2022-002 Financial Statement Reconciliations/Tie-In Procedures Significant Deficiency CONDITION: A weakness existed in the overall reconciliation/tie-in procedures performed over the School’s financial statement accounts for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. Financial accounts were either reconciled untimely or in some cases, accounts were not reconciled at all. Most of these accounts should be reconciled on a monthly basis. The major areas where reconciliation procedures were weak included:A) Beginning Balances B) Cash Balances C) Account Receivables D) Grant Receivables/Unearned Revenues E) Accounts Payable F) Grant Revenue CRITERIA: OMB Uniform Guidance states the following in section 200.302, “(2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.327 Financial reporting and 200.328 Monitoring and reporting program performance. CAUSE: Lack of written policies and procedures over financial tie-in procedures that identify who is responsible for performing these tie-in/reconciliation procedures. EFFECT: In the course of performing the audit, the auditor recommended 10 adjusting journal entries be made to the financial statements for fiscal year ending June 30, 2022. Many of these adjustments could have been avoided if timely reconciliation and tie-in procedures had been conducted by the finance department. Many of these audit adjustments were material in nature.
2022-002 Financial Statement Reconciliations/Tie-In Procedures Significant Deficiency CONDITION: A weakness existed in the overall reconciliation/tie-in procedures performed over the School’s financial statement accounts for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. Financial accounts were either reconciled untimely or in some cases, accounts were not reconciled at all. Most of these accounts should be reconciled on a monthly basis. The major areas where reconciliation procedures were weak included:A) Beginning Balances B) Cash Balances C) Account Receivables D) Grant Receivables/Unearned Revenues E) Accounts Payable F) Grant Revenue CRITERIA: OMB Uniform Guidance states the following in section 200.302, “(2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.327 Financial reporting and 200.328 Monitoring and reporting program performance. CAUSE: Lack of written policies and procedures over financial tie-in procedures that identify who is responsible for performing these tie-in/reconciliation procedures. EFFECT: In the course of performing the audit, the auditor recommended 10 adjusting journal entries be made to the financial statements for fiscal year ending June 30, 2022. Many of these adjustments could have been avoided if timely reconciliation and tie-in procedures had been conducted by the finance department. Many of these audit adjustments were material in nature.
2022-002 Financial Statement Reconciliations/Tie-In Procedures Significant Deficiency CONDITION: A weakness existed in the overall reconciliation/tie-in procedures performed over the School’s financial statement accounts for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. Financial accounts were either reconciled untimely or in some cases, accounts were not reconciled at all. Most of these accounts should be reconciled on a monthly basis. The major areas where reconciliation procedures were weak included:A) Beginning Balances B) Cash Balances C) Account Receivables D) Grant Receivables/Unearned Revenues E) Accounts Payable F) Grant Revenue CRITERIA: OMB Uniform Guidance states the following in section 200.302, “(2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.327 Financial reporting and 200.328 Monitoring and reporting program performance. CAUSE: Lack of written policies and procedures over financial tie-in procedures that identify who is responsible for performing these tie-in/reconciliation procedures. EFFECT: In the course of performing the audit, the auditor recommended 10 adjusting journal entries be made to the financial statements for fiscal year ending June 30, 2022. Many of these adjustments could have been avoided if timely reconciliation and tie-in procedures had been conducted by the finance department. Many of these audit adjustments were material in nature.
2022-002 Financial Statement Reconciliations/Tie-In Procedures Significant Deficiency CONDITION: A weakness existed in the overall reconciliation/tie-in procedures performed over the School’s financial statement accounts for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. Financial accounts were either reconciled untimely or in some cases, accounts were not reconciled at all. Most of these accounts should be reconciled on a monthly basis. The major areas where reconciliation procedures were weak included:A) Beginning Balances B) Cash Balances C) Account Receivables D) Grant Receivables/Unearned Revenues E) Accounts Payable F) Grant Revenue CRITERIA: OMB Uniform Guidance states the following in section 200.302, “(2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.327 Financial reporting and 200.328 Monitoring and reporting program performance. CAUSE: Lack of written policies and procedures over financial tie-in procedures that identify who is responsible for performing these tie-in/reconciliation procedures. EFFECT: In the course of performing the audit, the auditor recommended 10 adjusting journal entries be made to the financial statements for fiscal year ending June 30, 2022. Many of these adjustments could have been avoided if timely reconciliation and tie-in procedures had been conducted by the finance department. Many of these audit adjustments were material in nature.
2022-002 Financial Statement Reconciliations/Tie-In Procedures Significant Deficiency CONDITION: A weakness existed in the overall reconciliation/tie-in procedures performed over the School’s financial statement accounts for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. Financial accounts were either reconciled untimely or in some cases, accounts were not reconciled at all. Most of these accounts should be reconciled on a monthly basis. The major areas where reconciliation procedures were weak included:A) Beginning Balances B) Cash Balances C) Account Receivables D) Grant Receivables/Unearned Revenues E) Accounts Payable F) Grant Revenue CRITERIA: OMB Uniform Guidance states the following in section 200.302, “(2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.327 Financial reporting and 200.328 Monitoring and reporting program performance. CAUSE: Lack of written policies and procedures over financial tie-in procedures that identify who is responsible for performing these tie-in/reconciliation procedures. EFFECT: In the course of performing the audit, the auditor recommended 10 adjusting journal entries be made to the financial statements for fiscal year ending June 30, 2022. Many of these adjustments could have been avoided if timely reconciliation and tie-in procedures had been conducted by the finance department. Many of these audit adjustments were material in nature.
2022-002 Financial Statement Reconciliations/Tie-In Procedures Significant Deficiency CONDITION: A weakness existed in the overall reconciliation/tie-in procedures performed over the School’s financial statement accounts for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. Financial accounts were either reconciled untimely or in some cases, accounts were not reconciled at all. Most of these accounts should be reconciled on a monthly basis. The major areas where reconciliation procedures were weak included:A) Beginning Balances B) Cash Balances C) Account Receivables D) Grant Receivables/Unearned Revenues E) Accounts Payable F) Grant Revenue CRITERIA: OMB Uniform Guidance states the following in section 200.302, “(2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.327 Financial reporting and 200.328 Monitoring and reporting program performance. CAUSE: Lack of written policies and procedures over financial tie-in procedures that identify who is responsible for performing these tie-in/reconciliation procedures. EFFECT: In the course of performing the audit, the auditor recommended 10 adjusting journal entries be made to the financial statements for fiscal year ending June 30, 2022. Many of these adjustments could have been avoided if timely reconciliation and tie-in procedures had been conducted by the finance department. Many of these audit adjustments were material in nature.
2022-002 Financial Statement Reconciliations/Tie-In Procedures Significant Deficiency CONDITION: A weakness existed in the overall reconciliation/tie-in procedures performed over the School’s financial statement accounts for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. Financial accounts were either reconciled untimely or in some cases, accounts were not reconciled at all. Most of these accounts should be reconciled on a monthly basis. The major areas where reconciliation procedures were weak included:A) Beginning Balances B) Cash Balances C) Account Receivables D) Grant Receivables/Unearned Revenues E) Accounts Payable F) Grant Revenue CRITERIA: OMB Uniform Guidance states the following in section 200.302, “(2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.327 Financial reporting and 200.328 Monitoring and reporting program performance. CAUSE: Lack of written policies and procedures over financial tie-in procedures that identify who is responsible for performing these tie-in/reconciliation procedures. EFFECT: In the course of performing the audit, the auditor recommended 10 adjusting journal entries be made to the financial statements for fiscal year ending June 30, 2022. Many of these adjustments could have been avoided if timely reconciliation and tie-in procedures had been conducted by the finance department. Many of these audit adjustments were material in nature.
2022-002 Financial Statement Reconciliations/Tie-In Procedures Significant Deficiency CONDITION: A weakness existed in the overall reconciliation/tie-in procedures performed over the School’s financial statement accounts for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. Financial accounts were either reconciled untimely or in some cases, accounts were not reconciled at all. Most of these accounts should be reconciled on a monthly basis. The major areas where reconciliation procedures were weak included:A) Beginning Balances B) Cash Balances C) Account Receivables D) Grant Receivables/Unearned Revenues E) Accounts Payable F) Grant Revenue CRITERIA: OMB Uniform Guidance states the following in section 200.302, “(2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.327 Financial reporting and 200.328 Monitoring and reporting program performance. CAUSE: Lack of written policies and procedures over financial tie-in procedures that identify who is responsible for performing these tie-in/reconciliation procedures. EFFECT: In the course of performing the audit, the auditor recommended 10 adjusting journal entries be made to the financial statements for fiscal year ending June 30, 2022. Many of these adjustments could have been avoided if timely reconciliation and tie-in procedures had been conducted by the finance department. Many of these audit adjustments were material in nature.
2022-002 Financial Statement Reconciliations/Tie-In Procedures Significant Deficiency CONDITION: A weakness existed in the overall reconciliation/tie-in procedures performed over the School’s financial statement accounts for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. Financial accounts were either reconciled untimely or in some cases, accounts were not reconciled at all. Most of these accounts should be reconciled on a monthly basis. The major areas where reconciliation procedures were weak included:A) Beginning Balances B) Cash Balances C) Account Receivables D) Grant Receivables/Unearned Revenues E) Accounts Payable F) Grant Revenue CRITERIA: OMB Uniform Guidance states the following in section 200.302, “(2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.327 Financial reporting and 200.328 Monitoring and reporting program performance. CAUSE: Lack of written policies and procedures over financial tie-in procedures that identify who is responsible for performing these tie-in/reconciliation procedures. EFFECT: In the course of performing the audit, the auditor recommended 10 adjusting journal entries be made to the financial statements for fiscal year ending June 30, 2022. Many of these adjustments could have been avoided if timely reconciliation and tie-in procedures had been conducted by the finance department. Many of these audit adjustments were material in nature.
2022-008 Procurement Policy and Procedures U.S. Department of Justice, Passed through Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority Crime Victim Assistance – Assistance Listing Number 16.575 Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Condition: The Corporation does not maintain a formal procurement policy and procedures that meets the requirements of the Uniform Guidance, including procedures addressing allowable costs exceeding the small purchase threshold. The lack of such a formal policy increases the risk that purchases are made that do not comply with Uniform Guidance requirements. Cause: The Corporation has not implemented a formal procurement policy and procedures that meets the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Effect: The lack of such a formal policy increases the risk that purchases are made that do not comply with Uniform Guidance requirements. Questioned costs: None Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Corporation implement a formal procurement policy and procedures that meets the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. View of responsible officials of the auditee: Management agrees with the finding and recommendation.
Condition: Upon inquiry of county personnel and a test of twenty (20) disbursement totaling $303,873, the following instances of noncompliance were noted: • The County failed to document suspension and debarment of vendors for purchases over $25,000. • The County failed to have written standards of conduct that cover conflicts of interest and that govern the performance of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contract. Cause of Condition: Policies and procedures have not been designed and implemented to ensure federal disbursements are made in accordance with federal compliance requirements. Effect of Condition: This condition resulted in noncompliance with grant requirements and could result in a loss of federal funds. Recommendation: OSAI recommends the County gain an understanding of the grant requirements for this program and implement internal controls to ensure compliance with these grant requirements. Management Response: Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners: These procurement issues originated during the prior County Clerk’s administration, but the current leadership is focused on corrective measures. Together, we are: • developing a SOP to ensure vendor checks for suspension and debarment are conducted on all purchases over $25,000, • establishing written standards of conduct to address conflicts of interest and set clear procurement guidelines, • and enhancing oversight and review to ensure all procurement processes are fully compliant with federal regulations. Our goal is to build a consistent, transparent procurement framework that safeguards both compliance and public trust. County Clerk: I was not the County Clerk in office at this time. To correct this issue, the County plans to develop a SOP to timely and accurately track and report on the SEFA. The SOP will be reviewed, adopted, and monitored by the Board of County Commissioners. Criteria: Compliance and Reporting Guidance, State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (8. Procurement, Suspension & Debarment.) reads as follows: Recipients are responsible for ensuring that any procurement using SLFRF funds, or payments under procurement contracts using such funds, are consistent with the procurement standards set forth in the Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR 200.317 through 2 CFR 200.327, unless stated otherwise by Treasury. As outlined in FAQ 13.15, only a subset of the Uniform Guidance requirements at 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart D (Post Federal Award Requirements) applies to recipients’ use of funds in the revenue loss eligible use category. The procurement standards set forth in the Uniform Guidance at 2 CRF 200.317 through 2 CRF 200.327 are not included in FAQ 13.15’s list of applicable Subpart D requirements that apply to recipients’ use of funds in the revenue loss eligible use category. The Uniform Guidance establishes in 2 CFR 200.319 that all procurement transactions for property or services must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition, consistent with standards outlined in 2 CFR 200.320, which allows for non-competitive procurements only in certain circumstances. Recipients must have and use documented procurement procedures that are consistent with the standards outlined in 2 CFR 200.317 through 2 CFR 200.320. In addition, the Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR 200.214, 2 CFR Part 180, and Treasury’s implementing regulations at 31 CFR Part 19, prohibit recipients from entering into contracts with suspended or debarred parties. The procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance require an infrastructure for competitive bidding and contractor oversight, including maintaining written standards of conduct. Your organization must ensure adherence to all applicable local, State, and federal procurement laws and regulations. Further, 2 CFR § 200.319 Competition (d) reads as follows: The non-Federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions.
