FINDING 2022-014 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Cash Management Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Cash Management Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed nor implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with the requirements related to the grant agreement and the Cash Management compliance requirement. The School Corporation requested reimbursement based off a calculation with the budgeted line items instead of actual grant expenses. For 19 of 20 reimbursement requests tested, the School Corporation was unable to provide adequate supporting documentation. Due to the lack of supporting documentation, it was not possible to determine if grant payments were reimbursements of expenditures or advance payments. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 54 SCOTT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2 SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.305(b) states in part: "For non-Federal entities other than states, payments methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer, or issuance or redemption of checks, warrants, or payment by other means. . . . (3) Reimbursement is the preferred method when the requirements in paragraph (b) cannot be met, when the Federal awarding agency sets a specific condition per ? 200.208, or when the non-Federal entity requests payment by reimbursement. . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in ?? 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." Cause Management had not designed nor implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and available for audit related to the Cash Management compliance requirement. Effect The failure to retain and provide appropriate supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the Cash Management compliance requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and available for audit and comply with the grant agreement and the Cash Management compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-014 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Cash Management Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Cash Management Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed nor implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with the requirements related to the grant agreement and the Cash Management compliance requirement. The School Corporation requested reimbursement based off a calculation with the budgeted line items instead of actual grant expenses. For 19 of 20 reimbursement requests tested, the School Corporation was unable to provide adequate supporting documentation. Due to the lack of supporting documentation, it was not possible to determine if grant payments were reimbursements of expenditures or advance payments. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 54 SCOTT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2 SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.305(b) states in part: "For non-Federal entities other than states, payments methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer, or issuance or redemption of checks, warrants, or payment by other means. . . . (3) Reimbursement is the preferred method when the requirements in paragraph (b) cannot be met, when the Federal awarding agency sets a specific condition per ? 200.208, or when the non-Federal entity requests payment by reimbursement. . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in ?? 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." Cause Management had not designed nor implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and available for audit related to the Cash Management compliance requirement. Effect The failure to retain and provide appropriate supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the Cash Management compliance requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and available for audit and comply with the grant agreement and the Cash Management compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-014 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Cash Management Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Cash Management Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed nor implemented at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with the requirements related to the grant agreement and the Cash Management compliance requirement. The School Corporation requested reimbursement based off a calculation with the budgeted line items instead of actual grant expenses. For 19 of 20 reimbursement requests tested, the School Corporation was unable to provide adequate supporting documentation. Due to the lack of supporting documentation, it was not possible to determine if grant payments were reimbursements of expenditures or advance payments. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 54 SCOTT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2 SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.305(b) states in part: "For non-Federal entities other than states, payments methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer, or issuance or redemption of checks, warrants, or payment by other means. . . . (3) Reimbursement is the preferred method when the requirements in paragraph (b) cannot be met, when the Federal awarding agency sets a specific condition per ? 200.208, or when the non-Federal entity requests payment by reimbursement. . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in ?? 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." Cause Management had not designed nor implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and available for audit related to the Cash Management compliance requirement. Effect The failure to retain and provide appropriate supporting documentation prevented the determination of the School Corporation's compliance with the Cash Management compliance requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that documentation will be maintained and available for audit and comply with the grant agreement and the Cash Management compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to ? 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6), Requirements for Financial Management, the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide written procedures to implement the requirements of ? 2 CFR 200.305 Federal Payments. Condition: The Organization's Financial and Control Policy does not include any procedures that address the requirements of ? 2 CFR 200.305. Questioned costs: None. Context: We noted the Organization is not in compliance with the requirements defined within 2 CFR ?200.302(b)(6). Cause: The Organization lacks written procedures that address the Federal Payments requirements. Effect: Noncompliance with federal regulations. Repeat Finding: Yes: 2021-004 Recommendation: We recommend the Organization revise their Financial and Control Policy to encompass the requirements defined within ? 2 CFR 200.305. Views of responsible officials: Management concurs with the audit finding. While the policy has been updated previously, it was not updated such that it complied with the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305. The Controller and CFO have updated the policy so that it fully complies with all of the requirements defined within 2 CFR 200.305.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to ? 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6), Requirements for Financial Management, the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide written procedures to implement the requirements of ? 2 CFR 200.305 Federal Payments. Condition: The Organization's Financial and Control Policy does not include any procedures that address the requirements of ? 2 CFR 200.305. Questioned costs: None. Context: We noted the Organization is not in compliance with the requirements defined within 2 CFR ?200.302(b)(6). Cause: The Organization lacks written procedures that address the Federal Payments requirements. Effect: Noncompliance with federal regulations. Repeat Finding: Yes: 2021-004 Recommendation: We recommend the Organization revise their Financial and Control Policy to encompass the requirements defined within ? 