Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
56,320
In database
Filtered Results
53,335
Matching current filters
Showing Page
454 of 2134
25 per page

Filters

Clear
PRAC Budgets Recommendation: We recommend audits are completed timely to ensure the annual budget is submitted to HUD as required. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The process for submitting the budg...
PRAC Budgets Recommendation: We recommend audits are completed timely to ensure the annual budget is submitted to HUD as required. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The process for submitting the budget for 2025 has already begun. Management is monitoring the process to ensure timely submission. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Alex Lueth, VP of Finance Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 2025
Replacement Reserve Deposits Recommendation: We recommend management implement a control to ensure the monthly transfer is completed automatically and in accordance with the Regulatory Agreement. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action ...
Replacement Reserve Deposits Recommendation: We recommend management implement a control to ensure the monthly transfer is completed automatically and in accordance with the Regulatory Agreement. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Organization agrees with the finding and the recommendation will be implemented. Controls implemented include scheduling of automatic transfers to our reserve for replacement savings account as well as updating our treasury standard operating procedures to ensure funds are available for the transfer. Monthly bank reconciliation will also confirm that the transfer occurred. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Alex Lueth, VP of Finance Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 2025
View Audit 362958 Questioned Costs: $1
To ensure consistent completion of the Sliding Fee Discount Form for all patients, new procedures have been implemented to improve the collection and documentation of required information. Patient registration forms have been revised to reflect these updates. Clerical staff will now conduct schedule...
To ensure consistent completion of the Sliding Fee Discount Form for all patients, new procedures have been implemented to improve the collection and documentation of required information. Patient registration forms have been revised to reflect these updates. Clerical staff will now conduct schedule preparation and identify patients who are non-compliant with the Sliding Fee Discount Form requirements. Post visit audits will be conducted to confrim that all necessary data is being accurately captured. The Revenue Cycle Manager will continue to provide on-site training across all locations and will work in close collaboration with clerical support staff, Clinic Managers, the Director of Operations, and the Director of Quality to ensure successful implementation and ongoing compliance.
Housing Voucher Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 14.871/14.879 Recommendation: We recommend the Authority review their process for scheduling quality control reinspections to ensure they are performed timely. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit f...
Housing Voucher Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 14.871/14.879 Recommendation: We recommend the Authority review their process for scheduling quality control reinspections to ensure they are performed timely. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: CMHA would like to note that the 2024 sample size for QC for SEMAP compliance is approximately 95-100 inspections. Nonetheless, CMHA’s contracted vendor conducted over 170 QC inspections in 2024 and scheduled nearly double that amount. We are on track to far exceed the volume required by SEMAP sampling again this year. The team continues to review our inspections processes to ensure compliance with HQS guidelines and requirements. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Claire Russ, Chief of Agency Analytics, Inspections and Technology Planned completion date for corrective action plan: December 31, 2025
Unauthorized disbursements from the reserve fund were made. Recommendation: CLA recommends the Project return the withdrawn funds back to the reserve funds when the funds allow. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned in respon...
Unauthorized disbursements from the reserve fund were made. Recommendation: CLA recommends the Project return the withdrawn funds back to the reserve funds when the funds allow. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned in response to finding: Management has received the delayed rental income payments and is working to return the funds. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Sabine Cox, EHM Comptroller Planned completion date for corrective action plan: May 30, 2025 If the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has questions regarding this plan, please call Sabine Cox at 203-230-4809 ext. 1005
View Audit 362935 Questioned Costs: $1
Reserve for replacement funds were not maintained in a separate bank account. Recommendation: CLA Recommends withdrawing the reserve for replacement funds and opening a separate bank account. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action pla...
Reserve for replacement funds were not maintained in a separate bank account. Recommendation: CLA Recommends withdrawing the reserve for replacement funds and opening a separate bank account. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned in response to finding: During 2025, the funds were withdrawn from the operating account and deposited into a separate bank account. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Sabine Cox, EHM Comptroller Planned completion date for corrective action plan: March 4, 2025
Approved expenditures of federal awards without proper control completed. Recommendation: CLA Recommends enforcing control procedures over expenditures of federal awards. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned in response t...