Finding 2022-009 – Lack of Internal Controls Over the SEFA and Noncompliance with Compliance Requirements Over Major Federal Programs – FEMA (Repeat Finding – 2018-006, 2020-008) PASS-THROUGH GRANTOR: Oklahoma Department of Emergency Management FEDERAL AGENCY: U.S. Department of Homeland Security ASSISTANCE LISTING: 97.036 FEDERAL PROGRAM NAME: Disaster Grants – Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) FEDERAL AWARD NUMBER: DR-4438, DR-4315, and DR-4575 FEDERAL AWARD YEAR: 2022 CONTROL CATEGORY: Activities Allowed or Unallowed; Allowable Costs/Cost Principles; Period of Performance; Reporting; Special Tests and Provisions QUESTIONED COSTS: $1,170,296 Condition: Upon inquiry of District 1 staff and review of documentation and compliance procedures for ALN 97.036, the following items were noted: • Due to scope limitations placed on the audit, auditors were unable to access records and the ability to communicate with District 1 employees was restricted. • Documents provided to the auditors could not be reconciled to the amounts reported on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). • District 1 does not print or certify any expense reports; therefore, any supporting documentation was not reviewed when reporting federal expenditures to the County Clerk. • District 1 was unable to meet the deadlines set by themselves, as it took nine months for the County to provide limited documentation for federal projects. • Federal expenditures could not be tested due to inadequate implementation of policies and procedures regarding the reporting and retention of federal expense documentation. Cause of Condition: Policies and procedures have not been designed and implemented to ensure accurate reporting on the County’s SEFA, and to ensure federal expenditures are made in accordance with federal compliance requirements. Effect of Condition: These conditions resulted in noncompliance with grant requirements and could result in loss of federal funds to the County. Recommendation: OSAI recommends the County gain an understanding of the compliance requirements for federal programs and implement internal control procedures to ensure compliance with all requirements. Further, we recommend all documentation be properly maintained for inspection and ensure accurate reporting on the County’s SEFA. Management Response: Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners: The County will make sure that all federal documentation is maintained by each district for inspection and will ensure it is accurately reported on the SEFA. District 1 County Commissioner: All work associated with the projects referenced in Audit Finding 2020-005 was completed in accordance with FEMA requirements. The work was fully documented, and final results were physically inspected on site by Oklahoma Emergency Management (OEM) personnel. Both OEM and FEMA reviewed and accepted the work performed and the supporting documentation, as evidenced by the county’s reimbursement for the completed projects. FEMA reimbursement would not have occurred had the work or documentation been deficient. Auditors initially indicated that documentation was required for FEMA Event 4315 only. Subsequently, the scope of the request was expanded to include “all events” without a clear written explanation or formal notification of the expanded scope. Following an on-site visit to the county barn for a tabletop discussion, the auditor sent an email dated May 11, 2023, identifying specific projects for which documentation was reportedly still needed. The projects later cited in Audit Finding 2020-05 were not included in that list. On June 12, 2023, the auditor emailed stating: “I believe I have documents for every project except 4575.203.454750 and 4575.203.454831 (Disaster. Project Worksheet.Site).” The requested documentation was provided promptly, and the auditor acknowledged receipt. He subsequently sent several clarifying questions and, in a final email dated June 20, 2023, stated that he would consult with his team and follow up as needed. No further communication was received from the auditor. or any member of the auditor’s office requesting additional documentation. Nearly three years have elapsed without follow-up. The County does have documentation for all projects listed in the audit finding, and these records were provided to auditors during their on-site visits to the county barn. Auditor Response: District 1 did not comply with all requirements of the federal grant including, but not limited to, providing documentation for audit purposes and preparing accurate and reconciled reports. The required documentation to support the FEMA expenditures were not provided to the auditors. Physical inspections by FEMA or OEM do not constitute an audit under Uniform Guidance. An audit includes examining all supporting documentation to ensure the County complied with all the compliance requirements required by Uniform Guidance. Maintaining adequate documentation to support federal grant expenditures is critical for the County to comply with federal compliance requirements. Criteria: 2 CFR § 200.303(a) Internal Controls reads as follows: The non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Title 2 CFR § 200.318 (a), General procurement standards, reads as follows: The recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under a Federal award or subaward, including for acquisition of property or services. These documented procurement procedures must be consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards identified in 200.317 through 200.327. Title 2 CFR § 200.84 Questioned Cost reads as follows: Questioned cost means a cost that is questioned by the auditor because of an audit finding: (a) Which resulted from a violation or possible violation of a statute, regulation, or the terms and conditions of a Federal award, including for fund used to match Federal funds; (b) Where the costs, at the time of the audit, are not supported by adequate documentation; or (c) Where the costs incurred appear unreasonable and do not reflect the actions a prudent person would take in the circumstances. Further, GAO Standards – Section 2 – Objectives of an Entity – OV2.23 states in part: Compliance Objectives Management conducts activities in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. As part of specifying compliance objectives, the entity determines which laws and regulations apply to the entity. Management is expected to set objectives that incorporate these requirements. [….] The limitations of the auditor are described in the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Clarified Statements on Auditing Standards AU-C § 210, which states, in part: “The concept of an independent audit requires that the auditor's role does not involve assuming management's responsibility for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements or assuming responsibility for the entity's related internal control and that the auditor has a reasonable expectation of obtaining the information necessary for the audit insofar as management is able to provide or procure it. Accordingly, the premise is fundamental to the conduct of an independent audit.”
Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development and Department of Veterans Affairs Federal Program Name: Emergency Solutions Grant Program and VA Homeless Providers Grant and Per Diem Program Assistance Listing Number: 14.231 and 64.024 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: E20DW37001-2022 and ODMH543-1306-659-PC-21 Pass-Through Agency: North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Aging and Adult Services Pass-Through Number(s): 00041416 Award Period: 7/29/2020 – 6/30/2022 and 10/1/2021 – 9/30/2022 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.318 (a), the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: During our testing, we noted the Organization did not have documented procurement policies and procedures. Questioned costs: None Context: During our testing, we noted the Organization did not have documented procurement policies. Cause: The Organization did not have established procurement policies and did not have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with Federal procurement standards. Effect: The Organization was not in compliance with the Compliance Supplement and the Code of Federal Regulations related to procurement and suspension and debarment provisions. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization adopt a formal and written procurement policy. Additionally, management should develop controls to help ensure procurement procedures are followed and to monitor the amount spent with vendors throughout the year to ensure procurement procedures are initiated when the vendor costs exceed the procurement thresholds. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.
2022 ? 004 ? Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Policy Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: Education Stabilization Fund ? Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund ? Institutional Portion Federal Assistance Listing Number: 84.425F Award Period: 7/1/21-6/30/22 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: When procuring property and services under a Federal award, entities must follow the procurement standards outlined in 2 CFR 200.218 through 200.327. Included in these requirements, a non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition: The University has implemented formal, written policies and procedures to align with the requirements for procurement and suspension and debarment but did not maintain documentation that these policies were followed during the year. Questioned costs: Unknown. Context: We selected a sample of 5 transactions for procurement and suspension and debarment testing and noted the University did not maintain any documentation to support adherence to the University?s procurement and suspension and debarment policies. Cause: The University experienced turnover during the year and documentation could not be located. Effect: Supporting documentation could not be located to support required procurement and suspension and debarment standards were followed. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University ensure a process is put in place to maintain appropriate supporting documentation as evidence that the University?s procurement, suspension and debarment policies were followed. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.
2022 ? 004 ? Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Policy Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: Education Stabilization Fund ? Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund ? Institutional Portion Federal Assistance Listing Number: 84.425F Award Period: 7/1/21-6/30/22 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: When procuring property and services under a Federal award, entities must follow the procurement standards outlined in 2 CFR 200.218 through 200.327. Included in these requirements, a non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition: The University has implemented formal, written policies and procedures to align with the requirements for procurement and suspension and debarment but did not maintain documentation that these policies were followed during the year. Questioned costs: Unknown. Context: We selected a sample of 5 transactions for procurement and suspension and debarment testing and noted the University did not maintain any documentation to support adherence to the University?s procurement and suspension and debarment policies. Cause: The University experienced turnover during the year and documentation could not be located. Effect: Supporting documentation could not be located to support required procurement and suspension and debarment standards were followed. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University ensure a process is put in place to maintain appropriate supporting documentation as evidence that the University?s procurement, suspension and debarment policies were followed. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.
2022-012 Financial Statement Reconciliations/Tie-In Procedures Material Weakness This is a repeat finding. The prior-year’s auditing finding number is 2021-012. Condition: A weakness existed in the overall reconciliation/tie-in procedures performed over the Housing Authority’s financial statement accounts for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022. Financial accounts were not reconciled on a timely, monthly basis. The major areas where reconciliation procedures were weak included: A) Bank Reconciliations B) Grant Receivables C) Account Receivables and associated allowance for doubtful accounts D) Capital Assets E) Accounts Payable F) Payroll and Other Current Liabilities Criteria: OMB Uniform Guidance states the following in section 200.302, “(2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.327 Financial reporting and 200.328 Monitoring and reporting program performance. Cause: Lack of written policies and procedures over financial tie-in procedures that identify who is responsible for performing these tie-in/reconciliation procedures. Effect: In the course of performing the audit, the auditor recommended 4 adjusting journal entries be made to the financial statements for fiscal year ending March 31, 2022. Many of these adjustments could have been avoided if timely reconciliation and tie-in procedures had been conducted by the finance department. Many of these audit adjustments were material in nature. Recommendation: The Housing Authority should adopt written reconciliation and tie-in procedures into its financial policies and procedures manual. These policies should require timely reconciliations to take place as defined under policy. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: A non-federal entity is required to have certain written policies and procedure in compliance with Uniform Guidance and must comply with the procurement standards as described in 2 CFR 200.318 through 2 CFR 200.327. Specifically, the non-federal entity must comply with the following: • The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. • If the non-Federal entity has a parent, affiliate, or subsidiary organization that is not a State, local government, or Indian tribe, the non-Federal entity must also maintain written standards of conduct covering organizational conflicts of interest. Organizational conflicts of interest means that because of relationships with a parent company, affiliate, or subsidiary organization, the non-Federal entity is unable or appears to be unable to be impartial in conducting a procurement action involving a related organization. Condition: AIRS does not appear to have created written purchasing or procurement policies and procedures as required by 2 CFR 200.318(a). Since AIRS is an affiliate organization of the Ethiopian Community Development Council (ECDC), it appears that the relationship between AIRS and ECDC meets the “affiliate” requirement under 2 CFR 200.318 (c) (2). It does appear that AIRS has created written standards of conduct covering organizational conflicts of interest. Cause: Management has not created or maintained certain written policies and procedures as required under 2 CFR 200.318. Effect: AIRS is not in compliance with certain written policies and procedures as required under 2 CFR 200.318. Questioned Costs: None reported Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: Management and board should create written procurement policies and procedures and written standards of conduct covering organizational conflicts of interest that comply with the procurement standards as required under 2 CFR 200.317 through 2 CFR 200.327. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with this audit finding.
Finding 2021-002: Material Weakness – Lack of Documentation on Sole Source Contracts and Verification of Vendors Federal grantor: Department of Commerce Condition: The Chamber contract with a vendor on a sole-source basis and did not document justification for the use of a sole source vendor. In addition, the Chamber did not verify that the vendor was not on the list of vendors suspended or debarred from federal contracting before contracting with the vendor. Criteria: Entities are required to follow the procurement standards in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320 and noncompetitive procurements. Entities also must comply with 2 CFR Part 1326 that prohibits entities that have been debarred, suspended or voluntarily excluded from participating in Federal procurement. Cause: The Chamber’s Procurement Policy allows for a sole source vendor but requires staff to document sole source procurements prior to initial purchase. It appears staff did not follow its policy. The Policy also contains a requirement to verify or receive vendor certification that they are not debarred, suspended, ineligible or voluntarily excluded from Federal procurements, but this procedure was not followed. Effect: The Department of Commerce may impose additional conditions on the receipt of a subsequent tranche of future award funds, if any, or take other available remedies as set forth in 2 C.F.C. section 200.339. Recommendation: We recommend the Chamber review policies with staff to ensure procurement requirements are followed, and that staff are familiar with federal procurement requirements. Management’s Response: Management’s response to the finding is discussed in the Corrective Action Plan.
2 CFR § 1000.1 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Treasury for 2 CFR § 200.318 through 200.327 which describe specific procedures non-Federal entities must follow when entering into procurement transactions using Federal funds. 2 CFR § 200.318(a) indicates a non-Federal entity must have and use its own documented procurement procedures, consistent with State and local laws and regulations and the standards of 2 CFR § 200.318 through 200.327, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. 2 CFR § 200.320 indicates the non-Federal entity must use the following methods of procurement: (a) Procurement by micro-purchases, which the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed the non-Federal entity’s micro-purchase dollar threshold; (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures, which are procurements of relatively simple and informal nature, which do not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources; (c) Procurement by sealed bids, which requires public solicitation of bids and a firm fixed price contract (lump-sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all material terms and conditions in the invitations to bid, is the lowest in price; (d) Procurement by competitive proposals, which is generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids and is a procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded; or (e) Procurement by non-competitive proposals, which are appropriate when an item can be obtained only from a single source, the non-competitive procurement is specifically authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity, competition is deemed adequate after solicitation through competitive means, the aggregate amount of procurement does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold, and/or the public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation. 2 CFR § 200.318(i) indicates the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 31 CFR § 19.300 indicates before entering into a covered transaction as defined in 31 CFR § 19 Subpart B, the non-Federal entity must ensure the expenditure is not made to an individual or business that is excluded or disqualified from receiving Federal funds by checking the Excluded Party List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from the individual or business, or adding a clause or condition to the contract. The City did not establish the necessary controls or policies to ensure proper compliance with Procurement requirements. For five of five procurements in excess of the City’s micro-purchase threshold which were entered into using Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLRF), the City did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of the procurement. It was not evident if the City obtained quotes or bids for the items purchased or if a cost-price analysis was performed. Additionally, the City did not have written procurement procedures that conform to applicable laws noted above. Finally, the City did not ensure the vendors paid under covered transactions using SLRF funds were not excluded or disqualified from receiving Federal funds. The City should review the procurement requirements contained in 2 CFR § 200.318 through 200.327 and develop policies and procedures to ensure compliance. The City should maintain sufficient documentation to detail the history of the procurement, which may vary depending on the procurement method used. As a part of the procurement process, the City should include procedures for ensuring a vendor is not excluded or disqualified from receiving Federal funds and maintain documentation the procedure was followed.
Criteria: A non-federal entity is required to have certain written policies and procedure in compliance with Uniform Guidance and must comply with the procurement standards as described in 2 CFR 200.318 through 2 CFR 200.327. Specifically, the non-federal entity must comply with the following: • The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. • If the non-Federal entity has a parent, affiliate, or subsidiary organization that is not a State, local government, or Indian tribe, the non-Federal entity must also maintain written standards of conduct covering organizational conflicts of interest. Organizational conflicts of interest means that because of relationships with a parent company, affiliate, or subsidiary organization, the non-Federal entity is unable or appears to be unable to be impartial in conducting a procurement action involving a related organization. Condition: AIRS does not appear to have created written purchasing or procurement policies and procedures as required by 2 CFR 200.318(a). Since AIRS is an affiliate organization of the Ethiopian Community Development Council (ECDC), it appears that the relationship between AIRS and ECDC meets the “affiliate” requirement under 2 CFR 200.318 (c) (2). It does appear that AIRS has created written standards of conduct covering organizational conflicts of interest. Cause: Management has not created or maintained certain written policies and procedures as required under 2 CFR 200.318. Effect: AIRS is not in compliance with certain written policies and procedures as required under 2 CFR 200.318. Questioned Costs: None reported Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: Management and board should create written procurement policies and procedures and written standards of conduct covering organizational conflicts of interest that comply with the procurement standards as required under 2 CFR 200.317 through 2 CFR 200.327. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with this audit finding.
Finding 2021-002: Material Weakness – Lack of Documentation on Sole Source Contracts and Verification of Vendors Federal grantor: Department of Commerce Condition: The Chamber contract with a vendor on a sole-source basis and did not document justification for the use of a sole source vendor. In addition, the Chamber did not verify that the vendor was not on the list of vendors suspended or debarred from federal contracting before contracting with the vendor. Criteria: Entities are required to follow the procurement standards in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320 and noncompetitive procurements. Entities also must comply with 2 CFR Part 1326 that prohibits entities that have been debarred, suspended or voluntarily excluded from participating in Federal procurement. Cause: The Chamber’s Procurement Policy allows for a sole source vendor but requires staff to document sole source procurements prior to initial purchase. It appears staff did not follow its policy. The Policy also contains a requirement to verify or receive vendor certification that they are not debarred, suspended, ineligible or voluntarily excluded from Federal procurements, but this procedure was not followed. Effect: The Department of Commerce may impose additional conditions on the receipt of a subsequent tranche of future award funds, if any, or take other available remedies as set forth in 2 C.F.C. section 200.339. Recommendation: We recommend the Chamber review policies with staff to ensure procurement requirements are followed, and that staff are familiar with federal procurement requirements. Management’s Response: Management’s response to the finding is discussed in the Corrective Action Plan.
