Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.305(b)(12), a recipient or subrecipient may retain up to $500 per year in interest earned on Federal funds for administrative expenses. Any interest earned in excess of $500 per year must be remitted annually to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) through the Payment Management System (PMS) via the Automated Clearing House (ACH) network or Fedwire Funds Service. This requirement applies regardless of whether the recipient or subrecipient was paid through PMS. Condition: For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025, the entity earned interest on Federal funds in excess of the $500 allowable retention limit. The entity did not remit the excess interest to the Payment Management System (PMS) within the required timeframe. The amount of excess interest retained and not remitted totaled $1,417.45. Effect: Noncompliance with 2 CFR § 200.305(b)(12) may result in several consequences, including questioned costs, required reimbursement of federal funds, findings or enforcement actions by the federal awarding agency, and potential sanctions or the imposition of additional compliance requirements. Cause: The entity did not have adequate internal controls or formal procedures in place to periodically monitor interest earned on federal funds, identify when interest exceeded the $500 allowable threshold, and timely remit excess interest to HHS through the Payment Management System (PMS). Recommendations: We recommend that the Institution implement the following corrective actions: 1. Develop and implement formal written policies and procedures for monitoring interest earned on federal funds in accordance with 2 CFR § 200.305(b)(12). 2. Establish internal controls to periodically calculate and track interest earned on federal cash balances throughout the fiscal year. 3. Implement a process to identify when interest earned exceeds the allowable $500 annual retention threshold. 4. Assign responsibility to designated personnel for reviewing interest calculations and ensuring compliance with federal requirements. 5. Provide training to relevant staff on federal cash management requirements related to interest earned on federal funds.
Federal Agency: 11 – Department of Commerce, 12 – Department of Defense, 15 – Department of the Interior, 16 – Department of Justice, 43 – National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 47 – National Science Foundation, 81 – Department of Energy, 84 – Department of Education, 93 – Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Title: R&D Cluster, Child Care Access Means Parents in School, TRIO Cluster, and Higher Education Institutional Aid Assistance Listing Number: R&D, 84.335, 84.TRIO, and 84.031 Award Period: July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2025 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.305(b), when using the reimbursement method, Federal drawdowns must be limited to allowable costs that have been incurred and supported. Additionally, 2 CFR §200.302(a) requires non Federal entities to maintain financial management systems that provide for accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award. Condition/Context: During our testing of Cash Management, we selected a sample of 85 reimbursement requests, consisting of 40 R&D Cluster samples, 12 Child Care Access Means Parents in School samples, 23 TRIO Cluster samples, and 10 Higher Education Institutional Aid. The following exceptions were noted: R&D Cluster, TRIO Cluster, and Higher Education Institutional Aid: For 4 of the 40 R&D samples tested, 9 of the 23 TRIO samples tested, and 1 of the 10 Higher Education Institutional Aid samples tested, instances of noncompliance were identified. • For 4 of the 4 R&D samples, 8 of the 9 TRIO samples, and 1 of the 1 Higher Education Institutional Aid samples with instances of noncompliance noted, a portion of the reimbursement drawn down during fiscal year 2025 related to expenses incurred outside to the current fiscal year. Additionally, 1 of the 4 R&D samples included expenses incurred as far back as October 2020. • For 1 of the 9 TRIO samples with instances of noncompliance noted, supporting documentation (such as invoice support, indirect cost recalculations, or payroll registers) was not provided for a portion of the expenses included in the reimbursement requests. As a result, we were unable to determine the period to which the funds drawn down related. Child Care Access Means Parents in School (Control Finding Only): • For 1 of the 12 samples tested, the UEC was ultimately in compliance with cash management requirements; however, internal controls did not operate effectively. Specifically, there was an approximate six‑month delay between the incurrence of program costs and the submission of the reimbursement request. Questioned Costs: $68,759 Effect: Reimbursement requests that include costs incurred outside the applicable fiscal period or costs that are not supported increase the risk that Federal expenditures are not recorded in the proper accounting period and that Federal financial reporting is not accurate. Additionally, delays in submitting reimbursement requests increase the risk that expenditures are not timely reported in accordance with Federal requirements. Cause: The UEC’s internal controls were not designed or implemented to consistently ensure that costs included in reimbursement requests are recorded in the appropriate fiscal period, supported by adequate documentation, and submitted timely in accordance with Federal cash management and financial reporting requirements. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the UEC strengthen its cash management and financial reporting procedures to ensure reimbursement requests include only costs incurred in the appropriate fiscal period, are supported by adequate documentation, and are submitted timely. The UEC should also enhance review controls to verify proper period recognition of costs prior to submission of reimbursement requests. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding. Further, 2 CFR §200.303 requires non Federal entities to establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal awards to ensure transactions are recorded in the proper accounting period and in accordance with applicable Federal requirements.
Finding No: 2025-001 Cash Management Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Entities: N/A Assistance Listing Number: 93.493 Federal Program: Congressional Directives Federal Award Year: September 30, 2023 – September 29, 2026 Per section 2 CFR 200.305, non-federal entities must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the US Treasury and disbursement by the non-federal entity for direct program or project costs. Interest earned on Federal funds must be returned annually to the Department of Health and Human Services Payment Management System (PMS). Expenditures must be incurred prior to the date of the reimbursement request. Per section 2 CFR 200.303, non-Federal entities must establish, document and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition Found The System entity did not minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds and disbursement and did not remit interest earned on advances to the designated federal agency. The System requested reimbursement of federal grant funds of $1,042,278 over 350 days in advance of incurring the related expenditures for the St. Francis Medical Center Community Project Funding Congressionally Directed Spending – Construction award (ALN 93.493) and did not perform the required interest calculation or remit interest timely, representing a departure from the Uniform Guidance cash management requirements. We tested 100% of the expenditures and related cash draw activity for this award during the audit period; therefore, no sampling was used and no extrapolation was necessary. Possible Cause and Asserted Effect The System's internal controls did not ensure the federal funds requested for the program were either already expended or encumbered to be expended timely and did not implement the process steps and control to periodically identify and calculate the resulting accumulated interest earned on federal cash balances drawn in advance related to this program. Failing to minimize the time between the transfer and disbursement of funds, as well as failing to remit interest earned on advances, constitutes noncompliance with the Uniform Guidance.Questioned Cost Interest earned of $44,750 Statistical Validity The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Identification of Whether the Audit Finding is a Repeat of a Finding in the Immediately Prior Audit No. Recommendation We recommend that the System strengthen its internal controls over cash management controls to ensure that all federal fund drawdowns are based on incurred expenditures and documented immediate cash needs, and that a process is implemented to periodically calculate and remit any interest earned on advance balances as required by the Uniform Guidance. View of Responsible Officials Management concurs with this finding. The System is implementing a management review control through periodic inquiry and review of advance fundings to ensure drawdowns are supported by incurred expenditures or are for immediate cash needs and any interest calculations to ensure timely compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Corrective Action Plan In the event that the System receives federal cash advances prior to the cash expenditures, the System will perform an additional financial review of any advanced payments compared to the related expenditures. Should accounting identify advances not yet spent, they will inquire with the grant administrator responsible for the grant to review their advance fundings, any potential resulting interest calculations. Anticipated Completion Date June 30, 2026 Name of Contact Person for Corrective Action Amanda Hymel, Corporate Controller
Finding No: 2025-003– Internal control deficiencies over accounting and identification of federal funds received from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) that should be included on SEFA Federal Programs ALN 97.036, Disaster Grants - Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) Name of Federal Agency U.S. Department of Homeland Security (Pass-through program from The Central Office of Recovery, Reconstruction and Resiliency) Category Internal Control; Compliance. Compliance Requirement Activities Allowed/Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, Period of Performance, Project Accounting. Criteria 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart D Subsection 200.302 states the following: The recipient's and subrecipient's financial management system must provide for the following: 1. Identification of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the Assistance Listings title and number, Federal award identification number, year the Federal award was issued, and name of the Federal agency or pass-through entity. 2. Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. When a federal agency or pass-through entity requires reporting on an accrual basis from a recipient or subrecipient that maintains its records other than on an accrual basis, the recipient or subrecipient must not be required to establish an accrual accounting system. This recipient or subrecipient may develop accrual data for its reports based on an analysis of the documentation on hand. 3. Maintaining records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. 4. Effective control over and accountability for all funds, property, and assets. The recipient or subrecipient must safeguard all assets and ensure they are used solely for authorized purposes. See § 200.303. 5. Comparison of expenditures with budget amounts for each Federal award. 6. Written procedures to implement the requirements of § 200.305. 7. Written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition During our procedures concerning the Administration’s funds received from FEMA we noticed that the reimbursement funds received from FEMA were not recognized as income during the year ended June 30, 2025. Cause The Administration recognized the reimbursement as an accrual and not as income during the year ended June 30, 2025. They have recognized only the amount that they disbursed during the year at their discretion. This accounting is correct when the funds received are capital advances. Effect This can result in amounts not to be included in the Schedule of Expenditures and Federal Awards in the correct period and understate SEFA. Also, the Administration could be subject to penalties or sanctions from the Federal Grantor. Context The Administration identified $6,543 as federal expenditures from prior years capital advances of FEMA awards but did not identify as expended the amount of $11,063 from advances. In addition, the Administration received reimbursements of $1,413,451 in the fiscal year, however management did not identify this amount as federal expenditures until the audit procedures was performed. Identification of repeat finding None. Questioned costs None, as adjustments were made during the audit to correct the misstatement. Recommendation We recommend validating, with the staff in charge of Engineering, the type of funds received from FEMA, if they are reimbursements or capital advances. When the funds received are reimbursements they should be recognized as income in the year received. If the funds are capital advances they should be recognized as unearned revenue and as income in the year in which they are disbursed. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions We agreed with the auditors’ finding and recommendation. See further details regarding this matter within the Corrective Action Plan.
