FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2023, FY 2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Nonfederal entities may establish a micro-purchase threshold higher than the federal threshold of $10,000 as established in the FAR in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) and (v). The School Corporation established a higher micropurchase threshold of $50,000. The School Corporation self-certified due to meeting the classification of a public institution and established a higher threshold consistent with state law (Indiana threshold of micropurchases is $50,000). Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Adequate internal controls were not in place over procurements made under the small purchase threshold for one of the two vendors tested during the audit period. The School Corporation made purchases with a vendor in fiscal year 2022-2023 totaling $97,773 and 2023-2024 totaling $59,070 but did not provide audit evidence that price quotations had been requested. Additionally, the School Corporation was not able to provide evidence that internal controls over suspension and debarment procedures were in place. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. The noncompliance was isolated to procurement requirements. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 LIBERTY-PERRY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non- Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (1) . . . (iv) Non-Federal entity increase to the micro-purchase threshold up to $50,000. Non-Federal entities may establish a threshold higher than the micro-purchase threshold identified in the FAR in accordance with the requirements of this section. The non-Federal entity may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the Federal awarding agency and auditors in accordance with § 200.334. The self-certification must include a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation of any of the following: (A) A qualification as a low-risk auditee, in accordance with the criteria in § 200.520 for the most recent audit; (B) An annual internal institutional risk assessment to identify, mitigate, and manage financial risks; or, INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 LIBERTY-PERRY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (C) For public institutions, a higher threshold consistent with State law. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . . (d) If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required. . . ." Cause The School Corporation was not able to provide documentation to demonstrate that quotes were obtained for purchases under the small purchase method. The School Corporation was unable to provide documentation to demonstrate it checked SAM.gov to verify the contractor was not suspended or debarred prior to entering into the contract. The School Corporation did not have proper policies and procedures in place due to being unaware of the grant requirements. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the School Corporation cannot ensure the contractors paid with federal funds are eligible to participate in federal programs. Any funds the School Corporation used to pay contractors that have been suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the funding agency could potentially recover them. The School Corporation cannot ensure that contractors paid under the small purchase method were awarded the best price for their services. This could result in federal funding not providing as many services or projects as possible. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 LIBERTY-PERRY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation strengthen its system of internal controls to ensure the proper procurement method is followed and documentation is retained. We recommended the School Corporation document its internal control procedures performed to ensure that all contractors that are paid $25,000 or more, all or in part with federal funds, are not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs before entering into any contracts. We also recommended strengthening its policies and procedures to ensure appropriate evidence is retained for audit. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2023, FY 2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Nonfederal entities may establish a micro-purchase threshold higher than the federal threshold of $10,000 as established in the FAR in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(a)(1)(iv) and (v). The School Corporation established a higher micropurchase threshold of $50,000. The School Corporation self-certified due to meeting the classification of a public institution and established a higher threshold consistent with state law (Indiana threshold of micropurchases is $50,000). Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Adequate internal controls were not in place over procurements made under the small purchase threshold for one of the two vendors tested during the audit period. The School Corporation made purchases with a vendor in fiscal year 2022-2023 totaling $97,773 and 2023-2024 totaling $59,070 but did not provide audit evidence that price quotations had been requested. Additionally, the School Corporation was not able to provide evidence that internal controls over suspension and debarment procedures were in place. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. The noncompliance was isolated to procurement requirements. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 LIBERTY-PERRY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non- Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (1) . . . (iv) Non-Federal entity increase to the micro-purchase threshold up to $50,000. Non-Federal entities may establish a threshold higher than the micro-purchase threshold identified in the FAR in accordance with the requirements of this section. The non-Federal entity may self-certify a threshold up to $50,000 on an annual basis and must maintain documentation to be made available to the Federal awarding agency and auditors in accordance with § 200.334. The self-certification must include a justification, clear identification of the threshold, and supporting documentation of any of the following: (A) A qualification as a low-risk auditee, in accordance with the criteria in § 200.520 for the most recent audit; (B) An annual internal institutional risk assessment to identify, mitigate, and manage financial risks; or, INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 LIBERTY-PERRY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (C) For public institutions, a higher threshold consistent with State law. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . . (d) If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required. . . ." Cause The School Corporation was not able to provide documentation to demonstrate that quotes were obtained for purchases under the small purchase method. The School Corporation was unable to provide documentation to demonstrate it checked SAM.gov to verify the contractor was not suspended or debarred prior to entering into the contract. The School Corporation did not have proper policies and procedures in place due to being unaware of the grant requirements. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the School Corporation cannot ensure the contractors paid with federal funds are eligible to participate in federal programs. Any funds the School Corporation used to pay contractors that have been suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the funding agency could potentially recover them. The School Corporation cannot ensure that contractors paid under the small purchase method were awarded the best price for their services. This could result in federal funding not providing as many services or projects as possible. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 LIBERTY-PERRY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation strengthen its system of internal controls to ensure the proper procurement method is followed and documentation is retained. We recommended the School Corporation document its internal control procedures performed to ensure that all contractors that are paid $25,000 or more, all or in part with federal funds, are not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs before entering into any contracts. We also recommended strengthening its policies and procedures to ensure appropriate evidence is retained for audit. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Lack of Internal Controls Over the Reporting Process Significant Deficiency Reclamation States Emergency Drought Relief Program, AL 15.514 Condition During our audit of the District’s compliance with federal program requirements, we noted that the entity does not have established internal controls over the reporting process. Specifically, there are no formal procedures in place to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of required federal reports. Criteria Per 2 CFR § 200.303, non-federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards to provide reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the awards in compliance with applicable regulations. Additionally, 2 CFR § 200.327 requires recipients to submit performance and financial reports that are accurate, complete, and timely. Cause This is the first year the District has been subject to a single audit, exceeding the $750,000 expenditure threshold, and has not yet developed formal policies or procedures for reviewing and approving required financial and programmatic reports. Effect The lack of internal controls increases the risk of inaccurate, incomplete, or untimely reporting, which could result in noncompliance with federal requirements and potential future corrective actions by granting agencies. Recommendation We recommend that the District develop and implement formal policies and procedures to ensure that federal reports are reviewed for accuracy, completeness, and timeliness prior to submission. Management should assign responsibility for report preparation and review, implement checklists or reconciliation processes, and provide training to staff involved in federal reporting. Views of Responsible Officials See the attached Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2024-007 – Reporting Federal Program: COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number (ALN): 21.027 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Grant Year: 2023 Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303, the City is required to establish and maintain effective internal controls over federal awards to ensure accurate and timely reporting of expenditures in compliance with federal regulations. Additionally, 2 CFR §200.327 and the terms of the award require timely and accurate submission of required reports. Condition The City did not submit the required federal financial reports in a timely basis. Additionally, the amounts reported in the SLFRF Compliance Report – WY4581 – P&E Report – 2024 included encumbered amounts rather than actual expenditures incurred during the reporting period. Cause The City does not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure the timely preparation, reconciliation, review, and submission of required reports for federal awards. Additionally, turnover in key personnel during the reporting period contributed to these issues, as new staff did not have access to the proper login credentials or training necessary to prepare and submit reports timely and accurately. There was also no established process for reconciling reported expenditures to the City’s general ledger and supporting documentation prior to submission. Effect or Potential Effect As a result of the lack of internal controls and reconciliation procedures, the City submitted inaccurate and untimely financial reports. Reporting encumbrances instead of actual expenditures misrepresents program activity and may impact the City’s compliance with federal requirements. Continued inaccuracies could result in questioned costs, increased oversight by federal agencies, or delays in future funding. Questioned Costs None noted, as expenditures were ultimately supported by documentation; however, the reporting inaccuracies are considered a significant deficiency in internal control over compliance. Context The State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) program, established under the American Rescue Plan Act, provides significant funding to municipalities for pandemic recovery and infrastructure initiatives. Accurate and timely reporting of expenditures is not only a regulatory requirement but also essential for transparency, accountability, and continued eligibility for funding. Internal control deficiencies in reporting may compromise the City’s ability to demonstrate effective stewardship of federal funds and could trigger additional scrutiny, audits, or corrective action plans from federal agencies. Given the substantial financial and operational impact of SLFRF funds on the City’s budget and community initiatives, it is imperative that robust processes are in place to ensure reports reflect actual expenditures and are reconciled to the City’s general ledger. Strengthening these controls will protect the City from potential compliance risks, maintain public trust, and ensure uninterrupted access to federal resources critical for ongoing community projects. Identification as a Repeat Finding This is a new finding for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. Recommendation We recommend that the City develop and implement formal policies and procedures to ensure timely preparation, reconciliation, and submission of all federal reports. Management should assign clear oversight responsibility for federal reporting and establish a formal reconciliation process requiring that all reported amounts be reviewed and compared to the City’s accounting records and supporting documentation prior to submission. Additionally, procedures should be developed to ensure that login credentials and system access for federal reporting platforms are promptly updated and assigned during periods of staff turnover. Views of Responsible Officials The City concurs with the finding. The City will implement new internal control procedures by June 30, 2025, to ensure timely submission and reconciliation of federal reports and the Treasurer will review and approve all submissions prior to filing. See Corrective Action Plan.