2 CFR § 1000.1 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Treasury for 2 CFR § 200.318 through 200.327 which describe specific procedures non-Federal entities must follow when entering into procurement transactions using Federal funds. 2 CFR § 200.318(a) indicates a non-Federal entity must have and use its own documented procurement procedures, consistent with State and local laws and regulations and the standards of 2 CFR § 200.318 through 200.327, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. 2 CFR § 200.320 indicates the non-Federal entity must use the following methods of procurement: (a) Procurement by micro-purchases, which the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed the non-Federal entity’s micro-purchase dollar threshold; (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures, which are procurements of relatively simple and informal nature, which do not exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources; (c) Procurement by sealed bids, which requires public solicitation of bids and a firm fixed price contract (lump-sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all material terms and conditions in the invitations to bid, is the lowest in price; (d) Procurement by competitive proposals, which is generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids and is a procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded; or (e) Procurement by non-competitive proposals, which are appropriate when an item can be obtained only from a single source, the non-competitive procurement is specifically authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity, competition is deemed adequate after solicitation through competitive means, the aggregate amount of procurement does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold, and/or the public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation. 2 CFR § 200.318(i) indicates the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 31 CFR § 19.300 indicates before entering into a covered transaction as defined in 31 CFR § 19 Subpart B, the non-Federal entity must ensure the expenditure is not made to an individual or business that is excluded or disqualified from receiving Federal funds by checking the Excluded Party List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from the individual or business, or adding a clause or condition to the contract. The City did not establish the necessary controls or policies to ensure proper compliance with Procurement requirements. For five of five procurements in excess of the City’s micro-purchase threshold which were entered into using Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLRF), the City did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of the procurement. It was not evident if the City obtained quotes or bids for the items purchased or if a cost-price analysis was performed. Additionally, the City did not have written procurement procedures that conform to applicable laws noted above. Finally, the City did not ensure the vendors paid under covered transactions using SLRF funds were not excluded or disqualified from receiving Federal funds. The City should review the procurement requirements contained in 2 CFR § 200.318 through 200.327 and develop policies and procedures to ensure compliance. The City should maintain sufficient documentation to detail the history of the procurement, which may vary depending on the procurement method used. As a part of the procurement process, the City should include procedures for ensuring a vendor is not excluded or disqualified from receiving Federal funds and maintain documentation the procedure was followed.
Condition and Context: ITCN filed the final amended report for grant no. 90CI010041-01 outside the required timeframe under the Head Start grant. ITCN also did not file Form SF-429(A), required by the Head Start program. Also, ITCN’s single audit reporting package for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021, was not submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within nine months after ITCN’s year-end. Criteria: According to 2 CFR §200.327, Financial Reporting, information must be collected with the frequency required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The grants require the filing of quarterly reports within 30 days after the quarter-end. Cause and Effect: The cause is the lack of resources and turnover in personnel at ITCN. The effect is the late filing of the quarterly reports and the annual single audit reporting package, and, for Head Start, not reporting the real property status on the Form SF-429(A). Recommendation: We recommend that ITCN devote the necessary resources to the financial reporting process and establish a system of monitoring for the filing of all required reporting and that the executive director review the monitoring list on a regular basis consistent with the timing of report filings. Management’s Response: ITCN’s responsible officials’ views and planned corrective action are in its corrective action plan at the end of the report.
Condition and Context: ITCN filed the final amended report for grant no. 90CI010041-01 outside the required timeframe under the Head Start grant. ITCN also did not file Form SF-429(A), required by the Head Start program. Also, ITCN’s single audit reporting package for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021, was not submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within nine months after ITCN’s year-end. Criteria: According to 2 CFR §200.327, Financial Reporting, information must be collected with the frequency required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The grants require the filing of quarterly reports within 30 days after the quarter-end. Cause and Effect: The cause is the lack of resources and turnover in personnel at ITCN. The effect is the late filing of the quarterly reports and the annual single audit reporting package, and, for Head Start, not reporting the real property status on the Form SF-429(A). Recommendation: We recommend that ITCN devote the necessary resources to the financial reporting process and establish a system of monitoring for the filing of all required reporting and that the executive director review the monitoring list on a regular basis consistent with the timing of report filings. Management’s Response: ITCN’s responsible officials’ views and planned corrective action are in its corrective action plan at the end of the report.
Condition and Context: ITCN filed the final amended report for grant no. 90CI010041-01 outside the required timeframe under the Head Start grant. ITCN also did not file Form SF-429(A), required by the Head Start program. Also, ITCN’s single audit reporting package for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021, was not submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within nine months after ITCN’s year-end. Criteria: According to 2 CFR §200.327, Financial Reporting, information must be collected with the frequency required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The grants require the filing of quarterly reports within 30 days after the quarter-end. Cause and Effect: The cause is the lack of resources and turnover in personnel at ITCN. The effect is the late filing of the quarterly reports and the annual single audit reporting package, and, for Head Start, not reporting the real property status on the Form SF-429(A). Recommendation: We recommend that ITCN devote the necessary resources to the financial reporting process and establish a system of monitoring for the filing of all required reporting and that the executive director review the monitoring list on a regular basis consistent with the timing of report filings. Management’s Response: ITCN’s responsible officials’ views and planned corrective action are in its corrective action plan at the end of the report.
Condition and Context: ITCN filed the final amended report for grant no. 90CI010041-01 outside the required timeframe under the Head Start grant. ITCN also did not file Form SF-429(A), required by the Head Start program. Also, ITCN’s single audit reporting package for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021, was not submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within nine months after ITCN’s year-end. Criteria: According to 2 CFR §200.327, Financial Reporting, information must be collected with the frequency required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The grants require the filing of quarterly reports within 30 days after the quarter-end. Cause and Effect: The cause is the lack of resources and turnover in personnel at ITCN. The effect is the late filing of the quarterly reports and the annual single audit reporting package, and, for Head Start, not reporting the real property status on the Form SF-429(A). Recommendation: We recommend that ITCN devote the necessary resources to the financial reporting process and establish a system of monitoring for the filing of all required reporting and that the executive director review the monitoring list on a regular basis consistent with the timing of report filings. Management’s Response: ITCN’s responsible officials’ views and planned corrective action are in its corrective action plan at the end of the report.
Condition and Context: ITCN filed the final amended report for grant no. 90CI010041-01 outside the required timeframe under the Head Start grant. ITCN also did not file Form SF-429(A), required by the Head Start program. Also, ITCN’s single audit reporting package for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021, was not submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within nine months after ITCN’s year-end. Criteria: According to 2 CFR §200.327, Financial Reporting, information must be collected with the frequency required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The grants require the filing of quarterly reports within 30 days after the quarter-end. Cause and Effect: The cause is the lack of resources and turnover in personnel at ITCN. The effect is the late filing of the quarterly reports and the annual single audit reporting package, and, for Head Start, not reporting the real property status on the Form SF-429(A). Recommendation: We recommend that ITCN devote the necessary resources to the financial reporting process and establish a system of monitoring for the filing of all required reporting and that the executive director review the monitoring list on a regular basis consistent with the timing of report filings. Management’s Response: ITCN’s responsible officials’ views and planned corrective action are in its corrective action plan at the end of the report.
Condition and Context: ITCN filed the final amended report for grant no. 90CI010041-01 outside the required timeframe under the Head Start grant. ITCN also did not file Form SF-429(A), required by the Head Start program. Also, ITCN’s single audit reporting package for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021, was not submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within nine months after ITCN’s year-end. Criteria: According to 2 CFR §200.327, Financial Reporting, information must be collected with the frequency required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The grants require the filing of quarterly reports within 30 days after the quarter-end. Cause and Effect: The cause is the lack of resources and turnover in personnel at ITCN. The effect is the late filing of the quarterly reports and the annual single audit reporting package, and, for Head Start, not reporting the real property status on the Form SF-429(A). Recommendation: We recommend that ITCN devote the necessary resources to the financial reporting process and establish a system of monitoring for the filing of all required reporting and that the executive director review the monitoring list on a regular basis consistent with the timing of report filings. Management’s Response: ITCN’s responsible officials’ views and planned corrective action are in its corrective action plan at the end of the report.
Condition and Context: ITCN filed the final amended report for grant no. 90CI010041-01 outside the required timeframe under the Head Start grant. ITCN also did not file Form SF-429(A), required by the Head Start program. Also, ITCN’s single audit reporting package for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021, was not submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within nine months after ITCN’s year-end. Criteria: According to 2 CFR §200.327, Financial Reporting, information must be collected with the frequency required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The grants require the filing of quarterly reports within 30 days after the quarter-end. Cause and Effect: The cause is the lack of resources and turnover in personnel at ITCN. The effect is the late filing of the quarterly reports and the annual single audit reporting package, and, for Head Start, not reporting the real property status on the Form SF-429(A). Recommendation: We recommend that ITCN devote the necessary resources to the financial reporting process and establish a system of monitoring for the filing of all required reporting and that the executive director review the monitoring list on a regular basis consistent with the timing of report filings. Management’s Response: ITCN’s responsible officials’ views and planned corrective action are in its corrective action plan at the end of the report.
Condition and Context: ITCN filed the final amended report for grant no. 90CI010041-01 outside the required timeframe under the Head Start grant. ITCN also did not file Form SF-429(A), required by the Head Start program. Also, ITCN’s single audit reporting package for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021, was not submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within nine months after ITCN’s year-end. Criteria: According to 2 CFR §200.327, Financial Reporting, information must be collected with the frequency required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The grants require the filing of quarterly reports within 30 days after the quarter-end. Cause and Effect: The cause is the lack of resources and turnover in personnel at ITCN. The effect is the late filing of the quarterly reports and the annual single audit reporting package, and, for Head Start, not reporting the real property status on the Form SF-429(A). Recommendation: We recommend that ITCN devote the necessary resources to the financial reporting process and establish a system of monitoring for the filing of all required reporting and that the executive director review the monitoring list on a regular basis consistent with the timing of report filings. Management’s Response: ITCN’s responsible officials’ views and planned corrective action are in its corrective action plan at the end of the report.
Condition and Context: ITCN filed the final amended report for grant no. 90CI010041-01 outside the required timeframe under the Head Start grant. ITCN also did not file Form SF-429(A), required by the Head Start program. Also, ITCN’s single audit reporting package for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021, was not submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within nine months after ITCN’s year-end. Criteria: According to 2 CFR §200.327, Financial Reporting, information must be collected with the frequency required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The grants require the filing of quarterly reports within 30 days after the quarter-end. Cause and Effect: The cause is the lack of resources and turnover in personnel at ITCN. The effect is the late filing of the quarterly reports and the annual single audit reporting package, and, for Head Start, not reporting the real property status on the Form SF-429(A). Recommendation: We recommend that ITCN devote the necessary resources to the financial reporting process and establish a system of monitoring for the filing of all required reporting and that the executive director review the monitoring list on a regular basis consistent with the timing of report filings. Management’s Response: ITCN’s responsible officials’ views and planned corrective action are in its corrective action plan at the end of the report.
Condition and Context: ITCN filed the final amended report for grant no. 90CI010041-01 outside the required timeframe under the Head Start grant. ITCN also did not file Form SF-429(A), required by the Head Start program. Also, ITCN’s single audit reporting package for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021, was not submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within nine months after ITCN’s year-end. Criteria: According to 2 CFR §200.327, Financial Reporting, information must be collected with the frequency required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The grants require the filing of quarterly reports within 30 days after the quarter-end. Cause and Effect: The cause is the lack of resources and turnover in personnel at ITCN. The effect is the late filing of the quarterly reports and the annual single audit reporting package, and, for Head Start, not reporting the real property status on the Form SF-429(A). Recommendation: We recommend that ITCN devote the necessary resources to the financial reporting process and establish a system of monitoring for the filing of all required reporting and that the executive director review the monitoring list on a regular basis consistent with the timing of report filings. Management’s Response: ITCN’s responsible officials’ views and planned corrective action are in its corrective action plan at the end of the report.
CLAYTON COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES AUTHORITY, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Financial Statement Findings and Questioned Costs June 30, 2021 Comment #2021-001 INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL STATEMENT PREPARATION, PROPER APPROVAL OF DISBURSEMENTS, GRANT CLOSE-OUT PROCEDURES AND REQUIRED REGULATORY REPORTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES SHOULD IMPROVED GENERAL (Repeat Finding) As part of our auditing procedures, we assisted in the preparation of the financial statements, related disclosures, and the schedule of expenditures of federal awards of the Authority. The preparation of these financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, is the responsibility of the grantee. The authoritative and regulatory standards state in summary, that management should authorize, process, reconcile and close-out each grant and contract in a timely manner to ensure proper accounting and reporting of such activity in accordance with the specific professional standards and regulatory requirements. The closeout process is designed to help to reduce the risk of errors, fraud, material misstatement of financial and compliance reporting and recognition of expenditures (or revenue) in the proper period. We noted that the current system of internal controls over financial statements and compliance is not designed to ensure that the objectives are achieved. Further, the capacity of the current staff does not allow for adequate analysis of grants and contracts, other internal shared costs and support services provided, grantor receivables, deferred revenue, allocation of indirect costs and the reconciliation of bank accounts accurately and in a timely manner. Various regulatory reports were not filed accurately and in a timely manner (i.e., SF-425's for the Head Start Programs and DHS’s State budget reports for the LIHEAP programs). Specifically, revenue was recorded in excess of expenditures for the LIHEAP programs. Therefore, the risk exists that grant receivables and/or cash from the various programs are not recorded properly during the reporting period (interim and annually), which is consistent with our audit findings for the year ended June 30, 2020. The systemic cause appears to be a lack of personnel with the skills, knowledge, and experience with grant accounting and a weakness in the overall system of accounting controls, monitoring and policies and procedures not followed consistently. Context: Review of internal control structure of the organization in accordance with Government Auditing Standards. Criteria: Controls should be in place to ensure that financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. The auditee shall prepare financial statements that reflect its financial position, results of operations or changes in net assets, and, where appropriate, cash flows for the fiscal year audited. The auditee shall also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements. [2 CFR §200.510(a) and (b)] Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§200.327 Financial reporting and 200.328 Monitoring and reporting program performance. [2 CFR §200.302(b)(2)] Effect: Management may not be able to obtain complete and accurate financial statements on an interim or fiscal year basis to be used for internal or external reporting purposes. Cause: Limited personnel with knowledge and/or the ability to assist and provide needed information to aid in financial statement preparation. The implementation of a new accounting system without an adequate close-out of the old system. Recommendation: The degree to which the preparation of the financial statements and related disclosures are prepared by the independent auditor is a control deficiency is determined by the knowledge, skills and experience of those in the organization who are charged with the responsibility of its financial reporting. The Authority has a chief financial officer (CFO) and should hire additional staff (grant accountant and a general ledger accountant) to assist the new fiscal officer. The workload on the CFO is overwhelming. New staff hired should have the adequate skills, knowledge and experience to oversee and/or perform the necessary accounting functions each month. We believe that the CFO with the grant accountant and general ledger accountant should have the overall responsibility of properly reconciling and closing out the accounting system and grant activity each month in an efficient and timely manner so as to eliminate the risk of significant errors occurring. Budget-to-actual schedules should be an integral part of the grant accountant’s basic responsibilities. We further recommend that training be provided to all staff engaged in the financial reporting, allocation and reconciliation functions to ensure that a complete and accurate financial statements close-out process is achieved each month and annually. New policies and procedures should be established that conforms to the Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The management of Clayton County Community Services Authority, Inc. has reviewed the above referenced finding and fully agrees with the need for improved internal controls over financial statement preparation. Management believes that the proper approval of disbursements was adhered to during the reporting period with minimal deviation and continues to ensure proper policies are followed. Federal reports (SF425’s, LIHEAP) were filed during this period and may not have been properly reviewed during the course of this audit. For example, the LIHEAP reports were reconciled with the assistance of the State Program Specialist to ensure proper return of funds as requested by the funding agency. Management reserves the right to discuss this further as needed for the purpose of this finding. Adequate fiscal personnel staff has continued to be a challenge for the agency as management has done an exhaustive search for additional fiscal personnel and made job offers to qualified individuals only to have them decline the offer at the last moment. We have just offered the position of General Ledger Accountant to an individual and they are expected to start in two weeks. This will assist the CFO in the area of financial controls and reporting. It should also be noted that all bank reconciliations are current and being completed in a timely manner as dictated by our policies and procedures. Management continues to ensure all federal, state, and local and local regulatory reports and completed and submitted in a timely manner. As stated previously, the CFO worked directly with the State LIHEAP Program Staff to ensure proper reporting and reconciliation before returning unused funds.
