Findings and Questioned Costs Related to Federal Awards Finding Number: 2024‐001 Repeat Finding: No Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Award Number: ERMT‐21‐2016 Pass‐Through Agency: Arizona Governor’s Office Questioned Costs: N/A Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Criteria Non‐federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR §§200.318 through 200.326. Subrecipients must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Condition The District did not follow Federal, State, and Board policies and regulations governing procurement. Cause The District’s review procedures over each transaction did not operate as designed. Effect The District was not in compliance with Federal, State, and Board policies and regulations governing procurement. Context The District procured a multi‐year professional development support services contract in the amount of $111,200 using quotations rather than issuing a formal procurement. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendation Approvers of requisitions should ensure multi‐year purchases exceeding the formal procurement threshold are appropriately procured in accordance with Federal, State and Board policies and regulations. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING 2024-004: PROCUREMENT (50000) Assistance Listing # 10.553, 10.555 – U.S. Department of Agriculture, California Department of Education, Child Nutrition Cluster Repeat Finding? No Criteria: Code of Federal Regulations, CFR 200.320, requires the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. For “formal purchases,” those where the aggregate dollar amount is higher than the simplified acquisition threshold, sealed bids are publicly solicited through an invitation and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid conforms with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation and is the lowest in price. Condition: During our testing we discovered one contract which lacked documentation to demonstrate that competitive bids were obtained, contractor selection or rejection, and determination as to whom the contract was awarded to. Context: Error was isolated to one contract tested. Questioned Costs: This resulted in a contract of $997,040 being awarded without competitive bidding documentation. Cause: Change in key management. Effect: The District could potentially award contracts without doing due diligence. Recommendation: We recommend that the District comply with 2 CFR, section 200.318-322, which requires that an LEA maintain the documented procedures for procurement transactions under a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials: We posted a job walk and had one bidder. In the future we will post for a longer period of time and if needed repost for a second job walk. We will note each company that attends and if they did or did not chose to bid the job. The documentation of each bid and the board approval for the awarded bid will now be maintained at both the Construction, Maintenance, and Operations Department and the District Office to lessen the loss of documentation due to employee turnover.
FINDING 2024-004: PROCUREMENT (50000) Assistance Listing # 10.553, 10.555 – U.S. Department of Agriculture, California Department of Education, Child Nutrition Cluster Repeat Finding? No Criteria: Code of Federal Regulations, CFR 200.320, requires the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. For “formal purchases,” those where the aggregate dollar amount is higher than the simplified acquisition threshold, sealed bids are publicly solicited through an invitation and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid conforms with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation and is the lowest in price. Condition: During our testing we discovered one contract which lacked documentation to demonstrate that competitive bids were obtained, contractor selection or rejection, and determination as to whom the contract was awarded to. Context: Error was isolated to one contract tested. Questioned Costs: This resulted in a contract of $997,040 being awarded without competitive bidding documentation. Cause: Change in key management. Effect: The District could potentially award contracts without doing due diligence. Recommendation: We recommend that the District comply with 2 CFR, section 200.318-322, which requires that an LEA maintain the documented procedures for procurement transactions under a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials: We posted a job walk and had one bidder. In the future we will post for a longer period of time and if needed repost for a second job walk. We will note each company that attends and if they did or did not chose to bid the job. The documentation of each bid and the board approval for the awarded bid will now be maintained at both the Construction, Maintenance, and Operations Department and the District Office to lessen the loss of documentation due to employee turnover.
FINDING 2024-004: PROCUREMENT (50000) Assistance Listing # 10.553, 10.555 – U.S. Department of Agriculture, California Department of Education, Child Nutrition Cluster Repeat Finding? No Criteria: Code of Federal Regulations, CFR 200.320, requires the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. For “formal purchases,” those where the aggregate dollar amount is higher than the simplified acquisition threshold, sealed bids are publicly solicited through an invitation and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid conforms with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation and is the lowest in price. Condition: During our testing we discovered one contract which lacked documentation to demonstrate that competitive bids were obtained, contractor selection or rejection, and determination as to whom the contract was awarded to. Context: Error was isolated to one contract tested. Questioned Costs: This resulted in a contract of $997,040 being awarded without competitive bidding documentation. Cause: Change in key management. Effect: The District could potentially award contracts without doing due diligence. Recommendation: We recommend that the District comply with 2 CFR, section 200.318-322, which requires that an LEA maintain the documented procedures for procurement transactions under a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials: We posted a job walk and had one bidder. In the future we will post for a longer period of time and if needed repost for a second job walk. We will note each company that attends and if they did or did not chose to bid the job. The documentation of each bid and the board approval for the awarded bid will now be maintained at both the Construction, Maintenance, and Operations Department and the District Office to lessen the loss of documentation due to employee turnover.
FINDING 2024-004: PROCUREMENT (50000) Assistance Listing # 10.553, 10.555 – U.S. Department of Agriculture, California Department of Education, Child Nutrition Cluster Repeat Finding? No Criteria: Code of Federal Regulations, CFR 200.320, requires the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. For “formal purchases,” those where the aggregate dollar amount is higher than the simplified acquisition threshold, sealed bids are publicly solicited through an invitation and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid conforms with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation and is the lowest in price. Condition: During our testing we discovered one contract which lacked documentation to demonstrate that competitive bids were obtained, contractor selection or rejection, and determination as to whom the contract was awarded to. Context: Error was isolated to one contract tested. Questioned Costs: This resulted in a contract of $997,040 being awarded without competitive bidding documentation. Cause: Change in key management. Effect: The District could potentially award contracts without doing due diligence. Recommendation: We recommend that the District comply with 2 CFR, section 200.318-322, which requires that an LEA maintain the documented procedures for procurement transactions under a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials: We posted a job walk and had one bidder. In the future we will post for a longer period of time and if needed repost for a second job walk. We will note each company that attends and if they did or did not chose to bid the job. The documentation of each bid and the board approval for the awarded bid will now be maintained at both the Construction, Maintenance, and Operations Department and the District Office to lessen the loss of documentation due to employee turnover.
