Finding 2024-026 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Cash Management Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-022 Condition: For 1 out of 2 selections, the drawdown request forms did not have the approval of the Grant Service Director. For 1 out of 2 selections, the GL support provided included expenditures incurred after the request was submitted on Payment Management System (PMS). Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303: Internal Control, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. According to AM 413-60, Grant Documentation, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director Conducts ongoing monitoring and control of all reimbursement receipts and deposits until grant ends; as well as all program and sub-recipient (when applicable) documentation, to include: (1) program documentation; (2) timesheets; (3) deliverables; (4) activities; (5) vendor payments; (6) program data/charts/numbers; and (7) financial and compliance report. According to AM 413-61, Grant Management Financial Reporting, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director maintains all documentation, either electronic or hard copy, for all Federally funded grants for the term of the grant for a minimum of seven years for review and audit by the granting agency or its designee. Cause: Controls surrounding the cash drawdown process are not operating effectively. The agency could not reconcile information presented in the expenditure report to the underlying records. Finance and the agency use different parameters for generating reports and there was no documentation of the reconciling differences. Effect: Expenditures are not reviewed prior to submission of request. Expenditures reported to the federal government could be inaccurate. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that the City review policies, procedures and practices in place over controls related to reviewing and approving drawdowns prior to submission in PMS. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-027 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-023 Condition: For 1 out of 1 selection, we were unable to agree the expenditure details from the general ledger to the amount reported in the Federal Financial Report to ensure completeness, accuracy and compliance with required accounting basis. Additionally, we could not verify if the Final Performance Progress and Evaluation Report (PPER) was submitted. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Additionally, the grant agreement requires the Federal Financial Report to be submitted through recipient online accounts in the Payment Management System and the Final Performance Progress and Evaluation Report (PPER) to be submitted via www.grantsolutions.gov. no later than 120 days after the period of performance end date. Cause: The agency could not reconcile information reported in the expenditure report to the state to the underlying records. Finance and the agency use different parameters for running reports and neither department reconciled the other reporting completed. BCHD does not have controls in place to ensure reporting requirements of the grant are met. Effect: Expenditures reported to the federal government could be inaccurate. BCHD may not be in compliance with the reporting requirements. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement a process to reconcile reports used by the various departments for external reporting to the City’s internal records to validate compliance with reporting requirements. Additionally, there should be a process to ensure all reports are submitted timely. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-026 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Cash Management Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-022 Condition: For 1 out of 2 selections, the drawdown request forms did not have the approval of the Grant Service Director. For 1 out of 2 selections, the GL support provided included expenditures incurred after the request was submitted on Payment Management System (PMS). Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303: Internal Control, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. According to AM 413-60, Grant Documentation, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director Conducts ongoing monitoring and control of all reimbursement receipts and deposits until grant ends; as well as all program and sub-recipient (when applicable) documentation, to include: (1) program documentation; (2) timesheets; (3) deliverables; (4) activities; (5) vendor payments; (6) program data/charts/numbers; and (7) financial and compliance report. According to AM 413-61, Grant Management Financial Reporting, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director maintains all documentation, either electronic or hard copy, for all Federally funded grants for the term of the grant for a minimum of seven years for review and audit by the granting agency or its designee. Cause: Controls surrounding the cash drawdown process are not operating effectively. The agency could not reconcile information presented in the expenditure report to the underlying records. Finance and the agency use different parameters for generating reports and there was no documentation of the reconciling differences. Effect: Expenditures are not reviewed prior to submission of request. Expenditures reported to the federal government could be inaccurate. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that the City review policies, procedures and practices in place over controls related to reviewing and approving drawdowns prior to submission in PMS. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-027 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-023 Condition: For 1 out of 1 selection, we were unable to agree the expenditure details from the general ledger to the amount reported in the Federal Financial Report to ensure completeness, accuracy and compliance with required accounting basis. Additionally, we could not verify if the Final Performance Progress and Evaluation Report (PPER) was submitted. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Additionally, the grant agreement requires the Federal Financial Report to be submitted through recipient online accounts in the Payment Management System and the Final Performance Progress and Evaluation Report (PPER) to be submitted via www.grantsolutions.gov. no later than 120 days after the period of performance end date. Cause: The agency could not reconcile information reported in the expenditure report to the state to the underlying records. Finance and the agency use different parameters for running reports and neither department reconciled the other reporting completed. BCHD does not have controls in place to ensure reporting requirements of the grant are met. Effect: Expenditures reported to the federal government could be inaccurate. BCHD may not be in compliance with the reporting requirements. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement a process to reconcile reports used by the various departments for external reporting to the City’s internal records to validate compliance with reporting requirements. Additionally, there should be a process to ensure all reports are submitted timely. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-026 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Cash Management Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-022 Condition: For 1 out of 2 selections, the drawdown request forms did not have the approval of the Grant Service Director. For 1 out of 2 selections, the GL support provided included expenditures incurred after the request was submitted on Payment Management System (PMS). Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303: Internal Control, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. According to AM 413-60, Grant Documentation, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director Conducts ongoing monitoring and control of all reimbursement receipts and deposits until grant ends; as well as all program and sub-recipient (when applicable) documentation, to include: (1) program documentation; (2) timesheets; (3) deliverables; (4) activities; (5) vendor payments; (6) program data/charts/numbers; and (7) financial and compliance report. According to AM 413-61, Grant Management Financial Reporting, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director maintains all documentation, either electronic or hard copy, for all Federally funded grants for the term of the grant for a minimum of seven years for review and audit by the granting agency or its designee. Cause: Controls surrounding the cash drawdown process are not operating effectively. The agency could not reconcile information presented in the expenditure report to the underlying records. Finance and the agency use different parameters for generating reports and there was no documentation of the reconciling differences. Effect: Expenditures are not reviewed prior to submission of request. Expenditures reported to the federal government could be inaccurate. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that the City review policies, procedures and practices in place over controls related to reviewing and approving drawdowns prior to submission in PMS. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-027 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-023 Condition: For 1 out of 1 selection, we were unable to agree the expenditure details from the general ledger to the amount reported in the Federal Financial Report to ensure completeness, accuracy and compliance with required accounting basis. Additionally, we could not verify if the Final Performance Progress and Evaluation Report (PPER) was submitted. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Additionally, the grant agreement requires the Federal Financial Report to be submitted through recipient online accounts in the Payment Management System and the Final Performance Progress and Evaluation Report (PPER) to be submitted via www.grantsolutions.gov. no later than 120 days after the period of performance end date. Cause: The agency could not reconcile information reported in the expenditure report to the state to the underlying records. Finance and the agency use different parameters for running reports and neither department reconciled the other reporting completed. BCHD does not have controls in place to ensure reporting requirements of the grant are met. Effect: Expenditures reported to the federal government could be inaccurate. BCHD may not be in compliance with the reporting requirements. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement a process to reconcile reports used by the various departments for external reporting to the City’s internal records to validate compliance with reporting requirements. Additionally, there should be a process to ensure all reports are submitted timely. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-026 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Cash Management Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-022 Condition: For 1 out of 2 selections, the drawdown request forms did not have the approval of the Grant Service Director. For 1 out of 2 selections, the GL support provided included expenditures incurred after the request was submitted on Payment Management System (PMS). Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303: Internal Control, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. According to AM 413-60, Grant Documentation, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director Conducts ongoing monitoring and control of all reimbursement receipts and deposits until grant ends; as well as all program and sub-recipient (when applicable) documentation, to include: (1) program documentation; (2) timesheets; (3) deliverables; (4) activities; (5) vendor payments; (6) program data/charts/numbers; and (7) financial and compliance report. According to AM 413-61, Grant Management Financial Reporting, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director maintains all documentation, either electronic or hard copy, for all Federally funded grants for the term of the grant for a minimum of seven years for review and audit by the granting agency or its designee. Cause: Controls surrounding the cash drawdown process are not operating effectively. The agency could not reconcile information presented in the expenditure report to the underlying records. Finance and the agency use different parameters for generating reports and there was no documentation of the reconciling differences. Effect: Expenditures are not reviewed prior to submission of request. Expenditures reported to the federal government could be inaccurate. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that the City review policies, procedures and practices in place over controls related to reviewing and approving drawdowns prior to submission in PMS. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-027 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-023 Condition: For 1 out of 1 selection, we were unable to agree the expenditure details from the general ledger to the amount reported in the Federal Financial Report to ensure completeness, accuracy and compliance with required accounting basis. Additionally, we could not verify if the Final Performance Progress and Evaluation Report (PPER) was submitted. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Additionally, the grant agreement requires the Federal Financial Report to be submitted through recipient online accounts in the Payment Management System and the Final Performance Progress and Evaluation Report (PPER) to be submitted via www.grantsolutions.gov. no later than 120 days after the period of performance end date. Cause: The agency could not reconcile information reported in the expenditure report to the state to the underlying records. Finance and the agency use different parameters for running reports and neither department reconciled the other reporting completed. BCHD does not have controls in place to ensure reporting requirements of the grant are met. Effect: Expenditures reported to the federal government could be inaccurate. BCHD may not be in compliance with the reporting requirements. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement a process to reconcile reports used by the various departments for external reporting to the City’s internal records to validate compliance with reporting requirements. Additionally, there should be a process to ensure all reports are submitted timely. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-026 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Cash Management Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-022 Condition: For 1 out of 2 selections, the drawdown request forms did not have the approval of the Grant Service Director. For 1 out of 2 selections, the GL support provided included expenditures incurred after the request was submitted on Payment Management System (PMS). Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303: Internal Control, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. According to AM 413-60, Grant Documentation, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director Conducts ongoing monitoring and control of all reimbursement receipts and deposits until grant ends; as well as all program and sub-recipient (when applicable) documentation, to include: (1) program documentation; (2) timesheets; (3) deliverables; (4) activities; (5) vendor payments; (6) program data/charts/numbers; and (7) financial and compliance report. According to AM 413-61, Grant Management Financial Reporting, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director maintains all documentation, either electronic or hard copy, for all Federally funded grants for the term of the grant for a minimum of seven years for review and audit by the granting agency or its designee. Cause: Controls surrounding the cash drawdown process are not operating effectively. The agency could not reconcile information presented in the expenditure report to the underlying records. Finance and the agency use different parameters for generating reports and there was no documentation of the reconciling differences. Effect: Expenditures are not reviewed prior to submission of request. Expenditures reported to the federal government could be inaccurate. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that the City review policies, procedures and practices in place over controls related to reviewing and approving drawdowns prior to submission in PMS. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-027 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-023 Condition: For 1 out of 1 selection, we were unable to agree the expenditure details from the general ledger to the amount reported in the Federal Financial Report to ensure completeness, accuracy and compliance with required accounting basis. Additionally, we could not verify if the Final Performance Progress and Evaluation Report (PPER) was submitted. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Additionally, the grant agreement requires the Federal Financial Report to be submitted through recipient online accounts in the Payment Management System and the Final Performance Progress and Evaluation Report (PPER) to be submitted via www.grantsolutions.gov. no later than 120 days after the period of performance end date. Cause: The agency could not reconcile information reported in the expenditure report to the state to the underlying records. Finance and the agency use different parameters for running reports and neither department reconciled the other reporting completed. BCHD does not have controls in place to ensure reporting requirements of the grant are met. Effect: Expenditures reported to the federal government could be inaccurate. BCHD may not be in compliance with the reporting requirements. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement a process to reconcile reports used by the various departments for external reporting to the City’s internal records to validate compliance with reporting requirements. Additionally, there should be a process to ensure all reports are submitted timely. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-026 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Cash Management Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-022 Condition: For 1 out of 2 selections, the drawdown request forms did not have the approval of the Grant Service Director. For 1 out of 2 selections, the GL support provided included expenditures incurred after the request was submitted on Payment Management System (PMS). Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303: Internal Control, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. According to AM 413-60, Grant Documentation, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director Conducts ongoing monitoring and control of all reimbursement receipts and deposits until grant ends; as well as all program and sub-recipient (when applicable) documentation, to include: (1) program documentation; (2) timesheets; (3) deliverables; (4) activities; (5) vendor payments; (6) program data/charts/numbers; and (7) financial and compliance report. According to AM 413-61, Grant Management Financial Reporting, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director maintains all documentation, either electronic or hard copy, for all Federally funded grants for the term of the grant for a minimum of seven years for review and audit by the granting agency or its designee. Cause: Controls surrounding the cash drawdown process are not operating effectively. The agency could not reconcile information presented in the expenditure report to the underlying records. Finance and the agency use different parameters for generating reports and there was no documentation of the reconciling differences. Effect: Expenditures are not reviewed prior to submission of request. Expenditures reported to the federal government could be inaccurate. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that the City review policies, procedures and practices in place over controls related to reviewing and approving drawdowns prior to submission in PMS. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-027 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-023 Condition: For 1 out of 1 selection, we were unable to agree the expenditure details from the general ledger to the amount reported in the Federal Financial Report to ensure completeness, accuracy and compliance with required accounting basis. Additionally, we could not verify if the Final Performance Progress and Evaluation Report (PPER) was submitted. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Additionally, the grant agreement requires the Federal Financial Report to be submitted through recipient online accounts in the Payment Management System and the Final Performance Progress and Evaluation Report (PPER) to be submitted via www.grantsolutions.gov. no later than 120 days after the period of performance end date. Cause: The agency could not reconcile information reported in the expenditure report to the state to the underlying records. Finance and the agency use different parameters for running reports and neither department reconciled the other reporting completed. BCHD does not have controls in place to ensure reporting requirements of the grant are met. Effect: Expenditures reported to the federal government could be inaccurate. BCHD may not be in compliance with the reporting requirements. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement a process to reconcile reports used by the various departments for external reporting to the City’s internal records to validate compliance with reporting requirements. Additionally, there should be a process to ensure all reports are submitted timely. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-026 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Cash Management Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-022 Condition: For 1 out of 2 selections, the drawdown request forms did not have the approval of the Grant Service Director. For 1 out of 2 selections, the GL support provided included expenditures incurred after the request was submitted on Payment Management System (PMS). Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303: Internal Control, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. According to AM 413-60, Grant Documentation, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director Conducts ongoing monitoring and control of all reimbursement receipts and deposits until grant ends; as well as all program and sub-recipient (when applicable) documentation, to include: (1) program documentation; (2) timesheets; (3) deliverables; (4) activities; (5) vendor payments; (6) program data/charts/numbers; and (7) financial and compliance report. According to AM 413-61, Grant Management Financial Reporting, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director maintains all documentation, either electronic or hard copy, for all Federally funded grants for the term of the grant for a minimum of seven years for review and audit by the granting agency or its designee. Cause: Controls surrounding the cash drawdown process are not operating effectively. The agency could not reconcile information presented in the expenditure report to the underlying records. Finance and the agency use different parameters for generating reports and there was no documentation of the reconciling differences. Effect: Expenditures are not reviewed prior to submission of request. Expenditures reported to the federal government could be inaccurate. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that the City review policies, procedures and practices in place over controls related to reviewing and approving drawdowns prior to submission in PMS. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-027 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-023 Condition: For 1 out of 1 selection, we were unable to agree the expenditure details from the general ledger to the amount reported in the Federal Financial Report to ensure completeness, accuracy and compliance with required accounting basis. Additionally, we could not verify if the Final Performance Progress and Evaluation Report (PPER) was submitted. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Additionally, the grant agreement requires the Federal Financial Report to be submitted through recipient online accounts in the Payment Management System and the Final Performance Progress and Evaluation Report (PPER) to be submitted via www.grantsolutions.gov. no later than 120 days after the period of performance end date. Cause: The agency could not reconcile information reported in the expenditure report to the state to the underlying records. Finance and the agency use different parameters for running reports and neither department reconciled the other reporting completed. BCHD does not have controls in place to ensure reporting requirements of the grant are met. Effect: Expenditures reported to the federal government could be inaccurate. BCHD may not be in compliance with the reporting requirements. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement a process to reconcile reports used by the various departments for external reporting to the City’s internal records to validate compliance with reporting requirements. Additionally, there should be a process to ensure all reports are submitted timely. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-026 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Cash Management Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-022 Condition: For 1 out of 2 selections, the drawdown request forms did not have the approval of the Grant Service Director. For 1 out of 2 selections, the GL support provided included expenditures incurred after the request was submitted on Payment Management System (PMS). Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303: Internal Control, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. According to AM 413-60, Grant Documentation, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director Conducts ongoing monitoring and control of all reimbursement receipts and deposits until grant ends; as well as all program and sub-recipient (when applicable) documentation, to include: (1) program documentation; (2) timesheets; (3) deliverables; (4) activities; (5) vendor payments; (6) program data/charts/numbers; and (7) financial and compliance report. According to AM 413-61, Grant Management Financial Reporting, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director maintains all documentation, either electronic or hard copy, for all Federally funded grants for the term of the grant for a minimum of seven years for review and audit by the granting agency or its designee. Cause: Controls surrounding the cash drawdown process are not operating effectively. The agency could not reconcile information presented in the expenditure report to the underlying records. Finance and the agency use different parameters for generating reports and there was no documentation of the reconciling differences. Effect: Expenditures are not reviewed prior to submission of request. Expenditures reported to the federal government could be inaccurate. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that the City review policies, procedures and practices in place over controls related to reviewing and approving drawdowns prior to submission in PMS. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-027 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-023 Condition: For 1 out of 1 selection, we were unable to agree the expenditure details from the general ledger to the amount reported in the Federal Financial Report to ensure completeness, accuracy and compliance with required accounting basis. Additionally, we could not verify if the Final Performance Progress and Evaluation Report (PPER) was submitted. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Additionally, the grant agreement requires the Federal Financial Report to be submitted through recipient online accounts in the Payment Management System and the Final Performance Progress and Evaluation Report (PPER) to be submitted via www.grantsolutions.gov. no later than 120 days after the period of performance end date. Cause: The agency could not reconcile information reported in the expenditure report to the state to the underlying records. Finance and the agency use different parameters for running reports and neither department reconciled the other reporting completed. BCHD does not have controls in place to ensure reporting requirements of the grant are met. Effect: Expenditures reported to the federal government could be inaccurate. BCHD may not be in compliance with the reporting requirements. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement a process to reconcile reports used by the various departments for external reporting to the City’s internal records to validate compliance with reporting requirements. Additionally, there should be a process to ensure all reports are submitted timely. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-026 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Cash Management Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-022 Condition: For 1 out of 2 selections, the drawdown request forms did not have the approval of the Grant Service Director. For 1 out of 2 selections, the GL support provided included expenditures incurred after the request was submitted on Payment Management System (PMS). Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303: Internal Control, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. According to AM 413-60, Grant Documentation, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director Conducts ongoing monitoring and control of all reimbursement receipts and deposits until grant ends; as well as all program and sub-recipient (when applicable) documentation, to include: (1) program documentation; (2) timesheets; (3) deliverables; (4) activities; (5) vendor payments; (6) program data/charts/numbers; and (7) financial and compliance report. According to AM 413-61, Grant Management Financial Reporting, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director maintains all documentation, either electronic or hard copy, for all Federally funded grants for the term of the grant for a minimum of seven years for review and audit by the granting agency or its designee. Cause: Controls surrounding the cash drawdown process are not operating effectively. The agency could not reconcile information presented in the expenditure report to the underlying records. Finance and the agency use different parameters for generating reports and there was no documentation of the reconciling differences. Effect: Expenditures are not reviewed prior to submission of request. Expenditures reported to the federal government could be inaccurate. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that the City review policies, procedures and practices in place over controls related to reviewing and approving drawdowns prior to submission in PMS. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Finding 2024-027 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2023-023 Condition: For 1 out of 1 selection, we were unable to agree the expenditure details from the general ledger to the amount reported in the Federal Financial Report to ensure completeness, accuracy and compliance with required accounting basis. Additionally, we could not verify if the Final Performance Progress and Evaluation Report (PPER) was submitted. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Additionally, the grant agreement requires the Federal Financial Report to be submitted through recipient online accounts in the Payment Management System and the Final Performance Progress and Evaluation Report (PPER) to be submitted via www.grantsolutions.gov. no later than 120 days after the period of performance end date. Cause: The agency could not reconcile information reported in the expenditure report to the state to the underlying records. Finance and the agency use different parameters for running reports and neither department reconciled the other reporting completed. BCHD does not have controls in place to ensure reporting requirements of the grant are met. Effect: Expenditures reported to the federal government could be inaccurate. BCHD may not be in compliance with the reporting requirements. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement a process to reconcile reports used by the various departments for external reporting to the City’s internal records to validate compliance with reporting requirements. Additionally, there should be a process to ensure all reports are submitted timely. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Criteria: The auditee must prepare the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for the period under audit in accordance with the Uniform Guidance Sections 2 CFR 200.302(b) and 2 CFR 200.510(b). Condition: During our audit of the SEFA submitted by the Clinic, we noted that the Clinic inadvertently included nonfederal grants in the SEFA. Further, the Clinic inaccurately included out-of-performance period expenses in its SEFA due to inaccurate identification of the grant period during the SEFA preparation. The Clinic corrected the SEFA after the errors were brought to their attention. Cause: Wilmington was short-staffed and dealt with time constraints in the preparation and review of the SEFA. Effect: Inaccurate SEFA can lead to improper risk assessment and incorrect identification of major federal programs subject to audit. Revisions of the SEFA were necessary to ensure the completeness and accuracy of the federal expenditures reported. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend that the Clinic revisit its internal control processes over the preparation and review of the SEFA in conjunction with its other federal reporting requirements to ensure that the SEFA and all federal reports for internal and external purposes are accurate and complete. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The Clinic will be seeking professional consultation and guidance on a process to support and enforce monthly reconciliations of the amounts submitted for the grant with the amounts booked within the system, using appropriate grant-tracking schedules. Relevant staff will be retrained, and a monthly review will be completed by an appropriate professional and submitted to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO). Personnel responsible for implementation: Deborah Lerner, CEO and Board of Directors Date of implementation: July 1, 2025
Criteria: The auditee must prepare the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for the period under audit in accordance with the Uniform Guidance Sections 2 CFR 200.302(b) and 2 CFR 200.510(b). Condition: During our audit of the SEFA submitted by the Clinic, we noted that the Clinic inadvertently included nonfederal grants in the SEFA. Further, the Clinic inaccurately included out-of-performance period expenses in its SEFA due to inaccurate identification of the grant period during the SEFA preparation. The Clinic corrected the SEFA after the errors were brought to their attention. Cause: Wilmington was short-staffed and dealt with time constraints in the preparation and review of the SEFA. Effect: Inaccurate SEFA can lead to improper risk assessment and incorrect identification of major federal programs subject to audit. Revisions of the SEFA were necessary to ensure the completeness and accuracy of the federal expenditures reported. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend that the Clinic revisit its internal control processes over the preparation and review of the SEFA in conjunction with its other federal reporting requirements to ensure that the SEFA and all federal reports for internal and external purposes are accurate and complete. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The Clinic will be seeking professional consultation and guidance on a process to support and enforce monthly reconciliations of the amounts submitted for the grant with the amounts booked within the system, using appropriate grant-tracking schedules. Relevant staff will be retrained, and a monthly review will be completed by an appropriate professional and submitted to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO). Personnel responsible for implementation: Deborah Lerner, CEO and Board of Directors Date of implementation: July 1, 2025
Criteria: The auditee must prepare the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for the period under audit in accordance with the Uniform Guidance Sections 2 CFR 200.302(b) and 2 CFR 200.510(b). Condition: During our audit of the SEFA submitted by the Clinic, we noted that the Clinic inadvertently included nonfederal grants in the SEFA. Further, the Clinic inaccurately included out-of-performance period expenses in its SEFA due to inaccurate identification of the grant period during the SEFA preparation. The Clinic corrected the SEFA after the errors were brought to their attention. Cause: Wilmington was short-staffed and dealt with time constraints in the preparation and review of the SEFA. Effect: Inaccurate SEFA can lead to improper risk assessment and incorrect identification of major federal programs subject to audit. Revisions of the SEFA were necessary to ensure the completeness and accuracy of the federal expenditures reported. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend that the Clinic revisit its internal control processes over the preparation and review of the SEFA in conjunction with its other federal reporting requirements to ensure that the SEFA and all federal reports for internal and external purposes are accurate and complete. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The Clinic will be seeking professional consultation and guidance on a process to support and enforce monthly reconciliations of the amounts submitted for the grant with the amounts booked within the system, using appropriate grant-tracking schedules. Relevant staff will be retrained, and a monthly review will be completed by an appropriate professional and submitted to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO). Personnel responsible for implementation: Deborah Lerner, CEO and Board of Directors Date of implementation: July 1, 2025
