Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR 200.302(b)(4) requires non-federal entities to maintain effective internal control over federal programs. Specifically, the organization must reconcile its federal awards with expenditures incurred and revenue received. Additionally, 2 CFR Part 200.510(b)(1-6) mandates that a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) be prepared for each fiscal year in accordance with the applicable federal regulations. The SEFA must include, at a minimum, total federal awards expended for each individual federal program and must accurately report all federal expenditures received and expended during the fiscal year. Condition and Context: During our audit procedures performed over the current year SEFA, it was noted that Solvista Health improperly excluded expenditures for two federal awards from its June 30, 2023 SEFA. Questioned Costs: N/A Cause: Solvista Health’s accounting and internal control systems were not designed and implemented to ensure reconciliation of federal awards with expenditures and revenue, and the preparation of an accurate SEFA. Effect: Failure to reconcile federal awards with expenditures, along with an incomplete and inaccurate SEFA, could lead to incorrect reporting of federal funds, misstatement of financial information, and noncompliance with federal requirements. This represents a potential risk for improper use of federal funds and an inability to meet compliance and reporting obligations. Additionally, the omission of federal awards from the June 30, 2023 SEFA resulted in noncompliance with federal reporting requirements and inaccurate representation of Solvista Health’s federal award activity. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend Solvista Health design and implement internal control procedures to reconcile federal awards with the expenditures and revenue received to ensure completeness and accuracy in financial reporting. Additionally, management should prepare and maintain an accurate SEFA in accordance with 2 CFR 200.510 to ensure proper documentation and compliance with federal reporting requirements. Additionally, we recommend that Solvista Health train appropriate personnel on the requirements related to federal award reconciliations and SEFA preparation to mitigate the risk of noncompliance in the future.
8. Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation): The compliance requirements for "L. Reporting", requires the District to maintain accurate accounting records for grant expenditures. In addition, per subpart D (Post Federal Award Requirements), § 200.302, the underlying accounts records must be adequately documented and consistent with the terms and conditions of the grant. '9. Condition: The District claimed expenditures that did not agree with their underlying accounting records. '10. Questioned Costs: 6362. '11. Context: During compliance testing of the District's accounting records to the expenditure report filed with the Illinois State Board of Education, we noted the District overclaimed $6,362 of expenditures at 6/30/24. Upon review of the general ledger and quarterly expenditure report, it was determined that the District erroneously overstated their claim amount on one function object code by a cumulative amount of $6,362. under 2550-300, total expenditures were $4,573 but District claimed $10,935, resulting in an overclaim of $6,362. '12. Effect: The District was not compliant with reporting requirements. Inaccurate reporting resulted in the District being reimbursed for an additional $6,362 as of 6/30/24. 13. Cause: Policies and procedures are in place that provide reasonable assurance that reports of federal awards submitted to ISBE are supported by the underlying accounting records and are fairly presented in accordance with program requirements. These policies and procedures were not followed when the expenditure report was prepared and filed. 14. Recommendation: We recommend the District periodically review the itemized budget and ensure claimed expenditures fall within or file amendments as necessary for any changes. 15. Management's response: The District has agreed with the findings and recommendations as presented. The District will review the itemized budget and ensure claimed expenditures fall within the grant. See Corrective Action Plan provided by the District.
8. Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation): The compliance requirements for "L. Reporting", requires the District to maintain accurate accounting records for grant expenditures. In addition, per subpart D (Post Federal Award Requirements), § 200.302, the underlying accounts records must be adequately documented and consistent with the terms and conditions of the grant. '9. Condition: The District claimed expenditures that did not agree with their underlying accounting records. '10. Questioned Costs: 110867. '11. Context: During compliance testing of the District’s accounting records in comparison to the expenditure reports filed with the Illinois State Board of Education, it was noted that the District overclaimed a total of $110,867 in expenditures as of June 30, 2024. The following discrepancies were identified: Function 1000-300: The District claimed $50,148 on the quarterly report filed as of 6/30/24. This amount could not be traced to the accounting records as of that date, resulting in an overclaim of $50,148. Function 1000-200: The District claimed $107,470 on the final report filed 9/30/24. Supporting expenditures could only be provided for $67,752, resulting in an overclaim of $39,718. Function 2130-100: The District claimed $10,440 on the final report filed 9/30/24. Supporting expenditures could only be provided for $10,200, resulting in an overclaim of $240. Function 2130-200: The District claimed $1,054 on the final report filed 9/30/24. Supporting expenditures could only be provided for $709, resulting in an overclaim of $345. Function 2400-100: The District claimed $44,160 on the final report filed 9/30/24. Supporting expenditures could only be provided for $37,960, resulting in an overclaim of $6,200. Function 2660-300: The District claimed $1,711,854 on the final report filed 9/30/24 for expenditures as of 6/30/24. Supporting expenditures could only be provided for $1,697,638, resulting in an overclaim of $14,216. '12. Effect: The District was not compliant with reporting requirements. Inaccurate reporting resulted in the District being reimbursed for an additional $110,867 as of 6/30/24. 13. Cause: Policies and procedures are in place that provide reasonable assurance that reports of federal awards submitted to ISBE are supported by the underlying accounting records and are fairly presented in accordance with program requirements. These policies and procedures were not followed when the expenditure report was prepared and filed. 14. Recommendation: We recommend the District periodically review the itemized budget and ensure claimed expenditures fall within or file amendments as necessary for any changes. 15. Management's response: The District has agreed with the findings and recommendations as presented. The District will review the itemized budget and ensure claimed expenditures fall within the grant. See Corrective Action Plan provided by the District.
Condition - The Municipality’s staff was unable to provide officially prepared and certified reports supporting compliance with the filing and submission requirements for reports and financial information, as established by federal award and regulatory agreements. Similarly, reconciliations were not provided between the information used to prepare the required and submitted reports and the formal data recorded in the Municipality’s official accounting system. Due to these conditions, compliance with the reporting requirements established by the federal grantor and effectiveness of related internal controls could not be verified. Based on an analysis prepared by the Municipality of the bank accounts and certain records and subsidiary ledgers designated for managing Community Development Block Grant / Disaster Recovery (CDBG-DR) funds, including transactions during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024, and subsequent disbursements, a total of $850,079 was either expended or transferred to the General Fund to cover eligible expenditures under the terms permitted by the CDBG-DR program. Criteria - Per the Compliance and Reporting Guidance – Part I: General Guidance – Section D: Uniform Administrative Requirements – Section 10: Reporting: establishes that: All recipients of federal funds must complete financial, performance, and compliance reporting as required and outlined in Part 2 of this guidance. Expenditures may be reported on a cash or accrual basis, as long as the methodology is disclosed and consistently applied. Reporting must be consistent with the definition of expenditures pursuant to 2 CFR 200.1. Recipients should appropriately maintain accounting records for compiling and reporting accurate, compliant financial data, in accordance with appropriate accounting standards and principles. In addition, where appropriate, recipients need to establish controls to ensure completion and timely submission of all mandatory performance and/or compliance reporting. Also, as established in the 2 CFR Section 200.302 (a) of the Uniform Guidance, the non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, 2 CFR Section 200.403 states that otherwise authorized by statue, costs must be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles, be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity and be adequately documented. Cause - There is a lack of adequate knowledge and training among personnel assigned to the management and preparation of reports required by this federal award. Additionally, the Municipality did not demonstrate, nor did it provide evidence, that it has designed and implemented an adequate system of procedures and internal controls to monitor the activity, filing, and custody of reports, as required by the federal award and the pass-through entity. These deficiencies limit the Municipality’s ability to document and support compliance with the reporting requirements. Effect - These conditions expose the program to noncompliance with the reporting requirements established in the grant agreement. Furthermore, the Municipality may be at risk of the grantor questioning the allowability and use of federal funds. Recommendation - We recommend that the responsible personnel or department identify, compile, and retain all reports required under the grant agreement, including reconciliations with the Municipality’s official accounting records and subsidiary ledgers. Additionally, it is essential for the Municipality to develop, document, and implement a comprehensive training program, along with written guidelines and procedures, for all personnel involved, directly or indirectly, in the management of these federal funds. Questioned Costs - None
Condition - The Municipality’s staff was unable to provide officially prepared and certified reports supporting compliance with the filing and submission requirements for reports and financial information, as established by federal award and regulatory agreements. Similarly, reconciliations were not provided between the information used to prepare the required and submitted reports and the formal data recorded in the Municipality’s official accounting system. Due to these conditions, compliance with the reporting requirements established by the federal grantor and effectiveness of related internal controls could not be verified. Based on an analysis prepared by the Municipality of the bank accounts and certain records and subsidiary ledgers designated for managing Community Development Block Grant / Disaster Recovery (CDBG-DR) funds, including transactions during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024, and subsequent disbursements, a total of $850,079 was either expended or transferred to the General Fund to cover eligible expenditures under the terms permitted by the CDBG-DR program. Criteria - Per the Compliance and Reporting Guidance – Part I: General Guidance – Section D: Uniform Administrative Requirements – Section 10: Reporting: establishes that: All recipients of federal funds must complete financial, performance, and compliance reporting as required and outlined in Part 2 of this guidance. Expenditures may be reported on a cash or accrual basis, as long as the methodology is disclosed and consistently applied. Reporting must be consistent with the definition of expenditures pursuant to 2 CFR 200.1. Recipients should appropriately maintain accounting records for compiling and reporting accurate, compliant financial data, in accordance with appropriate accounting standards and principles. In addition, where appropriate, recipients need to establish controls to ensure completion and timely submission of all mandatory performance and/or compliance reporting. Also, as established in the 2 CFR Section 200.302 (a) of the Uniform Guidance, the non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, 2 CFR Section 200.403 states that otherwise authorized by statue, costs must be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles, be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity and be adequately documented. Cause - There is a lack of adequate knowledge and training among personnel assigned to the management and preparation of reports required by this federal award. Additionally, the Municipality did not demonstrate, nor did it provide evidence, that it has designed and implemented an adequate system of procedures and internal controls to monitor the activity, filing, and custody of reports, as required by the federal award and the pass-through entity. These deficiencies limit the Municipality’s ability to document and support compliance with the reporting requirements. Effect - These conditions expose the program to noncompliance with the reporting requirements established in the grant agreement. Furthermore, the Municipality may be at risk of the grantor questioning the allowability and use of federal funds. Recommendation - We recommend that the responsible personnel or department identify, compile, and retain all reports required under the grant agreement, including reconciliations with the Municipality’s official accounting records and subsidiary ledgers. Additionally, it is essential for the Municipality to develop, document, and implement a comprehensive training program, along with written guidelines and procedures, for all personnel involved, directly or indirectly, in the management of these federal funds. Questioned Costs - None
Condition - The Municipality’s staff was unable to provide officially prepared and certified reports supporting compliance with the filing and submission requirements for reports and financial information, as established by federal award and regulatory agreements. Similarly, reconciliations were not provided between the information used to prepare the required and submitted reports and the formal data recorded in the Municipality’s official accounting system. Due to these conditions, compliance with the reporting requirements established by the federal grantor and effectiveness of related internal controls could not be verified. Based on an analysis prepared by the Municipality of the bank account and certain records and subsidiary ledgers designated for managing Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) funds, including transactions during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024, and subsequent disbursements, a total of $768,525 was either expended or transferred to the General Fund to cover eligible expenditures under the terms permitted by the CSLFRF programs. Criteria - Per the Compliance and Reporting Guidance – Part I: General Guidance – Section D: Uniform Administrative Requirements – Section 10: Reporting: establishes that: All recipients of federal funds must complete financial, performance, and compliance reporting as required and outlined in Part 2 of this guidance. Expenditures may be reported on a cash or accrual basis, as long as the methodology is disclosed and consistently applied. Reporting must be consistent with the definition of expenditures pursuant to 2 CFR 200.1. Recipients should appropriately maintain accounting records for compiling and reporting accurate, compliant financial data, in accordance with appropriate accounting standards and principles. In addition, where appropriate, recipients need to establish controls to ensure completion and timely submission of all mandatory performance and/or compliance reporting. Also, as established in the 2 CFR Section 200.302 (a) of the Uniform Guidance, the non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, 2 CFR Section 200.403, states that otherwise authorized by statue, costs must be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles, be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity and be adequately documented. Cause - There is a lack of adequate knowledge and training among personnel assigned to the management and preparation of reports required by this federal award. Additionally, the Municipality did not demonstrate, nor did it provide evidence, that it has designed and implemented an adequate system of procedures and internal controls to monitor the activity, filing, and custody of reports, as required by the federal award and the pass-through entity. These deficiencies limit the Municipality’s ability to document and support compliance with the reporting requirements. Effect -These conditions expose the program to noncompliance with the reporting requirements established in the grant agreement. Furthermore, the Municipality may be at risk of the grantor questioning the allowability and use of federal funds. Recommendation - We recommend that the responsible personnel or department identify, compile, and retain all reports required under the grant agreement, including reconciliations with the Municipality’s official accounting records and subsidiary ledgers. Additionally, it is essential for the Municipality to develop, document, and implement a comprehensive training program, along with written guidelines and procedures, for all personnel involved, directly or indirectly, in the management of these federal funds. Questioned Costs – None
