Procurement Suspension & Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Research and Development Cluster Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurement standards conform to the applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Condition: The Organization has a procurement policy in place; however, the Organization is not consistently following the procurement policy. During the period of the contracts with these provisions, the Organization did not have a control structure in place to monitor compliance with procurement requirements. Consequently, for one (1) of six (2) contracts tested, the procurement policy was not followed and no documentation to reflect compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements related to procurement could be provided. Cause: The procurement policy retained by the Organization has not been updated to conform with the Organization’s current operations. Effect or potential effect: The Organization could become noncompliant with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to dollar amounts being expended to vendors. Additionally, the Organization could become ineligible to receive funds from federal entities or may have to issue refunds to federal entities. Questioned costs: None. Context: Our sample was not intended to be statistically valid. Recommendation: The Organization updated its procurement policy to reflect current operations, but did not go back and document procurement compliance against existing vendors. The Organization should review the current procurement operations in conjunction with the review of the procurement policies to ensure that all practices and policies conform to the standards promulgated by the CFR. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management's response is reported in "Management's Views and Corrective Action Plan" included at the end of this report. Identification of prior year finding: 2023-005
Procurement Suspension & Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Research and Development Cluster Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurement standards conform to the applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Condition: The Organization has a procurement policy in place; however, the Organization is not consistently following the procurement policy. During the period of the contracts with these provisions, the Organization did not have a control structure in place to monitor compliance with procurement requirements. Consequently, for one (1) of six (2) contracts tested, the procurement policy was not followed and no documentation to reflect compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements related to procurement could be provided. Cause: The procurement policy retained by the Organization has not been updated to conform with the Organization’s current operations. Effect or potential effect: The Organization could become noncompliant with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to dollar amounts being expended to vendors. Additionally, the Organization could become ineligible to receive funds from federal entities or may have to issue refunds to federal entities. Questioned costs: None. Context: Our sample was not intended to be statistically valid. Recommendation: The Organization updated its procurement policy to reflect current operations, but did not go back and document procurement compliance against existing vendors. The Organization should review the current procurement operations in conjunction with the review of the procurement policies to ensure that all practices and policies conform to the standards promulgated by the CFR. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management's response is reported in "Management's Views and Corrective Action Plan" included at the end of this report. Identification of prior year finding: 2023-005
Procurement Suspension & Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Research and Development Cluster Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurement standards conform to the applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Condition: The Organization has a procurement policy in place; however, the Organization is not consistently following the procurement policy. During the period of the contracts with these provisions, the Organization did not have a control structure in place to monitor compliance with procurement requirements. Consequently, for one (1) of six (2) contracts tested, the procurement policy was not followed and no documentation to reflect compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements related to procurement could be provided. Cause: The procurement policy retained by the Organization has not been updated to conform with the Organization’s current operations. Effect or potential effect: The Organization could become noncompliant with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to dollar amounts being expended to vendors. Additionally, the Organization could become ineligible to receive funds from federal entities or may have to issue refunds to federal entities. Questioned costs: None. Context: Our sample was not intended to be statistically valid. Recommendation: The Organization updated its procurement policy to reflect current operations, but did not go back and document procurement compliance against existing vendors. The Organization should review the current procurement operations in conjunction with the review of the procurement policies to ensure that all practices and policies conform to the standards promulgated by the CFR. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management's response is reported in "Management's Views and Corrective Action Plan" included at the end of this report. Identification of prior year finding: 2023-005
Procurement Suspension & Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Research and Development Cluster Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurement standards conform to the applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Condition: The Organization has a procurement policy in place; however, the Organization is not consistently following the procurement policy. During the period of the contracts with these provisions, the Organization did not have a control structure in place to monitor compliance with procurement requirements. Consequently, for one (1) of six (2) contracts tested, the procurement policy was not followed and no documentation to reflect compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements related to procurement could be provided. Cause: The procurement policy retained by the Organization has not been updated to conform with the Organization’s current operations. Effect or potential effect: The Organization could become noncompliant with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to dollar amounts being expended to vendors. Additionally, the Organization could become ineligible to receive funds from federal entities or may have to issue refunds to federal entities. Questioned costs: None. Context: Our sample was not intended to be statistically valid. Recommendation: The Organization updated its procurement policy to reflect current operations, but did not go back and document procurement compliance against existing vendors. The Organization should review the current procurement operations in conjunction with the review of the procurement policies to ensure that all practices and policies conform to the standards promulgated by the CFR. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management's response is reported in "Management's Views and Corrective Action Plan" included at the end of this report. Identification of prior year finding: 2023-005
FINDING 2024-002 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 22-23, FY 23-24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.318 states: “The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 200.317 through 200.327.” and 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Child Nutrition Cluster and Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation’s management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement vendors utilized and not procured by the School Corporation’s purchasing cooperative. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system could place the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the federal program and applicable federal/state procurement regulations. Not adhering to the School Corporation’s procurement policy designed to follow federal and state regulations, could result in the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds by conducting business with vendors not properly procured and verified to not be suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: There we no questioned costs identified. Context: Procurement The School Corporation participates in the Food2School Child Nutrition Cooperative which procures vendors for food purchases and other supplies on behalf of its members. During the audit period, the School Corporation purchased supplies and equipment from vendors not procured by the Cooperative. One vendor with aggregate annual purchases of $118,390 and $68,859 for fiscal year 2023 and fiscal year 2024, respectively, exceeded the small purchase threshold ($50,000 - $150,000) and was not subject to the School Corporation’s procurement policy to solicit multiple quotes and to document the method and rationale for procurement. Suspension and Debarment For three vendors tested which were not procured by the Cooperative and had aggregate annual disbursements exceeding the federal suspension and debarment threshold of $25,000, the School Corporation did not perform suspension and debarment checks to confirm the vendors were not suspended or debarred before entering into the contract or disbursing federal funds. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: Yes, see Finding 2022-002 and Finding 2022-003. Recommendation: We recommend the School Corporation implement an internal control to monitor purchases within the Food Service Department with vendors that exceed the small purchase dollar threshold, either individually or in annual aggregation, to ensure the School Corporation’s procurement policy is followed which includes soliciting competitive quotes for transactions within $50,000 - $150,000 and also ensure multiple purchases throughout the year are equitably spilt among all qualifying vendors. We also recommend that the School Corporation implement an internal control process to monitor aggregate vendor disbursements in Fund 800, School Lunch, on annual basis and perform suspension and debarment checks for all vendors exceeding $25,000 in aggregate disbursements on an annual basis to ensure compliance with federal suspension and debarment regulations. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2024-002 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 22-23, FY 23-24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.318 states: “The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 200.317 through 200.327.” and 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Child Nutrition Cluster and Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation’s management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement vendors utilized and not procured by the School Corporation’s purchasing cooperative. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system could place the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the federal program and applicable federal/state procurement regulations. Not adhering to the School Corporation’s procurement policy designed to follow federal and state regulations, could result in the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds by conducting business with vendors not properly procured and verified to not be suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: There we no questioned costs identified. Context: Procurement The School Corporation participates in the Food2School Child Nutrition Cooperative which procures vendors for food purchases and other supplies on behalf of its members. During the audit period, the School Corporation purchased supplies and equipment from vendors not procured by the Cooperative. One vendor with aggregate annual purchases of $118,390 and $68,859 for fiscal year 2023 and fiscal year 2024, respectively, exceeded the small purchase threshold ($50,000 - $150,000) and was not subject to the School Corporation’s procurement policy to solicit multiple quotes and to document the method and rationale for procurement. Suspension and Debarment For three vendors tested which were not procured by the Cooperative and had aggregate annual disbursements exceeding the federal suspension and debarment threshold of $25,000, the School Corporation did not perform suspension and debarment checks to confirm the vendors were not suspended or debarred before entering into the contract or disbursing federal funds. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: Yes, see Finding 2022-002 and Finding 2022-003. Recommendation: We recommend the School Corporation implement an internal control to monitor purchases within the Food Service Department with vendors that exceed the small purchase dollar threshold, either individually or in annual aggregation, to ensure the School Corporation’s procurement policy is followed which includes soliciting competitive quotes for transactions within $50,000 - $150,000 and also ensure multiple purchases throughout the year are equitably spilt among all qualifying vendors. We also recommend that the School Corporation implement an internal control process to monitor aggregate vendor disbursements in Fund 800, School Lunch, on annual basis and perform suspension and debarment checks for all vendors exceeding $25,000 in aggregate disbursements on an annual basis to ensure compliance with federal suspension and debarment regulations. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2024-002 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 22-23, FY 23-24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.318 states: “The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 200.317 through 200.327.” and 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Child Nutrition Cluster and Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation’s management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement vendors utilized and not procured by the School Corporation’s purchasing cooperative. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system could place the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the federal program and applicable federal/state procurement regulations. Not adhering to the School Corporation’s procurement policy designed to follow federal and state regulations, could result in the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds by conducting business with vendors not properly procured and verified to not be suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: There we no questioned costs identified. Context: Procurement The School Corporation participates in the Food2School Child Nutrition Cooperative which procures vendors for food purchases and other supplies on behalf of its members. During the audit period, the School Corporation purchased supplies and equipment from vendors not procured by the Cooperative. One vendor with aggregate annual purchases of $118,390 and $68,859 for fiscal year 2023 and fiscal year 2024, respectively, exceeded the small purchase threshold ($50,000 - $150,000) and was not subject to the School Corporation’s procurement policy to solicit multiple quotes and to document the method and rationale for procurement. Suspension and Debarment For three vendors tested which were not procured by the Cooperative and had aggregate annual disbursements exceeding the federal suspension and debarment threshold of $25,000, the School Corporation did not perform suspension and debarment checks to confirm the vendors were not suspended or debarred before entering into the contract or disbursing federal funds. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: Yes, see Finding 2022-002 and Finding 2022-003. Recommendation: We recommend the School Corporation implement an internal control to monitor purchases within the Food Service Department with vendors that exceed the small purchase dollar threshold, either individually or in annual aggregation, to ensure the School Corporation’s procurement policy is followed which includes soliciting competitive quotes for transactions within $50,000 - $150,000 and also ensure multiple purchases throughout the year are equitably spilt among all qualifying vendors. We also recommend that the School Corporation implement an internal control process to monitor aggregate vendor disbursements in Fund 800, School Lunch, on annual basis and perform suspension and debarment checks for all vendors exceeding $25,000 in aggregate disbursements on an annual basis to ensure compliance with federal suspension and debarment regulations. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires that Organization have written procurement policies in place that comply with 2 CFR Sections 200.318 – 300.327 when procurement is applicable to a federal program. According to the compliance requirements matrix, procurement is applicable to ALN #21.027. Condition: While testing the procurement compliance requirement, we found that management had not adopted the required policies contained in 2 CFR Sections 200.318 – 300.327. We did not, however, find any evidence of material noncompliance related to this requirement. Cause: Management does not regularly expend federal dollars above the threshold requiring a Single Audit under the Uniform Guidance. As such, policies related to procurement were not adopted. Effect: Internal controls surrounding Uniform Guidance are incomplete. Recommendation: Management should review 2 CFR Sections 200.138 – 300.327 and develop written policies that comply with the compliance requirements. Questioned Costs: None Management’s Response: Management will review their current procurement policies and make any necessary changes to update the policies to be compliant with 2 CFR Sections 200.138 – 300.327.
