Finding 2022-001 ? M. Subrecipient Monitoring Identification of the Federal Program: Grantor: Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing No. / FAIN: 93.847 / R24DK106743 Criteria or Specific Requirement: M. Subrecipient Monitoring ? A pass-through entity must evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward (2 CFR section 200.332(b)). Condition: Management should establish and implement a policy which addresses the requirement identified above, including evaluating the results of previous audits obtained by its subrecipients including whether or not the subrecipient receives a single audit in accordance with 2 CFR part 200, subpart F, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program. Cause: Management implemented updated policies related to subrecipient monitoring during 2022; however, such policies were not in effect for the full calendar year. Effect or Potential Effect: The lack of an effective control over subrecipient monitoring resulted in instances of noncompliance identified. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: In a sample of two subrecipients within the Research and Development Cluster, two instances of noncompliance were identified where it could not be ascertained that the Institute verified that subrecipients have been audited as required by 2 CFR part 200, subpart F, as Institute management did not evaluate the subrecipients? compliance. Identification as a repeat finding: This finding was reported as finding 2021-001 in the prior year. Recommendation: Management has implemented a policy over subrecipient monitoring during 2022. Management should therefore perform an annual review of Uniform Guidance grant compliance audit reports of subrecipients on an annual basis to identify and evaluate the subrecipients? risk of noncompliance for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with this audit finding. During 2022, management implemented an annual review control whereby the reports will be reviewed to ensure compliance with federal agency requirements.
FINDING 2022-003 Program Information: COVID-19 Governor?s Emergency Education Relief Fund (84.425C) Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): Federal Compliance Requirement: M. Subrecipient Monitoring - The pass-through entity must monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals (2 CFR sections 200.332(d) through (f)). The State of Georgia stipulates GEER II Funds may not be used for administrative or executive salaries or benefits, or for any purpose not permitted under Section 312 of the CRRSAA. Condition: The Organization did not have sufficient monitoring processes in place to detect unallowable personnel costs charged to the GEER grant. The Organization did not maintain sufficient audit evidence for subrecipient payroll charges under the grant. Cause: Lack of administrative oversight with respect to subrecipient monitoring requirements. Effect or Potential Effect: The Organization was not in compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements. Questioned Costs: $48,121 Context: We noted the following exceptions: For 11 of 51 monthly invoices selected for testing, the Organization did not properly identify unallowable personnel costs charged to the grant. For 17 of 51 monthly invoices selected for testing, the Organization did not properly verify hours charged to the grant by club employees. Identification as a Repeat Finding: No similar findings noted in the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization enhance its policies and procedures over subrecipient monitoring to properly detect and prevent unallowable charges to the grant as well as maintain sufficient audit evidence for all grant expenditures. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management will update subrecipient monitoring procedures to ensure compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements and will continue to follow these enhanced policies to properly detect and prevent unallowable charges to the grant. Management will implement monitoring processes to ensure subrecipients submit sufficient documentation prior to disbursing funds.
Criteria: Under the Uniform Guidance, pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes specific information identifying the federal award at the time of the subaward (2 CFR 200.332(a)). Additionally, entities receiving federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the awards (2 CFR 200.303(a)). Condition: Subaward agreements did not include certain required information such as the name and assistance listing number of the original federal award. Questioned Costs: Unknown Cause: Staff members at Seattle Good Business Network were not aware of the requirements for amounts passed through to subrecipients. Context: Seattle Good Business Network has not previously received significant federal awards and did not have adequate internal controls established to ensure all required communications were made to subrecipients. Effect: Failure to notify subrecipients of federal award information may result in subrecipients not properly administering the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds program in accordance with statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Recommendation: We recommend that Seattle Good Business Network updates its standard subaward agreements to include all required federal award information and implements policies and procedures to ensure staff are informed of all federal award compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the finding. See the attached unaudited corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-004: Internal Controls over Compliance and Other Matters M. Subrecipient Monitoring U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Children Exposed to Violence ? Assistance Listing No. 16.818 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES COVID-19 ? Community Services Block Grant? Assistance Listing No. 93.569 Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires program participants who are pass-through entities to monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals (2 CFR sections 200.331(d) through (f)). All pass-through entities must also ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following specific required information: federal award identification information, all requirements imposed by the pass-through entity, any additional requirements to meet the pass-through entity?s responsibilities, information on the indirect cost rate, requirements to permit access to subrecipients? records and statements, and appropriate closeout terms and conditions (2 CFR section 200.332). Condition: The U.S. Department of Justice?s (DOJ) EDPR of Youthprise?s Children Exposed to Violence Program (re. 2020-CV-FX-K007) noted compliance issues over Youthprise?s subrecipient monitoring. Deficiencies included the budget, risk assessments, determination of suitability, lobbying forms, and missing documentation as it related to its subrecipient grants. A formal letter was issued to Youthprise dated November 8, 2022, detailing the compliance issues noted. In addition, the subgrant agreements awarded for the COVID-19 ? Community Services Block Grant program did not include the required information per 2 CFR section 200.332. Cause: Internal controls were not in place to ensure Youthprise followed the subrecipient monitoring requirements outlined in 2 CFR section 200.331 and 200.332. Effect: The conditions noted above resulted in noncompliance over subrecipient monitoring by Youthprise. Context: The DOJ completed a EDPR of Youthprise?s Children Exposed to Violence Program (re. 2020-CV-FX-K007) during 2022. The DOJ outlined specific recommendations in its EPDR letter dated November 22, 2022 to address the conditions noted above and requested resolution to the conditions noted in its EPDR within 20 calendar days. DOJ completed a follow-up site visit at Youthprise on July 10, 2023 and determined all compliance issues to have been adequately resolved. The original agreement from Community Action Partnership of Hennepin County for the COVID-19 ? Community Services Block Grant program did not specify that Youthprise was considered a subrecipient of these federal funds, nor did it contain the required information under 2 CFR section 200.332. Youthprise originally considered themselves a contractor under the agreement and therefore the required subaward information per 2 CFR section 200.332 was not included in the subgrant agreements. Subsequently, it was verified with the pass-through entity that Youthprise is considered a subrecipient for this program. Questioned Costs: $0 Identification of Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that Youthprise review procedures to ensure adequate subrecipient monitoring is being performed over all subrecipient agreements, that meet the requirements of 2 CFR 200.331 and 2 CFR 200.332. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with this finding and is in the process of developing internal controls to ensure timely and appropriate actions are made on the deficiency noted. Additional details can be found in Youthprise?s Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2022-004: Internal Controls over Compliance and Other Matters M. Subrecipient Monitoring U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Children Exposed to Violence ? Assistance Listing No. 16.818 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES COVID-19 ? Community Services Block Grant? Assistance Listing No. 93.569 Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires program participants who are pass-through entities to monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals (2 CFR sections 200.331(d) through (f)). All pass-through entities must also ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following specific required information: federal award identification information, all requirements imposed by the pass-through entity, any additional requirements to meet the pass-through entity?s responsibilities, information on the indirect cost rate, requirements to permit access to subrecipients? records and statements, and appropriate closeout terms and conditions (2 CFR section 200.332). Condition: The U.S. Department of Justice?s (DOJ) EDPR of Youthprise?s Children Exposed to Violence Program (re. 2020-CV-FX-K007) noted compliance issues over Youthprise?s subrecipient monitoring. Deficiencies included the budget, risk assessments, determination of suitability, lobbying forms, and missing documentation as it related to its subrecipient grants. A formal letter was issued to Youthprise dated November 8, 2022, detailing the compliance issues noted. In addition, the subgrant agreements awarded for the COVID-19 ? Community Services Block Grant program did not include the required information per 2 CFR section 200.332. Cause: Internal controls were not in place to ensure Youthprise followed the subrecipient monitoring requirements outlined in 2 CFR section 200.331 and 200.332. Effect: The conditions noted above resulted in noncompliance over subrecipient monitoring by Youthprise. Context: The DOJ completed a EDPR of Youthprise?s Children Exposed to Violence Program (re. 2020-CV-FX-K007) during 2022. The DOJ outlined specific recommendations in its EPDR letter dated November 22, 2022 to address the conditions noted above and requested resolution to the conditions noted in its EPDR within 20 calendar days. DOJ completed a follow-up site visit at Youthprise on July 10, 2023 and determined all compliance issues to have been adequately resolved. The original agreement from Community Action Partnership of Hennepin County for the COVID-19 ? Community Services Block Grant program did not specify that Youthprise was considered a subrecipient of these federal funds, nor did it contain the required information under 2 CFR section 200.332. Youthprise originally considered themselves a contractor under the agreement and therefore the required subaward information per 2 CFR section 200.332 was not included in the subgrant agreements. Subsequently, it was verified with the pass-through entity that Youthprise is considered a subrecipient for this program. Questioned Costs: $0 Identification of Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that Youthprise review procedures to ensure adequate subrecipient monitoring is being performed over all subrecipient agreements, that meet the requirements of 2 CFR 200.331 and 2 CFR 200.332. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with this finding and is in the process of developing internal controls to ensure timely and appropriate actions are made on the deficiency noted. Additional details can be found in Youthprise?s Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2022-002 ? Subrecipient Monitoring Department of Health and Human Services Passed through Pennsylvania Department of Human Services Foster Care ? Title IV-E ? ALN 93.658 Subrecipient Monitoring Condition: The County appropriately notified the subrecipients of the federal award identification and performed a risk assessment; however, the County did not monitor ten of the twelve subrecipients during the year to ensure compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward. Criteria: The Pennsylvania Department of Human Services (PA DHS) and 2 CFR section 200.332 require pass-through entities to ensure that the award is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes information at the time of the subaward regarding federal award identification, all requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with federal statutes and the terms and conditions of the federal award, any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient, and a requirement that the subrecipient permit the pass-through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient?s records and financial statements as necessary. Additionally, the pass-through entity is required to evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance, monitoring the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward, and verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F, as necessary. It is the County?s policy, as part of the monitoring process, that each subrecipient of these federal awards be monitored annually. Cause: The County has established formal subrecipient monitoring policies. However, due to staffing issues, the County?s internal control process over subrecipient monitoring was not effective. Effect: A failure to monitor subrecipients? compliance with relevant federal requirements could result in noncompliance with the terms and conditions of the subawards. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding from the prior audit. Recommendation: We recommend that the County ensure adherence to the monitoring policy related to subrecipients and that these subrecipients be monitored on an annual basis in accordance with the policy. Management?s Response: Management agrees with this finding. See separate Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2022-002 ? Subrecipient Monitoring Department of Health and Human Services Passed through Pennsylvania Department of Human Services Foster Care ? Title IV-E ? ALN 93.658 Subrecipient Monitoring Condition: The County appropriately notified the subrecipients of the federal award identification and performed a risk assessment; however, the County did not monitor ten of the twelve subrecipients during the year to ensure compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward. Criteria: The Pennsylvania Department of Human Services (PA DHS) and 2 CFR section 200.332 require pass-through entities to ensure that the award is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes information at the time of the subaward regarding federal award identification, all requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with federal statutes and the terms and conditions of the federal award, any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient, and a requirement that the subrecipient permit the pass-through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient?s records and financial statements as necessary. Additionally, the pass-through entity is required to evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance, monitoring the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward, and verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F, as necessary. It is the County?s policy, as part of the monitoring process, that each subrecipient of these federal awards be monitored annually. Cause: The County has established formal subrecipient monitoring policies. However, due to staffing issues, the County?s internal control process over subrecipient monitoring was not effective. Effect: A failure to monitor subrecipients? compliance with relevant federal requirements could result in noncompliance with the terms and conditions of the subawards. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding from the prior audit. Recommendation: We recommend that the County ensure adherence to the monitoring policy related to subrecipients and that these subrecipients be monitored on an annual basis in accordance with the policy. Management?s Response: Management agrees with this finding. See separate Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2022-002 ? Subrecipient Monitoring Department of Health and Human Services Passed through Pennsylvania Department of Human Services Foster Care ? Title IV-E ? ALN 93.658 Subrecipient Monitoring Condition: The County appropriately notified the subrecipients of the federal award identification and performed a risk assessment; however, the County did not monitor ten of the twelve subrecipients during the year to ensure compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward. Criteria: The Pennsylvania Department of Human Services (PA DHS) and 2 CFR section 200.332 require pass-through entities to ensure that the award is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes information at the time of the subaward regarding federal award identification, all requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with federal statutes and the terms and conditions of the federal award, any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient, and a requirement that the subrecipient permit the pass-through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient?s records and financial statements as necessary. Additionally, the pass-through entity is required to evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance, monitoring the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward, and verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F, as necessary. It is the County?s policy, as part of the monitoring process, that each subrecipient of these federal awards be monitored annually. Cause: The County has established formal subrecipient monitoring policies. However, due to staffing issues, the County?s internal control process over subrecipient monitoring was not effective. Effect: A failure to monitor subrecipients? compliance with relevant federal requirements could result in noncompliance with the terms and conditions of the subawards. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding from the prior audit. Recommendation: We recommend that the County ensure adherence to the monitoring policy related to subrecipients and that these subrecipients be monitored on an annual basis in accordance with the policy. Management?s Response: Management agrees with this finding. See separate Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.332(d) states: Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: (1) Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. (2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. (3) Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by Section 200-521. Condition: As the HIV Care Formula Grant is a recurring grant, the Organization requires subrecipients to provide their most recent financial statement and Uniform Guidance audits annually when reapplying for grant funds. For one of three subrecipients tested, the subrecipient provided their 2021 Federal Form 990 when applying for 2022 funding and told the Organization they did not have a financial statement or Uniform Guidance audits. The federal assistance provided by the Organization to the subrecipient was less than $750,000, so this response was consistent with the Organization?s expectation for the subrecipient. However, per our review of the Federal Form 990, the subrecipient disclosed that it was required to undergo an audit under the Single Audit Act and that the audit had not been completed. The Organization did not notice this in the Federal Form 990 and did not follow-up on the delayed audit. The Organization performed quarterly fiscal audits of the subrecipient?s expenses and site visits with no compliance issues identified. Although the Organization was not aware of the financial statement and Uniform Guidance audit requirements and the untimely status of those audits, other effective monitoring procedures were completed. Cause: The Organization was not aware of the subrecipient?s other federal assistance resulting in the subrecipient having a financial statement and uniform guidance audit requirement. Effect or potential effect: Procedures required by 2 CFR section 200.332(d) related to reviewing financial reports of the subrecipient and following-up on deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award could not completed. The Uniform Guidance audit could have noted findings related to compliance with the spending of the federal assistance that would have been unknown to the Organization. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization require the subrecipient to provide a complete list of all their federal assistance when signing grant agreements. Based on that information received, we recommend that the Organization track all subrecipient with federal assistance over $750,000 and establish a process to ensure the financial statement and Uniform Guidance audits are obtained timely and monitoring procedures required by 2 CFR section 200.332(d) are completed. Views of responsible officials: Management acknowledges this finding and will address remediation in the accompanying corrective action plan in Appendix A.
