Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
60,097
In database
Filtered Results
56,878
Matching current filters
Showing Page
384 of 2276
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Finding No.: 2024-024 Reporting Responding Agency: Department of Administration (DOA) Responsible Personnel: Edward M. Birn, Director The Agency is reviewing its federal grants management to ensure robust handover and succession plans are in place of future programs.
Finding No.: 2024-024 Reporting Responding Agency: Department of Administration (DOA) Responsible Personnel: Edward M. Birn, Director The Agency is reviewing its federal grants management to ensure robust handover and succession plans are in place of future programs.
Finding No.: 2024-023 Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Responding Agency: Department of Administration (DOA) Responsible Personnel: Edward M. Birn, Director The Agency is reviewing its federal grants management to ensure robust handover and succession plans are in place of future programs.
Finding No.: 2024-023 Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Responding Agency: Department of Administration (DOA) Responsible Personnel: Edward M. Birn, Director The Agency is reviewing its federal grants management to ensure robust handover and succession plans are in place of future programs.
Finding No.: 2024-022 Eligibility Responding Agency: Department of Administration (DOA) Responsible Personnel: Edward M. Birn, Director The Agency is reviewing its federal grants management to ensure robust handover and succession plans are in place of future programs.
Finding No.: 2024-022 Eligibility Responding Agency: Department of Administration (DOA) Responsible Personnel: Edward M. Birn, Director The Agency is reviewing its federal grants management to ensure robust handover and succession plans are in place of future programs.
Finding No.: 2024-021 Activities Allowed or Unallowed: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Responding Agency: Department of Administration (DOA) Responsible Personnel: Edward M. Birn, Director The Agency disagrees with this finding. Please refer to a letter dated March 31, 2026, regarding Reports on Com...
Finding No.: 2024-021 Activities Allowed or Unallowed: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Responding Agency: Department of Administration (DOA) Responsible Personnel: Edward M. Birn, Director The Agency disagrees with this finding. Please refer to a letter dated March 31, 2026, regarding Reports on Compliance September 30, 2024.
Finding No.: 2024-020 Reporting Responding Agency: Department of Administration (DOA) Responsible Personnel: Edward M. Birn, Director The Agency disagrees with this finding. Please refer to a letter dated March 31, 2026, regarding Reports on Compliance September 30, 2024
Finding No.: 2024-020 Reporting Responding Agency: Department of Administration (DOA) Responsible Personnel: Edward M. Birn, Director The Agency disagrees with this finding. Please refer to a letter dated March 31, 2026, regarding Reports on Compliance September 30, 2024
Finding No.: 2024-019 Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Responding Agency: Department of Administration (DOA) Responsible Personnel: Edward M. Birn, Director The Agency is reviewing the management of Federal Grants to ensure robust handover and succession plans are in place for future programs. ...
Finding No.: 2024-019 Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Responding Agency: Department of Administration (DOA) Responsible Personnel: Edward M. Birn, Director The Agency is reviewing the management of Federal Grants to ensure robust handover and succession plans are in place for future programs. The sudden passing of the ERA Program Coordinator directly impacted overall management of the program.
Finding No.: 2024-018 Eligibility Responding Agency: Department of Administration (DOA) Responsible Personnel: Edward M. Birn, Director The Agency is reviewing the management of Federal Grants to ensure robust handover and succession plans are in place for future programs. The sudden passing of the ...
Finding No.: 2024-018 Eligibility Responding Agency: Department of Administration (DOA) Responsible Personnel: Edward M. Birn, Director The Agency is reviewing the management of Federal Grants to ensure robust handover and succession plans are in place for future programs. The sudden passing of the ERA Program Coordinator directly impacted overall management of the program.
Finding No.: 2024-017 Eligibility Responding Agency: Department of Labor (DOL) Responsible Personnel: David M. Dell’Isola In June 2024, GDOL established a policy workgroup to modernize internal procedures. Consequently, the AJC-024-Selective Service Registration policy was updated and formally appro...
Finding No.: 2024-017 Eligibility Responding Agency: Department of Labor (DOL) Responsible Personnel: David M. Dell’Isola In June 2024, GDOL established a policy workgroup to modernize internal procedures. Consequently, the AJC-024-Selective Service Registration policy was updated and formally approved on August 12, 2024. This updated guidance was distributed to all American Job Center (AJC) staff and case managers on August 15, 2024, to ensure future consistency in documentation and eligibility overrides.
