Criteria: 2 CFR 200.332 notes, ?All pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (1) Federal award identification. (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier; (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); (iv) Federal Award Date (see the definition of Federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the Federal agency; (v) Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; (vi) Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; (vii) Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; (viii) Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity including the current financial obligation; (ix) Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); (xi) Name of Federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D; and (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414. (2) All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award; ?? Condition: For all four subawards selected for testing, the identification of the award being Research and Development (R&D) was not noted. Further, two of the four subawards selected for testing, had information missing from the subaward including (1) Recipient DUNS number (2) Unique Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) (3) Assistance Listing number (4) Indirect Cost Rate. Lastly, one subaward did not include the following information: (a) Period of Performance of subaward (b) Amount of federal funds obligated and awarded (c) General terms and conditions of subaward (d) Federal award project description (e) Name of Federal awarding agency. Condition (Continued): We consider this condition to be an instance of noncompliance relating to the Subrecipient Monitoring compliance requirement. Statistical sampling was not used in making sample selections. Questioned Costs: N/A. Cause and Effect: Without communication of the required information, subrecipients may overspend award amounts or incur unallowable expenses towards the grant. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization evaluates policies and procedures to ensure all required information is communication with the subrecipient. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this Single Audit Finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.332 notes, ?All pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (1) Federal award identification. (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier; (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); (iv) Federal Award Date (see the definition of Federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the Federal agency; (v) Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; (vi) Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; (vii) Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; (viii) Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity including the current financial obligation; (ix) Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); (xi) Name of Federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D; and (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414. (2) All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award; ?? Condition: For all four subawards selected for testing, the identification of the award being Research and Development (R&D) was not noted. Further, two of the four subawards selected for testing, had information missing from the subaward including (1) Recipient DUNS number (2) Unique Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) (3) Assistance Listing number (4) Indirect Cost Rate. Lastly, one subaward did not include the following information: (a) Period of Performance of subaward (b) Amount of federal funds obligated and awarded (c) General terms and conditions of subaward (d) Federal award project description (e) Name of Federal awarding agency. Condition (Continued): We consider this condition to be an instance of noncompliance relating to the Subrecipient Monitoring compliance requirement. Statistical sampling was not used in making sample selections. Questioned Costs: N/A. Cause and Effect: Without communication of the required information, subrecipients may overspend award amounts or incur unallowable expenses towards the grant. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization evaluates policies and procedures to ensure all required information is communication with the subrecipient. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this Single Audit Finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.332 notes, ?All pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (1) Federal award identification. (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier; (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); (iv) Federal Award Date (see the definition of Federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the Federal agency; (v) Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; (vi) Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; (vii) Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; (viii) Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity including the current financial obligation; (ix) Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); (xi) Name of Federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D; and (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414. (2) All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award; ?? Condition: For all four subawards selected for testing, the identification of the award being Research and Development (R&D) was not noted. Further, two of the four subawards selected for testing, had information missing from the subaward including (1) Recipient DUNS number (2) Unique Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) (3) Assistance Listing number (4) Indirect Cost Rate. Lastly, one subaward did not include the following information: (a) Period of Performance of subaward (b) Amount of federal funds obligated and awarded (c) General terms and conditions of subaward (d) Federal award project description (e) Name of Federal awarding agency. Condition (Continued): We consider this condition to be an instance of noncompliance relating to the Subrecipient Monitoring compliance requirement. Statistical sampling was not used in making sample selections. Questioned Costs: N/A. Cause and Effect: Without communication of the required information, subrecipients may overspend award amounts or incur unallowable expenses towards the grant. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization evaluates policies and procedures to ensure all required information is communication with the subrecipient. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this Single Audit Finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Material Weakness, Compliance and Internal Control over Compliance, Subrecipient Monitoring ALN 21.027: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Criteria Or Specific Requirement: Per 2 CFR 200.332, Mesa County is responsible for informing subrecipients of the Federal award identifiers including but not limited to award date, period of performance and Federal awarding agency and Assistance Listing Number and title. Mesa County is required to assess the subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the subaward. In addition, the County should also verify that the subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F- Audit Requirement under the Uniform Guidance. The monitoring policy should include an initial valuation of risk of noncompliance to determine the appropriate level of monitoring required related to the subaward as well as appropriate awarding documentation. Condition: We noted that management did not evaluate the risk of noncompliance of the subrecipient and did not convey expectation of requirements for audit under Federal Regulations. Effect: The County was not in compliance with the subrecipient monitoring regulations set forth in the Uniform Guidance. The possibility exists that noncompliance with federal requirements could go undetected without proper controls over compliance relating to the aforementioned requirements. Questioned Costs: None Context: During the testing performed, we noted the County did not perform a risk assessment of subrecipient nor did the County have documentation of informing the subrecipient of all required rules and regulations, including the need for the subrecipient to receive an audit as required under Uniform Guidance. Identification As A Repeat Finding: Not Applicable Recommendation: We recommend that management implement a formal subrecipient monitoring policy that defines how the County will monitor each subrecipient. This policy should include an evaluation of the risk of noncompliance for each subrecipient as well as how the subrecipients will be monitored. The County should also request a copy of the subrecipient?s audit, if applicable.
Finding Number: 2022-007 Repeat Finding: Yes Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control and Material Noncompliance Description: Subrecipient Monitoring and Management Major Programs AL#93.665 - Emergency Grants to Address Mental and Substance Use Disorders During COVID-19 ? Direct Award (DHHS) ? Award numbers: 6H79FG000252-01M003 and 6H79FG000689-01M004 AL#93.772 - Tribal Public Health Capacity Building and Quality Improvement Umbrella Cooperative Agreement ? Direct Award (DHHS) ? Award numbers: 5NU38OT000257-04-00 and 5NU38OT000257-05-00 Questioned Costs: None How the questioned costs were computed: N/A Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Condition: The Organization did not comply with any of the subrecipient monitoring and management requirements in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.332. Criteria: The subrecipient monitoring and management requirements that are codified in 2 CFR Part 200.332 requires the pass-through entity must: Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes: Federal award identification; All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award; Any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass-through entity to meet its own responsibility to the Federal awarding agency including identification of any required financial and performance reports. An approved federally recognized indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal Government. If no approved rate exists, the pass-through entity must determine the appropriate rate in collaboration with the subrecipient, which is either: The negotiated indirect cost rate between the pass-through entity and the subrecipient; The de minimis indirect cost rate The pass-through entity must not require use of a de minimis indirect cost rate if the subrecipient has a Federally approved rate. A requirement that the subrecipient permit the pass-through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient?s records and financial statements as necessary for the pass-through entity to meet the requirements of this part; and Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward. Evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring. Consider imposing specific subaward conditions upon a subrecipient if appropriate as described in ? 200.208. Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by ? 200.521. The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient's cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section ? 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. Depending upon the pass-through entity's assessment of risk posed by the subrecipient, the following monitoring tools may be useful for the pass-through entity to ensure proper accountability and compliance with program requirements and achievement of performance goals: Providing subrecipients with training and technical assistance on program-related matters; and Performing on-site reviews of the subrecipient's program operations; Arranging for agreed-upon-procedures engagements as described in ? 200.425. Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in ? 200.501. Consider whether the results of the subrecipient's audits, on-site reviews, or other monitoring indicate conditions that necessitate adjustments to the pass-through entity's own records. Consider taking enforcement action against noncompliant subrecipients as described in ? 200.339 of this part and in program regulations. Cause: The Organization?s management was not aware of the subrecipient monitoring and management requirements. Effect: The Organization was not in compliance with any of the subrecipient monitoring and management requirements, resulting in a material noncompliance and a material weakness in internal controls over compliance. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement systems and procedures to ensure compliance with the subrecipient monitoring and management compliance requirements.
Finding Number: 2022-007 Repeat Finding: Yes Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control and Material Noncompliance Description: Subrecipient Monitoring and Management Major Programs AL#93.665 - Emergency Grants to Address Mental and Substance Use Disorders During COVID-19 ? Direct Award (DHHS) ? Award numbers: 6H79FG000252-01M003 and 6H79FG000689-01M004 AL#93.772 - Tribal Public Health Capacity Building and Quality Improvement Umbrella Cooperative Agreement ? Direct Award (DHHS) ? Award numbers: 5NU38OT000257-04-00 and 5NU38OT000257-05-00 Questioned Costs: None How the questioned costs were computed: N/A Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Condition: The Organization did not comply with any of the subrecipient monitoring and management requirements in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.332. Criteria: The subrecipient monitoring and management requirements that are codified in 2 CFR Part 200.332 requires the pass-through entity must: Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes: Federal award identification; All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award; Any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass-through entity to meet its own responsibility to the Federal awarding agency including identification of any required financial and performance reports. An approved federally recognized indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal Government. If no approved rate exists, the pass-through entity must determine the appropriate rate in collaboration with the subrecipient, which is either: The negotiated indirect cost rate between the pass-through entity and the subrecipient; The de minimis indirect cost rate The pass-through entity must not require use of a de minimis indirect cost rate if the subrecipient has a Federally approved rate. A requirement that the subrecipient permit the pass-through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient?s records and financial statements as necessary for the pass-through entity to meet the requirements of this part; and Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward. Evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring. Consider imposing specific subaward conditions upon a subrecipient if appropriate as described in ? 200.208. Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by ? 200.521. The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient's cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section ? 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. Depending upon the pass-through entity's assessment of risk posed by the subrecipient, the following monitoring tools may be useful for the pass-through entity to ensure proper accountability and compliance with program requirements and achievement of performance goals: Providing subrecipients with training and technical assistance on program-related matters; and Performing on-site reviews of the subrecipient's program operations; Arranging for agreed-upon-procedures engagements as described in ? 200.425. Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in ? 200.501. Consider whether the results of the subrecipient's audits, on-site reviews, or other monitoring indicate conditions that necessitate adjustments to the pass-through entity's own records. Consider taking enforcement action against noncompliant subrecipients as described in ? 200.339 of this part and in program regulations. Cause: The Organization?s management was not aware of the subrecipient monitoring and management requirements. Effect: The Organization was not in compliance with any of the subrecipient monitoring and management requirements, resulting in a material noncompliance and a material weakness in internal controls over compliance. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement systems and procedures to ensure compliance with the subrecipient monitoring and management compliance requirements.
Finding Number: 2022-007 Repeat Finding: Yes Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control and Material Noncompliance Description: Subrecipient Monitoring and Management Major Programs AL#93.665 - Emergency Grants to Address Mental and Substance Use Disorders During COVID-19 ? Direct Award (DHHS) ? Award numbers: 6H79FG000252-01M003 and 6H79FG000689-01M004 AL#93.772 - Tribal Public Health Capacity Building and Quality Improvement Umbrella Cooperative Agreement ? Direct Award (DHHS) ? Award numbers: 5NU38OT000257-04-00 and 5NU38OT000257-05-00 Questioned Costs: None How the questioned costs were computed: N/A Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Condition: The Organization did not comply with any of the subrecipient monitoring and management requirements in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.332. Criteria: The subrecipient monitoring and management requirements that are codified in 2 CFR Part 200.332 requires the pass-through entity must: Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes: Federal award identification; All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award; Any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass-through entity to meet its own responsibility to the Federal awarding agency including identification of any required financial and performance reports. An approved federally recognized indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal Government. If no approved rate exists, the pass-through entity must determine the appropriate rate in collaboration with the subrecipient, which is either: The negotiated indirect cost rate between the pass-through entity and the subrecipient; The de minimis indirect cost rate The pass-through entity must not require use of a de minimis indirect cost rate if the subrecipient has a Federally approved rate. A requirement that the subrecipient permit the pass-through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient?s records and financial statements as necessary for the pass-through entity to meet the requirements of this part; and Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward. Evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring. Consider imposing specific subaward conditions upon a subrecipient if appropriate as described in ? 200.208. Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by ? 200.521. The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient's cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section ? 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. Depending upon the pass-through entity's assessment of risk posed by the subrecipient, the following monitoring tools may be useful for the pass-through entity to ensure proper accountability and compliance with program requirements and achievement of performance goals: Providing subrecipients with training and technical assistance on program-related matters; and Performing on-site reviews of the subrecipient's program operations; Arranging for agreed-upon-procedures engagements as described in ? 200.425. Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in ? 200.501. Consider whether the results of the subrecipient's audits, on-site reviews, or other monitoring indicate conditions that necessitate adjustments to the pass-through entity's own records. Consider taking enforcement action against noncompliant subrecipients as described in ? 200.339 of this part and in program regulations. Cause: The Organization?s management was not aware of the subrecipient monitoring and management requirements. Effect: The Organization was not in compliance with any of the subrecipient monitoring and management requirements, resulting in a material noncompliance and a material weakness in internal controls over compliance. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement systems and procedures to ensure compliance with the subrecipient monitoring and management compliance requirements.