Department of Housing and Urban Development Continuum of Care, Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267, Affects all grant awards included under Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267 on the Schedule Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.318 maintains that recipients must have and use documented procurement policies and must conform to procurement standards in sections 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: Catholic Charities has documented procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal standards regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment; however, the procedures were not followed for four vendors selected for testing. Cause: Catholic Charities did not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure that the processes laid out in their procurement policy regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment were followed. Effect: Payments could be made to recipients who were suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 13 transactions out of 68 total transactions were selected for testing. Four vendors did not have support showing the search for suspension and debarment was performed which made up $60,537 of $796,282 federal awards. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes, 2023-001 Recommendation: We recommend Catholic Charities enhance internal control procedures to ensure all suspension and debarment verification procedures are performed prior to entering into the transactions. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Department of Housing and Urban Development Continuum of Care, Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267, Affects all grant awards included under Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267 on the Schedule Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.318 maintains that recipients must have and use documented procurement policies and must conform to procurement standards in sections 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: Catholic Charities has documented procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal standards regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment; however, the procedures were not followed for four vendors selected for testing. Cause: Catholic Charities did not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure that the processes laid out in their procurement policy regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment were followed. Effect: Payments could be made to recipients who were suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 13 transactions out of 68 total transactions were selected for testing. Four vendors did not have support showing the search for suspension and debarment was performed which made up $60,537 of $796,282 federal awards. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes, 2023-001 Recommendation: We recommend Catholic Charities enhance internal control procedures to ensure all suspension and debarment verification procedures are performed prior to entering into the transactions. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Department of Housing and Urban Development Continuum of Care, Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267, Affects all grant awards included under Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267 on the Schedule Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.318 maintains that recipients must have and use documented procurement policies and must conform to procurement standards in sections 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: Catholic Charities has documented procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal standards regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment; however, the procedures were not followed for four vendors selected for testing. Cause: Catholic Charities did not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure that the processes laid out in their procurement policy regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment were followed. Effect: Payments could be made to recipients who were suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 13 transactions out of 68 total transactions were selected for testing. Four vendors did not have support showing the search for suspension and debarment was performed which made up $60,537 of $796,282 federal awards. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes, 2023-001 Recommendation: We recommend Catholic Charities enhance internal control procedures to ensure all suspension and debarment verification procedures are performed prior to entering into the transactions. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Department of Housing and Urban Development Continuum of Care, Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267, Affects all grant awards included under Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267 on the Schedule Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.318 maintains that recipients must have and use documented procurement policies and must conform to procurement standards in sections 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: Catholic Charities has documented procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal standards regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment; however, the procedures were not followed for four vendors selected for testing. Cause: Catholic Charities did not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure that the processes laid out in their procurement policy regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment were followed. Effect: Payments could be made to recipients who were suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 13 transactions out of 68 total transactions were selected for testing. Four vendors did not have support showing the search for suspension and debarment was performed which made up $60,537 of $796,282 federal awards. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes, 2023-001 Recommendation: We recommend Catholic Charities enhance internal control procedures to ensure all suspension and debarment verification procedures are performed prior to entering into the transactions. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Department of Housing and Urban Development Continuum of Care, Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267, Affects all grant awards included under Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267 on the Schedule Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.318 maintains that recipients must have and use documented procurement policies and must conform to procurement standards in sections 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: Catholic Charities has documented procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal standards regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment; however, the procedures were not followed for four vendors selected for testing. Cause: Catholic Charities did not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure that the processes laid out in their procurement policy regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment were followed. Effect: Payments could be made to recipients who were suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 13 transactions out of 68 total transactions were selected for testing. Four vendors did not have support showing the search for suspension and debarment was performed which made up $60,537 of $796,282 federal awards. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes, 2023-001 Recommendation: We recommend Catholic Charities enhance internal control procedures to ensure all suspension and debarment verification procedures are performed prior to entering into the transactions. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Department of Housing and Urban Development Continuum of Care, Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267, Affects all grant awards included under Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267 on the Schedule Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.318 maintains that recipients must have and use documented procurement policies and must conform to procurement standards in sections 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: Catholic Charities has documented procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal standards regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment; however, the procedures were not followed for four vendors selected for testing. Cause: Catholic Charities did not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure that the processes laid out in their procurement policy regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment were followed. Effect: Payments could be made to recipients who were suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 13 transactions out of 68 total transactions were selected for testing. Four vendors did not have support showing the search for suspension and debarment was performed which made up $60,537 of $796,282 federal awards. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes, 2023-001 Recommendation: We recommend Catholic Charities enhance internal control procedures to ensure all suspension and debarment verification procedures are performed prior to entering into the transactions. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Department of Housing and Urban Development Continuum of Care, Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267, Affects all grant awards included under Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267 on the Schedule Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.318 maintains that recipients must have and use documented procurement policies and must conform to procurement standards in sections 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: Catholic Charities has documented procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal standards regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment; however, the procedures were not followed for four vendors selected for testing. Cause: Catholic Charities did not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure that the processes laid out in their procurement policy regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment were followed. Effect: Payments could be made to recipients who were suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 13 transactions out of 68 total transactions were selected for testing. Four vendors did not have support showing the search for suspension and debarment was performed which made up $60,537 of $796,282 federal awards. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes, 2023-001 Recommendation: We recommend Catholic Charities enhance internal control procedures to ensure all suspension and debarment verification procedures are performed prior to entering into the transactions. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Department of Housing and Urban Development Continuum of Care, Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267, Affects all grant awards included under Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267 on the Schedule Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.318 maintains that recipients must have and use documented procurement policies and must conform to procurement standards in sections 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: Catholic Charities has documented procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal standards regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment; however, the procedures were not followed for four vendors selected for testing. Cause: Catholic Charities did not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure that the processes laid out in their procurement policy regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment were followed. Effect: Payments could be made to recipients who were suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 13 transactions out of 68 total transactions were selected for testing. Four vendors did not have support showing the search for suspension and debarment was performed which made up $60,537 of $796,282 federal awards. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes, 2023-001 Recommendation: We recommend Catholic Charities enhance internal control procedures to ensure all suspension and debarment verification procedures are performed prior to entering into the transactions. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Department of Housing and Urban Development Continuum of Care, Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267, Affects all grant awards included under Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267 on the Schedule Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.318 maintains that recipients must have and use documented procurement policies and must conform to procurement standards in sections 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: Catholic Charities has documented procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal standards regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment; however, the procedures were not followed for four vendors selected for testing. Cause: Catholic Charities did not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure that the processes laid out in their procurement policy regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment were followed. Effect: Payments could be made to recipients who were suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 13 transactions out of 68 total transactions were selected for testing. Four vendors did not have support showing the search for suspension and debarment was performed which made up $60,537 of $796,282 federal awards. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes, 2023-001 Recommendation: We recommend Catholic Charities enhance internal control procedures to ensure all suspension and debarment verification procedures are performed prior to entering into the transactions. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Department of Housing and Urban Development Continuum of Care, Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267, Affects all grant awards included under Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267 on the Schedule Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.318 maintains that recipients must have and use documented procurement policies and must conform to procurement standards in sections 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: Catholic Charities has documented procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal standards regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment; however, the procedures were not followed for four vendors selected for testing. Cause: Catholic Charities did not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure that the processes laid out in their procurement policy regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment were followed. Effect: Payments could be made to recipients who were suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 13 transactions out of 68 total transactions were selected for testing. Four vendors did not have support showing the search for suspension and debarment was performed which made up $60,537 of $796,282 federal awards. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes, 2023-001 Recommendation: We recommend Catholic Charities enhance internal control procedures to ensure all suspension and debarment verification procedures are performed prior to entering into the transactions. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Department of Housing and Urban Development Continuum of Care, Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267, Affects all grant awards included under Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267 on the Schedule Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.318 maintains that recipients must have and use documented procurement policies and must conform to procurement standards in sections 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: Catholic Charities has documented procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal standards regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment; however, the procedures were not followed for four vendors selected for testing. Cause: Catholic Charities did not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure that the processes laid out in their procurement policy regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment were followed. Effect: Payments could be made to recipients who were suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 13 transactions out of 68 total transactions were selected for testing. Four vendors did not have support showing the search for suspension and debarment was performed which made up $60,537 of $796,282 federal awards. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes, 2023-001 Recommendation: We recommend Catholic Charities enhance internal control procedures to ensure all suspension and debarment verification procedures are performed prior to entering into the transactions. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Department of Housing and Urban Development Continuum of Care, Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267, Affects all grant awards included under Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267 on the Schedule Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.318 maintains that recipients must have and use documented procurement policies and must conform to procurement standards in sections 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: Catholic Charities has documented procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal standards regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment; however, the procedures were not followed for four vendors selected for testing. Cause: Catholic Charities did not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure that the processes laid out in their procurement policy regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment were followed. Effect: Payments could be made to recipients who were suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 13 transactions out of 68 total transactions were selected for testing. Four vendors did not have support showing the search for suspension and debarment was performed which made up $60,537 of $796,282 federal awards. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes, 2023-001 Recommendation: We recommend Catholic Charities enhance internal control procedures to ensure all suspension and debarment verification procedures are performed prior to entering into the transactions. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Department of Housing and Urban Development Continuum of Care, Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267, Affects all grant awards included under Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267 on the Schedule Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.318 maintains that recipients must have and use documented procurement policies and must conform to procurement standards in sections 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: Catholic Charities has documented procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal standards regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment; however, the procedures were not followed for four vendors selected for testing. Cause: Catholic Charities did not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure that the processes laid out in their procurement policy regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment were followed. Effect: Payments could be made to recipients who were suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 13 transactions out of 68 total transactions were selected for testing. Four vendors did not have support showing the search for suspension and debarment was performed which made up $60,537 of $796,282 federal awards. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes, 2023-001 Recommendation: We recommend Catholic Charities enhance internal control procedures to ensure all suspension and debarment verification procedures are performed prior to entering into the transactions. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Department of Housing and Urban Development Continuum of Care, Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267, Affects all grant awards included under Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267 on the Schedule Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.318 maintains that recipients must have and use documented procurement policies and must conform to procurement standards in sections 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: Catholic Charities has documented procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal standards regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment; however, the procedures were not followed for four vendors selected for testing. Cause: Catholic Charities did not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure that the processes laid out in their procurement policy regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment were followed. Effect: Payments could be made to recipients who were suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 13 transactions out of 68 total transactions were selected for testing. Four vendors did not have support showing the search for suspension and debarment was performed which made up $60,537 of $796,282 federal awards. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes, 2023-001 Recommendation: We recommend Catholic Charities enhance internal control procedures to ensure all suspension and debarment verification procedures are performed prior to entering into the transactions. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Department of Housing and Urban Development Continuum of Care, Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267, Affects all grant awards included under Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.267 on the Schedule Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.318 maintains that recipients must have and use documented procurement policies and must conform to procurement standards in sections 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: Catholic Charities has documented procurement procedures that conform to applicable federal standards regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment; however, the procedures were not followed for four vendors selected for testing. Cause: Catholic Charities did not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure that the processes laid out in their procurement policy regarding testing vendors for suspension and debarment were followed. Effect: Payments could be made to recipients who were suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 13 transactions out of 68 total transactions were selected for testing. Four vendors did not have support showing the search for suspension and debarment was performed which made up $60,537 of $796,282 federal awards. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes, 2023-001 Recommendation: We recommend Catholic Charities enhance internal control procedures to ensure all suspension and debarment verification procedures are performed prior to entering into the transactions. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Finding 2024-004, Significant deficiency Identification of federal program: US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE passed through the Indiana Department of Education Child Nutrition Cluster 10.553 & 10.555 Criteria : According to 2CFR 200.318(i) the recipient or subrecipient must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition : The School did not maintain records for a food vendor that met the simplified acquisition threshold for the year. Cause : The Schools procurement policies do not address the frequency of which vendors should be evaluated. In addition, the policies also do not address records retention. Potential effect: The procurement may not have been proper under the grant requirements. Questioned costs: None. Context: A total sample of four (4) of ten (10) purchases related to a certain food provider were selected as a part of procurement and suspension and debarment compliance requirement testing for the Child Nutrition Cluster. Recommendation : We recommend that the School follow federal procurement guidelines for each of the different purchase thresholds for each vendor. We further recommend that the School retain any documentation created related to the procurement selection and vetting process. Views of Responsible Officials: See attached Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2024-004, Significant deficiency Identification of federal program: US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE passed through the Indiana Department of Education Child Nutrition Cluster 10.553 & 10.555 Criteria : According to 2CFR 200.318(i) the recipient or subrecipient must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition : The School did not maintain records for a food vendor that met the simplified acquisition threshold for the year. Cause : The Schools procurement policies do not address the frequency of which vendors should be evaluated. In addition, the policies also do not address records retention. Potential effect: The procurement may not have been proper under the grant requirements. Questioned costs: None. Context: A total sample of four (4) of ten (10) purchases related to a certain food provider were selected as a part of procurement and suspension and debarment compliance requirement testing for the Child Nutrition Cluster. Recommendation : We recommend that the School follow federal procurement guidelines for each of the different purchase thresholds for each vendor. We further recommend that the School retain any documentation created related to the procurement selection and vetting process. Views of Responsible Officials: See attached Corrective Action Plan.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559, 10.582 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: None Provided Pass-Through Agency: Maryland Department of Education (MSDE) Pass-Through Number(s): None Provided Award Period: 7/1/2023–6/30/2024 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR section 200.320(b)). Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition/Context: During the testing of ten contracts, the Board was unable to provide documentation for one contract to demonstrate compliance with their procurement policy, specifically the requirement to obtain two quotes for a small purchase. Questioned costs: Undetermined. Cause: Controls were not operating effectively to ensure that the Board’s procurement policies were followed for contracts entered into where expenses were charged to the federal program. Effect: There is an increased risk of charging unallowed costs to the program. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board enhance controls and procedures to ensure that it follows its procurement policies for all goods and services charged to the program. Documentation should be readily available for audit. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559, 10.582 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: None Provided Pass-Through Agency: Maryland Department of Education (MSDE) Pass-Through Number(s): None Provided Award Period: 7/1/2023–6/30/2024 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR section 200.320(b)). Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition/Context: During the testing of ten contracts, the Board was unable to provide documentation for one contract to demonstrate compliance with their procurement policy, specifically the requirement to obtain two quotes for a small purchase. Questioned costs: Undetermined. Cause: Controls were not operating effectively to ensure that the Board’s procurement policies were followed for contracts entered into where expenses were charged to the federal program. Effect: There is an increased risk of charging unallowed costs to the program. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board enhance controls and procedures to ensure that it follows its procurement policies for all goods and services charged to the program. Documentation should be readily available for audit. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559, 10.582 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: None Provided Pass-Through Agency: Maryland Department of Education (MSDE) Pass-Through Number(s): None Provided Award Period: 7/1/2023–6/30/2024 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR section 200.320(b)). Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition/Context: During the testing of ten contracts, the Board was unable to provide documentation for one contract to demonstrate compliance with their procurement policy, specifically the requirement to obtain two quotes for a small purchase. Questioned costs: Undetermined. Cause: Controls were not operating effectively to ensure that the Board’s procurement policies were followed for contracts entered into where expenses were charged to the federal program. Effect: There is an increased risk of charging unallowed costs to the program. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board enhance controls and procedures to ensure that it follows its procurement policies for all goods and services charged to the program. Documentation should be readily available for audit. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559, 10.582 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: None Provided Pass-Through Agency: Maryland Department of Education (MSDE) Pass-Through Number(s): None Provided Award Period: 7/1/2023–6/30/2024 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR section 200.320(b)). Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition/Context: During the testing of ten contracts, the Board was unable to provide documentation for one contract to demonstrate compliance with their procurement policy, specifically the requirement to obtain two quotes for a small purchase. Questioned costs: Undetermined. Cause: Controls were not operating effectively to ensure that the Board’s procurement policies were followed for contracts entered into where expenses were charged to the federal program. Effect: There is an increased risk of charging unallowed costs to the program. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board enhance controls and procedures to ensure that it follows its procurement policies for all goods and services charged to the program. Documentation should be readily available for audit. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559, 10.582 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: None Provided Pass-Through Agency: Maryland Department of Education (MSDE) Pass-Through Number(s): None Provided Award Period: 7/1/2023–6/30/2024 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR section 200.320(b)). Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition/Context: During the testing of ten contracts, the Board was unable to provide documentation for one contract to demonstrate compliance with their procurement policy, specifically the requirement to obtain two quotes for a small purchase. Questioned costs: Undetermined. Cause: Controls were not operating effectively to ensure that the Board’s procurement policies were followed for contracts entered into where expenses were charged to the federal program. Effect: There is an increased risk of charging unallowed costs to the program. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board enhance controls and procedures to ensure that it follows its procurement policies for all goods and services charged to the program. Documentation should be readily available for audit. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559, 10.582 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: None Provided Pass-Through Agency: Maryland Department of Education (MSDE) Pass-Through Number(s): None Provided Award Period: 7/1/2023–6/30/2024 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR section 200.320(b)). Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition/Context: During the testing of ten contracts, the Board was unable to provide documentation for one contract to demonstrate compliance with their procurement policy, specifically the requirement to obtain two quotes for a small purchase. Questioned costs: Undetermined. Cause: Controls were not operating effectively to ensure that the Board’s procurement policies were followed for contracts entered into where expenses were charged to the federal program. Effect: There is an increased risk of charging unallowed costs to the program. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board enhance controls and procedures to ensure that it follows its procurement policies for all goods and services charged to the program. Documentation should be readily available for audit. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559, 10.582 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: None Provided Pass-Through Agency: Maryland Department of Education (MSDE) Pass-Through Number(s): None Provided Award Period: 7/1/2023–6/30/2024 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR section 200.320(b)). Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition/Context: During the testing of ten contracts, the Board was unable to provide documentation for one contract to demonstrate compliance with their procurement policy, specifically the requirement to obtain two quotes for a small purchase. Questioned costs: Undetermined. Cause: Controls were not operating effectively to ensure that the Board’s procurement policies were followed for contracts entered into where expenses were charged to the federal program. Effect: There is an increased risk of charging unallowed costs to the program. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board enhance controls and procedures to ensure that it follows its procurement policies for all goods and services charged to the program. Documentation should be readily available for audit. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Procurement Suspension & Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Research and Development Cluster Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurement standards conform to the applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Condition: The Organization has a procurement policy in place; however, the Organization is not consistently following the procurement policy. During the period of the contracts with these provisions, the Organization did not have a control structure in place to monitor compliance with procurement requirements. Consequently, for one (1) of six (2) contracts tested, the procurement policy was not followed and no documentation to reflect compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements related to procurement could be provided. Cause: The procurement policy retained by the Organization has not been updated to conform with the Organization’s current operations. Effect or potential effect: The Organization could become noncompliant with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to dollar amounts being expended to vendors. Additionally, the Organization could become ineligible to receive funds from federal entities or may have to issue refunds to federal entities. Questioned costs: None. Context: Our sample was not intended to be statistically valid. Recommendation: The Organization updated its procurement policy to reflect current operations, but did not go back and document procurement compliance against existing vendors. The Organization should review the current procurement operations in conjunction with the review of the procurement policies to ensure that all practices and policies conform to the standards promulgated by the CFR. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management's response is reported in "Management's Views and Corrective Action Plan" included at the end of this report. Identification of prior year finding: 2023-005
Procurement Suspension & Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Research and Development Cluster Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurement standards conform to the applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Condition: The Organization has a procurement policy in place; however, the Organization is not consistently following the procurement policy. During the period of the contracts with these provisions, the Organization did not have a control structure in place to monitor compliance with procurement requirements. Consequently, for one (1) of six (2) contracts tested, the procurement policy was not followed and no documentation to reflect compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements related to procurement could be provided. Cause: The procurement policy retained by the Organization has not been updated to conform with the Organization’s current operations. Effect or potential effect: The Organization could become noncompliant with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to dollar amounts being expended to vendors. Additionally, the Organization could become ineligible to receive funds from federal entities or may have to issue refunds to federal entities. Questioned costs: None. Context: Our sample was not intended to be statistically valid. Recommendation: The Organization updated its procurement policy to reflect current operations, but did not go back and document procurement compliance against existing vendors. The Organization should review the current procurement operations in conjunction with the review of the procurement policies to ensure that all practices and policies conform to the standards promulgated by the CFR. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management's response is reported in "Management's Views and Corrective Action Plan" included at the end of this report. Identification of prior year finding: 2023-005
Procurement Suspension & Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Research and Development Cluster Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurement standards conform to the applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Condition: The Organization has a procurement policy in place; however, the Organization is not consistently following the procurement policy. During the period of the contracts with these provisions, the Organization did not have a control structure in place to monitor compliance with procurement requirements. Consequently, for one (1) of six (2) contracts tested, the procurement policy was not followed and no documentation to reflect compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements related to procurement could be provided. Cause: The procurement policy retained by the Organization has not been updated to conform with the Organization’s current operations. Effect or potential effect: The Organization could become noncompliant with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to dollar amounts being expended to vendors. Additionally, the Organization could become ineligible to receive funds from federal entities or may have to issue refunds to federal entities. Questioned costs: None. Context: Our sample was not intended to be statistically valid. Recommendation: The Organization updated its procurement policy to reflect current operations, but did not go back and document procurement compliance against existing vendors. The Organization should review the current procurement operations in conjunction with the review of the procurement policies to ensure that all practices and policies conform to the standards promulgated by the CFR. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management's response is reported in "Management's Views and Corrective Action Plan" included at the end of this report. Identification of prior year finding: 2023-005
Procurement Suspension & Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Research and Development Cluster Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurement standards conform to the applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Condition: The Organization has a procurement policy in place; however, the Organization is not consistently following the procurement policy. During the period of the contracts with these provisions, the Organization did not have a control structure in place to monitor compliance with procurement requirements. Consequently, for one (1) of six (2) contracts tested, the procurement policy was not followed and no documentation to reflect compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements related to procurement could be provided. Cause: The procurement policy retained by the Organization has not been updated to conform with the Organization’s current operations. Effect or potential effect: The Organization could become noncompliant with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to dollar amounts being expended to vendors. Additionally, the Organization could become ineligible to receive funds from federal entities or may have to issue refunds to federal entities. Questioned costs: None. Context: Our sample was not intended to be statistically valid. Recommendation: The Organization updated its procurement policy to reflect current operations, but did not go back and document procurement compliance against existing vendors. The Organization should review the current procurement operations in conjunction with the review of the procurement policies to ensure that all practices and policies conform to the standards promulgated by the CFR. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management's response is reported in "Management's Views and Corrective Action Plan" included at the end of this report. Identification of prior year finding: 2023-005