Finding No.: 2024-016 Subrecipient Monitoring Responding Agency: Bureau of Budget and Management Research (BBMR) Responsible Personnel: Lester Carlson, Director BBMR will create Standard Operating Procedures as well as a checklist, to assist in the monitoring of subrecipient compliance.
Finding No.: 2024-016 Subrecipient Monitoring Responding Agency: Bureau of Budget and Management Research (BBMR) Responsible Personnel: Lester Carlson, Director BBMR will create Standard Operating Procedures as well as a checklist, to assist in the monitoring of subrecipient compliance.
Finding No.: 2024-015 Reporting Responding Agency: Bureau of Budget and Management Research (BBMR) Responsible Personnel: Lester Carlson, Director BBMR will work with DOA to keep soft copies of submitted and approved Federal Financial Reports (FFR) on hand.
Finding No.: 2024-015 Reporting Responding Agency: Bureau of Budget and Management Research (BBMR) Responsible Personnel: Lester Carlson, Director BBMR will work with DOA to keep soft copies of submitted and approved Federal Financial Reports (FFR) on hand.
Finding No.: 2024-014 Equipment and Real Property Management Responding Agency: Department of Administration (DOA) Responsible Personnel: Edward M. Birn, Director Implementation of a Fixed Assets Module as part of the new FMIS system that will help automate the tracking and reporting of Capital asse...
Finding No.: 2024-014 Equipment and Real Property Management Responding Agency: Department of Administration (DOA) Responsible Personnel: Edward M. Birn, Director Implementation of a Fixed Assets Module as part of the new FMIS system that will help automate the tracking and reporting of Capital assets, is near completion with final testing in progress. DOA will update the SOP for the Fixed Assets for capital asset reporting accordingly. Review of Assets acquired in FY2024 was completed, with FY2025 in progress. As noted previously, the process is hampered by difficulties in recruiting personnel.
Finding No.: 2024-013 Allowable Costs/Cost Principles: Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Responding Agency: Department of Administration (DOA) Responsible Personnel: Edward M. Birn, Director Agency disagrees with 2 out of the 3 findings. • Condition 1 regarding the Authorization To Proceed (ATP...
Finding No.: 2024-013 Allowable Costs/Cost Principles: Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Responding Agency: Department of Administration (DOA) Responsible Personnel: Edward M. Birn, Director Agency disagrees with 2 out of the 3 findings. • Condition 1 regarding the Authorization To Proceed (ATP), as per the Grant and Cooperative Agreement and the Grant Terms and Conditions, it did not state that an ATP is required to begin work on the grant for D20AP00048 and D21AP10145.The Government complies with ATP requirements for grants which mandate such compliance. If the grant is silent, no ATP is required.. • Condition 2 GSA will continue to verify vendor eligibility through SAM.gov prior to contract award. Documentation of the verification will be retained in the procurement file for each transaction. • Condition 3 The necessary controls will be strengthened when the updated Federal Grant module is fully implemented.
Finding No.: 2024-012 Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Responding Agency: Department of Administration (DOA) Responsible Personnel: Edward M. Birn, Director (DOA) GSA will continue to verify vendor eligibility through SAM.gov prior to contract award. Documentation of the verification will be r...
Finding No.: 2024-012 Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Responding Agency: Department of Administration (DOA) Responsible Personnel: Edward M. Birn, Director (DOA) GSA will continue to verify vendor eligibility through SAM.gov prior to contract award. Documentation of the verification will be retained in the procurement file for each transaction. GSA has revised IFB templates to include the required debarment and suspension certification language in accordance with 2 CFR 200.214. Effective immediately, all new contracts will include this clause prior to execution. For local vendors that may not appear in federal systems, GSA will require a debarment and suspension certification as part of the contracting process and maintain this documentation within the procurement record.
Finding No.: 2024-011 Period of Performance Responding Agency: Department of Public Health and Social Services (DPHSS) Responsible Personnel: Theresa Arriola, Director (DPHSS) The DPHSS WIC Program disagrees with the findings. All supporting documents related to the findings were provided promptly o...
