Federal Program: U.S. Department of Education: Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education, ALN 84.116Z Criteria: Federal regulations (2 CFR section 200.305) require that recipients minimize the time between the drawdown of federal funds and their disbursement for allowable project costs. Advances of federal funds must be limited to the minimum amounts needed and timed to be in accordance with the actual, immediate cash requirements of the project. Condition: The College drew down federal funds in April 2025 for project expenses that were not spent until May and June 2025. Cause: The issue occurred due to internal miscommunication regarding which account code should be used to record the grant activity. The incorrect code was used when processing the April drawdown, which led to drawing funds before eligible expenditures were incurred. Effect: Although the funds were ultimately spent within the same fiscal year, the timing of the drawdown did not meet the requirements for advance drawdowns. Questioned Costs: None Context: The College requested and received two drawdowns related to this award. This error occurred in only the first drawdown. Project expenses reimbursed by the second drawdown were appropriately incurred prior to the drawdown request. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: Crowe recommends the College establish clear guidance and training on the proper use of organization codes for federal grants. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: College officials acknowledge the error and attribute it to the misclassification of the grant under an incorrect organization code. They note that the funds were ultimately expended for allowable project costs within the same fiscal year. The College agrees to enhance training and implement additional review procedures to ensure compliance with cash management requirements going forward.
Program Name: Literacy Excellence Accelerates Performance – 84.215G Magnet Schools Assistance ARC – 84.165 Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Finding Type: Significant Deficiency on Internal Controls over Compliance and Noncompliance Questioned Cost Amount: None Context / Criteria: The School District should maintain internal controls to retain documentation that is available to support the expenditures that were paid prior to the request for reimbursement based on Uniform Guidance. The internal controls should provide reasonable assurance that the expenditures are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated as to grant and period. Condition: We noted one reimbursement request for the Literacy Excellence Accelerates Performance program and one for the Magnet Schools Assistance ARC program where supporting documentation did not match the amounts requested for reimbursement. Cause / Effect: The School District has not established appropriate controls for all cash reimbursement requests to have a report retained that reflects the supporting expenditures. The School District may undercharge or overcharge the grant as a result. Recommendation: We recommend that the School District implement a process to ensure the School District is following and complying with 2 CFR 200.305(b)(3). Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Actions: Management is in agreement with the finding. See accompanying corrective action plan.
Finding 2025-001: Cash Management Federal Agency-U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ALN: 93.297 and 93.217 Criteria: 2 CFR 200.305(b) states for non-Federal entities other than states, payments methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer, or issuance or redemption of checks, warrants, or payment by other means. Condition: The Council receives federal money to provide teen pregnancy prevention and family planning services. In order to carry out those services, the Council enters into sub-awards with providers throughout its service territory. Providers submit their invoices to the Council monthly, and the Council submits a request for payment to the grantor for reimbursement. The audit revealed that the non-federal entity did not consistently minimize the time between the transfer of federal funds from the U.S. Treasury and the disbursement of those funds for program purposes. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The Council provided services under grants received directly from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. In order to provide the services, sub-awards are made with providers within the Council’s service territory. Providers were to be paid based off the invoices submitted to the Council. The Council submits a request for payment to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and once the funds are received, the Council is to pay its providers in a timely manner. Cause: The finance department initiated drawdowns based on projected expenditures rather than actual, immediate disbursement needs, leading to early receipt and holding of funds. Effect: Holding federal funds for extended periods may result in noncompliance with federal cash management regulations, potential interest liabilities, and reduced efficiency in program execution. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend updates in the payment process to ensure that all providers are paid timely after receipt of grant funds. Management Response: We acknowledge the finding and take full responsibility for ensuring compliance with federal cash management requirements. The delay in provider payments during the audit period was primarily due to a temporary halt in government disbursements, which created uncertainty and the potential for funding gaps. To prevent recurrence, we have implemented the following corrective actions: • Payment Process Update: Provider disbursements are now prioritized immediately upon receipt of federal funds. • Compliance Calendar: A centralized calendar with automated reminders ensures timely processing of all payments. • Contingency Planning: A reserve allocation for provider payments has been established to mitigate risks associated with government-related payment interruptions.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 93.566, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Refugee and Entrant Assistance State/Replacement Designee Administered Programs Federal Award Identification Number and Year- FCSAK00843 2025 Pass- through Entity - Illinois Department of Human Services Finding Type - Significant deficiency and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - Yes 2024-001 Criteria - In accordance with 2 CFR 200.305 2(b), for nonfederal entities other than states, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass through entity and the disbursement by the nonfederal entity whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfers or issuance or redemption of checks, warrants, or payments by other means. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.305(3), when the reimbursement method is used, the federal awarding agency or pass through entity must make payment within 30 calendar days after receipt of billing unless the request is believed to be improper. Condition - Controls in place did not minimize the time elapsing between the transfer receipt of billing from the subrecipient and disbursement of federal dollars to the subrecipient in accordance with the guidance above. Questioned Costs - None. If questioned costs are not determinable, description of why known questioned costs were undetermined or otherwise could not be reported - Not applicable as there are no questioned costs. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable as there are no questioned costs. Context - Of the three transactions tested, two of the subrecipients were not paid within 30 days of receipt of billing. Cause and Effect - Policies, procedures, and related internal controls did not ensure compliance with federal payment requirements under Uniform Guidance. Recommendation - We recommend the Federation review its procedures and controls to ensure disbursement of funds to its subrecipients is consistent with applicable laws and regulations. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - As a pass-through recipient, the Federation relies on the timeliness of the State for reimbursement. In all transactions tested, the Federation reimbursed the subrecipients within 30 days of receipt of funds from the State. As a pass-through entity, the Federation understands the requirement to reimburse subrecipients within 30 calendar days after receipt of a billing. However, Federation does not have the financial means to advance cash to subrecipients before funds are collected from the State. Therefore, Federation has requested an advance from the State of Illinois in order to comply with the 30 day requirement.
Specific Requirements: 2 CFR 200.302(b) requires non-Federal entities to provide the following – 1) identification, in its accounts, of all Federal awards received and expended; 2) accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award program; 3) records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally-funded activities; 4) effective controls over, and accountability for all funds, property, and other assets; 5) comparison of expenditures with budget amounts for each Federal award; 6) written procedures to implement the requirements of the Federal payment section of Uniform Guidance (200.305); 7) written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with the cost principles as listed in Uniform Guidance. Best practices under generally accepted accounting principles require an organization to establish internal controls over financial reporting over federal awards, which includes tracking of federal dollars within the detailed general ledger by federal programs. Condition: We noted that internal controls over tracking federal funds in the general ledger by federal programs was not being executed to clearly identify which expenditures were for the federal program. Program expenses included both federal and non-federal dollars which made it difficult to ensure the expenditures for federal programs were accurately presented on the SEFA and to identify the specific expenditure to test for compliance. Cause: For the second year the accounting department had significant turnover and went through a software conversion in the current year. The software was not set up to track the expenditures by Federal grant. Effect or Potential Effect: Lack of controls over coding federal programs in detailed general ledger may result in either overstating or understating federal expenditures which could cause a material misstatement of the financial statements and SEFA. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the Organization update its coding process in their financial system. Begin including Project codes for expenses for all federal programs. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan.