MUNICIPALITY OF PATILLAS, PUERTO RICO SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2024 SECTION III – Federal Award Finding and Questioned Costs FINDING 2024-005 FEDERAL PROGRAM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) (ASSISTANCE LISTING NO.14.228) DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT PASS THROUGH STATE HOUSING DEPARTMENT CATEGORY INTERNAL CONTROL/COMPLIANCE NONCOMPLIANCE PROCUREMENT AND SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT CONDITIONS During our audits test we noted that the Municipality did not include the applicable clauses in two of the contracts as required by 2 CRF section 200.327. CRITERIA The contract for the delegation of funds between the Municipality and the Department of Housing of Puerto Rico establishes that the subrecipient must ensure that every contract to purchase goods and services paid with CDBG funds include the applicable contract clauses required by the 2 CFR section 200.327 appendix II. CAUSE The Municipal Secretary Office failed to take internal control measures to ensure that the contracts included all clauses required by applicable regulations. EFFECT The Municipality is in noncompliance with the applicable requirements. RECOMMENDATION The Municipal Secretary Office should implement adequate internal control procedures to ensure that the contracts contain all the clauses required by the federal regulation. QUESTIONED COST: None PRIOR YEAR: 2023-005
FINDING 2024-012 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.027X, 84.173, 84.173X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-027-PN01, 22611-027-ARP, 22619-027-ARP, 23611-027-PN01, 23619-027-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 35 HUNTINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context Procurement - Small Purchases Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, the informal procurement method is permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. A total of eight vendors were determined to require small purchase procedures. Of the vendors, totaling $174,456, three were selected for testing. For the three vendors tested, the School Corporation did not obtain an adequate number of price or rate quotations nor was its documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation, it was determined that the School Corporation ensures all service contracts include a provision regarding suspension and debarment. The contracts are reviewed and signed by a knowledgeable member of the School Corporation. A population of one covered transaction for goods or services that equaled or exceeded $25,000 paid from the grant funds during the audit period was identified. For this transaction tested, the School Corporation did not verify the vendors' suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of effective internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 36 HUNTINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 37 HUNTINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The School Corporation did not obtain more than one quote for the small purchases that were tested. The School Corporation was not aware of the suspension and debarment requirement, so it did not check the vendor to ensure they were not suspended and debarred. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, procurement procedures for goods and services were not adhered to, and vendors to whom payments were equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-012 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.027X, 84.173, 84.173X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-027-PN01, 22611-027-ARP, 22619-027-ARP, 23611-027-PN01, 23619-027-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 35 HUNTINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context Procurement - Small Purchases Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, the informal procurement method is permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. A total of eight vendors were determined to require small purchase procedures. Of the vendors, totaling $174,456, three were selected for testing. For the three vendors tested, the School Corporation did not obtain an adequate number of price or rate quotations nor was its documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation, it was determined that the School Corporation ensures all service contracts include a provision regarding suspension and debarment. The contracts are reviewed and signed by a knowledgeable member of the School Corporation. A population of one covered transaction for goods or services that equaled or exceeded $25,000 paid from the grant funds during the audit period was identified. For this transaction tested, the School Corporation did not verify the vendors' suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of effective internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 36 HUNTINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 37 HUNTINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The School Corporation did not obtain more than one quote for the small purchases that were tested. The School Corporation was not aware of the suspension and debarment requirement, so it did not check the vendor to ensure they were not suspended and debarred. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, procurement procedures for goods and services were not adhered to, and vendors to whom payments were equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-012 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.027X, 84.173, 84.173X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-027-PN01, 22611-027-ARP, 22619-027-ARP, 23611-027-PN01, 23619-027-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 35 HUNTINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context Procurement - Small Purchases Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, the informal procurement method is permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. A total of eight vendors were determined to require small purchase procedures. Of the vendors, totaling $174,456, three were selected for testing. For the three vendors tested, the School Corporation did not obtain an adequate number of price or rate quotations nor was its documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation, it was determined that the School Corporation ensures all service contracts include a provision regarding suspension and debarment. The contracts are reviewed and signed by a knowledgeable member of the School Corporation. A population of one covered transaction for goods or services that equaled or exceeded $25,000 paid from the grant funds during the audit period was identified. For this transaction tested, the School Corporation did not verify the vendors' suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of effective internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 36 HUNTINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 37 HUNTINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The School Corporation did not obtain more than one quote for the small purchases that were tested. The School Corporation was not aware of the suspension and debarment requirement, so it did not check the vendor to ensure they were not suspended and debarred. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, procurement procedures for goods and services were not adhered to, and vendors to whom payments were equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-012 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.027X, 84.173, 84.173X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-027-PN01, 22611-027-ARP, 22619-027-ARP, 23611-027-PN01, 23619-027-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 35 HUNTINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context Procurement - Small Purchases Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, the informal procurement method is permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. A total of eight vendors were determined to require small purchase procedures. Of the vendors, totaling $174,456, three were selected for testing. For the three vendors tested, the School Corporation did not obtain an adequate number of price or rate quotations nor was its documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation, it was determined that the School Corporation ensures all service contracts include a provision regarding suspension and debarment. The contracts are reviewed and signed by a knowledgeable member of the School Corporation. A population of one covered transaction for goods or services that equaled or exceeded $25,000 paid from the grant funds during the audit period was identified. For this transaction tested, the School Corporation did not verify the vendors' suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of effective internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 36 HUNTINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 37 HUNTINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The School Corporation did not obtain more than one quote for the small purchases that were tested. The School Corporation was not aware of the suspension and debarment requirement, so it did not check the vendor to ensure they were not suspended and debarred. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, procurement procedures for goods and services were not adhered to, and vendors to whom payments were equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-012 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.027X, 84.173, 84.173X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-027-PN01, 22611-027-ARP, 22619-027-ARP, 23611-027-PN01, 23619-027-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 35 HUNTINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context Procurement - Small Purchases Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, the informal procurement method is permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. A total of eight vendors were determined to require small purchase procedures. Of the vendors, totaling $174,456, three were selected for testing. For the three vendors tested, the School Corporation did not obtain an adequate number of price or rate quotations nor was its documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation, it was determined that the School Corporation ensures all service contracts include a provision regarding suspension and debarment. The contracts are reviewed and signed by a knowledgeable member of the School Corporation. A population of one covered transaction for goods or services that equaled or exceeded $25,000 paid from the grant funds during the audit period was identified. For this transaction tested, the School Corporation did not verify the vendors' suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of effective internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 36 HUNTINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 37 HUNTINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The School Corporation did not obtain more than one quote for the small purchases that were tested. The School Corporation was not aware of the suspension and debarment requirement, so it did not check the vendor to ensure they were not suspended and debarred. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, procurement procedures for goods and services were not adhered to, and vendors to whom payments were equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-012 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.027X, 84.173, 84.173X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-027-PN01, 22611-027-ARP, 22619-027-ARP, 23611-027-PN01, 23619-027-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 35 HUNTINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context Procurement - Small Purchases Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, the informal procurement method is permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. A total of eight vendors were determined to require small purchase procedures. Of the vendors, totaling $174,456, three were selected for testing. For the three vendors tested, the School Corporation did not obtain an adequate number of price or rate quotations nor was its documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation, it was determined that the School Corporation ensures all service contracts include a provision regarding suspension and debarment. The contracts are reviewed and signed by a knowledgeable member of the School Corporation. A population of one covered transaction for goods or services that equaled or exceeded $25,000 paid from the grant funds during the audit period was identified. For this transaction tested, the School Corporation did not verify the vendors' suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of effective internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 36 HUNTINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 37 HUNTINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The School Corporation did not obtain more than one quote for the small purchases that were tested. The School Corporation was not aware of the suspension and debarment requirement, so it did not check the vendor to ensure they were not suspended and debarred. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, procurement procedures for goods and services were not adhered to, and vendors to whom payments were equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-012 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.027X, 84.173, 84.173X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-027-PN01, 22611-027-ARP, 22619-027-ARP, 23611-027-PN01, 23619-027-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 35 HUNTINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context Procurement - Small Purchases Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, the informal procurement method is permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. A total of eight vendors were determined to require small purchase procedures. Of the vendors, totaling $174,456, three were selected for testing. For the three vendors tested, the School Corporation did not obtain an adequate number of price or rate quotations nor was its documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation, it was determined that the School Corporation ensures all service contracts include a provision regarding suspension and debarment. The contracts are reviewed and signed by a knowledgeable member of the School Corporation. A population of one covered transaction for goods or services that equaled or exceeded $25,000 paid from the grant funds during the audit period was identified. For this transaction tested, the School Corporation did not verify the vendors' suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of effective internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 36 HUNTINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 37 HUNTINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The School Corporation did not obtain more than one quote for the small purchases that were tested. The School Corporation was not aware of the suspension and debarment requirement, so it did not check the vendor to ensure they were not suspended and debarred. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, procurement procedures for goods and services were not adhered to, and vendors to whom payments were equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
MATERIAL WEAKNESSES 2024-001 - Procurement Policy Federal Program Information: Department of Environmental Protection: 66.468 Drinking Water State Revolving Funds Criteria: The following CFR(s) apply to this finding: 2 CFR section 200.318 through 200.327. Condition: During audit procedures, it was identified that the Royalton Fire District did not have a procurement policy consistent with federal compliance standards. Cause: The District did not adopt a procurement policy consistent with federal regulations. Effect: By not having a compliant federal procurement policy, the District is at an increased risk for making unallowable purchases. Identification of Questioned Costs: None identified. Context: A review was conducted of the Distict’s procurement policy and the policy was not in compliance with Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: It is recommended that the District adopt a federal procurement policy that is consistent with Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Client agrees with finding, and the unabridged version of their response can be found in the Corrective Action Plan. Please see the Corrective Action Plan issued by the District.