Finding 2024-001: Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through agency: Pennsylvania Department of Education Assistance Listing Number: 84.425 Education Stabilization Fund; 84.027 IDEA Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires that non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures consistent with laws and regulations and the standards for the acquisition of property or services under a federal award or subaward in accordance with 2 CFR 200.318. The Uniform Guidance requires that non-federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement and adherence to related compliance requirements. Records should include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR 200.318(i) Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply 2 CFR 200.320(c): The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold: The item is available only from a single source; The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. adequately document costs in accordance with 2 CFR 200.403(g). The Non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation, but as a starting point, the non-Federal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. 2 CFR 200.324(a). Per PDE and Pennsylvania Bulletin, the Entity must perform a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. Condition: The District did not follow the appropriate procedures to comply with Uniform Grant Guidance. During our audits and PDE’s monitoring review completed in fiscal year 2023-2024, the ESSER Monitoring Team and we noted the following Procurement Findings: The School District was unable to provide purchase orders for several services purchased with Federal funds. The School District did not document its rationale for noncompetitive procurement. The School District did not conduct a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. Procurement files for 2 vendors, which exceed $10,000 but not $22,500 for goods and $10,000 but not $250,000 for services, did not have the accompanying three price or rate quotations. The School District did not conduct a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. Vendor contracts did not contain the necessary contract provisions The ESSER Monitoring Team was unable to obtain and review sufficient documentation to verify that the procurement was competitively performed for 1 vendor, such as proof of advertisement, request for proposal, bid evaluation, and award letter for procurement of the following vendor Context: During testing, it was noted that the District had entered into a lease agreement in 2017 to acquire computer equipment. The equipment was acquired through COSTARS, a cooperative purchasing program. While purchases through COSTARS meet the cooperative purchase requirement for local government purchasing under 62 Pa.C.S. section 1902, they do not meet the more stringent requirements of the Uniform Grant Guidance. Subsequently, the District decided to budget for and pay for this lease agreement in the 2021-2022 school year under the Education Stabilization Fund. In using federal funds to pay for the lease agreement, the District inadvertently did not follow its procurement policy. While the school district developed a plan to correct these procedures, it was not fully implemented until the 2023-2024 school year. Cause: Non-compliance with Uniform Guidance Procurement requirements. Effect: The District did not follow its procurement policy and ultimately did not comply with the standards of the Uniform Grant Guidance. Questioned Cost: None Identification of Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: The District must implement procedures to fully comply with Uniform Guidance Procurement requirements. View of Responsible Officials: The District will require all payments to have either a purchase order or request for payment form completed. The Accounts Payable Coordinator is responsible for ensuring the form is signed for all disbursements. For the particular item cited by our monitors the Superintendent and Business Manager signed off on the invoice instead of a request for payment form. The District Accountant / Business Office Manager discussed with the Accounts Payable Coordinator that going forward this is insufficient. All payments must have either a purchase order or request for payment form. The District Accountant / Business Office Manager reviews backup documentation for check disbursements. During their review if any payments are discovered to be missing a purchase order or request for payment form, he will notify the Accounts Payable Coordinator to complete the form. This is effective immediately. The District has also reviewed the applicable Uniform Guidance Procurement requirements and has developed an electronic procurement process that all staff member making the purchase with federal funds, must complete a form prior to the procurement being made. Then the Business Manager approves the form. There is a box to check if the procurement is a sole source. If this is checked the Business Manager will require justification. This process was presented by the Business Office to Leadership Personnel on 5/9/24 and is effective now.
Finding 2024-001: Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through agency: Pennsylvania Department of Education Assistance Listing Number: 84.425 Education Stabilization Fund; 84.027 IDEA Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires that non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures consistent with laws and regulations and the standards for the acquisition of property or services under a federal award or subaward in accordance with 2 CFR 200.318. The Uniform Guidance requires that non-federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement and adherence to related compliance requirements. Records should include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR 200.318(i) Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply 2 CFR 200.320(c): The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold: The item is available only from a single source; The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. adequately document costs in accordance with 2 CFR 200.403(g). The Non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation, but as a starting point, the non-Federal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. 2 CFR 200.324(a). Per PDE and Pennsylvania Bulletin, the Entity must perform a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. Condition: The District did not follow the appropriate procedures to comply with Uniform Grant Guidance. During our audits and PDE’s monitoring review completed in fiscal year 2023-2024, the ESSER Monitoring Team and we noted the following Procurement Findings: The School District was unable to provide purchase orders for several services purchased with Federal funds. The School District did not document its rationale for noncompetitive procurement. The School District did not conduct a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. Procurement files for 2 vendors, which exceed $10,000 but not $22,500 for goods and $10,000 but not $250,000 for services, did not have the accompanying three price or rate quotations. The School District did not conduct a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. Vendor contracts did not contain the necessary contract provisions The ESSER Monitoring Team was unable to obtain and review sufficient documentation to verify that the procurement was competitively performed for 1 vendor, such as proof of advertisement, request for proposal, bid evaluation, and award letter for procurement of the following vendor Context: During testing, it was noted that the District had entered into a lease agreement in 2017 to acquire computer equipment. The equipment was acquired through COSTARS, a cooperative purchasing program. While purchases through COSTARS meet the cooperative purchase requirement for local government purchasing under 62 Pa.C.S. section 1902, they do not meet the more stringent requirements of the Uniform Grant Guidance. Subsequently, the District decided to budget for and pay for this lease agreement in the 2021-2022 school year under the Education Stabilization Fund. In using federal funds to pay for the lease agreement, the District inadvertently did not follow its procurement policy. While the school district developed a plan to correct these procedures, it was not fully implemented until the 2023-2024 school year. Cause: Non-compliance with Uniform Guidance Procurement requirements. Effect: The District did not follow its procurement policy and ultimately did not comply with the standards of the Uniform Grant Guidance. Questioned Cost: None Identification of Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: The District must implement procedures to fully comply with Uniform Guidance Procurement requirements. View of Responsible Officials: The District will require all payments to have either a purchase order or request for payment form completed. The Accounts Payable Coordinator is responsible for ensuring the form is signed for all disbursements. For the particular item cited by our monitors the Superintendent and Business Manager signed off on the invoice instead of a request for payment form. The District Accountant / Business Office Manager discussed with the Accounts Payable Coordinator that going forward this is insufficient. All payments must have either a purchase order or request for payment form. The District Accountant / Business Office Manager reviews backup documentation for check disbursements. During their review if any payments are discovered to be missing a purchase order or request for payment form, he will notify the Accounts Payable Coordinator to complete the form. This is effective immediately. The District has also reviewed the applicable Uniform Guidance Procurement requirements and has developed an electronic procurement process that all staff member making the purchase with federal funds, must complete a form prior to the procurement being made. Then the Business Manager approves the form. There is a box to check if the procurement is a sole source. If this is checked the Business Manager will require justification. This process was presented by the Business Office to Leadership Personnel on 5/9/24 and is effective now.