2 CFR 200.305. Views of responsible officials: Management concurs with the audit finding. While the policy has been updated previously, it was not updated such that it complied with the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305. The Controller and CFO have updated the policy so that it fully complies with all of the requirements defined within 2 CFR 200.305.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to ? 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6), Requirements for Financial Management, the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide written procedures to implement the requirements of ? 2 CFR 200.305 Federal Payments. Condition: The Organization's Financial and Control Policy does not include any procedures that address the requirements of ? 2 CFR 200.305. Questioned costs: None. Context: We noted the Organization is not in compliance with the requirements defined within 2 CFR ?200.302(b)(6). Cause: The Organization lacks written procedures that address the Federal Payments requirements. Effect: Noncompliance with federal regulations. Repeat Finding: Yes: 2021-004 Recommendation: We recommend the Organization revise their Financial and Control Policy to encompass the requirements defined within ? 2 CFR 200.305. Views of responsible officials: Management concurs with the audit finding. While the policy has been updated previously, it was not updated such that it complied with the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305. The Controller and CFO have updated the policy so that it fully complies with all of the requirements defined within 2 CFR 200.305.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to ? 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6), Requirements for Financial Management, the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide written procedures to implement the requirements of ? 2 CFR 200.305 Federal Payments. Condition: The Organization's Financial and Control Policy does not include any procedures that address the requirements of ? 2 CFR 200.305. Questioned costs: None. Context: We noted the Organization is not in compliance with the requirements defined within 2 CFR ?200.302(b)(6). Cause: The Organization lacks written procedures that address the Federal Payments requirements. Effect: Noncompliance with federal regulations. Repeat Finding: Yes: 2021-004 Recommendation: We recommend the Organization revise their Financial and Control Policy to encompass the requirements defined within ? 2 CFR 200.305. Views of responsible officials: Management concurs with the audit finding. While the policy has been updated previously, it was not updated such that it complied with the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305. The Controller and CFO have updated the policy so that it fully complies with all of the requirements defined within 2 CFR 200.305.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to ? 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6), Requirements for Financial Management, the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide written procedures to implement the requirements of ? 2 CFR 200.305 Federal Payments. Condition: The Organization's Financial and Control Policy does not include any procedures that address the requirements of ? 2 CFR 200.305. Questioned costs: None. Context: We noted the Organization is not in compliance with the requirements defined within 2 CFR ?200.302(b)(6). Cause: The Organization lacks written procedures that address the Federal Payments requirements. Effect: Noncompliance with federal regulations. Repeat Finding: Yes: 2021-004 Recommendation: We recommend the Organization revise their Financial and Control Policy to encompass the requirements defined within ? 2 CFR 200.305. Views of responsible officials: Management concurs with the audit finding. While the policy has been updated previously, it was not updated such that it complied with the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305. The Controller and CFO have updated the policy so that it fully complies with all of the requirements defined within 2 CFR 200.305.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to ? 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6), Requirements for Financial Management, the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide written procedures to implement the requirements of ? 2 CFR 200.305 Federal Payments. Condition: The Organization's Financial and Control Policy does not include any procedures that address the requirements of ? 2 CFR 200.305. Questioned costs: None. Context: We noted the Organization is not in compliance with the requirements defined within 2 CFR ?200.302(b)(6). Cause: The Organization lacks written procedures that address the Federal Payments requirements. Effect: Noncompliance with federal regulations. Repeat Finding: Yes: 2021-004 Recommendation: We recommend the Organization revise their Financial and Control Policy to encompass the requirements defined within ? 2 CFR 200.305. Views of responsible officials: Management concurs with the audit finding. While the policy has been updated previously, it was not updated such that it complied with the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305. The Controller and CFO have updated the policy so that it fully complies with all of the requirements defined within 2 CFR 200.305.
2022-003: Noncompliance with Cash Management Department of Labor WIOA Cluster AL #17.258 WIOA Adult Program AL #17.259 WIOA Youth Activities AL #17.278 WIOA Dislocated Worker Formula Grants Department of Treasury AL# 21.019 Coronavirus Relief Fund Condition: Cash draws from WIOA Cluster and Coronavirus Relief Fund grants exceeded the amount needed to cover allowable costs. Criteria: Non-federal entities must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the US Treasury or pass-through entity and disbursement by the non-federal entity for direct program or project costs and the proportionate share of allowable indirect costs, whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer, or issuance or redemption of checks, warrants, or payment by other means (2 CFR section 200.305(b)). Cause: Staffing issues resulted in funds being overdrawn and inaccuracies in reconciling the State of Indiana Department of Workforce Development?s system and the general ledger. Effect: Approximately $286,000 of WIOA Cluster funds and $94,000 of Coronavirus Relief Funds were drawn in excess of allowable costs incurred. Recommendation: Management needs to work with the State of Indiana Department of Workforce Development to refund the overdrawn funds or apply the funds to allowable costs in the upcoming fiscal year. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Staffing changes have occurred, and the fiscal management duties have been outsourced to a third party which has experience with Workforce Boards and related grants. The issues are being addressed with IN DWD.
2022-003: Noncompliance with Cash Management Department of Labor WIOA Cluster AL #17.258 WIOA Adult Program AL #17.259 WIOA Youth Activities AL #17.278 WIOA Dislocated Worker Formula Grants Department of Treasury AL# 21.019 Coronavirus Relief Fund Condition: Cash draws from WIOA Cluster and Coronavirus Relief Fund grants exceeded the amount needed to cover allowable costs. Criteria: Non-federal entities must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the US Treasury or pass-through entity and disbursement by the non-federal entity for direct program or project costs and the proportionate share of allowable indirect costs, whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer, or issuance or redemption of checks, warrants, or payment by other means (2 CFR section 200.305(b)). Cause: Staffing issues resulted in funds being overdrawn and inaccuracies in reconciling the State of Indiana Department of Workforce Development?s system and the general ledger. Effect: Approximately $286,000 of WIOA Cluster funds and $94,000 of Coronavirus Relief Funds were drawn in excess of allowable costs incurred. Recommendation: Management needs to work with the State of Indiana Department of Workforce Development to refund the overdrawn funds or apply the funds to allowable costs in the upcoming fiscal year. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Staffing changes have occurred, and the fiscal management duties have been outsourced to a third party which has experience with Workforce Boards and related grants. The issues are being addressed with IN DWD.
