Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 84.425F, 84.425M, 84.425N; U.S. Department of Education; HEERF Institutional Portion, HEERF Strengthening Institutions Program (SIP), HEERF Fund for Improvement of Postsecondary Education (FIPSE) Formula Grant. Federal Award Identification Number and Year - P425F204736, P425M201046-20A , P425N200748 Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.318 - The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327. Condition - The Corporation's procurement procedures does not fully conform to the procurements standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - During testing we did not identify any instances of noncompliance related to procurement. However, during the review of the policies we discovered the following provisions of the standards were not in conformity with Uniform Guidance: * ? 200.318 - general procurement standard: the policy excluded a written standard of conduct covering conflicts of interest, including organizational conflicts of interest * ? 200.320 - methods of procurement: the policy does not appear to conform to the standards specific to non-construction purchases in excess of the small acquisition threshold * ?? 200.321 - 300.326 are not addressed in the policies Cause and Effect - Controls in place did not ensure the procurement policies and procedures conformed to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327. The lack of controls could result in acquisition of property or services that does not provide full and open competition and could result in disallowed costs. Recommendation - The Corporation should review the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327 to identify policy deficiencies and work to establish policy that will confirm to the standards. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - Management concurs with the finding and will be conducting a thorough review of the current policies to ensure compliance with Uniform Guidance, as well as providing additional training and education to those responsible for procurement.
Finding Number: 2022-001 Repeat Finding: Yes, 2021-002 Program Names/Assistance Listing Titles: Indian School Equalization; Indian Education Facilities, Operations, and Maintenance Assistance Listing Numbers: 15.042; 15.047 Federal Award Numbers: A19AV00865 Questioned Costs: N/A Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior Pass-Through Agency: Bureau of Indian Affairs Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Compliance Requirements: Reporting CRITERIA Per the grant agreement, the School is required to file SF-425 Quarterly Financial Statements (2 CFR Subpart D ?200.327). Furthermore, the reports should agree to the School?s supporting documentation for federal revenues. CONDITION The School did not meet its financial reporting obligations during the year. CAUSE The School did not have an adequate system in place to maintain compliance with these requirements EFFECT The School was not always in compliance with federal regulations and guidelines. Less than full compliance with these reporting requirements could potentially result in a reduction or discontinuation of program awards in the future. CONTEXT During our review of the School?s SF-425 reports, we noted the following: - The first quarter SF-425 report included $9,491 of non-federal revenues and $67 of nonfederal disbursements. - The second and third quarter SF-425 reports included $980 of non-federal revenues and $67 of non-federal disbursements. - The fourth quarter SF-425 report included $1,491 of non-federal revenues and $67 of non-federal disbursements. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. RECOMMENDATION The School should implement standard procedures to ensure submission of accurate reports. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding Number: 2022-001 Repeat Finding: Yes, 2021-002 Program Names/Assistance Listing Titles: Indian School Equalization; Indian Education Facilities, Operations, and Maintenance Assistance Listing Numbers: 15.042; 15.047 Federal Award Numbers: A19AV00865 Questioned Costs: N/A Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior Pass-Through Agency: Bureau of Indian Affairs Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Compliance Requirements: Reporting CRITERIA Per the grant agreement, the School is required to file SF-425 Quarterly Financial Statements (2 CFR Subpart D ?200.327). Furthermore, the reports should agree to the School?s supporting documentation for federal revenues. CONDITION The School did not meet its financial reporting obligations during the year. CAUSE The School did not have an adequate system in place to maintain compliance with these requirements EFFECT The School was not always in compliance with federal regulations and guidelines. Less than full compliance with these reporting requirements could potentially result in a reduction or discontinuation of program awards in the future. CONTEXT During our review of the School?s SF-425 reports, we noted the following: - The first quarter SF-425 report included $9,491 of non-federal revenues and $67 of nonfederal disbursements. - The second and third quarter SF-425 reports included $980 of non-federal revenues and $67 of non-federal disbursements. - The fourth quarter SF-425 report included $1,491 of non-federal revenues and $67 of non-federal disbursements. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. RECOMMENDATION The School should implement standard procedures to ensure submission of accurate reports. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS See Corrective Action Plan.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
FEDERAL PROCUREMENT Criteria: 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327 govern procurement standards for federal programs. Per these standards, a non-federal entity (the city) must maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. Also, no employee, officer, or agent may participate in the selection, award, or administration of a contract supported by a federal award if he or she has a real or apparent conflict of interest. Condition: The city does not have a formal, written conflict of interest policy or procurement manual as required by 2 CFR section 200.318. Cause: Responsible officials were unaware of the requirement. Effect: Noncompliance with federal procurement standards. Recommendation: The city should develop a formal procurement manual that contains all elements necessary to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