Approved expenditures of federal awards without proper control completed. Recommendation: CLA Recommends enforcing control procedures over expenditures of federal awards. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned in response to finding: During 2024, a new management company was hired as of July 1, 2024 and has implemented and enforced proper controls over expenditures of federal awards. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Sabine Cox, EHM Comptroller Planned completion date for corrective action plan: May 30, 2025
Deposits required by HUD were not made during fiscal year 2024 to the reserve fund. Recommendation: CLA Recommends the Project make all fiscal year 2024 deposits as soon as funds allow. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned ...
Deposits required by HUD were not made during fiscal year 2024 to the reserve fund. Recommendation: CLA Recommends the Project make all fiscal year 2024 deposits as soon as funds allow. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned in response to finding: Management has received the delayed rental income payments and is working to make the back deposits. However, due to the turnover in management company the delay was extended. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Sabine Cox, EHM Comptroller Planned completion date for corrective action plan: May 30, 2025
View Audit 362935 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment: Special Education – Special Olympics Education Programs The recipient must maintain and use documented (written) procedures for procurement transactions under a Federal Award or subaward, including for acquisition of property or services. These documen...
Finding: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment: Special Education – Special Olympics Education Programs The recipient must maintain and use documented (written) procedures for procurement transactions under a Federal Award or subaward, including for acquisition of property or services. These documented procedures must be consistent with applicable State, and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200.317-200.327). The Organization has a written purchasing policy in place, but it does not include all required elements for a procurement policy in accordance with Federal statutes . Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management is in agreement with this finding. Management will review the organization’s current Procurement Policy and make adjustments to the policy to ensure that it contains the required criteria to meet the federal procurement guidelines. An updated copy of the organization's Procurement Policy will be finalized by Oct 31, 2025. This policy will be reviewed regularly to ensure that it remains in compliance with federal procurement guidelines. Responsible Official: Greg Vanselow, Chief Operating Officer Completion Date: Oct 31, 2025
Finding Number: 2024-003 Planned Corrective Action: The District will closely review the Final Expenditure Report for all grants to ensure accuracy. Anticipated Completion Date: 6/30/26 Responsible Contact Person: Kaitlin Huck, Treasurer/CFO
Finding Number: 2024-003 Planned Corrective Action: The District will closely review the Final Expenditure Report for all grants to ensure accuracy. Anticipated Completion Date: 6/30/26 Responsible Contact Person: Kaitlin Huck, Treasurer/CFO
Finding Number: 2024-002 Planned Corrective Action: The District will update the capital asset listing. Anticipated Completion Date: 6/30/26 Responsible Contact Person: Kaitlin Huck, Treasurer/CFO
Finding Number: 2024-002 Planned Corrective Action: The District will update the capital asset listing. Anticipated Completion Date: 6/30/26 Responsible Contact Person: Kaitlin Huck, Treasurer/CFO
Material Adjustment to Fund Balance and Net Position Condition: The District audit resulted in a material restatement to fund balance/net position that was detected by auditing procedures. Plan: The District acknowledges the finding and will continue to review new standards as part of the fiscal aud...
Material Adjustment to Fund Balance and Net Position Condition: The District audit resulted in a material restatement to fund balance/net position that was detected by auditing procedures. Plan: The District acknowledges the finding and will continue to review new standards as part of the fiscal audit process. Anticipated Date of Completion: The District will immediately implement yearly review of new standards as part of the fiscal audit process. Name of Contact Person: Nicki Ells, Business Manager Management Response: The District acknowledges the Plan and will begin reviewing regulatory requirements and capital assets on an annual basis.
Finding #2024-002: Completion and Submission of Annual Single Audit - Significant Deficiency/Noncompliance Condition: The Program's Single Audit and reporting package was delayed for the year ended June 30, 2023 beyond the nine-month due date, as a result of turnover and delays in reconciling feder...