FINDING 2024-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY22-23, FY23-24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-001. Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and the Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for goods or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. The informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not have effective controls in place to ensure that an adequate number of price or rate quotations were obtained for all small purchases. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotations from an adequate number of sources for all three vendors that were tested that met the small purchase threshold. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the Child Nutrition Cluster (CNC) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transactions with that vendor. The School Corporation did not have effective controls in place to ensure that the verification was completed for all contractors prior to entering into covered transactions. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . Cause Management had not established a system of internal controls to ensure documentation was obtained and retained to demonstrate they had properly procured all small purchases. Management had not established a system of internal controls to ensure that the School Corporation's procedures for verifying a contractor's suspension and debarment status was followed for all contractors. Effect Without a proper design or implementation of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. This could result in the School Corporation overpaying for goods or services or paying a contractor who has been suspended or debarred, which would be unallowable. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management strengthen its system of internal controls to ensure that an adequate number of price or rate quotations are obtained for all small purchases and that suspension and debarment is verified for all covered transaction of $25,000 or more. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY22-23, FY23-24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-001. Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and the Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for goods or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. The informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not have effective controls in place to ensure that an adequate number of price or rate quotations were obtained for all small purchases. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotations from an adequate number of sources for all three vendors that were tested that met the small purchase threshold. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the Child Nutrition Cluster (CNC) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transactions with that vendor. The School Corporation did not have effective controls in place to ensure that the verification was completed for all contractors prior to entering into covered transactions. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . Cause Management had not established a system of internal controls to ensure documentation was obtained and retained to demonstrate they had properly procured all small purchases. Management had not established a system of internal controls to ensure that the School Corporation's procedures for verifying a contractor's suspension and debarment status was followed for all contractors. Effect Without a proper design or implementation of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. This could result in the School Corporation overpaying for goods or services or paying a contractor who has been suspended or debarred, which would be unallowable. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management strengthen its system of internal controls to ensure that an adequate number of price or rate quotations are obtained for all small purchases and that suspension and debarment is verified for all covered transaction of $25,000 or more. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY22-23, FY23-24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-001. Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and the Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for goods or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. The informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not have effective controls in place to ensure that an adequate number of price or rate quotations were obtained for all small purchases. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotations from an adequate number of sources for all three vendors that were tested that met the small purchase threshold. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the Child Nutrition Cluster (CNC) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transactions with that vendor. The School Corporation did not have effective controls in place to ensure that the verification was completed for all contractors prior to entering into covered transactions. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . Cause Management had not established a system of internal controls to ensure documentation was obtained and retained to demonstrate they had properly procured all small purchases. Management had not established a system of internal controls to ensure that the School Corporation's procedures for verifying a contractor's suspension and debarment status was followed for all contractors. Effect Without a proper design or implementation of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. This could result in the School Corporation overpaying for goods or services or paying a contractor who has been suspended or debarred, which would be unallowable. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management strengthen its system of internal controls to ensure that an adequate number of price or rate quotations are obtained for all small purchases and that suspension and debarment is verified for all covered transaction of $25,000 or more. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY22-23, FY23-24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-001. Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and the Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for goods or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. The informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not have effective controls in place to ensure that an adequate number of price or rate quotations were obtained for all small purchases. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotations from an adequate number of sources for all three vendors that were tested that met the small purchase threshold. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the Child Nutrition Cluster (CNC) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transactions with that vendor. The School Corporation did not have effective controls in place to ensure that the verification was completed for all contractors prior to entering into covered transactions. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . Cause Management had not established a system of internal controls to ensure documentation was obtained and retained to demonstrate they had properly procured all small purchases. Management had not established a system of internal controls to ensure that the School Corporation's procedures for verifying a contractor's suspension and debarment status was followed for all contractors. Effect Without a proper design or implementation of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. This could result in the School Corporation overpaying for goods or services or paying a contractor who has been suspended or debarred, which would be unallowable. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management strengthen its system of internal controls to ensure that an adequate number of price or rate quotations are obtained for all small purchases and that suspension and debarment is verified for all covered transaction of $25,000 or more. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through Entity: North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Aging and Adult Services and City of Charlotte, North Carolina Program Name: Emergency Solutions Grant Federal Assistance Listing Number: 14.231 U.S. Department of Treasury Pass-through Entity: Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Significant Deficiency and Nonmaterial Noncompliance – Procurement Finding 2024-003 Criteria: Per Sections 200.318 – 200.327 of the Uniform Grant Guidance, a non-federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with Uniform Grant Guidance Title 2 CFR Section 200.318 for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. Furthermore, a contract award must not be made to a suspended or debarred party listed on the System for Award Management. Condition: There was one (1) instance in which a sole source provider was utilized rather than going through the bidding process that was not documented in line with the Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. There was another vendor where only one informal quote was obtained and the rationale for their selection was not documented. The same vendor was also not verified as not being on the suspended or debarred party list on the System for Award Management prior to procuring their services. Questioned Costs: None noted. Effect: By not having sufficient documentation, the Organization may not be able to evidence compliance with Uniform Grant Guidance and could have improperly contracted with a vendor. Cause: The Organization did not obtain quotes from more than one vendor nor document sole source justification for the contracts tested. Recommendation: The Organization should consider implementing a procurement policy in line with Uniform Grant Guidance and ensure proper documentation of the procurement process for all vendors utilized with federal funding. Views of Management: Management agrees with the finding and is implementing procedures to correct this which are further discussed in the Corrective Action Plan. See Corrective Action Plan for more information.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through Entity: North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Aging and Adult Services and City of Charlotte, North Carolina Program Name: Emergency Solutions Grant Federal Assistance Listing Number: 14.231 U.S. Department of Treasury Pass-through Entity: Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Significant Deficiency and Nonmaterial Noncompliance – Procurement Finding 2024-003 Criteria: Per Sections 200.318 – 200.327 of the Uniform Grant Guidance, a non-federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with Uniform Grant Guidance Title 2 CFR Section 200.318 for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. Furthermore, a contract award must not be made to a suspended or debarred party listed on the System for Award Management. Condition: There was one (1) instance in which a sole source provider was utilized rather than going through the bidding process that was not documented in line with the Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. There was another vendor where only one informal quote was obtained and the rationale for their selection was not documented. The same vendor was also not verified as not being on the suspended or debarred party list on the System for Award Management prior to procuring their services. Questioned Costs: None noted. Effect: By not having sufficient documentation, the Organization may not be able to evidence compliance with Uniform Grant Guidance and could have improperly contracted with a vendor. Cause: The Organization did not obtain quotes from more than one vendor nor document sole source justification for the contracts tested. Recommendation: The Organization should consider implementing a procurement policy in line with Uniform Grant Guidance and ensure proper documentation of the procurement process for all vendors utilized with federal funding. Views of Management: Management agrees with the finding and is implementing procedures to correct this which are further discussed in the Corrective Action Plan. See Corrective Action Plan for more information.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through Entity: North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Aging and Adult Services and City of Charlotte, North Carolina Program Name: Emergency Solutions Grant Federal Assistance Listing Number: 14.231 U.S. Department of Treasury Pass-through Entity: Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Significant Deficiency and Nonmaterial Noncompliance – Procurement Finding 2024-003 Criteria: Per Sections 200.318 – 200.327 of the Uniform Grant Guidance, a non-federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with Uniform Grant Guidance Title 2 CFR Section 200.318 for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. Furthermore, a contract award must not be made to a suspended or debarred party listed on the System for Award Management. Condition: There was one (1) instance in which a sole source provider was utilized rather than going through the bidding process that was not documented in line with the Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. There was another vendor where only one informal quote was obtained and the rationale for their selection was not documented. The same vendor was also not verified as not being on the suspended or debarred party list on the System for Award Management prior to procuring their services. Questioned Costs: None noted. Effect: By not having sufficient documentation, the Organization may not be able to evidence compliance with Uniform Grant Guidance and could have improperly contracted with a vendor. Cause: The Organization did not obtain quotes from more than one vendor nor document sole source justification for the contracts tested. Recommendation: The Organization should consider implementing a procurement policy in line with Uniform Grant Guidance and ensure proper documentation of the procurement process for all vendors utilized with federal funding. Views of Management: Management agrees with the finding and is implementing procedures to correct this which are further discussed in the Corrective Action Plan. See Corrective Action Plan for more information.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through Entity: North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Aging and Adult Services and City of Charlotte, North Carolina Program Name: Emergency Solutions Grant Federal Assistance Listing Number: 14.231 U.S. Department of Treasury Pass-through Entity: Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Significant Deficiency and Nonmaterial Noncompliance – Procurement Finding 2024-003 Criteria: Per Sections 200.318 – 200.327 of the Uniform Grant Guidance, a non-federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with Uniform Grant Guidance Title 2 CFR Section 200.318 for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. Furthermore, a contract award must not be made to a suspended or debarred party listed on the System for Award Management. Condition: There was one (1) instance in which a sole source provider was utilized rather than going through the bidding process that was not documented in line with the Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. There was another vendor where only one informal quote was obtained and the rationale for their selection was not documented. The same vendor was also not verified as not being on the suspended or debarred party list on the System for Award Management prior to procuring their services. Questioned Costs: None noted. Effect: By not having sufficient documentation, the Organization may not be able to evidence compliance with Uniform Grant Guidance and could have improperly contracted with a vendor. Cause: The Organization did not obtain quotes from more than one vendor nor document sole source justification for the contracts tested. Recommendation: The Organization should consider implementing a procurement policy in line with Uniform Grant Guidance and ensure proper documentation of the procurement process for all vendors utilized with federal funding. Views of Management: Management agrees with the finding and is implementing procedures to correct this which are further discussed in the Corrective Action Plan. See Corrective Action Plan for more information.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through Entity: North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Aging and Adult Services and City of Charlotte, North Carolina Program Name: Emergency Solutions Grant Federal Assistance Listing Number: 14.231 U.S. Department of Treasury Pass-through Entity: Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Significant Deficiency and Nonmaterial Noncompliance – Procurement Finding 2024-003 Criteria: Per Sections 200.318 – 200.327 of the Uniform Grant Guidance, a non-federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with Uniform Grant Guidance Title 2 CFR Section 200.318 for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. Furthermore, a contract award must not be made to a suspended or debarred party listed on the System for Award Management. Condition: There was one (1) instance in which a sole source provider was utilized rather than going through the bidding process that was not documented in line with the Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. There was another vendor where only one informal quote was obtained and the rationale for their selection was not documented. The same vendor was also not verified as not being on the suspended or debarred party list on the System for Award Management prior to procuring their services. Questioned Costs: None noted. Effect: By not having sufficient documentation, the Organization may not be able to evidence compliance with Uniform Grant Guidance and could have improperly contracted with a vendor. Cause: The Organization did not obtain quotes from more than one vendor nor document sole source justification for the contracts tested. Recommendation: The Organization should consider implementing a procurement policy in line with Uniform Grant Guidance and ensure proper documentation of the procurement process for all vendors utilized with federal funding. Views of Management: Management agrees with the finding and is implementing procedures to correct this which are further discussed in the Corrective Action Plan. See Corrective Action Plan for more information.
Criteria: Under 2 CFR Appendix A to Part 170, recipients (i.e., direct recipients) of grants or cooperative agreements are required to report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS). For subaward information, recipients of grants or cooperative agreements are required to report no later than the end of the month following the month in which the obligation was made. 2 CFR Section 200.327 states that “(financial) information must be collected with the frequency required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award, but no less frequently than annually nor more frequently than quarterly except in unusual circumstances.” Under this reporting requirement, the program must submit a Federal Financial Report (FFR) within 90 days after the close of the statutory grant period. Condition: We noted the program did not report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to FSRS. We further noted that one FFR was not timely submitted. Context: During the audit, we were informed by Department personnel that required information on first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more were not reported to FSRS, a requirement that is included in the program’s notice of awards. The following table summarizes our findings: The program was required to submit one FFR during the year. During the audit, we noted that the FFR was submitted 138 days after the close of the statutory grant period. Cause: Due to the timing of when the program was made aware of the prior year finding and the fiscal year end, there was insufficient time to properly implement corrective action. Based on inquiry with Department personnel, we noted that the failure to report first-tier subawards to FSRS was caused by a lack of time and inadequate understanding of FSRS due dates and reporting requirements. In addition, we noted that the delay in submitting the FFRs was caused by a lack of personnel available to monitor reporting requirements and complete reporting requirements timely. Effect: Failure to report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more and failure to timely submit FFRs results in noncompliance with the reporting requirement. Questioned Costs: None Identification as a Repeat Finding, if applicable: See finding 2023-007 included in the Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings. Recommendation: We recommend program management be more diligent in following Federal deadlines and grant agreements in order to ensure compliance with Federal requirements. We also recommend program management complete the implementation of the policies and procedures related to reporting subawards to FSRS to ensure compliance with Federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Client agrees with finding, and the unabridged version of their response can be found in the Corrective Action Plan issued by the Department.