Procurement Suspension & Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Research and Development Cluster Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurement standards conform to the applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Condition: The Organization has a procurement policy in place; however, the Organization is not consistently following the procurement policy. During the period of the contracts with these provisions, the Organization did not have a control structure in place to monitor compliance with procurement requirements. Consequently, for one (1) of six (2) contracts tested, the procurement policy was not followed and no documentation to reflect compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements related to procurement could be provided. Cause: The procurement policy retained by the Organization has not been updated to conform with the Organization’s current operations. Effect or potential effect: The Organization could become noncompliant with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to dollar amounts being expended to vendors. Additionally, the Organization could become ineligible to receive funds from federal entities or may have to issue refunds to federal entities. Questioned costs: None. Context: Our sample was not intended to be statistically valid. Recommendation: The Organization updated its procurement policy to reflect current operations, but did not go back and document procurement compliance against existing vendors. The Organization should review the current procurement operations in conjunction with the review of the procurement policies to ensure that all practices and policies conform to the standards promulgated by the CFR. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management's response is reported in "Management's Views and Corrective Action Plan" included at the end of this report. Identification of prior year finding: 2023-005
Procurement Suspension & Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Research and Development Cluster Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurement standards conform to the applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Condition: The Organization has a procurement policy in place; however, the Organization is not consistently following the procurement policy. During the period of the contracts with these provisions, the Organization did not have a control structure in place to monitor compliance with procurement requirements. Consequently, for one (1) of six (2) contracts tested, the procurement policy was not followed and no documentation to reflect compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements related to procurement could be provided. Cause: The procurement policy retained by the Organization has not been updated to conform with the Organization’s current operations. Effect or potential effect: The Organization could become noncompliant with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to dollar amounts being expended to vendors. Additionally, the Organization could become ineligible to receive funds from federal entities or may have to issue refunds to federal entities. Questioned costs: None. Context: Our sample was not intended to be statistically valid. Recommendation: The Organization updated its procurement policy to reflect current operations, but did not go back and document procurement compliance against existing vendors. The Organization should review the current procurement operations in conjunction with the review of the procurement policies to ensure that all practices and policies conform to the standards promulgated by the CFR. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management's response is reported in "Management's Views and Corrective Action Plan" included at the end of this report. Identification of prior year finding: 2023-005
Procurement Suspension & Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Research and Development Cluster Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurement standards conform to the applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Condition: The Organization has a procurement policy in place; however, the Organization is not consistently following the procurement policy. During the period of the contracts with these provisions, the Organization did not have a control structure in place to monitor compliance with procurement requirements. Consequently, for one (1) of six (2) contracts tested, the procurement policy was not followed and no documentation to reflect compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements related to procurement could be provided. Cause: The procurement policy retained by the Organization has not been updated to conform with the Organization’s current operations. Effect or potential effect: The Organization could become noncompliant with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to dollar amounts being expended to vendors. Additionally, the Organization could become ineligible to receive funds from federal entities or may have to issue refunds to federal entities. Questioned costs: None. Context: Our sample was not intended to be statistically valid. Recommendation: The Organization updated its procurement policy to reflect current operations, but did not go back and document procurement compliance against existing vendors. The Organization should review the current procurement operations in conjunction with the review of the procurement policies to ensure that all practices and policies conform to the standards promulgated by the CFR. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management's response is reported in "Management's Views and Corrective Action Plan" included at the end of this report. Identification of prior year finding: 2023-005
Procurement Suspension & Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Research and Development Cluster Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurement standards conform to the applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Condition: The Organization has a procurement policy in place; however, the Organization is not consistently following the procurement policy. During the period of the contracts with these provisions, the Organization did not have a control structure in place to monitor compliance with procurement requirements. Consequently, for one (1) of six (2) contracts tested, the procurement policy was not followed and no documentation to reflect compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements related to procurement could be provided. Cause: The procurement policy retained by the Organization has not been updated to conform with the Organization’s current operations. Effect or potential effect: The Organization could become noncompliant with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to dollar amounts being expended to vendors. Additionally, the Organization could become ineligible to receive funds from federal entities or may have to issue refunds to federal entities. Questioned costs: None. Context: Our sample was not intended to be statistically valid. Recommendation: The Organization updated its procurement policy to reflect current operations, but did not go back and document procurement compliance against existing vendors. The Organization should review the current procurement operations in conjunction with the review of the procurement policies to ensure that all practices and policies conform to the standards promulgated by the CFR. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management's response is reported in "Management's Views and Corrective Action Plan" included at the end of this report. Identification of prior year finding: 2023-005
Procurement Suspension & Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Research and Development Cluster Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurement standards conform to the applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Condition: The Organization has a procurement policy in place; however, the Organization is not consistently following the procurement policy. During the period of the contracts with these provisions, the Organization did not have a control structure in place to monitor compliance with procurement requirements. Consequently, for one (1) of six (2) contracts tested, the procurement policy was not followed and no documentation to reflect compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements related to procurement could be provided. Cause: The procurement policy retained by the Organization has not been updated to conform with the Organization’s current operations. Effect or potential effect: The Organization could become noncompliant with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to dollar amounts being expended to vendors. Additionally, the Organization could become ineligible to receive funds from federal entities or may have to issue refunds to federal entities. Questioned costs: None. Context: Our sample was not intended to be statistically valid. Recommendation: The Organization updated its procurement policy to reflect current operations, but did not go back and document procurement compliance against existing vendors. The Organization should review the current procurement operations in conjunction with the review of the procurement policies to ensure that all practices and policies conform to the standards promulgated by the CFR. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management's response is reported in "Management's Views and Corrective Action Plan" included at the end of this report. Identification of prior year finding: 2023-005
Procurement Suspension & Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Research and Development Cluster Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurement standards conform to the applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Condition: The Organization has a procurement policy in place; however, the Organization is not consistently following the procurement policy. During the period of the contracts with these provisions, the Organization did not have a control structure in place to monitor compliance with procurement requirements. Consequently, for one (1) of six (2) contracts tested, the procurement policy was not followed and no documentation to reflect compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements related to procurement could be provided. Cause: The procurement policy retained by the Organization has not been updated to conform with the Organization’s current operations. Effect or potential effect: The Organization could become noncompliant with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to dollar amounts being expended to vendors. Additionally, the Organization could become ineligible to receive funds from federal entities or may have to issue refunds to federal entities. Questioned costs: None. Context: Our sample was not intended to be statistically valid. Recommendation: The Organization updated its procurement policy to reflect current operations, but did not go back and document procurement compliance against existing vendors. The Organization should review the current procurement operations in conjunction with the review of the procurement policies to ensure that all practices and policies conform to the standards promulgated by the CFR. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management's response is reported in "Management's Views and Corrective Action Plan" included at the end of this report. Identification of prior year finding: 2023-005