Finding Number - 2025-005 Rebates Agency Department of Health & Human Services Federal Program Medicaid Cluster ALN 93.778 Compliance Requirement Allowable Costs / Activities Cash Management Reporting Type of Finding Internal Control over Compliance / Compliance Category Significant Deficiency Criteria Pursuant to Section 1927 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. § 1396r-8) and implementing regulations at 42 C.F.R. Part 447, Subpart I, states must: ✓ Report quarterly drug utilization data to manufacturers within 60 days after the end of each quarter; and ✓ Ensure that manufacturers remit rebate payments within 30 days after receipt of utilization data; and ✓ Properly identify, record, and credit rebate collections to the Medicaid program in a timely manner. Department of Health of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs – (Continued) For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2025 - 47 - Section III- Findings and Questioned Costs Relating to Federal Awards– (continued) Finding Number - 2025-005 Rebates – (continued) Criteria – (continued) In addition, 2 C.F.R. § 200.302 (Financial Management) requires non-federal entities to maintain effective financial management systems that provide accurate, current, and complete disclosure of financial results and ensure proper accounting for program income and federal funds. Further, 2 C.F.R. § 200.305 (Payment) requires that federal funds be minimized between drawdown and disbursement and that program income and recoveries be properly accounted for and applied. Condition During our audit, we identified that the Medicaid Cluster Program (the Program) returned Medicaid drug rebates outside of the federally required timeframes established under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program. Specifically, rebates received from pharmaceutical manufacturers were not identified, recorded, and returned to the Medicaid program in accordance with the regulatory deadlines prescribed by federal law and regulation. As a result, federal Medicaid funds were not reconciled and credited in a timely manner, and program expenditures were overstated for the applicable reporting periods. Quarter End period Due date Remmitance date Late Q1 FFY2024 3/31/2024 6/29/2024 9/20/2024 83 Q1 FFY2024 3/31/2024 6/29/2024 12/5/2024 159 Q1 FFY2024 3/31/2024 6/29/2024 4/25/2025 300 Q2 FFY2023 6/30/2023 9/28/2023 9/20/2024 358 Q2 FFY2023 6/30/2023 9/28/2023 12/5/2024 434 Q2 FFY2023 6/30/2023 9/28/2023 4/25/2025 575 Q2 FFY2024 6/30/2024 9/28/2024 12/5/2024 68 Q2 FFY2024 6/30/2024 9/28/2024 4/25/2025 209 Q3 FFY2023 9/30/2023 12/29/2023 9/20/2024 266 Q3 FFY2023 9/30/2023 12/29/2023 12/5/2024 342 Q3 FFY2023 9/30/2023 12/29/2023 4/25/2025 483 Q3 FFY2024 9/30/2024 12/29/2024 4/25/2025 117 Q4 FFY2023 12/31/2023 3/30/2024 9/20/2024 174 Q4 FFY2023 12/31/2023 3/30/2024 12/5/2024 250 Q4 FFY2023 12/31/2023 3/30/2024 4/25/2025 391 Cause The Program relies on information provided by the actuaries of Puerto Rico Health Insurance Administration (PRHIA) to identify and calculate Medicaid drug rebates. PRHIA is responsible for compiling and providing the necessary rebate data to the Program. Based on the information received from PRHIA, management processes the corresponding reimbursements once the data is received. However, the Program does not maintain independent monitoring procedures to verify the completeness and timeliness of the information provided by PRHIA, nor does it perform periodic reconciliations between rebate information received and program expenditures to ensure that all applicable rebates are properly identified and credited to the Medicaid program in accordance with federal requirements. Effect As a result of this condition: ✓ The Program was not in compliance with federal Medicaid Drug Rebate Program requirements and Uniform Guidance financial management standards; and ✓ There is an increased risk of questioned costs and federal disallowances. Questioned Costs Indeterminable Perspective Information Under the program, state Medicaid agencies are required to submit quarterly drug utilization data to participating manufacturers. Based on this data, manufacturers calculate and remit rebate payments to the state. These rebate revenues constitute program income and must be applied to reduce Medicaid expenditures in accordance with federal law and Uniform Guidance. Prior Year Audit Finding This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation We recommend that management establish formal monitoring and reconciliation procedures to ensure that all Medicaid drug rebate information received from PRHIA is complete and accurately recorded. This should include periodic reconciliations between rebate data provided by PRHIA, rebate receipts, and related Medicaid program expenditures. Also, management should implement a formal follow-up process with PRHIA to periodically confirm that all applicable rebate information has been provided and processed in a timely manner. We also recommend that management: ✓ Implement written policies and procedures governing the identification, recording, reconciliation, and return of Medicaid drug rebates; ✓ Establish periodic reconciliation controls to ensure rebate receipts are timely credited to the Medicaid program; ✓ Strengthen oversight and monitoring of rebate activity to ensure compliance with Section 1927 of the Social Security Act and 42 C.F.R. Part 447; and ✓ Provide training to financial and program staff regarding federal rebate compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The PRDH’s management agrees with this finding. Please refer to the corrective action on pages 57-60.
Finding Number - 2025-006 Late vendor credits Agency Department of Health & Human Services Federal Program Medicaid Cluster ALN 93.778 Compliance Requirement Cost Principles Type of Finding Internal Control over Compliance / Compliance Category Other Criteria In accordance with the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, 2 CFR §200.305(b)(1) requires that pass-through entities ensure payments to subrecipients are made in a timely manner, generally within a reasonable period after receipt of a valid request for payment. Federal guidance and established administrative practice interpret a reasonable period for purposes of cash management compliance to mean no later than 30 calendar days following receipt of a proper payment request, unless the pass-through entity reasonably determines the request to be improper. This requirement applies regardless of whether the federal award operates on a reimbursement basis and is intended to ensure compliance with federal cash management standards and minimize the time between disbursement of funds and federal reimbursement. Criteria – (continued) For Medicaid program (Assistance Listing 93.778), CMS regulations further require that expenditures claimed for Federal Financial Participation (FFP) be based on actual, incurred, and properly documented costs in accordance with 42 CFR §433.32 and applicable CMS financial management guidance. CMS oversight emphasizes timely payment and proper cash management practices to ensure that expenditures are valid and that federal funds are drawn only for allowable and properly incurred costs. Additionally, 2 CFR §200.332(a) requires pass-through entities to monitor subrecipients and ensure compliance with applicable federal requirements, including adherence to cash management provisions. Condition During testing of subrecipient disbursements, it was noted that six (6) payments included in the sample of 178 were made more than 30 calendar days after the pass-through entity received a valid request for payment from the subrecipient. The delays ranged from 46 to 150 days beyond the regulatory requirement. Item No. Check Date (Voucher id) Invoice Date Audited Amount 1 1/24/2025 00536685 12/4/2024 $ 1,458 2 5/23/2025 00553562 12/23/2024 $ (1,321,563) 3 5/23/2025 00553519 12/23/2024 $ 2,111 4 5/23/2025 00553562 4/1/2025 $ (220,261) 5 7/23/2024 00515301 6/7/2024 $ 5,876 6 7/23/2024 00515303 6/7/2024 $ 8,911 Also, we identified two (2) instances in which vendor credits related to previously issued invoices were not applied to the corresponding invoices until approximately one (1) to three (3) months after the original drawdown was requested. Item No. Invoice number Invoice date Credit amount Drawdown not including credit Date credit return Days 1 RF VITAL 25-003 12/27/2024 $ (1,321,563) 1/13/2025 6/3/2025 -141 2 RF VITAL 25-006 4/10/2025 $ (220,261) 4/28/2025 6/3/2025 -36 Cause The delays in payment were primarily attributable to internal cash management and administrative practices, including the practice of awaiting the receipt of federal funds or internal approvals prior to issuing payment to the subrecipient. These practices were not aligned with the timing requirements established under Uniform Guidance. Management indicated that the Program waits until sufficient positive fund balances are available before processing the return of outstanding credits. As a result, certain credit balances may remain pending until adequate funds are available to complete the reimbursement. This practice may delay the timely return of funds in accordance with applicable requirements. Effect Failure to remit payment to subrecipients within the required 30-day timeframe. Continued noncompliance may increase the risk of: a) Audit findings under the Uniform Guidance, b) Increased federal oversight, c) Potential questioned costs, and d) Strained financial operations for subrecipients due to delayed reimbursement. The delayed application of credits resulted in temporary overstatements of expenditures used to support Federal drawdowns. Although the credits were eventually applied, the timing difference may result in noncompliance with cash management requirements under 2 CFR §200.305, as Federal funds may have been drawn in excess of immediate cash needs. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information This finding was identified during the audit of the Medicaid program (Assistance Listing 93.778) for the fiscal year ended 2025. The payments tested related to expenditures incurred and invoiced by a state agency acting as a subrecipient under an interagency agreement. Although both the pass-through entity and the subrecipient are agencies within the same state government, federal regulations treat them as distinct entities for purposes of cash management compliance. Prior Year Audit Finding This is not a prior year finding Recommendation It is recommended that the pass-through entity strengthens internal controls over subrecipient payments to ensure that all valid requests for payment are processed and paid within the 30-calendar-day timeframe required by 2 CFR §200.305(b)(1). Management should also ensure that payment procedures are not contingent upon the timing of federal drawdowns and that any delays are adequately documented and communicated to the subrecipient. We recommend that management strengthen internal controls over the drawdown process by implementing a formal review procedure to verify that all outstanding vendor credits have been identified and applied prior to submitting a Federal draw request. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The PRDH’s management agrees with this finding. Please refer to the corrective action on pages 57-60.
Finding Number: 2025-013 State/Educational Agency(s): Arkansas Department of Commerce – Arkansas Economic Development Commission Pass-Through Entity: Not applicable AL Number(s) and Program Title(s): 21.029 – Coronavirus Capital Project Funds Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Award Number(s): CPFFN0186 Federal Award Year(s): 2022 Compliance Requirement(s) Affected: Cash Management Type of Finding: Noncompliance Repeat Finding: Not applicable Criteria: Pursuant to 31 CFR § 205.33, state recipients are required to minimize the time elapsing between drawdowns of award funds and outlays of award funds. Arkansas State Broadband Office (ASBO) procedures indicate the Agency should disburse funds within 15 days of drawdown from the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Condition and Context: ALA reviewed drawdowns from the U.S. Department of the Treasury to determine the funds were disbursed timely. Of 34 drawdowns, 19 exceeded the 15-day maximum processing time for disbursements. Statistically Valid Sample: Not a statistically valid sample Questioned Costs: None Cause: ASBO management did not ensure funds drawn down from the U.S. Department of the Treasury were paid to the subrecipient in accordance with Agency procedures. Effect: Failure to comply with federal regulations for minimizing time between the drawdown of funds from the U.S. Department of the Treasury and disbursement to the subrecipient may result in the denial of future requests for funds, suspension or termination of the federal award, or pursuit of other legal remedies. Recommendation: ALA staff recommend the Agency ensure drawdown of funds from the U.S. Department of the Treasury are disbursed to subrecipients within the 15-day maximum processing time in accordance with Agency procedures. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: ASBO acknowledges the auditor’s observation regarding the timing of disbursements following drawdowns from the U.S. Department of the Treasury. ASBO procedures include a 15-day internal processing target intended to promote efficient payment processing. While 19 of 34 drawdowns exceeded this internal benchmark, the applicable federal standard under 31 CFR § 205.33 requires recipients to minimize the time between drawdown and disbursement. Additionally, under 2 CFR § 200.305(b)(3), when the reimbursement method is used, payment must be made within 30 calendar days after receipt of a proper payment request. ASBO recognizes the importance of maintaining strong cash management controls and ensuring timely payment to subrecipients. The State of Arkansas is enhancing tracking, reconciliation, and workflow controls within its financial management processes to better monitor drawdown-to-disbursement timing. These measures are intended to strengthen timeliness and prevent recurrence. Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2026 Contact Person: Glen Howie State Broadband Director Arkansas State Broadband Office 1 Commerce Way Little Rock, AR 72202 (501) 683-6000 broadband@arkansas.gov
Finding 2025-002 - U.S. Department of Education (USD), Title IV Student Financial Aid Programs (significant deficiency): Information on the federal program – Federal Pell Grant Program, FAL No. 84.063, June 30, 2025; Federal Work-Study Program, FAL No. 84.033, June 30, 2025; Federal Supplemental Opportunity Grant Program, FAL No. 84.007, June 30, 2025; Federal Direct Student Loan Program, FAL No. 84.268, June 30, 2025; Teachers Education Assistance for College (TEACH),FAL No. 84.379, June 30, 2025. Criteria – Under 2 CFR 200.305 and the U.S. Department of Education’s cash management requirements at 34 CFR 668.162, institutions must draw down Title IV funds only for expenditures that have already been incurred and must maintain supporting documentation on file at the time of each drawdown request to demonstrate: 1. The existence of actual, allowable expenditures equal to or exceeding the amount drawn; and 2. That such expenditures were incurred before requesting Federal funds. These regulations require contemporaneous records to support that drawdowns reflect immediate cash needs for allowable program costs. Condition – During our testing of cash drawdowns, we noted In four (4) of the eight (8) drawdowns tested, the College did not maintain adequate supporting documentation to substantiate that allowable expenditures had been incurred at the time of the drawdowns. Additionally, although drawdowns exceeded recorded expenditures at certain points during the year, the College did not have Federal cash on hand at year-end. Cause – The condition resulted from insufficient internal controls over the drawdown and documentation retention processes, including the absence of a timely reconciliation between recorded expenditures and drawdown requests. Effect – Requesting Federal funds without maintaining adequate documentation of actual expenditures increases the risk of noncompliance with Federal cash management requirements and may result in temporary use of Federal funds for unallowable purposes. As a result, questioned costs totaling $58,270 were identified. Questioned Costs – $58,270 Program Title FAL No. Questioned Costs Federal Work Study Program 84.033 $ 8,882 Federal Direct Loans 84.268 49,388 Total Questioned Costs $ 58,270 Auditor’s Perspective – While the College did not have Federal cash on hand at year-end, the lack of documentation and proper reconciliation at the time of drawdown represents a compliance deviation under Uniform Guidance. These conditions increase the risk that future drawdowns may not align with actual cash needs or allowable expenditures. Repeat Finding – No. Auditor's Recommendation – We recommend the College strengthen controls over the cash drawdown process by: • Ensuring that reimbursement requests are supported by complete and readily available documentation at the time of submission; and • Requiring contemporaneous reconciliations between expenditures and drawdown requests; • Implementing improved supervisory review procedures prior to requesting funds. View of Responsible Officials – The College now requires all drawdowns to include supporting documentation of the funds requested from G5, along with sign-offs on preparation and approval. Supporting documents are stored securely on the College's accounting drive for easy access. This procedure took effect as of July 31, 2025.