Criteria - The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with the Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.331, a pass-through entity (PTE) must monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals (2 CFR sections 200.332(d) through (f)). In addition to procedures identified as necessary based upon the evaluation of subrecipient risk or specifically required by the terms and conditions of the award, subaward monitoring must include the following: 1. reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the PTE; 2. following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means; 3. issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. Furthermore, under the requirements of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (Pub. L. No. 109-282), as amended by Section 6202 of Public Law 110-252, hereafter referred as the ?Transparency Act? that are codified in 2 CFR Part 170, recipients (i.e., direct recipients) of grants or cooperative agreements are required to report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS). If a subaward/subcontract was subject to reporting under the Transparency Act, the action was required to be reported in FSRS no later than the last day of the month following the month in which the subaward/subcontract amendment obligation was made or in the subcontract award/subcontract modification was made. Conditions ? Our examination of the program?s subrecipient monitoring requirements includes the review and approval of financial and performance reports by the program managers. The financial reports are prepared by APS? grants administrator and submitted to the program managers whilst the performance reports and information are submitted by the subrecipients directly to the program managers. Of the program?s nineteen (19) subrecipients, we examined fifteen (15) subrecipients and observed that there was no consistent evidentiary documentation to support the monitoring oversight process performed by the respective program managers. However, we noted that APS did perform the required monitoring procedures and oversight of the subrecipients? financial and programmatic activities based on our review of program reports submitted to NSF, e-mail communication and minutes of meetings held during the year. We selected four (4) subrecipients and noted that for all the subrecipients selected, APS was unable to provide consistent evidentiary documentation to show that it had reviewed the subrecipients? single audit reports during the year. A subsequent review of the subrecipients? audit reports was performed and no reported deficiencies relating to APS? subawards was noted. We also tested a sample of two subrecipients and our examination of the monitoring and reporting requirements revealed that APS did not report the information on a subaward of $30,000 or more in federal funds and three grant amendments in the FSRS Reporting System to fulfil the FFATA requirements. Cause ? Management does not have adequate internal controls and policies in place to ensure that the monitoring controls performed over its subrecipients are documented appropriately and in a timely manner. There is also a lack of established monitoring and internal control procedures in place to ensure that reports required under the Transparency Act are prepared and submitted timely in FSRS Reporting System resulted in APS? noncompliance with the reporting requirements.Effect or potential effect ? APS is not in compliance with the subrecipient monitoring requirements as it did not maintain consistent documented evidence of its monitoring of subrecipients. Failure to comply with the reporting requirements of the Uniform Guidance could result in the awarding agency taking action such as reducing future funding. Questioned Costs ? None. Context ? These are conditions identified per review of APS? compliance with specified compliance requirements using a statistically valid sample. Recommendations ? BDO recommends that APS implement policies, procedures and controls that will ensure that all requisite reports are reviewed, and evidence of review are consistently documented and maintained. BDO also recommends that APS establish policies and procedure over the preparation and timely submission of reports required under the Transparency Act to ensure compliance with reporting requirements. Views of Responsible Officials - APS concurs with this finding. APS?s corrective action is described in the Management?s Corrective Action Plan included below.
Criteria - The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with the Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.331, a pass-through entity (PTE) must monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals (2 CFR sections 200.332(d) through (f)). In addition to procedures identified as necessary based upon the evaluation of subrecipient risk or specifically required by the terms and conditions of the award, subaward monitoring must include the following: 1. reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the PTE; 2. following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means; 3. issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. Furthermore, under the requirements of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (Pub. L. No. 109-282), as amended by Section 6202 of Public Law 110-252, hereafter referred as the ?Transparency Act? that are codified in 2 CFR Part 170, recipients (i.e., direct recipients) of grants or cooperative agreements are required to report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS). If a subaward/subcontract was subject to reporting under the Transparency Act, the action was required to be reported in FSRS no later than the last day of the month following the month in which the subaward/subcontract amendment obligation was made or in the subcontract award/subcontract modification was made. Conditions ? Our examination of the program?s subrecipient monitoring requirements includes the review and approval of financial and performance reports by the program managers. The financial reports are prepared by APS? grants administrator and submitted to the program managers whilst the performance reports and information are submitted by the subrecipients directly to the program managers. Of the program?s nineteen (19) subrecipients, we examined fifteen (15) subrecipients and observed that there was no consistent evidentiary documentation to support the monitoring oversight process performed by the respective program managers. However, we noted that APS did perform the required monitoring procedures and oversight of the subrecipients? financial and programmatic activities based on our review of program reports submitted to NSF, e-mail communication and minutes of meetings held during the year. We selected four (4) subrecipients and noted that for all the subrecipients selected, APS was unable to provide consistent evidentiary documentation to show that it had reviewed the subrecipients? single audit reports during the year. A subsequent review of the subrecipients? audit reports was performed and no reported deficiencies relating to APS? subawards was noted. We also tested a sample of two subrecipients and our examination of the monitoring and reporting requirements revealed that APS did not report the information on a subaward of $30,000 or more in federal funds and three grant amendments in the FSRS Reporting System to fulfil the FFATA requirements. Cause ? Management does not have adequate internal controls and policies in place to ensure that the monitoring controls performed over its subrecipients are documented appropriately and in a timely manner. There is also a lack of established monitoring and internal control procedures in place to ensure that reports required under the Transparency Act are prepared and submitted timely in FSRS Reporting System resulted in APS? noncompliance with the reporting requirements.Effect or potential effect ? APS is not in compliance with the subrecipient monitoring requirements as it did not maintain consistent documented evidence of its monitoring of subrecipients. Failure to comply with the reporting requirements of the Uniform Guidance could result in the awarding agency taking action such as reducing future funding. Questioned Costs ? None. Context ? These are conditions identified per review of APS? compliance with specified compliance requirements using a statistically valid sample. Recommendations ? BDO recommends that APS implement policies, procedures and controls that will ensure that all requisite reports are reviewed, and evidence of review are consistently documented and maintained. BDO also recommends that APS establish policies and procedure over the preparation and timely submission of reports required under the Transparency Act to ensure compliance with reporting requirements. Views of Responsible Officials - APS concurs with this finding. APS?s corrective action is described in the Management?s Corrective Action Plan included below.
Criteria - The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with the Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.331, a pass-through entity (PTE) must monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals (2 CFR sections 200.332(d) through (f)). In addition to procedures identified as necessary based upon the evaluation of subrecipient risk or specifically required by the terms and conditions of the award, subaward monitoring must include the following: 1. reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the PTE; 2. following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means; 3. issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. Furthermore, under the requirements of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (Pub. L. No. 109-282), as amended by Section 6202 of Public Law 110-252, hereafter referred as the ?Transparency Act? that are codified in 2 CFR Part 170, recipients (i.e., direct recipients) of grants or cooperative agreements are required to report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS). If a subaward/subcontract was subject to reporting under the Transparency Act, the action was required to be reported in FSRS no later than the last day of the month following the month in which the subaward/subcontract amendment obligation was made or in the subcontract award/subcontract modification was made. Conditions ? Our examination of the program?s subrecipient monitoring requirements includes the review and approval of financial and performance reports by the program managers. The financial reports are prepared by APS? grants administrator and submitted to the program managers whilst the performance reports and information are submitted by the subrecipients directly to the program managers. Of the program?s nineteen (19) subrecipients, we examined fifteen (15) subrecipients and observed that there was no consistent evidentiary documentation to support the monitoring oversight process performed by the respective program managers. However, we noted that APS did perform the required monitoring procedures and oversight of the subrecipients? financial and programmatic activities based on our review of program reports submitted to NSF, e-mail communication and minutes of meetings held during the year. We selected four (4) subrecipients and noted that for all the subrecipients selected, APS was unable to provide consistent evidentiary documentation to show that it had reviewed the subrecipients? single audit reports during the year. A subsequent review of the subrecipients? audit reports was performed and no reported deficiencies relating to APS? subawards was noted. We also tested a sample of two subrecipients and our examination of the monitoring and reporting requirements revealed that APS did not report the information on a subaward of $30,000 or more in federal funds and three grant amendments in the FSRS Reporting System to fulfil the FFATA requirements. Cause ? Management does not have adequate internal controls and policies in place to ensure that the monitoring controls performed over its subrecipients are documented appropriately and in a timely manner. There is also a lack of established monitoring and internal control procedures in place to ensure that reports required under the Transparency Act are prepared and submitted timely in FSRS Reporting System resulted in APS? noncompliance with the reporting requirements.Effect or potential effect ? APS is not in compliance with the subrecipient monitoring requirements as it did not maintain consistent documented evidence of its monitoring of subrecipients. Failure to comply with the reporting requirements of the Uniform Guidance could result in the awarding agency taking action such as reducing future funding. Questioned Costs ? None. Context ? These are conditions identified per review of APS? compliance with specified compliance requirements using a statistically valid sample. Recommendations ? BDO recommends that APS implement policies, procedures and controls that will ensure that all requisite reports are reviewed, and evidence of review are consistently documented and maintained. BDO also recommends that APS establish policies and procedure over the preparation and timely submission of reports required under the Transparency Act to ensure compliance with reporting requirements. Views of Responsible Officials - APS concurs with this finding. APS?s corrective action is described in the Management?s Corrective Action Plan included below.
