Criteria: • §200.303 Internal controls establishes that “The non-Federal entity must (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, (b) Comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards, (c) Evaluate and monitor the non-Federal entity's compliance with statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of Federal awards., (d) Take prompt action when instances of noncompliance are identified including noncompliance identified in audit findings. • • 2 CFR §200.332 Requirements for pass-through entities establishes that “All pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. • • Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include (1) Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity; (2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass- through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward; (3) Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by § 200.521; and (4) The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings”. Condition: The Chapter 11 Subrecipients Management and Monitoring Manual, subrecipients with risk assessment profile classified as High-High Risk (HH), require an annual site visit. However, during the year ended June 30, 2020, from six (6) subrecipients classified as HH, two (2) were not visited during the period. The subrecipients not visited were the following: Cause: Lack of implementation of work plan that includes monitoring process for at least major subrecipients before year end, in order to avoid noncompliance on subrecipients’ procedures. Effects: • • Noncompliance may be performed by subrecipients without timely evaluation to remediate possible questioned costs, which may result in delay receipt of funds through remediation be implemented. • • Incomplete monitoring process can prevent COR3 from timely detection of a material noncompliance from subrecipients. Questioned Costs: None. Identification as a repeat finding: Finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year and was identified as finding number 2019-07. Recommendation: • • We recommend management to implement a work plan for monitoring subrecipients to ascertain that major subrecipients be monitored during the year, or at reaching to determine threshold on used federal funds used in order to timely react to and avoid possible non-compliances. • • In addition, we recommended management to ascertain that all procedures related to the monitoring process be implemented.
Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Names: Health Center Program Cluster: Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care), COVID-19 Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care), Grants for New and Expanded Services under the Health Center Program CFDA Numbers: 93.224 and 93.527 Criteria In accordance with §200.305, Federal payment, Grantees and subgrantees that receive grant funds are responsible for maintaining controls regarding the management of Federal program funds under the Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR 200.302 and 200.303. Condition The Center's drawdowns did not illustrate review and approval by management. Cause The Center did not have adequate controls to ensure drawdowns were properly approved and such approval is documented. Effect The condition may lead to inaccurate or improper drawdowns. Questioned Costs None. Context We selected 6 drawdowns to test controls over cash management. We noted there was no formal approval or evidence of review for these drawdowns. Identification of Repeat Finding Not a repeat finding. Recommendation The Center should develop written procedures to review all drawdowns that occur in order to ensure accuracy. Views of Responsible Officials Management and the Board of Directors agree with the finding and will implement additional controls to ensure there is formal evidence of review being performed.
Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Names: Health Center Program Cluster: Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care), COVID-19 Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care), Grants for New and Expanded Services under the Health Center Program CFDA Numbers: 93.224 and 93.527 Criteria In accordance with §200.305, Federal payment, Grantees and subgrantees that receive grant funds are responsible for maintaining controls regarding the management of Federal program funds under the Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR 200.302 and 200.303. Condition The Center's drawdowns did not illustrate review and approval by management. Cause The Center did not have adequate controls to ensure drawdowns were properly approved and such approval is documented. Effect The condition may lead to inaccurate or improper drawdowns. Questioned Costs None. Context We selected 6 drawdowns to test controls over cash management. We noted there was no formal approval or evidence of review for these drawdowns. Identification of Repeat Finding Not a repeat finding. Recommendation The Center should develop written procedures to review all drawdowns that occur in order to ensure accuracy. Views of Responsible Officials Management and the Board of Directors agree with the finding and will implement additional controls to ensure there is formal evidence of review being performed.
Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Names: Health Center Program Cluster: Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care), COVID-19 Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care), Grants for New and Expanded Services under the Health Center Program CFDA Numbers: 93.224 and 93.527 Criteria In accordance with §200.305, Federal payment, Grantees and subgrantees that receive grant funds are responsible for maintaining controls regarding the management of Federal program funds under the Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR 200.302 and 200.303. Condition The Center's drawdowns did not illustrate review and approval by management. Cause The Center did not have adequate controls to ensure drawdowns were properly approved and such approval is documented. Effect The condition may lead to inaccurate or improper drawdowns. Questioned Costs None. Context We selected 6 drawdowns to test controls over cash management. We noted there was no formal approval or evidence of review for these drawdowns. Identification of Repeat Finding Not a repeat finding. Recommendation The Center should develop written procedures to review all drawdowns that occur in order to ensure accuracy. Views of Responsible Officials Management and the Board of Directors agree with the finding and will implement additional controls to ensure there is formal evidence of review being performed.
Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Names: Health Center Program Cluster: Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care), COVID-19 Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care), Grants for New and Expanded Services under the Health Center Program CFDA Numbers: 93.224 and 93.527 Criteria In accordance with §200.305, Federal payment, Grantees and subgrantees that receive grant funds are responsible for maintaining controls regarding the management of Federal program funds under the Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR 200.302 and 200.303. Condition The Center's drawdowns did not illustrate review and approval by management. Cause The Center did not have adequate controls to ensure drawdowns were properly approved and such approval is documented. Effect The condition may lead to inaccurate or improper drawdowns. Questioned Costs None. Context We selected 6 drawdowns to test controls over cash management. We noted there was no formal approval or evidence of review for these drawdowns. Identification of Repeat Finding Not a repeat finding. Recommendation The Center should develop written procedures to review all drawdowns that occur in order to ensure accuracy. Views of Responsible Officials Management and the Board of Directors agree with the finding and will implement additional controls to ensure there is formal evidence of review being performed.
Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Names: Health Center Program Cluster: Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care), COVID-19 Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care), Grants for New and Expanded Services under the Health Center Program CFDA Numbers: 93.224 and 93.527 Criteria In accordance with §200.305, Federal payment, Grantees and subgrantees that receive grant funds are responsible for maintaining controls regarding the management of Federal program funds under the Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR 200.302 and 200.303. Condition The Center's drawdowns did not illustrate review and approval by management. Cause The Center did not have adequate controls to ensure drawdowns were properly approved and such approval is documented. Effect The condition may lead to inaccurate or improper drawdowns. Questioned Costs None. Context We selected 6 drawdowns to test controls over cash management. We noted there was no formal approval or evidence of review for these drawdowns. Identification of Repeat Finding Not a repeat finding. Recommendation The Center should develop written procedures to review all drawdowns that occur in order to ensure accuracy. Views of Responsible Officials Management and the Board of Directors agree with the finding and will implement additional controls to ensure there is formal evidence of review being performed.
Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Names: Health Center Program Cluster: Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care), COVID-19 Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care), Grants for New and Expanded Services under the Health Center Program CFDA Numbers: 93.224 and 93.527 Criteria In accordance with §200.305, Federal payment, Grantees and subgrantees that receive grant funds are responsible for maintaining controls regarding the management of Federal program funds under the Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR 200.302 and 200.303. Condition The Center's drawdowns did not illustrate review and approval by management. Cause The Center did not have adequate controls to ensure drawdowns were properly approved and such approval is documented. Effect The condition may lead to inaccurate or improper drawdowns. Questioned Costs None. Context We selected 6 drawdowns to test controls over cash management. We noted there was no formal approval or evidence of review for these drawdowns. Identification of Repeat Finding Not a repeat finding. Recommendation The Center should develop written procedures to review all drawdowns that occur in order to ensure accuracy. Views of Responsible Officials Management and the Board of Directors agree with the finding and will implement additional controls to ensure there is formal evidence of review being performed.
Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Names: Health Center Program Cluster: Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care), COVID-19 Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care), Grants for New and Expanded Services under the Health Center Program CFDA Numbers: 93.224 and 93.527 Criteria In accordance with §200.305, Federal payment, Grantees and subgrantees that receive grant funds are responsible for maintaining controls regarding the management of Federal program funds under the Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR 200.302 and 200.303. Condition The Center's drawdowns did not illustrate review and approval by management. Cause The Center did not have adequate controls to ensure drawdowns were properly approved and such approval is documented. Effect The condition may lead to inaccurate or improper drawdowns. Questioned Costs None. Context We selected 6 drawdowns to test controls over cash management. We noted there was no formal approval or evidence of review for these drawdowns. Identification of Repeat Finding Not a repeat finding. Recommendation The Center should develop written procedures to review all drawdowns that occur in order to ensure accuracy. Views of Responsible Officials Management and the Board of Directors agree with the finding and will implement additional controls to ensure there is formal evidence of review being performed.
Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Names: Health Center Program Cluster: Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care), COVID-19 Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care), Grants for New and Expanded Services under the Health Center Program CFDA Numbers: 93.224 and 93.527 Criteria In accordance with §200.305, Federal payment, Grantees and subgrantees that receive grant funds are responsible for maintaining controls regarding the management of Federal program funds under the Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR 200.302 and 200.303. Condition The Center's drawdowns did not illustrate review and approval by management. Cause The Center did not have adequate controls to ensure drawdowns were properly approved and such approval is documented. Effect The condition may lead to inaccurate or improper drawdowns. Questioned Costs None. Context We selected 6 drawdowns to test controls over cash management. We noted there was no formal approval or evidence of review for these drawdowns. Identification of Repeat Finding Not a repeat finding. Recommendation The Center should develop written procedures to review all drawdowns that occur in order to ensure accuracy. Views of Responsible Officials Management and the Board of Directors agree with the finding and will implement additional controls to ensure there is formal evidence of review being performed.
Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(7) a non-federal entity must establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E – Cost Principles and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Per 2 CFR 200.303, a non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Article 12 of the Act 83 of May 2, 1941, as amended, establishes that the Authority must have an accounting system that provides for adequate control and statistical records of all income and expenses from, administered or controlled by the Authority. Condition and Context During our review of the internal controls over compliance, we noted that the following: • Authority did not have written procedures or formal policies to ensure compliance over the Allowable Costs and Cost Principles, Period of Performance, Matching and Reporting requirements. • During our test work over internal controls over compliance for activities allowed and cost principles requirements, we noted that the Authority implemented a system of compiling the relevant data elements, including allowed expenditures for all projects. However, there was no control addressing the completeness and accuracy of the allowed expenditures. Cause and Possible Asserted Effect Management did not establish proper internal controls to ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards. Absence of formal policies and procedures could cause the Authority to fall in noncompliance with federal awards. Also, the Authority’s processes and controls are not designed to ensure proper review of supporting documentation to meet the compliance requirements of the Federal Grant. Not having formal processes and controls caused that in multiple occasions the Grantor returned claims submitted due to lack of support documentation. Questioned Cost There were no questioned costs associated with the finding. Whether the Sampling was a Statistically Valid Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Prior Year Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in the prior year’s audit as finding 2019-008. Recommendation Management must establish written procedures and formal policies to ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards. View of Responsible Officials Management acknowledges the findings and has implemented a corrective action plan to enhance compliance with Federal awards. This plan includes developing Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for grant management activities, identifying, and documenting existing internal controls, and maintaining constant communication with stakeholders to prevent material non-compliance. Additionally, PREPA will provide training to staff on the new SOPs and establish a monitoring mechanism to continuously assess and improve the effectiveness of these controls. The corrective action plan, supervised by Mr. Ezequiel Nieves from the PREPA Disaster Funding Management Office, is expected to be completed by July 2025. Management is committed to addressing deficiencies, ensuring that processes and controls are robust and effective, and that Federal awards are managed transparently and in full compliance with all regulatory requirements. The estimated date of completion is expected to be in July 2025. Responsible Party - Mr. Ezequiel Nieves - PREPA Disaster Funding Management Office, Finance Department. Effective June 1, 2021, the Authority transitioned the management and operation of its transmission and distribution network as well as certain back- office functions, including billing, collections and accounting, to a third party. The third-party operator is reviewing operating procedures and controls within its responsibilities to make the necessary improvements. Management will work to address these findings with the assistance of the third-party operators, where applicable. Also, effective July 1, 2023, the Authority transitioned the management and operation of its generation assets as well as certain back- office functions to a third party. The third-party operator is reviewing operating procedures and controls within its responsibilities to make the necessary improvements. In addition, the Authority will also be implementing and monitoring corrective actions taken by the new generation segment operator.
PASS THROUGH GRANTOR: Direct Grant; Oklahoma Department of Transportation FEDERAL AGENCY: U.S. Department of Commerce; U.S. Department of Transportation ASSISTANCE LISTING: 11.300 and 20.205 FEDERAL PROGRAM NAME: Investments for Public Works and Economic Development Facilities and Highway Planning and Construction FEDERAL AWARD NUMBER: ERSTP 262C(075), ERSTP 266C(076), ERSTP 266C(077), and ERSTP 266C (082) FEDERAL AWARD YEAR: 2020 CONTROL CATEGORY: All QUESTIONED COSTS: $-0- Condition: During our review and reconciliation of the SEFA, as initially prepared by the County, we identified federal programs that were not reported accurately. These errors resulted in expenditures being overstated by $299,126. Cause of Condition: Policies and procedures have not been designed and implemented to ensure accurate reporting of expenditures for all federal awards. Effect of Condition: This condition resulted in inaccurate recording of expenditures on the SEFA and could increase the potential for material noncompliance. Recommendation: OSAI recommends county officials and department heads gain an understanding of federal programs awarded to Rogers County. Internal control procedures should be designed and implemented to ensure an accurate reporting of expenditures on the SEFA and to ensure compliance with federal requirements. Management Response: Board of County Commissioners: The BOCC is responsible for the overall fiscal concerns of the county. See OKLA. STAT. Title 19, § 345. The BOCC, with the cooperation and participation of all elected officials, reviews, develops and implements policies and procedures to create a strong internal control environment. Additionally, the BOCC conducts meetings with all elected officials and officers responsible for the receipt and/or expenditure of county funds. These meetings address fiscal matters, including but not limited to, policy discussions and implementation, financial reports, budget oversight, SEFA reporting, and legal compliance. Policies and procedures, combined with fiscal oversight meetings, are intended to: 1) prevent or detect material misstatements in the financial statements; 2) prevent or detect fraud within the county; 3) increase communication between the BOCC and those elected officials and officers responsible for the receipt and/or expenditure of public funds; 4) provide oversight over the fiscal concerns of the county; 5) identify and address risks related to financial reporting; 6) ensure the accuracy of Rogers County’s financial statements, Estimate of Needs, the SEFA; and 7) ensure compliance with all applicable federal and state laws, regulations, and/or codes. The BOCC is responsible for preparing the financial statements. See OKLA. STAT. Title 68, § 3002(A). At the end of fiscal year 2020, the BOCC chose not to renew the contract with the budget maker. Beginning in fiscal year 2021, the BOCC and the Rogers County Treasurer developed and implemented a plan for the preparation and presentation of the financial statements by the Rogers County Treasurer beginning in fiscal year 2021. The purpose of this plan was to increase communication, involvement and oversight regarding the County’s financial condition and for better accuracy and timeliness of the preparation and presentation of the financial statements. The BOCC, with the cooperation of all elected officials and officers responsible for the receipt or expenditure of county funds, will evaluate the processes and procedures currently in place to detect and identify material misstatements in Rogers County’s financial statements, detect fraud, and identify and address risks related to Rogers County’s financial reporting. Where deficiencies are identified, processes and procedures will be implemented to identify fraud, detect material misstatements in the financial statements, and address risks related to financial reporting. County Clerk: The County Clerk works with the BOCC and all elected officials to develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent material misstatements in Rogers County’s financial statements, detect fraud and identify and address risks related to Rogers County’s financial reporting. These policies are intended to ensure the accuracy of the County’s financial statements, Estimate of Needs, SEFA, and compliance with all applicable federal and state laws, regulations, and/or codes. The County Clerk will continue to perform the duties of her office in accordance with Oklahoma law. Where appropriate, the County Clerk will participate in the development and implementation of policies and procedures to prevent material misstatements in Rogers County’s financial statements, detect fraud and identify and address risks related to Rogers County’s financial reporting. County Treasurer: The County Treasurer was engaged to compile the SEFA report. Each department is responsible for reporting its own Federal revenues and expenditures. County Sheriff: The County Sheriff will work with the BOCC and all elected officials to develop and implement policies and procedures to ensure Rogers County’s SEFA is prepared timely and accurately. Criteria: GAO Standards – Section 2 – Establishing an Effective Internal Control System – OV2.23 states in part: Objectives of an Entity – Compliance Objectives Management conducts activities in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. As part of specifying compliance objectives, the entity determines which laws and regulations apply to the entity. Management is expected to set objectives that incorporate these requirements. 2 CFR § 200.303(a) Internal Controls reads as follows: The non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR § 200.508(b) Auditee responsibilities reads as follows: The auditee must: Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. 2 CFR § 200.510(b) Financial statements reads as follows: Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards. The auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended.