2022-003: Noncompliance with Cash Management Department of Labor WIOA Cluster AL #17.258 WIOA Adult Program AL #17.259 WIOA Youth Activities AL #17.278 WIOA Dislocated Worker Formula Grants Department of Treasury AL# 21.019 Coronavirus Relief Fund Condition: Cash draws from WIOA Cluster and Coronavirus Relief Fund grants exceeded the amount needed to cover allowable costs. Criteria: Non-federal entities must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the US Treasury or pass-through entity and disbursement by the non-federal entity for direct program or project costs and the proportionate share of allowable indirect costs, whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer, or issuance or redemption of checks, warrants, or payment by other means (2 CFR section 200.305(b)). Cause: Staffing issues resulted in funds being overdrawn and inaccuracies in reconciling the State of Indiana Department of Workforce Development?s system and the general ledger. Effect: Approximately $286,000 of WIOA Cluster funds and $94,000 of Coronavirus Relief Funds were drawn in excess of allowable costs incurred. Recommendation: Management needs to work with the State of Indiana Department of Workforce Development to refund the overdrawn funds or apply the funds to allowable costs in the upcoming fiscal year. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Staffing changes have occurred, and the fiscal management duties have been outsourced to a third party which has experience with Workforce Boards and related grants. The issues are being addressed with IN DWD.
2022-003: Noncompliance with Cash Management Department of Labor WIOA Cluster AL #17.258 WIOA Adult Program AL #17.259 WIOA Youth Activities AL #17.278 WIOA Dislocated Worker Formula Grants Department of Treasury AL# 21.019 Coronavirus Relief Fund Condition: Cash draws from WIOA Cluster and Coronavirus Relief Fund grants exceeded the amount needed to cover allowable costs. Criteria: Non-federal entities must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the US Treasury or pass-through entity and disbursement by the non-federal entity for direct program or project costs and the proportionate share of allowable indirect costs, whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer, or issuance or redemption of checks, warrants, or payment by other means (2 CFR section 200.305(b)). Cause: Staffing issues resulted in funds being overdrawn and inaccuracies in reconciling the State of Indiana Department of Workforce Development?s system and the general ledger. Effect: Approximately $286,000 of WIOA Cluster funds and $94,000 of Coronavirus Relief Funds were drawn in excess of allowable costs incurred. Recommendation: Management needs to work with the State of Indiana Department of Workforce Development to refund the overdrawn funds or apply the funds to allowable costs in the upcoming fiscal year. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Staffing changes have occurred, and the fiscal management duties have been outsourced to a third party which has experience with Workforce Boards and related grants. The issues are being addressed with IN DWD.
2022-003: Noncompliance with Cash Management Department of Labor WIOA Cluster AL #17.258 WIOA Adult Program AL #17.259 WIOA Youth Activities AL #17.278 WIOA Dislocated Worker Formula Grants Department of Treasury AL# 21.019 Coronavirus Relief Fund Condition: Cash draws from WIOA Cluster and Coronavirus Relief Fund grants exceeded the amount needed to cover allowable costs. Criteria: Non-federal entities must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the US Treasury or pass-through entity and disbursement by the non-federal entity for direct program or project costs and the proportionate share of allowable indirect costs, whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer, or issuance or redemption of checks, warrants, or payment by other means (2 CFR section 200.305(b)). Cause: Staffing issues resulted in funds being overdrawn and inaccuracies in reconciling the State of Indiana Department of Workforce Development?s system and the general ledger. Effect: Approximately $286,000 of WIOA Cluster funds and $94,000 of Coronavirus Relief Funds were drawn in excess of allowable costs incurred. Recommendation: Management needs to work with the State of Indiana Department of Workforce Development to refund the overdrawn funds or apply the funds to allowable costs in the upcoming fiscal year. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Staffing changes have occurred, and the fiscal management duties have been outsourced to a third party which has experience with Workforce Boards and related grants. The issues are being addressed with IN DWD.
2022-003: Noncompliance with Cash Management Department of Labor WIOA Cluster AL #17.258 WIOA Adult Program AL #17.259 WIOA Youth Activities AL #17.278 WIOA Dislocated Worker Formula Grants Department of Treasury AL# 21.019 Coronavirus Relief Fund Condition: Cash draws from WIOA Cluster and Coronavirus Relief Fund grants exceeded the amount needed to cover allowable costs. Criteria: Non-federal entities must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the US Treasury or pass-through entity and disbursement by the non-federal entity for direct program or project costs and the proportionate share of allowable indirect costs, whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer, or issuance or redemption of checks, warrants, or payment by other means (2 CFR section 200.305(b)). Cause: Staffing issues resulted in funds being overdrawn and inaccuracies in reconciling the State of Indiana Department of Workforce Development?s system and the general ledger. Effect: Approximately $286,000 of WIOA Cluster funds and $94,000 of Coronavirus Relief Funds were drawn in excess of allowable costs incurred. Recommendation: Management needs to work with the State of Indiana Department of Workforce Development to refund the overdrawn funds or apply the funds to allowable costs in the upcoming fiscal year. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Staffing changes have occurred, and the fiscal management duties have been outsourced to a third party which has experience with Workforce Boards and related grants. The issues are being addressed with IN DWD.
