FINDING 2022-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2020-2021, FY 2021-2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-004. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for four of four purchases of goods or services tested that were less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000, but exceeded the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. In addition, vendor contracts were not entered into for purchases above $50,000 as required by state statute. As a result, one vendor subject to a contract was not verified so ensure that the vendor was not excluded or disqualified from participation in federal assistance programs or activities. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 CONCORD COMMUNITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The School Corporation did not verify that vendors with contracts over $25,000 were not excluded or disqualified from participation in federal assistance programs or activities. Five of five contracts tested did not comply. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Revised Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states: "Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 CONCORD COMMUNITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases ? (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not established a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2020-2021, FY 2021-2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-004. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for four of four purchases of goods or services tested that were less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000, but exceeded the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. In addition, vendor contracts were not entered into for purchases above $50,000 as required by state statute. As a result, one vendor subject to a contract was not verified so ensure that the vendor was not excluded or disqualified from participation in federal assistance programs or activities. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 CONCORD COMMUNITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The School Corporation did not verify that vendors with contracts over $25,000 were not excluded or disqualified from participation in federal assistance programs or activities. Five of five contracts tested did not comply. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Revised Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states: "Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 CONCORD COMMUNITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases ? (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not established a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2020-2021, FY 2021-2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-004. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for four of four purchases of goods or services tested that were less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000, but exceeded the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. In addition, vendor contracts were not entered into for purchases above $50,000 as required by state statute. As a result, one vendor subject to a contract was not verified so ensure that the vendor was not excluded or disqualified from participation in federal assistance programs or activities. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 CONCORD COMMUNITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The School Corporation did not verify that vendors with contracts over $25,000 were not excluded or disqualified from participation in federal assistance programs or activities. Five of five contracts tested did not comply. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Revised Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states: "Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 CONCORD COMMUNITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases ? (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not established a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2020-2021, FY 2021-2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-004. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for four of four purchases of goods or services tested that were less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000, but exceeded the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. In addition, vendor contracts were not entered into for purchases above $50,000 as required by state statute. As a result, one vendor subject to a contract was not verified so ensure that the vendor was not excluded or disqualified from participation in federal assistance programs or activities. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 CONCORD COMMUNITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The School Corporation did not verify that vendors with contracts over $25,000 were not excluded or disqualified from participation in federal assistance programs or activities. Five of five contracts tested did not comply. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Revised Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.320(b) (Uniform Guidance) states: "Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 CONCORD COMMUNITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases ? (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not established a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
2022-006: Federal Awards ? Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development CFDA No.: 14.218 Federal Program: Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Federal Award Year: 2022 Control Category: Reporting Questioned Costs: $0 Condition For the Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants program, the City did not submit the following reports within the required deadline: Report Type Reporting Period (End Date) Report Submission Deadline Report Submission Date SF-425 Federal Financial Report September 30, 2021 October 30, 2022 January 11, 2022 SF-425 Federal Financial Report December 31, 2021 January 30, 2022 January 19, 2022 SF-425 Federal Financial Report March 31, 2022 April 30, 2022 May 10, 2022 SF-425 Federal Financial Report June 30, 2022 July 30, 2022 September 7, 2022 Criteria Pursuant to the Part 4 CDBG ? Entitlement Grants Cluster and financial and performance reporting requirements in the cooperative agreement provisions, and 2 CFR 200.327: SF-425 Federal Financial Report: Program award recipients must submit SF 425 reports to HUD quarterly, 30 days after the reporting period end date. Each report must cover all expenditures on the cooperative agreement from the start date of the reporting period to the reporting period end date. The following federal fiscal year quarter reporting period will be used for all quarterly reports, are due to HUD 30 days after the period end dates. Cause The City did not have internal controls in place to ensure that financial and performance reports are filed timely. Effect Delay in filing the reports resulted in non-compliance with the compliance requirements. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs. Recommendation We recommend that the City strengthen internal controls by implementing procedures to ensure the timely filing of financial and performance reports. Management?s Response Regarding Corrective Action Taken or Planned Management agrees with the finding. Due to vacancies experienced by the City of South Gate and the absence of a Director and Deputy Director of Administrative Services, management was not able to properly oversee the timely submission of the SF-425 financial reports for fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. Additionally, due to these vacancies, the late submission of these reports extended into the first two quarters of the following fiscal year. However, these vacant positions have since been filled and Management will ensure that all SF-425 financial reports are reviewed and submitted within 30 days after the reporting period end date.
Condition and Context: The four quarterly reports were not filed within the 30 days required by the contract. Also, the Uniform Guidance requires the submission of a single audit reporting package to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within nine months of the auditee?s fiscal year end. Criteria, Cause and Effect: According to 2 CFR ?200.327, Financial Reporting, information must be collected with the frequency required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The contracts require the filing of quarterly reports within 30 days after the quarter-end. Also, the Uniform Guidance requires the submission of a single audit reporting package to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within nine months of the auditees? fiscal year end. The cause is due to a decrease in personnel at the School, requiring finance personnel to complete additional nonfinance related tasks. The effect is the late filing of the quarterly reports and late submission to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse. Recommendation: We recommend that the School establish a system of monitoring for the filing of all required reporting and that the chief school administrator review the monitoring list on a regular basis consistent with the timing of report filings. Management?s Response: The School?s responsible officials? views and planned corrective action are in its corrective action plan at the end of the report.
Condition and Context: The four quarterly reports were not filed within the 30 days required by the contract. Also, the Uniform Guidance requires the submission of a single audit reporting package to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within nine months of the auditee?s fiscal year end. Criteria, Cause and Effect: According to 2 CFR ?200.327, Financial Reporting, information must be collected with the frequency required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The contracts require the filing of quarterly reports within 30 days after the quarter-end. Also, the Uniform Guidance requires the submission of a single audit reporting package to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within nine months of the auditees? fiscal year end. The cause is due to a decrease in personnel at the School, requiring finance personnel to complete additional nonfinance related tasks. The effect is the late filing of the quarterly reports and late submission to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse. Recommendation: We recommend that the School establish a system of monitoring for the filing of all required reporting and that the chief school administrator review the monitoring list on a regular basis consistent with the timing of report filings. Management?s Response: The School?s responsible officials? views and planned corrective action are in its corrective action plan at the end of the report.
See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table 2022-004: Procurement (Significant Deficiency) Criteria: The Authority must design internal controls to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Per 2 CFR 200.317, when procuring property and services under a Federal award, a State must follow the same policies and procedures it uses for procurements from its non-Federal funds. The State will comply with Sections 200.321, 200.322, and 200.323 and ensure that every purchase order or other contact includes any clauses required by Section 200.327. State means any state of the United States and any instrumentality thereof, which would include the Authority. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-102 requires that all recipients establish written procurement procedures. Condition/context: During the completion of the fiscal year 2021 audit, it was identified that the Authority did not have an internal control system in place to evaluate purchase requests for compliance with procurement requirements. In January 2022, the Authority rectified the deficiency and established a control system. However, proper controls were not in place for the first six months of the fiscal year under audit. For three out of seven vendors selected for testing with purchases greater than the Authority?s $10,000 procurement threshold, we determined that the Authority had failed to properly document the procurement of goods and services as required by 2 CFR 200.317 and OMB Circular A-102. However, per our conversations with Authority personnel, each of the three purchases met a requirement for noncompetitive (sole source) procurement as provided for under Section 200.320 of the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The Authority was not aware of the procurement requirements and had not documented its reasons for noncompetitive procurement. Effect: If an entity fails to comply with Federal statutes, regulations, or the terms and conditions of a Federal award, the Federal awarding agency may impose additional conditions. If the Federal awarding agency determines that noncompliance cannot be remedied by imposing additional conditions, the Federal awarding agency may take one or more of the following actions, as appropriate in the circumstances: (a) Temporarily withhold cash payments pending correction of the deficiency by the non-Federal entity or more severe enforcement action by the Federal awarding agency. (b) Disallow (that is, deny both use of funds and any applicable matching credit for) all or part of the cost of the activity or action not in compliance. (c) Wholly or partly suspend or terminate the Federal award. (d) Initiate suspension or debarment proceedings. (e) Withhold further Federal awards for the project or program. (f) Take other remedies that may be legally available. Questioned costs: $0 Identification as a repeat finding: Yes; see prior-year finding 2021-002. Recommendation: As the Authority has implemented a control system that evaluates all purchase requests for goods and services for compliance with the Federal procurement requirements, we recommend continued compliance with the established control system. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management concurs with the finding. See Exhibit I.
2022-001 Program: Highway Planning and Construction Cluster CFDA Number: 20.205 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Pass-through: California Department of Transportation Award Year: 2021-2022 Compliance Requirement(s): Procurement, Suspension, and Department Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Instance of Noncompliance Criteria: Per the 2 CFR 200.318(a), non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. The non-Federal entity must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200 (Uniform Guidance). Condition: As a result of the test work performed over the procurement, suspension, and debarment compliance requirements, we identified that the City?s written procedures for procurement of goods or services did not fully conform with the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR section 200.318 through 200.327. Cause: The City?s written policy and procedures for purchasing were not updated to incorporate the applicable requirements of sections 200.318 through 200.327 that apply to the procurement action based on the method of procurement. Effect: The City?s written policies and procedures did not comply with the requirements of 200.318(a). Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: Although the City?s purchasing policy incorporated portions of 2 CFR, sections 200.318 through 200.327, the written procedures do not conform to the requirements of 2 CFR, section 200.318(a) which requires that the non-federal entity must have and use documented procedures consistent with the standards identified in sections 200.318 through 200.327. The City?s written procedures do not identify the applicable requirements of sections 200.318 through 200.327 that apply to the procurement action based on the method of procurement. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): No. Recommendation: We recommend that the City continue to strengthen its written procurement procedures to incorporate the applicable requirements identified in sections 200.318 through 200.327 of the Uniform Guidance that apply based on the procurement action and the method of procurement as required by section 200.318(a). Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. Name of Responsible Individual: Kelly Sessions, Director of Administrative Services. Anticipated Implementation Date: June 30, 2023. See separate corrective action plan.
2022-001 Program: Highway Planning and Construction Cluster CFDA Number: 20.205 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Pass-through: California Department of Transportation Award Year: 2021-2022 Compliance Requirement(s): Procurement, Suspension, and Department Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Instance of Noncompliance Criteria: Per the 2 CFR 200.318(a), non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. The non-Federal entity must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200 (Uniform Guidance). Condition: As a result of the test work performed over the procurement, suspension, and debarment compliance requirements, we identified that the City?s written procedures for procurement of goods or services did not fully conform with the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR section 200.318 through 200.327. Cause: The City?s written policy and procedures for purchasing were not updated to incorporate the applicable requirements of sections 200.318 through 200.327 that apply to the procurement action based on the method of procurement. Effect: The City?s written policies and procedures did not comply with the requirements of 200.318(a). Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: Although the City?s purchasing policy incorporated portions of 2 CFR, sections 200.318 through 200.327, the written procedures do not conform to the requirements of 2 CFR, section 200.318(a) which requires that the non-federal entity must have and use documented procedures consistent with the standards identified in sections 200.318 through 200.327. The City?s written procedures do not identify the applicable requirements of sections 200.318 through 200.327 that apply to the procurement action based on the method of procurement. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): No. Recommendation: We recommend that the City continue to strengthen its written procurement procedures to incorporate the applicable requirements identified in sections 200.318 through 200.327 of the Uniform Guidance that apply based on the procurement action and the method of procurement as required by section 200.318(a). Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. Name of Responsible Individual: Kelly Sessions, Director of Administrative Services. Anticipated Implementation Date: June 30, 2023. See separate corrective action plan.
