Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
56,232
In database
Filtered Results
53,247
Matching current filters
Showing Page
451 of 2130
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Finding #2024-002: Completion and Submission of Annual Single Audit - Significant Deficiency/Noncompliance Condition: The Program's Single Audit and reporting package was delayed for the year ended June 30, 2023 beyond the nine-month due date, as a result of turnover and delays in reconciling feder...
Finding #2024-002: Completion and Submission of Annual Single Audit - Significant Deficiency/Noncompliance Condition: The Program's Single Audit and reporting package was delayed for the year ended June 30, 2023 beyond the nine-month due date, as a result of turnover and delays in reconciling federal and state award activity with the Commonwealth. Criteria: Pursuant to the provisions of the Uniform Guidance, under §200.512(a), the Program is required to complete and submit its Single Audit and related Data Collection Form within nine months of the end of its fiscal period (March 31) of the following year. Root Cause Analysis: The audit for the period ending June 30, 2023 was started in December 2023 and was completed and submitted in June 2024. In accordance with Uniform Guidance, the deadline is March 31st annually to have the audit completed and submitted. To meet this deadline, the year-end close and audit process needs to begin at least two months sooner to achieve this deadline. Planned Corrective Action Steps: Move up the year-end close and plan to start the audit in November annually. Responsible Party: MHDS Fiscal Director and MHDS Fiscal Unit Timeline for Completion: 1. Action Step #1 – November 2025 Comments: At the time of this publication, this timeline has already passed for the current period under audit (June 30, 2024). We plan to have this issue fixed for the June 30, 2025 audit period.
Finding 571862 (2024-004)
Significant Deficiency 2024
Finding Title: Subrecipient Monitoring Program: 21.027 COVID‐19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Name of Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Matthew Bower and George Hardgrove Corrective Action Planned: The City established and maintains a quarterly training for all ...
Finding Title: Subrecipient Monitoring Program: 21.027 COVID‐19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Name of Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Matthew Bower and George Hardgrove Corrective Action Planned: The City established and maintains a quarterly training for all grant managers to attend which includes training on grant management. Additional emphasis on subrecipient pre‐award risk management will be included within future quarterly trainings. Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2025
Finding 571861 (2024-003)
Significant Deficiency 2024
Finding Title: Suspension and Debarment Program: 21.027 COVID‐19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Name of Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Matthew Bower, Pam Fernandez, and George Hardgrove Corrective Action Planned: Procurement maintains control over which contra...
Finding Title: Suspension and Debarment Program: 21.027 COVID‐19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Name of Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Matthew Bower, Pam Fernandez, and George Hardgrove Corrective Action Planned: Procurement maintains control over which contracts have final approval. As part of the final contract approval, procurement will verify that debarment documentation has been maintained in the Comet software. Anticipated Completion Date: November 30, 2025
2024-007 – Preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) (Significant Deficiency) Department of Education, SFA Cluster, Special Tests and Provisions Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.210(b), a recipient of Federal awards is required to prepare a SEFA for the period covered by t...