2024-002 – Material Weakness in Compliance and Internal Control over Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Identification of federal programs: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development: #14.251 Economic Development Initiative, Community Project Funding, and Misc. Grants, #B-22-CP-AK-0003 Criteria: Part 3 Compliance Supplement Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. § 200.318(a) Documented procurement procedures – The recipient must maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under a Federal award or subaward, including for acquisition of property or services. These documented procurement procedures must be consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. § 200.318(i) Procurement records - The recipient must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. § 200.320 Procurement methods – There are three types of procurement methods described: informal procurement methods (for micro-purchases and simplified acquisitions); formal procurement methods (through sealed bids or proposals); and noncompetitive procurement methods. For any of these methods, the recipient must maintain and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319. § 200.214 Suspension and debarment – When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition: The Organization procured certain goods or services from vendors but did not maintain evidence that they followed their procurement policy or the procurement requirements of the federal program. Cause: The Organization’s purchasing policy does not address all of the procurement requirements of Uniform Guidance. The Organization did not maintain sufficient documentation supporting purchases greater than the micro-purchase threshold or relating to suspension and debarment on certain covered transactions. In the period after year end and before the date of fieldwork, there was turnover in management in the Executive Director position so it is possible that competitive bidding was sought, but that the knowledge and communications have been lost during the transition. Effect or potential effect: The Organization is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: None Context: During the course of the audit of the major program, auditors requested copies of the required support for purchases from three vendors. Support was provided for one of the purchases but could not be located for two of the purchases. Identification of Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendations: We recommend that the Organization reviews and revises their procurement policies and procedures to ensure that they align with the requirements of Uniform Guidance. We also recommend that as part of the Organization’s internal control structure over compliance with procurement requirements, to establish monitoring procedures or checklists to ensure that support is obtained from a sufficient number of qualified sources depending on the purchasing threshold and method required to be used, and that evidence is retained to show that vendors were not suspended or debarred before entering into a transaction with them. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan
Information of the Federal Programs: Assistance Listing Number: 14.218 Assistance Listing Title: Community Development Block Grants - Entitlement Grants Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) Federal Award Number and Award Year: B-21-MC-06-0536, B-22-MC-06-0536, B-23-MC-06-0536, and B-20-MW-06-0536 Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory, or Other Citation): Pursuant to the Guidance on Cash on Hand Quarterly Report (replaced the Federal Financial Report, SF-425) and financial reporting requirements in the cooperative agreement provisions, and 2 CFR 200.327: Quarterly reports: Program award recipients must submit Cash on Hand Quarterly Report reports to HUD quarterly, 30 days after the reporting period end date. Each report must cover all expenditures on the cooperative agreement from the start date of the reporting period to the reporting period end date. The following federal fiscal year quarter reporting period will be used for all quarterly reports, are due to HUD 30 days after the period end dates noted below: Reporting Period - Due Date of Report Quarter 1: 10/1-12/31 - January 30 Quarter 2: 1/1-3/31 - April 30 Quarter 3: 4/1-6/30 - July 30 Quarter 4:7/1-9/30 - October 30 Condition: The City did not submit the required Cash on Hand Quarterly Report in a timely manner. The Quarter 2 and Quarter 3 reports were both submitted on August 1, 2024. Cause: During the period the City was migrating to a new Enterprise Resource Planning software (ERP). The grant accountant missed the deadline due to the ERP migration deadlines. Effect or Potential Effect: Delay in filing the reports resulted in noncompliance with the compliance requirements. Questioned Costs: None. Context: See condition above for context of the finding. Identification as a Repeat Finding, If Applicable: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend that the City update policies and procedures to strengthen the report submission process to ensure all required reports are properly reviewed and approved and submitted timely. When a report cannot be submitted by the due date, the City should request an extension from the funding agency and maintain a record of the approval. View of Responsible Officials: Management concurs the finding.
Information of the Federal Programs: Assistance Listing Number: 14.218 Assistance Listing Title: Community Development Block Grants - Entitlement Grants Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) Federal Award Number and Award Year: B-21-MC-06-0536, B-22-MC-06-0536, B-23-MC-06-0536, and B-20-MW-06-0536 Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory, or Other Citation): Pursuant to the Guidance on Cash on Hand Quarterly Report (replaced the Federal Financial Report, SF-425) and financial reporting requirements in the cooperative agreement provisions, and 2 CFR 200.327: Quarterly reports: Program award recipients must submit Cash on Hand Quarterly Report reports to HUD quarterly, 30 days after the reporting period end date. Each report must cover all expenditures on the cooperative agreement from the start date of the reporting period to the reporting period end date. The following federal fiscal year quarter reporting period will be used for all quarterly reports, are due to HUD 30 days after the period end dates noted below: Reporting Period - Due Date of Report Quarter 1: 10/1-12/31 - January 30 Quarter 2: 1/1-3/31 - April 30 Quarter 3: 4/1-6/30 - July 30 Quarter 4:7/1-9/30 - October 30 Condition: The City did not submit the required Cash on Hand Quarterly Report in a timely manner. The Quarter 2 and Quarter 3 reports were both submitted on August 1, 2024. Cause: During the period the City was migrating to a new Enterprise Resource Planning software (ERP). The grant accountant missed the deadline due to the ERP migration deadlines. Effect or Potential Effect: Delay in filing the reports resulted in noncompliance with the compliance requirements. Questioned Costs: None. Context: See condition above for context of the finding. Identification as a Repeat Finding, If Applicable: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend that the City update policies and procedures to strengthen the report submission process to ensure all required reports are properly reviewed and approved and submitted timely. When a report cannot be submitted by the due date, the City should request an extension from the funding agency and maintain a record of the approval. View of Responsible Officials: Management concurs the finding.
Information of the Federal Programs: Assistance Listing Number: 14.218 Assistance Listing Title: Community Development Block Grants - Entitlement Grants Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) Federal Award Number and Award Year: B-21-MC-06-0536, B-22-MC-06-0536, B-23-MC-06-0536, and B-20-MW-06-0536 Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory, or Other Citation): Pursuant to the Guidance on Cash on Hand Quarterly Report (replaced the Federal Financial Report, SF-425) and financial reporting requirements in the cooperative agreement provisions, and 2 CFR 200.327: Quarterly reports: Program award recipients must submit Cash on Hand Quarterly Report reports to HUD quarterly, 30 days after the reporting period end date. Each report must cover all expenditures on the cooperative agreement from the start date of the reporting period to the reporting period end date. The following federal fiscal year quarter reporting period will be used for all quarterly reports, are due to HUD 30 days after the period end dates noted below: Reporting Period - Due Date of Report Quarter 1: 10/1-12/31 - January 30 Quarter 2: 1/1-3/31 - April 30 Quarter 3: 4/1-6/30 - July 30 Quarter 4:7/1-9/30 - October 30 Condition: The City did not submit the required Cash on Hand Quarterly Report in a timely manner. The Quarter 2 and Quarter 3 reports were both submitted on August 1, 2024. Cause: During the period the City was migrating to a new Enterprise Resource Planning software (ERP). The grant accountant missed the deadline due to the ERP migration deadlines. Effect or Potential Effect: Delay in filing the reports resulted in noncompliance with the compliance requirements. Questioned Costs: None. Context: See condition above for context of the finding. Identification as a Repeat Finding, If Applicable: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend that the City update policies and procedures to strengthen the report submission process to ensure all required reports are properly reviewed and approved and submitted timely. When a report cannot be submitted by the due date, the City should request an extension from the funding agency and maintain a record of the approval. View of Responsible Officials: Management concurs the finding.
Information of the Federal Programs: Assistance Listing Number: 14.218 Assistance Listing Title: Community Development Block Grants - Entitlement Grants Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) Federal Award Number and Award Year: B-21-MC-06-0536, B-22-MC-06-0536, B-23-MC-06-0536, and B-20-MW-06-0536 Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory, or Other Citation): Pursuant to the Guidance on Cash on Hand Quarterly Report (replaced the Federal Financial Report, SF-425) and financial reporting requirements in the cooperative agreement provisions, and 2 CFR 200.327: Quarterly reports: Program award recipients must submit Cash on Hand Quarterly Report reports to HUD quarterly, 30 days after the reporting period end date. Each report must cover all expenditures on the cooperative agreement from the start date of the reporting period to the reporting period end date. The following federal fiscal year quarter reporting period will be used for all quarterly reports, are due to HUD 30 days after the period end dates noted below: Reporting Period - Due Date of Report Quarter 1: 10/1-12/31 - January 30 Quarter 2: 1/1-3/31 - April 30 Quarter 3: 4/1-6/30 - July 30 Quarter 4:7/1-9/30 - October 30 Condition: The City did not submit the required Cash on Hand Quarterly Report in a timely manner. The Quarter 2 and Quarter 3 reports were both submitted on August 1, 2024. Cause: During the period the City was migrating to a new Enterprise Resource Planning software (ERP). The grant accountant missed the deadline due to the ERP migration deadlines. Effect or Potential Effect: Delay in filing the reports resulted in noncompliance with the compliance requirements. Questioned Costs: None. Context: See condition above for context of the finding. Identification as a Repeat Finding, If Applicable: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend that the City update policies and procedures to strengthen the report submission process to ensure all required reports are properly reviewed and approved and submitted timely. When a report cannot be submitted by the due date, the City should request an extension from the funding agency and maintain a record of the approval. View of Responsible Officials: Management concurs the finding.
Develop Written Policies and Procedures Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards to provide reasonable assurance that organizations who manage the federal award: • Understand and comply with the federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the award; • Evaluate and monitor compliance; • Take prompt action when instances of noncompliance is identified. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the Internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Additionally, the Uniform Guidance requires non-federal entities to develop written procedures related to the following areas: 1. Cash Management 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) states that the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 Federal Payment. 2. Equipment Management Requirements Non-federal entities other than states must follow 2 CFR sections 200.313(c) through (e). In addition, the organizations should ensure that existing written procedures are in compliance with: a. General Procurement Standards 2 CFR 200.318 to 200.327 discusses that contracts must be established and managed in accordance with the procurement requirements in 2 CFR Part 200. Grantees must have written procurement policies and procedures that demonstrate a fair and reliable process, with standards of conduct addressing conflicts of interest, for obtaining grant-funded goods and services. Condition MARTA does not have comprehensive written policies and procedures concerning the following key compliance areas which are required by the Uniform Guidance: Equipment and Real Property Management MARTA has an Asset Inventory Policy and Procedures, however, it does not clearly define the policies and procedures that are in place for the use, management and disposition of equipment acquired under a Federal award in accordance with 2 CFR sections 200.313(c) through (e). Cash Management MARTA does not have written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 Federal Payment. Procurement, Suspension and Debarment MARTA has a Procurement policy, however, documented procedures are not well-defined regarding the purchase process for different types of procurement, obtaining quotations, bidding, and procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Cause MARTA’s reliance on informal business practices leads to inconsistencies in its internal controls. Effect The absence of formal policies and procedures in the key compliance areas could result in non-compliance with federal regulations, which may lead to unnecessary sanctions. Additionally, without formal written policies and procedures, it is difficult to ensure consistent practices across the organization. Questioned Costs None Recommendation MARTA should develop and implement formal written policies and procedures for the specific areas required by the Uniform Guidance. These policies and procedures must clearly delineate the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Personnel responsible for these areas should receive adequate training and apply the policies effectively. Regular reviews should be conducted to update the policies and procedures as needed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action MARTA has grown substantially in the last several years. This progress includes identifying areas that we need to update or to develop new processes and documentation. MARTA has an Asset Inventory Policy and Procedures in which the purpose is to ensure that fixed assets are properly accounted for, identified, and tracked. MARTA also has Cash Handling Policy and Procedures which addresses safeguarding public funds and maximizing resources available. This is designed to reduce the risks associated with the collection, receipts storage and reporting of cash transactions and to safeguard and maintain the security and integrity of MARTA's fiscal assets. MARTA is in the process of updating the Procurement Policy. MARTA will review and update these policies and/or create new policies to make sure that they are compliant with the Uniform Guidance. The updated or newly created policies will be brought to the October 2025 Board of Directors meeting for Board review or approval. Personnel responsible: Sandy Benson, General Manager Anticipated completion date: October 2025
Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Criteria Procurement Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow specific procurement standards set out in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327, which includes documenting the procurement methods used for vendor selection. These procedures are designed to ensure fair competition, cost-effectiveness, and federal requirements. These procurement standards require, among other provisions, that a non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR Section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to reliable contractors, and maintaining records to document the history of procurement. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services under a federal award in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.320. 3. Use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of 2 CFR 200.317 to 320. 2 CFR 200.320 enumerates below the different procurement methods that a non-federal entity should use: a) The micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). Under the micro-purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $50,000. b) Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. The non-Federal entity is responsible for determining an appropriate simplified acquisition threshold based on internal controls, an evaluation of risk and its documented procurement procedures which must not exceed the threshold established in the FAR. When applicable, a lower simplified acquisition threshold used by the non-Federal entity must be authorized or not prohibited under State, local, or tribal laws or regulations. c) Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR section 200.320(a)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR section 200.320(b)). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b) (1); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320(b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” Suspension and Debarment Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at SAM.gov Home (click on Search Record, then click on Advanced Search-Exclusions) (Note: The OMB guidance at 2 CFR Part 180 and agency implementing regulations still refer to the SAM Exclusions as the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS)), (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition During our audit, MARTA was unable to provide purchase order documentation or contract for eight samples that are above $500. Per current procurement policy, “Purchases of supplies, services, and equipment costing more than five hundred ($500) shall be made by purchase order, unless authorized by a signed contract or Mountain Transit Board Approval”. During our audit, MARTA was unable to provide supporting documentation to demonstrate that the required price or rate quotations for those purchases or contracts with contract amounts above $10,000 were obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources and maintained the documentation to support its conclusion. These were noted for two samples tested. The expenditure paid ranged from $10,000 to $36,000 in 2024. During our audit, MARTA was unable to provide supporting documentation to demonstrate that the process of verifying if vendors are not suspended or debarred was performed on two vendors tested. The expenditure paid to these vendors ranged from $109,000 to $647,000 in 2024. Cause MARTA did not follow its existing purchasing policy and procedures, and lack of procedures in maintaining appropriate records of vendor selection and compliance with procurement standards. Effect The absence of procurement documentation raises the risk of non-compliance with federal regulations, which could lead to potential disallowances or unnecessary sanctions. Questioned Costs None Recommendation MARTA should strengthen its internal controls over procurement by ensuring that all procurement activities, particularly significant expenditures, are properly documented. This includes retaining evidence that procurement methods required by the Uniform Guidance were followed, such as bids, contracts, or justifications for sole-source vendors. MARTA should also conduct training for staff involved in procurement to ensure awareness and adherence to the policies. Regular internal audits may be implemented to verify compliance with procurement procedures. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action MARTA is in the process of updating the Procurement Policy. MARTA will ensure that updated policies and procedures will be implemented to address compliance and documentation requirements for small and micro-purchases, sole-source, and informal processes. The updated Procurement Policy will be brought to the October 2025 Board of Directors meeting for Board review or approval. Personnel responsible: Sandy Benson, General Manager Anticipated completion date: October 2025
Develop Written Policies and Procedures Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards to provide reasonable assurance that organizations who manage the federal award: • Understand and comply with the federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the award; • Evaluate and monitor compliance; • Take prompt action when instances of noncompliance is identified. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the Internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Additionally, the Uniform Guidance requires non-federal entities to develop written procedures related to the following areas: 1. Cash Management 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) states that the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 Federal Payment. 2. Equipment Management Requirements Non-federal entities other than states must follow 2 CFR sections 200.313(c) through (e). In addition, the organizations should ensure that existing written procedures are in compliance with: a. General Procurement Standards 2 CFR 200.318 to 200.327 discusses that contracts must be established and managed in accordance with the procurement requirements in 2 CFR Part 200. Grantees must have written procurement policies and procedures that demonstrate a fair and reliable process, with standards of conduct addressing conflicts of interest, for obtaining grant-funded goods and services. Condition MARTA does not have comprehensive written policies and procedures concerning the following key compliance areas which are required by the Uniform Guidance: Equipment and Real Property Management MARTA has an Asset Inventory Policy and Procedures, however, it does not clearly define the policies and procedures that are in place for the use, management and disposition of equipment acquired under a Federal award in accordance with 2 CFR sections 200.313(c) through (e). Cash Management MARTA does not have written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 Federal Payment. Procurement, Suspension and Debarment MARTA has a Procurement policy, however, documented procedures are not well-defined regarding the purchase process for different types of procurement, obtaining quotations, bidding, and procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Cause MARTA’s reliance on informal business practices leads to inconsistencies in its internal controls. Effect The absence of formal policies and procedures in the key compliance areas could result in non-compliance with federal regulations, which may lead to unnecessary sanctions. Additionally, without formal written policies and procedures, it is difficult to ensure consistent practices across the organization. Questioned Costs None Recommendation MARTA should develop and implement formal written policies and procedures for the specific areas required by the Uniform Guidance. These policies and procedures must clearly delineate the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Personnel responsible for these areas should receive adequate training and apply the policies effectively. Regular reviews should be conducted to update the policies and procedures as needed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action MARTA has grown substantially in the last several years. This progress includes identifying areas that we need to update or to develop new processes and documentation. MARTA has an Asset Inventory Policy and Procedures in which the purpose is to ensure that fixed assets are properly accounted for, identified, and tracked. MARTA also has Cash Handling Policy and Procedures which addresses safeguarding public funds and maximizing resources available. This is designed to reduce the risks associated with the collection, receipts storage and reporting of cash transactions and to safeguard and maintain the security and integrity of MARTA's fiscal assets. MARTA is in the process of updating the Procurement Policy. MARTA will review and update these policies and/or create new policies to make sure that they are compliant with the Uniform Guidance. The updated or newly created policies will be brought to the October 2025 Board of Directors meeting for Board review or approval. Personnel responsible: Sandy Benson, General Manager Anticipated completion date: October 2025
Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Criteria Procurement Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow specific procurement standards set out in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327, which includes documenting the procurement methods used for vendor selection. These procedures are designed to ensure fair competition, cost-effectiveness, and federal requirements. These procurement standards require, among other provisions, that a non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR Section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to reliable contractors, and maintaining records to document the history of procurement. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services under a federal award in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.320. 3. Use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of 2 CFR 200.317 to 320. 2 CFR 200.320 enumerates below the different procurement methods that a non-federal entity should use: a) The micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). Under the micro-purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $50,000. b) Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. The non-Federal entity is responsible for determining an appropriate simplified acquisition threshold based on internal controls, an evaluation of risk and its documented procurement procedures which must not exceed the threshold established in the FAR. When applicable, a lower simplified acquisition threshold used by the non-Federal entity must be authorized or not prohibited under State, local, or tribal laws or regulations. c) Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR section 200.320(a)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR section 200.320(b)). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b) (1); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320(b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” Suspension and Debarment Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at SAM.gov Home (click on Search Record, then click on Advanced Search-Exclusions) (Note: The OMB guidance at 2 CFR Part 180 and agency implementing regulations still refer to the SAM Exclusions as the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS)), (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition During our audit, MARTA was unable to provide purchase order documentation or contract for eight samples that are above $500. Per current procurement policy, “Purchases of supplies, services, and equipment costing more than five hundred ($500) shall be made by purchase order, unless authorized by a signed contract or Mountain Transit Board Approval”. During our audit, MARTA was unable to provide supporting documentation to demonstrate that the required price or rate quotations for those purchases or contracts with contract amounts above $10,000 were obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources and maintained the documentation to support its conclusion. These were noted for two samples tested. The expenditure paid ranged from $10,000 to $36,000 in 2024. During our audit, MARTA was unable to provide supporting documentation to demonstrate that the process of verifying if vendors are not suspended or debarred was performed on two vendors tested. The expenditure paid to these vendors ranged from $109,000 to $647,000 in 2024. Cause MARTA did not follow its existing purchasing policy and procedures, and lack of procedures in maintaining appropriate records of vendor selection and compliance with procurement standards. Effect The absence of procurement documentation raises the risk of non-compliance with federal regulations, which could lead to potential disallowances or unnecessary sanctions. Questioned Costs None Recommendation MARTA should strengthen its internal controls over procurement by ensuring that all procurement activities, particularly significant expenditures, are properly documented. This includes retaining evidence that procurement methods required by the Uniform Guidance were followed, such as bids, contracts, or justifications for sole-source vendors. MARTA should also conduct training for staff involved in procurement to ensure awareness and adherence to the policies. Regular internal audits may be implemented to verify compliance with procurement procedures. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action MARTA is in the process of updating the Procurement Policy. MARTA will ensure that updated policies and procedures will be implemented to address compliance and documentation requirements for small and micro-purchases, sole-source, and informal processes. The updated Procurement Policy will be brought to the October 2025 Board of Directors meeting for Board review or approval. Personnel responsible: Sandy Benson, General Manager Anticipated completion date: October 2025
Develop Written Policies and Procedures Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards to provide reasonable assurance that organizations who manage the federal award: • Understand and comply with the federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the award; • Evaluate and monitor compliance; • Take prompt action when instances of noncompliance is identified. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the Internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Additionally, the Uniform Guidance requires non-federal entities to develop written procedures related to the following areas: 1. Cash Management 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) states that the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 Federal Payment. 2. Equipment Management Requirements Non-federal entities other than states must follow 2 CFR sections 200.313(c) through (e). In addition, the organizations should ensure that existing written procedures are in compliance with: a. General Procurement Standards 2 CFR 200.318 to 200.327 discusses that contracts must be established and managed in accordance with the procurement requirements in 2 CFR Part 200. Grantees must have written procurement policies and procedures that demonstrate a fair and reliable process, with standards of conduct addressing conflicts of interest, for obtaining grant-funded goods and services. Condition MARTA does not have comprehensive written policies and procedures concerning the following key compliance areas which are required by the Uniform Guidance: Equipment and Real Property Management MARTA has an Asset Inventory Policy and Procedures, however, it does not clearly define the policies and procedures that are in place for the use, management and disposition of equipment acquired under a Federal award in accordance with 2 CFR sections 200.313(c) through (e). Cash Management MARTA does not have written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 Federal Payment. Procurement, Suspension and Debarment MARTA has a Procurement policy, however, documented procedures are not well-defined regarding the purchase process for different types of procurement, obtaining quotations, bidding, and procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Cause MARTA’s reliance on informal business practices leads to inconsistencies in its internal controls. Effect The absence of formal policies and procedures in the key compliance areas could result in non-compliance with federal regulations, which may lead to unnecessary sanctions. Additionally, without formal written policies and procedures, it is difficult to ensure consistent practices across the organization. Questioned Costs None Recommendation MARTA should develop and implement formal written policies and procedures for the specific areas required by the Uniform Guidance. These policies and procedures must clearly delineate the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Personnel responsible for these areas should receive adequate training and apply the policies effectively. Regular reviews should be conducted to update the policies and procedures as needed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action MARTA has grown substantially in the last several years. This progress includes identifying areas that we need to update or to develop new processes and documentation. MARTA has an Asset Inventory Policy and Procedures in which the purpose is to ensure that fixed assets are properly accounted for, identified, and tracked. MARTA also has Cash Handling Policy and Procedures which addresses safeguarding public funds and maximizing resources available. This is designed to reduce the risks associated with the collection, receipts storage and reporting of cash transactions and to safeguard and maintain the security and integrity of MARTA's fiscal assets. MARTA is in the process of updating the Procurement Policy. MARTA will review and update these policies and/or create new policies to make sure that they are compliant with the Uniform Guidance. The updated or newly created policies will be brought to the October 2025 Board of Directors meeting for Board review or approval. Personnel responsible: Sandy Benson, General Manager Anticipated completion date: October 2025
Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Criteria Procurement Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow specific procurement standards set out in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327, which includes documenting the procurement methods used for vendor selection. These procedures are designed to ensure fair competition, cost-effectiveness, and federal requirements. These procurement standards require, among other provisions, that a non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR Section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to reliable contractors, and maintaining records to document the history of procurement. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services under a federal award in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.320. 3. Use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of 2 CFR 200.317 to 320. 2 CFR 200.320 enumerates below the different procurement methods that a non-federal entity should use: a) The micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). Under the micro-purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $50,000. b) Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. The non-Federal entity is responsible for determining an appropriate simplified acquisition threshold based on internal controls, an evaluation of risk and its documented procurement procedures which must not exceed the threshold established in the FAR. When applicable, a lower simplified acquisition threshold used by the non-Federal entity must be authorized or not prohibited under State, local, or tribal laws or regulations. c) Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR section 200.320(a)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR section 200.320(b)). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b) (1); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320(b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” Suspension and Debarment Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at SAM.gov Home (click on Search Record, then click on Advanced Search-Exclusions) (Note: The OMB guidance at 2 CFR Part 180 and agency implementing regulations still refer to the SAM Exclusions as the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS)), (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition During our audit, MARTA was unable to provide purchase order documentation or contract for eight samples that are above $500. Per current procurement policy, “Purchases of supplies, services, and equipment costing more than five hundred ($500) shall be made by purchase order, unless authorized by a signed contract or Mountain Transit Board Approval”. During our audit, MARTA was unable to provide supporting documentation to demonstrate that the required price or rate quotations for those purchases or contracts with contract amounts above $10,000 were obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources and maintained the documentation to support its conclusion. These were noted for two samples tested. The expenditure paid ranged from $10,000 to $36,000 in 2024. During our audit, MARTA was unable to provide supporting documentation to demonstrate that the process of verifying if vendors are not suspended or debarred was performed on two vendors tested. The expenditure paid to these vendors ranged from $109,000 to $647,000 in 2024. Cause MARTA did not follow its existing purchasing policy and procedures, and lack of procedures in maintaining appropriate records of vendor selection and compliance with procurement standards. Effect The absence of procurement documentation raises the risk of non-compliance with federal regulations, which could lead to potential disallowances or unnecessary sanctions. Questioned Costs None Recommendation MARTA should strengthen its internal controls over procurement by ensuring that all procurement activities, particularly significant expenditures, are properly documented. This includes retaining evidence that procurement methods required by the Uniform Guidance were followed, such as bids, contracts, or justifications for sole-source vendors. MARTA should also conduct training for staff involved in procurement to ensure awareness and adherence to the policies. Regular internal audits may be implemented to verify compliance with procurement procedures. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action MARTA is in the process of updating the Procurement Policy. MARTA will ensure that updated policies and procedures will be implemented to address compliance and documentation requirements for small and micro-purchases, sole-source, and informal processes. The updated Procurement Policy will be brought to the October 2025 Board of Directors meeting for Board review or approval. Personnel responsible: Sandy Benson, General Manager Anticipated completion date: October 2025
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH PROCUREMENT AND SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT REQUIREMENTS, CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS, AL No. 21.027, DIRECT ALLOCATION Criteria: Per section 13 of Treasury’s Final Rule FAQs and 2 CFR 200.214, counties must comply with the procurement standards set forth in 2 CFR 200.318 through 2 CFR 200.327, when using their SLFRF award funds to procure goods and services to carry out the objectives of their SLFRF award. In addition, 2 CFR 200.214 prohibits recipients from using SLFRF funds to enter into subawards and contracts with parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs. Condition: The county did not comply with the procurement standards outlined in 2 CFR §200.318-§200.327, which require competitive procurement processes and verification that contractors are not suspended or debarred. Specifically, the county did not verify the eligibility of program recipients/participants/contractors through the System for Award Management (SAM) or equivalent documentation in order to verify that they were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the program. Cause: The county does not have procurement policies and procedures in place that allow it to comply with procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Non-compliance with program terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward, and that no subaward, contract, or agreement for purchase of goods or services is made with any suspended or debarred party. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.318, non-federal entities are required to maintain documented procurement procedures that align with applicable federal, state, and local laws. Additionally, entities must ensure that all procurements provide full and open competition and take steps to utilize small and minority businesses, women's business enterprises, and labor surplus area firms when possible. Condition: The District's procurement policies do not comply with the federal procurement standards outlined in 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.327. Specifically, the policies lack adequate procedures to ensure full and open competition, and they do not include provisions addressing the use of small, minority-owned, and women-owned business enterprises as required by federal regulations. Cause: The District has not updated its procurement policies to reflect current federal requirements, which were revised under the Uniform Guidance. The lack of training and resources contributed to the oversight. Effect: Noncompliance with federal procurement standards could lead to questioned costs for expenditures under the Child Nutrition Cluster. It also incresaes the risk of noncompetitive practices and missed opportunities to engage small and disadvantaged businesses. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: In order to correct the procurement process for Child Nutrition the client should revise the District's procurement policies to fully comply with 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.327, provide training for staff involved in procurement to ensure they understand and implement the updtaed policies, conduct periodic reviews of procurement activities to verify compliance with the revised policies, document efforts to engage small, minority-owned, and women-owned business enterprises in procurement activiites. Prior Year Finding: None. Auditee Response: See attached response.
2024-003 Significant Deficiency over Procurement Information on the Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, Assistance Listing Number 21.027, U.S. Department of the Treasury. Criteria: All entities under the program, must follow the procurement standards in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. Condition: We noted the County did not originally follow the procurement standards for their procurement of radio read water meters and installations. The County solicited price quotes for this contract. However, based on the amount of the contract, the County should have solicited a formal bid. Context/Cause: The County did not properly solicit for a formal bid for the radio read water meters and installation contract. The County was notified that the price quotes obtained would not be in compliance with the procurement standards and therefore solicited for a formal bid the contract. Effects: The County was not in compliance with the Federal and State procurement requirements. Recommendation: We recommend that the County implement a process to formally document all procurement actions and ensure the properly procurement based on the monetary amount of the contract. Auditee’s Response: We concur with the finding.
Finding 2024-02: Noncompliance with Timely Financial Reporting for Federal Grant Award and State Reporting requirements Criteria: 2 CFR § 200.327(a) states that grantees must submit financial reports no less frequently than annually. Further, SEFA to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse website within nine (9) months of June 30, 2024. UMARC also didn’t submit its audited financial statements, CYEFR, and other required information to the GATA portal within six (6) months after June 30, 2024. Condition: The report for the quarter ended June 30, 2024, was due on July 30, 2024, was not submitted as of the date of this Audit, and the annual financial reports for FY24, were due on December 31, 2024, were also not submitted to the GATA portal as of the date of this audit. Cause: The grantee's internal controls over financial reporting were inadequate, lacking tracking, formal review, and approvals. As well as the late appointment of a new auditor. Effect: Late submission of financial reports hinders the federal agency's ability to monitor the financial health and programmatic progress of the grant. This can delay funding disbursements, impede program evaluation, and potentially lead to closer scrutiny of the grantee's activities. It also prevents the agency from fulfilling its oversight responsibilities as outlined in 2 CFR Part 200. Recommendation: Develop and implement a comprehensive financial reporting calendar that clearly identifies deadlines for all required reports and assigns responsibility for their preparation and submission. This calendar should be distributed to all relevant staff. Also provide comprehensive training to the finance staff on federal financial reporting requirements, including 2 CFR Part 200 and the specific requirements of this grant agreement. Include training on the grantee's internal financial reporting policies and procedures. Questioned Costs None noted Auditee Response: Management concurs with the finding. A new financial reporting calendar has been implemented and distributed to all staff. A formal review and approval process for financial reports has been implemented. The report for the quarter ended June 2024 will be submitted by end of March 2025.
Questioned costs: Impossible to quantify, given the nature of the finding. Condition: The Organization did not have documented procurement procedures that were consistent with the standards identified in 2 CFR 200.318(a). Criteria: Per 2 CFR Sec. 200.318(a), “[t]he recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under a Federal award or subaward, including for acquisition of property or services. These documented procurement procedures must be consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327.” Effect: The Organization was not in compliance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Lack of formal documentation of the Organization’s procurement procedures increases the likelihood that staff is unaware of the procedures and updates to them, which increases the chances that staff is noncompliant with the applicable requirements. Cause: The Organization inadvertently did not document its procedures in a manner consistent with the standards identified in 2 CFR 200.318(a). Recommendation (2024-001-a): We recommend that management draft a formal procurement policy outlining the Organization’s procedures in a manner consistent with the standards identified in 2 CFR 200.318(a). Management’s Response: Management concurs with this finding and agrees with the auditor’s recommendations.
