Finding 2025-001: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles – Improper expenditure recognition Federal Program Name: Title II, Part A, Teacher & Principal Training and Recruiting Assistance Listing Number: 84.367A Federal Agency Name: U.S. Department of Education Passed-Through Agency Name: Texas Department of Education Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement Per 2 CFR 200.302 and 200.303, management is responsible for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of all financial records and related information, as well as for establishing and maintaining effective internal controls over grant reporting and compliance. Condition During the current fiscal year, grant expenditures initially included $291,666 for services scheduled to be provided in the subsequent fiscal year. Cause In preparing its financial records for the year ended June 30, 2025, the District did not identify expenditures recorded in the incorrect fiscal year. The failure to detect these errors in a timely manner indicates that closing procedures— specifically the monitoring and review of financial information—were not performed effectively. Effect or Potential Effect The District’s internal control system did not prevent, or timely detect and correct, misstatements in its financial records. Ineffective monitoring and closing procedures increase the risk that errors or irregularities may occur and remain undetected. Questioned Costs None Context or Perspective Information Improper recognition of expenditures could result in misstatements reported to awarding agencies and inaccuracies in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards, potentially affecting the determination of major programs subject to single audit testing. The expenditures identified above were ultimately removed from current year activity and were excluded from the year-end reimbursement request. Recommendation We recommend that the District provide additional training to staff responsible for preparing year-end grant expenditure reports to strengthen accuracy. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan
2025-002 - Lack of Written Federal Program Policies. Type: Material Weakness. Condition: The Village does not have documented policies and procedures specific to the administration of the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds program. This includes the absence of written guidance on key compliance areas such as payments, procurement, allowability of costs charged to federal programs, compensation, and travel costs under Uniform Guidance. Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.303 and 200.331 of the Uniform Guidance, non-federal entities are required to establish and maintain effective internal controls and written policies to ensure compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of federal awards. These policies should be tailored to the specific requirements of each federal program. Cause: The entity has not developed formal written policies and procedures for the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds program, possibly due to reliance on informal practices or general administrative policies that do not address federal-specific requirements. Effect: Without documented policies, there is an increased risk of noncompliance with federal requirements, inconsistent program administration, and lack of accountability. This may result in questioned costs, audit findings, or potential repayment of federal funds. Recommendation: We recommend that the Village develop and implement written policies and procedures specific to the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds program. These should include: - Payments in accordance with §200.302 (6), - Procurement in accordance with §200.318, - Allowability of costs charged to federal programs in accordance with §200.302 (7), - Compensation in accordance with §200.430 and §200.431, - Travel costs in accordance with §200.474. Training should also be provided to staff responsible for administering the program to ensure consistent application of these policies. Views of Responsible Officials: Management acknowledges the auditor’s finding regarding the absence of formally documented federal program policies. We recognize the importance of maintaining written procedures to ensure consistent compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements and to strengthen internal controls over federal awards. While informal practices have historically guided our federal program administration, we agree that formalizing these policies will enhance transparency, accountability, and operational efficiency. Management is currently in the process of developing written policies covering key areas such as procurement, allowable costs, subrecipient monitoring, and cash management. We anticipate completing this documentation and implementing the policies by February 28, 2026. We are committed to continuous improvement and appreciate the auditor’s recommendations as part of our efforts to maintain strong compliance and stewardship of federal funds.
Finding: 2025-001 Incomplete Tenant Records – Section 8 HCV Program (ALN 14.871) Condition: During our review of forty (40) tenant files under the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) Program, we identified multiple instances of missing documentation and compliance lapses: 1. For one (1) tenant, income verification was not performed for the current year, and prior year income was rolled forward. The HUD-50058 (Family Report) form was reviewed in the PIC system but was not present in the tenant file. 2. For one (1) tenant, the Approved Lease, HUD-52517 (Request for Tenancy Approval), and HUD- 52641 (HAP Contract) forms were not present in the tenant file. Criteria: Under 2 CFR § 200.303, non-Federal entities are required to “establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.” Additionally, 2 CFR § 200.302(b)(3) mandates that entities “maintain records which adequately identify the source and application of funds provided for federally-assisted activities.” HUD regulations governing the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program (ALN 14.871) further require that tenant files include complete and timely documentation of income verification, lease approvals, and execution of required HUD forms such as HUD-50058 (Family Report), HUD-52517 (Request for Tenancy Approval), and HUD-52641 (Housing Assistance Payments Contract). These documents are essential to support eligibility determinations and ensure accurate Housing Assistance Payments. Cause: The deficiencies appear to result from inconsistent implementation of file maintenance procedures and inadequate internal controls over documentation and compliance tracking. There may also be a lack of staff training or oversight regarding HUD documentation requirements. Effect: Incomplete tenant records compromise the Housing Authority’s ability to demonstrate compliance with HUD regulations and the proper use of Federal funds. Missing documentation such as income verification and executed lease agreements may result in eligibility determinations that cannot be substantiated, increasing the risk of noncompliance. These issues could lead to program findings, reputational harm, or future funding restrictions if not addressed. Questioned Costs: There were no determinable questioned costs identified during the review. While documentation gaps were noted, the absence of supporting records did not allow for a reliable calculation of financial impact. Recommendation: We recommend that the Housing Authority strengthen internal controls over tenant file documentation by implementing a standardized checklist to ensure all required forms and records are consistently retained. Staff should receive periodic training on HUD documentation and compliance requirements to reinforce expectations and reduce errors. Management should also conduct routine internal reviews to verify that income verification and lease documentation are properly completed and maintained. These measures will help ensure that tenant eligibility and payment determinations are adequately supported and compliant with federal regulations. Reply and Corrective Action: To address these findings, the Housing Authority will implement a standardized checklist for all tenant file changes, ensuring that all required forms and records are consistently retained. The Program Administrator and staff will conduct monthly reviews of completed reexaminations to verify that all necessary documentation is present and properly filed. All paperwork related to annual reexaminations, transfers, move-ins, and interims will be scanned into the Lindsey software system within five working days of receipt, prior to physical filing. The Program Administrator will organize monthly training sessions on HCV/S8 program requirements, with participation tracked to ensure all staff attend. Weekly spot checks will be performed to confirm that the checklist is being used appropriately. These actions will be supported by updated training materials, access to the Lindsey software, and dedicated staff time for audits and training. To mitigate risks such as incomplete documentation, missed scanning deadlines, or low training attendance, the Housing Authority will implement pre-audit checklists, set automated reminders for staff, and make training mandatory. Management will monitor the implementation of these corrective actions and conduct follow-up reviews to ensure sustained compliance with HUD regulations.
U.S. Department of Transportation – AL #20.106 Airport Improvement Program – Reporting Grant Award: 3-38-0022-064-2022 Criteria The Authority is required to submit payment requests using the DOT Electronic Grants payment system, Delphi e-Invoicing. These requests must meet the standards described in 2 CFR ss 200.302 and 200.305. Additionally, Authority is required to submit annual SF-425 reports within 90 days of the end of the federal fiscal year. Condition During review of submitted Request for Reimbursements and Outlay reports, it was noted that one request submitted was not accurately prepared as there was one instance in which the amount requested was greater than invoice documentation, additionally the request included a request for reimbursement of AIP ineligible costs. As of December 31, 2024 no funds have been returned to U.S. DOT. It was also noted that multiple annual SF-425 reports were submitted late. Questioned Costs N/A Context We reviewed the project financial summary for two of the 19 requests submitted during 2024 and SF-425 reports for all open grants. Cause Employee oversight. Effect The Authority could have had federal funding delayed or reduced. Recommendation We recommend that the Authority implement internal controls to ensure all reporting is accurately filed. Repeat Finding Yes. Prior audit finding 2023-003. Views of Responsible Officials Management recognizes the deficiency and plans to implement the auditor’s recommendation.
U.S. Department of Transportation – AL #20.106 Airport Improvement Program – Reporting Grant Award: 3-38-0022-064-2022 Criteria The Authority is required to submit payment requests using the DOT Electronic Grants payment system, Delphi e-Invoicing. These requests must meet the standards described in 2 CFR ss 200.302 and 200.305. Additionally, Authority is required to submit annual SF-425 reports within 90 days of the end of the federal fiscal year. Condition During review of submitted Request for Reimbursements and Outlay reports, it was noted that one request submitted was not accurately prepared as there was one instance in which the amount requested was greater than invoice documentation, additionally the request included a request for reimbursement of AIP ineligible costs. As of December 31, 2024 no funds have been returned to U.S. DOT. It was also noted that multiple annual SF-425 reports were submitted late. Questioned Costs N/A Context We reviewed the project financial summary for two of the 19 requests submitted during 2024 and SF-425 reports for all open grants. Cause Employee oversight. Effect The Authority could have had federal funding delayed or reduced. Recommendation We recommend that the Authority implement internal controls to ensure all reporting is accurately filed. Repeat Finding Yes. Prior audit finding 2023-003. Views of Responsible Officials Management recognizes the deficiency and plans to implement the auditor’s recommendation.
Identification of a Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding from the immediate previous audit, 2023-002. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires written procedures for cash management and determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E – Cost Principals. Condition: Boone County Senior Citizen Services Corporation DBA The Bluffs did not have written procedures for cash management (2 CFR 200.302(b)(6)) and allowable costs determination (2 CFR 200.302(b)(7)) in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. Questioned Costs: $0 Cause: Boone County Senior Citizen Services Corporation DBA The Bluffs’ written policies and procedures were not updated to include required Uniform Guidance policies. Effect: Boone County Senior Citizen Services Corporation DBA The Bluffs could enter into a transaction that is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements. Recommendation: We recommend Boone County Senior Citizen Services Corporation DBA The Bluffs draft and adopt written procedures in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding and is in process of developing and implementing the appropriate policies and procedures. The board anticipates approving written policies and procedures for cash management in May 2025.