Criteria: The auditee must prepare the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for the period under audit in accordance with the Uniform Guidance Sections 2 CFR 200.302(b) and 2 CFR 200.510(b). Condition: During our audit of the SEFA submitted by the Clinic, we noted that the Clinic inadvertently included nonfederal grants in the SEFA. Further, the Clinic inaccurately included out-of-performance period expenses in its SEFA due to inaccurate identification of the grant period during the SEFA preparation. The Clinic corrected the SEFA after the errors were brought to their attention. Cause: Wilmington was short-staffed and dealt with time constraints in the preparation and review of the SEFA. Effect: Inaccurate SEFA can lead to improper risk assessment and incorrect identification of major federal programs subject to audit. Revisions of the SEFA were necessary to ensure the completeness and accuracy of the federal expenditures reported. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend that the Clinic revisit its internal control processes over the preparation and review of the SEFA in conjunction with its other federal reporting requirements to ensure that the SEFA and all federal reports for internal and external purposes are accurate and complete. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The Clinic will be seeking professional consultation and guidance on a process to support and enforce monthly reconciliations of the amounts submitted for the grant with the amounts booked within the system, using appropriate grant-tracking schedules. Relevant staff will be retrained, and a monthly review will be completed by an appropriate professional and submitted to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO). Personnel responsible for implementation: Deborah Lerner, CEO and Board of Directors Date of implementation: July 1, 2025
Criteria: The auditee must prepare the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for the period under audit in accordance with the Uniform Guidance Sections 2 CFR 200.302(b) and 2 CFR 200.510(b). Condition: During our audit of the SEFA submitted by the Clinic, we noted that the Clinic inadvertently included nonfederal grants in the SEFA. Further, the Clinic inaccurately included out-of-performance period expenses in its SEFA due to inaccurate identification of the grant period during the SEFA preparation. The Clinic corrected the SEFA after the errors were brought to their attention. Cause: Wilmington was short-staffed and dealt with time constraints in the preparation and review of the SEFA. Effect: Inaccurate SEFA can lead to improper risk assessment and incorrect identification of major federal programs subject to audit. Revisions of the SEFA were necessary to ensure the completeness and accuracy of the federal expenditures reported. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend that the Clinic revisit its internal control processes over the preparation and review of the SEFA in conjunction with its other federal reporting requirements to ensure that the SEFA and all federal reports for internal and external purposes are accurate and complete. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The Clinic will be seeking professional consultation and guidance on a process to support and enforce monthly reconciliations of the amounts submitted for the grant with the amounts booked within the system, using appropriate grant-tracking schedules. Relevant staff will be retrained, and a monthly review will be completed by an appropriate professional and submitted to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO). Personnel responsible for implementation: Deborah Lerner, CEO and Board of Directors Date of implementation: July 1, 2025
Statement of condition: Supporting documentation for expenditures paid from the Education Stabilization Fund did not contain evidence of appropriate review and approval performed. Additionally, supporting documentation was not maintained for all expenditures. Criteria: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 200.302-303 requires non-federal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. Additionally, all recipients and subrecipients of federal awards must maintain sufficient records to track expenditures to establish that funds have been used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Sound internal control procedures should include a documented review and approval process for expenditures to ensure that funds are used appropriately and in accordance with program requirements. Cause of condition: Procedures are in place which require all federal program expenditures to be reviewed and approved by appropriate personnel and supported by appropriate documentation. However, due to turnover of key personnel, these procedures were not appropriately followed. Effect of condition: Without proper review and approval of expenditures and maintenance of supporting documentation, there is an increased risk of noncompliance with federal regulations. Context: A total of 20 non-payroll expenditures were selected for testing of the Education Stabilization Fund. Of these, 16 expenditures lacked evidence of review or approval. These expenditures total $1,017,291. Additionally, management was unable to provide adequate supporting documentation for 1 of the 20 non-payroll expenditures selected for testing totaling $200.Recommendation: To ensure that non-payroll expenditures charged to federal award programs are accurate, all expenditures should be reviewed and approved by the appropriate School personnel. Documentation of this review and approval should be maintained. Furthermore, expenditures paid with federal funds should be reviewed and approved by personnel with the appropriate training necessary to identify allowable expenditures. We also recommend that the Federal Program Director position is filled by an individual that has training and knowledge of the federal program they are administrating. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with this finding and will put procedures in place for the review and approval of expenditures and maintenance of supporting documentation surrounding federal awards.
8. Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation): The compliance requirements for "L. Reporting", requires the District to maintain accurate accounting records for grant expenditures. In addition, per subpart D (Post Federal Award Requirements), § 200.302, the underlying accounts records must be adequately documented and consistent with the terms and conditions of the grant. '9. Condition: During compliance testing of the District's accounting records to the expenditure report filed with the Illinois State Board of Education, we noted the District overclaimed $727 of expenditures at 6/30/24. Upon review of the general ledger and quarterly expenditure report, it was determined that the District erroneously overstated their claim amount on two function object codes by a cumulative amount of $727. Under 2560-100, total expenditures were $256,193 but District claimed $256,699, resulting in an overclaim of $506. Under 2560-200, total expenditures were $81,610 but District claimed $81,831, resulting in an overclaim of $221. '10. Questioned Costs: $727. '11. Context: The District claimed expenditures that did not agree with their underlying accounting records. '12. Effect: The District was not compliant with reporting requirements. Inaccurate reporting resulted in the District being reimbursed for an additional $727 as of 6/30/24. 13. Cause: The District inadvertently included expenditures in the claim which were not intended to be claimed. 14. Recommendation: We recommend the District periodically review the itemized budget and ensure claimed expenditures fall within or file amendments as necessary for any changes. 15. Management's response: The District has agreed with the findings and recommendations as presented. See Corrective Action Plan provided by the District.
8. Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation):The compliance requirements for "L. Reporting", requires the District to maintain accurate accounting records for grant expenditures. In addition, per subpart D (Post Federal Award Requirements), § 200.302, the underlying accounts records must be adequately documented and consistent with the terms and conditions of the grant. '9. During compliance testing of the District's accounting records to the expenditure report filed with the Illinois State Board of Education, we noted the District overclaimed $18,940 of expenditures at 6/30/24. Upon review of the general ledger and quarterly expenditure report, it was determined that the District erroneously overstated their claim amount on two function object codes by a cumulative amount of $18,940. Under 2300-200 (23-4300-00), total expenditures were $3,147 but District claimed $12,999, resulting in an overclaim of $9,852. Under 1000-200 (24-4300-00), total expenditures were $31,255 but District claimed $40,343, resulting in an overclaim of $9,088. '10. Questioned Costs: $18,940. '11. Context: The District claimed expenditures that did not agree with their underlying accounting records. '12. Effect: The District was not compliant with reporting requirements. Inaccurate reporting resulted in the District being reimbursed for an additional $18,940 as of 6/30/24. 13. Cause: Policies and procedures are in place that provide reasonable assurance that reports of federal awards submitted to ISBE are supported by the underlying accounting records and are fairly presented in accordance with program requirements. These policies and procedures were not followed when the expenditure report was prepared and filed. 14. Recommendation: We recommend the District periodically review the itemized budget and ensure claimed expenditures fall within or file amendments as necessary for any changes. 15. Management's response: The District has agreed with the findings and recommendations as presented. See Corrective Action Plan provided by the District.
8. Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation):The compliance requirements for "L. Reporting", requires the District to maintain accurate accounting records for grant expenditures. In addition, per subpart D (Post Federal Award Requirements), § 200.302, the underlying accounts records must be adequately documented and consistent with the terms and conditions of the grant. '9. During compliance testing of the District's accounting records to the expenditure report filed with the Illinois State Board of Education, we noted the District overclaimed $18,940 of expenditures at 6/30/24. Upon review of the general ledger and quarterly expenditure report, it was determined that the District erroneously overstated their claim amount on two function object codes by a cumulative amount of $18,940. Under 2300-200 (23-4300-00), total expenditures were $3,147 but District claimed $12,999, resulting in an overclaim of $9,852. Under 1000-200 (24-4300-00), total expenditures were $31,255 but District claimed $40,343, resulting in an overclaim of $9,088. '10. Questioned Costs: $18,940. '11. Context: The District claimed expenditures that did not agree with their underlying accounting records. '12. Effect: The District was not compliant with reporting requirements. Inaccurate reporting resulted in the District being reimbursed for an additional $18,940 as of 6/30/24. 13. Cause: Policies and procedures are in place that provide reasonable assurance that reports of federal awards submitted to ISBE are supported by the underlying accounting records and are fairly presented in accordance with program requirements. These policies and procedures were not followed when the expenditure report was prepared and filed. 14. Recommendation: We recommend the District periodically review the itemized budget and ensure claimed expenditures fall within or file amendments as necessary for any changes. 15. Management's response: The District has agreed with the findings and recommendations as presented. See Corrective Action Plan provided by the District.
