Procurement Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Management has implemented a revised procurement policy which complies with Uniform Guidance. However, it was not in place for the entire fiscal year. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy until the last month of the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City monitors the applicable federal guidance and standards for any future changes to be incorporated into the City’s procurement standards. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Procurement Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Management has implemented a revised procurement policy which complies with Uniform Guidance. However, it was not in place for the entire fiscal year. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy until the last month of the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City monitors the applicable federal guidance and standards for any future changes to be incorporated into the City’s procurement standards. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Procurement Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Management has implemented a revised procurement policy which complies with Uniform Guidance. However, it was not in place for the entire fiscal year. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy until the last month of the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City monitors the applicable federal guidance and standards for any future changes to be incorporated into the City’s procurement standards. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Procurement Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Management has implemented a revised procurement policy which complies with Uniform Guidance. However, it was not in place for the entire fiscal year. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy until the last month of the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City monitors the applicable federal guidance and standards for any future changes to be incorporated into the City’s procurement standards. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Procurement Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Management has implemented a revised procurement policy which complies with Uniform Guidance. However, it was not in place for the entire fiscal year. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy until the last month of the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City monitors the applicable federal guidance and standards for any future changes to be incorporated into the City’s procurement standards. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Procurement Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Management has implemented a revised procurement policy which complies with Uniform Guidance. However, it was not in place for the entire fiscal year. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy until the last month of the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City monitors the applicable federal guidance and standards for any future changes to be incorporated into the City’s procurement standards. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Procurement Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Management has implemented a revised procurement policy which complies with Uniform Guidance. However, it was not in place for the entire fiscal year. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy until the last month of the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City monitors the applicable federal guidance and standards for any future changes to be incorporated into the City’s procurement standards. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Procurement Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Management has implemented a revised procurement policy which complies with Uniform Guidance. However, it was not in place for the entire fiscal year. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy until the last month of the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City monitors the applicable federal guidance and standards for any future changes to be incorporated into the City’s procurement standards. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Procurement Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Management has implemented a revised procurement policy which complies with Uniform Guidance. However, it was not in place for the entire fiscal year. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy until the last month of the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City monitors the applicable federal guidance and standards for any future changes to be incorporated into the City’s procurement standards. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Procurement Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Management has implemented a revised procurement policy which complies with Uniform Guidance. However, it was not in place for the entire fiscal year. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy until the last month of the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City monitors the applicable federal guidance and standards for any future changes to be incorporated into the City’s procurement standards. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Procurement Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Management has implemented a revised procurement policy which complies with Uniform Guidance. However, it was not in place for the entire fiscal year. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy until the last month of the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City monitors the applicable federal guidance and standards for any future changes to be incorporated into the City’s procurement standards. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Procurement Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Management has implemented a revised procurement policy which complies with Uniform Guidance. However, it was not in place for the entire fiscal year. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy until the last month of the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City monitors the applicable federal guidance and standards for any future changes to be incorporated into the City’s procurement standards. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Procurement Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Management has implemented a revised procurement policy which complies with Uniform Guidance. However, it was not in place for the entire fiscal year. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy until the last month of the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City monitors the applicable federal guidance and standards for any future changes to be incorporated into the City’s procurement standards. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Procurement Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Management has implemented a revised procurement policy which complies with Uniform Guidance. However, it was not in place for the entire fiscal year. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy until the last month of the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City monitors the applicable federal guidance and standards for any future changes to be incorporated into the City’s procurement standards. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Procurement Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Management has implemented a revised procurement policy which complies with Uniform Guidance. However, it was not in place for the entire fiscal year. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy until the last month of the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City monitors the applicable federal guidance and standards for any future changes to be incorporated into the City’s procurement standards. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Procurement Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Management has implemented a revised procurement policy which complies with Uniform Guidance. However, it was not in place for the entire fiscal year. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy until the last month of the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City monitors the applicable federal guidance and standards for any future changes to be incorporated into the City’s procurement standards. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Procurement Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Management has implemented a revised procurement policy which complies with Uniform Guidance. However, it was not in place for the entire fiscal year. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy until the last month of the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City monitors the applicable federal guidance and standards for any future changes to be incorporated into the City’s procurement standards. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Procurement Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Management has implemented a revised procurement policy which complies with Uniform Guidance. However, it was not in place for the entire fiscal year. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy until the last month of the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City monitors the applicable federal guidance and standards for any future changes to be incorporated into the City’s procurement standards. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Procurement Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Management has implemented a revised procurement policy which complies with Uniform Guidance. However, it was not in place for the entire fiscal year. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy until the last month of the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City monitors the applicable federal guidance and standards for any future changes to be incorporated into the City’s procurement standards. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Procurement Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Management has implemented a revised procurement policy which complies with Uniform Guidance. However, it was not in place for the entire fiscal year. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy until the last month of the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City monitors the applicable federal guidance and standards for any future changes to be incorporated into the City’s procurement standards. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Procurement Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Management has implemented a revised procurement policy which complies with Uniform Guidance. However, it was not in place for the entire fiscal year. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy until the last month of the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City monitors the applicable federal guidance and standards for any future changes to be incorporated into the City’s procurement standards. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Procurement Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Management has implemented a revised procurement policy which complies with Uniform Guidance. However, it was not in place for the entire fiscal year. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy until the last month of the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City monitors the applicable federal guidance and standards for any future changes to be incorporated into the City’s procurement standards. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Procurement Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Management has implemented a revised procurement policy which complies with Uniform Guidance. However, it was not in place for the entire fiscal year. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy until the last month of the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City monitors the applicable federal guidance and standards for any future changes to be incorporated into the City’s procurement standards. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Procurement Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Management has implemented a revised procurement policy which complies with Uniform Guidance. However, it was not in place for the entire fiscal year. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy until the last month of the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City monitors the applicable federal guidance and standards for any future changes to be incorporated into the City’s procurement standards. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Procurement Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Management has implemented a revised procurement policy which complies with Uniform Guidance. However, it was not in place for the entire fiscal year. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy until the last month of the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City monitors the applicable federal guidance and standards for any future changes to be incorporated into the City’s procurement standards. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Procurement Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Management has implemented a revised procurement policy which complies with Uniform Guidance. However, it was not in place for the entire fiscal year. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy until the last month of the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City monitors the applicable federal guidance and standards for any future changes to be incorporated into the City’s procurement standards. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Procurement Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Management has implemented a revised procurement policy which complies with Uniform Guidance. However, it was not in place for the entire fiscal year. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy until the last month of the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City monitors the applicable federal guidance and standards for any future changes to be incorporated into the City’s procurement standards. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Procurement Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Management has implemented a revised procurement policy which complies with Uniform Guidance. However, it was not in place for the entire fiscal year. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy until the last month of the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City monitors the applicable federal guidance and standards for any future changes to be incorporated into the City’s procurement standards. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Procurement Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Management has implemented a revised procurement policy which complies with Uniform Guidance. However, it was not in place for the entire fiscal year. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy until the last month of the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City monitors the applicable federal guidance and standards for any future changes to be incorporated into the City’s procurement standards. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Procurement Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Management has implemented a revised procurement policy which complies with Uniform Guidance. However, it was not in place for the entire fiscal year. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy until the last month of the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City monitors the applicable federal guidance and standards for any future changes to be incorporated into the City’s procurement standards. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Procurement Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Management has implemented a revised procurement policy which complies with Uniform Guidance. However, it was not in place for the entire fiscal year. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy until the last month of the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City monitors the applicable federal guidance and standards for any future changes to be incorporated into the City’s procurement standards. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Procurement Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Management has implemented a revised procurement policy which complies with Uniform Guidance. However, it was not in place for the entire fiscal year. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy until the last month of the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City monitors the applicable federal guidance and standards for any future changes to be incorporated into the City’s procurement standards. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Procurement Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Management has implemented a revised procurement policy which complies with Uniform Guidance. However, it was not in place for the entire fiscal year. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy until the last month of the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City monitors the applicable federal guidance and standards for any future changes to be incorporated into the City’s procurement standards. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Procurement Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Management has implemented a revised procurement policy which complies with Uniform Guidance. However, it was not in place for the entire fiscal year. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy until the last month of the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City monitors the applicable federal guidance and standards for any future changes to be incorporated into the City’s procurement standards. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
FINDING 2024-002 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Child Nutrition Program and Procurement compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For one of the two small purchase method procurements sampled for testing, we noted that the School Corporation, did not obtain quotes from an adequate number of qualified sources. The sample item amount disbursed was $69,649 in FY23 and $110,313 in FY24 for food service technology support. The School Corporation did properly perform a suspension and debarment check on the vendor. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to ensure that the School Corporation’s procurement policy is adhered to and quotes are obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as required for small purchase method procurements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2024-002 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Child Nutrition Program and Procurement compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For one of the two small purchase method procurements sampled for testing, we noted that the School Corporation, did not obtain quotes from an adequate number of qualified sources. The sample item amount disbursed was $69,649 in FY23 and $110,313 in FY24 for food service technology support. The School Corporation did properly perform a suspension and debarment check on the vendor. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to ensure that the School Corporation’s procurement policy is adhered to and quotes are obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as required for small purchase method procurements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2024-002 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Child Nutrition Program and Procurement compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For one of the two small purchase method procurements sampled for testing, we noted that the School Corporation, did not obtain quotes from an adequate number of qualified sources. The sample item amount disbursed was $69,649 in FY23 and $110,313 in FY24 for food service technology support. The School Corporation did properly perform a suspension and debarment check on the vendor. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to ensure that the School Corporation’s procurement policy is adhered to and quotes are obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as required for small purchase method procurements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2024-002 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Child Nutrition Program and Procurement compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For one of the two small purchase method procurements sampled for testing, we noted that the School Corporation, did not obtain quotes from an adequate number of qualified sources. The sample item amount disbursed was $69,649 in FY23 and $110,313 in FY24 for food service technology support. The School Corporation did properly perform a suspension and debarment check on the vendor. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to ensure that the School Corporation’s procurement policy is adhered to and quotes are obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as required for small purchase method procurements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Control Deficiencies Suspension and Debarment – Child Nutrition Cluster Type of Finding: Significant deficiency in internal control compliance Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Pass-Through Agency: Wisconsin Department of Instruction Pass-Through Number(s): 2024-056328-DPI-SB-546, 2024-056328-DPI-NSL-547, 2024-056328-DPI-SFSP-586 Award Period: 7/1/23 – 6/30/24 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: The organization should have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209-6) Condition: The District has a policy in place that meets the requirements of Uniform Guidance, however, the policy was not followed in 2023-2024. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: For 5 out of 5 vendors tested, the District did not have documentation of checking for suspension and debarment. Cause: Due to turnover in the Food Service Director Position and related support staff, new Food Service Director was not able to produce documentation that suspension and debarment was checked for the vendors tested. Effect: The district could potentially be using Federal Grant dollars for suspended or debarred vendors Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the District implement a process to check for suspension and debarment for all vendors exceeding the threshold for purchases. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the finding
Control Deficiencies Suspension and Debarment – Child Nutrition Cluster Type of Finding: Significant deficiency in internal control compliance Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Pass-Through Agency: Wisconsin Department of Instruction Pass-Through Number(s): 2024-056328-DPI-SB-546, 2024-056328-DPI-NSL-547, 2024-056328-DPI-SFSP-586 Award Period: 7/1/23 – 6/30/24 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: The organization should have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209-6) Condition: The District has a policy in place that meets the requirements of Uniform Guidance, however, the policy was not followed in 2023-2024. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: For 5 out of 5 vendors tested, the District did not have documentation of checking for suspension and debarment. Cause: Due to turnover in the Food Service Director Position and related support staff, new Food Service Director was not able to produce documentation that suspension and debarment was checked for the vendors tested. Effect: The district could potentially be using Federal Grant dollars for suspended or debarred vendors Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the District implement a process to check for suspension and debarment for all vendors exceeding the threshold for purchases. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the finding
Control Deficiencies Suspension and Debarment – Child Nutrition Cluster Type of Finding: Significant deficiency in internal control compliance Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Pass-Through Agency: Wisconsin Department of Instruction Pass-Through Number(s): 2024-056328-DPI-SB-546, 2024-056328-DPI-NSL-547, 2024-056328-DPI-SFSP-586 Award Period: 7/1/23 – 6/30/24 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: The organization should have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209-6) Condition: The District has a policy in place that meets the requirements of Uniform Guidance, however, the policy was not followed in 2023-2024. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: For 5 out of 5 vendors tested, the District did not have documentation of checking for suspension and debarment. Cause: Due to turnover in the Food Service Director Position and related support staff, new Food Service Director was not able to produce documentation that suspension and debarment was checked for the vendors tested. Effect: The district could potentially be using Federal Grant dollars for suspended or debarred vendors Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the District implement a process to check for suspension and debarment for all vendors exceeding the threshold for purchases. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the finding