Procurement Suspension & Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Research and Development Cluster Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurement standards conform to the applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Condition: The Organization has a procurement policy in place; however, the Organization is not consistently following the procurement policy. During the period of the contracts with these provisions, the Organization did not have a control structure in place to monitor compliance with procurement requirements. Consequently, for one (1) of six (2) contracts tested, the procurement policy was not followed and no documentation to reflect compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements related to procurement could be provided. Cause: The procurement policy retained by the Organization has not been updated to conform with the Organization’s current operations. Effect or potential effect: The Organization could become noncompliant with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to dollar amounts being expended to vendors. Additionally, the Organization could become ineligible to receive funds from federal entities or may have to issue refunds to federal entities. Questioned costs: None. Context: Our sample was not intended to be statistically valid. Recommendation: The Organization updated its procurement policy to reflect current operations, but did not go back and document procurement compliance against existing vendors. The Organization should review the current procurement operations in conjunction with the review of the procurement policies to ensure that all practices and policies conform to the standards promulgated by the CFR. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management's response is reported in "Management's Views and Corrective Action Plan" included at the end of this report. Identification of prior year finding: 2023-005
Procurement Suspension & Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Research and Development Cluster Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurement standards conform to the applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Condition: The Organization has a procurement policy in place; however, the Organization is not consistently following the procurement policy. During the period of the contracts with these provisions, the Organization did not have a control structure in place to monitor compliance with procurement requirements. Consequently, for one (1) of six (2) contracts tested, the procurement policy was not followed and no documentation to reflect compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements related to procurement could be provided. Cause: The procurement policy retained by the Organization has not been updated to conform with the Organization’s current operations. Effect or potential effect: The Organization could become noncompliant with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to dollar amounts being expended to vendors. Additionally, the Organization could become ineligible to receive funds from federal entities or may have to issue refunds to federal entities. Questioned costs: None. Context: Our sample was not intended to be statistically valid. Recommendation: The Organization updated its procurement policy to reflect current operations, but did not go back and document procurement compliance against existing vendors. The Organization should review the current procurement operations in conjunction with the review of the procurement policies to ensure that all practices and policies conform to the standards promulgated by the CFR. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management's response is reported in "Management's Views and Corrective Action Plan" included at the end of this report. Identification of prior year finding: 2023-005
Procurement Suspension & Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Research and Development Cluster Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurement standards conform to the applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Condition: The Organization has a procurement policy in place; however, the Organization is not consistently following the procurement policy. During the period of the contracts with these provisions, the Organization did not have a control structure in place to monitor compliance with procurement requirements. Consequently, for one (1) of six (2) contracts tested, the procurement policy was not followed and no documentation to reflect compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements related to procurement could be provided. Cause: The procurement policy retained by the Organization has not been updated to conform with the Organization’s current operations. Effect or potential effect: The Organization could become noncompliant with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to dollar amounts being expended to vendors. Additionally, the Organization could become ineligible to receive funds from federal entities or may have to issue refunds to federal entities. Questioned costs: None. Context: Our sample was not intended to be statistically valid. Recommendation: The Organization updated its procurement policy to reflect current operations, but did not go back and document procurement compliance against existing vendors. The Organization should review the current procurement operations in conjunction with the review of the procurement policies to ensure that all practices and policies conform to the standards promulgated by the CFR. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management's response is reported in "Management's Views and Corrective Action Plan" included at the end of this report. Identification of prior year finding: 2023-005
Procurement Suspension & Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Research and Development Cluster Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurement standards conform to the applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Condition: The Organization has a procurement policy in place; however, the Organization is not consistently following the procurement policy. During the period of the contracts with these provisions, the Organization did not have a control structure in place to monitor compliance with procurement requirements. Consequently, for one (1) of six (2) contracts tested, the procurement policy was not followed and no documentation to reflect compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements related to procurement could be provided. Cause: The procurement policy retained by the Organization has not been updated to conform with the Organization’s current operations. Effect or potential effect: The Organization could become noncompliant with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to dollar amounts being expended to vendors. Additionally, the Organization could become ineligible to receive funds from federal entities or may have to issue refunds to federal entities. Questioned costs: None. Context: Our sample was not intended to be statistically valid. Recommendation: The Organization updated its procurement policy to reflect current operations, but did not go back and document procurement compliance against existing vendors. The Organization should review the current procurement operations in conjunction with the review of the procurement policies to ensure that all practices and policies conform to the standards promulgated by the CFR. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management's response is reported in "Management's Views and Corrective Action Plan" included at the end of this report. Identification of prior year finding: 2023-005
Procurement Suspension & Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Research and Development Cluster Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurement standards conform to the applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Condition: The Organization has a procurement policy in place; however, the Organization is not consistently following the procurement policy. During the period of the contracts with these provisions, the Organization did not have a control structure in place to monitor compliance with procurement requirements. Consequently, for one (1) of six (2) contracts tested, the procurement policy was not followed and no documentation to reflect compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements related to procurement could be provided. Cause: The procurement policy retained by the Organization has not been updated to conform with the Organization’s current operations. Effect or potential effect: The Organization could become noncompliant with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to dollar amounts being expended to vendors. Additionally, the Organization could become ineligible to receive funds from federal entities or may have to issue refunds to federal entities. Questioned costs: None. Context: Our sample was not intended to be statistically valid. Recommendation: The Organization updated its procurement policy to reflect current operations, but did not go back and document procurement compliance against existing vendors. The Organization should review the current procurement operations in conjunction with the review of the procurement policies to ensure that all practices and policies conform to the standards promulgated by the CFR. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management's response is reported in "Management's Views and Corrective Action Plan" included at the end of this report. Identification of prior year finding: 2023-005
