Findings Citing § 200.1

Criteria: 2 CFR 200.332 notes, ?All pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (1) Federal award identification. (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier; (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); (iv) Federal Award Date (see the definition of Federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the Federal agency; (v) Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; (vi) Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; (vii) Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; (viii) Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity including the current financial obligation; (ix) Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); (xi) Name of Federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D; and (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414. (2) All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award; ?? Condition: For all four subawards selected for testing, the identification of the award being Research and Development (R&D) was not noted. Further, two of the four subawards selected for testing, had information missing from the subaward including (1) Recipient DUNS number (2) Unique Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) (3) Assistance Listing number (4) Indirect Cost Rate. Lastly, one subaward did not include the following information: (a) Period of Performance of subaward (b) Amount of federal funds obligated and awarded (c) General terms and conditions of subaward (d) Federal award project description (e) Name of Federal awarding agency. Condition (Continued): We consider this condition to be an instance of noncompliance relating to the Subrecipient Monitoring compliance requirement. Statistical sampling was not used in making sample selections. Questioned Costs: N/A. Cause and Effect: Without communication of the required information, subrecipients may overspend award amounts or incur unallowable expenses towards the grant. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization evaluates policies and procedures to ensure all required information is communication with the subrecipient. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this Single Audit Finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.

FINDING 2022-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): 2022 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context The County had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls that was effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. Recipients are required to submit quarterly or annually Project and Expenditure (P&E) reports to the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury). The reporting periods, as well as the respective due dates, are based upon type of recipient and the recipient's population, as well as the recipient's allocation amount. Information to be reported includes projects funded, expenditures, and contracts for the appropriate reporting period. The County was classified as a metropolitan county with a population below 250,000 residents that received an allocation of more than $10 million in State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds. As such, the initial P&E report, covering the period from March 3, 2021 to December 31, 2021, was required to be submitted to the Treasury by January 31, 2022. The subsequent quarterly reports are to be submitted the last day of the month after the end of each quarter thereafter. The County submitted all four P&E reports that were required during the audit period. Although the County Auditor prepared the reports and the Board of County Commissioners reviewed and approved them, the internal controls did not prevent, or detect and correct, errors. All four P&E reports were tested. Two of the four reports were not supported by the County's records as encumbrances were incorrectly included in the County's expenditures. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance and Reporting Guidance, page 10, states in part: ". . . 10. Reporting. All recipients of federal funds must complete financial, performance, and compliance reporting as required and outlined in Part 2 of this guidance. Expenditures may be reported on a cash or accrual basis, as long as the methodology is disclosed and consistently applied. Reporting must be consistent with the definition of expenditures pursuant to 2 CFR 200.1. Your organization should appropriately maintain accounting records for compiling and reporting accurate, compliant financial data, in accordance with appropriate accounting standards and principles. . . ." 31 CFR 35.4(c) states in part: "Reporting and requests for other information. During the period of performance, recipients shall provide to the Secretary periodic reports providing detailed accounting of the uses of funds, . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls over the P&E report was not implemented by the management of the County to ensure that complete and accurate information related to the SLFRF awards was provided to the Treasury. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the County's management of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal fundings to the County. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the County's management should develop policies and procedures to ensure that the County provides the Treasury with complete and accurate information for the P&E report. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2022-001 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY2022 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 13 CITY OF CRAWFORDSVILLE SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context The City had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. Recipients are required to submit quarterly or annually Project and Expenditure (P&E) reports to the Department of Treasury (Treasury). The reporting periods, as well as the respective due dates, are based upon type of recipient and its population, as well as the recipient's allocation amount. Information to be reported includes projects funded, expenditures, and contracts for the appropriate reporting period. The City was classified as a metropolitan city with a population below 250,000 residents that received an allocation of less than $10 million in State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF). As such, the initial P&E report, covering the period from March 3, 2021 to March 31, 2022, was required to be submitted to the Treasury by April 30, 2022. The subsequent annual reports are to cover one calendar year and must be submitted to the Treasury by April 30 each year. The City submitted one P&E report during the audit period; however, a single employee prepared and submitted the P&E report without a review or oversight process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. In addition, the P&E report was not properly supported by the City's records. All items were reported under the Eligible Use Category of "Administrative Expenses." However, the City's expenditures during the audit period consisted of assistance to business and households, remote work recruiting, sewer infrastructure, and tourism support, none of which qualified as Administrative Expenses. Furthermore, the City reported that it was electing to take the Revenue Loss Standard Allowance, but the amount reported as Revenue Loss was $0. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The Non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance and Reporting Guidance, page 10, states in part: ". . . 10. Reporting. All recipients of federal funds must complete financial, performance, and compliance reporting as required and outlined in Part 2 of this guidance. Expenditures may be reported on a cash or accrual basis, as long as the methodology is disclosed and consistently applied. Reporting must be consistent with the definition of expenditures pursuant to 2 CFR 200.1. Your organization should appropriately maintain accounting records for compiling and reporting accurate, compliant financial data, in accordance with appropriate accounting standards and principles. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 14 CITY OF CRAWFORDSVILLE SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 31 CFR 35.4(c) states in part: "Reporting and requests for other information. During the period of performance, recipients shall provide to the Secretary periodic reports providing detailed accounting of the uses of funds, . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls over the P&E report was not designed by management of the City, which would include segregation of key functions to ensure the City provided the Treasury with complete and accurate information related to the SLFRF awards. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the City's management of what should be done to effect internal control, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the City. In addition, not meeting the SLFRF reporting requirements increases the likelihood that the public will not have access to transparent and accurate information regarding expenditures of federal awards. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the City design and implement a proper system of internal controls that would provide a segregation of duties for the preparation and review of federal reports to ensure appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversight are taking place. Additionally, management should develop policies and procedures to ensure that the City provides the Treasury with complete and accurate information for the P&E report. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2022-002 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 2022 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context The County had not properly implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. Recipients are required to submit quarterly or annually Project and Expenditure (P&E) Reports to the Department of the Treasury (Treasury). The reporting periods, as well as the respective due dates, are based upon type of recipient and its population, as well as the recipient's allocation amount. Information to be reported includes projects funded, expenditures, and contracts for the appropriate reporting period. The County was classified as a metropolitan county with a population below 250,000 residents that received an allocation of more than $10 million in Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) funding. As such, the initial P&E Report, covering three calendar quarters from March 3, 2021 to December 31, 2021, was required to be submitted to the Treasury by January 31, 2022. The subsequent quarterly reports were to cover one calendar quarter and must be submitted to the Treasury by the last day of the month following the end of the period covered. The County submitted four quarterly P&E Reports during the audit period. The County's process for the completion and submission of the P&E Reports was that the County Attorney prepared each P&E Report based on a spreadsheet prepared by the Board of County Commissioners Executive-Administrative Assistant, and then the Chair of the Board of County Commissioners reviewed and submitted the reports. One of the four quarterly reports was not properly supported by the County's records. For the final quarterly report in 2022, the County did not include an expenditure of $1,500,000 as it was not included on the spreadsheet prepared by the Board of County Commissioners Executive-Administrative Assistant. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 JOHNSON COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the final quarterly report in 2022. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance and Reporting Guidance, page 10, states in part: ". . . 10. Reporting. All recipients of federal funds must complete financial, performance, and compliance reporting as required and outlined in Part 2 of this guidance. Expenditures may be reported on a cash or accrual basis, as long as the methodology is disclosed and consistently applied. Reporting must be consistent with the definition of expenditures pursuant to 2 CFR 200.1. Your organization should appropriately maintain accounting records for compiling and reporting accurate, compliant financial data, in accordance with appropriate accounting standards and principles. . . ." 31 CFR 35.4(c) states in part: "Reporting and requests for other information. During the period of performance, recipients shall provide to the Secretary periodic reports providing detailed accounting of the uses of funds." Cause A proper system of internal controls over the P&E Report was not designed by management of the County to ensure the County provided the Treasury with complete and accurate information related to the SLFRF awards. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the County's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. In addition, not meeting the SLFRF reporting requirements increases the likelihood that the public will not have access to transparent and accurate information regarding expenditures of federal awards. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 JOHNSON COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that management of the County design and implement a proper system of internal controls, including policies and procedures to ensure that the County provides the Treasury with complete and accurate information for the P&E Report. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

According to Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance, a nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Point of Freedom needs to establish and document their policies and procedures to meet the control objectives outlined in 2 CFR section 200.1. One of the objectives focuses on ensuring that transactions are accurately recorded and accounted for, enabling the accurate preparation of dependable financial statements and federal reports. Based on our testing of reports, management was not able to provide accurate supporting documentation to corroborate reports submitted to the funding agency. The Organization's initial exposure to a Single Audit, along with limited time to develop policies and procedures for compliance, has resulted in the identified deficiencies. Inadequate controls in this compliance area could lead to a significant risk of the Organization not meeting federal award reporting requirements. We selected three months' worth of monthly reports for ADAMHS and one closeout report for OHMAS. We recommend management to seek professional advice in developing and implementing policies and procedures that address compliance requirements. We recommend further to provide comprehensive training to employees on these policies and procedures, along with consistent monitoring, to ensure accuracy and timeliness in federal reporting.

FINDING 2022-003 Subject: COVID-19: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): Account ID 20-1892-0-1-806 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context Recipients are required to submit quarterly or annually Project and Expenditure (P&E) reports to the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury). The reporting periods, as well as the respective due dates, are based upon type of recipient and its population, as well as the recipient's allocation amount. Information to be reported includes projects funded, expenditures, and contracts for the appropriate reporting period. The County was classified as a metropolitan county with a population below 250,000 residents that received an allocation of more than $10 million in Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF). Therefore, quarterly P&E Reports were due by January 31, 2022, and the last day of the month after the end of each quarter thereafter. The County submitted four quarterly P&E reports during the audit period. The County's process for the completion and submission of the P&E reports was that the County Grant Administrator prepared the P&E reports, and the County Auditor reviewed them prior to submission. Two of the four quarterly reports submitted during the audit period were selected for testing. The County utilized the current period obligations field to document total obligations less current period expenditures. For the reports tested, the current period obligations per the County's interpretation of the current period obligations field were not supported by the County's records. The following errors were noted: Quarter 2 P&E Report (April 1, 2022 - June 30, 2022)  The current period obligations for the Revenue Replacement project were overstated by $399,097. Quarter 3 P&E Report (July 1, 2022 - September 30, 2022)  The current period obligations for the Prairie Creek Water Run Water Line project were overstated by $67,773.  The current period obligations for the Parks Department - Latrine project were overstated by $25,758.  The current period obligations for the Foraker/Southwest project were overstated by $230,338. The lack of effective internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues during the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 ELKHART COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Project and Expenditure Report User Guide, Appendix B - Bulk File Upload Overview, i) Project Baseline Template, states in part: "The downloadable templates provide all information required to create the upload files. The following table highlights the data elements required to complete the Project Baseline Template. . . ." Defined Term Definition Required/Optional/ Conditional List Values Data Type Max Length Current Period Obligations Total dollar value of obligations for this current reporting period Required N/A Currency N/A Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance and Reporting Guidance, Page 10, states in part: ". . . 10. Reporting. All recipients of federal funds must complete financial, performance, and compliance reporting as required and outlined in Part 2 of this guidance. Expenditures may be reported on a cash or accrual basis, as long as the methodology is disclosed and consistently applied. Reporting must be consistent with the definition of expenditures pursuant to 2 CFR 200.1. Your organization should appropriately maintain accounting records for compiling and reporting accurate, compliant financial data, in accordance with appropriate accounting standards and principles. . . ." 31 CFR 35.4(c) states in part: "Reporting and requests for other information. During the period of performance, recipients shall provide to the Secretary periodic reports providing detailed accounting of the uses of funds . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed or implemented by management of the County to ensure that policies and procedures were in place related to Reporting. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the County's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 ELKHART COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. In addition, not meeting the CSLFRF reporting requirements increases the likelihood that the public will not have access to transparent and accurate information regarding expenditures of federal awards. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the County establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures over the preparation and review of federal reports to ensure appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversight are taking place. Additionally, management should develop policies and procedures to ensure that the County provides the Treasury with complete and accurate information for the P&E report. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report. Auditor's Response The County was able to provide documentation of communications with the Treasury detailing questions and issues with the reporting portal. Included within the communications between the County and the Treasury was the County's interpretation of the current obligations field and the Treasury's acceptance of this interpretation. However, as specified in the Condition and Context, the current obligations field did not follow this methodology. Furthermore, the County did not provide documentation or communication explaining the specific differences between the data in the P&E report and what the calculated amount should have been. We reaffirm our finding and will review the status of the finding during our next audit.