2022-003: Noncompliance with Cash Management Department of Labor WIOA Cluster AL #17.258 WIOA Adult Program AL #17.259 WIOA Youth Activities AL #17.278 WIOA Dislocated Worker Formula Grants Department of Treasury AL# 21.019 Coronavirus Relief Fund Condition: Cash draws from WIOA Cluster and Coronavirus Relief Fund grants exceeded the amount needed to cover allowable costs. Criteria: Non-federal entities must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the US Treasury or pass-through entity and disbursement by the non-federal entity for direct program or project costs and the proportionate share of allowable indirect costs, whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer, or issuance or redemption of checks, warrants, or payment by other means (2 CFR section 200.305(b)). Cause: Staffing issues resulted in funds being overdrawn and inaccuracies in reconciling the State of Indiana Department of Workforce Development?s system and the general ledger. Effect: Approximately $286,000 of WIOA Cluster funds and $94,000 of Coronavirus Relief Funds were drawn in excess of allowable costs incurred. Recommendation: Management needs to work with the State of Indiana Department of Workforce Development to refund the overdrawn funds or apply the funds to allowable costs in the upcoming fiscal year. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Staffing changes have occurred, and the fiscal management duties have been outsourced to a third party which has experience with Workforce Boards and related grants. The issues are being addressed with IN DWD.
2022-003: Noncompliance with Cash Management Department of Labor WIOA Cluster AL #17.258 WIOA Adult Program AL #17.259 WIOA Youth Activities AL #17.278 WIOA Dislocated Worker Formula Grants Department of Treasury AL# 21.019 Coronavirus Relief Fund Condition: Cash draws from WIOA Cluster and Coronavirus Relief Fund grants exceeded the amount needed to cover allowable costs. Criteria: Non-federal entities must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the US Treasury or pass-through entity and disbursement by the non-federal entity for direct program or project costs and the proportionate share of allowable indirect costs, whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer, or issuance or redemption of checks, warrants, or payment by other means (2 CFR section 200.305(b)). Cause: Staffing issues resulted in funds being overdrawn and inaccuracies in reconciling the State of Indiana Department of Workforce Development?s system and the general ledger. Effect: Approximately $286,000 of WIOA Cluster funds and $94,000 of Coronavirus Relief Funds were drawn in excess of allowable costs incurred. Recommendation: Management needs to work with the State of Indiana Department of Workforce Development to refund the overdrawn funds or apply the funds to allowable costs in the upcoming fiscal year. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Staffing changes have occurred, and the fiscal management duties have been outsourced to a third party which has experience with Workforce Boards and related grants. The issues are being addressed with IN DWD.
2022-003: Noncompliance with Cash Management Department of Labor WIOA Cluster AL #17.258 WIOA Adult Program AL #17.259 WIOA Youth Activities AL #17.278 WIOA Dislocated Worker Formula Grants Department of Treasury AL# 21.019 Coronavirus Relief Fund Condition: Cash draws from WIOA Cluster and Coronavirus Relief Fund grants exceeded the amount needed to cover allowable costs. Criteria: Non-federal entities must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the US Treasury or pass-through entity and disbursement by the non-federal entity for direct program or project costs and the proportionate share of allowable indirect costs, whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer, or issuance or redemption of checks, warrants, or payment by other means (2 CFR section 200.305(b)). Cause: Staffing issues resulted in funds being overdrawn and inaccuracies in reconciling the State of Indiana Department of Workforce Development?s system and the general ledger. Effect: Approximately $286,000 of WIOA Cluster funds and $94,000 of Coronavirus Relief Funds were drawn in excess of allowable costs incurred. Recommendation: Management needs to work with the State of Indiana Department of Workforce Development to refund the overdrawn funds or apply the funds to allowable costs in the upcoming fiscal year. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Staffing changes have occurred, and the fiscal management duties have been outsourced to a third party which has experience with Workforce Boards and related grants. The issues are being addressed with IN DWD.