Procurement Suspension & Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Research and Development Cluster Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurement standards conform to the applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Condition: The Organization has a procurement policy in place; however, the Organization is not consistently following the procurement policy. During the period of the contracts with these provisions, the Organization did not have a control structure in place to monitor compliance with procurement requirements. Consequently, for one (1) of six (2) contracts tested, the procurement policy was not followed and no documentation to reflect compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements related to procurement could be provided. Cause: The procurement policy retained by the Organization has not been updated to conform with the Organization’s current operations. Effect or potential effect: The Organization could become noncompliant with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to dollar amounts being expended to vendors. Additionally, the Organization could become ineligible to receive funds from federal entities or may have to issue refunds to federal entities. Questioned costs: None. Context: Our sample was not intended to be statistically valid. Recommendation: The Organization updated its procurement policy to reflect current operations, but did not go back and document procurement compliance against existing vendors. The Organization should review the current procurement operations in conjunction with the review of the procurement policies to ensure that all practices and policies conform to the standards promulgated by the CFR. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management's response is reported in "Management's Views and Corrective Action Plan" included at the end of this report. Identification of prior year finding: 2023-005
Procurement Suspension & Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Research and Development Cluster Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurement standards conform to the applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Condition: The Organization has a procurement policy in place; however, the Organization is not consistently following the procurement policy. During the period of the contracts with these provisions, the Organization did not have a control structure in place to monitor compliance with procurement requirements. Consequently, for one (1) of six (2) contracts tested, the procurement policy was not followed and no documentation to reflect compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements related to procurement could be provided. Cause: The procurement policy retained by the Organization has not been updated to conform with the Organization’s current operations. Effect or potential effect: The Organization could become noncompliant with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to dollar amounts being expended to vendors. Additionally, the Organization could become ineligible to receive funds from federal entities or may have to issue refunds to federal entities. Questioned costs: None. Context: Our sample was not intended to be statistically valid. Recommendation: The Organization updated its procurement policy to reflect current operations, but did not go back and document procurement compliance against existing vendors. The Organization should review the current procurement operations in conjunction with the review of the procurement policies to ensure that all practices and policies conform to the standards promulgated by the CFR. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management's response is reported in "Management's Views and Corrective Action Plan" included at the end of this report. Identification of prior year finding: 2023-005
Procurement Suspension & Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Research and Development Cluster Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurement standards conform to the applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Condition: The Organization has a procurement policy in place; however, the Organization is not consistently following the procurement policy. During the period of the contracts with these provisions, the Organization did not have a control structure in place to monitor compliance with procurement requirements. Consequently, for one (1) of six (2) contracts tested, the procurement policy was not followed and no documentation to reflect compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements related to procurement could be provided. Cause: The procurement policy retained by the Organization has not been updated to conform with the Organization’s current operations. Effect or potential effect: The Organization could become noncompliant with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to dollar amounts being expended to vendors. Additionally, the Organization could become ineligible to receive funds from federal entities or may have to issue refunds to federal entities. Questioned costs: None. Context: Our sample was not intended to be statistically valid. Recommendation: The Organization updated its procurement policy to reflect current operations, but did not go back and document procurement compliance against existing vendors. The Organization should review the current procurement operations in conjunction with the review of the procurement policies to ensure that all practices and policies conform to the standards promulgated by the CFR. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management's response is reported in "Management's Views and Corrective Action Plan" included at the end of this report. Identification of prior year finding: 2023-005
Procurement Suspension & Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Research and Development Cluster Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurement standards conform to the applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Condition: The Organization has a procurement policy in place; however, the Organization is not consistently following the procurement policy. During the period of the contracts with these provisions, the Organization did not have a control structure in place to monitor compliance with procurement requirements. Consequently, for one (1) of six (2) contracts tested, the procurement policy was not followed and no documentation to reflect compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements related to procurement could be provided. Cause: The procurement policy retained by the Organization has not been updated to conform with the Organization’s current operations. Effect or potential effect: The Organization could become noncompliant with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to dollar amounts being expended to vendors. Additionally, the Organization could become ineligible to receive funds from federal entities or may have to issue refunds to federal entities. Questioned costs: None. Context: Our sample was not intended to be statistically valid. Recommendation: The Organization updated its procurement policy to reflect current operations, but did not go back and document procurement compliance against existing vendors. The Organization should review the current procurement operations in conjunction with the review of the procurement policies to ensure that all practices and policies conform to the standards promulgated by the CFR. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management's response is reported in "Management's Views and Corrective Action Plan" included at the end of this report. Identification of prior year finding: 2023-005
Procurement Suspension & Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Research and Development Cluster Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurement standards conform to the applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Condition: The Organization has a procurement policy in place; however, the Organization is not consistently following the procurement policy. During the period of the contracts with these provisions, the Organization did not have a control structure in place to monitor compliance with procurement requirements. Consequently, for one (1) of six (2) contracts tested, the procurement policy was not followed and no documentation to reflect compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements related to procurement could be provided. Cause: The procurement policy retained by the Organization has not been updated to conform with the Organization’s current operations. Effect or potential effect: The Organization could become noncompliant with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to dollar amounts being expended to vendors. Additionally, the Organization could become ineligible to receive funds from federal entities or may have to issue refunds to federal entities. Questioned costs: None. Context: Our sample was not intended to be statistically valid. Recommendation: The Organization updated its procurement policy to reflect current operations, but did not go back and document procurement compliance against existing vendors. The Organization should review the current procurement operations in conjunction with the review of the procurement policies to ensure that all practices and policies conform to the standards promulgated by the CFR. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management's response is reported in "Management's Views and Corrective Action Plan" included at the end of this report. Identification of prior year finding: 2023-005
Procurement Suspension & Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Research and Development Cluster Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurement standards conform to the applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Condition: The Organization has a procurement policy in place; however, the Organization is not consistently following the procurement policy. During the period of the contracts with these provisions, the Organization did not have a control structure in place to monitor compliance with procurement requirements. Consequently, for one (1) of six (2) contracts tested, the procurement policy was not followed and no documentation to reflect compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements related to procurement could be provided. Cause: The procurement policy retained by the Organization has not been updated to conform with the Organization’s current operations. Effect or potential effect: The Organization could become noncompliant with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance, resulting in future findings and questioned costs related to dollar amounts being expended to vendors. Additionally, the Organization could become ineligible to receive funds from federal entities or may have to issue refunds to federal entities. Questioned costs: None. Context: Our sample was not intended to be statistically valid. Recommendation: The Organization updated its procurement policy to reflect current operations, but did not go back and document procurement compliance against existing vendors. The Organization should review the current procurement operations in conjunction with the review of the procurement policies to ensure that all practices and policies conform to the standards promulgated by the CFR. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management's response is reported in "Management's Views and Corrective Action Plan" included at the end of this report. Identification of prior year finding: 2023-005