2024-007 – Preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) (Significant Deficiency) Department of Education, SFA Cluster, Special Tests and Provisions Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.210(b), a recipient of Federal awards is required to prepare a SEFA for the period covered by the entity’s financial statement which must include the total Federal awards expended. In addition, 2 CFR 200.303 requires non-Federal entities to, among other things, establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over Federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure expenditures are properly reported on the SEFA. In addition to providing an accurate SEFA, an organization must also be able to demonstrate that it has a system of internal control that supports the preparation of the SEFA. Condition: The University did not have an adequate process in place to prepare and review its SEFA. Cause: The University’s internal control process for preparing the SEFA did not include review and approval of the SEFA prior to providing it to the auditor. Effect: Failure to accurately report federal expenditures on the SEFA could result in noncompliance with federal regulations. Repeat Finding from a Prior Year: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the University establish, document, and maintain effective internal controls over the preparation of the SEFA. At a minimum, an organization should be able to show documentation that the SEFA was reviewed and approved by an individual who was not directly involved with the initial preparation of the SEFA. The review process should include checking both the reported expenditures of federal awards and the assistance listing numbers reported for each grant program. Management Response: The University acknowledges the identified deficiency in the internal control process related to the preparation and review of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). In response, the University has implemented a formalized and documented process to ensure the SEFA is accurately prepared, thoroughly reviewed, and approved in compliance with 2 CFR 200.210(b) and 2 CFR 200.303. The corrective actions taken include: 1) Independent Review and Approval: The SEFA is now subject to a formal review and approval process by an individual who is independent of the initial preparation. This review involves verifying the accuracy of vreported expenditures, confirming the proper listing of assistance numbers (CFDA numbers), and ensuring that all program titles match the federal award documentation. 2) Internal Control Documentation: The University has documented its SEFA preparation and review procedures as part of its internal control framework. This documentation includes roles, responsibilities, timelines, and sign-off requirements to provide an audit trail for compliance verification. 3) Staff Training and Cross-Departmental Coordination: Staff involved in grants accounting and financial reporting will receive targeted training on SEFA requirements. Additionally, coordination among the Financial Aid Office and Finance Office has been strengthened to ensure the complete and accurate sharing of data related to federal award expenditures. Responsible Party and contact information: Joshua Henry – Executive Director of Financial Aid, henryjs@webber.edu, Jennifer Mueller – Assistant Vice President of Finance, muellerjj@webber.edu. Expected Date of Correction: 8/1/2025
2023-006 – Last Date of Attendance at an Academically Related Activity (Significant Deficiency) Department of Education, SFA Cluster, Special Tests and Provisions Criteria: If an institution is not required to take attendance, the withdrawal date is (1) the date, as determined by the institution, th...
2023-006 – Last Date of Attendance at an Academically Related Activity (Significant Deficiency) Department of Education, SFA Cluster, Special Tests and Provisions Criteria: If an institution is not required to take attendance, the withdrawal date is (1) the date, as determined by the institution, that the student began the withdrawal process prescribed by the institution; (2) the date, as determined by the institution, that the student otherwise provided official notification to the institution, in writing or orally, of his or her intent to withdrawal; (3) if the student ceases attendance without providing official notification to the institution of his or her withdrawal, the midpoint of the payment period or, if applicable, the period of enrollment; or (4-6) other special circumstances as documented by the institution. An institution that is not required to take attendance at an academically related activity may use, as the withdrawal date, the last date of attendance at an academically related activity as documented by the institution (34 CFR 668.22(c)). Condition: From a population of 163 students that officially or unofficially withdrew, we tested nineteen students and noted that documentation of the last date of attendance could not be provided for six students that unofficially withdrew and six students that officially withdrew. Cause: Controls are not functioning properly. Effect: Since documentation of the last date of attendance could not be provided, it could not be determined whether students that unofficially withdrew attended through the end of the period or students that officially withdrew had the correct date of last attendance. Repeat Finding from a Prior Year: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the University implement a policy to document the last date of attendance for students that unofficially withdrawal. In addition, we recommend the University maintain student-initiated withdrawal documentation for students that officially withdrawal. Management Response: The University acknowledges the deficiency in documenting the last dates of attendance for students who withdrew and has taken corrective actions to strengthen compliance with 34 CFR 668.22(c). To address this issue, the following steps have been implemented: 1)Revised Withdrawal Procedures: The University has formalized and updated its withdrawal procedures to require consistent documentation of the last date of attendance at an academically related activity for both official and unofficial withdrawals. Faculty are now required to report the last date a student participated in an academically related activity when submitting final grades or withdrawal notifications. 2) Mandatory Faculty Participation: Training will be provided to faculty and department chairs, emphasizing the importance of recording the last date of attendance for all students who cease attendance. The Registrar’s Office will incorporate this requirement into end-of-term processes and will enforce compliance before grade submission is finalized. 3) Retention of Student-Initiated Withdrawal Forms: A centralized and secure repository has been implemented to retain all student-initiated withdrawal requests. The Registrar’s Office is now responsible for maintaining this documentation and conducting periodic audits to ensure proper archiving. 4) Ongoing Monitoring: The Financial Aid and Registrar’s Offices will initiate a joint term-by-term reconciliation process to identify discrepancies in withdrawal reporting and verify the completeness of documentation. Responsible Party and contact information: Webber Registrar, Registrarmailbox@webber.edu, Pamela Denton - Financial Aid Counselor, dentonpe@webber.edu. Expected Date of Correction: 8/1/2025
2024-003 – Cash Management (Significant Deficiency) Department of Education, SFA Cluster, Cash Management Criteria: In accordance with 34 CFR 668.164, an institution submits a drawdown request for funds utilizing ED’s electronic grants management system that may not exceed the amount of funds needed...