Finding No.: 2024-011 Period of Performance Responding Agency: Department of Public Health and Social Services (DPHSS) Responsible Personnel: Theresa Arriola, Director (DPHSS) The DPHSS WIC Program disagrees with the findings. All supporting documents related to the findings were provided promptly on March 3,2026 when request was received on February 26,2026. In accordance with WIC FY 2024 Closeout Guidance and the requirements under 2 CFR 200.344, the WIC Program is allowed 90 days after the end of the period of performance to submit all final financial reports, as well as 90 days to liquidate all obligations incurred during the period of performance. For FY 2024, the closeout timeline required that all obligations be liquidated no later than January 31, 2025. The program adhered to these federal requirements. All obligations were liquidated prior to the close of the fiscal year grant, and obligations were reported in the fiscal year in which they occurred, consistent with 7 CFR 246.17. Furthermore, the final closeout report was submitted within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year, fully complying with WIC closeout procedures. Based on the timely submission of all supporting documentation and adherence to federal closeout regulations, the DPHSS WIC Program maintains that the questioned costs were appropriately obligated, liquidated, and reported.
Finding No.: 2024-010 Cash Management Responding Agency: Department of Administration (DOA) Responsible Personnel: Edward M. Birn, Director The Federal and Compliance section will establish a Standard Operating Procedure for draw downs. As well as, conducting drawdowns daily to minimize the time bet...
Finding No.: 2024-010 Cash Management Responding Agency: Department of Administration (DOA) Responsible Personnel: Edward M. Birn, Director The Federal and Compliance section will establish a Standard Operating Procedure for draw downs. As well as, conducting drawdowns daily to minimize the time between the drawdowns of federal funds and the disbursement for federal program purposes.
2024-001 Financial Reporting Material Weakness in Internal Control Material Noncompliance Condition: During our audit of the Authority’s financial statements, numerous adjustments were needed to properly report the financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Cer...
2024-001 Financial Reporting Material Weakness in Internal Control Material Noncompliance Condition: During our audit of the Authority’s financial statements, numerous adjustments were needed to properly report the financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Certain accounts had not been properly reconciled and corrective entries were not readily available. Significant audit adjustments were necessary for several audit areas and the audit was significantly delayed due to these adjustments. Auditor’s Recommendations: The Authority should continue to develop and implement internal controls over both internal and external reporting, and the year-end close process to ensure reporting remains accurate and timely, with any unexpected financial data being investigated and corrected before it is reported. The Authority should consider additional staff training on development activities. Action Taken: The Houston Housing Authority agrees with this finding and related recommendations. During this audit, as these issues arose, notes were taken, evaluation of what had happened was made so that we could make the necessary adjustments to our procedures to prevent the continuation of these issues. In addition, in the previous year we hired a firm to come in and undertake a review of the finance department. The purpose of this review was to review our existing staffing levels, workloads, experience, etc., for purposes of proposing a reorganization of the finance department to address any deficiencies. We have reviewed the recommendations from this consultant and are in the process of implementing many of the recommended changes. There have been a number of staffing changes made during the year with the intent of improving the overall performance of the finance department. We are in the process of evaluating if additional staff are needed to expand the capacity of the Finance department. In November of 2024 the Houston Housing authority converted to a new accounting system. The Yardi system was implemented and we began processing all transactions on this new system. Unfortunately, there have been a significant amount of post implementation corrections and modifications that have had to be made and continue to occur. We are still undergoing these implementation and modification processes and as a result of this we continue to have to make adjusting entries to correct errors as they are discovered. To further complicate this system conversion there were a number of changes made to the management companies that we utilize to do our primary property level accounting. They have also been converting portions of their accounting systems to Yardi. Many of the same problems that have been encountered during our system conversion have also been encountered by the management companies. It is anticipated that most of these system conversion related issues will be resolved within the 2025 calendar year. The VP Fiscal and Business Operations as well as the Director of Finance are responsible for implementing the necessary process and procedural changes to eliminate the need for this type of finding for the 2024 audit.
Eligibility Section 8 Project-Based Cluster Material Weakness in Internal Control Material Noncompliance Condition: Out of an approximate population of 240 of tenants, 11 tenant files were tested and the following deficiencies were noted: Four files did not have annual recertifications performed dur...
