Finding 2024-009: Reporting Program Title: Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Research Assistance Listing Number: 81.113 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Energy Direct Award Identifying Numbers: DE-NA003862, DE-NA004179, DE-NA0004177 Federal Award Year: Year ended September 30, 2024 Program Title: Export Control and Related Border Security Assistance Listing Number: 19.901 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of State Direct Award Identifying Number: SAQMIP23CA0153 Pass-Through Entity Name, Pass-Through Identifying Number: The Research Foundation for SUNY, University at Albany, 3-98939 Federal Award Year: Year ended September 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matter Compliance Finding Criteria: Per 2 CFR §200.327 and §200.328, non-Federal entities must submit required financial and performance reports by the specified due dates and maintain effective internal controls to ensure accuracy and compliance. Review and approval of reports is a key internal control. Condition: During the audit, we noted a lack of documented supervisory review and approval of financial reports and performance reports prior to submission. We also noted certain reports in our sample were filed a day late or not at all. Cause: PFI has not implemented formal procedures for documenting supervisory review of reports and lacks a tracking mechanism for reporting deadlines. Effect or Potential Effect: Without documented controls over reporting, there is a reasonable possibility that PFI could submit inaccurate or incomplete reporting. Late submissions may hinder the Federal agency’s ability to monitor program performance and compliance and could result in administrative actions or delays in funding. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: Under 81.113, 4 of 4 financial reports and 4 of 4 performance reports selected for testing did not have documented evidence of supervisory review and approval. Under 19.901, 4 of 4 financial reports and 4 of 4 performance reports selected for testing did not have documented evidence of supervisory review and approval. Under ALN 19.901, 2 out of 4 financial reports and 1 out of 4 performance reports selected for testing were filed 1 day late. For one subaward under ALN 19.901, quarterly performance reports were a noted requirement per the subaward agreement, however, no reports were filed during the year under audit. Recommendation: We recommend that PFI implement a formal review and approval process for all required reports, including maintaining evidence of supervisory sign-off, including date of review. Additionally, we recommend that PFI establish a reporting calendar with automated reminders and assign responsibility for monitoring deadlines to ensure timely submission.
Finding No.: 2024-007 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education AL Program: 84.027 Special Education Grants to States Federal Award No.: H027A220013, H027A230013 Area: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Questioned Costs: $0 Criteria: 2 CFR 200.318(a) states the recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under a Federal award or subaward, including for acquisition of property or services. These documented procurement procedures must be consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. Accordingly, documented procedures must ensure consistency to standards in 2 CFR 200.324(a) which articulates that the recipient or subrecipient must perform a cost or price analysis for every procurement transaction, including contract modifications, in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold. Condition: GDOE does not have procurement policies that meet the requirements of 2 CFR 200.318(a) and 2 CFR 200.324(a). Specifically, GDOE lacks documented procedures to ensure compliance with procurement transactions under a Federal award or subaward, requiring the performance and retention of cost price analysis for procurement transactions above the simplified acquisition threshold. Cause: GDOE lacks adequate internal control over periodic review of procurement policies, specifically, ensuring all required key provisions from the Compliance Supplement are included in the procurement policies. Effect: GDOE is in noncompliance with applicable procurement and suspension and debarment requirements. No questioned cost is presented because our procedures did not identify procurement of goods or services that would have required a cost price analysis in the current fiscal year. Recommendation: GDOE should revisit its procurement policies and ensure all required provisions stated in the Compliance Supplement are covered.
Finding Number: 2024-050 Prior Year Finding Number: 2023-046 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Program: U.S. Department of the Treasury Government Department/Agency: Office of Management and Budget (OMB) COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN: 21.027 Award #: N/A Award Period: 03/03/2021 – 12/31/2024 Criteria – Recipients may use award funds to enter into contracts to procure goods and services necessary to implement one or more of the eligible purposes outlined in sections 602I and 603I of the Act and Treasury’s Interim Final Rule and Final Rule. As such, recipients are expected to have procurement policies and procedures in place that comply with the procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Specifically, a state must follow the same policies and procedures it uses for procurements from its non-federal funds and comply with 2 CFR sections 200.321, 200.322, and 200.323. States must also ensure that every contract includes the applicable contract clauses required by 2 CFR section 200.327. Per the Procurement Manual, User Agencies are required to submit a written justification letter to the DPP, which was signed by the agency head, which explains the need for the services, the exception in title 31, Virgin Islands Code, chapter 23, section 239(a) being relied upon, the methodology for the selection process, and the rationale for selecting the prospective contractor. The letter must identify the funding source, and comply with all other requirements necessary for the acquisition of services under title 31, Virgin Islands Code, chapter 23, sections 239(a) (1), (2) or (3) whichever is applicable. The letter must contain an “approve/disapprove” block for the Commissioner of Property and Procurement. Further, the Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303, Internal Controls, requires that non-federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish, document, and maintain internal control designed to ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition – We were unable to verify the completeness of the procurement population. As a result, we were unable to test compliance and internal controls over compliance related to the procurement and suspension and debarment compliance requirements. Cause – It appears that policies and procedures, including review over procurement transactions, were not functioning as intended. Effect or Potential Effect – OMB is not in compliance with the stated provisions. OMB could inadvertently contract or make sub-awards to parties that are suspended or debarred from doing business with the Federal government as well as award contracts to vendors whose contract prices are unreasonable. In addition, contracts may be executed to unqualified vendors. Questioned Costs – Not determinable. Given the nature of the finding (e.g. unavailability of supporting documentation), we determined that projecting estimated questioned costs to the entire population was inappropriate. Context – This is a condition identified per review of OMB’s compliance with the specified requirements and general compliance principles. Recommendation – We recommend that OMB reevaluate its policies and procedures to ensure proper monitoring and continue to be vigilant in following internal procedures over reviews and authorizations. Views of Responsible Officials – The Government concurs with the auditor’s findings and recommendations. OMB will retain all necessary supporting documentation for purchase orders, contracts, and vendor profiles to ensure adherence to internal policies and regulatory requirements. Management will implement procedures to regularly review and verify that all procurement activities are properly documented and compliant with applicable regulations. The planned corrective actions are presented in the Government’s Corrective Action Plan attached as Appendix B to the Single Audit Report.