CLAYTON COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES AUTHORITY, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Financial Statement Findings and Questioned Costs June 30, 2021 Comment #2021-001 INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL STATEMENT PREPARATION, PROPER APPROVAL OF DISBURSEMENTS, GRANT CLOSE-OUT PROCEDURES AND REQUIRED REGULATORY REPORTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES SHOULD IMPROVED GENERAL (Repeat Finding) As part of our auditing procedures, we assisted in the preparation of the financial statements, related disclosures, and the schedule of expenditures of federal awards of the Authority. The preparation of these financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, is the responsibility of the grantee. The authoritative and regulatory standards state in summary, that management should authorize, process, reconcile and close-out each grant and contract in a timely manner to ensure proper accounting and reporting of such activity in accordance with the specific professional standards and regulatory requirements. The closeout process is designed to help to reduce the risk of errors, fraud, material misstatement of financial and compliance reporting and recognition of expenditures (or revenue) in the proper period. We noted that the current system of internal controls over financial statements and compliance is not designed to ensure that the objectives are achieved. Further, the capacity of the current staff does not allow for adequate analysis of grants and contracts, other internal shared costs and support services provided, grantor receivables, deferred revenue, allocation of indirect costs and the reconciliation of bank accounts accurately and in a timely manner. Various regulatory reports were not filed accurately and in a timely manner (i.e., SF-425's for the Head Start Programs and DHS’s State budget reports for the LIHEAP programs). Specifically, revenue was recorded in excess of expenditures for the LIHEAP programs. Therefore, the risk exists that grant receivables and/or cash from the various programs are not recorded properly during the reporting period (interim and annually), which is consistent with our audit findings for the year ended June 30, 2020. The systemic cause appears to be a lack of personnel with the skills, knowledge, and experience with grant accounting and a weakness in the overall system of accounting controls, monitoring and policies and procedures not followed consistently. Context: Review of internal control structure of the organization in accordance with Government Auditing Standards. Criteria: Controls should be in place to ensure that financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. The auditee shall prepare financial statements that reflect its financial position, results of operations or changes in net assets, and, where appropriate, cash flows for the fiscal year audited. The auditee shall also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements. [2 CFR §200.510(a) and (b)] Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§200.327 Financial reporting and 200.328 Monitoring and reporting program performance. [2 CFR §200.302(b)(2)] Effect: Management may not be able to obtain complete and accurate financial statements on an interim or fiscal year basis to be used for internal or external reporting purposes. Cause: Limited personnel with knowledge and/or the ability to assist and provide needed information to aid in financial statement preparation. The implementation of a new accounting system without an adequate close-out of the old system. Recommendation: The degree to which the preparation of the financial statements and related disclosures are prepared by the independent auditor is a control deficiency is determined by the knowledge, skills and experience of those in the organization who are charged with the responsibility of its financial reporting. The Authority has a chief financial officer (CFO) and should hire additional staff (grant accountant and a general ledger accountant) to assist the new fiscal officer. The workload on the CFO is overwhelming. New staff hired should have the adequate skills, knowledge and experience to oversee and/or perform the necessary accounting functions each month. We believe that the CFO with the grant accountant and general ledger accountant should have the overall responsibility of properly reconciling and closing out the accounting system and grant activity each month in an efficient and timely manner so as to eliminate the risk of significant errors occurring. Budget-to-actual schedules should be an integral part of the grant accountant’s basic responsibilities. We further recommend that training be provided to all staff engaged in the financial reporting, allocation and reconciliation functions to ensure that a complete and accurate financial statements close-out process is achieved each month and annually. New policies and procedures should be established that conforms to the Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The management of Clayton County Community Services Authority, Inc. has reviewed the above referenced finding and fully agrees with the need for improved internal controls over financial statement preparation. Management believes that the proper approval of disbursements was adhered to during the reporting period with minimal deviation and continues to ensure proper policies are followed. Federal reports (SF425’s, LIHEAP) were filed during this period and may not have been properly reviewed during the course of this audit. For example, the LIHEAP reports were reconciled with the assistance of the State Program Specialist to ensure proper return of funds as requested by the funding agency. Management reserves the right to discuss this further as needed for the purpose of this finding. Adequate fiscal personnel staff has continued to be a challenge for the agency as management has done an exhaustive search for additional fiscal personnel and made job offers to qualified individuals only to have them decline the offer at the last moment. We have just offered the position of General Ledger Accountant to an individual and they are expected to start in two weeks. This will assist the CFO in the area of financial controls and reporting. It should also be noted that all bank reconciliations are current and being completed in a timely manner as dictated by our policies and procedures. Management continues to ensure all federal, state, and local and local regulatory reports and completed and submitted in a timely manner. As stated previously, the CFO worked directly with the State LIHEAP Program Staff to ensure proper reporting and reconciliation before returning unused funds.
CLAYTON COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES AUTHORITY, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs June 30, 2021 Comment # 2021-005 INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER DISBURSEMENTS OF FEDERAL FUNDS MUST BE IMPROVED HEAD START AND EARLY HEAD START PROGRAMS Federal Assistance Listing # 93.600 (Questioned Costs - Undetermined) Condition: In connection with audit of the Authority, we performed risk assessment of the Authority’s significant financial transactions, material account balances, and other significant risk areas and each applicable relevant assertion of each area, and we designed and perform substantive procedures and test of internal controls to determine what level of reliance that could be placed on the system of internal control of the Authority. Using auditor’s judgment, we selected various transactions for testings the system of internal control and the appropriateness and reasonableness of the expenditures. During our audit, we performed the following procedures: We selected twenty- five (25) transactions using auditor’s judgement with the following exceptions noted as respects to the Head Start and Early Head Start Programs: 1. There were fifteen (15) transactions with missing check request documents and\or purchase orders to support the disbursements. 2 Four (4) transactions with only one signature on the cancelled checks. 3. There were fourteen (14) transactions missing evidence of support as required by the procurement policies and procedures of the Authority. 4. There was one (1) transaction for the purchase of a truck that was not in agreement with bid documentation provided by the Authority. Further, we noted no specific authorization of such transaction in the notice of award for the purchase during the budget period of the acquisition. We selected fifteen (15) transactions using auditor’s judgement with the following exceptions noted as respect to the indirect cost pool: 1. There were fourteen (14) transactions with missing check request documents and\or purchase orders to support the disbursements. 2 Two (2) transactions with only one signature on the cancelled checks. 3. There were one (1) transactions missing evidence of support as required by the procurement policies and procedures of the Authority. The aforementioned exceptions were not resolved as of the date the audit report, September 8, 2023. Context: We selected 25 transactions haphazardly from the disbursement records of the Head Start and Early Head Start Programs. We selected 15 transactions haphazardly from the disbursement records of the indirect cost pool Criteria: Internal policy of the Authority, generally accepted accounting principles, Government Auditing Standards and the Uniform Guidance. The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of the Uniform Guidance (UG), 2 CFR §200.318 General procurement standards for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR §200.317 through 200.327. Effect: The transaction could result in cost not allowed under federal and state regulations and the provisions of the grant agreement. Cause: The failure of the Authority to follow its written procurement policies and procedures and to update the existing procedures to conform to federal and state laws. Management and the board of directors must have proper oversight and governance of the purchase and procurement procedures. Recommendation: We recommend that the board of directors and management immediately review all the transactions outlined in this finding and determine if the exceptions noted can be resolved and corrected. Further action should be taken to prevent, eliminate and properly remediate other exceptions similar in nature as those described in this finding. Policies and procedures should be reviewed and updated to conform to 2 CFR §200.318 General procurement standards. The Authority should add additional staff with the proper accounting skills, knowledge and experience with grant accounting. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The management of Clayton County Community Services Authority, Inc. has reviewed the above referenced finding and takes exception to several of the items listed. For example, some of the transactions listed that were missing check requests (both Head Start/Early Head Start and Indirect Cost Pool) were for monthly expenditures like utility bills, insurance, rent and other contractual obligations. Management has not in the past issued a check request each month for these transactions as they are part of the ongoing operation of the programs listed. Transactions listed with only one signature occurred as an oversight as the banking authority only requires one signature while our policy may indicate two signatures. Management feels the purchase of the truck was procured in agreement with approvals from the funding agency and board as required. Proper documentation was provided and is currently available for further review. Management continues to follow the proper guidelines regarding procurement and purchases related to the policies and procedures of the agency as well as micro purchase guidelines set forth by the Federal awarding agency. The Board of Directors also approved a revision to the policies and procedures requiring two “live” signatures on all checks issued by the agency. There is also an ongoing review of the current policies and procedures and recommendations for changes and updates are forthcoming. Management reserves the right for further review of these findings with the audit firm for additional documentation and resolution.
CLAYTON COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES AUTHORITY, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs June 30, 2021 Comment # 2021-005 INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER DISBURSEMENTS OF FEDERAL FUNDS MUST BE IMPROVED HEAD START AND EARLY HEAD START PROGRAMS Federal Assistance Listing # 93.600 (Questioned Costs - Undetermined) Condition: In connection with audit of the Authority, we performed risk assessment of the Authority’s significant financial transactions, material account balances, and other significant risk areas and each applicable relevant assertion of each area, and we designed and perform substantive procedures and test of internal controls to determine what level of reliance that could be placed on the system of internal control of the Authority. Using auditor’s judgment, we selected various transactions for testings the system of internal control and the appropriateness and reasonableness of the expenditures. During our audit, we performed the following procedures: We selected twenty- five (25) transactions using auditor’s judgement with the following exceptions noted as respects to the Head Start and Early Head Start Programs: 1. There were fifteen (15) transactions with missing check request documents and\or purchase orders to support the disbursements. 2 Four (4) transactions with only one signature on the cancelled checks. 3. There were fourteen (14) transactions missing evidence of support as required by the procurement policies and procedures of the Authority. 4. There was one (1) transaction for the purchase of a truck that was not in agreement with bid documentation provided by the Authority. Further, we noted no specific authorization of such transaction in the notice of award for the purchase during the budget period of the acquisition. We selected fifteen (15) transactions using auditor’s judgement with the following exceptions noted as respect to the indirect cost pool: 1. There were fourteen (14) transactions with missing check request documents and\or purchase orders to support the disbursements. 2 Two (2) transactions with only one signature on the cancelled checks. 3. There were one (1) transactions missing evidence of support as required by the procurement policies and procedures of the Authority. The aforementioned exceptions were not resolved as of the date the audit report, September 8, 2023. Context: We selected 25 transactions haphazardly from the disbursement records of the Head Start and Early Head Start Programs. We selected 15 transactions haphazardly from the disbursement records of the indirect cost pool Criteria: Internal policy of the Authority, generally accepted accounting principles, Government Auditing Standards and the Uniform Guidance. The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of the Uniform Guidance (UG), 2 CFR §200.318 General procurement standards for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR §200.317 through 200.327. Effect: The transaction could result in cost not allowed under federal and state regulations and the provisions of the grant agreement. Cause: The failure of the Authority to follow its written procurement policies and procedures and to update the existing procedures to conform to federal and state laws. Management and the board of directors must have proper oversight and governance of the purchase and procurement procedures. Recommendation: We recommend that the board of directors and management immediately review all the transactions outlined in this finding and determine if the exceptions noted can be resolved and corrected. Further action should be taken to prevent, eliminate and properly remediate other exceptions similar in nature as those described in this finding. Policies and procedures should be reviewed and updated to conform to 2 CFR §200.318 General procurement standards. The Authority should add additional staff with the proper accounting skills, knowledge and experience with grant accounting. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The management of Clayton County Community Services Authority, Inc. has reviewed the above referenced finding and takes exception to several of the items listed. For example, some of the transactions listed that were missing check requests (both Head Start/Early Head Start and Indirect Cost Pool) were for monthly expenditures like utility bills, insurance, rent and other contractual obligations. Management has not in the past issued a check request each month for these transactions as they are part of the ongoing operation of the programs listed. Transactions listed with only one signature occurred as an oversight as the banking authority only requires one signature while our policy may indicate two signatures. Management feels the purchase of the truck was procured in agreement with approvals from the funding agency and board as required. Proper documentation was provided and is currently available for further review. Management continues to follow the proper guidelines regarding procurement and purchases related to the policies and procedures of the agency as well as micro purchase guidelines set forth by the Federal awarding agency. The Board of Directors also approved a revision to the policies and procedures requiring two “live” signatures on all checks issued by the agency. There is also an ongoing review of the current policies and procedures and recommendations for changes and updates are forthcoming. Management reserves the right for further review of these findings with the audit firm for additional documentation and resolution.
CLAYTON COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES AUTHORITY, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Financial Statement Findings and Questioned Costs June 30, 2021 Comment #2021-001 INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL STATEMENT PREPARATION, PROPER APPROVAL OF DISBURSEMENTS, GRANT CLOSE-OUT PROCEDURES AND REQUIRED REGULATORY REPORTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES SHOULD IMPROVED GENERAL (Repeat Finding) As part of our auditing procedures, we assisted in the preparation of the financial statements, related disclosures, and the schedule of expenditures of federal awards of the Authority. The preparation of these financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, is the responsibility of the grantee. The authoritative and regulatory standards state in summary, that management should authorize, process, reconcile and close-out each grant and contract in a timely manner to ensure proper accounting and reporting of such activity in accordance with the specific professional standards and regulatory requirements. The closeout process is designed to help to reduce the risk of errors, fraud, material misstatement of financial and compliance reporting and recognition of expenditures (or revenue) in the proper period. We noted that the current system of internal controls over financial statements and compliance is not designed to ensure that the objectives are achieved. Further, the capacity of the current staff does not allow for adequate analysis of grants and contracts, other internal shared costs and support services provided, grantor receivables, deferred revenue, allocation of indirect costs and the reconciliation of bank accounts accurately and in a timely manner. Various regulatory reports were not filed accurately and in a timely manner (i.e., SF-425's for the Head Start Programs and DHS’s State budget reports for the LIHEAP programs). Specifically, revenue was recorded in excess of expenditures for the LIHEAP programs. Therefore, the risk exists that grant receivables and/or cash from the various programs are not recorded properly during the reporting period (interim and annually), which is consistent with our audit findings for the year ended June 30, 2020. The systemic cause appears to be a lack of personnel with the skills, knowledge, and experience with grant accounting and a weakness in the overall system of accounting controls, monitoring and policies and procedures not followed consistently. Context: Review of internal control structure of the organization in accordance with Government Auditing Standards. Criteria: Controls should be in place to ensure that financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. The auditee shall prepare financial statements that reflect its financial position, results of operations or changes in net assets, and, where appropriate, cash flows for the fiscal year audited. The auditee shall also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements. [2 CFR §200.510(a) and (b)] Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§200.327 Financial reporting and 200.328 Monitoring and reporting program performance. [2 CFR §200.302(b)(2)] Effect: Management may not be able to obtain complete and accurate financial statements on an interim or fiscal year basis to be used for internal or external reporting purposes. Cause: Limited personnel with knowledge and/or the ability to assist and provide needed information to aid in financial statement preparation. The implementation of a new accounting system without an adequate close-out of the old system. Recommendation: The degree to which the preparation of the financial statements and related disclosures are prepared by the independent auditor is a control deficiency is determined by the knowledge, skills and experience of those in the organization who are charged with the responsibility of its financial reporting. The Authority has a chief financial officer (CFO) and should hire additional staff (grant accountant and a general ledger accountant) to assist the new fiscal officer. The workload on the CFO is overwhelming. New staff hired should have the adequate skills, knowledge and experience to oversee and/or perform the necessary accounting functions each month. We believe that the CFO with the grant accountant and general ledger accountant should have the overall responsibility of properly reconciling and closing out the accounting system and grant activity each month in an efficient and timely manner so as to eliminate the risk of significant errors occurring. Budget-to-actual schedules should be an integral part of the grant accountant’s basic responsibilities. We further recommend that training be provided to all staff engaged in the financial reporting, allocation and reconciliation functions to ensure that a complete and accurate financial statements close-out process is achieved each month and annually. New policies and procedures should be established that conforms to the Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The management of Clayton County Community Services Authority, Inc. has reviewed the above referenced finding and fully agrees with the need for improved internal controls over financial statement preparation. Management believes that the proper approval of disbursements was adhered to during the reporting period with minimal deviation and continues to ensure proper policies are followed. Federal reports (SF425’s, LIHEAP) were filed during this period and may not have been properly reviewed during the course of this audit. For example, the LIHEAP reports were reconciled with the assistance of the State Program Specialist to ensure proper return of funds as requested by the funding agency. Management reserves the right to discuss this further as needed for the purpose of this finding. Adequate fiscal personnel staff has continued to be a challenge for the agency as management has done an exhaustive search for additional fiscal personnel and made job offers to qualified individuals only to have them decline the offer at the last moment. We have just offered the position of General Ledger Accountant to an individual and they are expected to start in two weeks. This will assist the CFO in the area of financial controls and reporting. It should also be noted that all bank reconciliations are current and being completed in a timely manner as dictated by our policies and procedures. Management continues to ensure all federal, state, and local and local regulatory reports and completed and submitted in a timely manner. As stated previously, the CFO worked directly with the State LIHEAP Program Staff to ensure proper reporting and reconciliation before returning unused funds.
CLAYTON COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES AUTHORITY, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Financial Statement Findings and Questioned Costs June 30, 2021 Comment #2021-001 INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL STATEMENT PREPARATION, PROPER APPROVAL OF DISBURSEMENTS, GRANT CLOSE-OUT PROCEDURES AND REQUIRED REGULATORY REPORTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES SHOULD IMPROVED GENERAL (Repeat Finding) As part of our auditing procedures, we assisted in the preparation of the financial statements, related disclosures, and the schedule of expenditures of federal awards of the Authority. The preparation of these financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, is the responsibility of the grantee. The authoritative and regulatory standards state in summary, that management should authorize, process, reconcile and close-out each grant and contract in a timely manner to ensure proper accounting and reporting of such activity in accordance with the specific professional standards and regulatory requirements. The closeout process is designed to help to reduce the risk of errors, fraud, material misstatement of financial and compliance reporting and recognition of expenditures (or revenue) in the proper period. We noted that the current system of internal controls over financial statements and compliance is not designed to ensure that the objectives are achieved. Further, the capacity of the current staff does not allow for adequate analysis of grants and contracts, other internal shared costs and support services provided, grantor receivables, deferred revenue, allocation of indirect costs and the reconciliation of bank accounts accurately and in a timely manner. Various regulatory reports were not filed accurately and in a timely manner (i.e., SF-425's for the Head Start Programs and DHS’s State budget reports for the LIHEAP programs). Specifically, revenue was recorded in excess of expenditures for the LIHEAP programs. Therefore, the risk exists that grant receivables and/or cash from the various programs are not recorded properly during the reporting period (interim and annually), which is consistent with our audit findings for the year ended June 30, 2020. The systemic cause appears to be a lack of personnel with the skills, knowledge, and experience with grant accounting and a weakness in the overall system of accounting controls, monitoring and policies and procedures not followed consistently. Context: Review of internal control structure of the organization in accordance with Government Auditing Standards. Criteria: Controls should be in place to ensure that financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. The auditee shall prepare financial statements that reflect its financial position, results of operations or changes in net assets, and, where appropriate, cash flows for the fiscal year audited. The auditee shall also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements. [2 CFR §200.510(a) and (b)] Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§200.327 Financial reporting and 200.328 Monitoring and reporting program performance. [2 CFR §200.302(b)(2)] Effect: Management may not be able to obtain complete and accurate financial statements on an interim or fiscal year basis to be used for internal or external reporting purposes. Cause: Limited personnel with knowledge and/or the ability to assist and provide needed information to aid in financial statement preparation. The implementation of a new accounting system without an adequate close-out of the old system. Recommendation: The degree to which the preparation of the financial statements and related disclosures are prepared by the independent auditor is a control deficiency is determined by the knowledge, skills and experience of those in the organization who are charged with the responsibility of its financial reporting. The Authority has a chief financial officer (CFO) and should hire additional staff (grant accountant and a general ledger accountant) to assist the new fiscal officer. The workload on the CFO is overwhelming. New staff hired should have the adequate skills, knowledge and experience to oversee and/or perform the necessary accounting functions each month. We believe that the CFO with the grant accountant and general ledger accountant should have the overall responsibility of properly reconciling and closing out the accounting system and grant activity each month in an efficient and timely manner so as to eliminate the risk of significant errors occurring. Budget-to-actual schedules should be an integral part of the grant accountant’s basic responsibilities. We further recommend that training be provided to all staff engaged in the financial reporting, allocation and reconciliation functions to ensure that a complete and accurate financial statements close-out process is achieved each month and annually. New policies and procedures should be established that conforms to the Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The management of Clayton County Community Services Authority, Inc. has reviewed the above referenced finding and fully agrees with the need for improved internal controls over financial statement preparation. Management believes that the proper approval of disbursements was adhered to during the reporting period with minimal deviation and continues to ensure proper policies are followed. Federal reports (SF425’s, LIHEAP) were filed during this period and may not have been properly reviewed during the course of this audit. For example, the LIHEAP reports were reconciled with the assistance of the State Program Specialist to ensure proper return of funds as requested by the funding agency. Management reserves the right to discuss this further as needed for the purpose of this finding. Adequate fiscal personnel staff has continued to be a challenge for the agency as management has done an exhaustive search for additional fiscal personnel and made job offers to qualified individuals only to have them decline the offer at the last moment. We have just offered the position of General Ledger Accountant to an individual and they are expected to start in two weeks. This will assist the CFO in the area of financial controls and reporting. It should also be noted that all bank reconciliations are current and being completed in a timely manner as dictated by our policies and procedures. Management continues to ensure all federal, state, and local and local regulatory reports and completed and submitted in a timely manner. As stated previously, the CFO worked directly with the State LIHEAP Program Staff to ensure proper reporting and reconciliation before returning unused funds.
CLAYTON COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES AUTHORITY, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Financial Statement Findings and Questioned Costs June 30, 2021 Comment #2021-001 INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL STATEMENT PREPARATION, PROPER APPROVAL OF DISBURSEMENTS, GRANT CLOSE-OUT PROCEDURES AND REQUIRED REGULATORY REPORTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES SHOULD IMPROVED GENERAL (Repeat Finding) As part of our auditing procedures, we assisted in the preparation of the financial statements, related disclosures, and the schedule of expenditures of federal awards of the Authority. The preparation of these financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, is the responsibility of the grantee. The authoritative and regulatory standards state in summary, that management should authorize, process, reconcile and close-out each grant and contract in a timely manner to ensure proper accounting and reporting of such activity in accordance with the specific professional standards and regulatory requirements. The closeout process is designed to help to reduce the risk of errors, fraud, material misstatement of financial and compliance reporting and recognition of expenditures (or revenue) in the proper period. We noted that the current system of internal controls over financial statements and compliance is not designed to ensure that the objectives are achieved. Further, the capacity of the current staff does not allow for adequate analysis of grants and contracts, other internal shared costs and support services provided, grantor receivables, deferred revenue, allocation of indirect costs and the reconciliation of bank accounts accurately and in a timely manner. Various regulatory reports were not filed accurately and in a timely manner (i.e., SF-425's for the Head Start Programs and DHS’s State budget reports for the LIHEAP programs). Specifically, revenue was recorded in excess of expenditures for the LIHEAP programs. Therefore, the risk exists that grant receivables and/or cash from the various programs are not recorded properly during the reporting period (interim and annually), which is consistent with our audit findings for the year ended June 30, 2020. The systemic cause appears to be a lack of personnel with the skills, knowledge, and experience with grant accounting and a weakness in the overall system of accounting controls, monitoring and policies and procedures not followed consistently. Context: Review of internal control structure of the organization in accordance with Government Auditing Standards. Criteria: Controls should be in place to ensure that financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. The auditee shall prepare financial statements that reflect its financial position, results of operations or changes in net assets, and, where appropriate, cash flows for the fiscal year audited. The auditee shall also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements. [2 CFR §200.510(a) and (b)] Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§200.327 Financial reporting and 200.328 Monitoring and reporting program performance. [2 CFR §200.302(b)(2)] Effect: Management may not be able to obtain complete and accurate financial statements on an interim or fiscal year basis to be used for internal or external reporting purposes. Cause: Limited personnel with knowledge and/or the ability to assist and provide needed information to aid in financial statement preparation. The implementation of a new accounting system without an adequate close-out of the old system. Recommendation: The degree to which the preparation of the financial statements and related disclosures are prepared by the independent auditor is a control deficiency is determined by the knowledge, skills and experience of those in the organization who are charged with the responsibility of its financial reporting. The Authority has a chief financial officer (CFO) and should hire additional staff (grant accountant and a general ledger accountant) to assist the new fiscal officer. The workload on the CFO is overwhelming. New staff hired should have the adequate skills, knowledge and experience to oversee and/or perform the necessary accounting functions each month. We believe that the CFO with the grant accountant and general ledger accountant should have the overall responsibility of properly reconciling and closing out the accounting system and grant activity each month in an efficient and timely manner so as to eliminate the risk of significant errors occurring. Budget-to-actual schedules should be an integral part of the grant accountant’s basic responsibilities. We further recommend that training be provided to all staff engaged in the financial reporting, allocation and reconciliation functions to ensure that a complete and accurate financial statements close-out process is achieved each month and annually. New policies and procedures should be established that conforms to the Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The management of Clayton County Community Services Authority, Inc. has reviewed the above referenced finding and fully agrees with the need for improved internal controls over financial statement preparation. Management believes that the proper approval of disbursements was adhered to during the reporting period with minimal deviation and continues to ensure proper policies are followed. Federal reports (SF425’s, LIHEAP) were filed during this period and may not have been properly reviewed during the course of this audit. For example, the LIHEAP reports were reconciled with the assistance of the State Program Specialist to ensure proper return of funds as requested by the funding agency. Management reserves the right to discuss this further as needed for the purpose of this finding. Adequate fiscal personnel staff has continued to be a challenge for the agency as management has done an exhaustive search for additional fiscal personnel and made job offers to qualified individuals only to have them decline the offer at the last moment. We have just offered the position of General Ledger Accountant to an individual and they are expected to start in two weeks. This will assist the CFO in the area of financial controls and reporting. It should also be noted that all bank reconciliations are current and being completed in a timely manner as dictated by our policies and procedures. Management continues to ensure all federal, state, and local and local regulatory reports and completed and submitted in a timely manner. As stated previously, the CFO worked directly with the State LIHEAP Program Staff to ensure proper reporting and reconciliation before returning unused funds.
CLAYTON COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES AUTHORITY, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Financial Statement Findings and Questioned Costs June 30, 2021 Comment #2021-001 INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL STATEMENT PREPARATION, PROPER APPROVAL OF DISBURSEMENTS, GRANT CLOSE-OUT PROCEDURES AND REQUIRED REGULATORY REPORTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES SHOULD IMPROVED GENERAL (Repeat Finding) As part of our auditing procedures, we assisted in the preparation of the financial statements, related disclosures, and the schedule of expenditures of federal awards of the Authority. The preparation of these financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, is the responsibility of the grantee. The authoritative and regulatory standards state in summary, that management should authorize, process, reconcile and close-out each grant and contract in a timely manner to ensure proper accounting and reporting of such activity in accordance with the specific professional standards and regulatory requirements. The closeout process is designed to help to reduce the risk of errors, fraud, material misstatement of financial and compliance reporting and recognition of expenditures (or revenue) in the proper period. We noted that the current system of internal controls over financial statements and compliance is not designed to ensure that the objectives are achieved. Further, the capacity of the current staff does not allow for adequate analysis of grants and contracts, other internal shared costs and support services provided, grantor receivables, deferred revenue, allocation of indirect costs and the reconciliation of bank accounts accurately and in a timely manner. Various regulatory reports were not filed accurately and in a timely manner (i.e., SF-425's for the Head Start Programs and DHS’s State budget reports for the LIHEAP programs). Specifically, revenue was recorded in excess of expenditures for the LIHEAP programs. Therefore, the risk exists that grant receivables and/or cash from the various programs are not recorded properly during the reporting period (interim and annually), which is consistent with our audit findings for the year ended June 30, 2020. The systemic cause appears to be a lack of personnel with the skills, knowledge, and experience with grant accounting and a weakness in the overall system of accounting controls, monitoring and policies and procedures not followed consistently. Context: Review of internal control structure of the organization in accordance with Government Auditing Standards. Criteria: Controls should be in place to ensure that financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. The auditee shall prepare financial statements that reflect its financial position, results of operations or changes in net assets, and, where appropriate, cash flows for the fiscal year audited. The auditee shall also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements. [2 CFR §200.510(a) and (b)] Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§200.327 Financial reporting and 200.328 Monitoring and reporting program performance. [2 CFR §200.302(b)(2)] Effect: Management may not be able to obtain complete and accurate financial statements on an interim or fiscal year basis to be used for internal or external reporting purposes. Cause: Limited personnel with knowledge and/or the ability to assist and provide needed information to aid in financial statement preparation. The implementation of a new accounting system without an adequate close-out of the old system. Recommendation: The degree to which the preparation of the financial statements and related disclosures are prepared by the independent auditor is a control deficiency is determined by the knowledge, skills and experience of those in the organization who are charged with the responsibility of its financial reporting. The Authority has a chief financial officer (CFO) and should hire additional staff (grant accountant and a general ledger accountant) to assist the new fiscal officer. The workload on the CFO is overwhelming. New staff hired should have the adequate skills, knowledge and experience to oversee and/or perform the necessary accounting functions each month. We believe that the CFO with the grant accountant and general ledger accountant should have the overall responsibility of properly reconciling and closing out the accounting system and grant activity each month in an efficient and timely manner so as to eliminate the risk of significant errors occurring. Budget-to-actual schedules should be an integral part of the grant accountant’s basic responsibilities. We further recommend that training be provided to all staff engaged in the financial reporting, allocation and reconciliation functions to ensure that a complete and accurate financial statements close-out process is achieved each month and annually. New policies and procedures should be established that conforms to the Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The management of Clayton County Community Services Authority, Inc. has reviewed the above referenced finding and fully agrees with the need for improved internal controls over financial statement preparation. Management believes that the proper approval of disbursements was adhered to during the reporting period with minimal deviation and continues to ensure proper policies are followed. Federal reports (SF425’s, LIHEAP) were filed during this period and may not have been properly reviewed during the course of this audit. For example, the LIHEAP reports were reconciled with the assistance of the State Program Specialist to ensure proper return of funds as requested by the funding agency. Management reserves the right to discuss this further as needed for the purpose of this finding. Adequate fiscal personnel staff has continued to be a challenge for the agency as management has done an exhaustive search for additional fiscal personnel and made job offers to qualified individuals only to have them decline the offer at the last moment. We have just offered the position of General Ledger Accountant to an individual and they are expected to start in two weeks. This will assist the CFO in the area of financial controls and reporting. It should also be noted that all bank reconciliations are current and being completed in a timely manner as dictated by our policies and procedures. Management continues to ensure all federal, state, and local and local regulatory reports and completed and submitted in a timely manner. As stated previously, the CFO worked directly with the State LIHEAP Program Staff to ensure proper reporting and reconciliation before returning unused funds.