Questioned costs: Impossible to quantify, given the nature of the finding. Condition: The Organization did not have documented procurement procedures that were consistent with the standards identified in 2 CFR 200.318(a). Criteria: Per 2 CFR Sec. 200.318(a), “[t]he recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under a Federal award or subaward, including for acquisition of property or services. These documented procurement procedures must be consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327.” Effect: The Organization was not in compliance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Lack of formal documentation of the Organization’s procurement procedures increases the likelihood that staff is unaware of the procedures and updates to them, which increases the chances that staff is noncompliant with the applicable requirements. Cause: The Organization inadvertently did not document its procedures in a manner consistent with the standards identified in 2 CFR 200.318(a). Recommendation (2024-001-a): We recommend that management draft a formal procurement policy outlining the Organization’s procedures in a manner consistent with the standards identified in 2 CFR 200.318(a). Management’s Response: Management concurs with this finding and agrees with the auditor’s recommendations.
Questioned costs: Impossible to quantify, given the nature of the finding. Condition: The Organization did not have documented procurement procedures that were consistent with the standards identified in 2 CFR 200.318(a). Criteria: Per 2 CFR Sec. 200.318(a), “[t]he recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under a Federal award or subaward, including for acquisition of property or services. These documented procurement procedures must be consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327.” Effect: The Organization was not in compliance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Lack of formal documentation of the Organization’s procurement procedures increases the likelihood that staff is unaware of the procedures and updates to them, which increases the chances that staff is noncompliant with the applicable requirements. Cause: The Organization inadvertently did not document its procedures in a manner consistent with the standards identified in 2 CFR 200.318(a). Recommendation (2024-001-a): We recommend that management draft a formal procurement policy outlining the Organization’s procedures in a manner consistent with the standards identified in 2 CFR 200.318(a). Management’s Response: Management concurs with this finding and agrees with the auditor’s recommendations.
Questioned costs: Impossible to quantify, given the nature of the finding. Condition: The Organization did not have documented procurement procedures that were consistent with the standards identified in 2 CFR 200.318(a). Criteria: Per 2 CFR Sec. 200.318(a), “[t]he recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under a Federal award or subaward, including for acquisition of property or services. These documented procurement procedures must be consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327.” Effect: The Organization was not in compliance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Lack of formal documentation of the Organization’s procurement procedures increases the likelihood that staff is unaware of the procedures and updates to them, which increases the chances that staff is noncompliant with the applicable requirements. Cause: The Organization inadvertently did not document its procedures in a manner consistent with the standards identified in 2 CFR 200.318(a). Recommendation (2024-001-a): We recommend that management draft a formal procurement policy outlining the Organization’s procedures in a manner consistent with the standards identified in 2 CFR 200.318(a). Management’s Response: Management concurs with this finding and agrees with the auditor’s recommendations.
FINDING NO. 2024-001 Federal programs FINANCIAL STATEMENTS All federal financial assistance programs Category Internal control Condition found The Organization accounted for its activities based on the services provided, which are educational services. During our financial and compliance audit procedures for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2024, we noted the following conditions related to the accounting procedures and financial reporting practices of the Organization: a. Accounting and interim financial reports are not executed on a current (month-to-month) basis. Accounting journals, general ledger and interim financial reports, such as Balance Sheet, Statement of Activities and Bank Reconciliations, monthly analysis of certain accounts are executed after the end of the related accounting year. Criteria 2 CFR 200.302 (b) (2), (4), (5) and (7) establish that the financial management system of each non Federal entity must provide for the following: i. Cause Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.327 Financial reporting and 200.328 Monitoring and reporting program performance. Contracted outsource for the general accounting of the institution have been unable to prepare the monthly accounting and the related interim financial reports on a current basis. Effect This weakness in the accounting of the institution requires extra efforts from the administration to compensate for the lack of current accountability with additional alternative measures and procedures. Noncompliance with the above-mentioned requirements could lead to administrative actions by the grantor. Questioned Costs NoneIdentification as a Repeated Finding Yes Recommendations The Organization should enforce its policies and procedures in order to accurately maintain its financial information, and on a timely basis, assuring that they reflect its assets and liabilities, and to maintain an appropriate control over its revenues and the amounts expended, which will allow a proper management and monitoring of operations. These policies and procedures should be enforced to consider the following: • Establish monthly and year end closing procedures. • Prepare monthly or quarterly financial reports for management evaluation and analysis. Views of Responsible Officials The Organization agrees with the finding. Executed actions have substantially improved their year-end closing procedures. They contracted a new accounting firm to improve their accounting and the interim financial reporting.
2024-037 Improve Controls over the Procurement Process Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Material Weakness Compliance Impact: Material Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Pass-Through Entity: None AL Number and Title: 21.027 – COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Award Number: SLFRP1029 (Year: 2023) Questioned Costs: None Identified Description: The Georgia Department of Human Services should improve internal controls to ensure that they are complying with the State of Georgia’s Procurement Policy. Background Information: The Coronavirus State Fiscal Recovery Fund, (CSLFRF), provides direct payments to states, US territories, Tribal governments, metropolitan cities, counties, and non-entitlement units of local government to: 1. Respond to the public health emergency with respect to Coronavirus Disease 2019(COVID-19) or its negative economic impacts, including by providing assistance to households, small businesses, nonprofits, and impacted industries, such as tourism, travel, and hospitality; 2. Respond to workers performing essential work during the COVID-19 public health emergency by providing premium pay to eligible workers of the recipient that perform essential work or by providing grants to eligible employers that have eligible workers who are performing essential work; 3. Provide government services, to the extent of the reduction in revenue of the eligible entities due to the COVID-19 public health emergency relative to revenues collected in the most recent full fiscal year of the eligible entities prior to the emergency; and 4. Make necessary investments in water, sewer, or broadband infrastructure. In August 2022, the Governor’s Office of Planning and Budget (OPB) dedicated more than $1 billion of CSLFRF federal funds to the Department of Human Services (DHS) to establish the Cash Assistance program. The Cash Assistance program provided one-time cash assistance of up to $350 for active enrollees of the Medicaid, PeachCare for Kids, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, and/or Temporary Assistance for Needy Families government benefit programs in response to the negative economic impacts of the COVID-19 public health emergency. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the DHS is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. The DHS is also required to comply with the procurement standards set forth in 2 CFR 200.317 through 2 CFR 200.327 of the Uniform Guidance. Pursuant to 2 CFR 200.317, “When procuring property and services under a Federal award, a State must follow the same policies and procedures it uses for procurements from its non-Federal funds.” As a state agency, the DHS adheres to the State of Georgia Procurement Manual issued by the Department of Administrative Services (DOAS). Per the State of Georgia Procurement Manual, all contract extensions must occur in writing and require the supplier’s consent. The State Procurement Department’s (SPD) prior consent to the contract extension may also be required depending on the type of extension. Condition: Our examination of compliance with Procurement and Suspension and Debarment regulations for the Cash Assistance program revealed that the DHS did not follow the State of Georgia’s ongoing contract management process for the continuation of services. The DHS was also unable to provide a written notice of extension or amendment to continue services and was unable to provide documentation of written permission from the SPD. Cause: Through discussion with the DHS management, the DHS relied on the contractor to replace cash assistance cards that were lost or undeliverable in the prior year under the original terms of the contract rather than extending or amending the contract. Effect: Without a valid contract extension or amendment, federal funds may be used in a manner that is not in compliance with federal provisions and the Georgia Procurement Manual. Recommendation: The DHS should improve internal controls as they relate to the procurement and contracting processes to ensure that all contract extensions or amendments follow the processes established in the Georgia Procurement Manual. Views of Responsible Officials: Georgia Department of Human Services concurs with the finding.
2024-037 Improve Controls over the Procurement Process Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Material Weakness Compliance Impact: Material Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Pass-Through Entity: None AL Number and Title: 21.027 – COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Award Number: SLFRP1029 (Year: 2023) Questioned Costs: None Identified Description: The Georgia Department of Human Services should improve internal controls to ensure that they are complying with the State of Georgia’s Procurement Policy. Background Information: The Coronavirus State Fiscal Recovery Fund, (CSLFRF), provides direct payments to states, US territories, Tribal governments, metropolitan cities, counties, and non-entitlement units of local government to: 1. Respond to the public health emergency with respect to Coronavirus Disease 2019(COVID-19) or its negative economic impacts, including by providing assistance to households, small businesses, nonprofits, and impacted industries, such as tourism, travel, and hospitality; 2. Respond to workers performing essential work during the COVID-19 public health emergency by providing premium pay to eligible workers of the recipient that perform essential work or by providing grants to eligible employers that have eligible workers who are performing essential work; 3. Provide government services, to the extent of the reduction in revenue of the eligible entities due to the COVID-19 public health emergency relative to revenues collected in the most recent full fiscal year of the eligible entities prior to the emergency; and 4. Make necessary investments in water, sewer, or broadband infrastructure. In August 2022, the Governor’s Office of Planning and Budget (OPB) dedicated more than $1 billion of CSLFRF federal funds to the Department of Human Services (DHS) to establish the Cash Assistance program. The Cash Assistance program provided one-time cash assistance of up to $350 for active enrollees of the Medicaid, PeachCare for Kids, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, and/or Temporary Assistance for Needy Families government benefit programs in response to the negative economic impacts of the COVID-19 public health emergency. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the DHS is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. The DHS is also required to comply with the procurement standards set forth in 2 CFR 200.317 through 2 CFR 200.327 of the Uniform Guidance. Pursuant to 2 CFR 200.317, “When procuring property and services under a Federal award, a State must follow the same policies and procedures it uses for procurements from its non-Federal funds.” As a state agency, the DHS adheres to the State of Georgia Procurement Manual issued by the Department of Administrative Services (DOAS). Per the State of Georgia Procurement Manual, all contract extensions must occur in writing and require the supplier’s consent. The State Procurement Department’s (SPD) prior consent to the contract extension may also be required depending on the type of extension. Condition: Our examination of compliance with Procurement and Suspension and Debarment regulations for the Cash Assistance program revealed that the DHS did not follow the State of Georgia’s ongoing contract management process for the continuation of services. The DHS was also unable to provide a written notice of extension or amendment to continue services and was unable to provide documentation of written permission from the SPD. Cause: Through discussion with the DHS management, the DHS relied on the contractor to replace cash assistance cards that were lost or undeliverable in the prior year under the original terms of the contract rather than extending or amending the contract. Effect: Without a valid contract extension or amendment, federal funds may be used in a manner that is not in compliance with federal provisions and the Georgia Procurement Manual. Recommendation: The DHS should improve internal controls as they relate to the procurement and contracting processes to ensure that all contract extensions or amendments follow the processes established in the Georgia Procurement Manual. Views of Responsible Officials: Georgia Department of Human Services concurs with the finding.