We identified a significant deficiency in internal control over compliance related to procurement requirements due to missing federal contract clauses and certifications for the REAP program. Criteria: Federal regulations require nonfederal entities to include specific contract provisions in all contracts made under federal awards, as described in 2 CFR 200.327 and Appendix II to 2 CFR part 200, as applicable to the type and dollar amount of the procurement. In addition, the Center must ensure that it does not enter into a covered transaction with a party that is suspended or debarred by verifying the Center’s status in SAM.gov, collecting a certification, or including appropriate contract clauses (2 CFR 200.214 and 2 CFR part 180). Condition: The Center’s contracts did not include the required clauses, certifications, and/or language to meet the conditions listed in 2 CFR 200 Appendix II to Part 200. We selected 9 budgeted contracts totaling $1,633,265 under the REAP program. Seven of the nine included a required termination clause. None of the contracts tested contained the other required federal provisions from Appendix II to 2 CFR part 200. In addition, the Center did not perform or document alternative suspension and debarment procedures (such as SAM.gov checks, certifications, or contract clauses) at the time of contract execution. These conditions evidence a significant deficiency in internal control over compliance with procurement requirements for this major program. Cause: Management had not finalized and implemented procurement policies and procedures designed to ensure contracts executed under federal awards included required federal provisions and documented suspension and debarment checks. There was no standard contract template or addendum incorporating required federal clauses, and no control requiring review of contracts for compliance with 2 CFR 200.327 and Appendix II before execution. As a result, contractors were permitted to use their own templates without inclusion of required federal provisions.Potential Effect: Absent required contract provisions and documented suspension and debarment procedures, there is an increased risk that the Center could enter into agreements with entities that are ineligible or fail to comply with other federal requirements. If this were to occur, related expenditures could be determined to be unallowable, resulting in disallowed costs, potential repayment, and possible impact on future awards. Questioned Costs: $-0-. We performed alternative procedures by searching SAM.gov for each contractor to determine whether they were excluded or debarred; none were listed. Accordingly, we did not identify any known questioned costs related to this finding. Recommendation: Management should (1) develop and require the use of a standard contract addendum for all contractors under federal awards that includes all required clauses, certifications, and language required by Appendix II to 2 CFR part 200, as applicable to each contract; (2) implement written procurement policies and procedures that incorporate these requirements and require documented suspension and debarment checks (e.g., SAM.gov verification or certifications) before execution; and (3) establish a review control to verify that required provisions and documentation are present before contracts are approved. Based on the nature and dollar value of the contracts, we recommend that the addendum address applicable paragraphs (e.g., Sections A, B, G, H, I, J, K, and L) of Appendix II. To further correct this finding, management should develop and send each contractor an addendum to execute for the original contract that includes all required clauses, certifications, and/or language to meet the conditions listed in 2 CFR 200 Appendix II to Part 200 paragraphs where applicable. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agreed that the clauses, certifications, and/or language was missing from the original contracts and that addendums to the originals will be done to address the finding.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name -93.233/93.837, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Research and Development Cluster 93.323, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - 93.233 - R01HL142116; 93.837 - U01HL146245 93.323 - 22680258J; 32680012K Pass-through Entity - 93.233 N/A (direct); 93.837 N/A (direct) 93.323 Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), nonfederal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with the guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the Internal Control Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR 200.318(a), the nonfederal entity must have and use documented procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The nonfederal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Per 2 CFR 200.324(a), the nonfederal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the SAT, including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent upon the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation; but, as a starting point, the nonfederal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Condition - Controls were not sufficient to establish written policies and procedures surrounding procured contracts and to ensure that the history of procurement decisions was documented, as required by 2 CFR 200. Questioned Costs - Research and Development Cluster - unknown ELC - unknown Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Research and Development Cluster - For the four contracts tested, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Additionally, for the largest of the four contracts with activity of approximately $375,000, which is above the SAT established by FAR, management did not document its rationale for limiting competition, nor was management able to provide evidence that a cost-price analysis was performed. Finally, management has not formally documented an appropriate micropurchase or SAT threshold. ELC - For the three of the four contracts tested that were procured under noncompetitive means, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Further, for three out of four contracts tested under the Research and Development Cluster and all four contracts tested under ELC, management was unable to provide evidence that contractors were checked for suspension and debarment in advance of entering into a covered transaction. Because there was evidence that these contractors were not suspended or debarred, no questioned costs related to this noncompliance were identified. Cause and Effect - A lack of formal procurement policies and procedures, internally established procurement thresholds, or records in support of procurement decisions could result in material noncompliance with federal procurement standards. Recommendation - We recommend that management formalize procurement policies and procedures to demonstrate how the Institute will achieve compliance with standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Additionally, we recommend management retain documented evidence that its policies and procedures were followed to ensure compliance with procurement standards. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the recommendation and will review the relevant guidance to ensure compliance. Necessary revisions will be made to the existing procurement policies and procedures in a timely manner to ensure that procurement decisions are documented, as required by 2 CFR Part 200.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name -93.233/93.837, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Research and Development Cluster 93.323, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - 93.233 - R01HL142116; 93.837 - U01HL146245 93.323 - 22680258J; 32680012K Pass-through Entity - 93.233 N/A (direct); 93.837 N/A (direct) 93.323 Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), nonfederal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with the guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the Internal Control Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR 200.318(a), the nonfederal entity must have and use documented procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The nonfederal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Per 2 CFR 200.324(a), the nonfederal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the SAT, including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent upon the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation; but, as a starting point, the nonfederal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Condition - Controls were not sufficient to establish written policies and procedures surrounding procured contracts and to ensure that the history of procurement decisions was documented, as required by 2 CFR 200. Questioned Costs - Research and Development Cluster - unknown ELC - unknown Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Research and Development Cluster - For the four contracts tested, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Additionally, for the largest of the four contracts with activity of approximately $375,000, which is above the SAT established by FAR, management did not document its rationale for limiting competition, nor was management able to provide evidence that a cost-price analysis was performed. Finally, management has not formally documented an appropriate micropurchase or SAT threshold. ELC - For the three of the four contracts tested that were procured under noncompetitive means, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Further, for three out of four contracts tested under the Research and Development Cluster and all four contracts tested under ELC, management was unable to provide evidence that contractors were checked for suspension and debarment in advance of entering into a covered transaction. Because there was evidence that these contractors were not suspended or debarred, no questioned costs related to this noncompliance were identified. Cause and Effect - A lack of formal procurement policies and procedures, internally established procurement thresholds, or records in support of procurement decisions could result in material noncompliance with federal procurement standards. Recommendation - We recommend that management formalize procurement policies and procedures to demonstrate how the Institute will achieve compliance with standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Additionally, we recommend management retain documented evidence that its policies and procedures were followed to ensure compliance with procurement standards. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the recommendation and will review the relevant guidance to ensure compliance. Necessary revisions will be made to the existing procurement policies and procedures in a timely manner to ensure that procurement decisions are documented, as required by 2 CFR Part 200.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name -93.233/93.837, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Research and Development Cluster 93.323, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - 93.233 - R01HL142116; 93.837 - U01HL146245 93.323 - 22680258J; 32680012K Pass-through Entity - 93.233 N/A (direct); 93.837 N/A (direct) 93.323 Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), nonfederal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with the guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the Internal Control Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR 200.318(a), the nonfederal entity must have and use documented procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The nonfederal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Per 2 CFR 200.324(a), the nonfederal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the SAT, including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent upon the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation; but, as a starting point, the nonfederal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Condition - Controls were not sufficient to establish written policies and procedures surrounding procured contracts and to ensure that the history of procurement decisions was documented, as required by 2 CFR 200. Questioned Costs - Research and Development Cluster - unknown ELC - unknown Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Research and Development Cluster - For the four contracts tested, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Additionally, for the largest of the four contracts with activity of approximately $375,000, which is above the SAT established by FAR, management did not document its rationale for limiting competition, nor was management able to provide evidence that a cost-price analysis was performed. Finally, management has not formally documented an appropriate micropurchase or SAT threshold. ELC - For the three of the four contracts tested that were procured under noncompetitive means, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Further, for three out of four contracts tested under the Research and Development Cluster and all four contracts tested under ELC, management was unable to provide evidence that contractors were checked for suspension and debarment in advance of entering into a covered transaction. Because there was evidence that these contractors were not suspended or debarred, no questioned costs related to this noncompliance were identified. Cause and Effect - A lack of formal procurement policies and procedures, internally established procurement thresholds, or records in support of procurement decisions could result in material noncompliance with federal procurement standards. Recommendation - We recommend that management formalize procurement policies and procedures to demonstrate how the Institute will achieve compliance with standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Additionally, we recommend management retain documented evidence that its policies and procedures were followed to ensure compliance with procurement standards. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the recommendation and will review the relevant guidance to ensure compliance. Necessary revisions will be made to the existing procurement policies and procedures in a timely manner to ensure that procurement decisions are documented, as required by 2 CFR Part 200.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name -93.233/93.837, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Research and Development Cluster 93.323, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - 93.233 - R01HL142116; 93.837 - U01HL146245 93.323 - 22680258J; 32680012K Pass-through Entity - 93.233 N/A (direct); 93.837 N/A (direct) 93.323 Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), nonfederal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with the guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the Internal Control Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR 200.318(a), the nonfederal entity must have and use documented procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The nonfederal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Per 2 CFR 200.324(a), the nonfederal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the SAT, including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent upon the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation; but, as a starting point, the nonfederal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Condition - Controls were not sufficient to establish written policies and procedures surrounding procured contracts and to ensure that the history of procurement decisions was documented, as required by 2 CFR 200. Questioned Costs - Research and Development Cluster - unknown ELC - unknown Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Research and Development Cluster - For the four contracts tested, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Additionally, for the largest of the four contracts with activity of approximately $375,000, which is above the SAT established by FAR, management did not document its rationale for limiting competition, nor was management able to provide evidence that a cost-price analysis was performed. Finally, management has not formally documented an appropriate micropurchase or SAT threshold. ELC - For the three of the four contracts tested that were procured under noncompetitive means, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Further, for three out of four contracts tested under the Research and Development Cluster and all four contracts tested under ELC, management was unable to provide evidence that contractors were checked for suspension and debarment in advance of entering into a covered transaction. Because there was evidence that these contractors were not suspended or debarred, no questioned costs related to this noncompliance were identified. Cause and Effect - A lack of formal procurement policies and procedures, internally established procurement thresholds, or records in support of procurement decisions could result in material noncompliance with federal procurement standards. Recommendation - We recommend that management formalize procurement policies and procedures to demonstrate how the Institute will achieve compliance with standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Additionally, we recommend management retain documented evidence that its policies and procedures were followed to ensure compliance with procurement standards. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the recommendation and will review the relevant guidance to ensure compliance. Necessary revisions will be made to the existing procurement policies and procedures in a timely manner to ensure that procurement decisions are documented, as required by 2 CFR Part 200.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name -93.233/93.837, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Research and Development Cluster 93.323, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - 93.233 - R01HL142116; 93.837 - U01HL146245 93.323 - 22680258J; 32680012K Pass-through Entity - 93.233 N/A (direct); 93.837 N/A (direct) 93.323 Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), nonfederal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with the guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the Internal Control Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR 200.318(a), the nonfederal entity must have and use documented procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The nonfederal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Per 2 CFR 200.324(a), the nonfederal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the SAT, including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent upon the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation; but, as a starting point, the nonfederal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Condition - Controls were not sufficient to establish written policies and procedures surrounding procured contracts and to ensure that the history of procurement decisions was documented, as required by 2 CFR 200. Questioned Costs - Research and Development Cluster - unknown ELC - unknown Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Research and Development Cluster - For the four contracts tested, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Additionally, for the largest of the four contracts with activity of approximately $375,000, which is above the SAT established by FAR, management did not document its rationale for limiting competition, nor was management able to provide evidence that a cost-price analysis was performed. Finally, management has not formally documented an appropriate micropurchase or SAT threshold. ELC - For the three of the four contracts tested that were procured under noncompetitive means, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Further, for three out of four contracts tested under the Research and Development Cluster and all four contracts tested under ELC, management was unable to provide evidence that contractors were checked for suspension and debarment in advance of entering into a covered transaction. Because there was evidence that these contractors were not suspended or debarred, no questioned costs related to this noncompliance were identified. Cause and Effect - A lack of formal procurement policies and procedures, internally established procurement thresholds, or records in support of procurement decisions could result in material noncompliance with federal procurement standards. Recommendation - We recommend that management formalize procurement policies and procedures to demonstrate how the Institute will achieve compliance with standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Additionally, we recommend management retain documented evidence that its policies and procedures were followed to ensure compliance with procurement standards. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the recommendation and will review the relevant guidance to ensure compliance. Necessary revisions will be made to the existing procurement policies and procedures in a timely manner to ensure that procurement decisions are documented, as required by 2 CFR Part 200.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name -93.233/93.837, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Research and Development Cluster 93.323, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - 93.233 - R01HL142116; 93.837 - U01HL146245 93.323 - 22680258J; 32680012K Pass-through Entity - 93.233 N/A (direct); 93.837 N/A (direct) 93.323 Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), nonfederal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with the guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the Internal Control Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR 200.318(a), the nonfederal entity must have and use documented procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The nonfederal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Per 2 CFR 200.324(a), the nonfederal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the SAT, including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent upon the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation; but, as a starting point, the nonfederal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Condition - Controls were not sufficient to establish written policies and procedures surrounding procured contracts and to ensure that the history of procurement decisions was documented, as required by 2 CFR 200. Questioned Costs - Research and Development Cluster - unknown ELC - unknown Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Research and Development Cluster - For the four contracts tested, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Additionally, for the largest of the four contracts with activity of approximately $375,000, which is above the SAT established by FAR, management did not document its rationale for limiting competition, nor was management able to provide evidence that a cost-price analysis was performed. Finally, management has not formally documented an appropriate micropurchase or SAT threshold. ELC - For the three of the four contracts tested that were procured under noncompetitive means, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Further, for three out of four contracts tested under the Research and Development Cluster and all four contracts tested under ELC, management was unable to provide evidence that contractors were checked for suspension and debarment in advance of entering into a covered transaction. Because there was evidence that these contractors were not suspended or debarred, no questioned costs related to this noncompliance were identified. Cause and Effect - A lack of formal procurement policies and procedures, internally established procurement thresholds, or records in support of procurement decisions could result in material noncompliance with federal procurement standards. Recommendation - We recommend that management formalize procurement policies and procedures to demonstrate how the Institute will achieve compliance with standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Additionally, we recommend management retain documented evidence that its policies and procedures were followed to ensure compliance with procurement standards. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the recommendation and will review the relevant guidance to ensure compliance. Necessary revisions will be made to the existing procurement policies and procedures in a timely manner to ensure that procurement decisions are documented, as required by 2 CFR Part 200.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name -93.233/93.837, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Research and Development Cluster 93.323, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - 93.233 - R01HL142116; 93.837 - U01HL146245 93.323 - 22680258J; 32680012K Pass-through Entity - 93.233 N/A (direct); 93.837 N/A (direct) 93.323 Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), nonfederal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with the guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the Internal Control Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR 200.318(a), the nonfederal entity must have and use documented procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The nonfederal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Per 2 CFR 200.324(a), the nonfederal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the SAT, including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent upon the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation; but, as a starting point, the nonfederal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Condition - Controls were not sufficient to establish written policies and procedures surrounding procured contracts and to ensure that the history of procurement decisions was documented, as required by 2 CFR 200. Questioned Costs - Research and Development Cluster - unknown ELC - unknown Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Research and Development Cluster - For the four contracts tested, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Additionally, for the largest of the four contracts with activity of approximately $375,000, which is above the SAT established by FAR, management did not document its rationale for limiting competition, nor was management able to provide evidence that a cost-price analysis was performed. Finally, management has not formally documented an appropriate micropurchase or SAT threshold. ELC - For the three of the four contracts tested that were procured under noncompetitive means, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Further, for three out of four contracts tested under the Research and Development Cluster and all four contracts tested under ELC, management was unable to provide evidence that contractors were checked for suspension and debarment in advance of entering into a covered transaction. Because there was evidence that these contractors were not suspended or debarred, no questioned costs related to this noncompliance were identified. Cause and Effect - A lack of formal procurement policies and procedures, internally established procurement thresholds, or records in support of procurement decisions could result in material noncompliance with federal procurement standards. Recommendation - We recommend that management formalize procurement policies and procedures to demonstrate how the Institute will achieve compliance with standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Additionally, we recommend management retain documented evidence that its policies and procedures were followed to ensure compliance with procurement standards. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the recommendation and will review the relevant guidance to ensure compliance. Necessary revisions will be made to the existing procurement policies and procedures in a timely manner to ensure that procurement decisions are documented, as required by 2 CFR Part 200.
Finding 2024-004: Reportable finding considered a significant deficiency - Noncompliance with Internal Procurement Authorization Controls Program name: Child and Adult Care Food Program Assistance Listing: 10.558 Federal awarding agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Pass-through Entity: Maryland State Department of Education, District of Columbia Education Office Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.318(a), non-federal entities must establish and maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders. As required under 2 CFR Subpart D (§§200.317–200.327), organizations must follow written procurement procedures that reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal law and the standards in the Uniform Guidance. The Organization’s internal procurement policy includes specific thresholds for contract approvals and designates levels of review and signature authority based on the contract value. Adherence to these internal controls is essential to ensure compliance with federal procurement requirements and appropriate stewardship of federal funds. Condition: During our testing of procurement activity, we noted that a procurement contract was executed by an individual who did not have the delegated authority to approve or sign the agreement, as required by the Organization’s internal procurement policy. The contract amount exceeded the individual’s approval threshold. The policy’s required internal approval levels were not followed prior to execution. Cause: This issue appears to have resulted from a breakdown in adherence to established internal control procedures, possibly due to a lack of training or oversight. The Organization’s procurement policy was in place and compliant with 2 CFR requirements, but it was not enforced in practice. Effect: Noncompliance with internal procurement approval controls increases the risk of unauthorized or inappropriate spending, lack of transparency, and potential ineligibility of costs charged to federal programs. While the transaction itself may ultimately be allowable, failure to follow established approval protocols constitutes a significant deficiency in internal control over compliance. Repeat finding: This is not a repeat finding. Questioned costs: None identified, as the expenditure appeared otherwise allowable. However, the control deficiency presents a risk for future noncompliance. Perspective: We selected two procurement transactions from a population of four procurement transactions from this program. The issue reflects a control failure affecting procurement activity across federally funded programs and may result in future questioned costs if not corrected. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization follow up with the relevant parties to ensure proper reporting requirements are met on a timely basis. Management’s response and corrective action plan (unaudited): See corrective action plan.
Finding 2024-004: Reportable finding considered a significant deficiency - Noncompliance with Internal Procurement Authorization Controls Program name: Child and Adult Care Food Program Assistance Listing: 10.558 Federal awarding agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Pass-through Entity: Maryland State Department of Education, District of Columbia Education Office Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.318(a), non-federal entities must establish and maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders. As required under 2 CFR Subpart D (§§200.317–200.327), organizations must follow written procurement procedures that reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal law and the standards in the Uniform Guidance. The Organization’s internal procurement policy includes specific thresholds for contract approvals and designates levels of review and signature authority based on the contract value. Adherence to these internal controls is essential to ensure compliance with federal procurement requirements and appropriate stewardship of federal funds. Condition: During our testing of procurement activity, we noted that a procurement contract was executed by an individual who did not have the delegated authority to approve or sign the agreement, as required by the Organization’s internal procurement policy. The contract amount exceeded the individual’s approval threshold. The policy’s required internal approval levels were not followed prior to execution. Cause: This issue appears to have resulted from a breakdown in adherence to established internal control procedures, possibly due to a lack of training or oversight. The Organization’s procurement policy was in place and compliant with 2 CFR requirements, but it was not enforced in practice. Effect: Noncompliance with internal procurement approval controls increases the risk of unauthorized or inappropriate spending, lack of transparency, and potential ineligibility of costs charged to federal programs. While the transaction itself may ultimately be allowable, failure to follow established approval protocols constitutes a significant deficiency in internal control over compliance. Repeat finding: This is not a repeat finding. Questioned costs: None identified, as the expenditure appeared otherwise allowable. However, the control deficiency presents a risk for future noncompliance. Perspective: We selected two procurement transactions from a population of four procurement transactions from this program. The issue reflects a control failure affecting procurement activity across federally funded programs and may result in future questioned costs if not corrected. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization follow up with the relevant parties to ensure proper reporting requirements are met on a timely basis. Management’s response and corrective action plan (unaudited): See corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name -93.233/93.837, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Research and Development Cluster 93.323, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - 93.233 - R01HL142116; 93.837 - U01HL146245 93.323 - 22680258J; 32680012K Pass-through Entity - 93.233 N/A (direct); 93.837 N/A (direct) 93.323 Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), nonfederal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with the guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the Internal Control Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR 200.318(a), the nonfederal entity must have and use documented procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The nonfederal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Per 2 CFR 200.324(a), the nonfederal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the SAT, including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent upon the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation; but, as a starting point, the nonfederal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Condition - Controls were not sufficient to establish written policies and procedures surrounding procured contracts and to ensure that the history of procurement decisions was documented, as required by 2 CFR 200. Questioned Costs - Research and Development Cluster - unknown ELC - unknown Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Research and Development Cluster - For the four contracts tested, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Additionally, for the largest of the four contracts with activity of approximately $375,000, which is above the SAT established by FAR, management did not document its rationale for limiting competition, nor was management able to provide evidence that a cost-price analysis was performed. Finally, management has not formally documented an appropriate micropurchase or SAT threshold. ELC - For the three of the four contracts tested that were procured under noncompetitive means, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Further, for three out of four contracts tested under the Research and Development Cluster and all four contracts tested under ELC, management was unable to provide evidence that contractors were checked for suspension and debarment in advance of entering into a covered transaction. Because there was evidence that these contractors were not suspended or debarred, no questioned costs related to this noncompliance were identified. Cause and Effect - A lack of formal procurement policies and procedures, internally established procurement thresholds, or records in support of procurement decisions could result in material noncompliance with federal procurement standards. Recommendation - We recommend that management formalize procurement policies and procedures to demonstrate how the Institute will achieve compliance with standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Additionally, we recommend management retain documented evidence that its policies and procedures were followed to ensure compliance with procurement standards. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the recommendation and will review the relevant guidance to ensure compliance. Necessary revisions will be made to the existing procurement policies and procedures in a timely manner to ensure that procurement decisions are documented, as required by 2 CFR Part 200.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name -93.233/93.837, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Research and Development Cluster 93.323, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - 93.233 - R01HL142116; 93.837 - U01HL146245 93.323 - 22680258J; 32680012K Pass-through Entity - 93.233 N/A (direct); 93.837 N/A (direct) 93.323 Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), nonfederal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with the guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the Internal Control Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR 200.318(a), the nonfederal entity must have and use documented procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The nonfederal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Per 2 CFR 200.324(a), the nonfederal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the SAT, including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent upon the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation; but, as a starting point, the nonfederal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Condition - Controls were not sufficient to establish written policies and procedures surrounding procured contracts and to ensure that the history of procurement decisions was documented, as required by 2 CFR 200. Questioned Costs - Research and Development Cluster - unknown ELC - unknown Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Research and Development Cluster - For the four contracts tested, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Additionally, for the largest of the four contracts with activity of approximately $375,000, which is above the SAT established by FAR, management did not document its rationale for limiting competition, nor was management able to provide evidence that a cost-price analysis was performed. Finally, management has not formally documented an appropriate micropurchase or SAT threshold. ELC - For the three of the four contracts tested that were procured under noncompetitive means, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Further, for three out of four contracts tested under the Research and Development Cluster and all four contracts tested under ELC, management was unable to provide evidence that contractors were checked for suspension and debarment in advance of entering into a covered transaction. Because there was evidence that these contractors were not suspended or debarred, no questioned costs related to this noncompliance were identified. Cause and Effect - A lack of formal procurement policies and procedures, internally established procurement thresholds, or records in support of procurement decisions could result in material noncompliance with federal procurement standards. Recommendation - We recommend that management formalize procurement policies and procedures to demonstrate how the Institute will achieve compliance with standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Additionally, we recommend management retain documented evidence that its policies and procedures were followed to ensure compliance with procurement standards. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the recommendation and will review the relevant guidance to ensure compliance. Necessary revisions will be made to the existing procurement policies and procedures in a timely manner to ensure that procurement decisions are documented, as required by 2 CFR Part 200.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name -93.233/93.837, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Research and Development Cluster 93.323, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - 93.233 - R01HL142116; 93.837 - U01HL146245 93.323 - 22680258J; 32680012K Pass-through Entity - 93.233 N/A (direct); 93.837 N/A (direct) 93.323 Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), nonfederal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with the guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the Internal Control Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR 200.318(a), the nonfederal entity must have and use documented procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The nonfederal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Per 2 CFR 200.324(a), the nonfederal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the SAT, including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent upon the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation; but, as a starting point, the nonfederal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Condition - Controls were not sufficient to establish written policies and procedures surrounding procured contracts and to ensure that the history of procurement decisions was documented, as required by 2 CFR 200. Questioned Costs - Research and Development Cluster - unknown ELC - unknown Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Research and Development Cluster - For the four contracts tested, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Additionally, for the largest of the four contracts with activity of approximately $375,000, which is above the SAT established by FAR, management did not document its rationale for limiting competition, nor was management able to provide evidence that a cost-price analysis was performed. Finally, management has not formally documented an appropriate micropurchase or SAT threshold. ELC - For the three of the four contracts tested that were procured under noncompetitive means, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Further, for three out of four contracts tested under the Research and Development Cluster and all four contracts tested under ELC, management was unable to provide evidence that contractors were checked for suspension and debarment in advance of entering into a covered transaction. Because there was evidence that these contractors were not suspended or debarred, no questioned costs related to this noncompliance were identified. Cause and Effect - A lack of formal procurement policies and procedures, internally established procurement thresholds, or records in support of procurement decisions could result in material noncompliance with federal procurement standards. Recommendation - We recommend that management formalize procurement policies and procedures to demonstrate how the Institute will achieve compliance with standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Additionally, we recommend management retain documented evidence that its policies and procedures were followed to ensure compliance with procurement standards. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the recommendation and will review the relevant guidance to ensure compliance. Necessary revisions will be made to the existing procurement policies and procedures in a timely manner to ensure that procurement decisions are documented, as required by 2 CFR Part 200.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name -93.233/93.837, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Research and Development Cluster 93.323, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - 93.233 - R01HL142116; 93.837 - U01HL146245 93.323 - 22680258J; 32680012K Pass-through Entity - 93.233 N/A (direct); 93.837 N/A (direct) 93.323 Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), nonfederal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with the guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the Internal Control Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR 200.318(a), the nonfederal entity must have and use documented procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The nonfederal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Per 2 CFR 200.324(a), the nonfederal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the SAT, including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent upon the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation; but, as a starting point, the nonfederal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Condition - Controls were not sufficient to establish written policies and procedures surrounding procured contracts and to ensure that the history of procurement decisions was documented, as required by 2 CFR 200. Questioned Costs - Research and Development Cluster - unknown ELC - unknown Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Research and Development Cluster - For the four contracts tested, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Additionally, for the largest of the four contracts with activity of approximately $375,000, which is above the SAT established by FAR, management did not document its rationale for limiting competition, nor was management able to provide evidence that a cost-price analysis was performed. Finally, management has not formally documented an appropriate micropurchase or SAT threshold. ELC - For the three of the four contracts tested that were procured under noncompetitive means, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Further, for three out of four contracts tested under the Research and Development Cluster and all four contracts tested under ELC, management was unable to provide evidence that contractors were checked for suspension and debarment in advance of entering into a covered transaction. Because there was evidence that these contractors were not suspended or debarred, no questioned costs related to this noncompliance were identified. Cause and Effect - A lack of formal procurement policies and procedures, internally established procurement thresholds, or records in support of procurement decisions could result in material noncompliance with federal procurement standards. Recommendation - We recommend that management formalize procurement policies and procedures to demonstrate how the Institute will achieve compliance with standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Additionally, we recommend management retain documented evidence that its policies and procedures were followed to ensure compliance with procurement standards. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the recommendation and will review the relevant guidance to ensure compliance. Necessary revisions will be made to the existing procurement policies and procedures in a timely manner to ensure that procurement decisions are documented, as required by 2 CFR Part 200.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name -93.233/93.837, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Research and Development Cluster 93.323, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - 93.233 - R01HL142116; 93.837 - U01HL146245 93.323 - 22680258J; 32680012K Pass-through Entity - 93.233 N/A (direct); 93.837 N/A (direct) 93.323 Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), nonfederal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with the guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the Internal Control Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR 200.318(a), the nonfederal entity must have and use documented procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The nonfederal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Per 2 CFR 200.324(a), the nonfederal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the SAT, including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent upon the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation; but, as a starting point, the nonfederal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Condition - Controls were not sufficient to establish written policies and procedures surrounding procured contracts and to ensure that the history of procurement decisions was documented, as required by 2 CFR 200. Questioned Costs - Research and Development Cluster - unknown ELC - unknown Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Research and Development Cluster - For the four contracts tested, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Additionally, for the largest of the four contracts with activity of approximately $375,000, which is above the SAT established by FAR, management did not document its rationale for limiting competition, nor was management able to provide evidence that a cost-price analysis was performed. Finally, management has not formally documented an appropriate micropurchase or SAT threshold. ELC - For the three of the four contracts tested that were procured under noncompetitive means, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Further, for three out of four contracts tested under the Research and Development Cluster and all four contracts tested under ELC, management was unable to provide evidence that contractors were checked for suspension and debarment in advance of entering into a covered transaction. Because there was evidence that these contractors were not suspended or debarred, no questioned costs related to this noncompliance were identified. Cause and Effect - A lack of formal procurement policies and procedures, internally established procurement thresholds, or records in support of procurement decisions could result in material noncompliance with federal procurement standards. Recommendation - We recommend that management formalize procurement policies and procedures to demonstrate how the Institute will achieve compliance with standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Additionally, we recommend management retain documented evidence that its policies and procedures were followed to ensure compliance with procurement standards. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the recommendation and will review the relevant guidance to ensure compliance. Necessary revisions will be made to the existing procurement policies and procedures in a timely manner to ensure that procurement decisions are documented, as required by 2 CFR Part 200.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name -93.233/93.837, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Research and Development Cluster 93.323, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - 93.233 - R01HL142116; 93.837 - U01HL146245 93.323 - 22680258J; 32680012K Pass-through Entity - 93.233 N/A (direct); 93.837 N/A (direct) 93.323 Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), nonfederal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with the guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the Internal Control Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR 200.318(a), the nonfederal entity must have and use documented procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The nonfederal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Per 2 CFR 200.324(a), the nonfederal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the SAT, including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent upon the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation; but, as a starting point, the nonfederal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Condition - Controls were not sufficient to establish written policies and procedures surrounding procured contracts and to ensure that the history of procurement decisions was documented, as required by 2 CFR 200. Questioned Costs - Research and Development Cluster - unknown ELC - unknown Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Research and Development Cluster - For the four contracts tested, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Additionally, for the largest of the four contracts with activity of approximately $375,000, which is above the SAT established by FAR, management did not document its rationale for limiting competition, nor was management able to provide evidence that a cost-price analysis was performed. Finally, management has not formally documented an appropriate micropurchase or SAT threshold. ELC - For the three of the four contracts tested that were procured under noncompetitive means, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Further, for three out of four contracts tested under the Research and Development Cluster and all four contracts tested under ELC, management was unable to provide evidence that contractors were checked for suspension and debarment in advance of entering into a covered transaction. Because there was evidence that these contractors were not suspended or debarred, no questioned costs related to this noncompliance were identified. Cause and Effect - A lack of formal procurement policies and procedures, internally established procurement thresholds, or records in support of procurement decisions could result in material noncompliance with federal procurement standards. Recommendation - We recommend that management formalize procurement policies and procedures to demonstrate how the Institute will achieve compliance with standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Additionally, we recommend management retain documented evidence that its policies and procedures were followed to ensure compliance with procurement standards. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the recommendation and will review the relevant guidance to ensure compliance. Necessary revisions will be made to the existing procurement policies and procedures in a timely manner to ensure that procurement decisions are documented, as required by 2 CFR Part 200.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name -93.233/93.837, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Research and Development Cluster 93.323, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - 93.233 - R01HL142116; 93.837 - U01HL146245 93.323 - 22680258J; 32680012K Pass-through Entity - 93.233 N/A (direct); 93.837 N/A (direct) 93.323 Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), nonfederal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with the guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the Internal Control Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR 200.318(a), the nonfederal entity must have and use documented procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The nonfederal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Per 2 CFR 200.324(a), the nonfederal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the SAT, including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent upon the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation; but, as a starting point, the nonfederal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Condition - Controls were not sufficient to establish written policies and procedures surrounding procured contracts and to ensure that the history of procurement decisions was documented, as required by 2 CFR 200. Questioned Costs - Research and Development Cluster - unknown ELC - unknown Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Research and Development Cluster - For the four contracts tested, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Additionally, for the largest of the four contracts with activity of approximately $375,000, which is above the SAT established by FAR, management did not document its rationale for limiting competition, nor was management able to provide evidence that a cost-price analysis was performed. Finally, management has not formally documented an appropriate micropurchase or SAT threshold. ELC - For the three of the four contracts tested that were procured under noncompetitive means, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Further, for three out of four contracts tested under the Research and Development Cluster and all four contracts tested under ELC, management was unable to provide evidence that contractors were checked for suspension and debarment in advance of entering into a covered transaction. Because there was evidence that these contractors were not suspended or debarred, no questioned costs related to this noncompliance were identified. Cause and Effect - A lack of formal procurement policies and procedures, internally established procurement thresholds, or records in support of procurement decisions could result in material noncompliance with federal procurement standards. Recommendation - We recommend that management formalize procurement policies and procedures to demonstrate how the Institute will achieve compliance with standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Additionally, we recommend management retain documented evidence that its policies and procedures were followed to ensure compliance with procurement standards. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the recommendation and will review the relevant guidance to ensure compliance. Necessary revisions will be made to the existing procurement policies and procedures in a timely manner to ensure that procurement decisions are documented, as required by 2 CFR Part 200.
Finding 2024-004: Reportable finding considered a significant deficiency - Noncompliance with Internal Procurement Authorization Controls Program name: Child and Adult Care Food Program Assistance Listing: 10.558 Federal awarding agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Pass-through Entity: Maryland State Department of Education, District of Columbia Education Office Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.318(a), non-federal entities must establish and maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders. As required under 2 CFR Subpart D (§§200.317–200.327), organizations must follow written procurement procedures that reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal law and the standards in the Uniform Guidance. The Organization’s internal procurement policy includes specific thresholds for contract approvals and designates levels of review and signature authority based on the contract value. Adherence to these internal controls is essential to ensure compliance with federal procurement requirements and appropriate stewardship of federal funds. Condition: During our testing of procurement activity, we noted that a procurement contract was executed by an individual who did not have the delegated authority to approve or sign the agreement, as required by the Organization’s internal procurement policy. The contract amount exceeded the individual’s approval threshold. The policy’s required internal approval levels were not followed prior to execution. Cause: This issue appears to have resulted from a breakdown in adherence to established internal control procedures, possibly due to a lack of training or oversight. The Organization’s procurement policy was in place and compliant with 2 CFR requirements, but it was not enforced in practice. Effect: Noncompliance with internal procurement approval controls increases the risk of unauthorized or inappropriate spending, lack of transparency, and potential ineligibility of costs charged to federal programs. While the transaction itself may ultimately be allowable, failure to follow established approval protocols constitutes a significant deficiency in internal control over compliance. Repeat finding: This is not a repeat finding. Questioned costs: None identified, as the expenditure appeared otherwise allowable. However, the control deficiency presents a risk for future noncompliance. Perspective: We selected two procurement transactions from a population of four procurement transactions from this program. The issue reflects a control failure affecting procurement activity across federally funded programs and may result in future questioned costs if not corrected. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization follow up with the relevant parties to ensure proper reporting requirements are met on a timely basis. Management’s response and corrective action plan (unaudited): See corrective action plan.