Finding 2025-003 - U.S. Department of Education (USD), TRIO Programs (Significant Deficiencies): Information on the federal program – Student Support Services, FAL No. 84.042A, June 30, 2025; Ronald McNair Program, FAL No. 84.217A, June 30, 2025. a) Cash Management/Drawdown Supporting Documentation and Recordkeeping Criteria – Under 2 CFR 200.305, non-Federal entities must request Federal funds only for allowable program costs that have been incurred, and must maintain contemporaneous supporting documentation demonstrating: 1. Actual, allowable expenditures existed at the time Federal funds were drawn; and 2. Records supporting the nature and timing of those expenditures were on file and readily available. These requirements ensure that drawdowns reflect immediate cash needs supported by verifiable program expenditures. Condition – During our testing of cash drawdowns, we noted in four (3) of the four (4) drawdowns tested, the College did not maintain adequate supporting documentation to substantiate that allowable expenditures had been incurred at the time of the drawdowns. Additionally, although drawdowns exceeded recorded expenditures at certain points during the year, the College did not have Federal cash on hand at year-end. Additionally, two (2) of these four (4) unsupported transactions lacked evidence of required approval, such as documented review or authorization prior to requesting Federal funds. Cause – The condition resulted from insufficient internal controls over the drawdown and documentation retention processes, including the absence of a timely reconciliation between recorded expenditures and drawdown requests. Effect – Requesting Federal funds without maintaining adequate documentation of actual expenditures increases the risk of noncompliance with Federal cash management requirements and may result in temporary use of Federal funds for unallowable purposes. As a result, questioned costs totaling $52,159 were identified. Questioned Costs – $52,159 Program Title FAL No. Questioned Costs Ronald McNair Program 84.217A $ 32,684 Student Support Services 84.042A 19,475 Total Questioned Costs $ 52,159 Auditor’s Perspective – Although no Federal cash was on hand at year-end and funds were ultimately applied to allowable TRIO costs, the absence of adequate support at the time of the drawdowns constitutes a compliance deviation. Without contemporaneous documentation, the accuracy and allowability of drawdown requests cannot be assured. Repeat Finding – No. Auditor's Recommendation – We recommend the College strengthen controls over the cash drawdown process by: • Ensuring that reimbursement requests are supported by complete and readily available documentation at the time of submission; and Requiring contemporaneous reconciliations between expenditures and drawdown requests; • Implementing improved supervisory review procedures prior to requesting funds. View of Responsible Officials – The College now mandates that G5 drawdown requests include approved documentation stored on the accounting drive, effective July 31, 2025. b) Time and Effort Reporting & Grant Salary Accuracy Criteria – (Compensation – Personnel Services Documentation Requirements): Under 2 CFR 200.430(i), charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed, and such records must: • Be supported by a system of internal controls providing reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; • Reflect 100% of the employee’s compensated activities, both Federal and non-Federal; • Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; and • Be completed and documented in a timely and consistent manner. For TRIO programs, personnel costs must be supported by complete and accurate documentation demonstrating the portion of time dedicated to allowable TRIO activities Condition – During our testing of time and effort reporting and salaries charged to the TRIO programs, we identified the following exceptions: 1. Incorrect Salary Charge – For one (1) of the nine (9) time and effort reports tested, the salary expense charged to the McNair grant did not agree with the employee’s documented distribution of time. As a result, $24,947 of personnel costs charged to the grant were not supported by the corresponding time and effort report. 2. Incomplete Time and Effort Reports – Two (2) of the nine (9) reports tested, (both were for the same employee noted in the error above), were incomplete and did not reflect the employee’s full allocation of time across both restricted (grant-funded) and unrestricted activities. These omissions resulted in incomplete documentation to support the distribution of payroll costs. The College corrected the documentation after our inquiry; however, the corrections were not in place at the time of testing. Cause – The condition resulted from inconsistent application of time and effort reporting procedures and insufficient review controls to verify the completeness and accuracy of time distribution records prior to charging payroll costs to TRIO programs. Effect – Charging salaries without accurate, complete, and timely time and effort documentation increases the risk of unallowable personnel costs being charged to the program. As a result, questioned costs totaling $24,947 were identified for unsupported salary charges. Additionally, incomplete reports undermine the reliability of payroll allocations used to support Federal expenditures. Questioned Costs – Ronald McNair Program, FAL No. 84.217A: $24,947. Auditor’s Perspective – Although the College corrected the incomplete reports after our inquiry, corrections made after the fact do not demonstrate compliance at the time costs were charged. Accurate and complete time and effort reporting is essential to ensuring that salary costs charged to TRIO programs are allowable and properly supported. Repeat Finding – No. Auditor’s Recommendation – We recommend the College strengthen internal controls over time and effort reporting for TRIO programs by: • Ensuring all reports reflect 100% of compensated activities for each employee; • Implementing a supervisory review process to confirm accuracy before payroll is allocated to the grant; • Providing refresher training to staff responsible for preparing and approving time and effort documentation; and • Maintaining documentation that is complete, accurate, and contemporaneous with the period of performance. Views of Responsible Officials – Time and Effort reports must be submitted monthly with supervisor sign-off before reaching the Office of Sponsor Programs, showing 100% time allocation. Any changes will require a Personnel Action Form and administrative signatures of approval.
Finding 2025-003 - U.S. Department of Education (ED), Title III Programs (material weakness) Information on the Federal Programs – Title III, FAL No. 84.031, June 30, 2025 Criteria – Federal regulations require recipients of federal awards to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the U.S. Department of Education and the disbursement of those funds. Specifically, 2 CFR §200.305(b) requires non-federal entities to maintain effective cash management procedures to ensure that federal funds are drawn only to meet immediate cash needs for program expenditures. Condition – The institution maintained excess federal cash balances for Title III programs at year-end of $1,320,114. Federal funds were drawn down in advance of actual program expenditures and were not disbursed within a reasonable period, resulting in excess cash balances that exceeded immediate program needs. Cause – The excess cash balances resulted from inadequate cash management procedures, including: a) lack of timely reconciliation between federal drawdowns and actual expenditures; b) drawdown practices not aligned with immediate cash needs; c) insufficient monitoring and oversight of grant cash balances and d) failure to adjust drawdown amounts based on current spending patterns. Effect – As a result of these deficiencies: a) federal cash was not managed in accordance with 2 CFR §200.305; b) the College was exposed to potential disallowances and increased federal oversight; c) there is an increased risk of questioned costs and repayment of excess funds and d) continued noncompliance may jeopardize future federal funding. Auditor’s Perspective – From the auditor’s perspective, the magnitude of excess cash, particularly within the Title III program, combined with the repeat nature of the finding, indicates a material weakness in internal control over compliance. Effective cash management controls are fundamental to federal grant compliance, and failure to correct this issue increases the risk of misuse or mismanagement of federal funds. Questioned Costs – $1,320,114. However, the excess cash balances represent noncompliance with federal cash management requirements and may be subject to further review or repayment if not promptly resolved. Repeat Finding – Yes. This finding was reported in a prior audit and corrective actions were not sufficient to prevent recurrence. Auditor’s Recommendation – We recommend that management: a) Establish and implement formal cash management procedures to ensure federal funds are drawn only to meet immediate cash needs; b) perform regular and timely reconciliations between drawdowns and actual expenditures for each federal program; c) strengthen oversight and monitoring of grant cash balances at both the program and central finance levels; d) provide training to staff responsible for federal drawdowns on federal cash management requirements and e) periodically review spending trends and adjust drawdown practices accordingly. Management should also develop and implement a corrective action plan to address the repeat nature of this finding and ensure sustained compliance with federal regulations. View of Responsible Officials – The College is aware of the findings and has hired additional staff to ensure that past behavior changes through a better understanding of the process. In addition, the College will send additional individuals to Title III Training. The college will ensure that every expenditure has a clear audit trail and that reconciliation is performed monthly. Progress will be tracked on each activity.
Finding 2025-004 - U.S. Department of Education (ED), TRIO Programs (material weakness) Information on the Federal Programs –TRIO Upward Bound, FAL No. 84.047A, June 30, 2025 and TRIO Student Support Services, FAL No. 84.042A, June 30, 2025 Criteria – Federal regulations require recipients of federal awards to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the U.S. Department of Education and the disbursement of those funds. Specifically, 2 CFR §200.305(b) requires non-federal entities to maintain effective cash management procedures to ensure that federal funds are drawn only to meet immediate cash needs for program expenditures. Condition – The institution maintained excess federal cash balances for multiple federal programs at year-end, as follows: TRIO Upward Bound: $95,989 TRIO Student Support Services: $211,218 Federal funds were drawn down in advance of actual program expenditures and were not disbursed within a reasonable period, resulting in excess cash balances that exceeded immediate program needs. Cause – The excess cash balances resulted from inadequate cash management procedures, including: a) lack of timely reconciliation between federal drawdowns and actual expenditures; b) drawdown practices not aligned with immediate cash needs; c) insufficient monitoring and oversight of grant cash balances and d) failure to adjust drawdown amounts based on current spending patterns. Effect – As a result of these deficiencies: a) federal cash was not managed in accordance with 2 CFR §200.305; b) the College was exposed to potential disallowances and increased federal oversight; c) there is an increased risk of questioned costs and repayment of excess funds and d) continued noncompliance may jeopardize future federal funding. Auditor’s Perspective – From the auditor’s perspective, the magnitude of excess cash, particularly within the TRIO program, combined with the repeat nature of the finding, indicates a material weakness in internal control over compliance. Effective cash management controls are fundamental to federal grant compliance, and failure to correct this issue increases the risk of misuse or mismanagement of federal funds. Questioned Costs – $307,207. However, the excess cash balances represent noncompliance with federal cash management requirements and may be subject to further review or repayment if not promptly resolved. Repeat Finding – Yes. This finding was reported in a prior audit and corrective actions were not sufficient to prevent recurrence. Auditor’s Recommendation – We recommend that management: a) Establish and implement formal cash management procedures to ensure federal funds are drawn only to meet immediate cash needs; b) perform regular and timely reconciliations between drawdowns and actual expenditures for each federal program; c) strengthen oversight and monitoring of grant cash balances at both the program and central finance levels; d) provide training to staff responsible for federal drawdowns on federal cash management requirements and e) periodically review spending trends and adjust drawdown practices accordingly. Management should also develop and implement a corrective action plan to address the repeat nature of this finding and ensure sustained compliance with federal regulations. View of Responsible Officials – The College is aware of the past breakdown in Internal controls under the previous Administration and is working closely with the directors to ensure that we do not have any repeat findings in this area. The main tasks that are being performed are hiring of additional staff, constant communication, and timely reconciliation.