FINDING 2022-001 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): IN0429, SWIF221472 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 13CITY OF SCOTTSBURG SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context Procurement - Policy Non-federal entities must follow procurement standards set out in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) in addition to its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements idented in 2 CFR Part 200. The City did not have its own documented procurement procedures or policies that reflected applicable state laws and regulations or federal statutes for procuring goods and services paid with federal funds. Procurement Small Purchases Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Two vendors were identified with total purchases that fell within the small purchase threshold. Price or rate quotes were not obtained, nor was full and open competition provided for either vendor. Additionally, there was no documentation available to support the rationale to limit competition. Simplified Acquisition Threshold When the value of the procurement for property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), or a lower threshold established by a non-federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. The SAT is typically set at $250,000; however, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold, and, therefore, the SAT is set at $150,000. Formal procurement methods require adherence to documented procedures and formal methods such as sealed bids or proposals. Under the formal proposal method, the non-federal entity may use competitive proposal procedures for qualifications-based procurement of architectural/engineering (A/E) professional services whereby offeror's qualifications are evaluated, and the most qualified offeror is selected, subject to negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation. The method, where prices are not used as a selection factor, can only be used in procurement of A/E professional services. It cannot be used to purchase other types of services though A/E firms that are a potential source to perform the proposed effort. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 14CITY OF SCOTTSBURG SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Five vendors were identified with total purchases that fell within the SAT. One of the five vendors tested, which was for A/E professional services, did not have contract files, including sealed bids or proposals, to document the history of procurement, selection of contract type, or the basis for the contract. Additionally, there was no documentation available to support the rationale to limit competition nor was a cost or price analysis performed in connection with procurement. Conflict of Interest Policy Although conflicts of interest were addressed in the City's Employee Policy and Procedure Manual (manual), the manual did not include standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest nor govern the actions of its employees engaged in selection, award, and administration of contracts supported by federal awards. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. The City did not have any policies or procedures in place related to the SLFRF suspension and debarment requirements. A population of four covered transactions, totaling $1,507,088, that equaled or exceeded $25,000 paid from the SLFRF funds were identified. All four covered transactions were selected for testing. For each of the four transactions, the City did not verify the vendors' suspension or debarment status prior to payment due to the City not having any policies or procedures in place to verify that contractors were neither suspended nor debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified, from participating in federal assistance programs or activities. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15CITY OF SCOTTSBURG SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (c) (1) The non-Federal entity must maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases ? (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the nonFederal entity determines to be appropriate: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16CITY OF SCOTTSBURG SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. (i) In order for sealed bidding to be feasible, the following conditions should be present: (A) A complete, adequate, and realistic specification or purchase description is available; (B) Two or more responsible bidders are willing and able to compete effectively for the business; and (C) The procurement lends itself to a firm fixed price contract and the selection of the successful bidder can be made principally on the basis of price. (ii) If sealed bids are used, the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources, providing them sufficient response time prior to the date set for opening the bids, for local, and tribal governments, the invitation for bids must be publicly advertised; (B) The invitation for bids, which will include any specifications and pertinent attachments, must define the items or services in order for the bidder to properly respond; (C) All bids will be opened at the time and place prescribed in the invitation for bids, and for local and tribal governments, the bids must be opened publicly; (D) A firm fixed price contract award will be made in writing to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Where specified in bidding documents, factors such as discounts, transportation cost, and life cycle costs must be considered in determining which bid is lowest. Payment discounts will only be used to determine the low bid when prior experience indicates that such discounts are usually taken advantage of; and (E) Any or all bids may be rejected if there is a sound documented reason. (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or costreimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. They are awarded in accordance with the following requirements: (i) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. Any response to publicized requests for proposals must be considered to the maximum extent practical; (ii) The non-Federal entity must have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the proposals received and making selections; INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17CITY OF SCOTTSBURG SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (iii) Contracts must be awarded to the responsible offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the non-Federal entity, with price and other factors considered; and (iv) The non-Federal entity may use competitive proposal procedures for qualifications-based procurement of architectural/engineering (A/E) professional services whereby offeror's qualifications are evaluated and the most qualified offeror is selected, subject to negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation. The method, where price is not used as a selection factor, can only be used in procurement of A/E professional services. It cannot be used to purchase other types of services though A/E firms that are a potential source to perform the proposed effort. . . ." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls over procurement and suspension and debarment was not implemented by the management of the City to ensure that goods and services were properly procured and that vendors to whom payment equaled or exceeded $25,000 were not suspended or debarred. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the City's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, property and services were not properly procured and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the City. Questioned Costs There were no questioned cost identified. Recommendations We recommended that management of the City establish a proper system of internal controls and develop procedures to ensure that property and services are properly procured and that contractors are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18CITY OF SCOTTSBURG SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Views of Responsible Officials For the view of the responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2022-001 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): IN0429, SWIF221472 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 13CITY OF SCOTTSBURG SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context Procurement - Policy Non-federal entities must follow procurement standards set out in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) in addition to its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements idented in 2 CFR Part 200. The City did not have its own documented procurement procedures or policies that reflected applicable state laws and regulations or federal statutes for procuring goods and services paid with federal funds. Procurement Small Purchases Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Two vendors were identified with total purchases that fell within the small purchase threshold. Price or rate quotes were not obtained, nor was full and open competition provided for either vendor. Additionally, there was no documentation available to support the rationale to limit competition. Simplified Acquisition Threshold When the value of the procurement for property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), or a lower threshold established by a non-federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. The SAT is typically set at $250,000; however, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold, and, therefore, the SAT is set at $150,000. Formal procurement methods require adherence to documented procedures and formal methods such as sealed bids or proposals. Under the formal proposal method, the non-federal entity may use competitive proposal procedures for qualifications-based procurement of architectural/engineering (A/E) professional services whereby offeror's qualifications are evaluated, and the most qualified offeror is selected, subject to negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation. The method, where prices are not used as a selection factor, can only be used in procurement of A/E professional services. It cannot be used to purchase other types of services though A/E firms that are a potential source to perform the proposed effort. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 14CITY OF SCOTTSBURG SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Five vendors were identified with total purchases that fell within the SAT. One of the five vendors tested, which was for A/E professional services, did not have contract files, including sealed bids or proposals, to document the history of procurement, selection of contract type, or the basis for the contract. Additionally, there was no documentation available to support the rationale to limit competition nor was a cost or price analysis performed in connection with procurement. Conflict of Interest Policy Although conflicts of interest were addressed in the City's Employee Policy and Procedure Manual (manual), the manual did not include standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest nor govern the actions of its employees engaged in selection, award, and administration of contracts supported by federal awards. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. The City did not have any policies or procedures in place related to the SLFRF suspension and debarment requirements. A population of four covered transactions, totaling $1,507,088, that equaled or exceeded $25,000 paid from the SLFRF funds were identified. All four covered transactions were selected for testing. For each of the four transactions, the City did not verify the vendors' suspension or debarment status prior to payment due to the City not having any policies or procedures in place to verify that contractors were neither suspended nor debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified, from participating in federal assistance programs or activities. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15CITY OF SCOTTSBURG SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (c) (1) The non-Federal entity must maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases ? (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with ? 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the nonFederal entity determines to be appropriate: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16CITY OF SCOTTSBURG SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. (i) In order for sealed bidding to be feasible, the following conditions should be present: (A) A complete, adequate, and realistic specification or purchase description is available; (B) Two or more responsible bidders are willing and able to compete effectively for the business; and (C) The procurement lends itself to a firm fixed price contract and the selection of the successful bidder can be made principally on the basis of price. (ii) If sealed bids are used, the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources, providing them sufficient response time prior to the date set for opening the bids, for local, and tribal governments, the invitation for bids must be publicly advertised; (B) The invitation for bids, which will include any specifications and pertinent attachments, must define the items or services in order for the bidder to properly respond; (C) All bids will be opened at the time and place prescribed in the invitation for bids, and for local and tribal governments, the bids must be opened publicly; (D) A firm fixed price contract award will be made in writing to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Where specified in bidding documents, factors such as discounts, transportation cost, and life cycle costs must be considered in determining which bid is lowest. Payment discounts will only be used to determine the low bid when prior experience indicates that such discounts are usually taken advantage of; and (E) Any or all bids may be rejected if there is a sound documented reason. (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or costreimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. They are awarded in accordance with the following requirements: (i) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. Any response to publicized requests for proposals must be considered to the maximum extent practical; (ii) The non-Federal entity must have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the proposals received and making selections; INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17CITY OF SCOTTSBURG SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (iii) Contracts must be awarded to the responsible offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the non-Federal entity, with price and other factors considered; and (iv) The non-Federal entity may use competitive proposal procedures for qualifications-based procurement of architectural/engineering (A/E) professional services whereby offeror's qualifications are evaluated and the most qualified offeror is selected, subject to negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation. The method, where price is not used as a selection factor, can only be used in procurement of A/E professional services. It cannot be used to purchase other types of services though A/E firms that are a potential source to perform the proposed effort. . . ." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls over procurement and suspension and debarment was not implemented by the management of the City to ensure that goods and services were properly procured and that vendors to whom payment equaled or exceeded $25,000 were not suspended or debarred. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the City's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, property and services were not properly procured and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the City. Questioned Costs There were no questioned cost identified. Recommendations We recommended that management of the City establish a proper system of internal controls and develop procedures to ensure that property and services are properly procured and that contractors are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18CITY OF SCOTTSBURG SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Views of Responsible Officials For the view of the responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2022-002 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): IN0429 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context The City had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. Recipients are required to submit quarterly or annually Project and Expenditure (P&E) reports to the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury). The reporting periods, as well as the respective due dates, are based upon type of recipient and its population, as well as the recipient's allocation amount. Information to be reported includes projects funded, expenditures, and contracts for the appropriate reporting period. The City was classified as a metropolitan city with a population below 250,000 residents that received an allocation of less than $10 million in Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF). As such, the initial P&E report, covering the period from March 3, 2021 to March 31, 2022, was required to be submitted to the Treasury by April 30, 2022. The subsequent annual reports are to cover one calendar year and must be submitted to the Treasury by April 30 each year. The City submitted one P&E report during the audit period; however, the report was submitted without a review or oversight process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. As a result, errors in reporting were identified. The cumulative expenditures and current period expenditures were incorrectly reported. Expenditures made were $190,784; however, the amount reported was $202,393. In addition, the cumulative obligations and current period obligations reported was the total amount of grant funds received to date instead of funds obligated. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the March P&E report. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19CITY OF SCOTTSBURG SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance and Reporting Guidance states in part: ". . . 10. Reporting. All recipients of federal funds must complete financial, performance, and compliance reporting as required and outlined in Part 2 of this guidance. Expenditures may be reported on a cash or accrual basis, as long as the methodology is disclosed and consistently applied. Reporting must be consistent with the definition of expenditures pursuant to 2 CFR 200.1. Your organization should appropriately maintain accounting records for compiling and reporting accurate, compliance financial data, in accordance with appropriate accounting standards and principles. . . ." 31 CFR 35.4(c) states in part: "Reporting and requests for other information. During the period of performance, recipients shall provide to the Secretary periodic reports providing detailed accounting of the uses of funds, . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls over P&E reports was not implemented by the management of the City to ensure that complete and accurate information related to the SLFRF awards was provided to the Treasury. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the City's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the City. In addition, not meeting the SLFRF reporting requirements increases the likelihood that the public will not have access to transparent and accurate information regarding expenditures of federal awards. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the City design and implement a proper system of internal controls that would provide a segregation of duties for the preparation and review of federal reports to ensure appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversight are taking place. Additionally, management should develop policies and procedures to ensure that the City provides the Treasury with complete and accurate information for the P&E report. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Formerly 2021-003: Period of Performance: Federal Program: Assistance Listing Nos.: 14.267 Continuum of Care Program Condition: The organization was unable to demonstrate controls over the period of performance for six items selected for testing. Criteria: The requirements for the period of performance are contained in 2 CFR section 200.1 Definitions for “budget period,” “financial obligations,” “period of performance,” 2 CFR section 200.308 (revision of budget and program plans), 2 CFR section 200.309 (modifications to period of performance), 2 CFR section 200.344 (closeout), program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations; and the terms and conditions of the award. Questioned Costs: There were six expenditures where no documentation could be provided to support that the expense was incurred during the grant period resulting in a questioned cost of $2,699 for 14.267. Cause: The Organization did not have good controls on ensuring the period of performance requirement was met due to staff turn over and being unable to locate documentation. Effect: The Organization could have grant expenditures outside the grant period. Recommendation: In order to prevent future occurrences of this deficiency, we recommend that management enhance a set of controls to ensure that they are able to demonstrate the period of performance. Perspective: This is a systemic issue in that controls over the requirement have not been developed to ensure the reported information is accurate. Repeat: This is a repeat finding. Responsible Official’s View: The Organization agrees with the finding. See attached corrective action plan.

Formerly 2021-003: Period of Performance: Federal Program: Assistance Listing Nos.: 14.267 Continuum of Care Program Condition: The organization was unable to demonstrate controls over the period of performance for six items selected for testing. Criteria: The requirements for the period of performance are contained in 2 CFR section 200.1 Definitions for “budget period,” “financial obligations,” “period of performance,” 2 CFR section 200.308 (revision of budget and program plans), 2 CFR section 200.309 (modifications to period of performance), 2 CFR section 200.344 (closeout), program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations; and the terms and conditions of the award. Questioned Costs: There were six expenditures where no documentation could be provided to support that the expense was incurred during the grant period resulting in a questioned cost of $2,699 for 14.267. Cause: The Organization did not have good controls on ensuring the period of performance requirement was met due to staff turn over and being unable to locate documentation. Effect: The Organization could have grant expenditures outside the grant period. Recommendation: In order to prevent future occurrences of this deficiency, we recommend that management enhance a set of controls to ensure that they are able to demonstrate the period of performance. Perspective: This is a systemic issue in that controls over the requirement have not been developed to ensure the reported information is accurate. Repeat: This is a repeat finding. Responsible Official’s View: The Organization agrees with the finding. See attached corrective action plan.

Formerly 2021-003: Period of Performance: Federal Program: Assistance Listing Nos.: 14.267 Continuum of Care Program Condition: The organization was unable to demonstrate controls over the period of performance for six items selected for testing. Criteria: The requirements for the period of performance are contained in 2 CFR section 200.1 Definitions for “budget period,” “financial obligations,” “period of performance,” 2 CFR section 200.308 (revision of budget and program plans), 2 CFR section 200.309 (modifications to period of performance), 2 CFR section 200.344 (closeout), program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations; and the terms and conditions of the award. Questioned Costs: There were six expenditures where no documentation could be provided to support that the expense was incurred during the grant period resulting in a questioned cost of $2,699 for 14.267. Cause: The Organization did not have good controls on ensuring the period of performance requirement was met due to staff turn over and being unable to locate documentation. Effect: The Organization could have grant expenditures outside the grant period. Recommendation: In order to prevent future occurrences of this deficiency, we recommend that management enhance a set of controls to ensure that they are able to demonstrate the period of performance. Perspective: This is a systemic issue in that controls over the requirement have not been developed to ensure the reported information is accurate. Repeat: This is a repeat finding. Responsible Official’s View: The Organization agrees with the finding. See attached corrective action plan.

Formerly 2021-003: Period of Performance: Federal Program: Assistance Listing Nos.: 14.267 Continuum of Care Program Condition: The organization was unable to demonstrate controls over the period of performance for six items selected for testing. Criteria: The requirements for the period of performance are contained in 2 CFR section 200.1 Definitions for “budget period,” “financial obligations,” “period of performance,” 2 CFR section 200.308 (revision of budget and program plans), 2 CFR section 200.309 (modifications to period of performance), 2 CFR section 200.344 (closeout), program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations; and the terms and conditions of the award. Questioned Costs: There were six expenditures where no documentation could be provided to support that the expense was incurred during the grant period resulting in a questioned cost of $2,699 for 14.267. Cause: The Organization did not have good controls on ensuring the period of performance requirement was met due to staff turn over and being unable to locate documentation. Effect: The Organization could have grant expenditures outside the grant period. Recommendation: In order to prevent future occurrences of this deficiency, we recommend that management enhance a set of controls to ensure that they are able to demonstrate the period of performance. Perspective: This is a systemic issue in that controls over the requirement have not been developed to ensure the reported information is accurate. Repeat: This is a repeat finding. Responsible Official’s View: The Organization agrees with the finding. See attached corrective action plan.