Condition - The Municipality’s staff was unable to provide officially prepared and certified reports supporting compliance with the filing and submission requirements for reports and financial information, as established by federal award and regulatory agreements. Similarly, reconciliations were not provided between the information used to prepare the required and submitted reports and the formal data recorded in the Municipality’s official accounting system. Due to these conditions, compliance with the reporting requirements established by the federal grantor and effectiveness of related internal controls could not be verified. Based on an analysis prepared by the Municipality of the bank account and certain records and subsidiary ledgers designated for managing Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) funds, including transactions during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024, and subsequent disbursements, a total of $768,525 was either expended or transferred to the General Fund to cover eligible expenditures under the terms permitted by the CSLFRF programs. Criteria - Per the Compliance and Reporting Guidance – Part I: General Guidance – Section D: Uniform Administrative Requirements – Section 10: Reporting: establishes that: All recipients of federal funds must complete financial, performance, and compliance reporting as required and outlined in Part 2 of this guidance. Expenditures may be reported on a cash or accrual basis, as long as the methodology is disclosed and consistently applied. Reporting must be consistent with the definition of expenditures pursuant to 2 CFR 200.1. Recipients should appropriately maintain accounting records for compiling and reporting accurate, compliant financial data, in accordance with appropriate accounting standards and principles. In addition, where appropriate, recipients need to establish controls to ensure completion and timely submission of all mandatory performance and/or compliance reporting. Also, as established in the 2 CFR Section 200.302 (a) of the Uniform Guidance, the non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, 2 CFR Section 200.403, states that otherwise authorized by statue, costs must be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles, be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity and be adequately documented. Cause - There is a lack of adequate knowledge and training among personnel assigned to the management and preparation of reports required by this federal award. Additionally, the Municipality did not demonstrate, nor did it provide evidence, that it has designed and implemented an adequate system of procedures and internal controls to monitor the activity, filing, and custody of reports, as required by the federal award and the pass-through entity. These deficiencies limit the Municipality’s ability to document and support compliance with the reporting requirements. Effect -These conditions expose the program to noncompliance with the reporting requirements established in the grant agreement. Furthermore, the Municipality may be at risk of the grantor questioning the allowability and use of federal funds. Recommendation - We recommend that the responsible personnel or department identify, compile, and retain all reports required under the grant agreement, including reconciliations with the Municipality’s official accounting records and subsidiary ledgers. Additionally, it is essential for the Municipality to develop, document, and implement a comprehensive training program, along with written guidelines and procedures, for all personnel involved, directly or indirectly, in the management of these federal funds. Questioned Costs – None
Condition - The Municipality’s staff was unable to provide officially prepared and certified reports supporting compliance with the filing and submission requirements for reports and financial information, as established by federal award and regulatory agreements. Similarly, reconciliations were not provided between the information used to prepare the required and submitted reports and the formal data recorded in the Municipality’s official accounting system. Due to these conditions, compliance with the reporting requirements established by the federal grantor and effectiveness of related internal controls could not be verified. Based on an analysis prepared by the Municipality of the bank account and certain records and subsidiary ledgers designated for managing Disaster Grants - Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) funds, including transactions during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024, and subsequent disbursements, a total of $4,115,693 was either expended or transferred to the General Fund to cover eligible expenditures under the terms permitted by the grants. Criteria - The state is required to make an accounting of eligible costs. Similarly, the subrecipient must make an accounting to the state. In submitting the accounting, the entity is required to certify that reported costs were incurred in performance of eligible work, that the approved work was completed, that the project in in compliance with the provisions of the State Agreement, all grants conditions were met, and the provisions for that project were made in accordance with the applicable payment provisions. Also, as established in the 2 CFR Section 200.302 (a) of the Uniform Guidance, the non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, 2 CFR Section 200.403, states that otherwise authorized by statue, costs must be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles, be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity and be adequately documented. Cause - There is a lack of adequate knowledge and training among personnel assigned to the management and preparation of reports required by this federal award. Additionally, the Municipality did not demonstrate, nor did it provide evidence, that it has designed and implemented an adequate system of procedures and internal controls to monitor the activity, filing, and custody of reports, as required by the federal award and the pass-through entity. These deficiencies limit the Municipality’s ability to document and support compliance with the reporting requirements. Effect - These conditions expose the program to noncompliance with the reporting requirements established in the grant agreement. Furthermore, the Municipality may be at risk of the grantor questioning the allowability and use of federal funds. Recommendation - We recommend that the responsible personnel or department identify, compile, and retain all reports required under the grant agreement, including reconciliations with the Municipality’s official accounting records and subsidiary ledgers. Additionally, it is essential for the Municipality to develop, document, and implement a comprehensive training program, along with written guidelines and procedures, for all personnel involved, directly or indirectly, in the management of these federal funds. Questioned Costs - None
Condition - The Municipality’s staff was unable to provide officially prepared and certified reports supporting compliance with the filing and submission requirements for reports and financial information, as established by federal award and regulatory agreements. Similarly, reconciliations were not provided between the information used to prepare the required and submitted reports and the formal data recorded in the Municipality’s official accounting system. Due to these conditions, compliance with the reporting requirements established by the federal grantor and effectiveness of related internal controls could not be verified. Based on an analysis prepared by the Municipality of the bank account and certain records and subsidiary ledgers designated for managing Disaster Grants - Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) funds, including transactions during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024, and subsequent disbursements, a total of $4,115,693 was either expended or transferred to the General Fund to cover eligible expenditures under the terms permitted by the grants. Criteria - The state is required to make an accounting of eligible costs. Similarly, the subrecipient must make an accounting to the state. In submitting the accounting, the entity is required to certify that reported costs were incurred in performance of eligible work, that the approved work was completed, that the project in in compliance with the provisions of the State Agreement, all grants conditions were met, and the provisions for that project were made in accordance with the applicable payment provisions. Also, as established in the 2 CFR Section 200.302 (a) of the Uniform Guidance, the non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, 2 CFR Section 200.403, states that otherwise authorized by statue, costs must be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles, be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity and be adequately documented. Cause - There is a lack of adequate knowledge and training among personnel assigned to the management and preparation of reports required by this federal award. Additionally, the Municipality did not demonstrate, nor did it provide evidence, that it has designed and implemented an adequate system of procedures and internal controls to monitor the activity, filing, and custody of reports, as required by the federal award and the pass-through entity. These deficiencies limit the Municipality’s ability to document and support compliance with the reporting requirements. Effect - These conditions expose the program to noncompliance with the reporting requirements established in the grant agreement. Furthermore, the Municipality may be at risk of the grantor questioning the allowability and use of federal funds. Recommendation - We recommend that the responsible personnel or department identify, compile, and retain all reports required under the grant agreement, including reconciliations with the Municipality’s official accounting records and subsidiary ledgers. Additionally, it is essential for the Municipality to develop, document, and implement a comprehensive training program, along with written guidelines and procedures, for all personnel involved, directly or indirectly, in the management of these federal funds. Questioned Costs - None
#2024‐001 – Significant Deficiency – Supporting Documentation Opioid STR Grant ALN 93.788 Criteria The Office of Management and Budget issuance of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) specifically states uniform administrative requirements, cost principles, and audit requirements for federal awards. CFR 200.302(b)(3) states, “The recipient’s financial management system must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation.” Condition During the course of the audit, we noted there was no approved source documentation for a recurring expense tested. Cause The Organization has made a reasonable effort to design proper controls, but has faced challenges in implementing them effectively, due to growth across multiple locations and frequent turnover. Effect The potential effects of not having supporting documentation on file could include over or undercharging expenses to the federal grants. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information The finding noted related to one (1) transaction examined when testing a sample of forty (40) non‐payroll cash disbursements. The transaction was a recurring monthly charge that was supported by an agreement approved by an employee who has since left the Organization. The Organization was unable to locate a copy of the signed agreement. Identification as a repeat finding There was no similar finding in the prior year. Recommendation We recommend having supporting documentation on file for all expenses charged to the Federal grants that shows approval of the expense from an appropriate member of management. View of Responsible Official The CEO has implemented a policy that all signed documents and contracts will be uniformly kept in a corresponding file, and the files will be stored in a locked filing cabinet at the corporate office. The Director of Operations will be responsible to ensure that the documents and contracts are filed in a timely fashion.
#2024‐001 – Significant Deficiency – Supporting Documentation Opioid STR Grant ALN 93.788 Criteria The Office of Management and Budget issuance of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) specifically states uniform administrative requirements, cost principles, and audit requirements for federal awards. CFR 200.302(b)(3) states, “The recipient’s financial management system must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation.” Condition During the course of the audit, we noted there was no approved source documentation for a recurring expense tested. Cause The Organization has made a reasonable effort to design proper controls, but has faced challenges in implementing them effectively, due to growth across multiple locations and frequent turnover. Effect The potential effects of not having supporting documentation on file could include over or undercharging expenses to the federal grants. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information The finding noted related to one (1) transaction examined when testing a sample of forty (40) non‐payroll cash disbursements. The transaction was a recurring monthly charge that was supported by an agreement approved by an employee who has since left the Organization. The Organization was unable to locate a copy of the signed agreement. Identification as a repeat finding There was no similar finding in the prior year. Recommendation We recommend having supporting documentation on file for all expenses charged to the Federal grants that shows approval of the expense from an appropriate member of management. View of Responsible Official The CEO has implemented a policy that all signed documents and contracts will be uniformly kept in a corresponding file, and the files will be stored in a locked filing cabinet at the corporate office. The Director of Operations will be responsible to ensure that the documents and contracts are filed in a timely fashion.
#2024‐001 – Significant Deficiency – Supporting Documentation Opioid STR Grant ALN 93.788 Criteria The Office of Management and Budget issuance of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) specifically states uniform administrative requirements, cost principles, and audit requirements for federal awards. CFR 200.302(b)(3) states, “The recipient’s financial management system must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation.” Condition During the course of the audit, we noted there was no approved source documentation for a recurring expense tested. Cause The Organization has made a reasonable effort to design proper controls, but has faced challenges in implementing them effectively, due to growth across multiple locations and frequent turnover. Effect The potential effects of not having supporting documentation on file could include over or undercharging expenses to the federal grants. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information The finding noted related to one (1) transaction examined when testing a sample of forty (40) non‐payroll cash disbursements. The transaction was a recurring monthly charge that was supported by an agreement approved by an employee who has since left the Organization. The Organization was unable to locate a copy of the signed agreement. Identification as a repeat finding There was no similar finding in the prior year. Recommendation We recommend having supporting documentation on file for all expenses charged to the Federal grants that shows approval of the expense from an appropriate member of management. View of Responsible Official The CEO has implemented a policy that all signed documents and contracts will be uniformly kept in a corresponding file, and the files will be stored in a locked filing cabinet at the corporate office. The Director of Operations will be responsible to ensure that the documents and contracts are filed in a timely fashion.
#2024‐001 – Significant Deficiency – Supporting Documentation Opioid STR Grant ALN 93.788 Criteria The Office of Management and Budget issuance of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) specifically states uniform administrative requirements, cost principles, and audit requirements for federal awards. CFR 200.302(b)(3) states, “The recipient’s financial management system must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation.” Condition During the course of the audit, we noted there was no approved source documentation for a recurring expense tested. Cause The Organization has made a reasonable effort to design proper controls, but has faced challenges in implementing them effectively, due to growth across multiple locations and frequent turnover. Effect The potential effects of not having supporting documentation on file could include over or undercharging expenses to the federal grants. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information The finding noted related to one (1) transaction examined when testing a sample of forty (40) non‐payroll cash disbursements. The transaction was a recurring monthly charge that was supported by an agreement approved by an employee who has since left the Organization. The Organization was unable to locate a copy of the signed agreement. Identification as a repeat finding There was no similar finding in the prior year. Recommendation We recommend having supporting documentation on file for all expenses charged to the Federal grants that shows approval of the expense from an appropriate member of management. View of Responsible Official The CEO has implemented a policy that all signed documents and contracts will be uniformly kept in a corresponding file, and the files will be stored in a locked filing cabinet at the corporate office. The Director of Operations will be responsible to ensure that the documents and contracts are filed in a timely fashion.
#2024‐001 – Significant Deficiency – Supporting Documentation Opioid STR Grant ALN 93.788 Criteria The Office of Management and Budget issuance of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) specifically states uniform administrative requirements, cost principles, and audit requirements for federal awards. CFR 200.302(b)(3) states, “The recipient’s financial management system must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation.” Condition During the course of the audit, we noted there was no approved source documentation for a recurring expense tested. Cause The Organization has made a reasonable effort to design proper controls, but has faced challenges in implementing them effectively, due to growth across multiple locations and frequent turnover. Effect The potential effects of not having supporting documentation on file could include over or undercharging expenses to the federal grants. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information The finding noted related to one (1) transaction examined when testing a sample of forty (40) non‐payroll cash disbursements. The transaction was a recurring monthly charge that was supported by an agreement approved by an employee who has since left the Organization. The Organization was unable to locate a copy of the signed agreement. Identification as a repeat finding There was no similar finding in the prior year. Recommendation We recommend having supporting documentation on file for all expenses charged to the Federal grants that shows approval of the expense from an appropriate member of management. View of Responsible Official The CEO has implemented a policy that all signed documents and contracts will be uniformly kept in a corresponding file, and the files will be stored in a locked filing cabinet at the corporate office. The Director of Operations will be responsible to ensure that the documents and contracts are filed in a timely fashion.
#2024‐001 – Significant Deficiency – Supporting Documentation Opioid STR Grant ALN 93.788 Criteria The Office of Management and Budget issuance of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) specifically states uniform administrative requirements, cost principles, and audit requirements for federal awards. CFR 200.302(b)(3) states, “The recipient’s financial management system must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation.” Condition During the course of the audit, we noted there was no approved source documentation for a recurring expense tested. Cause The Organization has made a reasonable effort to design proper controls, but has faced challenges in implementing them effectively, due to growth across multiple locations and frequent turnover. Effect The potential effects of not having supporting documentation on file could include over or undercharging expenses to the federal grants. Questioned Costs None Perspective Information The finding noted related to one (1) transaction examined when testing a sample of forty (40) non‐payroll cash disbursements. The transaction was a recurring monthly charge that was supported by an agreement approved by an employee who has since left the Organization. The Organization was unable to locate a copy of the signed agreement. Identification as a repeat finding There was no similar finding in the prior year. Recommendation We recommend having supporting documentation on file for all expenses charged to the Federal grants that shows approval of the expense from an appropriate member of management. View of Responsible Official The CEO has implemented a policy that all signed documents and contracts will be uniformly kept in a corresponding file, and the files will be stored in a locked filing cabinet at the corporate office. The Director of Operations will be responsible to ensure that the documents and contracts are filed in a timely fashion.