Finding 2025-002 – Indirect Cost Reimbursement Noncompliance with Federal Requirement Program: ALN # 84.282M Charter Schools Program Criteria or Specific Requirements In accordance with: •2 CFR §200.403, costs charged to federal awards must be allowable and based on actual activity; •2 CFR §200.414, indirect costs must be calculated by applying the approved rate to actual direct costs incurred; and •2 CFR §200.305(b), under the reimbursement method, federal funds must be drawn only for costs incurred. Condition The Organization requested and received $130,000 of indirect cost reimbursement during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025. However, only $44,575 was supported by actual allowable direct costs incurred during the eligible period April 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025. The excess amount of $85,425 relates to expenditures applicable to a subsequent period. During the audit, management recorded this amount as a grant advance (liability) and did not recognize it as revenue or expense in the current year. Cause Use of budgeted amounts and lack of review controls. Effect Reimbursement requests exceeded allowable costs incurred during the period, resulting in noncompliance. Questioned Costs None, the excess was adjusted to a liability account. Context This exception was noted in 1 of 1 sample selected of indirect cost claims during the period. Recommendation We recommend that the Organization design and implement controls to ensure reimbursements are reviewed and based on actual costs. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan iLearn Schools, Inc. notes that the excess reimbursement of $85,425 was identified, properly recorded as a grant advance liability, and not recognized as revenue or expense in the current year. Going forward, all reimbursement requests will be based on actual allowable direct costs incurred. Management will establish written procedures for indirect cost recovery, implement a formal review and reconciliation process prior to submission, and provide staff training on Uniform Guidance requirements. These corrective actions will be in place for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2026.
Cash Management Federal Program and Specific Federal Award Identification CFDA Title and Number 84.031 Higher Education Institution Aid Federal Award Year June 30, 2025 Federal Agencies U. S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity Not applicable Criteria Pursuant to Uniform Guidance § 200.305, institutions must maintain documentation supporting cash drawdowns and ensure that federal funds are drawn only for immediate cash needs and are supported by underlying expenditures. Conditions and Contexts During my testing, I noted twenty-five (25) transactions out of twenty-five (25) tested in which the University did not provide documentation to support the related drawdown requests. Cause The University did not maintain or provide adequate documentation to support drawdown activity. Questioned Costs For the purposes of this condition, I have not questioned any costs. Effect Without supporting documentation, there is no assurance that drawdowns were made in accordance with federal requirements, increasing the risk of excess cash on hand or unsupported use of federal funds. Repeat Finding No. Recommendation The University should implement procedures to ensure that all drawdowns are properly supported by detailed expenditure records and that documentation is retained and available for audit. Management should also perform periodic reviews of drawdown activity for compliance. Management’s Response The University acknowledges the finding related to missing documentation supporting cash drawdowns for the Higher Education Institutional Aid program. We recognize that federal regulations require all drawdown requests to be supported by underlying expenditures and appropriate supporting records. Corrective Actions 1. Implementation of Required Documentation Procedures The University has established a formal process requiring that all drawdown requests be supported by detailed expenditure reports before funds are drawn. Supporting documentation must be uploaded and retained in a shared electronic repository. 2. Enhanced Review and Approval Controls: Drawdown requests must now undergo a two step review process by Grants Management and the Controller’s Office to ensure compliance with cash management requirements prior to submission. 3. Staff Training: Relevant staff is updating training on Uniform Guidance §200.305 requirements and on maintaining complete documentation to support each drawdown. 4. Ongoing Monitoring: Periodic internal reviews will be conducted to confirm that all future drawdowns are documented, properly supported, and compliant with federal cash management standards. The University believes these actions will strengthen internal controls over cash drawdowns and ensure compliance with federal regulations moving forward.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE PUBLIC SAFETY PARTNERSHIP AND COMMUNITY POLICING GRANT- AL NUMBER 16.710 AUDIT PERIOD - YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2025 2025-001. Cash Management Criteria or specific requirement: Advance payments must be limited to the minimum amounts needed and be timed to be in accordance with the actual, immediate cash requirements of the recipient, as specified in 2 CFR § 200.305(b)(1). The 2024 COPS Office School Violence Prevention Program (SVPP) Award Owner's Manual states the period allowed for advance payments is 10 days, and any interest earned on federal advance payments deposited in interest-bearing accounts that is in excess of $500 per year must be remitted annually to the Department of Health and Human Services Payment Management System. Condition: The District requested and received a federal drawdown of $400,352 from their COPS School Violence Prevention Program (Program) award on December 3, 2024. The Program allows for a 10-day period for federal advance payments. Following the allowable 10-day period, the District had $344,102 of excess federal award funds on hand. The remaining funds were spent from January 28, 2025 to February 11, 2025. Cause: Lack of internal controls over the timing of the drawdown and disbursement of award costs. Effect or potential effect: The failure to properly monitor drawdowns and limit the time between drawdown and disbursement could result in program noncompliance and loss of program funds. In addition, excess drawdowns can lead to interest earned on federal advance payments, which must be returned in excess of $500 per year. Questioned costs: None Context: In November 2024, the District requested a drawdown of the entire COPS grant award in the amount of $400,352, with $56,250 being expended prior to the request. The drawdown was received by the District on December 3, 2024. The remaining $344,102 was disbursed by the District from January 28, 2025 through February 11, 2025. Identification as a repeat finding: No Recommendation: The District should implement procedures to ensure drawdowns are timed with the District's immediate cash requirements and consult with the Department of Justice COPS Office. Views of responsible officials: The District will implement procedures to ensure drawdowns are timed with the District's immediate cash requirements.
CFDA Number: 93.224 Federal Program or Cluster: Health Center Program Cluster Grantor Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Award Identification: H8FCS41177 Compliance Requirements: Cash Management Type of Finding: Noncompliance/Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Questioned Costs: None Criteria: Per 2 CFR Part 200, Section 200.305, Federal payment, "payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency...and the disbursement of funds by the recipient… 2 CFR Part 200, Section 200.302(b)(6) also requires written procedures to implement the requirements of Section 200.305. Per HHS Grant Policy Statement: “In accordance with Dept of Treasury regulations, you must draw federal cash only for your immediate needs. At the time of draw down, you will certify you will not hold cash beyond three working days… Do not request cash to cover unliquidated encumbrances, obligation, or accrued expenditures until payment is pending”. Condition: On June 30, 2024, the Organization drew the remaining H8F funds of $1,253,464, and recorded this amount as a credit to a balance sheet account, indicating these were unspent or unearned grant funds. Throughout the year ended May 31, 2025, as expenditures were made, the Organization recorded debits to this balance sheet account, crediting a grant revenue account. The Organization's internal controls over compliance failed to prevent, or detect and correct, this noncompliance. Cause: Organization personnel were not aware of the cash management compliance requirement with respect to this federal award. The Organization's previous CEO retired approximately May 31, 2024. Per inquiry of the Organizaton's CFO, their understanding was that the deadline to obligate for this federal award was December 31, 2024, and the deadline to expend or liquidate was December 31, 2026, and they were spreading it out to what they thought was the deadline. Effect or Potential Effect: By drawing federal award funds prior to expenditure, the Organization did not comply with the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200, Section 200.305, Federal payment and of the HHS Grants Policy Statement. Context: Draws for this Federal award were taken in July, 2024 for $1,270,464. We requested supporting detail of the $1,270,464 expenditures made during the year for this Federal award as reported in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We received a spreadsheet that contained a list of 26 descriptions and amounts, but no transactional detail such as check numbers, check dates, payee, invoice number, invoice date, etc. After determining the check numbers and check dates for 9 of the 26 items in the spreadsheet, we noted that disburesments for 8 of those 9 occurred more than 3 days after the date the draw, with 2 disbursements made more than 5 months after the date of the draw. Repeat Finding? No Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization provide grants management training to all its financial staff and management covering the Uniform Guidance/OMB Guidance for Federal Financial Assistance. We also recommend that the Organization develop and implement policies and procedures that ensure grant funds are drawn at the time of, or following, expenditures for allowable costs by the Organization. These policies and procedures should include that, for each draw from a Federal award, 1) detailed documentation of the expenditures for which the grant funds are being drawn is prepared prior requesting the draw, including transactional details such as vendor, invoice number, invoice amount, check number, check date, payee, and check amount; 2) that the documentation supporting the draw is reviewed and approved by a member of management (other than the person who prepares the documentation) prior to requesting the draw, and 3) that the documentation supported each draw is maintained as part of the Organization's accounting records. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. We have never received proper training. See Corrective Action Plan for Reference 2025-005.
2025-001: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes for Health Research and Development Cluster, Cancer Control, Assistance Listing #93.399; Lack of Required Written Policies Condition Montana Cancer Consortium (the Consortium) does not have written policies and procedures in place as required by 2 CFR § 200.302 and § 200.313. Specifically, the Consortium lacks documented policies for: • The timing of federal cash draws; • The allowability of costs charged to federal awards; and • Documentation of time-and-effort for personal services. Criteria 2 CFR § 200.302(b)(6)–(7) requires nonfederal entities to have written procedures for: (a) cash drawdowns and (b) determining cost allowability. § 200.305 requires written cash-management procedures that minimize the time between draw and disbursement. § 200.430 requires a written policy that is consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities for documentation of compensation for personal services. Context At the time of completion of the audit for the year ended May 31, 2025, the written policies were not in place. We noted that the policies were implemented on December 1, 2025, which was after the fiscal year under audit had ended. Cause The Consortium has not yet developed or adopted the required written policies due to limited administrative capacity and reliance on informal practices. Effect The absence of written policies increases the risk of noncompliance with federal requirements, mismanagement of federal funds, and audit findings in future periods. It may also impair the Consortium’s ability to consistently apply federal cost principles and properly safeguard assets. Recommendation We recommend that the Consortium develop and implement written policies and procedures that comply with the requirements of Uniform Guidance. Management Response See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding Number: 2025-001 Award Identification: Assistance listing program title and number: NSF Technology, Innovation, and Partnerships – 47.084 Federal award identification number: 2303493 Award Date: May 9, 2023 Name of the federal agency: National Science Foundation Repeat Finding: No Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs related to this finding Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Cash Management Criteria: Section 2 CFR 200.305 establishes the requirements over the management of federal payments. Under this regulation, the grantee must minimize the time lapse between the draw down of federal funds and the disbursement of those funds as well as demonstrate written procedures and a system of financial management that meets control and accountability requirements. Condition: While testing of internal controls over cash management it was noted that the Center did not follow the procedures in place for the draw down of federal funds. Cause: The Center was guided by the NSF program manager to draw down the funds as they became available in accordance with the grant agreement as opposed to following procedures in accordance with Section 2 CFR 200.305. Effect: The Center did not incur the costs in-line with the draw down of federal funds. Recommendation: We recommend the Center follow cash management procedures in accordance with Section 2 CFR 200.305. These procedures should ensure that funds are drawn on a reimbursement basis, supported by actual expenditures incurred or very soon to be incurred and paid. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and has committed to a corrective action plan.