Federal Agency: Department of Justice Federal Assistance Listing Numbers: 16.756, 16.726 Programs: Court Appointed Special Advocates, Juvenile Mentoring Program Award/Pass-Through Entity Identifying Numbers: 2018-CH-BX-K001, 15PJDP-21-GK-02762-CASA, 2019-MU-FX-0004, 2020-JU-FX-0028 Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR §200.332 details requirements for pass-through entities in regard to subrecipient monitoring and management. Per 2 CFR §200.332, Requirements for Pass-Through Entities: “All pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (1) Federal award identification. i. Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); ii. Subrecipient’s unique entity identifier; iii. Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); iv. Federal Award Date (see the definition of federal award date in §200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency; v. Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; vi. Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; vii. Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; viii. Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass through entity, including the current financial obligation; ix. Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; x. Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); xi. Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; xii. Assistance Listings Number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; xiii. Identification of whether the award is R&D; and xiv. Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per § 200.414. (2) All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award; (3) Any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass-through entity to meet its own responsibility to the federal awarding agency, including identification of any required financial and performance reports; (4) i. An approved federally recognized indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal Government. If no approved rate exists, the pass-through entity must determine the appropriate rate in collaboration with the subrecipient, which is either: (A) The negotiated indirect cost rate between the pass-through entity and the subrecipient, which can be based on a prior negotiated rate between a different PTE and the same subrecipient. If basing the rate on a previously negotiated rate, the pass-through entity is not required to collect information justifying this rate, but may elect to do so; (B) The de minimis indirect cost rate. ii. The pass-through entity must not require use of a de minimis indirect cost rate if the subrecipient has a federally approved rate. Subrecipients can elect to use the cost allocation method to account for indirect costs in accordance with §200.405(d). (5) A requirement that the subrecipient permits the pass-through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient’s records and financial statements as necessary for the pass-through entity to meet the requirements of this part; and (6) Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward.” Condition: National CASA/GAL’s subrecipient agreements do not contain a level of specificity to fully comply with federal subrecipient regulations. During our testing of subrecipient monitoring, we selected 20 subrecipient awards within Court Appointed Special Advocates and 17 subrecipient awards within the Juvenile Mentoring Program. For all awards tested, National CASA/GAL’s subaward agreements did not comply with 2 CFR §200.332, Requirements for Pass-Through Entities, as they do not contain a specific scope of work or project description. Cause: National CASA/GAL did not have the proper policies and procedures in place to ensure subaward agreements complied to relevant federal regulation, and that all required elements are located in subaward agreements, and not in the application or by reference to other documents. Effect or Potential Effect: Without adequate controls in place to ensure conformity with subaward requirements, grantees may not ensure compliance with any award special conditions or revised budgets agreed upon at contract implementation. Questioned Costs: None. Context: This is a condition identified per review of National CASA/GAL’s compliance with specified requirements using a non-statistically valid sample. For the Court Appointed Special Advocates Program, the population consisted of 100 subawards made totaling to $1,471,827 provided to subrecipients in 2022. The sample consisted of 20 subawards totaling $410,352 provided to subrecipients in 2022. For the Juvenile Mentoring Program, the population consisted of 83 subawards totaling to $2,339,039 provided to subrecipients in 2022. The sample consisted of 17 subawards totaling $441,399 provided to subrecipients in 2022. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend establishing and maintaining written policies and procedures to ensure subaward agreements conform to the requirements outlined in 2 CFR §200.332. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees that subrecipient agreements in place in 2022 did not fully comply with 2 CFR §200.332. Updates were made to the policies and procedures as well to ensure subaward files contain the requisite components. Management has additionally implemented a Grant Master File Checklist to ensure compliance with terms and conditions required in subaward agreements.

Federal Agency: Department of Justice Federal Assistance Listing Numbers: 16.756, 16.726 Programs: Court Appointed Special Advocates, Juvenile Mentoring Program Award/Pass-Through Entity Identifying Numbers: 2018-CH-BX-K001, 15PJDP-21-GK-02762-CASA, 2019-MU-FX-0004, 2020-JU-FX-0028 Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR §200.332 details requirements for pass-through entities in regard to subrecipient monitoring and management. Per 2 CFR §200.332, Requirements for Pass-Through Entities: “All pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (1) Federal award identification. i. Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); ii. Subrecipient’s unique entity identifier; iii. Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); iv. Federal Award Date (see the definition of federal award date in §200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency; v. Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; vi. Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; vii. Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; viii. Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass through entity, including the current financial obligation; ix. Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; x. Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); xi. Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; xii. Assistance Listings Number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; xiii. Identification of whether the award is R&D; and xiv. Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per § 200.414. (2) All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award; (3) Any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass-through entity to meet its own responsibility to the federal awarding agency, including identification of any required financial and performance reports; (4) i. An approved federally recognized indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal Government. If no approved rate exists, the pass-through entity must determine the appropriate rate in collaboration with the subrecipient, which is either: (A) The negotiated indirect cost rate between the pass-through entity and the subrecipient, which can be based on a prior negotiated rate between a different PTE and the same subrecipient. If basing the rate on a previously negotiated rate, the pass-through entity is not required to collect information justifying this rate, but may elect to do so; (B) The de minimis indirect cost rate. ii. The pass-through entity must not require use of a de minimis indirect cost rate if the subrecipient has a federally approved rate. Subrecipients can elect to use the cost allocation method to account for indirect costs in accordance with §200.405(d). (5) A requirement that the subrecipient permits the pass-through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient’s records and financial statements as necessary for the pass-through entity to meet the requirements of this part; and (6) Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward.” Condition: National CASA/GAL’s subrecipient agreements do not contain a level of specificity to fully comply with federal subrecipient regulations. During our testing of subrecipient monitoring, we selected 20 subrecipient awards within Court Appointed Special Advocates and 17 subrecipient awards within the Juvenile Mentoring Program. For all awards tested, National CASA/GAL’s subaward agreements did not comply with 2 CFR §200.332, Requirements for Pass-Through Entities, as they do not contain a specific scope of work or project description. Cause: National CASA/GAL did not have the proper policies and procedures in place to ensure subaward agreements complied to relevant federal regulation, and that all required elements are located in subaward agreements, and not in the application or by reference to other documents. Effect or Potential Effect: Without adequate controls in place to ensure conformity with subaward requirements, grantees may not ensure compliance with any award special conditions or revised budgets agreed upon at contract implementation. Questioned Costs: None. Context: This is a condition identified per review of National CASA/GAL’s compliance with specified requirements using a non-statistically valid sample. For the Court Appointed Special Advocates Program, the population consisted of 100 subawards made totaling to $1,471,827 provided to subrecipients in 2022. The sample consisted of 20 subawards totaling $410,352 provided to subrecipients in 2022. For the Juvenile Mentoring Program, the population consisted of 83 subawards totaling to $2,339,039 provided to subrecipients in 2022. The sample consisted of 17 subawards totaling $441,399 provided to subrecipients in 2022. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend establishing and maintaining written policies and procedures to ensure subaward agreements conform to the requirements outlined in 2 CFR §200.332. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees that subrecipient agreements in place in 2022 did not fully comply with 2 CFR §200.332. Updates were made to the policies and procedures as well to ensure subaward files contain the requisite components. Management has additionally implemented a Grant Master File Checklist to ensure compliance with terms and conditions required in subaward agreements.

Federal Agency: Department of Justice Federal Assistance Listing Numbers: 16.756, 16.726 Programs: Court Appointed Special Advocates, Juvenile Mentoring Program Award/Pass-Through Entity Identifying Numbers: 2018-CH-BX-K001, 15PJDP-21-GK-02762-CASA, 2019-MU-FX-0004, 2020-JU-FX-0028 Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR §200.332 details requirements for pass-through entities in regard to subrecipient monitoring and management. Per 2 CFR §200.332, Requirements for Pass-Through Entities: “All pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (1) Federal award identification. i. Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); ii. Subrecipient’s unique entity identifier; iii. Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); iv. Federal Award Date (see the definition of federal award date in §200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency; v. Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; vi. Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; vii. Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; viii. Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass through entity, including the current financial obligation; ix. Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; x. Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); xi. Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; xii. Assistance Listings Number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; xiii. Identification of whether the award is R&D; and xiv. Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per § 200.414. (2) All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award; (3) Any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass-through entity to meet its own responsibility to the federal awarding agency, including identification of any required financial and performance reports; (4) i. An approved federally recognized indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal Government. If no approved rate exists, the pass-through entity must determine the appropriate rate in collaboration with the subrecipient, which is either: (A) The negotiated indirect cost rate between the pass-through entity and the subrecipient, which can be based on a prior negotiated rate between a different PTE and the same subrecipient. If basing the rate on a previously negotiated rate, the pass-through entity is not required to collect information justifying this rate, but may elect to do so; (B) The de minimis indirect cost rate. ii. The pass-through entity must not require use of a de minimis indirect cost rate if the subrecipient has a federally approved rate. Subrecipients can elect to use the cost allocation method to account for indirect costs in accordance with §200.405(d). (5) A requirement that the subrecipient permits the pass-through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient’s records and financial statements as necessary for the pass-through entity to meet the requirements of this part; and (6) Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward.” Condition: National CASA/GAL’s subrecipient agreements do not contain a level of specificity to fully comply with federal subrecipient regulations. During our testing of subrecipient monitoring, we selected 20 subrecipient awards within Court Appointed Special Advocates and 17 subrecipient awards within the Juvenile Mentoring Program. For all awards tested, National CASA/GAL’s subaward agreements did not comply with 2 CFR §200.332, Requirements for Pass-Through Entities, as they do not contain a specific scope of work or project description. Cause: National CASA/GAL did not have the proper policies and procedures in place to ensure subaward agreements complied to relevant federal regulation, and that all required elements are located in subaward agreements, and not in the application or by reference to other documents. Effect or Potential Effect: Without adequate controls in place to ensure conformity with subaward requirements, grantees may not ensure compliance with any award special conditions or revised budgets agreed upon at contract implementation. Questioned Costs: None. Context: This is a condition identified per review of National CASA/GAL’s compliance with specified requirements using a non-statistically valid sample. For the Court Appointed Special Advocates Program, the population consisted of 100 subawards made totaling to $1,471,827 provided to subrecipients in 2022. The sample consisted of 20 subawards totaling $410,352 provided to subrecipients in 2022. For the Juvenile Mentoring Program, the population consisted of 83 subawards totaling to $2,339,039 provided to subrecipients in 2022. The sample consisted of 17 subawards totaling $441,399 provided to subrecipients in 2022. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend establishing and maintaining written policies and procedures to ensure subaward agreements conform to the requirements outlined in 2 CFR §200.332. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees that subrecipient agreements in place in 2022 did not fully comply with 2 CFR §200.332. Updates were made to the policies and procedures as well to ensure subaward files contain the requisite components. Management has additionally implemented a Grant Master File Checklist to ensure compliance with terms and conditions required in subaward agreements.

Federal Agency: Department of Justice Federal Assistance Listing Numbers: 16.756, 16.726 Programs: Court Appointed Special Advocates, Juvenile Mentoring Program Award/Pass-Through Entity Identifying Numbers: 2018-CH-BX-K001, 15PJDP-21-GK-02762-CASA, 2019-MU-FX-0004, 2020-JU-FX-0028 Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR §200.332 details requirements for pass-through entities in regard to subrecipient monitoring and management. Per 2 CFR §200.332, Requirements for Pass-Through Entities: “All pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (1) Federal award identification. i. Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); ii. Subrecipient’s unique entity identifier; iii. Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); iv. Federal Award Date (see the definition of federal award date in §200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the federal agency; v. Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; vi. Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; vii. Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; viii. Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass through entity, including the current financial obligation; ix. Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; x. Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); xi. Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; xii. Assistance Listings Number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; xiii. Identification of whether the award is R&D; and xiv. Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per § 200.414. (2) All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award; (3) Any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass-through entity to meet its own responsibility to the federal awarding agency, including identification of any required financial and performance reports; (4) i. An approved federally recognized indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal Government. If no approved rate exists, the pass-through entity must determine the appropriate rate in collaboration with the subrecipient, which is either: (A) The negotiated indirect cost rate between the pass-through entity and the subrecipient, which can be based on a prior negotiated rate between a different PTE and the same subrecipient. If basing the rate on a previously negotiated rate, the pass-through entity is not required to collect information justifying this rate, but may elect to do so; (B) The de minimis indirect cost rate. ii. The pass-through entity must not require use of a de minimis indirect cost rate if the subrecipient has a federally approved rate. Subrecipients can elect to use the cost allocation method to account for indirect costs in accordance with §200.405(d). (5) A requirement that the subrecipient permits the pass-through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient’s records and financial statements as necessary for the pass-through entity to meet the requirements of this part; and (6) Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward.” Condition: National CASA/GAL’s subrecipient agreements do not contain a level of specificity to fully comply with federal subrecipient regulations. During our testing of subrecipient monitoring, we selected 20 subrecipient awards within Court Appointed Special Advocates and 17 subrecipient awards within the Juvenile Mentoring Program. For all awards tested, National CASA/GAL’s subaward agreements did not comply with 2 CFR §200.332, Requirements for Pass-Through Entities, as they do not contain a specific scope of work or project description. Cause: National CASA/GAL did not have the proper policies and procedures in place to ensure subaward agreements complied to relevant federal regulation, and that all required elements are located in subaward agreements, and not in the application or by reference to other documents. Effect or Potential Effect: Without adequate controls in place to ensure conformity with subaward requirements, grantees may not ensure compliance with any award special conditions or revised budgets agreed upon at contract implementation. Questioned Costs: None. Context: This is a condition identified per review of National CASA/GAL’s compliance with specified requirements using a non-statistically valid sample. For the Court Appointed Special Advocates Program, the population consisted of 100 subawards made totaling to $1,471,827 provided to subrecipients in 2022. The sample consisted of 20 subawards totaling $410,352 provided to subrecipients in 2022. For the Juvenile Mentoring Program, the population consisted of 83 subawards totaling to $2,339,039 provided to subrecipients in 2022. The sample consisted of 17 subawards totaling $441,399 provided to subrecipients in 2022. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend establishing and maintaining written policies and procedures to ensure subaward agreements conform to the requirements outlined in 2 CFR §200.332. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees that subrecipient agreements in place in 2022 did not fully comply with 2 CFR §200.332. Updates were made to the policies and procedures as well to ensure subaward files contain the requisite components. Management has additionally implemented a Grant Master File Checklist to ensure compliance with terms and conditions required in subaward agreements.