Finding 2022-002 – Subrecipient Monitoring Department of Health and Human Services Passed through Pennsylvania Department of Human Services Foster Care – Title IV-E – ALN 93.658 Subrecipient Monitoring Condition: The County appropriately notified the subrecipients of the federal award identification and performed a risk assessment; however, the County did not monitor ten of the twelve subrecipients during the year to ensure compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward. Criteria: The Pennsylvania Department of Human Services (PA DHS) and 2 CFR section 200.332 require pass-through entities to ensure that the award is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes information at the time of the subaward regarding federal award identification, all requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with federal statutes and the terms and conditions of the federal award, any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient, and a requirement that the subrecipient permit the pass-through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient’s records and financial statements as necessary. Additionally, the pass-through entity is required to evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance, monitoring the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward, and verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F, as necessary. It is the County’s policy, as part of the monitoring process, that each subrecipient of these federal awards be monitored annually. Cause: The County has established formal subrecipient monitoring policies. However, due to staffing issues, the County’s internal control process over subrecipient monitoring was not effective. Effect: A failure to monitor subrecipients’ compliance with relevant federal requirements could result in noncompliance with the terms and conditions of the subawards. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding from the prior audit. Recommendation: We recommend that the County ensure adherence to the monitoring policy related to subrecipients and that these subrecipients be monitored on an annual basis in accordance with the policy. Management’s Response: Management agrees with this finding. See separate Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2022-002 – Subrecipient Monitoring Department of Health and Human Services Passed through Pennsylvania Department of Human Services Foster Care – Title IV-E – ALN 93.658 Subrecipient Monitoring Condition: The County appropriately notified the subrecipients of the federal award identification and performed a risk assessment; however, the County did not monitor ten of the twelve subrecipients during the year to ensure compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward. Criteria: The Pennsylvania Department of Human Services (PA DHS) and 2 CFR section 200.332 require pass-through entities to ensure that the award is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes information at the time of the subaward regarding federal award identification, all requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with federal statutes and the terms and conditions of the federal award, any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient, and a requirement that the subrecipient permit the pass-through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient’s records and financial statements as necessary. Additionally, the pass-through entity is required to evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance, monitoring the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward, and verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F, as necessary. It is the County’s policy, as part of the monitoring process, that each subrecipient of these federal awards be monitored annually. Cause: The County has established formal subrecipient monitoring policies. However, due to staffing issues, the County’s internal control process over subrecipient monitoring was not effective. Effect: A failure to monitor subrecipients’ compliance with relevant federal requirements could result in noncompliance with the terms and conditions of the subawards. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding from the prior audit. Recommendation: We recommend that the County ensure adherence to the monitoring policy related to subrecipients and that these subrecipients be monitored on an annual basis in accordance with the policy. Management’s Response: Management agrees with this finding. See separate Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2022-002 – Subrecipient Monitoring Department of Health and Human Services Passed through Pennsylvania Department of Human Services Foster Care – Title IV-E – ALN 93.658 Subrecipient Monitoring Condition: The County appropriately notified the subrecipients of the federal award identification and performed a risk assessment; however, the County did not monitor ten of the twelve subrecipients during the year to ensure compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward. Criteria: The Pennsylvania Department of Human Services (PA DHS) and 2 CFR section 200.332 require pass-through entities to ensure that the award is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes information at the time of the subaward regarding federal award identification, all requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with federal statutes and the terms and conditions of the federal award, any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient, and a requirement that the subrecipient permit the pass-through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient’s records and financial statements as necessary. Additionally, the pass-through entity is required to evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance, monitoring the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward, and verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F, as necessary. It is the County’s policy, as part of the monitoring process, that each subrecipient of these federal awards be monitored annually. Cause: The County has established formal subrecipient monitoring policies. However, due to staffing issues, the County’s internal control process over subrecipient monitoring was not effective. Effect: A failure to monitor subrecipients’ compliance with relevant federal requirements could result in noncompliance with the terms and conditions of the subawards. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding from the prior audit. Recommendation: We recommend that the County ensure adherence to the monitoring policy related to subrecipients and that these subrecipients be monitored on an annual basis in accordance with the policy. Management’s Response: Management agrees with this finding. See separate Corrective Action Plan.
(MATERIAL WEAKNESS) – SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING– ALN 21.027 – COVID-19 – CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS Condition The County did not have an effective process in place to ensure required communications occur with subrecipients of federal awards. The agreements with the subrecipients did not explicitly include certain information required under 2 CFR 200.332(a)(1). Criteria The Federal Compliance Supplement and 2 CFR Section 200.332 requires pass-through entities to communicate and clearly identify to the subrecipient: 1) the award as a subaward at the time of the subaward by providing the information described in 2 CFR section 200.332(a)(1); 2) all requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the award; and 3) any additional requirements the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass-through entity to meet its own responsibility for the federal award. It also requires the pass-through entity to verify that every subrecipient is audited under the Uniform Guidance when required. Cause Management was not aware of the additional communication requirements imposed on pass-through entities. Effect There is a risk of noncompliance with the subrecipient monitoring communications, as well as a risk the subrecipient(s) may not be audited in accordance with the Uniform Guidance when required. Recommendation We recommend the County update its communications with subrecipients to include the required communications of the subrecipients’ responsibilities under the federal requirements, grant agreements and award requirements including, but not limited to its audit obligations under the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs None noted Views of Responsible Officials The county added information to the Payment Request Form to ensure that sub recipients are aware of possible single audit requirements, active SAM registry and UEI.
Finding 2022-002: Department of Health and Human Services – Research & Development Cluster – ALN #93.394, #93.395, and #93.399 – Subrecipient Monitoring Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.332 requires pass-through entities to evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance, monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes and is in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward, and verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F, as necessary. Statement of Condition: No formal documentation existed to indicate that the Foundation performed the required monitoring of its subrecipient’s activity and no written policy exists to establish procedures to document the monitoring of the subrecipient. Cause: The Foundation does not have employees and is operated by a volunteer Board of Directors. Additionally, no formal policies were written to establish procedures to document monitoring of subrecipients. Effect: A failure to monitor a subrecipient's compliance with relevant federal requirements could result in noncompliance with the terms and conditions of the subawards. Subrecipient monitoring was ineffective. Questioned Costs: None. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Foundation establish written policies to document the monitoring of its subrecipient by an individual independent of the subrecipient. This policy should address all required elements of 2 CFR 200.332. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with finding; see separate corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-002: Department of Health and Human Services – Research & Development Cluster – ALN #93.394, #93.395, and #93.399 – Subrecipient Monitoring Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.332 requires pass-through entities to evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance, monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes and is in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward, and verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F, as necessary. Statement of Condition: No formal documentation existed to indicate that the Foundation performed the required monitoring of its subrecipient’s activity and no written policy exists to establish procedures to document the monitoring of the subrecipient. Cause: The Foundation does not have employees and is operated by a volunteer Board of Directors. Additionally, no formal policies were written to establish procedures to document monitoring of subrecipients. Effect: A failure to monitor a subrecipient's compliance with relevant federal requirements could result in noncompliance with the terms and conditions of the subawards. Subrecipient monitoring was ineffective. Questioned Costs: None. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Foundation establish written policies to document the monitoring of its subrecipient by an individual independent of the subrecipient. This policy should address all required elements of 2 CFR 200.332. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with finding; see separate corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-002: Department of Health and Human Services – Research & Development Cluster – ALN #93.394, #93.395, and #93.399 – Subrecipient Monitoring Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.332 requires pass-through entities to evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance, monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes and is in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward, and verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F, as necessary. Statement of Condition: No formal documentation existed to indicate that the Foundation performed the required monitoring of its subrecipient’s activity and no written policy exists to establish procedures to document the monitoring of the subrecipient. Cause: The Foundation does not have employees and is operated by a volunteer Board of Directors. Additionally, no formal policies were written to establish procedures to document monitoring of subrecipients. Effect: A failure to monitor a subrecipient's compliance with relevant federal requirements could result in noncompliance with the terms and conditions of the subawards. Subrecipient monitoring was ineffective. Questioned Costs: None. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Foundation establish written policies to document the monitoring of its subrecipient by an individual independent of the subrecipient. This policy should address all required elements of 2 CFR 200.332. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with finding; see separate corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-002: Department of Health and Human Services – Research & Development Cluster – ALN #93.394, #93.395, and #93.399 – Subrecipient Monitoring Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.332 requires pass-through entities to evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance, monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes and is in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward, and verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F, as necessary. Statement of Condition: No formal documentation existed to indicate that the Foundation performed the required monitoring of its subrecipient’s activity and no written policy exists to establish procedures to document the monitoring of the subrecipient. Cause: The Foundation does not have employees and is operated by a volunteer Board of Directors. Additionally, no formal policies were written to establish procedures to document monitoring of subrecipients. Effect: A failure to monitor a subrecipient's compliance with relevant federal requirements could result in noncompliance with the terms and conditions of the subawards. Subrecipient monitoring was ineffective. Questioned Costs: None. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Foundation establish written policies to document the monitoring of its subrecipient by an individual independent of the subrecipient. This policy should address all required elements of 2 CFR 200.332. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with finding; see separate corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-002: Department of Health and Human Services – Research & Development Cluster – ALN #93.394, #93.395, and #93.399 – Subrecipient Monitoring Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.332 requires pass-through entities to evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance, monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes and is in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward, and verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F, as necessary. Statement of Condition: No formal documentation existed to indicate that the Foundation performed the required monitoring of its subrecipient’s activity and no written policy exists to establish procedures to document the monitoring of the subrecipient. Cause: The Foundation does not have employees and is operated by a volunteer Board of Directors. Additionally, no formal policies were written to establish procedures to document monitoring of subrecipients. Effect: A failure to monitor a subrecipient's compliance with relevant federal requirements could result in noncompliance with the terms and conditions of the subawards. Subrecipient monitoring was ineffective. Questioned Costs: None. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Foundation establish written policies to document the monitoring of its subrecipient by an individual independent of the subrecipient. This policy should address all required elements of 2 CFR 200.332. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with finding; see separate corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-002: Department of Health and Human Services – Research & Development Cluster – ALN #93.394, #93.395, and #93.399 – Subrecipient Monitoring Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.332 requires pass-through entities to evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance, monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes and is in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward, and verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F, as necessary. Statement of Condition: No formal documentation existed to indicate that the Foundation performed the required monitoring of its subrecipient’s activity and no written policy exists to establish procedures to document the monitoring of the subrecipient. Cause: The Foundation does not have employees and is operated by a volunteer Board of Directors. Additionally, no formal policies were written to establish procedures to document monitoring of subrecipients. Effect: A failure to monitor a subrecipient's compliance with relevant federal requirements could result in noncompliance with the terms and conditions of the subawards. Subrecipient monitoring was ineffective. Questioned Costs: None. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Foundation establish written policies to document the monitoring of its subrecipient by an individual independent of the subrecipient. This policy should address all required elements of 2 CFR 200.332. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with finding; see separate corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-002: Department of Health and Human Services – Research & Development Cluster – ALN #93.394, #93.395, and #93.399 – Subrecipient Monitoring Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.332 requires pass-through entities to evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance, monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes and is in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward, and verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F, as necessary. Statement of Condition: No formal documentation existed to indicate that the Foundation performed the required monitoring of its subrecipient’s activity and no written policy exists to establish procedures to document the monitoring of the subrecipient. Cause: The Foundation does not have employees and is operated by a volunteer Board of Directors. Additionally, no formal policies were written to establish procedures to document monitoring of subrecipients. Effect: A failure to monitor a subrecipient's compliance with relevant federal requirements could result in noncompliance with the terms and conditions of the subawards. Subrecipient monitoring was ineffective. Questioned Costs: None. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Foundation establish written policies to document the monitoring of its subrecipient by an individual independent of the subrecipient. This policy should address all required elements of 2 CFR 200.332. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with finding; see separate corrective action plan.