Finding 2024-001: Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through agency: Pennsylvania Department of Education Assistance Listing Number: 84.425 Education Stabilization Fund; 84.027 IDEA Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires that non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures consistent with laws and regulations and the standards for the acquisition of property or services under a federal award or subaward in accordance with 2 CFR 200.318. The Uniform Guidance requires that non-federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement and adherence to related compliance requirements. Records should include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR 200.318(i) Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply 2 CFR 200.320(c): The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold: The item is available only from a single source; The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. adequately document costs in accordance with 2 CFR 200.403(g). The Non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation, but as a starting point, the non-Federal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. 2 CFR 200.324(a). Per PDE and Pennsylvania Bulletin, the Entity must perform a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. Condition: The District did not follow the appropriate procedures to comply with Uniform Grant Guidance. During our audits and PDE’s monitoring review completed in fiscal year 2023-2024, the ESSER Monitoring Team and we noted the following Procurement Findings: The School District was unable to provide purchase orders for several services purchased with Federal funds. The School District did not document its rationale for noncompetitive procurement. The School District did not conduct a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. Procurement files for 2 vendors, which exceed $10,000 but not $22,500 for goods and $10,000 but not $250,000 for services, did not have the accompanying three price or rate quotations. The School District did not conduct a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. Vendor contracts did not contain the necessary contract provisions The ESSER Monitoring Team was unable to obtain and review sufficient documentation to verify that the procurement was competitively performed for 1 vendor, such as proof of advertisement, request for proposal, bid evaluation, and award letter for procurement of the following vendor Context: During testing, it was noted that the District had entered into a lease agreement in 2017 to acquire computer equipment. The equipment was acquired through COSTARS, a cooperative purchasing program. While purchases through COSTARS meet the cooperative purchase requirement for local government purchasing under 62 Pa.C.S. section 1902, they do not meet the more stringent requirements of the Uniform Grant Guidance. Subsequently, the District decided to budget for and pay for this lease agreement in the 2021-2022 school year under the Education Stabilization Fund. In using federal funds to pay for the lease agreement, the District inadvertently did not follow its procurement policy. While the school district developed a plan to correct these procedures, it was not fully implemented until the 2023-2024 school year. Cause: Non-compliance with Uniform Guidance Procurement requirements. Effect: The District did not follow its procurement policy and ultimately did not comply with the standards of the Uniform Grant Guidance. Questioned Cost: None Identification of Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: The District must implement procedures to fully comply with Uniform Guidance Procurement requirements. View of Responsible Officials: The District will require all payments to have either a purchase order or request for payment form completed. The Accounts Payable Coordinator is responsible for ensuring the form is signed for all disbursements. For the particular item cited by our monitors the Superintendent and Business Manager signed off on the invoice instead of a request for payment form. The District Accountant / Business Office Manager discussed with the Accounts Payable Coordinator that going forward this is insufficient. All payments must have either a purchase order or request for payment form. The District Accountant / Business Office Manager reviews backup documentation for check disbursements. During their review if any payments are discovered to be missing a purchase order or request for payment form, he will notify the Accounts Payable Coordinator to complete the form. This is effective immediately. The District has also reviewed the applicable Uniform Guidance Procurement requirements and has developed an electronic procurement process that all staff member making the purchase with federal funds, must complete a form prior to the procurement being made. Then the Business Manager approves the form. There is a box to check if the procurement is a sole source. If this is checked the Business Manager will require justification. This process was presented by the Business Office to Leadership Personnel on 5/9/24 and is effective now.
Finding 2024-001: Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through agency: Pennsylvania Department of Education Assistance Listing Number: 84.425 Education Stabilization Fund; 84.027 IDEA Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires that non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures consistent with laws and regulations and the standards for the acquisition of property or services under a federal award or subaward in accordance with 2 CFR 200.318. The Uniform Guidance requires that non-federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement and adherence to related compliance requirements. Records should include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR 200.318(i) Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply 2 CFR 200.320(c): The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold: The item is available only from a single source; The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. adequately document costs in accordance with 2 CFR 200.403(g). The Non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation, but as a starting point, the non-Federal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. 2 CFR 200.324(a). Per PDE and Pennsylvania Bulletin, the Entity must perform a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. Condition: The District did not follow the appropriate procedures to comply with Uniform Grant Guidance. During our audits and PDE’s monitoring review completed in fiscal year 2023-2024, the ESSER Monitoring Team and we noted the following Procurement Findings: The School District was unable to provide purchase orders for several services purchased with Federal funds. The School District did not document its rationale for noncompetitive procurement. The School District did not conduct a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. Procurement files for 2 vendors, which exceed $10,000 but not $22,500 for goods and $10,000 but not $250,000 for services, did not have the accompanying three price or rate quotations. The School District did not conduct a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. Vendor contracts did not contain the necessary contract provisions The ESSER Monitoring Team was unable to obtain and review sufficient documentation to verify that the procurement was competitively performed for 1 vendor, such as proof of advertisement, request for proposal, bid evaluation, and award letter for procurement of the following vendor Context: During testing, it was noted that the District had entered into a lease agreement in 2017 to acquire computer equipment. The equipment was acquired through COSTARS, a cooperative purchasing program. While purchases through COSTARS meet the cooperative purchase requirement for local government purchasing under 62 Pa.C.S. section 1902, they do not meet the more stringent requirements of the Uniform Grant Guidance. Subsequently, the District decided to budget for and pay for this lease agreement in the 2021-2022 school year under the Education Stabilization Fund. In using federal funds to pay for the lease agreement, the District inadvertently did not follow its procurement policy. While the school district developed a plan to correct these procedures, it was not fully implemented until the 2023-2024 school year. Cause: Non-compliance with Uniform Guidance Procurement requirements. Effect: The District did not follow its procurement policy and ultimately did not comply with the standards of the Uniform Grant Guidance. Questioned Cost: None Identification of Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: The District must implement procedures to fully comply with Uniform Guidance Procurement requirements. View of Responsible Officials: The District will require all payments to have either a purchase order or request for payment form completed. The Accounts Payable Coordinator is responsible for ensuring the form is signed for all disbursements. For the particular item cited by our monitors the Superintendent and Business Manager signed off on the invoice instead of a request for payment form. The District Accountant / Business Office Manager discussed with the Accounts Payable Coordinator that going forward this is insufficient. All payments must have either a purchase order or request for payment form. The District Accountant / Business Office Manager reviews backup documentation for check disbursements. During their review if any payments are discovered to be missing a purchase order or request for payment form, he will notify the Accounts Payable Coordinator to complete the form. This is effective immediately. The District has also reviewed the applicable Uniform Guidance Procurement requirements and has developed an electronic procurement process that all staff member making the purchase with federal funds, must complete a form prior to the procurement being made. Then the Business Manager approves the form. There is a box to check if the procurement is a sole source. If this is checked the Business Manager will require justification. This process was presented by the Business Office to Leadership Personnel on 5/9/24 and is effective now.
