2 CFR ? 400 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Agriculture for 2 CFR ? 200.305(b) which requires that for non-Federal entities other than states, payments methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer, or issuance or redemption of checks, warrants, or payment by other means. 2 CFR ? 200.305(b)(3) states reimbursement is the preferred method when the requirements in this paragraph (b) cannot be met, when the Federal awarding agency sets a specific condition per ?200.208, or when the non-Federal entity requests payment by reimbursement or when the non-Federal entity requests payment by reimbursement. 7 CFR ? 210 relates to the implementation of the National School Lunch Program where the Department provides States with general and special cash assistance and donations of foods acquired by the Department to be used to assist schools in serving nutritious lunches to children each school day. 7 CFR ? 210.7(c) states to be entitled to reimbursement under this part, each school food authority shall ensure that Claims for Reimbursement are limited to the number of free, reduced price and paid lunches and meal supplements that are served to children eligible for free, reduced price and paid lunches and meal supplements, respectively, for each day of operation. Claims for reimbursement should be based on lunch counts, taken daily at the point of service, which correctly identify the number of free, reduced price and paid lunches served to eligible children. Each school food authority should correctly record, consolidate, and report those lunch and supplement counts on the Claim for Reimbursement. The District completed the required site claim forms; however, due to lack of controls over review of the forms for accuracy, the January 2022 site claim form was overstated by 15 meals. The site claim form was used for federal reimbursement to the District and thus resulted in more reimbursements ($68) than the District was entitled to based on free, reduced, and paid lunches. Failure to properly report meals for reimbursement can result in loss of revenue, excess reimbursements, and/or federal questioned costs. The District should establish and implement procedures to verify the accuracy of reimbursement site claim forms.
2 CFR ? 400 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Agriculture for 2 CFR ? 200.305(b) which requires that for non-Federal entities other than states, payments methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer, or issuance or redemption of checks, warrants, or payment by other means. 2 CFR ? 200.305(b)(3) states reimbursement is the preferred method when the requirements in this paragraph (b) cannot be met, when the Federal awarding agency sets a specific condition per ?200.208, or when the non-Federal entity requests payment by reimbursement or when the non-Federal entity requests payment by reimbursement. 7 CFR ? 210 relates to the implementation of the National School Lunch Program where the Department provides States with general and special cash assistance and donations of foods acquired by the Department to be used to assist schools in serving nutritious lunches to children each school day. 7 CFR ? 210.7(c) states to be entitled to reimbursement under this part, each school food authority shall ensure that Claims for Reimbursement are limited to the number of free, reduced price and paid lunches and meal supplements that are served to children eligible for free, reduced price and paid lunches and meal supplements, respectively, for each day of operation. Claims for reimbursement should be based on lunch counts, taken daily at the point of service, which correctly identify the number of free, reduced price and paid lunches served to eligible children. Each school food authority should correctly record, consolidate, and report those lunch and supplement counts on the Claim for Reimbursement. The District completed the required site claim forms; however, due to lack of controls over review of the forms for accuracy, the January 2022 site claim form was overstated by 15 meals. The site claim form was used for federal reimbursement to the District and thus resulted in more reimbursements ($68) than the District was entitled to based on free, reduced, and paid lunches. Failure to properly report meals for reimbursement can result in loss of revenue, excess reimbursements, and/or federal questioned costs. The District should establish and implement procedures to verify the accuracy of reimbursement site claim forms.
2 CFR ? 400 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Agriculture for 2 CFR ? 200.305(b) which requires that for non-Federal entities other than states, payments methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer, or issuance or redemption of checks, warrants, or payment by other means. 2 CFR ? 200.305(b)(3) states reimbursement is the preferred method when the requirements in this paragraph (b) cannot be met, when the Federal awarding agency sets a specific condition per ?200.208, or when the non-Federal entity requests payment by reimbursement or when the non-Federal entity requests payment by reimbursement. 7 CFR ? 210 relates to the implementation of the National School Lunch Program where the Department provides States with general and special cash assistance and donations of foods acquired by the Department to be used to assist schools in serving nutritious lunches to children each school day. 7 CFR ? 210.7(c) states to be entitled to reimbursement under this part, each school food authority shall ensure that Claims for Reimbursement are limited to the number of free, reduced price and paid lunches and meal supplements that are served to children eligible for free, reduced price and paid lunches and meal supplements, respectively, for each day of operation. Claims for reimbursement should be based on lunch counts, taken daily at the point of service, which correctly identify the number of free, reduced price and paid lunches served to eligible children. Each school food authority should correctly record, consolidate, and report those lunch and supplement counts on the Claim for Reimbursement. The District completed the required site claim forms; however, due to lack of controls over review of the forms for accuracy, the January 2022 site claim form was overstated by 15 meals. The site claim form was used for federal reimbursement to the District and thus resulted in more reimbursements ($68) than the District was entitled to based on free, reduced, and paid lunches. Failure to properly report meals for reimbursement can result in loss of revenue, excess reimbursements, and/or federal questioned costs. The District should establish and implement procedures to verify the accuracy of reimbursement site claim forms.
2 CFR ? 400 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Agriculture for 2 CFR ? 200.305(b) which requires that for non-Federal entities other than states, payments methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer, or issuance or redemption of checks, warrants, or payment by other means. 2 CFR ? 200.305(b)(3) states reimbursement is the preferred method when the requirements in this paragraph (b) cannot be met, when the Federal awarding agency sets a specific condition per ?200.208, or when the non-Federal entity requests payment by reimbursement or when the non-Federal entity requests payment by reimbursement. 7 CFR ? 210 relates to the implementation of the National School Lunch Program where the Department provides States with general and special cash assistance and donations of foods acquired by the Department to be used to assist schools in serving nutritious lunches to children each school day. 7 CFR ? 210.7(c) states to be entitled to reimbursement under this part, each school food authority shall ensure that Claims for Reimbursement are limited to the number of free, reduced price and paid lunches and meal supplements that are served to children eligible for free, reduced price and paid lunches and meal supplements, respectively, for each day of operation. Claims for reimbursement should be based on lunch counts, taken daily at the point of service, which correctly identify the number of free, reduced price and paid lunches served to eligible children. Each school food authority should correctly record, consolidate, and report those lunch and supplement counts on the Claim for Reimbursement. The District completed the required site claim forms; however, due to lack of controls over review of the forms for accuracy, the January 2022 site claim form was overstated by 15 meals. The site claim form was used for federal reimbursement to the District and thus resulted in more reimbursements ($68) than the District was entitled to based on free, reduced, and paid lunches. Failure to properly report meals for reimbursement can result in loss of revenue, excess reimbursements, and/or federal questioned costs. The District should establish and implement procedures to verify the accuracy of reimbursement site claim forms.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.