2024-003 – Cash Management (Significant Deficiency) Department of Education, SFA Cluster, Cash Management Criteria: In accordance with 34 CFR 668.164, an institution submits a drawdown request for funds utilizing ED’s electronic grants management system that may not exceed the amount of funds needed to make immediate disbursements to eligible students and parents. The institution must disburse the requested funds as soon as administratively possible, but no later than three business days following receipt of those funds from ED. Any funds not disbursed by the end of the third business day are considered excess cash. Condition: A sample of twenty-six students were tested for timely distribution of federal student aid funds. Aid was distributed more than three business days after funds were received from ED for all students tested. Cause: Lack of controls over cash management. Effect: Excess federal cash retained by the institution. Recommendation: We recommend the University implement appropriate training regarding compliance regulations into the employee onboarding process and thereafter for applicable employees. In addition, we recommend the University implements timely review procedures to ensure that any overdrawn funds are returned within the tolerance period. Action Taken: The University acknowledges the deficiency in the timely disbursement of Title IV funds and has taken immediate corrective action to strengthen cash management controls. Specifically, the Financial Aid Office and the Business Office collaborated to revise internal procedures to ensure that federal funds are disbursed within three business days of receipt from the U.S. Department of Education. Effective 7/16/2025, a new standard operating procedure (SOP) was implemented, which includes: 1) Weekly reconciliation between Campus Anyware and G5 drawdowns to track the timing of funds received and disbursed. 2) Mandatory compliance training on federal cash management regulations for all financial aid and student accounts staff, both during onboarding and annually thereafter. 3) Monthly internal audits to review disbursement timelines and identify exceptions. Additionally, any funds inadvertently held beyond the three-day window are now promptly returned to G5 within the regulatory tolerance period. Responsible Party and contact information: Triniti Lee – Financial Aid Processor, Leetk2@webber.edu, Adhley Neal – Business Office Processor, nealad@webber.edu. Expected Date of Correction: 8/1/2025
2024-005 – Over Award of Federal Pell Grant Program Funds (Significant Deficiency) Department of Education, SFA Cluster, Special Tests and Provisions Criteria: In accordance with 34 CFR 668.32, a student is eligible to receive Title IV, HEA program assistance if the student meets all of the requirem...
2024-005 – Over Award of Federal Pell Grant Program Funds (Significant Deficiency) Department of Education, SFA Cluster, Special Tests and Provisions Criteria: In accordance with 34 CFR 668.32, a student is eligible to receive Title IV, HEA program assistance if the student meets all of the requirements in 34 CFR 668.32 paragraphs (a) through (m). 34 CFR 668.32(a)(1)(i) requires the student to be a regular student enrolled, or accepted for enrollment, in an eligible program at an eligible institution. Condition: Of 26 students tested for eligibility, one student received Title IV, HEA program assistance for a semester that the student was not enrolled in. Cause: Controls are not functioning properly. Effect: Title IV program funds were awarded to a student who was not eligible to receive such funds. Recommendation: We recommend the University review and update its procedures to ensure that Title IV funds are awarded properly. Management Response: The University acknowledges the over-award of Title IV funds due to disbursement for a student who was not enrolled during the term in question. In response, the University has strengthened its internal controls to ensure that federal aid is awarded and disbursed only to students who meet all eligibility criteria as outlined in 34 CFR 668.32. Corrective actions taken include: 1) System Validation Enhancements: The student information system has been updated to include enhanced enrollment validation checks before the release of Title IV funds. Title IV disbursements are now restricted to students with confirmed active enrollment in eligible programs for the applicable term. This is enforced through automated disbursement blocks that are triggered when enrollment data is missing or inconsistent. 2) Pre-Disbursement Review Process: A pre-disbursement verification step has been implemented, requiring financial aid staff to confirm active enrollment statuses before releasing funds. 3) Staff Training: Targeted training has been provided to financial aid staff on Title IV enrollment eligibility requirements. Responsible Party and contact information: Triniti Lee – Financial Aid Processor, Leetk2@webber.edu. Expected Date of Correction: 8/1/2025
2024-004 –Satisfactory Academic Progress Policy (Significant Deficiency) Department of Education, SFA Cluster, Eligibility Criteria: In accordance with 34 CFR 668.34(a), an institution must establish a reasonable satisfactory academic progress policy for determining whether an otherwise eligible stu...