2025-004 Inadequate Cash Management Procedures and Noncompliance with Period of Performance Requirements Program Name/Assistance Listing Number: 93.788 Opioid STR Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Compliance Requirement: Cash Management Criteria: Per 2 CFR §200.305(b), non-Federal entities must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the U.S. Treasury and the disbursement of those funds for program purposes under the period of performance. Furthermore, entities must have written procedures that clearly outline the timing and methods for drawing down federal funds in accordance with cash management requirements. These procedures should be documented, reviewed, approved, and periodically revised to ensure ongoing compliance. Condition: During our testing of cash management procedures, we noted the following: 1. UMADAOP of Lucas’ written procedures lacked key information, including dates of preparation, approval, implementation, review, and revision. 2. For Grant ID 24001119 (budget period 9/30/2023–9/30/2024; NOSA received 5/22/2024), funds were drawn before the start of FY 2025: First drawdown: 6/6/2024 – $1,125,000 Second drawdown: 7/22/2024 – $375,000 Total expenditures as of 12/31/2024: $352,021 expended before FY 2025 start; $990,223 July–Sept 2024; $157,756 Oct–Dec 2024 The timing of these drawdowns did not fully align with the requirement to minimize the time elapsed between the receipt of federal funds and their disbursement for program expenditures, resulting in funds being held in advance of actual cash needs. Cause of Condition: Management has not developed formal policies and procedures for subrecipient monitoring or consistent documentation standards. Cause of Condition: Funds were drawn before the start of FY 2025 because the Notice of Subaward (NOSA) for Grant ID 24001119 was received on 5/22/2024, which was prior to the beginning of the fiscal year. UMADAOP of Lucas’ written procedures did not provide guidance on aligning drawdowns with actual cash needs, and there was no documented review or update of the procedures to ensure compliance with federal cash management requirements. As a result, funds were held in advance of actual program expenditures, reflecting a gap in internal controls over cash management. Potential Effect of Condition: The use of a predetermined drawdown schedule that is not based on actual cash needs could lead to excess federal funds being held unnecessarily, increasing the risk of non compliance with cash management requirements. Additionally, the absence of comprehensive documentation for cash management procedures could result in inconsistencies in implementation, a lack of accountability, and difficulties in ensuring that policies remain current and effective. Questioned Cost: Not quantifiable. Recommendation: UMADAOP of Lucas should revise its cash management procedures to ensure they are in full compliance with federal requirements. UMADAOP of Lucas should adopt a drawdown process that is based on actual cash needs, minimizing the time elapsing between the drawdown of federal funds and their disbursement for program expenditures. Additionally, the organization should update its written procedures to include documentation of when the policies were prepared, approved, implemented, reviewed, and revised. This will help ensure that cash management practices are transparent, consistent, and compliant with applicable regulations. Finally, the organization should consider training relevant staff on the updated procedures and the importance of compliance with cash management requirements. Description of the Nature and Extent of Issues Reported: Funds were drawn and held longer than necessary, and the organization lacks adequate cash management procedures, constituting noncompliance with 2 CFR §200.305. Management Response: Management concurred with the finding. The organization will revise its current draw-down procedures to reflect timing and methods for drawing down federal funds that are in compliance with cash management requirements.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Name: Continuum of Care Assistance Listing Number: 14.267 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: PA0433L3T002312 - FY25, PA0433L3T002413 - FY25, PA0504L3T002211 - FY25, PA0504L3T002312 - FY25, PA0010L3T002316 - FY25, PA0004L3T002310 - FY25, PA0004L3T002411 - FY25, PA0681L3T002209 - FY25, PA0681L3T002310 - FY25, PA0911L3T002204 - FY25, PA0911L3T002305 - FY25, PA1067L3T002200 - FY25, PA1067L3T002301 - FY25 Award Period: July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2025 Type of Finding: - Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Cash Management - Noncompliance Criteria or specific requirement: Per the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR §200.305), nonfederal entities must minimize the time between the transfer of funds from the U.S. Treasury and the disbursement of program purposes. Drawdowns must be based on immediate cash needs and supported by incurred expenses. Condition: The entity drew down federal funds in excess of the amounts incurred for allowable expenses. Specifically, cash management procedures did not ensure that funds drawn down were limited to actual expenditures incurred, resulting in excess cash balances held temporarily beyond the allowable timeframe. Questioned Costs: Known: $3,547,358 Context: Through discussions with management and other required audit procedures, we noted that Pathways had drawn down $3,547,358 of advanced funding due to uncertainty of access to these funds in the future. The excess of these funds was subsequently returned to the funder. Cause: Due to pending changes in federal funding, the entity was concerned about its access to funding for contracts that were already executed. Effect: This deficiency resulted in noncompliance with federal cash management requirements and exposed to entity to potential interest liabilities and reputational risk. It also indicates a reasonable possibility that material noncompliance with federal requirements may not be prevented or detected and corrected on a timely basis. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that management ensure drawdowns are strictly aligned with incurred and allowable expense. This should include: - Pre-drawdown verification of expense documentation - Monthly reconciliations of drawdown activity to actual expenditures - Training for staff involved in federal fund management on Uniform Guidance. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding Type. Immaterial Noncompliance / Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance (Cash Management). Program. Research and Development Cluster; all Assistance Listing Numbers; all Award Numbers. Criteria. Per 2 CFR §200.305(b), non-federal entities must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds and disbursement. Entities must also ensure that drawdowns are based on actual, allowable expenditures and supported by adequate documentation. Condition. The University did not have documented review procedures in place for federal grant drawdowns under the Research and Development cluster. Drawdowns were processed without a formal review or approval process to verify that amounts requested were based on allowable expenditures. Cause. The University lacked formal internal controls and oversight mechanisms to ensure drawdowns were reviewed prior to submission. The process relied on informal practices without documented policies or designated reviewers. Effect. This deficiency increases the risk of drawing federal funds in excess of actual expenditures or for unallowable costs, potentially resulting in noncompliance with federal regulations. Questioned Costs. No costs were questioned related to this finding. Recommendation. The University should implement formal review procedures for all federal grant drawdowns, including documented policies, designated reviewers, and system controls to ensure drawdowns are accurate, allowable, and properly supported. View of Responsible Officials. Management agrees with this finding and has prepared a Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: Under Uniform Guidance (2 CFR §200.302, §200.303, §200.305, §200.318–§200.326, and §200.430), a non-federal entity must establish, document, and maintain written policies and procedures for the management of federal awards. Effective internal control over federal awards provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the awards. Condition: The Town did not have written policies and procedures required by Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200) for the administration of its federal programs. Specifically, the Town has not formally documented policies and procedures addressing key areas required under the Uniform Guidance, including but not limited to allowable and unallowable costs and cost principles, procurement standards, suspension and debarment, conflicts of interest, cash management, and reporting and record retention requirements. While informal processes exist, they are not sufficiently documented to ensure consistent application or compliance with federal requirements. Cause: The Town has not developed or formally adopted written federal grant management policies and procedures. Effect: Without formal written policies and procedures, there is an increased risk of noncompliance with federal program requirements. This condition exposes the Town to potential noncompliance with federal regulations, increases the risk of unallowable costs being charged to federal awards, and may affect the Town’s ability to properly administer, monitor, and report federal program activity. Additionally, the lack of documentation may impair continuity of compliance in the event of change in key personnel. Recommendation: The Town should develop, formally adopt, and implement written policies and procedures to comply with Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200). The policies should address all major compliance areas, including but not limited to allowable and unallowable costs and cost principles, procurement standards, suspension and debarment, conflicts of interest, cash management, and reporting and record retention requirements. The Town should ensure that staff responsible for federal grant administration are properly trained to ensure adherence to these policies and that the policies are reviewed periodically and updated as needed. Views of responsible officials: See management’s responses to findings on Page 78.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 93.914, Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), HIV Relief Project Grants Federal Award Identification Number and Year - 6 H89HA00021 32 01 2024 Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.303, the recipient must establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the recipient or subrecipient is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should align with the guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control-Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Per 2 CFR 200.305(b)(3), when the reimbursement method is used, the federal agency or pass-through entity must make payment within 30 calendar days after receipt of the payment request, unless the federal agency or pass-through entity reasonably believes the request to be improper. Condition - A lack of effective controls resulted in noncompliance with federal payment requirements, specifically for payments made to subrecipients. Questioned Costs - None If Questioned Costs are Not Determinable, Description of Why Known Questioned Costs Were Undetermined or Otherwise Could Not be Reported - N/A Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - During testing over a sample of 40 payments to subrecipients, we noted 3 payments that were made more than the required 30 days after the City received a reimbursement request from the subrecipient. Cause and Effect - A lack of effectively operating controls could result in the untimely disbursement of funds to subrecipients and material noncompliance with federal payment requirements. Recommendation - We recommend that the City design and implement controls to ensure compliance with federal payment requirements, including establishing timelines for processing subrecipient payments and review to ensure adherence to federal payment requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The three payments made were paid 1 to 2 days after the 30 day reimbursement requirement. The City will review its subrecipient payment terms and implement additional processes to help ensure compliance with federal payment requirements.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Community Development Financial Institutions Equitable Recovery Program Assistance Listing Number: 21.033 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 22ERP061061 – 2022 Award Period: April 10, 2023 through December 31, 2028 Type of Finding: - Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance - Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: The CDFI ERP Grant Agreement requires recipients to track the use of award funds, maintain separate accounting records, and ensure that the initial payment is fully expended within 12 months of the award announcement date. Furthermore, 2 C.F.R. § 200.305(b)(7) requires entities to deposit advance payments in interest-bearing accounts and remit any interest earned to the federal government, with appropriate documentation retained. Condition: The Credit Union did not maintain supporting documentation to demonstrate that interest earned on unused CDFI ERP funds held in interest-bearing accounts was remitted to the federal government as required. Additionally, the full amount of the initial grant payment was not fully expended within the 12-month period specified in the grant agreement. Questioned costs: None Context: The deficiency was identified during the audit of the SEFA and reconciliation of unearned grant revenue. The original SEFA lacked sufficient documentation, and the timing of expenditures did not align with the grant agreement’s 12-month requirement. The absence of documentation regarding interest earned and remitted may result in audit findings or repayment obligations. Cause: The Credit Union did not implement adequate internal controls to ensure timely and complete documentation of grant expenditures and to monitor compliance with grant terms regarding expenditure timing and interest remittance. Effect: Failure to maintain adequate documentation and comply with grant terms increases the risk of noncompliance with federal requirements. This could result in audit findings, repayment obligations, or other sanctions imposed by the federal awarding agency. Repeat finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Credit Union implement and enforce internal controls to track and document interest earned on federal funds, ensure timely remittance to the federal government, and monitor compliance with all grant terms, including the 12-month expenditure requirement. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management concurs with the finding and acknowledges the significance of the deficiency. They are committed to strengthening internal controls and ensuring full compliance with grant requirements.