Finding 2024-004: Reportable finding considered a significant deficiency - Noncompliance with Internal Procurement Authorization Controls Program name: Child and Adult Care Food Program Assistance Listing: 10.558 Federal awarding agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Pass-through Entity: Maryland State Department of Education, District of Columbia Education Office Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.318(a), non-federal entities must establish and maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders. As required under 2 CFR Subpart D (§§200.317–200.327), organizations must follow written procurement procedures that reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal law and the standards in the Uniform Guidance. The Organization’s internal procurement policy includes specific thresholds for contract approvals and designates levels of review and signature authority based on the contract value. Adherence to these internal controls is essential to ensure compliance with federal procurement requirements and appropriate stewardship of federal funds. Condition: During our testing of procurement activity, we noted that a procurement contract was executed by an individual who did not have the delegated authority to approve or sign the agreement, as required by the Organization’s internal procurement policy. The contract amount exceeded the individual’s approval threshold. The policy’s required internal approval levels were not followed prior to execution. Cause: This issue appears to have resulted from a breakdown in adherence to established internal control procedures, possibly due to a lack of training or oversight. The Organization’s procurement policy was in place and compliant with 2 CFR requirements, but it was not enforced in practice. Effect: Noncompliance with internal procurement approval controls increases the risk of unauthorized or inappropriate spending, lack of transparency, and potential ineligibility of costs charged to federal programs. While the transaction itself may ultimately be allowable, failure to follow established approval protocols constitutes a significant deficiency in internal control over compliance. Repeat finding: This is not a repeat finding. Questioned costs: None identified, as the expenditure appeared otherwise allowable. However, the control deficiency presents a risk for future noncompliance. Perspective: We selected two procurement transactions from a population of four procurement transactions from this program. The issue reflects a control failure affecting procurement activity across federally funded programs and may result in future questioned costs if not corrected. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization follow up with the relevant parties to ensure proper reporting requirements are met on a timely basis. Management’s response and corrective action plan (unaudited): See corrective action plan.
2024-003: Procurement Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 10.760, U. S Department of Agriculture - Water and waste disposal systems for rural communities Federal Award Identification Number and Year: RD Loan 92-12 Loan Period 9/6/23 - 9/1/2063, RD Loan 10 Loan and RD Loan 13 Loan period 1/1/24 - 1/1/2064 Type: Material weakness in internal control and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding: No Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.318 (a), the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. Condition: The Village did not utilize federal procurement requirements cited above for the engineering services for the Water and Sewer Fund project. Identification of How Likely Questioned Costs Were Computed: The questioned costs were determined from actual engineering design and construction cost billed (federal portion) during the July 6, 2018 through June 30, 2024 period as summarized from the request for disbursement of funds submitted. Known Questioned Costs: $562,676 Context: We tested the procurement of three contracts and identified one contract that did not follow federal procurement requirements. Cause/Effect: The Village's controls were not adequate to ensure it followed the federal requirement for procurement process. As a results, there was one instance of noncompliance related to procurements. Recommendation: We recommend the Village follow federal procurement as required in 2 CFR 200.319 (d) for all contracts reimbursed with federal funds. View of responsible officials and planned corrective action plan: See attached corrective action plan.
FINDING 2024-001 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Program, School Summer Food Service Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2023, FY 2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . .” 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: “The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . “ 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Child Nutrition Program and Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish internal controls enabled noncompliance to go undetected. The failure to comply with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could have resulted in the loss of federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-Federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $50,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. The School Corporation’s policy states that the small purchase threshold is between $10,000 and $150,000. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. For fiscal year 2023, two vendors, totaling $109,657 and $53,441, were selected for testing at the small purchase threshold. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes nor was there documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to fiscal year 2023. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. “Covered transactions” include but are not limited to contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. During the audit period, there were ten vendors identified which exceeded $25,000 in disbursements on an annual basis. Six vendors were selected for testing. In one instance, the School Corporation’s contract with the vendor did not include any suspension and debarment clause and the School Corporation did not verify the vendor’s suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was systemic issues throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish and implement control procedures to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. This should include documenting the procurement process taken by management for transactions with vendors exceeding the simplified acquisition and small purchase thresholds. When utilizing vendors providing specialized services, documentation should be prepared and maintained by management to support sole source procurement decisions when competitive is limited due to the nature of the service. We also recommend implement an annual control to review and document suspension and debarment checks for all vendors funded with Child Nutrition Cluster grant funds that meet the covered transaction threshold of $25,000. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2024-001 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Program, School Summer Food Service Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2023, FY 2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . .” 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: “The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . “ 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Child Nutrition Program and Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish internal controls enabled noncompliance to go undetected. The failure to comply with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could have resulted in the loss of federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-Federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $50,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. The School Corporation’s policy states that the small purchase threshold is between $10,000 and $150,000. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. For fiscal year 2023, two vendors, totaling $109,657 and $53,441, were selected for testing at the small purchase threshold. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes nor was there documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to fiscal year 2023. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. “Covered transactions” include but are not limited to contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. During the audit period, there were ten vendors identified which exceeded $25,000 in disbursements on an annual basis. Six vendors were selected for testing. In one instance, the School Corporation’s contract with the vendor did not include any suspension and debarment clause and the School Corporation did not verify the vendor’s suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was systemic issues throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish and implement control procedures to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. This should include documenting the procurement process taken by management for transactions with vendors exceeding the simplified acquisition and small purchase thresholds. When utilizing vendors providing specialized services, documentation should be prepared and maintained by management to support sole source procurement decisions when competitive is limited due to the nature of the service. We also recommend implement an annual control to review and document suspension and debarment checks for all vendors funded with Child Nutrition Cluster grant funds that meet the covered transaction threshold of $25,000. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2024-001 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Program, School Summer Food Service Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2023, FY 2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . .” 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: “The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . “ 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Child Nutrition Program and Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish internal controls enabled noncompliance to go undetected. The failure to comply with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could have resulted in the loss of federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-Federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $50,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. The School Corporation’s policy states that the small purchase threshold is between $10,000 and $150,000. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. For fiscal year 2023, two vendors, totaling $109,657 and $53,441, were selected for testing at the small purchase threshold. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes nor was there documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to fiscal year 2023. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. “Covered transactions” include but are not limited to contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. During the audit period, there were ten vendors identified which exceeded $25,000 in disbursements on an annual basis. Six vendors were selected for testing. In one instance, the School Corporation’s contract with the vendor did not include any suspension and debarment clause and the School Corporation did not verify the vendor’s suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was systemic issues throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish and implement control procedures to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. This should include documenting the procurement process taken by management for transactions with vendors exceeding the simplified acquisition and small purchase thresholds. When utilizing vendors providing specialized services, documentation should be prepared and maintained by management to support sole source procurement decisions when competitive is limited due to the nature of the service. We also recommend implement an annual control to review and document suspension and debarment checks for all vendors funded with Child Nutrition Cluster grant funds that meet the covered transaction threshold of $25,000. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2024-001 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Program, School Summer Food Service Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2023, FY 2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . .” 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: “The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . “ 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Child Nutrition Program and Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish internal controls enabled noncompliance to go undetected. The failure to comply with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could have resulted in the loss of federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-Federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $50,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. The School Corporation’s policy states that the small purchase threshold is between $10,000 and $150,000. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. For fiscal year 2023, two vendors, totaling $109,657 and $53,441, were selected for testing at the small purchase threshold. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes nor was there documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to fiscal year 2023. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. “Covered transactions” include but are not limited to contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. During the audit period, there were ten vendors identified which exceeded $25,000 in disbursements on an annual basis. Six vendors were selected for testing. In one instance, the School Corporation’s contract with the vendor did not include any suspension and debarment clause and the School Corporation did not verify the vendor’s suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was systemic issues throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish and implement control procedures to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. This should include documenting the procurement process taken by management for transactions with vendors exceeding the simplified acquisition and small purchase thresholds. When utilizing vendors providing specialized services, documentation should be prepared and maintained by management to support sole source procurement decisions when competitive is limited due to the nature of the service. We also recommend implement an annual control to review and document suspension and debarment checks for all vendors funded with Child Nutrition Cluster grant funds that meet the covered transaction threshold of $25,000. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2024-005 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): H027A210084, H027A220084, H027A230084 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.318 states: “The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 200.317 through 200.327.” and 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School District to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Special Education Cluster and Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements. Cause: The School District's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School District at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There we no questioned costs identified. Context: During the audit period, the School District purchased Special Education contracted services from one specialist with aggregate payments for each fiscal year which were within the small purchases threshold ($10,000 - $150,000) under Federal and State procurement regulations. The School District did not solicit multiple quotes for services, document the method and rationale for procurement, and did not perform a check to confirm the service provider was not suspended or debarred before entering into the contract and disbursing federal funds. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the School District enter into a written contract with service providers funded by federal grants. The contract should include a Suspension and Debarment clause or certification on an annual basis. We also recommend the School District follow their procurement policy for small purchase thresholds, including documenting procurement rationale and suspension and debarment checks prior to entering into the covered transaction funded by federal grants. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2024-005 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): H027A210084, H027A220084, H027A230084 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.318 states: “The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 200.317 through 200.327.” and 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School District to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Special Education Cluster and Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements. Cause: The School District's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School District at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There we no questioned costs identified. Context: During the audit period, the School District purchased Special Education contracted services from one specialist with aggregate payments for each fiscal year which were within the small purchases threshold ($10,000 - $150,000) under Federal and State procurement regulations. The School District did not solicit multiple quotes for services, document the method and rationale for procurement, and did not perform a check to confirm the service provider was not suspended or debarred before entering into the contract and disbursing federal funds. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the School District enter into a written contract with service providers funded by federal grants. The contract should include a Suspension and Debarment clause or certification on an annual basis. We also recommend the School District follow their procurement policy for small purchase thresholds, including documenting procurement rationale and suspension and debarment checks prior to entering into the covered transaction funded by federal grants. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2024-005 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): H027A210084, H027A220084, H027A230084 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.318 states: “The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 200.317 through 200.327.” and 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School District to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Special Education Cluster and Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements. Cause: The School District's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School District at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There we no questioned costs identified. Context: During the audit period, the School District purchased Special Education contracted services from one specialist with aggregate payments for each fiscal year which were within the small purchases threshold ($10,000 - $150,000) under Federal and State procurement regulations. The School District did not solicit multiple quotes for services, document the method and rationale for procurement, and did not perform a check to confirm the service provider was not suspended or debarred before entering into the contract and disbursing federal funds. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the School District enter into a written contract with service providers funded by federal grants. The contract should include a Suspension and Debarment clause or certification on an annual basis. We also recommend the School District follow their procurement policy for small purchase thresholds, including documenting procurement rationale and suspension and debarment checks prior to entering into the covered transaction funded by federal grants. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Finding 2024-001 Procurement Significant Deficiency Federal Program: Charter Schools Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.282A Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.318, “The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §200.317 through 200.327.” Condition The School’s procurement policies do not include wording or procedures to ensure the School is complying with the above standard. Cause A responsible individual is not monitoring Federal regulations to ensure the School’s procurement procedures are properly documented and in line with the regulations. Effect Not documenting these procedures could result in the School completing procurement transactions that are not in compliance with Federal regulations. Recommendation We recommend the School develop a written procurement policy that incorporates the Federal regulations identified above. Views of Responsible Officials The School’s Corrective Action Plan is included on page
Finding 2024-001 Procurement Significant Deficiency Federal Program: Charter Schools Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.282A Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.318, “The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §200.317 through 200.327.” Condition The School’s procurement policies do not include wording or procedures to ensure the School is complying with the above standard. Cause A responsible individual is not monitoring Federal regulations to ensure the School’s procurement procedures are properly documented and in line with the regulations. Effect Not documenting these procedures could result in the School completing procurement transactions that are not in compliance with Federal regulations. Recommendation We recommend the School develop a written procurement policy that incorporates the Federal regulations identified above. Views of Responsible Officials The School’s Corrective Action Plan is included on page
2024-001 Internal Control over Compliance and Compliance with Reporting (Preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA)) Information on the Major Federal Programs: Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Assistance Listing Number: 14.218 Federal Assistance Listing Name: Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Grant Number: CV-2-8 Department of Health and Human Services Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.566 Federal Assistance Listing Name: Refugee and Entrant Assistance - State-Administered Programs Grant Number: JA-FSA-RSS-2022 Criteria: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR part 200) Section §200.510(b) states in part: “The auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with CFR Section §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended.” The schedule must provide total federal awards expended for each individual Federal program. In accordance with §200.302 Financial Management, a non-Federal entity's financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: (1) Identification, in its accounts, of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §200.327 Financial Reporting and §200.328 Monitoring and Reporting Program Performance. (3) Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for Federally-funded activities. (4) Effective control over, and accountability for, all funds, property, and other assets.
2024-001 Internal Control over Compliance and Compliance with Reporting (Preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA)) Information on the Major Federal Programs: Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Assistance Listing Number: 14.218 Federal Assistance Listing Name: Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Grant Number: CV-2-8 Department of Health and Human Services Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.566 Federal Assistance Listing Name: Refugee and Entrant Assistance - State-Administered Programs Grant Number: JA-FSA-RSS-2022 Criteria: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR part 200) Section §200.510(b) states in part: “The auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with CFR Section §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended.” The schedule must provide total federal awards expended for each individual Federal program. In accordance with §200.302 Financial Management, a non-Federal entity's financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: (1) Identification, in its accounts, of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §200.327 Financial Reporting and §200.328 Monitoring and Reporting Program Performance. (3) Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for Federally-funded activities. (4) Effective control over, and accountability for, all funds, property, and other assets.
2024-001 Internal Control over Compliance and Compliance with Reporting (Preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA)) Information on the Major Federal Programs: Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Assistance Listing Number: 14.218 Federal Assistance Listing Name: Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Grant Number: CV-2-8 Department of Health and Human Services Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.566 Federal Assistance Listing Name: Refugee and Entrant Assistance - State-Administered Programs Grant Number: JA-FSA-RSS-2022 Criteria: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR part 200) Section §200.510(b) states in part: “The auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with CFR Section §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended.” The schedule must provide total federal awards expended for each individual Federal program. In accordance with §200.302 Financial Management, a non-Federal entity's financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: (1) Identification, in its accounts, of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §200.327 Financial Reporting and §200.328 Monitoring and Reporting Program Performance. (3) Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for Federally-funded activities. (4) Effective control over, and accountability for, all funds, property, and other assets.
Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553 and 10.555 Pass-Through Agency: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Pass-Through Number(s): 2024-678022-DPI-SB-546, 2024-010014-DPI-NSL-547, 2024-010014-DPISK_ NSLAE-566 Award Period: July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria: 2 CFR Sections 200.317 – 200.327 of the Uniform Guidance details procurement requirements for non-federal entities. Condition: One City Schools, Inc. did not document procurement methods, rationales, and decisions in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None Context: We sampled 3 procurement transactions, noting that none of them had documentation following a procurement policy. Cause: Policies and procedures were put in place after the prior year single audit findings, but were not able to be incorporated for the current fiscal year under audit. Effect: This could result in noncompliance, disallowed costs, or discontinuance of federal funding. Repeat Finding: Yes (2023-005) Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization establish and maintain effective internal controls over procurement requirements. Views of responsible officials: One City Schools, Inc. agrees with the finding and are working on implementing internal controls over procurement.
Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553 and 10.555 Pass-Through Agency: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Pass-Through Number(s): 2024-678022-DPI-SB-546, 2024-010014-DPI-NSL-547, 2024-010014-DPISK_ NSLAE-566 Award Period: July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria: 2 CFR Sections 200.317 – 200.327 of the Uniform Guidance details procurement requirements for non-federal entities. Condition: One City Schools, Inc. did not document procurement methods, rationales, and decisions in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None Context: We sampled 3 procurement transactions, noting that none of them had documentation following a procurement policy. Cause: Policies and procedures were put in place after the prior year single audit findings, but were not able to be incorporated for the current fiscal year under audit. Effect: This could result in noncompliance, disallowed costs, or discontinuance of federal funding. Repeat Finding: Yes (2023-005) Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization establish and maintain effective internal controls over procurement requirements. Views of responsible officials: One City Schools, Inc. agrees with the finding and are working on implementing internal controls over procurement.
Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553 and 10.555 Pass-Through Agency: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Pass-Through Number(s): 2024-678022-DPI-SB-546, 2024-010014-DPI-NSL-547, 2024-010014-DPISK_ NSLAE-566 Award Period: July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria: 2 CFR Sections 200.317 – 200.327 of the Uniform Guidance details procurement requirements for non-federal entities. Condition: One City Schools, Inc. did not document procurement methods, rationales, and decisions in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None Context: We sampled 3 procurement transactions, noting that none of them had documentation following a procurement policy. Cause: Policies and procedures were put in place after the prior year single audit findings, but were not able to be incorporated for the current fiscal year under audit. Effect: This could result in noncompliance, disallowed costs, or discontinuance of federal funding. Repeat Finding: Yes (2023-005) Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization establish and maintain effective internal controls over procurement requirements. Views of responsible officials: One City Schools, Inc. agrees with the finding and are working on implementing internal controls over procurement.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION & DEBARMENT REQUIREMENTS, CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS; AL No. 21.027; Direct Allocation Criteria: Per section 13 of Treasury’s Final Rule FAQs and 2 CFR 200.214, counties must comply with the procurement standards set forth in 2 CFR 200.318, through 2 CFR 200.327, when using their SLFRF award funds to procure goods and services to carry out the objectives of their SLFRF award. In addition, 2 CFR 200.214, prohibits recipients from using SLFRF funds to enter into subawards and contracts with parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs. Condition: The city did not verify that program recipients/participants were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the program. Cause: The city does not have procurement policies and procedures in place that allow it to comply with procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Non-compliance with program terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward, and that no subaward, contract, or agreement for purchase of goods or services is made with any suspended or debarred party. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION & DEBARMENT REQUIREMENTS, CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS; AL No. 21.027; Direct Allocation Criteria: Per section 13 of Treasury’s Final Rule FAQs and 2 CFR 200.214, counties must comply with the procurement standards set forth in 2 CFR 200.318, through 2 CFR 200.327, when using their SLFRF award funds to procure goods and services to carry out the objectives of their SLFRF award. In addition, 2 CFR 200.214, prohibits recipients from using SLFRF funds to enter into subawards and contracts with parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs. Condition: The city did not verify that program recipients/participants were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the program. Cause: The city does not have procurement policies and procedures in place that allow it to comply with procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Non-compliance with program terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward, and that no subaward, contract, or agreement for purchase of goods or services is made with any suspended or debarred party. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
Department of Education Financial Assistance Listing 84.184H School-Based Mental Health Services Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria – Uniform Guidance and 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327 set forth the procurement standards non-federal entities other than states must follow when operating federal programs. Condition – In our testing of procurement, suspension and debarment it was identified that the District did not go out for quotes on one contract over the mircro purchase threshold. Cause – Lack of oversight, awareness, or understanding of all the specific requirements under the Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections, and controls were not adequately designed to ensure compliance with all of these requirements. Effect – A lack of compliant policies increases the overall risk of non-compliance. Questioned Costs – None reported. Context/Sampling – 2 of 3 contracts were tested. Repeat Finding from Prior Years – No. Recommendation – We recommend that management establish controls to follow all applicable requirements under Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections. Views of Responsible Officials – There is no disagreement with the finding.
Department of Housing and Urban Development Continuum of Care, Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267, Affects all grant awards included under Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267 on the Schedule Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.318 maintains that recipients must have and use documented procurement policies and must conform to procurement standards in sections 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: Catholic Charities has documented procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal standards regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment; however, the procedures were not followed for four vendors selected for testing. Cause: Catholic Charities did not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure that the processes laid out in their procurement policy regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment were followed. Effect: Payments could be made to recipients who were suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 13 transactions out of 68 total transactions were selected for testing. Four vendors did not have support showing the search for suspension and debarment was performed which made up $60,537 of $796,282 federal awards. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes, 2023-001 Recommendation: We recommend Catholic Charities enhance internal control procedures to ensure all suspension and debarment verification procedures are performed prior to entering into the transactions. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Department of Housing and Urban Development Continuum of Care, Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267, Affects all grant awards included under Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267 on the Schedule Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.318 maintains that recipients must have and use documented procurement policies and must conform to procurement standards in sections 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: Catholic Charities has documented procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal standards regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment; however, the procedures were not followed for four vendors selected for testing. Cause: Catholic Charities did not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure that the processes laid out in their procurement policy regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment were followed. Effect: Payments could be made to recipients who were suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 13 transactions out of 68 total transactions were selected for testing. Four vendors did not have support showing the search for suspension and debarment was performed which made up $60,537 of $796,282 federal awards. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes, 2023-001 Recommendation: We recommend Catholic Charities enhance internal control procedures to ensure all suspension and debarment verification procedures are performed prior to entering into the transactions. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Department of Housing and Urban Development Continuum of Care, Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267, Affects all grant awards included under Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267 on the Schedule Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.318 maintains that recipients must have and use documented procurement policies and must conform to procurement standards in sections 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: Catholic Charities has documented procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal standards regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment; however, the procedures were not followed for four vendors selected for testing. Cause: Catholic Charities did not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure that the processes laid out in their procurement policy regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment were followed. Effect: Payments could be made to recipients who were suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 13 transactions out of 68 total transactions were selected for testing. Four vendors did not have support showing the search for suspension and debarment was performed which made up $60,537 of $796,282 federal awards. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes, 2023-001 Recommendation: We recommend Catholic Charities enhance internal control procedures to ensure all suspension and debarment verification procedures are performed prior to entering into the transactions. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Department of Housing and Urban Development Continuum of Care, Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267, Affects all grant awards included under Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267 on the Schedule Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.318 maintains that recipients must have and use documented procurement policies and must conform to procurement standards in sections 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: Catholic Charities has documented procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal standards regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment; however, the procedures were not followed for four vendors selected for testing. Cause: Catholic Charities did not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure that the processes laid out in their procurement policy regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment were followed. Effect: Payments could be made to recipients who were suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 13 transactions out of 68 total transactions were selected for testing. Four vendors did not have support showing the search for suspension and debarment was performed which made up $60,537 of $796,282 federal awards. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes, 2023-001 Recommendation: We recommend Catholic Charities enhance internal control procedures to ensure all suspension and debarment verification procedures are performed prior to entering into the transactions. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Department of Housing and Urban Development Continuum of Care, Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267, Affects all grant awards included under Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267 on the Schedule Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.318 maintains that recipients must have and use documented procurement policies and must conform to procurement standards in sections 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: Catholic Charities has documented procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal standards regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment; however, the procedures were not followed for four vendors selected for testing. Cause: Catholic Charities did not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure that the processes laid out in their procurement policy regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment were followed. Effect: Payments could be made to recipients who were suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 13 transactions out of 68 total transactions were selected for testing. Four vendors did not have support showing the search for suspension and debarment was performed which made up $60,537 of $796,282 federal awards. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes, 2023-001 Recommendation: We recommend Catholic Charities enhance internal control procedures to ensure all suspension and debarment verification procedures are performed prior to entering into the transactions. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Department of Housing and Urban Development Continuum of Care, Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267, Affects all grant awards included under Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267 on the Schedule Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.318 maintains that recipients must have and use documented procurement policies and must conform to procurement standards in sections 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: Catholic Charities has documented procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal standards regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment; however, the procedures were not followed for four vendors selected for testing. Cause: Catholic Charities did not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure that the processes laid out in their procurement policy regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment were followed. Effect: Payments could be made to recipients who were suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 13 transactions out of 68 total transactions were selected for testing. Four vendors did not have support showing the search for suspension and debarment was performed which made up $60,537 of $796,282 federal awards. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes, 2023-001 Recommendation: We recommend Catholic Charities enhance internal control procedures to ensure all suspension and debarment verification procedures are performed prior to entering into the transactions. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Department of Housing and Urban Development Continuum of Care, Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267, Affects all grant awards included under Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267 on the Schedule Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.318 maintains that recipients must have and use documented procurement policies and must conform to procurement standards in sections 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: Catholic Charities has documented procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal standards regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment; however, the procedures were not followed for four vendors selected for testing. Cause: Catholic Charities did not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure that the processes laid out in their procurement policy regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment were followed. Effect: Payments could be made to recipients who were suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 13 transactions out of 68 total transactions were selected for testing. Four vendors did not have support showing the search for suspension and debarment was performed which made up $60,537 of $796,282 federal awards. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes, 2023-001 Recommendation: We recommend Catholic Charities enhance internal control procedures to ensure all suspension and debarment verification procedures are performed prior to entering into the transactions. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Department of Housing and Urban Development Continuum of Care, Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267, Affects all grant awards included under Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267 on the Schedule Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.318 maintains that recipients must have and use documented procurement policies and must conform to procurement standards in sections 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: Catholic Charities has documented procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal standards regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment; however, the procedures were not followed for four vendors selected for testing. Cause: Catholic Charities did not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure that the processes laid out in their procurement policy regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment were followed. Effect: Payments could be made to recipients who were suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 13 transactions out of 68 total transactions were selected for testing. Four vendors did not have support showing the search for suspension and debarment was performed which made up $60,537 of $796,282 federal awards. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes, 2023-001 Recommendation: We recommend Catholic Charities enhance internal control procedures to ensure all suspension and debarment verification procedures are performed prior to entering into the transactions. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Department of Housing and Urban Development Continuum of Care, Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267, Affects all grant awards included under Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267 on the Schedule Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.318 maintains that recipients must have and use documented procurement policies and must conform to procurement standards in sections 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: Catholic Charities has documented procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal standards regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment; however, the procedures were not followed for four vendors selected for testing. Cause: Catholic Charities did not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure that the processes laid out in their procurement policy regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment were followed. Effect: Payments could be made to recipients who were suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 13 transactions out of 68 total transactions were selected for testing. Four vendors did not have support showing the search for suspension and debarment was performed which made up $60,537 of $796,282 federal awards. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes, 2023-001 Recommendation: We recommend Catholic Charities enhance internal control procedures to ensure all suspension and debarment verification procedures are performed prior to entering into the transactions. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.