FINDING 2022-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Subrecipient Monitoring Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number or Year (or Other Identifying Number): CY2021 Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The City received a total State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) allocation of $18,042,360. The City enlisted a non-profit, Heart City Health Center, Inc., to assist with public health information and paid them $50,000. The payment was made under the Responding to Public Health and Economic Impacts of COVID-19 eligible use category. Documentation to support the payment included an invoice from the Heart City Health Center, Inc., Board of Works Resolution 21-R-19, and Ordinance 5861. The Board of Works approved Resolution 21-R-19 on December 28, 2021. The resolution states in part, "Heart City Health Center is a separate legal entity from the City of Elkhart and as a separate legal entity, requires the formation of a subrecipient agreement to transfer funds from the City's ARPA Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds allocation to Heart City Health . . . now, therefore be it resolved, the Board of Public Works approves Heart City Health Center Inc. as a subrecipient of fifty thousand dollars in ARPA state and local fiscal recovery funds, and authorizes the Department of Law to prepare an appropriates subrecipient agreement for execution by the Board of Works and Heart City Health Center Inc. for the purposes approved herein . . ." The City provided SLFRF award funds to the Heart City Health Center, Inc. to carry out a program on the City's behalf, making the Heart City Health Center, Inc. a subrecipient of the City, as noted in their resolution, and, therefore, subject to subrecipient monitoring. The City was unable provide a copy of the subaward agreement or other supporting documentation to show evaluation of the subrecipient's risk of noncompliance or monitoring activities demonstrating compliance with the subrecipient monitoring requirement. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.331(a) states in part: "Subrecipients. A subaward is for the purpose of carrying out a portion of a Federal award and creates a Federal assistance relationship with the subrecipient. . . . Characteristics which support the classification of the non-Federal entity as a subrecipient include when the non- Federal entity: (1) Determines who is eligible to receive what Federal assistance; (2) Has its performance measured in relation to whether objectives of a Federal program were met; (3) Has responsibility for programmatic decision-making; (4) Is responsible for adherence to applicable Federal program requirements specified in the Federal award; and . . ." 2 CFR 200.332 states in part: "All pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward . . . (1) Federal award identification. (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier; (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); (iv) Federal Award Date (see the definition of Federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the Federal agency; (v) Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; (vi) Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; (vii) Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; (viii) Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the passthrough entity including the current financial obligation; (ix) Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the passthrough entity; (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); (xi) Name of Federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D; and (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414. (2) All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award; (3) Any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass-through entity to meet its own responsibility to the Federal awarding agency including identification of any required financial and performance reports; (4) (i) An approved federally recognized indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal Government. If no approved rate exists, the passthrough entity must determine the appropriate rate in collaboration with the subrecipient, which is either: (A) The negotiated indirect cost rate between the pass-through entity and the subrecipient; which can be based on a prior negotiated rate between a different PTE and the same subrecipient. If basing the rate on a previously negotiated rate, the pass-through entity is not required to collect information justifying this rate, but may elect to do so; (B) The de minimis indirect cost rate. (ii) The pass-through entity must not require use of a de minimis indirect cost rate if the subrecipient has a Federally approved rate. Subrecipients can elect to use the cost allocation method to account for indirect costs in accordance with ? 200.405(d). (5) A requirement that the subrecipient permit the pass-through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient's records and financial statements as necessary for the pass-through entity to meet the requirements of this part; and (6) Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward. . . . (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring . . . (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: (1) Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the passthrough entity. (2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. (3) Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by ? 200.521. (4) The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. . . ." Cause The system of internal controls as established by management of the City was not properly designed nor implemented. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the City's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. The City was responsible for providing a subaward agreement and monitoring the nonprofit. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the City. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the City design and implement a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure subrecipients are provided with an adequate subaward agreement and monitored as appropriate. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.332 notes, ?All pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (1) Federal award identification. (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier; (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); (iv) Federal Award Date (see the definition of Federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the Federal agency; (v) Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; (vi) Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; (vii) Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; (viii) Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity including the current financial obligation; (ix) Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); (xi) Name of Federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D; and (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414. (2) All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award; ?? Condition: For all four subawards selected for testing, the identification of the award being Research and Development (R&D) was not noted. Further, two of the four subawards selected for testing, had information missing from the subaward including (1) Recipient DUNS number (2) Unique Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) (3) Assistance Listing number (4) Indirect Cost Rate. Lastly, one subaward did not include the following information: (a) Period of Performance of subaward (b) Amount of federal funds obligated and awarded (c) General terms and conditions of subaward (d) Federal award project description (e) Name of Federal awarding agency. Condition (Continued): We consider this condition to be an instance of noncompliance relating to the Subrecipient Monitoring compliance requirement. Statistical sampling was not used in making sample selections. Questioned Costs: N/A. Cause and Effect: Without communication of the required information, subrecipients may overspend award amounts or incur unallowable expenses towards the grant. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization evaluates policies and procedures to ensure all required information is communication with the subrecipient. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this Single Audit Finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.332 notes, ?All pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (1) Federal award identification. (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier; (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); (iv) Federal Award Date (see the definition of Federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the Federal agency; (v) Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; (vi) Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; (vii) Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; (viii) Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity including the current financial obligation; (ix) Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); (xi) Name of Federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D; and (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414. (2) All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award; ?? Condition: For all four subawards selected for testing, the identification of the award being Research and Development (R&D) was not noted. Further, two of the four subawards selected for testing, had information missing from the subaward including (1) Recipient DUNS number (2) Unique Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) (3) Assistance Listing number (4) Indirect Cost Rate. Lastly, one subaward did not include the following information: (a) Period of Performance of subaward (b) Amount of federal funds obligated and awarded (c) General terms and conditions of subaward (d) Federal award project description (e) Name of Federal awarding agency. Condition (Continued): We consider this condition to be an instance of noncompliance relating to the Subrecipient Monitoring compliance requirement. Statistical sampling was not used in making sample selections. Questioned Costs: N/A. Cause and Effect: Without communication of the required information, subrecipients may overspend award amounts or incur unallowable expenses towards the grant. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization evaluates policies and procedures to ensure all required information is communication with the subrecipient. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this Single Audit Finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.332 notes, ?All pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (1) Federal award identification. (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier; (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); (iv) Federal Award Date (see the definition of Federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the Federal agency; (v) Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; (vi) Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; (vii) Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; (viii) Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity including the current financial obligation; (ix) Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); (xi) Name of Federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D; and (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414. (2) All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award; ?? Condition: For all four subawards selected for testing, the identification of the award being Research and Development (R&D) was not noted. Further, two of the four subawards selected for testing, had information missing from the subaward including (1) Recipient DUNS number (2) Unique Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) (3) Assistance Listing number (4) Indirect Cost Rate. Lastly, one subaward did not include the following information: (a) Period of Performance of subaward (b) Amount of federal funds obligated and awarded (c) General terms and conditions of subaward (d) Federal award project description (e) Name of Federal awarding agency. Condition (Continued): We consider this condition to be an instance of noncompliance relating to the Subrecipient Monitoring compliance requirement. Statistical sampling was not used in making sample selections. Questioned Costs: N/A. Cause and Effect: Without communication of the required information, subrecipients may overspend award amounts or incur unallowable expenses towards the grant. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization evaluates policies and procedures to ensure all required information is communication with the subrecipient. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this Single Audit Finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Material Weakness, Compliance and Internal Control over Compliance, Subrecipient Monitoring ALN 21.027: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Criteria Or Specific Requirement: Per 2 CFR 200.332, Mesa County is responsible for informing subrecipients of the Federal award identifiers including but not limited to award date, period of performance and Federal awarding agency and Assistance Listing Number and title. Mesa County is required to assess the subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the subaward. In addition, the County should also verify that the subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F- Audit Requirement under the Uniform Guidance. The monitoring policy should include an initial valuation of risk of noncompliance to determine the appropriate level of monitoring required related to the subaward as well as appropriate awarding documentation. Condition: We noted that management did not evaluate the risk of noncompliance of the subrecipient and did not convey expectation of requirements for audit under Federal Regulations. Effect: The County was not in compliance with the subrecipient monitoring regulations set forth in the Uniform Guidance. The possibility exists that noncompliance with federal requirements could go undetected without proper controls over compliance relating to the aforementioned requirements. Questioned Costs: None Context: During the testing performed, we noted the County did not perform a risk assessment of subrecipient nor did the County have documentation of informing the subrecipient of all required rules and regulations, including the need for the subrecipient to receive an audit as required under Uniform Guidance. Identification As A Repeat Finding: Not Applicable Recommendation: We recommend that management implement a formal subrecipient monitoring policy that defines how the County will monitor each subrecipient. This policy should include an evaluation of the risk of noncompliance for each subrecipient as well as how the subrecipients will be monitored. The County should also request a copy of the subrecipient?s audit, if applicable.
Finding Number: 2022-007 Repeat Finding: Yes Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control and Material Noncompliance Description: Subrecipient Monitoring and Management Major Programs AL#93.665 - Emergency Grants to Address Mental and Substance Use Disorders During COVID-19 ? Direct Award (DHHS) ? Award numbers: 6H79FG000252-01M003 and 6H79FG000689-01M004 AL#93.772 - Tribal Public Health Capacity Building and Quality Improvement Umbrella Cooperative Agreement ? Direct Award (DHHS) ? Award numbers: 5NU38OT000257-04-00 and 5NU38OT000257-05-00 Questioned Costs: None How the questioned costs were computed: N/A Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Condition: The Organization did not comply with any of the subrecipient monitoring and management requirements in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.332. Criteria: The subrecipient monitoring and management requirements that are codified in 2 CFR Part 200.332 requires the pass-through entity must: Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes: Federal award identification; All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award; Any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass-through entity to meet its own responsibility to the Federal awarding agency including identification of any required financial and performance reports. An approved federally recognized indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal Government. If no approved rate exists, the pass-through entity must determine the appropriate rate in collaboration with the subrecipient, which is either: The negotiated indirect cost rate between the pass-through entity and the subrecipient; The de minimis indirect cost rate The pass-through entity must not require use of a de minimis indirect cost rate if the subrecipient has a Federally approved rate. A requirement that the subrecipient permit the pass-through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient?s records and financial statements as necessary for the pass-through entity to meet the requirements of this part; and Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward. Evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring. Consider imposing specific subaward conditions upon a subrecipient if appropriate as described in ? 200.208. Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by ? 200.521. The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient's cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section ? 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. Depending upon the pass-through entity's assessment of risk posed by the subrecipient, the following monitoring tools may be useful for the pass-through entity to ensure proper accountability and compliance with program requirements and achievement of performance goals: Providing subrecipients with training and technical assistance on program-related matters; and Performing on-site reviews of the subrecipient's program operations; Arranging for agreed-upon-procedures engagements as described in ? 200.425. Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in ? 200.501. Consider whether the results of the subrecipient's audits, on-site reviews, or other monitoring indicate conditions that necessitate adjustments to the pass-through entity's own records. Consider taking enforcement action against noncompliant subrecipients as described in ? 200.339 of this part and in program regulations. Cause: The Organization?s management was not aware of the subrecipient monitoring and management requirements. Effect: The Organization was not in compliance with any of the subrecipient monitoring and management requirements, resulting in a material noncompliance and a material weakness in internal controls over compliance. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement systems and procedures to ensure compliance with the subrecipient monitoring and management compliance requirements.
Finding Number: 2022-007 Repeat Finding: Yes Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control and Material Noncompliance Description: Subrecipient Monitoring and Management Major Programs AL#93.665 - Emergency Grants to Address Mental and Substance Use Disorders During COVID-19 ? Direct Award (DHHS) ? Award numbers: 6H79FG000252-01M003 and 6H79FG000689-01M004 AL#93.772 - Tribal Public Health Capacity Building and Quality Improvement Umbrella Cooperative Agreement ? Direct Award (DHHS) ? Award numbers: 5NU38OT000257-04-00 and 5NU38OT000257-05-00 Questioned Costs: None How the questioned costs were computed: N/A Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Condition: The Organization did not comply with any of the subrecipient monitoring and management requirements in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.332. Criteria: The subrecipient monitoring and management requirements that are codified in 2 CFR Part 200.332 requires the pass-through entity must: Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes: Federal award identification; All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award; Any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass-through entity to meet its own responsibility to the Federal awarding agency including identification of any required financial and performance reports. An approved federally recognized indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal Government. If no approved rate exists, the pass-through entity must determine the appropriate rate in collaboration with the subrecipient, which is either: The negotiated indirect cost rate between the pass-through entity and the subrecipient; The de minimis indirect cost rate The pass-through entity must not require use of a de minimis indirect cost rate if the subrecipient has a Federally approved rate. A requirement that the subrecipient permit the pass-through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient?s records and financial statements as necessary for the pass-through entity to meet the requirements of this part; and Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward. Evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring. Consider imposing specific subaward conditions upon a subrecipient if appropriate as described in ? 200.208. Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by ? 200.521. The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient's cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section ? 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. Depending upon the pass-through entity's assessment of risk posed by the subrecipient, the following monitoring tools may be useful for the pass-through entity to ensure proper accountability and compliance with program requirements and achievement of performance goals: Providing subrecipients with training and technical assistance on program-related matters; and Performing on-site reviews of the subrecipient's program operations; Arranging for agreed-upon-procedures engagements as described in ? 200.425. Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in ? 200.501. Consider whether the results of the subrecipient's audits, on-site reviews, or other monitoring indicate conditions that necessitate adjustments to the pass-through entity's own records. Consider taking enforcement action against noncompliant subrecipients as described in ? 200.339 of this part and in program regulations. Cause: The Organization?s management was not aware of the subrecipient monitoring and management requirements. Effect: The Organization was not in compliance with any of the subrecipient monitoring and management requirements, resulting in a material noncompliance and a material weakness in internal controls over compliance. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement systems and procedures to ensure compliance with the subrecipient monitoring and management compliance requirements.