Control Deficiencies Suspension and Debarment – Child Nutrition Cluster Type of Finding: Significant deficiency in internal control compliance Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Pass-Through Agency: Wisconsin Department of Instruction Pass-Through Number(s): 2024-056328-DPI-SB-546, 2024-056328-DPI-NSL-547, 2024-056328-DPI-SFSP-586 Award Period: 7/1/23 – 6/30/24 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: The organization should have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209-6) Condition: The District has a policy in place that meets the requirements of Uniform Guidance, however, the policy was not followed in 2023-2024. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: For 5 out of 5 vendors tested, the District did not have documentation of checking for suspension and debarment. Cause: Due to turnover in the Food Service Director Position and related support staff, new Food Service Director was not able to produce documentation that suspension and debarment was checked for the vendors tested. Effect: The district could potentially be using Federal Grant dollars for suspended or debarred vendors Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the District implement a process to check for suspension and debarment for all vendors exceeding the threshold for purchases. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the finding
Control Deficiencies Suspension and Debarment – Child Nutrition Cluster Type of Finding: Significant deficiency in internal control compliance Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Pass-Through Agency: Wisconsin Department of Instruction Pass-Through Number(s): 2024-056328-DPI-SB-546, 2024-056328-DPI-NSL-547, 2024-056328-DPI-SFSP-586 Award Period: 7/1/23 – 6/30/24 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: The organization should have procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209-6) Condition: The District has a policy in place that meets the requirements of Uniform Guidance, however, the policy was not followed in 2023-2024. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: For 5 out of 5 vendors tested, the District did not have documentation of checking for suspension and debarment. Cause: Due to turnover in the Food Service Director Position and related support staff, new Food Service Director was not able to produce documentation that suspension and debarment was checked for the vendors tested. Effect: The district could potentially be using Federal Grant dollars for suspended or debarred vendors Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the District implement a process to check for suspension and debarment for all vendors exceeding the threshold for purchases. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the finding
Findings and Questioned Costs Related to Federal Awards Finding Number: 2024‐001 Repeat Finding: No Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Award Number: ERMT‐21‐2016 Pass‐Through Agency: Arizona Governor’s Office Questioned Costs: N/A Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Criteria Non‐federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR §§200.318 through 200.326. Subrecipients must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Condition The District did not follow Federal, State, and Board policies and regulations governing procurement. Cause The District’s review procedures over each transaction did not operate as designed. Effect The District was not in compliance with Federal, State, and Board policies and regulations governing procurement. Context The District procured a multi‐year professional development support services contract in the amount of $111,200 using quotations rather than issuing a formal procurement. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation Approvers of requisitions should ensure multi‐year purchases exceeding the formal procurement threshold are appropriately procured in accordance with Federal, State and Board policies and regulations. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING 2024-004: PROCUREMENT (50000) Assistance Listing # 10.553, 10.555 – U.S. Department of Agriculture, California Department of Education, Child Nutrition Cluster Repeat Finding? No Criteria: Code of Federal Regulations, CFR 200.320, requires the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. For “formal purchases,” those where the aggregate dollar amount is higher than the simplified acquisition threshold, sealed bids are publicly solicited through an invitation and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid conforms with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation and is the lowest in price. Condition: During our testing we discovered one contract which lacked documentation to demonstrate that competitive bids were obtained, contractor selection or rejection, and determination as to whom the contract was awarded to. Context: Error was isolated to one contract tested. Questioned Costs: This resulted in a contract of $997,040 being awarded without competitive bidding documentation. Cause: Change in key management. Effect: The District could potentially award contracts without doing due diligence. Recommendation: We recommend that the District comply with 2 CFR, section 200.318-322, which requires that an LEA maintain the documented procedures for procurement transactions under a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials: We posted a job walk and had one bidder. In the future we will post for a longer period of time and if needed repost for a second job walk. We will note each company that attends and if they did or did not chose to bid the job. The documentation of each bid and the board approval for the awarded bid will now be maintained at both the Construction, Maintenance, and Operations Department and the District Office to lessen the loss of documentation due to employee turnover.
FINDING 2024-004: PROCUREMENT (50000) Assistance Listing # 10.553, 10.555 – U.S. Department of Agriculture, California Department of Education, Child Nutrition Cluster Repeat Finding? No Criteria: Code of Federal Regulations, CFR 200.320, requires the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. For “formal purchases,” those where the aggregate dollar amount is higher than the simplified acquisition threshold, sealed bids are publicly solicited through an invitation and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid conforms with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation and is the lowest in price. Condition: During our testing we discovered one contract which lacked documentation to demonstrate that competitive bids were obtained, contractor selection or rejection, and determination as to whom the contract was awarded to. Context: Error was isolated to one contract tested. Questioned Costs: This resulted in a contract of $997,040 being awarded without competitive bidding documentation. Cause: Change in key management. Effect: The District could potentially award contracts without doing due diligence. Recommendation: We recommend that the District comply with 2 CFR, section 200.318-322, which requires that an LEA maintain the documented procedures for procurement transactions under a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials: We posted a job walk and had one bidder. In the future we will post for a longer period of time and if needed repost for a second job walk. We will note each company that attends and if they did or did not chose to bid the job. The documentation of each bid and the board approval for the awarded bid will now be maintained at both the Construction, Maintenance, and Operations Department and the District Office to lessen the loss of documentation due to employee turnover.