PASS THROUGH GRANTOR: Direct Grant; Oklahoma Department of Transportation FEDERAL AGENCY: U.S. Department of Commerce; U.S. Department of Transportation ASSISTANCE LISTING: 11.300 and 20.205 FEDERAL PROGRAM NAME: Investment for Public Works and Economic Development Facilities and Highway Planning and Construction FEDERAL AWARD NUMBER: ERSTP 262C(075), ERSTP 266C(076), ERSTP 266C(077), and ERSTP 266C (082)) FEDERAL AWARD YEAR: 2020 CONTROL CATEGORY: Activities Allowed or Unallowed; Allowable Costs/Costs Principles; Matching; Period of Performance, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment, Reporting; and Special Tests and Provisions. QUESTIONED COSTS: $-0- Condition: Through the process of gaining an understanding of the County’s internal control structure for federal programs, it was noted that county-wide internal controls regarding Control Environment, Risk Assessment, Information and Communication, and Monitoring have not been designed. Cause of Condition: Policies and procedures have not been designed and implemented to ensure the County complies with grant requirements. Effect of Condition: This condition could result in noncompliance to grant requirements and loss of federal funds. Recommendation: OSAI recommends that the County design and implement a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with grant requirements. Management Response: Board of County Commissioners: The BOCC is responsible for the overall fiscal concerns of the county. See OKLA. STAT. Title 19, § 345. The BOCC, with the cooperation and participation of all elected officials, reviews, develops and implements policies and procedures to create a strong internal control environment. The BOCC will work with all elected officials and with the state and local partners in each federal award to develop policies, procedures, and internal controls designed to accurately track grants, including the application process, verification, oversight, and reporting of grant requirements. These policies and procedures will be designed to identify requirements for recipients and sub-recipients of grants, ensure accurate equipment and real property management, procurement, recipient and subrecipient monitoring and reporting. Further, policies will ensure a proper understanding of all grant requirements and compliance of the same. Criteria: The GAO Standards – Section 1 – Fundamental Concepts of Internal Control – OV1.01 states in part: Definition of Internal Control Internal control is a process effected by an entity’s oversight body, management, and other personnel that provides reasonable assurance that the objectives of an entity will be achieved. Additionally, GAO Standards – Section 2 – Establishing an Effective Internal Control System – OV2.04 states in part: Components, Principles, and Attributes Control Environment - The foundation for an internal control system. It provides the discipline and structure to help an entity achieve its objectives. Risk Assessment - Assesses the risks facing the entity as it seeks to achieve its objectives. This assessment provides the basis for developing appropriate risk responses. Information and Communication - The quality information management and personnel communicate and use to support the internal control system. Monitoring - Activities management establishes and operates to assess the quality of performance over time and promptly resolve the findings of audits and other reviews. Furthermore, 2 CFR § 200.303 Internal Controls (a) reads as follows: The non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
PASS THROUGH GRANTOR: Direct Grant; Oklahoma Department of Transportation FEDERAL AGENCY: U.S. Department of Commerce; U.S. Department of Transportation ASSISTANCE LISTING: 11.300 and 20.205 FEDERAL PROGRAM NAME: Investments for Public Works and Economic Development Facilities and Highway Planning and Construction FEDERAL AWARD NUMBER: ERSTP 262C(075), ERSTP 266C(076), ERSTP 266C(077), and ERSTP 266C (082) FEDERAL AWARD YEAR: 2020 CONTROL CATEGORY: All QUESTIONED COSTS: $-0- Condition: During our review and reconciliation of the SEFA, as initially prepared by the County, we identified federal programs that were not reported accurately. These errors resulted in expenditures being overstated by $299,126. Cause of Condition: Policies and procedures have not been designed and implemented to ensure accurate reporting of expenditures for all federal awards. Effect of Condition: This condition resulted in inaccurate recording of expenditures on the SEFA and could increase the potential for material noncompliance. Recommendation: OSAI recommends county officials and department heads gain an understanding of federal programs awarded to Rogers County. Internal control procedures should be designed and implemented to ensure an accurate reporting of expenditures on the SEFA and to ensure compliance with federal requirements. Management Response: Board of County Commissioners: The BOCC is responsible for the overall fiscal concerns of the county. See OKLA. STAT. Title 19, § 345. The BOCC, with the cooperation and participation of all elected officials, reviews, develops and implements policies and procedures to create a strong internal control environment. Additionally, the BOCC conducts meetings with all elected officials and officers responsible for the receipt and/or expenditure of county funds. These meetings address fiscal matters, including but not limited to, policy discussions and implementation, financial reports, budget oversight, SEFA reporting, and legal compliance. Policies and procedures, combined with fiscal oversight meetings, are intended to: 1) prevent or detect material misstatements in the financial statements; 2) prevent or detect fraud within the county; 3) increase communication between the BOCC and those elected officials and officers responsible for the receipt and/or expenditure of public funds; 4) provide oversight over the fiscal concerns of the county; 5) identify and address risks related to financial reporting; 6) ensure the accuracy of Rogers County’s financial statements, Estimate of Needs, the SEFA; and 7) ensure compliance with all applicable federal and state laws, regulations, and/or codes. The BOCC is responsible for preparing the financial statements. See OKLA. STAT. Title 68, § 3002(A). At the end of fiscal year 2020, the BOCC chose not to renew the contract with the budget maker. Beginning in fiscal year 2021, the BOCC and the Rogers County Treasurer developed and implemented a plan for the preparation and presentation of the financial statements by the Rogers County Treasurer beginning in fiscal year 2021. The purpose of this plan was to increase communication, involvement and oversight regarding the County’s financial condition and for better accuracy and timeliness of the preparation and presentation of the financial statements. The BOCC, with the cooperation of all elected officials and officers responsible for the receipt or expenditure of county funds, will evaluate the processes and procedures currently in place to detect and identify material misstatements in Rogers County’s financial statements, detect fraud, and identify and address risks related to Rogers County’s financial reporting. Where deficiencies are identified, processes and procedures will be implemented to identify fraud, detect material misstatements in the financial statements, and address risks related to financial reporting. County Clerk: The County Clerk works with the BOCC and all elected officials to develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent material misstatements in Rogers County’s financial statements, detect fraud and identify and address risks related to Rogers County’s financial reporting. These policies are intended to ensure the accuracy of the County’s financial statements, Estimate of Needs, SEFA, and compliance with all applicable federal and state laws, regulations, and/or codes. The County Clerk will continue to perform the duties of her office in accordance with Oklahoma law. Where appropriate, the County Clerk will participate in the development and implementation of policies and procedures to prevent material misstatements in Rogers County’s financial statements, detect fraud and identify and address risks related to Rogers County’s financial reporting. County Treasurer: The County Treasurer was engaged to compile the SEFA report. Each department is responsible for reporting its own Federal revenues and expenditures. County Sheriff: The County Sheriff will work with the BOCC and all elected officials to develop and implement policies and procedures to ensure Rogers County’s SEFA is prepared timely and accurately. Criteria: GAO Standards – Section 2 – Establishing an Effective Internal Control System – OV2.23 states in part: Objectives of an Entity – Compliance Objectives Management conducts activities in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. As part of specifying compliance objectives, the entity determines which laws and regulations apply to the entity. Management is expected to set objectives that incorporate these requirements. 2 CFR § 200.303(a) Internal Controls reads as follows: The non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR § 200.508(b) Auditee responsibilities reads as follows: The auditee must: Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. 2 CFR § 200.510(b) Financial statements reads as follows: Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards. The auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended.
PASS THROUGH GRANTOR: Direct Grant; Oklahoma Department of Transportation FEDERAL AGENCY: U.S. Department of Commerce; U.S. Department of Transportation ASSISTANCE LISTING: 11.300 and 20.205 FEDERAL PROGRAM NAME: Investment for Public Works and Economic Development Facilities and Highway Planning and Construction FEDERAL AWARD NUMBER: ERSTP 262C(075), ERSTP 266C(076), ERSTP 266C(077), and ERSTP 266C (082)) FEDERAL AWARD YEAR: 2020 CONTROL CATEGORY: Activities Allowed or Unallowed; Allowable Costs/Costs Principles; Matching; Period of Performance, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment, Reporting; and Special Tests and Provisions. QUESTIONED COSTS: $-0- Condition: Through the process of gaining an understanding of the County’s internal control structure for federal programs, it was noted that county-wide internal controls regarding Control Environment, Risk Assessment, Information and Communication, and Monitoring have not been designed. Cause of Condition: Policies and procedures have not been designed and implemented to ensure the County complies with grant requirements. Effect of Condition: This condition could result in noncompliance to grant requirements and loss of federal funds. Recommendation: OSAI recommends that the County design and implement a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with grant requirements. Management Response: Board of County Commissioners: The BOCC is responsible for the overall fiscal concerns of the county. See OKLA. STAT. Title 19, § 345. The BOCC, with the cooperation and participation of all elected officials, reviews, develops and implements policies and procedures to create a strong internal control environment. The BOCC will work with all elected officials and with the state and local partners in each federal award to develop policies, procedures, and internal controls designed to accurately track grants, including the application process, verification, oversight, and reporting of grant requirements. These policies and procedures will be designed to identify requirements for recipients and sub-recipients of grants, ensure accurate equipment and real property management, procurement, recipient and subrecipient monitoring and reporting. Further, policies will ensure a proper understanding of all grant requirements and compliance of the same. Criteria: The GAO Standards – Section 1 – Fundamental Concepts of Internal Control – OV1.01 states in part: Definition of Internal Control Internal control is a process effected by an entity’s oversight body, management, and other personnel that provides reasonable assurance that the objectives of an entity will be achieved. Additionally, GAO Standards – Section 2 – Establishing an Effective Internal Control System – OV2.04 states in part: Components, Principles, and Attributes Control Environment - The foundation for an internal control system. It provides the discipline and structure to help an entity achieve its objectives. Risk Assessment - Assesses the risks facing the entity as it seeks to achieve its objectives. This assessment provides the basis for developing appropriate risk responses. Information and Communication - The quality information management and personnel communicate and use to support the internal control system. Monitoring - Activities management establishes and operates to assess the quality of performance over time and promptly resolve the findings of audits and other reviews. Furthermore, 2 CFR § 200.303 Internal Controls (a) reads as follows: The non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Finding SA2020-001: Internal Control AL number: 14.850 AL Title: Public and Indian Housing Name of Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Award Identification number and year: CA010 (2020) Criteria: Public Housing Authorities (PHA) are required to establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award as stated in CFR 200.303. Condition: During our audit, we were unable to obtain an understanding of the internal controls over the federal awards of the Authority, as current personnel could not respond to the processes and procedures. Cause: We understand that the staff overseeing the federal awards during fiscal year 2020 are no longer with the Authority, and therefore, the staff overseeing the federal awards subsequent to the fiscal year were unable to provide any information regarding the internal controls of the Authority. Effect: The Housing Authority is not in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award as stated in CFR 200.303. Identification as a repeat finding: Yes, since 2019. Recommendation: The Housing Authority must develop procedures to ensure that there is an internal control environment in compliance with the federal requirements. Management Response: The City has assigned staff to specific duties to support the Authority’s financial operations. Staff have implemented new processes that align with the City’s policies and procedures, while also in accordance with HUD regulations and requirements, to improve the integrity and accuracy of the Authority’s financial reporting and management of federal awards. The procedures ensure separation of duties and levels of approval to handle and manage federal funds. Staff also continue to attend trainings to understand Federal statutes and regulations.