Finding Number: 2022-007 Repeat Finding: Yes Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control and Material Noncompliance Description: Subrecipient Monitoring and Management Major Programs AL#93.665 - Emergency Grants to Address Mental and Substance Use Disorders During COVID-19 ? Direct Award (DHHS) ? Award numbers: 6H79FG000252-01M003 and 6H79FG000689-01M004 AL#93.772 - Tribal Public Health Capacity Building and Quality Improvement Umbrella Cooperative Agreement ? Direct Award (DHHS) ? Award numbers: 5NU38OT000257-04-00 and 5NU38OT000257-05-00 Questioned Costs: None How the questioned costs were computed: N/A Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Condition: The Organization did not comply with any of the subrecipient monitoring and management requirements in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.332. Criteria: The subrecipient monitoring and management requirements that are codified in 2 CFR Part 200.332 requires the pass-through entity must: Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes: Federal award identification; All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award; Any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass-through entity to meet its own responsibility to the Federal awarding agency including identification of any required financial and performance reports. An approved federally recognized indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal Government. If no approved rate exists, the pass-through entity must determine the appropriate rate in collaboration with the subrecipient, which is either: The negotiated indirect cost rate between the pass-through entity and the subrecipient; The de minimis indirect cost rate The pass-through entity must not require use of a de minimis indirect cost rate if the subrecipient has a Federally approved rate. A requirement that the subrecipient permit the pass-through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient?s records and financial statements as necessary for the pass-through entity to meet the requirements of this part; and Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward. Evaluate each subrecipient?s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring. Consider imposing specific subaward conditions upon a subrecipient if appropriate as described in ? 200.208. Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by ? 200.521. The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. If a subrecipient has a current Single Audit report posted in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and has not otherwise been excluded from receipt of Federal funding (e.g., has been debarred or suspended), the pass-through entity may rely on the subrecipient's cognizant audit agency or cognizant oversight agency to perform audit follow-up and make management decisions related to cross-cutting findings in accordance with section ? 200.513(a)(3)(vii). Such reliance does not eliminate the responsibility of the pass-through entity to issue subawards that conform to agency and award-specific requirements, to manage risk through ongoing subaward monitoring, and to monitor the status of the findings that are specifically related to the subaward. Depending upon the pass-through entity's assessment of risk posed by the subrecipient, the following monitoring tools may be useful for the pass-through entity to ensure proper accountability and compliance with program requirements and achievement of performance goals: Providing subrecipients with training and technical assistance on program-related matters; and Performing on-site reviews of the subrecipient's program operations; Arranging for agreed-upon-procedures engagements as described in ? 200.425. Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in ? 200.501. Consider whether the results of the subrecipient's audits, on-site reviews, or other monitoring indicate conditions that necessitate adjustments to the pass-through entity's own records. Consider taking enforcement action against noncompliant subrecipients as described in ? 200.339 of this part and in program regulations. Cause: The Organization?s management was not aware of the subrecipient monitoring and management requirements. Effect: The Organization was not in compliance with any of the subrecipient monitoring and management requirements, resulting in a material noncompliance and a material weakness in internal controls over compliance. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement systems and procedures to ensure compliance with the subrecipient monitoring and management compliance requirements.
Finding 2022-002 – Subrecipient Monitoring Department of Health and Human Services Passed through Pennsylvania Department of Human Services Foster Care – Title IV-E – ALN 93.658 Subrecipient Monitoring Condition: The County appropriately notified the subrecipients of the federal award identification and performed a risk assessment; however, the County did not monitor ten of the twelve subrecipients during the year to ensure compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward. Criteria: The Pennsylvania Department of Human Services (PA DHS) and 2 CFR section 200.332 require pass-through entities to ensure that the award is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes information at the time of the subaward regarding federal award identification, all requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with federal statutes and the terms and conditions of the federal award, any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient, and a requirement that the subrecipient permit the pass-through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient’s records and financial statements as necessary. Additionally, the pass-through entity is required to evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance, monitoring the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward, and verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F, as necessary. It is the County’s policy, as part of the monitoring process, that each subrecipient of these federal awards be monitored annually. Cause: The County has established formal subrecipient monitoring policies. However, due to staffing issues, the County’s internal control process over subrecipient monitoring was not effective. Effect: A failure to monitor subrecipients’ compliance with relevant federal requirements could result in noncompliance with the terms and conditions of the subawards. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding from the prior audit. Recommendation: We recommend that the County ensure adherence to the monitoring policy related to subrecipients and that these subrecipients be monitored on an annual basis in accordance with the policy. Management’s Response: Management agrees with this finding. See separate Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2022-002 – Subrecipient Monitoring Department of Health and Human Services Passed through Pennsylvania Department of Human Services Foster Care – Title IV-E – ALN 93.658 Subrecipient Monitoring Condition: The County appropriately notified the subrecipients of the federal award identification and performed a risk assessment; however, the County did not monitor ten of the twelve subrecipients during the year to ensure compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward. Criteria: The Pennsylvania Department of Human Services (PA DHS) and 2 CFR section 200.332 require pass-through entities to ensure that the award is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes information at the time of the subaward regarding federal award identification, all requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with federal statutes and the terms and conditions of the federal award, any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient, and a requirement that the subrecipient permit the pass-through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient’s records and financial statements as necessary. Additionally, the pass-through entity is required to evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance, monitoring the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward, and verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F, as necessary. It is the County’s policy, as part of the monitoring process, that each subrecipient of these federal awards be monitored annually. Cause: The County has established formal subrecipient monitoring policies. However, due to staffing issues, the County’s internal control process over subrecipient monitoring was not effective. Effect: A failure to monitor subrecipients’ compliance with relevant federal requirements could result in noncompliance with the terms and conditions of the subawards. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding from the prior audit. Recommendation: We recommend that the County ensure adherence to the monitoring policy related to subrecipients and that these subrecipients be monitored on an annual basis in accordance with the policy. Management’s Response: Management agrees with this finding. See separate Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2022-002 – Subrecipient Monitoring Department of Health and Human Services Passed through Pennsylvania Department of Human Services Foster Care – Title IV-E – ALN 93.658 Subrecipient Monitoring Condition: The County appropriately notified the subrecipients of the federal award identification and performed a risk assessment; however, the County did not monitor ten of the twelve subrecipients during the year to ensure compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward. Criteria: The Pennsylvania Department of Human Services (PA DHS) and 2 CFR section 200.332 require pass-through entities to ensure that the award is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes information at the time of the subaward regarding federal award identification, all requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with federal statutes and the terms and conditions of the federal award, any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient, and a requirement that the subrecipient permit the pass-through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient’s records and financial statements as necessary. Additionally, the pass-through entity is required to evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance, monitoring the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward, and verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F, as necessary. It is the County’s policy, as part of the monitoring process, that each subrecipient of these federal awards be monitored annually. Cause: The County has established formal subrecipient monitoring policies. However, due to staffing issues, the County’s internal control process over subrecipient monitoring was not effective. Effect: A failure to monitor subrecipients’ compliance with relevant federal requirements could result in noncompliance with the terms and conditions of the subawards. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding from the prior audit. Recommendation: We recommend that the County ensure adherence to the monitoring policy related to subrecipients and that these subrecipients be monitored on an annual basis in accordance with the policy. Management’s Response: Management agrees with this finding. See separate Corrective Action Plan.
(MATERIAL WEAKNESS) – SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING– ALN 21.027 – COVID-19 – CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS Condition The County did not have an effective process in place to ensure required communications occur with subrecipients of federal awards. The agreements with the subrecipients did not explicitly include certain information required under 2 CFR 200.332(a)(1). Criteria The Federal Compliance Supplement and 2 CFR Section 200.332 requires pass-through entities to communicate and clearly identify to the subrecipient: 1) the award as a subaward at the time of the subaward by providing the information described in 2 CFR section 200.332(a)(1); 2) all requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the award; and 3) any additional requirements the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass-through entity to meet its own responsibility for the federal award. It also requires the pass-through entity to verify that every subrecipient is audited under the Uniform Guidance when required. Cause Management was not aware of the additional communication requirements imposed on pass-through entities. Effect There is a risk of noncompliance with the subrecipient monitoring communications, as well as a risk the subrecipient(s) may not be audited in accordance with the Uniform Guidance when required. Recommendation We recommend the County update its communications with subrecipients to include the required communications of the subrecipients’ responsibilities under the federal requirements, grant agreements and award requirements including, but not limited to its audit obligations under the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs None noted Views of Responsible Officials The county added information to the Payment Request Form to ensure that sub recipients are aware of possible single audit requirements, active SAM registry and UEI.