2024-004 –Satisfactory Academic Progress Policy (Significant Deficiency) Department of Education, SFA Cluster, Eligibility Criteria: In accordance with 34 CFR 668.34(a), an institution must establish a reasonable satisfactory academic progress policy for determining whether an otherwise eligible student is making satisfactory academic progress in his or her educational program and may receive assistance under Title IV, HEA programs. A student placed on academic probation may receive Title IV, HEA program funds for one payment period. At the end of one payment period on financial aid probation, the student must meet the institution's satisfactory academic progress standards or meet the requirements of the academic plan developed by the institution and the student to qualify for further Title IV, HEA program funds. Condition: Our review of 26 student files disclosed that one student was placed on academic probation after fall 2023 semester and received Pell for spring 2024 semester. The student did not meet satisfactory academic progress standards at the end of spring 2024 semester, however, the student received Pell for summer semester 2024. Cause: Controls are not functioning properly. Effect: Title IV program funds were awarded to a student who was not eligible to receive such funds. Recommendation: We recommend the University review and update its policies to ensure that the University’s Satisfactory Academic Progress policy is enforced. Management Response: The University acknowledges the oversight in the enforcement of its Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) policy and has taken corrective action to address the deficiency. Specifically, the Financial Aid Office has conducted a comprehensive review of SAP monitoring procedures to ensure full compliance with federal regulations under 34 CFR 668.34. Corrective steps taken include: 1) Policy Clarification and Staff Training: The SAP policy has been reviewed and clarified to emphasize the requirement that a student failing to meet SAP after one payment period on financial aid probation is no longer eligible for Title IV funds unless they meet the conditions of an approved academic plan. Targeted training was delivered to financial aid counselors and compliance staff to reinforce correct application of SAP policies and documentation protocols. 2) Automated SAP Compliance Flag: An automated flag has been integrated into the student information system to alert staff when a student has reached the end of a probation period. This flag prevents Title IV disbursement until a manual review confirms eligibility based on SAP or academic plan compliance. 3)Ongoing Monitoring and Quality Assurance: At the conclusion of each academic term, the University runs comprehensive SAP reports to identify all students who have either regained eligibility, remained on SAP, or have newly been placed on SAP status. The student information system is configured to automatically flag these students and restrict Title IV disbursements through system-based controls in the auto-packaging process, thereby preventing ineligible aid disbursements and ensuring compliance with federal regulations. Responsible Party and contact information: Pamela Denton - Financial Aid Counselor, dentonpe@webber.edu, Trinity Lee – Financial Aid Processor, Leetk2@webber.edu. Expected Date of Correction: 8/1/2025
To: EisnerAmper LLP Date: 7/21/2025 Subject: Response to Management Letter Commend for the Fiscal Year Ended 6/30/2024 Thank you for your management letter dated 6/30/2025 and for your valuable insights and recommendations regarding our financial processes and controls. Areas of improvement ident...