CLAYTON COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES AUTHORITY, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Financial Statement Findings and Questioned Costs June 30, 2021 Comment #2021-001 INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL STATEMENT PREPARATION, PROPER APPROVAL OF DISBURSEMENTS, GRANT CLOSE-OUT PROCEDURES AND REQUIRED REGULATORY REPORTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES SHOULD IMPROVED GENERAL (Repeat Finding) As part of our auditing procedures, we assisted in the preparation of the financial statements, related disclosures, and the schedule of expenditures of federal awards of the Authority. The preparation of these financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, is the responsibility of the grantee. The authoritative and regulatory standards state in summary, that management should authorize, process, reconcile and close-out each grant and contract in a timely manner to ensure proper accounting and reporting of such activity in accordance with the specific professional standards and regulatory requirements. The closeout process is designed to help to reduce the risk of errors, fraud, material misstatement of financial and compliance reporting and recognition of expenditures (or revenue) in the proper period. We noted that the current system of internal controls over financial statements and compliance is not designed to ensure that the objectives are achieved. Further, the capacity of the current staff does not allow for adequate analysis of grants and contracts, other internal shared costs and support services provided, grantor receivables, deferred revenue, allocation of indirect costs and the reconciliation of bank accounts accurately and in a timely manner. Various regulatory reports were not filed accurately and in a timely manner (i.e., SF-425's for the Head Start Programs and DHS’s State budget reports for the LIHEAP programs). Specifically, revenue was recorded in excess of expenditures for the LIHEAP programs. Therefore, the risk exists that grant receivables and/or cash from the various programs are not recorded properly during the reporting period (interim and annually), which is consistent with our audit findings for the year ended June 30, 2020. The systemic cause appears to be a lack of personnel with the skills, knowledge, and experience with grant accounting and a weakness in the overall system of accounting controls, monitoring and policies and procedures not followed consistently. Context: Review of internal control structure of the organization in accordance with Government Auditing Standards. Criteria: Controls should be in place to ensure that financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. The auditee shall prepare financial statements that reflect its financial position, results of operations or changes in net assets, and, where appropriate, cash flows for the fiscal year audited. The auditee shall also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements. [2 CFR §200.510(a) and (b)] Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§200.327 Financial reporting and 200.328 Monitoring and reporting program performance. [2 CFR §200.302(b)(2)] Effect: Management may not be able to obtain complete and accurate financial statements on an interim or fiscal year basis to be used for internal or external reporting purposes. Cause: Limited personnel with knowledge and/or the ability to assist and provide needed information to aid in financial statement preparation. The implementation of a new accounting system without an adequate close-out of the old system. Recommendation: The degree to which the preparation of the financial statements and related disclosures are prepared by the independent auditor is a control deficiency is determined by the knowledge, skills and experience of those in the organization who are charged with the responsibility of its financial reporting. The Authority has a chief financial officer (CFO) and should hire additional staff (grant accountant and a general ledger accountant) to assist the new fiscal officer. The workload on the CFO is overwhelming. New staff hired should have the adequate skills, knowledge and experience to oversee and/or perform the necessary accounting functions each month. We believe that the CFO with the grant accountant and general ledger accountant should have the overall responsibility of properly reconciling and closing out the accounting system and grant activity each month in an efficient and timely manner so as to eliminate the risk of significant errors occurring. Budget-to-actual schedules should be an integral part of the grant accountant’s basic responsibilities. We further recommend that training be provided to all staff engaged in the financial reporting, allocation and reconciliation functions to ensure that a complete and accurate financial statements close-out process is achieved each month and annually. New policies and procedures should be established that conforms to the Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The management of Clayton County Community Services Authority, Inc. has reviewed the above referenced finding and fully agrees with the need for improved internal controls over financial statement preparation. Management believes that the proper approval of disbursements was adhered to during the reporting period with minimal deviation and continues to ensure proper policies are followed. Federal reports (SF425’s, LIHEAP) were filed during this period and may not have been properly reviewed during the course of this audit. For example, the LIHEAP reports were reconciled with the assistance of the State Program Specialist to ensure proper return of funds as requested by the funding agency. Management reserves the right to discuss this further as needed for the purpose of this finding. Adequate fiscal personnel staff has continued to be a challenge for the agency as management has done an exhaustive search for additional fiscal personnel and made job offers to qualified individuals only to have them decline the offer at the last moment. We have just offered the position of General Ledger Accountant to an individual and they are expected to start in two weeks. This will assist the CFO in the area of financial controls and reporting. It should also be noted that all bank reconciliations are current and being completed in a timely manner as dictated by our policies and procedures. Management continues to ensure all federal, state, and local and local regulatory reports and completed and submitted in a timely manner. As stated previously, the CFO worked directly with the State LIHEAP Program Staff to ensure proper reporting and reconciliation before returning unused funds.
CLAYTON COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES AUTHORITY, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Financial Statement Findings and Questioned Costs June 30, 2021 Comment #2021-001 INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL STATEMENT PREPARATION, PROPER APPROVAL OF DISBURSEMENTS, GRANT CLOSE-OUT PROCEDURES AND REQUIRED REGULATORY REPORTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES SHOULD IMPROVED GENERAL (Repeat Finding) As part of our auditing procedures, we assisted in the preparation of the financial statements, related disclosures, and the schedule of expenditures of federal awards of the Authority. The preparation of these financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, is the responsibility of the grantee. The authoritative and regulatory standards state in summary, that management should authorize, process, reconcile and close-out each grant and contract in a timely manner to ensure proper accounting and reporting of such activity in accordance with the specific professional standards and regulatory requirements. The closeout process is designed to help to reduce the risk of errors, fraud, material misstatement of financial and compliance reporting and recognition of expenditures (or revenue) in the proper period. We noted that the current system of internal controls over financial statements and compliance is not designed to ensure that the objectives are achieved. Further, the capacity of the current staff does not allow for adequate analysis of grants and contracts, other internal shared costs and support services provided, grantor receivables, deferred revenue, allocation of indirect costs and the reconciliation of bank accounts accurately and in a timely manner. Various regulatory reports were not filed accurately and in a timely manner (i.e., SF-425's for the Head Start Programs and DHS’s State budget reports for the LIHEAP programs). Specifically, revenue was recorded in excess of expenditures for the LIHEAP programs. Therefore, the risk exists that grant receivables and/or cash from the various programs are not recorded properly during the reporting period (interim and annually), which is consistent with our audit findings for the year ended June 30, 2020. The systemic cause appears to be a lack of personnel with the skills, knowledge, and experience with grant accounting and a weakness in the overall system of accounting controls, monitoring and policies and procedures not followed consistently. Context: Review of internal control structure of the organization in accordance with Government Auditing Standards. Criteria: Controls should be in place to ensure that financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. The auditee shall prepare financial statements that reflect its financial position, results of operations or changes in net assets, and, where appropriate, cash flows for the fiscal year audited. The auditee shall also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements. [2 CFR §200.510(a) and (b)] Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§200.327 Financial reporting and 200.328 Monitoring and reporting program performance. [2 CFR §200.302(b)(2)] Effect: Management may not be able to obtain complete and accurate financial statements on an interim or fiscal year basis to be used for internal or external reporting purposes. Cause: Limited personnel with knowledge and/or the ability to assist and provide needed information to aid in financial statement preparation. The implementation of a new accounting system without an adequate close-out of the old system. Recommendation: The degree to which the preparation of the financial statements and related disclosures are prepared by the independent auditor is a control deficiency is determined by the knowledge, skills and experience of those in the organization who are charged with the responsibility of its financial reporting. The Authority has a chief financial officer (CFO) and should hire additional staff (grant accountant and a general ledger accountant) to assist the new fiscal officer. The workload on the CFO is overwhelming. New staff hired should have the adequate skills, knowledge and experience to oversee and/or perform the necessary accounting functions each month. We believe that the CFO with the grant accountant and general ledger accountant should have the overall responsibility of properly reconciling and closing out the accounting system and grant activity each month in an efficient and timely manner so as to eliminate the risk of significant errors occurring. Budget-to-actual schedules should be an integral part of the grant accountant’s basic responsibilities. We further recommend that training be provided to all staff engaged in the financial reporting, allocation and reconciliation functions to ensure that a complete and accurate financial statements close-out process is achieved each month and annually. New policies and procedures should be established that conforms to the Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The management of Clayton County Community Services Authority, Inc. has reviewed the above referenced finding and fully agrees with the need for improved internal controls over financial statement preparation. Management believes that the proper approval of disbursements was adhered to during the reporting period with minimal deviation and continues to ensure proper policies are followed. Federal reports (SF425’s, LIHEAP) were filed during this period and may not have been properly reviewed during the course of this audit. For example, the LIHEAP reports were reconciled with the assistance of the State Program Specialist to ensure proper return of funds as requested by the funding agency. Management reserves the right to discuss this further as needed for the purpose of this finding. Adequate fiscal personnel staff has continued to be a challenge for the agency as management has done an exhaustive search for additional fiscal personnel and made job offers to qualified individuals only to have them decline the offer at the last moment. We have just offered the position of General Ledger Accountant to an individual and they are expected to start in two weeks. This will assist the CFO in the area of financial controls and reporting. It should also be noted that all bank reconciliations are current and being completed in a timely manner as dictated by our policies and procedures. Management continues to ensure all federal, state, and local and local regulatory reports and completed and submitted in a timely manner. As stated previously, the CFO worked directly with the State LIHEAP Program Staff to ensure proper reporting and reconciliation before returning unused funds.
Criteria 2 CFR Part 200, Section 302 and 45 CFR Part 75, Section 302- Financial management and standards for financial management systems state that (a) Each state must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state's own funds. In addition, the state's and the other non-Federal entity's financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, (b) The financial management system of each non- Federal entity must provide for the following: (1) Identification, in its accounts, of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§200.327 Financial reporting and 200.328 Monitoring and reporting program performance. (3) Records that identifies adequately the source and application of funds for federally funded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federal awards, authorizations, obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures, income, and interest and be supported by source documentation. (4) Effective control over, and accountability for, all funds, property, and other assets, and (5) Comparison of expenditures with budget amounts for each Federal award. Act Number 230 of July 23, 1974, Puerto Rico Government Accounting Law, as amended, states that the accounting system of the instrumentalities of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico should be designed to reflect or provide complete and clear information related to their financial results of operations. Condition The Department has a weakened financial reporting system, brought on by several deficiencies related to the accounting and financial reporting practices of the Department. The deficiencies noted as part of our procedures are summarized as follows: • The Department's procedure manuals contain outdated procedures which do not necessarily reflect the current tasks and operations of the Department. • The Department does not prepare monthly closings on a recurring and periodic basis. • The Single Audit Report has not been submitted in a timely manner and audit procedures are significantly delayed due to a lack of reconciliations and monthly closing procedures. • Multiple transactions are recognized retroactively several months after occurring, as a result of the significant delays brought forth by a weak financial reporting system. • The Department does not have adequate procedures to reconcile, in a timely manner, financial transactions recorded in the accounting system of the Puerto Rico Treasury Department with the accounting records maintained by the Department. Effect Deficiencies in the financial reporting and accounting practices of the Department may result in the following: • Financial Reports which are required as part of compliance with federal programs may be prepared with inaccurate or incomplete financial information and may not be submitted in a timely and compliant manner. • Sanctions, reduced funding, return of monies to federal agencies, cancellation of grants, among other potential sanctions. • Inconsistency between the financial information registered in the Department with financial transactions recognized in the records of the Puerto Rico Treasury Department. • Difficulties in accurately assessing program performance and monitoring of expenses in line with budgeted amounts to actual amounts expended as part of program activities. Inefficiencies and additional effort incurred by employee's part as a result of outdated or inaccurate procedure manuals. This also results in confusion as to the proper procedures to follow and the relevant approval and revision tasks to be performed. • Non-compliance with federal program requirements brought forth as a result of financial information which is inaccurate. Cause The Department has not implemented a uniform internal accounting process that allows all the Department's administrations (5) to consolidate accounting information for both fiscal and program periods and reconcile with financial information with the Treasury Department. In addition, the Department lacks uniform internal accounting software and applications between the administrations of the Department, which precludes them from timely and accurate consolidation of financial information. Recommendation The Department needs to implement a formal monthly closing of its accounting records and financial reporting with the purpose of ensuring accurate and timely financial information. Monthly closing procedures would be carried out most efficiently by developing a logical order for closing procedures and assigning responsibility for completing the procedures to specific personnel. As the Department is composed of various administrations, a task force should be assigned to develop procedures which detail the data-gathering information process to accumulate financial data of the administrations in a consistent manner. In addition, financial information should be consolidated at the Department level in order to reconcile with the financial records of the Treasury Department. Procedures should include, at a minimum, the following: the month-end period, a list of monthly closing tasks (post sub ledger balances to general ledgers, post journal entries, reconcile financial records with those of the Treasury Department, etc.), and the due date of each task (2 weeks after month end, etc.) It is recommended that the closing and reconciliation procedures be documented in a checklist that indicates the responsible individual who will perform each procedure and when completion of each procedure is due. Following are recommendations regarding the required closing procedures and suggestions to improve the financial reporting system: • Determine that all transactions have been recorded and posted. Transactions should be reviewed for completeness by scanning accounts to determine any unusual balances or fluctuations from expectations. • Reconcile general ledger accounts to underlying records and compareireconcile this information with the records of the Puerto Rico Treasury Department. Any differences observed during this process should be followed up in a timely manner in order to clarify and clear any reconciling items between the two sets of financial records. • Accumulate pertinent information necessary for the preparation of federal reports (financial and performance reports). In addition, a proper flowchart of procedures and revisions should be prepared to ensure that federal reports are filed and certified within established deadlines. • Perform a budgetary analysis by comparing expected amounts of expenditure with actual results. This will provide a more accurate measure of performance for federal programs and the overall efficiency in the use of funds of the Department. This will enhance the monitoring of program performance to ensure compliance with federal regulations and State Plan objectives. • Proper storage and backup of Department data files as part of the closing procedure. All files should be properly backed up before monthly closing is determined to be complete. • Differences observed during the reconciliation and closing procedure need to be discussed with the management personnel responsible for providing oversight over each respective area of the financial reporting cycle. Any adjustments necessary as a result of these procedures should be posted in a timely manner and before the closing is completed. Internal control manuals should be evaluated to ensure that they provide a clear and descriptive flowchart which details personnel involved, flow of information, estimated time frames for deliverables, and other control procedures relevant to the Department's operations. The Department should also evaluate its existing manuals to determine if they are updated and accurately reflect the procedures the Department currently carries out and ensure that these are in compliance with federal requirements. Updated written procedures and instructions will prevent or reduce misunderstandings, errors, inefficiencies or wasted efforts, enhancing the efficiency of the operations of the Department. Questioned Costs None Management's Response Refer to Grantee's Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria 2 CFR Part 200, Section 302 and 45 CFR Part 75, Section 302- Financial management and standards for financial management systems state that (a) Each state must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state's own funds. In addition, the state's and the other non-Federal entity's financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, (b) The financial management system of each non- Federal entity must provide for the following: (1) Identification, in its accounts, of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§200.327 Financial reporting and 200.328 Monitoring and reporting program performance. (3) Records that identifies adequately the source and application of funds for federally funded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federal awards, authorizations, obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures, income, and interest and be supported by source documentation. (4) Effective control over, and accountability for, all funds, property, and other assets, and (5) Comparison of expenditures with budget amounts for each Federal award. Act Number 230 of July 23, 1974, Puerto Rico Government Accounting Law, as amended, states that the accounting system of the instrumentalities of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico should be designed to reflect or provide complete and clear information related to their financial results of operations. Condition The Department has a weakened financial reporting system, brought on by several deficiencies related to the accounting and financial reporting practices of the Department. The deficiencies noted as part of our procedures are summarized as follows: • The Department's procedure manuals contain outdated procedures which do not necessarily reflect the current tasks and operations of the Department. • The Department does not prepare monthly closings on a recurring and periodic basis. • The Single Audit Report has not been submitted in a timely manner and audit procedures are significantly delayed due to a lack of reconciliations and monthly closing procedures. • Multiple transactions are recognized retroactively several months after occurring, as a result of the significant delays brought forth by a weak financial reporting system. • The Department does not have adequate procedures to reconcile, in a timely manner, financial transactions recorded in the accounting system of the Puerto Rico Treasury Department with the accounting records maintained by the Department. Effect Deficiencies in the financial reporting and accounting practices of the Department may result in the following: • Financial Reports which are required as part of compliance with federal programs may be prepared with inaccurate or incomplete financial information and may not be submitted in a timely and compliant manner. • Sanctions, reduced funding, return of monies to federal agencies, cancellation of grants, among other potential sanctions. • Inconsistency between the financial information registered in the Department with financial transactions recognized in the records of the Puerto Rico Treasury Department. • Difficulties in accurately assessing program performance and monitoring of expenses in line with budgeted amounts to actual amounts expended as part of program activities. Inefficiencies and additional effort incurred by employee's part as a result of outdated or inaccurate procedure manuals. This also results in confusion as to the proper procedures to follow and the relevant approval and revision tasks to be performed. • Non-compliance with federal program requirements brought forth as a result of financial information which is inaccurate. Cause The Department has not implemented a uniform internal accounting process that allows all the Department's administrations (5) to consolidate accounting information for both fiscal and program periods and reconcile with financial information with the Treasury Department. In addition, the Department lacks uniform internal accounting software and applications between the administrations of the Department, which precludes them from timely and accurate consolidation of financial information. Recommendation The Department needs to implement a formal monthly closing of its accounting records and financial reporting with the purpose of ensuring accurate and timely financial information. Monthly closing procedures would be carried out most efficiently by developing a logical order for closing procedures and assigning responsibility for completing the procedures to specific personnel. As the Department is composed of various administrations, a task force should be assigned to develop procedures which detail the data-gathering information process to accumulate financial data of the administrations in a consistent manner. In addition, financial information should be consolidated at the Department level in order to reconcile with the financial records of the Treasury Department. Procedures should include, at a minimum, the following: the month-end period, a list of monthly closing tasks (post sub ledger balances to general ledgers, post journal entries, reconcile financial records with those of the Treasury Department, etc.), and the due date of each task (2 weeks after month end, etc.) It is recommended that the closing and reconciliation procedures be documented in a checklist that indicates the responsible individual who will perform each procedure and when completion of each procedure is due. Following are recommendations regarding the required closing procedures and suggestions to improve the financial reporting system: • Determine that all transactions have been recorded and posted. Transactions should be reviewed for completeness by scanning accounts to determine any unusual balances or fluctuations from expectations. • Reconcile general ledger accounts to underlying records and compareireconcile this information with the records of the Puerto Rico Treasury Department. Any differences observed during this process should be followed up in a timely manner in order to clarify and clear any reconciling items between the two sets of financial records. • Accumulate pertinent information necessary for the preparation of federal reports (financial and performance reports). In addition, a proper flowchart of procedures and revisions should be prepared to ensure that federal reports are filed and certified within established deadlines. • Perform a budgetary analysis by comparing expected amounts of expenditure with actual results. This will provide a more accurate measure of performance for federal programs and the overall efficiency in the use of funds of the Department. This will enhance the monitoring of program performance to ensure compliance with federal regulations and State Plan objectives. • Proper storage and backup of Department data files as part of the closing procedure. All files should be properly backed up before monthly closing is determined to be complete. • Differences observed during the reconciliation and closing procedure need to be discussed with the management personnel responsible for providing oversight over each respective area of the financial reporting cycle. Any adjustments necessary as a result of these procedures should be posted in a timely manner and before the closing is completed. Internal control manuals should be evaluated to ensure that they provide a clear and descriptive flowchart which details personnel involved, flow of information, estimated time frames for deliverables, and other control procedures relevant to the Department's operations. The Department should also evaluate its existing manuals to determine if they are updated and accurately reflect the procedures the Department currently carries out and ensure that these are in compliance with federal requirements. Updated written procedures and instructions will prevent or reduce misunderstandings, errors, inefficiencies or wasted efforts, enhancing the efficiency of the operations of the Department. Questioned Costs None Management's Response Refer to Grantee's Corrective Action Plan.
CLAYTON COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES AUTHORITY, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Financial Statement Findings and Questioned Costs June 30, 2021 Comment #2021-001 INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL STATEMENT PREPARATION, PROPER APPROVAL OF DISBURSEMENTS, GRANT CLOSE-OUT PROCEDURES AND REQUIRED REGULATORY REPORTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES SHOULD IMPROVED GENERAL (Repeat Finding) As part of our auditing procedures, we assisted in the preparation of the financial statements, related disclosures, and the schedule of expenditures of federal awards of the Authority. The preparation of these financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, is the responsibility of the grantee. The authoritative and regulatory standards state in summary, that management should authorize, process, reconcile and close-out each grant and contract in a timely manner to ensure proper accounting and reporting of such activity in accordance with the specific professional standards and regulatory requirements. The closeout process is designed to help to reduce the risk of errors, fraud, material misstatement of financial and compliance reporting and recognition of expenditures (or revenue) in the proper period. We noted that the current system of internal controls over financial statements and compliance is not designed to ensure that the objectives are achieved. Further, the capacity of the current staff does not allow for adequate analysis of grants and contracts, other internal shared costs and support services provided, grantor receivables, deferred revenue, allocation of indirect costs and the reconciliation of bank accounts accurately and in a timely manner. Various regulatory reports were not filed accurately and in a timely manner (i.e., SF-425's for the Head Start Programs and DHS’s State budget reports for the LIHEAP programs). Specifically, revenue was recorded in excess of expenditures for the LIHEAP programs. Therefore, the risk exists that grant receivables and/or cash from the various programs are not recorded properly during the reporting period (interim and annually), which is consistent with our audit findings for the year ended June 30, 2020. The systemic cause appears to be a lack of personnel with the skills, knowledge, and experience with grant accounting and a weakness in the overall system of accounting controls, monitoring and policies and procedures not followed consistently. Context: Review of internal control structure of the organization in accordance with Government Auditing Standards. Criteria: Controls should be in place to ensure that financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. The auditee shall prepare financial statements that reflect its financial position, results of operations or changes in net assets, and, where appropriate, cash flows for the fiscal year audited. The auditee shall also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements. [2 CFR §200.510(a) and (b)] Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§200.327 Financial reporting and 200.328 Monitoring and reporting program performance. [2 CFR §200.302(b)(2)] Effect: Management may not be able to obtain complete and accurate financial statements on an interim or fiscal year basis to be used for internal or external reporting purposes. Cause: Limited personnel with knowledge and/or the ability to assist and provide needed information to aid in financial statement preparation. The implementation of a new accounting system without an adequate close-out of the old system. Recommendation: The degree to which the preparation of the financial statements and related disclosures are prepared by the independent auditor is a control deficiency is determined by the knowledge, skills and experience of those in the organization who are charged with the responsibility of its financial reporting. The Authority has a chief financial officer (CFO) and should hire additional staff (grant accountant and a general ledger accountant) to assist the new fiscal officer. The workload on the CFO is overwhelming. New staff hired should have the adequate skills, knowledge and experience to oversee and/or perform the necessary accounting functions each month. We believe that the CFO with the grant accountant and general ledger accountant should have the overall responsibility of properly reconciling and closing out the accounting system and grant activity each month in an efficient and timely manner so as to eliminate the risk of significant errors occurring. Budget-to-actual schedules should be an integral part of the grant accountant’s basic responsibilities. We further recommend that training be provided to all staff engaged in the financial reporting, allocation and reconciliation functions to ensure that a complete and accurate financial statements close-out process is achieved each month and annually. New policies and procedures should be established that conforms to the Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The management of Clayton County Community Services Authority, Inc. has reviewed the above referenced finding and fully agrees with the need for improved internal controls over financial statement preparation. Management believes that the proper approval of disbursements was adhered to during the reporting period with minimal deviation and continues to ensure proper policies are followed. Federal reports (SF425’s, LIHEAP) were filed during this period and may not have been properly reviewed during the course of this audit. For example, the LIHEAP reports were reconciled with the assistance of the State Program Specialist to ensure proper return of funds as requested by the funding agency. Management reserves the right to discuss this further as needed for the purpose of this finding. Adequate fiscal personnel staff has continued to be a challenge for the agency as management has done an exhaustive search for additional fiscal personnel and made job offers to qualified individuals only to have them decline the offer at the last moment. We have just offered the position of General Ledger Accountant to an individual and they are expected to start in two weeks. This will assist the CFO in the area of financial controls and reporting. It should also be noted that all bank reconciliations are current and being completed in a timely manner as dictated by our policies and procedures. Management continues to ensure all federal, state, and local and local regulatory reports and completed and submitted in a timely manner. As stated previously, the CFO worked directly with the State LIHEAP Program Staff to ensure proper reporting and reconciliation before returning unused funds.
CLAYTON COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES AUTHORITY, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Financial Statement Findings and Questioned Costs June 30, 2021 Comment #2021-001 INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL STATEMENT PREPARATION, PROPER APPROVAL OF DISBURSEMENTS, GRANT CLOSE-OUT PROCEDURES AND REQUIRED REGULATORY REPORTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES SHOULD IMPROVED GENERAL (Repeat Finding) As part of our auditing procedures, we assisted in the preparation of the financial statements, related disclosures, and the schedule of expenditures of federal awards of the Authority. The preparation of these financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, is the responsibility of the grantee. The authoritative and regulatory standards state in summary, that management should authorize, process, reconcile and close-out each grant and contract in a timely manner to ensure proper accounting and reporting of such activity in accordance with the specific professional standards and regulatory requirements. The closeout process is designed to help to reduce the risk of errors, fraud, material misstatement of financial and compliance reporting and recognition of expenditures (or revenue) in the proper period. We noted that the current system of internal controls over financial statements and compliance is not designed to ensure that the objectives are achieved. Further, the capacity of the current staff does not allow for adequate analysis of grants and contracts, other internal shared costs and support services provided, grantor receivables, deferred revenue, allocation of indirect costs and the reconciliation of bank accounts accurately and in a timely manner. Various regulatory reports were not filed accurately and in a timely manner (i.e., SF-425's for the Head Start Programs and DHS’s State budget reports for the LIHEAP programs). Specifically, revenue was recorded in excess of expenditures for the LIHEAP programs. Therefore, the risk exists that grant receivables and/or cash from the various programs are not recorded properly during the reporting period (interim and annually), which is consistent with our audit findings for the year ended June 30, 2020. The systemic cause appears to be a lack of personnel with the skills, knowledge, and experience with grant accounting and a weakness in the overall system of accounting controls, monitoring and policies and procedures not followed consistently. Context: Review of internal control structure of the organization in accordance with Government Auditing Standards. Criteria: Controls should be in place to ensure that financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. The auditee shall prepare financial statements that reflect its financial position, results of operations or changes in net assets, and, where appropriate, cash flows for the fiscal year audited. The auditee shall also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements. [2 CFR §200.510(a) and (b)] Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§200.327 Financial reporting and 200.328 Monitoring and reporting program performance. [2 CFR §200.302(b)(2)] Effect: Management may not be able to obtain complete and accurate financial statements on an interim or fiscal year basis to be used for internal or external reporting purposes. Cause: Limited personnel with knowledge and/or the ability to assist and provide needed information to aid in financial statement preparation. The implementation of a new accounting system without an adequate close-out of the old system. Recommendation: The degree to which the preparation of the financial statements and related disclosures are prepared by the independent auditor is a control deficiency is determined by the knowledge, skills and experience of those in the organization who are charged with the responsibility of its financial reporting. The Authority has a chief financial officer (CFO) and should hire additional staff (grant accountant and a general ledger accountant) to assist the new fiscal officer. The workload on the CFO is overwhelming. New staff hired should have the adequate skills, knowledge and experience to oversee and/or perform the necessary accounting functions each month. We believe that the CFO with the grant accountant and general ledger accountant should have the overall responsibility of properly reconciling and closing out the accounting system and grant activity each month in an efficient and timely manner so as to eliminate the risk of significant errors occurring. Budget-to-actual schedules should be an integral part of the grant accountant’s basic responsibilities. We further recommend that training be provided to all staff engaged in the financial reporting, allocation and reconciliation functions to ensure that a complete and accurate financial statements close-out process is achieved each month and annually. New policies and procedures should be established that conforms to the Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The management of Clayton County Community Services Authority, Inc. has reviewed the above referenced finding and fully agrees with the need for improved internal controls over financial statement preparation. Management believes that the proper approval of disbursements was adhered to during the reporting period with minimal deviation and continues to ensure proper policies are followed. Federal reports (SF425’s, LIHEAP) were filed during this period and may not have been properly reviewed during the course of this audit. For example, the LIHEAP reports were reconciled with the assistance of the State Program Specialist to ensure proper return of funds as requested by the funding agency. Management reserves the right to discuss this further as needed for the purpose of this finding. Adequate fiscal personnel staff has continued to be a challenge for the agency as management has done an exhaustive search for additional fiscal personnel and made job offers to qualified individuals only to have them decline the offer at the last moment. We have just offered the position of General Ledger Accountant to an individual and they are expected to start in two weeks. This will assist the CFO in the area of financial controls and reporting. It should also be noted that all bank reconciliations are current and being completed in a timely manner as dictated by our policies and procedures. Management continues to ensure all federal, state, and local and local regulatory reports and completed and submitted in a timely manner. As stated previously, the CFO worked directly with the State LIHEAP Program Staff to ensure proper reporting and reconciliation before returning unused funds.