Finding 2022-002: Department of Health and Human Services – Research & Development Cluster – ALN #93.394, #93.395, and #93.399 – Subrecipient Monitoring Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.332 requires pass-through entities to evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance, monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes and is in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward, and verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F, as necessary. Statement of Condition: No formal documentation existed to indicate that the Foundation performed the required monitoring of its subrecipient’s activity and no written policy exists to establish procedures to document the monitoring of the subrecipient. Cause: The Foundation does not have employees and is operated by a volunteer Board of Directors. Additionally, no formal policies were written to establish procedures to document monitoring of subrecipients. Effect: A failure to monitor a subrecipient's compliance with relevant federal requirements could result in noncompliance with the terms and conditions of the subawards. Subrecipient monitoring was ineffective. Questioned Costs: None. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Foundation establish written policies to document the monitoring of its subrecipient by an individual independent of the subrecipient. This policy should address all required elements of 2 CFR 200.332. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with finding; see separate corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-002: Department of Health and Human Services – Research & Development Cluster – ALN #93.394, #93.395, and #93.399 – Subrecipient Monitoring Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.332 requires pass-through entities to evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance, monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes and is in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward, and verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F, as necessary. Statement of Condition: No formal documentation existed to indicate that the Foundation performed the required monitoring of its subrecipient’s activity and no written policy exists to establish procedures to document the monitoring of the subrecipient. Cause: The Foundation does not have employees and is operated by a volunteer Board of Directors. Additionally, no formal policies were written to establish procedures to document monitoring of subrecipients. Effect: A failure to monitor a subrecipient's compliance with relevant federal requirements could result in noncompliance with the terms and conditions of the subawards. Subrecipient monitoring was ineffective. Questioned Costs: None. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Foundation establish written policies to document the monitoring of its subrecipient by an individual independent of the subrecipient. This policy should address all required elements of 2 CFR 200.332. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with finding; see separate corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-002: Department of Health and Human Services – Research & Development Cluster – ALN #93.394, #93.395, and #93.399 – Subrecipient Monitoring Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.332 requires pass-through entities to evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance, monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes and is in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward, and verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F, as necessary. Statement of Condition: No formal documentation existed to indicate that the Foundation performed the required monitoring of its subrecipient’s activity and no written policy exists to establish procedures to document the monitoring of the subrecipient. Cause: The Foundation does not have employees and is operated by a volunteer Board of Directors. Additionally, no formal policies were written to establish procedures to document monitoring of subrecipients. Effect: A failure to monitor a subrecipient's compliance with relevant federal requirements could result in noncompliance with the terms and conditions of the subawards. Subrecipient monitoring was ineffective. Questioned Costs: None. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Foundation establish written policies to document the monitoring of its subrecipient by an individual independent of the subrecipient. This policy should address all required elements of 2 CFR 200.332. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with finding; see separate corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-002: Department of Health and Human Services – Research & Development Cluster – ALN #93.394, #93.395, and #93.399 – Subrecipient Monitoring Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.332 requires pass-through entities to evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance, monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes and is in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward, and verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F, as necessary. Statement of Condition: No formal documentation existed to indicate that the Foundation performed the required monitoring of its subrecipient’s activity and no written policy exists to establish procedures to document the monitoring of the subrecipient. Cause: The Foundation does not have employees and is operated by a volunteer Board of Directors. Additionally, no formal policies were written to establish procedures to document monitoring of subrecipients. Effect: A failure to monitor a subrecipient's compliance with relevant federal requirements could result in noncompliance with the terms and conditions of the subawards. Subrecipient monitoring was ineffective. Questioned Costs: None. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Foundation establish written policies to document the monitoring of its subrecipient by an individual independent of the subrecipient. This policy should address all required elements of 2 CFR 200.332. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with finding; see separate corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-002: Department of Health and Human Services – Research & Development Cluster – ALN #93.394, #93.395, and #93.399 – Subrecipient Monitoring Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.332 requires pass-through entities to evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance, monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes and is in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward, and verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F, as necessary. Statement of Condition: No formal documentation existed to indicate that the Foundation performed the required monitoring of its subrecipient’s activity and no written policy exists to establish procedures to document the monitoring of the subrecipient. Cause: The Foundation does not have employees and is operated by a volunteer Board of Directors. Additionally, no formal policies were written to establish procedures to document monitoring of subrecipients. Effect: A failure to monitor a subrecipient's compliance with relevant federal requirements could result in noncompliance with the terms and conditions of the subawards. Subrecipient monitoring was ineffective. Questioned Costs: None. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Foundation establish written policies to document the monitoring of its subrecipient by an individual independent of the subrecipient. This policy should address all required elements of 2 CFR 200.332. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with finding; see separate corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-002: Department of Health and Human Services – Research & Development Cluster – ALN #93.394, #93.395, and #93.399 – Subrecipient Monitoring Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.332 requires pass-through entities to evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance, monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes and is in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward, and verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F, as necessary. Statement of Condition: No formal documentation existed to indicate that the Foundation performed the required monitoring of its subrecipient’s activity and no written policy exists to establish procedures to document the monitoring of the subrecipient. Cause: The Foundation does not have employees and is operated by a volunteer Board of Directors. Additionally, no formal policies were written to establish procedures to document monitoring of subrecipients. Effect: A failure to monitor a subrecipient's compliance with relevant federal requirements could result in noncompliance with the terms and conditions of the subawards. Subrecipient monitoring was ineffective. Questioned Costs: None. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Foundation establish written policies to document the monitoring of its subrecipient by an individual independent of the subrecipient. This policy should address all required elements of 2 CFR 200.332. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with finding; see separate corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-002: Department of Health and Human Services – Research & Development Cluster – ALN #93.394, #93.395, and #93.399 – Subrecipient Monitoring Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.332 requires pass-through entities to evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance, monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes and is in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward, and verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F, as necessary. Statement of Condition: No formal documentation existed to indicate that the Foundation performed the required monitoring of its subrecipient’s activity and no written policy exists to establish procedures to document the monitoring of the subrecipient. Cause: The Foundation does not have employees and is operated by a volunteer Board of Directors. Additionally, no formal policies were written to establish procedures to document monitoring of subrecipients. Effect: A failure to monitor a subrecipient's compliance with relevant federal requirements could result in noncompliance with the terms and conditions of the subawards. Subrecipient monitoring was ineffective. Questioned Costs: None. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Foundation establish written policies to document the monitoring of its subrecipient by an individual independent of the subrecipient. This policy should address all required elements of 2 CFR 200.332. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with finding; see separate corrective action plan.
Federal Program Community Programs to Improve Minority Health - 93.137, Contract 1 CPIMP211290-01-00 Criteria Each entity that passes federal funds to a subrecipient must evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward and monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes per 2 CFR, Section 200.332(d). Condition The City did not perform a risk assessment or any additional monitoring of subrecipients beyond reviewing requests for payment. Cause This is a new grant for the City in 2022 and there was turnover in the grant director position during the year. Effect If subrecipient monitoring procedures were performed, the City would be able to ensure that funds were used to carry out the subaward for the intended purpose. Questioned Costs None. Context The City was awarded a grant to be used for improving minority health. To carry out part of the grant programs, the City has contracted with subrecipients’ organizations. The City has a process where all applications for reimbursement from the subrecipients is reviewed with proper documentation before approval for payment. The City does not perform a risk assessment of the subrecipient agencies nor any further monitoring such as site visits. Repeat Finding Yes. Recommendation We recommend that the City continue developing standard operating procedures for subrecipient monitoring of grant activities. This is especially important for grants handled outside the community development office. Management Response See corrective action plan included in this report package.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 14.241 – Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS Passed through Texas Department of State Health Services Award Periods: September 1, 2021 to March 31, 2022 and April 1, 2022 to August 31, 2023 Contract No. 537-17-0195-00001 and HHS001022300003 Texas Department of State Health Services State HIV Service Grants Award Periods: September 1, 2021 to March 31, 2022 and April 1, 2022 to August 31, 2023 Contract No. 537-18-0097-00001 and HHS001022300002 Criteria: Pass-through entities are required to monitor subrecipients in accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.332. Further, under 2 CFR Section 200.303a, non-federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls to provide reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition: For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, The Resource Group did not perform financial monitoring of its subrecipients. Cause: Initially subrecipient monitoring was suspended due to COVID-19 in 2020 and reinstated late 2021. The Resource Group restarted their monitoring of subrecipients, however the monitoring was done by two individuals, one for programming and the other for financial monitoring. Monitoring of programming was completed timely, while the financial monitoring was not. Further, the Finance Director, who was responsible for the financial monitoring, resigned in 2023 and the successor Finance Director was hired in August 2023. Effect: As a result of not completing all financial monitoring and the turnover in Finance Director, The Resource Group is not in compliance with grant requirements. Questioned Costs: None Noted Recommendation: The Resource Group should follow its policies to perform fiscal monitoring on its subrecipients in accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.332. Views of Responsible Officials: See corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-009 Subrecipient Monitoring – Material Noncompliance and Material Weakness in Internal Controls Over Compliance Agency/Pass-through Grantor Department of the Treasury, Department of Health and Human Services passed through the State of Alaska Department of Health and Social Services ALN and Program Name 21.027 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – COVID 19 21.023 – Emergency Rental Assistance Program – COVID 19 93.323 – COVID-19-Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) Award # 21.027 – 1505-0271 21.023 – ERA-2101060120 (ERA 1); ERA2-0469 (ERA 2) 93.323 – C0621-570-BB Award Year 21.027 – 2022 21.023 - 2022 93.323 – 3/15/2021-6/30/2022 Criteria or Specific Requirement 2 CFR 200.332 requires pass-through entities to ensure that subrecipients comply with the terms and conditions of 2 CFR 200.501 related to audit requirements. This includes ensuring that every subaward is (1) clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward; (2) includes the necessary information at the time of the subaward for subrecipient reporting on federal awards (2 CFR 200.332) and (3) includes requirement to follow 2 CFR 200.501 if expenditure thresholds are met. This also includes verifying that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR Subpart F if the subrecipient’s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. Condition During our testing of subrecipient monitoring, we noted all 18 of the subrecipient agreements tested did not include language clearly identifying the federal program from which the subaward originated, or the applicable requirements from 2 CFR 300.332 and Subpart F. We also noted for all 18 subrecipients tested that the Municipality did not verify whether subrecipients were audited in accordance with 2 CFR 200.501 where applicable. Cause The issuance of subrecipient agreements for these grants related to new funding streams in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Significant amounts of funding were provided in a short period of time, and systems to distribute these monies were newly created and implemented. The standard award agreements were not reviewed in advance to ensure adherence to federal requirements. Staff were not fully trained on the informational requirements and monitoring responsibilities related to audit requirements. Effect or Potential Effect Subrecipients may be unaware and not in compliance with the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200. Questioned Costs Not applicable. Context For ALN 21.027 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, we tested a sample of 10 subawards totaling to $28,079,600 from a population of 37 totaling to $37,052,621. For ALN 21.023 - Emergency Rental Assistance Program, we tested all 3 subawards within the population totaling to $10,900,177. For ALN 93.323 – COVID-19-Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC), we tested all 5 subawards within the population totaling to $5,086,923. As noted in the condition, we identified exceptions for 18 subrecipient agreements tested. All samples tested were selected using nonstatistical sampling methods and were not statistically valid samples. Identification as a Repeat Finding Yes. This finding was reported as Finding 2021-002 in the prior audit. Recommendation Management should establish policies to ensure subawards contain required federal award information. In addition, procedures should be established to monitor subrecipient compliance with audit requirements of 2 CFR 200.501. Views of Responsible Officials Management concurs with the finding and will adhere to the corrective action plan included in this report. Management plans to revise policies and procedures related to subrecipient monitoring.
Finding 2022-009 Subrecipient Monitoring – Material Noncompliance and Material Weakness in Internal Controls Over Compliance Agency/Pass-through Grantor Department of the Treasury, Department of Health and Human Services passed through the State of Alaska Department of Health and Social Services ALN and Program Name 21.027 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – COVID 19 21.023 – Emergency Rental Assistance Program – COVID 19 93.323 – COVID-19-Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) Award # 21.027 – 1505-0271 21.023 – ERA-2101060120 (ERA 1); ERA2-0469 (ERA 2) 93.323 – C0621-570-BB Award Year 21.027 – 2022 21.023 - 2022 93.323 – 3/15/2021-6/30/2022 Criteria or Specific Requirement 2 CFR 200.332 requires pass-through entities to ensure that subrecipients comply with the terms and conditions of 2 CFR 200.501 related to audit requirements. This includes ensuring that every subaward is (1) clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward; (2) includes the necessary information at the time of the subaward for subrecipient reporting on federal awards (2 CFR 200.332) and (3) includes requirement to follow 2 CFR 200.501 if expenditure thresholds are met. This also includes verifying that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR Subpart F if the subrecipient’s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. Condition During our testing of subrecipient monitoring, we noted all 18 of the subrecipient agreements tested did not include language clearly identifying the federal program from which the subaward originated, or the applicable requirements from 2 CFR 300.332 and Subpart F. We also noted for all 18 subrecipients tested that the Municipality did not verify whether subrecipients were audited in accordance with 2 CFR 200.501 where applicable. Cause The issuance of subrecipient agreements for these grants related to new funding streams in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Significant amounts of funding were provided in a short period of time, and systems to distribute these monies were newly created and implemented. The standard award agreements were not reviewed in advance to ensure adherence to federal requirements. Staff were not fully trained on the informational requirements and monitoring responsibilities related to audit requirements. Effect or Potential Effect Subrecipients may be unaware and not in compliance with the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200. Questioned Costs Not applicable. Context For ALN 21.027 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, we tested a sample of 10 subawards totaling to $28,079,600 from a population of 37 totaling to $37,052,621. For ALN 21.023 - Emergency Rental Assistance Program, we tested all 3 subawards within the population totaling to $10,900,177. For ALN 93.323 – COVID-19-Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC), we tested all 5 subawards within the population totaling to $5,086,923. As noted in the condition, we identified exceptions for 18 subrecipient agreements tested. All samples tested were selected using nonstatistical sampling methods and were not statistically valid samples. Identification as a Repeat Finding Yes. This finding was reported as Finding 2021-002 in the prior audit. Recommendation Management should establish policies to ensure subawards contain required federal award information. In addition, procedures should be established to monitor subrecipient compliance with audit requirements of 2 CFR 200.501. Views of Responsible Officials Management concurs with the finding and will adhere to the corrective action plan included in this report. Management plans to revise policies and procedures related to subrecipient monitoring.