Finding #2024-002: Completion and Submission of Annual Single Audit - Significant Deficiency/Noncompliance Condition: The Program's Single Audit and reporting package was delayed for the year ended June 30, 2023 beyond the nine-month due date, as a result of turnover and delays in reconciling federal and state award activity with the Commonwealth. Criteria: Pursuant to the provisions of the Uniform Guidance, under §200.512(a), the Program is required to complete and submit its Single Audit and related Data Collection Form within nine months of the end of its fiscal period (March 31) of the following year. Root Cause Analysis: The audit for the period ending June 30, 2023 was started in December 2023 and was completed and submitted in June 2024. In accordance with Uniform Guidance, the deadline is March 31st annually to have the audit completed and submitted. To meet this deadline, the year-end close and audit process needs to begin at least two months sooner to achieve this deadline. Planned Corrective Action Steps: Move up the year-end close and plan to start the audit in November annually. Responsible Party: MHDS Fiscal Director and MHDS Fiscal Unit Timeline for Completion: 1. Action Step #1 – November 2025 Comments: At the time of this publication, this timeline has already passed for the current period under audit (June 30, 2024). We plan to have this issue fixed for the June 30, 2025 audit period.
Finding 571862 (2024-004)
Significant Deficiency 2024
Finding Title: Subrecipient Monitoring Program: 21.027 COVID‐19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Name of Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Matthew Bower and George Hardgrove Corrective Action Planned: The City established and maintains a quarterly training for all ...
Finding Title: Subrecipient Monitoring Program: 21.027 COVID‐19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Name of Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Matthew Bower and George Hardgrove Corrective Action Planned: The City established and maintains a quarterly training for all grant managers to attend which includes training on grant management. Additional emphasis on subrecipient pre‐award risk management will be included within future quarterly trainings. Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2025
Finding 571861 (2024-003)
Significant Deficiency 2024
Finding Title: Suspension and Debarment Program: 21.027 COVID‐19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Name of Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Matthew Bower, Pam Fernandez, and George Hardgrove Corrective Action Planned: Procurement maintains control over which contra...
Finding Title: Suspension and Debarment Program: 21.027 COVID‐19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Name of Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Matthew Bower, Pam Fernandez, and George Hardgrove Corrective Action Planned: Procurement maintains control over which contracts have final approval. As part of the final contract approval, procurement will verify that debarment documentation has been maintained in the Comet software. Anticipated Completion Date: November 30, 2025
2024-007 – Preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) (Significant Deficiency) Department of Education, SFA Cluster, Special Tests and Provisions Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.210(b), a recipient of Federal awards is required to prepare a SEFA for the period covered by t...
2024-007 – Preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) (Significant Deficiency) Department of Education, SFA Cluster, Special Tests and Provisions Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.210(b), a recipient of Federal awards is required to prepare a SEFA for the period covered by the entity’s financial statement which must include the total Federal awards expended. In addition, 2 CFR 200.303 requires non-Federal entities to, among other things, establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over Federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure expenditures are properly reported on the SEFA. In addition to providing an accurate SEFA, an organization must also be able to demonstrate that it has a system of internal control that supports the preparation of the SEFA. Condition: The University did not have an adequate process in place to prepare and review its SEFA. Cause: The University’s internal control process for preparing the SEFA did not include review and approval of the SEFA prior to providing it to the auditor. Effect: Failure to accurately report federal expenditures on the SEFA could result in noncompliance with federal regulations. Repeat Finding from a Prior Year: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the University establish, document, and maintain effective internal controls over the preparation of the SEFA. At a minimum, an organization should be able to show documentation that the SEFA was reviewed and approved by an individual who was not directly involved with the initial preparation of the SEFA. The review process should include checking both the reported expenditures of federal awards and the assistance listing numbers reported for each grant program. Management Response: The University acknowledges the identified deficiency in the internal control process related to the preparation and review of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). In response, the University has implemented a formalized and documented process to ensure the SEFA is accurately prepared, thoroughly reviewed, and approved in compliance with 2 CFR 200.210(b) and 2 CFR 200.303. The corrective actions taken include: 1) Independent Review and Approval: The SEFA is now subject to a formal review and approval process by an individual who is independent of the initial preparation. This review involves verifying the accuracy of vreported expenditures, confirming the proper listing of assistance numbers (CFDA numbers), and ensuring that all program titles match the federal award documentation. 2) Internal Control Documentation: The University has documented its SEFA preparation and review procedures as part of its internal control framework. This documentation includes roles, responsibilities, timelines, and sign-off requirements to provide an audit trail for compliance verification. 3) Staff Training and Cross-Departmental Coordination: Staff involved in grants accounting and financial reporting will receive targeted training on SEFA requirements. Additionally, coordination among the Financial Aid Office and Finance Office has been strengthened to ensure the complete and accurate sharing of data related to federal award expenditures. Responsible Party and contact information: Joshua Henry – Executive Director of Financial Aid, henryjs@webber.edu, Jennifer Mueller – Assistant Vice President of Finance, muellerjj@webber.edu. Expected Date of Correction: 8/1/2025
2023-006 – Last Date of Attendance at an Academically Related Activity (Significant Deficiency) Department of Education, SFA Cluster, Special Tests and Provisions Criteria: If an institution is not required to take attendance, the withdrawal date is (1) the date, as determined by the institution, th...
