroll period ending date and invoice date rather than the date the transactions were incurred by the Organization. In addition, the Organization experienced turnover within the finance department and the missing supporting documentation was likely misfiled and therefore unable to be located. Effect: If the Organization includes expenses either incurred before the start date or after the end date of the approved period of performance, it could result in funds being required to be returned to the funding agency. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2022-005. Recommendation: The Organization should work with the federal agency to provide additional documentation or justification for the expenses, or to adjust the budget or funding limits to ensure that all expenses are within the approved period of performance. It is important to address any period of performance findings as soon as possible to avoid potential penalties or repayment obligations. The Organization should also review its process of entering invoices and payroll related expenses into the accounting software to ensure the correct period is used for federal expenditures. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Please refer to Community Action Committee of the Lehigh Valley, Inc. and subsidiaries’ Corrective Action Plan.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Name: Community Service Block Grant; Community Development Block Grant Assistance Listing Number: 93.569; 14.218 Pass-through Agency: Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development; City of Bethlehem (CB); Northampton County (NC) Pass-Through Number: Contract #C000067069; Contract #C000082084; B-22-MC-42-0003 (CB) Award Period: April 1, 2020 – September 30, 2022; January 1, 2022 – December 31, 2027; January 1, 2022 - December 31, 2023 (CB); July 1, 2020 - December 31, 2022 (NC) Type of Finding: • Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria: 3 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of period of performance. The Organization should have procedures and controls in place to ensure expenses are charged to a federal program within the approved period of performance. In addition, in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.403, allowable costs should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), therefore payroll accruals should be appropriately reflected when recording program expenditures. Condition: During our testing, we noted there were several salary expenditures charged to the grant based on the payroll period ending date, however the costs were incurred for the period 12/24/22 - 1/6/23, which the first eight days were prior to the start of the period of performance. There was also one transaction selected for testing where no supporting documentation was able to be located and one transaction that was incurred after the period of performance for the program. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs above the $25,000 threshold have been identified. Context: During the review of community service block grant costs recorded at the beginning of the approved period of performance (January 2023), seventeen transactions charged to the federal program in January 2023 for salary and related payroll taxes were observed. A portion of these expenses was incurred before the start of the contract period, specifically covering the payroll period from 12/24/22 to 1/6/23, with the first eight days outside the approved period of performance. The total amount of these transactions was $11,606. Additionally, one transaction for facilities maintenance totaling $2,625 lacked supporting documentation. Furthermore, during testing of costs recorded towards the end of the period of performance (September 2022), there was one transaction for outside computer services amounting to $1,125, with the invoice indicating services performed in October 2022. During the testing of community development block grant costs recorded at the beginning of the approved period of performance (January 2023), seventeen transactions charged to the federal program in January 2023 for salary and related payroll taxes were noted, with a portion incurred prior to the start of the contract period. The total amount of these transactions was $1,079. Cause: The Organization recorded the transactions into the general ledger based on the payroll period ending date and invoice date rather than the date the transactions were incurred by the Organization. In addition, the Organization experienced turnover within the finance department and the missing supporting documentation was likely misfiled and therefore unable to be located. Effect: If the Organization includes expenses either incurred before the start date or after the end date of the approved period of performance, it could result in funds being required to be returned to the funding agency. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2022-005. Recommendation: The Organization should work with the federal agency to provide additional documentation or justification for the expenses, or to adjust the budget or funding limits to ensure that all expenses are within the approved period of performance. It is important to address any period of performance findings as soon as possible to avoid potential penalties or repayment obligations. The Organization should also review its process of entering invoices and payroll related expenses into the accounting software to ensure the correct period is used for federal expenditures. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Please refer to Community Action Committee of the Lehigh Valley, Inc. and subsidiaries’ Corrective Action Plan.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Name: Community Service Block Grant; Community Development Block Grant Assistance Listing Number: 93.569; 14.218 Pass-through Agency: Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development; City of Bethlehem (CB); Northampton County (NC) Pass-Through Number: Contract #C000067069; Contract #C000082084; B-22-MC-42-0003 (CB) Award Period: April 1, 2020 – September 30, 2022; January 1, 2022 – December 31, 2027; January 1, 2022 - December 31, 2023 (CB); July 1, 2020 - December 31, 2022 (NC) Type of Finding: • Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria: 3 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of period of performance. The Organization should have procedures and controls in place to ensure expenses are charged to a federal program within the approved period of performance. In addition, in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.403, allowable costs should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), therefore payroll accruals should be appropriately reflected when recording program expenditures. Condition: During our testing, we noted there were several salary expenditures charged to the grant based on the payroll period ending date, however the costs were incurred for the period 12/24/22 - 1/6/23, which the first eight days were prior to the start of the period of performance. There was also one transaction selected for testing where no supporting documentation was able to be located and one transaction that was incurred after the period of performance for the program. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs above the $25,000 threshold have been identified. Context: During the review of community service block grant costs recorded at the beginning of the approved period of performance (January 2023), seventeen transactions charged to the federal program in January 2023 for salary and related payroll taxes were observed. A portion of these expenses was incurred before the start of the contract period, specifically covering the payroll period from 12/24/22 to 1/6/23, with the first eight days outside the approved period of performance. The total amount of these transactions was $11,606. Additionally, one transaction for facilities maintenance totaling $2,625 lacked supporting documentation. Furthermore, during testing of costs recorded towards the end of the period of performance (September 2022), there was one transaction for outside computer services amounting to $1,125, with the invoice indicating services performed in October 2022. During the testing of community development block grant costs recorded at the beginning of the approved period of performance (January 2023), seventeen transactions charged to the federal program in January 2023 for salary and related payroll taxes were noted, with a portion incurred prior to the start of the contract period. The total amount of these transactions was $1,079. Cause: The Organization recorded the transactions into the general ledger based on the payroll period ending date and invoice date rather than the date the transactions were incurred by the Organization. In addition, the Organization experienced turnover within the finance department and the missing supporting documentation was likely misfiled and therefore unable to be located. Effect: If the Organization includes expenses either incurred before the start date or after the end date of the approved period of performance, it could result in funds being required to be returned to the funding agency. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2022-005. Recommendation: The Organization should work with the federal agency to provide additional documentation or justification for the expenses, or to adjust the budget or funding limits to ensure that all expenses are within the approved period of performance. It is important to address any period of performance findings as soon as possible to avoid potential penalties or repayment obligations. The Organization should also review its process of entering invoices and payroll related expenses into the accounting software to ensure the correct period is used for federal expenditures. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Please refer to Community Action Committee of the Lehigh Valley, Inc. and subsidiaries’ Corrective Action Plan.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Name: Community Service Block Grant; Community Development Block Grant Assistance Listing Number: 93.569; 14.218 Pass-through Agency: Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development; City of Bethlehem (CB); Northampton County (NC) Pass-Through Number: Contract #C000067069; Contract #C000082084; B-22-MC-42-0003 (CB) Award Period: April 1, 2020 – September 30, 2022; January 1, 2022 – December 31, 2027; January 1, 2022 - December 31, 2023 (CB); July 1, 2020 - December 31, 2022 (NC) Type of Finding: • Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria: 3 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of period of performance. The Organization should have procedures and controls in place to ensure expenses are charged to a federal program within the approved period of performance. In addition, in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.403, allowable costs should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), therefore payroll accruals should be appropriately reflected when recording program expenditures. Condition: During our testing, we noted there were several salary expenditures charged to the grant based on the payroll period ending date, however the costs were incurred for the period 12/24/22 - 1/6/23, which the first eight days were prior to the start of the period of performance. There was also one transaction selected for testing where no supporting documentation was able to be located and one transaction that was incurred after the period of performance for the program. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs above the $25,000 threshold have been identified. Context: During the review of community service block grant costs recorded at the beginning of the approved period of performance (January 2023), seventeen transactions charged to the federal program in January 2023 for salary and related payroll taxes were observed. A portion of these expenses was incurred before the start of the contract period, specifically covering the payroll period from 12/24/22 to 1/6/23, with the first eight days outside the approved period of performance. The total amount of these transactions was $11,606. Additionally, one transaction for facilities maintenance totaling $2,625 lacked supporting documentation. Furthermore, during testing of costs recorded towards the end of the period of performance (September 2022), there was one transaction for outside computer services amounting to $1,125, with the invoice indicating services performed in October 2022. During the testing of community development block grant costs recorded at the beginning of the approved period of performance (January 2023), seventeen transactions charged to the federal program in January 2023 for salary and related payroll taxes were noted, with a portion incurred prior to the start of the contract period. The total amount of these transactions was $1,079. Cause: The Organization recorded the transactions into the general ledger based on the payroll period ending date and invoice date rather than the date the transactions were incurred by the Organization. In addition, the Organization experienced turnover within the finance department and the missing supporting documentation was likely misfiled and therefore unable to be located. Effect: If the Organization includes expenses either incurred before the start date or after the end date of the approved period of performance, it could result in funds being required to be returned to the funding agency. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2022-005. Recommendation: The Organization should work with the federal agency to provide additional documentation or justification for the expenses, or to adjust the budget or funding limits to ensure that all expenses are within the approved period of performance. It is important to address any period of performance findings as soon as possible to avoid potential penalties or repayment obligations. The Organization should also review its process of entering invoices and payroll related expenses into the accounting software to ensure the correct period is used for federal expenditures. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Please refer to Community Action Committee of the Lehigh Valley, Inc. and subsidiaries’ Corrective Action Plan.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Name: Community Service Block Grant; Community Development Block Grant Assistance Listing Number: 93.569; 14.218 Pass-through Agency: Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development; City of Bethlehem (CB); Northampton County (NC) Pass-Through Number: Contract #C000067069; Contract #C000082084; B-22-MC-42-0003 (CB) Award Period: April 1, 2020 – September 30, 2022; January 1, 2022 – December 31, 2027; January 1, 2022 - December 31, 2023 (CB); July 1, 2020 - December 31, 2022 (NC) Type of Finding: • Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria: 3 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of period of performance. The Organization should have procedures and controls in place to ensure expenses are charged to a federal program within the approved period of performance. In addition, in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.403, allowable costs should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), therefore payroll accruals should be appropriately reflected when recording program expenditures. Condition: During our testing, we noted there were several salary expenditures charged to the grant based on the payroll period ending date, however the costs were incurred for the period 12/24/22 - 1/6/23, which the first eight days were prior to the start of the period of performance. There was also one transaction selected for testing where no supporting documentation was able to be located and one transaction that was incurred after the period of performance for the program. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs above the $25,000 threshold have been identified. Context: During the review of community service block grant costs recorded at the beginning of the approved period of performance (January 2023), seventeen transactions charged to the federal program in January 2023 for salary and related payroll taxes were observed. A portion of these expenses was incurred before the start of the contract period, specifically covering the payroll period from 12/24/22 to 1/6/23, with the first eight days outside the approved period of performance. The total amount of these transactions was $11,606. Additionally, one transaction for facilities maintenance totaling $2,625 lacked supporting documentation. Furthermore, during testing of costs recorded towards the end of the period of performance (September 2022), there was one transaction for outside computer services amounting to $1,125, with the invoice indicating services performed in October 2022. During the testing of community development block grant costs recorded at the beginning of the approved period of performance (January 2023), seventeen transactions charged to the federal program in January 2023 for salary and related payroll taxes were noted, with a portion incurred prior to the start of the contract period. The total amount of these transactions was $1,079. Cause: The Organization recorded the transactions into the general ledger based on the payroll period ending date and invoice date rather than the date the transactions were incurred by the Organization. In addition, the Organization experienced turnover within the finance department and the missing supporting documentation was likely misfiled and therefore unable to be located. Effect: If the Organization includes expenses either incurred before the start date or after the end date of the approved period of performance, it could result in funds being required to be returned to the funding agency. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2022-005. Recommendation: The Organization should work with the federal agency to provide additional documentation or justification for the expenses, or to adjust the budget or funding limits to ensure that all expenses are within the approved period of performance. It is important to address any period of performance findings as soon as possible to avoid potential penalties or repayment obligations. The Organization should also review its process of entering invoices and payroll related expenses into the accounting software to ensure the correct period is used for federal expenditures. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Please refer to Community Action Committee of the Lehigh Valley, Inc. and subsidiaries’ Corrective Action Plan.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Name: Community Service Block Grant; Community Development Block Grant Assistance Listing Number: 93.569; 14.218 Pass-through Agency: Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development; City of Bethlehem (CB); Northampton County (NC) Pass-Through Number: Contract #C000067069; Contract #C000082084; B-22-MC-42-0003 (CB) Award Period: April 1, 2020 – September 30, 2022; January 1, 2022 – December 31, 2027; January 1, 2022 - December 31, 2023 (CB); July 1, 2020 - December 31, 2022 (NC) Type of Finding: • Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria: 3 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of period of performance. The Organization should have procedures and controls in place to ensure expenses are charged to a federal program within the approved period of performance. In addition, in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.403, allowable costs should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), therefore payroll accruals should be appropriately reflected when recording program expenditures. Condition: During our testing, we noted there were several salary expenditures charged to the grant based on the payroll period ending date, however the costs were incurred for the period 12/24/22 - 1/6/23, which the first eight days were prior to the start of the period of performance. There was also one transaction selected for testing where no supporting documentation was able to be located and one transaction that was incurred after the period of performance for the program. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs above the $25,000 threshold have been identified. Context: During the review of community service block grant costs recorded at the beginning of the approved period of performance (January 2023), seventeen transactions charged to the federal program in January 2023 for salary and related payroll taxes were observed. A portion of these expenses was incurred before the start of the contract period, specifically covering the payroll period from 12/24/22 to 1/6/23, with the first eight days outside the approved period of performance. The total amount of these transactions was $11,606. Additionally, one transaction for facilities maintenance totaling $2,625 lacked supporting documentation. Furthermore, during testing of costs recorded towards the end of the period of performance (September 2022), there was one transaction for outside computer services amounting to $1,125, with the invoice indicating services performed in October 2022. During the testing of community development block grant costs recorded at the beginning of the approved period of performance (January 2023), seventeen transactions charged to the federal program in January 2023 for salary and related payroll taxes were noted, with a portion incurred prior to the start of the contract period. The total amount of these transactions was $1,079. Cause: The Organization recorded the transactions into the general ledger based on the payroll period ending date and invoice date rather than the date the transactions were incurred by the Organization. In addition, the Organization experienced turnover within the finance department and the missing supporting documentation was likely misfiled and therefore unable to be located. Effect: If the Organization includes expenses either incurred before the start date or after the end date of the approved period of performance, it could result in funds being required to be returned to the funding agency. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2022-005. Recommendation: The Organization should work with the federal agency to provide additional documentation or justification for the expenses, or to adjust the budget or funding limits to ensure that all expenses are within the approved period of performance. It is important to address any period of performance findings as soon as possible to avoid potential penalties or repayment obligations. The Organization should also review its process of entering invoices and payroll related expenses into the accounting software to ensure the correct period is used for federal expenditures. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Please refer to Community Action Committee of the Lehigh Valley, Inc. and subsidiaries’ Corrective Action Plan.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Name: Community Service Block Grant; Community Development Block Grant Assistance Listing Number: 93.569; 14.218 Pass-through Agency: Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development; City of Bethlehem (CB); Northampton County (NC) Pass-Through Number: Contract #C000067069; Contract #C000082084; B-22-MC-42-0003 (CB) Award Period: April 1, 2020 – September 30, 2022; January 1, 2022 – December 31, 2027; January 1, 2022 - December 31, 2023 (CB); July 1, 2020 - December 31, 2022 (NC) Type of Finding: • Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria: 3 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of period of performance. The Organization should have procedures and controls in place to ensure expenses are charged to a federal program within the approved period of performance. In addition, in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.403, allowable costs should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), therefore payroll accruals should be appropriately reflected when recording program expenditures. Condition: During our testing, we noted there were several salary expenditures charged to the grant based on the payroll period ending date, however the costs were incurred for the period 12/24/22 - 1/6/23, which the first eight days were prior to the start of the period of performance. There was also one transaction selected for testing where no supporting documentation was able to be located and one transaction that was incurred after the period of performance for the program. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs above the $25,000 threshold have been identified. Context: During the review of community service block grant costs recorded at the beginning of the approved period of performance (January 2023), seventeen transactions charged to the federal program in January 2023 for salary and related payroll taxes were observed. A portion of these expenses was incurred before the start of the contract period, specifically covering the payroll period from 12/24/22 to 1/6/23, with the first eight days outside the approved period of performance. The total amount of these transactions was $11,606. Additionally, one transaction for facilities maintenance totaling $2,625 lacked supporting documentation. Furthermore, during testing of costs recorded towards the end of the period of performance (September 2022), there was one transaction for outside computer services amounting to $1,125, with the invoice indicating services performed in October 2022. During the testing of community development block grant costs recorded at the beginning of the approved period of performance (January 2023), seventeen transactions charged to the federal program in January 2023 for salary and related payroll taxes were noted, with a portion incurred prior to the start of the contract period. The total amount of these transactions was $1,079. Cause: The Organization recorded the transactions into the general ledger based on the payroll period ending date and invoice date rather than the date the transactions were incurred by the Organization. In addition, the Organization experienced turnover within the finance department and the missing supporting documentation was likely misfiled and therefore unable to be located. Effect: If the Organization includes expenses either incurred before the start date or after the end date of the approved period of performance, it could result in funds being required to be returned to the funding agency. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2022-005. Recommendation: The Organization should work with the federal agency to provide additional documentation or justification for the expenses, or to adjust the budget or funding limits to ensure that all expenses are within the approved period of performance. It is important to address any period of performance findings as soon as possible to avoid potential penalties or repayment obligations. The Organization should also review its process of entering invoices and payroll related expenses into the accounting software to ensure the correct period is used for federal expenditures. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Please refer to Community Action Committee of the Lehigh Valley, Inc. and subsidiaries’ Corrective Action Plan.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Name: Community Service Block Grant; Community Development Block Grant Assistance Listing Number: 93.569; 14.218 Pass-through Agency: Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development; City of Bethlehem (CB); Northampton County (NC) Pass-Through Number: Contract #C000067069; Contract #C000082084; B-22-MC-42-0003 (CB) Award Period: April 1, 2020 – September 30, 2022; January 1, 2022 – December 31, 2027; January 1, 2022 - December 31, 2023 (CB); July 1, 2020 - December 31, 2022 (NC) Type of Finding: • Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria: 3 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of period of performance. The Organization should have procedures and controls in place to ensure expenses are charged to a federal program within the approved period of performance. In addition, in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.403, allowable costs should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), therefore payroll accruals should be appropriately reflected when recording program expenditures. Condition: During our testing, we noted there were several salary expenditures charged to the grant based on the payroll period ending date, however the costs were incurred for the period 12/24/22 - 1/6/23, which the first eight days were prior to the start of the period of performance. There was also one transaction selected for testing where no supporting documentation was able to be located and one transaction that was incurred after the period of performance for the program. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs above the $25,000 threshold have been identified. Context: During the review of community service block grant costs recorded at the beginning of the approved period of performance (January 2023), seventeen transactions charged to the federal program in January 2023 for salary and related payroll taxes were observed. A portion of these expenses was incurred before the start of the contract period, specifically covering the payroll period from 12/24/22 to 1/6/23, with the first eight days outside the approved period of performance. The total amount of these transactions was $11,606. Additionally, one transaction for facilities maintenance totaling $2,625 lacked supporting documentation. Furthermore, during testing of costs recorded towards the end of the period of performance (September 2022), there was one transaction for outside computer services amounting to $1,125, with the invoice indicating services performed in October 2022. During the testing of community development block grant costs recorded at the beginning of the approved period of performance (January 2023), seventeen transactions charged to the federal program in January 2023 for salary and related payroll taxes were noted, with a portion incurred prior to the start of the contract period. The total amount of these transactions was $1,079. Cause: The Organization recorded the transactions into the general ledger based on the payroll period ending date and invoice date rather than the date the transactions were incurred by the Organization. In addition, the Organization experienced turnover within the finance department and the missing supporting documentation was likely misfiled and therefore unable to be located. Effect: If the Organization includes expenses either incurred before the start date or after the end date of the approved period of performance, it could result in funds being required to be returned to the funding agency. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2022-005. Recommendation: The Organization should work with the federal agency to provide additional documentation or justification for the expenses, or to adjust the budget or funding limits to ensure that all expenses are within the approved period of performance. It is important to address any period of performance findings as soon as possible to avoid potential penalties or repayment obligations. The Organization should also review its process of entering invoices and payroll related expenses into the accounting software to ensure the correct period is used for federal expenditures. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Please refer to Community Action Committee of the Lehigh Valley, Inc. and subsidiaries’ Corrective Action Plan.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Name: Community Service Block Grant; Community Development Block Grant Assistance Listing Number: 93.569; 14.218 Pass-through Agency: Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development; City of Bethlehem (CB); Northampton County (NC) Pass-Through Number: Contract #C000067069; Contract #C000082084; B-22-MC-42-0003 (CB) Award Period: April 1, 2020 – September 30, 2022; January 1, 2022 – December 31, 2027; January 1, 2022 - December 31, 2023 (CB); July 1, 2020 - December 31, 2022 (NC) Type of Finding: • Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria: 3 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of period of performance. The Organization should have procedures and controls in place to ensure expenses are charged to a federal program within the approved period of performance. In addition, in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.403, allowable costs should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), therefore payroll accruals should be appropriately reflected when recording program expenditures. Condition: During our testing, we noted there were several salary expenditures charged to the grant based on the payroll period ending date, however the costs were incurred for the period 12/24/22 - 1/6/23, which the first eight days were prior to the start of the period of performance. There was also one transaction selected for testing where no supporting documentation was able to be located and one transaction that was incurred after the period of performance for the program. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs above the $25,000 threshold have been identified. Context: During the review of community service block grant costs recorded at the beginning of the approved period of performance (January 2023), seventeen transactions charged to the federal program in January 2023 for salary and related payroll taxes were observed. A portion of these expenses was incurred before the start of the contract period, specifically covering the payroll period from 12/24/22 to 1/6/23, with the first eight days outside the approved period of performance. The total amount of these transactions was $11,606. Additionally, one transaction for facilities maintenance totaling $2,625 lacked supporting documentation. Furthermore, during testing of costs recorded towards the end of the period of performance (September 2022), there was one transaction for outside computer services amounting to $1,125, with the invoice indicating services performed in October 2022. During the testing of community development block grant costs recorded at the beginning of the approved period of performance (January 2023), seventeen transactions charged to the federal program in January 2023 for salary and related payroll taxes were noted, with a portion incurred prior to the start of the contract period. The total amount of these transactions was $1,079. Cause: The Organization recorded the transactions into the general ledger based on the payroll period ending date and invoice date rather than the date the transactions were incurred by the Organization. In addition, the Organization experienced turnover within the finance department and the missing supporting documentation was likely misfiled and therefore unable to be located. Effect: If the Organization includes expenses either incurred before the start date or after the end date of the approved period of performance, it could result in funds being required to be returned to the funding agency. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2022-005. Recommendation: The Organization should work with the federal agency to provide additional documentation or justification for the expenses, or to adjust the budget or funding limits to ensure that all expenses are within the approved period of performance. It is important to address any period of performance findings as soon as possible to avoid potential penalties or repayment obligations. The Organization should also review its process of entering invoices and payroll related expenses into the accounting software to ensure the correct period is used for federal expenditures. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Please refer to Community Action Committee of the Lehigh Valley, Inc. and subsidiaries’ Corrective Action Plan.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Name: Community Service Block Grant; Community Development Block Grant Assistance Listing Number: 93.569; 14.218 Pass-through Agency: Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development; City of Bethlehem (CB); Northampton County (NC) Pass-Through Number: Contract #C000067069; Contract #C000082084; B-22-MC-42-0003 (CB) Award Period: April 1, 2020 – September 30, 2022; January 1, 2022 – December 31, 2027; January 1, 2022 - December 31, 2023 (CB); July 1, 2020 - December 31, 2022 (NC) Type of Finding: • Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria: 3 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of period of performance. The Organization should have procedures and controls in place to ensure expenses are charged to a federal program within the approved period of performance. In addition, in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.403, allowable costs should be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), therefore payroll accruals should be appropriately reflected when recording program expenditures. Condition: During our testing, we noted there were several salary expenditures charged to the grant based on the payroll period ending date, however the costs were incurred for the period 12/24/22 - 1/6/23, which the first eight days were prior to the start of the period of performance. There was also one transaction selected for testing where no supporting documentation was able to be located and one transaction that was incurred after the period of performance for the program. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs above the $25,000 threshold have been identified. Context: During the review of community service block grant costs recorded at the beginning of the approved period of performance (January 2023), seventeen transactions charged to the federal program in January 2023 for salary and related payroll taxes were observed. A portion of these expenses was incurred before the start of the contract period, specifically covering the payroll period from 12/24/22 to 1/6/23, with the first eight days outside the approved period of performance. The total amount of these transactions was $11,606. Additionally, one transaction for facilities maintenance totaling $2,625 lacked supporting documentation. Furthermore, during testing of costs recorded towards the end of the period of performance (September 2022), there was one transaction for outside computer services amounting to $1,125, with the invoice indicating services performed in October 2022. During the testing of community development block grant costs recorded at the beginning of the approved period of performance (January 2023), seventeen transactions charged to the federal program in January 2023 for salary and related payroll taxes were noted, with a portion incurred prior to the start of the contract period. The total amount of these transactions was $1,079. Cause: The Organization recorded the transactions into the general ledger based on the payroll period ending date and invoice date rather than the date the transactions were incurred by the Organization. In addition, the Organization experienced turnover within the finance department and the missing supporting documentation was likely misfiled and therefore unable to be located. Effect: If the Organization includes expenses either incurred before the start date or after the end date of the approved period of performance, it could result in funds being required to be returned to the funding agency. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2022-005. Recommendation: The Organization should work with the federal agency to provide additional documentation or justification for the expenses, or to adjust the budget or funding limits to ensure that all expenses are within the approved period of performance. It is important to address any period of performance findings as soon as possible to avoid potential penalties or repayment obligations. The Organization should also review its process of entering invoices and payroll related expenses into the accounting software to ensure the correct period is used for federal expenditures. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Please refer to Community Action Committee of the Lehigh Valley, Inc. and subsidiaries’ Corrective Action Plan.
2023 – 027 – Supporting Documentation Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR part 200.403(g) states costs must meet criteria to be allowable under federal awards including be adequately documented. Condition: Credit card statements and receipts for transactions in which credit cards were used were not retained. Questioned costs: None. Context: During our testing, it was noted that 1 out of the 40 tested that the University did not maintain proper support for the expenditure. Cause: The University did not maintain documentation to support the expenditure. Effect: The University did not follow the policies and procedures in place to maintain supporting documentation for expenditures. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University develop a procedure for ensuring all expenditures made via corporate credit card receive appropriate approval. We also recommend management maintain proper recordkeeping and retention of documentation. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 027 – Supporting Documentation Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR part 200.403(g) states costs must meet criteria to be allowable under federal awards including be adequately documented. Condition: Credit card statements and receipts for transactions in which credit cards were used were not retained. Questioned costs: None. Context: During our testing, it was noted that 1 out of the 40 tested that the University did not maintain proper support for the expenditure. Cause: The University did not maintain documentation to support the expenditure. Effect: The University did not follow the policies and procedures in place to maintain supporting documentation for expenditures. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University develop a procedure for ensuring all expenditures made via corporate credit card receive appropriate approval. We also recommend management maintain proper recordkeeping and retention of documentation. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 027 – Supporting Documentation Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR part 200.403(g) states costs must meet criteria to be allowable under federal awards including be adequately documented. Condition: Credit card statements and receipts for transactions in which credit cards were used were not retained. Questioned costs: None. Context: During our testing, it was noted that 1 out of the 40 tested that the University did not maintain proper support for the expenditure. Cause: The University did not maintain documentation to support the expenditure. Effect: The University did not follow the policies and procedures in place to maintain supporting documentation for expenditures. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University develop a procedure for ensuring all expenditures made via corporate credit card receive appropriate approval. We also recommend management maintain proper recordkeeping and retention of documentation. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 027 – Supporting Documentation Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR part 200.403(g) states costs must meet criteria to be allowable under federal awards including be adequately documented. Condition: Credit card statements and receipts for transactions in which credit cards were used were not retained. Questioned costs: None. Context: During our testing, it was noted that 1 out of the 40 tested that the University did not maintain proper support for the expenditure. Cause: The University did not maintain documentation to support the expenditure. Effect: The University did not follow the policies and procedures in place to maintain supporting documentation for expenditures. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University develop a procedure for ensuring all expenditures made via corporate credit card receive appropriate approval. We also recommend management maintain proper recordkeeping and retention of documentation. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 027 – Supporting Documentation Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR part 200.403(g) states costs must meet criteria to be allowable under federal awards including be adequately documented. Condition: Credit card statements and receipts for transactions in which credit cards were used were not retained. Questioned costs: None. Context: During our testing, it was noted that 1 out of the 40 tested that the University did not maintain proper support for the expenditure. Cause: The University did not maintain documentation to support the expenditure. Effect: The University did not follow the policies and procedures in place to maintain supporting documentation for expenditures. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University develop a procedure for ensuring all expenditures made via corporate credit card receive appropriate approval. We also recommend management maintain proper recordkeeping and retention of documentation. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 027 – Supporting Documentation Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR part 200.403(g) states costs must meet criteria to be allowable under federal awards including be adequately documented. Condition: Credit card statements and receipts for transactions in which credit cards were used were not retained. Questioned costs: None. Context: During our testing, it was noted that 1 out of the 40 tested that the University did not maintain proper support for the expenditure. Cause: The University did not maintain documentation to support the expenditure. Effect: The University did not follow the policies and procedures in place to maintain supporting documentation for expenditures. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University develop a procedure for ensuring all expenditures made via corporate credit card receive appropriate approval. We also recommend management maintain proper recordkeeping and retention of documentation. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 027 – Supporting Documentation Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR part 200.403(g) states costs must meet criteria to be allowable under federal awards including be adequately documented. Condition: Credit card statements and receipts for transactions in which credit cards were used were not retained. Questioned costs: None. Context: During our testing, it was noted that 1 out of the 40 tested that the University did not maintain proper support for the expenditure. Cause: The University did not maintain documentation to support the expenditure. Effect: The University did not follow the policies and procedures in place to maintain supporting documentation for expenditures. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University develop a procedure for ensuring all expenditures made via corporate credit card receive appropriate approval. We also recommend management maintain proper recordkeeping and retention of documentation. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 027 – Supporting Documentation Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR part 200.403(g) states costs must meet criteria to be allowable under federal awards including be adequately documented. Condition: Credit card statements and receipts for transactions in which credit cards were used were not retained. Questioned costs: None. Context: During our testing, it was noted that 1 out of the 40 tested that the University did not maintain proper support for the expenditure. Cause: The University did not maintain documentation to support the expenditure. Effect: The University did not follow the policies and procedures in place to maintain supporting documentation for expenditures. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University develop a procedure for ensuring all expenditures made via corporate credit card receive appropriate approval. We also recommend management maintain proper recordkeeping and retention of documentation. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 027 – Supporting Documentation Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR part 200.403(g) states costs must meet criteria to be allowable under federal awards including be adequately documented. Condition: Credit card statements and receipts for transactions in which credit cards were used were not retained. Questioned costs: None. Context: During our testing, it was noted that 1 out of the 40 tested that the University did not maintain proper support for the expenditure. Cause: The University did not maintain documentation to support the expenditure. Effect: The University did not follow the policies and procedures in place to maintain supporting documentation for expenditures. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University develop a procedure for ensuring all expenditures made via corporate credit card receive appropriate approval. We also recommend management maintain proper recordkeeping and retention of documentation. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 027 – Supporting Documentation Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR part 200.403(g) states costs must meet criteria to be allowable under federal awards including be adequately documented. Condition: Credit card statements and receipts for transactions in which credit cards were used were not retained. Questioned costs: None. Context: During our testing, it was noted that 1 out of the 40 tested that the University did not maintain proper support for the expenditure. Cause: The University did not maintain documentation to support the expenditure. Effect: The University did not follow the policies and procedures in place to maintain supporting documentation for expenditures. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University develop a procedure for ensuring all expenditures made via corporate credit card receive appropriate approval. We also recommend management maintain proper recordkeeping and retention of documentation. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 027 – Supporting Documentation Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR part 200.403(g) states costs must meet criteria to be allowable under federal awards including be adequately documented. Condition: Credit card statements and receipts for transactions in which credit cards were used were not retained. Questioned costs: None. Context: During our testing, it was noted that 1 out of the 40 tested that the University did not maintain proper support for the expenditure. Cause: The University did not maintain documentation to support the expenditure. Effect: The University did not follow the policies and procedures in place to maintain supporting documentation for expenditures. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University develop a procedure for ensuring all expenditures made via corporate credit card receive appropriate approval. We also recommend management maintain proper recordkeeping and retention of documentation. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 027 – Supporting Documentation Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR part 200.403(g) states costs must meet criteria to be allowable under federal awards including be adequately documented. Condition: Credit card statements and receipts for transactions in which credit cards were used were not retained. Questioned costs: None. Context: During our testing, it was noted that 1 out of the 40 tested that the University did not maintain proper support for the expenditure. Cause: The University did not maintain documentation to support the expenditure. Effect: The University did not follow the policies and procedures in place to maintain supporting documentation for expenditures. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University develop a procedure for ensuring all expenditures made via corporate credit card receive appropriate approval. We also recommend management maintain proper recordkeeping and retention of documentation. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 027 – Supporting Documentation Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR part 200.403(g) states costs must meet criteria to be allowable under federal awards including be adequately documented. Condition: Credit card statements and receipts for transactions in which credit cards were used were not retained. Questioned costs: None. Context: During our testing, it was noted that 1 out of the 40 tested that the University did not maintain proper support for the expenditure. Cause: The University did not maintain documentation to support the expenditure. Effect: The University did not follow the policies and procedures in place to maintain supporting documentation for expenditures. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University develop a procedure for ensuring all expenditures made via corporate credit card receive appropriate approval. We also recommend management maintain proper recordkeeping and retention of documentation. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 027 – Supporting Documentation Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR part 200.403(g) states costs must meet criteria to be allowable under federal awards including be adequately documented. Condition: Credit card statements and receipts for transactions in which credit cards were used were not retained. Questioned costs: None. Context: During our testing, it was noted that 1 out of the 40 tested that the University did not maintain proper support for the expenditure. Cause: The University did not maintain documentation to support the expenditure. Effect: The University did not follow the policies and procedures in place to maintain supporting documentation for expenditures. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University develop a procedure for ensuring all expenditures made via corporate credit card receive appropriate approval. We also recommend management maintain proper recordkeeping and retention of documentation. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 027 – Supporting Documentation Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR part 200.403(g) states costs must meet criteria to be allowable under federal awards including be adequately documented. Condition: Credit card statements and receipts for transactions in which credit cards were used were not retained. Questioned costs: None. Context: During our testing, it was noted that 1 out of the 40 tested that the University did not maintain proper support for the expenditure. Cause: The University did not maintain documentation to support the expenditure. Effect: The University did not follow the policies and procedures in place to maintain supporting documentation for expenditures. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University develop a procedure for ensuring all expenditures made via corporate credit card receive appropriate approval. We also recommend management maintain proper recordkeeping and retention of documentation. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 027 – Supporting Documentation Federal Agency: Various Federal Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR part 200.403(g) states costs must meet criteria to be allowable under federal awards including be adequately documented. Condition: Credit card statements and receipts for transactions in which credit cards were used were not retained. Questioned costs: None. Context: During our testing, it was noted that 1 out of the 40 tested that the University did not maintain proper support for the expenditure. Cause: The University did not maintain documentation to support the expenditure. Effect: The University did not follow the policies and procedures in place to maintain supporting documentation for expenditures. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University develop a procedure for ensuring all expenditures made via corporate credit card receive appropriate approval. We also recommend management maintain proper recordkeeping and retention of documentation. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.