Finding 2022-009 Subrecipient Monitoring – Material Noncompliance and Material Weakness in Internal Controls Over Compliance Agency/Pass-through Grantor Department of the Treasury, Department of Health and Human Services passed through the State of Alaska Department of Health and Social Services ALN and Program Name 21.027 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – COVID 19 21.023 – Emergency Rental Assistance Program – COVID 19 93.323 – COVID-19-Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) Award # 21.027 – 1505-0271 21.023 – ERA-2101060120 (ERA 1); ERA2-0469 (ERA 2) 93.323 – C0621-570-BB Award Year 21.027 – 2022 21.023 - 2022 93.323 – 3/15/2021-6/30/2022 Criteria or Specific Requirement 2 CFR 200.332 requires pass-through entities to ensure that subrecipients comply with the terms and conditions of 2 CFR 200.501 related to audit requirements. This includes ensuring that every subaward is (1) clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward; (2) includes the necessary information at the time of the subaward for subrecipient reporting on federal awards (2 CFR 200.332) and (3) includes requirement to follow 2 CFR 200.501 if expenditure thresholds are met. This also includes verifying that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR Subpart F if the subrecipient’s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in 2 CFR 200.501. Condition During our testing of subrecipient monitoring, we noted all 18 of the subrecipient agreements tested did not include language clearly identifying the federal program from which the subaward originated, or the applicable requirements from 2 CFR 300.332 and Subpart F. We also noted for all 18 subrecipients tested that the Municipality did not verify whether subrecipients were audited in accordance with 2 CFR 200.501 where applicable. Cause The issuance of subrecipient agreements for these grants related to new funding streams in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Significant amounts of funding were provided in a short period of time, and systems to distribute these monies were newly created and implemented. The standard award agreements were not reviewed in advance to ensure adherence to federal requirements. Staff were not fully trained on the informational requirements and monitoring responsibilities related to audit requirements. Effect or Potential Effect Subrecipients may be unaware and not in compliance with the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200. Questioned Costs Not applicable. Context For ALN 21.027 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, we tested a sample of 10 subawards totaling to $28,079,600 from a population of 37 totaling to $37,052,621. For ALN 21.023 - Emergency Rental Assistance Program, we tested all 3 subawards within the population totaling to $10,900,177. For ALN 93.323 – COVID-19-Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC), we tested all 5 subawards within the population totaling to $5,086,923. As noted in the condition, we identified exceptions for 18 subrecipient agreements tested. All samples tested were selected using nonstatistical sampling methods and were not statistically valid samples. Identification as a Repeat Finding Yes. This finding was reported as Finding 2021-002 in the prior audit. Recommendation Management should establish policies to ensure subawards contain required federal award information. In addition, procedures should be established to monitor subrecipient compliance with audit requirements of 2 CFR 200.501. Views of Responsible Officials Management concurs with the finding and will adhere to the corrective action plan included in this report. Management plans to revise policies and procedures related to subrecipient monitoring.
Federal Agency: Department of Justice Federal Assistance Listing Numbers: 16.756, 16.726 Programs: Court Appointed Special Advocates, Juvenile Mentoring Program Award/Pass-Through Entity Identifying Numbers: 2018-CH-BX-K001, 15PJDP-21-GK-02762-CASA, 2019-MU-FX-0004, 2020-JU-FX-0028 Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR §200.332 details requirements for pass-through entities in regard to subrecipient monitoring and management. Per 2 CFR §200.332, Requirements for Pass-Through Entities: “All pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (1) Federal award identification. i. Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); ii. Subrecipient’s unique entity identifier; iii. Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); iv. Federal Award Date (see the definition of federal award date in §200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency; v. Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; vi. Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; vii. Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; viii. Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass through entity, including the current financial obligation; ix. Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; x. Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); xi. Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; xii. Assistance Listings Number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; xiii. Identification of whether the award is R&D; and xiv. Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per § 200.414. (2) All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award; (3) Any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass-through entity to meet its own responsibility to the federal awarding agency, including identification of any required financial and performance reports; (4) i. An approved federally recognized indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal Government. If no approved rate exists, the pass-through entity must determine the appropriate rate in collaboration with the subrecipient, which is either: (A) The negotiated indirect cost rate between the pass-through entity and the subrecipient, which can be based on a prior negotiated rate between a different PTE and the same subrecipient. If basing the rate on a previously negotiated rate, the pass-through entity is not required to collect information justifying this rate, but may elect to do so; (B) The de minimis indirect cost rate. ii. The pass-through entity must not require use of a de minimis indirect cost rate if the subrecipient has a federally approved rate. Subrecipients can elect to use the cost allocation method to account for indirect costs in accordance with §200.405(d). (5) A requirement that the subrecipient permits the pass-through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient’s records and financial statements as necessary for the pass-through entity to meet the requirements of this part; and (6) Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward.” Condition: National CASA/GAL’s subrecipient agreements do not contain a level of specificity to fully comply with federal subrecipient regulations. During our testing of subrecipient monitoring, we selected 20 subrecipient awards within Court Appointed Special Advocates and 17 subrecipient awards within the Juvenile Mentoring Program. For all awards tested, National CASA/GAL’s subaward agreements did not comply with 2 CFR §200.332, Requirements for Pass-Through Entities, as they do not contain a specific scope of work or project description. Cause: National CASA/GAL did not have the proper policies and procedures in place to ensure subaward agreements complied to relevant federal regulation, and that all required elements are located in subaward agreements, and not in the application or by reference to other documents. Effect or Potential Effect: Without adequate controls in place to ensure conformity with subaward requirements, grantees may not ensure compliance with any award special conditions or revised budgets agreed upon at contract implementation. Questioned Costs: None. Context: This is a condition identified per review of National CASA/GAL’s compliance with specified requirements using a non-statistically valid sample. For the Court Appointed Special Advocates Program, the population consisted of 100 subawards made totaling to $1,471,827 provided to subrecipients in 2022. The sample consisted of 20 subawards totaling $410,352 provided to subrecipients in 2022. For the Juvenile Mentoring Program, the population consisted of 83 subawards totaling to $2,339,039 provided to subrecipients in 2022. The sample consisted of 17 subawards totaling $441,399 provided to subrecipients in 2022. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend establishing and maintaining written policies and procedures to ensure subaward agreements conform to the requirements outlined in 2 CFR §200.332. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees that subrecipient agreements in place in 2022 did not fully comply with 2 CFR §200.332. Updates were made to the policies and procedures as well to ensure subaward files contain the requisite components. Management has additionally implemented a Grant Master File Checklist to ensure compliance with terms and conditions required in subaward agreements.
Federal Agency: Department of Justice Federal Assistance Listing Numbers: 16.756, 16.726 Programs: Court Appointed Special Advocates, Juvenile Mentoring Program Award/Pass-Through Entity Identifying Numbers: 2018-CH-BX-K001, 15PJDP-21-GK-02762-CASA, 2019-MU-FX-0004, 2020-JU-FX-0028 Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR §200.332 details requirements for pass-through entities in regard to subrecipient monitoring and management. Per 2 CFR §200.332, Requirements for Pass-Through Entities: “All pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (1) Federal award identification. i. Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); ii. Subrecipient’s unique entity identifier; iii. Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); iv. Federal Award Date (see the definition of federal award date in §200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency; v. Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; vi. Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; vii. Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; viii. Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass through entity, including the current financial obligation; ix. Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; x. Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); xi. Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; xii. Assistance Listings Number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; xiii. Identification of whether the award is R&D; and xiv. Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per § 200.414. (2) All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award; (3) Any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass-through entity to meet its own responsibility to the federal awarding agency, including identification of any required financial and performance reports; (4) i. An approved federally recognized indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal Government. If no approved rate exists, the pass-through entity must determine the appropriate rate in collaboration with the subrecipient, which is either: (A) The negotiated indirect cost rate between the pass-through entity and the subrecipient, which can be based on a prior negotiated rate between a different PTE and the same subrecipient. If basing the rate on a previously negotiated rate, the pass-through entity is not required to collect information justifying this rate, but may elect to do so; (B) The de minimis indirect cost rate. ii. The pass-through entity must not require use of a de minimis indirect cost rate if the subrecipient has a federally approved rate. Subrecipients can elect to use the cost allocation method to account for indirect costs in accordance with §200.405(d). (5) A requirement that the subrecipient permits the pass-through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient’s records and financial statements as necessary for the pass-through entity to meet the requirements of this part; and (6) Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward.” Condition: National CASA/GAL’s subrecipient agreements do not contain a level of specificity to fully comply with federal subrecipient regulations. During our testing of subrecipient monitoring, we selected 20 subrecipient awards within Court Appointed Special Advocates and 17 subrecipient awards within the Juvenile Mentoring Program. For all awards tested, National CASA/GAL’s subaward agreements did not comply with 2 CFR §200.332, Requirements for Pass-Through Entities, as they do not contain a specific scope of work or project description. Cause: National CASA/GAL did not have the proper policies and procedures in place to ensure subaward agreements complied to relevant federal regulation, and that all required elements are located in subaward agreements, and not in the application or by reference to other documents. Effect or Potential Effect: Without adequate controls in place to ensure conformity with subaward requirements, grantees may not ensure compliance with any award special conditions or revised budgets agreed upon at contract implementation. Questioned Costs: None. Context: This is a condition identified per review of National CASA/GAL’s compliance with specified requirements using a non-statistically valid sample. For the Court Appointed Special Advocates Program, the population consisted of 100 subawards made totaling to $1,471,827 provided to subrecipients in 2022. The sample consisted of 20 subawards totaling $410,352 provided to subrecipients in 2022. For the Juvenile Mentoring Program, the population consisted of 83 subawards totaling to $2,339,039 provided to subrecipients in 2022. The sample consisted of 17 subawards totaling $441,399 provided to subrecipients in 2022. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend establishing and maintaining written policies and procedures to ensure subaward agreements conform to the requirements outlined in 2 CFR §200.332. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees that subrecipient agreements in place in 2022 did not fully comply with 2 CFR §200.332. Updates were made to the policies and procedures as well to ensure subaward files contain the requisite components. Management has additionally implemented a Grant Master File Checklist to ensure compliance with terms and conditions required in subaward agreements.
Federal Agency: Department of Justice Federal Assistance Listing Numbers: 16.756, 16.726 Programs: Court Appointed Special Advocates, Juvenile Mentoring Program Award/Pass-Through Entity Identifying Numbers: 2018-CH-BX-K001, 15PJDP-21-GK-02762-CASA, 2019-MU-FX-0004, 2020-JU-FX-0028 Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR §200.332 details requirements for pass-through entities in regard to subrecipient monitoring and management. Per 2 CFR §200.332, Requirements for Pass-Through Entities: “All pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (1) Federal award identification. i. Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); ii. Subrecipient’s unique entity identifier; iii. Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); iv. Federal Award Date (see the definition of federal award date in §200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency; v. Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; vi. Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; vii. Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; viii. Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass through entity, including the current financial obligation; ix. Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; x. Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); xi. Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; xii. Assistance Listings Number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; xiii. Identification of whether the award is R&D; and xiv. Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per § 200.414. (2) All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award; (3) Any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass-through entity to meet its own responsibility to the federal awarding agency, including identification of any required financial and performance reports; (4) i. An approved federally recognized indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal Government. If no approved rate exists, the pass-through entity must determine the appropriate rate in collaboration with the subrecipient, which is either: (A) The negotiated indirect cost rate between the pass-through entity and the subrecipient, which can be based on a prior negotiated rate between a different PTE and the same subrecipient. If basing the rate on a previously negotiated rate, the pass-through entity is not required to collect information justifying this rate, but may elect to do so; (B) The de minimis indirect cost rate. ii. The pass-through entity must not require use of a de minimis indirect cost rate if the subrecipient has a federally approved rate. Subrecipients can elect to use the cost allocation method to account for indirect costs in accordance with §200.405(d). (5) A requirement that the subrecipient permits the pass-through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient’s records and financial statements as necessary for the pass-through entity to meet the requirements of this part; and (6) Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward.” Condition: National CASA/GAL’s subrecipient agreements do not contain a level of specificity to fully comply with federal subrecipient regulations. During our testing of subrecipient monitoring, we selected 20 subrecipient awards within Court Appointed Special Advocates and 17 subrecipient awards within the Juvenile Mentoring Program. For all awards tested, National CASA/GAL’s subaward agreements did not comply with 2 CFR §200.332, Requirements for Pass-Through Entities, as they do not contain a specific scope of work or project description. Cause: National CASA/GAL did not have the proper policies and procedures in place to ensure subaward agreements complied to relevant federal regulation, and that all required elements are located in subaward agreements, and not in the application or by reference to other documents. Effect or Potential Effect: Without adequate controls in place to ensure conformity with subaward requirements, grantees may not ensure compliance with any award special conditions or revised budgets agreed upon at contract implementation. Questioned Costs: None. Context: This is a condition identified per review of National CASA/GAL’s compliance with specified requirements using a non-statistically valid sample. For the Court Appointed Special Advocates Program, the population consisted of 100 subawards made totaling to $1,471,827 provided to subrecipients in 2022. The sample consisted of 20 subawards totaling $410,352 provided to subrecipients in 2022. For the Juvenile Mentoring Program, the population consisted of 83 subawards totaling to $2,339,039 provided to subrecipients in 2022. The sample consisted of 17 subawards totaling $441,399 provided to subrecipients in 2022. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend establishing and maintaining written policies and procedures to ensure subaward agreements conform to the requirements outlined in 2 CFR §200.332. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees that subrecipient agreements in place in 2022 did not fully comply with 2 CFR §200.332. Updates were made to the policies and procedures as well to ensure subaward files contain the requisite components. Management has additionally implemented a Grant Master File Checklist to ensure compliance with terms and conditions required in subaward agreements.