2024-006 Financial Management Fiscal year finding initially occurred: 2024 CONDITION: While performing audit procedures, it was noted that numerous special revenue grant funds were not being reconciled from grant reimbursement request to the district's detailed accounting records in a timely manner. CRITERIA: 2 CFR 1.200.302(b) Financial Management requires that the financial management system of a non-Federal entity provide for records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally funded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures, income and interest and be supported by source documentation. CAUSE: The reconciliations of detailed accounting records to grant program requests for reimbursement were not performed in a timely manner during FY 24. EFFECT: Inaccurate, incomplete and untimely grant program requests for reimbursement may result in the school district requesting incorrect grant funding under various grant awards. RECOMMENDATION: All supporting accounting records should be reviewed and reconciled to grant program draw down requests on a regular basis to ensure complete, accurate, and timely financial information is used to request grant funding.
2024-006 Financial Management Fiscal year finding initially occurred: 2024 CONDITION: While performing audit procedures, it was noted that numerous special revenue grant funds were not being reconciled from grant reimbursement request to the district's detailed accounting records in a timely manner. CRITERIA: 2 CFR 1.200.302(b) Financial Management requires that the financial management system of a non-Federal entity provide for records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally funded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures, income and interest and be supported by source documentation. CAUSE: The reconciliations of detailed accounting records to grant program requests for reimbursement were not performed in a timely manner during FY 24. EFFECT: Inaccurate, incomplete and untimely grant program requests for reimbursement may result in the school district requesting incorrect grant funding under various grant awards. RECOMMENDATION: All supporting accounting records should be reviewed and reconciled to grant program draw down requests on a regular basis to ensure complete, accurate, and timely financial information is used to request grant funding.
2024-006 Financial Management Fiscal year finding initially occurred: 2024 CONDITION: While performing audit procedures, it was noted that numerous special revenue grant funds were not being reconciled from grant reimbursement request to the district's detailed accounting records in a timely manner. CRITERIA: 2 CFR 1.200.302(b) Financial Management requires that the financial management system of a non-Federal entity provide for records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally funded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures, income and interest and be supported by source documentation. CAUSE: The reconciliations of detailed accounting records to grant program requests for reimbursement were not performed in a timely manner during FY 24. EFFECT: Inaccurate, incomplete and untimely grant program requests for reimbursement may result in the school district requesting incorrect grant funding under various grant awards. RECOMMENDATION: All supporting accounting records should be reviewed and reconciled to grant program draw down requests on a regular basis to ensure complete, accurate, and timely financial information is used to request grant funding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Federal Program Name: Supportive Services for Veteran Families Assistance Listing Number: 64.033 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 12-NC-050 Award Period: September 30, 2022 through September 30, 2024 - Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Per 2 CFR 200.302(b)(3), non-Federal entities must maintain records that adequately identify the source and application of funds for federally-funded activities. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.403(g) requires that costs must be adequately documented to be allowable under Federal awards. Condition: During testing of allowable costs, we identified cash disbursements that lacked adequate supporting documentation. Specifically, these disbursements were made without proof of payment and corresponding invoice support. Questioned costs: $16,576 Context: As part of our audit procedures, we selected a sample of cash disbursements to ensure compliance with federal regulations. The sample included transactions from various periods within the award year. During the review, it was noted that disbursements totaling $15,754 did not have the required supporting documentation, such as proof of payment and corresponding invoices. This finding indicates potential systemic issues within the accounts payable process that could affect the overall compliance with federal awards. Cause: The lack of supporting documentation appears to be due to weaknesses in the internal controls over the accounts payable process. The Corporation did not have a process in place to ensure that expenditures charged to the grant were supported by proof of payment and corresponding invoice support. Effect: There is a risk that unallowable costs were charged to the grant, which could lead to noncompliance with federal requirements and potential disallowance of costs. Recommendation: We recommend that the Corporation strengthen its internal controls over cash disbursements. This should include retention of payments supported by valid invoices and proof of payment documentation as well as periodic internal audits to ensure compliance with the documentation requirements. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the above finding. All purchase-related supporting documentation will be transitioned to paper files to eliminate confusion created by the electronic record-keeping system, and to ensure that all staff requiring access to such documentation can immediately and easily retrieve them. Records will be maintained in the Finance Department office for seven years.
Criteria or Specific Requirement: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302(b)(1) and (b)(3), non-federal entities must maintain effective control over, and accountability for, all funds, property, and other assets. Financial management systems must allow for the identification, in their accounts, of all federal awards received and expended, and must ensure that funds are used in accordance with federal award agreements. In addition, state grant agreements typically require the separate tracking of expenditures by funding source. Condition and Context: During procedures performed over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards, it was noted that Solvista Health did not separately track expenditures, and related revenues from state and federal programs/sources for the Mental Health Block Grant. All transactions were recorded within a single classification of accounts without designation of funding or expenditure source, resulting in the commingling of revenues and expenditures. Questioned Costs: N/A Cause: Solvista Health did not implement internal control procedures to separately identify and record state and federal expenditures related to the Mental Health Block Grant. Effect: Because state and federal funds were commingled, Solvista Health could not identify federal awards received and expended under this federal program as compared to state awards received and expended. In addition, this could cause Solvista Health compliance issues with the specific allowable cost principles and reporting requirements of each funding source. This increases the risk of unallowable expenditures and may result in questioned costs or repayment obligations. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend Solvista Health implement internal control procedures to establish separate accounts, classification, use of cost centers or project codes to clearly distinguish expenditures by funding source, as well as revenues received.
Criteria or Specific Requirement: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302, non-federal entities must maintain financial systems that provide for the identification, of all federal awards received and expended, including revenues and expenditures tracked separately by federal program. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.430(i) requires that charges to federal awards for salaries and wages be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed and must be supported by a system of internal control. Condition and Context: During the audit, it was noted that Solvista Health did not ensure that an eligible employee’s time was properly coded to the federal grant. Furthermore, the organization did not separately track grant revenues and expenditures from its general operating funds, making it difficult to clearly identify program-specific activity related to the federal award. Questioned Costs: N/A Cause: Solvista Health did not implement sufficient internal control procedures to ensure that employee timecards were accurately coded to the appropriate grant, nor to ensure that grant revenues and expenditures were tracked separately from general operating funds in accordance with grant and federal requirements. Effect: Failure to properly code eligible employee time to the appropriate grant and to separately track grant revenues and expenditures increases the risk of unallowable activities and possible questioned costs. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that Solvista Health implement internal controls over tracking of expenditures related to federal award grants and the related reimbursed cost to ensure compliance with federal requirements.
Criteria or Specific Requirement: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302(b)(4) and 2 CFR 200.329(a), nonfederal entities must establish internal controls to ensure accountability over federal funds and must monitor grant activities to ensure compliance with applicable requirements and achievement of performance goals. These responsibilities include assigning oversight roles and implementing processes to track both financial and programmatic aspects of federal awards. Condition and Context: During the audit, it was noted that Solvista Health did not have clearly defined roles and responsibilities for monitoring grant activities. It was difficult to determine who within the organization was responsible for overseeing compliance with grant requirements, tracking grant performance, and ensuring proper financial management of the grant funds. When asked, management was unable to identify designated individuals or a department currently accountable for these duties. Questioned Costs: N/A Cause: Solvista Health does not have an established formal grant management structure or assigned responsibility for grant oversight. Effect: Lack of properly designed and implemented internal controls, including policies and procedures relating to accountability and oversight of federal programs, may result in noncompliance with federal grant requirements under 2 CFR § 200.329 (monitoring and reporting program performance) and § 200.302 (financial management). Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: Solvista Health should design and implement internal controls related to federal program grant management, including assignment of responsibility for grant oversight to specific individuals or departments. This will help ensure that Solvista Health is in compliance with federal regulations related to the monitoring and oversight of grant activities.