Material Weakness Finding: 2025-002 Cash Management – Federal Grants Federal Programs: Department of Health and Human Services Rural Health Care Services Outreach, Rural Health Network Development and Small Health Care Provider Quality Improvement Assistance Listing No. 93.912 Criteria: Cash Management, 2 CFR 200.305(b)(1) Condition: The Organization did not reconcile federal grant expenditures in a timely manner, resulting in a lack of draws of federal funds for which qualifying expenditures had been made prior to the end of the Organization’s financial statement year end. This resulted in unrecorded revenue and receivables of approximately $224,564 at March 31, 2025. Without proper reconciliations and timely draws of federal grant funds, the Organization could be impacted by lost federal funding. Cause: The Organization did not reconcile federal grant expenditures or make federal grant draws in a timely manner. Effect: The Organization failed to properly recognize federal grant revenue and receivables of $224,564. Questioned Costs: None Context/Sampling: Not applicable. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: The Organization should ensure that qualifying expenditures are reconciled, recorded in the Organization’s financial statements, and drawn from the Payment Management System in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization understands the importance of timely reconciliations of federal grant expenditures and timely draws of federal grant funds. The Organization will review its processes and procedures to ensure that federal grants are reconciled in a timely manner. Contact Person: Brian Morton, CFO Anticipated Date of Completion: November 30, 2025
Material Weakness Finding: 2025-002 Cash Management – Federal Grants Federal Programs: Department of Health and Human Services Health Center Program Cluster Assistance Listing No. - 93.224 and 93.527 Department of Health and Human Services Grants for Capital Development in Health Centers Assistance Listing No.- 93.526 Criteria: Cash Management, 2 CFR 200.305(b)(1) Condition: The Organization made three draws of federal funds for which qualifying expenditures were not made prior to the end of the Organization’s financial statement year end. This resulted in excess federal cash on hand at March 31, 2025. The Organization is required to incur qualifying expenditures prior to drawing funds from the U.S. Treasury. Cause: The Organization made drawdowns of federal grant funds for which qualifying expenditures were not incurred. Effect: The Organization held excess federal cash due to lack of qualifying expenditures. Questioned Costs: $430,732. Context/Sampling: Out of 39 drawdowns during the fiscal year, three of the drawdowns were received for expenditures that had yet to be incurred and paid. The finding appears to be a systemic issue. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: The Organization should ensure that qualifying expenditures are incurred prior to making the related draws of funds from the U.S. Treasury. Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization understands the requirements to incur qualifying expenditures prior to drawing funds from the U.S. Treasury. Procedures will be established to ensure that excess federal cash is not held by the Organization. Contact Person: Dr. Aretha Powers, CEO Anticipated Date of Completion: November 30, 2025
2025-004 Cash Management (repeat of finding 2024-008) Program Information Federal Organization U.S Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing Numbers 93.224 & 93.527 Health Center Program Cluster Award Numbers H80CS00513, H8FCS41684 Criteria [X] Compliance Finding [ ] Significant Deficiency [X] Material Weakness Title 2 CFR 200.305 requires that organizations “must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-federal entity whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer, or issuance or redemption of checks, warrants, or payment by other means.” Condition The Organization did not maintain supporting documentation for cash draws made from the Payment Management System (PMS). This finding appears to be a systemic problem. Cause The Organization’s internal controls over cash management and PMS draws does not include procedures for non-payroll expenditures. As a result, draws were made without supporting documentation. In addition, the Organization did not always maintain documentation of the payroll calculations supporting draws, as required by company policy. Effect The Organization may not have minimized the timing between draws from the PMS and the related payments for expenditures incurred as required. Questioned Costs None noted. Context Out of seven draws tested, the Organization was not able to provide any supporting documentation or expenditure detail to support two draws. Due to this, we were unable to verify the time elapsing between the funds transfer from the PMS system and the disbursement of funds. Recommendation We recommend the Organization implement controls requiring all draws from the PMS to be based on detailed reports of expenditures claimed for reimbursement and retain this documentation along with the supporting invoices and payroll reports supporting the expenditures to be paid or reimbursed. In addition, we recommend that the listing of expenditures be reviewed by qualified personnel to ensure that the expenditures claimed are allowable and cash payments for the expenditures are made before the date of the draw or within a reasonable time after the draw. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action Management is in agreement with this finding and will take corrective action as outlined below.
2025-004 Cash Management (repeat of finding 2024-008) Program Information Federal Organization U.S Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing Numbers 93.224 & 93.527 Health Center Program Cluster Award Numbers H80CS00513, H8FCS41684 Criteria [X] Compliance Finding [ ] Significant Deficiency [X] Material Weakness Title 2 CFR 200.305 requires that organizations “must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-federal entity whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer, or issuance or redemption of checks, warrants, or payment by other means.” Condition The Organization did not maintain supporting documentation for cash draws made from the Payment Management System (PMS). This finding appears to be a systemic problem. Cause The Organization’s internal controls over cash management and PMS draws does not include procedures for non-payroll expenditures. As a result, draws were made without supporting documentation. In addition, the Organization did not always maintain documentation of the payroll calculations supporting draws, as required by company policy. Effect The Organization may not have minimized the timing between draws from the PMS and the related payments for expenditures incurred as required. Questioned Costs None noted. Context Out of seven draws tested, the Organization was not able to provide any supporting documentation or expenditure detail to support two draws. Due to this, we were unable to verify the time elapsing between the funds transfer from the PMS system and the disbursement of funds. Recommendation We recommend the Organization implement controls requiring all draws from the PMS to be based on detailed reports of expenditures claimed for reimbursement and retain this documentation along with the supporting invoices and payroll reports supporting the expenditures to be paid or reimbursed. In addition, we recommend that the listing of expenditures be reviewed by qualified personnel to ensure that the expenditures claimed are allowable and cash payments for the expenditures are made before the date of the draw or within a reasonable time after the draw. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action Management is in agreement with this finding and will take corrective action as outlined below.
U.S. Department of Transportation – AL #20.106 Airport Improvement Program – Reporting Grant Award: 3-38-0022-064-2022 Criteria The Authority is required to submit payment requests using the DOT Electronic Grants payment system, Delphi e-Invoicing. These requests must meet the standards described in 2 CFR ss 200.302 and 200.305. Additionally, Authority is required to submit annual SF-425 reports within 90 days of the end of the federal fiscal year. Condition During review of submitted Request for Reimbursements and Outlay reports, it was noted that one request submitted was not accurately prepared as there was one instance in which the amount requested was greater than invoice documentation, additionally the request included a request for reimbursement of AIP ineligible costs. As of December 31, 2024 no funds have been returned to U.S. DOT. It was also noted that multiple annual SF-425 reports were submitted late. Questioned Costs N/A Context We reviewed the project financial summary for two of the 19 requests submitted during 2024 and SF-425 reports for all open grants. Cause Employee oversight. Effect The Authority could have had federal funding delayed or reduced. Recommendation We recommend that the Authority implement internal controls to ensure all reporting is accurately filed. Repeat Finding Yes. Prior audit finding 2023-003. Views of Responsible Officials Management recognizes the deficiency and plans to implement the auditor’s recommendation.
U.S. Department of Transportation – AL #20.106 Airport Improvement Program – Reporting Grant Award: 3-38-0022-064-2022 Criteria The Authority is required to submit payment requests using the DOT Electronic Grants payment system, Delphi e-Invoicing. These requests must meet the standards described in 2 CFR ss 200.302 and 200.305. Additionally, Authority is required to submit annual SF-425 reports within 90 days of the end of the federal fiscal year. Condition During review of submitted Request for Reimbursements and Outlay reports, it was noted that one request submitted was not accurately prepared as there was one instance in which the amount requested was greater than invoice documentation, additionally the request included a request for reimbursement of AIP ineligible costs. As of December 31, 2024 no funds have been returned to U.S. DOT. It was also noted that multiple annual SF-425 reports were submitted late. Questioned Costs N/A Context We reviewed the project financial summary for two of the 19 requests submitted during 2024 and SF-425 reports for all open grants. Cause Employee oversight. Effect The Authority could have had federal funding delayed or reduced. Recommendation We recommend that the Authority implement internal controls to ensure all reporting is accurately filed. Repeat Finding Yes. Prior audit finding 2023-003. Views of Responsible Officials Management recognizes the deficiency and plans to implement the auditor’s recommendation.
2024-002 Twenty-First Century Community Learning Centers – Assistance Listing No. 84.287 Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance and Noncompliance – Appropriate Review of Expenditures Claimed B. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and C. Cash Management Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.403(e), expenses must be determined under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) to be considered allowable unless otherwise noted in 2 CFR 200. In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.305(b), the draws under reimbursable grants must be limited to the minimum amount needed and drawn down after expenses have incurred. Condition and Context: During our testing of expenses charged to the federal program, we identified one transaction which the Organization prepaid for services to be rendered in 2025. The prepaid expense were charged to the SEFA in 2024 which does not match when they should be recognized as expenses under GAAP. The expenses were claimed for reimbursement prior to being incurred based on GAAP. Total questioned costs for this instance were $8,750. The population was considered the month of December as these were went the prepayments were made. The error rate for the defined population was 93.85% resulting in likely questioned costs of $14,393. Our sample was not statistically valid. Cause and Effect: The issue appears to have resulted from a lack of adequate review procedures to ensure that expenses charged to the federal award align with recognition under GAAP. As a result, the entity claimed expenditures which may be unallowable. Claimed expenditures which may be unallowable and drawn prior to being incurred. Recommendation: We recommend that management strengthen its review procedures over expense cutoff to ensure that expenditures are recognized on the SEFA in alignment with GAAP and are drawn down appropriately under the cost reimbursement method. Additionally, training should be provided to accounting personnel on Uniform Guidance compliance and GAAP requirements related to expense recognition. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: We agree with the recommendation and plan to have the corrective action implemented by August 2025.
2024-005 - Lack of Written Federal Policies and Procedures Required by Uniform Guidance Finding Type: Material weakness in internal control over compliance Federal Program: 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Condition/Finding: The Village has not developed or implemented the written policies and procedures required under the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Required documentation is absent in areas such as internal controls over compliance, cash management, procurement, and allowable costs. Criteria: Per 2 CFR §200.303 and related sections (including §§200.305 and 200.318–320), non-federal entities expending federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal controls and must document policies and procedures governing compliance with applicable federal statutes, regulations, and terms of award. Cause: The Village has not formally developed Uniform Guidance-compliant policies due to limited administrative resources and competing operational priorities. Effect: The absence of formal written policies and procedures increases the risk of inconsistent or noncompliant treatment of federal expenditures. Without documented controls and expectations, the Village may fail to detect or prevent noncompliance with federal requirements in key grant administration areas. Recommendation: We recommend that the Village adopt written policies and procedures addressing the specific requirements outlined in the Uniform Guidance. These policies should include, but not be limited to, internal controls over compliance, procurement, cash management, subrecipient monitoring (if applicable), and allowable cost determinations. Management should ensure that these policies are communicated and periodically reviewed. View of Responsible Officials: Management’s response and planned corrective action can be found in the accompanying Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR §200.305(b), when a non-federal entity receives advance payments of federal funds, it must deposit those funds in interest-bearing accounts, unless certain exceptions apply, and must remit any interest earned on advances in excess of $500 per year to the federal agency. Furthermore, advance payments should be segregated to ensure proper tracking and safeguarding of federal funds. Condition: During our audit of the Organization’s federal awards, we identified deficiencies in the grantee’s cash management procedures related to advance payments received from federal awarding agencies. Specifically, the grantee did not segregate advance payments into separate insured interestbearing accounts as required by the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The Organization did not have adequate policies and procedures or internal controls in place to ensure compliance with the cash management requirements related to advance payments. Effect: The federal awarding agency did not receive interest that could have been earned on the advances. All advances received during 2024 were expended by December 31, 2024. There was no loss from uninsured funds or from lack of segregating funds into separate accounts. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization implement policies and procedures to ensure that all advance payments are deposited into separate, insured, interest-bearing accounts as required. The Organization should also establish controls to track interest earned on these accounts and remit amounts due to the federal awarding agencies in a timely manner. Training should be provided to staff responsible for cash management to ensure ongoing compliance with federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and procedures have been implemented to address the related issues.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR §200.305(b), when a non-federal entity receives advance payments of federal funds, it must deposit those funds in interest-bearing accounts, unless certain exceptions apply, and must remit any interest earned on advances in excess of $500 per year to the federal agency. Furthermore, advance payments should be segregated to ensure proper tracking and safeguarding of federal funds. Condition: During our audit of the Organization’s federal awards, we identified deficiencies in the grantee’s cash management procedures related to advance payments received from federal awarding agencies. Specifically, the grantee did not segregate advance payments into separate insured interestbearing accounts as required by the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The Organization did not have adequate policies and procedures or internal controls in place to ensure compliance with the cash management requirements related to advance payments. Effect: The federal awarding agency did not receive interest that could have been earned on the advances. All advances received during 2024 were expended by December 31, 2024. There was no loss from uninsured funds or from lack of segregating funds into separate accounts. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization implement policies and procedures to ensure that all advance payments are deposited into separate, insured, interest-bearing accounts as required. The Organization should also establish controls to track interest earned on these accounts and remit amounts due to the federal awarding agencies in a timely manner. Training should be provided to staff responsible for cash management to ensure ongoing compliance with federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and procedures have been implemented to address the related issues.