2024-003 Internal Controls over Payroll – (Significant Deficiency) Federal Program Information: Funding Agency Title Federal Assistance Listing Number(s) Award Year and Number U.S. Department of Interior Indian School Equalization Program 15.042 2023; A23AV00801 U.S. Department of Interior Indian Schools Student Transportation 15.044 2023; A23AV00801 U.S. Department of Interior Administrative Cost Grants for Indian Schools 15.046 2023; A23AV00801 U.S. Department of Interior Indian Education Facilities, Operations, and Maintenance 15.047 2023; A23AV00801 Criteria or Specific Requirements: In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.302(b)(3) and § 200.430(i), recipients of federal funds must maintain documentation that supports the allowability and allocability of compensation costs. Personnel expenses must be supported by records that accurately reflect the work performed, and documentation must be maintained for each employee, including executed contracts, offer letters, pay rate approvals, timesheets, and separation documentation. Adequate support is necessary to demonstrate that federal funds were used in compliance with award conditions. Condition: During our review of internal controls over payroll processing, we selected 102 payroll transactions across four major programs. The School did not fully comply with its own adopted policies or applicable federal regulations concerning payroll documentation and processing. The following exceptions were identified: Termination letters were not provided for 5 samples. Adequate supporting document was not provided for 1 sample. Timesheet was not provided for 1 sample. Cause: The deficiencies appear to be due to a lack of consistent personnel file maintenance and insufficient internal controls over payroll documentation, record retention, and post-hiring compliance reviews. Effect: The lack of complete personnel documentation increases the risk of charging unallowable or unsupported costs to federal awards. It also affects the ability to verify employee eligibility, compensation accuracy, and the proper use of federal funds, potentially resulting in questioned costs and potential repayment obligations to granting agencies. Auditor's Recommendation: We recommend that the School implement enhanced internal controls and standardized procedures to ensure complete and accurate personnel records are maintained. This should include routine documentation checks to ensure that all required items, such as offer letters, contracts, paystubs, pay rate verifications, timesheets, and termination letters, are present and properly filed. Management should also provide training to relevant staff on federal compliance requirements related to payroll and personnel documentation.
2024-003 Internal Controls over Payroll – (Significant Deficiency) Federal Program Information: Funding Agency Title Federal Assistance Listing Number(s) Award Year and Number U.S. Department of Interior Indian School Equalization Program 15.042 2023; A23AV00801 U.S. Department of Interior Indian Schools Student Transportation 15.044 2023; A23AV00801 U.S. Department of Interior Administrative Cost Grants for Indian Schools 15.046 2023; A23AV00801 U.S. Department of Interior Indian Education Facilities, Operations, and Maintenance 15.047 2023; A23AV00801 Criteria or Specific Requirements: In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.302(b)(3) and § 200.430(i), recipients of federal funds must maintain documentation that supports the allowability and allocability of compensation costs. Personnel expenses must be supported by records that accurately reflect the work performed, and documentation must be maintained for each employee, including executed contracts, offer letters, pay rate approvals, timesheets, and separation documentation. Adequate support is necessary to demonstrate that federal funds were used in compliance with award conditions. Condition: During our review of internal controls over payroll processing, we selected 102 payroll transactions across four major programs. The School did not fully comply with its own adopted policies or applicable federal regulations concerning payroll documentation and processing. The following exceptions were identified: Termination letters were not provided for 5 samples. Adequate supporting document was not provided for 1 sample. Timesheet was not provided for 1 sample. Cause: The deficiencies appear to be due to a lack of consistent personnel file maintenance and insufficient internal controls over payroll documentation, record retention, and post-hiring compliance reviews. Effect: The lack of complete personnel documentation increases the risk of charging unallowable or unsupported costs to federal awards. It also affects the ability to verify employee eligibility, compensation accuracy, and the proper use of federal funds, potentially resulting in questioned costs and potential repayment obligations to granting agencies. Auditor's Recommendation: We recommend that the School implement enhanced internal controls and standardized procedures to ensure complete and accurate personnel records are maintained. This should include routine documentation checks to ensure that all required items, such as offer letters, contracts, paystubs, pay rate verifications, timesheets, and termination letters, are present and properly filed. Management should also provide training to relevant staff on federal compliance requirements related to payroll and personnel documentation.
2024-003 Internal Controls over Payroll – (Significant Deficiency) Federal Program Information: Funding Agency Title Federal Assistance Listing Number(s) Award Year and Number U.S. Department of Interior Indian School Equalization Program 15.042 2023; A23AV00801 U.S. Department of Interior Indian Schools Student Transportation 15.044 2023; A23AV00801 U.S. Department of Interior Administrative Cost Grants for Indian Schools 15.046 2023; A23AV00801 U.S. Department of Interior Indian Education Facilities, Operations, and Maintenance 15.047 2023; A23AV00801 Criteria or Specific Requirements: In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.302(b)(3) and § 200.430(i), recipients of federal funds must maintain documentation that supports the allowability and allocability of compensation costs. Personnel expenses must be supported by records that accurately reflect the work performed, and documentation must be maintained for each employee, including executed contracts, offer letters, pay rate approvals, timesheets, and separation documentation. Adequate support is necessary to demonstrate that federal funds were used in compliance with award conditions. Condition: During our review of internal controls over payroll processing, we selected 102 payroll transactions across four major programs. The School did not fully comply with its own adopted policies or applicable federal regulations concerning payroll documentation and processing. The following exceptions were identified: Termination letters were not provided for 5 samples. Adequate supporting document was not provided for 1 sample. Timesheet was not provided for 1 sample. Cause: The deficiencies appear to be due to a lack of consistent personnel file maintenance and insufficient internal controls over payroll documentation, record retention, and post-hiring compliance reviews. Effect: The lack of complete personnel documentation increases the risk of charging unallowable or unsupported costs to federal awards. It also affects the ability to verify employee eligibility, compensation accuracy, and the proper use of federal funds, potentially resulting in questioned costs and potential repayment obligations to granting agencies. Auditor's Recommendation: We recommend that the School implement enhanced internal controls and standardized procedures to ensure complete and accurate personnel records are maintained. This should include routine documentation checks to ensure that all required items, such as offer letters, contracts, paystubs, pay rate verifications, timesheets, and termination letters, are present and properly filed. Management should also provide training to relevant staff on federal compliance requirements related to payroll and personnel documentation.
2024-003 Internal Controls over Payroll – (Significant Deficiency) Federal Program Information: Funding Agency Title Federal Assistance Listing Number(s) Award Year and Number U.S. Department of Interior Indian School Equalization Program 15.042 2023; A23AV00801 U.S. Department of Interior Indian Schools Student Transportation 15.044 2023; A23AV00801 U.S. Department of Interior Administrative Cost Grants for Indian Schools 15.046 2023; A23AV00801 U.S. Department of Interior Indian Education Facilities, Operations, and Maintenance 15.047 2023; A23AV00801 Criteria or Specific Requirements: In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.302(b)(3) and § 200.430(i), recipients of federal funds must maintain documentation that supports the allowability and allocability of compensation costs. Personnel expenses must be supported by records that accurately reflect the work performed, and documentation must be maintained for each employee, including executed contracts, offer letters, pay rate approvals, timesheets, and separation documentation. Adequate support is necessary to demonstrate that federal funds were used in compliance with award conditions. Condition: During our review of internal controls over payroll processing, we selected 102 payroll transactions across four major programs. The School did not fully comply with its own adopted policies or applicable federal regulations concerning payroll documentation and processing. The following exceptions were identified: Termination letters were not provided for 5 samples. Adequate supporting document was not provided for 1 sample. Timesheet was not provided for 1 sample. Cause: The deficiencies appear to be due to a lack of consistent personnel file maintenance and insufficient internal controls over payroll documentation, record retention, and post-hiring compliance reviews. Effect: The lack of complete personnel documentation increases the risk of charging unallowable or unsupported costs to federal awards. It also affects the ability to verify employee eligibility, compensation accuracy, and the proper use of federal funds, potentially resulting in questioned costs and potential repayment obligations to granting agencies. Auditor's Recommendation: We recommend that the School implement enhanced internal controls and standardized procedures to ensure complete and accurate personnel records are maintained. This should include routine documentation checks to ensure that all required items, such as offer letters, contracts, paystubs, pay rate verifications, timesheets, and termination letters, are present and properly filed. Management should also provide training to relevant staff on federal compliance requirements related to payroll and personnel documentation.
Finding 2024-003 Improper Revenue Recognition (Material Weakness) Assistance Listing Number and Title: 84.010 Title I Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Assistance Listing Number and Title: 10.553 and 10.555 National School Lunch Breakfast and Lunch Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Criteria: Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial report-ing. Internal controls should allow management or employees in the normal course of performing their assigned func-tions to prevent or detect material misstatements in the financial reporting of all district funds. 2 CFR Part 200.302(b)(1) The financial management system of each non-federal entity must provide for the following: Identification, in its accounts, of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. 200.302(b)(2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in 200.328 and 200.329. Condition: During our audit, it was noted that revenue from certain grant-funded programs was not accurately recog-nized between state and federal sources. Specifically: • Some payments of federal revenue was recorded as state revenue, and some payments of state revenue was rec-orded as federal revenue. • In some cases, revenue was not recognized in the correct reporting period. This caused under recognition of current year federal revenue, and grant reimbursement to be therefore to be claimed in duplicate. Cause: Lack of clear procedures for distinguishing and recording revenue streams for blended funding sources. Internal controls to prevent, detect and correct accounting entries for grant revenues were weak or nonexistent allowing errors in reporting of revenues, overclaiming of federal revenues, and distinguishing revenue between state and federal sources. The lack of timely recognition of revenues caused the overclaiming of Title I. The accounting records were retroactively revised during the audit, for federal award and other reporting purposes. Dis-trict management did not have sufficient training or monitoring policies to recognize and correct the deficiency during the fiscal year. Effect or Potential Effect: Not accurately recording transactions timely into the general ledger, may result in transac-tions not being properly reported in the district’s financial statements and the ability to rely on the general ledger for correct and timely information. This may cause misstatement of financial statements, and inappropriate reporting of federal awards. Questioned Cost: No Context: Due to improper recording of financial activity, Title I grant revenues were overclaimed, and general ledger required adjustment for proper state and federal presentation of grant revenues for National School Lunch Program. Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that Willamina School District implement accounting staff training programs, and implement a standardized revenue recognition policy that clearly distinguishes between state and federal funding sources. Additionally, we recommend that a reconciliation process be established to ensure all federal, state and matching funds are recorded timely and accurately. District's Response: The District concurs with the recommendation. Corrective Action Plan: The District will provide training for staff in order to devise and implement appropriate poli-cies and procedures for accurately recording all financial transactions, including federal award revenues and expendi-tures. Additional internal control policies will be adopted and procedures implemented as on-going improvement efforts are made. Planned Implementation Date: August 1, 2025 Responsible Person: District Business Manager
Finding 2024-003 Improper Revenue Recognition (Material Weakness) Assistance Listing Number and Title: 84.010 Title I Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Assistance Listing Number and Title: 10.553 and 10.555 National School Lunch Breakfast and Lunch Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Criteria: Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial report-ing. Internal controls should allow management or employees in the normal course of performing their assigned func-tions to prevent or detect material misstatements in the financial reporting of all district funds. 2 CFR Part 200.302(b)(1) The financial management system of each non-federal entity must provide for the following: Identification, in its accounts, of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. 200.302(b)(2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in 200.328 and 200.329. Condition: During our audit, it was noted that revenue from certain grant-funded programs was not accurately recog-nized between state and federal sources. Specifically: • Some payments of federal revenue was recorded as state revenue, and some payments of state revenue was rec-orded as federal revenue. • In some cases, revenue was not recognized in the correct reporting period. This caused under recognition of current year federal revenue, and grant reimbursement to be therefore to be claimed in duplicate. Cause: Lack of clear procedures for distinguishing and recording revenue streams for blended funding sources. Internal controls to prevent, detect and correct accounting entries for grant revenues were weak or nonexistent allowing errors in reporting of revenues, overclaiming of federal revenues, and distinguishing revenue between state and federal sources. The lack of timely recognition of revenues caused the overclaiming of Title I. The accounting records were retroactively revised during the audit, for federal award and other reporting purposes. Dis-trict management did not have sufficient training or monitoring policies to recognize and correct the deficiency during the fiscal year. Effect or Potential Effect: Not accurately recording transactions timely into the general ledger, may result in transac-tions not being properly reported in the district’s financial statements and the ability to rely on the general ledger for correct and timely information. This may cause misstatement of financial statements, and inappropriate reporting of federal awards. Questioned Cost: No Context: Due to improper recording of financial activity, Title I grant revenues were overclaimed, and general ledger required adjustment for proper state and federal presentation of grant revenues for National School Lunch Program. Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that Willamina School District implement accounting staff training programs, and implement a standardized revenue recognition policy that clearly distinguishes between state and federal funding sources. Additionally, we recommend that a reconciliation process be established to ensure all federal, state and matching funds are recorded timely and accurately. District's Response: The District concurs with the recommendation. Corrective Action Plan: The District will provide training for staff in order to devise and implement appropriate poli-cies and procedures for accurately recording all financial transactions, including federal award revenues and expendi-tures. Additional internal control policies will be adopted and procedures implemented as on-going improvement efforts are made. Planned Implementation Date: August 1, 2025 Responsible Person: District Business Manager
Finding 2024-003 Improper Revenue Recognition (Material Weakness) Assistance Listing Number and Title: 84.010 Title I Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Assistance Listing Number and Title: 10.553 and 10.555 National School Lunch Breakfast and Lunch Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Criteria: Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial report-ing. Internal controls should allow management or employees in the normal course of performing their assigned func-tions to prevent or detect material misstatements in the financial reporting of all district funds. 2 CFR Part 200.302(b)(1) The financial management system of each non-federal entity must provide for the following: Identification, in its accounts, of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. 200.302(b)(2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in 200.328 and 200.329. Condition: During our audit, it was noted that revenue from certain grant-funded programs was not accurately recog-nized between state and federal sources. Specifically: • Some payments of federal revenue was recorded as state revenue, and some payments of state revenue was rec-orded as federal revenue. • In some cases, revenue was not recognized in the correct reporting period. This caused under recognition of current year federal revenue, and grant reimbursement to be therefore to be claimed in duplicate. Cause: Lack of clear procedures for distinguishing and recording revenue streams for blended funding sources. Internal controls to prevent, detect and correct accounting entries for grant revenues were weak or nonexistent allowing errors in reporting of revenues, overclaiming of federal revenues, and distinguishing revenue between state and federal sources. The lack of timely recognition of revenues caused the overclaiming of Title I. The accounting records were retroactively revised during the audit, for federal award and other reporting purposes. Dis-trict management did not have sufficient training or monitoring policies to recognize and correct the deficiency during the fiscal year. Effect or Potential Effect: Not accurately recording transactions timely into the general ledger, may result in transac-tions not being properly reported in the district’s financial statements and the ability to rely on the general ledger for correct and timely information. This may cause misstatement of financial statements, and inappropriate reporting of federal awards. Questioned Cost: No Context: Due to improper recording of financial activity, Title I grant revenues were overclaimed, and general ledger required adjustment for proper state and federal presentation of grant revenues for National School Lunch Program. Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that Willamina School District implement accounting staff training programs, and implement a standardized revenue recognition policy that clearly distinguishes between state and federal funding sources. Additionally, we recommend that a reconciliation process be established to ensure all federal, state and matching funds are recorded timely and accurately. District's Response: The District concurs with the recommendation. Corrective Action Plan: The District will provide training for staff in order to devise and implement appropriate poli-cies and procedures for accurately recording all financial transactions, including federal award revenues and expendi-tures. Additional internal control policies will be adopted and procedures implemented as on-going improvement efforts are made. Planned Implementation Date: August 1, 2025 Responsible Person: District Business Manager