Finding 2024-004 Internal Controls Over Compliance for Cash Management, Allowable Costs, Procurement, and Conflicts of Interest Federal Program: 66.468 Capitalization Grants for Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Condition: The City does not have formally documented written controls to ensure compliance with the U.S. Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) Uniform Administrative Requirement, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), regarding the determination of allowable costs, procurement procedures, conflicts of interest, and cash management. Criteria: 2 CFR § 200.302(b) requires the City to have written procedures related to managing cash from federal award, including determining the allowability of costs in accordance with 2 CFR 200 Subpart E – Cost Principles. Additionally, 2 CFR § 318(a) and (c), requires the City to formally document procedures used for procurements made within federal programs, to demonstrate compliance with Uniform Guidance, which includes written standards of conduct that cover conflicts of interest and govern the performance of individuals engaged in procurement. Cause: The City’s policies and procedures have not been formally drafted and updated in written form. Effect: The failure to have written policies and procedures resulted in the City’s noncompliance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Context: This is a general requirement that pertains to most federal grants. This was not identified via sampling procedures. Questioned Costs: None identified. Recommendation: We recommend the City review the Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, particularly the sections referenced above, to obtain a better understanding of the related requirements under Uniform Guidance. Based on this understanding, we recommend the City adopt written policies and procedures pertaining to cash management, determining the allowability of costs, procurement procedures, and conflicts of interest for all federal programs. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with our recommendation. See corresponding Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2024-001 Internal Controls Over Compliance for Cash Management, Allowable Costs, Procurement, and Conflicts of Interest Federal Program: 14.251 Economic Development Initiative, Community Project Funding, and Miscellaneous Grants Condition: The City did not have formally documented written controls to ensure compliance with the U.S. Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) Uniform Administrative Requirement, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), in regard to determining allowable costs, procurement procedures, conflicts of interest, and cash management. Criteria: 2 CFR § 200.302(b) requires the City to have written procedures related to managing cash from federal awards, including determining the allowability of costs in accordance with 2 CFR 200 Subpart E – Cost Principles. Additionally, 2 CFR § 318(a) and (c), requires the City to formally document procedures used for procurements made within federal programs, to demonstrate compliance with Uniform Guidance, which includes written standards of conduct that cover conflicts of interest and govern the performance of individuals engaged in procurement. Cause: The City’s policies and procedures were not formally drafted and updated in written form. Effect: The failure to have written policies and procedures during the grant period resulted in the City’s temporary noncompliance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Context: This is a general requirement that pertains to most federal grants. This was not identified via sampling procedures. Questioned Costs: None identified. Recommendation: We recommend the City review the Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, particularly the sections referenced above, to obtain a better understanding of the related requirements under Uniform Guidance. Based on this understanding, we recommend the City adopt written policies and procedures pertaining to cash management, determining the allowability of costs, procurement procedures, and conflicts of interest for all federal programs. Since the discovery of this issue, the City has adopted written policies and procedures pertaining to cash management, determining the allowability of costs, procurement procedures, and conflicts of interest for all federal programs. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with our recommendation, and this matter has already been resolved subsequent to year-end. See corresponding Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING 2024-004 Subject: Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities Assistance Listings Number: 10.760 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY2024 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2023-003. Condition and Context As part of sound management of the federal award, the Town was responsible for implementing a system of internal controls that would ensure compliance with the applicable requirements. The Town had not properly designed or implemented such a system, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. The Town was required to submit the following reporting to the Department of Agriculture annually: • Statement of Budget, Income, and Equity (Form RD 442-2) • Balance Sheet (Form RD 442-3) INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 TOWN OF PAOLI SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The Form RD 442-2 covers financial operations relating to the Town's wastewater utility and the Form RD 442-3 presents the financial status of the wastewater utility. In both instances, a borrower may submit the financial data on other forms, provided the forms are in a similar format and signed and dated by the organization's official to certify the correctness of the information. Alternatively, an annual audit may be submitted in lieu of the forms. The Town did not submit the Form RD 442-2 during the audit period as required. The Town submitted the Form RD 442-3 reporting 2023 data in 2024 as required. However, this report is intended to be a comparative balance sheet as described in the USDA Rural Utilities Service Borrower's Guide. The Town did not include comparative data for 2022 in the report. There was also no documentation or other evidence of an oversight, review, or approval process for the report that was filed. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." 7 CFR 1780.47 states in part: "(a) Borrowers are required to provide RUS an annual audit or financial statements. . . . (e) Borrowers exempt from audits. All borrowers who are exempt from audits, will, within 60 days following the end of each fiscal year, furnish the RUS with annual financial statements, consisting of a verification of the organization's balance sheet and statement of income and expense by an appropriate official of the organization. Forms RD 442-2, 'Statement of Budget, Income and Equity,' and 442-3 may be used. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 TOWN OF PAOLI SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (f) Management reports. These reports will furnish management with a means of evaluating prior decisions and serve as a basis for planning future operations and financial strategies. In those cases where revenues from multiple sources are pledged as security for an RUS loan, two reports will be required; one for the project being financed by RUS and one combining the entire operation of the borrower. In those cases where RUS loans are secured by general obligation bonds or assessments and the borrower combines revenues from all sources, one management report combining all such revenues is acceptable. The following management data will be submitted by the borrower to the processing office. These reports at a minimum will include a balance sheet and income and expense statement. . . . (2) Annual management reports. Prior to the beginning of each fiscal year the following will be submitted to the processing office. (If Form RD 442-2 is used as the annual management report, enter data in column three only of Schedule 1, and complete all of Schedule 2.) (i) Two copies of the management reports and proposed 'Annual Budget'. (ii) Financial information may be reported on Form RD 442-2 which includes Schedule 1, 'Statement of Budget, Income and Equity' and Schedule 2, 'Projected Cash Flow' or information in similar format. (iii) A copy of the rate schedule in effect at the time of submission. . . ." Cause The Clerk-Treasurer was only in her first year of her first term in office when these were due. As such, she was unfamiliar with the reporting requirements of the grant. Effect Without a proper system of internal controls in place that operated effectively, the Town did not file one of the two required reports, and the report that was filed was incomplete. As a result, material noncompliance occurred and remained undetected. By not reporting the comparative data, all information needed to determine the true financial status of the Town was not readily available. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the Town's management establish a proper system of internal controls and develop and implement reporting policies and procedures to ensure that all required reports are filed timely, accurately, and contain all the required information. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Criteria: Per 2 CFR § 200.303(a), the non-Federal entity must establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over Federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the awards. Additionally, per 2 CFR §200.403 and §200.302, costs charged to federal awards must be allowable, allocable, and properly documented, and financial reporting must be accurate, complete, and supported by the accounting system. Condition: Although the Parish has implemented internal controls related to the allowability of costs and the preparation of required reports for the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery funds, they were not operating effectively during fiscal year 2024. Tests of controls indicated that transactions were not tracked appropriately to ensure they were charged to the correct funding source. In addition, quarterly project and expenditure reports submitted to the U.S. Treasury included inaccurate or unsupported information due to a lack of tracking and reconciliation procedures. Cause: As discussed in item 2024-001, the Parish encountered several challenges during the transition of administration and key personnel. Parish administration and management were immediately tasked with enhancing operations related to procedural concerns from the prior administration and performing the accounting function without sufficient documentation on several balances and transactions. The documented controls were not in practice because of this. Effect: While no instances of noncompliance were noted, the lack of documented controls in practice increases the risk that future required reports could be incomplete, inaccurate, or untimely, as well as, federal costs being unallowed per the cost principles which could potentially result in program noncompliance. Recommendation: We recommend that the Parish enhance and document internal controls over financial reporting, as described in our recommendations described under item 2024-001, to prevent noncompliance of the Uniform Guidance as required.
Finding 2024-005 Internal Controls Over Compliance for Subrecipient Monitoring Federal Program: 14.251 Economic Development Initiative, Community Project Funding, and Miscellaneous Grants Condition: The City does not have formally documented written controls to ensure compliance with the U.S. Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) Uniform Administrative Requirement, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), in regard to determining subrecipient monitoring. Criteria: 2 CFR § 200.302(b) requires the City to have written procedures related to managing subrecipient monitoring in accordance with 2 CFR 200 Subpart D – Subrecipient Monitoring. Cause: The City’s policies and procedures have not been formally drafted and updated in written form. Effect: The failure to have written policies and procedures resulted in the City’s noncompliance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Context: This is a general requirement that pertains to many federal grants. This was not identified via sampling procedures. Questioned Costs: None identified. Recommendation: We recommend the City review the Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, particularly the sections referenced above, to obtain a better understanding of the related requirements under Uniform Guidance. Based on this understanding, we recommend the City adopt written policies and procedures pertaining to subrecipient monitoring for all applicable federal programs. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with our recommendation. See corresponding Corrective Action Plan.