Child Nutrition Cluster ?School Nutrition Program ? Assistance Listing #10.555 and Summer Food Service Program ? Assistance Listing #10.559 2022-005 ? Significant Deficiency in Controls over Compliance and Compliance Finding: Administrative Requirements of Uniform Guidance ? Administrative Policies This is a repeat of prior year finding 2021-006 Conditions and Criteria: Written policies associated with financial management, allowable costs, cash management, procurement and compensation are in need of adoption and enhancement to meet the administrative requirements of Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200). Cause/Context: The Catholic Secondary Schools of the Diocese of Grand Rapids have limited written policies and procedures that are applicable to federal awards and address the direct and material compliance matters important to the major federal program. In addition, there are unique policy requirements of Uniform Guidance related to financial management, allowable costs, cash management and procurement that are relevant to the Schools? federal programs. Recommendations: The Catholic Secondary Schools of the Diocese of Grand Rapids should adopt the following written policies and updates: ? Financial Management (2 CFR 200.302) The financial management policy should include records documenting compliance, and the tracking of funds to determine that expenditures are in accordance with the terms and conditions of the federal awards. The financial management and reporting system must provide the following: ? Identification - Title of the award, CFDA number ? Complete disclosure of accurate and current financial results of each federal award ? Source and application of funds for federal award activity ? Record retention and access ? define the time period for which records must be kept (can vary by grant agreement), and who has the ability access the records (?200.333 - ?200.337) ? Written procedure to implement cash management requirements (see below) ? Written procedures for determining the allowability of costs (see below) ? Cash Management (2 CFR 200.305) A written policy is required by Uniform Guidance detailing the Schools? procedures to minimize the time that elapses between draw and expenditure of federal dollars. ? Allowable Costs (2 CFR 200.302(b)(7)) The Schools must have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E - Cost Principles of Uniform Guidance and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. This includes the determination of allowable costs and the review of this determination. The standard assumes policies and procedures are in place for disbursements, and the allowable cost policy will demonstrate how the Schools ensure compliance. The criteria for costs to be considered allowable are documented within 2 CFR 200.403. ? Procurement Standards (2 CFR 200.317 ? 200.326) The Schools must have a written policy that promotes full and open vendor competition, conflict of interest policies should cover employees as well as the organization, and general purchase requirements with specific thresholds as set forth by the Uniform Guidance. There are five allowable procurement methods as described in ?200.320. ? Policy Guide (2 CFR 200.400) In summary, the Schools must have written policies that document the efficient and effective administration of federal awards through sound management practices. The Schools have the primary responsibility for employing whatever form of sound organization and management techniques may be necessary to assure proper and efficient administration of the federal awards. The accounting practices must be consistent with Uniform Guidance cost principles, support the accumulation of costs as required, and must provide for adequate documentation to support costs charged to the federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Child Nutrition Cluster ?School Nutrition Program ? Assistance Listing #10.555 and Summer Food Service Program ? Assistance Listing #10.559 2022-005 ? Significant Deficiency in Controls over Compliance and Compliance Finding: Administrative Requirements of Uniform Guidance ? Administrative Policies This is also a compliance finding, not just controls - UPDATED This is a repeat of prior year finding 2021-006 Conditions and Criteria: Written policies associated with financial management, allowable costs, cash management, procurement and compensation are in need of adoption and enhancement to meet the administrative requirements of Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200). Cause/Context: The Catholic Secondary Schools of the Diocese of Grand Rapids have limited written policies and procedures that are applicable to federal awards and address the direct and material compliance matters important to the major federal program. In addition, there are unique policy requirements of Uniform Guidance related to financial management, allowable costs, cash management and procurement that are relevant to the Schools? federal programs. Recommendations: The Catholic Secondary Schools of the Diocese of Grand Rapids should adopt the following written policies and updates: ? Financial Management (2 CFR 200.302) The financial management policy should include records documenting compliance, and the tracking of funds to determine that expenditures are in accordance with the terms and conditions of the federal awards. The financial management and reporting system must provide the following: ? Identification - Title of the award, CFDA number ? Complete disclosure of accurate and current financial results of each federal award ? Source and application of funds for federal award activity ? Record retention and access ? define the time period for which records must be kept (can vary by grant agreement), and who has the ability access the records (?200.333 - ?200.337) ? Written procedure to implement cash management requirements (see below) ? Written procedures for determining the allowability of costs (see below) ? Cash Management (2 CFR 200.305) A written policy is required by Uniform Guidance detailing the Schools? procedures to minimize the time that elapses between draw and expenditure of federal dollars. ? Allowable Costs (2 CFR 200.302(b)(7)) The Schools must have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E - Cost Principles of Uniform Guidance and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. This includes the determination of allowable costs and the review of this determination. The standard assumes policies and procedures are in place for disbursements, and the allowable cost policy will demonstrate how the Schools ensure compliance. The criteria for costs to be considered allowable are documented within 2 CFR 200.403. ? Procurement Standards (2 CFR 200.317 ? 200.326) The Schools must have a written policy that promotes full and open vendor competition, conflict of interest policies should cover employees as well as the organization, and general purchase requirements with specific thresholds as set forth by the Uniform Guidance. There are five allowable procurement methods as described in ?200.320. ? Policy Guide (2 CFR 200.400) In summary, the Schools must have written policies that document the efficient and effective administration of federal awards through sound management practices. The Schools have the primary responsibility for employing whatever form of sound organization and management techniques may be necessary to assure proper and efficient administration of the federal awards. The accounting practices must be consistent with Uniform Guidance cost principles, support the accumulation of costs as required, and must provide for adequate documentation to support costs charged to the federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We concur with the findings of the auditors. We have developed a plan to address the findings, and are actively working to implement that plan. The corrective action plan is attached to this report.
Child Nutrition Cluster ?School Nutrition Program ? Assistance Listing #10.555 and Summer Food Service Program ? Assistance Listing #10.559 2022-005 ? Significant Deficiency in Controls over Compliance and Compliance Finding: Administrative Requirements of Uniform Guidance ? Administrative Policies This is a repeat of prior year finding 2021-006 Conditions and Criteria: Written policies associated with financial management, allowable costs, cash management, procurement and compensation are in need of adoption and enhancement to meet the administrative requirements of Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200). Cause/Context: The Catholic Secondary Schools of the Diocese of Grand Rapids have limited written policies and procedures that are applicable to federal awards and address the direct and material compliance matters important to the major federal program. In addition, there are unique policy requirements of Uniform Guidance related to financial management, allowable costs, cash management and procurement that are relevant to the Schools? federal programs. Recommendations: The Catholic Secondary Schools of the Diocese of Grand Rapids should adopt the following written policies and updates: ? Financial Management (2 CFR 200.302) The financial management policy should include records documenting compliance, and the tracking of funds to determine that expenditures are in accordance with the terms and conditions of the federal awards. The financial management and reporting system must provide the following: ? Identification - Title of the award, CFDA number ? Complete disclosure of accurate and current financial results of each federal award ? Source and application of funds for federal award activity ? Record retention and access ? define the time period for which records must be kept (can vary by grant agreement), and who has the ability access the records (?200.333 - ?200.337) ? Written procedure to implement cash management requirements (see below) ? Written procedures for determining the allowability of costs (see below) ? Cash Management (2 CFR 200.305) A written policy is required by Uniform Guidance detailing the Schools? procedures to minimize the time that elapses between draw and expenditure of federal dollars. ? Allowable Costs (2 CFR 200.302(b)(7)) The Schools must have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E - Cost Principles of Uniform Guidance and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. This includes the determination of allowable costs and the review of this determination. The standard assumes policies and procedures are in place for disbursements, and the allowable cost policy will demonstrate how the Schools ensure compliance. The criteria for costs to be considered allowable are documented within 2 CFR 200.403. ? Procurement Standards (2 CFR 200.317 ? 200.326) The Schools must have a written policy that promotes full and open vendor competition, conflict of interest policies should cover employees as well as the organization, and general purchase requirements with specific thresholds as set forth by the Uniform Guidance. There are five allowable procurement methods as described in ?200.320. ? Policy Guide (2 CFR 200.400) In summary, the Schools must have written policies that document the efficient and effective administration of federal awards through sound management practices. The Schools have the primary responsibility for employing whatever form of sound organization and management techniques may be necessary to assure proper and efficient administration of the federal awards. The accounting practices must be consistent with Uniform Guidance cost principles, support the accumulation of costs as required, and must provide for adequate documentation to support costs charged to the federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Child Nutrition Cluster ?School Nutrition Program ? Assistance Listing #10.555 and Summer Food Service Program ? Assistance Listing #10.559 2022-005 ? Significant Deficiency in Controls over Compliance and Compliance Finding: Administrative Requirements of Uniform Guidance ? Administrative Policies This is also a compliance finding, not just controls - UPDATED This is a repeat of prior year finding 2021-006 Conditions and Criteria: Written policies associated with financial management, allowable costs, cash management, procurement and compensation are in need of adoption and enhancement to meet the administrative requirements of Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200). Cause/Context: The Catholic Secondary Schools of the Diocese of Grand Rapids have limited written policies and procedures that are applicable to federal awards and address the direct and material compliance matters important to the major federal program. In addition, there are unique policy requirements of Uniform Guidance related to financial management, allowable costs, cash management and procurement that are relevant to the Schools? federal programs. Recommendations: The Catholic Secondary Schools of the Diocese of Grand Rapids should adopt the following written policies and updates: ? Financial Management (2 CFR 200.302) The financial management policy should include records documenting compliance, and the tracking of funds to determine that expenditures are in accordance with the terms and conditions of the federal awards. The financial management and reporting system must provide the following: ? Identification - Title of the award, CFDA number ? Complete disclosure of accurate and current financial results of each federal award ? Source and application of funds for federal award activity ? Record retention and access ? define the time period for which records must be kept (can vary by grant agreement), and who has the ability access the records (?200.333 - ?200.337) ? Written procedure to implement cash management requirements (see below) ? Written procedures for determining the allowability of costs (see below) ? Cash Management (2 CFR 200.305) A written policy is required by Uniform Guidance detailing the Schools? procedures to minimize the time that elapses between draw and expenditure of federal dollars. ? Allowable Costs (2 CFR 200.302(b)(7)) The Schools must have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E - Cost Principles of Uniform Guidance and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. This includes the determination of allowable costs and the review of this determination. The standard assumes policies and procedures are in place for disbursements, and the allowable cost policy will demonstrate how the Schools ensure compliance. The criteria for costs to be considered allowable are documented within 2 CFR 200.403. ? Procurement Standards (2 CFR 200.317 ? 200.326) The Schools must have a written policy that promotes full and open vendor competition, conflict of interest policies should cover employees as well as the organization, and general purchase requirements with specific thresholds as set forth by the Uniform Guidance. There are five allowable procurement methods as described in ?200.320. ? Policy Guide (2 CFR 200.400) In summary, the Schools must have written policies that document the efficient and effective administration of federal awards through sound management practices. The Schools have the primary responsibility for employing whatever form of sound organization and management techniques may be necessary to assure proper and efficient administration of the federal awards. The accounting practices must be consistent with Uniform Guidance cost principles, support the accumulation of costs as required, and must provide for adequate documentation to support costs charged to the federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We concur with the findings of the auditors. We have developed a plan to address the findings, and are actively working to implement that plan. The corrective action plan is attached to this report.