Finding 2025.002: Cash Management - Significant Deficiency Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.958 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 24MHA2102 Criteria In accordance with §200.305, Federal Payment, grantees and subgrantees that receive grant funds are responsible for maintaining controls regarding the management of federal program funds under the Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR 200.302 and 200.303. Condition The Organization's drawdowns did not illustrate review and approval by management. Cause The Organization did not have adequate controls to ensure drawdowns were properly approved and such approval is documented. Effect or Potential Effect The condition may lead to inaccurate or improper drawdowns. Questioned Costs None Context We selected three drawdowns for testing of cash management procedures. We noted that for all three drawdowns, there was no formal approval or evidence of review. Identification of Repeat Finding No Recommendation The Organization should develop written procedures to review all drawdowns that occur in order to ensure accuracy. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions Management and the Board of Directors agree with the finding and will implement additional controls to ensure there is formal evidence of review being performed.
Assistance Listing Number(s): 14.239 and 21.027 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: Home Investment Partnerships Program and COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Name of Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development and Department of the Treasury Name of Pass-Through Entity: Milwaukee County Department of Health and Human Services Criteria or Specific Requirement: Subparts D and E of 2 CFR Part 200 require a nonfederal entity to establish written policies, procedures, and standards of conduct, including procedures to implement the cash management requirements of 2 CFR section 200.305, procedures that comply with the procurement standards of 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326, and procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E of 2 CFR Part 200. Specifically, 2 CFR sections 200.430, 200.431, and 200.475 require written policies concerning compensation for personal services, fringe benefits, and travel costs, respectively. Condition: Policies and procedures with requirements in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200 for cash management, procurement, compensation, including fringe benefits, and travel were not maintained. Cause: The Agency is not aware of the requirements of Subparts D and E of 2 CFR Part 200 for written policies, procedures, and standards of conduct. Effect or Potential Effect: A lack of written policies, procedures, and standards of conduct may result in noncompliance with the requirements of federal programs and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: The Agency should become familiar with the requirements of Subparts D and E of 2 CFR Part 200 and establish appropriate written policies, procedures, and standards of conduct. Views of Responsible Officials: Management has established written policies and procedures after year end that were the policies and procedures followed during the year under audit and meets the requirements of Subparts D and E of 2 CFR Part 200.
Finding Number: 2025-001 Federal Program: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various, 2024-2025 Assistance Listing Number (ALN): 84.268, 84.038, 93.342, 93.925 Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education and U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Pass-through Entity: N/A Repeat Finding: No Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance – Cash Management Criteria: 2 C.F.R. § 200.305 For recipients and subrecipients other than States, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency or the pass-through entity and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or subrecipient regardless of whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer or by other means. All other Federal funds must be returned to the payment system of the Federal agency. Returns should follow the instructions provided by the Federal agency. Condition: The University operates on a reimbursement basis; however, the University overdrew federal funds and did not return the overdrawn funds in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: None. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed: N/A Context: Through testing of cash management draws during the year, we identified one instance where the University overdrew federal funds in the amount of $210,077. After discussion with personnel in the Bursar office, the University further reported that it overdrew additional funds of $349,952. In addition, the University did not return the funds timely, with return times ranging from three days to thirty days. Cause and Effect: The University experienced turnover in the Bursar office, which resulted in a misunderstanding of the procedures related to cash draws. As a result, three draws were made in a onemonth period that exceeded the cash needed for disbursements to students. Recommendation: We recommend management implement procedures and processes to ensure that all cash draws are for expenses incurred and any overdrawn funds are returned promptly. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: See corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 66.202, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Congressionally Mandated Projects Federal Award Identification Number and Year - CG-00E03697-0, 2024 Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.319(d), the recipient is required to maintain a written procurement policy that adheres to procurement standards and requirements specified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 2 CFR 200.327. Per 2 CFR 200.305, the recipient is required to maintain a written cash management policy that addresses the requirements of the aforementioned code section. Condition - The Village did not have written policies for cash management or procurement that adhered to the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs - None If Questioned Costs are Not Determinable, Description of Why Known Questioned Costs Were Undetermined or Otherwise Could Not Be Reported - N/A Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - While the Village has written policies in place to address procurement and cash management, the policies do not address the requirements of 2 CFR 200.317 through 2 CFR 200.327 and of 2 CFR 200.305, respectively. Cause and Effect - The Village was not in compliance with grant requirements related to procurement and cash management, nor did it have proper controls in place to ensure these policies had the required elements. The absence of these requirements in the Village's policies increases the potential for further noncompliance because the Village's procedures may not adequately address relevant compliance requirements. Recommendation - We recommend that the Village create and put in place a procurement policy that addresses the requirements of 2 CFR 200.317 through 2 CFR 200.327 and a cash management policy that addresses the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The Village is currently reviewing existing policies to determine the best course of action and updating them for compliance. Some updates may require voter approval, as certain provisions are in the village charter.
2025-001: Cash Management Assistance Listing Number: 14.872, Capital Fund Program Condition and Criteria: 24 CFR 905.310 has the following conditions for the cash management regulation: 1) The PHA shall initiate a fund requisition only when funds are due and payable, unless HUD approves another payment schedule as authorized by 2 CFR 200.305. 2) The PHA shall maintain detailed disbursement records to document eligible expenditures (e.g., contracts or other documents), in a form and manner prescribed by HUD. During the current year audit, the following were noted: 1) One drawdown was deposited 2/5/2025, payment was made 2/27/25. 2) A drawdown dated 12/16/24 for $53,475 – The Housing Authority did not have any invoice documentation attached to the drawdown. 3) The Authority drew down funds from their 501-23 year program in February 2025. As of June 30, 2025, $256,674.13 remains unspent and is shown as an unearned revenue on the Statement of Net Position. Type of Finding: Material Weakness Cause: The Housing Authority experienced turnover in the Executive Director Position. Proper communication and training was not done in the internal control structure to allow compliance with HUD rules and regulations. Effect: The Housing Authority is not in compliance with the Cash Management requirements. Questioned Costs: None known Auditors’ Recommendation: We recommend that the Housing Authority strengthen its internal control structure in relation to the Cash Management requirements.
Program: 14.872 - Capital Funds Criteria: 2 CFR 200.305 requires PHAs to minimize the time federal funds are drawn down to expenditure. The Capital Fund Program provides guidelines of three business days from draw down to expenditure to minimize the interest accrued by the PHA. 24 CFR 905.310 states the PHA shall initiate a fund requisition from HUD only when funds are due and payable, unless HUD approves another payment schedule as authorized by 2 CFR 200.305. Condition: The Housing Authority had drawn down Capital Funds and did not expend within three days. Cause: The Housing Authority was not aware that Capital Funds drawn needed to be expended within three days. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Effect: The Housing Authority is not in compliance with cash management requirements. Prior Year Finding: N/A Information: Isolated instance. Recommendation: Traditionally we would recommend that the Housing Authority implements appropriate controls over voucher draws to ensure compliance with Public Housing Capital Fund cash management requirements. We recognize that the Capital Funds have been fully expended as of June 30, 2025, so the recommendation does not apply. When receiving Capital Funds in the future, we recommend to follow this recommendation. Management’s Response: Management concurs with the recommendation to implement timely LOCCS fundings that coincides with our normal accounting cycle when receiving Capital Funds in the future.
Finding Number: 2025-001 Award Identification: Assistance listing program title and number: NSF Technology, Innovation, and Partnerships – 47.084 Federal award identification number: 2303493 Award Date: May 9, 2023 Name of the federal agency: National Science Foundation Repeat Finding: No Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs related to this finding Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Cash Management Criteria: Section 2 CFR 200.305 establishes the requirements over the management of federal payments. Under this regulation, the grantee must minimize the time lapse between the draw down of federal funds and the disbursement of those funds as well as demonstrate written procedures and a system of financial management that meets control and accountability requirements. Condition: While testing of internal controls over cash management it was noted that the Center did not follow the procedures in place for the draw down of federal funds. Cause: The Center was guided by the NSF program manager to draw down the funds as they became available in accordance with the grant agreement as opposed to following procedures in accordance with Section 2 CFR 200.305. Effect: The Center did not incur the costs in-line with the draw down of federal funds. Recommendation: We recommend the Center follow cash management procedures in accordance with Section 2 CFR 200.305. These procedures should ensure that funds are drawn on a reimbursement basis, supported by actual expenditures incurred or very soon to be incurred and paid. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and has committed to a corrective action plan.