Adjoin Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended December 31, 2024 Section II - Financial Statement Findings Section None noted. Section III - Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs Section 1. Finding Number: Finding 2024-001 Program Name: Supportive Services for Veterans Families: CFDA 64.033 Pass Through Agency: N/A Type of Finding: Other matters, compliance a. Criteria: Failure to comply with the grant agreement’s terms and applicable regulations: The Organization did not comply with grant compliance requirements such as tracking administrative expenses charged to the program outside of the general ledger and in other matters noted in Supportive Services for Veterans Families (SSVF) reviews. b. Condition: During our audit, JGD reviewed the results of all reviews for the SSVF grant and noted seven compliance deficiencies were indicated in the reporting period. These deficiencies resulted in a failure of controls over compliance. Under the SSVF Program, a minimum of 90% of supportive services grant funds must be used to provide and coordinate the provision of supportive services to very lowincome Veteran families who are occupying permanent housing. A maximum of 10% of supportive services grant funds may be used for administrative costs. Per Section 62.70 of the 38 CFR Part 62, administrative costs are defined as all direct and indirect costs associated with the indirect, of subcontractors. SSVF requires grantees to provide support documentation (payroll records, invoices, receipts etc.) for all costs and expenses associated with the administration of the SSVF grant. Administrative costs should be placed in the Administrative section of an SSVF program budget. An approved Indirect Cost Rate is not considered adequate support or source documentation for costs listed in the Administrative section of the budget. Grantees are required to have a detailed breakout of these administrative costs along with any supporting documents for those expenses for auditing and oversight. Title 2 CFR 200.302 requires the financial management system of each non-Federal entity provide “records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally-funded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federal awards, authorizations, obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures, income and interest and be supported by source documentation.” These citations are included for informational purposes: Fiscal Administration – Administrative Expenses: Administrative expenses were not recorded in the general ledger, resulting in questioned costs. Fiscal Administration – Unallowed Supplemental Pay: Five employees did not have evidence to support reasonableness and compliance with incentive compensation requirements, resulting in questioned costs. 25 Adjoin Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended December 31, 2024 Fiscal Administration – Inadequate TFA Identification: TFA expenses were not paid through credit card charges in the general ledger. This deficiency was cleared as corrective action was taken during the review. Participant Eligibility – HMIS Release of Information Forms: Four case files were missing HMIS Release of Information Forms for household members over the age of 18. Participant Eligibility – Missing Income Eligibility Documentation: Three case files missing income eligibility documents for Veterans and one case file missing income eligibility documents for Veteran and household members at certification of eligibility events. Participant Eligibility – Missing Exit Checklist: Five case files did not include exit checklist documentation. This deficiency was cleared as corrective action was taken during the review. Program Operations – Inadequate MOU: MOU for a legal subcontractor was missing required elements, including expectations and requirements for quarterly assessments and annual monitoring of performance, listing of only eligible/allowable legal services, highlighting of response time expectations and requirements to support payments, and account for Veterans that have been separated from the program and those in need of long-term legal services. c. Context: Recipients of Federal grants are required to comply with all terms and applicable regulations of grant agreements. d. Questioned Costs: Administrative expenses resulted in $937,794 and supplemental pay resulted in $1,500 in questioned costs. The Organization has disputed both findings noting the expenses are itemized within their internal tracking files and that the costs are allowable, allocable, and reasonable. The Organization has received no response from the agency. e. Cause: Internal accounting procedures, lack of compliance policies, and lack of training over verification and documentation processes, resulting in a failure of controls over compliance. f. Effect: Considered to be an other matter related to internal control over compliance. g. Recommendation: Management should take steps to ensure that all administrative expenses are properly recorded in the general ledger, supplemental pay is approved with proper evidence of approvals, and proper documentation and policies are in place to comply with all grant compliance requirements. We recommend that management closely monitor areas of non-compliance as noted in the licensing reviews. Section IV – Schedule of Prior Year Findings and Questioned Costs None noted.
Finding 2024-003 Insufficient Documentation of Other Direct Expenses Type of Finding: Noncompliance and Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Condition: During testing of direct costs charged to the federal program, the Organization did not maintain sufficient documentation to fully support all expenditures claimed. In one instance, a receipt supporting a claimed expense was missing. In three additional cases, although the expenditures were generally supported, the documentation did not clearly reflect how the amounts allocated to the major federal program were determined. While these issues were isolated and the known and likely questioned costs were immaterial, the lack of complete documentation represents noncompliance with federal requirements for allowable costs. Criteria: According to Uniform Guidance 2 CFR §200.302(b)(3), the Organization's financial management system must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. All records must be supported by source documentation. Additionally, 2 CFR §200.403(g) requires that all costs charged to federal awards must be adequately documented. Cause: These exceptions appear to result from informal documentation practices and a lack of consistent application of procedures. Management is heavily involved in the Organization’s financial processes, including allocation of costs, which can limit opportunities for independent oversight or review. The absence of a standardized and consistently enforced process for documenting cost allocations contributes to inconsistent recordkeeping. Possible of Known Effect: Although the overall financial impact of these exceptions was not material, the missing documentation prevents the Organization from fully demonstrating compliance with 2 CFR 200.403 and 200.302. Overreliance on a single individual for documentation and procedural execution without accompanying review or monitoring controls can increase the risk of errors, omissions, or audit findings, even when expenditures are reasonable and allowable. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $2,742 were identified. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization implement a standardized procedure for documenting all direct and indirect cost allocations charged to federal programs, ensuring that each claim includes full supporting documentation such as receipts and annotated allocation details with consistent allocation methods. To strengthen internal controls, the Organization should consider establishing a review process for claims preparation that includes someone other than the individual preparing or allocating the expenditures. This will enhance accountability and help ensure compliance with federal documentation requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization will develop written guidelines specifying the required supporting documentation for each type of direct expense. Set up vendors in QuickBooks. We will hire and train Finance Manager to manage and track revenue and expenses, QuickBooks, grant reporting etc. All receipts and expenses will be scanned in and kept electronically. The Organization will provide training on documentation requirements, proper record submission, and compliance expectations.
2024-004: Written Policies and Procedures – Significant Deficiency Criteria and Condition: 2 CFR 200.302 requires that the recipient or subrecipient’s financial management system must provide written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 (Federal payments) and for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.318 requires that the recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under a Federal award or subaward, including for acquisition of property or services. Context: Although the Organization follows procedures that minimize the time between reimbursement of dollars and expenditure (2 CFR 200.305), verify payments made are in accordance with subpart E and terms and conditions of the award, and follow procurement standards for vendors, there are no written procedures as required by the CFR. Cause and Effect: The Organization did not maintain written procedures as required by the CFR. Questioned Costs: This finding does not result in questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization formally document the current policies and procedures in place to meet documentation requirements of the CFR. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We will adopt formal policies and procedures that document our current practices and also meet the requirements of the CFR.
2024-004: Written Policies and Procedures – Significant Deficiency Criteria and Condition: 2 CFR 200.302 requires that the recipient or subrecipient’s financial management system must provide written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 (Federal payments) and for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.318 requires that the recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under a Federal award or subaward, including for acquisition of property or services. Context: Although the Organization follows procedures that minimize the time between reimbursement of dollars and expenditure (2 CFR 200.305), verify payments made are in accordance with subpart E and terms and conditions of the award, and follow procurement standards for vendors, there are no written procedures as required by the CFR. Cause and Effect: The Organization did not maintain written procedures as required by the CFR. Questioned Costs: This finding does not result in questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization formally document the current policies and procedures in place to meet documentation requirements of the CFR. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We will adopt formal policies and procedures that document our current practices and also meet the requirements of the CFR.
Finding 2024-001 Interproject Payable – Amounts Owed to Other HUD Project Type of finding: Significant deficiency in internal control. Condition and context: During our audit we noted that the project has recorded a payable due to another HUD-assisted project in the amount of $3,072, and there is no documented HUD authorization supporting this obligation. Criteria: Per 2 CFR Part 200 (Uniform Guidance), §§200.302 and 200.403, federal program funds must be used only for allowable costs and in direct support of the objectives of the program. HUD requirements also prohibit the commingling of funds between projects unless explicitly authorized. Interproject payables or advances without proper documentation or timely settlement may constitute an unallowable use of program resources. Cause: Management permitted the use of funds from another HUD-assisted project to support operations of this project without obtaining HUD approval or establishing proper repayment terms. This occurred due to inadequate oversight of cash management and interproject transactions. Effect: Maintaining an outstanding payable to another HUD project: • Indicates potential misuse of federal funds. • Increases the risk of noncompliance with HUD requirements and Uniform Guidance. • May impair the project’s ability to demonstrate financial independence and program accountability. • Exposes the project to possible HUD sanctions, questioned costs, or repayment obligations. Questioned costs: Known questioned costs are $3,072. Recommendation: We recommend that project management: • Repay the outstanding payable to the related HUD project as soon as feasible. • Cease the practice of interproject borrowing unless HUD has provided explicit authorization. • Implement stronger internal controls over cash management and interproject transactions. • Document and monitor all project-level obligations to ensure compliance with HUD regulations. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding and the payment will be corrected. Management will review internal controls and implement a review process to only pay expenses already incurred to avoid future payments.
U.S. Department of Transportation – AL #20.106 Airport Improvement Program – Reporting Grant Award: 3-38-0022-064-2022 Criteria The Authority is required to submit payment requests using the DOT Electronic Grants payment system, Delphi e-Invoicing. These requests must meet the standards described in 2 CFR ss 200.302 and 200.305. Additionally, Authority is required to submit annual SF-425 reports within 90 days of the end of the federal fiscal year. Condition During review of submitted Request for Reimbursements and Outlay reports, it was noted that one request submitted was not accurately prepared as there was one instance in which the amount requested was greater than invoice documentation, additionally the request included a request for reimbursement of AIP ineligible costs. As of December 31, 2024 no funds have been returned to U.S. DOT. It was also noted that multiple annual SF-425 reports were submitted late. Questioned Costs N/A Context We reviewed the project financial summary for two of the 19 requests submitted during 2024 and SF-425 reports for all open grants. Cause Employee oversight. Effect The Authority could have had federal funding delayed or reduced. Recommendation We recommend that the Authority implement internal controls to ensure all reporting is accurately filed. Repeat Finding Yes. Prior audit finding 2023-003. Views of Responsible Officials Management recognizes the deficiency and plans to implement the auditor’s recommendation.
U.S. Department of Transportation – AL #20.106 Airport Improvement Program – Reporting Grant Award: 3-38-0022-064-2022 Criteria The Authority is required to submit payment requests using the DOT Electronic Grants payment system, Delphi e-Invoicing. These requests must meet the standards described in 2 CFR ss 200.302 and 200.305. Additionally, Authority is required to submit annual SF-425 reports within 90 days of the end of the federal fiscal year. Condition During review of submitted Request for Reimbursements and Outlay reports, it was noted that one request submitted was not accurately prepared as there was one instance in which the amount requested was greater than invoice documentation, additionally the request included a request for reimbursement of AIP ineligible costs. As of December 31, 2024 no funds have been returned to U.S. DOT. It was also noted that multiple annual SF-425 reports were submitted late. Questioned Costs N/A Context We reviewed the project financial summary for two of the 19 requests submitted during 2024 and SF-425 reports for all open grants. Cause Employee oversight. Effect The Authority could have had federal funding delayed or reduced. Recommendation We recommend that the Authority implement internal controls to ensure all reporting is accurately filed. Repeat Finding Yes. Prior audit finding 2023-003. Views of Responsible Officials Management recognizes the deficiency and plans to implement the auditor’s recommendation.