on the federal program: Subject: Head Start Cluster - Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program: Head Start Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 93.600 Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the Unit to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principle compliance requirements. The Unit did not have adequate documentation to support expenditures. Cause: The Unit's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the Unit at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: $23,700. Context: We noted that there was no primary, documented review for one of the seventeen sample vendor head start cluster accounts payable vouchers. Additionally, one of the vouchers was not supported by appropriate documentation. The voucher was for the purchase of gift cards for teachers to buy books for professional development. However, there was no backup or support showing what the gift cards were used to purchase. The total of this voucher was $23,700. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the Unit establish a documented, primary review of all head start cluster account payable claims before they are paid. Additionally, we recommend the Unit maintain all supporting documentation to show what the gift cards were used to purchase to ensure they are used for allowable purposes. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
on the federal program: Subject: Head Start Cluster - Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program: Head Start Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 93.600 Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the Unit to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principle compliance requirements. The Unit did not have adequate documentation to support expenditures. Cause: The Unit's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the Unit at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: $23,700. Context: We noted that there was no primary, documented review for one of the seventeen sample vendor head start cluster accounts payable vouchers. Additionally, one of the vouchers was not supported by appropriate documentation. The voucher was for the purchase of gift cards for teachers to buy books for professional development. However, there was no backup or support showing what the gift cards were used to purchase. The total of this voucher was $23,700. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the Unit establish a documented, primary review of all head start cluster account payable claims before they are paid. Additionally, we recommend the Unit maintain all supporting documentation to show what the gift cards were used to purchase to ensure they are used for allowable purposes. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
on the federal program: Subject: Head Start Cluster - Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program: Head Start Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 93.600 Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the Unit to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principle compliance requirements. The Unit did not have adequate documentation to support expenditures. Cause: The Unit's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the Unit at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: $23,700. Context: We noted that there was no primary, documented review for one of the seventeen sample vendor head start cluster accounts payable vouchers. Additionally, one of the vouchers was not supported by appropriate documentation. The voucher was for the purchase of gift cards for teachers to buy books for professional development. However, there was no backup or support showing what the gift cards were used to purchase. The total of this voucher was $23,700. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the Unit establish a documented, primary review of all head start cluster account payable claims before they are paid. Additionally, we recommend the Unit maintain all supporting documentation to show what the gift cards were used to purchase to ensure they are used for allowable purposes. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
on the federal program: Subject: Head Start Cluster - Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program: Head Start Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 93.600 Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the Unit to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principle compliance requirements. The Unit did not have adequate documentation to support expenditures. Cause: The Unit's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the Unit at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: $23,700. Context: We noted that there was no primary, documented review for one of the seventeen sample vendor head start cluster accounts payable vouchers. Additionally, one of the vouchers was not supported by appropriate documentation. The voucher was for the purchase of gift cards for teachers to buy books for professional development. However, there was no backup or support showing what the gift cards were used to purchase. The total of this voucher was $23,700. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the Unit establish a documented, primary review of all head start cluster account payable claims before they are paid. Additionally, we recommend the Unit maintain all supporting documentation to show what the gift cards were used to purchase to ensure they are used for allowable purposes. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Information on the federal program: Subject: Head Start Cluster - Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program: Head Start Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 93.600 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the Unit in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the reporting compliance requirement. Cause: The Unit's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the reporting requirements. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the Unit at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: None. Context: We noted that for two federal financial reports in a sample of two reports, the Supervisor prepared the report without a secondary, documented review before the submission of the report to ensure the accuracy of the report. The amounts reported agreed to the supporting records without error. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the Unit implement a documented, formal review of the reports before they are submitted. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Information on the federal program: Subject: Head Start Cluster - Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program: Head Start Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 93.600 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the Unit in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the reporting compliance requirement. Cause: The Unit's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the reporting requirements. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the Unit at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: None. Context: We noted that for two federal financial reports in a sample of two reports, the Supervisor prepared the report without a secondary, documented review before the submission of the report to ensure the accuracy of the report. The amounts reported agreed to the supporting records without error. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the Unit implement a documented, formal review of the reports before they are submitted. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Information on the federal program: Subject: Head Start Cluster - Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program: Head Start Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 93.600 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the Unit in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the reporting compliance requirement. Cause: The Unit's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the reporting requirements. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the Unit at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: None. Context: We noted that for two federal financial reports in a sample of two reports, the Supervisor prepared the report without a secondary, documented review before the submission of the report to ensure the accuracy of the report. The amounts reported agreed to the supporting records without error. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the Unit implement a documented, formal review of the reports before they are submitted. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Information on the federal program: Subject: Head Start Cluster - Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program: Head Start Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 93.600 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the Unit in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the reporting compliance requirement. Cause: The Unit's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the reporting requirements. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the Unit at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: None. Context: We noted that for two federal financial reports in a sample of two reports, the Supervisor prepared the report without a secondary, documented review before the submission of the report to ensure the accuracy of the report. The amounts reported agreed to the supporting records without error. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the Unit implement a documented, formal review of the reports before they are submitted. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Criteria: • §200.303 Internal controls establishes that “The non-Federal entity must (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, (b) Comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards, (c) Evaluate and monitor the non-Federal entity's compliance with statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of Federal awards., (d) Take prompt action when instances of noncompliance are identified including noncompliance identified in audit findings. • • 2 CFR §200.332 Requirements for pass-through entities establishes that “All pass-through entities must: Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. • • Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include (1) Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity; (2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass- through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward; (3) Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by § 200.521; and (4) The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings”. Condition: The Chapter 11 Subrecipients Management and Monitoring Manual, subrecipients with risk assessment profile classified as High-High Risk (HH), require an annual site visit. However, during the year ended June 30, 2020, from six (6) subrecipients classified as HH, two (2) were not visited during the period. The subrecipients not visited were the following: Cause: Lack of implementation of work plan that includes monitoring process for at least major subrecipients before year end, in order to avoid noncompliance on subrecipients’ procedures. Effects: • • Noncompliance may be performed by subrecipients without timely evaluation to remediate possible questioned costs, which may result in delay receipt of funds through remediation be implemented. • • Incomplete monitoring process can prevent COR3 from timely detection of a material noncompliance from subrecipients. Questioned Costs: None. Identification as a repeat finding: Finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year and was identified as finding number 2019-07. Recommendation: • • We recommend management to implement a work plan for monitoring subrecipients to ascertain that major subrecipients be monitored during the year, or at reaching to determine threshold on used federal funds used in order to timely react to and avoid possible non-compliances. • • In addition, we recommended management to ascertain that all procedures related to the monitoring process be implemented.
Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Names: Health Center Program Cluster: Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care), COVID-19 Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care), Grants for New and Expanded Services under the Health Center Program CFDA Numbers: 93.224 and 93.527 Criteria In accordance with §200.305, Federal payment, Grantees and subgrantees that receive grant funds are responsible for maintaining controls regarding the management of Federal program funds under the Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR 200.302 and 200.303. Condition The Center's drawdowns did not illustrate review and approval by management. Cause The Center did not have adequate controls to ensure drawdowns were properly approved and such approval is documented. Effect The condition may lead to inaccurate or improper drawdowns. Questioned Costs None. Context We selected 6 drawdowns to test controls over cash management. We noted there was no formal approval or evidence of review for these drawdowns. Identification of Repeat Finding Not a repeat finding. Recommendation The Center should develop written procedures to review all drawdowns that occur in order to ensure accuracy. Views of Responsible Officials Management and the Board of Directors agree with the finding and will implement additional controls to ensure there is formal evidence of review being performed.
Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Names: Health Center Program Cluster: Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care), COVID-19 Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care), Grants for New and Expanded Services under the Health Center Program CFDA Numbers: 93.224 and 93.527 Criteria In accordance with §200.305, Federal payment, Grantees and subgrantees that receive grant funds are responsible for maintaining controls regarding the management of Federal program funds under the Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR 200.302 and 200.303. Condition The Center's drawdowns did not illustrate review and approval by management. Cause The Center did not have adequate controls to ensure drawdowns were properly approved and such approval is documented. Effect The condition may lead to inaccurate or improper drawdowns. Questioned Costs None. Context We selected 6 drawdowns to test controls over cash management. We noted there was no formal approval or evidence of review for these drawdowns. Identification of Repeat Finding Not a repeat finding. Recommendation The Center should develop written procedures to review all drawdowns that occur in order to ensure accuracy. Views of Responsible Officials Management and the Board of Directors agree with the finding and will implement additional controls to ensure there is formal evidence of review being performed.
Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Names: Health Center Program Cluster: Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care), COVID-19 Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care), Grants for New and Expanded Services under the Health Center Program CFDA Numbers: 93.224 and 93.527 Criteria In accordance with §200.305, Federal payment, Grantees and subgrantees that receive grant funds are responsible for maintaining controls regarding the management of Federal program funds under the Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR 200.302 and 200.303. Condition The Center's drawdowns did not illustrate review and approval by management. Cause The Center did not have adequate controls to ensure drawdowns were properly approved and such approval is documented. Effect The condition may lead to inaccurate or improper drawdowns. Questioned Costs None. Context We selected 6 drawdowns to test controls over cash management. We noted there was no formal approval or evidence of review for these drawdowns. Identification of Repeat Finding Not a repeat finding. Recommendation The Center should develop written procedures to review all drawdowns that occur in order to ensure accuracy. Views of Responsible Officials Management and the Board of Directors agree with the finding and will implement additional controls to ensure there is formal evidence of review being performed.
Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Names: Health Center Program Cluster: Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care), COVID-19 Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care), Grants for New and Expanded Services under the Health Center Program CFDA Numbers: 93.224 and 93.527 Criteria In accordance with §200.305, Federal payment, Grantees and subgrantees that receive grant funds are responsible for maintaining controls regarding the management of Federal program funds under the Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR 200.302 and 200.303. Condition The Center's drawdowns did not illustrate review and approval by management. Cause The Center did not have adequate controls to ensure drawdowns were properly approved and such approval is documented. Effect The condition may lead to inaccurate or improper drawdowns. Questioned Costs None. Context We selected 6 drawdowns to test controls over cash management. We noted there was no formal approval or evidence of review for these drawdowns. Identification of Repeat Finding Not a repeat finding. Recommendation The Center should develop written procedures to review all drawdowns that occur in order to ensure accuracy. Views of Responsible Officials Management and the Board of Directors agree with the finding and will implement additional controls to ensure there is formal evidence of review being performed.
Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Names: Health Center Program Cluster: Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care), COVID-19 Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care), Grants for New and Expanded Services under the Health Center Program CFDA Numbers: 93.224 and 93.527 Criteria In accordance with §200.305, Federal payment, Grantees and subgrantees that receive grant funds are responsible for maintaining controls regarding the management of Federal program funds under the Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR 200.302 and 200.303. Condition The Center's drawdowns did not illustrate review and approval by management. Cause The Center did not have adequate controls to ensure drawdowns were properly approved and such approval is documented. Effect The condition may lead to inaccurate or improper drawdowns. Questioned Costs None. Context We selected 6 drawdowns to test controls over cash management. We noted there was no formal approval or evidence of review for these drawdowns. Identification of Repeat Finding Not a repeat finding. Recommendation The Center should develop written procedures to review all drawdowns that occur in order to ensure accuracy. Views of Responsible Officials Management and the Board of Directors agree with the finding and will implement additional controls to ensure there is formal evidence of review being performed.
Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Names: Health Center Program Cluster: Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care), COVID-19 Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care), Grants for New and Expanded Services under the Health Center Program CFDA Numbers: 93.224 and 93.527 Criteria In accordance with §200.305, Federal payment, Grantees and subgrantees that receive grant funds are responsible for maintaining controls regarding the management of Federal program funds under the Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR 200.302 and 200.303. Condition The Center's drawdowns did not illustrate review and approval by management. Cause The Center did not have adequate controls to ensure drawdowns were properly approved and such approval is documented. Effect The condition may lead to inaccurate or improper drawdowns. Questioned Costs None. Context We selected 6 drawdowns to test controls over cash management. We noted there was no formal approval or evidence of review for these drawdowns. Identification of Repeat Finding Not a repeat finding. Recommendation The Center should develop written procedures to review all drawdowns that occur in order to ensure accuracy. Views of Responsible Officials Management and the Board of Directors agree with the finding and will implement additional controls to ensure there is formal evidence of review being performed.
Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Names: Health Center Program Cluster: Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care), COVID-19 Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care), Grants for New and Expanded Services under the Health Center Program CFDA Numbers: 93.224 and 93.527 Criteria In accordance with §200.305, Federal payment, Grantees and subgrantees that receive grant funds are responsible for maintaining controls regarding the management of Federal program funds under the Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR 200.302 and 200.303. Condition The Center's drawdowns did not illustrate review and approval by management. Cause The Center did not have adequate controls to ensure drawdowns were properly approved and such approval is documented. Effect The condition may lead to inaccurate or improper drawdowns. Questioned Costs None. Context We selected 6 drawdowns to test controls over cash management. We noted there was no formal approval or evidence of review for these drawdowns. Identification of Repeat Finding Not a repeat finding. Recommendation The Center should develop written procedures to review all drawdowns that occur in order to ensure accuracy. Views of Responsible Officials Management and the Board of Directors agree with the finding and will implement additional controls to ensure there is formal evidence of review being performed.
Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Names: Health Center Program Cluster: Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care), COVID-19 Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care), Grants for New and Expanded Services under the Health Center Program CFDA Numbers: 93.224 and 93.527 Criteria In accordance with §200.305, Federal payment, Grantees and subgrantees that receive grant funds are responsible for maintaining controls regarding the management of Federal program funds under the Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR 200.302 and 200.303. Condition The Center's drawdowns did not illustrate review and approval by management. Cause The Center did not have adequate controls to ensure drawdowns were properly approved and such approval is documented. Effect The condition may lead to inaccurate or improper drawdowns. Questioned Costs None. Context We selected 6 drawdowns to test controls over cash management. We noted there was no formal approval or evidence of review for these drawdowns. Identification of Repeat Finding Not a repeat finding. Recommendation The Center should develop written procedures to review all drawdowns that occur in order to ensure accuracy. Views of Responsible Officials Management and the Board of Directors agree with the finding and will implement additional controls to ensure there is formal evidence of review being performed.
Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(7) a non-federal entity must establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E – Cost Principles and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Per 2 CFR 200.303, a non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Article 12 of the Act 83 of May 2, 1941, as amended, establishes that the Authority must have an accounting system that provides for adequate control and statistical records of all income and expenses from, administered or controlled by the Authority. Condition and Context During our review of the internal controls over compliance, we noted that the following: • Authority did not have written procedures or formal policies to ensure compliance over the Allowable Costs and Cost Principles, Period of Performance, Matching and Reporting requirements. • During our test work over internal controls over compliance for activities allowed and cost principles requirements, we noted that the Authority implemented a system of compiling the relevant data elements, including allowed expenditures for all projects. However, there was no control addressing the completeness and accuracy of the allowed expenditures. Cause and Possible Asserted Effect Management did not establish proper internal controls to ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards. Absence of formal policies and procedures could cause the Authority to fall in noncompliance with federal awards. Also, the Authority’s processes and controls are not designed to ensure proper review of supporting documentation to meet the compliance requirements of the Federal Grant. Not having formal processes and controls caused that in multiple occasions the Grantor returned claims submitted due to lack of support documentation. Questioned Cost There were no questioned costs associated with the finding. Whether the Sampling was a Statistically Valid Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Prior Year Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in the prior year’s audit as finding 2019-008. Recommendation Management must establish written procedures and formal policies to ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards. View of Responsible Officials Management acknowledges the findings and has implemented a corrective action plan to enhance compliance with Federal awards. This plan includes developing Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for grant management activities, identifying, and documenting existing internal controls, and maintaining constant communication with stakeholders to prevent material non-compliance. Additionally, PREPA will provide training to staff on the new SOPs and establish a monitoring mechanism to continuously assess and improve the effectiveness of these controls. The corrective action plan, supervised by Mr. Ezequiel Nieves from the PREPA Disaster Funding Management Office, is expected to be completed by July 2025. Management is committed to addressing deficiencies, ensuring that processes and controls are robust and effective, and that Federal awards are managed transparently and in full compliance with all regulatory requirements. The estimated date of completion is expected to be in July 2025. Responsible Party - Mr. Ezequiel Nieves - PREPA Disaster Funding Management Office, Finance Department. Effective June 1, 2021, the Authority transitioned the management and operation of its transmission and distribution network as well as certain back- office functions, including billing, collections and accounting, to a third party. The third-party operator is reviewing operating procedures and controls within its responsibilities to make the necessary improvements. Management will work to address these findings with the assistance of the third-party operators, where applicable. Also, effective July 1, 2023, the Authority transitioned the management and operation of its generation assets as well as certain back- office functions to a third party. The third-party operator is reviewing operating procedures and controls within its responsibilities to make the necessary improvements. In addition, the Authority will also be implementing and monitoring corrective actions taken by the new generation segment operator.