To: EisnerAmper LLP Date: 7/21/2025 Subject: Response to Management Letter Commend for the Fiscal Year Ended 6/30/2024 Thank you for your management letter dated 6/30/2025 and for your valuable insights and recommendations regarding our financial processes and controls. Areas of improvement identified by the audit team are acknowledged. CUCS is committed to addressing the points raised. For each recommendation we have taken corrective actions as outlined below. Response to comment#1: CUCS experienced delays in producing final audit schedules due to staffing transitions, including the unanticipated resignation of the Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and other key executive members. While various members of the fiscal team are responsible for preparing audit schedules, the CFO has historically overseen the initiation and finalization of the financial statements and served as the primary liaison with EisnerAmper during the audit process. We appreciate the opportunity to respond to the internal control deficiencies identified during your audit for fiscal year 2024. We acknowledge your finding that our current internal control processes may not consistently detect and correct material misstatements in a timely manner. This concern has been noted and taken seriously by management. Corrective Actions: Staffing and Leadership Stabilization • A Part-time Chief Financial Officer Consultant has been hired to provide leadership, oversight, and stability within the Finance Department while CUCS continues to recruit for a permanent CFO. • Internal resources are being strengthened to reduce reliance on external accounting services. Process and Calendar Improvements • An annual financial reporting and audit preparation calendar has been developed and implemented to improve planning and accountability for deliverables. • Key deadlines for closing entries, reconciliations are now documented and monitored quarterly. • Enhance our review procedures by implementing an additional layer of financial oversight. All required financial reports and key reconciliation’s will be conducted monthly. Capacity Building and Training • Cross-training of finance staff is underway to reduce dependency on single individuals and improve team resilience. Monitoring and Follow-Up • Regular updates to the Executive Team and Audit Committee. Response to comment#2: We acknowledge the auditor’s observation regarding the presence of former employees remaining listed as authorized signers on CUCS bank accounts. We agree that maintaining accurate and up-to-date signer authorizations is critical to safeguarding the organization’s financial assets. In response to this finding, CUCS has taken the following corrective actions: Immediate Review and Removal of Former Employees All bank accounts have been reviewed, and individuals who are no longer employed by CUCS have been removed from signer authority. This process was completed promptly upon identification of the issue. Ongoing Monitoring and Annual Review We are instituting an annual review of all authorized bank signers to ensure that records are current and appropriately reflect active personnel with approval authority. This review will be documented and conducted under the direction of the new part-time CFO consultant. CUCS is committed to maintaining effective internal controls over its financial operations, and we appreciate the auditor’s recommendation in helping us strengthen this process.
Management will restore funds to replacement reserve account when project funds become available. Management will review reserve withdrawals prior of release of funds from the serve account to verify the release is approved by the HUD account executive and the release is not a duplicate. The approva...
Management will restore funds to replacement reserve account when project funds become available. Management will review reserve withdrawals prior of release of funds from the serve account to verify the release is approved by the HUD account executive and the release is not a duplicate. The approval will be reviewed by the person initiating the request and verified by the project bookkeeper.
A revision to the PO process requires a PO to be approved in writing by the Director of Operations and the Superintendent before a purchase can be made.
A revision to the PO process requires a PO to be approved in writing by the Director of Operations and the Superintendent before a purchase can be made.
Corrective Action Plan Year Ended December 31, 2024 Findings Related to the Financial Statements Reported in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards None Findings Related to Federal Awards 2024-001 Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: U.S. Depa...
Corrective Action Plan Year Ended December 31, 2024 Findings Related to the Financial Statements Reported in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards None Findings Related to Federal Awards 2024-001 Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Homeland Security: Passed through the State of New Jersey, Department of Law and Public Safety Program Titles and Assistance Listing Numbers (ALN): Disaster Grants – Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) – ALN 97.036 Federal Grant Numbers: State of New Jersey pass-through number: UH1WX, Project #2365 – Award Year 2024 (Application 696220) Contact Person: Donna Wilser, Deputy Executive Director, 732-750-5300 Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. Beginning in December 2024, as a commitment to strengthen our processes and ensure that all physical timesheets related to FEMA-declared disaster events are properly maintained and readily accessible, management put a process in place to enhance procedures and controls for timesheets going forward to ensure full compliance with the Uniform Guidance requirements. This process was successfully implemented as of this date and for prospective periods. However, this process does not remedy the issue noted in the finding which relates to time worked from 2020-2022, which is before the process was in place. Therefore, the finding is repeated from the prior year. Anticipated Completion Date: Completed
The City-Parish transitioned the administration of the BRIGHT grant in the first quarter of 2025; therefore, we are unable to obtain some supporting documentation. The City-Parish provided documentation that a change in the project plan/scope from running five trauma centers to a variety of services...
The City-Parish transitioned the administration of the BRIGHT grant in the first quarter of 2025; therefore, we are unable to obtain some supporting documentation. The City-Parish provided documentation that a change in the project plan/scope from running five trauma centers to a variety of services based on needs and accessibility as opposed to confining them to centers was approved by the grantor agency through the programmatic reports which allowed expenses for gathering events, fitness camps, and activities for the Summer of Hope. This grant period ended September 27, 2024. Expected Implementation Date: June 2025 Contact person: Kelly LeDuff, Urban Development Director, Office of Community Development
View Audit 362863 Questioned Costs: $1
The City-Parish transitioned the administration of the SLFR grant in the first quarter of 2025; therefore, we are unable to obtain direct clarification on the supporting documentation and reasonableness of the youth camps and travel costs. Moving forward supporting documentation will be attached to...