Federal Program Community Programs to Improve Minority Health - 93.137, Contract 1 CPIMP211290-01-00 Criteria Each entity that passes federal funds to a subrecipient must evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward and monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes per 2 CFR, Section 200.332(d). Condition The City did not perform a risk assessment or any additional monitoring of subrecipients beyond reviewing requests for payment. Cause This is a new grant for the City in 2022 and there was turnover in the grant director position during the year. Effect If subrecipient monitoring procedures were performed, the City would be able to ensure that funds were used to carry out the subaward for the intended purpose. Questioned Costs None. Context The City was awarded a grant to be used for improving minority health. To carry out part of the grant programs, the City has contracted with subrecipients’ organizations. The City has a process where all applications for reimbursement from the subrecipients is reviewed with proper documentation before approval for payment. The City does not perform a risk assessment of the subrecipient agencies nor any further monitoring such as site visits. Repeat Finding Yes. Recommendation We recommend that the City continue developing standard operating procedures for subrecipient monitoring of grant activities. This is especially important for grants handled outside the community development office. Management Response See corrective action plan included in this report package.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 14.241 – Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS Passed through Texas Department of State Health Services Award Periods: September 1, 2021 to March 31, 2022 and April 1, 2022 to August 31, 2023 Contract No. 537-17-0195-00001 and HHS001022300003 Texas Department of State Health Services State HIV Service Grants Award Periods: September 1, 2021 to March 31, 2022 and April 1, 2022 to August 31, 2023 Contract No. 537-18-0097-00001 and HHS001022300002 Criteria: Pass-through entities are required to monitor subrecipients in accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.332. Further, under 2 CFR Section 200.303a, non-federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls to provide reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition: For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, The Resource Group did not perform financial monitoring of its subrecipients. Cause: Initially subrecipient monitoring was suspended due to COVID-19 in 2020 and reinstated late 2021. The Resource Group restarted their monitoring of subrecipients, however the monitoring was done by two individuals, one for programming and the other for financial monitoring. Monitoring of programming was completed timely, while the financial monitoring was not. Further, the Finance Director, who was responsible for the financial monitoring, resigned in 2023 and the successor Finance Director was hired in August 2023. Effect: As a result of not completing all financial monitoring and the turnover in Finance Director, The Resource Group is not in compliance with grant requirements. Questioned Costs: None Noted Recommendation: The Resource Group should follow its policies to perform fiscal monitoring on its subrecipients in accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.332. Views of Responsible Officials: See corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-009 Subrecipient Monitoring – Material Noncompliance and Material Weakness in Internal Controls Over Compliance Agency/Pass-through Grantor Department of the Treasury, Department of Health and Human Services passed through the State of Alaska Department of Health and Social Services ALN and Program Name 21.027 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – COVID 19 21.023 – Emergency Rental Assistance Program – COVID 19 93.323 – COVID-19-Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) Award # 21.027 – 1505-0271 21.023 – ERA-2101060120 (ERA 1); ERA2-0469 (ERA 2) 93.323 – C0621-570-BB Award Year 21.027 – 2022 21.023 - 2022 93.323 – 3/15/2021-6/30/2022 Criteria or Specific Requirement 2 CFR 200.332 requires pass-through entities to ensure that subrecipients comply with the terms and conditions of 2 CFR 200.501 related to audit requirements. This includes ensuring that every subaward is (1) clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward; (2) includes the necessary information at the time of the subaward for subrecipient reporting on federal awards (2 CFR 200.332) and (3) includes requirement to follow 2 CFR 200.501 if expenditure thresholds are met. This also includes verifying that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR Subpart F if the subrecipient’s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. Condition During our testing of subrecipient monitoring, we noted all 18 of the subrecipient agreements tested did not include language clearly identifying the federal program from which the subaward originated, or the applicable requirements from 2 CFR 300.332 and Subpart F. We also noted for all 18 subrecipients tested that the Municipality did not verify whether subrecipients were audited in accordance with 2 CFR 200.501 where applicable. Cause The issuance of subrecipient agreements for these grants related to new funding streams in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Significant amounts of funding were provided in a short period of time, and systems to distribute these monies were newly created and implemented. The standard award agreements were not reviewed in advance to ensure adherence to federal requirements. Staff were not fully trained on the informational requirements and monitoring responsibilities related to audit requirements. Effect or Potential Effect Subrecipients may be unaware and not in compliance with the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200. Questioned Costs Not applicable. Context For ALN 21.027 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, we tested a sample of 10 subawards totaling to $28,079,600 from a population of 37 totaling to $37,052,621. For ALN 21.023 - Emergency Rental Assistance Program, we tested all 3 subawards within the population totaling to $10,900,177. For ALN 93.323 – COVID-19-Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC), we tested all 5 subawards within the population totaling to $5,086,923. As noted in the condition, we identified exceptions for 18 subrecipient agreements tested. All samples tested were selected using nonstatistical sampling methods and were not statistically valid samples. Identification as a Repeat Finding Yes. This finding was reported as Finding 2021-002 in the prior audit. Recommendation Management should establish policies to ensure subawards contain required federal award information. In addition, procedures should be established to monitor subrecipient compliance with audit requirements of 2 CFR 200.501. Views of Responsible Officials Management concurs with the finding and will adhere to the corrective action plan included in this report. Management plans to revise policies and procedures related to subrecipient monitoring.
Finding 2022-009 Subrecipient Monitoring – Material Noncompliance and Material Weakness in Internal Controls Over Compliance Agency/Pass-through Grantor Department of the Treasury, Department of Health and Human Services passed through the State of Alaska Department of Health and Social Services ALN and Program Name 21.027 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – COVID 19 21.023 – Emergency Rental Assistance Program – COVID 19 93.323 – COVID-19-Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) Award # 21.027 – 1505-0271 21.023 – ERA-2101060120 (ERA 1); ERA2-0469 (ERA 2) 93.323 – C0621-570-BB Award Year 21.027 – 2022 21.023 - 2022 93.323 – 3/15/2021-6/30/2022 Criteria or Specific Requirement 2 CFR 200.332 requires pass-through entities to ensure that subrecipients comply with the terms and conditions of 2 CFR 200.501 related to audit requirements. This includes ensuring that every subaward is (1) clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward; (2) includes the necessary information at the time of the subaward for subrecipient reporting on federal awards (2 CFR 200.332) and (3) includes requirement to follow 2 CFR 200.501 if expenditure thresholds are met. This also includes verifying that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR Subpart F if the subrecipient’s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. Condition During our testing of subrecipient monitoring, we noted all 18 of the subrecipient agreements tested did not include language clearly identifying the federal program from which the subaward originated, or the applicable requirements from 2 CFR 300.332 and Subpart F. We also noted for all 18 subrecipients tested that the Municipality did not verify whether subrecipients were audited in accordance with 2 CFR 200.501 where applicable. Cause The issuance of subrecipient agreements for these grants related to new funding streams in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Significant amounts of funding were provided in a short period of time, and systems to distribute these monies were newly created and implemented. The standard award agreements were not reviewed in advance to ensure adherence to federal requirements. Staff were not fully trained on the informational requirements and monitoring responsibilities related to audit requirements. Effect or Potential Effect Subrecipients may be unaware and not in compliance with the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200. Questioned Costs Not applicable. Context For ALN 21.027 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, we tested a sample of 10 subawards totaling to $28,079,600 from a population of 37 totaling to $37,052,621. For ALN 21.023 - Emergency Rental Assistance Program, we tested all 3 subawards within the population totaling to $10,900,177. For ALN 93.323 – COVID-19-Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC), we tested all 5 subawards within the population totaling to $5,086,923. As noted in the condition, we identified exceptions for 18 subrecipient agreements tested. All samples tested were selected using nonstatistical sampling methods and were not statistically valid samples. Identification as a Repeat Finding Yes. This finding was reported as Finding 2021-002 in the prior audit. Recommendation Management should establish policies to ensure subawards contain required federal award information. In addition, procedures should be established to monitor subrecipient compliance with audit requirements of 2 CFR 200.501. Views of Responsible Officials Management concurs with the finding and will adhere to the corrective action plan included in this report. Management plans to revise policies and procedures related to subrecipient monitoring.
Finding 2022-009 Subrecipient Monitoring – Material Noncompliance and Material Weakness in Internal Controls Over Compliance Agency/Pass-through Grantor Department of the Treasury, Department of Health and Human Services passed through the State of Alaska Department of Health and Social Services ALN and Program Name 21.027 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – COVID 19 21.023 – Emergency Rental Assistance Program – COVID 19 93.323 – COVID-19-Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) Award # 21.027 – 1505-0271 21.023 – ERA-2101060120 (ERA 1); ERA2-0469 (ERA 2) 93.323 – C0621-570-BB Award Year 21.027 – 2022 21.023 - 2022 93.323 – 3/15/2021-6/30/2022 Criteria or Specific Requirement 2 CFR 200.332 requires pass-through entities to ensure that subrecipients comply with the terms and conditions of 2 CFR 200.501 related to audit requirements. This includes ensuring that every subaward is (1) clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward; (2) includes the necessary information at the time of the subaward for subrecipient reporting on federal awards (2 CFR 200.332) and (3) includes requirement to follow 2 CFR 200.501 if expenditure thresholds are met. This also includes verifying that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR Subpart F if the subrecipient’s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. Condition During our testing of subrecipient monitoring, we noted all 18 of the subrecipient agreements tested did not include language clearly identifying the federal program from which the subaward originated, or the applicable requirements from 2 CFR 300.332 and Subpart F. We also noted for all 18 subrecipients tested that the Municipality did not verify whether subrecipients were audited in accordance with 2 CFR 200.501 where applicable. Cause The issuance of subrecipient agreements for these grants related to new funding streams in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Significant amounts of funding were provided in a short period of time, and systems to distribute these monies were newly created and implemented. The standard award agreements were not reviewed in advance to ensure adherence to federal requirements. Staff were not fully trained on the informational requirements and monitoring responsibilities related to audit requirements. Effect or Potential Effect Subrecipients may be unaware and not in compliance with the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200. Questioned Costs Not applicable. Context For ALN 21.027 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, we tested a sample of 10 subawards totaling to $28,079,600 from a population of 37 totaling to $37,052,621. For ALN 21.023 - Emergency Rental Assistance Program, we tested all 3 subawards within the population totaling to $10,900,177. For ALN 93.323 – COVID-19-Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC), we tested all 5 subawards within the population totaling to $5,086,923. As noted in the condition, we identified exceptions for 18 subrecipient agreements tested. All samples tested were selected using nonstatistical sampling methods and were not statistically valid samples. Identification as a Repeat Finding Yes. This finding was reported as Finding 2021-002 in the prior audit. Recommendation Management should establish policies to ensure subawards contain required federal award information. In addition, procedures should be established to monitor subrecipient compliance with audit requirements of 2 CFR 200.501. Views of Responsible Officials Management concurs with the finding and will adhere to the corrective action plan included in this report. Management plans to revise policies and procedures related to subrecipient monitoring.