PASS THROUGH GRANTOR: Direct Grant; Oklahoma Department of Transportation FEDERAL AGENCY: U.S. Department of Commerce; U.S. Department of Transportation ASSISTANCE LISTING: 11.300 and 20.205 FEDERAL PROGRAM NAME: Investments for Public Works and Economic Development Facilities and Highway Planning and Construction FEDERAL AWARD NUMBER: ERSTP 262C(075), ERSTP 266C(076), ERSTP 266C(077), and ERSTP 266C (082) FEDERAL AWARD YEAR: 2020 CONTROL CATEGORY: All QUESTIONED COSTS: $-0- Condition: During our review and reconciliation of the SEFA, as initially prepared by the County, we identified federal programs that were not reported accurately. These errors resulted in expenditures being overstated by $299,126. Cause of Condition: Policies and procedures have not been designed and implemented to ensure accurate reporting of expenditures for all federal awards. Effect of Condition: This condition resulted in inaccurate recording of expenditures on the SEFA and could increase the potential for material noncompliance. Recommendation: OSAI recommends county officials and department heads gain an understanding of federal programs awarded to Rogers County. Internal control procedures should be designed and implemented to ensure an accurate reporting of expenditures on the SEFA and to ensure compliance with federal requirements. Management Response: Board of County Commissioners: The BOCC is responsible for the overall fiscal concerns of the county. See OKLA. STAT. Title 19, § 345. The BOCC, with the cooperation and participation of all elected officials, reviews, develops and implements policies and procedures to create a strong internal control environment. Additionally, the BOCC conducts meetings with all elected officials and officers responsible for the receipt and/or expenditure of county funds. These meetings address fiscal matters, including but not limited to, policy discussions and implementation, financial reports, budget oversight, SEFA reporting, and legal compliance. Policies and procedures, combined with fiscal oversight meetings, are intended to: 1) prevent or detect material misstatements in the financial statements; 2) prevent or detect fraud within the county; 3) increase communication between the BOCC and those elected officials and officers responsible for the receipt and/or expenditure of public funds; 4) provide oversight over the fiscal concerns of the county; 5) identify and address risks related to financial reporting; 6) ensure the accuracy of Rogers County’s financial statements, Estimate of Needs, the SEFA; and 7) ensure compliance with all applicable federal and state laws, regulations, and/or codes. The BOCC is responsible for preparing the financial statements. See OKLA. STAT. Title 68, § 3002(A). At the end of fiscal year 2020, the BOCC chose not to renew the contract with the budget maker. Beginning in fiscal year 2021, the BOCC and the Rogers County Treasurer developed and implemented a plan for the preparation and presentation of the financial statements by the Rogers County Treasurer beginning in fiscal year 2021. The purpose of this plan was to increase communication, involvement and oversight regarding the County’s financial condition and for better accuracy and timeliness of the preparation and presentation of the financial statements. The BOCC, with the cooperation of all elected officials and officers responsible for the receipt or expenditure of county funds, will evaluate the processes and procedures currently in place to detect and identify material misstatements in Rogers County’s financial statements, detect fraud, and identify and address risks related to Rogers County’s financial reporting. Where deficiencies are identified, processes and procedures will be implemented to identify fraud, detect material misstatements in the financial statements, and address risks related to financial reporting. County Clerk: The County Clerk works with the BOCC and all elected officials to develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent material misstatements in Rogers County’s financial statements, detect fraud and identify and address risks related to Rogers County’s financial reporting. These policies are intended to ensure the accuracy of the County’s financial statements, Estimate of Needs, SEFA, and compliance with all applicable federal and state laws, regulations, and/or codes. The County Clerk will continue to perform the duties of her office in accordance with Oklahoma law. Where appropriate, the County Clerk will participate in the development and implementation of policies and procedures to prevent material misstatements in Rogers County’s financial statements, detect fraud and identify and address risks related to Rogers County’s financial reporting. County Treasurer: The County Treasurer was engaged to compile the SEFA report. Each department is responsible for reporting its own Federal revenues and expenditures. County Sheriff: The County Sheriff will work with the BOCC and all elected officials to develop and implement policies and procedures to ensure Rogers County’s SEFA is prepared timely and accurately. Criteria: GAO Standards – Section 2 – Establishing an Effective Internal Control System – OV2.23 states in part: Objectives of an Entity – Compliance Objectives Management conducts activities in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. As part of specifying compliance objectives, the entity determines which laws and regulations apply to the entity. Management is expected to set objectives that incorporate these requirements. 2 CFR § 200.303(a) Internal Controls reads as follows: The non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR § 200.508(b) Auditee responsibilities reads as follows: The auditee must: Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. 2 CFR § 200.510(b) Financial statements reads as follows: Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards. The auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended.
PASS THROUGH GRANTOR: Direct Grant; Oklahoma Department of Transportation FEDERAL AGENCY: U.S. Department of Commerce; U.S. Department of Transportation ASSISTANCE LISTING: 11.300 and 20.205 FEDERAL PROGRAM NAME: Investment for Public Works and Economic Development Facilities and Highway Planning and Construction FEDERAL AWARD NUMBER: ERSTP 262C(075), ERSTP 266C(076), ERSTP 266C(077), and ERSTP 266C (082)) FEDERAL AWARD YEAR: 2020 CONTROL CATEGORY: Activities Allowed or Unallowed; Allowable Costs/Costs Principles; Matching; Period of Performance, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment, Reporting; and Special Tests and Provisions. QUESTIONED COSTS: $-0- Condition: Through the process of gaining an understanding of the County’s internal control structure for federal programs, it was noted that county-wide internal controls regarding Control Environment, Risk Assessment, Information and Communication, and Monitoring have not been designed. Cause of Condition: Policies and procedures have not been designed and implemented to ensure the County complies with grant requirements. Effect of Condition: This condition could result in noncompliance to grant requirements and loss of federal funds. Recommendation: OSAI recommends that the County design and implement a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with grant requirements. Management Response: Board of County Commissioners: The BOCC is responsible for the overall fiscal concerns of the county. See OKLA. STAT. Title 19, § 345. The BOCC, with the cooperation and participation of all elected officials, reviews, develops and implements policies and procedures to create a strong internal control environment. The BOCC will work with all elected officials and with the state and local partners in each federal award to develop policies, procedures, and internal controls designed to accurately track grants, including the application process, verification, oversight, and reporting of grant requirements. These policies and procedures will be designed to identify requirements for recipients and sub-recipients of grants, ensure accurate equipment and real property management, procurement, recipient and subrecipient monitoring and reporting. Further, policies will ensure a proper understanding of all grant requirements and compliance of the same. Criteria: The GAO Standards – Section 1 – Fundamental Concepts of Internal Control – OV1.01 states in part: Definition of Internal Control Internal control is a process effected by an entity’s oversight body, management, and other personnel that provides reasonable assurance that the objectives of an entity will be achieved. Additionally, GAO Standards – Section 2 – Establishing an Effective Internal Control System – OV2.04 states in part: Components, Principles, and Attributes Control Environment - The foundation for an internal control system. It provides the discipline and structure to help an entity achieve its objectives. Risk Assessment - Assesses the risks facing the entity as it seeks to achieve its objectives. This assessment provides the basis for developing appropriate risk responses. Information and Communication - The quality information management and personnel communicate and use to support the internal control system. Monitoring - Activities management establishes and operates to assess the quality of performance over time and promptly resolve the findings of audits and other reviews. Furthermore, 2 CFR § 200.303 Internal Controls (a) reads as follows: The non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