CLAYTON COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES AUTHORITY, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs June 30, 2021 Comment # 2021-005 INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER DISBURSEMENTS OF FEDERAL FUNDS MUST BE IMPROVED HEAD START AND EARLY HEAD START PROGRAMS Federal Assistance Listing # 93.600 (Questioned Costs - Undetermined) Condition: In connection with audit of the Authority, we performed risk assessment of the Authority’s significant financial transactions, material account balances, and other significant risk areas and each applicable relevant assertion of each area, and we designed and perform substantive procedures and test of internal controls to determine what level of reliance that could be placed on the system of internal control of the Authority. Using auditor’s judgment, we selected various transactions for testings the system of internal control and the appropriateness and reasonableness of the expenditures. During our audit, we performed the following procedures: We selected twenty- five (25) transactions using auditor’s judgement with the following exceptions noted as respects to the Head Start and Early Head Start Programs: 1. There were fifteen (15) transactions with missing check request documents and\or purchase orders to support the disbursements. 2 Four (4) transactions with only one signature on the cancelled checks. 3. There were fourteen (14) transactions missing evidence of support as required by the procurement policies and procedures of the Authority. 4. There was one (1) transaction for the purchase of a truck that was not in agreement with bid documentation provided by the Authority. Further, we noted no specific authorization of such transaction in the notice of award for the purchase during the budget period of the acquisition. We selected fifteen (15) transactions using auditor’s judgement with the following exceptions noted as respect to the indirect cost pool: 1. There were fourteen (14) transactions with missing check request documents and\or purchase orders to support the disbursements. 2 Two (2) transactions with only one signature on the cancelled checks. 3. There were one (1) transactions missing evidence of support as required by the procurement policies and procedures of the Authority. The aforementioned exceptions were not resolved as of the date the audit report, September 8, 2023. Context: We selected 25 transactions haphazardly from the disbursement records of the Head Start and Early Head Start Programs. We selected 15 transactions haphazardly from the disbursement records of the indirect cost pool Criteria: Internal policy of the Authority, generally accepted accounting principles, Government Auditing Standards and the Uniform Guidance. The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of the Uniform Guidance (UG), 2 CFR §200.318 General procurement standards for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR §200.317 through 200.327. Effect: The transaction could result in cost not allowed under federal and state regulations and the provisions of the grant agreement. Cause: The failure of the Authority to follow its written procurement policies and procedures and to update the existing procedures to conform to federal and state laws. Management and the board of directors must have proper oversight and governance of the purchase and procurement procedures. Recommendation: We recommend that the board of directors and management immediately review all the transactions outlined in this finding and determine if the exceptions noted can be resolved and corrected. Further action should be taken to prevent, eliminate and properly remediate other exceptions similar in nature as those described in this finding. Policies and procedures should be reviewed and updated to conform to 2 CFR §200.318 General procurement standards. The Authority should add additional staff with the proper accounting skills, knowledge and experience with grant accounting. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The management of Clayton County Community Services Authority, Inc. has reviewed the above referenced finding and takes exception to several of the items listed. For example, some of the transactions listed that were missing check requests (both Head Start/Early Head Start and Indirect Cost Pool) were for monthly expenditures like utility bills, insurance, rent and other contractual obligations. Management has not in the past issued a check request each month for these transactions as they are part of the ongoing operation of the programs listed. Transactions listed with only one signature occurred as an oversight as the banking authority only requires one signature while our policy may indicate two signatures. Management feels the purchase of the truck was procured in agreement with approvals from the funding agency and board as required. Proper documentation was provided and is currently available for further review. Management continues to follow the proper guidelines regarding procurement and purchases related to the policies and procedures of the agency as well as micro purchase guidelines set forth by the Federal awarding agency. The Board of Directors also approved a revision to the policies and procedures requiring two “live” signatures on all checks issued by the agency. There is also an ongoing review of the current policies and procedures and recommendations for changes and updates are forthcoming. Management reserves the right for further review of these findings with the audit firm for additional documentation and resolution.
CLAYTON COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES AUTHORITY, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs June 30, 2021 Comment # 2021-005 INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER DISBURSEMENTS OF FEDERAL FUNDS MUST BE IMPROVED HEAD START AND EARLY HEAD START PROGRAMS Federal Assistance Listing # 93.600 (Questioned Costs - Undetermined) Condition: In connection with audit of the Authority, we performed risk assessment of the Authority’s significant financial transactions, material account balances, and other significant risk areas and each applicable relevant assertion of each area, and we designed and perform substantive procedures and test of internal controls to determine what level of reliance that could be placed on the system of internal control of the Authority. Using auditor’s judgment, we selected various transactions for testings the system of internal control and the appropriateness and reasonableness of the expenditures. During our audit, we performed the following procedures: We selected twenty- five (25) transactions using auditor’s judgement with the following exceptions noted as respects to the Head Start and Early Head Start Programs: 1. There were fifteen (15) transactions with missing check request documents and\or purchase orders to support the disbursements. 2 Four (4) transactions with only one signature on the cancelled checks. 3. There were fourteen (14) transactions missing evidence of support as required by the procurement policies and procedures of the Authority. 4. There was one (1) transaction for the purchase of a truck that was not in agreement with bid documentation provided by the Authority. Further, we noted no specific authorization of such transaction in the notice of award for the purchase during the budget period of the acquisition. We selected fifteen (15) transactions using auditor’s judgement with the following exceptions noted as respect to the indirect cost pool: 1. There were fourteen (14) transactions with missing check request documents and\or purchase orders to support the disbursements. 2 Two (2) transactions with only one signature on the cancelled checks. 3. There were one (1) transactions missing evidence of support as required by the procurement policies and procedures of the Authority. The aforementioned exceptions were not resolved as of the date the audit report, September 8, 2023. Context: We selected 25 transactions haphazardly from the disbursement records of the Head Start and Early Head Start Programs. We selected 15 transactions haphazardly from the disbursement records of the indirect cost pool Criteria: Internal policy of the Authority, generally accepted accounting principles, Government Auditing Standards and the Uniform Guidance. The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of the Uniform Guidance (UG), 2 CFR §200.318 General procurement standards for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR §200.317 through 200.327. Effect: The transaction could result in cost not allowed under federal and state regulations and the provisions of the grant agreement. Cause: The failure of the Authority to follow its written procurement policies and procedures and to update the existing procedures to conform to federal and state laws. Management and the board of directors must have proper oversight and governance of the purchase and procurement procedures. Recommendation: We recommend that the board of directors and management immediately review all the transactions outlined in this finding and determine if the exceptions noted can be resolved and corrected. Further action should be taken to prevent, eliminate and properly remediate other exceptions similar in nature as those described in this finding. Policies and procedures should be reviewed and updated to conform to 2 CFR §200.318 General procurement standards. The Authority should add additional staff with the proper accounting skills, knowledge and experience with grant accounting. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The management of Clayton County Community Services Authority, Inc. has reviewed the above referenced finding and takes exception to several of the items listed. For example, some of the transactions listed that were missing check requests (both Head Start/Early Head Start and Indirect Cost Pool) were for monthly expenditures like utility bills, insurance, rent and other contractual obligations. Management has not in the past issued a check request each month for these transactions as they are part of the ongoing operation of the programs listed. Transactions listed with only one signature occurred as an oversight as the banking authority only requires one signature while our policy may indicate two signatures. Management feels the purchase of the truck was procured in agreement with approvals from the funding agency and board as required. Proper documentation was provided and is currently available for further review. Management continues to follow the proper guidelines regarding procurement and purchases related to the policies and procedures of the agency as well as micro purchase guidelines set forth by the Federal awarding agency. The Board of Directors also approved a revision to the policies and procedures requiring two “live” signatures on all checks issued by the agency. There is also an ongoing review of the current policies and procedures and recommendations for changes and updates are forthcoming. Management reserves the right for further review of these findings with the audit firm for additional documentation and resolution.
CLAYTON COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES AUTHORITY, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Financial Statement Findings and Questioned Costs June 30, 2021 Comment #2021-001 INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL STATEMENT PREPARATION, PROPER APPROVAL OF DISBURSEMENTS, GRANT CLOSE-OUT PROCEDURES AND REQUIRED REGULATORY REPORTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES SHOULD IMPROVED GENERAL (Repeat Finding) As part of our auditing procedures, we assisted in the preparation of the financial statements, related disclosures, and the schedule of expenditures of federal awards of the Authority. The preparation of these financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, is the responsibility of the grantee. The authoritative and regulatory standards state in summary, that management should authorize, process, reconcile and close-out each grant and contract in a timely manner to ensure proper accounting and reporting of such activity in accordance with the specific professional standards and regulatory requirements. The closeout process is designed to help to reduce the risk of errors, fraud, material misstatement of financial and compliance reporting and recognition of expenditures (or revenue) in the proper period. We noted that the current system of internal controls over financial statements and compliance is not designed to ensure that the objectives are achieved. Further, the capacity of the current staff does not allow for adequate analysis of grants and contracts, other internal shared costs and support services provided, grantor receivables, deferred revenue, allocation of indirect costs and the reconciliation of bank accounts accurately and in a timely manner. Various regulatory reports were not filed accurately and in a timely manner (i.e., SF-425's for the Head Start Programs and DHS’s State budget reports for the LIHEAP programs). Specifically, revenue was recorded in excess of expenditures for the LIHEAP programs. Therefore, the risk exists that grant receivables and/or cash from the various programs are not recorded properly during the reporting period (interim and annually), which is consistent with our audit findings for the year ended June 30, 2020. The systemic cause appears to be a lack of personnel with the skills, knowledge, and experience with grant accounting and a weakness in the overall system of accounting controls, monitoring and policies and procedures not followed consistently. Context: Review of internal control structure of the organization in accordance with Government Auditing Standards. Criteria: Controls should be in place to ensure that financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. The auditee shall prepare financial statements that reflect its financial position, results of operations or changes in net assets, and, where appropriate, cash flows for the fiscal year audited. The auditee shall also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements. [2 CFR §200.510(a) and (b)] Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§200.327 Financial reporting and 200.328 Monitoring and reporting program performance. [2 CFR §200.302(b)(2)] Effect: Management may not be able to obtain complete and accurate financial statements on an interim or fiscal year basis to be used for internal or external reporting purposes. Cause: Limited personnel with knowledge and/or the ability to assist and provide needed information to aid in financial statement preparation. The implementation of a new accounting system without an adequate close-out of the old system. Recommendation: The degree to which the preparation of the financial statements and related disclosures are prepared by the independent auditor is a control deficiency is determined by the knowledge, skills and experience of those in the organization who are charged with the responsibility of its financial reporting. The Authority has a chief financial officer (CFO) and should hire additional staff (grant accountant and a general ledger accountant) to assist the new fiscal officer. The workload on the CFO is overwhelming. New staff hired should have the adequate skills, knowledge and experience to oversee and/or perform the necessary accounting functions each month. We believe that the CFO with the grant accountant and general ledger accountant should have the overall responsibility of properly reconciling and closing out the accounting system and grant activity each month in an efficient and timely manner so as to eliminate the risk of significant errors occurring. Budget-to-actual schedules should be an integral part of the grant accountant’s basic responsibilities. We further recommend that training be provided to all staff engaged in the financial reporting, allocation and reconciliation functions to ensure that a complete and accurate financial statements close-out process is achieved each month and annually. New policies and procedures should be established that conforms to the Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The management of Clayton County Community Services Authority, Inc. has reviewed the above referenced finding and fully agrees with the need for improved internal controls over financial statement preparation. Management believes that the proper approval of disbursements was adhered to during the reporting period with minimal deviation and continues to ensure proper policies are followed. Federal reports (SF425’s, LIHEAP) were filed during this period and may not have been properly reviewed during the course of this audit. For example, the LIHEAP reports were reconciled with the assistance of the State Program Specialist to ensure proper return of funds as requested by the funding agency. Management reserves the right to discuss this further as needed for the purpose of this finding. Adequate fiscal personnel staff has continued to be a challenge for the agency as management has done an exhaustive search for additional fiscal personnel and made job offers to qualified individuals only to have them decline the offer at the last moment. We have just offered the position of General Ledger Accountant to an individual and they are expected to start in two weeks. This will assist the CFO in the area of financial controls and reporting. It should also be noted that all bank reconciliations are current and being completed in a timely manner as dictated by our policies and procedures. Management continues to ensure all federal, state, and local and local regulatory reports and completed and submitted in a timely manner. As stated previously, the CFO worked directly with the State LIHEAP Program Staff to ensure proper reporting and reconciliation before returning unused funds.
CLAYTON COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES AUTHORITY, INC. SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Financial Statement Findings and Questioned Costs June 30, 2021 Comment #2021-001 INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL STATEMENT PREPARATION, PROPER APPROVAL OF DISBURSEMENTS, GRANT CLOSE-OUT PROCEDURES AND REQUIRED REGULATORY REPORTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES SHOULD IMPROVED GENERAL (Repeat Finding) As part of our auditing procedures, we assisted in the preparation of the financial statements, related disclosures, and the schedule of expenditures of federal awards of the Authority. The preparation of these financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, is the responsibility of the grantee. The authoritative and regulatory standards state in summary, that management should authorize, process, reconcile and close-out each grant and contract in a timely manner to ensure proper accounting and reporting of such activity in accordance with the specific professional standards and regulatory requirements. The closeout process is designed to help to reduce the risk of errors, fraud, material misstatement of financial and compliance reporting and recognition of expenditures (or revenue) in the proper period. We noted that the current system of internal controls over financial statements and compliance is not designed to ensure that the objectives are achieved. Further, the capacity of the current staff does not allow for adequate analysis of grants and contracts, other internal shared costs and support services provided, grantor receivables, deferred revenue, allocation of indirect costs and the reconciliation of bank accounts accurately and in a timely manner. Various regulatory reports were not filed accurately and in a timely manner (i.e., SF-425's for the Head Start Programs and DHS’s State budget reports for the LIHEAP programs). Specifically, revenue was recorded in excess of expenditures for the LIHEAP programs. Therefore, the risk exists that grant receivables and/or cash from the various programs are not recorded properly during the reporting period (interim and annually), which is consistent with our audit findings for the year ended June 30, 2020. The systemic cause appears to be a lack of personnel with the skills, knowledge, and experience with grant accounting and a weakness in the overall system of accounting controls, monitoring and policies and procedures not followed consistently. Context: Review of internal control structure of the organization in accordance with Government Auditing Standards. Criteria: Controls should be in place to ensure that financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. The auditee shall prepare financial statements that reflect its financial position, results of operations or changes in net assets, and, where appropriate, cash flows for the fiscal year audited. The auditee shall also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements. [2 CFR §200.510(a) and (b)] Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§200.327 Financial reporting and 200.328 Monitoring and reporting program performance. [2 CFR §200.302(b)(2)] Effect: Management may not be able to obtain complete and accurate financial statements on an interim or fiscal year basis to be used for internal or external reporting purposes. Cause: Limited personnel with knowledge and/or the ability to assist and provide needed information to aid in financial statement preparation. The implementation of a new accounting system without an adequate close-out of the old system. Recommendation: The degree to which the preparation of the financial statements and related disclosures are prepared by the independent auditor is a control deficiency is determined by the knowledge, skills and experience of those in the organization who are charged with the responsibility of its financial reporting. The Authority has a chief financial officer (CFO) and should hire additional staff (grant accountant and a general ledger accountant) to assist the new fiscal officer. The workload on the CFO is overwhelming. New staff hired should have the adequate skills, knowledge and experience to oversee and/or perform the necessary accounting functions each month. We believe that the CFO with the grant accountant and general ledger accountant should have the overall responsibility of properly reconciling and closing out the accounting system and grant activity each month in an efficient and timely manner so as to eliminate the risk of significant errors occurring. Budget-to-actual schedules should be an integral part of the grant accountant’s basic responsibilities. We further recommend that training be provided to all staff engaged in the financial reporting, allocation and reconciliation functions to ensure that a complete and accurate financial statements close-out process is achieved each month and annually. New policies and procedures should be established that conforms to the Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The management of Clayton County Community Services Authority, Inc. has reviewed the above referenced finding and fully agrees with the need for improved internal controls over financial statement preparation. Management believes that the proper approval of disbursements was adhered to during the reporting period with minimal deviation and continues to ensure proper policies are followed. Federal reports (SF425’s, LIHEAP) were filed during this period and may not have been properly reviewed during the course of this audit. For example, the LIHEAP reports were reconciled with the assistance of the State Program Specialist to ensure proper return of funds as requested by the funding agency. Management reserves the right to discuss this further as needed for the purpose of this finding. Adequate fiscal personnel staff has continued to be a challenge for the agency as management has done an exhaustive search for additional fiscal personnel and made job offers to qualified individuals only to have them decline the offer at the last moment. We have just offered the position of General Ledger Accountant to an individual and they are expected to start in two weeks. This will assist the CFO in the area of financial controls and reporting. It should also be noted that all bank reconciliations are current and being completed in a timely manner as dictated by our policies and procedures. Management continues to ensure all federal, state, and local and local regulatory reports and completed and submitted in a timely manner. As stated previously, the CFO worked directly with the State LIHEAP Program Staff to ensure proper reporting and reconciliation before returning unused funds.