Criteria or Specific Requirement: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302(b)(4) and 2 CFR 200.329(a), nonfederal entities must establish internal controls to ensure accountability over federal funds and must monitor grant activities to ensure compliance with applicable requirements and achievement of performance goals. These responsibilities include assigning oversight roles and implementing processes to track both financial and programmatic aspects of federal awards. Condition and Context: During the audit, it was noted that Solvista Health did not have clearly defined roles and responsibilities for monitoring grant activities. It was difficult to determine who within the organization was responsible for overseeing compliance with grant requirements, tracking grant performance, and ensuring proper financial management of the grant funds. When asked, management was unable to identify designated individuals or a department currently accountable for these duties. Questioned Costs: N/A Cause: Solvista Health does not have an established formal grant management structure or assigned responsibility for grant oversight. Effect: Lack of properly designed and implemented internal controls, including policies and procedures relating to accountability and oversight of federal programs, may result in noncompliance with federal grant requirements under 2 CFR § 200.329 (monitoring and reporting program performance) and § 200.302 (financial management). Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: Solvista Health should design and implement internal controls related to federal program grant management, including assignment of responsibility for grant oversight to specific individuals or departments. This will help ensure that Solvista Health is in compliance with federal regulations related to the monitoring and oversight of grant activities.
Criteria or Specific Requirement: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302(b)(4) and 2 CFR 200.329(a), nonfederal entities must establish internal controls to ensure accountability over federal funds and must monitor grant activities to ensure compliance with applicable requirements and achievement of performance goals. These responsibilities include assigning oversight roles and implementing processes to track both financial and programmatic aspects of federal awards. Condition and Context: During the audit, it was noted that Solvista Health did not have clearly defined roles and responsibilities for monitoring grant activities. It was difficult to determine who within the organization was responsible for overseeing compliance with grant requirements, tracking grant performance, and ensuring proper financial management of the grant funds. When asked, management was unable to identify designated individuals or a department currently accountable for these duties. Questioned Costs: N/A Cause: Solvista Health does not have an established formal grant management structure or assigned responsibility for grant oversight. Effect: Lack of properly designed and implemented internal controls, including policies and procedures relating to accountability and oversight of federal programs, may result in noncompliance with federal grant requirements under 2 CFR § 200.329 (monitoring and reporting program performance) and § 200.302 (financial management). Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: Solvista Health should design and implement internal controls related to federal program grant management, including assignment of responsibility for grant oversight to specific individuals or departments. This will help ensure that Solvista Health is in compliance with federal regulations related to the monitoring and oversight of grant activities.
Criteria or Specific Requirement: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302(b)(4) and 2 CFR 200.329(a), nonfederal entities must establish internal controls to ensure accountability over federal funds and must monitor grant activities to ensure compliance with applicable requirements and achievement of performance goals. These responsibilities include assigning oversight roles and implementing processes to track both financial and programmatic aspects of federal awards. Condition and Context: During the audit, it was noted that Solvista Health did not have clearly defined roles and responsibilities for monitoring grant activities. It was difficult to determine who within the organization was responsible for overseeing compliance with grant requirements, tracking grant performance, and ensuring proper financial management of the grant funds. When asked, management was unable to identify designated individuals or a department currently accountable for these duties. Questioned Costs: N/A Cause: Solvista Health does not have an established formal grant management structure or assigned responsibility for grant oversight. Effect: Lack of properly designed and implemented internal controls, including policies and procedures relating to accountability and oversight of federal programs, may result in noncompliance with federal grant requirements under 2 CFR § 200.329 (monitoring and reporting program performance) and § 200.302 (financial management). Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: Solvista Health should design and implement internal controls related to federal program grant management, including assignment of responsibility for grant oversight to specific individuals or departments. This will help ensure that Solvista Health is in compliance with federal regulations related to the monitoring and oversight of grant activities.
Criteria or Specific Requirement: Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 200.302(b)(4) requires non-federal entities to maintain effective internal control over federal programs. Specifically, the organization must reconcile its federal awards with expenditures incurred and revenue received. Additionally, 2 CFR Part 200.510(b)(1-6) specifies that a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) be prepared for each fiscal year in accordance with the applicable federal regulations. The SEFA must include, at a minimum, total federal awards expended for each individual federal program and must accurately report all federal expenditures received and expended during the fiscal year. Condition and Context: During the audit, it was noted that Solvista Health does not reconcile federal awards with the expenditures used and revenue earned. Additionally, Solvista Health did not prepare an accurate SEFA. Questioned Costs: N/A Cause: Solvista Health’s accounting and internal control systems were not designed and implemented to ensure reconciliation of federal awards with expenditures and revenue, and the preparation of an accurate SEFA. Effect: Failure to reconcile federal awards with expenditures and related revenue, along with the absence of an accurate SEFA, could lead to incorrect reporting of federal funds, misstatement of financial information, and non-compliance with federal requirements. This represents a potential risk for improper use of federal funds and an inability to meet compliance and reporting obligations. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend Solvista Health design and implement internal control procedures to reconcile federal awards with the expenditures and revenue received to ensure completeness and accuracy in financial reporting. Additionally, management should prepare and maintain an accurate SEFA in accordance with 2 CFR 200.510 to ensure proper documentation and compliance with federal reporting requirements. Additionally, we recommend that Solvista Health train appropriate personnel on the requirements related to federal award reconciliations and SEFA preparation to mitigate the risk of noncompliance in the future.
Criteria or Specific Requirement: Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 200.302(b)(4) requires non-federal entities to maintain effective internal control over federal programs. Specifically, the organization must reconcile its federal awards with expenditures incurred and revenue received. Additionally, 2 CFR Part 200.510(b)(1-6) specifies that a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) be prepared for each fiscal year in accordance with the applicable federal regulations. The SEFA must include, at a minimum, total federal awards expended for each individual federal program and must accurately report all federal expenditures received and expended during the fiscal year. Condition and Context: During the audit, it was noted that Solvista Health does not reconcile federal awards with the expenditures used and revenue earned. Additionally, Solvista Health did not prepare an accurate SEFA. Questioned Costs: N/A Cause: Solvista Health’s accounting and internal control systems were not designed and implemented to ensure reconciliation of federal awards with expenditures and revenue, and the preparation of an accurate SEFA. Effect: Failure to reconcile federal awards with expenditures and related revenue, along with the absence of an accurate SEFA, could lead to incorrect reporting of federal funds, misstatement of financial information, and non-compliance with federal requirements. This represents a potential risk for improper use of federal funds and an inability to meet compliance and reporting obligations. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend Solvista Health design and implement internal control procedures to reconcile federal awards with the expenditures and revenue received to ensure completeness and accuracy in financial reporting. Additionally, management should prepare and maintain an accurate SEFA in accordance with 2 CFR 200.510 to ensure proper documentation and compliance with federal reporting requirements. Additionally, we recommend that Solvista Health train appropriate personnel on the requirements related to federal award reconciliations and SEFA preparation to mitigate the risk of noncompliance in the future.
Criteria or Specific Requirement: Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 200.302(b)(4) requires non-federal entities to maintain effective internal control over federal programs. Specifically, the organization must reconcile its federal awards with expenditures incurred and revenue received. Additionally, 2 CFR Part 200.510(b)(1-6) specifies that a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) be prepared for each fiscal year in accordance with the applicable federal regulations. The SEFA must include, at a minimum, total federal awards expended for each individual federal program and must accurately report all federal expenditures received and expended during the fiscal year. Condition and Context: During the audit, it was noted that Solvista Health does not reconcile federal awards with the expenditures used and revenue earned. Additionally, Solvista Health did not prepare an accurate SEFA. Questioned Costs: N/A Cause: Solvista Health’s accounting and internal control systems were not designed and implemented to ensure reconciliation of federal awards with expenditures and revenue, and the preparation of an accurate SEFA. Effect: Failure to reconcile federal awards with expenditures and related revenue, along with the absence of an accurate SEFA, could lead to incorrect reporting of federal funds, misstatement of financial information, and non-compliance with federal requirements. This represents a potential risk for improper use of federal funds and an inability to meet compliance and reporting obligations. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend Solvista Health design and implement internal control procedures to reconcile federal awards with the expenditures and revenue received to ensure completeness and accuracy in financial reporting. Additionally, management should prepare and maintain an accurate SEFA in accordance with 2 CFR 200.510 to ensure proper documentation and compliance with federal reporting requirements. Additionally, we recommend that Solvista Health train appropriate personnel on the requirements related to federal award reconciliations and SEFA preparation to mitigate the risk of noncompliance in the future.