Federal Agency: Department of Justice Federal Assistance Listing Numbers: 16.756, 16.726 Programs: Court Appointed Special Advocates, Juvenile Mentoring Program Award/Pass-Through Entity Identifying Numbers: 2018-CH-BX-K001, 15PJDP-21-GK-02762-CASA, 2019-MU-FX-0004, 2020-JU-FX-0028 Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR §200.332 details requirements for pass-through entities in regard to subrecipient monitoring and management. Per 2 CFR §200.332, Requirements for Pass-Through Entities: “All pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (1) Federal award identification. i. Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); ii. Subrecipient’s unique entity identifier; iii. Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); iv. Federal Award Date (see the definition of federal award date in §200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency; v. Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; vi. Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; vii. Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; viii. Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass through entity, including the current financial obligation; ix. Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; x. Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); xi. Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; xii. Assistance Listings Number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; xiii. Identification of whether the award is R&D; and xiv. Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per § 200.414. (2) All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award; (3) Any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass-through entity to meet its own responsibility to the federal awarding agency, including identification of any required financial and performance reports; (4) i. An approved federally recognized indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal Government. If no approved rate exists, the pass-through entity must determine the appropriate rate in collaboration with the subrecipient, which is either: (A) The negotiated indirect cost rate between the pass-through entity and the subrecipient, which can be based on a prior negotiated rate between a different PTE and the same subrecipient. If basing the rate on a previously negotiated rate, the pass-through entity is not required to collect information justifying this rate, but may elect to do so; (B) The de minimis indirect cost rate. ii. The pass-through entity must not require use of a de minimis indirect cost rate if the subrecipient has a federally approved rate. Subrecipients can elect to use the cost allocation method to account for indirect costs in accordance with §200.405(d). (5) A requirement that the subrecipient permits the pass-through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient’s records and financial statements as necessary for the pass-through entity to meet the requirements of this part; and (6) Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward.” Condition: National CASA/GAL’s subrecipient agreements do not contain a level of specificity to fully comply with federal subrecipient regulations. During our testing of subrecipient monitoring, we selected 20 subrecipient awards within Court Appointed Special Advocates and 17 subrecipient awards within the Juvenile Mentoring Program. For all awards tested, National CASA/GAL’s subaward agreements did not comply with 2 CFR §200.332, Requirements for Pass-Through Entities, as they do not contain a specific scope of work or project description. Cause: National CASA/GAL did not have the proper policies and procedures in place to ensure subaward agreements complied to relevant federal regulation, and that all required elements are located in subaward agreements, and not in the application or by reference to other documents. Effect or Potential Effect: Without adequate controls in place to ensure conformity with subaward requirements, grantees may not ensure compliance with any award special conditions or revised budgets agreed upon at contract implementation. Questioned Costs: None. Context: This is a condition identified per review of National CASA/GAL’s compliance with specified requirements using a non-statistically valid sample. For the Court Appointed Special Advocates Program, the population consisted of 100 subawards made totaling to $1,471,827 provided to subrecipients in 2022. The sample consisted of 20 subawards totaling $410,352 provided to subrecipients in 2022. For the Juvenile Mentoring Program, the population consisted of 83 subawards totaling to $2,339,039 provided to subrecipients in 2022. The sample consisted of 17 subawards totaling $441,399 provided to subrecipients in 2022. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend establishing and maintaining written policies and procedures to ensure subaward agreements conform to the requirements outlined in 2 CFR §200.332. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees that subrecipient agreements in place in 2022 did not fully comply with 2 CFR §200.332. Updates were made to the policies and procedures as well to ensure subaward files contain the requisite components. Management has additionally implemented a Grant Master File Checklist to ensure compliance with terms and conditions required in subaward agreements.
Federal Agency: Department of Justice Federal Assistance Listing Numbers: 16.756, 16.726 Programs: Court Appointed Special Advocates, Juvenile Mentoring Program Award/Pass-Through Entity Identifying Numbers: 2018-CH-BX-K001, 15PJDP-21-GK-02762-CASA, 2019-MU-FX-0004, 2020-JU-FX-0028 Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR §200.332 details requirements for pass-through entities in regard to subrecipient monitoring and management. Per 2 CFR §200.332, Requirements for Pass-Through Entities: “All pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (1) Federal award identification. i. Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); ii. Subrecipient’s unique entity identifier; iii. Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); iv. Federal Award Date (see the definition of federal award date in §200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency; v. Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; vi. Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; vii. Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; viii. Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass through entity, including the current financial obligation; ix. Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; x. Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); xi. Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; xii. Assistance Listings Number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; xiii. Identification of whether the award is R&D; and xiv. Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per § 200.414. (2) All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award; (3) Any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass-through entity to meet its own responsibility to the federal awarding agency, including identification of any required financial and performance reports; (4) i. An approved federally recognized indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal Government. If no approved rate exists, the pass-through entity must determine the appropriate rate in collaboration with the subrecipient, which is either: (A) The negotiated indirect cost rate between the pass-through entity and the subrecipient, which can be based on a prior negotiated rate between a different PTE and the same subrecipient. If basing the rate on a previously negotiated rate, the pass-through entity is not required to collect information justifying this rate, but may elect to do so; (B) The de minimis indirect cost rate. ii. The pass-through entity must not require use of a de minimis indirect cost rate if the subrecipient has a federally approved rate. Subrecipients can elect to use the cost allocation method to account for indirect costs in accordance with §200.405(d). (5) A requirement that the subrecipient permits the pass-through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient’s records and financial statements as necessary for the pass-through entity to meet the requirements of this part; and (6) Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward.” Condition: National CASA/GAL’s subrecipient agreements do not contain a level of specificity to fully comply with federal subrecipient regulations. During our testing of subrecipient monitoring, we selected 20 subrecipient awards within Court Appointed Special Advocates and 17 subrecipient awards within the Juvenile Mentoring Program. For all awards tested, National CASA/GAL’s subaward agreements did not comply with 2 CFR §200.332, Requirements for Pass-Through Entities, as they do not contain a specific scope of work or project description. Cause: National CASA/GAL did not have the proper policies and procedures in place to ensure subaward agreements complied to relevant federal regulation, and that all required elements are located in subaward agreements, and not in the application or by reference to other documents. Effect or Potential Effect: Without adequate controls in place to ensure conformity with subaward requirements, grantees may not ensure compliance with any award special conditions or revised budgets agreed upon at contract implementation. Questioned Costs: None. Context: This is a condition identified per review of National CASA/GAL’s compliance with specified requirements using a non-statistically valid sample. For the Court Appointed Special Advocates Program, the population consisted of 100 subawards made totaling to $1,471,827 provided to subrecipients in 2022. The sample consisted of 20 subawards totaling $410,352 provided to subrecipients in 2022. For the Juvenile Mentoring Program, the population consisted of 83 subawards totaling to $2,339,039 provided to subrecipients in 2022. The sample consisted of 17 subawards totaling $441,399 provided to subrecipients in 2022. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend establishing and maintaining written policies and procedures to ensure subaward agreements conform to the requirements outlined in 2 CFR §200.332. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees that subrecipient agreements in place in 2022 did not fully comply with 2 CFR §200.332. Updates were made to the policies and procedures as well to ensure subaward files contain the requisite components. Management has additionally implemented a Grant Master File Checklist to ensure compliance with terms and conditions required in subaward agreements.
Federal Agency: Department of Justice Federal Assistance Listing Numbers: 16.756, 16.726 Programs: Court Appointed Special Advocates, Juvenile Mentoring Program Award/Pass-Through Entity Identifying Numbers: 2018-CH-BX-K001, 15PJDP-21-GK-02762-CASA, 2019-MU-FX-0004, 2020-JU-FX-0028 Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR §200.332 details requirements for pass-through entities in regard to subrecipient monitoring and management. Per 2 CFR §200.332, Requirements for Pass-Through Entities: “All pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (1) Federal award identification. i. Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); ii. Subrecipient’s unique entity identifier; iii. Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); iv. Federal Award Date (see the definition of federal award date in §200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency; v. Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; vi. Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; vii. Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; viii. Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass through entity, including the current financial obligation; ix. Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; x. Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); xi. Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; xii. Assistance Listings Number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; xiii. Identification of whether the award is R&D; and xiv. Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per § 200.414. (2) All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award; (3) Any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass-through entity to meet its own responsibility to the federal awarding agency, including identification of any required financial and performance reports; (4) i. An approved federally recognized indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal Government. If no approved rate exists, the pass-through entity must determine the appropriate rate in collaboration with the subrecipient, which is either: (A) The negotiated indirect cost rate between the pass-through entity and the subrecipient, which can be based on a prior negotiated rate between a different PTE and the same subrecipient. If basing the rate on a previously negotiated rate, the pass-through entity is not required to collect information justifying this rate, but may elect to do so; (B) The de minimis indirect cost rate. ii. The pass-through entity must not require use of a de minimis indirect cost rate if the subrecipient has a federally approved rate. Subrecipients can elect to use the cost allocation method to account for indirect costs in accordance with §200.405(d). (5) A requirement that the subrecipient permits the pass-through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient’s records and financial statements as necessary for the pass-through entity to meet the requirements of this part; and (6) Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward.” Condition: National CASA/GAL’s subrecipient agreements do not contain a level of specificity to fully comply with federal subrecipient regulations. During our testing of subrecipient monitoring, we selected 20 subrecipient awards within Court Appointed Special Advocates and 17 subrecipient awards within the Juvenile Mentoring Program. For all awards tested, National CASA/GAL’s subaward agreements did not comply with 2 CFR §200.332, Requirements for Pass-Through Entities, as they do not contain a specific scope of work or project description. Cause: National CASA/GAL did not have the proper policies and procedures in place to ensure subaward agreements complied to relevant federal regulation, and that all required elements are located in subaward agreements, and not in the application or by reference to other documents. Effect or Potential Effect: Without adequate controls in place to ensure conformity with subaward requirements, grantees may not ensure compliance with any award special conditions or revised budgets agreed upon at contract implementation. Questioned Costs: None. Context: This is a condition identified per review of National CASA/GAL’s compliance with specified requirements using a non-statistically valid sample. For the Court Appointed Special Advocates Program, the population consisted of 100 subawards made totaling to $1,471,827 provided to subrecipients in 2022. The sample consisted of 20 subawards totaling $410,352 provided to subrecipients in 2022. For the Juvenile Mentoring Program, the population consisted of 83 subawards totaling to $2,339,039 provided to subrecipients in 2022. The sample consisted of 17 subawards totaling $441,399 provided to subrecipients in 2022. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend establishing and maintaining written policies and procedures to ensure subaward agreements conform to the requirements outlined in 2 CFR §200.332. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees that subrecipient agreements in place in 2022 did not fully comply with 2 CFR §200.332. Updates were made to the policies and procedures as well to ensure subaward files contain the requisite components. Management has additionally implemented a Grant Master File Checklist to ensure compliance with terms and conditions required in subaward agreements.