FINDING 2022-003 Subject: CDBG - Entitlement Grants Cluster - Program Income Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program: Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Assistance Listings Number: 14.218 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): B-11-UN-18-0002, B-17-UC-18-0016, B-18-UC-18-0016, B-19-UC-18-0016, B-20-UC-18-0016, B-21-UC-18-0016 Compliance Requirement: Program Income Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The County received program income through various loan programs it offered to qualifying individuals. Once the County received a loan payment, the receipt was posted into the financial accounting system of the County and recorded in a grant fund. The amount received was also to be recorded in the Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) Integrated Disbursement and Information System (IDIS) website. The recorded program income in the IDIS would then appear on the Drawdown Report by Voucher Number report (PR07). One individual was responsible for notifying the County Auditor's office when program income money was received, so it could be receipted in the County's financial accounting system. The same individual was also responsible for reporting the information on the IDIS site. No internal controls were established to ensure the program income that was recorded in the financial accounting system was also reported on the IDIS site and the PR07 report. Four receipts totaling $38,960 were selected for testing from the County's receipt ledger. The four receipts were unable to be located on the PR07 report provided for audit. However, one of the four receipts was recorded in the IDIS system after information regarding the receipt was requested. In addition, we were unable to verify the total amount recorded in the receipt ledger to the total reported on the PR07 report. The County's ledger was greater than the PR07 report by $30,324 and is primarily attributed to under reporting of program income in the IDIS as identified above. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 LAKE COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.1 states in part: ". . . Internal controls for non-Federal entities means: (1) Processes designed and implemented by non-Federal entities to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of objectives in the following categories: (i) Effectiveness and efficiency of operations; (ii) Reliability of reporting for internal and external use; . . ." 2 CFR 200.302 states in part: "(a) Each state must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state's own funds. In addition, the state's and the other non-Federal entity's financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. . . . (b) The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: . . . (3) Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federallyfunded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures, income and interest and be supported by source documentation. . . ." 24 CFR 570.504 states in part: "(a) Recording program income. The receipt and expenditure of program income as defined in § 570.500(a) shall be recorded as part of the financial transactions of the grant program. (b) Disposition of program income received by recipients. (1) Program income received before grant closeout may be retained by the recipient if the income is treated as additional CDBG funds subject to all applicable requirements governing the use of CDBG funds. (2) If the recipient chooses to retain program income, that program income shall be disposed of as follows: (i) Program income in the form of repayments to, or interest earned on, a revolving fund as defined in § 570.500(b) shall be substantially disbursed from the fund before additional cash withdrawals are made from the U.S. Treasury for the same activity. (This rule does not prevent a lump sum disbursement to finance the rehabilitation of privately owned properties as provided for in § 570.513.) (ii) Substantially all other program income shall be disbursed for eligible activities before additional cash withdrawals are made from the U.S. Treasury. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 LAKE COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Cause A turnover of staff in the County's Community Development office, and management not ensuring that a system of internal controls that segregated key functions was designed, implemented, and operating effectively, contributed to the program income issue identified above. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the County could not ensure that program income was properly reported and used before the drawdown of federal funds as required. The County could be at risk of losing federal funds by the federal awarding agency due to noncompliance with federal regulations. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the management of the County establish a system of internal controls to ensure that all program income received is properly reported in the IDIS system and expended prior to drawing down federal awards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2022-004 Subject: CDBG - Entitlement Grants Cluster - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Programs: Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants; COVID-19 - Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Assistance Listings Number: 14.218 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): B-11-UN-18-0002, B-17-UC-18-0016, B-18-UC-18-0016, B-19-UC-18-0016, B-20-UC-18-0016, B-21-UC-18-0016, B-20-UW-18-0016 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context The County did not have internal control procedures over the Quarterly Reports (PR29), the IDIS Section 3 Performance Report, and the NSP Quarterly Reports. One individual prepared or generated the report without a review or oversight process. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 LAKE COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Additionally, the County's internal controls were not consistently documented over the drawdown requests for the CDBG grant during the audit period. The drawdown requests were entered into the IDIS, which then became the basis for several of the reports. The internal control presented by the County was that one individual prepared and entered the request, which would then be printed, and another individual would review and sign the printed request to document the review. Of the 13 reimbursement requests tested, internal control documentation for 8 of the requests was printed and signed during the current period, after the documentation was requested. The creation of documentation of the internal control procedure did not support that internal controls were properly implemented and effective during the audit period. The lack of internal controls were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.1 states in part: ". . . Internal controls for non-Federal entities means: (1) Processes designed and implemented by non-Federal entities to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of objectives in the following categories: (i) Effectiveness and efficiency of operations; (ii) Reliability of reporting for internal and external use; . . ." Cause A turnover of staff in the County's Community Development office, and management not ensuring that a system of internal controls that segregated key functions was designed, implemented, and operating effectively, contributed to the program income issue identified above. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 LAKE COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the County's management design and implement a proper system of internal controls, and retain documentation of its system of internal controls, to ensure compliance with reporting requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2022-004 Subject: CDBG - Entitlement Grants Cluster - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Programs: Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants; COVID-19 - Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Assistance Listings Number: 14.218 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): B-11-UN-18-0002, B-17-UC-18-0016, B-18-UC-18-0016, B-19-UC-18-0016, B-20-UC-18-0016, B-21-UC-18-0016, B-20-UW-18-0016 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context The County did not have internal control procedures over the Quarterly Reports (PR29), the IDIS Section 3 Performance Report, and the NSP Quarterly Reports. One individual prepared or generated the report without a review or oversight process. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 LAKE COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Additionally, the County's internal controls were not consistently documented over the drawdown requests for the CDBG grant during the audit period. The drawdown requests were entered into the IDIS, which then became the basis for several of the reports. The internal control presented by the County was that one individual prepared and entered the request, which would then be printed, and another individual would review and sign the printed request to document the review. Of the 13 reimbursement requests tested, internal control documentation for 8 of the requests was printed and signed during the current period, after the documentation was requested. The creation of documentation of the internal control procedure did not support that internal controls were properly implemented and effective during the audit period. The lack of internal controls were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.1 states in part: ". . . Internal controls for non-Federal entities means: (1) Processes designed and implemented by non-Federal entities to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of objectives in the following categories: (i) Effectiveness and efficiency of operations; (ii) Reliability of reporting for internal and external use; . . ." Cause A turnover of staff in the County's Community Development office, and management not ensuring that a system of internal controls that segregated key functions was designed, implemented, and operating effectively, contributed to the program income issue identified above. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 LAKE COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the County's management design and implement a proper system of internal controls, and retain documentation of its system of internal controls, to ensure compliance with reporting requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2022-005 Subject: CDBG - Entitlement Grants Cluster - Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program: Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Assistance Listings Number: 14.218 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): B-11-UN-18-0002, B-17-UC-18-0016, B-18-UC-18-0016, B-19-UC-18-0016, B-20-UC-18-0016, B-21-UC-18-0016 Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context The County did not have internal control procedures over adjustments to Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants funds. During and after the transition to a new financial accounting software system for the County, various adjusting entries were entered by outside consultants without any oversight or review by County management. The lack of internal controls was a systematic issue from July 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 25 LAKE COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.1 states in part: ". . . Internal controls for non-Federal entities means: (1) Processes designed and implemented by non-Federal entities to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of objectives in the following categories: (i) Effectiveness and efficiency of operations; (ii) Reliability of reporting for internal and external use; . . ." Cause The conversion process due to the change in financial software in the middle of year 2022 caused abnormal activity which was not a part of the system of internal controls as designed and implemented by the County. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the County's management design and implement a proper system of internal controls, and retain documentation of its system of internal controls, to ensure compliance with period of performance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2022-005 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): Regular FY 2022, Revenue Loss FY 2022 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 27 LA PORTE COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the County in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirement. Recipients are required to quarterly or annually submit Project and Expenditure (P&E) Reports to the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury). The reporting periods, as well as the respective due dates, are based upon type of recipient and its population, as well as the recipient's allocation amount. Information to be reported includes projects funded, expenditures, and contracts for the appropriate reporting period. The County was classified as a metropolitan county with a population below 250,000 residents that received an allocation of more than $10 million in COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) funding. As such, the initial P&E Report, covering three calendar quarters from March 3, 2021 to December 31, 2021, was required to be submitted to the Treasury by January 31, 2022. The subsequent quarterly reports were to cover one calendar quarter and must be submitted to the Treasury by the last day of the month following the end of the period covered. The County submitted four quarterly P&E Reports during the audit period. The County's process for the completion and submission of the P&E Reports was that the County Auditor prepared each P&E Report based on the County's Financial Ledgers without a proper oversight or review process in place prior to submission. All four quarterly reports that were due during the audit period were not properly supported by the County's records and contained the following errors:  The 2021 Quarter 4 P&E Report period expenditures were overstated by $159,541.  The 2022 Quarter 1 P&E Report period expenditures were understated by $15,375.  The 2022 Quarter 2 P&E Report period expenditures were understated by $21,109.  The 2022 Quarter 3 P&E Report period expenditures were overstated by $216,216. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance occurred throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 28 LA PORTE COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance and Reporting Guidance, page 10, states in part: ". . . 10. Reporting. All recipients of federal funds must complete financial, performance, and compliance reporting as required and outlined in Part 2 of this guidance. Expenditures may be reported on a cash or accrual basis, as long as the methodology is disclosed and consistently applied. Reporting must be consistent with the definition of expenditures pursuant to 2 CFR 200.1. Your organization should appropriately maintain accounting records for compiling and reporting accurate, compliant financial data, in accordance with appropriate accounting standards and principles. . . ." 31 CFR 35.4(c) states in part: "Reporting and requests for other information. During the period of performance, recipients shall provide to the Secretary periodic reports providing detailed accounting of the uses of funds, . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed or implemented by management of the County to ensure that policies and procedures were in place related to reporting to ensure the amounts reported were accurate. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. Noncompliance with the provision of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of federal funding to the County. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the management of the County establish a system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures over the preparation and review of federal reports to ensure appropriate reviews, approval, and oversight are taking place. Additionally, management should develop policies and procedures to ensure that the County provides the Treasury with complete and accurate information for all reports. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Finding 2022-5 No Prior Written Approval for Capital Disbursements in Excess of $10,000 Name of Federal Agency: Listing Award Number Number 64.033 13-ZZ-134 U. S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Program Title VA Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR 200.1 Definition for: Capital Expenditures means expenditures to acquire capital assets or expenditures to make additions, improvements, modifications, replacements, rearrangements, reinstallations, renovations, or alterations to capital assets that materially increase their value or useful life. 14 THE ALSTON WILKES SOCIETY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2022 Section III - Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) 2 CFR 200.452 Maintenance and repair costs states: Costs incurred for utilities, insurance, security, necessary maintenance, janitorial services, repair, or upkeep of buildings and equipment (including Federal property unless otherwise provided for) which neither add to the permanent value of the property nor appreciably prolong its intended life, but keep it in an efficient operating condition, are allowable. Costs incurred for improvements that add to the permanent value of the buildings and equipment or appreciably prolong their intended life must be treated as capital expenditures (see § 200.439). These costs are only allowable to the extent not paid through rental or other agreements. 2 CFR 200.439 Equipment and Other Capital Expenditures, (b) (1-3) 1 Capital expenditures for general purpose equipment, buildings, and land are allowable as direct costs, but only with the prior written approval of the Federal agency or pass-through entity. 2 Capital expenditures for special purpose equipment are allowable as direct costs, provided that items with a unit cost of $10,000 or more have the prior written approval of the Federal agency or pass-through entity, and 3 Capital expenditures for improvements to land, buildings, or equipment that materially increase their value or useful life are allowable as a direct cost, but only with the prior written approval of the Federal agency or pass-through entity. Condition: We identified two transactions where the Society should have received prior written approval from the awarding agency, before incurring the costs. The transactions, in the amounts of $26,057 and $18,000, were recorded as equipment maintenance expense, and floor repairs, respectively. In accordance 2 CFR 200.439 b, it appears the cost should have had prior written approval. Cause of condition: The reason the condition occurred appears to be the lack of a thorough understanding of the cost principles under the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E - Cost Principles). Potential effect of condition: The possible effect of this condition is non-compliance with prior written approval requirements for disbursements totaling $44,057.51. Section III - Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Questioned Costs: This condition resulted in questioned costs totaling $44,057.51. The questioned cost amount was computed by adding the total of the two sample items tested for this condition, as shown below: Sample # Description 28 Floor Repairs 29 Equipment Maintenance Amount $18,000.00 26,057.51 $ 44,057.51 Prevalence and Consequence: A judgmental sample of 40 disbursements totaling $134,400.16 was selected. Out of the 40 sample items tested, two were identified where prior written approval was not obtained, totaling $44,057.51. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management ensure accounting personnel responsible for the administration of funds related to award programs, refamiliarize themselves with 2 CFR 200 Subpart E - Cost Principles, to enable them to recognize when prior written approval is required, and when to capitalize certain capital expenditures when the federal criteria are met for nongovernmental entities.