PASS THROUGH GRANTOR: Direct Grant; Oklahoma Department of Transportation FEDERAL AGENCY: U.S. Department of Commerce; U.S. Department of Transportation ASSISTANCE LISTING: 11.300 and 20.205 FEDERAL PROGRAM NAME: Investments for Public Works and Economic Development Facilities and Highway Planning and Construction FEDERAL AWARD NUMBER: ERSTP 262C(075), ERSTP 266C(076), ERSTP 266C(077), and ERSTP 266C (082) FEDERAL AWARD YEAR: 2020 CONTROL CATEGORY: All QUESTIONED COSTS: $-0- Condition: During our review and reconciliation of the SEFA, as initially prepared by the County, we identified federal programs that were not reported accurately. These errors resulted in expenditures being overstated by $299,126. Cause of Condition: Policies and procedures have not been designed and implemented to ensure accurate reporting of expenditures for all federal awards. Effect of Condition: This condition resulted in inaccurate recording of expenditures on the SEFA and could increase the potential for material noncompliance. Recommendation: OSAI recommends county officials and department heads gain an understanding of federal programs awarded to Rogers County. Internal control procedures should be designed and implemented to ensure an accurate reporting of expenditures on the SEFA and to ensure compliance with federal requirements. Management Response: Board of County Commissioners: The BOCC is responsible for the overall fiscal concerns of the county. See OKLA. STAT. Title 19, § 345. The BOCC, with the cooperation and participation of all elected officials, reviews, develops and implements policies and procedures to create a strong internal control environment. Additionally, the BOCC conducts meetings with all elected officials and officers responsible for the receipt and/or expenditure of county funds. These meetings address fiscal matters, including but not limited to, policy discussions and implementation, financial reports, budget oversight, SEFA reporting, and legal compliance. Policies and procedures, combined with fiscal oversight meetings, are intended to: 1) prevent or detect material misstatements in the financial statements; 2) prevent or detect fraud within the county; 3) increase communication between the BOCC and those elected officials and officers responsible for the receipt and/or expenditure of public funds; 4) provide oversight over the fiscal concerns of the county; 5) identify and address risks related to financial reporting; 6) ensure the accuracy of Rogers County’s financial statements, Estimate of Needs, the SEFA; and 7) ensure compliance with all applicable federal and state laws, regulations, and/or codes. The BOCC is responsible for preparing the financial statements. See OKLA. STAT. Title 68, § 3002(A). At the end of fiscal year 2020, the BOCC chose not to renew the contract with the budget maker. Beginning in fiscal year 2021, the BOCC and the Rogers County Treasurer developed and implemented a plan for the preparation and presentation of the financial statements by the Rogers County Treasurer beginning in fiscal year 2021. The purpose of this plan was to increase communication, involvement and oversight regarding the County’s financial condition and for better accuracy and timeliness of the preparation and presentation of the financial statements. The BOCC, with the cooperation of all elected officials and officers responsible for the receipt or expenditure of county funds, will evaluate the processes and procedures currently in place to detect and identify material misstatements in Rogers County’s financial statements, detect fraud, and identify and address risks related to Rogers County’s financial reporting. Where deficiencies are identified, processes and procedures will be implemented to identify fraud, detect material misstatements in the financial statements, and address risks related to financial reporting. County Clerk: The County Clerk works with the BOCC and all elected officials to develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent material misstatements in Rogers County’s financial statements, detect fraud and identify and address risks related to Rogers County’s financial reporting. These policies are intended to ensure the accuracy of the County’s financial statements, Estimate of Needs, SEFA, and compliance with all applicable federal and state laws, regulations, and/or codes. The County Clerk will continue to perform the duties of her office in accordance with Oklahoma law. Where appropriate, the County Clerk will participate in the development and implementation of policies and procedures to prevent material misstatements in Rogers County’s financial statements, detect fraud and identify and address risks related to Rogers County’s financial reporting. County Treasurer: The County Treasurer was engaged to compile the SEFA report. Each department is responsible for reporting its own Federal revenues and expenditures. County Sheriff: The County Sheriff will work with the BOCC and all elected officials to develop and implement policies and procedures to ensure Rogers County’s SEFA is prepared timely and accurately. Criteria: GAO Standards – Section 2 – Establishing an Effective Internal Control System – OV2.23 states in part: Objectives of an Entity – Compliance Objectives Management conducts activities in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. As part of specifying compliance objectives, the entity determines which laws and regulations apply to the entity. Management is expected to set objectives that incorporate these requirements. 2 CFR § 200.303(a) Internal Controls reads as follows: The non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR § 200.508(b) Auditee responsibilities reads as follows: The auditee must: Prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards in accordance with §200.510 Financial statements. 2 CFR § 200.510(b) Financial statements reads as follows: Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards. The auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended.
PASS THROUGH GRANTOR: Direct Grant; Oklahoma Department of Transportation FEDERAL AGENCY: U.S. Department of Commerce; U.S. Department of Transportation ASSISTANCE LISTING: 11.300 and 20.205 FEDERAL PROGRAM NAME: Investment for Public Works and Economic Development Facilities and Highway Planning and Construction FEDERAL AWARD NUMBER: ERSTP 262C(075), ERSTP 266C(076), ERSTP 266C(077), and ERSTP 266C (082)) FEDERAL AWARD YEAR: 2020 CONTROL CATEGORY: Activities Allowed or Unallowed; Allowable Costs/Costs Principles; Matching; Period of Performance, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment, Reporting; and Special Tests and Provisions. QUESTIONED COSTS: $-0- Condition: Through the process of gaining an understanding of the County’s internal control structure for federal programs, it was noted that county-wide internal controls regarding Control Environment, Risk Assessment, Information and Communication, and Monitoring have not been designed. Cause of Condition: Policies and procedures have not been designed and implemented to ensure the County complies with grant requirements. Effect of Condition: This condition could result in noncompliance to grant requirements and loss of federal funds. Recommendation: OSAI recommends that the County design and implement a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with grant requirements. Management Response: Board of County Commissioners: The BOCC is responsible for the overall fiscal concerns of the county. See OKLA. STAT. Title 19, § 345. The BOCC, with the cooperation and participation of all elected officials, reviews, develops and implements policies and procedures to create a strong internal control environment. The BOCC will work with all elected officials and with the state and local partners in each federal award to develop policies, procedures, and internal controls designed to accurately track grants, including the application process, verification, oversight, and reporting of grant requirements. These policies and procedures will be designed to identify requirements for recipients and sub-recipients of grants, ensure accurate equipment and real property management, procurement, recipient and subrecipient monitoring and reporting. Further, policies will ensure a proper understanding of all grant requirements and compliance of the same. Criteria: The GAO Standards – Section 1 – Fundamental Concepts of Internal Control – OV1.01 states in part: Definition of Internal Control Internal control is a process effected by an entity’s oversight body, management, and other personnel that provides reasonable assurance that the objectives of an entity will be achieved. Additionally, GAO Standards – Section 2 – Establishing an Effective Internal Control System – OV2.04 states in part: Components, Principles, and Attributes Control Environment - The foundation for an internal control system. It provides the discipline and structure to help an entity achieve its objectives. Risk Assessment - Assesses the risks facing the entity as it seeks to achieve its objectives. This assessment provides the basis for developing appropriate risk responses. Information and Communication - The quality information management and personnel communicate and use to support the internal control system. Monitoring - Activities management establishes and operates to assess the quality of performance over time and promptly resolve the findings of audits and other reviews. Furthermore, 2 CFR § 200.303 Internal Controls (a) reads as follows: The non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Finding SA2020-001: Internal Control AL number: 14.850 AL Title: Public and Indian Housing Name of Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Award Identification number and year: CA010 (2020) Criteria: Public Housing Authorities (PHA) are required to establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award as stated in CFR 200.303. Condition: During our audit, we were unable to obtain an understanding of the internal controls over the federal awards of the Authority, as current personnel could not respond to the processes and procedures. Cause: We understand that the staff overseeing the federal awards during fiscal year 2020 are no longer with the Authority, and therefore, the staff overseeing the federal awards subsequent to the fiscal year were unable to provide any information regarding the internal controls of the Authority. Effect: The Housing Authority is not in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award as stated in CFR 200.303. Identification as a repeat finding: Yes, since 2019. Recommendation: The Housing Authority must develop procedures to ensure that there is an internal control environment in compliance with the federal requirements. Management Response: The City has assigned staff to specific duties to support the Authority’s financial operations. Staff have implemented new processes that align with the City’s policies and procedures, while also in accordance with HUD regulations and requirements, to improve the integrity and accuracy of the Authority’s financial reporting and management of federal awards. The procedures ensure separation of duties and levels of approval to handle and manage federal funds. Staff also continue to attend trainings to understand Federal statutes and regulations.
Federal Program Information U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Housing Trust Fund (ALN: 14.275) Criteria or specific requirement The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR section 200.303 states, “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR section 200.510 states, “(b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards. The auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA) for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended.” Condition The Agency omitted federally-funded expenditures required to be reported as part of the Schedule for the year ended October 31, 2019. Cause The Agency’s internal controls in place over the preparation of the Schedule were not sufficient to accurately report all expenditures of federal awards. Effect The omission of expenditures resulted in a major program not being identified in a timely manner. Section III –Federal Awards Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Questioned Costs None. Context Expenditures of ALN 14.275 Housing Trust Fund were understated by $5.3 million. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if applicable This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation The Agency should review its internal controls over the process of accumulating and reporting expenditures of federal awards. Views of Responsible Officials The Agency agrees with the finding and has developed internal controls to ensure accurate and complete reporting of federal expenditures.