Federal Agency: Department of Justice Federal Assistance Listing Numbers: 16.756, 16.726 Programs: Court Appointed Special Advocates, Juvenile Mentoring Program Award/Pass-Through Entity Identifying Numbers: 2018-CH-BX-K001, 15PJDP-21-GK-02762-CASA, 2019-MU-FX-0004, 2020-JU-FX-0028 Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR §200.332 details requirements for pass-through entities in regard to subrecipient monitoring and management. Per 2 CFR §200.332, Requirements for Pass-Through Entities: “All pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (1) Federal award identification. i. Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); ii. Subrecipient’s unique entity identifier; iii. Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); iv. Federal Award Date (see the definition of federal award date in §200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency; v. Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; vi. Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; vii. Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; viii. Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass through entity, including the current financial obligation; ix. Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; x. Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); xi. Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; xii. Assistance Listings Number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; xiii. Identification of whether the award is R&D; and xiv. Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per § 200.414. (2) All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award; (3) Any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass-through entity to meet its own responsibility to the federal awarding agency, including identification of any required financial and performance reports; (4) i. An approved federally recognized indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal Government. If no approved rate exists, the pass-through entity must determine the appropriate rate in collaboration with the subrecipient, which is either: (A) The negotiated indirect cost rate between the pass-through entity and the subrecipient, which can be based on a prior negotiated rate between a different PTE and the same subrecipient. If basing the rate on a previously negotiated rate, the pass-through entity is not required to collect information justifying this rate, but may elect to do so; (B) The de minimis indirect cost rate. ii. The pass-through entity must not require use of a de minimis indirect cost rate if the subrecipient has a federally approved rate. Subrecipients can elect to use the cost allocation method to account for indirect costs in accordance with §200.405(d). (5) A requirement that the subrecipient permits the pass-through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient’s records and financial statements as necessary for the pass-through entity to meet the requirements of this part; and (6) Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward.” Condition: National CASA/GAL’s subrecipient agreements do not contain a level of specificity to fully comply with federal subrecipient regulations. During our testing of subrecipient monitoring, we selected 20 subrecipient awards within Court Appointed Special Advocates and 17 subrecipient awards within the Juvenile Mentoring Program. For all awards tested, National CASA/GAL’s subaward agreements did not comply with 2 CFR §200.332, Requirements for Pass-Through Entities, as they do not contain a specific scope of work or project description. Cause: National CASA/GAL did not have the proper policies and procedures in place to ensure subaward agreements complied to relevant federal regulation, and that all required elements are located in subaward agreements, and not in the application or by reference to other documents. Effect or Potential Effect: Without adequate controls in place to ensure conformity with subaward requirements, grantees may not ensure compliance with any award special conditions or revised budgets agreed upon at contract implementation. Questioned Costs: None. Context: This is a condition identified per review of National CASA/GAL’s compliance with specified requirements using a non-statistically valid sample. For the Court Appointed Special Advocates Program, the population consisted of 100 subawards made totaling to $1,471,827 provided to subrecipients in 2022. The sample consisted of 20 subawards totaling $410,352 provided to subrecipients in 2022. For the Juvenile Mentoring Program, the population consisted of 83 subawards totaling to $2,339,039 provided to subrecipients in 2022. The sample consisted of 17 subawards totaling $441,399 provided to subrecipients in 2022. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend establishing and maintaining written policies and procedures to ensure subaward agreements conform to the requirements outlined in 2 CFR §200.332. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees that subrecipient agreements in place in 2022 did not fully comply with 2 CFR §200.332. Updates were made to the policies and procedures as well to ensure subaward files contain the requisite components. Management has additionally implemented a Grant Master File Checklist to ensure compliance with terms and conditions required in subaward agreements.
Repeat of Prior Audit Finding 2021-005 Federal Program: Trans-National Crime Federal Agency: United States Department of State - United States Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs Federal Assistance Listing Number: 19.705 Federal Award Year: December 31, 2022 Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart D Section 200.332 of the Uniform Guidance require all non-Federal entities to assess subrecipients' risk, as well as monitor sub-awards passed through. All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient are to ensure that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition/Context: For the selection of two subrecipients, we were unable to verify that the respective subaward agreements contained accurate award information, such as the identification of the funding being U.S. federal funds, the federal Assistance Listing Number and the requirements that the subrecipients would need to comply with the Uniform Guidance. In addition, for two other subrecipients, we could not determine whether the quarterly programmatic and financial reports were reviewed or approved by Panthera Corporation as there was no evidence of formal review and approval. There was also no evidence that those subrecipients had been audited or monitored under appropriate local government regulations. This was not a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs: Not determinable. Cause: Panthera Corporation's procedures did not ensure the required written subrecipient monitoring policies were implemented in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Panthera Corporation's control design and operation does not provide reasonable assurance that Panthera Corporation is managing the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Recommendation: We recommend that Panthera Corporation clearly identify in each agreement with subrecipients the reference to the applicable federal Assistance Listing Number and request audited reports from subrecipients when applicable. We further recommend that Panthera Corporation follow its policies and procedures by ensuring that subrecipient quarterly reports are subject to the appropriate process as well as maintaining documentation to allow for an audit trail. View of Responsible Officials: Management acknowledges the finding and will be retaining support and updating subrecipient agreements to include the relevant award information and the Uniform Guidance compliance requirements for subrecipients.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, passed through Kansas Department of Aging Aging Cluster - ALN 93.044 - Special Programs for the Aging_Title III, Part B_Grants for Supportive Services and Senior Centers - 2201KSOASS and 2201KSOACM ALN 93.045 - Special Programs for the Aging _Title III, Part C_Nutrition Services - 2201KSOAHD Criteria or Specific Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring and Material Weakness Per 2 CFR 200.332, a pass-through entity is required to evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance with federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the subaward as well as monitor the activities of the subrecipient which include reviewing financial and performance reports, obtaining and reviewing subrecipient single audit reports, etc. Per 2 CFR 200.303, the non-Federal entities receiving federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain internal control design to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: No risk assessment or ongoing formal monitoring of the subrecipient was performed. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: There is only one subrecipient associated with this program. During 2022, the subrecipient received $418,171 ($104,601 - ALN 93.044, $313,570 - ALN 93.045) from the Unified Government. The subrecipient for this program is a long-time subrecipient that is familiar with federal compliance requirements, but the risk assessment was not done in writing. Additionally, ongoing monitoring including reviewing for single audit filings were not completed. Identification of Prior Year Finding: 2021-007 Effect: Federal funds could be improperly utilized by a subrecipient which does not have an adequate understanding of the requirements or tools to support the program. Cause: The Unified Government has a long-time relationship with this subrecipient and did not formalize the risk assessment process. Further, formalized processes for monitoring subrecipients were not operating effectively. Recommendation: We recommend that the Unified Government develop procedures to perform a risk assessment on all potential subrecipients before entering into an agreement to provide federal funds to that entity and revisit annually thereafter. Additionally, formal policies and procedures should be put in place over the various levels of monitoring that may occur as a result of the risk assessment and should also include a trigger to ensure single audit reports of subrecipients are reviewed. View of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Actions: The reason for recurrence is the finding was communicated late in the prior year and due to transition and turnover within the department's staff. Aging department is now completing these assessments annually.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, passed through Kansas Department of Aging Aging Cluster - ALN 93.044 - Special Programs for the Aging_Title III, Part B_Grants for Supportive Services and Senior Centers - 2201KSOASS and 2201KSOACM ALN 93.045 - Special Programs for the Aging _Title III, Part C_Nutrition Services - 2201KSOAHD Criteria or Specific Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring and Material Weakness Per 2 CFR 200.332, a pass-through entity is required to evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance with federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the subaward as well as monitor the activities of the subrecipient which include reviewing financial and performance reports, obtaining and reviewing subrecipient single audit reports, etc. Per 2 CFR 200.303, the non-Federal entities receiving federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain internal control design to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: No risk assessment or ongoing formal monitoring of the subrecipient was performed. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: There is only one subrecipient associated with this program. During 2022, the subrecipient received $418,171 ($104,601 - ALN 93.044, $313,570 - ALN 93.045) from the Unified Government. The subrecipient for this program is a long-time subrecipient that is familiar with federal compliance requirements, but the risk assessment was not done in writing. Additionally, ongoing monitoring including reviewing for single audit filings were not completed. Identification of Prior Year Finding: 2021-007 Effect: Federal funds could be improperly utilized by a subrecipient which does not have an adequate understanding of the requirements or tools to support the program. Cause: The Unified Government has a long-time relationship with this subrecipient and did not formalize the risk assessment process. Further, formalized processes for monitoring subrecipients were not operating effectively. Recommendation: We recommend that the Unified Government develop procedures to perform a risk assessment on all potential subrecipients before entering into an agreement to provide federal funds to that entity and revisit annually thereafter. Additionally, formal policies and procedures should be put in place over the various levels of monitoring that may occur as a result of the risk assessment and should also include a trigger to ensure single audit reports of subrecipients are reviewed. View of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Actions: The reason for recurrence is the finding was communicated late in the prior year and due to transition and turnover within the department's staff. Aging department is now completing these assessments annually.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, passed through Kansas Department of Aging Aging Cluster - ALN 93.044 - Special Programs for the Aging_Title III, Part B_Grants for Supportive Services and Senior Centers - 2201KSOASS and 2201KSOACM ALN 93.045 - Special Programs for the Aging _Title III, Part C_Nutrition Services - 2201KSOAHD Criteria or Specific Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring and Material Weakness Per 2 CFR 200.332, a pass-through entity is required to evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance with federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the subaward as well as monitor the activities of the subrecipient which include reviewing financial and performance reports, obtaining and reviewing subrecipient single audit reports, etc. Per 2 CFR 200.303, the non-Federal entities receiving federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain internal control design to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: No risk assessment or ongoing formal monitoring of the subrecipient was performed. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: There is only one subrecipient associated with this program. During 2022, the subrecipient received $418,171 ($104,601 - ALN 93.044, $313,570 - ALN 93.045) from the Unified Government. The subrecipient for this program is a long-time subrecipient that is familiar with federal compliance requirements, but the risk assessment was not done in writing. Additionally, ongoing monitoring including reviewing for single audit filings were not completed. Identification of Prior Year Finding: 2021-007 Effect: Federal funds could be improperly utilized by a subrecipient which does not have an adequate understanding of the requirements or tools to support the program. Cause: The Unified Government has a long-time relationship with this subrecipient and did not formalize the risk assessment process. Further, formalized processes for monitoring subrecipients were not operating effectively. Recommendation: We recommend that the Unified Government develop procedures to perform a risk assessment on all potential subrecipients before entering into an agreement to provide federal funds to that entity and revisit annually thereafter. Additionally, formal policies and procedures should be put in place over the various levels of monitoring that may occur as a result of the risk assessment and should also include a trigger to ensure single audit reports of subrecipients are reviewed. View of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Actions: The reason for recurrence is the finding was communicated late in the prior year and due to transition and turnover within the department's staff. Aging department is now completing these assessments annually.
Information on the federal program: Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Pass-Through Entity: N/A – Direct Grant Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Noncompliance Criteria: Title 2 Subtitle A Chapter II Part 200 Subparts A and D, Section 200.332, establishes requirements that pass-through entities must adhere to their subrecipient grant agreements and the monitoring processes of those subrecipients. Condition: City of Bloomington was unable to identify subrecipients of CSLFRF funding for the purposes of financial reporting and compliance with requirements under 2 CFR 200.332. Management misreported subrecipient activity on the SEFA, failed to include required contractual language for subrecipient awards in executed agreements, and did not perform monitoring procedures over the subrecipients that were identified during testing procedures. Cause: The City does not have an effective system of internal controls in place to effectively structure and review CSLFRF subaward agreements or to effectively monitor subrecipients. Effect: Due to lack of required information being present with agreements and the contracts not clearly differentiating between a subrecipient and a beneficiary, there could be noncompliance issues in how funds are spent and recorded by the subrecipient, which could lead to noncompliance issues for the City of Bloomington and its subrecipients. Questioned costs: There are no questioned costs. Context: The 10 subrecipients represent approximately 38%, $1,935,000, of the total award expenditures of $4,999,384. The condition reported was prevalent for each subrecipient participating in the award. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the City institute a policy for the handling of subrecipients for all sources of federal funding. The City should review Title 2 Subtitle A Chapter II Part 200 Subpart A and ensure their agreements with subrecipients include all required information. Management should review Title 2 Subtitle A Chapter II Part 200 Subpart D and ensure all necessary monitoring procedures are being performed over subrecipients moving forward. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management acknowledges the finding. See management’s corrective action plan attached to this audit report.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Commerce Federal Program Name: Office for Coastal Management Assistance Listing Number: 11.473 Federal Award Identification Year: 2020 Pass-Through Agency: National Fish and Wildlife Grant Agreement Award Period: 9/1/20-08/31/23 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria: 2 CFR 200.332(d) - establishes that the auditee must monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Condition: Management did not perform risk assessment for all subrecipients selected for testing. Management was unable to provide supporting documentation to show that they inquired with the subrecipients about any audits they had undergone or evidence that management received and reviewed audit reports to ensure timely follow ups were made if any findings pertaining to the Federal Award was noted. Context: A nonstatistical sample of 2 out of 4 subrecipients were selected for testing for the Office for Coastal Management program. The condition noted above was identified during our procedures over CFSC’s subrecipients. Effect: CFSC did not perform the following, which increases the risk of noncompliance: Required risk assessments for the subrecipients, Review subrecipient audit reports to ensure compliance with Federal Awards or make any necessary follow-ups pertaining to any findings noted, if any. Cause: CFSC’s procedures did not consistently ensure that the required risk assessments were performed. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that management modifies and strengthens its current policies and procedures to ensure that all required risk assessments are performed in accordance with the criteria outlined above. Management’s Views: See separate corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-001 Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 COVID-19 ? Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Pass-Through Agency: Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity Award Numbers/Years: ARPA 21-413010 / 2021-2022 Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.332, all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and include specific award identification data as detailed in the Uniform Guidance. Condition/Context: Out of the three executed subrecipient agreements selected for testing, none of them included the subaward information required by the Uniform Guidance. Our sample was not statistically valid. Effect: Subrecipients may not receive the appropriate subaward information. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: The County did not have a process to ensure that the subaward information was included in the subrecipient contracts for this award. Recommendation: We recommend the County develop a template with the required subaward information and share it with the subrecipients of this award program. In addition, this process should be incorporated into the regular subrecipient contracting procedures. Views of Responsible Officials: Lake County acknowledges that subaward information required by the Uniform Guidance was not provided to subrecipients in a separate notice. The County had previously incorporated the information in various clauses of the contracts/agreements with each subrecipient. The County has since developed a single notification form with the required subaward information which it includes with the initial contract and upon any modifications or change orders.