Eligibility Section 8 Project-Based Cluster Material Weakness in Internal Control Material Noncompliance Condition: Out of an approximate population of 240 of tenants, 11 tenant files were tested and the following deficiencies were noted: Four files did not have annual recertifications performed during the year, Two files did not have a 214 declaration form for all members of the household, Two files used incorrect income based on the support provided during the annual recertification, One file did not have documentation necessary to verify the reported income, and One files did not have utility allowance documentation. Auditor Recommendations: The Authority should reevaluate their established procedures and controls in place to ensure full compliance in regards to eligibility and the timeliness of recertifications. The Authority needs to correct the deficiencies noted in the tested files and consider the impact to the rest of the population of tenant files that were not selected as part of the auditor’s sample. Action Taken: The Houston Housing Authority agrees with this fining and related recommendations. During 2024 the voucher and public housing programs converted to a new software system. Yardi is not the principal operating system for both the voucher and public housing programs. This system conversion has required that work flows had to be modified. This modification and implementation of a new processing system did not allow staff to conduct the necessary reviews of existing files to make sure that the compliance related materials that should be found in each file were to be completed. This issue has been discussed and there will be an internal review conducted on file samples to determine what compliance deficiencies are prevalent. Corrective action steps will be implemented to address these issues designed to correct them. Additional training resources will be devoted to staff in these departments designed to improve quality control with these program areas.
Eligibility Housing Voucher Cluster Material Weakness in Internal Control Material Noncompliance Condition: Out of an approximate population of 1,500 of Housing Voucher Cluster tenants we tested 11 tenants and the following deficiencies were noted: Five files did not have an annual recertification p...
Eligibility Housing Voucher Cluster Material Weakness in Internal Control Material Noncompliance Condition: Out of an approximate population of 1,500 of Housing Voucher Cluster tenants we tested 11 tenants and the following deficiencies were noted: Five files did not have an annual recertification performed with 12 months of the previous certification Two files did not have inspection documentation during the period, One file did not have an annual recertification performed, One file did not have documentation to support HAP amount reported, One file used an incorrect payment standard, One file did not have dependency documentation for a dependent member of the household, One file was missing documentation to support income claimed during recertification, and One file will missing rent reasonableness documentation and approval. Auditor Recommendations: The Authority should reevaluate their established procedures and controls in place to ensure full compliance in regards to eligibility and the timeliness of recertifications. The Authority needs to correct the deficiencies noted in the tested files and consider the impact to the rest of the population of tenant files that were not selected as part of the auditor’s sample. Action Taken: The Houston Housing Authority agrees with this fining and related recommendations. During 2024 the voucher and public housing programs converted to a new software system. Yardi is not the principal operating system for both the voucher and public housing programs. This system conversion has required that work flows had to be modified. This modification and implementation of a new processing system did not allow staff to conduct the necessary reviews of existing files to make sure that the compliance related materials that should be found in each file were to be completed. This issue has been discussed and there will be an internal review conducted on file samples to determine what compliance deficiencies are prevalent. Corrective action steps will be implemented to address these issues designed to correct them. Additional training resources will be devoted to staff in these departments designed to improve quality control with these program areas.
Eligibility Moving to Work Demonstration Program AL No. 14.881 Material Weakness in Internal Control Material Noncompliance Condition: Out of an approximate population of 17,500 of Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher and 2,200 Low Rent Public Housing tenants the following deficiencies were noted: Secti...
Eligibility Moving to Work Demonstration Program AL No. 14.881 Material Weakness in Internal Control Material Noncompliance Condition: Out of an approximate population of 17,500 of Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher and 2,200 Low Rent Public Housing tenants the following deficiencies were noted: Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher (a total of 11 tenants selected for testing): One file did not have annual recertifications performed during the year, Two files did not have 9886 release of information forms within 15 months of annual recertification, Three files did not have an annual recertification performed with 12 months of the previous certification, Two files did not have a utility allowance calculation sheet during annual recertification, Three files did not have documentation necessary to verify the reported income, Two files did not have an inspection performed during the period, and Two files did not utilize the correct payment standard. Low Rent Public Housing (a total of 12 tenants selected for testing): Three files did not contain flat rent options forms, Four files did not have documentation necessary to verify the reported income, Six files did not have a 214 declaration for a member of the household, and One file did not have support necessary to verify income allowances. Auditor Recommendations: The Authority should reevaluate their established procedures and controls in place to ensure full compliance in regards to eligibility and the timeliness of recertifications. The Authority needs to correct the deficiencies noted in the tested files and consider the impact to the rest of the population of tenant files that were not selected as part of the auditor’s sample. Action Taken: The Houston Housing Authority agrees with this fining and related recommendations. During 2024 the voucher and public housing programs converted to a new software system. Yardi is not the principal operating system for both the voucher and public housing programs. This system conversion has required that work flows had to be modified. This modification and implementation of a new processing system did not allow staff to conduct the necessary reviews of existing files to make sure that the compliance related materials that should be found in each file were to be completed. This issue has been discussed and there will be an internal review conducted on file samples to determine what compliance deficiencies are prevalent. Corrective action steps will be implemented to address these issues designed to correct them. Additional training resources will be devoted to staff in these departments designed to improve quality control with these program areas. The Senior Vice President of Voucher Operations and the Senior Vice President of Asset Management will be focused on improving the quality of our files that support the voucher and public housing operations.