Finding 2024-003 Improper Revenue Recognition (Material Weakness) Assistance Listing Number and Title: 84.010 Title I Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Assistance Listing Number and Title: 10.553 and 10.555 National School Lunch Breakfast and Lunch Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Criteria: Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial report-ing. Internal controls should allow management or employees in the normal course of performing their assigned func-tions to prevent or detect material misstatements in the financial reporting of all district funds. 2 CFR Part 200.302(b)(1) The financial management system of each non-federal entity must provide for the following: Identification, in its accounts, of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. 200.302(b)(2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in 200.328 and 200.329. Condition: During our audit, it was noted that revenue from certain grant-funded programs was not accurately recog-nized between state and federal sources. Specifically: • Some payments of federal revenue was recorded as state revenue, and some payments of state revenue was rec-orded as federal revenue. • In some cases, revenue was not recognized in the correct reporting period. This caused under recognition of current year federal revenue, and grant reimbursement to be therefore to be claimed in duplicate. Cause: Lack of clear procedures for distinguishing and recording revenue streams for blended funding sources. Internal controls to prevent, detect and correct accounting entries for grant revenues were weak or nonexistent allowing errors in reporting of revenues, overclaiming of federal revenues, and distinguishing revenue between state and federal sources. The lack of timely recognition of revenues caused the overclaiming of Title I. The accounting records were retroactively revised during the audit, for federal award and other reporting purposes. Dis-trict management did not have sufficient training or monitoring policies to recognize and correct the deficiency during the fiscal year. Effect or Potential Effect: Not accurately recording transactions timely into the general ledger, may result in transac-tions not being properly reported in the district’s financial statements and the ability to rely on the general ledger for correct and timely information. This may cause misstatement of financial statements, and inappropriate reporting of federal awards. Questioned Cost: No Context: Due to improper recording of financial activity, Title I grant revenues were overclaimed, and general ledger required adjustment for proper state and federal presentation of grant revenues for National School Lunch Program. Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that Willamina School District implement accounting staff training programs, and implement a standardized revenue recognition policy that clearly distinguishes between state and federal funding sources. Additionally, we recommend that a reconciliation process be established to ensure all federal, state and matching funds are recorded timely and accurately. District's Response: The District concurs with the recommendation. Corrective Action Plan: The District will provide training for staff in order to devise and implement appropriate poli-cies and procedures for accurately recording all financial transactions, including federal award revenues and expendi-tures. Additional internal control policies will be adopted and procedures implemented as on-going improvement efforts are made. Planned Implementation Date: August 1, 2025 Responsible Person: District Business Manager
Finding 2024-003 Improper Revenue Recognition (Material Weakness) Assistance Listing Number and Title: 84.010 Title I Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Assistance Listing Number and Title: 10.553 and 10.555 National School Lunch Breakfast and Lunch Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Criteria: Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial report-ing. Internal controls should allow management or employees in the normal course of performing their assigned func-tions to prevent or detect material misstatements in the financial reporting of all district funds. 2 CFR Part 200.302(b)(1) The financial management system of each non-federal entity must provide for the following: Identification, in its accounts, of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. 200.302(b)(2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in 200.328 and 200.329. Condition: During our audit, it was noted that revenue from certain grant-funded programs was not accurately recog-nized between state and federal sources. Specifically: • Some payments of federal revenue was recorded as state revenue, and some payments of state revenue was rec-orded as federal revenue. • In some cases, revenue was not recognized in the correct reporting period. This caused under recognition of current year federal revenue, and grant reimbursement to be therefore to be claimed in duplicate. Cause: Lack of clear procedures for distinguishing and recording revenue streams for blended funding sources. Internal controls to prevent, detect and correct accounting entries for grant revenues were weak or nonexistent allowing errors in reporting of revenues, overclaiming of federal revenues, and distinguishing revenue between state and federal sources. The lack of timely recognition of revenues caused the overclaiming of Title I. The accounting records were retroactively revised during the audit, for federal award and other reporting purposes. Dis-trict management did not have sufficient training or monitoring policies to recognize and correct the deficiency during the fiscal year. Effect or Potential Effect: Not accurately recording transactions timely into the general ledger, may result in transac-tions not being properly reported in the district’s financial statements and the ability to rely on the general ledger for correct and timely information. This may cause misstatement of financial statements, and inappropriate reporting of federal awards. Questioned Cost: No Context: Due to improper recording of financial activity, Title I grant revenues were overclaimed, and general ledger required adjustment for proper state and federal presentation of grant revenues for National School Lunch Program. Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that Willamina School District implement accounting staff training programs, and implement a standardized revenue recognition policy that clearly distinguishes between state and federal funding sources. Additionally, we recommend that a reconciliation process be established to ensure all federal, state and matching funds are recorded timely and accurately. District's Response: The District concurs with the recommendation. Corrective Action Plan: The District will provide training for staff in order to devise and implement appropriate poli-cies and procedures for accurately recording all financial transactions, including federal award revenues and expendi-tures. Additional internal control policies will be adopted and procedures implemented as on-going improvement efforts are made. Planned Implementation Date: August 1, 2025 Responsible Person: District Business Manager
Finding 2024-003 Improper Revenue Recognition (Material Weakness) Assistance Listing Number and Title: 84.010 Title I Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Assistance Listing Number and Title: 10.553 and 10.555 National School Lunch Breakfast and Lunch Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Criteria: Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial report-ing. Internal controls should allow management or employees in the normal course of performing their assigned func-tions to prevent or detect material misstatements in the financial reporting of all district funds. 2 CFR Part 200.302(b)(1) The financial management system of each non-federal entity must provide for the following: Identification, in its accounts, of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. 200.302(b)(2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in 200.328 and 200.329. Condition: During our audit, it was noted that revenue from certain grant-funded programs was not accurately recog-nized between state and federal sources. Specifically: • Some payments of federal revenue was recorded as state revenue, and some payments of state revenue was rec-orded as federal revenue. • In some cases, revenue was not recognized in the correct reporting period. This caused under recognition of current year federal revenue, and grant reimbursement to be therefore to be claimed in duplicate. Cause: Lack of clear procedures for distinguishing and recording revenue streams for blended funding sources. Internal controls to prevent, detect and correct accounting entries for grant revenues were weak or nonexistent allowing errors in reporting of revenues, overclaiming of federal revenues, and distinguishing revenue between state and federal sources. The lack of timely recognition of revenues caused the overclaiming of Title I. The accounting records were retroactively revised during the audit, for federal award and other reporting purposes. Dis-trict management did not have sufficient training or monitoring policies to recognize and correct the deficiency during the fiscal year. Effect or Potential Effect: Not accurately recording transactions timely into the general ledger, may result in transac-tions not being properly reported in the district’s financial statements and the ability to rely on the general ledger for correct and timely information. This may cause misstatement of financial statements, and inappropriate reporting of federal awards. Questioned Cost: No Context: Due to improper recording of financial activity, Title I grant revenues were overclaimed, and general ledger required adjustment for proper state and federal presentation of grant revenues for National School Lunch Program. Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that Willamina School District implement accounting staff training programs, and implement a standardized revenue recognition policy that clearly distinguishes between state and federal funding sources. Additionally, we recommend that a reconciliation process be established to ensure all federal, state and matching funds are recorded timely and accurately. District's Response: The District concurs with the recommendation. Corrective Action Plan: The District will provide training for staff in order to devise and implement appropriate poli-cies and procedures for accurately recording all financial transactions, including federal award revenues and expendi-tures. Additional internal control policies will be adopted and procedures implemented as on-going improvement efforts are made. Planned Implementation Date: August 1, 2025 Responsible Person: District Business Manager
Finding 2024.003: Cash Management - Significant Deficiency Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Names: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects of Regional and National Significance Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic Expansion Grants Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.243 and 93.696 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H79SM087223 - 2024, H79SM086969 - 2024 Criteria In accordance with §200.305, federal payment, grantees and subgrantees that receive grant funds are responsible for maintaining controls regarding the management of federal program funds under the Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR 200.302 and 200.303. Condition The Center's drawdowns did not illustrate review and approval by management. Cause The Center did not have adequate controls to ensure drawdowns were properly approved and such approval is documented. Effect The condition may lead to inaccurate or improper drawdowns. Questioned Costs None Context We selected seven drawdowns for testing of cash management relating to these major programs. We noted there was no formal approval or evidence of review for these drawdowns Identification of Repeat Finding Not a repeat finding. Recommendation The Center should develop written procedures to review all drawdowns that occur in order to ensure accuracy. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions Management and the Board of Directors agree with the finding and will implement additional controls to ensure there is formal evidence of review being performed.
Finding 2024.003: Cash Management - Significant Deficiency Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Names: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects of Regional and National Significance Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic Expansion Grants Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.243 and 93.696 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H79SM087223 - 2024, H79SM086969 - 2024 Criteria In accordance with §200.305, federal payment, grantees and subgrantees that receive grant funds are responsible for maintaining controls regarding the management of federal program funds under the Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR 200.302 and 200.303. Condition The Center's drawdowns did not illustrate review and approval by management. Cause The Center did not have adequate controls to ensure drawdowns were properly approved and such approval is documented. Effect The condition may lead to inaccurate or improper drawdowns. Questioned Costs None Context We selected seven drawdowns for testing of cash management relating to these major programs. We noted there was no formal approval or evidence of review for these drawdowns Identification of Repeat Finding Not a repeat finding. Recommendation The Center should develop written procedures to review all drawdowns that occur in order to ensure accuracy. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions Management and the Board of Directors agree with the finding and will implement additional controls to ensure there is formal evidence of review being performed.
Finding 2024.003: Cash Management - Significant Deficiency Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Names: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects of Regional and National Significance Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic Expansion Grants Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.243 and 93.696 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H79SM087223 - 2024, H79SM086969 - 2024 Criteria In accordance with §200.305, federal payment, grantees and subgrantees that receive grant funds are responsible for maintaining controls regarding the management of federal program funds under the Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR 200.302 and 200.303. Condition The Center's drawdowns did not illustrate review and approval by management. Cause The Center did not have adequate controls to ensure drawdowns were properly approved and such approval is documented. Effect The condition may lead to inaccurate or improper drawdowns. Questioned Costs None Context We selected seven drawdowns for testing of cash management relating to these major programs. We noted there was no formal approval or evidence of review for these drawdowns Identification of Repeat Finding Not a repeat finding. Recommendation The Center should develop written procedures to review all drawdowns that occur in order to ensure accuracy. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions Management and the Board of Directors agree with the finding and will implement additional controls to ensure there is formal evidence of review being performed.
Information on the Federal Program: Assistance Listing Number 10.568—Food Distribution Cluster; Emergency Food Assistance Program (Food Commodities). Pass-Through Entity: Los Angeles Regional Foodbank. Compliance Requirements: Special Test and Provision. Type of Finding: Material Noncompliance. Criteria: The Compliance Supplement for the Food Distribution Cluster requires recipient organizations to maintain accurate, timely records of USDA Foods activity, including receipts, distributions (usage), and losses. Records must reflect correct quantities, proper periods, and supporting documentation for federal commodities. Additionally, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR § 200.302 mandates that non-federal entities maintain complete and accurate financial and programmatic records to ensure accountability for federal funds and assets. Condition: During our testing, we found that NVCS recorded all TEFAP distributions as a single year-end transaction instead of recording distributions as they occurred. Consequently, detailed, contemporaneous records of usage or distributions were not available, preventing verification of the accuracy, timing, and proper support of federal food distributions during the audit period. Cause: NVCS misunderstood the requirement to record USDA Foods usage and distributions throughout the year, believing a year-end summary was sufficient. Furthermore, NVCS lacked written procedures and internal controls to ensure timely and compliant documentation of commodity distributions. Effect or Potential Effect: Without detailed records of distributions throughout the year, NVCS cannot demonstrate compliance with federal requirements. This increases the risk of incorrect quantities, misreporting periods, or distributions to ineligible recipients. It may also result in questioned costs or affect NVCS’s eligibility to continue administering the program. Questioned Costs: None Context: NVCS recorded only one summary distribution transaction for the year ended June 30, 2024, representing 100% of USDA Foods activity. No detailed records were maintained, preventing sample testing and indicating a systemic control deficiency. Repeat Finding: No — This is NVCS's first Single Audit. Recommendation: We recommend NVCS establish procedures to record USDA Foods distributions at the time they occur, documenting quantities, dates, recipient agencies (if applicable), and supporting evidence. Staff should be trained on proper recordkeeping requirements, and management should implement periodic reviews to ensure accuracy and timeliness. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management concurs with the finding and will revise procedures to ensure detailed, timely recording of USDA Foods distributions. Staff will receive training on documentation requirements, and management will implement periodic compliance reviews. These corrective actions are expected to be completed by March 1, 2025.