Rural Behavioral Health Workforce Coordinating Centers – Northern Border Region – CFDA #93.912; Grant #1 U2SRH43523-01-00 – Year ended August 31, 2022) Criteria: According to 2 CFR section 200.305(b), non-federal entities must minimize the time elapsed between the transfer of federal funds and disbursement by the non-federal entity for direct program costs. Condition: Drawdown reports were not available for testing and financial reports weren’t available to determine that the time elapsed between the transfer of federal funds and disbursement by the non-federal entity for direct program costs was minimized. Effect: The entity may not be in compliance with the cash management requirements. Questioned Costs: $0 Context: There was a significant amount of turnover within the organization. Due to the turnover and the lack of record retention policies and procedures, records of drawdowns and documentation to support compliance with cash management requirements couldn’t be located. On November 14, 2022, the Company adopted new records management policies and procedures.
Rural Behavioral Health Workforce Coordinating Centers – Northern Border Region – CFDA #93.912; Grant #1 U2SRH43523-01-00 – Year ended August 31, 2022) Criteria: According to 2 CFR section 200.305(b), non-federal entities must minimize the time elapsed between the transfer of federal funds and disbursement by the non-federal entity for direct program costs. Condition: Drawdown reports were not available for testing and financial reports weren’t available to determine that the time elapsed between the transfer of federal funds and disbursement by the non-federal entity for direct program costs was minimized. Effect: The entity may not be in compliance with the cash management requirements. Questioned Costs: $0 Context: There was a significant amount of turnover within the organization. Due to the turnover and the lack of record retention policies and procedures, records of drawdowns and documentation to support compliance with cash management requirements couldn’t be located. On November 14, 2022, the Company adopted new records management policies and procedures.
Rural Behavioral Health Workforce Coordinating Centers – Northern Border Region – CFDA #93.912; Grant #1 U2SRH43523-01-00 – Year ended August 31, 2022) Criteria: According to 2 CFR section 200.305(b), non-federal entities must minimize the time elapsed between the transfer of federal funds and disbursement by the non-federal entity for direct program costs. Condition: Drawdown reports were not available for testing and financial reports weren’t available to determine that the time elapsed between the transfer of federal funds and disbursement by the non-federal entity for direct program costs was minimized. Effect: The entity may not be in compliance with the cash management requirements. Questioned Costs: $0 Context: There was a significant amount of turnover within the organization. Due to the turnover and the lack of record retention policies and procedures, records of drawdowns and documentation to support compliance with cash management requirements couldn’t be located. On November 14, 2022, the Company adopted new records management policies and procedures.
Rural Behavioral Health Workforce Coordinating Centers – Northern Border Region – CFDA #93.912; Grant #1 U2SRH43523-01-00 – Year ended August 31, 2022) Criteria: According to 2 CFR section 200.305(b), non-federal entities must minimize the time elapsed between the transfer of federal funds and disbursement by the non-federal entity for direct program costs. Condition: Drawdown reports were not available for testing and financial reports weren’t available to determine that the time elapsed between the transfer of federal funds and disbursement by the non-federal entity for direct program costs was minimized. Effect: The entity may not be in compliance with the cash management requirements. Questioned Costs: $0 Context: There was a significant amount of turnover within the organization. Due to the turnover and the lack of record retention policies and procedures, records of drawdowns and documentation to support compliance with cash management requirements couldn’t be located. On November 14, 2022, the Company adopted new records management policies and procedures.
2022-007 - Cash Management Federal Program Information: ALN - 66.458 - Clean Water State Revolving Funds Criteria: The following CFR(s) apply to this finding: 2 CFR section 200.302(b)(6)) & 2 CFR section 200.305(b) (3). Condition: During audit procedures, it was identified that the Town did not have a cash management policy in place. Cause: The Town has experienced turnover in the Treasurer’s position over the past few years, which has delayed the policy implementation. Effect: The Town may not have adequate policy and procedures in place to safeguard its most liquid assets. Identification of Questioned Costs: None identified. Context: The population consisted of 12 out of the 30 pay requisition deposit of reimbursements from the fiscal year were examined. Out of the 12 selections only 4 deposits had backup documentation and those 4 were not properly recorded. The other 8 were lacking proof that deposits were recorded properly. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding of 2021-006. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Town adopt a cash management policy that follows the Uniform Guidance and that the Town implement internal control processes and procedures to ensure that the adopted policy is followed. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Client agrees with finding, and a version of their response can be found in the Corrective Action Plan. Please see the Corrective Action Plan issued by the Town of Livermore Falls.
2022-007 - Cash Management Federal Program Information: ALN - 66.458 - Clean Water State Revolving Funds Criteria: The following CFR(s) apply to this finding: 2 CFR section 200.302(b)(6)) & 2 CFR section 200.305(b) (3). Condition: During audit procedures, it was identified that the Town did not have a cash management policy in place. Cause: The Town has experienced turnover in the Treasurer’s position over the past few years, which has delayed the policy implementation. Effect: The Town may not have adequate policy and procedures in place to safeguard its most liquid assets. Identification of Questioned Costs: None identified. Context: The population consisted of 12 out of the 30 pay requisition deposit of reimbursements from the fiscal year were examined. Out of the 12 selections only 4 deposits had backup documentation and those 4 were not properly recorded. The other 8 were lacking proof that deposits were recorded properly. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding of 2021-006. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Town adopt a cash management policy that follows the Uniform Guidance and that the Town implement internal control processes and procedures to ensure that the adopted policy is followed. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Client agrees with finding, and a version of their response can be found in the Corrective Action Plan. Please see the Corrective Action Plan issued by the Town of Livermore Falls.