We concur with this finding. During the fiscal year 2025-2026, both reports for fiscal years 2022 and 2023 will be filed. Therefore, the conditions of the findings will be corrected.
We concur with this finding. During the fiscal year 2025-2026, both reports for fiscal years 2022 and 2023 will be filed. Therefore, the conditions of the findings will be corrected.
93.796 State Survey Certification of Health Care Providers and Supplies (Title XIX) Medicaid 2024-022 Strengthen Controls to Ensure Compliance with Provider Health and Safety Standards Requirements of the Medical Assistance Program DOM Response: One hundred of 196 nursing facilities did not have man...
93.796 State Survey Certification of Health Care Providers and Supplies (Title XIX) Medicaid 2024-022 Strengthen Controls to Ensure Compliance with Provider Health and Safety Standards Requirements of the Medical Assistance Program DOM Response: One hundred of 196 nursing facilities did not have mandatory health and safety survey within required 15.9 month survey interval. Statewide average survey interval for nursing home facilities was 20.37 months, exceeding required 12-moth average between surveys. DOM Concurs. During the period of the government shutdown, standard Medicare-funded recertification surveys were not performed. This included statutorily mandated surveys (Nursing facilities, Home health agencies, etc.) which contributed to delays in survey completion timelines. Since the June 2024 audit findings, the Mississippi State Department of Health (MSDH) has made significant improvements in completing required surveys. According to the Annual Survey Report submitted in January 2026, the average time to complete surveys decreased to 16.9 months, improving from the previous average of 20.37 months. While this timeframe still exceeds the required 12-month average interval between surveys, it represents meaningful progress toward compliance. Additionally, the Division of Medicaid (DOM) and MSDH are collaborating with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to participate in the Nurse Staffing Campaign. This initiative is designed to increase the number of nurses in nursing homes to improve resident health and safety. A portion of the funding will also support the hiring of additional surveyors within MSDH, which will help the agency move toward full compliance with mandatory health and safety survey requirements and meet the required 15.9-month survey interval. DOM Corrective Action Plan: a. The Division of Medicaid (DOM) and MSDH are collaborating with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to participate in the Nurse Staffing Campaign. This initiative is designed to increase the number of nurses in nursing homes to improve resident health and safety. A portion of the funding will also support the hiring of additional surveyors within MSDH, which will help the agency move toward full compliance with mandatory health and safety survey requirements and meet the required 15.9-month survey interval. b. Misty Jenkins c. March 31, 2027
93.767 Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) 93.778 Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX) 2024-023 Strengthen Controls to Ensure Compliance with Provider Eligibility Requirements of CHIP and the Medical Assistance Program DOM Response: Two instances of no documentation that required ...