FEDERAL PROCUREMENT Criteria: 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327 govern procurement standards for federal programs. Per these standards, a non-federal entity (the city) must maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. Also, no employee, officer, or agent may participate in the selection, award, or administration of a contract supported by a federal award if he or she has a real or apparent conflict of interest. Condition: The city does not have a formal, written conflict of interest policy or procurement manual as required by 2 CFR section 200.318. Cause: Responsible officials were unaware of the requirement. Effect: Noncompliance with federal procurement standards. Recommendation: The city should develop a formal procurement manual that contains all elements necessary to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
2022-003 Noncompliance with Procurement Requirements Federal Programs: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CFDA No. 21.027) and Special Education (CFDA No.?s 84.027 and 84.173) Criteria: Recipients are required to comply with 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327, including ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320. The Board follows the Annotated Code of Maryland, the Education Article, and Board Policy DJB with respect to procurement. For purchases between $3,501 and $25,000, two written oral quotes must be acquired. Condition: Seven purchases between $3,501 and $25,000 were noted for which there was not documentation of two quotes or supporting documentation of single sourcing. Cause: The individuals in charge of purchasing did not document their procedures. Effect: The Board is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the grant which could affect future funding. Repeat Finding: This finding was not a finding in FY21. Recommendation: We recommend the grants administrators communicate procurement requirements, including documentation requirements, to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretations and noncompliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Board will communicate procurement requirements to purchasing agents in order to avoid future misinterpretation and noncompliance. In most instances, evidence of procurement requirement compliance was observed, but not documented appropriately for compliance requirements.
Condition There is no formal documentation or evidence to support that competitive price analysis for vendors selected by CCI several years ago or that suspension and debarment verifications were performed for vendors, as required by the general procurement standards of the Uniform Guidance. Context We selected two samples which were deemed sole sourced by management and noted no written documentation for this conclusion or evidence of suspension or debarment verification being performed was maintained in the file. Based on our discussions with management, we understand that the arrangements with these vendors were established several years ago. Criteria Under Uniform Guidance Section 200.318, General Procurement Standards, a non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity?s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in Sections 200.317 through 200.327. These sections include policies and procedures related to competition, informal and formal procurement methods and noncompetitive procurement also known as sole source. Under Uniform Guidance Section 200.214, Suspension and Debarment and 2 CFR part 180, non-federal entities are required to verify that vendors are not suspended or debarred from participating in federal funds. Cause CCI?s procurement policy was not updated to include the provisions of the general procurement standards required under the Uniform Guidance. Effect Charges relating to vendor services that were charged to the federal award may not be in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs None. Repeat Finding Yes. Recommendation We recommend that CCI update its existing procurement policy governing contracts with vendors that will be reimbursed by federal grants to incorporate all of the provisions included in the general procurement standards of the Uniform Guidance Section 200.318 and the debarment and suspension regulations of Uniform Guidance Section 200.214. We also recommend that a review of all vendor contract files be performed to ensure that the documentation as required under the Uniform Guidance is maintained in the files. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action See corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Compliance Requirement: Procurement Federal Award Identification Number and Year: MD0044 and 2021 Award Period: March 11, 2021 through December 31, 2024, liquidated by December 31, 2026 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Per 2CFR ? 200.318(a), non-Federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327. Questioned Costs: None Condition/Context: The Town?s procurement policy for federal expenditures is not in accordance with ?? 200.317 through 200.327. Therefore, for one of three vendors tested, proper procurement processes of obtaining price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources was not followed. Cause: The Town?s policies and procedures did not require proper federal procurement requirements to be followed prior to paying a vendor with Federal grant funds. Effect: Funds were disbursed to vendors without following proper federal procurement requirements. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the Town establish and document procurement policies and procedures in conformity with the Federal requirements ?? 200.317 through 200.327. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 2020-2021, SY 2021-2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective system of internal controls was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Monthly Sponsor Claims for Reimbursement (Claims) were submitted to the Indiana Department of Education based upon meals served for the month. For two of the five Claims tested, there were differences between the Claims submitted and the School Corporation's summary meal count reports. The two Claims over reported meals by 1 and 50 meals, respectively. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 SCHOOL TOWN OF MUNSTER SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) (Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in ?? 200.327 Financial reporting and 200.328 Monitoring and reporting program performance. . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in ?? 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." Cause Management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the Reporting compliance requirement. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 SCHOOL TOWN OF MUNSTER SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 2020-2021, SY 2021-2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective system of internal controls was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Monthly Sponsor Claims for Reimbursement (Claims) were submitted to the Indiana Department of Education based upon meals served for the month. For two of the five Claims tested, there were differences between the Claims submitted and the School Corporation's summary meal count reports. The two Claims over reported meals by 1 and 50 meals, respectively. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 SCHOOL TOWN OF MUNSTER SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) (Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in ?? 200.327 Financial reporting and 200.328 Monitoring and reporting program performance. . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in ?? 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." Cause Management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the Reporting compliance requirement. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 SCHOOL TOWN OF MUNSTER SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 2020-2021, SY 2021-2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective system of internal controls was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Monthly Sponsor Claims for Reimbursement (Claims) were submitted to the Indiana Department of Education based upon meals served for the month. For two of the five Claims tested, there were differences between the Claims submitted and the School Corporation's summary meal count reports. The two Claims over reported meals by 1 and 50 meals, respectively. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 SCHOOL TOWN OF MUNSTER SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) (Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in ?? 200.327 Financial reporting and 200.328 Monitoring and reporting program performance. . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in ?? 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." Cause Management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the Reporting compliance requirement. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 SCHOOL TOWN OF MUNSTER SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 2020-2021, SY 2021-2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective system of internal controls was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Monthly Sponsor Claims for Reimbursement (Claims) were submitted to the Indiana Department of Education based upon meals served for the month. For two of the five Claims tested, there were differences between the Claims submitted and the School Corporation's summary meal count reports. The two Claims over reported meals by 1 and 50 meals, respectively. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 SCHOOL TOWN OF MUNSTER SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) (Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in ?? 200.327 Financial reporting and 200.328 Monitoring and reporting program performance. . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in ?? 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." Cause Management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the Reporting compliance requirement. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 SCHOOL TOWN OF MUNSTER SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 2020-2021, SY 2021-2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective system of internal controls was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Monthly Sponsor Claims for Reimbursement (Claims) were submitted to the Indiana Department of Education based upon meals served for the month. For two of the five Claims tested, there were differences between the Claims submitted and the School Corporation's summary meal count reports. The two Claims over reported meals by 1 and 50 meals, respectively. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 SCHOOL TOWN OF MUNSTER SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) (Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in ?? 200.327 Financial reporting and 200.328 Monitoring and reporting program performance. . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in ?? 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." Cause Management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the Reporting compliance requirement. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 SCHOOL TOWN OF MUNSTER SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): SY 2020-2021, SY 2021-2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective system of internal controls was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Monthly Sponsor Claims for Reimbursement (Claims) were submitted to the Indiana Department of Education based upon meals served for the month. For two of the five Claims tested, there were differences between the Claims submitted and the School Corporation's summary meal count reports. The two Claims over reported meals by 1 and 50 meals, respectively. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 SCHOOL TOWN OF MUNSTER SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) (Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in ?? 200.327 Financial reporting and 200.328 Monitoring and reporting program performance. . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in ?? 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." Cause Management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the Reporting compliance requirement. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 SCHOOL TOWN OF MUNSTER SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Program: AL 21.023 ? COVID-19 Emergency Rental Assistance ? Allowability & Earmarking Grant Number & Year: N/A Federal Grantor Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Criteria: Per 2 CFR ? 1000.10 (January 1, 2022), the U.S. Department of the Treasury adopted the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements set forth at 2 CFR part 200. 2 CFR ? 200.403 (January 1, 2022) states, in relevant part, the following: Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. 2 CFR ? 200.404 (January 1, 2022) states the following: A cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the cost. The question of reasonableness is particularly important when the non-Federal entity is predominantly federally-funded. In determining reasonableness of a given cost, consideration must be given to: (a) Whether the cost is of a type generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the operation of the non-Federal entity or the proper and efficient performance of the Federal award. (b) The restraints or requirements imposed by such factors as: sound business practices; arm?s-length bargaining; Federal, state, local, tribal, and other laws and regulations; and terms and conditions of the Federal award. (c) Market prices for comparable goods or services for the geographic area. (d) Whether the individuals concerned acted with prudence in the circumstances considering their responsibilities to the non-Federal entity, its employees, where applicable its students or membership, the public at large, and the Federal Government. (e) Whether the non-Federal entity significantly deviates from its established practices and policies regarding the incurrence of costs, which may unjustifiably increase the Federal award?s cost. 2 CFR ? 200.459 (January 1, 2022) states, in relevant part, the following: (a) Costs of professional and consultant services rendered by persons who are members of a particular profession or possess a special skill, and who are not officers or employees of the non-Federal entity, are allowable, subject to paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section when reasonable in relation to the services rendered and when not contingent upon recovery of the costs from the Federal Government. . . . (b) In determining the allowability of costs in a particular case, no single factor or any special combination of factors is necessarily determinative. However, the following factors are relevant: (1) The nature and scope of the service rendered in relation to the service required. * * * * (6) Whether the service can be performed more economically by direct employment rather than contracting. (7) The qualifications of the individual or concern rendering the service and the customary fees charged, especially on non-federally funded activities. (8) Adequacy of the contractual agreement for the service (e.g., description of the service, estimate of time required, rate of compensation, and termination provisions). Division N ? Additional Coronavirus Response and Relief, Title V ? Banking, Section 501(c)(2)(A) of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, states, in relevant part: Not less than 90 percent of the funds received by an eligible grantee from a payment made under this section shall be used to provide financial assistance to eligible households . . . . Division N ? Additional Coronavirus Response and Relief, Title V ? Banking, Section 501(c)(3) of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, states, in relevant part: Not more than 10 percent of funds received by an eligible grantee from a payment made under this section may be used to provide eligible households with case management and other services related to the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak, as defined by the Secretary, intended to help keep households stably housed. Division N ? Additional Coronavirus Response and Relief, Title V ? Banking, Section 501(c)(5)(A) of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, states, in relevant part: Not more than 10 percent of the amount paid to an eligible grantee under this section may be used for administrative costs attributable to providing financial assistance and housing stability services under paragraphs (2) and (3), respectively, including for data collection and reporting requirements related to such funds. Per the amended Emergency Rental Assistance terms, dated March 26, 2021, ?The total of all administrative costs, whether direct or indirect costs, may not exceed 10 percent of the total amount of the total award.? The Reallocation Guidance from the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury), dated March 30, 2022, states the following: A Grantee may spend up to 10% of its initial ERA1 allocation for administrative expenses only if the Grantee obligates at least 30% of its initial allocation for the provision of financial assistance and housing stability services on behalf of eligible households by September 30, 2022. If a Grantee has obligated less than 30% of its initial allocation providing financial assistance and housing stability services as of September 30, 2022, Treasury will presume that the Grantee?s administrative expenses were not attributable to such services ? and therefore were not permissible uses of ERA1 funds ? to the extent that the administrative expenses exceed 10% of the Grantee?s allocation after deducting amounts recaptured or reallocated as excess funds, unless the Grantee can demonstrate that those costs are related to the delivery of the program. Condition: The contractual agreement to receive and evaluate applications for Emergency Rental Assistance (ERA) did not have adequate limitations or provisions to ensure costs were reasonable. A similar finding was noted in the prior audit. Repeat Finding: 2021-063 Questioned Costs: $3,580,007 known Statistical Sample: No Context: The State of Nebraska was initially awarded $158,572,581 for ERA to assist eligible households that have difficulty making timely payments of rent and utilities due to the COVID-19 pandemic. At least 90% of funds are to be earmarked for financial aid to eligible households. Not more than 10% of funds may be used for administrative costs. The Agency entered