Subrecipient Monitoring Federal Department ? U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Identification Number and Year: NH75OT000024 and 2021 COVID-19 - Activities to Support State, Tribal, Local and Territorial (STLT) Health Department Response to Public Health or Healthcare Crises, Federal Assistance Listing # 93.391 County Department ? Department of Public Health Finding 2022 ? 009 CRITERIA 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart D?Post Federal Award Requirements Standards for Financial and Program Management, Section 200.332. Requirements for pass-through entities, requires that ?All pass-through entities must: (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F?Audit Requirements of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). (c) Consider imposing specific subaward conditions upon a subrecipient if appropriate as described in Section 200.208 Specific conditions. (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: (1) Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. (2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. (3) Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by Section 200.521 Management decision. (e) Depending upon the pass-through entity's assessment of risk posed by the subrecipient (as described in paragraph (b) of this section), the following monitoring tools may be useful for the pass-through entity to ensure proper accountability and compliance with program requirements and achievement of performance goals: (1) Providing subrecipients with training and technical assistance on program-related matters; and (2) Performing on-site reviews of the subrecipient's program operations; (3) Arranging for agreed-upon-procedures engagements as described in Section 200.425 Audit services. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F?Audit Requirements of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in Section 200.501 Audit requirements. (g) Consider whether the results of the subrecipient's audits, on-site reviews, or other monitoring indicate conditions that necessitate adjustments to the pass-through entity's own records. (h) Consider taking enforcement action against noncompliant subrecipients as described in Section 200.338 Remedies for noncompliance of this part and in program regulations.? SECTION III: FEDERAL AWARDS FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Subrecipient Monitoring Federal Department ? U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Identification Number and Year: NH75OT000024 and 2021 COVID-19 - Activities to Support State, Tribal, Local and Territorial (STLT) Health Department Response to Public Health or Healthcare Crises, Federal Assistance Listing # 93.391 County Department ? Department of Public Health Finding 2022 ? 009 (Continued) CONDITION During the current audit period, the Cook County Department of Public Health (DPH) did not perform adequate monitoring of its subrecipients as required by Federal regulations. CAUSE Based on discussions with management, the cause of this finding resulted from subrecipients being identified as vendors in the grant application. Also, the Program Lead informed Finance late which did not allow sufficient time to mobilize CCH staff and/or external consultant to perform subrecipient monitoring. EFFECT Failure to adequately communicate and monitor the activities and performance of a subrecipient could result in Federal awards being used for unauthorized purposes and DPH?s inability to adequately perform risk assessments on its subrecipient(s). QUESTIONED COSTS None. CONTEXT During the current audit period, we noted 27 subrecipients were awarded funds. During our review of 6 subrecipients, we noted adequate documentation was not maintained to support both the financial and programmatic monitoring of these subrecipients. Specifically, we noted documentation was not maintained to support DPH?s evaluation of each subrecipients risk of noncompliance and the frequency of monitoring to be conducted by DPH based on the assessed risk. Also, we noted no documentation was provided to verify whether the subrecipients were required to have a Single Audit conducted, including DPH?s review of the report, and if applicable, issuance of a management decision on audit findings noted as required by 2 CFR 200.332d(3). SECTION III: FEDERAL AWARDS FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Subrecipient Monitoring Federal Department ? U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Identification Number and Year: NH75OT000024 and 2021 COVID-19 - Activities to Support State, Tribal, Local and Territorial (STLT) Health Department Response to Public Health or Healthcare Crises, Federal Assistance Listing # 93.391 County Department ? Department of Public Health Finding 2022 ? 009 (Continued) CONTEXT (Continued) In addition, while we noted that DPH does have a draft policy manual regarding the monitoring of its subrecipients, we noted the manual does not currently address or include the process and related procedures for conducting both fiscal and programmatic monitoring. Specifically, the draft manual does not: a) include any related checklists and/or forms being utilized, b) address the performance of risk assessments, or c) detail the frequency and type of monitoring (i.e., desk review, site visit) to be conducted based on assessed risks. IDENTIFICATION OF REPEATED FINDINGS None. RECOMMENDATION We recommend DPH update its written procedures to document the monitoring of its subrecipients in accordance with 2 CFR 200.332 and once updated the draft policy should be finalized and implemented. Also, adequate staff resources and training should be in place to oversee the process of completing the required subrecipient monitoring, including documentation of the evaluation of the subrecipient risk of noncompliance and review of the Single Audit report, as required by federal regulations. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTIONS The County agrees with the finding and recommendation. The County?s corrective action plan is on page 64.
Finding 2022-001 Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 COVID-19 ? Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Pass-Through Agency: Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity Award Numbers/Years: ARPA 21-413010 / 2021-2022 Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.332, all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and include specific award identification data as detailed in the Uniform Guidance. Condition/Context: Out of the three executed subrecipient agreements selected for testing, none of them included the subaward information required by the Uniform Guidance. Our sample was not statistically valid. Effect: Subrecipients may not receive the appropriate subaward information. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: The County did not have a process to ensure that the subaward information was included in the subrecipient contracts for this award. Recommendation: We recommend the County develop a template with the required subaward information and share it with the subrecipients of this award program. In addition, this process should be incorporated into the regular subrecipient contracting procedures. Views of Responsible Officials: Lake County acknowledges that subaward information required by the Uniform Guidance was not provided to subrecipients in a separate notice. The County had previously incorporated the information in various clauses of the contracts/agreements with each subrecipient. The County has since developed a single notification form with the required subaward information which it includes with the initial contract and upon any modifications or change orders.
Subrecipient Monitoring Federal Department ? U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Identification Number and Year: NH75OT000024 and 2021 COVID-19 - Activities to Support State, Tribal, Local and Territorial (STLT) Health Department Response to Public Health or Healthcare Crises, Federal Assistance Listing # 93.391 County Department ? Department of Public Health Finding 2022 ? 009 CRITERIA 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart D?Post Federal Award Requirements Standards for Financial and Program Management, Section 200.332. Requirements for pass-through entities, requires that ?All pass-through entities must: (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F?Audit Requirements of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). (c) Consider imposing specific subaward conditions upon a subrecipient if appropriate as described in Section 200.208 Specific conditions. (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: (1) Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. (2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. (3) Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by Section 200.521 Management decision. (e) Depending upon the pass-through entity's assessment of risk posed by the subrecipient (as described in paragraph (b) of this section), the following monitoring tools may be useful for the pass-through entity to ensure proper accountability and compliance with program requirements and achievement of performance goals: (1) Providing subrecipients with training and technical assistance on program-related matters; and (2) Performing on-site reviews of the subrecipient's program operations; (3) Arranging for agreed-upon-procedures engagements as described in Section 200.425 Audit services. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F?Audit Requirements of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in Section 200.501 Audit requirements. (g) Consider whether the results of the subrecipient's audits, on-site reviews, or other monitoring indicate conditions that necessitate adjustments to the pass-through entity's own records. (h) Consider taking enforcement action against noncompliant subrecipients as described in Section 200.338 Remedies for noncompliance of this part and in program regulations.? SECTION III: FEDERAL AWARDS FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Subrecipient Monitoring Federal Department ? U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Identification Number and Year: NH75OT000024 and 2021 COVID-19 - Activities to Support State, Tribal, Local and Territorial (STLT) Health Department Response to Public Health or Healthcare Crises, Federal Assistance Listing # 93.391 County Department ? Department of Public Health Finding 2022 ? 009 (Continued) CONDITION During the current audit period, the Cook County Department of Public Health (DPH) did not perform adequate monitoring of its subrecipients as required by Federal regulations. CAUSE Based on discussions with management, the cause of this finding resulted from subrecipients being identified as vendors in the grant application. Also, the Program Lead informed Finance late which did not allow sufficient time to mobilize CCH staff and/or external consultant to perform subrecipient monitoring. EFFECT Failure to adequately communicate and monitor the activities and performance of a subrecipient could result in Federal awards being used for unauthorized purposes and DPH?s inability to adequately perform risk assessments on its subrecipient(s). QUESTIONED COSTS None. CONTEXT During the current audit period, we noted 27 subrecipients were awarded funds. During our review of 6 subrecipients, we noted adequate documentation was not maintained to support both the financial and programmatic monitoring of these subrecipients. Specifically, we noted documentation was not maintained to support DPH?s evaluation of each subrecipients risk of noncompliance and the frequency of monitoring to be conducted by DPH based on the assessed risk. Also, we noted no documentation was provided to verify whether the subrecipients were required to have a Single Audit conducted, including DPH?s review of the report, and if applicable, issuance of a management decision on audit findings noted as required by 2 CFR 200.332d(3). SECTION III: FEDERAL AWARDS FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Subrecipient Monitoring Federal Department ? U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Identification Number and Year: NH75OT000024 and 2021 COVID-19 - Activities to Support State, Tribal, Local and Territorial (STLT) Health Department Response to Public Health or Healthcare Crises, Federal Assistance Listing # 93.391 County Department ? Department of Public Health Finding 2022 ? 009 (Continued) CONTEXT (Continued) In addition, while we noted that DPH does have a draft policy manual regarding the monitoring of its subrecipients, we noted the manual does not currently address or include the process and related procedures for conducting both fiscal and programmatic monitoring. Specifically, the draft manual does not: a) include any related checklists and/or forms being utilized, b) address the performance of risk assessments, or c) detail the frequency and type of monitoring (i.e., desk review, site visit) to be conducted based on assessed risks. IDENTIFICATION OF REPEATED FINDINGS None. RECOMMENDATION We recommend DPH update its written procedures to document the monitoring of its subrecipients in accordance with 2 CFR 200.332 and once updated the draft policy should be finalized and implemented. Also, adequate staff resources and training should be in place to oversee the process of completing the required subrecipient monitoring, including documentation of the evaluation of the subrecipient risk of noncompliance and review of the Single Audit report, as required by federal regulations. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTIONS The County agrees with the finding and recommendation. The County?s corrective action plan is on page 64.
2022-001 – Communications with Subrecipients Finding Type: Significant Deficiency in internal control over compliance Program: ALN 93.959 – SAPT COVID Supplement ALN 93.959 – Prevention, Women’s Specialty Services, Administration ALN 93.959 – Treatment/AMS Criteria: As required by 2 CFR 200.332, the pass-through entity must communicate specific information to subrecipients, as applicable. Condition: Contracts with subrecipients did not include portions of required disclosures. Cause/Effect: Inadequate internal controls over compliance. Select contracts were not in compliance with 2 CFR 200.332. Questioned Cost: None. Recommendation: We recommend that the Entity update all contracts with subrecipients to include required language. View of Responsible Official: Management is in agreement with this recommendation.