2023-006 – Last Date of Attendance at an Academically Related Activity (Significant Deficiency) Department of Education, SFA Cluster, Special Tests and Provisions Criteria: If an institution is not required to take attendance, the withdrawal date is (1) the date, as determined by the institution, that the student began the withdrawal process prescribed by the institution; (2) the date, as determined by the institution, that the student otherwise provided official notification to the institution, in writing or orally, of his or her intent to withdrawal; (3) if the student ceases attendance without providing official notification to the institution of his or her withdrawal, the midpoint of the payment period or, if applicable, the period of enrollment; or (4-6) other special circumstances as documented by the institution. An institution that is not required to take attendance at an academically related activity may use, as the withdrawal date, the last date of attendance at an academically related activity as documented by the institution (34 CFR 668.22(c)). Condition: From a population of 163 students that officially or unofficially withdrew, we tested nineteen students and noted that documentation of the last date of attendance could not be provided for six students that unofficially withdrew and six students that officially withdrew. Cause: Controls are not functioning properly. Effect: Since documentation of the last date of attendance could not be provided, it could not be determined whether students that unofficially withdrew attended through the end of the period or students that officially withdrew had the correct date of last attendance. Repeat Finding from a Prior Year: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the University implement a policy to document the last date of attendance for students that unofficially withdrawal. In addition, we recommend the University maintain student-initiated withdrawal documentation for students that officially withdrawal. Management Response: The University acknowledges the deficiency in documenting the last dates of attendance for students who withdrew and has taken corrective actions to strengthen compliance with 34 CFR 668.22(c). To address this issue, the following steps have been implemented: 1)Revised Withdrawal Procedures: The University has formalized and updated its withdrawal procedures to require consistent documentation of the last date of attendance at an academically related activity for both official and unofficial withdrawals. Faculty are now required to report the last date a student participated in an academically related activity when submitting final grades or withdrawal notifications. 2) Mandatory Faculty Participation: Training will be provided to faculty and department chairs, emphasizing the importance of recording the last date of attendance for all students who cease attendance. The Registrar’s Office will incorporate this requirement into end-of-term processes and will enforce compliance before grade submission is finalized. 3) Retention of Student-Initiated Withdrawal Forms: A centralized and secure repository has been implemented to retain all student-initiated withdrawal requests. The Registrar’s Office is now responsible for maintaining this documentation and conducting periodic audits to ensure proper archiving. 4) Ongoing Monitoring: The Financial Aid and Registrar’s Offices will initiate a joint term-by-term reconciliation process to identify discrepancies in withdrawal reporting and verify the completeness of documentation. Responsible Party and contact information: Webber Registrar, Registrarmailbox@webber.edu, Pamela Denton - Financial Aid Counselor, dentonpe@webber.edu. Expected Date of Correction: 8/1/2025
2024-003 – Cash Management (Significant Deficiency) Department of Education, SFA Cluster, Cash Management Criteria: In accordance with 34 CFR 668.164, an institution submits a drawdown request for funds utilizing ED’s electronic grants management system that may not exceed the amount of funds needed...
2024-003 – Cash Management (Significant Deficiency) Department of Education, SFA Cluster, Cash Management Criteria: In accordance with 34 CFR 668.164, an institution submits a drawdown request for funds utilizing ED’s electronic grants management system that may not exceed the amount of funds needed to make immediate disbursements to eligible students and parents. The institution must disburse the requested funds as soon as administratively possible, but no later than three business days following receipt of those funds from ED. Any funds not disbursed by the end of the third business day are considered excess cash. Condition: A sample of twenty-six students were tested for timely distribution of federal student aid funds. Aid was distributed more than three business days after funds were received from ED for all students tested. Cause: Lack of controls over cash management. Effect: Excess federal cash retained by the institution. Recommendation: We recommend the University implement appropriate training regarding compliance regulations into the employee onboarding process and thereafter for applicable employees. In addition, we recommend the University implements timely review procedures to ensure that any overdrawn funds are returned within the tolerance period. Action Taken: The University acknowledges the deficiency in the timely disbursement of Title IV funds and has taken immediate corrective action to strengthen cash management controls. Specifically, the Financial Aid Office and the Business Office collaborated to revise internal procedures to ensure that federal funds are disbursed within three business days of receipt from the U.S. Department of Education. Effective 7/16/2025, a new standard operating procedure (SOP) was implemented, which includes: 1) Weekly reconciliation between Campus Anyware and G5 drawdowns to track the timing of funds received and disbursed. 2) Mandatory compliance training on federal cash management regulations for all financial aid and student accounts staff, both during onboarding and annually thereafter. 3) Monthly internal audits to review disbursement timelines and identify exceptions. Additionally, any funds inadvertently held beyond the three-day window are now promptly returned to G5 within the regulatory tolerance period. Responsible Party and contact information: Triniti Lee – Financial Aid Processor, Leetk2@webber.edu, Adhley Neal – Business Office Processor, nealad@webber.edu. Expected Date of Correction: 8/1/2025
2024-005 – Over Award of Federal Pell Grant Program Funds (Significant Deficiency) Department of Education, SFA Cluster, Special Tests and Provisions Criteria: In accordance with 34 CFR 668.32, a student is eligible to receive Title IV, HEA program assistance if the student meets all of the requirem...
2024-005 – Over Award of Federal Pell Grant Program Funds (Significant Deficiency) Department of Education, SFA Cluster, Special Tests and Provisions Criteria: In accordance with 34 CFR 668.32, a student is eligible to receive Title IV, HEA program assistance if the student meets all of the requirements in 34 CFR 668.32 paragraphs (a) through (m). 34 CFR 668.32(a)(1)(i) requires the student to be a regular student enrolled, or accepted for enrollment, in an eligible program at an eligible institution. Condition: Of 26 students tested for eligibility, one student received Title IV, HEA program assistance for a semester that the student was not enrolled in. Cause: Controls are not functioning properly. Effect: Title IV program funds were awarded to a student who was not eligible to receive such funds. Recommendation: We recommend the University review and update its procedures to ensure that Title IV funds are awarded properly. Management Response: The University acknowledges the over-award of Title IV funds due to disbursement for a student who was not enrolled during the term in question. In response, the University has strengthened its internal controls to ensure that federal aid is awarded and disbursed only to students who meet all eligibility criteria as outlined in 34 CFR 668.32. Corrective actions taken include: 1) System Validation Enhancements: The student information system has been updated to include enhanced enrollment validation checks before the release of Title IV funds. Title IV disbursements are now restricted to students with confirmed active enrollment in eligible programs for the applicable term. This is enforced through automated disbursement blocks that are triggered when enrollment data is missing or inconsistent. 2) Pre-Disbursement Review Process: A pre-disbursement verification step has been implemented, requiring financial aid staff to confirm active enrollment statuses before releasing funds. 3) Staff Training: Targeted training has been provided to financial aid staff on Title IV enrollment eligibility requirements. Responsible Party and contact information: Triniti Lee – Financial Aid Processor, Leetk2@webber.edu. Expected Date of Correction: 8/1/2025
2024-004 –Satisfactory Academic Progress Policy (Significant Deficiency) Department of Education, SFA Cluster, Eligibility Criteria: In accordance with 34 CFR 668.34(a), an institution must establish a reasonable satisfactory academic progress policy for determining whether an otherwise eligible stu...
2024-004 –Satisfactory Academic Progress Policy (Significant Deficiency) Department of Education, SFA Cluster, Eligibility Criteria: In accordance with 34 CFR 668.34(a), an institution must establish a reasonable satisfactory academic progress policy for determining whether an otherwise eligible student is making satisfactory academic progress in his or her educational program and may receive assistance under Title IV, HEA programs. A student placed on academic probation may receive Title IV, HEA program funds for one payment period. At the end of one payment period on financial aid probation, the student must meet the institution's satisfactory academic progress standards or meet the requirements of the academic plan developed by the institution and the student to qualify for further Title IV, HEA program funds. Condition: Our review of 26 student files disclosed that one student was placed on academic probation after fall 2023 semester and received Pell for spring 2024 semester. The student did not meet satisfactory academic progress standards at the end of spring 2024 semester, however, the student received Pell for summer semester 2024. Cause: Controls are not functioning properly. Effect: Title IV program funds were awarded to a student who was not eligible to receive such funds. Recommendation: We recommend the University review and update its policies to ensure that the University’s Satisfactory Academic Progress policy is enforced. Management Response: The University acknowledges the oversight in the enforcement of its Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) policy and has taken corrective action to address the deficiency. Specifically, the Financial Aid Office has conducted a comprehensive review of SAP monitoring procedures to ensure full compliance with federal regulations under 34 CFR 668.34. Corrective steps taken include: 1) Policy Clarification and Staff Training: The SAP policy has been reviewed and clarified to emphasize the requirement that a student failing to meet SAP after one payment period on financial aid probation is no longer eligible for Title IV funds unless they meet the conditions of an approved academic plan. Targeted training was delivered to financial aid counselors and compliance staff to reinforce correct application of SAP policies and documentation protocols. 2) Automated SAP Compliance Flag: An automated flag has been integrated into the student information system to alert staff when a student has reached the end of a probation period. This flag prevents Title IV disbursement until a manual review confirms eligibility based on SAP or academic plan compliance. 3)Ongoing Monitoring and Quality Assurance: At the conclusion of each academic term, the University runs comprehensive SAP reports to identify all students who have either regained eligibility, remained on SAP, or have newly been placed on SAP status. The student information system is configured to automatically flag these students and restrict Title IV disbursements through system-based controls in the auto-packaging process, thereby preventing ineligible aid disbursements and ensuring compliance with federal regulations. Responsible Party and contact information: Pamela Denton - Financial Aid Counselor, dentonpe@webber.edu, Trinity Lee – Financial Aid Processor, Leetk2@webber.edu. Expected Date of Correction: 8/1/2025
To: EisnerAmper LLP Date: 7/21/2025 Subject: Response to Management Letter Commend for the Fiscal Year Ended 6/30/2024 Thank you for your management letter dated 6/30/2025 and for your valuable insights and recommendations regarding our financial processes and controls. Areas of improvement ident...
To: EisnerAmper LLP Date: 7/21/2025 Subject: Response to Management Letter Commend for the Fiscal Year Ended 6/30/2024 Thank you for your management letter dated 6/30/2025 and for your valuable insights and recommendations regarding our financial processes and controls. Areas of improvement identified by the audit team are acknowledged. CUCS is committed to addressing the points raised. For each recommendation we have taken corrective actions as outlined below. Response to comment#1: CUCS experienced delays in producing final audit schedules due to staffing transitions, including the unanticipated resignation of the Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and other key executive members. While various members of the fiscal team are responsible for preparing audit schedules, the CFO has historically overseen the initiation and finalization of the financial statements and served as the primary liaison with EisnerAmper during the audit process. We appreciate the opportunity to respond to the internal control deficiencies identified during your audit for fiscal year 2024. We acknowledge your finding that our current internal control processes may not consistently detect and correct material misstatements in a timely manner. This concern has been noted and taken seriously by management. Corrective Actions: Staffing and Leadership Stabilization • A Part-time Chief Financial Officer Consultant has been hired to provide leadership, oversight, and stability within the Finance Department while CUCS continues to recruit for a permanent CFO. • Internal resources are being strengthened to reduce reliance on external accounting services. Process and Calendar Improvements • An annual financial reporting and audit preparation calendar has been developed and implemented to improve planning and accountability for deliverables. • Key deadlines for closing entries, reconciliations are now documented and monitored quarterly. • Enhance our review procedures by implementing an additional layer of financial oversight. All required financial reports and key reconciliation’s will be conducted monthly. Capacity Building and Training • Cross-training of finance staff is underway to reduce dependency on single individuals and improve team resilience. Monitoring and Follow-Up • Regular updates to the Executive Team and Audit Committee. Response to comment#2: We acknowledge the auditor’s observation regarding the presence of former employees remaining listed as authorized signers on CUCS bank accounts. We agree that maintaining accurate and up-to-date signer authorizations is critical to safeguarding the organization’s financial assets. In response to this finding, CUCS has taken the following corrective actions: Immediate Review and Removal of Former Employees All bank accounts have been reviewed, and individuals who are no longer employed by CUCS have been removed from signer authority. This process was completed promptly upon identification of the issue. Ongoing Monitoring and Annual Review We are instituting an annual review of all authorized bank signers to ensure that records are current and appropriately reflect active personnel with approval authority. This review will be documented and conducted under the direction of the new part-time CFO consultant. CUCS is committed to maintaining effective internal controls over its financial operations, and we appreciate the auditor’s recommendation in helping us strengthen this process.
Management will restore funds to replacement reserve account when project funds become available. Management will review reserve withdrawals prior of release of funds from the serve account to verify the release is approved by the HUD account executive and the release is not a duplicate. The approva...
Management will restore funds to replacement reserve account when project funds become available. Management will review reserve withdrawals prior of release of funds from the serve account to verify the release is approved by the HUD account executive and the release is not a duplicate. The approval will be reviewed by the person initiating the request and verified by the project bookkeeper.
A revision to the PO process requires a PO to be approved in writing by the Director of Operations and the Superintendent before a purchase can be made.
A revision to the PO process requires a PO to be approved in writing by the Director of Operations and the Superintendent before a purchase can be made.
Corrective Action Plan Year Ended December 31, 2024 Findings Related to the Financial Statements Reported in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards None Findings Related to Federal Awards 2024-001 Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: U.S. Depa...
Corrective Action Plan Year Ended December 31, 2024 Findings Related to the Financial Statements Reported in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards None Findings Related to Federal Awards 2024-001 Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Homeland Security: Passed through the State of New Jersey, Department of Law and Public Safety Program Titles and Assistance Listing Numbers (ALN): Disaster Grants – Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) – ALN 97.036 Federal Grant Numbers: State of New Jersey pass-through number: UH1WX, Project #2365 – Award Year 2024 (Application 696220) Contact Person: Donna Wilser, Deputy Executive Director, 732-750-5300 Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. Beginning in December 2024, as a commitment to strengthen our processes and ensure that all physical timesheets related to FEMA-declared disaster events are properly maintained and readily accessible, management put a process in place to enhance procedures and controls for timesheets going forward to ensure full compliance with the Uniform Guidance requirements. This process was successfully implemented as of this date and for prospective periods. However, this process does not remedy the issue noted in the finding which relates to time worked from 2020-2022, which is before the process was in place. Therefore, the finding is repeated from the prior year. Anticipated Completion Date: Completed
The City-Parish transitioned the administration of the BRIGHT grant in the first quarter of 2025; therefore, we are unable to obtain some supporting documentation. The City-Parish provided documentation that a change in the project plan/scope from running five trauma centers to a variety of services...
The City-Parish transitioned the administration of the BRIGHT grant in the first quarter of 2025; therefore, we are unable to obtain some supporting documentation. The City-Parish provided documentation that a change in the project plan/scope from running five trauma centers to a variety of services based on needs and accessibility as opposed to confining them to centers was approved by the grantor agency through the programmatic reports which allowed expenses for gathering events, fitness camps, and activities for the Summer of Hope. This grant period ended September 27, 2024. Expected Implementation Date: June 2025 Contact person: Kelly LeDuff, Urban Development Director, Office of Community Development
View Audit 362863 Questioned Costs: $1
« 1 452 453 455 456 2134 »