2 CFR § 1000 gives regulatory effect to the Department of the Treasury for 2 CFR Part 200. 2 CFR § 200.1 states, in part, that the term “Period of performance” means the total estimated time interval between the start of an initial Federal award and the planned end date, which may include one or more funded portions, or budget periods. Identification of the period of performance in the Federal award per § 200.211(b)(5) does not commit the awarding agency to fund the award beyond the currently approved budget period. 2 CFR § 200.211(b)(5) states, in part, that the Federal awarding agency must include the following general Federal award information in each Federal award the Period of Performance Start and End Date. The period of performance for the award under the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery begins on the date the awards are issued (i.e., the date funds are disbursed to recipients) and ends on December 31, 2026. Recipients may only use funds to cover costs incurred after March 3, 2021, and ending on December 31, 2024. Recipients must liquidate all obligations incurred by December 31, 2024, under the award no later than December 31, 2026, which is the end of the period of performance. 2021 Treasury SLFRF Compliance Supplement Addendum 1, 21.027; 2022 OMB Compliance Supplement, Part 4, 21.027. The County reimbursed payroll for all of fiscal year 2021 General Fund gross wages, using Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery funds, which included pay dates prior to March 3, 2021. The total gross wages reimbursed prior to March 3, 2021, was $993,575. Expenditures paid from federal funds outside the period of performance could result in federal questioned costs and follow-up action taken by the grantor agency, which may result in loss of future federal funding. The County should establish and implement procedures to verify that only expenditures incurred during the period of performance are charged to federal awards. Noncompliance with grant requirements could have an adverse effect on future grant awards by the awarding agency in addition to an inaccurate assessment of major federal programs that would be subjected to audit. County management should review all grant award documents in order to execute policies and procedures which help ensure compliance with grant requirements, including Schedule reporting requirements. The County should implement a system to track all federal expenditures and related information separately from other expenditures and report federal expenditures with proper support including, but not limited to, grant agreements, calculation of the expenditures, and any federal reporting requirements. This will help ensure the County is in compliance with grant requirements, the Schedule is complete and accurate, and major federal programs are accurately identified for audit.

2 C.F.R. Subpart F 200.510(b) requires that the auditee prepare a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) for the period covered by the County's financial statements which must include the total federal awards expended as determined in accordance with 200.502. At a minimum, the schedule must: (1) List individual Federal programs by Federal Agency (2) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included. (3) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the AL number or other identifying number when the AL information is not available. (4) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program. (5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in 200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended, paragraph (b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. (6) Include notes that describe the significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule, and note whether or not the auditee has elected to use the 10 percent de minimis cost rate as covered in 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. 2 CFR Part 170 "subaward" has the meaning given in 2 CFR 200.1 and means an award provided by a pass-through entity to a subrecipient for the subrecipient to carry out part of a federal award received by the pass-through entity. It does not include payments to a contractor or payments to an individual that is a beneficiary of a federal program. A subaward may be provided through any form of legal agreement, including an agreement that the pass-through entity considers a contract. The County's Federal Schedule had the following error: Funds provided to subrecipients for the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (AL 21.027) were understated by $3,000,000. Errors and omissions to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards could adversely affect future grant awards in addition to causing an inaccurate assessment of major federal programs that would be subjected to audit. Adjustments, to which management have agreed, are reflected in the accompanying Schedule. County management should review all grant and loan awards and be familiar with federal reporting requirements. The County should implement a system to track all federal expenditures and related information separately from other expenditures and report federal expenditures with proper support including, but not limited to, grant agreements, calculation of the expenditures, and any federal reporting requirements. This may help ensure the Schedule is complete and accurate and major federal programs are correctly identified for audit.