2022-001 – Communications with Subrecipients Finding Type: Significant Deficiency in internal control over compliance Program: ALN 93.959 – SAPT COVID Supplement ALN 93.959 – Prevention, Women’s Specialty Services, Administration ALN 93.959 – Treatment/AMS Criteria: As required by 2 CFR 200.332, the pass-through entity must communicate specific information to subrecipients, as applicable. Condition: Contracts with subrecipients did not include portions of required disclosures. Cause/Effect: Inadequate internal controls over compliance. Select contracts were not in compliance with 2 CFR 200.332. Questioned Cost: None. Recommendation: We recommend that the Entity update all contracts with subrecipients to include required language. View of Responsible Official: Management is in agreement with this recommendation.
2022-001 – Communications with Subrecipients Finding Type: Significant Deficiency in internal control over compliance Program: ALN 93.959 – SAPT COVID Supplement ALN 93.959 – Prevention, Women’s Specialty Services, Administration ALN 93.959 – Treatment/AMS Criteria: As required by 2 CFR 200.332, the pass-through entity must communicate specific information to subrecipients, as applicable. Condition: Contracts with subrecipients did not include portions of required disclosures. Cause/Effect: Inadequate internal controls over compliance. Select contracts were not in compliance with 2 CFR 200.332. Questioned Cost: None. Recommendation: We recommend that the Entity update all contracts with subrecipients to include required language. View of Responsible Official: Management is in agreement with this recommendation.
2022-002: Subrecipient Monitoring Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Grantor: Missouri Department of Social Services Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.558 Program Title: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Pass-through Entity Identifying Number: CS200821001 Award Year: 2021-2022; 2022-2023 Questioned Costs: None Criteria: The Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR 200.332(d) requires non-federal entities providing federal funds to subrecipients to ?Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward.? As part of the organization?s monitoring procedures, on-site monitoring visits of each subrecipients SkillUp program performance are to be conducted each year to ensure compliance with the state of Missouri SkillUp Provider Handbook. Condition: The organization did not conduct on-site monitoring of SkillUp subrecipients during the fiscal year. Cause: The organization had turnover in the Executive Director and program management positions during the fiscal year. The monitoring is typically performed in the summer but the SkillUp Program Manager left in the summer of 2022 prior to conducting the monitoring, and the process of finding and training a replacement took some time. Effect: The lack of on-site monitoring or the performance of alternative procedures inhibits the organizations ability to ensure that subrecipients are complying with the requirements of the federal program. Recommendation: We recommend that the organization implement internal controls over the subrecipient monitoring process to ensure that on-site visits or adequate alternative procedures are in place to ensure subrecipient compliance with the requirements of federal programs.
FINDING 2022-037 Crime Victim Assistance, ALN 16.575, Subrecipient Monitoring - Risk Assessment and During-the-Award Monitoring See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table. Condition MDHHS did not sufficiently monitor and evaluate the risk of noncompliance with program requirements. We noted: a. MDHHS did not sufficiently monitor service activity for 3 (14%) of 21 subrecipients during fiscal year 2022. For 2 of the 3 subrecipients, MDHHS did not monitor the service activity for all quarters of fiscal year 2022. For 1 of the 3 subrecipients, MDHHS did not require the subrecipient to provide service activity data for its review. b. MDHHS did not evaluate 1 (5%) of 21 subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with program requirements to determine and implement the type of monitoring appropriate for the subrecipient. Criteria Federal regulation 2 CFR 200.332(d) requires MDHHS to monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure the subaward is used for authorized purposes in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward and that subaward performance goals are achieved. In addition, federal regulation 2 CFR 200.332(b) requires MDHHS to evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring. As part of its monitoring procedures, MDHHS reviews subrecipient service activity data. Cause For part a., MDHHS informed us data was reviewed and certified by the grantee, but MDHHS did not document its review in the log. For the service activity data that was not reviewed, MDHHS believed the administrative portion of the Crime Victims Assistance funds did not require service activity reports. For part b., MDHHS informed us it completes its annual risk assessment by November 15 and adjusts its monitoring plan for any awards issued through March 31. The grant agreement commenced May 1, 2022 and continued through September 30, 2022 and, therefore, was not included in the fiscal year 2022 monitoring plan. Effect Insufficient monitoring and evaluation of subrecipients could increase the subrecipients' and MDHHS's noncompliance with federal statutes, regulations, or the terms and conditions of federal awards. The federal grantor agency could issue sanctions or disallowances related to noncompliance. Known Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend MDHHS sufficiently monitor and evaluate the risk of noncompliance with program requirements. Management Views MDHHS agrees with the finding.
FINDING 2022-040 Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program, ALN 20.509, Subrecipient Monitoring - Subrecipient Audits See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table. Condition MDOT did not ensure its review of subrecipient single audit* reports and issuance of management decisions were completed within six months of the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC) acceptance date. MDOT's process is to begin its review of subrecipient single audits after all applicable audits are received. Therefore, it reviewed the 2020 and 2021 single audits in March 2022 and March and April 2023, respectively. We noted: a. For all 9 sampled 2020 single audits, MDOT's reviews were not timely and ranged between 72 and 229 days late. b. MDOT had not reviewed any of its subrecipient 2021 single audits as of September 30, 2022, which should have been reviewed between June 2022 and September 2022. In addition, MDOT did not issue management decision letters within six months of the FAC acceptance date for 3 subrecipient single audit reports. Each of these reports contained material weaknesses. Criteria Federal regulation 2 CFR 200.501 requires nonfederal entities who expend $750,000 or more in federal awards during their fiscal year to obtain a single audit for that fiscal year. Also, federal regulation 2 CFR 200.332(f) requires the pass-through entity to verify these subrecipients are audited as required by Subpart F of the Uniform Guidance, Audit Requirements, when it is expected the subrecipient's federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the $750,000 threshold. In addition, federal regulation 2 CFR 200.521 requires MDOT to issue a management decision letter on the appropriateness of all audit findings related to its federal awards and the subrecipient's corrective action plan within six months of acceptance by the FAC. Cause MDOT informed us an oversight occurred due to employee turnover and the need to update its procedures. Effect MDOT limited the State's assurance its subrecipients complied with grant requirements and implemented corrective action for audit findings to prevent future sanctions or disallowed costs, which could necessitate adjustments to MDOT's records. The federal grantor agency could issue sanctions or disallowance related to noncompliance. Known Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend MDOT ensure its review of subrecipient single audit reports and issuance of management decisions are completed within six months of the FAC acceptance date. Management Views MDOT agrees with the finding.
FINDING 2022-040 Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program, ALN 20.509, Subrecipient Monitoring - Subrecipient Audits See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table. Condition MDOT did not ensure its review of subrecipient single audit* reports and issuance of management decisions were completed within six months of the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC) acceptance date. MDOT's process is to begin its review of subrecipient single audits after all applicable audits are received. Therefore, it reviewed the 2020 and 2021 single audits in March 2022 and March and April 2023, respectively. We noted: a. For all 9 sampled 2020 single audits, MDOT's reviews were not timely and ranged between 72 and 229 days late. b. MDOT had not reviewed any of its subrecipient 2021 single audits as of September 30, 2022, which should have been reviewed between June 2022 and September 2022. In addition, MDOT did not issue management decision letters within six months of the FAC acceptance date for 3 subrecipient single audit reports. Each of these reports contained material weaknesses. Criteria Federal regulation 2 CFR 200.501 requires nonfederal entities who expend $750,000 or more in federal awards during their fiscal year to obtain a single audit for that fiscal year. Also, federal regulation 2 CFR 200.332(f) requires the pass-through entity to verify these subrecipients are audited as required by Subpart F of the Uniform Guidance, Audit Requirements, when it is expected the subrecipient's federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the $750,000 threshold. In addition, federal regulation 2 CFR 200.521 requires MDOT to issue a management decision letter on the appropriateness of all audit findings related to its federal awards and the subrecipient's corrective action plan within six months of acceptance by the FAC. Cause MDOT informed us an oversight occurred due to employee turnover and the need to update its procedures. Effect MDOT limited the State's assurance its subrecipients complied with grant requirements and implemented corrective action for audit findings to prevent future sanctions or disallowed costs, which could necessitate adjustments to MDOT's records. The federal grantor agency could issue sanctions or disallowance related to noncompliance. Known Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend MDOT ensure its review of subrecipient single audit reports and issuance of management decisions are completed within six months of the FAC acceptance date. Management Views MDOT agrees with the finding.
FINDING 2022-018 MDE, Subrecipient Monitoring - Subaward Information See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table. Condition MDE did not report to its subrecipients all subaward information as required by the Uniform Guidance. We noted: a. MDE did not report one or more of the following for 4 (16%) of 25 sampled Supporting Effective Instruction State Grant subrecipients and 28 (47%) of 60 ESF subrecipients: unique entity identifier, FAIN, federal award date, federal award project description, name of federal awarding agency and pass-through entity, ALN, Assistance Listing Title, federal award dollar amount, identification of whether the award is research and development, indirect cost rate for the federal award, an approved federally recognized indirect cost rate for the subrecipient, and closeout terms and conditions. b. MDE did not report the correct FAIN or closeout terms and conditions for all 5 sampled Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds subrecipients. Criteria Federal regulation 2 CFR 200.332(a) requires that all pass-through entities ensure that every subaward includes certain information. Cause For part a., MDE informed us MEGS+ is designed to automatically generate the grant award notifications upon approval of subaward applications; however, this function did not operate correctly in fiscal year 2022. For part b., MDE informed us because of an oversight, it did not always provide all required subaward information to subrecipients. Also, MDE believed it used the best available information at the time MDE developed and executed the subawards; however, our review of documentation noted MDE was provided the program's award identification prior to the executed subawards, but MDE staff did not appropriately communicate the information to applicable parties. Effect Subrecipients and their auditors may not be aware of the federal award information needed to ensure compliance with the federal requirements. We consider this to be a material weakness and material noncompliance for ESF because of the high error rate related to federal award information which was not disclosed to the subrecipient. The federal grantor agency could issue sanctions or disallowances related to noncompliance. Known Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend MDE report to its subrecipients all subaward information as required by the Uniform Guidance. Management Views MDE agrees with the finding
FINDING 2022-018 MDE, Subrecipient Monitoring - Subaward Information See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table. Condition MDE did not report to its subrecipients all subaward information as required by the Uniform Guidance. We noted: a. MDE did not report one or more of the following for 4 (16%) of 25 sampled Supporting Effective Instruction State Grant subrecipients and 28 (47%) of 60 ESF subrecipients: unique entity identifier, FAIN, federal award date, federal award project description, name of federal awarding agency and pass-through entity, ALN, Assistance Listing Title, federal award dollar amount, identification of whether the award is research and development, indirect cost rate for the federal award, an approved federally recognized indirect cost rate for the subrecipient, and closeout terms and conditions. b. MDE did not report the correct FAIN or closeout terms and conditions for all 5 sampled Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds subrecipients. Criteria Federal regulation 2 CFR 200.332(a) requires that all pass-through entities ensure that every subaward includes certain information. Cause For part a., MDE informed us MEGS+ is designed to automatically generate the grant award notifications upon approval of subaward applications; however, this function did not operate correctly in fiscal year 2022. For part b., MDE informed us because of an oversight, it did not always provide all required subaward information to subrecipients. Also, MDE believed it used the best available information at the time MDE developed and executed the subawards; however, our review of documentation noted MDE was provided the program's award identification prior to the executed subawards, but MDE staff did not appropriately communicate the information to applicable parties. Effect Subrecipients and their auditors may not be aware of the federal award information needed to ensure compliance with the federal requirements. We consider this to be a material weakness and material noncompliance for ESF because of the high error rate related to federal award information which was not disclosed to the subrecipient. The federal grantor agency could issue sanctions or disallowances related to noncompliance. Known Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend MDE report to its subrecipients all subaward information as required by the Uniform Guidance. Management Views MDE agrees with the finding