Identification of a Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding from the immediate previous audit, 2023-002. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires written procedures for cash management and determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E – Cost Principals. Condition: Boone County Senior Citizen Services Corporation DBA The Bluffs did not have written procedures for cash management (2 CFR 200.302(b)(6)) and allowable costs determination (2 CFR 200.302(b)(7)) in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. Questioned Costs: $0 Cause: Boone County Senior Citizen Services Corporation DBA The Bluffs’ written policies and procedures were not updated to include required Uniform Guidance policies. Effect: Boone County Senior Citizen Services Corporation DBA The Bluffs could enter into a transaction that is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements. Recommendation: We recommend Boone County Senior Citizen Services Corporation DBA The Bluffs draft and adopt written procedures in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding and is in process of developing and implementing the appropriate policies and procedures. The board anticipates approving written policies and procedures for cash management in May 2025.
Finding 2024-004 Internal Controls Over Compliance for Cash Management, Allowable Costs, Procurement, and Conflicts of Interest Federal Program: 66.468 Capitalization Grants for Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Condition: The City does not have formally documented written controls to ensure compliance with the U.S. Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) Uniform Administrative Requirement, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), regarding the determination of allowable costs, procurement procedures, conflicts of interest, and cash management. Criteria: 2 CFR § 200.302(b) requires the City to have written procedures related to managing cash from federal award, including determining the allowability of costs in accordance with 2 CFR 200 Subpart E – Cost Principles. Additionally, 2 CFR § 318(a) and (c), requires the City to formally document procedures used for procurements made within federal programs, to demonstrate compliance with Uniform Guidance, which includes written standards of conduct that cover conflicts of interest and govern the performance of individuals engaged in procurement. Cause: The City’s policies and procedures have not been formally drafted and updated in written form. Effect: The failure to have written policies and procedures resulted in the City’s noncompliance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Context: This is a general requirement that pertains to most federal grants. This was not identified via sampling procedures. Questioned Costs: None identified. Recommendation: We recommend the City review the Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, particularly the sections referenced above, to obtain a better understanding of the related requirements under Uniform Guidance. Based on this understanding, we recommend the City adopt written policies and procedures pertaining to cash management, determining the allowability of costs, procurement procedures, and conflicts of interest for all federal programs. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with our recommendation. See corresponding Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2024-001 Internal Controls Over Compliance for Cash Management, Allowable Costs, Procurement, and Conflicts of Interest Federal Program: 14.251 Economic Development Initiative, Community Project Funding, and Miscellaneous Grants Condition: The City did not have formally documented written controls to ensure compliance with the U.S. Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) Uniform Administrative Requirement, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), in regard to determining allowable costs, procurement procedures, conflicts of interest, and cash management. Criteria: 2 CFR § 200.302(b) requires the City to have written procedures related to managing cash from federal awards, including determining the allowability of costs in accordance with 2 CFR 200 Subpart E – Cost Principles. Additionally, 2 CFR § 318(a) and (c), requires the City to formally document procedures used for procurements made within federal programs, to demonstrate compliance with Uniform Guidance, which includes written standards of conduct that cover conflicts of interest and govern the performance of individuals engaged in procurement. Cause: The City’s policies and procedures were not formally drafted and updated in written form. Effect: The failure to have written policies and procedures during the grant period resulted in the City’s temporary noncompliance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Context: This is a general requirement that pertains to most federal grants. This was not identified via sampling procedures. Questioned Costs: None identified. Recommendation: We recommend the City review the Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, particularly the sections referenced above, to obtain a better understanding of the related requirements under Uniform Guidance. Based on this understanding, we recommend the City adopt written policies and procedures pertaining to cash management, determining the allowability of costs, procurement procedures, and conflicts of interest for all federal programs. Since the discovery of this issue, the City has adopted written policies and procedures pertaining to cash management, determining the allowability of costs, procurement procedures, and conflicts of interest for all federal programs. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with our recommendation, and this matter has already been resolved subsequent to year-end. See corresponding Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING 2024-004 Subject: Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities Assistance Listings Number: 10.760 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY2024 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2023-003. Condition and Context As part of sound management of the federal award, the Town was responsible for implementing a system of internal controls that would ensure compliance with the applicable requirements. The Town had not properly designed or implemented such a system, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. The Town was required to submit the following reporting to the Department of Agriculture annually: • Statement of Budget, Income, and Equity (Form RD 442-2) • Balance Sheet (Form RD 442-3) INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 TOWN OF PAOLI SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The Form RD 442-2 covers financial operations relating to the Town's wastewater utility and the Form RD 442-3 presents the financial status of the wastewater utility. In both instances, a borrower may submit the financial data on other forms, provided the forms are in a similar format and signed and dated by the organization's official to certify the correctness of the information. Alternatively, an annual audit may be submitted in lieu of the forms. The Town did not submit the Form RD 442-2 during the audit period as required. The Town submitted the Form RD 442-3 reporting 2023 data in 2024 as required. However, this report is intended to be a comparative balance sheet as described in the USDA Rural Utilities Service Borrower's Guide. The Town did not include comparative data for 2022 in the report. There was also no documentation or other evidence of an oversight, review, or approval process for the report that was filed. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." 7 CFR 1780.47 states in part: "(a) Borrowers are required to provide RUS an annual audit or financial statements. . . . (e) Borrowers exempt from audits. All borrowers who are exempt from audits, will, within 60 days following the end of each fiscal year, furnish the RUS with annual financial statements, consisting of a verification of the organization's balance sheet and statement of income and expense by an appropriate official of the organization. Forms RD 442-2, 'Statement of Budget, Income and Equity,' and 442-3 may be used. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 TOWN OF PAOLI SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (f) Management reports. These reports will furnish management with a means of evaluating prior decisions and serve as a basis for planning future operations and financial strategies. In those cases where revenues from multiple sources are pledged as security for an RUS loan, two reports will be required; one for the project being financed by RUS and one combining the entire operation of the borrower. In those cases where RUS loans are secured by general obligation bonds or assessments and the borrower combines revenues from all sources, one management report combining all such revenues is acceptable. The following management data will be submitted by the borrower to the processing office. These reports at a minimum will include a balance sheet and income and expense statement. . . . (2) Annual management reports. Prior to the beginning of each fiscal year the following will be submitted to the processing office. (If Form RD 442-2 is used as the annual management report, enter data in column three only of Schedule 1, and complete all of Schedule 2.) (i) Two copies of the management reports and proposed 'Annual Budget'. (ii) Financial information may be reported on Form RD 442-2 which includes Schedule 1, 'Statement of Budget, Income and Equity' and Schedule 2, 'Projected Cash Flow' or information in similar format. (iii) A copy of the rate schedule in effect at the time of submission. . . ." Cause The Clerk-Treasurer was only in her first year of her first term in office when these were due. As such, she was unfamiliar with the reporting requirements of the grant. Effect Without a proper system of internal controls in place that operated effectively, the Town did not file one of the two required reports, and the report that was filed was incomplete. As a result, material noncompliance occurred and remained undetected. By not reporting the comparative data, all information needed to determine the true financial status of the Town was not readily available. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the Town's management establish a proper system of internal controls and develop and implement reporting policies and procedures to ensure that all required reports are filed timely, accurately, and contain all the required information. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Criteria: Per 2 CFR § 200.303(a), the non-Federal entity must establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over Federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the awards. Additionally, per 2 CFR §200.403 and §200.302, costs charged to federal awards must be allowable, allocable, and properly documented, and financial reporting must be accurate, complete, and supported by the accounting system. Condition: Although the Parish has implemented internal controls related to the allowability of costs and the preparation of required reports for the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery funds, they were not operating effectively during fiscal year 2024. Tests of controls indicated that transactions were not tracked appropriately to ensure they were charged to the correct funding source. In addition, quarterly project and expenditure reports submitted to the U.S. Treasury included inaccurate or unsupported information due to a lack of tracking and reconciliation procedures. Cause: As discussed in item 2024-001, the Parish encountered several challenges during the transition of administration and key personnel. Parish administration and management were immediately tasked with enhancing operations related to procedural concerns from the prior administration and performing the accounting function without sufficient documentation on several balances and transactions. The documented controls were not in practice because of this. Effect: While no instances of noncompliance were noted, the lack of documented controls in practice increases the risk that future required reports could be incomplete, inaccurate, or untimely, as well as, federal costs being unallowed per the cost principles which could potentially result in program noncompliance. Recommendation: We recommend that the Parish enhance and document internal controls over financial reporting, as described in our recommendations described under item 2024-001, to prevent noncompliance of the Uniform Guidance as required.
Finding 2024-005 Internal Controls Over Compliance for Subrecipient Monitoring Federal Program: 14.251 Economic Development Initiative, Community Project Funding, and Miscellaneous Grants Condition: The City does not have formally documented written controls to ensure compliance with the U.S. Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) Uniform Administrative Requirement, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), in regard to determining subrecipient monitoring. Criteria: 2 CFR § 200.302(b) requires the City to have written procedures related to managing subrecipient monitoring in accordance with 2 CFR 200 Subpart D – Subrecipient Monitoring. Cause: The City’s policies and procedures have not been formally drafted and updated in written form. Effect: The failure to have written policies and procedures resulted in the City’s noncompliance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Context: This is a general requirement that pertains to many federal grants. This was not identified via sampling procedures. Questioned Costs: None identified. Recommendation: We recommend the City review the Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, particularly the sections referenced above, to obtain a better understanding of the related requirements under Uniform Guidance. Based on this understanding, we recommend the City adopt written policies and procedures pertaining to subrecipient monitoring for all applicable federal programs. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with our recommendation. See corresponding Corrective Action Plan.
Adjoin Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended December 31, 2024 Section II - Financial Statement Findings Section None noted. Section III - Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs Section 1. Finding Number: Finding 2024-001 Program Name: Supportive Services for Veterans Families: CFDA 64.033 Pass Through Agency: N/A Type of Finding: Other matters, compliance a. Criteria: Failure to comply with the grant agreement’s terms and applicable regulations: The Organization did not comply with grant compliance requirements such as tracking administrative expenses charged to the program outside of the general ledger and in other matters noted in Supportive Services for Veterans Families (SSVF) reviews. b. Condition: During our audit, JGD reviewed the results of all reviews for the SSVF grant and noted seven compliance deficiencies were indicated in the reporting period. These deficiencies resulted in a failure of controls over compliance. Under the SSVF Program, a minimum of 90% of supportive services grant funds must be used to provide and coordinate the provision of supportive services to very lowincome Veteran families who are occupying permanent housing. A maximum of 10% of supportive services grant funds may be used for administrative costs. Per Section 62.70 of the 38 CFR Part 62, administrative costs are defined as all direct and indirect costs associated with the indirect, of subcontractors. SSVF requires grantees to provide support documentation (payroll records, invoices, receipts etc.) for all costs and expenses associated with the administration of the SSVF grant. Administrative costs should be placed in the Administrative section of an SSVF program budget. An approved Indirect Cost Rate is not considered adequate support or source documentation for costs listed in the Administrative section of the budget. Grantees are required to have a detailed breakout of these administrative costs along with any supporting documents for those expenses for auditing and oversight. Title 2 CFR 200.302 requires the financial management system of each non-Federal entity provide “records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally-funded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federal awards, authorizations, obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures, income and interest and be supported by source documentation.” These citations are included for informational purposes: Fiscal Administration – Administrative Expenses: Administrative expenses were not recorded in the general ledger, resulting in questioned costs. Fiscal Administration – Unallowed Supplemental Pay: Five employees did not have evidence to support reasonableness and compliance with incentive compensation requirements, resulting in questioned costs. 25 Adjoin Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended December 31, 2024 Fiscal Administration – Inadequate TFA Identification: TFA expenses were not paid through credit card charges in the general ledger. This deficiency was cleared as corrective action was taken during the review. Participant Eligibility – HMIS Release of Information Forms: Four case files were missing HMIS Release of Information Forms for household members over the age of 18. Participant Eligibility – Missing Income Eligibility Documentation: Three case files missing income eligibility documents for Veterans and one case file missing income eligibility documents for Veteran and household members at certification of eligibility events. Participant Eligibility – Missing Exit Checklist: Five case files did not include exit checklist documentation. This deficiency was cleared as corrective action was taken during the review. Program Operations – Inadequate MOU: MOU for a legal subcontractor was missing required elements, including expectations and requirements for quarterly assessments and annual monitoring of performance, listing of only eligible/allowable legal services, highlighting of response time expectations and requirements to support payments, and account for Veterans that have been separated from the program and those in need of long-term legal services. c. Context: Recipients of Federal grants are required to comply with all terms and applicable regulations of grant agreements. d. Questioned Costs: Administrative expenses resulted in $937,794 and supplemental pay resulted in $1,500 in questioned costs. The Organization has disputed both findings noting the expenses are itemized within their internal tracking files and that the costs are allowable, allocable, and reasonable. The Organization has received no response from the agency. e. Cause: Internal accounting procedures, lack of compliance policies, and lack of training over verification and documentation processes, resulting in a failure of controls over compliance. f. Effect: Considered to be an other matter related to internal control over compliance. g. Recommendation: Management should take steps to ensure that all administrative expenses are properly recorded in the general ledger, supplemental pay is approved with proper evidence of approvals, and proper documentation and policies are in place to comply with all grant compliance requirements. We recommend that management closely monitor areas of non-compliance as noted in the licensing reviews. Section IV – Schedule of Prior Year Findings and Questioned Costs None noted.
Finding 2024-003 Insufficient Documentation of Other Direct Expenses Type of Finding: Noncompliance and Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Condition: During testing of direct costs charged to the federal program, the Organization did not maintain sufficient documentation to fully support all expenditures claimed. In one instance, a receipt supporting a claimed expense was missing. In three additional cases, although the expenditures were generally supported, the documentation did not clearly reflect how the amounts allocated to the major federal program were determined. While these issues were isolated and the known and likely questioned costs were immaterial, the lack of complete documentation represents noncompliance with federal requirements for allowable costs. Criteria: According to Uniform Guidance 2 CFR §200.302(b)(3), the Organization's financial management system must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. All records must be supported by source documentation. Additionally, 2 CFR §200.403(g) requires that all costs charged to federal awards must be adequately documented. Cause: These exceptions appear to result from informal documentation practices and a lack of consistent application of procedures. Management is heavily involved in the Organization’s financial processes, including allocation of costs, which can limit opportunities for independent oversight or review. The absence of a standardized and consistently enforced process for documenting cost allocations contributes to inconsistent recordkeeping. Possible of Known Effect: Although the overall financial impact of these exceptions was not material, the missing documentation prevents the Organization from fully demonstrating compliance with 2 CFR 200.403 and 200.302. Overreliance on a single individual for documentation and procedural execution without accompanying review or monitoring controls can increase the risk of errors, omissions, or audit findings, even when expenditures are reasonable and allowable. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $2,742 were identified. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization implement a standardized procedure for documenting all direct and indirect cost allocations charged to federal programs, ensuring that each claim includes full supporting documentation such as receipts and annotated allocation details with consistent allocation methods. To strengthen internal controls, the Organization should consider establishing a review process for claims preparation that includes someone other than the individual preparing or allocating the expenditures. This will enhance accountability and help ensure compliance with federal documentation requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization will develop written guidelines specifying the required supporting documentation for each type of direct expense. Set up vendors in QuickBooks. We will hire and train Finance Manager to manage and track revenue and expenses, QuickBooks, grant reporting etc. All receipts and expenses will be scanned in and kept electronically. The Organization will provide training on documentation requirements, proper record submission, and compliance expectations.
2024-004: Written Policies and Procedures – Significant Deficiency Criteria and Condition: 2 CFR 200.302 requires that the recipient or subrecipient’s financial management system must provide written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 (Federal payments) and for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.318 requires that the recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under a Federal award or subaward, including for acquisition of property or services. Context: Although the Organization follows procedures that minimize the time between reimbursement of dollars and expenditure (2 CFR 200.305), verify payments made are in accordance with subpart E and terms and conditions of the award, and follow procurement standards for vendors, there are no written procedures as required by the CFR. Cause and Effect: The Organization did not maintain written procedures as required by the CFR. Questioned Costs: This finding does not result in questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization formally document the current policies and procedures in place to meet documentation requirements of the CFR. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We will adopt formal policies and procedures that document our current practices and also meet the requirements of the CFR.
2024-004: Written Policies and Procedures – Significant Deficiency Criteria and Condition: 2 CFR 200.302 requires that the recipient or subrecipient’s financial management system must provide written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 (Federal payments) and for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.318 requires that the recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under a Federal award or subaward, including for acquisition of property or services. Context: Although the Organization follows procedures that minimize the time between reimbursement of dollars and expenditure (2 CFR 200.305), verify payments made are in accordance with subpart E and terms and conditions of the award, and follow procurement standards for vendors, there are no written procedures as required by the CFR. Cause and Effect: The Organization did not maintain written procedures as required by the CFR. Questioned Costs: This finding does not result in questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization formally document the current policies and procedures in place to meet documentation requirements of the CFR. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: We will adopt formal policies and procedures that document our current practices and also meet the requirements of the CFR.
Finding 2024-001 Interproject Payable – Amounts Owed to Other HUD Project Type of finding: Significant deficiency in internal control. Condition and context: During our audit we noted that the project has recorded a payable due to another HUD-assisted project in the amount of $3,072, and there is no documented HUD authorization supporting this obligation. Criteria: Per 2 CFR Part 200 (Uniform Guidance), §§200.302 and 200.403, federal program funds must be used only for allowable costs and in direct support of the objectives of the program. HUD requirements also prohibit the commingling of funds between projects unless explicitly authorized. Interproject payables or advances without proper documentation or timely settlement may constitute an unallowable use of program resources. Cause: Management permitted the use of funds from another HUD-assisted project to support operations of this project without obtaining HUD approval or establishing proper repayment terms. This occurred due to inadequate oversight of cash management and interproject transactions. Effect: Maintaining an outstanding payable to another HUD project: • Indicates potential misuse of federal funds. • Increases the risk of noncompliance with HUD requirements and Uniform Guidance. • May impair the project’s ability to demonstrate financial independence and program accountability. • Exposes the project to possible HUD sanctions, questioned costs, or repayment obligations. Questioned costs: Known questioned costs are $3,072. Recommendation: We recommend that project management: • Repay the outstanding payable to the related HUD project as soon as feasible. • Cease the practice of interproject borrowing unless HUD has provided explicit authorization. • Implement stronger internal controls over cash management and interproject transactions. • Document and monitor all project-level obligations to ensure compliance with HUD regulations. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding and the payment will be corrected. Management will review internal controls and implement a review process to only pay expenses already incurred to avoid future payments.
2 CFR § 300 codified in 45 CFR part 75 and gives regulatory effect to the Department of Health and Human Services 2 CFR § 200; while 2 CFR § 400 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Agriculture for 2 CFR § 200. 2 CFR § 200.302(b)(6) states the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR § 200.305 for Payment. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7) requires written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E-Cost Principles of this part and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 states that costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. 2 CFR 200.431 requires established written leave policies if the entity intends to pay fringe benefits. 2 CFR 200.464(a)(2) requires reimbursement of relocation costs to employees be in accordance with an established written policy must be consistently followed by the employer. 2 CFR 200.475 requires reimbursement and/or charges to be consistent with those normally allowed in like circumstances in the non-Federal entity's non-federally-funded activities and in accordance with non-Federal entity's written travel reimbursement policies. Additionally, for Federal awards, the Uniform Guidance requires a written policy for the procurement requirements outlined in 2 CFR § 200.318(c)(1), 2 CFR § 200.318(c)(2), and 2 CFR § 200.320(B). The Board of Health did not have written policies as required by the Uniform Guidance as they were not aware of the requirements. The failure to implement written policies as required by the Uniform Guidance could result in noncompliance with the District’s federal programs. The Board of Health should adopt written policies in accordance with the Uniform Guidance to help improve internal controls over federal compliance.
2 CFR § 300 codified in 45 CFR part 75 and gives regulatory effect to the Department of Health and Human Services 2 CFR § 200; while 2 CFR § 400 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Agriculture for 2 CFR § 200. 2 CFR § 200.302(b)(6) states the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR § 200.305 for Payment. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7) requires written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E-Cost Principles of this part and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 states that costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. 2 CFR 200.431 requires established written leave policies if the entity intends to pay fringe benefits. 2 CFR 200.464(a)(2) requires reimbursement of relocation costs to employees be in accordance with an established written policy must be consistently followed by the employer. 2 CFR 200.475 requires reimbursement and/or charges to be consistent with those normally allowed in like circumstances in the non-Federal entity's non-federally-funded activities and in accordance with non-Federal entity's written travel reimbursement policies. Additionally, for Federal awards, the Uniform Guidance requires a written policy for the procurement requirements outlined in 2 CFR § 200.318(c)(1), 2 CFR § 200.318(c)(2), and 2 CFR § 200.320(B). The Board of Health did not have written policies as required by the Uniform Guidance as they were not aware of the requirements. The failure to implement written policies as required by the Uniform Guidance could result in noncompliance with the District’s federal programs. The Board of Health should adopt written policies in accordance with the Uniform Guidance to help improve internal controls over federal compliance.
2 CFR § 300 codified in 45 CFR part 75 and gives regulatory effect to the Department of Health and Human Services 2 CFR § 200; while 2 CFR § 400 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Agriculture for 2 CFR § 200. 2 CFR § 200.302(b)(6) states the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR § 200.305 for Payment. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7) requires written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E-Cost Principles of this part and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 states that costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. 2 CFR 200.431 requires established written leave policies if the entity intends to pay fringe benefits. 2 CFR 200.464(a)(2) requires reimbursement of relocation costs to employees be in accordance with an established written policy must be consistently followed by the employer. 2 CFR 200.475 requires reimbursement and/or charges to be consistent with those normally allowed in like circumstances in the non-Federal entity's non-federally-funded activities and in accordance with non-Federal entity's written travel reimbursement policies. Additionally, for Federal awards, the Uniform Guidance requires a written policy for the procurement requirements outlined in 2 CFR § 200.318(c)(1), 2 CFR § 200.318(c)(2), and 2 CFR § 200.320(B). The Board of Health did not have written policies as required by the Uniform Guidance as they were not aware of the requirements. The failure to implement written policies as required by the Uniform Guidance could result in noncompliance with the District’s federal programs. The Board of Health should adopt written policies in accordance with the Uniform Guidance to help improve internal controls over federal compliance.
2 CFR § 300 codified in 45 CFR part 75 and gives regulatory effect to the Department of Health and Human Services 2 CFR § 200; while 2 CFR § 400 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Agriculture for 2 CFR § 200. 2 CFR § 200.302(b)(6) states the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR § 200.305 for Payment. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7) requires written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E-Cost Principles of this part and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 states that costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. 2 CFR 200.431 requires established written leave policies if the entity intends to pay fringe benefits. 2 CFR 200.464(a)(2) requires reimbursement of relocation costs to employees be in accordance with an established written policy must be consistently followed by the employer. 2 CFR 200.475 requires reimbursement and/or charges to be consistent with those normally allowed in like circumstances in the non-Federal entity's non-federally-funded activities and in accordance with non-Federal entity's written travel reimbursement policies. Additionally, for Federal awards, the Uniform Guidance requires a written policy for the procurement requirements outlined in 2 CFR § 200.318(c)(1), 2 CFR § 200.318(c)(2), and 2 CFR § 200.320(B). The Board of Health did not have written policies as required by the Uniform Guidance as they were not aware of the requirements. The failure to implement written policies as required by the Uniform Guidance could result in noncompliance with the District’s federal programs. The Board of Health should adopt written policies in accordance with the Uniform Guidance to help improve internal controls over federal compliance.
2 CFR § 300 codified in 45 CFR part 75 and gives regulatory effect to the Department of Health and Human Services 2 CFR § 200; while 2 CFR § 400 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Agriculture for 2 CFR § 200. 2 CFR § 200.302(b)(6) states the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR § 200.305 for Payment. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7) requires written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E-Cost Principles of this part and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 states that costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. 2 CFR 200.431 requires established written leave policies if the entity intends to pay fringe benefits. 2 CFR 200.464(a)(2) requires reimbursement of relocation costs to employees be in accordance with an established written policy must be consistently followed by the employer. 2 CFR 200.475 requires reimbursement and/or charges to be consistent with those normally allowed in like circumstances in the non-Federal entity's non-federally-funded activities and in accordance with non-Federal entity's written travel reimbursement policies. Additionally, for Federal awards, the Uniform Guidance requires a written policy for the procurement requirements outlined in 2 CFR § 200.318(c)(1), 2 CFR § 200.318(c)(2), and 2 CFR § 200.320(B). The Board of Health did not have written policies as required by the Uniform Guidance as they were not aware of the requirements. The failure to implement written policies as required by the Uniform Guidance could result in noncompliance with the District’s federal programs. The Board of Health should adopt written policies in accordance with the Uniform Guidance to help improve internal controls over federal compliance.
Finding 2024-01: Considered a significant deficiency. Criteria: Uniform Guidance (2 CFR §§200.302–303 and 200.318–320) requires non-federal entities to establish and maintain effective internal controls and written policies and procedures to ensure compliance with federal award requirements. These policies must be sufficiently detailed to provide consistent and proper administration of federal programs Condition: As part of our audit of compliance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance for the year ended December 31, 2024, we noted that West Michigan Food Processing Association does not have formal, written policies and procedures in place related to the administration of its federal awards. Specifically, we noted the absence of written procedures addressing: ➢ Financial management systems (including allowable costs and cash management) ➢ Procurement standards ➢ Subrecipient monitoring ➢ Internal controls over compliance ➢ Conflicts of interest Effect: Without formal written policies and procedures, there is an increased risk that federal program requirements may not be followed consistently. This could result in noncompliance with federal regulations, mismanagement of federal funds, or potential questioned costs. Additionally, the absence of documentation limits the ability to demonstrate compliance during audit or grantor review processes. Cause: The absence of written policies appears to result from the entity historically depending on established practices and staff knowledge, rather than formally documenting procedures as required under Uniform Guidance. Recommendation: We recommend that West Michigan Food Processing Association develop and implement comprehensive written policies and procedures to address the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. These should be tailored to the Association’s structure and operations and cover all applicable federal compliance areas. Management should also establish a process to periodically review and update these documents to ensure continued compliance. Response: West Michigan Food Processing Association concurs with the facts of the finding and is implementing procedures to prevent this in the future.
Finding 2024-01: Considered a significant deficiency. Criteria: Uniform Guidance (2 CFR §§200.302–303 and 200.318–320) requires non-federal entities to establish and maintain effective internal controls and written policies and procedures to ensure compliance with federal award requirements. These policies must be sufficiently detailed to provide consistent and proper administration of federal programs Condition: As part of our audit of compliance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance for the year ended December 31, 2024, we noted that West Michigan Food Processing Association does not have formal, written policies and procedures in place related to the administration of its federal awards. Specifically, we noted the absence of written procedures addressing: ➢ Financial management systems (including allowable costs and cash management) ➢ Procurement standards ➢ Subrecipient monitoring ➢ Internal controls over compliance ➢ Conflicts of interest Effect: Without formal written policies and procedures, there is an increased risk that federal program requirements may not be followed consistently. This could result in noncompliance with federal regulations, mismanagement of federal funds, or potential questioned costs. Additionally, the absence of documentation limits the ability to demonstrate compliance during audit or grantor review processes. Cause: The absence of written policies appears to result from the entity historically depending on established practices and staff knowledge, rather than formally documenting procedures as required under Uniform Guidance. Recommendation: We recommend that West Michigan Food Processing Association develop and implement comprehensive written policies and procedures to address the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. These should be tailored to the Association’s structure and operations and cover all applicable federal compliance areas. Management should also establish a process to periodically review and update these documents to ensure continued compliance. Response: West Michigan Food Processing Association concurs with the facts of the finding and is implementing procedures to prevent this in the future.
Assistance Listing Number: 93.193 Name of Federal Program: COVID-19 Urban Indian Health Services Name of Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Award Period: January 1, 2024 – December 31, 2024 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Per 2 CFR Part 200, non-federal entities receiving federal awards must establish and maintain written policies and procedures addressing areas including, but not limited to: procurement (§200.317–§200.327); travel costs (§200.475); methods for avoiding duplication of costs (§200.403); subrecipient monitoring (§200.332); cash management and allowable costs (§200.302, §200.305). Condition: The organization has not implemented all policies and procedures required under the Uniform Guidance. Specifically, certain written policies and procedures required by 2 CFR Part 200, such as cash management, allowability of costs, equipment management, conflict of interest, procurement, travel, compensation, and fringe benefits, were either incomplete, not formally documented, or not in place during the audit period. Cause: The Council has not detailed its policies to conform with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect: Without documented and implemented policies and procedures, the organization increases the risk of noncompliance with federal regulations, inconsistent application of requirements, unallowable costs being charged to federal awards, and potential questioned costs or sanctions from funding agencies. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: Management should develop, formally adopt, and implement all required Uniform Guidance policies and procedures. Policies should be documented, communicated to relevant staff, and periodically reviewed to ensure ongoing compliance. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and revise its policies and procedures to meet the criteria of the Uniform Guidance.
Assistance Listing Number: 93.193 Name of Federal Program: COVID-19 Urban Indian Health Services Name of Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Award Period: January 1, 2024 – December 31, 2024 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Per 2 CFR Part 200, non-federal entities receiving federal awards must establish and maintain written policies and procedures addressing areas including, but not limited to: procurement (§200.317–§200.327); travel costs (§200.475); methods for avoiding duplication of costs (§200.403); subrecipient monitoring (§200.332); cash management and allowable costs (§200.302, §200.305). Condition: The organization has not implemented all policies and procedures required under the Uniform Guidance. Specifically, certain written policies and procedures required by 2 CFR Part 200, such as cash management, allowability of costs, equipment management, conflict of interest, procurement, travel, compensation, and fringe benefits, were either incomplete, not formally documented, or not in place during the audit period. Cause: The Council has not detailed its policies to conform with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect: Without documented and implemented policies and procedures, the organization increases the risk of noncompliance with federal regulations, inconsistent application of requirements, unallowable costs being charged to federal awards, and potential questioned costs or sanctions from funding agencies. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: Management should develop, formally adopt, and implement all required Uniform Guidance policies and procedures. Policies should be documented, communicated to relevant staff, and periodically reviewed to ensure ongoing compliance. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and revise its policies and procedures to meet the criteria of the Uniform Guidance.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Economic Development Cluster - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Commerce Federal Program: Economic Adjustment Assistance Assistance Listings Number: 11.307 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): 06-79-06420 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective system of internal controls was not in place at the City in order to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the reporting compliance requirement. The grant agreement for the City's construction project states that the City is to submit a Federal Financial Report (SF-425) on a semi-annual basis. The SF-425 report includes, among other line items: cash receipts, cash disbursements, cash on hand, total federal funds authorized, and total recipient share required. Both of the submitted SF-425 reports were tested. Additionally, the City was required to submit progress reports on a quarterly basis. Two of the quarterly reports were selected for testing. Both the SF-425 reports and the quarterly progress reports were prepared and submitted by one employee of the City. Evidence of an established internal control over the reports tested was not available for audit. The data submitted in the SF-425 report submitted by the City for the reporting period ending on September 30, 2024, contained the following errors: Cash receipts were understated by $1,037,155. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 CITY OF KOKOMO SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cash disbursements were understated by $1,037,155. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the award 06-79-06420, EDA-Davis Road construction project. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following (see §§ 200.334, 200.335, 200.336, and 200.337): (1) Identification, in its accounts, of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the Assistance Listings title and number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. If a Federal awarding agency requires reporting on an accrual basis from a recipient that maintains its records on other than an accrual basis, the recipient must not be required to establish an accrual accounting system. This recipient may develop accrual data for its reports on the basis of an analysis of the documentation on hand. . . . (3) Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federallyfunded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures, income and interest and be supported by source documentation. . . ." Cause Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the City's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. The errors were due to federal reimbursements not being included as cash receipts and cash disbursements in the SF-425 reports. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 CITY OF KOKOMO SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls over reporting, the City could not ensure that the reports submitted were accurate. In addition, not meeting the Economic Development Cluster reporting requirements increases the likelihood that the public will not have access to transparent and accurate information regarding expenditures of federal awards. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the City. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the City design and implement a proper system of internal controls, including policies and procedures, to ensure that the City provides the Department of Commerce with complete and accurate information for the SF-425 and quarterly reports. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): 2024 Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/ Cost Principles, Period of Performance Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context As part of sound management of the federal award, the City was responsible for implementing a system of internal controls that would ensure compliance with the applicable requirements. The City had not properly designed or implemented such a system, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. Prior to the receipt of direct COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF), all eligible entities were required to execute a Financial Assistance Agreement (Agreement), which included the Award Terms and Conditions that recipients must comply with in carrying out the objectives of their award. Per the Agreement, the City was responsible for the effective administration of the federal award, as well as the application of sound management practices and administration of federal funds in a manner consistent with program objectives and terms and conditions of the award. Recipients may use SLFRF funds for any eligible expenses subject to the restrictions set forth in sections 602 and 603 of the Social Security Act, as added by section 9901 of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021. The SLFRF program provides substantial flexibility for each recipient to meet local needs within four separate eligible use categories. Recipients may use SLFRF funds to: • Respond to the COVID-19 public health emergency and its negative economic impacts; • Respond to workers performing essential work during the COVID-19 public health emergency by providing premium pay to eligible workers of eligible employers that have eligible workers who are performing essential work; • Provide government services, to the extent COVID-19 caused a reduction in revenues collected in the most recent full fiscal year of the recipient; and • Make necessary investments in water, sewer, or broadband infrastructure. The City elected to receive the standard revenue loss allowance, allowing it to claim its total SLFRF allocation of $3,821,386 as revenue loss to use for government services. The allocated funds may only be used to cover costs incurred from the period beginning on March 3, 2021, and ending on December 31, 2024. Obligations for costs incurred are required to be liquidated no later than December 31, 2026. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 CITY OF VINCENNES SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) During the audit period, the City completed one transfer of SLFRF funds from the Coronavirus State and Local Fi fund to the Grant Stipends fund in the amount of $30,000. The transfer was described as a reimbursement for stipends paid to essential workers. There was no documentation provided for audit to determine if the transfer was for allowable activities, met the cost objectives of the award, or that the associated expenditures were within the period of performance. The Grant Stipends fund was established in 2022, with total expenditures from the fund from 2022, 2023, and 2024 of only $28,009. Additionally, the transfer of SLFRF funds was commingled with other receipts into the Grant Stipends fund. Because the $30,000 transfer of SLFRF funds exceeded the total disbursements out of the Grant Stipends fund and because the City did not have an appropriate system in place to account for the federal expenditures separately from other grant and operating expenditures, we were unable to determine what, if any, expenditures from the Grant Stipends fund should be included in the population of federal expenditures under the award. Without a complete population of expenditures, we were unable to determine the City's compliance with the Activities Allowed or Unallowed, the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, and the Period of Performance compliance requirements. As such, the $30,000 transferred from the Coronavirus State and Local Fi fund is considered questioned costs. The City also did not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of 2 CFR 200. The lack of effective internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the situations described above. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.300(b) states in part: "The non-Federal entity is responsible for complying with all requirements of the Federal award. . . ." 2 CFR 200.302 states in part: "(a) Each state must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state's own funds. In addition, the state's and the other non-Federal entity's financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. . . . INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 CITY OF VINCENNES SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (b) The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (1) Identification, in its accounts, of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the Assistance Listings title and number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . . (3) Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federallyfunded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures, income and interest and be supported by source documentation. (4) Effective control over, and accountability for, all funds, property, and other assets. . . . (7) Written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the Federal award." 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. . . . (g) be adequately documented. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls over the SLFRF expenditures was not designed by management of the City to ensure the SLFRF funds were being used appropriately. The City did not have policies and procedures in place to ensure that expenditures of federal awards were allowable and occurred within the period of performance. The City initiated a transfer of SLFRF funds from the grant fund to another fund without proper supporting documentation. The City was unable to differentiate expenditures made from federal and nonfederal funds within its ledger for the Grant Stipends fund. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, a population of expenditures associated with the Grant Stipends fund could not be determined. As such, the City cannot ensure nor can we determine that expenditures of the grant were not unallowable, within the proper period, and adhered to established practices and policies. As a result, noncompliance in the form of questioned costs occurred and remained undetected. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the City. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 CITY OF VINCENNES SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Questioned Costs Questioned costs in the amount of $30,000 were identified as noted in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended the City's management establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that expenditures of federal awards are allowable and occur within the period of performance. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-005 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): 2024 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context As part of sound management of the federal award, the City was responsible for implementing a system of internal controls that would ensure compliance with the applicable requirements. The City had not properly designed or implemented such a system, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. Recipients are required to submit an initial interim report and quarterly or annually submit Project and Expenditure (P&E) reports to the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury). The reporting periods, as well as the respective due dates are based upon type of recipient and its population, as well as the recipient's allocation amount. Information to be reported includes projects funded, expenditures, and contracts for the appropriate reporting period. The City was classified as a city with a population below 250,000 residents that was allocated less than $10 million in COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF). As such, an annual P&E report, covering one calendar year from April 1, 2023 to March 31, 2024, was prepared and submitted by the Clerk-Treasurer to the Treasury by April 30, 2024. The P&E report data to be submitted included, but was not limited to, current period and total cumulative obligations and current period and total cumulative expenditures. We were unable to trace the annual P&E report to the City's records. The errors identified were as follows: Total cumulative obligations were overstated by $1,732,149. Current period obligations were understated by $2,089,238. Current period expenditures and total cumulative expenditures were both overstated by $38,398. In addition, the P&E report required obligations and expenditures to be reported by project. The City completed the report utilizing total amounts for all projects. There were 11 projects appropriated using the SLFRF award. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 CITY OF VINCENNES SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." 31 CFR 35.4(c) states in part: "Reporting and requests for other information. During the period of performance, recipients shall provide to the Secretary periodic reports providing detailed accounting of the uses of funds, . . ." Compliance and Reporting Guidance, State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, page 13, states in part: ". . . 10. Reporting. All recipients of federal funds must complete financial, performance, and compliance reporting as required and outlined in Part 2 of this guidance. Expenditures may be reported on a cash or accrual basis, as long as the methodology is disclosed and consistently applied. Reporting must be consistent with the definition of expenditures pursuant to 2 CFR 200.1. Your organization should appropriately maintain accounting records for compiling and reporting accurate, compliant financial data, in accordance with appropriate accounting standards and principles. . . ." Cause The City officials appropriated the entire SLFRF award in May 2022 and reported the entire award amount as obligated in the P&E reports completed in 2023 and 2024. City officials were not aware that appropriating the funds alone does not constitute obligations of the award. Additionally, correcting adjustments made after the report was submitted partially contributed to the differences noted in expenditures. City officials were also not aware that obligations and expenditures could not be reported in total but should be reported by project. Effect Without a proper system of internal controls in place that operated effectively, the City did not file an accurate annual P&E report as required under the federal award. As such, the City did not accurately report current period obligations, cumulative obligations, current period expenditures, and cumulative expenditures when filing the P&E report for the period April 1, 2023 to March 31, 2024. As a result, material noncompliance occurred and remained undetected. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the City. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 CITY OF VINCENNES SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the City's management establish a proper system of internal controls and develop and implement reporting policies and procedures to ensure that all required reports are complete and accurate when submitted. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
2 CFR 1000.10 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Treasury for 2 CFR part 200. 2 CFR 200.302 states, in part, the non-Federal entity's financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.302 further states, in part, the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for accurate, current, and complete disclosures of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. Additionally, the Ohio Department of Development (ODOD) Water and Wastewater Infrastructure Program Grant Agreement provides in Exhibit II that "Program reports must be submitted on a quarterly basis. Program reports must be submitted by close of business, on the second Friday at the end of each quarter". Due to deficiencies in the Village’s internal controls over reporting, the Village did not submit quarterly program reports for any quarter in 2024. Failure to submit required quarterly program reports could result in the Village not receiving the reimbursements that it is entitled to. The Village should implement internal controls to ensure that reports are submitted by the required deadlines per reporting requirements.
CONDITION: During our testing of federal expenditures, we selected a sample of 25 transactions. For twelve of these transactions, totaling $3,003, the PALM could not provide the original or reconstructed vendor receipts. The payments were supported only by credit card statements, which did not include a detailed description of the goods or services purchased. CRITERIA: The PALM is required by federal grant guidelines, specifically 2 CFR 200.302, to maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. CAUSE: The primary cause is a breakdown in the PALM’s internal controls over procurement and record-keeping. The lack of a consistent process to ensure all staff members who make purchases submit timely and complete receipts has created a weakness that could lead to unallowable costs being charged to the federal award. EFFECT: The lack of supporting documentation prevents the auditor from determining if the costs were necessary, reasonable, and for the exclusive purpose of the federal award. This also increases the risk of fraud, waste, and abuse. The grantee is at risk of having these costs disallowed and potentially required to repay the federal agency for the undocumented expenditures. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend that management implement a more robust internal control system to ensure all federal expenditures are supported by proper documentation. This includes: • Mandating that all employees submit itemized receipts for purchases made on federal awards. • Creating a "Missing Receipt" form that requires a detailed explanation and supervisory approval when an original receipt cannot be located. • Providing mandatory training for staff on proper procurement and documentation procedures. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION: The PALM believes the expenses referred to were indeed for allowable costs for the federal program. They will start to maintain all proper source documentation regardless of dollar amount. QUESTIONED COSTS: A total of $3,003 is being questioned for twelve transactions lacking adequate documentation.
Criteria or Specific Requirement: Per 2 CFR §200.302, nonfederal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards to provide reasonable assurance of compliance with applicable federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. • Cash Management requirements under 2 CFR §200.305 require that drawdowns be based on allowable costs incurred, supported by documentation, and reviewed for accuracy prior to submission. • Matching requirements under 2 CFR §200.306 require that cost sharing or matching contributions be verifiable from the entity’s records and documented in accordance with the cost principles. Entities must retain written documentation of the review and approval process before submission of reimbursement requests to ensure accuracy and compliance. Condition: The Organization maintained a written cash management policy; however, the policy did not specify that documentation of review and approval of reimbursement requests must be retained. As a result, the Organization was unable to provide written evidence of review and approval prior to submission of certain reimbursement requests. In addition, the Organization did not have a formal written policy addressing the review, approval, and documentation of matching contributions to ensure they are allowable, verifiable, and in compliance with federal requirements. While management indicated that a review process occurs, the lack of documented approval reduces the audit trail and does not provide adequate evidence that costs included in the requests were reviewed for accuracy, allowability, and compliance with both cash management and matching requirements. Cause: The lack of specificity in the cash management policy regarding retention of documented approvals, combined with the absence of a written matching policy, resulted in a lack of written documentation of the review and approval process that could be verified. Effect or Potential Effect: Without documented approval for reimbursement requests or a formal policy over matching, there is an increased risk that unallowable or unsupported costs could be included in reimbursement requests or that matching contributions could be inaccurately reported, potentially resulting in noncompliance with federal requirements. Questioned Costs: Not applicable as there were no questioned costs related to noncompliance. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization strengthen its internal controls over cash management and matching by implementing the following: 1. Update the cash management policy to require documented review and approval of reimbursement requests, with such documentation retained as part of the grant record. 2. Develop and implement a formal written matching policy that includes procedures for review, approval, and documentation of matching contributions to ensure compliance with 2 CFR §200.306. Repeat finding from prior year: No – this is the Organization’s first single audit. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See attached corrective action plan.
2024-002 Procedures for Match Requirements – Significant Deficiency Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.306, recipients must provide required cost sharing or matching as stipulated in the award. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7) requires nonfederal entities to have written procedures to ensure compliance with the terms and conditions of federal awards, including matching requirements. Condition: During our audit, we noted that Mountain Home does not have written policies and procedures in place to ensure compliance with the federal grant’s matching requirement. While management tracks matching expenditures, there is no documented process describing how matching costs are identified, recorded, reviewed, or monitored for compliance. Cause: Undetermined. Effect: Without documented policies and procedures, there is an increased risk that matching requirements may not be met, that ineligible costs could be charged as match, or that insufficient documentation may exist to support amounts reported to the granting agency. This could lead to questioned costs, disallowance of claimed matching contributions, or potential noncompliance with federal grant requirements. Recommendation: We recommend that management develop and implement written policies and procedures that describe the process for identifying, tracking, and reviewing matching expenditures.
Finding 2024-002 Material Weakness in Controls over Compliance and Material Noncompliance – Allowable Costs Federal Program: 93.137 Community Programs to Improve Minority Health Year: 2024 Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Criteria – In accordance with 2 CFR 200.403 and 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3) costs charged to the federal program should be adequately supported by source documentation. Condition – Payroll expenses for one employee were inadvertently recorded twice for the fiscal year, resulting in an overstatement of personnel costs charged to the federal award. Further, indirect costs were charged in excess of the budgeted and approved amount under the grant agreement. Cause – The capturing of payroll expenses to the federal grant was not set up appropriately in the general ledger system which led management to record the above entries manually to the grant program. The manual process led to the duplication of the payroll journal entry and the overcharging of the indirect cost. Perspective – There are six key personnel who charged payroll to the federal program. Out of the six personnel one individual’s payroll was incorrectly duplicated. This resulted in a $30,291 over charge to the grant. Further, from an indirect cost perspective, the grant budget limited indirect costs to $18,296, however a total of $70,965 was charged to the grant, resulting in a $52,669 overcharge. Questioned Cost - $82,960 Effect – Overcharging expenses may result in the granting agency withholding future funding for this grant. Recommendation – Ensure the grant is appropriately set up in the system to capture the relevant expenses. Management also needs to have a more precise control to ensure no expense items are duplicated and are within budget. View of Responsible Officials – See Corrective Action Plan
Material Weakness/Noncompliance – Allowable Costs/Cost Principles 2 CFR 200 outlines the following policies required for a County spending Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: • 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7) for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E-Cost Principles; • 2 CFR 200.430 for allowability of compensation costs; 2 CFR 200.464(a)(2) for reimbursement of relocation costs; During testing we noted that the County Commissioner’s department did not have sufficient written policies addressing the above requirements. Failure to adopt and implement policies could lead to noncompliance with federal requirements. We recommend the County approve and implement the above policies to ensure compliance with federal requirements.
2 CFR 200 outlines the following policies required for a County spending for Foster Care Title IV-E funds: • 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7) for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E-Cost Principles; During testing we noted that the County Children Services department did not have sufficient written policies addressing the above requirement. Failure to adopt and implement policies could lead to noncompliance with federal requirements. We recommend the County approve and implement the above policies to ensure compliance with federal requirements.
Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds- Assistance Listing Number 21.027 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Pass-through Entity: Illinois Department of Human Services Condition: The Organization has not established written procedures to identify, assess risk of, monitor, or accurately track amounts provided to subrecipients of ARPA funding. No subrecipient notification letters were issued to entities receiving subawards, and the Organization could not provide complete and accurate records of the amounts passed through to subrecipients during the audit period. Criteria: 2 CFR §200.331 requires pass-through entities to evaluate subrecipient risk, ensure each subaward is properly identified, issue required subaward notifications, verify suspension/debarment status, monitor subrecipient activities, and ensure subrecipients meet audit requirements. 2 CFR §200.302 further requires non-federal entities to identify, in their accounts, all federal awards received and expended, including amounts provided to subrecipients, to ensure accurate financial reporting and SEFA disclosure. Cause: Lack of formal policies and training regarding pass-through responsibilities under Uniform Guidance. Effect: The Organization cannot demonstrate compliance with federal pass-through requirements. This increases the risk of unallowable costs, subrecipient noncompliance, and misstated SEFA reporting due to the inability to determine and disclose amounts passed through to subrecipients . Questioned Costs: None noted during audit testing. Auditor’s Recommendation: The Organization should adopt written subrecipient monitoring and tracking policies, perform risk assessments, issue subaward notifications with all required elements, and implement procedures to accurately record and disclose the amounts provided to subrecipients in the general ledger and SEFA.
Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds- Assistance Listing Number 21.027 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Pass-through Entity: Illinois Department of Human Services Condition: The Organization does not track federal award expenditures separately in its general ledger. ARPA expenditures are commingled with other organizational expenses, making it difficult to directly reconcile federal activity to the SEFA or supporting records. Criteria: 2 CFR §200.302 requires non-federal entities to identify, in their accounts, all federal awards received and expended, and the federal programs under which they were received. The financial management system must provide for accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each federal award. Entities must be able to identify federal awards separately by Assistance Listing number. Cause: The Organization has not implemented an accounting system or chart of accounts structure that captures federal awards separately by Assistance Listing number. Effect: Without separate identification of federal award expenditures, the Organization cannot readily demonstrate allowability of costs, reconcile SEFA expenditures to its accounting system, or ensure compliance with federal cost principles. This increases the risk of misstated SEFA reporting, unsupported expenditures, or disallowed costs. Questioned Costs: None specifically identified during audit testing; however, the lack of a tracking mechanism impairs the Organization’s ability to fully support ARPA expenditures. Auditor’s Recommendation: The Organization should establish accounting procedures to ensure federal award expenditures are tracked separately in the general ledger by Assistance Listing number and by grant. The Organization should reconcile grant expenditures recorded in the general ledger to reimbursement requests and the SEFA on a regular basis.