Finding Number: 2019-007 Prior Year Finding Number: N/A Compliance Requirement: Equipment and Real Property Management Information on Federal Program(s) - U.S. Department of Transportation: Direct Program: Federal Aviation Administration Airport Improvement Program CFDA Number: 20.106 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Per 2 CFR section 200.313, Equipment, property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of property, who holds title, the acquisition date, cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the cost of the property, the location, use and conditions of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. Further, a physical inventory of equipment should be taken at least once every 2 years and reconciled to the equipment records along with the usage of an appropriate control system to safeguard and maintain equipment. Additionally, the Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition – The Authority did not conduct a physical inventory count of equipment in the last two years. The most recent physical inventory count was performed during fiscal year 2017. Further, it does not appear that internal controls over compliance are operating at a level of precision to ensure compliance with the physical inventory count requirement. Questioned Costs – Not determinable. Context – This is a condition identified per review of the Authority’s compliance with the specified requirements. Effect – There is a risk that inadequate monitoring of equipment could lead to misappropriation of assets and noncompliance with Federal regulations resulting in a return of Federal awards received. Cause – The internal controls established for the physical inventory count did not fully operate as designed causing the Authority to fall out of compliance with the required timing of such physical inventory count. Recommendation – We recommend that the Authority improve internal controls to ensure adherence to Federal regulations related to performing physical inventory counts of equipment. There should be timely coordination and communication amongst all departments that are responsible for handling and managing such assets. Views of Responsible Officials - The Authority concurs with the auditor’s findings and recommendations. The planned corrective actions are presented in the Authority’s Corrective Action Plan which is attached as Appendix B.
Finding Number: 2019-007 Prior Year Finding Number: N/A Compliance Requirement: Equipment and Real Property Management Information on Federal Program(s) - U.S. Department of Transportation: Direct Program: Federal Aviation Administration Airport Improvement Program CFDA Number: 20.106 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Per 2 CFR section 200.313, Equipment, property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of property, who holds title, the acquisition date, cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the cost of the property, the location, use and conditions of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. Further, a physical inventory of equipment should be taken at least once every 2 years and reconciled to the equipment records along with the usage of an appropriate control system to safeguard and maintain equipment. Additionally, the Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition – The Authority did not conduct a physical inventory count of equipment in the last two years. The most recent physical inventory count was performed during fiscal year 2017. Further, it does not appear that internal controls over compliance are operating at a level of precision to ensure compliance with the physical inventory count requirement. Questioned Costs – Not determinable. Context – This is a condition identified per review of the Authority’s compliance with the specified requirements. Effect – There is a risk that inadequate monitoring of equipment could lead to misappropriation of assets and noncompliance with Federal regulations resulting in a return of Federal awards received. Cause – The internal controls established for the physical inventory count did not fully operate as designed causing the Authority to fall out of compliance with the required timing of such physical inventory count. Recommendation – We recommend that the Authority improve internal controls to ensure adherence to Federal regulations related to performing physical inventory counts of equipment. There should be timely coordination and communication amongst all departments that are responsible for handling and managing such assets. Views of Responsible Officials - The Authority concurs with the auditor’s findings and recommendations. The planned corrective actions are presented in the Authority’s Corrective Action Plan which is attached as Appendix B.
Finding SA2019-008: Internal Controls AL number: 14.850 and 14.871 AL Title: Public and Indian Housing, and Housing Voucher Cluster - Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Name of Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Award Identification number and year: CA010 (2019) Criteria: Public Housing Authorities (PHA) are required to establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award as stated in CFR 200.303. Condition: During our audit, we were unable to obtain an understanding of the internal controls over the federal awards of the Authority, because current Authority staff could not respond to our inquiries about processes and procedures. Cause: We understand that the staff overseeing the federal awards during fiscal year 2019 are no longer with the Authority, and therefore, the staff overseeing the federal awards subsequent to the fiscal year were unable to provide any information regarding the internal controls of the Authority. Effect: The Housing Authority is not in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award as stated in CFR 200.303. Recommendation: The Housing Authority must develop procedures to ensure that there is an internal control environment in compliance with the federal requirements. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Please see Corrective Action Plan separately prepared by the Housing Authority.
Finding SA2019-008: Internal Controls AL number: 14.850 and 14.871 AL Title: Public and Indian Housing, and Housing Voucher Cluster - Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Name of Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Award Identification number and year: CA010 (2019) Criteria: Public Housing Authorities (PHA) are required to establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award as stated in CFR 200.303. Condition: During our audit, we were unable to obtain an understanding of the internal controls over the federal awards of the Authority, because current Authority staff could not respond to our inquiries about processes and procedures. Cause: We understand that the staff overseeing the federal awards during fiscal year 2019 are no longer with the Authority, and therefore, the staff overseeing the federal awards subsequent to the fiscal year were unable to provide any information regarding the internal controls of the Authority. Effect: The Housing Authority is not in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award as stated in CFR 200.303. Recommendation: The Housing Authority must develop procedures to ensure that there is an internal control environment in compliance with the federal requirements. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Please see Corrective Action Plan separately prepared by the Housing Authority.
Finding SA2019-008: Internal Controls AL number: 14.850 and 14.871 AL Title: Public and Indian Housing, and Housing Voucher Cluster - Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Name of Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Award Identification number and year: CA010 (2019) Criteria: Public Housing Authorities (PHA) are required to establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award as stated in CFR 200.303. Condition: During our audit, we were unable to obtain an understanding of the internal controls over the federal awards of the Authority, because current Authority staff could not respond to our inquiries about processes and procedures. Cause: We understand that the staff overseeing the federal awards during fiscal year 2019 are no longer with the Authority, and therefore, the staff overseeing the federal awards subsequent to the fiscal year were unable to provide any information regarding the internal controls of the Authority. Effect: The Housing Authority is not in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award as stated in CFR 200.303. Recommendation: The Housing Authority must develop procedures to ensure that there is an internal control environment in compliance with the federal requirements. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Please see Corrective Action Plan separately prepared by the Housing Authority.
Finding SA2019-008: Internal Controls AL number: 14.850 and 14.871 AL Title: Public and Indian Housing, and Housing Voucher Cluster - Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Name of Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Award Identification number and year: CA010 (2019) Criteria: Public Housing Authorities (PHA) are required to establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award as stated in CFR 200.303. Condition: During our audit, we were unable to obtain an understanding of the internal controls over the federal awards of the Authority, because current Authority staff could not respond to our inquiries about processes and procedures. Cause: We understand that the staff overseeing the federal awards during fiscal year 2019 are no longer with the Authority, and therefore, the staff overseeing the federal awards subsequent to the fiscal year were unable to provide any information regarding the internal controls of the Authority. Effect: The Housing Authority is not in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award as stated in CFR 200.303. Recommendation: The Housing Authority must develop procedures to ensure that there is an internal control environment in compliance with the federal requirements. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Please see Corrective Action Plan separately prepared by the Housing Authority.
Criteria: The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 2 CFR Part 200, Appendix XI, Compliance Supplement 2017, Part 6 Internal Control section 6-M-1 states: "The A-102 Common Rule, 0MB Circular A-110 and 2 CFR section 200.303 require that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award." Condition: The City did not properly approve payroll timesheets for both CDBG and Section 8 program administration expenditures. Cause: Lack of internal controls and adequate staff training over the proper approval process of electronic timesheets. Effect or Potential Effect: The City could be charging an inaccurate or unallowable amount of payroll expenditures to its Federal grants programs, which is a noncompliance for allowable costs. Questioned Cost: Unknown Context: We selected a sample of two employees for four pay periods each for CDBG and Section 8 to test payroll internal controls and compliance. Our review identified 8 out of the 13 timesheets had no indication of supervisory review and approval, and no further support can be provided to ascertain that the timesheet is accurate and valid for direct program administration to request for Federal award reimbursement. Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No
Criteria: The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 2 CFR Part 200, Appendix XI, Compliance Supplement 2017, Part 6 Internal Control section 6-M-1 states: "The A-102 Common Rule, 0MB Circular A-110 and 2 CFR section 200.303 require that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award." Condition: The City did not properly approve payroll timesheets for both CDBG and Section 8 program administration expenditures. Cause: Lack of internal controls and adequate staff training over the proper approval process of electronic timesheets. Effect or Potential Effect: The City could be charging an inaccurate or unallowable amount of payroll expenditures to its Federal grants programs, which is a noncompliance for allowable costs. Questioned Cost: Unknown Context: We selected a sample of two employees for four pay periods each for CDBG and Section 8 to test payroll internal controls and compliance. Our review identified 8 out of the 13 timesheets had no indication of supervisory review and approval, and no further support can be provided to ascertain that the timesheet is accurate and valid for direct program administration to request for Federal award reimbursement. Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No