Criteria or Specific Requirement: Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 200.302(b)(4) requires non-federal entities to maintain effective internal control over federal programs. Specifically, the organization must reconcile its federal awards with expenditures incurred and revenue received. Additionally, 2 CFR Part 200.510(b)(1-6) specifies that a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) be prepared for each fiscal year in accordance with the applicable federal regulations. The SEFA must include, at a minimum, total federal awards expended for each individual federal program and must accurately report all federal expenditures received and expended during the fiscal year. Condition and Context: During the audit, it was noted that Solvista Health does not reconcile federal awards with the expenditures used and revenue earned. Additionally, Solvista Health did not prepare an accurate SEFA. Questioned Costs: N/A Cause: Solvista Health’s accounting and internal control systems were not designed and implemented to ensure reconciliation of federal awards with expenditures and revenue, and the preparation of an accurate SEFA. Effect: Failure to reconcile federal awards with expenditures and related revenue, along with the absence of an accurate SEFA, could lead to incorrect reporting of federal funds, misstatement of financial information, and non-compliance with federal requirements. This represents a potential risk for improper use of federal funds and an inability to meet compliance and reporting obligations. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend Solvista Health design and implement internal control procedures to reconcile federal awards with the expenditures and revenue received to ensure completeness and accuracy in financial reporting. Additionally, management should prepare and maintain an accurate SEFA in accordance with 2 CFR 200.510 to ensure proper documentation and compliance with federal reporting requirements. Additionally, we recommend that Solvista Health train appropriate personnel on the requirements related to federal award reconciliations and SEFA preparation to mitigate the risk of noncompliance in the future.
Criteria or Specific Requirement: Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 200.302(b)(4) requires non-federal entities to maintain effective internal control over federal programs. Specifically, the organization must reconcile its federal awards with expenditures incurred and revenue received. Additionally, 2 CFR Part 200.510(b)(1-6) specifies that a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) be prepared for each fiscal year in accordance with the applicable federal regulations. The SEFA must include, at a minimum, total federal awards expended for each individual federal program and must accurately report all federal expenditures received and expended during the fiscal year. Condition and Context: During the audit, it was noted that Solvista Health does not reconcile federal awards with the expenditures used and revenue earned. Additionally, Solvista Health did not prepare an accurate SEFA. Questioned Costs: N/A Cause: Solvista Health’s accounting and internal control systems were not designed and implemented to ensure reconciliation of federal awards with expenditures and revenue, and the preparation of an accurate SEFA. Effect: Failure to reconcile federal awards with expenditures and related revenue, along with the absence of an accurate SEFA, could lead to incorrect reporting of federal funds, misstatement of financial information, and non-compliance with federal requirements. This represents a potential risk for improper use of federal funds and an inability to meet compliance and reporting obligations. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend Solvista Health design and implement internal control procedures to reconcile federal awards with the expenditures and revenue received to ensure completeness and accuracy in financial reporting. Additionally, management should prepare and maintain an accurate SEFA in accordance with 2 CFR 200.510 to ensure proper documentation and compliance with federal reporting requirements. Additionally, we recommend that Solvista Health train appropriate personnel on the requirements related to federal award reconciliations and SEFA preparation to mitigate the risk of noncompliance in the future.
Criteria or Specific Requirement: Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 200.302(b)(4) requires non-federal entities to maintain effective internal control over federal programs. Specifically, the organization must reconcile its federal awards with expenditures incurred and revenue received. Additionally, 2 CFR Part 200.510(b)(1-6) specifies that a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) be prepared for each fiscal year in accordance with the applicable federal regulations. The SEFA must include, at a minimum, total federal awards expended for each individual federal program and must accurately report all federal expenditures received and expended during the fiscal year. Condition and Context: During the audit, it was noted that Solvista Health does not reconcile federal awards with the expenditures used and revenue earned. Additionally, Solvista Health did not prepare an accurate SEFA. Questioned Costs: N/A Cause: Solvista Health’s accounting and internal control systems were not designed and implemented to ensure reconciliation of federal awards with expenditures and revenue, and the preparation of an accurate SEFA. Effect: Failure to reconcile federal awards with expenditures and related revenue, along with the absence of an accurate SEFA, could lead to incorrect reporting of federal funds, misstatement of financial information, and non-compliance with federal requirements. This represents a potential risk for improper use of federal funds and an inability to meet compliance and reporting obligations. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend Solvista Health design and implement internal control procedures to reconcile federal awards with the expenditures and revenue received to ensure completeness and accuracy in financial reporting. Additionally, management should prepare and maintain an accurate SEFA in accordance with 2 CFR 200.510 to ensure proper documentation and compliance with federal reporting requirements. Additionally, we recommend that Solvista Health train appropriate personnel on the requirements related to federal award reconciliations and SEFA preparation to mitigate the risk of noncompliance in the future.
Criteria or Specific Requirement: Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 200.302(b)(4) requires non-federal entities to maintain effective internal control over federal programs. Specifically, the organization must reconcile its federal awards with expenditures incurred and revenue received. Additionally, 2 CFR Part 200.510(b)(1-6) specifies that a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) be prepared for each fiscal year in accordance with the applicable federal regulations. The SEFA must include, at a minimum, total federal awards expended for each individual federal program and must accurately report all federal expenditures received and expended during the fiscal year. Condition and Context: During the audit, it was noted that Solvista Health does not reconcile federal awards with the expenditures used and revenue earned. Additionally, Solvista Health did not prepare an accurate SEFA. Questioned Costs: N/A Cause: Solvista Health’s accounting and internal control systems were not designed and implemented to ensure reconciliation of federal awards with expenditures and revenue, and the preparation of an accurate SEFA. Effect: Failure to reconcile federal awards with expenditures and related revenue, along with the absence of an accurate SEFA, could lead to incorrect reporting of federal funds, misstatement of financial information, and non-compliance with federal requirements. This represents a potential risk for improper use of federal funds and an inability to meet compliance and reporting obligations. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend Solvista Health design and implement internal control procedures to reconcile federal awards with the expenditures and revenue received to ensure completeness and accuracy in financial reporting. Additionally, management should prepare and maintain an accurate SEFA in accordance with 2 CFR 200.510 to ensure proper documentation and compliance with federal reporting requirements. Additionally, we recommend that Solvista Health train appropriate personnel on the requirements related to federal award reconciliations and SEFA preparation to mitigate the risk of noncompliance in the future.
Criteria or Specific Requirement: Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 200.302(b)(4) requires non-federal entities to maintain effective internal control over federal programs. Specifically, the organization must reconcile its federal awards with expenditures incurred and revenue received. Additionally, 2 CFR Part 200.510(b)(1-6) specifies that a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) be prepared for each fiscal year in accordance with the applicable federal regulations. The SEFA must include, at a minimum, total federal awards expended for each individual federal program and must accurately report all federal expenditures received and expended during the fiscal year. Condition and Context: During the audit, it was noted that Solvista Health does not reconcile federal awards with the expenditures used and revenue earned. Additionally, Solvista Health did not prepare an accurate SEFA. Questioned Costs: N/A Cause: Solvista Health’s accounting and internal control systems were not designed and implemented to ensure reconciliation of federal awards with expenditures and revenue, and the preparation of an accurate SEFA. Effect: Failure to reconcile federal awards with expenditures and related revenue, along with the absence of an accurate SEFA, could lead to incorrect reporting of federal funds, misstatement of financial information, and non-compliance with federal requirements. This represents a potential risk for improper use of federal funds and an inability to meet compliance and reporting obligations. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend Solvista Health design and implement internal control procedures to reconcile federal awards with the expenditures and revenue received to ensure completeness and accuracy in financial reporting. Additionally, management should prepare and maintain an accurate SEFA in accordance with 2 CFR 200.510 to ensure proper documentation and compliance with federal reporting requirements. Additionally, we recommend that Solvista Health train appropriate personnel on the requirements related to federal award reconciliations and SEFA preparation to mitigate the risk of noncompliance in the future.