Reference Number 2024-002 Federal Program: 21.027 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Agency U.S. Department of Treasury Pass-Through Entity State of California Evaluation of Finding Significant Deficiency Compliance Area L – Reporting Condition During the allowable cost testing for the 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds program, it was found that an expenditure of $945,041 was recorded in the wrong period. The invoice indicated that the services were rendered as of June 30, 2023, but the expenditure was recorded as July 1, 2023 instead. This misstatement impacts the accuracy of financial reporting and grant compliance. Criteria According to 2 CFR 200.302(b)(3) and 2 CFR 200.303, entities receiving federal funds must maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting to ensure accurate and timely recognition of expenditures in the appropriate period. Cause of Condition The City's internal controls over financial reporting and expenditure recognition were not effectively designed or implemented, leading to recurring errors in the timing of recorded expenditures. Effect or Potential Effect of Condition Improper recording of expenditures can lead to misstatements in financial reports, noncompliance with federal grant requirements, and potential audit findings. Continued recurrence of this issue may impact the entity’s ability to demonstrate sound financial management practices. Recommendation We recommend that management continue to strengthen internal controls over expenditure recognition by implementing enhanced review procedures and periodic reconciliations to ensure expenditures are recorded in the appropriate period. Client Response The City agrees with the recommendation and has implemented new procedures and review processes to ensure expenditures for federal programs are recognized in the appropriate fiscal year's Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA).
Finding 2024-012 - Material Weakness - Maintenance of Effort Federal Assistance Listing Number: 84.010 and 84.367 Federal Program Name: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies and Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants Federal Agency Name: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity Name: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Pass-Through Entity Identification Number: 2024-403619-DPI-TI-A-141, 2024-403619-DPI-TID-144, 2024-403619-DPI-CSI-148 and 2024-403619-DPI-TIIA-365 Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303(a), the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302(a), the non-Federal entity's financial management systems must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions. Condition/Context: The Maintenance of Effort (MOE) calculation is calculated annually by the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction (WI DPI) based on the information submitted in the PI-1505 report. There was a $16,977,949 variance between what was reported in the PI-1505 and the District's accounting records for the revenue source code 751. Due to this variance, we recalculated the MOE based on the District's accounting records. The MOE on a per pupil basis would have still been met. Cause: There was turnover related to those previously responsible for preparing the PI-1505 report. The cross-walk between the accounting records and the PI-1505 submission could not be located. Effect or Potential Effect: The PI-1505 report was not fully supported by the District's accounting records for one of the line items used in the calculation of MOE. Questioned Costs: None noted. Recommendations: We recommend the District establish written policies and procedures related to the preparation and submission of the PI-1505 report. The report should be fully supported by the accounting records and any cross-walk documentation should be maintained by the District. Views of Responsible Official: Management concurs with the finding.
Finding 2024-012 - Material Weakness - Maintenance of Effort Federal Assistance Listing Number: 84.010 and 84.367 Federal Program Name: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies and Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants Federal Agency Name: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity Name: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Pass-Through Entity Identification Number: 2024-403619-DPI-TI-A-141, 2024-403619-DPI-TID-144, 2024-403619-DPI-CSI-148 and 2024-403619-DPI-TIIA-365 Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303(a), the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302(a), the non-Federal entity's financial management systems must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions. Condition/Context: The Maintenance of Effort (MOE) calculation is calculated annually by the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction (WI DPI) based on the information submitted in the PI-1505 report. There was a $16,977,949 variance between what was reported in the PI-1505 and the District's accounting records for the revenue source code 751. Due to this variance, we recalculated the MOE based on the District's accounting records. The MOE on a per pupil basis would have still been met. Cause: There was turnover related to those previously responsible for preparing the PI-1505 report. The cross-walk between the accounting records and the PI-1505 submission could not be located. Effect or Potential Effect: The PI-1505 report was not fully supported by the District's accounting records for one of the line items used in the calculation of MOE. Questioned Costs: None noted. Recommendations: We recommend the District establish written policies and procedures related to the preparation and submission of the PI-1505 report. The report should be fully supported by the accounting records and any cross-walk documentation should be maintained by the District. Views of Responsible Official: Management concurs with the finding.
Finding 2024-012 - Material Weakness - Maintenance of Effort Federal Assistance Listing Number: 84.010 and 84.367 Federal Program Name: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies and Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants Federal Agency Name: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity Name: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Pass-Through Entity Identification Number: 2024-403619-DPI-TI-A-141, 2024-403619-DPI-TID-144, 2024-403619-DPI-CSI-148 and 2024-403619-DPI-TIIA-365 Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303(a), the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302(a), the non-Federal entity's financial management systems must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions. Condition/Context: The Maintenance of Effort (MOE) calculation is calculated annually by the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction (WI DPI) based on the information submitted in the PI-1505 report. There was a $16,977,949 variance between what was reported in the PI-1505 and the District's accounting records for the revenue source code 751. Due to this variance, we recalculated the MOE based on the District's accounting records. The MOE on a per pupil basis would have still been met. Cause: There was turnover related to those previously responsible for preparing the PI-1505 report. The cross-walk between the accounting records and the PI-1505 submission could not be located. Effect or Potential Effect: The PI-1505 report was not fully supported by the District's accounting records for one of the line items used in the calculation of MOE. Questioned Costs: None noted. Recommendations: We recommend the District establish written policies and procedures related to the preparation and submission of the PI-1505 report. The report should be fully supported by the accounting records and any cross-walk documentation should be maintained by the District. Views of Responsible Official: Management concurs with the finding.
Condition and Context Bebashi failed to maintain an accurate trial balance and general ledger to support certain account balances resulting in auditor journal entries at year-end which were material to the current year financial statements and audit delays due to support not reconciling and multiple versions of the trial balance being provided. Criteria Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards require that the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting should allow management or employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions to prevent, or detect and correct, misstatements on a timely basis. 2 CFR 200.303 states, “The non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ‘Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government’ issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ‘Internal Control Integrated Framework,’ issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.” 2 CFR 200.302 states, “The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following… accurate, current, and complete disclosure of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in sections 200.328 and 200.329.” Cause As a result of financial constraints, and corresponding staffing challenges, the accounting and finance team at Bebashi was unable to prepare its accounting records on a timely and thorough basis. At the same time, the accounting and finance team was faced with other administrative and operational matters requiring immediate attention to help ensure Bebashi remained operational. The financial and staffing constraints resulted in lack of timely preparation and detailed review of accounting records and analysis which resulted in material audit adjustments. Effect or Potential Effect The accounting records of certain account balances and transactions provided to the auditors were inaccurate for a period of time during the fiscal year and for the year ended June 30, 2024. In certain instances, the related reconciliations and analysis were not performed on a timely basis. This caused adjustments proposed by the auditors that were material to the financial statements. Recommendation We recommend that management implements a more detailed and adequate review of the accounting records including strong processes and internal controls surrounding financial reporting. This process should identify the required accounting records and reconciliations, ensure the existence of preparer and reviewer requirements for the accounting records and reconciliations, and implement an appropriate time frame for the completion of accounting records and reconciliations. We recommend that management implements processes and procedures to identify the required financial reporting deadlines and controls to ensure compliance with the deadlines. Views of Responsible Officials Management agrees with the finding above. Management will review the existing accounting policies and procedures and implement additional steps and controls to incorporate the recommendations above. Subsequent to year-end, management of Bebashi hired a new Director of Finance. Management will review the operational resources available to further expand the finance team and do so accordingly.
Finding 2024-003 – Internal Controls Over Reporting (Material Weakness) Condition: The City did not report accurate expenditures during the year in its Project and Expenditure Quarterly Reports for the uses of ARPA funding. The reports contained incorrect project amounts and expenditure classifications due to internal control deficiencies, including insufficient review by someone other than the preparer. Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.302(b)(3) and 2 CFR 200.328, recipients of federal funds are required to maintain accurate financial records and report expenditures in accordance with federal award terms. Specifically, recipients of ARPA funding are required to submit accurate quarterly Project and Expenditure Reports to provide transparency and ensure funds are used in compliance with allowable purposes. Cause: The inaccuracies resulted from a lack of sufficient internal controls over the reporting process. Specifically: No independent review was performed to validate the accuracy and completeness of the quarterly reports. Documentation of the expenditure allocation process was not consistently maintained to support the reported amounts. The timing of the prior year audit limited the City’s ability to implement corrective measures before the FY2025 reports were due. Effect: The lack of accurate reporting undermines compliance with the reporting requirements of the federal award. Although no unallowable costs were identified, the inaccuracies may necessitate correction of reported amounts in the future. Recommendation: We recommend that the City strengthen its internal controls over the reporting process by: 1. Identify and correct previous reporting amounts and balances to ensure the lifetime project is properly reported. 2. Implementing a formal review process where quarterly reports are reviewed and approved by a designated individual other than the preparer. 3. Establishing a documented process for reconciling expenditures reported to the underlying accounting records and federal award guidelines. 4. Providing training to staff responsible for the preparation and review of federal compliance reports to ensure familiarity with reporting requirements. Management’s Response: See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2024-003 - Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance (Qualified Opinion) - Inadequate Tracking of Expenditures and Retention of Documentation: Activities Allowed or Unallowed: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Reporting (A/B/L) for Assistance Listing Number 19.510 and 93.567 Criteria: The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 200.510(b) states in part, “The auditee must also prepare a schedule of federal expenditures for the period covered by the auditee’s consolidated financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with 200.502.” Also, in accordance with CFR Section 200.302(b) - Financial Management, the auditees financial management system must provide 1) identification of all federal awards received and expended; 2) accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each federal award or program; 3) records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally‐funded activities; 4) effective control over, and accountability for, all funds, property, and other assets; 5) comparison of expenditures with budget amounts for each Federal award; 6) written procedures to implement the requirements of section 200.305 and; 7) written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Recipients of federal awards must submit accurate, complete and timely financial and performance reports. The Organization should have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with those provisions. The Organization should retain sufficient documentation such as invoice and allocation support for expenditures to retain documentation for audit purposes. Condition: During detail testing of expenditures, it was noted that the Organization did not maintain adequate documentation to support how certain costs were allocated to the federal program. Several transactions lacked sufficient detail, such as invoice or expense reimbursement form. Several expenditures selected for testing did not obtain sufficient approval by an individual at the Organization. There was one instance of employee compensation being processed at an approved pay rate and the Center could not provide any supporting documentation such as an offer letter, to substantiate the rate paid. It was noted that quarterly reports provided to the federal program were not reviewed by an individual at the Organization prior to submission to ensure accurate report of expenditures. 2 of the 8 monthly reports sampled were not submitted timely to the grantor. Cause: The Organization does not have an adequate system in place to ensure quarterly reports have sufficient supporting documentation, proper approval/review, and accurate reporting prior to submission. Responsibilities for expenditure tracking were not clearly assigned, and there was no formal review process in place. The Organization is not following their Document Retention Policy. Effect: The effect of this condition increases the possibility that quarterly financial reports are misstated or inaccurate and increase the risk of noncompliance with federal requirements. The effect of this condition also increases the risk that expenditures are unallowable per the grant, federal regulations, or cost principles due to the insufficient support of proper approval retained. Questioned costs: None Repeat Finding: Yes - 2023-003 Recommendation: Policies and procedures should be in place to ensure quarterly financial reports are properly supported, accurately reported, and adequately approved and reviewed. A formal review process should be established to ensure compliance. The Organization should follow the Document Retention Policy that was put in place and required by law and submit the required reporting documentation timely to the grantor to ensure compliance. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding and their response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING REFERENCE NUMBER 2024-002 FEDERAL PROGRAMS (ALN – 84.027) SPECIAL EDUCATION – GRANTS TO STATES (IDEA, PART B) – SPECIAL EDUCATION CLUSTER (IDEA) (ALN – 84.173) SPECIAL EDUCATION – PRESCHOOL GRANTS (IDEA PRESCHOOL) – SPECIAL EDUCATION CLUSTER (IDEA) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AWARD NUMBERS H027A220003 – 22A (07/01/2022 – 09/30/2023); H027A230003 – 23A (07/01/2023 – 09/30/2024); H173A220002 (07/01/2022 – 09/30/2023); H173A230002 (07/01/2023 – 09/30/2024) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS ACTIVITIES ALLOWED OR UNALLOWED // ALLOWABLE COSTS/COSTS PRINCIPLES TYPE OF FINDING MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE AND MATERIAL WEAKNESS CRITERIA 2 CFR Section 200.302 (a) establishes that each state must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In addition, 2 CFR Section 200.403 (b) establishes that except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under Federal awards. STATEMENT OF CONDITION As part of our procedures over internal controls and compliance for the allowable activities’ requirement, we selected a sample of seventy-three (73) disbursements to suppliers made during the fiscal year under audit. We noted the following deficiencies: 1. In thirty-seven (37) disbursement receipts related to evaluation and therapy intervention services, service sheets with the signature or stamp of the institution that provided the services were not found. They were requested on several occasions and were not provided. 2. In nine (9) disbursement vouchers, the Excel master sheet and the adjustment report presented different amounts. No justification was provided for the differences in the reports. 3. In an evaluated disbursement voucher, a student was included who is billed $34,000 per month. In the student's file in MIPE, there is no breakdown of how the institution arrived at that amount in its service quote. The average monthly payments at that institution fluctuate between $9,300 and $20,800 per month. We were not provided with evidence of the educational cost analysis for this participant monthly cost. 4. In nine (9) disbursement vouchers, the payments to the suppliers for therapy services do not match the cost assigned by contract for these services. 5. In nine (9) disbursement voucher, the educational cost of a participant is not consistent with the proposal that the Institution includes in MIPE. 6. In four (4) disbursement vouchers evaluated, we were not provided with evidence of the supplier's proposals, nor was there evidence of receipt by the PRDE personnel demonstrating that the services were received as contracted. 7. In thirty-nine (39) vouchers evaluated, it was found that the invoiced expenses corresponded to both cluster programs (ALNs 84.027 and 84.173), and the invoices established this. However, the expenses in the system were recognized in grant ALN 84.027, not according to the participants attended and invoiced, according to their age. 8. In two (2) vouchers evaluated for training services, it was found that there were participants who were not employees of the IDEA program. 