Federal Agency: Department of Justice Federal Assistance Listing Numbers: 16.756, 16.726 Programs: Court Appointed Special Advocates, Juvenile Mentoring Program Award/Pass-Through Entity Identifying Numbers: 2018-CH-BX-K001, 15PJDP-21-GK-02762-CASA, 2019-MU-FX-0004, 2020-JU-FX-0028 Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR §200.332 details requirements for pass-through entities in regard to subrecipient monitoring and management. Per 2 CFR §200.332, Requirements for Pass-Through Entities: “All pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (1) Federal award identification. i. Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); ii. Subrecipient’s unique entity identifier; iii. Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); iv. Federal Award Date (see the definition of federal award date in §200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency; v. Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; vi. Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; vii. Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; viii. Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass through entity, including the current financial obligation; ix. Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; x. Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); xi. Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; xii. Assistance Listings Number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; xiii. Identification of whether the award is R&D; and xiv. Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per § 200.414. (2) All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award; (3) Any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass-through entity to meet its own responsibility to the federal awarding agency, including identification of any required financial and performance reports; (4) i. An approved federally recognized indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal Government. If no approved rate exists, the pass-through entity must determine the appropriate rate in collaboration with the subrecipient, which is either: (A) The negotiated indirect cost rate between the pass-through entity and the subrecipient, which can be based on a prior negotiated rate between a different PTE and the same subrecipient. If basing the rate on a previously negotiated rate, the pass-through entity is not required to collect information justifying this rate, but may elect to do so; (B) The de minimis indirect cost rate. ii. The pass-through entity must not require use of a de minimis indirect cost rate if the subrecipient has a federally approved rate. Subrecipients can elect to use the cost allocation method to account for indirect costs in accordance with §200.405(d). (5) A requirement that the subrecipient permits the pass-through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient’s records and financial statements as necessary for the pass-through entity to meet the requirements of this part; and (6) Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward.” Condition: National CASA/GAL’s subrecipient agreements do not contain a level of specificity to fully comply with federal subrecipient regulations. During our testing of subrecipient monitoring, we selected 20 subrecipient awards within Court Appointed Special Advocates and 17 subrecipient awards within the Juvenile Mentoring Program. For all awards tested, National CASA/GAL’s subaward agreements did not comply with 2 CFR §200.332, Requirements for Pass-Through Entities, as they do not contain a specific scope of work or project description. Cause: National CASA/GAL did not have the proper policies and procedures in place to ensure subaward agreements complied to relevant federal regulation, and that all required elements are located in subaward agreements, and not in the application or by reference to other documents. Effect or Potential Effect: Without adequate controls in place to ensure conformity with subaward requirements, grantees may not ensure compliance with any award special conditions or revised budgets agreed upon at contract implementation. Questioned Costs: None. Context: This is a condition identified per review of National CASA/GAL’s compliance with specified requirements using a non-statistically valid sample. For the Court Appointed Special Advocates Program, the population consisted of 100 subawards made totaling to $1,471,827 provided to subrecipients in 2022. The sample consisted of 20 subawards totaling $410,352 provided to subrecipients in 2022. For the Juvenile Mentoring Program, the population consisted of 83 subawards totaling to $2,339,039 provided to subrecipients in 2022. The sample consisted of 17 subawards totaling $441,399 provided to subrecipients in 2022. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend establishing and maintaining written policies and procedures to ensure subaward agreements conform to the requirements outlined in 2 CFR §200.332. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees that subrecipient agreements in place in 2022 did not fully comply with 2 CFR §200.332. Updates were made to the policies and procedures as well to ensure subaward files contain the requisite components. Management has additionally implemented a Grant Master File Checklist to ensure compliance with terms and conditions required in subaward agreements.
Repeat of Prior Audit Finding 2021-005 Federal Program: Trans-National Crime Federal Agency: United States Department of State - United States Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs Federal Assistance Listing Number: 19.705 Federal Award Year: December 31, 2022 Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart D Section 200.332 of the Uniform Guidance require all non-Federal entities to assess subrecipients' risk, as well as monitor sub-awards passed through. All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient are to ensure that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition/Context: For the selection of two subrecipients, we were unable to verify that the respective subaward agreements contained accurate award information, such as the identification of the funding being U.S. federal funds, the federal Assistance Listing Number and the requirements that the subrecipients would need to comply with the Uniform Guidance. In addition, for two other subrecipients, we could not determine whether the quarterly programmatic and financial reports were reviewed or approved by Panthera Corporation as there was no evidence of formal review and approval. There was also no evidence that those subrecipients had been audited or monitored under appropriate local government regulations. This was not a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs: Not determinable. Cause: Panthera Corporation's procedures did not ensure the required written subrecipient monitoring policies were implemented in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Panthera Corporation's control design and operation does not provide reasonable assurance that Panthera Corporation is managing the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Recommendation: We recommend that Panthera Corporation clearly identify in each agreement with subrecipients the reference to the applicable federal Assistance Listing Number and request audited reports from subrecipients when applicable. We further recommend that Panthera Corporation follow its policies and procedures by ensuring that subrecipient quarterly reports are subject to the appropriate process as well as maintaining documentation to allow for an audit trail. View of Responsible Officials: Management acknowledges the finding and will be retaining support and updating subrecipient agreements to include the relevant award information and the Uniform Guidance compliance requirements for subrecipients.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, passed through Kansas Department of Aging Aging Cluster - ALN 93.044 - Special Programs for the Aging_Title III, Part B_Grants for Supportive Services and Senior Centers - 2201KSOASS and 2201KSOACM ALN 93.045 - Special Programs for the Aging _Title III, Part C_Nutrition Services - 2201KSOAHD Criteria or Specific Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring and Material Weakness Per 2 CFR 200.332, a pass-through entity is required to evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance with federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the subaward as well as monitor the activities of the subrecipient which include reviewing financial and performance reports, obtaining and reviewing subrecipient single audit reports, etc. Per 2 CFR 200.303, the non-Federal entities receiving federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain internal control design to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: No risk assessment or ongoing formal monitoring of the subrecipient was performed. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: There is only one subrecipient associated with this program. During 2022, the subrecipient received $418,171 ($104,601 - ALN 93.044, $313,570 - ALN 93.045) from the Unified Government. The subrecipient for this program is a long-time subrecipient that is familiar with federal compliance requirements, but the risk assessment was not done in writing. Additionally, ongoing monitoring including reviewing for single audit filings were not completed. Identification of Prior Year Finding: 2021-007 Effect: Federal funds could be improperly utilized by a subrecipient which does not have an adequate understanding of the requirements or tools to support the program. Cause: The Unified Government has a long-time relationship with this subrecipient and did not formalize the risk assessment process. Further, formalized processes for monitoring subrecipients were not operating effectively. Recommendation: We recommend that the Unified Government develop procedures to perform a risk assessment on all potential subrecipients before entering into an agreement to provide federal funds to that entity and revisit annually thereafter. Additionally, formal policies and procedures should be put in place over the various levels of monitoring that may occur as a result of the risk assessment and should also include a trigger to ensure single audit reports of subrecipients are reviewed. View of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Actions: The reason for recurrence is the finding was communicated late in the prior year and due to transition and turnover within the department's staff. Aging department is now completing these assessments annually.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, passed through Kansas Department of Aging Aging Cluster - ALN 93.044 - Special Programs for the Aging_Title III, Part B_Grants for Supportive Services and Senior Centers - 2201KSOASS and 2201KSOACM ALN 93.045 - Special Programs for the Aging _Title III, Part C_Nutrition Services - 2201KSOAHD Criteria or Specific Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring and Material Weakness Per 2 CFR 200.332, a pass-through entity is required to evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance with federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the subaward as well as monitor the activities of the subrecipient which include reviewing financial and performance reports, obtaining and reviewing subrecipient single audit reports, etc. Per 2 CFR 200.303, the non-Federal entities receiving federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain internal control design to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: No risk assessment or ongoing formal monitoring of the subrecipient was performed. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: There is only one subrecipient associated with this program. During 2022, the subrecipient received $418,171 ($104,601 - ALN 93.044, $313,570 - ALN 93.045) from the Unified Government. The subrecipient for this program is a long-time subrecipient that is familiar with federal compliance requirements, but the risk assessment was not done in writing. Additionally, ongoing monitoring including reviewing for single audit filings were not completed. Identification of Prior Year Finding: 2021-007 Effect: Federal funds could be improperly utilized by a subrecipient which does not have an adequate understanding of the requirements or tools to support the program. Cause: The Unified Government has a long-time relationship with this subrecipient and did not formalize the risk assessment process. Further, formalized processes for monitoring subrecipients were not operating effectively. Recommendation: We recommend that the Unified Government develop procedures to perform a risk assessment on all potential subrecipients before entering into an agreement to provide federal funds to that entity and revisit annually thereafter. Additionally, formal policies and procedures should be put in place over the various levels of monitoring that may occur as a result of the risk assessment and should also include a trigger to ensure single audit reports of subrecipients are reviewed. View of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Actions: The reason for recurrence is the finding was communicated late in the prior year and due to transition and turnover within the department's staff. Aging department is now completing these assessments annually.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, passed through Kansas Department of Aging Aging Cluster - ALN 93.044 - Special Programs for the Aging_Title III, Part B_Grants for Supportive Services and Senior Centers - 2201KSOASS and 2201KSOACM ALN 93.045 - Special Programs for the Aging _Title III, Part C_Nutrition Services - 2201KSOAHD Criteria or Specific Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring and Material Weakness Per 2 CFR 200.332, a pass-through entity is required to evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance with federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the subaward as well as monitor the activities of the subrecipient which include reviewing financial and performance reports, obtaining and reviewing subrecipient single audit reports, etc. Per 2 CFR 200.303, the non-Federal entities receiving federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain internal control design to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: No risk assessment or ongoing formal monitoring of the subrecipient was performed. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: There is only one subrecipient associated with this program. During 2022, the subrecipient received $418,171 ($104,601 - ALN 93.044, $313,570 - ALN 93.045) from the Unified Government. The subrecipient for this program is a long-time subrecipient that is familiar with federal compliance requirements, but the risk assessment was not done in writing. Additionally, ongoing monitoring including reviewing for single audit filings were not completed. Identification of Prior Year Finding: 2021-007 Effect: Federal funds could be improperly utilized by a subrecipient which does not have an adequate understanding of the requirements or tools to support the program. Cause: The Unified Government has a long-time relationship with this subrecipient and did not formalize the risk assessment process. Further, formalized processes for monitoring subrecipients were not operating effectively. Recommendation: We recommend that the Unified Government develop procedures to perform a risk assessment on all potential subrecipients before entering into an agreement to provide federal funds to that entity and revisit annually thereafter. Additionally, formal policies and procedures should be put in place over the various levels of monitoring that may occur as a result of the risk assessment and should also include a trigger to ensure single audit reports of subrecipients are reviewed. View of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Actions: The reason for recurrence is the finding was communicated late in the prior year and due to transition and turnover within the department's staff. Aging department is now completing these assessments annually.