FINDING 2024-004: PROCUREMENT (50000) Assistance Listing # 10.553, 10.555 – U.S. Department of Agriculture, California Department of Education, Child Nutrition Cluster Repeat Finding? No Criteria: Code of Federal Regulations, CFR 200.320, requires the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. For “formal purchases,” those where the aggregate dollar amount is higher than the simplified acquisition threshold, sealed bids are publicly solicited through an invitation and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid conforms with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation and is the lowest in price. Condition: During our testing we discovered one contract which lacked documentation to demonstrate that competitive bids were obtained, contractor selection or rejection, and determination as to whom the contract was awarded to. Context: Error was isolated to one contract tested. Questioned Costs: This resulted in a contract of $997,040 being awarded without competitive bidding documentation. Cause: Change in key management. Effect: The District could potentially award contracts without doing due diligence. Recommendation: We recommend that the District comply with 2 CFR, section 200.318-322, which requires that an LEA maintain the documented procedures for procurement transactions under a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials: We posted a job walk and had one bidder. In the future we will post for a longer period of time and if needed repost for a second job walk. We will note each company that attends and if they did or did not chose to bid the job. The documentation of each bid and the board approval for the awarded bid will now be maintained at both the Construction, Maintenance, and Operations Department and the District Office to lessen the loss of documentation due to employee turnover.
FINDING 2024-004: PROCUREMENT (50000) Assistance Listing # 10.553, 10.555 – U.S. Department of Agriculture, California Department of Education, Child Nutrition Cluster Repeat Finding? No Criteria: Code of Federal Regulations, CFR 200.320, requires the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. For “formal purchases,” those where the aggregate dollar amount is higher than the simplified acquisition threshold, sealed bids are publicly solicited through an invitation and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid conforms with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation and is the lowest in price. Condition: During our testing we discovered one contract which lacked documentation to demonstrate that competitive bids were obtained, contractor selection or rejection, and determination as to whom the contract was awarded to. Context: Error was isolated to one contract tested. Questioned Costs: This resulted in a contract of $997,040 being awarded without competitive bidding documentation. Cause: Change in key management. Effect: The District could potentially award contracts without doing due diligence. Recommendation: We recommend that the District comply with 2 CFR, section 200.318-322, which requires that an LEA maintain the documented procedures for procurement transactions under a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials: We posted a job walk and had one bidder. In the future we will post for a longer period of time and if needed repost for a second job walk. We will note each company that attends and if they did or did not chose to bid the job. The documentation of each bid and the board approval for the awarded bid will now be maintained at both the Construction, Maintenance, and Operations Department and the District Office to lessen the loss of documentation due to employee turnover.
Department of Housing and Urban Development Continuum of Care, Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267, Affects all grant awards included under Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267 on the Schedule Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.318 maintains that recipients must have and use documented procurement policies and must conform to procurement standards in sections 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: Catholic Charities has documented procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal standards regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment; however, the procedures were not followed for four vendors selected for testing. Cause: Catholic Charities did not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure that the processes laid out in their procurement policy regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment were followed. Effect: Payments could be made to recipients who were suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 13 transactions out of 68 total transactions were selected for testing. Four vendors did not have support showing the search for suspension and debarment was performed which made up $60,537 of $796,282 federal awards. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes, 2023-001 Recommendation: We recommend Catholic Charities enhance internal control procedures to ensure all suspension and debarment verification procedures are performed prior to entering into the transactions. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Department of Housing and Urban Development Continuum of Care, Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267, Affects all grant awards included under Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267 on the Schedule Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.318 maintains that recipients must have and use documented procurement policies and must conform to procurement standards in sections 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: Catholic Charities has documented procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal standards regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment; however, the procedures were not followed for four vendors selected for testing. Cause: Catholic Charities did not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure that the processes laid out in their procurement policy regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment were followed. Effect: Payments could be made to recipients who were suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 13 transactions out of 68 total transactions were selected for testing. Four vendors did not have support showing the search for suspension and debarment was performed which made up $60,537 of $796,282 federal awards. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes, 2023-001 Recommendation: We recommend Catholic Charities enhance internal control procedures to ensure all suspension and debarment verification procedures are performed prior to entering into the transactions. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.