9. In a disbursement voucher, the cost per student could not be validated with the supplier's proposal per student, since it was not located in MIPE. QUESTIONED COSTS None. PERSPECTIVE INFORMATION This deficiency is a systemic problem that is related to lack of proper training and controls that require standard evaluation, approval, and reporting of expenditures incurred. STATEMENT OF CAUSE According to interviews carried out and documentation evaluated, some goods and services are received in the different Regional Offices (ORE), and each one carries out similar, but not standard, processes when certifying as received or pre-intervening invoices. Regarding the distribution of expenses, according to interviews and evaluated documentation, it was found that at the time of binding a contract, an analysis of the assigned participants is not made, in order to be able to make a distribution between the two programs of the cluster according to the age of the participant. In addition, according to interviews, although the contract budget is validated, they only limit themselves to verifying the amount available in general and there is no distribution of the expense according to the service provider's invoice. POSSIBLE ASSERTED EFFECT The PRDE is reporting expenses within the cluster that do not necessarily reflect the actual expenses incurred by each program in the cluster, this deficiency requires that when the period of availability of funds is ending, some adjustments be made to reclassify expenses, up to the amount of the award. In addition, the PRDE may have incurred payments for which the service or goods were not provided as contracted. IDENTIFICATION OF REPEAT FINDING This is a repeat finding (Finding Reference Number 2023-003). RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend that the PRDE establish standardized written guidelines and train the staff of the Regions to carry out and document the reviews and approvals of services, and ascertain that this information is uploaded in the accounting system of SIFDE. In addition, the personnel must be instructed to account for the budget and expense of therapy and related services, according to the enrollment of students who will attend, in accordance with the program that applies within the cluster. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS The PRDE acknowledges the auditor’s finding. Management clarifies that all requested information was available and existed within the PRDE systems; however, it was not provided in a timely manner due to circumstances beyond the Department’s control, including competing deliverables required from the same operational areas. Regarding the disbursement vouchers referenced by the auditors, including the Excel Master and Adjustment Reports, the program area reviewed the documents and confirmed that they reconciled accurately. The timing differences were due to automatic and manual adjustments. All supporting information was available in PRDE’s databases, including SIFDE and MIPE, and has been included as part of this response for further reference. For the student billed for $34,000, all supporting documentation—such as the proposal, approval of payment, and related evidence—was and remains available in MIPE. As part of PRDE’s internal controls, all necessary documentation must be uploaded into the system before any transaction can proceed. It is also important to note that auditors were granted full access to both MIPE and SIFDE at the beginning of their audit procedures. In relation to Findings 4 and 5, documentation was available in MIPE. Management notes that certain contracts and proposals may have amendments, and it appears the auditors may have reviewed an incorrect version of the file. Similarly, for Finding 6, the area revalidated the information during the preparation of this response and confirmed that the documentation cited as missing was, in fact, available in the MIPE portal. Additionally, management evaluated the matter related to expense recognition. In accordance with federal regulations and to ensure compliance with IDEA requirements, PRDE is authorized to cover certain expenses of the Preschool Grant (84.173) using IDEA Part B (84.027) funds. As detailed in the prior Single Audit report: “IDEA Part B, Section 611 funds can be used for students ages 3 to 21. According to the description provided by OSEP, the Grants to States program assists states in meeting the excess costs of providing special education and related services to children with disabilities. States must serve all children with disabilities between the ages of 3 through 21, unless inconsistent with State law or court orders. Under 34 CFR § 300.202(a), the LEA must use IDEA Part B funds to pay the excess costs of providing special education and related services to children with disabilities.” Regarding the vouchers related to training services, PRDE does not concur with that portion of the finding, as the contract does not stipulate that the teachers must be an IDEA employee. This contract was previously evaluated as part of the auditors’ procedures. The PRDE accepts the auditors’ recommendations and will implement corrective actions to improve the timely submission of documentation and strengthen internal coordination among areas involved in responding to audit requests Auditor Comment on Management Response for Finding No. 2024-002 In response of the second paragraph, our Auditors held three (3) meetings with PRDE’s personnel and the amounts were not reconciled. For the third response, no justification exists in MIPE or SIFDE that the amount paid is reasonable and in accordance with the contract. In fact, if all costs disclosed in the contract were applied to that student, the amount is less than the $34,000 paid monthly. For the fourth response related to Conditions 4 and 5, our Auditors requested all information to be available. We held three (3) meetings, and the information did not reconcile and was not available for our evaluation. In addition, we understand and acknowledge that contracts have amendments; however, these amendments relate to increases in the total amount because an original contract is based on a certain quantity, and amendments are made as funds are received. The cost per student established in the contract or proposals remained unchanged in these amendments. The lack of verification between the supplier's cost as stated in the contract and the cost invoiced by the supplier is a significant problem because the supplier is billing for a cost that was not part of the original agreement or proposal. For the fifth through seven responses, the Uniform Guidance requires that financial management system record the expenditures in the program that benefited from the services; no in the program with more budget.. IMPLEMENTATION DATE None RESPONSIBLE PERSON Enid Díaz Executive Director Alayra Figueroa Associate Secretary of Special Education
FINDING REFERENCE NUMBER 2024-003 FEDERAL PROGRAM (ALN – 84.938A) HURRICANE EDUCATION RECOVERY – INMMEDIATE AID TO RESTART SCHOOL OPERATIONS (RESTART) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AWARD NUMBER S938A180002 (04/26/2018 – 09/30/2025) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS ACTIVITIES ALLOWED OR UNALLOWED // ALLOWABLE COSTS/COSTS PRINCIPLES // EQUIPMENT AND REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT TYPE OF FINDING MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE AND MATERIAL WEAKNESS CRITERIA 2 CFR §200.302(b)(3)(4) establishes that the recipient's and subrecipient's financial management system must provide for the following: maintaining records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Effective control over and accountability for all funds, property, and assets. The recipient or subrecipient must safeguard all assets and ensure they are used solely for authorized purposes. 2 CFR §200.403 establishes that costs must meet the following criteria to be allowable under Federal awards: (g) be adequately documented. The Fiscal Process Guide – Program Funds Restart designed by the PRDE establishes that all movable and immovable property with a unit cost of five hundred dollars ($500.00) or more and a useful life of more than two (2) years will be capitalized. Both conditions must exist. These will be classified in the E5000 expense accounts, as appropriate. Also, indicate that capitalizable equipment (E5000) and non-capitalizable equipment (E4414) purchased with program funds will be labeled with the number assigned by the Property Registry System, as established in Section X of the "Procedure for the Control and Accounting of the Property of the Department of Education”. Also as stated in the Section 102(h)(3) of the 2018 Hurricane Relief Act, states that public control of funds and property for services provided to non-public schools must remain with a public agency, which also administers the funds and resources or contracts for services with public or private entities. STATEMENT OF CONDITION As part of our audit procedures over internal controls and compliance with the allowable activities requirement, we selected a sample of forty (40) disbursements from a population of six hundred eighty-three (683) disbursements to suppliers made during the fiscal year 2023-2024. During our testing, the following deficiencies were noted: 1. For two (2) reimbursement payments issued by the PRDE to private schools, we found that they were made based on a quotation instead of the invoice, which should have been submitted by the private school. 2. We noted three (3) reimbursement payments made by the PRDE to private schools due to equipment purchases performed that did not have the receiving reports issued by the private schools for properly validating that the equipment was incorporated as part of the private school records and its regular operations. Furthermore, the Restart Fiscal Process Guide does not contain a control that mandates the submission of a private school receiving report as part of the reimbursement process for equipment-related expenses. 3. For five (5) reimbursement payments for purchase of equipment were incorrectly recorded in account E6170 (Donations and Contributions to Private Entities) rather than in one of the E5000-series accounts designated for equipment. Also, these equipment’s were not included in the property & equipment register of the PRDE. According to the Restart Fiscal Process Guide, all the equipment purchased or reimbursed to the private schools should be recorded as part of the property list that belongs to the PRDE. In other words, PRDE must maintain ownership over the property bought with the Restart funds. QUESTIONED COSTS None. PERSPECTIVE INFORMATION During the evaluation of the supporting documents for the voucher, we observed that the invoice and receiving report were not available in SIFDE, considering that it is the accounting system designated for the evaluation of supporting documentation before the approval of any disbursement of funds. Also the codifications of these transactions were not properly reviewed in order to avoid missed codification, considering that the PRDE has the Third-Party Fiduciary Agent that had reviewed them and did not detect the missing codification and the missing documentation for the proper accounting and authorization process. STATEMENT OF CAUSE 1. The PRDE did not perform an effective review procedure over the reimbursement supporting documentation before the authorization of the payment. 2. Before reimbursements are processed, the PRDE has no established internal control or procedure requiring the private schools to submit receiving report for equipment purchases. 3. The PRDE lack of training or oversight on proper accounting practices, which leads to equipment expenses being coded incorrectly in account E6170 rather than the proper E5000 series. POSSIBLE ASSERTED EFFECT 1. If the PRDE issue reimbursement payment without the invoice, this could lead the PRDE to incur improper payments. 2. The PRDE lack of obtaining the receiving report for equipment purchases could lead to the reimbursing unallowable costs under the Federal program. Without proper documentation, it becomes difficult to verify whether the equipment purchases were legitimate and necessary for the program. 3. The PRDE incorrect accounting of equipment expenses could result in inaccurate financial reporting and a potential noncompliance issue with Federal regulations that require proper codification of expenses. IDENTIFICATION OF REPEAT FINDING Not previously reported. RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend that the PRDE review the Restart Fiscal Process Guide in order to include a requirement for private schools to submit receiving reports or equivalent documentation to substantiate equipment purchases prior to reimbursement. Provide training to all relevant personnel on the importance of accurate accounting and documentation, particularly for equipment purchases, and ensure that such expenses are properly coded. Implement a review process to verify that equipment reimbursements are supported by the required receiving report, invoice and that disbursements are coded appropriately in the accounting system (SIFDE). VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS The PRDE does not agree with the recommendation to revise the Restart Fiscal Process Guide to require private schools to submit a receiving report or equivalent documentation to substantiate equipment purchases prior to reimbursement. These transactions correspond to reimbursements, not direct purchases made by PRDE; therefore, verification is performed through proof of payment submitted by the schools. When auditors requested confirmation of receipt, PRDE obtained photographs of the equipment from the schools to provide additional verification that the items were in the school. In addition, the PRDE wants to clarify that where quotations were used instead of invoices, the private schools provided valid proof of payment that matched the quotations submitted. This evidence demonstrated that the purchases were completed and consistent with the approved documentation, meeting the requirements for allowable and verifiable costs under Federal regulations. The PRDE does not agree with the recommendation to change the accounting classification or to implement additional review procedures related to the use of account E6170, “Donations and Contributions to Private Entities.” The use of account E6170 is appropriate given the nature of the transaction, which reflects a reimbursement to a private school rather than a direct purchase by PRDE that would otherwise be recorded under account E5500. The PRDE acknowledges the deficiencies noted during the audit regarding the omission of reimbursed equipment purchases from the PRDE Property and Equipment Register. To address this, the PRDE has prepared a list of reimbursed equipment purchased by private schools under the Restart Program. This list will be provided to the personnel responsible for maintaining the register to ensure the inclusion of these items in the Property and Equipment Register, in compliance with the capitalization and accountability requirements established in the Restart Fiscal Process Guide. The corrective action is scheduled for implementation on or before the end of the current fiscal year. Auditor Comment on Management Response for Finding No. 2024-003 In relation to situation #2 comments, the PRDE didn’t have evidence of the receiving report, which is required for all other purchases of equipment for which the PRDE is the owner. Internal controls over property and equipment should be the same for all equipment for which the PRDE is the owner. In relation to situation #3, all equipment purchased and registered in this account was not included in the inventory of the PRDE, because the general ledger account used is not recognized for purchase of property and equipment, instead is a general ledger account for donations. Further, in accordance with the “Guia de Procesos Fiscales – Fondos Programa Restart”, it is established that all reimbursement of equipment should be recorded in accounts E5000 or E4414. This is because the system recognizes that an addition of equipment was made and must be capitalized. IMPLEMENTATION DATE In process. RESPONSIBLE PERSON María de los A. Lizardi Valdés Office of Federal Affairs Director Edgar Delgado Serrano Office of Federal Affairs Associate Director Hamir M. Mojica Mojica Program Coordinator
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: HIV Prevention Activities: Non-Governmental Organization Based Assistance Listing Number: 93.939 Federal Award Identification Number: NU65PS923746 Award Period: July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Compliance – Reporting Criteria or specific requirement: Per 2 CFR §200.302 and §200.328, recipients of federal awards must provide accurate, current, and complete disclosure of financial results of each federally-sponsored project or program in accordance with the reporting requirements of the federal awarding agency. Condition: It was noted that the expenditures reported on the FFR matched the cash receipts for the period rather than the actual expenditures incurred. Questioned costs: $45,667 Context: During the testing of reporting compliance of the contract during the fiscal year ended 6/30/24, we identified errors in the interim Federal Financial Report (FFR) reporting during the period of 4/1/23-9/30/23 for the actual expenditures in the amount of $45,667. This overstatement in reporting of expenditures at the time of the report submission remained unspent for extended periods, contrary to federal requirements. Cause: The Organization lacked effective internal controls to reconcile actual expenditures incurred within reporting periods. The process relied on estimates and did not include timely reconciliation of actual costs. Effect: This deficiency resulted in noncompliance with federal reporting requirements. It also indicates a reasonable possibility that material noncompliance with federal requirements may not be prevented or detected and corrected on a timely basis. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that management implement procedures to ensure that expenditures reported on the Federal Financial Report reflect actual costs incurred during the reporting period and are supported by appropriate documentation. Staff responsible for preparing the Federal Financial Report should be trained in federal reporting requirements to ensure compliance. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. See Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING NO. 2024-005 PROGRAM REPORTS AND ACCOUNTING RECORDS Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program: Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.228 Community Development Block Grants/State’s Program and Non- Entitlement Grants in Hawaii Federal Award No: B-18-DP-72-0001 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Questioned Costs: None Repeated Finding: Yes Criteria: The subrecipient agreement between the Bank and the Puerto Rico Department of Housing (PRDOH), establishes in the Terms and Conditions Part IV. Performance, Monitoring and Reporting, Section B. Reporting, that the Bank as Subrecipient shall submit regular monthly progress reports to the PRDOH, on the form and with the content to be specified and required by the PRDOH. Moreover, the subrecipient agreement between the Bank and the PRDOH, establishes in the Terms and Conditions Section Part III-Scope of Work, sub-section A. (2), that all services shall be made in accordance with PRDOH guidelines, HUD guidelines and regulations, and other applicable state and federal laws and regulations. The CDBG-DR Financial Policy of the Puerto Rico Department of Housing, (the Financial Policy), in its Part 7 Accounting Records and Systems, Section 7.1.2 Subrecipient Accounting Records, establishes that the Bank as subrecipient is responsible for ensuring that separate accounting are maintained for CDBG-DR funds in its internal accounting system and records. These records should, to the extend possible, be developed to be consistent with PRDOH CDBG-DR general accounting and recordkeeping policies. Also, the Financial Policy in its Part 13 Reconciliations, establishes that the Bank as subrecipient, must have procedures in place to reconcile accounts and reports by comparing revenues and expenditures against disbursements for CDBG- DR funded activities. The subrecipient must: Maintain in its accounting records the amounts budgeted for eligible activities. Compare actual obligations and expenditures to date against planned obligations and expenditures: and Report deviations from budget and program plans and request approval for budget and program plan revisions. The Code of Federal Regulations, 2 C.F.R., Part 200, Subpart D, Section 200.302 (b) (2), establishes that the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. Condition and Context: Monthly Reporting The Bank uses the Grant Compliance Portal (GCP) to submit Administrative and Performance Reports to the PRDOH. The GCP is a performance reporting system created for PRDOH to monitor regular monthly progress by the subrecipient for administrative and performance activities. The GCP is independent of other systems used for the underwriting, approval, closeout and billing of the grants to PRDOH. As such, requires the manual input of the information monthly. Once the Bank completes the information in the GCP, it is reviewed by PRDOH. Review notes related to the performance of the Bank are added before finalizing the report. The signed report by all the points of contact is kept by the Bank as evidence of compliance with the submission of the Administrative and Performance Reports by the due date. We compared the amount of grants awarded as per the Administrative and Performance Reports submitted to the PRDOH with the amount reported in the Schedule of Expenditures and Federal Awards as of June 30, 2024. We noted a difference of $25,766,191 due to grants awarded from January 2024 through June 2024 were not reflected in the Administrative and Performance Reports. This caused a discrepancy in the cumulative actual total amount of grants awarded for the year that impacts the results in the monitoring of performance by PRDOH. The Bank needs to reconcile the figures with the accounting system to confirm the information for the period is properly reflected in the Administrative and Performance Reports before the submission of the report to ensure the monitoring performed by PRDOH is based on correct and reliable information. Accounting Records and Reconciliations In relation to the CDBG-DR Fund, although disbursements are recorded in a separate fund, the Bank does not present, on a monthly basis, the revenues, expenses, assets, and liabilities in the Bank’s general ledger. Instead, the Bank is recording the transactions as revenues, expenses, assets, and liabilities related to the CDBG-DR fund at year end. The CDBG-DR fund activity is monitored in another system that is maintained parallel to the Bank’s general ledger. This additional system is used for the reporting process but is not monitored and reconciled jointly with the Bank’s general ledger. Entity level controls related to monthly approvals, reconciliations, actual versus budget comparisons, and other financial reporting controls are performed in another system that does not make automatic interface with the Bank’s general ledger. The trial balance maintained by management for internal and external reporting related to CDBG-DR funds had not been reconciled with the subsidiary records for grant expenditures, including both direct and indirect costs. Cause: The management of the Bank has not implemented effective internal control procedures that permit the proper reconciliation of the amount of grants awarded per accounting records with the amounts disclosed in the Administrative and Performance Reports. Effect: The absence of proper internal controls in the areas of program reports and accounting records causes the Bank to fall in noncompliance with federal reporting requirements and the terms and conditions as established in the subrecipient agreement. This matter may result in material differences or errors that could not be detected and resolved on a timely basis and consequently we consider that the above conditions are material weaknesses in internal control over compliance. Recommendation: The Bank should ensure, specifically to the CDBG-DR Fund, that adequate procedures and internal controls related to monthly review, reconciliation and approval are in place to ensure that proper monthly accounting is maintained and that the awarded grants per accounting records are reconciled and agreed to the balances as disclosed in the Administrative and Performance Reports. Evidence of such reconciliations must be maintained as support for the reconciliation procedures performed.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH REPORTING REQUIREMENTS, CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS, ASSISTANCE LISTING No. 21.027, DIRECT ALLOCATION, YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2024 Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.302 and the CSLFRF Compliance Supplement, recipients are required to accurately report all expenditures on the Annual Project and Expenditure Report. Adequate internal controls must be in place to ensure the completeness and accuracy of federal reporting. Condition: During our audit, we noted that the government did not correctly report expenditures on its Annual Project and Expenditure Report for the CSLFRF program. Reported expenditures did not agree to the underlying accounting records. Cause: The city does not have internal control procedures in place that allow it to comply with reporting standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance and the OMB Compliance Supplement. Further, there was no independent review or approval of the report prior to submission. Effect: Non-compliance with program terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We recommend that the government establish and implement formal internal controls over the preparation and review of the Annual Project and Expenditure Report. This should include an independent review and approval process to ensure that all reported expenditures are accurate and agree to the underlying accounting records. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
2024-001 - Cash Management Federal Program Information: EPA - Direct Award: ALN - 66.468 – Drinking Water State Revolving Funds Criteria: The following CFR(s) apply to this finding: 2 CFR Section 200.302(b)(6) Condition: During audit procedures, it was identified that the client did not have a written cash management policy. Cause: There was a change in personnel responsible for federal grants. Effect: Transactions could occur that did not comply with federal regulations. Identification of Questioned Costs: None identified. Context: The finding was based on requesting the Town’s written financial policies related to federal compliance and therefore was not the result of a statistical sample. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Unit implement internal control processes and procedures to ensure that policies are in compliance with federal regulations. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Please see the Corrective Action Plan issued by the Town of Bristol, Vermont.
FINDING 2024-201 Multiple errors were identified in the amounts reported on the Rehabilitation Services Administration (RSA) reports required for the Rehabilitation Services-Vocational Rehabilitation Grants to States. Type of Finding: Material Weakness, Material Noncompliance Assistance Listing Title: Rehabilitation Services - Vocational Rehabilitation Grants to States Assistance Listing Number: 84.126 Federal Award Number: H126A220017, H126A230017, H126A240017 Program Year: October 1, 2021 – September 30, 2023, October 1, 2022 – September 30, 2024, October 1, 2023 – September 30, 2024 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education, Rehabilitation Services Administration Compliance Requirement: Reporting Questioned Costs: None Criteria: The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR 200.303) requires that a nonfederal entity receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls that provide reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions in the federal award. Section 2 CFR 200.400 contains the policy guide for cost principles related to federal grant administration. Paragraph (a) states that the nonfederal entity is responsible for the efficient and effective administration of the federal award through the application of sound management practices. Paragraph (d) states that the accounting practices of the nonfederal entity must be consistent with these cost principles and support the accumulation of costs as required by the principles and must provide for adequate documentation to support costs charged to the federal award. Section CFR 200.302 – Financial Management states that federal award recipient’s financial management system must identify all federal awards received and expended and the federal programs under which they were received. Additionally, they must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of federal funds for federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition: The RSA requires the Commission to submit financial reports quarterly. The reports are cumulative and cover the entire grant period through to the end of the reporting period. The RSA also requires a final report at the end of the grant period. The Vocational Rehabilitation Basic Services (BS) Grants are issued for an initial 12-month period. If State match requirements are met within the initial period, recipients qualify for an additional 12-month carryover period to spend any unobligated federal funds. Including the carryover period, the federal fiscal year 2024 grant period is October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2025. The Commission identifies the grant periods using the initials BS and the last two digits of the grant year. During State fiscal year 2024, there were three grants open: BS22, BS23, and BS24. We tested four quarterly reports that reported on the periods within State fiscal year 2024. We identified errors in 3 of the 4 quarterly reports. We also identified errors in the final report for the federal fiscal year 2022 grant which ended on September 30, 2023. The following errors were identified: BS23 – Report Period July 1, 2023, to September 30, 2023 • Line 21 Total Federal Program Income Received: The reported amount was $47,300, and the supporting documentation showed $43,700, resulting in a $3,600 overstatement. This error carried forward to all subsequent quarterly reports because the amounts reported were cumulative. • Line 38A Required Pre-ETS Services Provided: The amount reported was $47,755. The Commission could not provide any documentation to support that amount or provide an explanation for how the amount was calculated. This error carried forward to all subsequent quarterly reports because the amounts reported were cumulative. • Line 38B Authorized Pre-ETS Services Provided: The amount reported was $73,708. The Commission could not provide any documentation to support that amount or provide an explanation for how the amount was calculated. This error carried forward to all subsequent quarterly reports because the amounts reported were cumulative. • Line 39G Transition Services to Youth and Students: The amount reported was $211,595; however, the supporting schedule showed $199,194 resulting in a $12,401 overstatement. The Commission included expenditures outside of the reporting period. • Line 41 Total Innovation and Expansion Expenditures: The amount reported was $20,943. The Commission could not provide any documentation to support that amount or provide an explanation for how the amount was calculated. BS23 – Report Period October 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023 • Line 39G Transition Services to Youth and Students: The amount reported was $211,594; however, the supporting schedule showed $227,249 resulting in a $15,655 understatement. The Commission included expenditures outside of the reporting period. • Line 41 Total Innovation and Expansion Expenditures: The amount reported was $20,943; however, the supporting schedule showed $10,472 resulting in a $10,471 overstatement. BS23 – Report Period January 1, 2024, to March 31, 2024 • Line 39E Business Enterprise Program (Randolph-Sheppard Program): The reported amount was $383,399; however, the supporting schedule showed $383,399 resulting in a $46,380 overstatement. • Line 39G Transition Services to Youth and Students: The amount reported was $254,977, however, the supporting schedule showed $249,977 resulting in a $4,303 overstatement. The Commission included expenditures outside of the reporting period. BS22 – Report Period October 1, 2021, to September 30, 2023 (Final report for federal fiscal year 2022 grant) • Line 21 Total Federal Program Income Received: The reported amount was $0; however, the supporting schedules showed $43,700 resulting in a $43,700 understatement. • Line 37 Administrative Expenditures: The reported amount was $853,677; however, the supporting schedules showed $1,399,438 resulting in a $545,761 understatement. • Line 38A Required Pre-ETS Services Provided: The reported amount was $302,972; however, the supporting schedules showed $287,258 resulting in a $15,714 overstatement. • Line 38B Authorized Pre-ETS Services Provided: The reported amount was $44,151; however, the supporting schedules showed $75,110 resulting in a $30,959 understatement. • Line 39E Business Enterprise Program (Randolph-Sheppard Program): The reported amount was $372,887; however, the supporting schedule showed $438,558 resulting in a $65,671 understatement. • Line 39G Transition Services to Youth and Students: The amount reported was $91,966; however, the supporting schedule showed $76,407 resulting in a $15,559 overstatement. • Line 41 Total Innovation and Expansion Expenditures: The amount reported was $104,647; however, the supporting schedule showed $83,903 resulting in a $20,744 overstatement. We also noted an error while testing compliance with the Matching and Level of Effort requirements using amounts reported on the final RSA-17 report for the federal fiscal year 2022 grant. The Commission reported $835,255 as total State expenditures; however, the amount recorded in STARS was $566,698, resulting in a $268,557 overstatement. Cause: The Commission has designed a procedure to detect errors in reporting prior to issuance. The reports are compiled by one individual and reviewed by a second individual prior to issuing them to the federal agency. However, the review did not detect the errors indicating that the staff completing these reviews did not have adequate knowledge to ensure this internal control was effective. Our testing found that two of the three quarterly reports with errors were not reviewed prior to submission. The Commission could not provide an explanation for the errors. Effect: The RSA uses the RSA-17 reports to determine compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Incorrect reporting can affect both the ability to cover current obligations and the amount of future federal grant awards received by the State of Idaho. The total errors in the quarterly reports were overstatements of $219,561 and understatements of $15,655. The total errors in the final report for the federal fiscal year 2022 grant were overstatements of $271,578 and understatements of $701,746. The aggregated errors are a $229,262 understatement of costs. Recommendation: We recommend that the Commission design and implement procedures to ensure accurate federal grant reporting and retain appropriate documentation to support the amounts reported. We also recommend that the Commission review prior submissions, identify correct reporting, and communicate with the federal grantor about resubmitting corrected reports. Providing appropriate training and staff recruitment is critical to ensuring the internal controls are effective in preventing or detecting errors. Management’s View: Agree - These errors in quarterly and final RSA-17 reports are acknowledged, and immediate measures are being taken to address root causes Corrective Action • Accurate Financial Reporting: ICBVI will develop detailed procedures to ensure all amounts reported on federal forms are reconciled to supporting documentation in the accounting system (Luma) prior to submission. • Review and Oversight: A two-person review process will be formalized, ensuring every report is checked for accuracy by a knowledgeable reviewer before submission. • Documentation and Training: Supporting documentation for all line items will be archived securely. Staff will receive training in federal grant reporting standards. Auditor’s Concluding Remarks: We thank the Commission for its cooperation and assistance throughout the audit.
FINDING 2024-230 The Department did not provide documented support to verify the accuracy of a Low-Income Home Energy Assistance (LIHEAP) performance report. Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency, Noncompliance AL Title: Low-Income Home Energy Assistance AL Number: 93.568 Federal Award Number: 2101IDLIE4, 2201IDLIE4, 2301IDLIEE, 2401IDLIEA, 2401IDLIEI Program Year: October 1, 2020 – September 30, 2022, October 1, 2021 – September 30, 2023, October 1, 2022 – September 30, 2024, October 1, 2023 – September 30, 2025 Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Requirement: Reporting Questioned Costs: None Criteria: The U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) included in 2 CFR 200.303 requires that nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. The Internal Control Integrated Framework published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) identifies control activities that help ensure management directives are carried out and risks are mitigated. These activities include approvals, authorizations, verifications, reconciliations, and segregation of duties. The Uniform Guidance included in 2 CFR 200.302(b)(3) states that the recipient's financial management system must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of federal funds for federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition: During fiscal year 2024, the Department was required to submit one LIHEAP performance report to the Federal Government. The Department’s LIHEAP program manager compiled and submitted the report to the Office of Community Services. The Department was unable to provide the supporting documentation to confirm the accuracy of the information included in the report. Cause: The Department did not design and implement an internal control to ensure that sufficient documentation was maintained to support the accuracy of the required report. Effect: Without documented support for the LIHEAP performance report, there is an increased risk of errors occurring and going undetected. Recommendation: We recommend that the Department maintain sufficient documentation to support information in LIHEAP performance reports. Management’s View: The Department Agrees with this Finding. Corrective Action: A process was developed that includes obtaining and documenting approval by the Bureau Chief. This process was shared with LSO following receipt of the FY23 review findings. Supporting documents can be provided again as needed. Auditor’s Concluding Remarks: We thank the Department for its cooperation and assistance throughout the audit. The corrective action referenced above was not completed, by the Department’s own admission, until March 25, 2025, which would have been significantly after the fiscal year 2023 issuance of the Single Audit Report, and also would have left fiscal year 2024 and most of fiscal year 2025 without proper internal controls in place. Without an appropriate control in place the Department continued to risk errors in the report going undetected and uncorrected until March of 2025 which could lead to noncompliance.