The City-Parish transitioned the administration of the SLFR grant in the first quarter of 2025; therefore, we are unable to obtain direct clarification on the supporting documentation and reasonableness of the youth camps and travel costs. Moving forward supporting documentation will be attached to all P-card transactions as well as documentation to support the public purpose. Expected Implementation Date: January 2025 Contact person: Kelly LeDuff, Urban Development Director, Office of Community Development Yolanda Burnette-Lankford, Ph.D., Chief Service Office, Office of the Mayor-President
View Audit 362863 Questioned Costs: $1
The City-Parish acknowledges that the development has not progressed in accordance with the schedule outlined in the original loan agreement with the developer for the Scotlandville Housing Development. At the time of the 2023 disbursement, documentation provided by the developer supported project r...
The City-Parish acknowledges that the development has not progressed in accordance with the schedule outlined in the original loan agreement with the developer for the Scotlandville Housing Development. At the time of the 2023 disbursement, documentation provided by the developer supported project readiness and anticipated completion timelines; however, subsequent review and monitoring activities identified delays tied to financing, site control, and design completion. At present, the administration is evaluating if it wants to proceed with the project and what contract amendments would be stipulated. The Office of Community Development, working alongside its grant management consultant CSRS, recently initiated a detailed review of the project status and supporting documentation. This review culminated in the identification of potential deficiencies, including unresolved site control issues and the need for updated construction plans. An updated site plan, ownership verification, environmental remediation documentation, and full construction package are being actively pursued, and the developer has been provided a prioritized list of immediate action items to remedy outstanding issues if the project is going to proceed. To bring the project and agreement into compliance, the corrective actions noted below are actively being pursued. These corrective actions are intended to either return the project to a viable status under the existing agreement or establish the necessary conditions to invoke appropriate default provisions should remediation fail. These corrective actions include: Formal reassessment of project viability with CSRS, OCD, and project leadership, including a meeting scheduled for the week of July 1, 2025; Issuance of a formal notice to the developer requesting documentation of progress and corrective actions related to site control, tax clearance, design completion, and permitting; Evaluation of amendment or enforcement actions under the agreement, including potential restructuring of the loan timeline or initiating default proceedings if satisfactory progress is not demonstrated by mid-Q3 2025; Preparation of an updated commitment letter from the current administration to support the developer’s financial closing, contingent on demonstrated progress and documentation clearance, if the administration chooses to move forward with the project. Expected Implementation Date: September 2025 Contact person: Kelly LeDuff, Urban Development Director, Office of Community Development
View Audit 362863 Questioned Costs: $1
The Purchasing Director for the City-Parish has the authority as provided by the Code of Ordinances to approve emergency purchases upon review of the certification of the emergency by the user department. At the beginning of 2024, the Baton Rouge Police Department noted its patrol units were in less...
The Purchasing Director for the City-Parish has the authority as provided by the Code of Ordinances to approve emergency purchases upon review of the certification of the emergency by the user department. At the beginning of 2024, the Baton Rouge Police Department noted its patrol units were in less than standard conditions and a recent Police Academy graduating class of sworn officers compounded the need for viable units. At the same time, a nationwide supply chain crisis limited the availability of vehicles for purchase. Multiple quote requests from vendors across Louisiana confirmed a lack of available inventory including the Louisiana State Contract vendor as well as a piggyback contract for the Jefferson Parish Sheriff’s Office. After an exhaustive search, a single vendor was located who had an inventory of matching vehicles on hand for offer within a limited time frame. In an effort to not compromise public safety, an emergency purchase was utilized which was signed by both the Police Chief and the Purchasing Director. As required, notice was given by publishing in the newspaper. Expected Implementation Date: June 2025 Contact person: Philip Gore, Interim Director, Purchasing Division
View Audit 362863 Questioned Costs: $1
The City-Parish transitioned the administration of the SLFR grant in the first quarter of 2025; therefore, we are unable to obtain direct clarification if there was other supporting documentation obtained but not included with the invoice. Moving forward, more detailed documentation will be required...
The City-Parish transitioned the administration of the SLFR grant in the first quarter of 2025; therefore, we are unable to obtain direct clarification if there was other supporting documentation obtained but not included with the invoice. Moving forward, more detailed documentation will be required to substantiate payments and services rendered. Expected Implementation Date: January 2025 Contact person: Kelly LeDuff, Urban Development Director, Office of Community Development Yolanda Burnette-Lankford, Ph.D., Chief Service Office, Office of the Mayor-President
View Audit 362863 Questioned Costs: $1
The amendment in question did not constitute a material change in the scope, nature, or intent of the original procurement. The additional funding awarded was consistent with the original services solicited and did not involve new activities or substantially alter the deliverables or performance sta...
The amendment in question did not constitute a material change in the scope, nature, or intent of the original procurement. The additional funding awarded was consistent with the original services solicited and did not involve new activities or substantially alter the deliverables or performance standards initially procured. As such, the amendment fell within the bounds of the original competitive process and was not required to be procured. The City-Parish procurement policy allows for amendments when they do not exceed the original scope of work or introduce fundamentally different services. The amendment was processed with full documentation of cost reasonableness, continued eligibility under the applicable grant program and internal approval. Therefore, we assert that the contract amendment was executed in accordance with both HUD and local procurement requirements and no formal procurement was necessary. To strengthen internal controls and ensure full alignment with federal procurement requirements, the OCD will document and reinforce internal procedures outlining when procurement is or is not required for amendments within the original scope. Procurement training is ongoing. The OCD staff will conduct refresher training with procurement and program personnel on contract amendment procedures and documentation requirements. Expected Implementation Date: August 2025 Contact person: Kelly LeDuff, Urban Development Director, Office of Community Development
View Audit 362863 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding: 2024-3 Name of contact person: Renae Alston Corrective Action: The County will continue to train employees on a monthly basis and as needed when new and updated policies are received. Supervisors and lead workers will continue to conduct second party reviews and utilizing any findings...
Finding: 2024-3 Name of contact person: Renae Alston Corrective Action: The County will continue to train employees on a monthly basis and as needed when new and updated policies are received. Supervisors and lead workers will continue to conduct second party reviews and utilizing any findings to aid in training staff on any necessary policy information. The department will continue to implement changes as necessary to achieve the overall improvement of eligibility determinations. Proposed Completion Date: June 30, 2025
Finding 2024-002 Federal Agency Name: Department of Housing and Urban Development Assistance Listing Number: 14.871 Program Name: Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program Initial Fiscal Year Finding Occurred: 2024 Finding Summary: Metro West Housing Solutions did not determine rent reasonableness f...
Finding 2024-002 Federal Agency Name: Department of Housing and Urban Development Assistance Listing Number: 14.871 Program Name: Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program Initial Fiscal Year Finding Occurred: 2024 Finding Summary: Metro West Housing Solutions did not determine rent reasonableness for 2 tenants during 2024. In addition, Metro West Housing Solutions did not follow their internal controls in place to determine rent reasonableness for 3 tenants, and internal controls in place did not prevent the missing determinations on the tenants noted. Corrective Action Plan: In response to the recent audit finding related to missing rent reasonableness determinations, Metro West Housing Solutions has implemented the following corrective actions and is strengthening internal controls to ensure compliance with HUD regulations at 24 CFR § 982.507. Actions implemented: • Discontinued using Nelrod rent reasonableness system, which we found to have inconsistent and outdated comparable rent data. MWHS has also discontinued using the “point system” as a control measure. • The recently implemented rent reasonableness control measure requires that the proposed rent for the assisted unit must be within 10% of the rents for comparable, unassisted units in the private market. A unit is considered rent reasonable if none of the selected comparable units are more than 10% below or above the proposed rent. • Yardi Rent Reasonableness module is now being used to determine reasonable rent in accordance with 24 CFR § 982.507(b). This system enables automated, consistent comparisons based on key HUD criteria. • Staff will conduct periodic Yardi Rent Reasonableness system reviews to confirm comparable market data is current and geographically appropriate • Enhanced compliance protocols have been implemented to ensure all staff are receiving frequent, standard training. In addition, individual file audits will be conducted more frequently. Responsible Individual(s): Director, Housing Choice Vouchers Anticipated Completion Date: September 2025
Financial Statement Findings None reported Federal Award Finding Finding 2024-001 Federal Agency Name: Department of Housing and Urban Development Assistance Listing Number: 14.871 Program Name: Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program Finding Summary: Metro West Housing Solutions did not perform r...