into a contract with Deloitte & Touche LLP (Deloitte) to provide program administration and case management. Eligibility determinations were made by Deloitte and then sent to the State for review and to process the aid payments to eligible recipients. Deloitte was paid $8,672,561 during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. We tested one payment for $531,314 and noted the following: ? Adequate support was not on file to allow for a determination as to whether the contracted amount was reasonable. There were no maximums or limitations other than the $14,627,160 cap specified in the contract. The contract was paid on an hourly rate and did not have any stipulations regarding the number of hours paid per application or performance measures to be achieved. ? Per guidance from Treasury, if the State obligates less than 30% of its initial allocation providing financial aid by September 30, 2022, Treasury will presume that the State?s administrative expenses were not attributable to the program, at least to the extent that the administrative expenses exceed 10% of the Grantee?s allocation after deducting amounts recaptured or reallocated as excess funds. The State voluntarily reallocated $84,700,000 to local governments and was required to return an additional $11,716,548 for reallocation. Therefore, State administrative expenses would be limited to $6,215,603 (10% of awarded amount less reallocations). Administrative expenses in fiscal year 2021 and 2022 totaled $9,795,610. As a result, we question costs of $3,580,007 for administrative costs exceeding 10%. As of January 17, 2023, the Agency has spent $26,399,517 on financial aid, and $13,080,572 for administrative expenses, of which $12,563,227 was paid to Deloitte. This is 33.13% of the total amount paid as of January 17, 2023. Without spending 30% of its award on financial aid, the Agency will not meet the earmarking requirements per the guidance released from Treasury. Based on the amount of financial aid spent, the administrative costs appear unreasonable. Cause: The contract was not competitively bid, and contract provisions were not specific enough to ensure that amounts paid were reasonable. The Agency lacked adequate procedures to ensure adherence to earmarking requirements. Effect: Without such adequate procedures, there is an increased risk for misuse of Federal funds. The Agency did not meet earmarking requirements. Recommendation: We recommend the Agency improve its procedures for ensuring the reasonableness of contractual service payments. Management Response: The Military Department does not agree with this finding. Vendor Contract: The State performed procurement procedures soliciting Requests for Information from vendors in 2020 to support COVID-19 related tasks. A contractual agreement was completed with the vendor once the State determined the program costs, estimated level-of-effort, and key assumptions were reasonable based on the scope of services the State requested. In addition, the state complied with the procurement standards set forth in 2 CFR 200.317-200.327, including expected contract provisions, key program assumptions, and not-to-exceed thresholds. The contractual agreement was completed to enable the State to proactively monitor vendor performance and analyze detailed information on associated cost. Vendor performance was monitored through twice-weekly status meetings, bi-weekly executive status briefings with executives across multiple agencies, bi-weekly Executive Steering Committee meetings, and review of detailed invoices. The State as the Grantee is able to demonstrate that the administrative costs are related to the delivery of the program in a timely fashion and is aligned with US Treasury Guidance. APA Response: As of January 17, 2023, the Agency has spent $1 in administration costs for every $2 spent for aid. This does not appear reasonable and is not in accordance with earmarking requirements. Thus, in addition to the questioned administrative costs identified for 2022, the agency appears to be on track for incurring millions of dollars more in such questioned costs for 2023.
FINDING 2022-002, 2021-001 ? REPEAT FINDING Information on the Federal Program: Federal Agencies: U.S. Department of Education Federal Programs: 84.027/84.173 Special Education Cluster (IDEA) 84.377 School Improvement Grants (Title 1003a IL-Empower) 93.323 Epidemiology and Lab Capacity (ELC) Pass-Through Entity: Illinois State Board of Education; City of Chicago Department of Public Health (CDPH) Pass-Through Entity Award Numbers: H027A210072; S377A160014 Criteria: Procurement Standards of Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Costs Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) state that all non-federal entities will follow Sections 200.318 through Section 200.327. A. Section 200.320 identifies five methods of procurement to be followed: a. Informal ? micro-purchases b. Informal ? small purchases c. Formal ? sealed bids d. Formal ? competitive proposals e. Noncompetitive proposals Section 200.318 states that non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures that are consistent with State and local laws in addition to the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. B. Per Section 200.320(b) if small purchases are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. C. Title 2 CFR section 200.303 states the following regarding internal control: ?The auditee shall maintain internal control over Federal programs that provides reasonable assurance that the auditee is managing Federal awards in compliance with law, regulations, and the provisions of contracts or grant agreements that could have a material effect on each of its Federal programs.? D. The Chicago Public Schools Procurement Manual requires the collection of three quotes for any purchase between $2,000.01 and $25,000 for any purchase with federal grant funds. Condition/Context: For the three programs referenced, we tested one-hundred and five (105) purchase orders totaling $31,156,308. Thirty-four (34) purchase orders totaling $523,384 were purchases greater than $2,000 but less than $25,000, and for which CPS did not obtain and/or document an adequate number of price or rate quotations as required by CPS? procurement policies. Our samples were not statistically valid. Cause: CPS employees at the program/school level may not be following the CPS Procurement Manual due to the decentralized nature of the process and the high number of purchases that can fall under the $2,000.01-$25,000 threshold. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs, if any, are unable to be determined, however, actual purchase orders that did not comply with the small purchase requirements of the CPS Policy Manual totaled $133,788 for Assistance Listing Number 84.027/84.173, $376,459 for Assistance Listing Number 84.377, and $13,137 for Assistance Listing Number 93.323. Effect: Chicago Public Schools did not document compliance with the requirements of the CPS Policy Manual as it relates to small purchases that fall between $2,000.01 and $25,000. Recommendation: We recommend that CPS communicate and re-enforce its procurement policies and procedures and any changes thereto in order to comply with the purchase requirements of the CPS Procurement Manual. Ensure proper communication is delivered to relevant employees regarding any changes to the CPS Procurement Manual and the CPS Procurement Manual. In addition, we recommend the consideration of implementing a system control that requires the recording of three quotes for purchases between $2,000.01 and $25,000. The system may be the permanent record. Views of Responsible Officials: Based on the prior year recommendation to the FY21 finding, dated December 15, 2021, in April, 2022, CPS revised the policies in the Procurement Manual to reflect the current standard. The Oracle procurement module was tested and upgraded to implement further controls to require the collection of three quotes for any purchase using federal grant funds between $2,000.01 and $25,000 in value. In addition, communication and reenforcement of the procurement policies in the CPS Procurement Manual at the program and school level has been completed through the mandatory training and district wide announcement. On May 9, 2022, US department of Education issued the determination letter concluding this finding resolved and closed.
FINDING 2022-002, 2021-001 ? REPEAT FINDING Information on the Federal Program: Federal Agencies: U.S. Department of Education Federal Programs: 84.027/84.173 Special Education Cluster (IDEA) 84.377 School Improvement Grants (Title 1003a IL-Empower) 93.323 Epidemiology and Lab Capacity (ELC) Pass-Through Entity: Illinois State Board of Education; City of Chicago Department of Public Health (CDPH) Pass-Through Entity Award Numbers: H027A210072; S377A160014 Criteria: Procurement Standards of Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Costs Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) state that all non-federal entities will follow Sections 200.318 through Section 200.327. A. Section 200.320 identifies five methods of procurement to be followed: a. Informal ? micro-purchases b. Informal ? small purchases c. Formal ? sealed bids d. Formal ? competitive proposals e. Noncompetitive proposals Section 200.318 states that non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures that are consistent with State and local laws in addition to the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. B. Per Section 200.320(b) if small purchases are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. C. Title 2 CFR section 200.303 states the following regarding internal control: ?The auditee shall maintain internal control over Federal programs that provides reasonable assurance that the auditee is managing Federal awards in compliance with law, regulations, and the provisions of contracts or grant agreements that could have a material effect on each of its Federal programs.? D. The Chicago Public Schools Procurement Manual requires the collection of three quotes for any purchase between $2,000.01 and $25,000 for any purchase with federal grant funds. Condition/Context: For the three programs referenced, we tested one-hundred and five (105) purchase orders totaling $31,156,308. Thirty-four (34) purchase orders totaling $523,384 were purchases greater than $2,000 but less than $25,000, and for which CPS did not obtain and/or document an adequate number of price or rate quotations as required by CPS? procurement policies. Our samples were not statistically valid. Cause: CPS employees at the program/school level may not be following the CPS Procurement Manual due to the decentralized nature of the process and the high number of purchases that can fall under the $2,000.01-$25,000 threshold. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs, if any, are unable to be determined, however, actual purchase orders that did not comply with the small purchase requirements of the CPS Policy Manual totaled $133,788 for Assistance Listing Number 84.027/84.173, $376,459 for Assistance Listing Number 84.377, and $13,137 for Assistance Listing Number 93.323. Effect: Chicago Public Schools did not document compliance with the requirements of the CPS Policy Manual as it relates to small purchases that fall between $2,000.01 and $25,000. Recommendation: We recommend that CPS communicate and re-enforce its procurement policies and procedures and any changes thereto in order to comply with the purchase requirements of the CPS Procurement Manual. Ensure proper communication is delivered to relevant employees regarding any changes to the CPS Procurement Manual and the CPS Procurement Manual. In addition, we recommend the consideration of implementing a system control that requires the recording of three quotes for purchases between $2,000.01 and $25,000. The system may be the permanent record. Views of Responsible Officials: Based on the prior year recommendation to the FY21 finding, dated December 15, 2021, in April, 2022, CPS revised the policies in the Procurement Manual to reflect the current standard. The Oracle procurement module was tested and upgraded to implement further controls to require the collection of three quotes for any purchase using federal grant funds between $2,000.01 and $25,000 in value. In addition, communication and reenforcement of the procurement policies in the CPS Procurement Manual at the program and school level has been completed through the mandatory training and district wide announcement. On May 9, 2022, US department of Education issued the determination letter concluding this finding resolved and closed.