2022-007 - Cash Management Federal Program Information: ALN - 66.458 - Clean Water State Revolving Funds Criteria: The following CFR(s) apply to this finding: 2 CFR section 200.302(b)(6)) & 2 CFR section 200.305(b) (3). Condition: During audit procedures, it was identified that the Town did not have a cash management policy in place. Cause: The Town has experienced turnover in the Treasurer’s position over the past few years, which has delayed the policy implementation. Effect: The Town may not have adequate policy and procedures in place to safeguard its most liquid assets. Identification of Questioned Costs: None identified. Context: The population consisted of 12 out of the 30 pay requisition deposit of reimbursements from the fiscal year were examined. Out of the 12 selections only 4 deposits had backup documentation and those 4 were not properly recorded. The other 8 were lacking proof that deposits were recorded properly. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding of 2021-006. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Town adopt a cash management policy that follows the Uniform Guidance and that the Town implement internal control processes and procedures to ensure that the adopted policy is followed. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Client agrees with finding, and a version of their response can be found in the Corrective Action Plan. Please see the Corrective Action Plan issued by the Town of Livermore Falls.
Finding Number 2022-007: Costs Incurred & Paid Prior to Reimbursements (Significant Deficiency over Internal Control and Instance of Noncompliance – Cash Management; Period of Performance) FALN 16.575 U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Victims of Crime – Crime Victim Assistance Criteria: 2022 Compliance Supplement stated that program costs must be paid by non-federal entity funds before submitting a payment request (2 CFR section 200.305(b)(3)) (i.e., the non-federal entity must disburse funds for program purposes before requesting payment from the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity). In addition, a non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance. Condition/Context: As a result of our audit procedures to evaluate the summary schedule of prior audit findings, we noted 1 sample of $2,500 nonpayroll expenditures that was submitted for reimbursement prior to the expenditure being incurred. In addition, the cost incurred was outside of the period of performance ended 9/30/2021. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes, Finding Number 2021-005 Cause and Effect: The Health System did not have proper controls in place to ensure expenditures are incurred and paid for prior to reimbursements, and that expenditures are incurred within the period of performance of the contract, which resulted in noncompliance with the compliance requirements of the program. Questioned Cost: None Recommendation: We recommend management implement policies and procedures to ensure funds are disbursed for expenditures incurred prior to reimbursement requests, and that expenditures are incurred within the contract’s performance period. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with finding. The Health System will review and modify policies and procedures over the program to ensure management implements policies, procedures, and processes to make sure that funds are disbursed for incurred expenditures prior to reimbursement requests.
Finding number: 2022-001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster – various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass-through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A-102 Common Rule (§_.21), 0MB Circular A-110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022-001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster – various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass-through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A-102 Common Rule (§_.21), 0MB Circular A-110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022-001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster – various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass-through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A-102 Common Rule (§_.21), 0MB Circular A-110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022-001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster – various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass-through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A-102 Common Rule (§_.21), 0MB Circular A-110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022-001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster – various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass-through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A-102 Common Rule (§_.21), 0MB Circular A-110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022-001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster – various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass-through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A-102 Common Rule (§_.21), 0MB Circular A-110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022-001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster – various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass-through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A-102 Common Rule (§_.21), 0MB Circular A-110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022-001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster – various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass-through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A-102 Common Rule (§_.21), 0MB Circular A-110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022-001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster – various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass-through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A-102 Common Rule (§_.21), 0MB Circular A-110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022-001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster – various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass-through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A-102 Common Rule (§_.21), 0MB Circular A-110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022-001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster – various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass-through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A-102 Common Rule (§_.21), 0MB Circular A-110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022-001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster – various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass-through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A-102 Common Rule (§_.21), 0MB Circular A-110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022-001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster – various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass-through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A-102 Common Rule (§_.21), 0MB Circular A-110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022-001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster – various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass-through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A-102 Common Rule (§_.21), 0MB Circular A-110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022-001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster – various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass-through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A-102 Common Rule (§_.21), 0MB Circular A-110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022-001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster – various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass-through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A-102 Common Rule (§_.21), 0MB Circular A-110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022-001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster – various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass-through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A-102 Common Rule (§_.21), 0MB Circular A-110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022-001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster – various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass-through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A-102 Common Rule (§_.21), 0MB Circular A-110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022-001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster – various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass-through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A-102 Common Rule (§_.21), 0MB Circular A-110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022-001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster – various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass-through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A-102 Common Rule (§_.21), 0MB Circular A-110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022-001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster – various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass-through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A-102 Common Rule (§_.21), 0MB Circular A-110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022-001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster – various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass-through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A-102 Common Rule (§_.21), 0MB Circular A-110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.