Financial Statement Findings None reported Federal Award Finding Finding 2024-001 Federal Agency Name: Department of Housing and Urban Development Assistance Listing Number: 14.871 Program Name: Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program Finding Summary: Metro West Housing Solutions did not perform re-inspections of 17 failed inspections within the prescribed 30-day or 24-hour requirement during 2024. In addition, HAP was not properly reviewed for possible abatement for these tenants. Metro West Housing Solutions also did not perform inspections of 2 units within the biennial requirement. Corrective Action Plan: We have replaced the retired staff with the new titled positions Chief Housing Officer and Director of Housing Choice Vouchers. They are bringing new energy and ideas to the Housing team and have been actively seeking out and participating in 3rd party training opportunities. We have added two additional HCV Specialist Positions, and a Housing Eligibility Specialist to address workload concerns, and are now fully staffed. In January of 2025, we replaced the in-house Inspector. They have completed the HUD Exchange NSPIRE Inspector Training Program Certification. In addition, the new inspector was an internal candidate from our property management team who has been with MWHS for over a year and was eager to move into the new position. We believe by moving a proven employee into the role it will create the long-term stability that position requires. We have also completed a thorough review of the inspection process protocols and implemented a new tracking system to better track and schedule timely inspections. Responsible Individual(s): Director, Housing Choice Vouchers Anticipated Completion Date: September 2025
Identification: 10.766 United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Community Facilities Loans and Grants Cluster, Noncompliance Finding/Significant Deficiency, Special Tests and Provisions. Corrective Action Plan: The Medical Center will seek guidance from the bond trustee and USDA related to...
Identification: 10.766 United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Community Facilities Loans and Grants Cluster, Noncompliance Finding/Significant Deficiency, Special Tests and Provisions. Corrective Action Plan: The Medical Center will seek guidance from the bond trustee and USDA related to the insurance provisions in the bond documents for the amount of fidelity bond coverage and retaining an insurance consultant to provide a report. Anticipated completion date: The Medical Center anticipates this to be completed during 2025.
Identification: 10.766 United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Community Facilities Loans and Grants; Noncompliance Finding; Special Tests and Provisions Corrective Action Plan: The Medical Center will take the necessary steps outlined in the bond indenture and work with the bond trustee ...
Identification: 10.766 United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Community Facilities Loans and Grants; Noncompliance Finding; Special Tests and Provisions Corrective Action Plan: The Medical Center will take the necessary steps outlined in the bond indenture and work with the bond trustee in order to improve the financial covenants and come back into compliance. Anticipated completion date: The Medical Center anticipates this to be completed during 2025.
Finding 571824 (2024-001)
Significant Deficiency 2024
Recommendation: The City should evaluate its procedures and implement an additional control to ensure verifications checks are occurring prior to entering into contracts with a vendor Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There are no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned/tak...
Recommendation: The City should evaluate its procedures and implement an additional control to ensure verifications checks are occurring prior to entering into contracts with a vendor Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There are no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned/taken in response to finding: The City will ensure all verification checks are occurring prior to entering into contracts with vendors. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Michelle DePew Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2025
Condition: Supporting documentation for the monthly food service meals provided did not align with the claims reported for reimbursement by free, reduced, and paid categories. Plan: The District will keep physical copies of reports and claims submitted. As students switched categories (free, reduced...
Condition: Supporting documentation for the monthly food service meals provided did not align with the claims reported for reimbursement by free, reduced, and paid categories. Plan: The District will keep physical copies of reports and claims submitted. As students switched categories (free, reduced, and paid), the electronic system failed to keep that in account, leading to discrepancies. Anticipated Date of Completion: The District anticipates completion during the 2024-2025 fiscal year. Name of Contact Person: Nathan Knitt, Director of Business Services
View Audit 362828 Questioned Costs: $1
« 1 449 450 452 453 2130 »