Information on the federal program: Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Pass-Through Entity: N/A – Direct Grant Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Noncompliance Criteria: Title 2 Subtitle A Chapter II Part 200 Subparts A and D, Section 200.332, establishes requirements that pass-through entities must adhere to their subrecipient grant agreements and the monitoring processes of those subrecipients. Condition: City of Bloomington was unable to identify subrecipients of CSLFRF funding for the purposes of financial reporting and compliance with requirements under 2 CFR 200.332. Management misreported subrecipient activity on the SEFA, failed to include required contractual language for subrecipient awards in executed agreements, and did not perform monitoring procedures over the subrecipients that were identified during testing procedures. Cause: The City does not have an effective system of internal controls in place to effectively structure and review CSLFRF subaward agreements or to effectively monitor subrecipients. Effect: Due to lack of required information being present with agreements and the contracts not clearly differentiating between a subrecipient and a beneficiary, there could be noncompliance issues in how funds are spent and recorded by the subrecipient, which could lead to noncompliance issues for the City of Bloomington and its subrecipients. Questioned costs: There are no questioned costs. Context: The 10 subrecipients represent approximately 38%, $1,935,000, of the total award expenditures of $4,999,384. The condition reported was prevalent for each subrecipient participating in the award. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the City institute a policy for the handling of subrecipients for all sources of federal funding. The City should review Title 2 Subtitle A Chapter II Part 200 Subpart A and ensure their agreements with subrecipients include all required information. Management should review Title 2 Subtitle A Chapter II Part 200 Subpart D and ensure all necessary monitoring procedures are being performed over subrecipients moving forward. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management acknowledges the finding. See management’s corrective action plan attached to this audit report.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Commerce Federal Program Name: Office for Coastal Management Assistance Listing Number: 11.473 Federal Award Identification Year: 2020 Pass-Through Agency: National Fish and Wildlife Grant Agreement Award Period: 9/1/20-08/31/23 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria: 2 CFR 200.332(d) - establishes that the auditee must monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Condition: Management did not perform risk assessment for all subrecipients selected for testing. Management was unable to provide supporting documentation to show that they inquired with the subrecipients about any audits they had undergone or evidence that management received and reviewed audit reports to ensure timely follow ups were made if any findings pertaining to the Federal Award was noted. Context: A nonstatistical sample of 2 out of 4 subrecipients were selected for testing for the Office for Coastal Management program. The condition noted above was identified during our procedures over CFSC’s subrecipients. Effect: CFSC did not perform the following, which increases the risk of noncompliance: Required risk assessments for the subrecipients, Review subrecipient audit reports to ensure compliance with Federal Awards or make any necessary follow-ups pertaining to any findings noted, if any. Cause: CFSC’s procedures did not consistently ensure that the required risk assessments were performed. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that management modifies and strengthens its current policies and procedures to ensure that all required risk assessments are performed in accordance with the criteria outlined above. Management’s Views: See separate corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-001 Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 COVID-19 ? Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Pass-Through Agency: Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity Award Numbers/Years: ARPA 21-413010 / 2021-2022 Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.332, all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and include specific award identification data as detailed in the Uniform Guidance. Condition/Context: Out of the three executed subrecipient agreements selected for testing, none of them included the subaward information required by the Uniform Guidance. Our sample was not statistically valid. Effect: Subrecipients may not receive the appropriate subaward information. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: The County did not have a process to ensure that the subaward information was included in the subrecipient contracts for this award. Recommendation: We recommend the County develop a template with the required subaward information and share it with the subrecipients of this award program. In addition, this process should be incorporated into the regular subrecipient contracting procedures. Views of Responsible Officials: Lake County acknowledges that subaward information required by the Uniform Guidance was not provided to subrecipients in a separate notice. The County had previously incorporated the information in various clauses of the contracts/agreements with each subrecipient. The County has since developed a single notification form with the required subaward information which it includes with the initial contract and upon any modifications or change orders.
Subrecipient Monitoring Federal Department ? U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Identification Number and Year: NH75OT000024 and 2021 COVID-19 - Activities to Support State, Tribal, Local and Territorial (STLT) Health Department Response to Public Health or Healthcare Crises, Federal Assistance Listing # 93.391 County Department ? Department of Public Health Finding 2022 ? 009 CRITERIA 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart D?Post Federal Award Requirements Standards for Financial and Program Management, Section 200.332. Requirements for pass-through entities, requires that ?All pass-through entities must: (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F?Audit Requirements of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). (c) Consider imposing specific subaward conditions upon a subrecipient if appropriate as described in Section 200.208 Specific conditions. (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: (1) Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. (2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. (3) Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by Section 200.521 Management decision. (e) Depending upon the pass-through entity's assessment of risk posed by the subrecipient (as described in paragraph (b) of this section), the following monitoring tools may be useful for the pass-through entity to ensure proper accountability and compliance with program requirements and achievement of performance goals: (1) Providing subrecipients with training and technical assistance on program-related matters; and (2) Performing on-site reviews of the subrecipient's program operations; (3) Arranging for agreed-upon-procedures engagements as described in Section 200.425 Audit services. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F?Audit Requirements of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in Section 200.501 Audit requirements. (g) Consider whether the results of the subrecipient's audits, on-site reviews, or other monitoring indicate conditions that necessitate adjustments to the pass-through entity's own records. (h) Consider taking enforcement action against noncompliant subrecipients as described in Section 200.338 Remedies for noncompliance of this part and in program regulations.? SECTION III: FEDERAL AWARDS FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Subrecipient Monitoring Federal Department ? U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Identification Number and Year: NH75OT000024 and 2021 COVID-19 - Activities to Support State, Tribal, Local and Territorial (STLT) Health Department Response to Public Health or Healthcare Crises, Federal Assistance Listing # 93.391 County Department ? Department of Public Health Finding 2022 ? 009 (Continued) CONDITION During the current audit period, the Cook County Department of Public Health (DPH) did not perform adequate monitoring of its subrecipients as required by Federal regulations. CAUSE Based on discussions with management, the cause of this finding resulted from subrecipients being identified as vendors in the grant application. Also, the Program Lead informed Finance late which did not allow sufficient time to mobilize CCH staff and/or external consultant to perform subrecipient monitoring. EFFECT Failure to adequately communicate and monitor the activities and performance of a subrecipient could result in Federal awards being used for unauthorized purposes and DPH?s inability to adequately perform risk assessments on its subrecipient(s). QUESTIONED COSTS None. CONTEXT During the current audit period, we noted 27 subrecipients were awarded funds. During our review of 6 subrecipients, we noted adequate documentation was not maintained to support both the financial and programmatic monitoring of these subrecipients. Specifically, we noted documentation was not maintained to support DPH?s evaluation of each subrecipients risk of noncompliance and the frequency of monitoring to be conducted by DPH based on the assessed risk. Also, we noted no documentation was provided to verify whether the subrecipients were required to have a Single Audit conducted, including DPH?s review of the report, and if applicable, issuance of a management decision on audit findings noted as required by 2 CFR 200.332d(3). SECTION III: FEDERAL AWARDS FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Subrecipient Monitoring Federal Department ? U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Identification Number and Year: NH75OT000024 and 2021 COVID-19 - Activities to Support State, Tribal, Local and Territorial (STLT) Health Department Response to Public Health or Healthcare Crises, Federal Assistance Listing # 93.391 County Department ? Department of Public Health Finding 2022 ? 009 (Continued) CONTEXT (Continued) In addition, while we noted that DPH does have a draft policy manual regarding the monitoring of its subrecipients, we noted the manual does not currently address or include the process and related procedures for conducting both fiscal and programmatic monitoring. Specifically, the draft manual does not: a) include any related checklists and/or forms being utilized, b) address the performance of risk assessments, or c) detail the frequency and type of monitoring (i.e., desk review, site visit) to be conducted based on assessed risks. IDENTIFICATION OF REPEATED FINDINGS None. RECOMMENDATION We recommend DPH update its written procedures to document the monitoring of its subrecipients in accordance with 2 CFR 200.332 and once updated the draft policy should be finalized and implemented. Also, adequate staff resources and training should be in place to oversee the process of completing the required subrecipient monitoring, including documentation of the evaluation of the subrecipient risk of noncompliance and review of the Single Audit report, as required by federal regulations. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTIONS The County agrees with the finding and recommendation. The County?s corrective action plan is on page 64.
Finding 2022-001 Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 COVID-19 ? Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Pass-Through Agency: Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity Award Numbers/Years: ARPA 21-413010 / 2021-2022 Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.332, all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and include specific award identification data as detailed in the Uniform Guidance. Condition/Context: Out of the three executed subrecipient agreements selected for testing, none of them included the subaward information required by the Uniform Guidance. Our sample was not statistically valid. Effect: Subrecipients may not receive the appropriate subaward information. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: The County did not have a process to ensure that the subaward information was included in the subrecipient contracts for this award. Recommendation: We recommend the County develop a template with the required subaward information and share it with the subrecipients of this award program. In addition, this process should be incorporated into the regular subrecipient contracting procedures. Views of Responsible Officials: Lake County acknowledges that subaward information required by the Uniform Guidance was not provided to subrecipients in a separate notice. The County had previously incorporated the information in various clauses of the contracts/agreements with each subrecipient. The County has since developed a single notification form with the required subaward information which it includes with the initial contract and upon any modifications or change orders.
Subrecipient Monitoring Federal Department ? U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Identification Number and Year: NH75OT000024 and 2021 COVID-19 - Activities to Support State, Tribal, Local and Territorial (STLT) Health Department Response to Public Health or Healthcare Crises, Federal Assistance Listing # 93.391 County Department ? Department of Public Health Finding 2022 ? 009 CRITERIA 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart D?Post Federal Award Requirements Standards for Financial and Program Management, Section 200.332. Requirements for pass-through entities, requires that ?All pass-through entities must: (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit in accordance with Subpart F?Audit Requirements of this part, and the extent to which the same or similar subaward has been audited as a major program; (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems; and (4) The extent and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring (e.g., if the subrecipient also receives Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency). (c) Consider imposing specific subaward conditions upon a subrecipient if appropriate as described in Section 200.208 Specific conditions. (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: (1) Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. (2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. (3) Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by Section 200.521 Management decision. (e) Depending upon the pass-through entity's assessment of risk posed by the subrecipient (as described in paragraph (b) of this section), the following monitoring tools may be useful for the pass-through entity to ensure proper accountability and compliance with program requirements and achievement of performance goals: (1) Providing subrecipients with training and technical assistance on program-related matters; and (2) Performing on-site reviews of the subrecipient's program operations; (3) Arranging for agreed-upon-procedures engagements as described in Section 200.425 Audit services. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F?Audit Requirements of this part when it is expected that the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in Section 200.501 Audit requirements. (g) Consider whether the results of the subrecipient's audits, on-site reviews, or other monitoring indicate conditions that necessitate adjustments to the pass-through entity's own records. (h) Consider taking enforcement action against noncompliant subrecipients as described in Section 200.338 Remedies for noncompliance of this part and in program regulations.? SECTION III: FEDERAL AWARDS FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Subrecipient Monitoring Federal Department ? U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Identification Number and Year: NH75OT000024 and 2021 COVID-19 - Activities to Support State, Tribal, Local and Territorial (STLT) Health Department Response to Public Health or Healthcare Crises, Federal Assistance Listing # 93.391 County Department ? Department of Public Health Finding 2022 ? 009 (Continued) CONDITION During the current audit period, the Cook County Department of Public Health (DPH) did not perform adequate monitoring of its subrecipients as required by Federal regulations. CAUSE Based on discussions with management, the cause of this finding resulted from subrecipients being identified as vendors in the grant application. Also, the Program Lead informed Finance late which did not allow sufficient time to mobilize CCH staff and/or external consultant to perform subrecipient monitoring. EFFECT Failure to adequately communicate and monitor the activities and performance of a subrecipient could result in Federal awards being used for unauthorized purposes and DPH?s inability to adequately perform risk assessments on its subrecipient(s). QUESTIONED COSTS None. CONTEXT During the current audit period, we noted 27 subrecipients were awarded funds. During our review of 6 subrecipients, we noted adequate documentation was not maintained to support both the financial and programmatic monitoring of these subrecipients. Specifically, we noted documentation was not maintained to support DPH?s evaluation of each subrecipients risk of noncompliance and the frequency of monitoring to be conducted by DPH based on the assessed risk. Also, we noted no documentation was provided to verify whether the subrecipients were required to have a Single Audit conducted, including DPH?s review of the report, and if applicable, issuance of a management decision on audit findings noted as required by 2 CFR 200.332d(3). SECTION III: FEDERAL AWARDS FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Subrecipient Monitoring Federal Department ? U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Identification Number and Year: NH75OT000024 and 2021 COVID-19 - Activities to Support State, Tribal, Local and Territorial (STLT) Health Department Response to Public Health or Healthcare Crises, Federal Assistance Listing # 93.391 County Department ? Department of Public Health Finding 2022 ? 009 (Continued) CONTEXT (Continued) In addition, while we noted that DPH does have a draft policy manual regarding the monitoring of its subrecipients, we noted the manual does not currently address or include the process and related procedures for conducting both fiscal and programmatic monitoring. Specifically, the draft manual does not: a) include any related checklists and/or forms being utilized, b) address the performance of risk assessments, or c) detail the frequency and type of monitoring (i.e., desk review, site visit) to be conducted based on assessed risks. IDENTIFICATION OF REPEATED FINDINGS None. RECOMMENDATION We recommend DPH update its written procedures to document the monitoring of its subrecipients in accordance with 2 CFR 200.332 and once updated the draft policy should be finalized and implemented. Also, adequate staff resources and training should be in place to oversee the process of completing the required subrecipient monitoring, including documentation of the evaluation of the subrecipient risk of noncompliance and review of the Single Audit report, as required by federal regulations. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTIONS The County agrees with the finding and recommendation. The County?s corrective action plan is on page 64.