2024-037 Improve Controls over the Procurement Process Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Material Weakness Compliance Impact: Material Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Pass-Through Entity: None AL Number and Title: 21.027 – COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Award Number: SLFRP1029 (Year: 2023) Questioned Costs: None Identified Description: The Georgia Department of Human Services should improve internal controls to ensure that they are complying with the State of Georgia’s Procurement Policy. Background Information: The Coronavirus State Fiscal Recovery Fund, (CSLFRF), provides direct payments to states, US territories, Tribal governments, metropolitan cities, counties, and non-entitlement units of local government to: 1. Respond to the public health emergency with respect to Coronavirus Disease 2019(COVID-19) or its negative economic impacts, including by providing assistance to households, small businesses, nonprofits, and impacted industries, such as tourism, travel, and hospitality; 2. Respond to workers performing essential work during the COVID-19 public health emergency by providing premium pay to eligible workers of the recipient that perform essential work or by providing grants to eligible employers that have eligible workers who are performing essential work; 3. Provide government services, to the extent of the reduction in revenue of the eligible entities due to the COVID-19 public health emergency relative to revenues collected in the most recent full fiscal year of the eligible entities prior to the emergency; and 4. Make necessary investments in water, sewer, or broadband infrastructure. In August 2022, the Governor’s Office of Planning and Budget (OPB) dedicated more than $1 billion of CSLFRF federal funds to the Department of Human Services (DHS) to establish the Cash Assistance program. The Cash Assistance program provided one-time cash assistance of up to $350 for active enrollees of the Medicaid, PeachCare for Kids, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, and/or Temporary Assistance for Needy Families government benefit programs in response to the negative economic impacts of the COVID-19 public health emergency. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the DHS is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. The DHS is also required to comply with the procurement standards set forth in 2 CFR 200.317 through 2 CFR 200.327 of the Uniform Guidance. Pursuant to 2 CFR 200.317, “When procuring property and services under a Federal award, a State must follow the same policies and procedures it uses for procurements from its non-Federal funds.” As a state agency, the DHS adheres to the State of Georgia Procurement Manual issued by the Department of Administrative Services (DOAS). Per the State of Georgia Procurement Manual, all contract extensions must occur in writing and require the supplier’s consent. The State Procurement Department’s (SPD) prior consent to the contract extension may also be required depending on the type of extension. Condition: Our examination of compliance with Procurement and Suspension and Debarment regulations for the Cash Assistance program revealed that the DHS did not follow the State of Georgia’s ongoing contract management process for the continuation of services. The DHS was also unable to provide a written notice of extension or amendment to continue services and was unable to provide documentation of written permission from the SPD. Cause: Through discussion with the DHS management, the DHS relied on the contractor to replace cash assistance cards that were lost or undeliverable in the prior year under the original terms of the contract rather than extending or amending the contract. Effect: Without a valid contract extension or amendment, federal funds may be used in a manner that is not in compliance with federal provisions and the Georgia Procurement Manual. Recommendation: The DHS should improve internal controls as they relate to the procurement and contracting processes to ensure that all contract extensions or amendments follow the processes established in the Georgia Procurement Manual. Views of Responsible Officials: Georgia Department of Human Services concurs with the finding.
Program: Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) Assistance Listing No.: 10.557 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Agriculture Passed-through: California Department of Public Health Award No.: 22-10307 Award Year: 2024 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Non-Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303(a), Internal Controls, states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Title 2 CFR Section 200.214 of the Uniform Guidance states that the County must comply with 2 CFR part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Per 2 CFR Section 180.300, when a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at https://www.sam.gov/SAM/, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity. 2 CFR 200.318(i) Procurement records. The recipient or subrecipient must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR 200.327 Contract provisions. The recipient's or subrecipient's contracts must contain the applicable provisions described in Appendix II to Part 200—Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards. Condition: During our testing of the County’s provisions for procurement requirements, we noted the following: 1. For two (2) out of two (2) contracts selected for testing there was no evidence that the County verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract. 2. For two (2) out of two (2) contracts selected for testing, the County did not include all applicable provisions described in 2 CFR 200 Appendix II. 3. For one (1) out of two (2) contracts selected for testing with a contract value of $600,000, the County could not provide documentation of the history of the procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, basis for contractor selection, and the basis for the contract price. Cause: The County did not follow their policy to verify the information described in the condition prior to entering the transactions. The County did not follow their policy documenting the history of the procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, basis for contractor selection, and the basis for the contract price. The County’s policy does not include the requirement to include all applicable provisions identified in 2 CFR 200 Appendix II in its contracts. Effect: Failure to implement and maintain a proper control process could result in payments to vendors that are suspended or debarred or improper awarding of contracts under the procurement guidance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of two (2) out of twelve (12) procurement contracts were tested. This represented a total of $2,285,000 in contracted services under the grant. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: No. Recommendation: We recommend the County strengthen its policies and procedures to ensure that the verification of the debarment and suspension is documented and retained, the history of procurement transactions is documented and retained in its official records, and that contracts include all applicable provisions of 2 CFR 200 Appendix II. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.
Program: Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) Assistance Listing No.: 10.557 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Agriculture Passed-through: California Department of Public Health Award No.: 22-10307 Award Year: 2024 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Non-Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303(a), Internal Controls, states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Title 2 CFR Section 200.214 of the Uniform Guidance states that the County must comply with 2 CFR part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Per 2 CFR Section 180.300, when a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at https://www.sam.gov/SAM/, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity. 2 CFR 200.318(i) Procurement records. The recipient or subrecipient must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR 200.327 Contract provisions. The recipient's or subrecipient's contracts must contain the applicable provisions described in Appendix II to Part 200—Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards. Condition: During our testing of the County’s provisions for procurement requirements, we noted the following: 1. For two (2) out of two (2) contracts selected for testing there was no evidence that the County verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract. 2. For two (2) out of two (2) contracts selected for testing, the County did not include all applicable provisions described in 2 CFR 200 Appendix II. 3. For one (1) out of two (2) contracts selected for testing with a contract value of $600,000, the County could not provide documentation of the history of the procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, basis for contractor selection, and the basis for the contract price. Cause: The County did not follow their policy to verify the information described in the condition prior to entering the transactions. The County did not follow their policy documenting the history of the procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, basis for contractor selection, and the basis for the contract price. The County’s policy does not include the requirement to include all applicable provisions identified in 2 CFR 200 Appendix II in its contracts. Effect: Failure to implement and maintain a proper control process could result in payments to vendors that are suspended or debarred or improper awarding of contracts under the procurement guidance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of two (2) out of twelve (12) procurement contracts were tested. This represented a total of $2,285,000 in contracted services under the grant. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: No. Recommendation: We recommend the County strengthen its policies and procedures to ensure that the verification of the debarment and suspension is documented and retained, the history of procurement transactions is documented and retained in its official records, and that contracts include all applicable provisions of 2 CFR 200 Appendix II. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.
Program: Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) Assistance Listing No.: 10.557 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Agriculture Passed-through: California Department of Public Health Award No.: 22-10307 Award Year: 2024 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Non-Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303(a), Internal Controls, states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Title 2 CFR Section 200.214 of the Uniform Guidance states that the County must comply with 2 CFR part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Per 2 CFR Section 180.300, when a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at https://www.sam.gov/SAM/, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity. 2 CFR 200.318(i) Procurement records. The recipient or subrecipient must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR 200.327 Contract provisions. The recipient's or subrecipient's contracts must contain the applicable provisions described in Appendix II to Part 200—Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards. Condition: During our testing of the County’s provisions for procurement requirements, we noted the following: 1. For two (2) out of two (2) contracts selected for testing there was no evidence that the County verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract. 2. For two (2) out of two (2) contracts selected for testing, the County did not include all applicable provisions described in 2 CFR 200 Appendix II. 3. For one (1) out of two (2) contracts selected for testing with a contract value of $600,000, the County could not provide documentation of the history of the procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, basis for contractor selection, and the basis for the contract price. Cause: The County did not follow their policy to verify the information described in the condition prior to entering the transactions. The County did not follow their policy documenting the history of the procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, basis for contractor selection, and the basis for the contract price. The County’s policy does not include the requirement to include all applicable provisions identified in 2 CFR 200 Appendix II in its contracts. Effect: Failure to implement and maintain a proper control process could result in payments to vendors that are suspended or debarred or improper awarding of contracts under the procurement guidance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of two (2) out of twelve (12) procurement contracts were tested. This represented a total of $2,285,000 in contracted services under the grant. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: No. Recommendation: We recommend the County strengthen its policies and procedures to ensure that the verification of the debarment and suspension is documented and retained, the history of procurement transactions is documented and retained in its official records, and that contracts include all applicable provisions of 2 CFR 200 Appendix II. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.
Program: COVID-19 Health Center Program Cluster Assistance Listing No.: 93.224; 93.527 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Passed-through: N/A Award No.: 4 H8GCS48295‐01‐01 Award Year: 12/01/2022 ‐ 12/31/2023 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Non-Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303(a), Internal Controls, states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Title 2 CFR Section 200.214 of the Uniform Guidance states that the County must comply with 2 CFR part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Per 2 CFR Section 180.300, when a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at https://www.sam.gov/SAM/, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity. 2 CFR 200.318(i) Procurement records. The recipient or subrecipient must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR 200.327 Contract provisions. The recipient's or subrecipient's contracts must contain the applicable provisions described in Appendix II to Part 200—Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards. Condition: During our testing of the County’s provisions for procurement requirements, we noted the following: 1. For one (1) out of three (3) contracts selected for testing, there was no evidence that the County verified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction, prior to entering the contract. 2. For one (1) out of three (3) contracts selected for testing, the County did not include all applicable provisions described in 2 CFR 200 Appendix II. 3. For one (1) out of three (3) contracts selected for testing with a total contract value of $2,616,000, the County could not provide documentation of the history of the procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, basis for contractor selection, and the basis for the contract price. Cause: The County did not follow their policy to verify the information described in the condition prior to entering the transactions. The County did not follow their policy documenting the history of the procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, basis for contractor selection, and the basis for the contract price. The County’s policy does not include the requirement to include all applicable provisions identified in 2 CFR 200 Appendix II in its contracts. Effect: Failure to implement and maintain a proper control process could result in payments to vendors that are suspended or debarred or improper awarding of contracts under the procurement guidance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of three (3) out of three (3) procurement contracts were tested. This represented a total of $21,679,640 in contracted services under the grant. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: No. Recommendation: We recommend the County strengthen its policies and procedures to ensure that the verification of the debarment and suspension is documented and retained, the history of procurement transactions is documented and retained in its official records, and that contracts include all applicable provisions of 2 CFR 200 Appendix II. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.