FINDING 2022-002, 2021-001 ? REPEAT FINDING Information on the Federal Program: Federal Agencies: U.S. Department of Education Federal Programs: 84.027/84.173 Special Education Cluster (IDEA) 84.377 School Improvement Grants (Title 1003a IL-Empower) 93.323 Epidemiology and Lab Capacity (ELC) Pass-Through Entity: Illinois State Board of Education; City of Chicago Department of Public Health (CDPH) Pass-Through Entity Award Numbers: H027A210072; S377A160014 Criteria: Procurement Standards of Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Costs Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) state that all non-federal entities will follow Sections 200.318 through Section 200.327. A. Section 200.320 identifies five methods of procurement to be followed: a. Informal ? micro-purchases b. Informal ? small purchases c. Formal ? sealed bids d. Formal ? competitive proposals e. Noncompetitive proposals Section 200.318 states that non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures that are consistent with State and local laws in addition to the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. B. Per Section 200.320(b) if small purchases are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. C. Title 2 CFR section 200.303 states the following regarding internal control: ?The auditee shall maintain internal control over Federal programs that provides reasonable assurance that the auditee is managing Federal awards in compliance with law, regulations, and the provisions of contracts or grant agreements that could have a material effect on each of its Federal programs.? D. The Chicago Public Schools Procurement Manual requires the collection of three quotes for any purchase between $2,000.01 and $25,000 for any purchase with federal grant funds. Condition/Context: For the three programs referenced, we tested one-hundred and five (105) purchase orders totaling $31,156,308. Thirty-four (34) purchase orders totaling $523,384 were purchases greater than $2,000 but less than $25,000, and for which CPS did not obtain and/or document an adequate number of price or rate quotations as required by CPS? procurement policies. Our samples were not statistically valid. Cause: CPS employees at the program/school level may not be following the CPS Procurement Manual due to the decentralized nature of the process and the high number of purchases that can fall under the $2,000.01-$25,000 threshold. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs, if any, are unable to be determined, however, actual purchase orders that did not comply with the small purchase requirements of the CPS Policy Manual totaled $133,788 for Assistance Listing Number 84.027/84.173, $376,459 for Assistance Listing Number 84.377, and $13,137 for Assistance Listing Number 93.323. Effect: Chicago Public Schools did not document compliance with the requirements of the CPS Policy Manual as it relates to small purchases that fall between $2,000.01 and $25,000. Recommendation: We recommend that CPS communicate and re-enforce its procurement policies and procedures and any changes thereto in order to comply with the purchase requirements of the CPS Procurement Manual. Ensure proper communication is delivered to relevant employees regarding any changes to the CPS Procurement Manual and the CPS Procurement Manual. In addition, we recommend the consideration of implementing a system control that requires the recording of three quotes for purchases between $2,000.01 and $25,000. The system may be the permanent record. Views of Responsible Officials: Based on the prior year recommendation to the FY21 finding, dated December 15, 2021, in April, 2022, CPS revised the policies in the Procurement Manual to reflect the current standard. The Oracle procurement module was tested and upgraded to implement further controls to require the collection of three quotes for any purchase using federal grant funds between $2,000.01 and $25,000 in value. In addition, communication and reenforcement of the procurement policies in the CPS Procurement Manual at the program and school level has been completed through the mandatory training and district wide announcement. On May 9, 2022, US department of Education issued the determination letter concluding this finding resolved and closed.