FINDING 2022-018 MDE, Subrecipient Monitoring - Subaward Information See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table. Condition MDE did not report to its subrecipients all subaward information as required by the Uniform Guidance. We noted: a. MDE did not report one or more of the following for 4 (16%) of 25 sampled Supporting Effective Instruction State Grant subrecipients and 28 (47%) of 60 ESF subrecipients: unique entity identifier, FAIN, federal award date, federal award project description, name of federal awarding agency and pass-through entity, ALN, Assistance Listing Title, federal award dollar amount, identification of whether the award is research and development, indirect cost rate for the federal award, an approved federally recognized indirect cost rate for the subrecipient, and closeout terms and conditions. b. MDE did not report the correct FAIN or closeout terms and conditions for all 5 sampled Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds subrecipients. Criteria Federal regulation 2 CFR 200.332(a) requires that all pass-through entities ensure that every subaward includes certain information. Cause For part a., MDE informed us MEGS+ is designed to automatically generate the grant award notifications upon approval of subaward applications; however, this function did not operate correctly in fiscal year 2022. For part b., MDE informed us because of an oversight, it did not always provide all required subaward information to subrecipients. Also, MDE believed it used the best available information at the time MDE developed and executed the subawards; however, our review of documentation noted MDE was provided the program's award identification prior to the executed subawards, but MDE staff did not appropriately communicate the information to applicable parties. Effect Subrecipients and their auditors may not be aware of the federal award information needed to ensure compliance with the federal requirements. We consider this to be a material weakness and material noncompliance for ESF because of the high error rate related to federal award information which was not disclosed to the subrecipient. The federal grantor agency could issue sanctions or disallowances related to noncompliance. Known Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend MDE report to its subrecipients all subaward information as required by the Uniform Guidance. Management Views MDE agrees with the finding
FINDING 2022-042 Education Stabilization Fund, ALN 84.425, Subrecipient Monitoring - During-the-Award Monitoring Procedures See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table. Condition MDE did not complete sufficient during-the-award monitoring procedures in fiscal year 2022. MDE provided its subrecipients a two-year grant and notified its subrecipients in their grant award notification that a final expenditure report (FER) was due by August 29, 2022. As of September 30, 2022, MDE received 1,335 (78%) of 1,717 FERs for the two-year grant. In addition, MDE contracted with a vendor to conduct desk reviews of ESF subrecipients beginning in July 2022. We noted: a. MDE did not complete any reviews of the FERs submitted during fiscal year 2022. We determined subrecipients submitted 990 (58%) FERs by August 29, 2022. b. Neither MDE nor its contractor could provide documentation supporting the subrecipient desk reviews finalized and whether any corrective action was required or enforcement action was taken against noncompliant subrecipients during fiscal year 2022. Criteria Federal regulation 2 CFR 200.303 requires the nonfederal entity to establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. In addition, federal regulation 2 CFR 200.332(d) states that all pass-through entities must monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. ? Following up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address single audit findings related to the particular subaward. Federal regulation 2 CFR 200.332(h) states that all pass-through entities must consider taking enforcement action against noncompliant subrecipients. MDE's grant award notifications required ESF subrecipients to submit a FER by August 29, 2022. MDE contracted for the completion of subrecipient desk reviews. Cause MDE elected to delay its review of FERs until all FERs were received. Also, because MDE's contracted desk reviews did not begin until July 2022, it was unable to finalize any individual subrecipient reviews by September 30, 2022. Effect MDE may not identify in a timely manner subrecipients that used funds for unauthorized purposes. We consider this to be a material weakness and material noncompliance because of lack of during-the-award monitoring activities. The federal grantor agency could issue sanctions or disallowances related to noncompliance. Known Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend MDE complete sufficient during-the-award monitoring of ESF subrecipients. Management Views For part a., MDE partially agrees with the finding. MDE acknowledges that it did not complete any reviews of the FERs submitted during fiscal year 2022. However, the Uniform Guidance does not specify a timeframe for the review of FERs for ESF funds and the ESF program is inherently more flexible than other federal programs in this regard. Although grant award notifications (GANs) originally required ESF subrecipients to submit a FER by August 29, 2022, MDE communicated to ESF subrecipients after the initial GANs that the August 29, 2022 due date was subject to change due to the continuously changing rules and requirements around this funding, including extension possibilities such as late liquidation. ESF FERs were due either within 60 days of full draw of the funds or within 60 days of the end of the award period, which could have been during the State's fiscal year 2022 or well after September 30, 2022. For this reason, under Uniform Guidance, MDE had the authority to delay the review of FERs until closer to the end date of the award. In the case of late liquidation, the U.S. Department of Education provided notification that extended the award period as far as 14 months beyond the original end date of the award. For part b., MDE partially agrees with the finding. MDE acknowledges that subrecipient desk reviews were not finalized; however, the majority of the subrecipient monitoring was complete. The Uniform Guidance does not specify a timeframe for ESF subrecipient monitoring to occur and no requirement or expectation was made that monitoring would be finalized by MDE management by September 30, 2022. While the MDE contractor was not tracking completion against the date of September 30, 2022, documentation was and is still available, upon request from the OAG, to demonstrate the substantial ongoing monitoring activities, such as desk reviews and review of amendments, as of the end of the State's fiscal year 2022. The Compliance Team was in regular contact with MDE throughout the monitoring process. The Compliance Team provided regular updates leading up to September 30, 2022 and shared comprehensive preliminary results with the department soon after September 30, 2022. Auditor's Comments to Management Views We determined, and MDE acknowledged, it did not complete any FER reviews or finalize any desk reviews as part of its during-the-award monitoring activities for the $1.8 billion provided to subrecipients in fiscal year 2022. In addition, the contractor acknowledged it did not have a tracking mechanism in place identifying when desk reviews were completed, consequently documentation did not exist to validate MDE's assertion that a majority of the subrecipient monitoring was complete. Federal regulation 2 CFR 200 Subpart F requires the SOM single audit be conducted annually in accordance with the State's fiscal year, which represents the period covered by the auditor's compliance opinion. Therefore, sufficient appropriate evidence must exist during the audit period to determine whether MDE complied with the subrecipient monitoring requirement identified as subject to audit in the OMB Compliance Supplement. Sufficient appropriate evidence did not exist in fiscal year 2022 to support compliance with federal regulation 2 CFR 200.332(d). Therefore, the finding stands as written.
FINDING 2022-018 MDE, Subrecipient Monitoring - Subaward Information See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table. Condition MDE did not report to its subrecipients all subaward information as required by the Uniform Guidance. We noted: a. MDE did not report one or more of the following for 4 (16%) of 25 sampled Supporting Effective Instruction State Grant subrecipients and 28 (47%) of 60 ESF subrecipients: unique entity identifier, FAIN, federal award date, federal award project description, name of federal awarding agency and pass-through entity, ALN, Assistance Listing Title, federal award dollar amount, identification of whether the award is research and development, indirect cost rate for the federal award, an approved federally recognized indirect cost rate for the subrecipient, and closeout terms and conditions. b. MDE did not report the correct FAIN or closeout terms and conditions for all 5 sampled Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds subrecipients. Criteria Federal regulation 2 CFR 200.332(a) requires that all pass-through entities ensure that every subaward includes certain information. Cause For part a., MDE informed us MEGS+ is designed to automatically generate the grant award notifications upon approval of subaward applications; however, this function did not operate correctly in fiscal year 2022. For part b., MDE informed us because of an oversight, it did not always provide all required subaward information to subrecipients. Also, MDE believed it used the best available information at the time MDE developed and executed the subawards; however, our review of documentation noted MDE was provided the program's award identification prior to the executed subawards, but MDE staff did not appropriately communicate the information to applicable parties. Effect Subrecipients and their auditors may not be aware of the federal award information needed to ensure compliance with the federal requirements. We consider this to be a material weakness and material noncompliance for ESF because of the high error rate related to federal award information which was not disclosed to the subrecipient. The federal grantor agency could issue sanctions or disallowances related to noncompliance. Known Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend MDE report to its subrecipients all subaward information as required by the Uniform Guidance. Management Views MDE agrees with the finding
FINDING 2022-042 Education Stabilization Fund, ALN 84.425, Subrecipient Monitoring - During-the-Award Monitoring Procedures See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table. Condition MDE did not complete sufficient during-the-award monitoring procedures in fiscal year 2022. MDE provided its subrecipients a two-year grant and notified its subrecipients in their grant award notification that a final expenditure report (FER) was due by August 29, 2022. As of September 30, 2022, MDE received 1,335 (78%) of 1,717 FERs for the two-year grant. In addition, MDE contracted with a vendor to conduct desk reviews of ESF subrecipients beginning in July 2022. We noted: a. MDE did not complete any reviews of the FERs submitted during fiscal year 2022. We determined subrecipients submitted 990 (58%) FERs by August 29, 2022. b. Neither MDE nor its contractor could provide documentation supporting the subrecipient desk reviews finalized and whether any corrective action was required or enforcement action was taken against noncompliant subrecipients during fiscal year 2022. Criteria Federal regulation 2 CFR 200.303 requires the nonfederal entity to establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. In addition, federal regulation 2 CFR 200.332(d) states that all pass-through entities must monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: ? Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. ? Following up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address single audit findings related to the particular subaward. Federal regulation 2 CFR 200.332(h) states that all pass-through entities must consider taking enforcement action against noncompliant subrecipients. MDE's grant award notifications required ESF subrecipients to submit a FER by August 29, 2022. MDE contracted for the completion of subrecipient desk reviews. Cause MDE elected to delay its review of FERs until all FERs were received. Also, because MDE's contracted desk reviews did not begin until July 2022, it was unable to finalize any individual subrecipient reviews by September 30, 2022. Effect MDE may not identify in a timely manner subrecipients that used funds for unauthorized purposes. We consider this to be a material weakness and material noncompliance because of lack of during-the-award monitoring activities. The federal grantor agency could issue sanctions or disallowances related to noncompliance. Known Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend MDE complete sufficient during-the-award monitoring of ESF subrecipients. Management Views For part a., MDE partially agrees with the finding. MDE acknowledges that it did not complete any reviews of the FERs submitted during fiscal year 2022. However, the Uniform Guidance does not specify a timeframe for the review of FERs for ESF funds and the ESF program is inherently more flexible than other federal programs in this regard. Although grant award notifications (GANs) originally required ESF subrecipients to submit a FER by August 29, 2022, MDE communicated to ESF subrecipients after the initial GANs that the August 29, 2022 due date was subject to change due to the continuously changing rules and requirements around this funding, including extension possibilities such as late liquidation. ESF FERs were due either within 60 days of full draw of the funds or within 60 days of the end of the award period, which could have been during the State's fiscal year 2022 or well after September 30, 2022. For this reason, under Uniform Guidance, MDE had the authority to delay the review of FERs until closer to the end date of the award. In the case of late liquidation, the U.S. Department of Education provided notification that extended the award period as far as 14 months beyond the original end date of the award. For part b., MDE partially agrees with the finding. MDE acknowledges that subrecipient desk reviews were not finalized; however, the majority of the subrecipient monitoring was complete. The Uniform Guidance does not specify a timeframe for ESF subrecipient monitoring to occur and no requirement or expectation was made that monitoring would be finalized by MDE management by September 30, 2022. While the MDE contractor was not tracking completion against the date of September 30, 2022, documentation was and is still available, upon request from the OAG, to demonstrate the substantial ongoing monitoring activities, such as desk reviews and review of amendments, as of the end of the State's fiscal year 2022. The Compliance Team was in regular contact with MDE throughout the monitoring process. The Compliance Team provided regular updates leading up to September 30, 2022 and shared comprehensive preliminary results with the department soon after September 30, 2022. Auditor's Comments to Management Views We determined, and MDE acknowledged, it did not complete any FER reviews or finalize any desk reviews as part of its during-the-award monitoring activities for the $1.8 billion provided to subrecipients in fiscal year 2022. In addition, the contractor acknowledged it did not have a tracking mechanism in place identifying when desk reviews were completed, consequently documentation did not exist to validate MDE's assertion that a majority of the subrecipient monitoring was complete. Federal regulation 2 CFR 200 Subpart F requires the SOM single audit be conducted annually in accordance with the State's fiscal year, which represents the period covered by the auditor's compliance opinion. Therefore, sufficient appropriate evidence must exist during the audit period to determine whether MDE complied with the subrecipient monitoring requirement identified as subject to audit in the OMB Compliance Supplement. Sufficient appropriate evidence did not exist in fiscal year 2022 to support compliance with federal regulation 2 CFR 200.332(d). Therefore, the finding stands as written.