Finding 2024-001: Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through agency: Pennsylvania Department of Education Assistance Listing Number: 84.425 Education Stabilization Fund; 84.027 IDEA Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires that non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures consistent with laws and regulations and the standards for the acquisition of property or services under a federal award or subaward in accordance with 2 CFR 200.318. The Uniform Guidance requires that non-federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement and adherence to related compliance requirements. Records should include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR 200.318(i) Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply 2 CFR 200.320(c): The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold: The item is available only from a single source; The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. adequately document costs in accordance with 2 CFR 200.403(g). The Non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation, but as a starting point, the non-Federal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. 2 CFR 200.324(a). Per PDE and Pennsylvania Bulletin, the Entity must perform a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. Condition: The District did not follow the appropriate procedures to comply with Uniform Grant Guidance. During our audits and PDE’s monitoring review completed in fiscal year 2023-2024, the ESSER Monitoring Team and we noted the following Procurement Findings: The School District was unable to provide purchase orders for several services purchased with Federal funds. The School District did not document its rationale for noncompetitive procurement. The School District did not conduct a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. Procurement files for 2 vendors, which exceed $10,000 but not $22,500 for goods and $10,000 but not $250,000 for services, did not have the accompanying three price or rate quotations. The School District did not conduct a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. Vendor contracts did not contain the necessary contract provisions The ESSER Monitoring Team was unable to obtain and review sufficient documentation to verify that the procurement was competitively performed for 1 vendor, such as proof of advertisement, request for proposal, bid evaluation, and award letter for procurement of the following vendor Context: During testing, it was noted that the District had entered into a lease agreement in 2017 to acquire computer equipment. The equipment was acquired through COSTARS, a cooperative purchasing program. While purchases through COSTARS meet the cooperative purchase requirement for local government purchasing under 62 Pa.C.S. section 1902, they do not meet the more stringent requirements of the Uniform Grant Guidance. Subsequently, the District decided to budget for and pay for this lease agreement in the 2021-2022 school year under the Education Stabilization Fund. In using federal funds to pay for the lease agreement, the District inadvertently did not follow its procurement policy. While the school district developed a plan to correct these procedures, it was not fully implemented until the 2023-2024 school year. Cause: Non-compliance with Uniform Guidance Procurement requirements. Effect: The District did not follow its procurement policy and ultimately did not comply with the standards of the Uniform Grant Guidance. Questioned Cost: None Identification of Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: The District must implement procedures to fully comply with Uniform Guidance Procurement requirements. View of Responsible Officials: The District will require all payments to have either a purchase order or request for payment form completed. The Accounts Payable Coordinator is responsible for ensuring the form is signed for all disbursements. For the particular item cited by our monitors the Superintendent and Business Manager signed off on the invoice instead of a request for payment form. The District Accountant / Business Office Manager discussed with the Accounts Payable Coordinator that going forward this is insufficient. All payments must have either a purchase order or request for payment form. The District Accountant / Business Office Manager reviews backup documentation for check disbursements. During their review if any payments are discovered to be missing a purchase order or request for payment form, he will notify the Accounts Payable Coordinator to complete the form. This is effective immediately. The District has also reviewed the applicable Uniform Guidance Procurement requirements and has developed an electronic procurement process that all staff member making the purchase with federal funds, must complete a form prior to the procurement being made. Then the Business Manager approves the form. There is a box to check if the procurement is a sole source. If this is checked the Business Manager will require justification. This process was presented by the Business Office to Leadership Personnel on 5/9/24 and is effective now.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION & DEBARMENT REQUIREMENTS, CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS; AL No. 21.027, YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2024 Criteria: Per section 13 of Treasury’s Final Rule FAQs and 2 CFR 200.214, counties must comply with the procurement standards set forth in 2 CFR 200.318, through 2 CFR 200.327, when using their SLFRF award funds to procure goods and services to carry out the objectives of their SLFRF award. In addition, 2 CFR 200.214, prohibits recipients from using SLFRF funds to enter into subawards and contracts with parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs. Condition 1: The county did not verify that program recipients/participants were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the program. Condition 2: The county did not formally bid a communications upgrade pre-install project as required by federal procurement standards established in 2 CFR 300.19. Cause: The county does not have procurement policies and procedures in place that allows it to comply with procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Non-compliance with program terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward, and that no subaward, contract, or agreement for purchase of goods or services is made with any suspended or debarred party. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
Criteria: The Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR 200.318(I)) requires that each non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition: The Organization did not maintain sufficient documentation of its procurement decisions. Cause: The exception noted above was due a lack of documentation of the process followed by the Organization to ensure that all procurements of goods and services are in accordance with the Uniform Guidance and it’s procurement policy. Context: The population subject procurement requirements was one vendor under the small purchase threshold. The Organization did not maintain documentation of quotes from other qualified sources and document the selection of the vendor. Effect: Improper procurement procedures can result in actions taken by oversight agencies which could impact future funding. Recommendation: The Organization should ensure its procedures specifically include maintaining documentation of procurement decisions. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and recommendation.
MATERIAL WEAKNESS IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE AND MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE – U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, PASSED THROUGH MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, CHILD NUTRITION CLUSTER – FEDERAL ALN 10.553, 10.555, AND 10.559 2024-002 Internal Control Over Compliance and Material Noncompliance With Federal Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Requirements Criteria – 2 CFR § 180 and 2 CFR § 200.318-327 requires the District to establish and maintain effective internal control over compliance with requirements applicable to federal program expenditures, including procurement, suspension, and debarment requirements applicable to the child nutrition cluster federal program. Condition – During our audit, we noted the District did not have sufficient controls in place resulting in material noncompliance within its child nutrition cluster federal program to ensure compliance with federal procurement requirements related to methods of procurement and to assure that it was not contracting for goods or services with parties that are suspended or debarred, or whose principals are suspended or debarred from participating in contracts involving the expenditures of federal program funds. Questioned Costs – None. Context – For two of six vendors exceeding the micro-purchase threshold, the District did not document procurement policy and the Uniform Guidance requirements related to methods of procurement and a proper documentation of suspension and debarment testing was not maintained for four of four vendors tested to ensure compliance with this requirement in the current year. This was not a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding – This is a current year and prior year finding. Cause – This was an oversight by district personnel. Effect – Noncompliance with procurement, suspension, and debarment requirements could result in the District expending federal funds inappropriately or utilizing vendors that are not eligible to be parties to such transactions, which could be viewed as a violation of the award agreement. Recommendation – We recommend that the District review its internal control procedures relating to procurement, suspension, and debarment for the child nutrition cluster federal program. Internal controls over compliance should be in place to ensure compliance with federal procurement procedures, including awarding and documenting contracts based on sealed bids or quotations for the purchase of goods or services exceeding applicable federal dollar thresholds. Internal controls over compliance should also include verification that any vendor with which the District contracts for goods or services exceeding $25,000 is not listed as suspended or debarred on the federal Excluded Parties List System website. View of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Actions – The District agrees with the finding. The District intends to review its policies and procedures relating to procurement, suspension, and debarment for its federal programs to ensure compliance with the Uniform Guidance in the future. The District has separately issued a Corrective Action Plan related to this finding.
MATERIAL WEAKNESS IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE AND MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE – U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, PASSED THROUGH MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, CHILD NUTRITION CLUSTER – FEDERAL ALN 10.553, 10.555, AND 10.559 2024-002 Internal Control Over Compliance and Material Noncompliance With Federal Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Requirements Criteria – 2 CFR § 180 and 2 CFR § 200.318-327 requires the District to establish and maintain effective internal control over compliance with requirements applicable to federal program expenditures, including procurement, suspension, and debarment requirements applicable to the child nutrition cluster federal program. Condition – During our audit, we noted the District did not have sufficient controls in place resulting in material noncompliance within its child nutrition cluster federal program to ensure compliance with federal procurement requirements related to methods of procurement and to assure that it was not contracting for goods or services with parties that are suspended or debarred, or whose principals are suspended or debarred from participating in contracts involving the expenditures of federal program funds. Questioned Costs – None. Context – For two of six vendors exceeding the micro-purchase threshold, the District did not document procurement policy and the Uniform Guidance requirements related to methods of procurement and a proper documentation of suspension and debarment testing was not maintained for four of four vendors tested to ensure compliance with this requirement in the current year. This was not a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding – This is a current year and prior year finding. Cause – This was an oversight by district personnel. Effect – Noncompliance with procurement, suspension, and debarment requirements could result in the District expending federal funds inappropriately or utilizing vendors that are not eligible to be parties to such transactions, which could be viewed as a violation of the award agreement. Recommendation – We recommend that the District review its internal control procedures relating to procurement, suspension, and debarment for the child nutrition cluster federal program. Internal controls over compliance should be in place to ensure compliance with federal procurement procedures, including awarding and documenting contracts based on sealed bids or quotations for the purchase of goods or services exceeding applicable federal dollar thresholds. Internal controls over compliance should also include verification that any vendor with which the District contracts for goods or services exceeding $25,000 is not listed as suspended or debarred on the federal Excluded Parties List System website. View of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Actions – The District agrees with the finding. The District intends to review its policies and procedures relating to procurement, suspension, and debarment for its federal programs to ensure compliance with the Uniform Guidance in the future. The District has separately issued a Corrective Action Plan related to this finding.
MATERIAL WEAKNESS IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE AND MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE – U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, PASSED THROUGH MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, CHILD NUTRITION CLUSTER – FEDERAL ALN 10.553, 10.555, AND 10.559 2024-002 Internal Control Over Compliance and Material Noncompliance With Federal Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Requirements Criteria – 2 CFR § 180 and 2 CFR § 200.318-327 requires the District to establish and maintain effective internal control over compliance with requirements applicable to federal program expenditures, including procurement, suspension, and debarment requirements applicable to the child nutrition cluster federal program. Condition – During our audit, we noted the District did not have sufficient controls in place resulting in material noncompliance within its child nutrition cluster federal program to ensure compliance with federal procurement requirements related to methods of procurement and to assure that it was not contracting for goods or services with parties that are suspended or debarred, or whose principals are suspended or debarred from participating in contracts involving the expenditures of federal program funds. Questioned Costs – None. Context – For two of six vendors exceeding the micro-purchase threshold, the District did not document procurement policy and the Uniform Guidance requirements related to methods of procurement and a proper documentation of suspension and debarment testing was not maintained for four of four vendors tested to ensure compliance with this requirement in the current year. This was not a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding – This is a current year and prior year finding. Cause – This was an oversight by district personnel. Effect – Noncompliance with procurement, suspension, and debarment requirements could result in the District expending federal funds inappropriately or utilizing vendors that are not eligible to be parties to such transactions, which could be viewed as a violation of the award agreement. Recommendation – We recommend that the District review its internal control procedures relating to procurement, suspension, and debarment for the child nutrition cluster federal program. Internal controls over compliance should be in place to ensure compliance with federal procurement procedures, including awarding and documenting contracts based on sealed bids or quotations for the purchase of goods or services exceeding applicable federal dollar thresholds. Internal controls over compliance should also include verification that any vendor with which the District contracts for goods or services exceeding $25,000 is not listed as suspended or debarred on the federal Excluded Parties List System website. View of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Actions – The District agrees with the finding. The District intends to review its policies and procedures relating to procurement, suspension, and debarment for its federal programs to ensure compliance with the Uniform Guidance in the future. The District has separately issued a Corrective Action Plan related to this finding.
Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listing Number: 84.027, 84.027X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-090-PN01, 23611-090-PN01, 22611-090-ARP, 24611-090-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Special Education Cluster and Procurement compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For the three small purchase method procurements sampled for testing, we noted that the School Corporation, did not obtain quotes from an adequate number of qualified sources. The total amount disbursed for the sample items was $127,299 in FY23 and $25,354 in FY24 for contracted rehabilitation therapy and speech pathology services. Additionally, the School Corporation did not perform suspension and debarment checks on the sample vendors. Identification as a repeat finding: This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit. The prior finding numbers were 2022-005 and 2022-006. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to ensure that the School Corporation’s procurement policy is adhered to and quotes are obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as required for small purchase method procurements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listing Number: 84.027, 84.027X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-090-PN01, 23611-090-PN01, 22611-090-ARP, 24611-090-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Special Education Cluster and Procurement compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For the three small purchase method procurements sampled for testing, we noted that the School Corporation, did not obtain quotes from an adequate number of qualified sources. The total amount disbursed for the sample items was $127,299 in FY23 and $25,354 in FY24 for contracted rehabilitation therapy and speech pathology services. Additionally, the School Corporation did not perform suspension and debarment checks on the sample vendors. Identification as a repeat finding: This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit. The prior finding numbers were 2022-005 and 2022-006. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to ensure that the School Corporation’s procurement policy is adhered to and quotes are obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as required for small purchase method procurements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listing Number: 84.027, 84.027X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-090-PN01, 23611-090-PN01, 22611-090-ARP, 24611-090-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Special Education Cluster and Procurement compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For the three small purchase method procurements sampled for testing, we noted that the School Corporation, did not obtain quotes from an adequate number of qualified sources. The total amount disbursed for the sample items was $127,299 in FY23 and $25,354 in FY24 for contracted rehabilitation therapy and speech pathology services. Additionally, the School Corporation did not perform suspension and debarment checks on the sample vendors. Identification as a repeat finding: This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit. The prior finding numbers were 2022-005 and 2022-006. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to ensure that the School Corporation’s procurement policy is adhered to and quotes are obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as required for small purchase method procurements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listing Number: 84.027, 84.027X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-090-PN01, 23611-090-PN01, 22611-090-ARP, 24611-090-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Special Education Cluster and Procurement compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For the three small purchase method procurements sampled for testing, we noted that the School Corporation, did not obtain quotes from an adequate number of qualified sources. The total amount disbursed for the sample items was $127,299 in FY23 and $25,354 in FY24 for contracted rehabilitation therapy and speech pathology services. Additionally, the School Corporation did not perform suspension and debarment checks on the sample vendors. Identification as a repeat finding: This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit. The prior finding numbers were 2022-005 and 2022-006. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to ensure that the School Corporation’s procurement policy is adhered to and quotes are obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as required for small purchase method procurements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
U.S. Department of the Treasury Passed through Lancaster County, Nebraska COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds AL #21.027 Criteria: 2 CFR 200.318 requires that a non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state and local law regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal law and standards. Condition: The Organization does not have a formalized procurement policy that conforms to applicable standards under Uniform Guidance. Additionally, the Organization did not follow procurement policies when obtaining bids for contracts. Cause: Due to grant timing restraints, the Organization did not follow proper procurement procedures for obtaining bids for contracts under the Uniform Guidance. Adequate internal controls were not in place to ensure a documented policy in compliance with procurement requirements was in place. Effect: The Organization did not have proper procedures to ensure its procurement policies were updated to conform to the requirements identified in Uniform Guidance. Additionally, the Organization did not follow proper procurement procedures. Questioned Costs: None Context/Sampling: One contract over the small purchase threshold and one contract over the simplified acquisition threshold were selected for testing. Both contracts did not follow procurement compliance requirements including obtaining competitive bids or documentation to support the bidding process. These transactions totaled $749,431 of $760,284 costs tested. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: Management should implement a formal procurement policy using the guidance of 2 CFR 200.317 – 200.327. Additionally, management should follow this policy when procuring services or property. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-043-ARP; 23611-043-PN01; 24611-043-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (b) Formal Procurement Methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: . . . (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. . . . (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. . . ." Condition: The Cooperative did not obtain sealed bids or competitive proposals, nor was a circumstance met that would have allowed for a noncompetitive procurement for the purchases. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Cause: The Cooperative noted they were unaware of the procurement requirements of expenditures exceeding the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. They stated they have used the same vendors to provide professional services for several years but only recently started using federal grant award funds for the services. Effect or potential effect: Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the Cooperative cannot ensure the vendors paid with federal award funds are procured using the required methods. Without following the required methods for procurement, the Cooperative could be overpaying for services. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Northwest Indiana Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2023-2024, the Cooperative operated the special education program and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. When the value of the procurement for property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), or a lower threshold established by a nonfederal entity, formal procurement methods are required. The SAT is typically set at $250,000; however, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold, and, therefore, the SAT threshold is set at $150,000. Formal procurement methods require adherence to documented procedures and formal methods such as sealed bids or proposals. During the fiscal year 2023-2024, the Cooperative had three vendors which exceeded the SAT and all three vendors were tested. The Cooperative did not obtain sealed bids or competitive proposals, nor was a circumstance met that would have allowed for a noncompetitive procurement for the purchases. The total dollar amount spent with all three vendors was $1,417,349. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: Management of the Cooperative should develop written policies and procedures which would require that appropriate procurement methods are used for vendors that exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. Appropriate documentation should be maintained to ensure the procurement methods are being followed and compliance with Procurement methods are being followed. Views of Responsible Officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-043-ARP; 23611-043-PN01; 24611-043-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (b) Formal Procurement Methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: . . . (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. . . . (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. . . ." Condition: The Cooperative did not obtain sealed bids or competitive proposals, nor was a circumstance met that would have allowed for a noncompetitive procurement for the purchases. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Cause: The Cooperative noted they were unaware of the procurement requirements of expenditures exceeding the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. They stated they have used the same vendors to provide professional services for several years but only recently started using federal grant award funds for the services. Effect or potential effect: Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the Cooperative cannot ensure the vendors paid with federal award funds are procured using the required methods. Without following the required methods for procurement, the Cooperative could be overpaying for services. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Northwest Indiana Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2023-2024, the Cooperative operated the special education program and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. When the value of the procurement for property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), or a lower threshold established by a nonfederal entity, formal procurement methods are required. The SAT is typically set at $250,000; however, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold, and, therefore, the SAT threshold is set at $150,000. Formal procurement methods require adherence to documented procedures and formal methods such as sealed bids or proposals. During the fiscal year 2023-2024, the Cooperative had three vendors which exceeded the SAT and all three vendors were tested. The Cooperative did not obtain sealed bids or competitive proposals, nor was a circumstance met that would have allowed for a noncompetitive procurement for the purchases. The total dollar amount spent with all three vendors was $1,417,349. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: Management of the Cooperative should develop written policies and procedures which would require that appropriate procurement methods are used for vendors that exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. Appropriate documentation should be maintained to ensure the procurement methods are being followed and compliance with Procurement methods are being followed. Views of Responsible Officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-043-ARP; 23611-043-PN01; 24611-043-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (b) Formal Procurement Methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: . . . (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. . . . (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. . . ." Condition: The Cooperative did not obtain sealed bids or competitive proposals, nor was a circumstance met that would have allowed for a noncompetitive procurement for the purchases. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Cause: The Cooperative noted they were unaware of the procurement requirements of expenditures exceeding the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. They stated they have used the same vendors to provide professional services for several years but only recently started using federal grant award funds for the services. Effect or potential effect: Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the Cooperative cannot ensure the vendors paid with federal award funds are procured using the required methods. Without following the required methods for procurement, the Cooperative could be overpaying for services. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Northwest Indiana Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2023-2024, the Cooperative operated the special education program and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. When the value of the procurement for property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), or a lower threshold established by a nonfederal entity, formal procurement methods are required. The SAT is typically set at $250,000; however, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold, and, therefore, the SAT threshold is set at $150,000. Formal procurement methods require adherence to documented procedures and formal methods such as sealed bids or proposals. During the fiscal year 2023-2024, the Cooperative had three vendors which exceeded the SAT and all three vendors were tested. The Cooperative did not obtain sealed bids or competitive proposals, nor was a circumstance met that would have allowed for a noncompetitive procurement for the purchases. The total dollar amount spent with all three vendors was $1,417,349. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: Management of the Cooperative should develop written policies and procedures which would require that appropriate procurement methods are used for vendors that exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. Appropriate documentation should be maintained to ensure the procurement methods are being followed and compliance with Procurement methods are being followed. Views of Responsible Officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Condition: During our audit procedures, we noted that 1 out of 4 vendors files did not have the completely required documentation in the vendor’s permanent file. Criteria: 2.CFR 200.318 (General Procurement Standards), outlines the requirements for procurement processes, including the need for proper vendor documentation. Cause: The primary cause attributed to the missing documentation finding can be identified as a deficiency in verification process within FUNDACION DE DESARROLLO COMUNAL DE PUERTO RICO, INC. (FUNDESCO) The Corporation has experienced challenges in adequately training its accounting department, thereby impeding its ability to fulfill documentation requirements. Effect: Missing the required documentation can result in heightened scrutiny from Federal awarding agencies. The Corporation could face delays in receiving future funding until compliance issues are resolved, impacting on its financial stability and mission delivery. Recommendation: FUNDACION DE DESARROLLO COMUNAL DE PUERTO RICO, INC. (FUNDESCO) should establish clear protocols in the review of required documentations to ensure compliance with Federal awarding agency requirements. This includes training and defining roles and responsibilities within the finance and accounting team.