Criteria or Specific Requirement: Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 200.302(b)(4) requires non-federal entities to maintain effective internal control over federal programs. Specifically, the organization must reconcile its federal awards with expenditures incurred and revenue received. Additionally, 2 CFR Part 200.510(b)(1-6) specifies that a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) be prepared for each fiscal year in accordance with the applicable federal regulations. The SEFA must include, at a minimum, total federal awards expended for each individual federal program and must accurately report all federal expenditures received and expended during the fiscal year. Condition and Context: During the audit, it was noted that Solvista Health does not reconcile federal awards with the expenditures used and revenue earned. Additionally, Solvista Health did not prepare an accurate SEFA. Questioned Costs: N/A Cause: Solvista Health’s accounting and internal control systems were not designed and implemented to ensure reconciliation of federal awards with expenditures and revenue, and the preparation of an accurate SEFA. Effect: Failure to reconcile federal awards with expenditures and related revenue, along with the absence of an accurate SEFA, could lead to incorrect reporting of federal funds, misstatement of financial information, and non-compliance with federal requirements. This represents a potential risk for improper use of federal funds and an inability to meet compliance and reporting obligations. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend Solvista Health design and implement internal control procedures to reconcile federal awards with the expenditures and revenue received to ensure completeness and accuracy in financial reporting. Additionally, management should prepare and maintain an accurate SEFA in accordance with 2 CFR 200.510 to ensure proper documentation and compliance with federal reporting requirements. Additionally, we recommend that Solvista Health train appropriate personnel on the requirements related to federal award reconciliations and SEFA preparation to mitigate the risk of noncompliance in the future.
Criteria or Specific Requirement: Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 200.302(b)(4) requires non-federal entities to maintain effective internal control over federal programs. Specifically, the organization must reconcile its federal awards with expenditures incurred and revenue received. Additionally, 2 CFR Part 200.510(b)(1-6) specifies that a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) be prepared for each fiscal year in accordance with the applicable federal regulations. The SEFA must include, at a minimum, total federal awards expended for each individual federal program and must accurately report all federal expenditures received and expended during the fiscal year. Condition and Context: During the audit, it was noted that Solvista Health does not reconcile federal awards with the expenditures used and revenue earned. Additionally, Solvista Health did not prepare an accurate SEFA. Questioned Costs: N/A Cause: Solvista Health’s accounting and internal control systems were not designed and implemented to ensure reconciliation of federal awards with expenditures and revenue, and the preparation of an accurate SEFA. Effect: Failure to reconcile federal awards with expenditures and related revenue, along with the absence of an accurate SEFA, could lead to incorrect reporting of federal funds, misstatement of financial information, and non-compliance with federal requirements. This represents a potential risk for improper use of federal funds and an inability to meet compliance and reporting obligations. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend Solvista Health design and implement internal control procedures to reconcile federal awards with the expenditures and revenue received to ensure completeness and accuracy in financial reporting. Additionally, management should prepare and maintain an accurate SEFA in accordance with 2 CFR 200.510 to ensure proper documentation and compliance with federal reporting requirements. Additionally, we recommend that Solvista Health train appropriate personnel on the requirements related to federal award reconciliations and SEFA preparation to mitigate the risk of noncompliance in the future.
Criteria or Specific Requirement: Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 200.302(b)(4) requires non-federal entities to maintain effective internal control over federal programs. Specifically, the organization must reconcile its federal awards with expenditures incurred and revenue received. Additionally, 2 CFR Part 200.510(b)(1-6) specifies that a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) be prepared for each fiscal year in accordance with the applicable federal regulations. The SEFA must include, at a minimum, total federal awards expended for each individual federal program and must accurately report all federal expenditures received and expended during the fiscal year. Condition and Context: During the audit, it was noted that Solvista Health does not reconcile federal awards with the expenditures used and revenue earned. Additionally, Solvista Health did not prepare an accurate SEFA. Questioned Costs: N/A Cause: Solvista Health’s accounting and internal control systems were not designed and implemented to ensure reconciliation of federal awards with expenditures and revenue, and the preparation of an accurate SEFA. Effect: Failure to reconcile federal awards with expenditures and related revenue, along with the absence of an accurate SEFA, could lead to incorrect reporting of federal funds, misstatement of financial information, and non-compliance with federal requirements. This represents a potential risk for improper use of federal funds and an inability to meet compliance and reporting obligations. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend Solvista Health design and implement internal control procedures to reconcile federal awards with the expenditures and revenue received to ensure completeness and accuracy in financial reporting. Additionally, management should prepare and maintain an accurate SEFA in accordance with 2 CFR 200.510 to ensure proper documentation and compliance with federal reporting requirements. Additionally, we recommend that Solvista Health train appropriate personnel on the requirements related to federal award reconciliations and SEFA preparation to mitigate the risk of noncompliance in the future.
Criteria or Specific Requirement: Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 200.302(b)(4) requires non-federal entities to maintain effective internal control over federal programs. Specifically, the organization must reconcile its federal awards with expenditures incurred and revenue received. Additionally, 2 CFR Part 200.510(b)(1-6) specifies that a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) be prepared for each fiscal year in accordance with the applicable federal regulations. The SEFA must include, at a minimum, total federal awards expended for each individual federal program and must accurately report all federal expenditures received and expended during the fiscal year. Condition and Context: During the audit, it was noted that Solvista Health does not reconcile federal awards with the expenditures used and revenue earned. Additionally, Solvista Health did not prepare an accurate SEFA. Questioned Costs: N/A Cause: Solvista Health’s accounting and internal control systems were not designed and implemented to ensure reconciliation of federal awards with expenditures and revenue, and the preparation of an accurate SEFA. Effect: Failure to reconcile federal awards with expenditures and related revenue, along with the absence of an accurate SEFA, could lead to incorrect reporting of federal funds, misstatement of financial information, and non-compliance with federal requirements. This represents a potential risk for improper use of federal funds and an inability to meet compliance and reporting obligations. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend Solvista Health design and implement internal control procedures to reconcile federal awards with the expenditures and revenue received to ensure completeness and accuracy in financial reporting. Additionally, management should prepare and maintain an accurate SEFA in accordance with 2 CFR 200.510 to ensure proper documentation and compliance with federal reporting requirements. Additionally, we recommend that Solvista Health train appropriate personnel on the requirements related to federal award reconciliations and SEFA preparation to mitigate the risk of noncompliance in the future.
Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR 200.302(b)(4) requires non-federal entities to maintain effective internal control over federal programs. Specifically, the organization must reconcile its federal awards with expenditures incurred and revenue received. Additionally, 2 CFR Part 200.510(b)(1-6) mandates that a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) be prepared for each fiscal year in accordance with the applicable federal regulations. The SEFA must include, at a minimum, total federal awards expended for each individual federal program and must accurately report all federal expenditures received and expended during the fiscal year. Condition and Context: During our audit procedures performed over the current year SEFA, it was noted that Solvista Health improperly excluded expenditures for two federal awards from its June 30, 2023 SEFA. Questioned Costs: N/A Cause: Solvista Health’s accounting and internal control systems were not designed and implemented to ensure reconciliation of federal awards with expenditures and revenue, and the preparation of an accurate SEFA. Effect: Failure to reconcile federal awards with expenditures, along with an incomplete and inaccurate SEFA, could lead to incorrect reporting of federal funds, misstatement of financial information, and noncompliance with federal requirements. This represents a potential risk for improper use of federal funds and an inability to meet compliance and reporting obligations. Additionally, the omission of federal awards from the June 30, 2023 SEFA resulted in noncompliance with federal reporting requirements and inaccurate representation of Solvista Health’s federal award activity. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend Solvista Health design and implement internal control procedures to reconcile federal awards with the expenditures and revenue received to ensure completeness and accuracy in financial reporting. Additionally, management should prepare and maintain an accurate SEFA in accordance with 2 CFR 200.510 to ensure proper documentation and compliance with federal reporting requirements. Additionally, we recommend that Solvista Health train appropriate personnel on the requirements related to federal award reconciliations and SEFA preparation to mitigate the risk of noncompliance in the future.