FINDING 2024-237 The Division could not provide supporting documentation for amounts included on the Rehabilitation Services Administration (RSA) reports required under the Rehabilitation Services-Vocational Rehabilitation Grants to States. Type of Finding: Material Weakness, Material Noncompliance Assistance Listing Title: Rehabilitation Services – Vocational Rehabilitation Grants to States Assistance Listing Number: 84.126 Federal Award Number: H126A240016, H126A220016, H126A210016 Program Year: October 1, 2020 – September 30, 2022; October 1, 2021 – September 30, 2023; October 1, 2023 – September 30, 2024 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education, Rehabilitation Services Administration Compliance Requirement: Reporting Questioned Costs: $1,445,110 Known Criteria: The Internal Control Integrated Framework published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) identifies control activities that help ensure management directives are carried out throughout the operation. Verifications, approvals, and authorizations are all control activities that support this objective. The U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), 2 CFR 200.303, states that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Section CFR 200.302 – Financial Management states that federal award recipient’s financial management system must identify all federal awards received and expended and the federal programs under which they were received. Additionally, they must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of federal funds for federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition: The RSA requires the Division to submit financial reports (RSA-17) every 6 months. The reports are cumulative and cover the entire grant period through to the end of the reporting period. Reporting periods end on March 31 and September 30. If the reporting period is the final report for the grant, the report is due 120 days after the close of the period. All other reports are due 30 days after the close of the period. Grants are issued for an initial 12-month period. If State match requirements are met within the initial period, recipients qualify for an additional 12-month carryover period to spend any unobligated federal funds. Including the carryover period, the federal fiscal year 2024 grant period is October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2025. In State fiscal year 2024, there were 3 grants open – federal fiscal years 2022, 2023, and 2024. The Division was required to submit 4 reports for these grants. We compared the federal expenditure amounts reported for the grant in total and for the Pre-Employment Transition Services (Pre-ETS) to the amounts in Luma and found errors in all 4 as follows: Total Expenditures Grant Year Report Period End RSA-17 Amount Luma Amount Difference Federal Fiscal Year 2022 9/30/23 $14,601,067 $13,941,207 $659,860 Federal Fiscal Year 2023 9/30/23 $7,633,338 $7,465,827 $167,511 Federal Fiscal Year 2023 3/31/24 $16,823,595 $16,661,795 $161,800 Federal Fiscal Year 2024 3/31/24 $2,007,420 $2,077,874 $(70,454) TOTAL $918,717 Pre-ETS Grant Year Report Period End RSA-17 Amount Luma Amount Difference Federal Fiscal Year 2022 9/30/23 $2,579,855 $2,991,527 $(411,672) Federal Fiscal Year 2023 9/30/23 $3,083,866 $2,869,311 $214,555 Federal Fiscal Year 2023 3/31/24 $5,596,382 $5,005,941 $590,441 Federal Fiscal Year 2024 3/31/24 $211,681 $78,612 $133,069 TOTAL $526,393 Cause: Reports were prepared by former employees, and the current personnel could not determine why the reported amounts did not match Luma. Further, supporting documentation was not retained by the Division, which might have provided insight into the differences. Effect: The RSA uses the RSA-17 reports to determine compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Incorrect reporting can affect both the ability to cover current obligations and the amount of future federal grant awards received by the State of Idaho. We are questioning the amount that Division cannot support for reported total expenditures and pre-ETS expenditures of $918,717 and $526,393, respectively. Recommendation: We recommend that the Division design and implement procedures to ensure accurate federal grant reporting and retain appropriate documentation to support the amounts reported. We also recommend that the Division review prior submissions, identify correct reporting, and communicate with the federal grantor about resubmitting corrected reports. Management’s View: The issues uncovered during the single audit are in alignment with challenges and weaknesses uncovered over the last 17 months. As such, we are in agreement with the seven identified findings specified in the Management letter. The Division will ensure the accuracy, reliability, and sufficient supporting documentation of financial data pulled from the state accounting system of record (LUMA) that is reported on all RSA-17 reports by implementing effective internal controls, verification procedures, and record retention practices in compliance with 2 CFR 200.302 and 2 CFR 200.303. Corrective Action: 1.1 Establish Accurate Reporting Procedures: Develop and implement procedures for preparing, reviewing, and approving all RSA financial reports, including step-by-step reconciliation. 1.2 Ensure Documentation and Audit Trail: Maintain comprehensive supporting documentation for all amounts reported, including detailed reconciliations, adjustments, and source data, in accordance with requirements for traceable and verifiable records. 1.3 Strengthen Internal Controls and Oversight: Implement Strategic Leadership review of all reports prior to submission to the Rehabilitation Services Administration to confirm data accuracy and compliance with reporting requirements. 1.4 Complete a Restatement of RSA-17 Reports: Review previously submitted RSA-17 reports for fiscal years 2022–2024, determine accurate expenditure amounts, and coordinate with RSA to correct and resubmit revised reports, if necessary. Auditor’s Concluding Remarks: We thank the Division for its cooperation and assistance throughout the audit. While the Division’s corrective action plans indicate that portions are complete, because they have occurred outside of the period under audit, we have not reviewed those actions to see that they are effective at addressing the issues identified.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Homeland Security Pass-Through Agency: Central Office of Recovery, Reconstruction and Resiliency of Puerto Rico (COR3) Program: Disaster Grants – Public Assistance (Presidentially-Declared Disaster) (ALN 97.036) Compliance Requirement: Reporting (L) Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control (SD), Instance of Noncompliance (NC) This finding is similar to prior year finding 2023-009. Statement of Condition In our Reporting Test, we evaluated the Quarterly Progress Reports of a total of nine (9) projects for two quarters of fiscal year 2023-2024. During our audit procedures, we noted that the reports did not agree with the accounting and project records. Criteria 2 CFR 200.302 (a) states that the states’ and other non-Federal entities’ financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Also, 2 CFR 200.302 (b) (2) states that the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. Cause of Condition The Municipality’s accounting controls and procedures fail to ensure accurate, current and complete disclosure of the financial results of federal assisted activities. Effect of Condition The expenses reported in the Quarterly Progress Reports do not agree with the accounting records. Recommendation We recommend the Program Administrators reconcile the differences between the quarterly report and the accounting records before the submission to the pass-through entity. Questioned Costs None Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action We will give instructions to the accounting staff in charge of the preparation of the quarterly progress reports of the Program, in order to comply with the FEMA reporting requirements. Responsible Official: Mrs. Irma M. Vargas Aguirre, Finance and Budget Director Implementation Date: December 31, 2025
2024-001: Reconciliations and Material Adjustments Questioned Costs: None How the questioned costs were computed: N/A Grant Funding Source Grant Period Head Start U.S. Department of Health 06/01/2023 - 05/31/2024 10CH010945-05 and Human Services Early Head Start U.S. Department of Health 07/01/2023 - 06/30/2024 Child Care Partnerships and Human Services 10HP000422-04 Condition: At the time of audit fieldwork, Umatilla-Morrow Head Start, Inc. had not reconciled all account balances. As a result, Wipfli, LLP proposed and management posted adjusting journal entries to contributions receivable, grants receivable, refundable advance, accrued liabilities, operating right of use assets and lease obligations, property and equipment, grant revenue, in-kind, and net assets with donor restrictions. As Umatilla-Morrow Head Start, Inc.’s internal controls did not discover these adjustments prior to our audit, a material weakness exists in Umatilla-Morrow Head Start, Inc.’s internal controls over financial reporting. Criteria: Federal Regulation 2 CFR 200.302(4) requires that an organization have…Effective control over, and accountability for, all funds, property, and other assets. Cause: During the audit year, Umatilla-Morrow Head Start, Inc. experienced turnover in its business office which contributed to the lack of timely reconciliations, review of reconciliations performed, and subsequent adjustments to account balances. Repeat: Yes - Years as repeat finding: Five 2023-001 Effect: As a result of the lack of segregation of duties surrounding bank reconciliations and not reconciling all account balances resulting in subsequent adjustments to accounts, a material weakness exists in internal controls over financial reporting. Recommendation: Accounts should be reconciled monthly with the adjustments posted timely so that management is relying on accurate financial information to make decisions. We recommend management and those charged with governance evaluate the operation of the business office and implement adequate and timely closing procedures to ensure that financial statement amounts are being reconciled, reviewed, and adjusted in a timely manner. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the assessment and subsequent to year end, steps were taken to correct the matter.
2024-001: Reconciliations and Material Adjustments Questioned Costs: None How the questioned costs were computed: N/A Grant Funding Source Grant Period Head Start U.S. Department of Health 06/01/2023 - 05/31/2024 10CH010945-05 and Human Services Early Head Start U.S. Department of Health 07/01/2023 - 06/30/2024 Child Care Partnerships and Human Services 10HP000422-04 Condition: At the time of audit fieldwork, Umatilla-Morrow Head Start, Inc. had not reconciled all account balances. As a result, Wipfli, LLP proposed and management posted adjusting journal entries to contributions receivable, grants receivable, refundable advance, accrued liabilities, operating right of use assets and lease obligations, property and equipment, grant revenue, in-kind, and net assets with donor restrictions. As Umatilla-Morrow Head Start, Inc.’s internal controls did not discover these adjustments prior to our audit, a material weakness exists in Umatilla-Morrow Head Start, Inc.’s internal controls over financial reporting. Criteria: Federal Regulation 2 CFR 200.302(4) requires that an organization have…Effective control over, and accountability for, all funds, property, and other assets. Cause: During the audit year, Umatilla-Morrow Head Start, Inc. experienced turnover in its business office which contributed to the lack of timely reconciliations, review of reconciliations performed, and subsequent adjustments to account balances. Repeat: Yes - Years as repeat finding: Five 2023-001 Effect: As a result of the lack of segregation of duties surrounding bank reconciliations and not reconciling all account balances resulting in subsequent adjustments to accounts, a material weakness exists in internal controls over financial reporting. Recommendation: Accounts should be reconciled monthly with the adjustments posted timely so that management is relying on accurate financial information to make decisions. We recommend management and those charged with governance evaluate the operation of the business office and implement adequate and timely closing procedures to ensure that financial statement amounts are being reconciled, reviewed, and adjusted in a timely manner. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the assessment and subsequent to year end, steps were taken to correct the matter.
Material Weakness in Internal Control over Federal Programs Inadequate Internal Controls over Financial Management in Accordance with the Uniform Guidance – Reporting Review and Approval Assistance Listing Number: 93.129 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: Technical and Non-Financial Assistance to Health Centers Name of Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Name of Pass-Through Entities: N/A WI DHS Contract Number: 435100-G24-226233-490 Profile ID #: 155043 Name of State Program: WI Primary Care 2 CFR §200.302 Financial Management: The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 200.302 requires that nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. - All recipient and subrecipient financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal Award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by the terms and conditions; and tracking expenditures to establish that funds have been used in accordance with Federal Statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal Award. -Maintaining records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal Awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. The State Award is passed through from the Federal government and is required to follow the Uniform Guidance as well. Management’s grant tracking for Federal Awards were not properly updated or reviewed and approved during the year. Due to staff turnover during the year, Management was unable to provide the general ledger information that reconciles to the grant cost reimbursement requests submitted to the funding sources. In addition, Management was unable to provide supporting documentation that information submitted to the funding sources was reviewed and approved. There is an increased risk that the Organization could potentially charge unallowable costs to Federal or State Awards. In addition, there is an increased risk that a material misstatement of the financial statements or the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards may not be prevented, or detected and corrected, in a timely manner. WHPCA hired a new third party accountant after the end of the fiscal year and has been working with the new accountant to implement additional monitoring and review and approval procedures. We recommend that WHPCA continues this process to strengthen its internal controls. No Staff at WHPCA are dedicated to adhering to the regulations. WHPCA has hired a third-party accountant as well as implemented additional monitoring and review and approval procedures to strengthen its financial management.
Material Weakness in Internal Control over Federal Programs Inadequate Internal Controls over Financial Management in Accordance with the Uniform Guidance – Reporting Review and Approval Assistance Listing Number: 93.129 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: Technical and Non-Financial Assistance to Health Centers Name of Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Name of Pass-Through Entities: N/A WI DHS Contract Number: 435100-G24-226233-490 Profile ID #: 155043 Name of State Program: WI Primary Care 2 CFR §200.302 Financial Management: The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 200.302 requires that nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. - All recipient and subrecipient financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal Award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by the terms and conditions; and tracking expenditures to establish that funds have been used in accordance with Federal Statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal Award. -Maintaining records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal Awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. The State Award is passed through from the Federal government and is required to follow the Uniform Guidance as well. Management’s grant tracking for Federal Awards were not properly updated or reviewed and approved during the year. Due to staff turnover during the year, Management was unable to provide the general ledger information that reconciles to the grant cost reimbursement requests submitted to the funding sources. In addition, Management was unable to provide supporting documentation that information submitted to the funding sources was reviewed and approved. There is an increased risk that the Organization could potentially charge unallowable costs to Federal or State Awards. In addition, there is an increased risk that a material misstatement of the financial statements or the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards may not be prevented, or detected and corrected, in a timely manner. WHPCA hired a new third party accountant after the end of the fiscal year and has been working with the new accountant to implement additional monitoring and review and approval procedures. We recommend that WHPCA continues this process to strengthen its internal controls. No Staff at WHPCA are dedicated to adhering to the regulations. WHPCA has hired a third-party accountant as well as implemented additional monitoring and review and approval procedures to strengthen its financial management.