FINDING 2022-004 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): 2022 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The County had not properly implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. Recipients are required to submit quarterly or annually Project and Expenditure (P&E) reports to the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury). The reporting periods, as well as the respective due dates, are based upon type of recipient and its population, as well as the recipient's allocation amount. Information to be reported includes projects funded, expenditures, and contracts for the appropriate reporting period. The County was classified as a metropolitan county with a population below 250,000 residents that received an allocation of less than $10 million in Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) funding. As such, the initial P&E report, covering the period from March 3, 2021 to March 31, 2022, was required to be submitted to the Treasury by April 30, 2022. The subsequent annual reports are to cover one calendar year and must be submitted to the Treasury by April 30 each year. The County submitted one P&E report during the audit period. The County Auditor prepared and submitted the P&E report and the Deputy County Auditor observed. However, there is no documentation of the review or oversight process in place. In addition, the P&E report submitted was not properly supported by the County's records. The County incorrectly reported the amounts approved to be spent from the grant proceeds, $550,000, instead of the actual expenditures of $219,719 spent during the reporting period. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance and Reporting Guidance, page 10, states in part: ". . . 10. Reporting. All recipients of federal funds must complete financial, performance, and compliance reporting as required and outlined in Part 2 of this guidance. Expenditures may be reported on a cash or accrual basis, as long as the methodology is disclosed and consistently applied. Reporting must be consistent with the definition of expenditures pursuant to 2 CFR 200.1. Your organization should appropriately maintain accounting records for compiling and reporting accurate, compliant financial data, in accordance with appropriate accounting standards and principles. . . ." 31 CFR 35.4(c) states in part: "Reporting and requests for other information. During the period of performance, recipients shall provide to the Secretary periodic reports providing detailed accounting of the uses of funds, . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not implemented by management of the County, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the County's management of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. In addition, not meeting the SLFRF reporting requirements increases the likelihood that the public will not have access to transparent and accurate information regarding expenditures of federal awards. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the County design and implement a proper system of internal controls that would provide a segregation of duties for the preparation and review of federal reports to ensure appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversight are taking place. Additionally, management should develop policies and procedures to ensure that the County provides the Treasury with complete and accurate information for the P&E report. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2022-002 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Reporting Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number or Year (or Other Identifying Number): ARP Act Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context The City had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. Recipients are required to submit quarterly or annually Project and Expenditure (P&E) Reports to the Department of the Treasury (Treasury). The reporting periods as well as the respective due dates are based upon type of recipient and its population, as well as the recipient's allocation amount. Information to be reported includes projects funded, expenditures, and contracts for the appropriate reporting period. The City was classified as a metropolitan city with a population below 250,000 residents that received an allocation of more than $10 million in State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds. As such, the initial P&E report, covering three calendar quarters from March 3, 2021 to December 31, 2021, was required to be submitted to the Treasury by January 31, 2022. The subsequent quarterly reports are to cover one calendar quarter and must be submitted to the Treasury by the last day of the month following the end of the period covered. The City submitted four quarterly P&E reports during the audit period. The reports were prepared by one knowledgeable employee and reviewed and submitted by another employee; however, the review process in place was not effective to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. Of the four reports filed, two reports were selected for testing. The two reports tested were the quarterly reports due on July 31, 2022, and October 31, 2022. Errors noted on the reports were as follows: Project and Expenditure Report: July 31, 2022: The report was not mathematically accurate and complete, nor was it supported by the unit's records. Additionally, data accumulated and summarized was not accurate and complete including information to support key line items. Of the four projects reported by the City the current period obligation was overstated for all four. The current period obligation was based on a budgeted amount per Resolution instead of an amount for the current period. In addition, the current period expenditures were incorrect for three of the four projects and the cumulative expenditures were incorrect for two of the four projects. Project and Expenditure Report: October 31, 2022: The report was not mathematically accurate and complete, nor was it supported by the unit's records. Additionally, data accumulated and summarized was not accurate and complete including information to support key line items. Of the five projects reported by the City the current period obligation one was overstated as it was based on a budgeted amount per Resolution instead of an amount for the current period and three were understated. In addition, the current period expenditures were incorrect for four of the five projects, and the cumulative expenditures were incorrect for two of the five projects. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was systemic throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Reporting. All recipients of federal funds must complete financial, performance, and compliance reporting as required and outlined in Part 2 of this guidance. Expenditures may be reported on a cash or accrual basis, as long as the methodology is disclosed and consistently applied. Reporting must be consistent with the definition of expenditures pursuant to 2 CFR 200.1. Your organization should appropriately maintain accounting records for compiling and reporting accurate, compliant financial data, in accordance with appropriate accounting standards and principles. . . . (Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance and Reporting Guidance) 31 CFR 35.4(c) states in part: "Reporting and requests for other information. During the period of performance, recipients shall provide to the Secretary periodic reports providing detailed accounting of the uses of funds . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls over the P&E report was not designed by management of the City. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the City's management of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the City. In addition, not meeting the SLFRF reporting requirements increases the likelihood that the public will not have access to transparent and accurate information regarding expenditures of federal awards. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the City design and implement a proper system of internal controls that would ensure appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversight are taking place. Additionally, management should develop policies and procedures to ensure that the City provides the Treasury with complete and accurate information for the P&E report. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2022-004 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY22 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The City had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. Recipients are required to submit quarterly or annually Project and Expenditure (P&E) reports to the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury). The reporting periods, as well as the respective due dates, are based upon type of recipient and its population, as well as the recipient's allocation amount. Information to be reported includes projects funded, expenditures, and contracts for the appropriate reporting period. The City had a population below 250,000 residents that received an allocation of less than $10 million in Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF). As such, the initial P&E report, covering the period from March 3, 2021 to March 31, 2022, was required to be submitted to the Treasury by April 30, 2022. The subsequent annual reports are to cover one calendar year and must be submitted to the Treasury by April 30 each year. The City submitted one P&E report during the audit period; however, a single employee prepared and submitted the P&E report without evidence of a review or oversight process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 CITY OF SULLIVAN SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The P&E report was not completed or supported by the City's ledger. The City's ledgers have expenses for projects of $65,282 as of March 31, 2022. However, the City's report had all zeros and no projects in the Project Overview Section. Additionally, as the report was zeros, there was no information input for the key line items of current period obligations, cumulative obligations, current period expenditures, or cumulative expenditures even though expenses occurred. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance and Reporting Guidance, page 10, states in part: ". . . 10. Reporting. All recipients of federal funds must complete financial, performance, and compliance reporting as required and outlined in Part 2 of this guidance. Expenditures may be reported on a cash or accrual basis, as long as the methodology is disclosed and consistently applied. Reporting must be consistent with the definition of expenditures pursuant to 2 CFR 200.1. Your organization should appropriately maintain accounting records for compiling and reporting accurate, compliant financial data, in accordance with appropriate accounting standards and principles. . . ." 31 CFR 35.4(c) states in part: "Reporting and requests for other information. During the period of performance, recipients shall provide to the Secretary periodic reports providing detailed accounting of the uses of funds." Cause A proper system of internal controls over the P&E report was not designed by management of the City, which would include segregation of key functions to ensure the City provided the Treasury with complete and accurate information related to the SLFRF awards. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the City's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the City. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 CITY OF SULLIVAN SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) In addition, not meeting the SLFRF reporting requirements increases the likelihood that the public will not have access to transparent and accurate information regarding expenditures of federal awards. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the City design and implement a proper system of internal controls that would provide a segregation of duties for the preparation and review of federal reports to ensure appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversight are taking place. Additionally, management should develop policies and procedures to ensure that the City provides the Treasury with complete and accurate information for the P&E report. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2022-004 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY22 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The City had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. Recipients are required to submit quarterly or annually Project and Expenditure (P&E) reports to the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury). The reporting periods, as well as the respective due dates, are based upon type of recipient and its population, as well as the recipient's allocation amount. Information to be reported includes projects funded, expenditures, and contracts for the appropriate reporting period. The City had a population below 250,000 residents that received an allocation of less than $10 million in Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF). As such, the initial P&E report, covering the period from March 3, 2021 to March 31, 2022, was required to be submitted to the Treasury by April 30, 2022. The subsequent annual reports are to cover one calendar year and must be submitted to the Treasury by April 30 each year. The City submitted one P&E report during the audit period; however, a single employee prepared and submitted the P&E report without evidence of a review or oversight process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 CITY OF SULLIVAN SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The P&E report was not completed or supported by the City's ledger. The City's ledgers have expenses for projects of $65,282 as of March 31, 2022. However, the City's report had all zeros and no projects in the Project Overview Section. Additionally, as the report was zeros, there was no information input for the key line items of current period obligations, cumulative obligations, current period expenditures, or cumulative expenditures even though expenses occurred. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance and Reporting Guidance, page 10, states in part: ". . . 10. Reporting. All recipients of federal funds must complete financial, performance, and compliance reporting as required and outlined in Part 2 of this guidance. Expenditures may be reported on a cash or accrual basis, as long as the methodology is disclosed and consistently applied. Reporting must be consistent with the definition of expenditures pursuant to 2 CFR 200.1. Your organization should appropriately maintain accounting records for compiling and reporting accurate, compliant financial data, in accordance with appropriate accounting standards and principles. . . ." 31 CFR 35.4(c) states in part: "Reporting and requests for other information. During the period of performance, recipients shall provide to the Secretary periodic reports providing detailed accounting of the uses of funds." Cause A proper system of internal controls over the P&E report was not designed by management of the City, which would include segregation of key functions to ensure the City provided the Treasury with complete and accurate information related to the SLFRF awards. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the City's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the City. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 CITY OF SULLIVAN SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) In addition, not meeting the SLFRF reporting requirements increases the likelihood that the public will not have access to transparent and accurate information regarding expenditures of federal awards. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the City design and implement a proper system of internal controls that would provide a segregation of duties for the preparation and review of federal reports to ensure appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversight are taking place. Additionally, management should develop policies and procedures to ensure that the City provides the Treasury with complete and accurate information for the P&E report. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2022-002 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year or Other Identifying Number: FY2022 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Significant Deficiency, Other Matters Condition and Context The County had not established an effective system of internal controls that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. Recipients are required to submit quarterly or annually Project and Expenditure (P&E) reports to the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury). The reporting periods, as well as the respective due dates are based upon type of recipient and its population, as well as the recipient's allocation amount. Information to be reported includes projects funded, expenditures, and contracts for the appropriate reporting period. The County was classified as a county with a population below 250,000 residents that received an allocation of less than $10 million in State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds funding. As such, the initial P&E report, covering the period from March 3, 2021 to March 31, 2022, was required to be submitted to the Treasury by April 30, 2022. The subsequent annual reports are to cover one calendar year and must be submitted to the Treasury by April 30 each year. The County submitted one P&E report during the audit period. The Chief Deputy County Auditor was responsible for preparing and submitting the P&E report and the County Auditor reviewed and approved the report prior to submission; however, the review process in place was not effective and did not prevent, or detect and correct, errors. Due to the lack of effective internal controls one expenditure dated March 30, 2022, in the amount of $47,363 was omitted. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance and Reporting Guidance, page 10, states in part: ". . . 10. Reporting. All recipients of federal funds must complete financial, performance, and compliance reporting as required and outlined in Part 2 of this guidance. Expenditures may be reported on a cash or accrual basis, as long as the methodology is disclosed and consistently applied. Reporting must be consistent with the definition of expenditures pursuant to 2 CFR 200.1. Your organization should appropriately maintain accounting records for compiling and reporting accurate, compliant financial data, in accordance with appropriate accounting standards and principles. . . ." 35 CFR 35.4(c) states in part: "Reporting and requests for other information. During the period of performance, recipients shall provide to the Secretary periodic reports providing detailed accounting of the uses of funds, . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls over the P&E report was not designed by management of the County. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the County's management statements of what should be done to effect internal control, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the County design and implement a proper system of internal controls that would ensure appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversight are taking place. Additionally, management should develop policies and procedures to ensure that the County provides the Treasury with complete and accurate information for the P&E report. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2022-005 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY2021 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context The County had not properly designed a system of internal controls that would be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. Recipients are required to submit quarterly or annually Project and Expenditure (P&E) reports to the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury). The reporting periods, as well as the respective due dates, are based upon type of recipient and its population, as well as recipient's allocation amount. Information to be reported includes projects funded, expenditures, and contracts for the appropriate reporting period. The County was classified as a Tier 2 (Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received more than $10 million in Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF)) recipient. As such, the initial P&E report, covering three calendar quarters from March 3, 2021 to December 31, 2021, was required to be submitted to the Treasury by January 31, 2022. The subsequent quarterly reports were to cover one calendar quarter and must be submitted to the Treasury by the last day of the month following the end of the period covered. The County submitted four P&E reports during the audit period; however, the errors as identified below were noted on all four reports. Quarterly Report: March 3, 2021 to December 31, 2021 Current period expenditures were reported as $0 for all 44 projects identified in the report. However, 3 projects had current year expenditures. Quarterly Report: January 1, 2022 to March 31, 2022 Current period expenditures were reported as $0 for all 22 projects identified in the report. However, 5 projects had current year expenditures. In addition, 1 project reported total cumulative expenditures when in fact no expenditures had yet occurred. Quarterly Report: April 1, 2022 to June 30, 2022 Current period expenditures were reported as $0 for 20 of 22 projects identified in the report. However, 1 project, had current year expenditures. In addition, 1 project reported total cumulative expenditures when in fact no expenditures had yet occurred. Quarterly Report: July 1, 2022 to September 30, 2022 Current period expenditures were reported as $0 for 5 projects identified in the report. However, the 5 projects had current period expenditures. In addition, 5 projects identified in the report reported current period expenditures when in fact no expenditures had occurred in the reporting period. Finally total cumulative expenditures for 1 project could not be traced to the County's ledger. The lack of effective internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance and Reporting Guidance, states in part: "Reporting. All recipients of federal funds must complete financial, performance, and compliance reporting as required and outlined in Part 2 of this guidance. Expenditures may be reported on a cash or accrual basis, as long as the methodology is disclosed and consistently applied. Reporting must be consistent with the definition of expenditures pursuant to 2 CFR 200.1. Your organization should appropriately maintain accounting records for compiling and reporting accurate, compliance financial data, in accordance with appropriate accounting standards and principles. . . ." 31 CFR 35.4(c) states in part: "Reporting and requests for other information. During the period of performance, recipients shall provide to the Secretary periodic reports providing detailed accounting of the uses of funds, . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls over P&E reports was not implemented by the management of the County to ensure that complete and accurate information related to the SLFRF awards was provided to the Treasury. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the County's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. In addition, not meeting the SLFRF reporting requirements increases the likelihood that the public will not have access to transparent and accurate information regarding expenditures of federal awards. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the County design and implement a proper system of internal controls that would provide a segregation of duties for the preparation and review of federal reports to ensure appropriate reviews, approvals and oversight are taking place. Additionally, management should develop policies and procedures to ensure that the County provides the Treasury with complete and accurate information for the P&E report. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2022-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 2022 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2021-003. Condition and Context The County had not properly designed a system of internal controls that would be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. Recipients are required to submit quarterly or annually Project and Expenditure (P&E) reports to the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury). The reporting periods, as well as the respective due dates, are based upon type of recipient and its population, as well as recipient's allocation amount. Information to be reported includes projects funded, expenditures, and contracts for the appropriate reporting period. The County was classified as a Tier 5 (Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds) recipient. As such, the initial P&E report, covering from March 3, 2021 to March 31, 2022, was required to be submitted to the Treasury by April 30, 2022. The subsequent annual reports were to cover one calendar year and must be submitted to the Treasury by April 30. The County submitted one annual P&E report during the audit period. The report was prepared by the County Auditor and reviewed and certified by a designated County Commissioner; however, the review process in place was not effective and did not prevent or detect and correct errors. As a result, $0 was reported as the current expenditures and current obligations, when in fact there were current expenditures and current obligations of $639,824. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance and Reporting Guidance, page 10, states in part: ". . . 10. Reporting. All recipients of federal funds must complete financial, performance, and compliance reporting as required and outlined in Part 2 of this guidance. Expenditures may be reported on a cash or accrual basis, as long as the methodology is disclosed and consistently applied. Reporting must be consistent with the definition of expenditures pursuant to 2 CFR 200.1. Your organization should appropriately maintain accounting records for compiling and reporting accurate, compliance financial data, in accordance with appropriate accounting standards and principles. . . ." 31 CFR 35.4(c) states in part: "Reporting and requests for other information. During the period of performance, recipients shall provide to the Secretary periodic reports providing accounting of the uses of funds, . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls over the P&E report was not designed by management of the County. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the County's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. In addition, not meeting the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds reporting requirements increases the likelihood that the public will not have access to transparent and accurate information regarding expenditures of federal awards. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the County design and implement a proper system of internal controls that would ensure appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversight are taking place. Additionally, management should develop policies and procedures to ensure that the County provides the Treasury with complete and accurate information for the P&E report. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2022-004 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 2022 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context The County had not established a system of internal controls that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. Recipients are required to submit quarterly or annual Project and Expenditure (P&E) reports to the Department of the Treasury (Treasury). The reporting periods as well as the respective due dates are based upon type of recipient and its population as well as the recipient's allocation amount. Information to be reported includes projects funded, expenditures, and contracts for the appropriate reporting period. The County was classified as a county with a population below 250,000 residents that received an allocation of less than $10 million in State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds. As such, the initial P&E report covering the period from March 3, 2021 to March 31, 2022, was required to be submitted to the Treasury by April 30, 2022. The subsequent annual reports are to cover one calendar year and must be submitted to the Treasury by April 30 each year. The County submitted the P&E report by April 30, 2022, as required; however, the report was not mathematically accurate and complete, nor was it supported by the unit's records. Additionally, data accumulated and summarized was not accurate and complete. The key line items of "Cumulative Expenditures" and "Current Period Expenditures" as reported on the P&E report did not agree to the County's ledger. The amounts reported for the two key line items noted were understated as not all activity for the reporting period was properly included. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Reporting. All recipients of federal funds must complete financial, performance, and compliance reporting as required and outlined in Part 2 of this guidance. Expenditures may be reported on a cash or accrual basis, as long as the methodology is disclosed and consistently applied. Reporting must be consistent with the definition of expenditures pursuant to 2 CFR 200.1. Your organization should appropriately maintain accounting records for compiling and reporting accurate, compliant financial data, in accordance with appropriate accounting standards and principles. . . . (Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance and Reporting Guidance) 31 CFR 35.4(c) states in part: "Reporting and requests for other information. During the period of performance, recipients shall provide to the Secretary periodic reports providing detailed accounting of the uses of funds." Cause A proper system of internal controls over the P&E report was not designed by management of the County. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the County's management view of what should be done to effect internal control, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. In addition, not meeting the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds reporting requirements increases the likelihood that the public will not have access to transparent and accurate information regarding expenditures of federal awards. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the County establish a proper system of internal controls including strengthening its policies and procedures to ensure that the County provides the Treasury with complete and accurate information for the P&E report. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2022-004 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): CY 2021 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context The City had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. Recipients are required to submit quarterly or annually Project and Expenditure (P&E) reports to the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury). The reporting periods, as well as the respective due dates are based upon type of recipient and its population, as well as the recipient's allocation amount. Information to be reported includes projects funded, expenditures, and contracts for the appropriate reporting period. The City was classified as a metropolitan city with a population below 250,000 residents that received an allocation of more than $10 million in State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF). As such, the initial P&E report, covering the calendar quarters from March 3, 2021 to December 31, 2021, was required to be submitted to the Treasury by January 31, 2022. The subsequent quarterly reports are to cover one calendar quarter and must be submitted to the Treasury by the last day of the month following the end of the period covered. The City submitted four P&E reports during the audit period; however, a single employee prepared and submitted each P&E report without a review or oversight process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. All four of the quarterly reports filed during the audit period were selected for testing. The report due October 31, 2022, incorrectly reported the subrecipient key line item. A vendor was reported as a subrecipient, but should not have been classified as such. The lack of internal controls and the noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance and Reporting Guidance, page 10, states in part: " . . . Reporting. All recipients of federal funds must complete financial, performance, and compliance reporting as required and outlined in Part 2 of this guidance. Expenditures may be reported on a cash or accrual basis, as long as the methodology is disclosed and consistently applied. Reporting must be consistent with the definition of expenditures pursuant to 2 CFR 200.1. Your organization should appropriately maintain accounting records for compiling and reporting accurate, compliant financial data, in accordance with appropriate accounting standards and principles. . . ." 31 CFR 35.4(c) states in part: "Reporting and requests for other information. During the period of performance, recipients shall provide to the Secretary periodic reports providing detailed accounting of the uses of funds, . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls over the P&E report was not designed by management of the City. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the City's management of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the City. In addition, not meeting the SLFRF reporting requirements increases the likelihood that the public will not have access to transparent and accurate information regarding expenditures of federal awards. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the City design and implement a proper system of internal controls that would ensure appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversight are taking place. Additionally, management should develop policies and procedures to ensure that the City provides the Treasury with complete and accurate information for the P&E report. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2022-004 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 2022 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The County had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. A single employee prepared and submitted reports without a review or oversight process in place to prevent or detect and correct errors. Recipients are required to submit quarterly or annual Project and Expenditure (P&E) reports to the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury). The reporting periods, as well as the respective due dates are based upon the type of recipient and its population, as well as the recipient's allocation amount. Information to be reported includes projects funded, expenditures, and contracts for the appropriate reporting period. The County was classified as a metropolitan county with a population below 250,000 residents that received an allocation of more than $10 million in State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds. As such, the initial P&E report, covering three calendar quarters from March 3, 2021 to December 31, 2021, was required to be submitted to the Treasury by January 31, 2022. The subsequent quarterly reports are to cover one calendar quarter and must be submitted to the Treasury by the last day of the month following the end of the period covered. The County submitted three P&E reports during the audit period as no expenditures existed for the period of October 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021, and, therefore, the County did not submit a report for that period. For the three reports submitted, all activity for the reporting period was not included, information submitted was not supported by the County's records, and the reports were not fairly presented. Errors identified included the following: Quarter 1 report (January 1, 2022 to March 31, 2022) 1. Total Cumulative Obligations and Total Cumulative Expenditures were overstated by $500,000. 2. Current Period Obligations and Current Period Expenditures were understated by $1,850,000. Quarter 2 report (April 1, 2022 to June 30, 2022) 1. Total Cumulative Obligations and Total Cumulative Expenditures were understated by $144. 2. Current Period Obligations and Current Period Expenditures were overstated by $1,849,856. Quarter 3 report (July 1, 2022 to September 30, 2022) 1. Total Cumulative Obligations and Total Cumulative Expenditures were understated by $316,080. 2. Current Period Obligations and Current Period Expenditures were overstated by $2,159,064. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance and Reporting Guidance, page 10, states in part: ". . . 10. Reporting. All recipients of federal funds must complete financial, performance, and compliance reporting as required and outlined in Part 2 of this guidance. Expenditures may be reported on a cash or accrual basis, as long as the methodology is disclosed and consistently applied. Reporting must be consistent with the definition of expenditures pursuant to 2 CFR 200.1. Your organization should appropriately maintain accounting records for compiling and reporting accurate, compliant financial data, in accordance with appropriate accounting standards and principles. . . ." 31 CFR 35.4(c) states in part: "Reporting and requests for other information. During the period of performance, recipients shall provide to the Secretary periodic reports providing detailed accounting of the uses of funds, . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls over the P&E reports was not designed by management of the County. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the County's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. In addition, not meeting the SLFRF reporting requirements increases the likelihood that the public will not have access to transparent and accurate information regarding expenditures of federal awards. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the County design and implement a proper system of internal controls that would ensure appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversight are taking place. Additionally, management should develop policies and procedures to ensure that the County provides the Treasury with complete and accurate information for the P&E report. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2022-005 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Subrecipient Monitoring Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 2022 Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The County received a total State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) allocation of $13,177,707. During the audit period, the County provided subawards of SLFRF funds to other entities. As a pass-through entity, the County must: 1. Identify the award and the applicable requirements to each subrecipient. 2. Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring related to the subaward. 3. Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purpose, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Subawards, totaling $2,503,400, were provided to four different entities. Three of the subrecipient agreements associated with the subawards were selected for testing. For the three agreements tested, the following information was incomplete or missing: 1. The subrecipients unique entity identifier. 2. The federal award identification number (FAIN). 3. The federal award date of award to the recipient by the federal agency. 4. The name of the federal awarding agency, pass-through entity (auditee), and contact information for awarding official of the pass-through entity (auditee). 5. The Assistance Listings Number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement. Furthermore, the County did not have an evaluation of the subrecipients' risk of noncompliance or monitoring activities demonstrating compliance with the subrecipient monitoring requirement. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.331(a) states: "Subrecipients. A subaward is for the purpose of carrying out a portion of a Federal award and creates a Federal assistance relationship with the subrecipient. See definition for Subaward in ? 200.1 of this part. Characteristics which support the classification of the non-Federal entity as a subrecipient include when the non-Federal entity: (1) Determines who is eligible to receive what Federal assistance; (2) Has its performance measured in relation to whether objectives of a Federal program were met; (3) Has responsibility for programmatic decision-making; (4) Is responsible for adherence to applicable Federal program requirements specified in the Federal award; and (5) In accordance with its agreement, uses the Federal funds to carry out a program for a public purpose specified in authorizing statute, as opposed to providing goods or services for the benefit of the pass-through entity." 2 CFR 200.332 states in part: "All pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward . . . (1) Federal award identification. (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier; (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); (iv) Federal Award Date (see the definition of Federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the Federal agency; (v) Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; (vi) Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; (vii) Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; (viii) Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the passthrough entity including the current financial obligation; (ix) Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the passthrough entity; (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); (xi) Name of Federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D; and (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414. (2) All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award; (3) Any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass-through entity to meet its own responsibility to the Federal awarding agency including identification of any required financial and performance reports; (4) (i) An approved federally recognized indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal Government. If no approved rate exists, the passthrough entity must determine the appropriate rate in collaboration with the subrecipient, which is either: (A) The negotiated indirect cost rate between the pass-through entity and the subrecipient; which can be based on a prior negotiated rate between a different PTE and the same subrecipient. If basing the rate on a previously negotiated rate, the pass-through entity is not required to collect information justifying this rate, but may elect to do so; (B) The de minimis indirect cost rate. (iii) The pass-through entity must not require use of a de minimis indirect cost rate if the subrecipient has a Federally approved rate. Subrecipients can elect to use the cost allocation method to account for indirect costs in accordance with ? 200.405(d). (5) A requirement that the subrecipient permit the pass-through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient's records and financial statements as necessary for the pass-through entity to meet the requirements of this part; and (6) Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward. (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determined the appropriate subrecipient monitoring . . . (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: (1) Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the pass-through entity. (2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. (3) Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by ? 200.521. (4) The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. . . ." Cause The system of internal controls as established by management of the County was not properly designed, nor implemented. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the County's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. The County was responsible for providing a subaward agreement, with all required elements, and monitoring the non-profit. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the County design and implement a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure subrecipients are provided with an adequate subaward agreement and monitored as appropriate. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