2024-004: Written Policies and Procedures – Significant Deficiency Criteria and Condition: 2 CFR 200.302 requires that the recipient or subrecipient’s financial management system must provide written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 (Federal payments) and for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.318 requires that the recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under a Federal award or subaward, including for acquisition of property or services. Context: Although the Organization follows procedures that minimize the time between reimbursement of dollars and expenditure (2 CFR 200.305), verify payments made are in accordance with subpart E and terms and conditions of the award, and follow procurement standards for vendors, there are no written procedures as required by the CFR. Cause and Effect: The Organization did not maintain written procedures as required by the CFR. Questioned Costs: This finding does not result in questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization formally document the current policies and procedures in place to meet documentation requirements of the CFR. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We will adopt formal policies and procedures that document our current practices and also meet the requirements of the CFR.
2024-004: Written Policies and Procedures – Significant Deficiency Criteria and Condition: 2 CFR 200.302 requires that the recipient or subrecipient’s financial management system must provide written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 (Federal payments) and for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.318 requires that the recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under a Federal award or subaward, including for acquisition of property or services. Context: Although the Organization follows procedures that minimize the time between reimbursement of dollars and expenditure (2 CFR 200.305), verify payments made are in accordance with subpart E and terms and conditions of the award, and follow procurement standards for vendors, there are no written procedures as required by the CFR. Cause and Effect: The Organization did not maintain written procedures as required by the CFR. Questioned Costs: This finding does not result in questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization formally document the current policies and procedures in place to meet documentation requirements of the CFR. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We will adopt formal policies and procedures that document our current practices and also meet the requirements of the CFR.
U.S. Department of Transportation – AL #20.106 Airport Improvement Program – Reporting Grant Award: 3-38-0022-064-2022 Criteria The Authority is required to submit payment requests using the DOT Electronic Grants payment system, Delphi e-Invoicing. These requests must meet the standards described in 2 CFR ss 200.302 and 200.305. Additionally, Authority is required to submit annual SF-425 reports within 90 days of the end of the federal fiscal year. Condition During review of submitted Request for Reimbursements and Outlay reports, it was noted that one request submitted was not accurately prepared as there was one instance in which the amount requested was greater than invoice documentation, additionally the request included a request for reimbursement of AIP ineligible costs. As of December 31, 2024 no funds have been returned to U.S. DOT. It was also noted that multiple annual SF-425 reports were submitted late. Questioned Costs N/A Context We reviewed the project financial summary for two of the 19 requests submitted during 2024 and SF-425 reports for all open grants. Cause Employee oversight. Effect The Authority could have had federal funding delayed or reduced. Recommendation We recommend that the Authority implement internal controls to ensure all reporting is accurately filed. Repeat Finding Yes. Prior audit finding 2023-003. Views of Responsible Officials Management recognizes the deficiency and plans to implement the auditor’s recommendation.
U.S. Department of Transportation – AL #20.106 Airport Improvement Program – Reporting Grant Award: 3-38-0022-064-2022 Criteria The Authority is required to submit payment requests using the DOT Electronic Grants payment system, Delphi e-Invoicing. These requests must meet the standards described in 2 CFR ss 200.302 and 200.305. Additionally, Authority is required to submit annual SF-425 reports within 90 days of the end of the federal fiscal year. Condition During review of submitted Request for Reimbursements and Outlay reports, it was noted that one request submitted was not accurately prepared as there was one instance in which the amount requested was greater than invoice documentation, additionally the request included a request for reimbursement of AIP ineligible costs. As of December 31, 2024 no funds have been returned to U.S. DOT. It was also noted that multiple annual SF-425 reports were submitted late. Questioned Costs N/A Context We reviewed the project financial summary for two of the 19 requests submitted during 2024 and SF-425 reports for all open grants. Cause Employee oversight. Effect The Authority could have had federal funding delayed or reduced. Recommendation We recommend that the Authority implement internal controls to ensure all reporting is accurately filed. Repeat Finding Yes. Prior audit finding 2023-003. Views of Responsible Officials Management recognizes the deficiency and plans to implement the auditor’s recommendation.
2024-002 Twenty-First Century Community Learning Centers – Assistance Listing No. 84.287 Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance and Noncompliance – Appropriate Review of Expenditures Claimed B. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and C. Cash Management Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.403(e), expenses must be determined under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) to be considered allowable unless otherwise noted in 2 CFR 200. In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.305(b), the draws under reimbursable grants must be limited to the minimum amount needed and drawn down after expenses have incurred. Condition and Context: During our testing of expenses charged to the federal program, we identified one transaction which the Organization prepaid for services to be rendered in 2025. The prepaid expense were charged to the SEFA in 2024 which does not match when they should be recognized as expenses under GAAP. The expenses were claimed for reimbursement prior to being incurred based on GAAP. Total questioned costs for this instance were $8,750. The population was considered the month of December as these were went the prepayments were made. The error rate for the defined population was 93.85% resulting in likely questioned costs of $14,393. Our sample was not statistically valid. Cause and Effect: The issue appears to have resulted from a lack of adequate review procedures to ensure that expenses charged to the federal award align with recognition under GAAP. As a result, the entity claimed expenditures which may be unallowable. Claimed expenditures which may be unallowable and drawn prior to being incurred. Recommendation: We recommend that management strengthen its review procedures over expense cutoff to ensure that expenditures are recognized on the SEFA in alignment with GAAP and are drawn down appropriately under the cost reimbursement method. Additionally, training should be provided to accounting personnel on Uniform Guidance compliance and GAAP requirements related to expense recognition. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: We agree with the recommendation and plan to have the corrective action implemented by August 2025.
2024-005 - Lack of Written Federal Policies and Procedures Required by Uniform Guidance Finding Type: Material weakness in internal control over compliance Federal Program: 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Condition/Finding: The Village has not developed or implemented the written policies and procedures required under the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Required documentation is absent in areas such as internal controls over compliance, cash management, procurement, and allowable costs. Criteria: Per 2 CFR §200.303 and related sections (including §§200.305 and 200.318–320), non-federal entities expending federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal controls and must document policies and procedures governing compliance with applicable federal statutes, regulations, and terms of award. Cause: The Village has not formally developed Uniform Guidance-compliant policies due to limited administrative resources and competing operational priorities. Effect: The absence of formal written policies and procedures increases the risk of inconsistent or noncompliant treatment of federal expenditures. Without documented controls and expectations, the Village may fail to detect or prevent noncompliance with federal requirements in key grant administration areas. Recommendation: We recommend that the Village adopt written policies and procedures addressing the specific requirements outlined in the Uniform Guidance. These policies should include, but not be limited to, internal controls over compliance, procurement, cash management, subrecipient monitoring (if applicable), and allowable cost determinations. Management should ensure that these policies are communicated and periodically reviewed. View of Responsible Officials: Management’s response and planned corrective action can be found in the accompanying Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR §200.305(b), when a non-federal entity receives advance payments of federal funds, it must deposit those funds in interest-bearing accounts, unless certain exceptions apply, and must remit any interest earned on advances in excess of $500 per year to the federal agency. Furthermore, advance payments should be segregated to ensure proper tracking and safeguarding of federal funds. Condition: During our audit of the Organization’s federal awards, we identified deficiencies in the grantee’s cash management procedures related to advance payments received from federal awarding agencies. Specifically, the grantee did not segregate advance payments into separate insured interestbearing accounts as required by the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The Organization did not have adequate policies and procedures or internal controls in place to ensure compliance with the cash management requirements related to advance payments. Effect: The federal awarding agency did not receive interest that could have been earned on the advances. All advances received during 2024 were expended by December 31, 2024. There was no loss from uninsured funds or from lack of segregating funds into separate accounts. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization implement policies and procedures to ensure that all advance payments are deposited into separate, insured, interest-bearing accounts as required. The Organization should also establish controls to track interest earned on these accounts and remit amounts due to the federal awarding agencies in a timely manner. Training should be provided to staff responsible for cash management to ensure ongoing compliance with federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and procedures have been implemented to address the related issues.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR §200.305(b), when a non-federal entity receives advance payments of federal funds, it must deposit those funds in interest-bearing accounts, unless certain exceptions apply, and must remit any interest earned on advances in excess of $500 per year to the federal agency. Furthermore, advance payments should be segregated to ensure proper tracking and safeguarding of federal funds. Condition: During our audit of the Organization’s federal awards, we identified deficiencies in the grantee’s cash management procedures related to advance payments received from federal awarding agencies. Specifically, the grantee did not segregate advance payments into separate insured interestbearing accounts as required by the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The Organization did not have adequate policies and procedures or internal controls in place to ensure compliance with the cash management requirements related to advance payments. Effect: The federal awarding agency did not receive interest that could have been earned on the advances. All advances received during 2024 were expended by December 31, 2024. There was no loss from uninsured funds or from lack of segregating funds into separate accounts. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization implement policies and procedures to ensure that all advance payments are deposited into separate, insured, interest-bearing accounts as required. The Organization should also establish controls to track interest earned on these accounts and remit amounts due to the federal awarding agencies in a timely manner. Training should be provided to staff responsible for cash management to ensure ongoing compliance with federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and procedures have been implemented to address the related issues.
2024-004: Written Policies and Procedures – Significant Deficiency Criteria and Condition: 2 CFR 200.302 requires that the recipient or subrecipient’s financial management system must provide written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 (Federal payments) and for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.318 requires that the recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under a Federal award or subaward, including for acquisition of property or services. Context: Although the Organization follows procedures that minimize the time between reimbursement of dollars and expenditure (2 CFR 200.305), verify payments made are in accordance with subpart E and terms and conditions of the award, and follow procurement standards for vendors, there are no written procedures as required by the CFR. Cause and Effect: The Organization did not maintain written procedures as required by the CFR. Questioned Costs: This finding does not result in questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization formally document the current policies and procedures in place to meet documentation requirements of the CFR. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We will adopt formal policies and procedures that document our current practices and also meet the requirements of the CFR.
2024-004: Written Policies and Procedures – Significant Deficiency Criteria and Condition: 2 CFR 200.302 requires that the recipient or subrecipient’s financial management system must provide written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 (Federal payments) and for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.318 requires that the recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under a Federal award or subaward, including for acquisition of property or services. Context: Although the Organization follows procedures that minimize the time between reimbursement of dollars and expenditure (2 CFR 200.305), verify payments made are in accordance with subpart E and terms and conditions of the award, and follow procurement standards for vendors, there are no written procedures as required by the CFR. Cause and Effect: The Organization did not maintain written procedures as required by the CFR. Questioned Costs: This finding does not result in questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization formally document the current policies and procedures in place to meet documentation requirements of the CFR. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We will adopt formal policies and procedures that document our current practices and also meet the requirements of the CFR.
2 CFR § 300 codified in 45 CFR part 75 and gives regulatory effect to the Department of Health and Human Services 2 CFR § 200; while 2 CFR § 400 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Agriculture for 2 CFR § 200. 2 CFR § 200.302(b)(6) states the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR § 200.305 for Payment. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7) requires written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E-Cost Principles of this part and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 states that costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. 2 CFR 200.431 requires established written leave policies if the entity intends to pay fringe benefits. 2 CFR 200.464(a)(2) requires reimbursement of relocation costs to employees be in accordance with an established written policy must be consistently followed by the employer. 2 CFR 200.475 requires reimbursement and/or charges to be consistent with those normally allowed in like circumstances in the non-Federal entity's non-federally-funded activities and in accordance with non-Federal entity's written travel reimbursement policies. Additionally, for Federal awards, the Uniform Guidance requires a written policy for the procurement requirements outlined in 2 CFR § 200.318(c)(1), 2 CFR § 200.318(c)(2), and 2 CFR § 200.320(B). The Board of Health did not have written policies as required by the Uniform Guidance as they were not aware of the requirements. The failure to implement written policies as required by the Uniform Guidance could result in noncompliance with the District’s federal programs. The Board of Health should adopt written policies in accordance with the Uniform Guidance to help improve internal controls over federal compliance.
2 CFR § 300 codified in 45 CFR part 75 and gives regulatory effect to the Department of Health and Human Services 2 CFR § 200; while 2 CFR § 400 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Agriculture for 2 CFR § 200. 2 CFR § 200.302(b)(6) states the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR § 200.305 for Payment. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7) requires written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E-Cost Principles of this part and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 states that costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. 2 CFR 200.431 requires established written leave policies if the entity intends to pay fringe benefits. 2 CFR 200.464(a)(2) requires reimbursement of relocation costs to employees be in accordance with an established written policy must be consistently followed by the employer. 2 CFR 200.475 requires reimbursement and/or charges to be consistent with those normally allowed in like circumstances in the non-Federal entity's non-federally-funded activities and in accordance with non-Federal entity's written travel reimbursement policies. Additionally, for Federal awards, the Uniform Guidance requires a written policy for the procurement requirements outlined in 2 CFR § 200.318(c)(1), 2 CFR § 200.318(c)(2), and 2 CFR § 200.320(B). The Board of Health did not have written policies as required by the Uniform Guidance as they were not aware of the requirements. The failure to implement written policies as required by the Uniform Guidance could result in noncompliance with the District’s federal programs. The Board of Health should adopt written policies in accordance with the Uniform Guidance to help improve internal controls over federal compliance.
2 CFR § 300 codified in 45 CFR part 75 and gives regulatory effect to the Department of Health and Human Services 2 CFR § 200; while 2 CFR § 400 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Agriculture for 2 CFR § 200. 2 CFR § 200.302(b)(6) states the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR § 200.305 for Payment. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7) requires written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E-Cost Principles of this part and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 states that costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. 2 CFR 200.431 requires established written leave policies if the entity intends to pay fringe benefits. 2 CFR 200.464(a)(2) requires reimbursement of relocation costs to employees be in accordance with an established written policy must be consistently followed by the employer. 2 CFR 200.475 requires reimbursement and/or charges to be consistent with those normally allowed in like circumstances in the non-Federal entity's non-federally-funded activities and in accordance with non-Federal entity's written travel reimbursement policies. Additionally, for Federal awards, the Uniform Guidance requires a written policy for the procurement requirements outlined in 2 CFR § 200.318(c)(1), 2 CFR § 200.318(c)(2), and 2 CFR § 200.320(B). The Board of Health did not have written policies as required by the Uniform Guidance as they were not aware of the requirements. The failure to implement written policies as required by the Uniform Guidance could result in noncompliance with the District’s federal programs. The Board of Health should adopt written policies in accordance with the Uniform Guidance to help improve internal controls over federal compliance.
2 CFR § 300 codified in 45 CFR part 75 and gives regulatory effect to the Department of Health and Human Services 2 CFR § 200; while 2 CFR § 400 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Agriculture for 2 CFR § 200. 2 CFR § 200.302(b)(6) states the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR § 200.305 for Payment. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7) requires written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E-Cost Principles of this part and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 states that costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. 2 CFR 200.431 requires established written leave policies if the entity intends to pay fringe benefits. 2 CFR 200.464(a)(2) requires reimbursement of relocation costs to employees be in accordance with an established written policy must be consistently followed by the employer. 2 CFR 200.475 requires reimbursement and/or charges to be consistent with those normally allowed in like circumstances in the non-Federal entity's non-federally-funded activities and in accordance with non-Federal entity's written travel reimbursement policies. Additionally, for Federal awards, the Uniform Guidance requires a written policy for the procurement requirements outlined in 2 CFR § 200.318(c)(1), 2 CFR § 200.318(c)(2), and 2 CFR § 200.320(B). The Board of Health did not have written policies as required by the Uniform Guidance as they were not aware of the requirements. The failure to implement written policies as required by the Uniform Guidance could result in noncompliance with the District’s federal programs. The Board of Health should adopt written policies in accordance with the Uniform Guidance to help improve internal controls over federal compliance.
2 CFR § 300 codified in 45 CFR part 75 and gives regulatory effect to the Department of Health and Human Services 2 CFR § 200; while 2 CFR § 400 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Agriculture for 2 CFR § 200. 2 CFR § 200.302(b)(6) states the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR § 200.305 for Payment. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7) requires written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E-Cost Principles of this part and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 states that costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. 2 CFR 200.431 requires established written leave policies if the entity intends to pay fringe benefits. 2 CFR 200.464(a)(2) requires reimbursement of relocation costs to employees be in accordance with an established written policy must be consistently followed by the employer. 2 CFR 200.475 requires reimbursement and/or charges to be consistent with those normally allowed in like circumstances in the non-Federal entity's non-federally-funded activities and in accordance with non-Federal entity's written travel reimbursement policies. Additionally, for Federal awards, the Uniform Guidance requires a written policy for the procurement requirements outlined in 2 CFR § 200.318(c)(1), 2 CFR § 200.318(c)(2), and 2 CFR § 200.320(B). The Board of Health did not have written policies as required by the Uniform Guidance as they were not aware of the requirements. The failure to implement written policies as required by the Uniform Guidance could result in noncompliance with the District’s federal programs. The Board of Health should adopt written policies in accordance with the Uniform Guidance to help improve internal controls over federal compliance.
Internal control deficiency and noncompliance over cash management related to advance payments. Identification of the federal program: Assistance Listing Number 84.116Z: • Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education • U.S. Department of Education • Federal award identification number – P116Z230323 • Federal award year – June 1, 2023 to May 31, 2026 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart D, 200.303 Internal controls. The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart D, 200.305(b) Federal payment. (b) Payments for recipients and subrecipients other than States. For recipients and subrecipients other than States, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency or the pass-through entity and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or subrecipient regardless of whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer or by other means. Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart D, 200.305(b) Federal payment. (b) (1) Advance payments to a recipient or subrecipient must be limited to the minimum amounts needed and be timed with actual, immediate cash requirements of the recipient or subrecipient in carrying out the purpose of the approved program or project. The timing and amount of advance payments must be as close as is administratively feasible to the actual disbursements by the recipient or subrecipient for direct program or project costs and the proportionate share of any allowable indirect costs. Condition: During our testing over cash management, we observed management used the advance method for cash management; however, the entity did not minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the U.S. Treasury and disbursement by the entity. Management submitted and received an advance method payment for the full amount of the federal award in June of 2024. However, there were expenditures incurred between July and December 2024 which were incurred after the advance method payment was completed. Therefore, management did not implement procedures to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the U.S. Treasury and disbursement by the entity. Cause: Management did not have internal controls in place over the compliance requirement as stated in the criteria or specific requirement section above. Effect or potential effect: Advance payments were not supported by internal controls and management did not minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the U.S. Treasury and disbursement by the entity. This can potentially result in interest earned on Federal funds. Questioned costs: $981,704 – Assistance Listing Number 84.116Z – Federal award identification number – P116Z230323 Questioned costs were computed as the expenditures incurred between July and December 2024 which were after the advance method payment was completed in June 2024. Questioned costs means an amount, expended or received from a Federal award, that (1) is noncompliant or suspected noncompliant with Federal statutes, regulations, or the terms and conditions of the Federal award or (2) at the time of the audit, lacked adequate documentation to support compliance. Context: During our testing over cash management, we observed management submitted and received an advance method payment for the full amount of the federal award in June of 2024. However, there were $981,704 expenditures incurred between July and December 2024 which were incurred after the advance method payment was completed. Therefore, management did not implement procedures to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the U.S. Treasury and disbursement by the entity. We were unable to quantify the interest earned on Federal funds. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: Management should develop and implement internal controls over advance method payments to ensure the entity minimizes the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the U.S. Treasury and disbursement by the entity or switch to the reimbursement method. Management should review the advance method payment identified as questioned costs to identify if any improper payments were made to the entity. Views of responsible officials: The Company acknowledges non-compliance with 2 CFR § 200.305 that the entity must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the U.S. Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or subrecipient. However, the questioned costs that were transferred in advance were ultimately deemed reasonable because they were disbursed during the grant period for allowable costs as part of the federal contract awarded. The Company will ensure a proper understanding of the compliance requirements for all federal contracts prior to requesting funds and will ensure funds transferred are compliant with the requirement that the Company minimize the time elapsed from the time of transfer and the disbursement of funds in accordance with the grant terms.
Finding 2024-002 Type of Finding: Cash Management – Noncompliance and Internal Control (Significant Deficiency) Community Development Financial Institutions Fund Equitable Recovery Program (FAL #21.033) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Award Number: 22ERP061764 Funding Years: 4/1/2023 - 3/31/2029 Criteria: Per 2 CFR §200.305(b)(11), a recipient or subrecipient must maintain advance payments of Federal funds in interest-bearing accounts, unless one of the following applies: i. The recipient or subrecipient receives less than $250,000 in Federal funding per year; ii. The best available interest-bearing account would not reasonably be expected to earn interest in excess of $500 per year on Federal cash balances; iii. The depository would require an average or minimum balance so high that it would not be feasible with the expected Federal and non-Federal cash resources; iv. A foreign government or banking system prohibits or precludes interest-bearing accounts; or v. An interest-bearing account is not readily accessible. Furthermore, per 2 CFR §200.305(b)(12), the recipient or subrecipient may retain up to $500 per year of interest earned on Federal funds to use for administrative expenses of the recipient or subrecipient. Any additional interest earned on Federal funds must be returned annually to the Department of Health and Human Services Payment Management System (PMS) through either the Automated Clearing House network or a Fedwire Funds Service payment. All interest in excess of $500 per year must be returned to PMS regardless of whether the recipient or subrecipient was paid through PMS. Condition/Context: REDC received a grant advance payment of approximately $3.2 million from the U.S. Department of Treasury in 2023. However, REDC did not maintain such funds in an interest-bearing account and did not either meet any of the exempting requirements described in 2 CFR §200.305(b)(11) or obtain a waiver that would relieve REDC of the criteria referred to above. Statistically Valid Sample: No, as no sample was tested in connection with the Cash Management compliance requirement. Cause: Management was not aware of the specific Uniform Guidance and grant requirement regarding the maintenance of advance payments of Federal funds in interest-bearing accounts. Effect: REDC did not maintain the federal advance in an interest-bearing account and therefore missed the opportunity to earn interest on the unspent portion of the Federal advance. Questioned Costs: During the year ended December 31, 2024, $35,610 of estimated interest would have been earned on the unspent portion of REDC’s federal advance if the federal advance was maintained in REDC’s interest-bearing account. Identified as a Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: REDC should establish procedures to ensure that all federal advances are deposited into interest-bearing accounts, unless an applicable exception under 2 CFR §200.305(b)(11) applies. Additionally, REDC should periodically review account balances and remit any interest earned on federal funds to the federal awarding agency in accordance with the requirements described in 2 CFR §200.305(b)(12). Views of Responsible Officials: We recognize the auditor’s finding regarding our cash management because we were not fully aware of the requirement to use interest-bearing accounts for advanced federal funds. This was unintentional and we acknowledge the gap in the cash management compliance process for federal grants. We will update our grant cash management policy to ensure all advance payments from federal or similar grants are placed in interest-bearing accounts where applicable. We will have separate interest-bearing accounts established for any federal grant advances with this requirement. Staff will be trained on federal grant cash management. Remittance of interest earned over $500 per year to the federal government. On-going quarterly reviews of all federal grant accounts will be conducted to ensure compliance with interest-bearing requirements. Management is committed to full compliance with federal grant requirements and has taken steps to ensure this issue does not recur. 1) Renaissance booked a payable to federal government of $48,248 on 12/31/2024 financials for the interest. The interest was paid to the federal government on 9/12/2025 regarding the federal CDFI grant contracts. 2) Federal grants to be held in interest bearing accounts will be completed by Sept 30, 2025. 3) Staff will be trained on federal grant cash management to be completed by Sept 30, 2025. 4) Grant cash management policy update to be completed by Oct 31, 2025. 5) On-going quarterly reviews of all federal grant accounts will be conducted to ensure compliance with interest-bearing requirements. The interest earned over $500 will be remitted to federal government each year before the organization’s fiscal year end.
Finding 2024-002 Type of Finding: Cash Management – Noncompliance and Internal Control (Significant Deficiency) Community Development Financial Institutions Fund Equitable Recovery Program (FAL #21.033) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Award Number: 22ERP061764 Funding Years: 4/1/2023 - 3/31/2029 Criteria: Per 2 CFR §200.305(b)(11), a recipient or subrecipient must maintain advance payments of Federal funds in interest-bearing accounts, unless one of the following applies: i. The recipient or subrecipient receives less than $250,000 in Federal funding per year; ii. The best available interest-bearing account would not reasonably be expected to earn interest in excess of $500 per year on Federal cash balances; iii. The depository would require an average or minimum balance so high that it would not be feasible with the expected Federal and non-Federal cash resources; iv. A foreign government or banking system prohibits or precludes interest-bearing accounts; or v. An interest-bearing account is not readily accessible. Furthermore, per 2 CFR §200.305(b)(12), the recipient or subrecipient may retain up to $500 per year of interest earned on Federal funds to use for administrative expenses of the recipient or subrecipient. Any additional interest earned on Federal funds must be returned annually to the Department of Health and Human Services Payment Management System (PMS) through either the Automated Clearing House network or a Fedwire Funds Service payment. All interest in excess of $500 per year must be returned to PMS regardless of whether the recipient or subrecipient was paid through PMS. Condition/Context: REDC received a grant advance payment of approximately $3.2 million from the U.S. Department of Treasury in 2023. However, REDC did not maintain such funds in an interest-bearing account and did not either meet any of the exempting requirements described in 2 CFR §200.305(b)(11) or obtain a waiver that would relieve REDC of the criteria referred to above. Statistically Valid Sample: No, as no sample was tested in connection with the Cash Management compliance requirement. Cause: Management was not aware of the specific Uniform Guidance and grant requirement regarding the maintenance of advance payments of Federal funds in interest-bearing accounts. Effect: REDC did not maintain the federal advance in an interest-bearing account and therefore missed the opportunity to earn interest on the unspent portion of the Federal advance. Questioned Costs: During the year ended December 31, 2024, $35,610 of estimated interest would have been earned on the unspent portion of REDC’s federal advance if the federal advance was maintained in REDC’s interest-bearing account. Identified as a Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: REDC should establish procedures to ensure that all federal advances are deposited into interest-bearing accounts, unless an applicable exception under 2 CFR §200.305(b)(11) applies. Additionally, REDC should periodically review account balances and remit any interest earned on federal funds to the federal awarding agency in accordance with the requirements described in 2 CFR §200.305(b)(12). Views of Responsible Officials: We recognize the auditor’s finding regarding our cash management because we were not fully aware of the requirement to use interest-bearing accounts for advanced federal funds. This was unintentional and we acknowledge the gap in the cash management compliance process for federal grants. We will update our grant cash management policy to ensure all advance payments from federal or similar grants are placed in interest-bearing accounts where applicable. We will have separate interest-bearing accounts established for any federal grant advances with this requirement. Staff will be trained on federal grant cash management. Remittance of interest earned over $500 per year to the federal government. On-going quarterly reviews of all federal grant accounts will be conducted to ensure compliance with interest-bearing requirements. Management is committed to full compliance with federal grant requirements and has taken steps to ensure this issue does not recur. 1) Renaissance booked a payable to federal government of $48,248 on 12/31/2024 financials for the interest. The interest was paid to the federal government on 9/12/2025 regarding the federal CDFI grant contracts. 2) Federal grants to be held in interest bearing accounts will be completed by Sept 30, 2025. 3) Staff will be trained on federal grant cash management to be completed by Sept 30, 2025. 4) Grant cash management policy update to be completed by Oct 31, 2025. 5) On-going quarterly reviews of all federal grant accounts will be conducted to ensure compliance with interest-bearing requirements. The interest earned over $500 will be remitted to federal government each year before the organization’s fiscal year end.
2024-002 Noncompliance with Cash Management (Public Housing Capital Fund CFDA 14.872) Criteria: Federal Code of Regulations, 2 CFR § 200.305 requires the Authority to maintain both written procedures that minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from HUD and disbursement of those funds for eligible costs and financial management systems that meet the standards for fund control and accountability. Advance payments to the Authority must be limited to the minimum amounts needed and be timed with actual, immediate cash requirements of the Authority in its Capital Fund Program. Furthermore, in accordance with 2 CFR § 905.310, the Authority shall initiate a fund requisition from HUD only when funds are due and payable, unless HUD approves another payment schedule as authorized by 2 CFR 200.305. The Capital Fund Program rules provide guidelines of 3 business days from drawdown to expenditure. Condition: During the year, the Authority had 24 transactions in its Capital Fund Program for grants ranging from CFP 2019-2022. All transactions made during the year did not adhere to the requirements to minimize the time federal funds were drawn down to expenditures of 3 business days. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: The Authority did not properly follow the requirements of 2 CFR § 200.305 and 905.310. Cause: The Authority did not have an adequate understanding of the Capital Fund Program requirements as related to Cash Management. Recommendation: The Authority’s staff should familiarize themselves with Capital Fund Program rules and guidelines in relation to Cash Management. Management Response: Management was unaware of the Cash Management rules and guidelines of the Authority’s Capital Fund Program. We will ensure all future eligible Capital Fund draws are made within 3 business days of expenditures.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 11.611, United States Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology Federal Award Identification Number and Year - 70NANB20H067 Pass through Entity - Not applicable - Direct funded Finding Type - Significant deficiency and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - Yes, 2023-002/2023-003 Criteria - The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA), as amended by 6202 of Public Law 110-252, requires a prime grant awardee to report its subgrants using the FFATA Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) tool. The prime recipient will have until the end of the month plus one additional month after an award or subaward is obligated to fulfill the reporting requirement. In addition, written procedures to implement cash management requirements should be in place and updated in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.305. Condition The Organization did not have the appropriate controls in place over FFATA reporting and did not file the required reports. Further, while the Organization had written procedures over cash management, they were outdated and did not reflect the current staffing model. This finding is repeated from the December 31, 2023 audit. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - The following table summarizes the transactions examined and the noncompliance identified for FFATA: Additionally, the cash management policy was not updated when there was restructuring in the finance department during the prior fiscal year. Cause and Effect - A process was not in place for the Organization to determine the required reports to be submitted under the grant. The outdated cash management policy was not reflective of the actual process. Recommendation - The Organization must implement processes and controls to identify and comply with funding agency reporting requirements. Additionally, the cash management policy should be updated to reflect the new process. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - Reporting was completed in SAM.gov in May 2025 for subrecipient subaward amount based on the award period running from calendar periods of July to June.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name 20.500, 20.507, 20.525, 20.526, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year All Pass through Entity Not applicable Finding Type Material weakness Repeat Finding No Criteria 2 CFR 200.305 requires that for reimbursement based grants, the entity should incur the costs for which reimbursement was requested prior to the date of the reimbursement request. Condition During our testing, we identified one reimbursement request that included a check that was not paid as it was voided and paid with a subsequent check, which was also requested for reimbursement. Questioned Costs $3,819 If questioned costs are not determinable, description of why known questioned costs were undetermined or otherwise could not be reported Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed The sum of the expenditures incurred under the contracts for the exception identified in our testing was used to calculate questioned costs. Context Of the 9 draws selected for testing, there was one draw that included one invoice submitted for reimbursement twice on the same draw as it was incorrectly entered into the system. Cause and Effect A check was voided and expense was never paid as the invoice was incorrectly coded to the incorrect vendor, but was still included as a check on the reimbursement request. Recommendation We recommend that the internal controls be put in place to ensure that there are no duplicate expenses being submitted for reimbursement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions Effective 6/1/2025, TARTA implemented a new ERP system that will allow us to electronically control, accumulated, and monitor all transaction related to our grant draws in accordance with 2 CFR 200.305 going forward.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name 20.500, 20.507, 20.525, 20.526, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year All Pass through Entity Not applicable Finding Type Material weakness Repeat Finding No Criteria 2 CFR 200.305 requires that for reimbursement based grants, the entity should incur the costs for which reimbursement was requested prior to the date of the reimbursement request. Condition During our testing, we identified one reimbursement request that included a check that was not paid as it was voided and paid with a subsequent check, which was also requested for reimbursement. Questioned Costs $3,819 If questioned costs are not determinable, description of why known questioned costs were undetermined or otherwise could not be reported Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed The sum of the expenditures incurred under the contracts for the exception identified in our testing was used to calculate questioned costs. Context Of the 9 draws selected for testing, there was one draw that included one invoice submitted for reimbursement twice on the same draw as it was incorrectly entered into the system. Cause and Effect A check was voided and expense was never paid as the invoice was incorrectly coded to the incorrect vendor, but was still included as a check on the reimbursement request. Recommendation We recommend that the internal controls be put in place to ensure that there are no duplicate expenses being submitted for reimbursement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions Effective 6/1/2025, TARTA implemented a new ERP system that will allow us to electronically control, accumulated, and monitor all transaction related to our grant draws in accordance with 2 CFR 200.305 going forward.
1. Provide staff training on proper cash management and documentation standards under 2 CFR § 200.305.