Material Weakness Finding: 2025-002 Cash Management – Federal Grants Federal Programs: Department of Health and Human Services Rural Health Care Services Outreach, Rural Health Network Development and Small Health Care Provider Quality Improvement Assistance Listing No. 93.912 Criteria: Cash Management, 2 CFR 200.305(b)(1) Condition: The Organization did not reconcile federal grant expenditures in a timely manner, resulting in a lack of draws of federal funds for which qualifying expenditures had been made prior to the end of the Organization’s financial statement year end. This resulted in unrecorded revenue and receivables of approximately $224,564 at March 31, 2025. Without proper reconciliations and timely draws of federal grant funds, the Organization could be impacted by lost federal funding. Cause: The Organization did not reconcile federal grant expenditures or make federal grant draws in a timely manner. Effect: The Organization failed to properly recognize federal grant revenue and receivables of $224,564. Questioned Costs: None Context/Sampling: Not applicable. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: The Organization should ensure that qualifying expenditures are reconciled, recorded in the Organization’s financial statements, and drawn from the Payment Management System in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization understands the importance of timely reconciliations of federal grant expenditures and timely draws of federal grant funds. The Organization will review its processes and procedures to ensure that federal grants are reconciled in a timely manner. Contact Person: Brian Morton, CFO Anticipated Date of Completion: November 30, 2025
Material Weakness Finding: 2025-002 Cash Management – Federal Grants Federal Programs: Department of Health and Human Services Health Center Program Cluster Assistance Listing No. - 93.224 and 93.527 Department of Health and Human Services Grants for Capital Development in Health Centers Assistance Listing No.- 93.526 Criteria: Cash Management, 2 CFR 200.305(b)(1) Condition: The Organization made three draws of federal funds for which qualifying expenditures were not made prior to the end of the Organization’s financial statement year end. This resulted in excess federal cash on hand at March 31, 2025. The Organization is required to incur qualifying expenditures prior to drawing funds from the U.S. Treasury. Cause: The Organization made drawdowns of federal grant funds for which qualifying expenditures were not incurred. Effect: The Organization held excess federal cash due to lack of qualifying expenditures. Questioned Costs: $430,732. Context/Sampling: Out of 39 drawdowns during the fiscal year, three of the drawdowns were received for expenditures that had yet to be incurred and paid. The finding appears to be a systemic issue. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: The Organization should ensure that qualifying expenditures are incurred prior to making the related draws of funds from the U.S. Treasury. Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization understands the requirements to incur qualifying expenditures prior to drawing funds from the U.S. Treasury. Procedures will be established to ensure that excess federal cash is not held by the Organization. Contact Person: Dr. Aretha Powers, CEO Anticipated Date of Completion: November 30, 2025
2025-004 Cash Management (repeat of finding 2024-008) Program Information Federal Organization U.S Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing Numbers 93.224 & 93.527 Health Center Program Cluster Award Numbers H80CS00513, H8FCS41684 Criteria [X] Compliance Finding [ ] Significant Deficiency [X] Material Weakness Title 2 CFR 200.305 requires that organizations “must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-federal entity whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer, or issuance or redemption of checks, warrants, or payment by other means.” Condition The Organization did not maintain supporting documentation for cash draws made from the Payment Management System (PMS). This finding appears to be a systemic problem. Cause The Organization’s internal controls over cash management and PMS draws does not include procedures for non-payroll expenditures. As a result, draws were made without supporting documentation. In addition, the Organization did not always maintain documentation of the payroll calculations supporting draws, as required by company policy. Effect The Organization may not have minimized the timing between draws from the PMS and the related payments for expenditures incurred as required. Questioned Costs None noted. Context Out of seven draws tested, the Organization was not able to provide any supporting documentation or expenditure detail to support two draws. Due to this, we were unable to verify the time elapsing between the funds transfer from the PMS system and the disbursement of funds. Recommendation We recommend the Organization implement controls requiring all draws from the PMS to be based on detailed reports of expenditures claimed for reimbursement and retain this documentation along with the supporting invoices and payroll reports supporting the expenditures to be paid or reimbursed. In addition, we recommend that the listing of expenditures be reviewed by qualified personnel to ensure that the expenditures claimed are allowable and cash payments for the expenditures are made before the date of the draw or within a reasonable time after the draw. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action Management is in agreement with this finding and will take corrective action as outlined below.
2025-004 Cash Management (repeat of finding 2024-008) Program Information Federal Organization U.S Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing Numbers 93.224 & 93.527 Health Center Program Cluster Award Numbers H80CS00513, H8FCS41684 Criteria [X] Compliance Finding [ ] Significant Deficiency [X] Material Weakness Title 2 CFR 200.305 requires that organizations “must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-federal entity whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer, or issuance or redemption of checks, warrants, or payment by other means.” Condition The Organization did not maintain supporting documentation for cash draws made from the Payment Management System (PMS). This finding appears to be a systemic problem. Cause The Organization’s internal controls over cash management and PMS draws does not include procedures for non-payroll expenditures. As a result, draws were made without supporting documentation. In addition, the Organization did not always maintain documentation of the payroll calculations supporting draws, as required by company policy. Effect The Organization may not have minimized the timing between draws from the PMS and the related payments for expenditures incurred as required. Questioned Costs None noted. Context Out of seven draws tested, the Organization was not able to provide any supporting documentation or expenditure detail to support two draws. Due to this, we were unable to verify the time elapsing between the funds transfer from the PMS system and the disbursement of funds. Recommendation We recommend the Organization implement controls requiring all draws from the PMS to be based on detailed reports of expenditures claimed for reimbursement and retain this documentation along with the supporting invoices and payroll reports supporting the expenditures to be paid or reimbursed. In addition, we recommend that the listing of expenditures be reviewed by qualified personnel to ensure that the expenditures claimed are allowable and cash payments for the expenditures are made before the date of the draw or within a reasonable time after the draw. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action Management is in agreement with this finding and will take corrective action as outlined below.
U.S. Department of Transportation – AL #20.106 Airport Improvement Program – Reporting Grant Award: 3-38-0022-064-2022 Criteria The Authority is required to submit payment requests using the DOT Electronic Grants payment system, Delphi e-Invoicing. These requests must meet the standards described in 2 CFR ss 200.302 and 200.305. Additionally, Authority is required to submit annual SF-425 reports within 90 days of the end of the federal fiscal year. Condition During review of submitted Request for Reimbursements and Outlay reports, it was noted that one request submitted was not accurately prepared as there was one instance in which the amount requested was greater than invoice documentation, additionally the request included a request for reimbursement of AIP ineligible costs. As of December 31, 2024 no funds have been returned to U.S. DOT. It was also noted that multiple annual SF-425 reports were submitted late. Questioned Costs N/A Context We reviewed the project financial summary for two of the 19 requests submitted during 2024 and SF-425 reports for all open grants. Cause Employee oversight. Effect The Authority could have had federal funding delayed or reduced. Recommendation We recommend that the Authority implement internal controls to ensure all reporting is accurately filed. Repeat Finding Yes. Prior audit finding 2023-003. Views of Responsible Officials Management recognizes the deficiency and plans to implement the auditor’s recommendation.
U.S. Department of Transportation – AL #20.106 Airport Improvement Program – Reporting Grant Award: 3-38-0022-064-2022 Criteria The Authority is required to submit payment requests using the DOT Electronic Grants payment system, Delphi e-Invoicing. These requests must meet the standards described in 2 CFR ss 200.302 and 200.305. Additionally, Authority is required to submit annual SF-425 reports within 90 days of the end of the federal fiscal year. Condition During review of submitted Request for Reimbursements and Outlay reports, it was noted that one request submitted was not accurately prepared as there was one instance in which the amount requested was greater than invoice documentation, additionally the request included a request for reimbursement of AIP ineligible costs. As of December 31, 2024 no funds have been returned to U.S. DOT. It was also noted that multiple annual SF-425 reports were submitted late. Questioned Costs N/A Context We reviewed the project financial summary for two of the 19 requests submitted during 2024 and SF-425 reports for all open grants. Cause Employee oversight. Effect The Authority could have had federal funding delayed or reduced. Recommendation We recommend that the Authority implement internal controls to ensure all reporting is accurately filed. Repeat Finding Yes. Prior audit finding 2023-003. Views of Responsible Officials Management recognizes the deficiency and plans to implement the auditor’s recommendation.
2024-002 Twenty-First Century Community Learning Centers – Assistance Listing No. 84.287 Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance and Noncompliance – Appropriate Review of Expenditures Claimed B. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and C. Cash Management Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.403(e), expenses must be determined under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) to be considered allowable unless otherwise noted in 2 CFR 200. In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.305(b), the draws under reimbursable grants must be limited to the minimum amount needed and drawn down after expenses have incurred. Condition and Context: During our testing of expenses charged to the federal program, we identified one transaction which the Organization prepaid for services to be rendered in 2025. The prepaid expense were charged to the SEFA in 2024 which does not match when they should be recognized as expenses under GAAP. The expenses were claimed for reimbursement prior to being incurred based on GAAP. Total questioned costs for this instance were $8,750. The population was considered the month of December as these were went the prepayments were made. The error rate for the defined population was 93.85% resulting in likely questioned costs of $14,393. Our sample was not statistically valid. Cause and Effect: The issue appears to have resulted from a lack of adequate review procedures to ensure that expenses charged to the federal award align with recognition under GAAP. As a result, the entity claimed expenditures which may be unallowable. Claimed expenditures which may be unallowable and drawn prior to being incurred. Recommendation: We recommend that management strengthen its review procedures over expense cutoff to ensure that expenditures are recognized on the SEFA in alignment with GAAP and are drawn down appropriately under the cost reimbursement method. Additionally, training should be provided to accounting personnel on Uniform Guidance compliance and GAAP requirements related to expense recognition. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: We agree with the recommendation and plan to have the corrective action implemented by August 2025.
2024-005 - Lack of Written Federal Policies and Procedures Required by Uniform Guidance Finding Type: Material weakness in internal control over compliance Federal Program: 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Condition/Finding: The Village has not developed or implemented the written policies and procedures required under the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Required documentation is absent in areas such as internal controls over compliance, cash management, procurement, and allowable costs. Criteria: Per 2 CFR §200.303 and related sections (including §§200.305 and 200.318–320), non-federal entities expending federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal controls and must document policies and procedures governing compliance with applicable federal statutes, regulations, and terms of award. Cause: The Village has not formally developed Uniform Guidance-compliant policies due to limited administrative resources and competing operational priorities. Effect: The absence of formal written policies and procedures increases the risk of inconsistent or noncompliant treatment of federal expenditures. Without documented controls and expectations, the Village may fail to detect or prevent noncompliance with federal requirements in key grant administration areas. Recommendation: We recommend that the Village adopt written policies and procedures addressing the specific requirements outlined in the Uniform Guidance. These policies should include, but not be limited to, internal controls over compliance, procurement, cash management, subrecipient monitoring (if applicable), and allowable cost determinations. Management should ensure that these policies are communicated and periodically reviewed. View of Responsible Officials: Management’s response and planned corrective action can be found in the accompanying Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR §200.305(b), when a non-federal entity receives advance payments of federal funds, it must deposit those funds in interest-bearing accounts, unless certain exceptions apply, and must remit any interest earned on advances in excess of $500 per year to the federal agency. Furthermore, advance payments should be segregated to ensure proper tracking and safeguarding of federal funds. Condition: During our audit of the Organization’s federal awards, we identified deficiencies in the grantee’s cash management procedures related to advance payments received from federal awarding agencies. Specifically, the grantee did not segregate advance payments into separate insured interestbearing accounts as required by the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The Organization did not have adequate policies and procedures or internal controls in place to ensure compliance with the cash management requirements related to advance payments. Effect: The federal awarding agency did not receive interest that could have been earned on the advances. All advances received during 2024 were expended by December 31, 2024. There was no loss from uninsured funds or from lack of segregating funds into separate accounts. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization implement policies and procedures to ensure that all advance payments are deposited into separate, insured, interest-bearing accounts as required. The Organization should also establish controls to track interest earned on these accounts and remit amounts due to the federal awarding agencies in a timely manner. Training should be provided to staff responsible for cash management to ensure ongoing compliance with federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and procedures have been implemented to address the related issues.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR §200.305(b), when a non-federal entity receives advance payments of federal funds, it must deposit those funds in interest-bearing accounts, unless certain exceptions apply, and must remit any interest earned on advances in excess of $500 per year to the federal agency. Furthermore, advance payments should be segregated to ensure proper tracking and safeguarding of federal funds. Condition: During our audit of the Organization’s federal awards, we identified deficiencies in the grantee’s cash management procedures related to advance payments received from federal awarding agencies. Specifically, the grantee did not segregate advance payments into separate insured interestbearing accounts as required by the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The Organization did not have adequate policies and procedures or internal controls in place to ensure compliance with the cash management requirements related to advance payments. Effect: The federal awarding agency did not receive interest that could have been earned on the advances. All advances received during 2024 were expended by December 31, 2024. There was no loss from uninsured funds or from lack of segregating funds into separate accounts. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization implement policies and procedures to ensure that all advance payments are deposited into separate, insured, interest-bearing accounts as required. The Organization should also establish controls to track interest earned on these accounts and remit amounts due to the federal awarding agencies in a timely manner. Training should be provided to staff responsible for cash management to ensure ongoing compliance with federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and procedures have been implemented to address the related issues.
2024-004: Written Policies and Procedures – Significant Deficiency Criteria and Condition: 2 CFR 200.302 requires that the recipient or subrecipient’s financial management system must provide written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 (Federal payments) and for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.318 requires that the recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under a Federal award or subaward, including for acquisition of property or services. Context: Although the Organization follows procedures that minimize the time between reimbursement of dollars and expenditure (2 CFR 200.305), verify payments made are in accordance with subpart E and terms and conditions of the award, and follow procurement standards for vendors, there are no written procedures as required by the CFR. Cause and Effect: The Organization did not maintain written procedures as required by the CFR. Questioned Costs: This finding does not result in questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization formally document the current policies and procedures in place to meet documentation requirements of the CFR. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We will adopt formal policies and procedures that document our current practices and also meet the requirements of the CFR.
2024-004: Written Policies and Procedures – Significant Deficiency Criteria and Condition: 2 CFR 200.302 requires that the recipient or subrecipient’s financial management system must provide written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 (Federal payments) and for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.318 requires that the recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under a Federal award or subaward, including for acquisition of property or services. Context: Although the Organization follows procedures that minimize the time between reimbursement of dollars and expenditure (2 CFR 200.305), verify payments made are in accordance with subpart E and terms and conditions of the award, and follow procurement standards for vendors, there are no written procedures as required by the CFR. Cause and Effect: The Organization did not maintain written procedures as required by the CFR. Questioned Costs: This finding does not result in questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization formally document the current policies and procedures in place to meet documentation requirements of the CFR. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We will adopt formal policies and procedures that document our current practices and also meet the requirements of the CFR.
U.S. Department of Transportation – AL #20.106 Airport Improvement Program – Reporting Grant Award: 3-38-0022-064-2022 Criteria The Authority is required to submit payment requests using the DOT Electronic Grants payment system, Delphi e-Invoicing. These requests must meet the standards described in 2 CFR ss 200.302 and 200.305. Additionally, Authority is required to submit annual SF-425 reports within 90 days of the end of the federal fiscal year. Condition During review of submitted Request for Reimbursements and Outlay reports, it was noted that one request submitted was not accurately prepared as there was one instance in which the amount requested was greater than invoice documentation, additionally the request included a request for reimbursement of AIP ineligible costs. As of December 31, 2024 no funds have been returned to U.S. DOT. It was also noted that multiple annual SF-425 reports were submitted late. Questioned Costs N/A Context We reviewed the project financial summary for two of the 19 requests submitted during 2024 and SF-425 reports for all open grants. Cause Employee oversight. Effect The Authority could have had federal funding delayed or reduced. Recommendation We recommend that the Authority implement internal controls to ensure all reporting is accurately filed. Repeat Finding Yes. Prior audit finding 2023-003. Views of Responsible Officials Management recognizes the deficiency and plans to implement the auditor’s recommendation.
U.S. Department of Transportation – AL #20.106 Airport Improvement Program – Reporting Grant Award: 3-38-0022-064-2022 Criteria The Authority is required to submit payment requests using the DOT Electronic Grants payment system, Delphi e-Invoicing. These requests must meet the standards described in 2 CFR ss 200.302 and 200.305. Additionally, Authority is required to submit annual SF-425 reports within 90 days of the end of the federal fiscal year. Condition During review of submitted Request for Reimbursements and Outlay reports, it was noted that one request submitted was not accurately prepared as there was one instance in which the amount requested was greater than invoice documentation, additionally the request included a request for reimbursement of AIP ineligible costs. As of December 31, 2024 no funds have been returned to U.S. DOT. It was also noted that multiple annual SF-425 reports were submitted late. Questioned Costs N/A Context We reviewed the project financial summary for two of the 19 requests submitted during 2024 and SF-425 reports for all open grants. Cause Employee oversight. Effect The Authority could have had federal funding delayed or reduced. Recommendation We recommend that the Authority implement internal controls to ensure all reporting is accurately filed. Repeat Finding Yes. Prior audit finding 2023-003. Views of Responsible Officials Management recognizes the deficiency and plans to implement the auditor’s recommendation.
2024-002 Twenty-First Century Community Learning Centers – Assistance Listing No. 84.287 Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance and Noncompliance – Appropriate Review of Expenditures Claimed B. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and C. Cash Management Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.403(e), expenses must be determined under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) to be considered allowable unless otherwise noted in 2 CFR 200. In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.305(b), the draws under reimbursable grants must be limited to the minimum amount needed and drawn down after expenses have incurred. Condition and Context: During our testing of expenses charged to the federal program, we identified one transaction which the Organization prepaid for services to be rendered in 2025. The prepaid expense were charged to the SEFA in 2024 which does not match when they should be recognized as expenses under GAAP. The expenses were claimed for reimbursement prior to being incurred based on GAAP. Total questioned costs for this instance were $8,750. The population was considered the month of December as these were went the prepayments were made. The error rate for the defined population was 93.85% resulting in likely questioned costs of $14,393. Our sample was not statistically valid. Cause and Effect: The issue appears to have resulted from a lack of adequate review procedures to ensure that expenses charged to the federal award align with recognition under GAAP. As a result, the entity claimed expenditures which may be unallowable. Claimed expenditures which may be unallowable and drawn prior to being incurred. Recommendation: We recommend that management strengthen its review procedures over expense cutoff to ensure that expenditures are recognized on the SEFA in alignment with GAAP and are drawn down appropriately under the cost reimbursement method. Additionally, training should be provided to accounting personnel on Uniform Guidance compliance and GAAP requirements related to expense recognition. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: We agree with the recommendation and plan to have the corrective action implemented by August 2025.
2024-005 - Lack of Written Federal Policies and Procedures Required by Uniform Guidance Finding Type: Material weakness in internal control over compliance Federal Program: 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Condition/Finding: The Village has not developed or implemented the written policies and procedures required under the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Required documentation is absent in areas such as internal controls over compliance, cash management, procurement, and allowable costs. Criteria: Per 2 CFR §200.303 and related sections (including §§200.305 and 200.318–320), non-federal entities expending federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal controls and must document policies and procedures governing compliance with applicable federal statutes, regulations, and terms of award. Cause: The Village has not formally developed Uniform Guidance-compliant policies due to limited administrative resources and competing operational priorities. Effect: The absence of formal written policies and procedures increases the risk of inconsistent or noncompliant treatment of federal expenditures. Without documented controls and expectations, the Village may fail to detect or prevent noncompliance with federal requirements in key grant administration areas. Recommendation: We recommend that the Village adopt written policies and procedures addressing the specific requirements outlined in the Uniform Guidance. These policies should include, but not be limited to, internal controls over compliance, procurement, cash management, subrecipient monitoring (if applicable), and allowable cost determinations. Management should ensure that these policies are communicated and periodically reviewed. View of Responsible Officials: Management’s response and planned corrective action can be found in the accompanying Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR §200.305(b), when a non-federal entity receives advance payments of federal funds, it must deposit those funds in interest-bearing accounts, unless certain exceptions apply, and must remit any interest earned on advances in excess of $500 per year to the federal agency. Furthermore, advance payments should be segregated to ensure proper tracking and safeguarding of federal funds. Condition: During our audit of the Organization’s federal awards, we identified deficiencies in the grantee’s cash management procedures related to advance payments received from federal awarding agencies. Specifically, the grantee did not segregate advance payments into separate insured interestbearing accounts as required by the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The Organization did not have adequate policies and procedures or internal controls in place to ensure compliance with the cash management requirements related to advance payments. Effect: The federal awarding agency did not receive interest that could have been earned on the advances. All advances received during 2024 were expended by December 31, 2024. There was no loss from uninsured funds or from lack of segregating funds into separate accounts. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization implement policies and procedures to ensure that all advance payments are deposited into separate, insured, interest-bearing accounts as required. The Organization should also establish controls to track interest earned on these accounts and remit amounts due to the federal awarding agencies in a timely manner. Training should be provided to staff responsible for cash management to ensure ongoing compliance with federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and procedures have been implemented to address the related issues.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR §200.305(b), when a non-federal entity receives advance payments of federal funds, it must deposit those funds in interest-bearing accounts, unless certain exceptions apply, and must remit any interest earned on advances in excess of $500 per year to the federal agency. Furthermore, advance payments should be segregated to ensure proper tracking and safeguarding of federal funds. Condition: During our audit of the Organization’s federal awards, we identified deficiencies in the grantee’s cash management procedures related to advance payments received from federal awarding agencies. Specifically, the grantee did not segregate advance payments into separate insured interestbearing accounts as required by the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The Organization did not have adequate policies and procedures or internal controls in place to ensure compliance with the cash management requirements related to advance payments. Effect: The federal awarding agency did not receive interest that could have been earned on the advances. All advances received during 2024 were expended by December 31, 2024. There was no loss from uninsured funds or from lack of segregating funds into separate accounts. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization implement policies and procedures to ensure that all advance payments are deposited into separate, insured, interest-bearing accounts as required. The Organization should also establish controls to track interest earned on these accounts and remit amounts due to the federal awarding agencies in a timely manner. Training should be provided to staff responsible for cash management to ensure ongoing compliance with federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and procedures have been implemented to address the related issues.
2024-004: Written Policies and Procedures – Significant Deficiency Criteria and Condition: 2 CFR 200.302 requires that the recipient or subrecipient’s financial management system must provide written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 (Federal payments) and for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.318 requires that the recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under a Federal award or subaward, including for acquisition of property or services. Context: Although the Organization follows procedures that minimize the time between reimbursement of dollars and expenditure (2 CFR 200.305), verify payments made are in accordance with subpart E and terms and conditions of the award, and follow procurement standards for vendors, there are no written procedures as required by the CFR. Cause and Effect: The Organization did not maintain written procedures as required by the CFR. Questioned Costs: This finding does not result in questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization formally document the current policies and procedures in place to meet documentation requirements of the CFR. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We will adopt formal policies and procedures that document our current practices and also meet the requirements of the CFR.
2024-004: Written Policies and Procedures – Significant Deficiency Criteria and Condition: 2 CFR 200.302 requires that the recipient or subrecipient’s financial management system must provide written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 (Federal payments) and for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.318 requires that the recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under a Federal award or subaward, including for acquisition of property or services. Context: Although the Organization follows procedures that minimize the time between reimbursement of dollars and expenditure (2 CFR 200.305), verify payments made are in accordance with subpart E and terms and conditions of the award, and follow procurement standards for vendors, there are no written procedures as required by the CFR. Cause and Effect: The Organization did not maintain written procedures as required by the CFR. Questioned Costs: This finding does not result in questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization formally document the current policies and procedures in place to meet documentation requirements of the CFR. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We will adopt formal policies and procedures that document our current practices and also meet the requirements of the CFR.
2 CFR § 300 codified in 45 CFR part 75 and gives regulatory effect to the Department of Health and Human Services 2 CFR § 200; while 2 CFR § 400 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Agriculture for 2 CFR § 200. 2 CFR § 200.302(b)(6) states the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR § 200.305 for Payment. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7) requires written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E-Cost Principles of this part and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 states that costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. 2 CFR 200.431 requires established written leave policies if the entity intends to pay fringe benefits. 2 CFR 200.464(a)(2) requires reimbursement of relocation costs to employees be in accordance with an established written policy must be consistently followed by the employer. 2 CFR 200.475 requires reimbursement and/or charges to be consistent with those normally allowed in like circumstances in the non-Federal entity's non-federally-funded activities and in accordance with non-Federal entity's written travel reimbursement policies. Additionally, for Federal awards, the Uniform Guidance requires a written policy for the procurement requirements outlined in 2 CFR § 200.318(c)(1), 2 CFR § 200.318(c)(2), and 2 CFR § 200.320(B). The Board of Health did not have written policies as required by the Uniform Guidance as they were not aware of the requirements. The failure to implement written policies as required by the Uniform Guidance could result in noncompliance with the District’s federal programs. The Board of Health should adopt written policies in accordance with the Uniform Guidance to help improve internal controls over federal compliance.
2 CFR § 300 codified in 45 CFR part 75 and gives regulatory effect to the Department of Health and Human Services 2 CFR § 200; while 2 CFR § 400 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Agriculture for 2 CFR § 200. 2 CFR § 200.302(b)(6) states the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR § 200.305 for Payment. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7) requires written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E-Cost Principles of this part and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 states that costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. 2 CFR 200.431 requires established written leave policies if the entity intends to pay fringe benefits. 2 CFR 200.464(a)(2) requires reimbursement of relocation costs to employees be in accordance with an established written policy must be consistently followed by the employer. 2 CFR 200.475 requires reimbursement and/or charges to be consistent with those normally allowed in like circumstances in the non-Federal entity's non-federally-funded activities and in accordance with non-Federal entity's written travel reimbursement policies. Additionally, for Federal awards, the Uniform Guidance requires a written policy for the procurement requirements outlined in 2 CFR § 200.318(c)(1), 2 CFR § 200.318(c)(2), and 2 CFR § 200.320(B). The Board of Health did not have written policies as required by the Uniform Guidance as they were not aware of the requirements. The failure to implement written policies as required by the Uniform Guidance could result in noncompliance with the District’s federal programs. The Board of Health should adopt written policies in accordance with the Uniform Guidance to help improve internal controls over federal compliance.
2 CFR § 300 codified in 45 CFR part 75 and gives regulatory effect to the Department of Health and Human Services 2 CFR § 200; while 2 CFR § 400 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Agriculture for 2 CFR § 200. 2 CFR § 200.302(b)(6) states the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR § 200.305 for Payment. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7) requires written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E-Cost Principles of this part and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 states that costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. 2 CFR 200.431 requires established written leave policies if the entity intends to pay fringe benefits. 2 CFR 200.464(a)(2) requires reimbursement of relocation costs to employees be in accordance with an established written policy must be consistently followed by the employer. 2 CFR 200.475 requires reimbursement and/or charges to be consistent with those normally allowed in like circumstances in the non-Federal entity's non-federally-funded activities and in accordance with non-Federal entity's written travel reimbursement policies. Additionally, for Federal awards, the Uniform Guidance requires a written policy for the procurement requirements outlined in 2 CFR § 200.318(c)(1), 2 CFR § 200.318(c)(2), and 2 CFR § 200.320(B). The Board of Health did not have written policies as required by the Uniform Guidance as they were not aware of the requirements. The failure to implement written policies as required by the Uniform Guidance could result in noncompliance with the District’s federal programs. The Board of Health should adopt written policies in accordance with the Uniform Guidance to help improve internal controls over federal compliance.
2 CFR § 300 codified in 45 CFR part 75 and gives regulatory effect to the Department of Health and Human Services 2 CFR § 200; while 2 CFR § 400 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Agriculture for 2 CFR § 200. 2 CFR § 200.302(b)(6) states the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR § 200.305 for Payment. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7) requires written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E-Cost Principles of this part and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 states that costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. 2 CFR 200.431 requires established written leave policies if the entity intends to pay fringe benefits. 2 CFR 200.464(a)(2) requires reimbursement of relocation costs to employees be in accordance with an established written policy must be consistently followed by the employer. 2 CFR 200.475 requires reimbursement and/or charges to be consistent with those normally allowed in like circumstances in the non-Federal entity's non-federally-funded activities and in accordance with non-Federal entity's written travel reimbursement policies. Additionally, for Federal awards, the Uniform Guidance requires a written policy for the procurement requirements outlined in 2 CFR § 200.318(c)(1), 2 CFR § 200.318(c)(2), and 2 CFR § 200.320(B). The Board of Health did not have written policies as required by the Uniform Guidance as they were not aware of the requirements. The failure to implement written policies as required by the Uniform Guidance could result in noncompliance with the District’s federal programs. The Board of Health should adopt written policies in accordance with the Uniform Guidance to help improve internal controls over federal compliance.
2 CFR § 300 codified in 45 CFR part 75 and gives regulatory effect to the Department of Health and Human Services 2 CFR § 200; while 2 CFR § 400 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Agriculture for 2 CFR § 200. 2 CFR § 200.302(b)(6) states the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR § 200.305 for Payment. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7) requires written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E-Cost Principles of this part and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 states that costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. 2 CFR 200.431 requires established written leave policies if the entity intends to pay fringe benefits. 2 CFR 200.464(a)(2) requires reimbursement of relocation costs to employees be in accordance with an established written policy must be consistently followed by the employer. 2 CFR 200.475 requires reimbursement and/or charges to be consistent with those normally allowed in like circumstances in the non-Federal entity's non-federally-funded activities and in accordance with non-Federal entity's written travel reimbursement policies. Additionally, for Federal awards, the Uniform Guidance requires a written policy for the procurement requirements outlined in 2 CFR § 200.318(c)(1), 2 CFR § 200.318(c)(2), and 2 CFR § 200.320(B). The Board of Health did not have written policies as required by the Uniform Guidance as they were not aware of the requirements. The failure to implement written policies as required by the Uniform Guidance could result in noncompliance with the District’s federal programs. The Board of Health should adopt written policies in accordance with the Uniform Guidance to help improve internal controls over federal compliance.
Internal control deficiency and noncompliance over cash management related to advance payments. Identification of the federal program: Assistance Listing Number 84.116Z: • Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education • U.S. Department of Education • Federal award identification number – P116Z230323 • Federal award year – June 1, 2023 to May 31, 2026 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart D, 200.303 Internal controls. The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart D, 200.305(b) Federal payment. (b) Payments for recipients and subrecipients other than States. For recipients and subrecipients other than States, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency or the pass-through entity and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or subrecipient regardless of whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer or by other means. Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart D, 200.305(b) Federal payment. (b) (1) Advance payments to a recipient or subrecipient must be limited to the minimum amounts needed and be timed with actual, immediate cash requirements of the recipient or subrecipient in carrying out the purpose of the approved program or project. The timing and amount of advance payments must be as close as is administratively feasible to the actual disbursements by the recipient or subrecipient for direct program or project costs and the proportionate share of any allowable indirect costs. Condition: During our testing over cash management, we observed management used the advance method for cash management; however, the entity did not minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the U.S. Treasury and disbursement by the entity. Management submitted and received an advance method payment for the full amount of the federal award in June of 2024. However, there were expenditures incurred between July and December 2024 which were incurred after the advance method payment was completed. Therefore, management did not implement procedures to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the U.S. Treasury and disbursement by the entity. Cause: Management did not have internal controls in place over the compliance requirement as stated in the criteria or specific requirement section above. Effect or potential effect: Advance payments were not supported by internal controls and management did not minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the U.S. Treasury and disbursement by the entity. This can potentially result in interest earned on Federal funds. Questioned costs: $981,704 – Assistance Listing Number 84.116Z – Federal award identification number – P116Z230323 Questioned costs were computed as the expenditures incurred between July and December 2024 which were after the advance method payment was completed in June 2024. Questioned costs means an amount, expended or received from a Federal award, that (1) is noncompliant or suspected noncompliant with Federal statutes, regulations, or the terms and conditions of the Federal award or (2) at the time of the audit, lacked adequate documentation to support compliance. Context: During our testing over cash management, we observed management submitted and received an advance method payment for the full amount of the federal award in June of 2024. However, there were $981,704 expenditures incurred between July and December 2024 which were incurred after the advance method payment was completed. Therefore, management did not implement procedures to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the U.S. Treasury and disbursement by the entity. We were unable to quantify the interest earned on Federal funds. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: Management should develop and implement internal controls over advance method payments to ensure the entity minimizes the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the U.S. Treasury and disbursement by the entity or switch to the reimbursement method. Management should review the advance method payment identified as questioned costs to identify if any improper payments were made to the entity. Views of responsible officials: The Company acknowledges non-compliance with 2 CFR § 200.305 that the entity must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the U.S. Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or subrecipient. However, the questioned costs that were transferred in advance were ultimately deemed reasonable because they were disbursed during the grant period for allowable costs as part of the federal contract awarded. The Company will ensure a proper understanding of the compliance requirements for all federal contracts prior to requesting funds and will ensure funds transferred are compliant with the requirement that the Company minimize the time elapsed from the time of transfer and the disbursement of funds in accordance with the grant terms.
Finding 2024-002 Type of Finding: Cash Management – Noncompliance and Internal Control (Significant Deficiency) Community Development Financial Institutions Fund Equitable Recovery Program (FAL #21.033) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Award Number: 22ERP061764 Funding Years: 4/1/2023 - 3/31/2029 Criteria: Per 2 CFR §200.305(b)(11), a recipient or subrecipient must maintain advance payments of Federal funds in interest-bearing accounts, unless one of the following applies: i. The recipient or subrecipient receives less than $250,000 in Federal funding per year; ii. The best available interest-bearing account would not reasonably be expected to earn interest in excess of $500 per year on Federal cash balances; iii. The depository would require an average or minimum balance so high that it would not be feasible with the expected Federal and non-Federal cash resources; iv. A foreign government or banking system prohibits or precludes interest-bearing accounts; or v. An interest-bearing account is not readily accessible. Furthermore, per 2 CFR §200.305(b)(12), the recipient or subrecipient may retain up to $500 per year of interest earned on Federal funds to use for administrative expenses of the recipient or subrecipient. Any additional interest earned on Federal funds must be returned annually to the Department of Health and Human Services Payment Management System (PMS) through either the Automated Clearing House network or a Fedwire Funds Service payment. All interest in excess of $500 per year must be returned to PMS regardless of whether the recipient or subrecipient was paid through PMS. Condition/Context: REDC received a grant advance payment of approximately $3.2 million from the U.S. Department of Treasury in 2023. However, REDC did not maintain such funds in an interest-bearing account and did not either meet any of the exempting requirements described in 2 CFR §200.305(b)(11) or obtain a waiver that would relieve REDC of the criteria referred to above. Statistically Valid Sample: No, as no sample was tested in connection with the Cash Management compliance requirement. Cause: Management was not aware of the specific Uniform Guidance and grant requirement regarding the maintenance of advance payments of Federal funds in interest-bearing accounts. Effect: REDC did not maintain the federal advance in an interest-bearing account and therefore missed the opportunity to earn interest on the unspent portion of the Federal advance. Questioned Costs: During the year ended December 31, 2024, $35,610 of estimated interest would have been earned on the unspent portion of REDC’s federal advance if the federal advance was maintained in REDC’s interest-bearing account. Identified as a Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: REDC should establish procedures to ensure that all federal advances are deposited into interest-bearing accounts, unless an applicable exception under 2 CFR §200.305(b)(11) applies. Additionally, REDC should periodically review account balances and remit any interest earned on federal funds to the federal awarding agency in accordance with the requirements described in 2 CFR §200.305(b)(12). Views of Responsible Officials: We recognize the auditor’s finding regarding our cash management because we were not fully aware of the requirement to use interest-bearing accounts for advanced federal funds. This was unintentional and we acknowledge the gap in the cash management compliance process for federal grants. We will update our grant cash management policy to ensure all advance payments from federal or similar grants are placed in interest-bearing accounts where applicable. We will have separate interest-bearing accounts established for any federal grant advances with this requirement. Staff will be trained on federal grant cash management. Remittance of interest earned over $500 per year to the federal government. On-going quarterly reviews of all federal grant accounts will be conducted to ensure compliance with interest-bearing requirements. Management is committed to full compliance with federal grant requirements and has taken steps to ensure this issue does not recur. 1) Renaissance booked a payable to federal government of $48,248 on 12/31/2024 financials for the interest. The interest was paid to the federal government on 9/12/2025 regarding the federal CDFI grant contracts. 2) Federal grants to be held in interest bearing accounts will be completed by Sept 30, 2025. 3) Staff will be trained on federal grant cash management to be completed by Sept 30, 2025. 4) Grant cash management policy update to be completed by Oct 31, 2025. 5) On-going quarterly reviews of all federal grant accounts will be conducted to ensure compliance with interest-bearing requirements. The interest earned over $500 will be remitted to federal government each year before the organization’s fiscal year end.
Finding 2024-002 Type of Finding: Cash Management – Noncompliance and Internal Control (Significant Deficiency) Community Development Financial Institutions Fund Equitable Recovery Program (FAL #21.033) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Award Number: 22ERP061764 Funding Years: 4/1/2023 - 3/31/2029 Criteria: Per 2 CFR §200.305(b)(11), a recipient or subrecipient must maintain advance payments of Federal funds in interest-bearing accounts, unless one of the following applies: i. The recipient or subrecipient receives less than $250,000 in Federal funding per year; ii. The best available interest-bearing account would not reasonably be expected to earn interest in excess of $500 per year on Federal cash balances; iii. The depository would require an average or minimum balance so high that it would not be feasible with the expected Federal and non-Federal cash resources; iv. A foreign government or banking system prohibits or precludes interest-bearing accounts; or v. An interest-bearing account is not readily accessible. Furthermore, per 2 CFR §200.305(b)(12), the recipient or subrecipient may retain up to $500 per year of interest earned on Federal funds to use for administrative expenses of the recipient or subrecipient. Any additional interest earned on Federal funds must be returned annually to the Department of Health and Human Services Payment Management System (PMS) through either the Automated Clearing House network or a Fedwire Funds Service payment. All interest in excess of $500 per year must be returned to PMS regardless of whether the recipient or subrecipient was paid through PMS. Condition/Context: REDC received a grant advance payment of approximately $3.2 million from the U.S. Department of Treasury in 2023. However, REDC did not maintain such funds in an interest-bearing account and did not either meet any of the exempting requirements described in 2 CFR §200.305(b)(11) or obtain a waiver that would relieve REDC of the criteria referred to above. Statistically Valid Sample: No, as no sample was tested in connection with the Cash Management compliance requirement. Cause: Management was not aware of the specific Uniform Guidance and grant requirement regarding the maintenance of advance payments of Federal funds in interest-bearing accounts. Effect: REDC did not maintain the federal advance in an interest-bearing account and therefore missed the opportunity to earn interest on the unspent portion of the Federal advance. Questioned Costs: During the year ended December 31, 2024, $35,610 of estimated interest would have been earned on the unspent portion of REDC’s federal advance if the federal advance was maintained in REDC’s interest-bearing account. Identified as a Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: REDC should establish procedures to ensure that all federal advances are deposited into interest-bearing accounts, unless an applicable exception under 2 CFR §200.305(b)(11) applies. Additionally, REDC should periodically review account balances and remit any interest earned on federal funds to the federal awarding agency in accordance with the requirements described in 2 CFR §200.305(b)(12). Views of Responsible Officials: We recognize the auditor’s finding regarding our cash management because we were not fully aware of the requirement to use interest-bearing accounts for advanced federal funds. This was unintentional and we acknowledge the gap in the cash management compliance process for federal grants. We will update our grant cash management policy to ensure all advance payments from federal or similar grants are placed in interest-bearing accounts where applicable. We will have separate interest-bearing accounts established for any federal grant advances with this requirement. Staff will be trained on federal grant cash management. Remittance of interest earned over $500 per year to the federal government. On-going quarterly reviews of all federal grant accounts will be conducted to ensure compliance with interest-bearing requirements. Management is committed to full compliance with federal grant requirements and has taken steps to ensure this issue does not recur. 1) Renaissance booked a payable to federal government of $48,248 on 12/31/2024 financials for the interest. The interest was paid to the federal government on 9/12/2025 regarding the federal CDFI grant contracts. 2) Federal grants to be held in interest bearing accounts will be completed by Sept 30, 2025. 3) Staff will be trained on federal grant cash management to be completed by Sept 30, 2025. 4) Grant cash management policy update to be completed by Oct 31, 2025. 5) On-going quarterly reviews of all federal grant accounts will be conducted to ensure compliance with interest-bearing requirements. The interest earned over $500 will be remitted to federal government each year before the organization’s fiscal year end.
2024-002 Noncompliance with Cash Management (Public Housing Capital Fund CFDA 14.872) Criteria: Federal Code of Regulations, 2 CFR § 200.305 requires the Authority to maintain both written procedures that minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from HUD and disbursement of those funds for eligible costs and financial management systems that meet the standards for fund control and accountability. Advance payments to the Authority must be limited to the minimum amounts needed and be timed with actual, immediate cash requirements of the Authority in its Capital Fund Program. Furthermore, in accordance with 2 CFR § 905.310, the Authority shall initiate a fund requisition from HUD only when funds are due and payable, unless HUD approves another payment schedule as authorized by 2 CFR 200.305. The Capital Fund Program rules provide guidelines of 3 business days from drawdown to expenditure. Condition: During the year, the Authority had 24 transactions in its Capital Fund Program for grants ranging from CFP 2019-2022. All transactions made during the year did not adhere to the requirements to minimize the time federal funds were drawn down to expenditures of 3 business days. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: The Authority did not properly follow the requirements of 2 CFR § 200.305 and 905.310. Cause: The Authority did not have an adequate understanding of the Capital Fund Program requirements as related to Cash Management. Recommendation: The Authority’s staff should familiarize themselves with Capital Fund Program rules and guidelines in relation to Cash Management. Management Response: Management was unaware of the Cash Management rules and guidelines of the Authority’s Capital Fund Program. We will ensure all future eligible Capital Fund draws are made within 3 business days of expenditures.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 11.611, United States Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology Federal Award Identification Number and Year - 70NANB20H067 Pass through Entity - Not applicable - Direct funded Finding Type - Significant deficiency and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - Yes, 2023-002/2023-003 Criteria - The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA), as amended by 6202 of Public Law 110-252, requires a prime grant awardee to report its subgrants using the FFATA Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) tool. The prime recipient will have until the end of the month plus one additional month after an award or subaward is obligated to fulfill the reporting requirement. In addition, written procedures to implement cash management requirements should be in place and updated in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.305. Condition The Organization did not have the appropriate controls in place over FFATA reporting and did not file the required reports. Further, while the Organization had written procedures over cash management, they were outdated and did not reflect the current staffing model. This finding is repeated from the December 31, 2023 audit. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - The following table summarizes the transactions examined and the noncompliance identified for FFATA: Additionally, the cash management policy was not updated when there was restructuring in the finance department during the prior fiscal year. Cause and Effect - A process was not in place for the Organization to determine the required reports to be submitted under the grant. The outdated cash management policy was not reflective of the actual process. Recommendation - The Organization must implement processes and controls to identify and comply with funding agency reporting requirements. Additionally, the cash management policy should be updated to reflect the new process. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - Reporting was completed in SAM.gov in May 2025 for subrecipient subaward amount based on the award period running from calendar periods of July to June.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name 20.500, 20.507, 20.525, 20.526, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year All Pass through Entity Not applicable Finding Type Material weakness Repeat Finding No Criteria 2 CFR 200.305 requires that for reimbursement based grants, the entity should incur the costs for which reimbursement was requested prior to the date of the reimbursement request. Condition During our testing, we identified one reimbursement request that included a check that was not paid as it was voided and paid with a subsequent check, which was also requested for reimbursement. Questioned Costs $3,819 If questioned costs are not determinable, description of why known questioned costs were undetermined or otherwise could not be reported Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed The sum of the expenditures incurred under the contracts for the exception identified in our testing was used to calculate questioned costs. Context Of the 9 draws selected for testing, there was one draw that included one invoice submitted for reimbursement twice on the same draw as it was incorrectly entered into the system. Cause and Effect A check was voided and expense was never paid as the invoice was incorrectly coded to the incorrect vendor, but was still included as a check on the reimbursement request. Recommendation We recommend that the internal controls be put in place to ensure that there are no duplicate expenses being submitted for reimbursement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions Effective 6/1/2025, TARTA implemented a new ERP system that will allow us to electronically control, accumulated, and monitor all transaction related to our grant draws in accordance with 2 CFR 200.305 going forward.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name 20.500, 20.507, 20.525, 20.526, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year All Pass through Entity Not applicable Finding Type Material weakness Repeat Finding No Criteria 2 CFR 200.305 requires that for reimbursement based grants, the entity should incur the costs for which reimbursement was requested prior to the date of the reimbursement request. Condition During our testing, we identified one reimbursement request that included a check that was not paid as it was voided and paid with a subsequent check, which was also requested for reimbursement. Questioned Costs $3,819 If questioned costs are not determinable, description of why known questioned costs were undetermined or otherwise could not be reported Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed The sum of the expenditures incurred under the contracts for the exception identified in our testing was used to calculate questioned costs. Context Of the 9 draws selected for testing, there was one draw that included one invoice submitted for reimbursement twice on the same draw as it was incorrectly entered into the system. Cause and Effect A check was voided and expense was never paid as the invoice was incorrectly coded to the incorrect vendor, but was still included as a check on the reimbursement request. Recommendation We recommend that the internal controls be put in place to ensure that there are no duplicate expenses being submitted for reimbursement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions Effective 6/1/2025, TARTA implemented a new ERP system that will allow us to electronically control, accumulated, and monitor all transaction related to our grant draws in accordance with 2 CFR 200.305 going forward.