93.767 Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) 93.778 Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX) 2024-023 Strengthen Controls to Ensure Compliance with Provider Eligibility Requirements of CHIP and the Medical Assistance Program DOM Response: Two instances of no documentation that required fee were collected. DOM Partially Concurs. After a review of the 2 files, DOM has found in one instance an application fee was collected and sent to DOM for processing; however, the receipt of the application fee was not indicated by comments in the system. DOM will work with Gainwell to ensure remedial training is conducted to reduce errors in the future. One (1) instance correlates to an application received before DOM began requiring the fee on October I, 2022. Thirty-eight instances of no documentation that provider's medical license was current and free of limitations. DOM Partially Concurs. After a review of the 38 files, DOM has found in thirty-one (31) instances the license from the board was attached and the checklist completed after the license was not verified by LexisNexis . Two (2) instances were applications approved prior to the Gainwell implementation; however, the licenses remain valid in SFY 2024 and reflect correct effective dates in the system. One (1) instance is a group and does not require license. Four (4) instances the license from the board was manually verified and attached after the license was not verified by LexisNexis; however, there were typographical errors or omissions in the license fields in the system. DOM will ensure Gainwell conducts remedial training to mitigate these errors in the future. Thirty-one instances of no documentation of review prior to approval of provider's application. DOM Does Not Concur. After a review of the 31 files, DOM has verified all applications identified within this finding as being approved by DOM without review have documented comments in the system of record to show a review of each application was conducted prior to approval. This would include Fifteen (15) instances with review notes, requests for missing information (if applicable), etc. entered by reviewers since the Gainwell Go-Live. Sixteen (16) instances with review notes, requests for missing information (if applicable), etc. entered by reviewers prior to the Gainwell Go-Live. Ten instances of no documentation of verified identity and exclusion status of providers using required federal databases prior to application approval. DOM Partially Concurs. After a review of the 10 files, DOM has found in five (5) instances the LexisNexis report indicated the NPI was verified. One (I) instance of the NPI not verified by LexisNexis, but the Gainwell Analyst performed a manual search in NPPES and attached the verification results on 11/14/24. Four (4) instances before Gainwell began processing applications. The provider was sent to Digital Harbor for screening. DOM's contractual relationship with Digital Harbor ended in 2016 and the data is no longer available. Agency began revalidation in 2017 by stratifying all providers; however, due to PHE all revalidations were paused. As a result, not all revalidations have been completed. At this time, revalidation dates have been assigned in alignment with CMS guidance and will be completed within CMS required timelines, i.e. 44 months from end of the PHE. One (I) instance has a note indicating revalidation occurred in 2017, but no documentation can be located in the system, which potentially could be attributed to data conversion from the legacy system to the new system. Four instances of no documentation of OIG exclusion checks prior to application approval. DOM Concurs. After a review of the 4 files, DOM has found in three (3) instances contain a comment within EDMS that verifies the providers were sent to Digital Harbor for screening. DOM's contractual relationship with Digital Harbor ended in 2016 and the data is no longer available. Please note: Agency began revalidation in 2017 by stratifying all providers, however due to PHE all revalidations were paused. As a result, not all revalidations have been completed. At this time, revalidation dates have been assigned in alignment with CMS guidance and will be completed within CMS required timelines, i.e., 44 months from end of the PHE. One (1) instance has a note indicating revalidation occurred in 2017, but no documentation can be located in the system, which potentially could be attributed to data conversion from the legacy system to the new system. Two instances of no documentation of collection of the provider's NPI. DOM Concurs. After a review of the 2 files, DOM has found all instances contain a comment within the system which verifies the provider was sent to Digital Harbor for screening. DOM's contractual relationship with Digital Harbor ended in 2016 and the data is no longer available. Eight instances of missing or incomplete documentation of required disclosure details. DOM Partially Concurs. After a review of the 8 files, DOM has found in two (2) instances where the individual provider's date of birth is in the system. Two (2) instances where the individual provider's date of birth is not available as it was not a required element at the time of application. DOM will ensure the date of birth is obtained from the provider and added to the system. Three (3) instances where the organizational provider has all required elements. One (1) instance where the organizational provider's address is not available as it was not a required element at the time of application. The missing data is now required and will be collected at the next revalidation. Four instances of no documentation required screening procedures in accordance with provider's designated risk level. DOM Partially Concurs. After a review of the 4 files, DOM has found in three (3) instances where the individual provider's file contains a comment within EDMS verifies provider was sent to Digital Harbor for screening. DOM's contractual relationship with Digital Harbor ended in 2016 and the data is no longer available. Please note: Agency began revalidation in 2017 by stratifying all providers, however due to PHE all revalidations were paused. As a result, not all revalidations have been completed. At this time, revalidation dates have been assigned in alignment with CMS guidance and will be completed within CMS required timelines, i.e., 44 months from end of the PHE. One ( l) instance the individual provider was screened, and a site visit was conducted (as this provider type was deemed moderate risk at that time) and the documentation is available in the system. DOM Corrective Action Plan: a. In response to the audit findings, the Division of Medicaid (DOM) will collaborate with its Fiscal Agent, Gainwell Technologies, to review all identified issues and implement corrective measures. As part of this effort, mandatory refresher and remedial training will be conducted for Gainwell Provider Enrollment staff. This training will emphasize the requirement for comprehensive and accurate documentation within provider files, including clear, detailed, and supportive comments that fully reflect all actions taken during the enrollment and maintenance processes. Additionally, DOM will implement enhanced oversight and quality assurance monitoring to ensure sustained compliance with documentation standards. DOM notes that certain discrepancies identified in the audit may predate the implementation of the MESA system and the transition to Gainwell Technologies as the Fiscal Agent. Due to system conversion constraints, data limitations, and the absence of complete historical documentation within the current system, DOM's ability to retrospectively validate or remediate these pre-implementation discrepancies is limited. As such, corrective actions will be applied prospectively, with a focus on ensuring accuracy, completeness, and compliance within the current MESA environment moving forward. b. Bill Hardin c. March 31, 2026
93.767 Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) 93.778 Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX) Eligibility 2024-021 Strengthen Controls to Ensure Compliance with Eligibility Requirements of the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) and the Medical Assistance Program DOM Response: Use...
93.767 Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) 93.778 Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX) Eligibility 2024-021 Strengthen Controls to Ensure Compliance with Eligibility Requirements of the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) and the Medical Assistance Program DOM Response: Use of Tax Return Resources Three MAGI beneficiaries - DOM did not verify self-employment income reported on tax return One of the 180 MAGI beneficiaries - reported self-employment income, DOM did not request a tax return DOM Does Not Concur. OSA compared eligibility data to state income tax returns. DOM is prohibited from accessing state income tax records per Mississippi Code Annotated 27-3-73 and currently, is not allowed to have access to federal income tax records. For eligibility, DOM asserts compliance with the CMS-approved state plan. During the audit period, the state used the CMS MAGI Based Verification plan to confirm income reports using all available electronic data sources according to CMS's reasonable compatibility standard. DOM must accept applicant information and use CMS-approved verification methods to check its accuracy. If self-employment income is not reported and DOM's tools do not detect it, DOM has met eligibility and compliance standards set by CMS. In addition, tax returns are considered outdated and not relevant to DOM. Six of the 180 MAGI beneficiaries - income was not verified through Mississippi Department of Employment Security DOM Partially Concurs. Four beneficiaries' income was not verified through Mississippi Department of Employment Security (MDES). DOM requested MDES on the identified beneficiaries and found no new information that would have affected the eligibility decision. DOM does not concur with two of the findings as MDES was requested on those beneficiaries. Each finding will be reviewed with the individual team members and additional communication has been provided to all Eligibility Team Members. Twelve of the 300 beneficiaries - the beneficiary's case file did not contain a completed application. DOM Concurs. DOM was unable to locate and provide the auditors the original application for the twelve beneficiaries. These documents do not impact the redetermination of eligibility. All redetermination decisions have been verified as accurate. Six of the 300 beneficiaries - DOM could not provide a case file. DOM Concurs. DOM was unable to locate and provide the auditors the case files for six beneficiaries. These documents do not impact the redetermination of eligibility. All redetermination decisions have been verified as accurate. One ABD beneficiary - resources were not verified through AVS at the time of redetermination. DOM Concurs. DOM has since requested AVS records for the beneficiary in question. No bank accounts were found, which indicates there was no impact to eligibility. The Eligibility Team Member will be coached to ensure appropriate processes are followed for all future cases. One hundred thirty-five beneficiaries were not included on all of the required quarterly Public Assistance Reporting Information System (PARIS) file transmissions for fiscal year 2024. DOM Partially Concurs. DOM does not concur with a number of these findings as they were appropriately absent from the PARIS request file because they were in a denied status, had retroactive coverage, or was absent due to the timing of the case approval. DOM concurs with some of the findings. Findings related to COE 29 - Family Planning were addressed in late 2023, which was after the approval of these cases. This issue was resolved in late 2023. There were findings that occurred due to the timing of the PARIS file. DOM has submitted a change request to submit the PARIS file based on the run date not based on the end of the previous month. All previously missed members were added to the 11/1/2025 PARIS outgoing data file, and this report was provided to the auditors. No eligibility decisions were affected by the 11/1/2025 returned PARIS file. DOM Corrective Action Plan: a. DOM submitted a change request to submit the PARIS file based on the eligibility end date of the previous quarter rather than the actual run date. This has been completed. All individual issues identified will be reviewed with the appropriate team member. b. Brian Whitmire c. March 31, 2026
Rndlng 2024-017: Spedal Tests and Provisions Significant Defldency In Internal Control over Compliance Crit eria: Per 45 CFR 1356.2l (ml(l ), in meeting the requirements of section 47l(a)(ll) of the Act, the tilie IV·E agency must review at reasonable, specifi c, tim e-limi tedperiods, to be establi...
Rndlng 2024-017: Spedal Tests and Provisions Significant Defldency In Internal Control over Compliance Crit eria: Per 45 CFR 1356.2l (ml(l ), in meeting the requirements of section 47l(a)(ll) of the Act, the tilie IV·E agency must review at reasonable, specifi c, tim e-limi tedperiods, to be established by the agency, the amount of the payments made for foster care maint enance to assure their continued appropriateness , and that the amount made to a licensed or approved relative or kinship foster famil y home is the same as th e amount that would have been made if the child was placed in a licensed or appr oved non-relative foster family home. Based on the Olicia Y. Lawsuit' s Mi ssissippi Sett.lem ent Agreement and Reform Plan, MOCPS is requ ired to review and publi sh u pdated! foster boardpayment rates every two years. Per 45 CFR 75.303(a), non-Federal entities expending HHS awards must establish and maintain effective internal contro ls over comp liance with Federal states, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condit ion: Our audit procedures over foster care board payments disclosed that the approved payment board rates were unattai nable . The rates had not been updated from the rate approved in 2019 and no documentation could be provided for the required biannual review. Furt her, therate applied for children aged 0- 8 were not the most recent approved rates resulting in underpayments to foster families. Perspective: Below are the exceptions noted in our testing of foster care board payments for proper allocation of the rates and their approval. The samples were not statistically valid. • One of tenrate categories did not have the proper rateappliedbased on provided board rates resulting in twenty-six of forty sample payment Items being underpaid. • MDCPS did not maintain adequate documentation for the required rate review. Personnel Responsible for Corrective Action: Name: A/asha King Title: Grants Accounting Team Lead Email: Aiasha.King@mdcps.ms.gov Phone Number: 601-359-4016 Co rr ective Acti on Plan: Prior to lhe Single Audit, MDCPS im plemented the Foster Board Payment Review Standard Operating Proce dure (2.15.9.1) to ensure payment rates are verified and approved prior to issuan ce. Annual reviews of board payment rates will be conducted to ensure alignment with approved rates. Antldpatecl Completion Date: Completed as of March 19, 2026.
Finding 2024 - 016: Ellglblllty Significant Defldency In Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria: Per 45 CFR 75.1356.21, .22 and .30, a title IV-E agency must determine eligibility of foster homes and foster children prior to providing foster care maintenance payments. Per 45 CFR 7S. 303(a), non-F...
Finding 2024 - 016: Ellglblllty Significant Defldency In Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria: Per 45 CFR 75.1356.21, .22 and .30, a title IV-E agency must determine eligibility of foster homes and foster children prior to providing foster care maintenance payments. Per 45 CFR 7S. 303(a), non-Federal entities expending HHS awards must establish and maintai n effective inte rnal contro ls over compliance with Federal states, regulat ions, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. MDCPS policies and procedures require a two-level approval for child eligibility determinations . A Social Worker comp letes an eligibility packet for each child and signs of f before submitting the eligibility packet to the Eligibility department. An Eli gibility Worker reviews and approves the eligibility packets prior to submitt ingthe packet for the El i gibility Supervisor's review. The Eli gibility Supervisor makes the necessary adjustments prior to final approval. Condition: Our audit procedures over eligibility packets disclosed a lack of approval from the Social Worker and second-level approval from the Eligibility Supervisor. Perspective: Below are the exceptions noted in our testing of eligibility for proper approval of eligibility packets. The sample was not statistically valid. • Eleven of forty sample items did not have proper Social Worker sign off. • Twenty-eight of forty sample had only one level of approval documented. All eligibility determinations included at least one level of approval, but MCOPS's policies were not implemented consistently. Personnel Responsib le for Corrective Action: Name: Kristi Plotner Title: Deputy Commissioner of Care Management Email : Kristi .Pl otner@md cps.ms.gov Phone Number: 769-352-5532 Corrective Action Plan: MDCPS will enforce our policy requiring approval of eligibility packets to ensure all eligibility packets are complete and accurate. The Agency is also evaluating its existing policy to strengthen internal controls while improving operational efficiency. As part of this effort, we are reviewing eligibility determination procedures to determine whether to move to a single level of approval model. The objective is to ensure that eligibility determinations remain accurate, well-documented, and compliant with federal requirements, while aligning internal processes with best practices in risk­ based control design. Antidpated Completion Date: Policy enforcement completed as of March 31, 2026 Agency review of eligibility determination procedures to be completed as of Juty 1, 2027. Agency will continue to follow current policy in effect.
« 1 382 383 385 386 2276 »