Condition: During our audit procedures, we noted that 1 out of 4 vendors files did not have the completely required documentation in the vendor’s permanent file. Criteria: 2.CFR 200.318 (General Procurement Standards), outlines the requirements for procurement processes, including the need for proper vendor documentation. Cause: The primary cause attributed to the missing documentation finding can be identified as a deficiency in verification process within FUNDACION DE DESARROLLO COMUNAL DE PUERTO RICO, INC. (FUNDESCO) The Corporation has experienced challenges in adequately training its accounting department, thereby impeding its ability to fulfill documentation requirements. Effect: Missing the required documentation can result in heightened scrutiny from Federal awarding agencies. The Corporation could face delays in receiving future funding until compliance issues are resolved, impacting on its financial stability and mission delivery. Recommendation: FUNDACION DE DESARROLLO COMUNAL DE PUERTO RICO, INC. (FUNDESCO) should establish clear protocols in the review of required documentations to ensure compliance with Federal awarding agency requirements. This includes training and defining roles and responsibilities within the finance and accounting team.
Criteria: Nonfederal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR Sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Nonfederal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the suspension and debarment standards set out at 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension,” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition: During transactional testing, the following was noted: • 93.441 – 4 out of 6 vendors reviewed did not have evidence of multiple competitive bids being obtained. Additionally, there are no consistent processes in place to check to ensure vendors are not suspended or debarred prior to conducting business. • 93.441 – 4 out of 6 vendors reviewed did not have evidence or processes in place to check to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to conducting business. None of the 6 vendors were suspended of debarred. Context: The audit findings represent a systematic problem, see condition above. Cause: There were ineffective controls in place during the period over procurement, along with lack of management oversight. Effect: The Clinic is not enacting fair competition in the procurement process nor are they following their policies by making sure bidding support is provided before the appropriate officials sign the Purchase Order. Additionally, the Clinic may be paying vendors that are suspended and debarred which would be an unallowable cost. Questioned Costs: AL#: 93.441 Known: Procurement- $71,963. Repeat Finding: Yes, 2022-007 and 2023-004. Recommendation: We recommend the Clinic conduct training for staff and program managers to review the Clinic’s procurement and suspension and debarment policies and procedures along with federal regulations. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Clinic will review the procurement standards set forth at 2 CFR part 200 and will update the procurement and purchasing policies to comply with all required purchasing standards. All vendors will be required to submit and certify a statement regarding debarment and suspension prior to contract award.
Criteria: Nonfederal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR Sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Nonfederal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the suspension and debarment standards set out at 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension,” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition: During transactional testing, the following was noted: • 93.441 – 4 out of 6 vendors reviewed did not have evidence of multiple competitive bids being obtained. Additionally, there are no consistent processes in place to check to ensure vendors are not suspended or debarred prior to conducting business. • 93.441 – 4 out of 6 vendors reviewed did not have evidence or processes in place to check to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to conducting business. None of the 6 vendors were suspended of debarred. Context: The audit findings represent a systematic problem, see condition above. Cause: There were ineffective controls in place during the period over procurement, along with lack of management oversight. Effect: The Clinic is not enacting fair competition in the procurement process nor are they following their policies by making sure bidding support is provided before the appropriate officials sign the Purchase Order. Additionally, the Clinic may be paying vendors that are suspended and debarred which would be an unallowable cost. Questioned Costs: AL#: 93.441 Known: Procurement- $71,963. Repeat Finding: Yes, 2022-007 and 2023-004. Recommendation: We recommend the Clinic conduct training for staff and program managers to review the Clinic’s procurement and suspension and debarment policies and procedures along with federal regulations. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Clinic will review the procurement standards set forth at 2 CFR part 200 and will update the procurement and purchasing policies to comply with all required purchasing standards. All vendors will be required to submit and certify a statement regarding debarment and suspension prior to contract award.
Finding 2024-001 Material noncompliance and material weakness in internal control over compliance with procurement and suspension and debarment procedures meeting the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200. Federal Agency: United States Department Treasury Program Titles: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Pass-Through Entity: King County Regional Homeless Authority Award Numbers: DA-202305-01899 Award Periods: January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023 Criteria Internal controls requirements contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance) , Subpart D ‐ Post Federal Award Requirements, Section 200.318 through 200.327, require that a non‐Federal entity use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirement identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Condition/Context The Organization has a procurement policy, which includes procedures to include documenting the history of the procurement, including justification of the procurement method utilized. For 2 of 2 procurements selected for testing over the micro-purchase threshold the Organization could not produce contemporaneous documentation supporting the history of the procurement including justification for utilization of the noncompetitive procurement method of procurement and performance of suspension and debarment search. The Organization determined at the time of procurement that due to a state of public emergency the noncompetitive procurement methodology was in compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Subsequent to procurement the Organization received approval from the pass-through funder that a noncompetitive procurement methodology was authorized. Additionally, the Organization documented the vendor justification and performance of suspension and debarment search subsequent to entering into the procurement, as part of preparation for the annual audit. Cause The Organization did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Organization’s procurement policy was followed by retaining documentation of the history of the procurement. Effect The Organization entered into agreements to procure goods and services for which no documentation was retained to support the history of the procurement. Questioned Costs $0 Repeat Finding Repeat of finding 2023-002 Recommendation We recommend the Organization implement internal controls to ensure that documentation is retained to support procurements in accordance with its procurement policy. Views of Responsible Individual and Corrective Action Plan Management agrees with the finding and has provided the accompanying corrective action plan.
Finding 2024-001 Material noncompliance and material weakness in internal control over compliance with procurement and suspension and debarment procedures meeting the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200. Federal Agency: United States Department Treasury Program Titles: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Pass-Through Entity: King County Regional Homeless Authority Award Numbers: DA-202305-01899 Award Periods: January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023 Criteria Internal controls requirements contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance) , Subpart D ‐ Post Federal Award Requirements, Section 200.318 through 200.327, require that a non‐Federal entity use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirement identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Condition/Context The Organization has a procurement policy, which includes procedures to include documenting the history of the procurement, including justification of the procurement method utilized. For 2 of 2 procurements selected for testing over the micro-purchase threshold the Organization could not produce contemporaneous documentation supporting the history of the procurement including justification for utilization of the noncompetitive procurement method of procurement and performance of suspension and debarment search. The Organization determined at the time of procurement that due to a state of public emergency the noncompetitive procurement methodology was in compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Subsequent to procurement the Organization received approval from the pass-through funder that a noncompetitive procurement methodology was authorized. Additionally, the Organization documented the vendor justification and performance of suspension and debarment search subsequent to entering into the procurement, as part of preparation for the annual audit. Cause The Organization did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Organization’s procurement policy was followed by retaining documentation of the history of the procurement. Effect The Organization entered into agreements to procure goods and services for which no documentation was retained to support the history of the procurement. Questioned Costs $0 Repeat Finding Repeat of finding 2023-002 Recommendation We recommend the Organization implement internal controls to ensure that documentation is retained to support procurements in accordance with its procurement policy. Views of Responsible Individual and Corrective Action Plan Management agrees with the finding and has provided the accompanying corrective action plan.
Finding 2024-001 Material noncompliance and material weakness in internal control over compliance with procurement and suspension and debarment procedures meeting the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200. Federal Agency: United States Department Treasury Program Titles: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Pass-Through Entity: King County Regional Homeless Authority Award Numbers: DA-202305-01899 Award Periods: January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023 Criteria Internal controls requirements contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance) , Subpart D ‐ Post Federal Award Requirements, Section 200.318 through 200.327, require that a non‐Federal entity use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirement identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Condition/Context The Organization has a procurement policy, which includes procedures to include documenting the history of the procurement, including justification of the procurement method utilized. For 2 of 2 procurements selected for testing over the micro-purchase threshold the Organization could not produce contemporaneous documentation supporting the history of the procurement including justification for utilization of the noncompetitive procurement method of procurement and performance of suspension and debarment search. The Organization determined at the time of procurement that due to a state of public emergency the noncompetitive procurement methodology was in compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Subsequent to procurement the Organization received approval from the pass-through funder that a noncompetitive procurement methodology was authorized. Additionally, the Organization documented the vendor justification and performance of suspension and debarment search subsequent to entering into the procurement, as part of preparation for the annual audit. Cause The Organization did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Organization’s procurement policy was followed by retaining documentation of the history of the procurement. Effect The Organization entered into agreements to procure goods and services for which no documentation was retained to support the history of the procurement. Questioned Costs $0 Repeat Finding Repeat of finding 2023-002 Recommendation We recommend the Organization implement internal controls to ensure that documentation is retained to support procurements in accordance with its procurement policy. Views of Responsible Individual and Corrective Action Plan Management agrees with the finding and has provided the accompanying corrective action plan.
Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559, 10.582 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Child Nutrition Program and Procurement compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For the two small purchase method procurements sampled for testing, we noted that the School Corporation, did not obtain quotes from an adequate number of qualified sources. Additionally, the School Corporation did not perform a suspension and debarment check on the vendors. The sample items were for $76,200 and $31,639 worth of repair supplies in FY2023 and FY2024, respectively. Identification as a repeat finding: This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit. The prior finding number was 2022-003. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to ensure that the School Corporation’s procurement policy is adhered to and quotes are obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as required for small purchase method procurements. Additionally, we recommend management monitor annual vendor activity to ensure vendors that exceed small purchase threshold and suspension and debarment threshold in aggregate are reviewed for potential analysis and suspension and debarment checks required by federal and state regulations. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559, 10.582 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Child Nutrition Program and Procurement compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For the two small purchase method procurements sampled for testing, we noted that the School Corporation, did not obtain quotes from an adequate number of qualified sources. Additionally, the School Corporation did not perform a suspension and debarment check on the vendors. The sample items were for $76,200 and $31,639 worth of repair supplies in FY2023 and FY2024, respectively. Identification as a repeat finding: This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit. The prior finding number was 2022-003. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to ensure that the School Corporation’s procurement policy is adhered to and quotes are obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as required for small purchase method procurements. Additionally, we recommend management monitor annual vendor activity to ensure vendors that exceed small purchase threshold and suspension and debarment threshold in aggregate are reviewed for potential analysis and suspension and debarment checks required by federal and state regulations. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559, 10.582 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Child Nutrition Program and Procurement compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For the two small purchase method procurements sampled for testing, we noted that the School Corporation, did not obtain quotes from an adequate number of qualified sources. Additionally, the School Corporation did not perform a suspension and debarment check on the vendors. The sample items were for $76,200 and $31,639 worth of repair supplies in FY2023 and FY2024, respectively. Identification as a repeat finding: This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit. The prior finding number was 2022-003. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to ensure that the School Corporation’s procurement policy is adhered to and quotes are obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as required for small purchase method procurements. Additionally, we recommend management monitor annual vendor activity to ensure vendors that exceed small purchase threshold and suspension and debarment threshold in aggregate are reviewed for potential analysis and suspension and debarment checks required by federal and state regulations. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559, 10.582 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Child Nutrition Program and Procurement compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For the two small purchase method procurements sampled for testing, we noted that the School Corporation, did not obtain quotes from an adequate number of qualified sources. Additionally, the School Corporation did not perform a suspension and debarment check on the vendors. The sample items were for $76,200 and $31,639 worth of repair supplies in FY2023 and FY2024, respectively. Identification as a repeat finding: This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit. The prior finding number was 2022-003. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to ensure that the School Corporation’s procurement policy is adhered to and quotes are obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as required for small purchase method procurements. Additionally, we recommend management monitor annual vendor activity to ensure vendors that exceed small purchase threshold and suspension and debarment threshold in aggregate are reviewed for potential analysis and suspension and debarment checks required by federal and state regulations. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559, 10.582 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Child Nutrition Program and Procurement compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For the two small purchase method procurements sampled for testing, we noted that the School Corporation, did not obtain quotes from an adequate number of qualified sources. Additionally, the School Corporation did not perform a suspension and debarment check on the vendors. The sample items were for $76,200 and $31,639 worth of repair supplies in FY2023 and FY2024, respectively. Identification as a repeat finding: This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit. The prior finding number was 2022-003. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to ensure that the School Corporation’s procurement policy is adhered to and quotes are obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as required for small purchase method procurements. Additionally, we recommend management monitor annual vendor activity to ensure vendors that exceed small purchase threshold and suspension and debarment threshold in aggregate are reviewed for potential analysis and suspension and debarment checks required by federal and state regulations. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children, Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559, 10.582 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Child Nutrition Program and Procurement compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For the two small purchase method procurements sampled for testing, we noted that the School Corporation, did not obtain quotes from an adequate number of qualified sources. Additionally, the School Corporation did not perform a suspension and debarment check on the vendors. The sample items were for $76,200 and $31,639 worth of repair supplies in FY2023 and FY2024, respectively. Identification as a repeat finding: This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit. The prior finding number was 2022-003. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to ensure that the School Corporation’s procurement policy is adhered to and quotes are obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as required for small purchase method procurements. Additionally, we recommend management monitor annual vendor activity to ensure vendors that exceed small purchase threshold and suspension and debarment threshold in aggregate are reviewed for potential analysis and suspension and debarment checks required by federal and state regulations. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
CONDITION: During my review of the District’s compliance with the requirements for noncompetitive procurement, I noted the District did not document its rationale for purchases made from ‘Western PA Psych Care’ totaling $20,000. This is a repeat finding from the previous fiscal year 2023-003 CRITERIA: In accordance with Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the District must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records include but are not limited to the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Furthermore, Section 2 CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance details five (5) circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. EFFECT: The District did not comply with Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and Section 2CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance, and District Procurement Policy #626, regarding the proper documentation required for noncompetitive procurement. QUESTIONED COST: $20,000 CAUSE: The District has had a long-standing relationship with Western PA Psych Care and feels that this vendor best fits the needs of the District. However, the additional procedures addressed in its Procurement Policy for Federal Programs (#626) which addresses the issue of noncompetitive procurement as outlined in Section 2 CFR 200.320(c’), were inadvertently not performed. RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that for all future purchases involving noncompetitive procurement, that the District adhere to the requirements of 1) the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs (#626), and 2) Section 2 CFR 200.320(c) of the Uniform Guidance. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: The School District concurs with the above noted finding and addresses this issue in the ‘Corrective Action Plan’ included within this report.
FINDING 2024-005 Procurement – Documentation FINDING TYPE Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance AGENCY U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ALN 93.224 / 93.527 Health Center Cluster CRITERIA In accordance with 2 CFR 200.318(i), entities receiving federal funds are responsible for maintaining records that contain sufficient detail of the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractors selection or rejections, and the basis for the contract price. CONDITION AND CONTEXT We selected four procurements for testing. Out of these four, we noted one instance where the documentation of the rationale behind the vendor selection was not available. Management was able to explain to us why the vendor offered an appropriate mix of price and value to the Federal program, but the documentation of the decision was not able to be presented. Also, for one out of four tested items, a record of the initial debarment/suspension check was not able to be produced. Management was able to show us a master vendor database compliance screening that was run after this vendor had been selected. However, documentation of the initial check was not available. CAUSE The staff involved with these procurement decisions did not have a consistent process for maintaining documentation related to procurement decisions. EFFECT OR POTENTIAL EFFECT Without consistent documentation, there is a risk that procurement decisions will not be in compliance with the procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance. REPEAT FINDING No. RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the organization reinforce to all personnel involved in procurement the importance of maintaining the required documentation for procurement decisions. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See attached corrective action plan. Questioned Costs None.
FINDING 2024-005 Procurement – Documentation FINDING TYPE Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance AGENCY U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ALN 93.224 / 93.527 Health Center Cluster CRITERIA In accordance with 2 CFR 200.318(i), entities receiving federal funds are responsible for maintaining records that contain sufficient detail of the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractors selection or rejections, and the basis for the contract price. CONDITION AND CONTEXT We selected four procurements for testing. Out of these four, we noted one instance where the documentation of the rationale behind the vendor selection was not available. Management was able to explain to us why the vendor offered an appropriate mix of price and value to the Federal program, but the documentation of the decision was not able to be presented. Also, for one out of four tested items, a record of the initial debarment/suspension check was not able to be produced. Management was able to show us a master vendor database compliance screening that was run after this vendor had been selected. However, documentation of the initial check was not available. CAUSE The staff involved with these procurement decisions did not have a consistent process for maintaining documentation related to procurement decisions. EFFECT OR POTENTIAL EFFECT Without consistent documentation, there is a risk that procurement decisions will not be in compliance with the procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance. REPEAT FINDING No. RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the organization reinforce to all personnel involved in procurement the importance of maintaining the required documentation for procurement decisions. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See attached corrective action plan. Questioned Costs None.
FINDING 2024-005 Procurement – Documentation FINDING TYPE Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance AGENCY U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ALN 93.224 / 93.527 Health Center Cluster CRITERIA In accordance with 2 CFR 200.318(i), entities receiving federal funds are responsible for maintaining records that contain sufficient detail of the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractors selection or rejections, and the basis for the contract price. CONDITION AND CONTEXT We selected four procurements for testing. Out of these four, we noted one instance where the documentation of the rationale behind the vendor selection was not available. Management was able to explain to us why the vendor offered an appropriate mix of price and value to the Federal program, but the documentation of the decision was not able to be presented. Also, for one out of four tested items, a record of the initial debarment/suspension check was not able to be produced. Management was able to show us a master vendor database compliance screening that was run after this vendor had been selected. However, documentation of the initial check was not available. CAUSE The staff involved with these procurement decisions did not have a consistent process for maintaining documentation related to procurement decisions. EFFECT OR POTENTIAL EFFECT Without consistent documentation, there is a risk that procurement decisions will not be in compliance with the procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance. REPEAT FINDING No. RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the organization reinforce to all personnel involved in procurement the importance of maintaining the required documentation for procurement decisions. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See attached corrective action plan. Questioned Costs None.
FINDING 2024-005 Procurement – Documentation FINDING TYPE Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance AGENCY U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ALN 93.224 / 93.527 Health Center Cluster CRITERIA In accordance with 2 CFR 200.318(i), entities receiving federal funds are responsible for maintaining records that contain sufficient detail of the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractors selection or rejections, and the basis for the contract price. CONDITION AND CONTEXT We selected four procurements for testing. Out of these four, we noted one instance where the documentation of the rationale behind the vendor selection was not available. Management was able to explain to us why the vendor offered an appropriate mix of price and value to the Federal program, but the documentation of the decision was not able to be presented. Also, for one out of four tested items, a record of the initial debarment/suspension check was not able to be produced. Management was able to show us a master vendor database compliance screening that was run after this vendor had been selected. However, documentation of the initial check was not available. CAUSE The staff involved with these procurement decisions did not have a consistent process for maintaining documentation related to procurement decisions. EFFECT OR POTENTIAL EFFECT Without consistent documentation, there is a risk that procurement decisions will not be in compliance with the procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance. REPEAT FINDING No. RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the organization reinforce to all personnel involved in procurement the importance of maintaining the required documentation for procurement decisions. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See attached corrective action plan. Questioned Costs None.
FINDING 2024-005 Procurement – Documentation FINDING TYPE Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance AGENCY U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ALN 93.224 / 93.527 Health Center Cluster CRITERIA In accordance with 2 CFR 200.318(i), entities receiving federal funds are responsible for maintaining records that contain sufficient detail of the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractors selection or rejections, and the basis for the contract price. CONDITION AND CONTEXT We selected four procurements for testing. Out of these four, we noted one instance where the documentation of the rationale behind the vendor selection was not available. Management was able to explain to us why the vendor offered an appropriate mix of price and value to the Federal program, but the documentation of the decision was not able to be presented. Also, for one out of four tested items, a record of the initial debarment/suspension check was not able to be produced. Management was able to show us a master vendor database compliance screening that was run after this vendor had been selected. However, documentation of the initial check was not available. CAUSE The staff involved with these procurement decisions did not have a consistent process for maintaining documentation related to procurement decisions. EFFECT OR POTENTIAL EFFECT Without consistent documentation, there is a risk that procurement decisions will not be in compliance with the procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance. REPEAT FINDING No. RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the organization reinforce to all personnel involved in procurement the importance of maintaining the required documentation for procurement decisions. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See attached corrective action plan. Questioned Costs None.
FINDING 2024-005 Procurement – Documentation FINDING TYPE Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance AGENCY U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ALN 93.224 / 93.527 Health Center Cluster CRITERIA In accordance with 2 CFR 200.318(i), entities receiving federal funds are responsible for maintaining records that contain sufficient detail of the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractors selection or rejections, and the basis for the contract price. CONDITION AND CONTEXT We selected four procurements for testing. Out of these four, we noted one instance where the documentation of the rationale behind the vendor selection was not available. Management was able to explain to us why the vendor offered an appropriate mix of price and value to the Federal program, but the documentation of the decision was not able to be presented. Also, for one out of four tested items, a record of the initial debarment/suspension check was not able to be produced. Management was able to show us a master vendor database compliance screening that was run after this vendor had been selected. However, documentation of the initial check was not available. CAUSE The staff involved with these procurement decisions did not have a consistent process for maintaining documentation related to procurement decisions. EFFECT OR POTENTIAL EFFECT Without consistent documentation, there is a risk that procurement decisions will not be in compliance with the procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance. REPEAT FINDING No. RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the organization reinforce to all personnel involved in procurement the importance of maintaining the required documentation for procurement decisions. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See attached corrective action plan. Questioned Costs None.
FINDING 2024-005 Procurement – Documentation FINDING TYPE Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance AGENCY U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ALN 93.224 / 93.527 Health Center Cluster CRITERIA In accordance with 2 CFR 200.318(i), entities receiving federal funds are responsible for maintaining records that contain sufficient detail of the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractors selection or rejections, and the basis for the contract price. CONDITION AND CONTEXT We selected four procurements for testing. Out of these four, we noted one instance where the documentation of the rationale behind the vendor selection was not available. Management was able to explain to us why the vendor offered an appropriate mix of price and value to the Federal program, but the documentation of the decision was not able to be presented. Also, for one out of four tested items, a record of the initial debarment/suspension check was not able to be produced. Management was able to show us a master vendor database compliance screening that was run after this vendor had been selected. However, documentation of the initial check was not available. CAUSE The staff involved with these procurement decisions did not have a consistent process for maintaining documentation related to procurement decisions. EFFECT OR POTENTIAL EFFECT Without consistent documentation, there is a risk that procurement decisions will not be in compliance with the procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance. REPEAT FINDING No. RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the organization reinforce to all personnel involved in procurement the importance of maintaining the required documentation for procurement decisions. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See attached corrective action plan. Questioned Costs None.
Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agencies: United States Department of Treasury, Department of Transportation Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, Highway Planning and Construction Assistance Listing Number: 21.027, 20.205 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Not Available Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Office of Policy and Management, State of Connecticut Department of Education, State of Connecticut Department of Transportation, State of Connecticut Office of Early Childhood Pass-Through Number: 12060-OPM20600-29669, 12060-SDE64370-23083, 1206-SDE64370-28095, 12060-DE64370-28105, 12060-SDE64370-29732, 12060-OEC64845-28227, 12062-DOT57151-22108 Award Period: March 3, 2021 through December 31, 2026 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: There were no controls in place to review for suspension and debarment on related procurement activities. Questioned Costs: None Context: Although testing did not reveal vendors providing services that were suspended and debarred, no documentation requirement exists for the Town to verify compliance with this requirement. Cause: The Town did not properly implement a conforming policy during the fiscal year. Effect: With the absence of a compliant documentation policy, the Town is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to all federal procurement requirements. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendations: We recommend that the Town review its formal procurement policies and revise with the criteria in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agencies: United States Department of Treasury, Department of Transportation Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, Highway Planning and Construction Assistance Listing Number: 21.027, 20.205 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Not Available Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Office of Policy and Management, State of Connecticut Department of Education, State of Connecticut Department of Transportation, State of Connecticut Office of Early Childhood Pass-Through Number: 12060-OPM20600-29669, 12060-SDE64370-23083, 1206-SDE64370-28095, 12060-DE64370-28105, 12060-SDE64370-29732, 12060-OEC64845-28227, 12062-DOT57151-22108 Award Period: March 3, 2021 through December 31, 2026 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: There were no controls in place to review for suspension and debarment on related procurement activities. Questioned Costs: None Context: Although testing did not reveal vendors providing services that were suspended and debarred, no documentation requirement exists for the Town to verify compliance with this requirement. Cause: The Town did not properly implement a conforming policy during the fiscal year. Effect: With the absence of a compliant documentation policy, the Town is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to all federal procurement requirements. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendations: We recommend that the Town review its formal procurement policies and revise with the criteria in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agencies: United States Department of Treasury, Department of Transportation Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, Highway Planning and Construction Assistance Listing Number: 21.027, 20.205 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Not Available Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Office of Policy and Management, State of Connecticut Department of Education, State of Connecticut Department of Transportation, State of Connecticut Office of Early Childhood Pass-Through Number: 12060-OPM20600-29669, 12060-SDE64370-23083, 1206-SDE64370-28095, 12060-DE64370-28105, 12060-SDE64370-29732, 12060-OEC64845-28227, 12062-DOT57151-22108 Award Period: March 3, 2021 through December 31, 2026 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: There were no controls in place to review for suspension and debarment on related procurement activities. Questioned Costs: None Context: Although testing did not reveal vendors providing services that were suspended and debarred, no documentation requirement exists for the Town to verify compliance with this requirement. Cause: The Town did not properly implement a conforming policy during the fiscal year. Effect: With the absence of a compliant documentation policy, the Town is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to all federal procurement requirements. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendations: We recommend that the Town review its formal procurement policies and revise with the criteria in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding.