Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 16.922 Equitable Sharing Federal Forfeitures Program Federal Award Identification Number and Year: MI8245300 Direct award – Department of Justice Finding Type – Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR § 200.303, the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition – During our testing for Reporting compliance, it was noted the client failed to submit Equitable Sharing Agreement and Certification within the required time frame. The Equitable Sharing Agreement and Certification was submitted late. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Questioned Costs – None Cause – Current Management procedures and controls were not sufficient to ensure that report was completing in a timely manner, therefore required report was not submitted on time. Effect – The City did not submit monthly report on time. Recommendation – We recommend management increase awareness of federal program compliance requirements and monitor compliance with the requirements on regular basis. In addition, we recommend that management review its procedures and controls in place to ensure that reports are completed and submitted by the required due dates. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
United States Department Agriculture Federal Financial Assistance Listing #10.766 Community Facilities Loans and Grant Special Tests and Provisions Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria – 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. Condition – During our testing, there was no formal review separate from the preparer over the reserve fund reconciliation for the federal program and there was no formal review of the balance in comparison to the required minimum reserve balance. Cause – The Health Center did not have an adequate internal control policy in place to ensure review and approval over the amount of the reserve fund. Effect – The lack of adequate policies governing review increases the risk that employees participating in the federal award administration may not be able to detect and correct noncompliance in a timely manner. Questioned Costs – None reported. Context – Sampling was not used. The Health Center has one reserve account, which includes the debt service and emergency and replacement reserve, that was tested. Due to there being no formal review of the balance in comparison to the required minimum reserve balances, the reserve balance was underfunded as of June 30, 2025, in the amount of $17,486. Repeat Finding from Prior Years – Yes, Finding 2024-003 Recommendation – While noncompliance was identified due to the minimum reserve balance being underfunded as of June 30, 2025, it is noted that Management has corrected the reserve balance to in compliance after year-end. We recommend that the Health Center enhance internal control policies to ensure that a formal review over the reserve fund reconciliation and a formal review of the balance in comparison to the required minimum reserve balances be completed by staff separate from the preparer. Views of Responsible Officials – Management agrees with the finding.
2025-003: Reporting Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 252IL058N1099-2024, 252IL058N1199-2024, 252IL058N1099-2025, 252IL058N1199-2025 Pass-Through Agency: Illinois State Board of Education Pass-Through Number(s): 25-4210-00, 25-4220-00, 24-4210-00, 24-4220-00 Award Period: July 1, 2024 – June 30, 2025 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires non-federal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal Laws, regulations and program compliance requirements. Effective internal controls should include formal documentation of review and approval for reports submitted under the program. Condition: There is no formal documentation of review and approval of reports submitted by an individual other than the preparer. Questioned Costs: None Context: 5 of 5 financial reports tested. Cause: The District has not implemented adequate internal controls to ensure independent review and approval of submitted reports. Effect: Noncompliance with reporting requirements. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the District strengthen its internal control procedures by ensuring that all reports are reviewed and approved by someone other than the individual responsible for preparing and submitting them. This review should be formally documented. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2025-004: Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 252IL058N1099-2024, 252IL058N1199-2024, 252IL058N1099-2025, 252IL058N1199-2025 Pass-Through Agency: Illinois State Board of Education Pass-Through Number(s): 25-4210-00, 25-4220-00, 24-4210-00, 24-4220-00 Award Period: July 1, 2024 – June 30, 2025 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires non-federal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal Laws, regulations and program compliance requirements. Effective internal controls should include formal documentation of review and approval by the board for procurements over the small purchases threshold. Condition: Procurement methods for certain purchases made with federal award funds were not adequately documented or approved in accordance with the District’s procurement policy. Questioned Costs: None Context: 3 of the 4 procurements tested. Cause: The District did not follow its established internal control procedures for procurement. Effect: May result in a disallowed cost if grant requirements are not followed. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the District review federal procurement requirements to ensure proper documentation and authorization procedures are followed. The District should consider implementing a federal procurement checklist to support compliance. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2025-005: Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 252IL058N1099-2024, 252IL058N1199-2024, 252IL058N1099-2025, 252IL058N1199-2025 Pass-Through Agency: Illinois State Board of Education Pass-Through Number(s): 25-4210-00, 25-4220-00, 24-4210-00, 24-4220-00 Award Period: July 1, 2024 – June 30, 2025 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires non-federal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal Laws, regulations and program compliance requirements. Effective internal controls should include verification the vendor is not suspended or debarred through the SAMs exclusion list, collecting of certification from the entity, or by adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the entity. Condition: The District did not retain documentation verifying that vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into the transactions. Questioned Costs: None Context: 2 of 3 vendors tested did not have supporting documentation retained. Cause: The District lacks an effective internal control system to verify and document suspension and debarment status of vendors prior to contract execution. Effect: May result in a disallowed cost if grant requirements are not followed. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the District review federal procurement requirements and implement procedures to ensure proper documentation of suspension and debarment checks of vendors, prior to contracts and purchases over the covered transaction threshold. The District should consider using a federal procurement checklist to support compliance. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Passed Through the North Dakota Department of Public Instruction and the Minnesota Department of Human Services Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.565 All Awards Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.568 All Awards Food Distribution Cluster Activities Allowed/Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria – 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. Condition – As part of our audit, two payroll allocation errors were identified. It was determined that some errors resulted in overallocation of costs while others in underallocation of costs. Cause – No formal review of the allocations were completed before or after each payroll. This resulted in incorrect amounts being allocated to the programs. Effect – The failure to adequately review payroll allocations resulted in incorrect charges to the program. Questioned Costs – None Reported. Context/Sampling – A nonstatistical sample of 8 pay periods out of a population of 26 pay periods were selected for testing. 2 pay periods had an error. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) – Yes, Finding 2024-004. Recommendation – It is recommended that the Organization implement processes and controls to ensure that payroll allocations are reviewed and approved with each payroll processed. Views of Responsible Officials – Management agrees with the finding.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Passed Through the North Dakota Department of Public Instruction and the Minnesota Department of Human Services Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.568 All Awards Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 10.569 All Awards Food Distribution Cluster Eligibility Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria – 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. This includes a process to ensure proper completion of all tracking forms and documentation, including documented reviews in relation to eligibility. Condition – During our review of the eligibility determinations, it was identified that there were various instances where applications or other eligibility determinations and reviews were not completed timely or accurately. The files were missing the documented processes or were completed after the prior form’s expiration dates. Cause – Due to oversight by management, all forms were not completed and documented within participant files. This was largely due to differences in fiscal years, calendar years, and terms of the applications and certifications not being appropriately considered when completing and monitoring the various eligibility documents. Effect – The Organization’s internal control process was not appropriately enforced and monitored, resulting in lack of timely documentation of eligibility determination. However, it is noted that the agencies were subsequently determined to be eligible for the program. Questioned Costs – $29,692 Context/Sampling – A nonstatistical sample of 32 participating agencies within TEFAP who received $2,061,190 in food commodities, out of a population of 151 agencies receiving food commodities totaling $5,958,935, were selected for eligibility testing. 4 out of the 32 eligibility determinations tested had an error, with 4 of those resulting in questioned costs, as reported above. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) – Yes, Finding 2024-003. Recommendation – Management should review internal control procedures to ensure all eligibility determination reviews are documented and retained in the file and consideration is appropriately given to fiscal year, calendar year, and application terms. Views of Responsible Officials – Management agrees with the finding.
ELMWOOD PARK COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT 401 06-016-4010-26 SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Year Ending June 30, 2025 SECTION III - FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Year originally reported? 3. Federal Program Name and Year: National School Lunch Program, School Breakfast Program 4. Project No.: 25-4210-00 & 25-4220-00 5. AL No.: 10.555 & 10.553 6. Passed Through: 7. Federal Agency: Illinois State Board of Education U.S. Department of Agriculture 8. Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation) Per 2 CFR §200.303, non-federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards to provide reasonable assurance of compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Additionally, 7 CFR §210.8(a) requires school food authorities to establish internal controls to ensure the accuracy of meal counts prior to submitting monthly claims for reimbursement. These controls must include a review process before submission to verify that claims are correct 9. Condition The District does not have an adequate review process in place for meal count claims prior to submission. Claims prepared by one individual are submitted without independent verification. As a result, the district reported an incorrect lunch count for January 2025. This error appears to be isolated to January; however, it would likely have been prevented if a review process were in place. 10. Questioned Costs No reportable questioned costs identified. 11. Context The District participates in the National School Lunch Program (ALN 10.555) and School Breakfast Program (ALN 10.553), which require accurate reporting of meal counts to determine reimbursement. Meal count claims are prepared monthly by a designated staff member and submitted to the state agency for reimbursement. Currently, the district does not have a formal process for independent review of these claims prior to submission. This lack of review contributed to an error in January 2025, when the district reported fewer lunches than were actually served. We reviewed a non-statistical sample of meal claims, and aside from the month of January 2025, noted no similar issues. 12. Effect The District claimed fewer meals than were actually served for January 2025, resulting in lower reimbursement than it was entitled to under the National School Lunch Program. While the error appears isolated to January, the lack of an independent review increases the risk of similar underclaims or overclaims in the future. 13. Cause The district did not implement a secondary review of meal count claims before submission. 14. Recommendation The District should implement a formal review process for all meal count claims prior to submission. This process should include independent verification by someone other than the preparer to ensure accuracy and compliance. 15. Management's response The District will implement a system in which meal count claims will have secondary approval by the CSBO.
Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2024, FY 2025 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Eligibility, Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Service Accounts Audit Finding: Material Weakness INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 14 CROWN POINT COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance related to the grant agreement and the Eligibility and the Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Service Accounts compliance requirements. Eligibility - Direct Certifications A child's eligibility for free or reduced-price meals under a Child Nutrition Cluster program may be established by the submission of an annual application or statement which furnishes such information as family income and family size. Local educational agencies, institutions, and sponsors then determine eligibility by comparing the data reported by the child's household to published income eligibility guidelines. Additionally, a child may be direct certified. For a direct certification, annual eligibility determinations are based on the child's household receiving benefits under SNAP, FDPIR, the Head Start Program (ALN 93.600), or, under most circumstances, the TANF program (ALN 93.558). A household may furnish documentation of its participation in one of these programs; or the school, institution, or sponsor may obtain the information directly from the state or local agency that administers these programs. Certain foster, runaway, homeless, and migrant children are categorically eligible for free school lunches and breakfasts. Direct certified households do not need to complete an application. The Direct Certification Report was downloaded from the State of Indiana database and uploaded to the School Corporation's lunch point-of-sale (POS) system at the beginning of the school year and then monthly throughout the school year. An oversight or review process to ensure the Direct Certification Report was downloaded monthly, the upload had imported correctly, and that students' statuses were updated accordingly was not designed or implemented. Special Tests and Provisions - Non-Profit School Food Service Accounts A School Food Authority (SFA) is required to account for all revenues and expenditures of its non-profit school food service in accordance with state and federal requirements. An SFA must operate its food services on a non-profit basis; all revenue generated by the school food service must be used to operate and improve its food services. Federal reimbursement receipts were posted to the School Lunch fund by one individual without a documented oversight or review process to ensure they were correctly credited to the school food service account. The lack of internal controls was systemic throughout the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 CROWN POINT COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The recipient and subrecipient must: (a) Establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the recipient or subrecipient is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should align with the guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control-Integrated Framework' issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause Management had not developed or documented that an oversight or review process to ensure the direct certification report was properly processed or that reimbursements related to the Non-Profit Food Service Account were properly posted to the School Lunch fund. Effect The failure to design or implement a system of internal controls places the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management design and implement a proper system of internal controls that would ensure that the appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversight are completed and documented. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2025-003 Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - Special Tests and Provisions - Annual Report Card, High School Graduation Rate Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listings Number: 84.010 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S010A220014, S010A230014, S010A240014 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Annual Report Card, High School Graduation Rate Audit Finding: Material Weakness INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 CROWN POINT COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance related to the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions - Annual Report Card, High School Graduation Rate compliance requirement. The School Corporation must report graduation rate data for all public high schools within the School Corporation using the four-year adjusted cohort rate. To remove a student from the cohort, the School Corporation must confirm the reason for removal in writing. Additionally, required documentation for each removal type must be retained by the School Corporation. The School Corporation had a process in place to ensure that a student's removal from the high school graduation cohort for mobility reasons was properly documented and reviewed. However, for 5 of the 34 students tested, evidence of the review process was not documented. The lack of internal controls was systemic throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The recipient and subrecipient must: (a) Establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the recipient or subrecipient is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should align with the guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control-Integrated Framework' issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause Management had not ensured that the oversight or review process was consistently documented. Effect The failure to design or implement a system of internal controls places the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management design and implement a proper system of internal controls that would ensure that the appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversight are completed and documented consistently. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2025-002 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.027X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 21611-010-PN01, 22611-010-PN01, 23611-010-PN01, 24611-010-PN01, 22611-010-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2023-004. Condition and Context Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., a grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a person with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the School Corporation did provide documentation that suspension and debarment requirements were verified for one of the tested vendors. No documentation was provided for the remaining covered transactions, totaling $329,876. The lack of proper internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 EAST ALLEN COUNTY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." 2 CFR 200.214 states: "Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation to ensure all vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were verified prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not all verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provision of federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the reduction of future federal funding to the School Corporation. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 EAST ALLEN COUNTY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish and implement an effective system of internal controls to ensure all vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 are verified prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Finding 2025-002: Federal Program: Corporation for National and Community Service: Kentucky Cabinet for Health & Family Services AmeriCorps State & National, Assistance Listing No. 94.006 Criteria: The University must have internal controls in place for compliance as required by 2 CFR Part 200.303. The University requires that interviews be conducted and documented prior to onboarding AmeriCorps members. Condition: During our testing of eligibility for 25 program participants, we noted that four participants did not have evidence of being interviewed prior to being hired. Cause: Until the implementation of a new system and procedure, the University's documentation process for interviews during a portion of the audit period did not include formalized controls to centralize retention and documentation of interview evidence. Interview documentation was maintained through individual staff email accounts and calendar systems lacked standardized filing and retention protocols, resulting in the inability to locate evidence that interviews were conducted for four participants. Effect: The University's internal control was not followed and thus a total of four program participants did not have evidence of being properly interviewed prior to being hired. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend the University review controls and implement a standardized process and refine its system to ensure ongoing compliance with established controls. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The University agrees with the auditors' finding and recommendations. The following corrective actions have been taken: During the 2023-2024 academic year, EngageKY implemented a new process for recordkeeping related to the recruitment and selection of Kentucky College Coaches. As part of the implementation, site supervisors and program staff began to use Salesforce to maintain notes from screening interviews and general interviews. The missing documentation referenced in this finding was for individuals hired prior to the new process. EngageKY will continue to use Salesforce to document the recruitment and selection of Kentucky College Coaches.
Finding 2025-003: Federal Program: U.S. National Science Foundation: Research and Development Cluster Office of Integrated Activities, Assistance Listing No. 47.083 Criteria: The University must have internal controls in place for compliance as required by 2 CFR Part 200.303. The University requires review by grant department before disbursement. Condition: During our testing of awarded scholarships for eight students, we noted that two student applications did not have evidence of being reviewed prior to disbursement of the scholarship. Cause: The University does not have a procedure in place to properly review scholarship applications prior to disbursement. Effect: Two students received scholarships that were not properly reviewed prior to disbursement. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend that the University review and revise their policies and procedures related to reviewing and approving Research & Development grant scholarships prior to disbursement. Specifically, the University should: Implement a review process to verify scholarships are reviewed and approved by Grant Administration prior to disbursement. Provide training to relevant staff on proper documentation procedures to forward to Grant Administration to enhance compliance and accuracy. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The University agrees with the auditors' finding and recommendations. The following corrective action will be taken: The University will review and revise policies and procedures related to reviewing and approving Research & Development grant scholarships prior to disbursement. The University will do the following: Implement a review process to verify scholarships are reviewed and approved by Grant Administration prior to disbursement. Provide training to relevant staff on proper documentation procedures to forward to Grant Administration to enhance compliance and accuracy.
8. Criteria or specific requirement: Per Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR Part 200) Subpart D, Post Federal Award Requirements Section 200.303, Internal controls, the recipient must establish, document and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the recipient is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Per 7 CFR Section 210.8(a), the school food authority shall establish internal controls which ensure the accuracy of meal counts prior to the submission of the monthly claim for reimbursement. '9. Condition: Three (3) monthly claims for reimbursement reported meal counts in excess of those supported by records of the District. 10. Cause: The District's internal controls over compliance were not functioning effectively to ensure claims for reimbursement were accurately prepared. '11. Effect: The District was not in compliance with the reporting compliance requirement. '12. Questioned Costs: The following questioned costs were computed based on the excess meals claimed for reimbursement times the applicable reimbursement rate: $37 (Project No. 25-4220-00) $2,074 (Project No. 25-4210-00) '13. Context: From the population of eleven (11) monthly claims for reimbursement, a sample of four (4) claims were selected for testing. We noted three (3) months in which the claims for reimbursement reported meal counts in excess of those supported by records of the District as follows: October 2024: Actual breakfast meals served: 10,313; Breakfast meals claimed for reimbursement: 10,326. March 2025: Actual lunch meals served: 12,901; Lunch meals claimed for reimbursement: 12,911 April 2025: Actual lunch meals served: 10,087; Lunch meals claimed for reimbursement: 10,190 In addition, the District was unable to locate supporting documentation of the snack claim counts of 765 for October 2024 and 525 for April 2025, which contributed to the questioned cost total for program 25-4210-00. A statistically valid sample was not utilized. 14. Recommendation: We recommend that management review its policies and procedures and implement changes to strengthen internal control over compliance. 15. Management's response: The District agrees with the auditor's finding and recommendation.
SIGNIFICANT DEFICENCY Internal Controls and Compliance Criteria: Pursuant to the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 2 Grants and Agreements, Subpart D Post Federal Award Requirements, Section 200.303 “the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal aware that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.” Condition: When investigating the controls related to equipment management, we became aware that the District has implemented new procedures to track and maintain an inventory list adequately. However, the infrastructure items bought were not inventoried. Only non-infrastructure items were being inventoried and tracked. Cause: The internal control-related infrastructure items for the Education Stabilization Fund are nonexistent. Effect: There is noncompliance and a lack of internal control regarding the infrastructure items for the Education Stabilization Fund. Recommendations: The District should include infrastructure items in the current inventory system. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The District agrees with the finding. See the separate document for planned corrective actions.
2025-001: Enrollment Reporting Controls– Student Financial Aid Special Test Material Weakness Federal Program: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Award Year: July 1, 2024 - June 30, 2025 Assistance Listing Number(s): Student Financial Assistance Cluster • 84.007 • 84.033 • 84.038 • 84.063 • 84.268 • 84.379 • 93.925 Criteria: To comply with enrollment reporting requirements, institutions must accurately and timely report student enrollment status changes to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) within 60 days of determining the change, as outlined in Federal Regulations 34 CFR 682.610 and 685.309. Auditee requirements contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart D – Post Federal Award Requirements, Section 200.303 – Internal Controls, requires the auditee to establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with a framework such as the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: There is no control in place by the College to review information submitted to the NSLDS for student enrollment status changes. The individual performing the submission is able to complete and transmit the data without an independent review or verification by another person, increasing the risk of inaccurate or incomplete information being reported. Cause: Lack of control in place over enrollment status changes reported to the NSLDS. Effect or Potential Effect: Lack of controls in place could result in instances of noncompliance with Department of Education and Federal regulations. Questioned Costs: None Context: While the College ensures accurate status change data is sent to the National Student Clearinghouse (third party who submits enrollment status changes to the NSLDS), the College does not have controls in place to ensure information was submitted to the NSLDS accurately and timely. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend the College implement controls where there is an independent review of the submissions received by NSLDS to ensure enrollment status changes are reported accurately and timely. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
2025-002: Return of Title IV Funds Controls Significant Deficiency Federal Program: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Award Year: July 1, 2024 - June 30, 2025 Assistance Listing Number(s): Student Financial Assistance Cluster • 84.007 • 84.033 • 84.038 • 84.063 • 84.268 • 84.379 • 93.925 Criteria: When a student withdraws, institutions must comply with the "Return of Title IV Funds" requirements outlined in 34 CFR 668.22, ensuring any unearned funds are returned to the Department of Education within 45 days of determining the student's withdrawal. Auditee requirements contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart D – Post Federal Award Requirements, Section 200.303 – Internal Controls, requires the auditee to establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with a framework such as the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: There is no evidence of a control in place by the College to review Return of Title IV Fund calculations. Cause: Lack of control in place over returns of Title IV funding. Effect or Potential Effect: Returns of Title IV Funds may not be refunded within the 45-day requirement and result in instances of noncompliance with the Department of Education. Questioned Costs: None Context: The College claims to review these calculations; however, there is no evidence that such reviews were conducted or effective. Additionally, there is no retention of documentation demonstrating that an approval or review occurred, making it impossible to verify that the process was properly performed. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend the College review its process and controls in place for calculating refunds from Title IV and include an independent review and sufficient documentation to support the application of the control. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Finding 2025.002: Cash Management - Significant Deficiency Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.958 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 24MHA2102 Criteria In accordance with §200.305, Federal Payment, grantees and subgrantees that receive grant funds are responsible for maintaining controls regarding the management of federal program funds under the Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR 200.302 and 200.303. Condition The Organization's drawdowns did not illustrate review and approval by management. Cause The Organization did not have adequate controls to ensure drawdowns were properly approved and such approval is documented. Effect or Potential Effect The condition may lead to inaccurate or improper drawdowns. Questioned Costs None Context We selected three drawdowns for testing of cash management procedures. We noted that for all three drawdowns, there was no formal approval or evidence of review. Identification of Repeat Finding No Recommendation The Organization should develop written procedures to review all drawdowns that occur in order to ensure accuracy. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions Management and the Board of Directors agree with the finding and will implement additional controls to ensure there is formal evidence of review being performed.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 21.027, U.S. Department of Treasury, COVID 19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Award Identification Number and Year - H4HRGP33345 Pass-through Entity - State of Colorado, Department of Local Affairs, for the benefit of the Division of Housing Finding Type - Material weakness Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.303, the recipient must establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the recipient or subrecipient is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should align with the guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government,” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition - Management did not have controls in place to ensure documentation was maintained evidencing the organization's verfication that contractors are not suspended or debarred from participating in a federally funded activity. Questioned Costs - N/A If questioned costs are not determinable, description of why known questioned costs were undetermined or otherwise could not be reported - N/A Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - While gaining an understanding of the organization's internal controls, we noted management was unable to provide documentation to support that checks for suspension and debarment occurred before the organization entered into a covered transaction. We were able to verify in our sample testing that management did not enter into contracts with individuals or organizations suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs. Cause and Effect - A lack of controls could result in material noncompliance with federal procurement standards. Recommendation - We recommend management retain documented evidence that checks for suspension and debarment have occurred before entering into a covered transaction with outside contractors. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - Management concurs with the finding. We acknowledge that, for one federal program under the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds program (Assistance Listing 21.027), the required suspension and debarment verification was performed; however, the supporting documentation evidencing this verification was not retained in the contract file. This represents a documentation lapse rather than a control deficiency. Volunteers of America Colorado (VOAC) routinely performs suspension and debarment verifications for all applicable vendors, contractors, and subrecipients receiving federal funds in accordance with 2 CFR 200.214. This requirement applies to entities and individuals awarded federally funded contracts or subawards exceeding the micro purchase threshold and excludes routine commercial vendors for indirect administrative costs or purchases under $10,000. To strengthen compliance documentation and ensure consistent audit support, VOAC has implemented the following corrective actions: 1.Policy Enhancement: The procurement procedure has been updated to explicitly require saving and retaining a time stamped screenshot or PDF confirmation of each SAM.gov verification showing the verification date and results. Where applicable, contractors subject to 2 CFR 200.214 must also provide a self certification statement within the executed agreement. 2.Centralized Recordkeeping: Verification evidence will be maintained in both the individual contract file and the centralized grant management system. 3.Annual Training and Refresher: Procurement and grants management staff will participate in annual training to reinforce 2 CFR 200.214 requirements and best practices for documentation and record retention. Management believes this was an isolated documentation lapse prior to the current audit period when the contractor was selected, and that the actions taken since have resolved the issue and will ensure continued compliance.
FINDING 2025-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2024, FY2025 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance related to the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 MITCHELL COMMUNITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Procurement - Small Purchases Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, the informal procurement method is permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not have an internal control in place to ensure that an adequate number of price or rate quotations were obtained for all small purchases. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. The School Corporation had not designed or implemented internal controls, which would consist of policies and procedures, to ensure that vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into a covered transaction. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause Management had not established a system of internal controls to ensure documentation was obtained and retained to demonstrate they had properly procured all small purchases. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 MITCHELL COMMUNITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Management had not established a system of internal controls to ensure that the School Corporation's procedures for verifying a contractor's suspension and debarment status were followed for all contractors. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. This could result in the School Corporation overpaying for goods or services or paying a contractor who has been suspended or debarred, which would be unallowable. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2025-003 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to the States Assistance Listings Number: 84.027, 84.027X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 23611-161 PN01, 22611-161-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context The School Corporation did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met for each grant award. The School Corporation did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for private school and homeschooled students as nonpublic students were met. The School Corporation spent the entire portion of the required proportionate share amount during the audit period. Time and effort logs were not maintained to determine if the speech-language pathologists paid from these funds were performing duties for the nonpublic students; therefore, amounts charged to the grants were not based on actual time spent for the nonpublic students as required. The School Corporation required amount of proportionate share for grant awards 22611-161-ARP and 23611-161-PN01 was $1,256 and $1,156, respectively. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the 22611-161-ARP and the 23611-161-PN01 grant awards. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 MITCHELL COMMUNITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause The School Corporation's management had not developed nor implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured that time and effort logs were maintained and made available for audit, as it related to the grant agreement and the earmarking compliance requirement. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the School Corporation did not retain and provide appropriate supporting documentation to ensure compliance with earmarking requirements. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish an effective system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure the Non-Public Proportionate Share funds are appropriately documented using time and effort logs, which are to be maintained and made available for audit as related to the earmarking compliance requirement. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 MITCHELL COMMUNITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2025-004 Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - Eligibility Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listings Number: 84.010 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2024, FY2025 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Eligibility Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context Eligibility for Title I is determined on the Eligible School Summary of the Title I application. Enrollment and poverty numbers are automatically pulled from the Indiana Department of Education's (IDOE) Official Pupil Enrollment (PE) count for each school into the Eligible School Summary page of the Title I application. These counts that are prepopulated should be based on the School Corporation's records as of October of the prior fiscal year. There was no audit evidence that the School Corporation performed a review of the enrollment and poverty counts that were prepopulated into the School Corporation's Title I grant application. During the audit period, the School Corporation submitted two Title I applications. The School Corporation was required to use the October 2022 Real Time Report data for the 2023-2024 Title I application, and the October 2023 Real Time Report data for the 2024-2025 Title I application submitted to the IDOE. Data to be submitted included student socioeconomic status information. The school lunch software was used to verify the socioeconomic status of students reported in the Title I application. A total of 25 students were selected for testing. The socioeconomic status for 1 of the 25 students tested from the October 2022 Real Time Report data did not agree to data reported in the 2023-2024 Title I application. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. The noncompliance was isolated to the October 2022 Real Time Report and the 2023-2024 Title I application. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 MITCHELL COMMUNITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for the Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annual, from the date of submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." 34 CFR 200.78(a)(1) states: "After reserving funds, as applicable, under § 200.77, including funds for equitable services for private school students, their teachers, and their families, an LEA must allocate funds under this subpart to school attendance areas and schools, identified as eligible and selected to participate under section 1113(a) or (b) of the ESEA, in rank order on the basis of the total number of public school children from low-income families in each area or school." Cause Due to turnover of staff in the School Corporation's administrative office, the School Corporation's management had not established a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance or that supporting documentation would have been maintained and made available for audit related to the eligibility compliance requirement. Effect The School Corporation did not establish an effective system of internal controls to retain and provide appropriate supporting documentation for the Real Time Reports and for the audit period which enabled noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the eligibility compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure Real Time Reports are reviewed for accuracy and compared to the Title I application and that adequate documentation is maintained to support the information in the Title I application. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2025-005 Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - Special Tests and Provisions - Assessment System Security Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listings Number: 84.010 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2024, FY2025 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Assessment System Security Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context State educational agencies (SEA), in consultation with local educational agencies (LEA), are required to establish and maintain an assessment security system that is valid, reliable, and consistent with relevant professional and technical standards. Within their assessment system, SEAs must have policies and procedures to maintain test security measures and ensure that LEAs implement those policies and procedures. As such, the Indiana Department of Education created and published the Indiana Assessment Policy Manual. As a part of the assessment security, any individual who administers, handles, or has access to secure test materials at the school or school corporation shall complete assessment training and sign a testing security and integrity statement that remains on file in the appropriate building-level office each year. Each individual required to sign the testing integrity agreement shall sign the form by an established date. The School Corporation had a process to provide assessment system security training and to ensure each employee that attended training signed the agreement indicating training was received. However, there was no process in place to ensure that all documentation of School Corporation employees being trained was retained for audit. Due to the lack of internal controls over maintaining the supporting documentation, some of the Indiana Testing and Security agreements were not provided for review. A sample of 25 employees was selected for testing from the School Corporation's roster. Of the 25 employees tested, 6 did not have a signed agreement on file indicating training was received as required. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 MITCHELL COMMUNITY SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed . . ." 511 IAC 5-5-5(b) states: "Any individual who administers, handles, or has access to secure test materials at the school or school corporation shall complete assessment training and sign a testing security and integrity agreement to remain on file in the appropriate building-level office each year." Cause Management of the School Corporation had not established an effective system of internal controls that would have ensured required staff received training on the Assessment System Security and evidence of the training was retained for audit. Management did not retain documentation for the audit that would have provided evidence that it had properly held training for staff on the Assessment System Security. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls and retain and provide appropriate supporting documentation placed the School Corporation in noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions - Assessment System Security compliance requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure supporting documentation is maintained and available for audit to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions - Assessment System Security compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report. INDIANA STATE
FINDING 2025-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2023-003. Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. The School Corporation was required to submit annual data reports to the Indiana Department of Education via JotForm, a form/report builder. Data to be submitted included, but was not limited to, current period expenditures, prior period expenditures, and expenditures per activity. During the prior audit period, the School Corporation submitted two ESSER I reports, two ESSER II reports, and two ESSER III reports, for a total of six reports. The Superintendent of Schools submitted all of the reports without an oversight or review process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. No reports were required to be filed in the subsequent period; however, follow-up indicated that an internal control had not been implemented over reporting for federal programs. The lack of internal controls was a systematic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause The School Corporation chose not to implement an internal control for this compliance requirement and did not have an excuse for not implementing it. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 SOUTH PUTNAM COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect Without the proper design or implementation of the components of a system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, material noncompliance could remain undetected. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation design and implement a proper system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that are documented, that would provide segregation of duties to ensure appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversight are taking place. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2025-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2024, FY2025 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. The School Corporation entered into a fixed price meal contract with a food service management company (FSMC). For each meal type, a fixed price was established and billed by the FSMC based on meal counts served. The School Corporation did not compare the invoices received from the FSMC to the School Corporation's software reports to ensure the number of meals invoiced agreed to the meals served. Two invoices totaling $213,049 from the FSMC were selected for testing but could not be supported with documentation for the amounts billed. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 SOUTH PUTNAM COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." Cause Management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Invoices from the FSMC were not thoroughly reviewed to ensure the number of meals invoiced agreed with meals served by the School Corporation. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could have resulted in the loss of funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs We identified $213,049 in known questioned costs as noted above in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls, including segregation of duties, to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) AL No. 14.218 Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Reporting Repeat Finding: No Condition: The agency did not maintain documentation to support financial information submitted in the federal funding reports submitted during the year. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303: The non-federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Cause: The agency did not have controls in place to evidence the reporting requirements of the grant were met. Effect: The agency may not be in compliance with the reporting requirements of the grant. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement controls to maintain compliance with reporting requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) AL No. 14.241 Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2024-013 Condition: For 1 out of 3 selections, we were unable to agree the expenditure details from the general ledger to the amounts reported in the Federal Financial Report to ensure completeness, accuracy and compliance with required accounting basis. We were unable to verify whether the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) report was prepared and submitted. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303: The non-federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Under the requirements of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (Pub. L. No. 109-282), as amended by Section 6202 of Pub. L. No. 110-252, hereafter referred as the “Transparency Act” that was codified in 2 CFR Part 170, recipients (i.e., direct recipients) of grants or cooperative agreements are required to report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS). Cause: The agency did not report its first-tier subawards in accordance with the Transparency Act requirements. The agency may not have proper controls in place for the reporting process. Effect: The agency may not be in compliance with the reporting requirements of the grant. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement controls to maintain compliance with reporting requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) AL No. 14.241 Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes; 2024-014 Condition: For 2 out of 2 selections, the unique identifier number and federal award identification number were not included in the grant agreement. For 2 out 2 selections, evidence that the prior year Single Audit Report was reviewed was not provided. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303: The non-federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Pursuant to 31 USC 7502(f)(2) (Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-156)), 2 CFR sections 200.330, .331, and .501(h), a pass-through entity must identify the award and applicable requirements, evaluate risk, monitor, and ensure accountability of subrecipients. According to 2 CFR §200.332, all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the federal award identification including the subrecipient's unique entity identifier, federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for the federal award. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; and (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit. (f) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by 2 CFR § 200.331 when it is expected that the subrecipient's federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the threshold set forth in § 200.501. Cause: The Mayor’s Office of Homeless Services (MOHS) did not maintain adequate documentation of the requirements included in Uniform Guidance for subrecipient monitoring. Effect: The subrecipient could not be in compliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that MOHS establish and implement controls to ensure grant agreements include the unique identifier number and federal award identification number. We also recommend a process to ensure that the single audit of subrecipients are reviewed timely. Additionally, we recommend that MOHS provides training on the Uniform Guidance requirements related to subrecipient monitoring. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) AL No. 17.258, 17.259, 17.278 Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) Cluster Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Reporting Repeat Finding: No Condition: In 2 instances (out of 14 reports selected for testing), the report was submitted after the 45 day requirement date. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Under the requirements of the grant, reports are due 45 calendar days after the end of the reporting quarter. Cause: The agency did not have controls in place to evidence the reporting requirements of the grant were met. Effect: The agency may not be in compliance with the reporting requirements of the grant. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement controls to maintain compliance with reporting requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) AL No. 17.258, 17.259, 17.278 Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) Cluster Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: No Condition: For 2 out of 2 selections, the unique identifier number on the notice of award did not agree with the subrecipient's active registration UEI on SAM.gov. For 2 out of 2 selections, management was unable to provide evidence that subrecipient monitoring was performed to ensure compliance with accounting requirements. For 2 out of 2 selections, evidence that the prior year Single Audit Report was reviewed was not provided. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303: The non-federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR §25.300: (a) A recipient may not make a subaward to a subrecipient unless that subrecipient has obtained and provided to the recipient a unique entity identifier. Subrecipients are not required to complete full SAM registration to obtain a unique entity identifier; and (b) A recipient must notify any potential subrecipients that the recipient cannot make a subaward unless the subrecipient has obtained a unique entity identifier as described in paragraph (a) of this section. According to 2 CFR §200.332, all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the federal award identification including the subrecipient's unique entity identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for the federal award. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring described in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, which may include consideration of such factors as: (1) The subrecipient's prior experience with the same or similar subawards; (2) The results of previous audits including whether or not the subrecipient receives a Single Audit (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. According to AM 413-60, Grant Documentation, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director Conducts ongoing monitoring and control of all reimbursement receipts and deposits until grant ends; as well as all program and sub-recipient (when applicable) documentation, to include: (1) program documentation; (2) timesheets; (3) deliverables; (4) activities; (5) vendor payments; (6) program data/charts/numbers; and (7) financial and compliance report. According to AM 413-61, Grant Management Financial Reporting, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director maintains all documentation, either electronic or hard copy, for all federally funded grants for the term of the grant for a minimum of seven years for review and audit by the granting agency or its designee. Cause: The Mayor’s Office of Employment Development (MOED) did not have proper controls in place to ensure the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant were met. Effect: MOED may not be in compliance with the subrecipient monitoring requirements of its grants. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement controls to maintain compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.686 Ending the HIV Epidemic: A Plan for America Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes; 2024-022 Condition: The unique entity identifier (UEI) was not included in the grant agreements for 1 out of 1 subrecipient grant agreement selected for testing. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303: Internal Control, the non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR §25.300: (a) A recipient may not make a subaward to a subrecipient unless that subrecipient has obtained and provided to the recipient a unique entity identifier. Subrecipients are not required to complete full SAM registration to obtain a unique entity identifier; and (b) A recipient must notify any potential subrecipients that the recipient cannot make a subaward unless the subrecipient has obtained a unique entity identifier as described in paragraph (a) of this section. According to 2 CFR §200.332, all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the federal award identification including the subrecipient's unique entity identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for the federal award. Cause: The Baltimore County Department of Health (BCHD) did not have proper controls in place to ensure the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant were met. Effect: BCHD may not be in compliance with the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement controls to maintain compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.914 HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes; 2024-025 Condition: The unique entity identifier (UEI) was not included in the grant agreements for 5 out of 6 subrecipient grant agreement selected for testing. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303: Internal Control, the non-federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR §25.300: (a) A recipient may not make a subaward to a subrecipient unless that subrecipient has obtained and provided to the recipient a unique entity identifier. Subrecipients are not required to complete full SAM registration to obtain a unique entity identifier; and (b) A recipient must notify any potential subrecipients that the recipient cannot make a subaward unless the subrecipient has obtained a unique entity identifier as described in paragraph (a) of this section. According to 2 CFR §200.332, all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the federal award identification including the subrecipient's unique entity identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for the federal award. Cause: The Baltimore County Department of Health (BCHD) did not have proper controls in place to ensure the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant were met. Effect: BCHD may not be in compliance with the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement controls to maintain compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2024-027 Condition: Management could not provide evidence that Equipment and Supplies – Tangible Personal Property Report (SF-428) report was submitted. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303, The non-federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. In accordance with the grant agreement: A completed Tangible Personal Property Report SF-428 and Final Report SF-428B addendum must be submitted, along with any Supplemental Sheet SF- 428S detailing all major equipment acquired or furnished under this project with a unit acquisition cost of $5,000 or more. If no equipment was acquired under an award, a negative report is required. The recipient must identify each item of equipment that it wished to retain for continued use in accordance with 45 CFR Part 75. Cause: The Baltimore County Department of Health (BCHD) may not have controls in place to ensure reporting requirements of the grant are met. Effect: BCHD may not be in compliance with the reporting requirements. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement a process to ensure all reports are submitted timely. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes; 2024-028 Condition: The unique entity identifier (UEI) was not included in the grant agreements for 2 out of 5 subrecipient grant agreement selected for testing. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303: the non-federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR §25.300: (a) A recipient may not make a subaward to a subrecipient unless that subrecipient has obtained and provided to the recipient a unique entity identifier. Subrecipients are not required to complete full SAM registration to obtain a unique entity identifier; and (b) A recipient must notify any potential subrecipients that the recipient cannot make a subaward unless the subrecipient has obtained a unique entity identifier as described in paragraph (a) of this section. According to 2 CFR §200.332, all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the federal award identification including the subrecipient's unique entity identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for the federal award. Cause: BCHD did not have proper controls in place to ensure the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant were met. Effect: BCHD may not be in compliance with the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement controls to maintain compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.977 Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STD) Prevention and Control Grants Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Reporting Repeat Finding: No Condition: Management could not provide evidence that Equipment and Supplies – Tangible Personal Property Report (SF-428) report was submitted. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303, The non-federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. In accordance with the grant agreement: A completed Tangible Personal Property Report SF-428 and Final Report SF-428B addendum must be submitted, along with any Supplemental Sheet SF- 428S detailing all major equipment acquired or furnished under this project with a unit acquisition cost of $5,000 or more. If no equipment was acquired under an award, a negative report is required. The recipient must identify each item of equipment that it wished to retain for continued use in accordance with 45 CFR Part 75. Cause: The Baltimore County Department of Health (BCHD) may not have controls in place to ensure reporting requirements of the grant are met. Effect: BCHD may not be in compliance with the reporting requirements. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement a process to ensure all reports are submitted timely. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2025-020 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.977 Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STD) Prevention and Control Grants Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: No Condition: For 1 out of 1 selection, management was unable to provide evidence that subrecipient monitoring was performed to ensure compliance with accounting requirements. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303: Internal Control, The non-federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR §25.300 recipients should: (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Cause: BCHD did not have proper controls in place to ensure the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant were met. Effect: The Baltimore County Department of Health (BCHD) may not be in compliance with the subrecipient monitoring requirements of the grant. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement controls to maintain compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
U.S. Department of Treasury AL No. 21.027 American Rescue Plan Act Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Subrecipient Monitoring Repeat Finding: Yes; 2024-015 Condition: There was no evidence that the City verified whether the subrecipient was suspended and/or debarred from receiving federal funds for 3 out of 40 subrecipients selected for testing. The City did not have current subrecipient grant agreements for 3 out of 40 subrecipients selected for testing. The unique entity identifier (UEI) was not included in the grant agreements for 3 out of 40 subrecipient grant agreements selected for testing. The Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) was not included in the grant agreements for 8 out of 40 subrecipient grant agreements selected for testing. The UEI was incorrect in the grant agreement for 1 out of 40 subrecipient grant agreements selected for testing. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303: The non-federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR §25.300: (a) A recipient may not make a subaward to a subrecipient unless that subrecipient has obtained and provided to the recipient a unique entity identifier. Subrecipients are not required to complete full SAM registration to obtain a unique entity identifier; and (b) A recipient must notify any potential subrecipients that the recipient cannot make a subaward unless the subrecipient has obtained a unique entity identifier as described in paragraph (a) of this section. According to 2 CFR §200.332, all pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the federal award identification including the subrecipient's unique entity identifier, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D and indirect cost rate for the federal award. (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. According to AM 413-61, Grant Management Financial Reporting, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director maintains all documentation, either electronic or hard copy, for all federally funded grants for the term of the grant for a minimum of seven years for review and audit by the granting agency or its designee. Cause: The City did not maintain adequate documentation of the requirements included in Uniform Guidance for subrecipient monitoring. Effect: The subrecipient could not be in compliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement controls to maintain compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