2022-002 ? CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS ? NONCOMPLIANCE WITH SUBRECIPIENT GRANT AGREEMENT REQUIREMENTS ? ALN 21.027 ? OTHER NONCOMPLIANCE FINDING TYPE: Other Noncompliance Finding 2022-002 Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN: 21.027 Federal Award Number(s) and Year(s): SLFRP1964, 2022 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Questioned Cost: $0 Condition Burleigh County did not communicate and document all of the elements as outlined in 2 CFR 200.332(a) for the subrecipients of the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds program. During testing, we noted the following elements were not included: ? subrecipient's unique entity identifier ? federal award identification number ? federal award date (see definition of Federal award date ? 200.1) of award to the recipient by the Federal agency ? subaward period of performance start and end date ? name of Federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity ? Assistance Listings number and Title ? identification of whether the award is Research and Development ? indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ?200.414 ? a requirement that the subrecipient permit the pass-through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient's records and financial statements as necessary for the pass-through entity to meet the requirements of this part, and appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward Effect Burleigh County did not comply with all elements of 2 CFR 200.332(a). Therefore, subrecipients may not have been aware of all necessary grant information and requirements. Cause Burleigh County was not aware of the requirements set forth in 2 CFR 200.332(a) that needed to be included in the grant agreements. Criteria 31 U.S.C 7502(f)(2)(A) states that each pass-through entity shall provide subrecipient the Federal requirements which govern the use of such awards. 2 CFR 200.332(a) states the required information that pass-through entities must disclose. This includes information related to federal award identification and period of performance, approved federally recognized indirect cost rate, requirement that the subrecipient allow access to records, and appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward. Repeat Finding Yes. Recommendation We recommend Burleigh County ensure that all elements as outlined in 2 CFR 200.332(a) are communicated and documented to the subrecipients of the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds program. Burleigh County?s Response See Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2022-004 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 2022 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context The County had not established a system of internal controls that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance related to the reporting compliance requirement. Recipients are required to submit quarterly or annually Project and Expenditure (P&E) reports to the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury). The reporting periods, as well as the respective due dates are based upon type of recipient and its population, as well as the recipient's allocation amount. Information to be reported includes projects funded, expenditures, and contracts for the appropriate reporting period. The County was classified as a county with a population below 250,000 residents that received an allocation of less than $10 million in State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds. As such, the initial P&E report, covering the period from March 3, 2021 to March 31, 2022, was required to be submitted to the Treasury by April 30, 2022. The subsequent annual reports are to cover one calendar year and must be submitted to the Treasury by April 30 each year. The County submitted the P&E report by April 30, 2022, as required; however, the report was not mathematically accurate and complete, nor was it supported by the County's records. Additionally, data accumulated and summarized was not accurate and complete. The key line items of "Total Cumulative Expenditures" and "Current Period Expenditures" as reported on the P&E report did not agree to the County's ledger. The amount reported for the "Total Cumulative Expenditures" line item was overstated by $5,408,166 due to listing the full amount of obligations instead of cumulative expenditures. The amount reported for the "Current Period Expenditures" was understated by $1,409,585 as not all activity for the reporting period was properly included due to the reported amount not including expenditures for March 3, 2021 to December 31, 2021. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance and Reporting Guidance, page 10, states in part: ". . . 10. Reporting. All recipients of federal funds must complete financial, performance, and compliance reporting as required and outlined in Part 2 of this guidance. Expenditures may be reported on a cash or accrual basis, as long as the methodology is disclosed and consistently applied. Reporting must be consistent with the definition of expenditures pursuant to 2 CFR 200.1. Your organization should appropriately maintain accounting records for compiling and reporting accurate, compliant financial data, in accordance with appropriate accounting standards and principles. . . ." 31 CFR 35.4(c) states in part: "Reporting and requests for other information. During the period of performance, recipients shall provide to the Secretary periodic reports providing detailed accounting of the uses of funds, . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls over the reporting compliance requirement was not designed by management of the County. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the County's management view of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. In addition, not meeting the SLFRF reporting requirements increases the likelihood that the public will not have access to transparent and accurate information regarding expenditures of federal awards. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the County establish a proper system of internal controls over the Reporting compliance requirement, including strengthening their policies and procedures to ensure that the County provides the Treasury with complete and accurate information for the P&E report. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2022-004 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 2022 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The County had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal control, which would include appropriate segregation of duties that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. Recipients are required to submit quarterly or annually Project and Expenditure (P&E) reports to the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury). The reporting periods, as well as the respective due dates, are based on the type of recipient and the recipient's population, as well as the recipient's allocation amount. Information to be reported includes projects funded, expenditures, and contracts for the appropriate reporting period. The County was classified as a metropolitan county with a population of below 250,000 residents that received an allocation of less than $10 million in State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds. As such, the initial P& E report, covering the period from March 3, 2021 to March 31, 2022, was required to be submitted to the Treasury by April 30, 2022. The subsequent annual reports are to cover one calendar year and must be submitted to the Treasury by April 30 each year. The County submitted one P&E report during the audit period, which we obtained from the Treasury's website; however, a single employee prepared and submitted the P&E report without a review or oversight process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. In addition, the P&E report was not complete or properly supported by the County's records. The County reported no projects for the reporting period; however, the County's expenditures during the reporting period consisted of one project, totaling $311,286, for the support of broadband backbone services in the County. This project should have been reported in the key line items of current period obligations, cumulative obligations, current period expenditures, and cumulative expenditures. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the April 2022 P&E report. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance and Reporting Guidance, page 10, states in part: ". . . 10. Reporting. All recipients of federal funds must complete financial, performance, and compliance reporting as required and outlined in Part 2 of this guidance. Expenditures may be reported on a cash or accrual basis, as long as the methodology is disclosed and consistently applied. Reporting must be consistent with the definition of expenditures pursuant to 2 CFR 200.1. Your organization should appropriately maintain accounting records for compiling and reporting accurate, compliant financial data, in accordance with appropriate accounting standards and principles. . . ." 31 CFR 35.4(c) states in part: "Reporting and requests for other information. During the period of performance, recipients shall provide to the Secretary periodic reports providing detailed accounting of the uses of funds, . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls over the P&E report was not designed by management of the County, which would include segregation of key functions to ensure the County provided the Treasury with complete and accurate information related to the SLFRF awards. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the City's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. In addition, not meeting the SLFRF reporting requirements increases the likelihood that the public will not have access to transparent and accurate information regarding expenditures of federal awards. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the County design and implement a proper system of internal controls that would provide a segregation of duties for the preparation and review of federal reports to ensure appropriate reviews, approvals and oversight are taking place. Additionally, management should develop policies and procedures to ensure that the County provides the Treasury with complete and accurate information for the P&E report. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Federal Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services Federal Assistance Listing Numbers: 93.110 Program: Maternal and Child Health Federal Consolidated Programs Pass-Through Entity Identifying Numbers: N/A Criteria: The Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Per 2 CFR Section 200.414: ?In addition to the procedures outlined in the appendices in paragraph (e) of this section, any non-Federal entity that does not have a current negotiated (including provisional) rate, except for those non-Federal entities described in appendix VII to this part, paragraph D.1.b, may elect to charge a de minimis rate of 10% of modified total direct costs (MTDC) which may be used indefinitely. No documentation is required to justify the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate. As described in ? 200.403, costs must be consistently charged as either indirect or direct costs, but may not be double charged or inconsistently charged as both. If chosen, this methodology once elected must be used consistently for all Federal awards until such time as a non-Federal entity chooses to negotiate for a rate, which the non-Federal entity may apply to do at any time.? As defined by 2 CFR Section 200.1: ?Modified Total Direct Cost (MTDC) means all direct salaries and wages, applicable fringe benefits, materials and supplies, services, travel, and up to the first $25,000 of each subaward (regardless of the period of performance of the subawards under the award). MTDC excludes equipment, capital expenditures, charges for patient care, rental costs, tuition remission, scholarships and fellowships, participant support costs and the portion of each subaward in excess of $25,000. Other items may only be excluded when necessary to avoid a serious inequity in the distribution of indirect costs, and with the approval of the cognizant agency for indirect costs.? Condition: We noted that the calculation for indirect costs utilized the incorrect base which was not the MTDC. Context: Safe & Sound utilizes the de minimis indirect rate of 10% of MTDC. The condition was identified in a recalculation of indirect costs based on MTDC for 2022. Cause: Safe & Sound did not have policies and procedures in place to ensure indirect cost rate is calculated based on the appropriate base, MTDC. Effect or Potential Effect: Without adequate controls in place to ensure indirect costs are calculated based on MTDC, Safe & Sound could incorrectly charge expenditures to the federal program, or not request appropriate reimbursement Safe & Sound is entitled to under the terms of the grant. Questioned Costs: Below reporting threshold. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not Applicable. Recommendation: We recommend that Safe & Sound implement policies and procedures to review indirect cost calculations based on MTDC and provide training to staff. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. Management will implement policies and procedures to appropriately calculate indirect costs.

2022-002 Material Weakness 93.558 Criteria 2 CFR section 200.303 requires that non-federal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls. The objectives of internal control over compliance as found in 2 CFR section 200.1, are to ensure that transactions are properly recorded and accounted for in order to permit the preparation of reliable financial statements and federal reports. Condition As a result of our audit procedures in relation to the audit of the financial statements it was determined that amounts reported in the prior year on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards was understated by $433,027. A restatement of the prior period was required in the financial statements. Context The Organization has experienced high turnover in its fiscal department. Cause Due to turn over in the fiscal department grant claims for reimbursements of expenses incurred in accordance with grant agreements were not submitted timely or recorded in the period the conditions of the grant were met. Effect The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards was materially misstated in the prior year. Recommendations We recommend that documented accounting procedures establish clear guidelines for revenue recognition and that monitoring be performed by management to ensure that grant claims are submitted timely. We also recommend that monthly reconciliations of revenue to expenditures be performed monthly and reviewed by management to ensure that expenditures of federal awards are complete and accurate.