2022-001 Program: Highway Planning and Construction Cluster CFDA Number: 20.205 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Pass-through: California Department of Transportation Award Year: 2021-2022 Compliance Requirement(s): Procurement, Suspension, and Department Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Instance of Noncompliance Criteria: Per the 2 CFR 200.318(a), non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. The non-Federal entity must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200 (Uniform Guidance). Condition: As a result of the test work performed over the procurement, suspension, and debarment compliance requirements, we identified that the City?s written procedures for procurement of goods or services did not fully conform with the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR section 200.318 through 200.327. Cause: The City?s written policy and procedures for purchasing were not updated to incorporate the applicable requirements of sections 200.318 through 200.327 that apply to the procurement action based on the method of procurement. Effect: The City?s written policies and procedures did not comply with the requirements of 200.318(a). Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: Although the City?s purchasing policy incorporated portions of 2 CFR, sections 200.318 through 200.327, the written procedures do not conform to the requirements of 2 CFR, section 200.318(a) which requires that the non-federal entity must have and use documented procedures consistent with the standards identified in sections 200.318 through 200.327. The City?s written procedures do not identify the applicable requirements of sections 200.318 through 200.327 that apply to the procurement action based on the method of procurement. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): No. Recommendation: We recommend that the City continue to strengthen its written procurement procedures to incorporate the applicable requirements identified in sections 200.318 through 200.327 of the Uniform Guidance that apply based on the procurement action and the method of procurement as required by section 200.318(a). Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. Name of Responsible Individual: Kelly Sessions, Director of Administrative Services. Anticipated Implementation Date: June 30, 2023. See separate corrective action plan.
2022-001 Program: Highway Planning and Construction Cluster CFDA Number: 20.205 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Pass-through: California Department of Transportation Award Year: 2021-2022 Compliance Requirement(s): Procurement, Suspension, and Department Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Instance of Noncompliance Criteria: Per the 2 CFR 200.318(a), non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. The non-Federal entity must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200 (Uniform Guidance). Condition: As a result of the test work performed over the procurement, suspension, and debarment compliance requirements, we identified that the City?s written procedures for procurement of goods or services did not fully conform with the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR section 200.318 through 200.327. Cause: The City?s written policy and procedures for purchasing were not updated to incorporate the applicable requirements of sections 200.318 through 200.327 that apply to the procurement action based on the method of procurement. Effect: The City?s written policies and procedures did not comply with the requirements of 200.318(a). Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: Although the City?s purchasing policy incorporated portions of 2 CFR, sections 200.318 through 200.327, the written procedures do not conform to the requirements of 2 CFR, section 200.318(a) which requires that the non-federal entity must have and use documented procedures consistent with the standards identified in sections 200.318 through 200.327. The City?s written procedures do not identify the applicable requirements of sections 200.318 through 200.327 that apply to the procurement action based on the method of procurement. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): No. Recommendation: We recommend that the City continue to strengthen its written procurement procedures to incorporate the applicable requirements identified in sections 200.318 through 200.327 of the Uniform Guidance that apply based on the procurement action and the method of procurement as required by section 200.318(a). Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. Name of Responsible Individual: Kelly Sessions, Director of Administrative Services. Anticipated Implementation Date: June 30, 2023. See separate corrective action plan.
See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table 2022-003: Reporting Criteria: 2 CFR 200.327, Financial Reporting, and the laws, regulations, and provisions of contracts or grant agreements pertaining to the specific programs require that reports be complete, accurate, and supported by accounting records (if applicable), and submitted in compliance with the appropriate deadlines. Per various guidance published by ED, the Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) portion of the ESF requires the following with respect to reporting: Quarterly Public Reporting (Student Portion): Institutes of Higher Education (IHE) were required to publicly post certain information on their websites no later than 30 days after award and update that information every 45 days thereafter. However, on August 31, 2020, ED revised the requirement by decreasing the frequency of reporting after the initial 30-day period from every 45 days thereafter to every calendar quarter. IHEs posting a 45-day report on or after August 31, 2020 should instead post a report every calendar quarter, with the first calendar quarter report due by October 10, 2020, and covering the period from after their last 45-day or 30-day report through the end of the calendar quarter on September 30, 2020. IHEs may have until the end of the second calendar quarter, June 30, 2021, to post these retroactive reports if they have not already done so. Quarterly Public Reporting (Institutional Portion): A new, separate form was to be posted covering aggregate amounts spent for all HEERF funds each quarterly reporting period. IHEs must post this quarterly report form no later than 10 days after the end of each calendar quarter, apart from the first report, which was due on October 30, 2020, and the report covering the first quarter of 2021, which was due on July 10, 2021. The forms are required to be conspicuously posted on each institution?s primary website on the same page the reports of the IHE?s activities as to the emergency financial aid grants to students (Student Portion) are posted. Condition/context: A total of five reports were selected for testing, including one annual report, two quarterly reports related to the Student Portion and two quarterly reports related to the Institutional Portion. Of these five reports: 1. All reports lacked evidence of proper review and approval by authorized individuals before submission of the report to the ED. 2. The Quarterly Student report for the period ended March 31, 2022 was not submitted in a timely manner. 3. The Quarterly Institutional report for the period ended September 30, 2021 was not submitted in a timely manner. 4. The Quarterly Institutional report for the period ended March 31, 2022 was not submitted in a timely manner. Questioned costs: $0 Cause: The College?s internal control system did not have a sufficient control process in place to ensure all reports were reviewed and approved by proper authorized individuals or that the reports were completed and submitted timely. Effect: If a non-Federal entity fails to comply with Federal statutes, regulations, or the terms and conditions of a Federal award, the Federal awarding agency may impose additional conditions, which include requiring payments as reimbursements rather than advance payments; withholding authority to proceed to the next phase until receiving evidence of acceptable performance within a given period of performance; requiring additional, more detailed financial reports; requiring additional project monitoring; requiring the non-Federal entity to obtain technical or management assistance; and establishing additional prior approvals. If the Federal awarding agency determines that noncompliance cannot be remedied by imposing additional conditions, the Federal awarding agency may take one or more of the following actions, as appropriate in the circumstances: (a) Temporarily withhold cash payments pending correction of the deficiency by the non-Federal entity or more severe enforcement action by the Federal awarding agency. (b) Disallow (that is, deny both use of funds and any applicable matching credit for) all or part of the cost of the activity or action not in compliance. (c) Wholly or partly suspend or terminate the Federal award. (d) Initiate suspension or debarment proceedings as authorized under 2 CFR Part 180 and Federal awarding agency regulations (or in the case of a pass-through entity, recommend such a proceeding be initiated by a Federal awarding agency). (e) Withhold further Federal awards for the project or program. (f) Take other remedies that may be legally available. Identification as a repeat finding: Yes; see prior-year finding 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend that the College revise its procedures to include an independent review of reports for accuracy before they are submitted and posted. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: Management concurs with the finding. See Exhibit I.
See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table 2022-003: Reporting Criteria: 2 CFR 200.327, Financial Reporting, and the laws, regulations, and provisions of contracts or grant agreements pertaining to the specific programs require that reports be complete, accurate, and supported by accounting records (if applicable), and submitted in compliance with the appropriate deadlines. Per various guidance published by ED, the Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) portion of the ESF requires the following with respect to reporting: Quarterly Public Reporting (Student Portion): Institutes of Higher Education (IHE) were required to publicly post certain information on their websites no later than 30 days after award and update that information every 45 days thereafter. However, on August 31, 2020, ED revised the requirement by decreasing the frequency of reporting after the initial 30-day period from every 45 days thereafter to every calendar quarter. IHEs posting a 45-day report on or after August 31, 2020 should instead post a report every calendar quarter, with the first calendar quarter report due by October 10, 2020, and covering the period from after their last 45-day or 30-day report through the end of the calendar quarter on September 30, 2020. IHEs may have until the end of the second calendar quarter, June 30, 2021, to post these retroactive reports if they have not already done so. Quarterly Public Reporting (Institutional Portion): A new, separate form was to be posted covering aggregate amounts spent for all HEERF funds each quarterly reporting period. IHEs must post this quarterly report form no later than 10 days after the end of each calendar quarter, apart from the first report, which was due on October 30, 2020, and the report covering the first quarter of 2021, which was due on July 10, 2021. The forms are required to be conspicuously posted on each institution?s primary website on the same page the reports of the IHE?s activities as to the emergency financial aid grants to students (Student Portion) are posted. Condition/context: A total of five reports were selected for testing, including one annual report, two quarterly reports related to the Student Portion and two quarterly reports related to the Institutional Portion. Of these five reports: 1. All reports lacked evidence of proper review and approval by authorized individuals before submission of the report to the ED. 2. The Quarterly Student report for the period ended March 31, 2022 was not submitted in a timely manner. 3. The Quarterly Institutional report for the period ended September 30, 2021 was not submitted in a timely manner. 4. The Quarterly Institutional report for the period ended March 31, 2022 was not submitted in a timely manner. Questioned costs: $0 Cause: The College?s internal control system did not have a sufficient control process in place to ensure all reports were reviewed and approved by proper authorized individuals or that the reports were completed and submitted timely. Effect: If a non-Federal entity fails to comply with Federal statutes, regulations, or the terms and conditions of a Federal award, the Federal awarding agency may impose additional conditions, which include requiring payments as reimbursements rather than advance payments; withholding authority to proceed to the next phase until receiving evidence of acceptable performance within a given period of performance; requiring additional, more detailed financial reports; requiring additional project monitoring; requiring the non-Federal entity to obtain technical or management assistance; and establishing additional prior approvals. If the Federal awarding agency determines that noncompliance cannot be remedied by imposing additional conditions, the Federal awarding agency may take one or more of the following actions, as appropriate in the circumstances: (a) Temporarily withhold cash payments pending correction of the deficiency by the non-Federal entity or more severe enforcement action by the Federal awarding agency. (b) Disallow (that is, deny both use of funds and any applicable matching credit for) all or part of the cost of the activity or action not in compliance. (c) Wholly or partly suspend or terminate the Federal award. (d) Initiate suspension or debarment proceedings as authorized under 2 CFR Part 180 and Federal awarding agency regulations (or in the case of a pass-through entity, recommend such a proceeding be initiated by a Federal awarding agency). (e) Withhold further Federal awards for the project or program. (f) Take other remedies that may be legally available. Identification as a repeat finding: Yes; see prior-year finding 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend that the College revise its procedures to include an independent review of reports for accuracy before they are submitted and posted. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: Management concurs with the finding. See Exhibit I.
Finding 2022-004 Department of Education Education Stabilization Fund - Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund ? Institutional Federal Financial Assistance Listing #84.425F P425F200756-20A and P425F200756-20B Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. The nonfederal entity?s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR 200 Appendix II requires certain provisions be included in contracts if criteria are met. As outlined in 2 CFR 180, recipients must not utilize any vendor which is suspended or debarred or is otherwise excluded from the central contractor registry. Condition: The University?s procurement policy did not include all the required elements as outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Additionally, the University did not retain documentation to support the procedures it performed to ensure compliance with procurement, suspension, and debarment. Cause: The University does not typically use federal financial assistance to procure goods and services; consequently, certain elements required by the Uniform Guidance were missing. Effect: Lack of complete procurement, suspension, and debarment policies and not retaining documentation to support compliance with procurement, suspension, and debarment could result in procurements that do not conform with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: None reported Context: A non-statistical sample of 4 ($291,493) out of 21 ($392,941) purchases / contracts with expenditures over the micropurchase threshold of $3,000 were tested for procurement. In addition, suspension and debarment was applicable to two vendors. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: Yes, prior year finding 2021-003 Recommendation: We recommend that management develop a written procurement policy that conforms with Uniform Guidance. In addition, we recommend that management implement procedures and control processes to retain documentation supporting compliance with major federal program compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and the recommendation.
FINDING NUMBER: 2022-007 FEDERAL AGENCY: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY PASS-THROUGH AGENCY: P.R. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY - PUERTO RICO FISCAL AGENCY AND FINANCIAL ADVISORY AUTHORITY FEDERAL PROGRAM: CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS (ALN 21.027) REQUIREMENT: PROCUREMENT SUSPENSION & DEBARMENT (I) TYPE OF FINDING: SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY (SD) / NONCOMPLIANCE (NC) CONDITION: In our Procurement Contract Provision Test, we evaluated four contract agreements. We found that the Municipality validated prior to award the contract that the supplier was not listed as a debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded by agencies in the System for Award Management (SAM) for one (1) of the contracts. The validation of one (1) of the other three (3) contracts was made after the contract was signed, and the Municipality in the process to finalize the validation for the other two (2). Also, we found that the Municipality did not include all contract provisions required for non-federal entity contracts under federal awards for one (1) of the four (4) contracts. CRITERIA: Pursuant to 31 CFR section 19.300, prior to entering into subawards and contracts with award funds, recipients must verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded by (a) checking the EPLS; or collecting a certification from the entity; or adding a contract provision. 2 CFR section 200.327 references Appendix II to Part 200, which establishes contract provisions that must be included in non-federal entity contracts under federal awards. According to 2 CFR section 200.327, Appendix II to Part 200, (h), a contract must not be awarded to parties listed on the government exclusions in the System for Award Management (SAM), in accordance with OMB guidelines at 2 CFR 180 that implement Executive 12549 and 12689. The SAM Exclusions contain the names of parties debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded by agencies, as well as parties found ineligible under any legal or regulatory authority other than Executive Order 12549. CAUSE:There is lack of knowledge about the contract provisions required to be included in federal awards contracts and the procedure to verify if the contractors are excluded in the System for Award Management (SAM). Therefore, the Municipality has been awarding contracts without the proper procurement procedure. EFFECT: The program is in noncompliance with the Procurement Suspension and Debarment requirements as established in 31 CFR section 19.300 and 2 CFR section 200.327. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend to the program administrators to include in the requisition for contracts a description of the requirements that need to be fulfilled to award a federal contract. In order to take into consideration a proposal or bid, the Municipality must have on hand the System for Award Management certification of the entity that indicates that the supplier is active and not listed in the governmentwide exclusion list. Contracts should not be signed without the proper documentation of the SAM.gov certification and payments should not be made without the required contract provisions. QUESTIONED COST: None PRIOR YEAR FINDING: None VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION: We concur with the auditor?s finding. We are going to prepare written policies and procedures in accordance with Uniform Guidance. Implementation Date: May 31, 2023 Responsible Person: Kristian Rivera Santiago Finance Director
FINDING NUMBER: 2022-007 FEDERAL AGENCY: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY PASS-THROUGH AGENCY: P.R. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY - PUERTO RICO FISCAL AGENCY AND FINANCIAL ADVISORY AUTHORITY FEDERAL PROGRAM: CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS (ALN 21.027) REQUIREMENT: PROCUREMENT SUSPENSION & DEBARMENT (I) TYPE OF FINDING: SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY (SD) / NONCOMPLIANCE (NC) CONDITION: In our Procurement Contract Provision Test, we evaluated four contract agreements. We found that the Municipality validated prior to award the contract that the supplier was not listed as a debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded by agencies in the System for Award Management (SAM) for one (1) of the contracts. The validation of one (1) of the other three (3) contracts was made after the contract was signed, and the Municipality in the process to finalize the validation for the other two (2). Also, we found that the Municipality did not include all contract provisions required for non-federal entity contracts under federal awards for one (1) of the four (4) contracts. CRITERIA: Pursuant to 31 CFR section 19.300, prior to entering into subawards and contracts with award funds, recipients must verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded by (a) checking the EPLS; or collecting a certification from the entity; or adding a contract provision. 2 CFR section 200.327 references Appendix II to Part 200, which establishes contract provisions that must be included in non-federal entity contracts under federal awards. According to 2 CFR section 200.327, Appendix II to Part 200, (h), a contract must not be awarded to parties listed on the government exclusions in the System for Award Management (SAM), in accordance with OMB guidelines at 2 CFR 180 that implement Executive 12549 and 12689. The SAM Exclusions contain the names of parties debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded by agencies, as well as parties found ineligible under any legal or regulatory authority other than Executive Order 12549. CAUSE:There is lack of knowledge about the contract provisions required to be included in federal awards contracts and the procedure to verify if the contractors are excluded in the System for Award Management (SAM). Therefore, the Municipality has been awarding contracts without the proper procurement procedure. EFFECT: The program is in noncompliance with the Procurement Suspension and Debarment requirements as established in 31 CFR section 19.300 and 2 CFR section 200.327. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend to the program administrators to include in the requisition for contracts a description of the requirements that need to be fulfilled to award a federal contract. In order to take into consideration a proposal or bid, the Municipality must have on hand the System for Award Management certification of the entity that indicates that the supplier is active and not listed in the governmentwide exclusion list. Contracts should not be signed without the proper documentation of the SAM.gov certification and payments should not be made without the required contract provisions. QUESTIONED COST: None PRIOR YEAR FINDING: None VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION: We concur with the auditor?s finding. We are going to prepare written policies and procedures in accordance with Uniform Guidance. Implementation Date: May 31, 2023 Responsible Person: Kristian Rivera Santiago Finance Director
The Lawrence County Fiscal Court Failed To Implement Effective Internal Controls Over Federally Reimbursed Expenditures And Circumvented Internal Controls By Performing A Split Purchase Federal Program: Assistance Listing #: 21.027 COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Award Number and Year - 2022 Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Compliance Requirements; Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Type of Finding: Material Weakness and Noncompliance Amount of Questioned Costs: $64,999 Opinion Modification: Yes, Qualified COVID Related: Yes The Lawrence County Fiscal Court paid $29,999 to a vendor for inflatables and associated items for the Lawrence County Cove project. This vendor was paid an additional $5,000 on the same day for other items applicable to the cove project for a total of $34,999. In addition, the fiscal court also made a payment of $30,000 to another vendor for the renting of equipment which is also a violation of the ethics code as discussed in finding 2022-002 and 2022-005. There was a total of $64,999 in purchases with federal funds that were not advertised or opened for bid in accordance with KRS 424.260. Additionally, vendors were not checked to see if they were debarred or suspended. The fiscal court circumvented internal controls by making split payments to the vendor for less than $30,000. The county issued separate payments to the vendor so that bidding would not be required. The county also failed to advertise or open a bid for the inflatables cove project and the rental of the dozer. The county failed to follow proper procurement procedures which results in a noncompliance with state laws and federal regulations and is at risk for extensive federal oversight and repayment of questioned costs. The version of KRS 424.260(1) in effect at the time of the subject expenditures stated, ?[e]xcept where a statute specifically fixes a larger sum as the minimum for a requirement of advertisement for bids, no city, county, or district, or board or commission of a city or county, or sheriff or county clerk, may make a contract, lease, or other agreement for: (a) Materials; (b) Supplies, except perishable foods such as meat, poultry, fish, egg products, fresh vegetables, and fresh fruits; (c) Equipment; or (d) Contractual services other than professional; involving an expenditure of more than thirty thousand dollars ($30,000) without first making newspaper advertisement for bids.? 2 CFR ?200.318(a) requires, ?[t]he non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ? 200.317 through 200.327.? We recommend all expenditures of $30,000 or more be bid in accordance with KRS 424.260(1). Purchases should not be split in order to avoid bid requirements. The fiscal court and management should also abide by the requirements of 2 CFR ?200.318(a) by adhering to their own policies and procedures for procurement of projects.
2022-004 Department of Education Federal Financial Assistance Listing 84.425E, 84.425F, 84.425K Federal Award Numbers P425E201501, P425E201757, P425E200021, award year 2021 COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund - Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) Reporting Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.327 and 2 CFR 200.328 require the auditee to collect financial information and monitor its activities under federal awards to assure compliance with applicable federal requirements and performance expectations are being achieved and report these items in accordance with the program requirements. Condition: In our sample of reports selected for testing, we noted the following items; a) No support could be provided to substantiate a secondary level of review was completed for student and institutional portion quarterly reports for the quarters ended 12/31/2021 and 3/31/2022 and the year two annual report. b) Student portion quarterly reports ending 12/31/2021 and 3/31/2022 reported cumulative expenditures incurred from the inception of the federal program rather than expenditures incurred within the quarter, resulting in an error of $105,202 in the first report and $165,154 in the second report. Cause: There was a lapse in oversight of the internal control process ensuring expenditures reported were accurate and reconciled to supporting documentation. The College failed to identify the change in reporting requirements between HEERF awards. Effect: The College?s controls did not detect or correct the errors identified, which resulted in inaccurate expenditures reported within HEERF quarterly reports. Additionally, not having a formal oversight process over reporting results in a reasonable possibility that reports that are inaccurate or incomplete could be submitted. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: Four out of eight quarterly reports were reviewed along with one annual report. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: Yes, prior year finding 2021-003. Recommendation: We recommend that management implement procedures and control processes to comply with the federal requirements noted above and ensure documentation is retained supporting a secondary level of review is completed prior to submission of required reports. Views of Responsible Officials: Management is in agreement with the finding.
2022-005 Department of Education Federal Financial Assistance Listing 84.425E, 84.425F, 84.425K Federal Award Numbers P425E201501, P425E201757, P425E200021, award year 2021 COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund - Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. The nonfederal entity?s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR 200 Appendix II requires certain provisions be included in contracts if criteria are met. As outlined in 2 CFR 180, recipients must not utilize any vendor who is suspended or debarred or is otherwise excluded from the central contractor registry. Condition: The College?s procurement policy did not include all the required elements as outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Additionally, two vendors were not verified against the central contractor registry prior to expenses incurred to ensure that the vendor was not suspended or debarred. Cause: The College?s procurement policy does not include all the required elements as outlined in the Uniform Guidance. There was a lapse in oversight of the internal control process ensuring vendors are verified against the central contractor registry. Effect: Without a written procurement policy in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, demonstrating that the program complies with laws, regulations, and other compliance requirements is difficult. Failing to verify vendors against the central contractor registry may result in the College contracting for services with ineligible parties Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: The College had two transactions totaling $120,822 equaling or exceeding $25,000 that were selected for suspension and debarment testing. Those two contracts selected for testing totaled $120,822. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend that management implement procedures and control processes to comply with the federal requirements noted above. Views of Responsible Officials: Management is in agreement with the finding.
2022-004 Department of Education Federal Financial Assistance Listing 84.425E, 84.425F, 84.425K Federal Award Numbers P425E201501, P425E201757, P425E200021, award year 2021 COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund - Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) Reporting Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.327 and 2 CFR 200.328 require the auditee to collect financial information and monitor its activities under federal awards to assure compliance with applicable federal requirements and performance expectations are being achieved and report these items in accordance with the program requirements. Condition: In our sample of reports selected for testing, we noted the following items; a) No support could be provided to substantiate a secondary level of review was completed for student and institutional portion quarterly reports for the quarters ended 12/31/2021 and 3/31/2022 and the year two annual report. b) Student portion quarterly reports ending 12/31/2021 and 3/31/2022 reported cumulative expenditures incurred from the inception of the federal program rather than expenditures incurred within the quarter, resulting in an error of $105,202 in the first report and $165,154 in the second report. Cause: There was a lapse in oversight of the internal control process ensuring expenditures reported were accurate and reconciled to supporting documentation. The College failed to identify the change in reporting requirements between HEERF awards. Effect: The College?s controls did not detect or correct the errors identified, which resulted in inaccurate expenditures reported within HEERF quarterly reports. Additionally, not having a formal oversight process over reporting results in a reasonable possibility that reports that are inaccurate or incomplete could be submitted. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: Four out of eight quarterly reports were reviewed along with one annual report. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: Yes, prior year finding 2021-003. Recommendation: We recommend that management implement procedures and control processes to comply with the federal requirements noted above and ensure documentation is retained supporting a secondary level of review is completed prior to submission of required reports. Views of Responsible Officials: Management is in agreement with the finding.
2022-005 Department of Education Federal Financial Assistance Listing 84.425E, 84.425F, 84.425K Federal Award Numbers P425E201501, P425E201757, P425E200021, award year 2021 COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund - Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. The nonfederal entity?s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR 200 Appendix II requires certain provisions be included in contracts if criteria are met. As outlined in 2 CFR 180, recipients must not utilize any vendor who is suspended or debarred or is otherwise excluded from the central contractor registry. Condition: The College?s procurement policy did not include all the required elements as outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Additionally, two vendors were not verified against the central contractor registry prior to expenses incurred to ensure that the vendor was not suspended or debarred. Cause: The College?s procurement policy does not include all the required elements as outlined in the Uniform Guidance. There was a lapse in oversight of the internal control process ensuring vendors are verified against the central contractor registry. Effect: Without a written procurement policy in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, demonstrating that the program complies with laws, regulations, and other compliance requirements is difficult. Failing to verify vendors against the central contractor registry may result in the College contracting for services with ineligible parties Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: The College had two transactions totaling $120,822 equaling or exceeding $25,000 that were selected for suspension and debarment testing. Those two contracts selected for testing totaled $120,822. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend that management implement procedures and control processes to comply with the federal requirements noted above. Views of Responsible Officials: Management is in agreement with the finding.
2022-004 Department of Education Federal Financial Assistance Listing 84.425E, 84.425F, 84.425K Federal Award Numbers P425E201501, P425E201757, P425E200021, award year 2021 COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund - Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) Reporting Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.327 and 2 CFR 200.328 require the auditee to collect financial information and monitor its activities under federal awards to assure compliance with applicable federal requirements and performance expectations are being achieved and report these items in accordance with the program requirements. Condition: In our sample of reports selected for testing, we noted the following items; a) No support could be provided to substantiate a secondary level of review was completed for student and institutional portion quarterly reports for the quarters ended 12/31/2021 and 3/31/2022 and the year two annual report. b) Student portion quarterly reports ending 12/31/2021 and 3/31/2022 reported cumulative expenditures incurred from the inception of the federal program rather than expenditures incurred within the quarter, resulting in an error of $105,202 in the first report and $165,154 in the second report. Cause: There was a lapse in oversight of the internal control process ensuring expenditures reported were accurate and reconciled to supporting documentation. The College failed to identify the change in reporting requirements between HEERF awards. Effect: The College?s controls did not detect or correct the errors identified, which resulted in inaccurate expenditures reported within HEERF quarterly reports. Additionally, not having a formal oversight process over reporting results in a reasonable possibility that reports that are inaccurate or incomplete could be submitted. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: Four out of eight quarterly reports were reviewed along with one annual report. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: Yes, prior year finding 2021-003. Recommendation: We recommend that management implement procedures and control processes to comply with the federal requirements noted above and ensure documentation is retained supporting a secondary level of review is completed prior to submission of required reports. Views of Responsible Officials: Management is in agreement with the finding.
2022-005 Department of Education Federal Financial Assistance Listing 84.425E, 84.425F, 84.425K Federal Award Numbers P425E201501, P425E201757, P425E200021, award year 2021 COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund - Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. The nonfederal entity?s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR 200 Appendix II requires certain provisions be included in contracts if criteria are met. As outlined in 2 CFR 180, recipients must not utilize any vendor who is suspended or debarred or is otherwise excluded from the central contractor registry. Condition: The College?s procurement policy did not include all the required elements as outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Additionally, two vendors were not verified against the central contractor registry prior to expenses incurred to ensure that the vendor was not suspended or debarred. Cause: The College?s procurement policy does not include all the required elements as outlined in the Uniform Guidance. There was a lapse in oversight of the internal control process ensuring vendors are verified against the central contractor registry. Effect: Without a written procurement policy in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, demonstrating that the program complies with laws, regulations, and other compliance requirements is difficult. Failing to verify vendors against the central contractor registry may result in the College contracting for services with ineligible parties Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: The College had two transactions totaling $120,822 equaling or exceeding $25,000 that were selected for suspension and debarment testing. Those two contracts selected for testing totaled $120,822. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend that management implement procedures and control processes to comply with the federal requirements noted above. Views of Responsible Officials: Management is in agreement with the finding.
Finding No.: 2022-003 Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Assistance Listing No.: 93.958 Requirement: Reporting Type of Finding: Material Noncompliance and Material Weakness Program: Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services Federal award no. and year: 1B09SM082596-01 10/01/19 ? 09/30/21 1B09SM083798-01 10/01/20 ? 09/30/22 1B09SM083952-01 03/15/21 ? 03/14/23 1B09SM085353-01 03/01/21 ? 09/30/25 1B09SM085881-01 09/01/21 ? 09/30/25 Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.327 states that "(financial) information must be collected with the frequency required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award, but no less frequently than annually nor more frequently than quarterly except in unusual circumstances." Under this reporting requirement, the program must submit a Federal Financial Report (FFR) within 90 days after the close of the statutory grant period. Under 2 CFR Appendix A to Part 170, recipients (i.e., direct recipients) of grants or cooperative agreements are required to report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS). Condition: We noted one FFR was not timely submitted and the program did not report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to FSRS. Context: The program was required to submit one FFR during FY2022. During the audit, we noted that the FFR was submitted 133 days after the close of the statutory grant period. During the audit, we were also informed by Department personnel that required information on first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more were not reported to FSRS, a requirement that is included in the programs notice of awards. The following table summarizes our findings: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for table. We tested all first-tier subawards that amounted to $30,000 or more during FY2022. Cause: Based on further inquiry with Department personnel, we noted that the delay in submitting the FFR and failure to report first-tier subawards to FSRS was caused by a lack of personnel available to monitor reporting requirements and complete reporting requirements timely. Effect: Failure to timely submit reports and report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to FSRS results in noncompliance with the reporting requirement. Questioned Costs: None Identification as a Repeat Finding, if applicable: See finding 2021-004 included in the Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings. Recommendation: We recommend program management be more diligent in following Federal deadlines in order to ensure compliance with Federal requirements. We also recommend program management be more diligent in understanding all requirements of grant agreements to ensure compliance with Federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See Part VI Corrective Action Plan.
Finding No.: 2022-003 Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Assistance Listing No.: 93.958 Requirement: Reporting Type of Finding: Material Noncompliance and Material Weakness Program: Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services Federal award no. and year: 1B09SM082596-01 10/01/19 ? 09/30/21 1B09SM083798-01 10/01/20 ? 09/30/22 1B09SM083952-01 03/15/21 ? 03/14/23 1B09SM085353-01 03/01/21 ? 09/30/25 1B09SM085881-01 09/01/21 ? 09/30/25 Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.327 states that "(financial) information must be collected with the frequency required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award, but no less frequently than annually nor more frequently than quarterly except in unusual circumstances." Under this reporting requirement, the program must submit a Federal Financial Report (FFR) within 90 days after the close of the statutory grant period. Under 2 CFR Appendix A to Part 170, recipients (i.e., direct recipients) of grants or cooperative agreements are required to report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS). Condition: We noted one FFR was not timely submitted and the program did not report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to FSRS. Context: The program was required to submit one FFR during FY2022. During the audit, we noted that the FFR was submitted 133 days after the close of the statutory grant period. During the audit, we were also informed by Department personnel that required information on first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more were not reported to FSRS, a requirement that is included in the programs notice of awards. The following table summarizes our findings: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for table. We tested all first-tier subawards that amounted to $30,000 or more during FY2022. Cause: Based on further inquiry with Department personnel, we noted that the delay in submitting the FFR and failure to report first-tier subawards to FSRS was caused by a lack of personnel available to monitor reporting requirements and complete reporting requirements timely. Effect: Failure to timely submit reports and report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to FSRS results in noncompliance with the reporting requirement. Questioned Costs: None Identification as a Repeat Finding, if applicable: See finding 2021-004 included in the Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings. Recommendation: We recommend program management be more diligent in following Federal deadlines in order to ensure compliance with Federal requirements. We also recommend program management be more diligent in understanding all requirements of grant agreements to ensure compliance with Federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See Part VI Corrective Action Plan.
Finding No.: 2022-007 Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Assistance Listing No.: 93.982 Requirement: Reporting Type of Finding: Material Noncompliance and Material Weakness Program: Mental Health Disaster Assistance and Emergency Mental Health Federal award no. and year: 1H79FG000623-01 09/30/20 ? 09/29/21 Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.327 states that "(financial) information must be collected with the frequency required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award, but no less frequently than annually nor more frequently than quarterly except in unusual circumstances." Under this reporting requirement, the program must submit a Federal Financial Report (FFR) within 90 days after the close of the statutory grant period. Under 2 CFR Appendix A to Part 170, recipients (i.e., direct recipients) of grants or cooperative agreements are required to report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS). Condition: We noted one FFR was not timely submitted and the program did not report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to FSRS. Context: The program was required to submit one FFR during FY2022. During the audit, we noted that the FFR was submitted 126 days after the close of the statutory grant period. During the audit, we were also informed by Department personnel that required information on first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more were not reported to FSRS, a requirement that is included in the programs notice of awards. The following table summarizes our findings: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for table. We tested all first-tier subawards that amounted to $30,000 or more during FY2022. Cause: Based on further inquiry with Department personnel, we noted that the delay in submitting the FFR was caused by a lack of communication between ASO and program management. We further noted that the failure to report first-tier subawards to FSRS was caused by a lack of awareness of the FSRS reporting requirement. Effect: Failure to timely submit reports and report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to FSRS results in noncompliance with the reporting requirement. Questioned Costs: None Identification as a Repeat Finding, if applicable: Not applicable Recommendation: We recommend program management be more diligent in following Federal deadlines in order to ensure compliance with Federal requirements. We also recommend program management be more diligent in understanding all requirements of grant agreements to ensure compliance with Federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See Part VI Corrective Action Plan.
Finding No.: 2022-007 Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Assistance Listing No.: 93.982 Requirement: Reporting Type of Finding: Material Noncompliance and Material Weakness Program: Mental Health Disaster Assistance and Emergency Mental Health Federal award no. and year: 1H79FG000623-01 09/30/20 ? 09/29/21 Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.327 states that "(financial) information must be collected with the frequency required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award, but no less frequently than annually nor more frequently than quarterly except in unusual circumstances." Under this reporting requirement, the program must submit a Federal Financial Report (FFR) within 90 days after the close of the statutory grant period. Under 2 CFR Appendix A to Part 170, recipients (i.e., direct recipients) of grants or cooperative agreements are required to report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS). Condition: We noted one FFR was not timely submitted and the program did not report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to FSRS. Context: The program was required to submit one FFR during FY2022. During the audit, we noted that the FFR was submitted 126 days after the close of the statutory grant period. During the audit, we were also informed by Department personnel that required information on first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more were not reported to FSRS, a requirement that is included in the programs notice of awards. The following table summarizes our findings: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for table. We tested all first-tier subawards that amounted to $30,000 or more during FY2022. Cause: Based on further inquiry with Department personnel, we noted that the delay in submitting the FFR was caused by a lack of communication between ASO and program management. We further noted that the failure to report first-tier subawards to FSRS was caused by a lack of awareness of the FSRS reporting requirement. Effect: Failure to timely submit reports and report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to FSRS results in noncompliance with the reporting requirement. Questioned Costs: None Identification as a Repeat Finding, if applicable: Not applicable Recommendation: We recommend program management be more diligent in following Federal deadlines in order to ensure compliance with Federal requirements. We also recommend program management be more diligent in understanding all requirements of grant agreements to ensure compliance with Federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See Part VI Corrective Action Plan.
2022-003 Department of Agriculture, Passed through North Dakota Department of Public Instruction Federal Financial Assistance Listing/CFDA Number 10.553/10.555/10.555C/10.555S/10.559 Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Noncompliance and Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria - Uniform Guidance and 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327 set forth the standards non-federal entities other than states must follow when operating federal programs. Condition - In our testing of procurement, suspension, and debarment, it was identified that the District did not satisfy the requirements of 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. The District did not comply with requirements of the grant for procurement of food service related services. Cause - Lack of oversight, awareness, or understanding of all of the specific requirements under Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections, and controls were not adequately designed to ensure compliance with all of these requirements. Effect - Lack of noncompliance to federal requirements increases overall risk on non-compliance. Questioned Costs - None reported. Context/Sampling - All food service contracts were selected for testing. Repeat Finding from Prior Years - Yes Recommendation - We recommend that management establish controls to follow all applicable requirements under Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections. View of Responsible Officials - There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2022-003 Department of Agriculture, Passed through North Dakota Department of Public Instruction Federal Financial Assistance Listing/CFDA Number 10.553/10.555/10.555C/10.555S/10.559 Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Noncompliance and Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria - Uniform Guidance and 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327 set forth the standards non-federal entities other than states must follow when operating federal programs. Condition - In our testing of procurement, suspension, and debarment, it was identified that the District did not satisfy the requirements of 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. The District did not comply with requirements of the grant for procurement of food service related services. Cause - Lack of oversight, awareness, or understanding of all of the specific requirements under Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections, and controls were not adequately designed to ensure compliance with all of these requirements. Effect - Lack of noncompliance to federal requirements increases overall risk on non-compliance. Questioned Costs - None reported. Context/Sampling - All food service contracts were selected for testing. Repeat Finding from Prior Years - Yes Recommendation - We recommend that management establish controls to follow all applicable requirements under Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections. View of Responsible Officials - There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2022-003 Department of Agriculture, Passed through North Dakota Department of Public Instruction Federal Financial Assistance Listing/CFDA Number 10.553/10.555/10.555C/10.555S/10.559 Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Noncompliance and Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria - Uniform Guidance and 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327 set forth the standards non-federal entities other than states must follow when operating federal programs. Condition - In our testing of procurement, suspension, and debarment, it was identified that the District did not satisfy the requirements of 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. The District did not comply with requirements of the grant for procurement of food service related services. Cause - Lack of oversight, awareness, or understanding of all of the specific requirements under Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections, and controls were not adequately designed to ensure compliance with all of these requirements. Effect - Lack of noncompliance to federal requirements increases overall risk on non-compliance. Questioned Costs - None reported. Context/Sampling - All food service contracts were selected for testing. Repeat Finding from Prior Years - Yes Recommendation - We recommend that management establish controls to follow all applicable requirements under Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections. View of Responsible Officials - There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2022-003 Department of Agriculture, Passed through North Dakota Department of Public Instruction Federal Financial Assistance Listing/CFDA Number 10.553/10.555/10.555C/10.555S/10.559 Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Noncompliance and Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria - Uniform Guidance and 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327 set forth the standards non-federal entities other than states must follow when operating federal programs. Condition - In our testing of procurement, suspension, and debarment, it was identified that the District did not satisfy the requirements of 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. The District did not comply with requirements of the grant for procurement of food service related services. Cause - Lack of oversight, awareness, or understanding of all of the specific requirements under Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections, and controls were not adequately designed to ensure compliance with all of these requirements. Effect - Lack of noncompliance to federal requirements increases overall risk on non-compliance. Questioned Costs - None reported. Context/Sampling - All food service contracts were selected for testing. Repeat Finding from Prior Years - Yes Recommendation - We recommend that management establish controls to follow all applicable requirements under Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections. View of Responsible Officials - There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2022-003 Department of Agriculture, Passed through North Dakota Department of Public Instruction Federal Financial Assistance Listing/CFDA Number 10.553/10.555/10.555C/10.555S/10.559 Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Noncompliance and Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria - Uniform Guidance and 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327 set forth the standards non-federal entities other than states must follow when operating federal programs. Condition - In our testing of procurement, suspension, and debarment, it was identified that the District did not satisfy the requirements of 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. The District did not comply with requirements of the grant for procurement of food service related services. Cause - Lack of oversight, awareness, or understanding of all of the specific requirements under Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections, and controls were not adequately designed to ensure compliance with all of these requirements. Effect - Lack of noncompliance to federal requirements increases overall risk on non-compliance. Questioned Costs - None reported. Context/Sampling - All food service contracts were selected for testing. Repeat Finding from Prior Years - Yes Recommendation - We recommend that management establish controls to follow all applicable requirements under Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections. View of Responsible Officials - There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
FINDING 2022-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-006. Condition and Context Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Micro-Purchases A sample of 40 micro-purchase procurements from the School Lunch fund was selected for testing to verify proper procurement methods were followed. There were 11 micro-purchase procurements, totaling $7,602, that were paid for which the School Corporation could not provide documentation to support the purchase. As such, the 11 transactions could not be verified as properly procured. Due to the number and magnitude of exceptions, per auditor judgment, we concluded it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 24 micro-purchase procurements. Small Purchases The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that an adequate number of price or rate quotes was obtained to ensure full and open competition for two of six procurements under the small purchase threshold. Furthermore, vendor contracts were not entered into for two total purchases above $50,000 as required by state statute. As a result, vendors subject to contracts were not verified for suspension and debarment to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal award programs. Exceeds Simplified Acquisition The School Corporation did not follow procurement requirements for purchases of commodities which exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000. The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that a contract was procured for Gordon Food Service for fiscal year 2020-2021. As a result, vendors subject to contracts were not verified for suspension and debarment to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal award programs. The lack of internal controls, availability of supporting documentation, and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Revised Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The nonFederal entity's documented procurement procedures must confirm to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (1) Micro-purchases - (i) Distribution. The acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold ( . . . ? 200.1) To the maximum extent practicable, the non-Federal entity should distribute micro-purchases equitably among qualified suppliers. (ii) Micro-purchase awards. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. Purchase cards can be used for micro-purchases if procedures are documented and approved by the non-Federal entity. . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. (i) In order for sealed bidding to be feasible, the following conditions should be present: (A) A complete, adequate, and realistic specification or purchase description is available; (B) Two or more responsible bidders are willing and able to compete effectively for the business; and (C) The procurement lends itself to a firm fixed price contract and the selection of the successful bidder can be made principally on the basis of price. (ii) If sealed bids are used, the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources, providing them sufficient response time prior to the date set for opening the bids, for local, and tribal governments, the invitation for bids must be publicly advertised; (B) The invitation for bids, which will include any specifications and pertinent attachments, must define the items or services in order for the bidder to properly respond; (C) All bids will be opened at the time and place prescribed in the invitation for bids, and for local and tribal governments, the bids must be opened publicly; (D) A firm fixed price contract award will be made in writing to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Where specified in bidding documents, factors such as discounts, transportation cost, and life cycle costs must be considered in determining which bid is lowest. Payment discounts will only be used to determine the low bid when prior experience indicates that such discounts are usually taken advantage of; and (E) Any or all bids may be rejected if there is a sound documented reason. (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. They are awarded in accordance with the following requirements: (i) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. Any response to publicized requests for proposals must be considered to the maximum extent practical; (ii) The non-Federal entity must have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the proposals received and making selections; (iii) Contracts must be awarded to the responsible offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the non-Federal entity, with price and other factors considered; and (iv) The non-Federal entity may use competitive proposal procedures for qualifications-based procurement of architectural/engineering (A/E) professional services whereby offeror's qualifications are evaluated and the most qualified offeror is selected, subject to negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation. The method, where price is not used as a selection factor, can only be used in procurement of A/E professional services. It cannot be used to purchase other types of services though A/E firms that are a potential source to perform the proposed effort. . . . Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . . (d) If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system and retain and provide supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with compliance requirement listed above. The failure to design and implement an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-006. Condition and Context Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Micro-Purchases A sample of 40 micro-purchase procurements from the School Lunch fund was selected for testing to verify proper procurement methods were followed. There were 11 micro-purchase procurements, totaling $7,602, that were paid for which the School Corporation could not provide documentation to support the purchase. As such, the 11 transactions could not be verified as properly procured. Due to the number and magnitude of exceptions, per auditor judgment, we concluded it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 24 micro-purchase procurements. Small Purchases The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that an adequate number of price or rate quotes was obtained to ensure full and open competition for two of six procurements under the small purchase threshold. Furthermore, vendor contracts were not entered into for two total purchases above $50,000 as required by state statute. As a result, vendors subject to contracts were not verified for suspension and debarment to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal award programs. Exceeds Simplified Acquisition The School Corporation did not follow procurement requirements for purchases of commodities which exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000. The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that a contract was procured for Gordon Food Service for fiscal year 2020-2021. As a result, vendors subject to contracts were not verified for suspension and debarment to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal award programs. The lack of internal controls, availability of supporting documentation, and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Revised Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The nonFederal entity's documented procurement procedures must confirm to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (1) Micro-purchases - (i) Distribution. The acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold ( . . . ? 200.1) To the maximum extent practicable, the non-Federal entity should distribute micro-purchases equitably among qualified suppliers. (ii) Micro-purchase awards. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. Purchase cards can be used for micro-purchases if procedures are documented and approved by the non-Federal entity. . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. (i) In order for sealed bidding to be feasible, the following conditions should be present: (A) A complete, adequate, and realistic specification or purchase description is available; (B) Two or more responsible bidders are willing and able to compete effectively for the business; and (C) The procurement lends itself to a firm fixed price contract and the selection of the successful bidder can be made principally on the basis of price. (ii) If sealed bids are used, the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources, providing them sufficient response time prior to the date set for opening the bids, for local, and tribal governments, the invitation for bids must be publicly advertised; (B) The invitation for bids, which will include any specifications and pertinent attachments, must define the items or services in order for the bidder to properly respond; (C) All bids will be opened at the time and place prescribed in the invitation for bids, and for local and tribal governments, the bids must be opened publicly; (D) A firm fixed price contract award will be made in writing to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Where specified in bidding documents, factors such as discounts, transportation cost, and life cycle costs must be considered in determining which bid is lowest. Payment discounts will only be used to determine the low bid when prior experience indicates that such discounts are usually taken advantage of; and (E) Any or all bids may be rejected if there is a sound documented reason. (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. They are awarded in accordance with the following requirements: (i) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. Any response to publicized requests for proposals must be considered to the maximum extent practical; (ii) The non-Federal entity must have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the proposals received and making selections; (iii) Contracts must be awarded to the responsible offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the non-Federal entity, with price and other factors considered; and (iv) The non-Federal entity may use competitive proposal procedures for qualifications-based procurement of architectural/engineering (A/E) professional services whereby offeror's qualifications are evaluated and the most qualified offeror is selected, subject to negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation. The method, where price is not used as a selection factor, can only be used in procurement of A/E professional services. It cannot be used to purchase other types of services though A/E firms that are a potential source to perform the proposed effort. . . . Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . . (d) If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system and retain and provide supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with compliance requirement listed above. The failure to design and implement an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-006. Condition and Context Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Micro-Purchases A sample of 40 micro-purchase procurements from the School Lunch fund was selected for testing to verify proper procurement methods were followed. There were 11 micro-purchase procurements, totaling $7,602, that were paid for which the School Corporation could not provide documentation to support the purchase. As such, the 11 transactions could not be verified as properly procured. Due to the number and magnitude of exceptions, per auditor judgment, we concluded it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 24 micro-purchase procurements. Small Purchases The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that an adequate number of price or rate quotes was obtained to ensure full and open competition for two of six procurements under the small purchase threshold. Furthermore, vendor contracts were not entered into for two total purchases above $50,000 as required by state statute. As a result, vendors subject to contracts were not verified for suspension and debarment to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal award programs. Exceeds Simplified Acquisition The School Corporation did not follow procurement requirements for purchases of commodities which exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000. The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that a contract was procured for Gordon Food Service for fiscal year 2020-2021. As a result, vendors subject to contracts were not verified for suspension and debarment to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal award programs. The lack of internal controls, availability of supporting documentation, and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Revised Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The nonFederal entity's documented procurement procedures must confirm to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (1) Micro-purchases - (i) Distribution. The acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold ( . . . ? 200.1) To the maximum extent practicable, the non-Federal entity should distribute micro-purchases equitably among qualified suppliers. (ii) Micro-purchase awards. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. Purchase cards can be used for micro-purchases if procedures are documented and approved by the non-Federal entity. . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. (i) In order for sealed bidding to be feasible, the following conditions should be present: (A) A complete, adequate, and realistic specification or purchase description is available; (B) Two or more responsible bidders are willing and able to compete effectively for the business; and (C) The procurement lends itself to a firm fixed price contract and the selection of the successful bidder can be made principally on the basis of price. (ii) If sealed bids are used, the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources, providing them sufficient response time prior to the date set for opening the bids, for local, and tribal governments, the invitation for bids must be publicly advertised; (B) The invitation for bids, which will include any specifications and pertinent attachments, must define the items or services in order for the bidder to properly respond; (C) All bids will be opened at the time and place prescribed in the invitation for bids, and for local and tribal governments, the bids must be opened publicly; (D) A firm fixed price contract award will be made in writing to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Where specified in bidding documents, factors such as discounts, transportation cost, and life cycle costs must be considered in determining which bid is lowest. Payment discounts will only be used to determine the low bid when prior experience indicates that such discounts are usually taken advantage of; and (E) Any or all bids may be rejected if there is a sound documented reason. (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. They are awarded in accordance with the following requirements: (i) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. Any response to publicized requests for proposals must be considered to the maximum extent practical; (ii) The non-Federal entity must have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the proposals received and making selections; (iii) Contracts must be awarded to the responsible offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the non-Federal entity, with price and other factors considered; and (iv) The non-Federal entity may use competitive proposal procedures for qualifications-based procurement of architectural/engineering (A/E) professional services whereby offeror's qualifications are evaluated and the most qualified offeror is selected, subject to negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation. The method, where price is not used as a selection factor, can only be used in procurement of A/E professional services. It cannot be used to purchase other types of services though A/E firms that are a potential source to perform the proposed effort. . . . Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . . (d) If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system and retain and provide supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with compliance requirement listed above. The failure to design and implement an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-006. Condition and Context Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Micro-Purchases A sample of 40 micro-purchase procurements from the School Lunch fund was selected for testing to verify proper procurement methods were followed. There were 11 micro-purchase procurements, totaling $7,602, that were paid for which the School Corporation could not provide documentation to support the purchase. As such, the 11 transactions could not be verified as properly procured. Due to the number and magnitude of exceptions, per auditor judgment, we concluded it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 24 micro-purchase procurements. Small Purchases The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that an adequate number of price or rate quotes was obtained to ensure full and open competition for two of six procurements under the small purchase threshold. Furthermore, vendor contracts were not entered into for two total purchases above $50,000 as required by state statute. As a result, vendors subject to contracts were not verified for suspension and debarment to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal award programs. Exceeds Simplified Acquisition The School Corporation did not follow procurement requirements for purchases of commodities which exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000. The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that a contract was procured for Gordon Food Service for fiscal year 2020-2021. As a result, vendors subject to contracts were not verified for suspension and debarment to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal award programs. The lack of internal controls, availability of supporting documentation, and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Revised Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The nonFederal entity's documented procurement procedures must confirm to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (1) Micro-purchases - (i) Distribution. The acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold ( . . . ? 200.1) To the maximum extent practicable, the non-Federal entity should distribute micro-purchases equitably among qualified suppliers. (ii) Micro-purchase awards. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. Purchase cards can be used for micro-purchases if procedures are documented and approved by the non-Federal entity. . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. (i) In order for sealed bidding to be feasible, the following conditions should be present: (A) A complete, adequate, and realistic specification or purchase description is available; (B) Two or more responsible bidders are willing and able to compete effectively for the business; and (C) The procurement lends itself to a firm fixed price contract and the selection of the successful bidder can be made principally on the basis of price. (ii) If sealed bids are used, the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources, providing them sufficient response time prior to the date set for opening the bids, for local, and tribal governments, the invitation for bids must be publicly advertised; (B) The invitation for bids, which will include any specifications and pertinent attachments, must define the items or services in order for the bidder to properly respond; (C) All bids will be opened at the time and place prescribed in the invitation for bids, and for local and tribal governments, the bids must be opened publicly; (D) A firm fixed price contract award will be made in writing to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Where specified in bidding documents, factors such as discounts, transportation cost, and life cycle costs must be considered in determining which bid is lowest. Payment discounts will only be used to determine the low bid when prior experience indicates that such discounts are usually taken advantage of; and (E) Any or all bids may be rejected if there is a sound documented reason. (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. They are awarded in accordance with the following requirements: (i) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. Any response to publicized requests for proposals must be considered to the maximum extent practical; (ii) The non-Federal entity must have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the proposals received and making selections; (iii) Contracts must be awarded to the responsible offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the non-Federal entity, with price and other factors considered; and (iv) The non-Federal entity may use competitive proposal procedures for qualifications-based procurement of architectural/engineering (A/E) professional services whereby offeror's qualifications are evaluated and the most qualified offeror is selected, subject to negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation. The method, where price is not used as a selection factor, can only be used in procurement of A/E professional services. It cannot be used to purchase other types of services though A/E firms that are a potential source to perform the proposed effort. . . . Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . . (d) If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system and retain and provide supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with compliance requirement listed above. The failure to design and implement an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-006. Condition and Context Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Micro-Purchases A sample of 40 micro-purchase procurements from the School Lunch fund was selected for testing to verify proper procurement methods were followed. There were 11 micro-purchase procurements, totaling $7,602, that were paid for which the School Corporation could not provide documentation to support the purchase. As such, the 11 transactions could not be verified as properly procured. Due to the number and magnitude of exceptions, per auditor judgment, we concluded it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 24 micro-purchase procurements. Small Purchases The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that an adequate number of price or rate quotes was obtained to ensure full and open competition for two of six procurements under the small purchase threshold. Furthermore, vendor contracts were not entered into for two total purchases above $50,000 as required by state statute. As a result, vendors subject to contracts were not verified for suspension and debarment to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal award programs. Exceeds Simplified Acquisition The School Corporation did not follow procurement requirements for purchases of commodities which exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000. The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that a contract was procured for Gordon Food Service for fiscal year 2020-2021. As a result, vendors subject to contracts were not verified for suspension and debarment to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal award programs. The lack of internal controls, availability of supporting documentation, and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Revised Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The nonFederal entity's documented procurement procedures must confirm to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (1) Micro-purchases - (i) Distribution. The acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold ( . . . ? 200.1) To the maximum extent practicable, the non-Federal entity should distribute micro-purchases equitably among qualified suppliers. (ii) Micro-purchase awards. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. Purchase cards can be used for micro-purchases if procedures are documented and approved by the non-Federal entity. . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. (i) In order for sealed bidding to be feasible, the following conditions should be present: (A) A complete, adequate, and realistic specification or purchase description is available; (B) Two or more responsible bidders are willing and able to compete effectively for the business; and (C) The procurement lends itself to a firm fixed price contract and the selection of the successful bidder can be made principally on the basis of price. (ii) If sealed bids are used, the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources, providing them sufficient response time prior to the date set for opening the bids, for local, and tribal governments, the invitation for bids must be publicly advertised; (B) The invitation for bids, which will include any specifications and pertinent attachments, must define the items or services in order for the bidder to properly respond; (C) All bids will be opened at the time and place prescribed in the invitation for bids, and for local and tribal governments, the bids must be opened publicly; (D) A firm fixed price contract award will be made in writing to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Where specified in bidding documents, factors such as discounts, transportation cost, and life cycle costs must be considered in determining which bid is lowest. Payment discounts will only be used to determine the low bid when prior experience indicates that such discounts are usually taken advantage of; and (E) Any or all bids may be rejected if there is a sound documented reason. (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. They are awarded in accordance with the following requirements: (i) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. Any response to publicized requests for proposals must be considered to the maximum extent practical; (ii) The non-Federal entity must have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the proposals received and making selections; (iii) Contracts must be awarded to the responsible offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the non-Federal entity, with price and other factors considered; and (iv) The non-Federal entity may use competitive proposal procedures for qualifications-based procurement of architectural/engineering (A/E) professional services whereby offeror's qualifications are evaluated and the most qualified offeror is selected, subject to negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation. The method, where price is not used as a selection factor, can only be used in procurement of A/E professional services. It cannot be used to purchase other types of services though A/E firms that are a potential source to perform the proposed effort. . . . Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . . (d) If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system and retain and provide supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with compliance requirement listed above. The failure to design and implement an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-006. Condition and Context Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Micro-Purchases A sample of 40 micro-purchase procurements from the School Lunch fund was selected for testing to verify proper procurement methods were followed. There were 11 micro-purchase procurements, totaling $7,602, that were paid for which the School Corporation could not provide documentation to support the purchase. As such, the 11 transactions could not be verified as properly procured. Due to the number and magnitude of exceptions, per auditor judgment, we concluded it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 24 micro-purchase procurements. Small Purchases The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that an adequate number of price or rate quotes was obtained to ensure full and open competition for two of six procurements under the small purchase threshold. Furthermore, vendor contracts were not entered into for two total purchases above $50,000 as required by state statute. As a result, vendors subject to contracts were not verified for suspension and debarment to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal award programs. Exceeds Simplified Acquisition The School Corporation did not follow procurement requirements for purchases of commodities which exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000. The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that a contract was procured for Gordon Food Service for fiscal year 2020-2021. As a result, vendors subject to contracts were not verified for suspension and debarment to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal award programs. The lack of internal controls, availability of supporting documentation, and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Revised Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The nonFederal entity's documented procurement procedures must confirm to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (1) Micro-purchases - (i) Distribution. The acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold ( . . . ? 200.1) To the maximum extent practicable, the non-Federal entity should distribute micro-purchases equitably among qualified suppliers. (ii) Micro-purchase awards. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. Purchase cards can be used for micro-purchases if procedures are documented and approved by the non-Federal entity. . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. (i) In order for sealed bidding to be feasible, the following conditions should be present: (A) A complete, adequate, and realistic specification or purchase description is available; (B) Two or more responsible bidders are willing and able to compete effectively for the business; and (C) The procurement lends itself to a firm fixed price contract and the selection of the successful bidder can be made principally on the basis of price. (ii) If sealed bids are used, the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources, providing them sufficient response time prior to the date set for opening the bids, for local, and tribal governments, the invitation for bids must be publicly advertised; (B) The invitation for bids, which will include any specifications and pertinent attachments, must define the items or services in order for the bidder to properly respond; (C) All bids will be opened at the time and place prescribed in the invitation for bids, and for local and tribal governments, the bids must be opened publicly; (D) A firm fixed price contract award will be made in writing to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Where specified in bidding documents, factors such as discounts, transportation cost, and life cycle costs must be considered in determining which bid is lowest. Payment discounts will only be used to determine the low bid when prior experience indicates that such discounts are usually taken advantage of; and (E) Any or all bids may be rejected if there is a sound documented reason. (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. They are awarded in accordance with the following requirements: (i) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. Any response to publicized requests for proposals must be considered to the maximum extent practical; (ii) The non-Federal entity must have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the proposals received and making selections; (iii) Contracts must be awarded to the responsible offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the non-Federal entity, with price and other factors considered; and (iv) The non-Federal entity may use competitive proposal procedures for qualifications-based procurement of architectural/engineering (A/E) professional services whereby offeror's qualifications are evaluated and the most qualified offeror is selected, subject to negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation. The method, where price is not used as a selection factor, can only be used in procurement of A/E professional services. It cannot be used to purchase other types of services though A/E firms that are a potential source to perform the proposed effort. . . . Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . . (d) If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system and retain and provide supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with compliance requirement listed above. The failure to design and implement an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-006. Condition and Context Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Micro-Purchases A sample of 40 micro-purchase procurements from the School Lunch fund was selected for testing to verify proper procurement methods were followed. There were 11 micro-purchase procurements, totaling $7,602, that were paid for which the School Corporation could not provide documentation to support the purchase. As such, the 11 transactions could not be verified as properly procured. Due to the number and magnitude of exceptions, per auditor judgment, we concluded it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 24 micro-purchase procurements. Small Purchases The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that an adequate number of price or rate quotes was obtained to ensure full and open competition for two of six procurements under the small purchase threshold. Furthermore, vendor contracts were not entered into for two total purchases above $50,000 as required by state statute. As a result, vendors subject to contracts were not verified for suspension and debarment to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal award programs. Exceeds Simplified Acquisition The School Corporation did not follow procurement requirements for purchases of commodities which exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000. The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that a contract was procured for Gordon Food Service for fiscal year 2020-2021. As a result, vendors subject to contracts were not verified for suspension and debarment to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal award programs. The lack of internal controls, availability of supporting documentation, and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Revised Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The nonFederal entity's documented procurement procedures must confirm to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (1) Micro-purchases - (i) Distribution. The acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold ( . . . ? 200.1) To the maximum extent practicable, the non-Federal entity should distribute micro-purchases equitably among qualified suppliers. (ii) Micro-purchase awards. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. Purchase cards can be used for micro-purchases if procedures are documented and approved by the non-Federal entity. . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. (i) In order for sealed bidding to be feasible, the following conditions should be present: (A) A complete, adequate, and realistic specification or purchase description is available; (B) Two or more responsible bidders are willing and able to compete effectively for the business; and (C) The procurement lends itself to a firm fixed price contract and the selection of the successful bidder can be made principally on the basis of price. (ii) If sealed bids are used, the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources, providing them sufficient response time prior to the date set for opening the bids, for local, and tribal governments, the invitation for bids must be publicly advertised; (B) The invitation for bids, which will include any specifications and pertinent attachments, must define the items or services in order for the bidder to properly respond; (C) All bids will be opened at the time and place prescribed in the invitation for bids, and for local and tribal governments, the bids must be opened publicly; (D) A firm fixed price contract award will be made in writing to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Where specified in bidding documents, factors such as discounts, transportation cost, and life cycle costs must be considered in determining which bid is lowest. Payment discounts will only be used to determine the low bid when prior experience indicates that such discounts are usually taken advantage of; and (E) Any or all bids may be rejected if there is a sound documented reason. (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. They are awarded in accordance with the following requirements: (i) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. Any response to publicized requests for proposals must be considered to the maximum extent practical; (ii) The non-Federal entity must have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the proposals received and making selections; (iii) Contracts must be awarded to the responsible offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the non-Federal entity, with price and other factors considered; and (iv) The non-Federal entity may use competitive proposal procedures for qualifications-based procurement of architectural/engineering (A/E) professional services whereby offeror's qualifications are evaluated and the most qualified offeror is selected, subject to negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation. The method, where price is not used as a selection factor, can only be used in procurement of A/E professional services. It cannot be used to purchase other types of services though A/E firms that are a potential source to perform the proposed effort. . . . Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . . (d) If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system and retain and provide supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with compliance requirement listed above. The failure to design and implement an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-006. Condition and Context Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Micro-Purchases A sample of 40 micro-purchase procurements from the School Lunch fund was selected for testing to verify proper procurement methods were followed. There were 11 micro-purchase procurements, totaling $7,602, that were paid for which the School Corporation could not provide documentation to support the purchase. As such, the 11 transactions could not be verified as properly procured. Due to the number and magnitude of exceptions, per auditor judgment, we concluded it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 24 micro-purchase procurements. Small Purchases The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that an adequate number of price or rate quotes was obtained to ensure full and open competition for two of six procurements under the small purchase threshold. Furthermore, vendor contracts were not entered into for two total purchases above $50,000 as required by state statute. As a result, vendors subject to contracts were not verified for suspension and debarment to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal award programs. Exceeds Simplified Acquisition The School Corporation did not follow procurement requirements for purchases of commodities which exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000. The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that a contract was procured for Gordon Food Service for fiscal year 2020-2021. As a result, vendors subject to contracts were not verified for suspension and debarment to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal award programs. The lack of internal controls, availability of supporting documentation, and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Revised Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The nonFederal entity's documented procurement procedures must confirm to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (1) Micro-purchases - (i) Distribution. The acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold ( . . . ? 200.1) To the maximum extent practicable, the non-Federal entity should distribute micro-purchases equitably among qualified suppliers. (ii) Micro-purchase awards. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. Purchase cards can be used for micro-purchases if procedures are documented and approved by the non-Federal entity. . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. (i) In order for sealed bidding to be feasible, the following conditions should be present: (A) A complete, adequate, and realistic specification or purchase description is available; (B) Two or more responsible bidders are willing and able to compete effectively for the business; and (C) The procurement lends itself to a firm fixed price contract and the selection of the successful bidder can be made principally on the basis of price. (ii) If sealed bids are used, the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources, providing them sufficient response time prior to the date set for opening the bids, for local, and tribal governments, the invitation for bids must be publicly advertised; (B) The invitation for bids, which will include any specifications and pertinent attachments, must define the items or services in order for the bidder to properly respond; (C) All bids will be opened at the time and place prescribed in the invitation for bids, and for local and tribal governments, the bids must be opened publicly; (D) A firm fixed price contract award will be made in writing to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Where specified in bidding documents, factors such as discounts, transportation cost, and life cycle costs must be considered in determining which bid is lowest. Payment discounts will only be used to determine the low bid when prior experience indicates that such discounts are usually taken advantage of; and (E) Any or all bids may be rejected if there is a sound documented reason. (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. They are awarded in accordance with the following requirements: (i) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. Any response to publicized requests for proposals must be considered to the maximum extent practical; (ii) The non-Federal entity must have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the proposals received and making selections; (iii) Contracts must be awarded to the responsible offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the non-Federal entity, with price and other factors considered; and (iv) The non-Federal entity may use competitive proposal procedures for qualifications-based procurement of architectural/engineering (A/E) professional services whereby offeror's qualifications are evaluated and the most qualified offeror is selected, subject to negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation. The method, where price is not used as a selection factor, can only be used in procurement of A/E professional services. It cannot be used to purchase other types of services though A/E firms that are a potential source to perform the proposed effort. . . . Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . . (d) If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system and retain and provide supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with compliance requirement listed above. The failure to design and implement an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, COVID-19 - Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20/21, FY 21/22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-006. Condition and Context Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Micro-Purchases A sample of 40 micro-purchase procurements from the School Lunch fund was selected for testing to verify proper procurement methods were followed. There were 11 micro-purchase procurements, totaling $7,602, that were paid for which the School Corporation could not provide documentation to support the purchase. As such, the 11 transactions could not be verified as properly procured. Due to the number and magnitude of exceptions, per auditor judgment, we concluded it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 24 micro-purchase procurements. Small Purchases The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that an adequate number of price or rate quotes was obtained to ensure full and open competition for two of six procurements under the small purchase threshold. Furthermore, vendor contracts were not entered into for two total purchases above $50,000 as required by state statute. As a result, vendors subject to contracts were not verified for suspension and debarment to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal award programs. Exceeds Simplified Acquisition The School Corporation did not follow procurement requirements for purchases of commodities which exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000. The School Corporation could not provide supporting documentation that a contract was procured for Gordon Food Service for fiscal year 2020-2021. As a result, vendors subject to contracts were not verified for suspension and debarment to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal award programs. The lack of internal controls, availability of supporting documentation, and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.318(a) (Revised Uniform Guidance) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The nonFederal entity's documented procurement procedures must confirm to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (1) Micro-purchases - (i) Distribution. The acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold ( . . . ? 200.1) To the maximum extent practicable, the non-Federal entity should distribute micro-purchases equitably among qualified suppliers. (ii) Micro-purchase awards. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. Purchase cards can be used for micro-purchases if procedures are documented and approved by the non-Federal entity. . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. (i) In order for sealed bidding to be feasible, the following conditions should be present: (A) A complete, adequate, and realistic specification or purchase description is available; (B) Two or more responsible bidders are willing and able to compete effectively for the business; and (C) The procurement lends itself to a firm fixed price contract and the selection of the successful bidder can be made principally on the basis of price. (ii) If sealed bids are used, the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources, providing them sufficient response time prior to the date set for opening the bids, for local, and tribal governments, the invitation for bids must be publicly advertised; (B) The invitation for bids, which will include any specifications and pertinent attachments, must define the items or services in order for the bidder to properly respond; (C) All bids will be opened at the time and place prescribed in the invitation for bids, and for local and tribal governments, the bids must be opened publicly; (D) A firm fixed price contract award will be made in writing to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Where specified in bidding documents, factors such as discounts, transportation cost, and life cycle costs must be considered in determining which bid is lowest. Payment discounts will only be used to determine the low bid when prior experience indicates that such discounts are usually taken advantage of; and (E) Any or all bids may be rejected if there is a sound documented reason. (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. They are awarded in accordance with the following requirements: (i) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. Any response to publicized requests for proposals must be considered to the maximum extent practical; (ii) The non-Federal entity must have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the proposals received and making selections; (iii) Contracts must be awarded to the responsible offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the non-Federal entity, with price and other factors considered; and (iv) The non-Federal entity may use competitive proposal procedures for qualifications-based procurement of architectural/engineering (A/E) professional services whereby offeror's qualifications are evaluated and the most qualified offeror is selected, subject to negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation. The method, where price is not used as a selection factor, can only be used in procurement of A/E professional services. It cannot be used to purchase other types of services though A/E firms that are a potential source to perform the proposed effort. . . . Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . . (d) If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system and retain and provide supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with compliance requirement listed above. The failure to design and implement an effective system of internal controls enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-007 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 19611-014-PN01, 19619-014-PN01, 20611-014-PN01, 20619-014-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context Reimbursement requests are submitted through the Indiana Department of Education information portal after review by the Executive Director of the Elkhart County Special Education Cooperative and the School Corporation's Treasurer. Supporting documentation was not provided to substantiate the amounts reported on the reimbursement requests. Ledgers provided during the audit were used to determine amounts requested by abstracting the expenses for each Special Education Fund. However, upon testing of the reimbursement requests it was determined that the documentation, or lack thereof, accompanying the reimbursement requests was not sufficient to prevent or detect noncompliance. Therefore, an internal control had not been properly designed and implemented. ? 19611-014-PN01 - Reimbursement request totaled $105,205, and ledger detail provided for audit totaled $110,703, with a variance of $5,498 recorded in the ledger but not requested for reimbursement. ? 20611-014-PN01 - Reimbursement request totaled $638,466, and ledger detail provided for audit totaled $597,441, with a variance of $41,025 over requested on the reimbursement. ? 19619-014-PN01 - Reimbursement request totaled $71,486, and ledger detail provided for audit totaled $69,527, with a variance of $1,959 over requested on the reimbursement. ? 20619-014-PN01 - Reimbursement request totaled $72,589, and ledger detail provided for audit totaled $72,031, with a variance of $558 over requested on the reimbursement. The lack of internal controls, availability of supporting documentation, and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.207(a) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may impose additional specific award conditions as needed, . . ." 2 CFR 200.327 states: "Unless otherwise approved by OMB, the Federal awarding agency may solicit only the standard, OMB-approved governmentwide data elements for collection of financial information (at time of publication the Federal Financial Report or such future collections as may be approved by OMB and listed on the OMB Web site). This information must be collected with the frequency required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award, but no less frequently than annually nor more frequently than quarterly except in unusual circumstances, for example where more frequent reporting is necessary for the effective monitoring of the Federal award or could significantly affect program outcomes, and preferably in coordination with performance reporting." Cause Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance, or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit, with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Effect The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system and to retain supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the compliance requirement listed above. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-007 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 19611-014-PN01, 19619-014-PN01, 20611-014-PN01, 20619-014-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context Reimbursement requests are submitted through the Indiana Department of Education information portal after review by the Executive Director of the Elkhart County Special Education Cooperative and the School Corporation's Treasurer. Supporting documentation was not provided to substantiate the amounts reported on the reimbursement requests. Ledgers provided during the audit were used to determine amounts requested by abstracting the expenses for each Special Education Fund. However, upon testing of the reimbursement requests it was determined that the documentation, or lack thereof, accompanying the reimbursement requests was not sufficient to prevent or detect noncompliance. Therefore, an internal control had not been properly designed and implemented. ? 19611-014-PN01 - Reimbursement request totaled $105,205, and ledger detail provided for audit totaled $110,703, with a variance of $5,498 recorded in the ledger but not requested for reimbursement. ? 20611-014-PN01 - Reimbursement request totaled $638,466, and ledger detail provided for audit totaled $597,441, with a variance of $41,025 over requested on the reimbursement. ? 19619-014-PN01 - Reimbursement request totaled $71,486, and ledger detail provided for audit totaled $69,527, with a variance of $1,959 over requested on the reimbursement. ? 20619-014-PN01 - Reimbursement request totaled $72,589, and ledger detail provided for audit totaled $72,031, with a variance of $558 over requested on the reimbursement. The lack of internal controls, availability of supporting documentation, and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.207(a) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may impose additional specific award conditions as needed, . . ." 2 CFR 200.327 states: "Unless otherwise approved by OMB, the Federal awarding agency may solicit only the standard, OMB-approved governmentwide data elements for collection of financial information (at time of publication the Federal Financial Report or such future collections as may be approved by OMB and listed on the OMB Web site). This information must be collected with the frequency required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award, but no less frequently than annually nor more frequently than quarterly except in unusual circumstances, for example where more frequent reporting is necessary for the effective monitoring of the Federal award or could significantly affect program outcomes, and preferably in coordination with performance reporting." Cause Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance, or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit, with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Effect The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system and to retain supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the compliance requirement listed above. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-007 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 19611-014-PN01, 19619-014-PN01, 20611-014-PN01, 20619-014-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context Reimbursement requests are submitted through the Indiana Department of Education information portal after review by the Executive Director of the Elkhart County Special Education Cooperative and the School Corporation's Treasurer. Supporting documentation was not provided to substantiate the amounts reported on the reimbursement requests. Ledgers provided during the audit were used to determine amounts requested by abstracting the expenses for each Special Education Fund. However, upon testing of the reimbursement requests it was determined that the documentation, or lack thereof, accompanying the reimbursement requests was not sufficient to prevent or detect noncompliance. Therefore, an internal control had not been properly designed and implemented. ? 19611-014-PN01 - Reimbursement request totaled $105,205, and ledger detail provided for audit totaled $110,703, with a variance of $5,498 recorded in the ledger but not requested for reimbursement. ? 20611-014-PN01 - Reimbursement request totaled $638,466, and ledger detail provided for audit totaled $597,441, with a variance of $41,025 over requested on the reimbursement. ? 19619-014-PN01 - Reimbursement request totaled $71,486, and ledger detail provided for audit totaled $69,527, with a variance of $1,959 over requested on the reimbursement. ? 20619-014-PN01 - Reimbursement request totaled $72,589, and ledger detail provided for audit totaled $72,031, with a variance of $558 over requested on the reimbursement. The lack of internal controls, availability of supporting documentation, and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.207(a) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may impose additional specific award conditions as needed, . . ." 2 CFR 200.327 states: "Unless otherwise approved by OMB, the Federal awarding agency may solicit only the standard, OMB-approved governmentwide data elements for collection of financial information (at time of publication the Federal Financial Report or such future collections as may be approved by OMB and listed on the OMB Web site). This information must be collected with the frequency required by the terms and conditions of the Federal award, but no less frequently than annually nor more frequently than quarterly except in unusual circumstances, for example where more frequent reporting is necessary for the effective monitoring of the Federal award or could significantly affect program outcomes, and preferably in coordination with performance reporting." Cause Management had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance, or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit, with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Effect The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system and to retain supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the compliance requirement listed above. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and made available for audit and to comply with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Identification of federal program: US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 84.425D and 84.425U, Education Stabilization Fund Criteria: Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction) (2 CFR section 200.327; Appendix II.D. to 2 CFR Part 200). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.327). Condition: An LEA must use ESF funds for minor remodeling, renovation or construction contracts that are over $2,000 and use laborers and mechanics that must meet Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirements. Cause: USI failed to timely notify a certain contractor about the Davis-Bacon Act contract clause requirements related to the prevailing wage rate for contractors and subcontractors. Potential effect: This certain contractor may not have used the appropriate prevailing wage rate for contractors and subcontractors. Questioned costs: None. Context: A total sample of one (1) item related to a certain contractors HVAC project was selected as a part of allowable cost testing for the Education Stabilization Fund. Although the contractor did not include the appropriate prevailing wage rate clauses within the construction contracts, the contractor was able to provide certified payroll totals for the period under audit. However, the certified payrolls were not provided weekly, as required, they were provided after the project was complete. Recommendation: We recommend that USI provide timely communication related to the prevailing wage rate requirements for contracts with future contractors. USI should also ensure that the proper prevailing wage rate clauses are included in future contracts. Views of Responsible Officials: See attached Corrective Action Plan.
Identification of federal program: US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 84.425D and 84.425U, Education Stabilization Fund Criteria: Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction) (2 CFR section 200.327; Appendix II.D. to 2 CFR Part 200). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.327). Condition: An LEA must use ESF funds for minor remodeling, renovation or construction contracts that are over $2,000 and use laborers and mechanics that must meet Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirements. Cause: USI failed to timely notify a certain contractor about the Davis-Bacon Act contract clause requirements related to the prevailing wage rate for contractors and subcontractors. Potential effect: This certain contractor may not have used the appropriate prevailing wage rate for contractors and subcontractors. Questioned costs: None. Context: A total sample of one (1) item related to a certain contractors HVAC project was selected as a part of allowable cost testing for the Education Stabilization Fund. Although the contractor did not include the appropriate prevailing wage rate clauses within the construction contracts, the contractor was able to provide certified payroll totals for the period under audit. However, the certified payrolls were not provided weekly, as required, they were provided after the project was complete. Recommendation: We recommend that USI provide timely communication related to the prevailing wage rate requirements for contracts with future contractors. USI should also ensure that the proper prevailing wage rate clauses are included in future contracts. Views of Responsible Officials: See attached Corrective Action Plan.
Identification of federal program: US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 84.425D and 84.425U, Education Stabilization Fund Criteria: Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction) (2 CFR section 200.327; Appendix II.D. to 2 CFR Part 200). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.327). Condition: An LEA must use ESF funds for minor remodeling, renovation or construction contracts that are over $2,000 and use laborers and mechanics that must meet Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirements. Cause: USI failed to timely notify a certain contractor about the Davis-Bacon Act contract clause requirements related to the prevailing wage rate for contractors and subcontractors. Potential effect: This certain contractor may not have used the appropriate prevailing wage rate for contractors and subcontractors. Questioned costs: None. Context: A total sample of one (1) item related to a certain contractors HVAC project was selected as a part of allowable cost testing for the Education Stabilization Fund. Although the contractor did not include the appropriate prevailing wage rate clauses within the construction contracts, the contractor was able to provide certified payroll totals for the period under audit. However, the certified payrolls were not provided weekly, as required, they were provided after the project was complete. Recommendation: We recommend that USI provide timely communication related to the prevailing wage rate requirements for contracts with future contractors. USI should also ensure that the proper prevailing wage rate clauses are included in future contracts. Views of Responsible Officials: See attached Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2022-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster ? Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20-21, FY 21-22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.214 States in part: "Non-federal entities and contractors are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities." 2CFR 200.318 (a) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327." (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. Section III ? Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued) FINDING 2021-004 (Continued) (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases? (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) . . . if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . . (d) . . . the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. There was no documented control over procurements made under the small purchase threshold. Cause: Management had not developed a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation did not provide audit evidence that it verified that vendors which were paid $25,000 or more per school year were not excluded or disqualified from participation in federal award programs. Section III ? Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued) FINDING 2021-004 (Continued) Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster ? Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 20-21, FY 21-22 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.214 States in part: "Non-federal entities and contractors are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities." 2CFR 200.318 (a) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327." (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 (Revised Uniform Guidance) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. Section III ? Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued) FINDING 2021-004 (Continued) (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases? (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) . . . if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . . (d) . . . the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. There was no documented control over procurements made under the small purchase threshold. Cause: Management had not developed a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation did not provide audit evidence that it verified that vendors which were paid $25,000 or more per school year were not excluded or disqualified from participation in federal award programs. Section III ? Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued) FINDING 2021-004 (Continued) Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.