FINDING 2025-003 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.027X, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-076-PN01, 22611-076-ARP, 23619-076-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context The School Corporation did not have an effective internal control system in place to ensure compliance with the earmarking requirements and to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met. The 22611-076-PN01, 23611-076-PN01, 22611-076-ARP, 22619-076-ARP, and 23619-076-PN01 grant awards ended during the audit period. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that it fully spent the required nonpublic proportionate share amounts by the end of the grant award for three of the five grant awards tested. The following schedule shows the total nonpublic proportionate share approved by the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) for the School Corporation for each grant award compared with the total expenditures posted to the ledger for nonpublic proportionate share. The School Corporation had not spent $25,100 of proportionate share funds by the end of the grant award for all awards ending during the audit period. Total Nonpublic Proportionate Grant Award/ IDOE Approved Nonpublic Share Spent by School Project No. Proportionate Share Corporation Difference 22611-076-PN01 $ 61,782 $ 45,609 $ 16,173 22611-076-ARP 14,833 6,553 8,280 23619-076-PN01 2,359 1,712 647 Totals $ 78,974 $ 53,874 $ 25,100 INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 SOUTH GIBSON SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 22611-076-PN01, 22611-076-ARP, and 23619-076-PN01 grant awards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: . . . (g) Be adequately documented. . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed, . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause The School Corporation had not developed or implemented an effective system of internal controls, including oversight and review procedures, to ensure that expenditures for the nonpublic proportionate share were monitored and fully utilized within the grant period. Management was aware of the ability to request a waiver for unspent funds but chose not to pursue that option, resulting in the funds remaining unspent. Effect The failure to establish and maintain an effective internal control system prevented the School Corporation from identifying and correcting the unspent balance of required earmarking funds in a timely manner. This resulted in noncompliance with the earmarking requirements for three of the five grant awards tested as the School Corporation failed to expend $25,100 of the required nonpublic proportionate share by the end of the grant awards. Noncompliance with federal program requirements and the lack of internal controls could jeopardize future federal funding and may require the School Corporation to repay the unspent portion to the pass-through agency. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 SOUTH GIBSON SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to track total nonpublic proportionate share by approved grant amounts from the IDOE to ensure proportionate share is being spent by the end of the grant award. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name 84.007, 84.063, 84.268, 84.379, 93.264; U.S. Department of Education; Federal Supplemental Opportunity Grants, Federal Pell Grant Program, Federal Direct Student Loans, Teacher Education Assistance for College and Higher Education Grants, Nurse Faculty Loan Program Federal Award Identification Number and Year N/A Pass through Entity N/A Finding Type Significant deficiency Repeat Finding No Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, the University must establish and maintain effective internal control over its federal awards in order to provide reasonable assurance that it is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. Specifically for Title IV programs, 34 CFR 668.164(h)(2) requires institutions to disburse credit balances directly to the student or parent no later than 14 days after the credit balance occurs after the first day of class. Condition The University did not have adequate controls in place to ensure that credit balances were refunded timely within the 14 calendar day requirement. Questioned Costs N/A Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed N/A Context Of the 40 student credit balances tested within the Student Financial Assistance (SFA) Cluster, 1 student was identified with credit balances refunded after the 14 calendar day requirement. All refunds tested were ultimately disbursed to the appropriate student or parent (for Parent PLUS loans). However, for the exception noted, the Pell Grant refund was issued 1 day late and the Parent PLUS Loan refund was issued 36 days late. Cause and Effect The University's Bursar's Office experienced a period of short staffing during which there was no designated backup to perform credit balance refund processing. As a result, when the primary individual responsible for monitoring and issuing refunds was unavailable, the University did not have sufficient coverage or compensating controls to ensure timely processing. This staffing limitation resulted in the delayed refund for the 1 identified student credit balance within the tested sample. Recommendation We recommend that the University revise its credit balance review procedures to ensure that all credit balances are consistently identified and monitored as a part of the University's weekly review process. The University should also ensure there is appropriate designated backups for credit balance refund processing. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan Management has implemented a process to ensure that credit balances are processed within the 14 calendar day requirement. A workflow hierarchy is in place to ensure adequate staffing and training, preventing processing delays. Any deviations from the normal processing of credit balances will be sent to the relevant department immediately for further action.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Passed through State of Nevada Division of Environmental Protection Sewer Overflow and Stormwater Reuse Municipal Grant Program, 66.447 Reporting Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Grant Award Number: Affects all grant awards under assistance listing number 66.447 on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Criteria: 2CFR Section 200.303(a), Internal Controls, states that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance the the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Cause: The City did not have adequate controls to ensure that all reimbursement requests were properly approved. Condition: Two out of five reimbursement requests had not evidence of approval. Effect: Reimbursement requests may be processed without proper authorization, increasing risk of improper payments. Questions Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: All five reimbursement requests filed during the year were selected for testing; two lacked evidence of approval. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: We recommend the City implement procedures to ensure all reimbursement requests are properly approved and documented. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Identification of the Federal Program: Federal Agency and Program Name Assistance Listing # COVID-19 – Disaster Grants – Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) (FEMA) U.S. Department of Homeland Security Pass through grantor: Virginia Department of Emergency Management Pass through award number: 4512DR-VA Award Period: 1/21/2020 – 6/30/2022 97.036 Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): 2 CFR 200.303 requires that a non-Federal entity must “(a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the comptroller General of the United States and the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” 2 CFR 200.403(h) states: “Administrative closeout costs may be incurred until the due date of the final report(s). If incurred, these costs must be liquidated prior to the due date of the final report(s) and charged to the final budget period of the award unless otherwise specified by the Federal agency. All other costs must be incurred during the approved budget period. At its discretion, the Federal agency is authorized to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods. See § 200.308(g)(3).” Condition: The Authority did not validate the accuracy of the cost incurred dates and identify expenditures that were incurred outside of the period of performance related to assistance listing 97.036 – COVID-19 – Disaster Grants – Public Assistances (Presidentially Declared Disasters) (FEMA) prior to submission of the non-federal entity’s project worksheet. Cause: The Authority did not have sufficient internal controls to ensure that accuracy of the cost incurred dates or expenditures were incurred within the period of performance prior to submission of the non-federal entity’s project worksheet. Effect or Potential Effect: The Authority may inappropriately obtain funding for unallowable expenses or costs incurred outside the period of performance as a result of the reporting and verification of the completeness and accuracy of the cost incurred dates and expenditures included within the submission was not sufficient. Questioned Costs: $104,434 – represents the total payroll expenditures incurred after the end of the period of performance. Context: We identified $104,434 of payroll expenditures included in the submission of two force labor FEMA projects, resulting in duplicate costs being submitted to FEMA. The $104,434 was incorrectly included in the project that ended June 30, 2022 and was appropriately included in the project that began July 1, 2022. The costs in question are the payroll expenses from the second week of the pay period (June 26, 2022 through July 9, 2022) incurred after the end of the period of performance. The total obligation of the project worksheet that had the duplicate costs was $2,278,390. Management corrected the duplicated amount of the federal expenditures reported on the Schedule, in which total FEMA expenditures are $31,901,782 for the year ended June 30, 2025. The duplicate costs represent 4.6% of the related project and approximately 0.3% of total FEMA expenditures for the fiscal year. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: The Authority’s policy and procedures should be designed to strengthen the internal controls over the review of the submissions to ensure accurate reporting as required by the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding and the Authority has developed a plan to correct the finding.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 66.202, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Congressionally Mandated Projects Federal Award Identification Number and Year - CG-00E03697-0, 2024 Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Material weakness Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.303, the recipient must establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the recipient or subrecipient is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should align with the guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the Internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition - The Village did not have adequate controls in place to exercise its oversight responsibility of adherence to wage rate requirements that were reviewed by a contractor for the program. The Village also did not have controls in place to exercise oversight over the same contractor's review of general and subcontractors for suspension and debarment. Questioned Costs - None If Questioned Costs are Not Determinable, Description of Why Known Questioned Costs Were Undetermined or Otherwise Could Not Be Reported - N/A Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - The Village entered into an agreement with a contractor to administer the grant. While the Village arranges for the contractor to obtain and review certified payroll registers from general and subcontractors in adherence with wage rate requirements, the Village is fully responsible for compliance with wage rate requirements. Similarly, the Village arranges for the contractor to review general and subcontractors for suspension and debarment prior to entering into contracts with them; however, the Village is fully responsible for compliance with suspension and debarment requirements. Testing revealed that the Village contractor reviewed the certified payroll registers obtained from general and subcontractors and reviewed the contractor for suspension and debarment prior to the Village entering into a contract with them. However, in both cases, no controls related to ensuring compliance with wage rate requirements and suspension and debarment were in place, as the Village was unable to provide evidence of the Village’s review of the contractor’s work. Cause and Effect - The Village did not implement controls to ensure reviews of certified payroll registers performed by the contractor were in compliance with the terms and conditions of the award. Without a review of the contractor’s procedures to assess general and subcontractors' adherence with wage rate requirements, construction work could be performed by workers paid at rates that do not adhere to requirements, resulting in material noncompliance. The Village did not implement controls to ensure reviews for suspension and debarment performed by the contractor were in compliance with the terms and conditions of the award. Without a review of the contractor’s procedures to ensure contractors were not suspended or debarred, activities charged to the grant could be performed by suspended or debarred contractors, resulting in material noncompliance. Recommendation - We recommend that the Village develop oversight procedures to perform a documented review of the work completed by contractors that pertains to compliance requirements and programmatic decisions; in this case, wage rate requirement review and suspension and debarment review. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The Village has implemented updated procedures as recommended by the auditors.
FINDING 2025-002 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Number: 84.425U Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirement. Construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must pay wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) to their laborers and mechanics. Nonfederal entities are to include in their construction contracts subject to the wage rate requirements a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with these requirements and the DOL regulations. This would include a requirement to submit a copy of the payroll and statement of compliance to the entity for each week in which contract work was performed. The School Corporation did not have policies and procedures in place to ensure that contractors were paid prevailing wage rates for contracts in excess of $2,000 that were paid from federal grant funds. The School Corporation contracted with a company for a roofing project on an elementary school building. While the contract did contain the required prevailing wage language, the School Corporation used an architect firm to manage the payments to the contractor. The architect firm only submitted 4 of the 11 certified payrolls to the School Corporation for review. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 TELL CITY-TROY TOWNSHIP SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 29 CFR 5.5 states in part: "(a) Required contract clauses. The Agency head will cause or require the contracting officer to require the contracting officer to [sic] insert in full, or (for contracts covered by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR chapter 1)) by reference, in any contract in excess of $2,000 which is entered into for the actual construction, alteration and/or repair, including painting and decorating, of a public building or public work, or building or work financed in whole or in part from Federal funds or in accordance with guarantees of a Federal agency or financed from funds obtained by pledge of any contract of a Federal agency to make a loan, grant or annual contribution (except where a different meaning is expressly indicated), and which is subject to the labor standards provisions of any of the laws referenced by § 5.1, the following clauses . . . (1) Minimum wages— (i) Wage rates and fringe benefits. All laborers and mechanics employed or working upon the site of the work (or otherwise working in construction or development of the project under a development statute), will be paid unconditionally and not less often than once a week, and without subsequent deduction or rebate on any account (except such payroll deductions as are permitted by regulations issued by the Secretary of Labor under the Copeland Act (29 CFR part 3)), the full amount of basic hourly wages and bona fide fringe benefits (or cash equivalents thereof) due at time of payment computed at rates not less than those contained in the wage determination of the Secretary of Labor which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, regardless of any contractual relationship which may be alleged to exist between the contractor and such laborers and mechanics. . . . (3) Records and certified payrolls— (ii) Certified payroll requirements— (A) Frequency and method of submission. The contractor or subcontractor must submit weekly, for each week in which any DBA- or Related Acts-covered work is performed, certified payrolls to the [write in name of appropriate Federal agency] if the agency is a party to the contract, but if the agency is not such a party, the contractor will submit the certified payrolls to the applicant, sponsor, owner, or other entity, as the case may be, that maintains such records, for transmission to the [write in name of agency]. . . ." 2 CFR 200 Appendix II states in part: "In addition to other provisions required by the Federal agency or non-Federal entity; all contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions covering the following, as applicable. . . . INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 TELL CITY-TROY TOWNSHIP SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (D) Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148). When required by Federal program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non- Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5, 'Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction'). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition, contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week. . . ." Cause The School Corporation was inexperienced with managing federal awards to which the wage rate requirements apply and was, therefore, unaware of the requirement to obtain and review all certified payrolls from the contractor. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. As a result, the School Corporation did not comply with the wage rate requirements of the federal award and did not obtain and review all certified payrolls submitted to the project architect by the contractor. Accordingly, the School Corporation could not have verified that the contractor paid the required prevailing wage rates. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the wage rate requirements. The School Corporation's system should be designed to ensure that the School Corporation receives and reviews all certified payrolls for construction contracts paid with federal dollars. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Finding 2025-002 – Internal Control over Compliance – Reporting (Significant Deficiency) CFDA Title and Number 84.354A Qualified Zone Academy Bonds (QZAB) Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Compliance/Internal Control over Compliance: Auditee Responsibilities - 87 - Criteria: Uniform Guidance CFR Part 200.303 requires entities to maintain effective internal control over compliance for federal programs, including accurate financial reporting. GAAP requires proper recognition and disclosure of long-term obligations such as Qualified Zone Academy Bonds (QZAB). In-ternal controls should ensure debt balances are reconciled to lender statements and amortization schedules to prevent misstatement in reports and the SEFA. Condition: Myrtle Point School District No. did not perform routine reconciliations of QZAB debt bal-ances during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025. The general ledger balance for QZAB differed from the amortization schedule and accrued interest was not updated. No documented review or reconciliation was performed. Failed to report the interest for the QZAB bonds and failed to post the principal pay-ments that were paid from the QZAB for the Flex fund. Entries were required to correct this deficiency in order to complete the audit. Cause: Lack of formal reconciliation procedures and oversight; reliance on outdated schedules without updates. Effect or Potential Effect: Failure to accurately reconcile QZAB balances or amortization records, can result in a risk of material misstatement of liabilities and interest expense for the financial statements; po-tential errors in SEFA reporting when QZAB financed federally funded assets. This could lead to non-compliance with reporting requirements and misclassification of debt-financed assets. Questioned Cost: None reported Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that Myrtle Point School District No. 41 implement a monthly recon-ciliation process for QZAB debt, agreeing general ledger balances to lender statements and amortization schedules, and require documented review and sign-off by the Director of Business Services. District's Response: The District concurs with the recommendation. Corrective Action Plan: The District will implement reconciliations and update the schedules, and inte-grate review into the year-end close process. Planned Implementation Date: January 31, 2026 Responsible Person: Director of Business Services, Myrtle Point School District No. 41
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Maternal and Child Health Services Block Grant Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.994 Significant Deficiency, Nonmaterial Noncompliance – Reporting Finding 2025-010 – Repeat Finding Criteria or Specific Requirement: Per Section 200.303 of the Uniform Grant Guidance, a non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Per 2 CFR 200.334 the recipient must retain all federal award records for three years from the date of submission of their final financial report. Condition: During the audit we tested nine reports and noted the following: a) There was one instance out of nine reports tested where the submitted reports were unable to be provided, including the date of submission for the reports. b) There were four instances out of nine reports tested where the County was unable to provide evidence the report was reviewed prior to submission. c) There were two instances out of nine reports tested where the County was unable to provide the date of submission for the reports. Questioned Costs: None of the nonmaterial noncompliance items resulted in questioned costs. Effect: By not having the required documentation and underlying support, the County is not able to demonstrate compliance with the applicable requirements. Cause: The County did not have a formal policy to ensure documentation was retained to evidence review and submission of all reports. Recommendation: While the County made updates to policies and procedures surrounding reporting during the current year to address the prior year finding, the County should ensure these policies are adhered to ensure all submitted reports and underlying data are retained in accordance with the Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and is implementing procedures to correct this which is further discussed in the Corrective Action Plan. Corrective Action Plan: See Corrective Action Plan prepared by the County.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster (School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, and Summer Food Service Program for Children) Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, and 10.559 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A Pass-Through Agency: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Pass-Through Number(s): 2025-105726-DPI-SB-SEVERE-546, 2025-105726-DPI-SK_NSLAE-566, 2025-105726-DPI-NSL-547, 2025-105726-DPI-SFSP-586 Award Period: July 1, 2024 – June 30, 2025 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR 200.303 requires grantees to establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the grantee is managing the federal in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal award. This includes internal controls over the procurement transactions and verifying suspension and debarment status of vendors when required. Segregation of duties is an internal control intended to prevent or decrease the occurrence of errors or intentional fraud. Segregation of duties ensures that no single employee has control over all phases of a transaction. Condition: There is not a formal, documented review in place for procurement transactions related to micro purchases or food service contracts. Accordingly, this does not allow for a proper segregation of duties for internal control purposes. Questioned Costs: None. Context: When performing audit procedures related to procurement, and suspension and debarment, it was noted that the food service director position handled all the responsibilities of those functions related to Child Nutrition Cluster and there were no formal, documented internal controls over compliance in place to review that procurement transactions met Uniform Guidance requirements and were properly documented. Cause: The lack of segregation of duties is due to the limited number of employees and the size of the District’s operations. Effect: Errors or intentional fraud could occur and not be detected timely by other employees in the normal course of their responsibilities as a result of the lack of segregation of duties. The District could chose the incorrect procurement method for a transaction and fail to maintain all required documentation resulting in noncompliance. The District could award contracts to vendors who are suspended or debarred by the federal government resulting in noncompliance. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District review its procurement process to ensure that there is adequate segregation of duties in regards to initiating, authorizing, reviewing for grant allowability and approving all procurement transactions. We also recommend that the District review and update policies and procedures to help ensure that all federal grants with covered transactions have vendors reviewed for suspension and debarment status prior to entering into the transaction and that documentation of the status is maintained with the procurement history of each transaction that it is required for. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: Title I Grants to Educational Agencies Assistance Listing Number: 84.010 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: S010A240049 Pass-Through Agency: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Pass-Through Number(s): 2025-105726-DPI-TI-A-141 Award Period: July 1, 2024 – June 30, 2025 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR 200.303 requires grantees to establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the grantee is managing the federal in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal award. This includes implementing controls for verifying only allowable costs are recorded and eligibility determinations are properly documented and reviewed by someone other than the preparer. Segregation of duties is an internal control intended to prevent or decrease the occurrence of errors or intentional fraud. Segregation of duties ensures that no single employee has control over all phases of a transaction. Condition: There is no formal, documented review and approval by any District employee to ensure the activity and cost is allowable under the grant. There is also no formal documented review and approval of the eligibility forms filed in Wisegrants. Accordingly, this does not allow for a proper segregation of duties for internal control purposes. Questioned Costs: None. Context: When identifying internal controls over compliance related to allowable costs, it was noted that the Bookkeeper or District Office Manager position handled all the responsibilities of those functions related to Title I and there were no formal, documented internal controls over compliance in place to review that costs met all requirements and were properly documented. There was no review of the work completed by someone other than the preparer. While the District met with CESA 10 to review the eligibility reports, there was no formal review or approval of the reports submitted in Wisegrants. Cause: The lack of segregation of duties is due to the limited number of employees and the size of the District’s operations. Effect: Errors or intentional fraud could occur and not be detected timely by other employees in the normal course of their responsibilities as a result of the lack of segregation of duties. Unallowable costs could be recorded for the grant resulting in noncompliance. Eligibility determinations could be incorrect, resulting in noncompliance. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District review its grant disbursement process to ensure that there is adequate segregation of duties in regards to initiating, authorizing, reviewing for grant allowability and approving purchases, along with adding controls to ensure that the item purchased was received by the District. We also recommend the District printout the eligibility reports from Wisegrants and sign and date them to indicate review and approval after meeting with CESA 10 each year. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria: 2 CFR §200.303 requires that the grant recipient must establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the recipient is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These controls should align with the guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control- Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In addition, the District is required to promptly disclose whenever, in connection with the Federal award, it has credible evidence of the commission of a violation of Federal criminal law involving fraud, conflict of interest, bribery, or gratuity violations found in Title 18 of the United States Code or violation of the False Claims Act. Condition: During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025, District staff have identified fraud in the payroll related to the Food Service Program. The District identified that an employee was submitting additional timecards for payment by circumventing the District’s regular timecard internal controls and process. The employee falsified the timecard document and circumvented the manager approval process. This occurred approximately from November 2024 to November 2025 in the amount of $20,250. Based on our testing of 60 payroll transactions with no exceptions, the District’s internal controls were properly designed but were not effective in identifying the fraud in a timely manner. However, the District’s management was able to discover the fraud by identifying the risk and suspicion with the employee’s timecard and properly reported the fraud. In addition, the District’s Food Service Program is reimbursed based on eligible student count used in the food service program. Questioned Costs: The fraudulent transactions amounted to $20,250, which is below the $25,000 questioned cost threshold. Cause: The District’s internal controls over payroll were properly designed but not effective to identify the fraud in a timely manner. The District processed the falsified timecards with the fake manager approval. However, the District’s management and risk assessment identified the fraud months after the fraud has occurred. Effect: The internal controls over payroll caused the District to incur fraud of $20,250. The District was required to report the fraud to the grantor and the Colorado Department of Education. The District terminated the employee and implemented additional timecard and payroll internal controls in order to avoid similar situations in the future by reviewing any timecards that are submitted outside of the regular internal control process. ALAMOSA SCHOOL DISTRICT RE-11J SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Year Ended June 30, 2025 58 Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the District implement additional internal controls over payroll and timecard processing and communicate with staff to properly review timecards for appropriate signatures and communicate with managers regarding timecards that are submitted outside of the regular internal control process. The District may have already implemented these processes in light of the fraud discovery. Corrective Action Plan: Reported on page 59.
Criteria or Specific Requirement: Per 2 CFR 200.303 - Internal Controls and the OMB Compliance Supplement: Child Nutrition Cluster - The District is required to have internal controls, including segregation of duties, over reporting of monthly reimbursement claims. Condition: The same individual is responsible for preparing and submitting monthly reimbursement claims for the Child Nutrition Program without an independent review or approval prior to submission. Questioned Costs: This condition resulted in no identified questioned costs. Context: Currently, one individual is responsible for preparing and submitting monthly reimbursement claims. Effect: Meal claims could be submitted to the Illinois State Board of Education that do not accurately reflect the number of meals served. Consequently, the District could be over- or under- reimbursed by this grant program. Cause: Absence of formal internal control procedures resulted in one person performing all reporting functions. Recommendation: Implement segregation of duties by requiring one person to prepare the monthly claim and a second person (e.g., supervisor) to review and approve the claim before submission. The review should be supported with signatures or electronic approval logs. Management's Response: A corrective action plan will be developed and implemented. A secondary review of the meal claim will be performed and documented.
FINDING 2025-002 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY23-24, FY24-25, Rounds 1 - 4 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective system of internal controls was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. A population of three covered transactions, totaling $1,854,606, was identified for testing. For all three transactions, the School Corporation did not have documentation to show that the vendors were verified for suspension and debarment status prior to entering into the transaction. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 MILL CREEK COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause There was no documented internal control process for verification of vendors' suspension and debarment status. With no documented internal control process, it was unclear which employee at the School Corporation was responsible for the verification. As such, no internal controls could be observed to verify the School Corporation complied with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The School Corporation was not able to provide the documentation that they verified vendors were not suspended or debarred. If the School Corporation does not verify that vendors are not suspended or debarred, the School Corporation may be purchasing from vendors that are not eligible to receive federal funds. Without a proper system of internal controls in place that operated effectively, material noncompliance remained undetected. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls, including policies that would provide segregation of duties to ensure appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversight are taking place prior to entering covered transactions. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.