FINDING 2022-004 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY22 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context The County had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. Recipients are required to submit quarterly or annually Project and Expenditure (P&E) reports to the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury). The reporting periods, as well as the respective due dates, are based upon type of recipient and its population, as well as the recipient's allocation amount. Information to be reported includes projects funded, expenditures, and contracts for the appropriate reporting period. The County had a population below 250,000 residents that received an allocation of less than $10 million in Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF). As such, the initial P&E report, covering the period from March 3, 2021 to March 31, 2022, was required to be submitted to the Treasury by April 30, 2022. The subsequent annual reports are to cover one calendar year and must be submitted to the Treasury by April 30 each year. The County submitted one P&E report during the audit period. The P&E report incorrectly reported amounts granted as subawards. As the County elected to receive the standard revenue loss allowance in which the Treasury determined that there are no subawards, the County should not have reported subawards. Additionally, a review of the County's spending plan, ledgers, and during discussions with the County, it was confirmed no amount was granted as a subaward. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance and Reporting Guidance, page 10, states in part: ". . . 10. Reporting. All recipients of federal funds must complete financial, performance, and compliance reporting as required and outlined in Part 2 of this guidance. Expenditures may be reported on a cash or accrual basis, as long as the methodology is disclosed and consistently applied. Reporting must be consistent with the definition of expenditures pursuant to 2 CFR 200.1. Your organization should appropriately maintain accounting records for compiling and reporting accurate, compliant financial data, in accordance with appropriate accounting standards and principles. . . ." 31 CFR 35.4(c) states in part: "Reporting and requests for other information. During the period of performance, recipients shall provide to the Secretary periodic reports providing detailed accounting of the uses of funds, . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls over the P&E report was not designed by management of the County, which would include segregation of key functions to ensure the County provided the Treasury with complete and accurate information related to the SLFRF awards. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the County's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. In addition, not meeting the SLFRF reporting requirements increases the likelihood that the public will not have access to transparent and accurate information regarding expenditures of federal awards. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the County design and implement a proper system of internal controls that would provide a segregation of duties for the preparation and review of federal reports to ensure appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversight are taking place. Additionally, management should develop policies and procedures to ensure that the County provides the Treasury with complete and accurate information for the P&E report. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2022-006 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY2022 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The County had not properly implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. Recipients are required to submit quarterly or annually Project and Expenditure (P&E) reports to the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury). The reporting periods, as well as the respective due dates are based upon type of recipient and its population, as well as the recipient's allocation amount. Information to be reported includes projects funded, expenditures, and contracts for the appropriate reporting period. The County was classified as a metropolitan county with a population below 250,000 residents that received an allocation of less than $10 million in Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) funding. As such, the initial P&E report, covering the period from March 3, 2021 to March 31, 2022, was required to be submitted to the Treasury by April 30, 2022. The subsequent annual reports are to cover one calendar year and must be submitted to the Treasury by April 30 each year. A member of the Board of County Commissioners was responsible for the terms and conditions of the grant. The County did not have any policies or procedures to ensure the required report was submitted timely and accurately. As such, the County failed to prepare and submit the P&E report that was due during the audit period. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance and Reporting Guidance, page 10, states in part: ". . . 10. Reporting. All recipients of federal funds must complete financial, performance, and compliance reporting as required and outlined in Part 2 of this guidance. Expenditures may be reported on a cash or accrual basis, as long as the methodology is disclosed and consistently applied. Reporting must be consistent with the definition of expenditures pursuant to 2 CFR 200.1. Your organization should appropriately maintain accounting records for compiling and reporting accurate, compliant financial data, in accordance with appropriate accounting standards and principles. . . ." 31 CFR 35.4(c) states in part: "Reporting and requests for other information. During the period of performance, recipients shall provide to the Secretary periodic reports providing detailed accounting of the uses of funds, . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not implemented by management of the County, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the County's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. In addition, not meeting the SLFRF reporting requirements increases the likelihood that the public will not have access to transparent and accurate information regarding expenditures of federal awards. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the County design and implement a proper system of internal controls that would provide segregation of duties for the preparation and review of federal reports to ensure appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversight are taking place. Additionally, management should develop policies and procedures to ensure that the County completes and provides to the Treasury the required P&E reports. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2022-006 Subject: COVID-19 - Public Health Emergency Response: Cooperative Agreement for Emergency Response: Public Health Crisis Response - Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program: COVID-19 - Public Health Emergency Response: Cooperative Agreement for Emergency Response: Public Health Crisis Response Assistance Listings Number: 93.354 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): 1NU90TP922179 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana State Department of Health Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The County had not designed, nor implemented a system of internal controls to ensure grant funds were expended during the grant's period of performance. A grant's period of performance is the time frame during which the grant funds may be expended. The period of performance for the grant was identified in the grant agreement. The County received $220,000 in advance funding for the grant with a period of performance beginning July 1, 2022. The entirety of the grant funds were receipted into the County's Supp PH Workforce GRT 93.354 fund (grant fund); however, the County disbursed $36,150 from the grant fund prior to the start of the grant's period of performance. As the grant did not allow for expenditures prior to the beginning of the period performance and approval from the grantor for the costs was not obtained, the total $36,150 was considered questioned costs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.1 states in part: ". . . Period of performance means the total estimated time interval between the start of an initial Federal award and the planned end date, which may include one or more funded portions, or budget periods. Identification of the period of performance in the Federal award per ? 200.211(b)(5) does not commit the awarding agency to fund the award beyond the currently approved budget period. . . ." 2 CFR 200.458 states: "Pre-award costs are those incurred prior to the effective date of the Federal award or subaward directly pursuant to the negotiation and in anticipation of the Federal award where such costs are necessary for efficient and timely performance of the scope of work. Such costs are allowable only to the extent that they would have been allowable if incurred after the date of the Federal award and only with the written approval of the Federal awarding agency. If charged to the award, these costs must be charged to the initial budget period of the award, unless otherwise specified by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the County. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the County's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, expenses were paid outside of the period of performance. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. Questioned Costs Questioned costs of $36,150 were identified as outlined in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended that management of the County establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure all expenditures are within the period of performance or appropriate approval is obtained for pre-award costs. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2022-006 Subject: CDBG - Entitlement Grants Cluster - Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program: Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Assistance Listings Number: 14.218 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): B-22-MC-18-0015 Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context A non-federal entity may charge to the federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. Grant number B-22-MC-18-0015 had a period of performance which began on July 1, 2022. Two of the four claims tested, or 50 percent, were for services provided prior to the beginning of the period of performance. The City did not receive approval from the federal awarding agency to charge costs incurred before the period of performance to the federal grant. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to grant B-22-MC-18-0015. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.1 states in part: ". . . Period of performance means the total estimated time interval between the start of an initial Federal award and the planned end date, which may include one or more funded portions, or budget periods. Identification of the period of performance in the Federal award per ? 200.211(b)(5) does not commit the awarding agency to fund the award beyond the currently approved budget period. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the City. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the City's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, costs incurred before the beginning of the period of performance were charged to the grant. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the City. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the City design and implement a proper system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that would provide segregation of duties to ensure costs charged to the grant occur within the proper period of performance. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2022-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Subrecipient Monitoring Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number or Year (or Other Identifying Number): CY2021 Compliance Requirement: Subrecipient Monitoring Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The City received a total State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) allocation of $18,042,360. The City enlisted a non-profit, Heart City Health Center, Inc., to assist with public health information and paid them $50,000. The payment was made under the Responding to Public Health and Economic Impacts of COVID-19 eligible use category. Documentation to support the payment included an invoice from the Heart City Health Center, Inc., Board of Works Resolution 21-R-19, and Ordinance 5861. The Board of Works approved Resolution 21-R-19 on December 28, 2021. The resolution states in part, "Heart City Health Center is a separate legal entity from the City of Elkhart and as a separate legal entity, requires the formation of a subrecipient agreement to transfer funds from the City's ARPA Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds allocation to Heart City Health . . . now, therefore be it resolved, the Board of Public Works approves Heart City Health Center Inc. as a subrecipient of fifty thousand dollars in ARPA state and local fiscal recovery funds, and authorizes the Department of Law to prepare an appropriates subrecipient agreement for execution by the Board of Works and Heart City Health Center Inc. for the purposes approved herein . . ." The City provided SLFRF award funds to the Heart City Health Center, Inc. to carry out a program on the City's behalf, making the Heart City Health Center, Inc. a subrecipient of the City, as noted in their resolution, and, therefore, subject to subrecipient monitoring. The City was unable provide a copy of the subaward agreement or other supporting documentation to show evaluation of the subrecipient's risk of noncompliance or monitoring activities demonstrating compliance with the subrecipient monitoring requirement. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.331(a) states in part: "Subrecipients. A subaward is for the purpose of carrying out a portion of a Federal award and creates a Federal assistance relationship with the subrecipient. . . . Characteristics which support the classification of the non-Federal entity as a subrecipient include when the non- Federal entity: (1) Determines who is eligible to receive what Federal assistance; (2) Has its performance measured in relation to whether objectives of a Federal program were met; (3) Has responsibility for programmatic decision-making; (4) Is responsible for adherence to applicable Federal program requirements specified in the Federal award; and . . ." 2 CFR 200.332 states in part: "All pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward . . . (1) Federal award identification. (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier; (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); (iv) Federal Award Date (see the definition of Federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the Federal agency; (v) Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; (vi) Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; (vii) Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; (viii) Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the passthrough entity including the current financial obligation; (ix) Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the passthrough entity; (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); (xi) Name of Federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D; and (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414. (2) All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award; (3) Any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass-through entity to meet its own responsibility to the Federal awarding agency including identification of any required financial and performance reports; (4) (i) An approved federally recognized indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal Government. If no approved rate exists, the passthrough entity must determine the appropriate rate in collaboration with the subrecipient, which is either: (A) The negotiated indirect cost rate between the pass-through entity and the subrecipient; which can be based on a prior negotiated rate between a different PTE and the same subrecipient. If basing the rate on a previously negotiated rate, the pass-through entity is not required to collect information justifying this rate, but may elect to do so; (B) The de minimis indirect cost rate. (ii) The pass-through entity must not require use of a de minimis indirect cost rate if the subrecipient has a Federally approved rate. Subrecipients can elect to use the cost allocation method to account for indirect costs in accordance with ? 200.405(d). (5) A requirement that the subrecipient permit the pass-through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient's records and financial statements as necessary for the pass-through entity to meet the requirements of this part; and (6) Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward. . . . (b) Evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring . . . (d) Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Pass-through entity monitoring of the subrecipient must include: (1) Reviewing financial and performance reports required by the passthrough entity. (2) Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity detected through audits, on-site reviews, and written confirmation from the subrecipient, highlighting the status of actions planned or taken to address Single Audit findings related to the particular subaward. (3) Issuing a management decision for applicable audit findings pertaining only to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient from the pass-through entity as required by ? 200.521. (4) The pass-through entity is responsible for resolving audit findings specifically related to the subaward and not responsible for resolving crosscutting findings. . . ." Cause The system of internal controls as established by management of the City was not properly designed nor implemented. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the City's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. The City was responsible for providing a subaward agreement and monitoring the nonprofit. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the City. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the City design and implement a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure subrecipients are provided with an adequate subaward agreement and monitored as appropriate. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2022-004 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): 2022 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context The County had not properly implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. Recipients are required to submit quarterly or annually Project and Expenditure (P&E) reports to the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury). The reporting periods, as well as the respective due dates, are based upon type of recipient and its population, as well as the recipient's allocation amount. Information to be reported includes projects funded, expenditures, and contracts for the appropriate reporting period. The County was classified as a metropolitan county with a population below 250,000 residents that received an allocation of less than $10 million in Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) funding. As such, the initial P&E report, covering the period from March 3, 2021 to March 31, 2022, was required to be submitted to the Treasury by April 30, 2022. The subsequent annual reports are to cover one calendar year and must be submitted to the Treasury by April 30 each year. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 JEFFERSON COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The County submitted one P&E report during the audit period; however, there was no documentation of a proper review or oversight process in place to ensure the report was accurate prior to being submitted. Per inquiry, the County Auditor prepared the report and the report was reviewed and submitted by the President of the Board of County Commissioners (President). However, source documents to adequately review the data in the report were not provided to the President, nor was there evidence to support the review or oversight process took place. Due to the lack of internal controls, the P&E report submitted was not properly supported by the County's records. The County incorrectly reported as total expenditures and total obligations the total allocation of their grant funds, $6,275,450, instead of the actual expenditures and obligations of $12,500 spent and obligated during the reporting period. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance and Reporting Guidance, page 10, states in part: ". . . 10. Reporting. All recipients of federal funds must complete financial, performance, and compliance reporting as required and outlined in Part 2 of this guidance. Expenditures may be reported on a cash or accrual basis, as long as the methodology is disclosed and consistently applied. Reporting must be consistent with the definition of expenditures pursuant to 2 CFR 200.1. Your organization should appropriately maintain accounting records for compiling and reporting accurate, compliant financial data, in accordance with appropriate accounting standards and principles. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not implemented by management of the County, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the County's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. In addition, not meeting the SLFRF reporting requirements increases the likelihood that the public will not have access to transparent and accurate information regarding expenditures of federal awards. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 JEFFERSON COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the County design and implement a proper system of internal controls that would provide a segregation of duties for the preparation and review of federal reports to ensure appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversight are taking place. Additionally, management should develop policies and procedures to ensure that the County provides the Treasury with complete and accurate information for the P&E report. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23

Criteria: 2 CFR 200.332 notes, ?All pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (1) Federal award identification. (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier; (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); (iv) Federal Award Date (see the definition of Federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the Federal agency; (v) Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; (vi) Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; (vii) Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; (viii) Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity including the current financial obligation; (ix) Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); (xi) Name of Federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D; and (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414. (2) All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award; ?? Condition: For all four subawards selected for testing, the identification of the award being Research and Development (R&D) was not noted. Further, two of the four subawards selected for testing, had information missing from the subaward including (1) Recipient DUNS number (2) Unique Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) (3) Assistance Listing number (4) Indirect Cost Rate. Lastly, one subaward did not include the following information: (a) Period of Performance of subaward (b) Amount of federal funds obligated and awarded (c) General terms and conditions of subaward (d) Federal award project description (e) Name of Federal awarding agency. Condition (Continued): We consider this condition to be an instance of noncompliance relating to the Subrecipient Monitoring compliance requirement. Statistical sampling was not used in making sample selections. Questioned Costs: N/A. Cause and Effect: Without communication of the required information, subrecipients may overspend award amounts or incur unallowable expenses towards the grant. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization evaluates policies and procedures to ensure all required information is communication with the subrecipient. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this Single Audit Finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.

Criteria: 2 CFR 200.332 notes, ?All pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (1) Federal award identification. (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier; (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); (iv) Federal Award Date (see the definition of Federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the Federal agency; (v) Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; (vi) Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; (vii) Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; (viii) Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity including the current financial obligation; (ix) Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); (xi) Name of Federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D; and (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414. (2) All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award; ?? Condition: For all four subawards selected for testing, the identification of the award being Research and Development (R&D) was not noted. Further, two of the four subawards selected for testing, had information missing from the subaward including (1) Recipient DUNS number (2) Unique Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) (3) Assistance Listing number (4) Indirect Cost Rate. Lastly, one subaward did not include the following information: (a) Period of Performance of subaward (b) Amount of federal funds obligated and awarded (c) General terms and conditions of subaward (d) Federal award project description (e) Name of Federal awarding agency. Condition (Continued): We consider this condition to be an instance of noncompliance relating to the Subrecipient Monitoring compliance requirement. Statistical sampling was not used in making sample selections. Questioned Costs: N/A. Cause and Effect: Without communication of the required information, subrecipients may overspend award amounts or incur unallowable expenses towards the grant. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization evaluates policies and procedures to ensure all required information is communication with the subrecipient. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this Single Audit Finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.

Criteria: 2 CFR 200.332 notes, ?All pass-through entities must: (a) Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: (1) Federal award identification. (i) Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); (ii) Subrecipient's unique entity identifier; (iii) Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); (iv) Federal Award Date (see the definition of Federal award date in ? 200.1 of this part) of award to the recipient by the Federal agency; (v) Subaward Period of Performance Start and End Date; (vi) Subaward Budget Period Start and End Date; (vii) Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this action by the pass-through entity to the subrecipient; (viii) Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity including the current financial obligation; (ix) Total Amount of the Federal Award committed to the subrecipient by the pass-through entity; (x) Federal award project description, as required to be responsive to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA); (xi) Name of Federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official of the Pass-through entity; (xii) Assistance Listings number and Title; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the Assistance Listings Number at time of disbursement; (xiii) Identification of whether the award is R&D; and (xiv) Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per ? 200.414. (2) All requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the Federal award is used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award; ?? Condition: For all four subawards selected for testing, the identification of the award being Research and Development (R&D) was not noted. Further, two of the four subawards selected for testing, had information missing from the subaward including (1) Recipient DUNS number (2) Unique Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) (3) Assistance Listing number (4) Indirect Cost Rate. Lastly, one subaward did not include the following information: (a) Period of Performance of subaward (b) Amount of federal funds obligated and awarded (c) General terms and conditions of subaward (d) Federal award project description (e) Name of Federal awarding agency. Condition (Continued): We consider this condition to be an instance of noncompliance relating to the Subrecipient Monitoring compliance requirement. Statistical sampling was not used in making sample selections. Questioned Costs: N/A. Cause and Effect: Without communication of the required information, subrecipients may overspend award amounts or incur unallowable expenses towards the grant. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization evaluates policies and procedures to ensure all required information is communication with the subrecipient. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this Single Audit Finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.