FINDING 2022-002, 2021-001 ? REPEAT FINDING Information on the Federal Program: Federal Agencies: U.S. Department of Education Federal Programs: 84.027/84.173 Special Education Cluster (IDEA) 84.377 School Improvement Grants (Title 1003a IL-Empower) 93.323 Epidemiology and Lab Capacity (ELC) Pass-Through Entity: Illinois State Board of Education; City of Chicago Department of Public Health (CDPH) Pass-Through Entity Award Numbers: H027A210072; S377A160014 Criteria: Procurement Standards of Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Costs Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) state that all non-federal entities will follow Sections 200.318 through Section 200.327. A. Section 200.320 identifies five methods of procurement to be followed: a. Informal ? micro-purchases b. Informal ? small purchases c. Formal ? sealed bids d. Formal ? competitive proposals e. Noncompetitive proposals Section 200.318 states that non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures that are consistent with State and local laws in addition to the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. B. Per Section 200.320(b) if small purchases are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. C. Title 2 CFR section 200.303 states the following regarding internal control: ?The auditee shall maintain internal control over Federal programs that provides reasonable assurance that the auditee is managing Federal awards in compliance with law, regulations, and the provisions of contracts or grant agreements that could have a material effect on each of its Federal programs.? D. The Chicago Public Schools Procurement Manual requires the collection of three quotes for any purchase between $2,000.01 and $25,000 for any purchase with federal grant funds. Condition/Context: For the three programs referenced, we tested one-hundred and five (105) purchase orders totaling $31,156,308. Thirty-four (34) purchase orders totaling $523,384 were purchases greater than $2,000 but less than $25,000, and for which CPS did not obtain and/or document an adequate number of price or rate quotations as required by CPS? procurement policies. Our samples were not statistically valid. Cause: CPS employees at the program/school level may not be following the CPS Procurement Manual due to the decentralized nature of the process and the high number of purchases that can fall under the $2,000.01-$25,000 threshold. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs, if any, are unable to be determined, however, actual purchase orders that did not comply with the small purchase requirements of the CPS Policy Manual totaled $133,788 for Assistance Listing Number 84.027/84.173, $376,459 for Assistance Listing Number 84.377, and $13,137 for Assistance Listing Number 93.323. Effect: Chicago Public Schools did not document compliance with the requirements of the CPS Policy Manual as it relates to small purchases that fall between $2,000.01 and $25,000. Recommendation: We recommend that CPS communicate and re-enforce its procurement policies and procedures and any changes thereto in order to comply with the purchase requirements of the CPS Procurement Manual. Ensure proper communication is delivered to relevant employees regarding any changes to the CPS Procurement Manual and the CPS Procurement Manual. In addition, we recommend the consideration of implementing a system control that requires the recording of three quotes for purchases between $2,000.01 and $25,000. The system may be the permanent record. Views of Responsible Officials: Based on the prior year recommendation to the FY21 finding, dated December 15, 2021, in April, 2022, CPS revised the policies in the Procurement Manual to reflect the current standard. The Oracle procurement module was tested and upgraded to implement further controls to require the collection of three quotes for any purchase using federal grant funds between $2,000.01 and $25,000 in value. In addition, communication and reenforcement of the procurement policies in the CPS Procurement Manual at the program and school level has been completed through the mandatory training and district wide announcement. On May 9, 2022, US department of Education issued the determination letter concluding this finding resolved and closed.
Identification of the Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture ? Community Facilities Loans and Grants Cluster, Community Facilities Loans and Grants ? 10.766 Criteria: The Partnership must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the Partnership is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.327 and 2 CFR 200.328 require the auditee to collect financial information and monitor its activities under federal awards to assure compliance with applicable federal requirements and performance expectations are being achieved and report these items in accordance with program requirements. Terms and conditions of the federal award require the audited financial statements to be provided to the federal agency annually within 150 days of fiscal year-end, as well as quarterly internal financial statements. Condition: The Partnership did not submit the audited financial statements within the prescribed period or request an extension and did not submit any quarterly reports to the federal agency. The Partnership was not asked for the information after they failed to submit it. The audited financial statements are readily available to the federal agency through the federal clearinghouse website. Cause: The Partnership did not provide the required information. Effect: The required reports were not submitted to the federal agency. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: Sampling was not used. All required reports were tested for compliance. Recommendation: We recommend that management implement procedures to ensure that the required financial reports are submitted in a timely manner in accordance with the terms and conditions of the federal award. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan.