Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
57,859
In database
Filtered Results
54,763
Matching current filters
Showing Page
211 of 2191
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Finding 2025-002 – Internal Control over Compliance – Reporting (Significant Deficiency) CFDA Title and Number 84.354A Qualified Zone Academy Bonds (QZAB) Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Compliance/Internal Control over Compliance: Auditee Responsibilities - 87 - Criteria: Unifo...
Finding 2025-002 – Internal Control over Compliance – Reporting (Significant Deficiency) CFDA Title and Number 84.354A Qualified Zone Academy Bonds (QZAB) Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Compliance/Internal Control over Compliance: Auditee Responsibilities - 87 - Criteria: Uniform Guidance CFR Part 200.303 requires entities to maintain effective internal control over compliance for federal programs, including accurate financial reporting. GAAP requires proper recognition and disclosure of long-term obligations such as Qualified Zone Academy Bonds (QZAB). In-ternal controls should ensure debt balances are reconciled to lender statements and amortization schedules to prevent misstatement in reports and the SEFA. Condition: Myrtle Point School District No. did not perform routine reconciliations of QZAB debt bal-ances during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025. The general ledger balance for QZAB differed from the amortization schedule and accrued interest was not updated. No documented review or reconciliation was performed. Failed to report the interest for the QZAB bonds and failed to post the principal pay-ments that were paid from the QZAB for the Flex fund. Entries were required to correct this deficiency in order to complete the audit. Cause: Lack of formal reconciliation procedures and oversight; reliance on outdated schedules without updates. Effect or Potential Effect: Failure to accurately reconcile QZAB balances or amortization records, can result in a risk of material misstatement of liabilities and interest expense for the financial statements; po-tential errors in SEFA reporting when QZAB financed federally funded assets. This could lead to non-compliance with reporting requirements and misclassification of debt-financed assets. Questioned Cost: None reported Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that Myrtle Point School District No. 41 implement a monthly recon-ciliation process for QZAB debt, agreeing general ledger balances to lender statements and amortization schedules, and require documented review and sign-off by the Director of Business Services. District's Response: The District concurs with the recommendation. Corrective Action Plan: The District will implement reconciliations and update the schedules, and inte-grate review into the year-end close process. Planned Implementation Date: January 31, 2026 Responsible Person: Director of Business Services, Myrtle Point School District No. 41
Finding 2025-002 - Procurement (Significant Deficiency) CFDA Title and Number: 20.513 (5310) Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals with Disabilities. Name of Federal Agency: Department of Transportation Internal Control over Compliance: Procurement CFDA Title and Number: 20.509 (5311) Operating...
Finding 2025-002 - Procurement (Significant Deficiency) CFDA Title and Number: 20.513 (5310) Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals with Disabilities. Name of Federal Agency: Department of Transportation Internal Control over Compliance: Procurement CFDA Title and Number: 20.509 (5311) Operating Assistance. Formula Grants for Rural. Name of Federal Agency: Department of Transportation Internal Control over Compliance: Procurement Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200.318(a-k) Numerous procurement regulations exist requiring federal grant awardees to develop and implement internal control policies and procedures related to procurement activities. Condition: The District made expenditures and engaged in contracts without following relevant procurement requirements. Cause: Management and leadership lacked awareness of relevant procurement regulations. Consequently, no internal control policies or procedures related to procurement existed, or policies and procedures existed but were not implemented. Effect or Potential Effect: The lack of effective internal controls over procurement activities had allowed for widespread deficiencies and noncompliant activities, which resulted in the District’s revocation of one award. Questioned Cost: None reported Context: Without proper procurement policies and procedures, the risk of compliance requirement violations is significant. The District failed to meet numerous procurement requirements early in the fiscal year and ultimately lost a significant award for bus acquisitions. Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: Yes Recommendation: The District should design and implement internal controls related to procurement regulations that will reduce the risk that the District’s procurement activities are not in compliance with federal regulations. District's Response: The District acknowledges the weaknesses and its intention of correcting weaknesses. There has been a change in the General Manager position, to improve the operations, and training of all management, staffing and leadership. The Board has had significant membership change, with new leadership actively engaged in creating a quality internal control and policy environment. Much education and training has occurred during and after fiscal year 2024-2025, up through December 2025, and is ongoing, to meet these goals. Corrective Action Plan: The District acknowledges the weaknesses and its intention of correcting weaknesses. There has been a change in the General Manager position, to improve the operations, and training of all management, staffing and leadership. The Board has had significant membership change, with new leadership actively engaged in creating a quality internal control and policy environment. Much education and training has occurred during and after fiscal year 2024-2025, up through December 2025, and is ongoing, to meet these goals. Planned Implementation Date: December 31, 2025 Responsible Persons: District Board, Umpqua Public Transit District
Finding 2025-001, Reporting- Significant deficiency in internal controls over compliance Cause: The finding resulted from the lack of a formalized, documented review process to verify the accuracy of claim data between Skyward, PrimeroEdge, and TXUNPS. Historically, the claim reporting relied on sin...
Finding 2025-001, Reporting- Significant deficiency in internal controls over compliance Cause: The finding resulted from the lack of a formalized, documented review process to verify the accuracy of claim data between Skyward, PrimeroEdge, and TXUNPS. Historically, the claim reporting relied on single-entry verification without a defined cross-check procedure or document retention system to confirm alignment across platforms. Corrective Action: NYOS Charter School has implemented a new monthly verification process to ensure accuracy and transparency in the meal count reporting workflow. - The PEIMS Manager will generate the Average Daily Attendance (ADA) report from Skyward each month. - The Food Service Manager will use this report to enter claim data into PrimeroEdge. - The Director of Operations will then cross-reference the claim information from PrimeroEdge with the ADA report from Skyward before entering final claim data into TXUNPS. - Copies of the ADA report, the PrimeroEdge claim summary, and the TXUNPS submission confirmation will be downloaded and stored in the Food Services Google Drive for audit documentation and ongoing internal control review. - Staff involved in this process will receive annual training on verification procedures, documentation standards, and data integrity best practices. Timeline: Updated verification process implemented in October 2025; full rollout and training completed by December 2025. Responsible Party: - Chief of Operations & HR -Director of Operations - PEIMS Manager - Food Service Manager Monitoring: Quarterly internal reviews will be conducted by the Chief of Operations & HR to ensure consistent application of the cross-verification process and proper retention of supporting documentation in the Food Services Google Drive.
FISAP Reporting Planned Corrective Action: Deficiency: The backup documentation submitted for the Fiscal Operations Report and Application to Participate (FISAP) did not match the data reported on the FISAP. Institution Response: We acknowledge this discrepancy and agree that the FISAP backup docume...
FISAP Reporting Planned Corrective Action: Deficiency: The backup documentation submitted for the Fiscal Operations Report and Application to Participate (FISAP) did not match the data reported on the FISAP. Institution Response: We acknowledge this discrepancy and agree that the FISAP backup documentation did not fully align with Part II, Sections 7a (Total Undergraduate Students) and 7b (Total Graduate Students) as reported on the submitted FISAP. The current FISAP reflects 43 for Section 7a, whereas the correct figure is 60, and 199 for Section 7b, whereas the correct figure is 202. Root Cause: At the time the report was prepared, the institution was relying on a contracted financial aid professional to provide the data for FISAP reporting. Although this work was performed in good faith, the contracted individual provided incorrect figures, which resulted in minor data discrepancies between the FISAP and the supporting documentation. Corrective Action Taken: Our Institution has ended its contract with the external financial aid services provider. We have transitioned all financial aid and FISAP-related responsibilities in-house and designated a qualified Data Point Administrator / Director of Financial Aid to oversee the preparation of the report. Additionally, there will be multiple financial professionals reviewing future FISAP and backup data. The current year’s FISAP has already been worked on using this updated structure, and all backup documentation has been reviewed for accuracy and confirmed to match the submitted FISAP. Preventive Measures Going Forward: To ensure accuracy and prevent recurrence, the institution has implemented the following procedures: 1. The Director of Financial Aid (Data Point Administrator) will prepare all FISAP data and maintain appropriate source documentation. 2. The Financial Aid Representative will review the completed FISAP and all backup documents to verify accuracy prior to submission. 3. The Financial Controller will receive the full FISAP packet, including backup documentation for an additional review and institutional oversight. 4. All FISAP materials and supporting documents will be stored in the institution’s secure Financial Aid OneDrive folder to ensure accessibility and consistency during audits. These steps have already been implemented for the most recent FISAP cycle and will be followed annually to maintain compliance and data integrity. Person Responsible for Corrective Action Plan: Josh James, CFO Anticipated Date of Completion: 11/24/2025
FINDING 2025-002 Finding Subject: COVID-19- Education Stabilization Fund – Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Requirements Summary of Finding: State Board of Accounts has asserted that the school corporation did not ensure that the contractor for the elementary building’s roofing project, whic...
FINDING 2025-002 Finding Subject: COVID-19- Education Stabilization Fund – Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Requirements Summary of Finding: State Board of Accounts has asserted that the school corporation did not ensure that the contractor for the elementary building’s roofing project, which was partially funded through a federal ESSER grant, had paid prevailing wage rates on this project. Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Debra Elder, Treasurer and John Scioldo, Superintendent Contact Phone Number and Email Address: 812-547-3300; debbie.elder@tellcity.k12.in.us and john.scioldo@tellcity.k12.in.us Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with the finding.. Description of Corrective Action Plan: While we will agree that the school corporation did not physically have on file and/or review the detailed certified payroll timesheets from Eskola, the awarded contractor for the project, the school corporation had hired in good faith Universal Design Associates (UDA) to manage all facets of the project. UDA has managed other capital improvements on the school’s campus, and their services have been exemplary. A school corporation of our size simply does not have the manpower, resources or expertise to oversee a project of this size, and therefore we rely on the hired project manager/architectural design company to ensure all federal Davis-Bacon wage scale requirements and the construction project as a whole are being fully followed, in addition to their close oversight of the day-to-day project management. The Application to Pay statements for payment to Eskola were provided by, and assumably thoroughly reviewed by, UDA. These pay applications obviously included payment for payroll, again assumably of which UDA checked certified payroll for federal wage compliance. The project was completed in the spring of 2025, and therefore this is no longer an issue. We have determined as a result of this finding that the current school administration will not consider funding future capital projects with federal grants due to the complexities of the involved federal compliance requirements. Anticipated Completion Date: N/A – Based on Corrective Action Plan
Student Financial Aid Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 84.063, 84.007, 84.033 Recommendation: Recommend that the College design and implement controls to ensure that all safeguards for identified risks required by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) are fully documented and updated as necessary. Expla...
Student Financial Aid Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 84.063, 84.007, 84.033 Recommendation: Recommend that the College design and implement controls to ensure that all safeguards for identified risks required by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) are fully documented and updated as necessary. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Moraine Park Technical College will take or has already taken the following actions to address the audit finding: 1. Updated existing policies and documentation to fully reflect the controls in place to safeguard identified risks under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. 2. Revised and formalized the following documents to ensure they clearly describe current practices and continuous monitoring activities: • Incident Response document • Risk Assessment document • Written Information Security Plan • IT Vulnerability Management Practices document These updates ensure that all existing controls and processes are fully documented, current, and aligned with GLBA requirements. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Larry Plamann, Director of Enterprise Infrastructure Planned completion date for corrective action plan: January 2026
Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The Authority accepts the recommendation of the auditor. The Authority will increase oversight in the Moving to Work Demonstration Program to ensure that established internal control policies are being followed on a timely basis. Adam Bov...
Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The Authority accepts the recommendation of the auditor. The Authority will increase oversight in the Moving to Work Demonstration Program to ensure that established internal control policies are being followed on a timely basis. Adam Bovilsky, Executive Director, is responsible for implementing this corrective action by March 31, 2026.
Student Financial Assistance – Assistance Listing No. Various Recommendation: We recommend the University review its reporting procedures to ensure that students’ statuses are accurately and timely reported to NSLDS as required by regulations. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is...
Student Financial Assistance – Assistance Listing No. Various Recommendation: We recommend the University review its reporting procedures to ensure that students’ statuses are accurately and timely reported to NSLDS as required by regulations. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Auditors identified two students for whom enrollment status on the campus level and program level was correctly reported to NSLDS as withdrawal in December 2024; however, both students graduated in March 2025 and that enrollment status was not updated at the campus level or the program level. We have a manual tracking procedure in place for students who complete missing coursework after their last term of enrollment that results in completion of their program. These two students were missed in that process. As a result of this finding, we have reviewed the procedure with the relevant staff and will continue to monitor the process, adding routine spot-checking of this tracking list. Names of the contact persons responsible for corrective action: Gwenn Sherburne, Registrar, and Lynette Wahl, Student Financial Aid Director Planned completion date for corrective action plan: October 31, 2025
Condition: The Village did not have adequate controls in place to exercise its oversight responsibility of adherence to wage rate requirements that were reviewed by a contractor for the program. The Village also did not have controls in place to exercise oversight over the same contractor's review o...
Condition: The Village did not have adequate controls in place to exercise its oversight responsibility of adherence to wage rate requirements that were reviewed by a contractor for the program. The Village also did not have controls in place to exercise oversight over the same contractor's review of general and subcontractors for suspension and debarment. Planned Corrective Action: The Village has implemented updated procedures as recommended by the auditors. Contact person responsible for corrective action: Penny Ray Anticipated Completion Date: 12/31/2025
Condition: Controls were not in place to ensure that the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA) was complete and accurate. Planned Corrective Action: The Village has hired an outside contractor to assist with review of audit documents. Contact person responsible for corrective action: Pen...
Condition: Controls were not in place to ensure that the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA) was complete and accurate. Planned Corrective Action: The Village has hired an outside contractor to assist with review of audit documents. Contact person responsible for corrective action: Penny Ray Anticipated Completion Date: 12/31/2025
Condition: The Village did not have written policies for cash management or procurement that adhered to the requirements of the Code of Federal Regulations. Planned Corrective Action: The Village is currently reviewing existing policies to determine the best course of action and updating them for co...
Condition: The Village did not have written policies for cash management or procurement that adhered to the requirements of the Code of Federal Regulations. Planned Corrective Action: The Village is currently reviewing existing policies to determine the best course of action and updating them for compliance. Some updates may require voter approval as certain provisions are in the Village Charter. Contact person responsible for corrective action: Penny Ray Anticipated Completion Date: 12/31/2026
HRSA Grant Self-Reporting Memo Deficiencies, Investigation, Reporting and Corrective Actions January 15, 2026 RE: Grant Number (FAIN): CE152520, under Assistance Listing Number: 93.493, Award Number: CE1HS52520-01-06 (the “Grant”) Federal Award Date: 9/21/2023 Grant Title: Community Project Funding/...
HRSA Grant Self-Reporting Memo Deficiencies, Investigation, Reporting and Corrective Actions January 15, 2026 RE: Grant Number (FAIN): CE152520, under Assistance Listing Number: 93.493, Award Number: CE1HS52520-01-06 (the “Grant”) Federal Award Date: 9/21/2023 Grant Title: Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending - Construction Grantee: Spokane Guilds’ School (Unique Entity ID: DZJ5TZ4LGWH3, EIN: 91-0863163) (d/b/a Joya Child & Family Development “Joya”) 1016 N Superior St. Spokane, WA 99202 Grantee Contact: Colleen Fuchs, Executive Director Grant Purposes: Alteration and Renovation to Existing Facility, and related Equipment and other costs, to create Joya’s Neurodevelopmental Research & Training Institute Grant Amount (Per Notice of Award, Section 31. Approved Budget): e. Equipment $ 690,195.00 h. Construction/Alteration and Renovation $ 2,377,431.00 i. Other $ 117,114.00 Total Direct Costs $ 3,184,740.00 Less: Cost Sharing or Matching $ 184,740.00 Total Amount of Federal Share $ 3,000,000.00 Background: Joya’s facility was constructed from March 2021 to June 2022, and funded via private charitable contributions received from donors and a loan from Joya’s bank. The facility was placed in service in June, 2022 for a total approximate cost of $13.0 million. The facility is utilized by Joya, a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization, to house programs that provide physical, occupational, speech and other therapies to children with neurological and developmental delays, primarily from birth to three years of age. In Fall of 2022, Joya applied for a $3.0 million grant from HRSA to improve its facility to include a Neurodevelopmental Research & Training Institute and expand its services. The Grant was awarded to Joya, and Joya awarded a construction contract to the General Contractor who had completed its facility in 2022. The facility improvements were substantially completed in 2025. As of the date of this memo, approximately $123,000 remains available to Joya under the Grant. Procedural Deficiencies: 1. Competitive Bid (Eide Bailly Finding # 2025-001): In April 2025, during a selfreview of Joya’s compliance with 45 CFR Sections 75.326 to 75.335, specifically the required procurement procedures, management discovered that Joya’s procurement procedures were deficient in the following specific area. Joya’s policies and procedures did not require public notice to be issued regarding a competitive bidding process for the facility improvements, specifically the construction contract award, as required in the CFR. The contract was awarded to the same contractor who had recently constructed the original facility, as the contractor possessed critical knowledge of the facility along with the requisite skills to perform the improvements. However, market cost information (obtained through a public bid process) was not available. Further, a sample of nine transactions (out of 43 total transactions) indicated that contracts for three vendors between $10,000 and $250,000 required Joya to follow simplified acquisition procedures and obtain rate quotations in advance of procurement. 2. Proportion of Federal to Non-Federal Share (Eide Bailly Finding # 2025-002): Later in 2025, Joya engaged its independent CPA firm, Eide Bailly to audit its financial statements, and as part of that, to issue an opinion on its internal controls over financial reporting and on compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grant agreements. During its review, the CPA firm discovered that Joya’s procedures regarding matching/cost sharing were deficient. Joya’s policies and procedures did not have su􀆯icient internal controls to ensure that grant funds were drawn down following the required proportion of (i) the Federal Share of Grant funds in proportion to (ii) the Cost Sharing/Matching Grant funds. Following a review of Joya’s financial records, it was determined that Joya’s contribution of its Non-Federal Share of improvement costs was approximately $12,000 lower than the amount required by the defined contract proportion, through June 30, 2025. Self-Investigation and Reporting: Joya’s investigation and specifically its review of the Grant requirements and the CFR language in April 2025, along with its seeking an independent review of its internal controls resulted in identifying both procedural deficiencies described above. Corrective Actions: The following corrective actions to address the Procedural Deficiencies have all been completed, as further described below. 1. Joya’s Director of Business and Accounting (B. Judge) timely notified its independent CPA firm, Eide Bailly, which described the internal control deficiencies in its qualified opinion to its Independent Auditor’s Report on Internal Control and Compliance for the year ended June 30, 2025. The CPA firm did not qualify its separate opinion to Joya’s Audited Financial Statements for the year ended June 30, 2025. 2. In April 2025, Joya’s Director of Business and Accounting (B. Judge) sought technical guidance and approval from Joya’s board of directors and its independent CPA firm. By June 2025, Mr. Judge had updated Joya’s policies and procedures to include the required internal controls described above. 3. Joya’s Director of Business and Accounting (B. Judge) engaged MACC Estimating Group, an independent construction estimation firm in Liberty Lake, WA, to obtain an itemized cost estimate for the facility improvements funded by the grant. The independent results issued on June 24, 2025 were only 6% higher than the awarded contractor bid. Joya’s management believes this provides a reasonable market cost for its awarded project. 4. On April 18, 2025, Joya’s Director of Business and Accounting (B. Judge) emailed HRSA sta􀆯 members A. Glasser and C. Barnes, o􀆯icially notifying HRSA of its procurement policy deficiencies. HRSA (A. Glasser, Grants Management Specialist) responded via email on April 18, 2025, asking about the procurement process Joya ultimately used, and informing Joya as follows: “At this time, all HRSA conditions for award CE1HS52520 have been met, and you are free to draw down funds from document number 23CE1HS52520 in the Payment Management System. However, please ensure that the terms outlined on the Notice of Award dated 9/21/23 are followed. If you have specific questions regarding these terms, I am happy to discuss further.” Joya has received no further correspondence from HRSA on the matter. 5. Joya’s Director of Business and Accounting (B. Judge) continued to monitor its procurement process and proportional cost sharing to remain in compliance with 45 CFR Sections 75.326 to 75.335. Specifically, Joya’s Accounting Policies were updated in 2025 to include the following internal controls, as reviewed and amended from time to time: “If a purchase is funded in whole or in part by a Federal Grant, any related procurement or payment must comply with Federal Grant Procurement policies and applicable Federal Regulations under 2 CFR §§ 200.317– 200.327, including, but not limited to: • Following allowable procurement methods (micro-purchase, small purchase, sealed bids, competitive proposals, or noncompetitive proposals) • Obtaining multiple quotes when required and providing public notice requesting sealed competitive bids for expenditures over $250,000 • Avoiding conflicts of interest • Ensuring that contractors have not been suspended or debarred • Documenting the basis for selection and price reasonableness • Ensuring that Joya monitors expenditures to ensure that it maintains the appropriate proportion of Federal Share of Grant funds in proportion to the Cost Sharing/Matching Grant funds”. 6. In February 2025, Joya received a private grant in the amount of $178,000 from a private donor, which served as 96% of the required shared/matching funds Joya required for the entire Grant. These and other Joya funds are su􀆯icient to meet 100% of the required shared/matching funds.
HRSA Grant Self-Reporting Memo Deficiencies, Investigation, Reporting and Corrective Actions January 15, 2026 RE: Grant Number (FAIN): CE152520, under Assistance Listing Number: 93.493, Award Number: CE1HS52520-01-06 (the “Grant”) Federal Award Date: 9/21/2023 Grant Title: Community Project Funding/...
HRSA Grant Self-Reporting Memo Deficiencies, Investigation, Reporting and Corrective Actions January 15, 2026 RE: Grant Number (FAIN): CE152520, under Assistance Listing Number: 93.493, Award Number: CE1HS52520-01-06 (the “Grant”) Federal Award Date: 9/21/2023 Grant Title: Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending - Construction Grantee: Spokane Guilds’ School (Unique Entity ID: DZJ5TZ4LGWH3, EIN: 91-0863163) (d/b/a Joya Child & Family Development “Joya”) 1016 N Superior St. Spokane, WA 99202 Grantee Contact: Colleen Fuchs, Executive Director Grant Purposes: Alteration and Renovation to Existing Facility, and related Equipment and other costs, to create Joya’s Neurodevelopmental Research & Training Institute Grant Amount (Per Notice of Award, Section 31. Approved Budget): e. Equipment $ 690,195.00 h. Construction/Alteration and Renovation $ 2,377,431.00 i. Other $ 117,114.00 Total Direct Costs $ 3,184,740.00 Less: Cost Sharing or Matching $ 184,740.00 Total Amount of Federal Share $ 3,000,000.00 Background: Joya’s facility was constructed from March 2021 to June 2022, and funded via private charitable contributions received from donors and a loan from Joya’s bank. The facility was placed in service in June, 2022 for a total approximate cost of $13.0 million. The facility is utilized by Joya, a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization, to house programs that provide physical, occupational, speech and other therapies to children with neurological and developmental delays, primarily from birth to three years of age. In Fall of 2022, Joya applied for a $3.0 million grant from HRSA to improve its facility to include a Neurodevelopmental Research & Training Institute and expand its services. The Grant was awarded to Joya, and Joya awarded a construction contract to the General Contractor who had completed its facility in 2022. The facility improvements were substantially completed in 2025. As of the date of this memo, approximately $123,000 remains available to Joya under the Grant. Procedural Deficiencies: 1. Competitive Bid (Eide Bailly Finding # 2025-001): In April 2025, during a selfreview of Joya’s compliance with 45 CFR Sections 75.326 to 75.335, specifically the required procurement procedures, management discovered that Joya’s procurement procedures were deficient in the following specific area. Joya’s policies and procedures did not require public notice to be issued regarding a competitive bidding process for the facility improvements, specifically the construction contract award, as required in the CFR. The contract was awarded to the same contractor who had recently constructed the original facility, as the contractor possessed critical knowledge of the facility along with the requisite skills to perform the improvements. However, market cost information (obtained through a public bid process) was not available. Further, a sample of nine transactions (out of 43 total transactions) indicated that contracts for three vendors between $10,000 and $250,000 required Joya to follow simplified acquisition procedures and obtain rate quotations in advance of procurement. 2. Proportion of Federal to Non-Federal Share (Eide Bailly Finding # 2025-002): Later in 2025, Joya engaged its independent CPA firm, Eide Bailly to audit its financial statements, and as part of that, to issue an opinion on its internal controls over financial reporting and on compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grant agreements. During its review, the CPA firm discovered that Joya’s procedures regarding matching/cost sharing were deficient. Joya’s policies and procedures did not have su􀆯icient internal controls to ensure that grant funds were drawn down following the required proportion of (i) the Federal Share of Grant funds in proportion to (ii) the Cost Sharing/Matching Grant funds. Following a review of Joya’s financial records, it was determined that Joya’s contribution of its Non-Federal Share of improvement costs was approximately $12,000 lower than the amount required by the defined contract proportion, through June 30, 2025. Self-Investigation and Reporting: Joya’s investigation and specifically its review of the Grant requirements and the CFR language in April 2025, along with its seeking an independent review of its internal controls resulted in identifying both procedural deficiencies described above. Corrective Actions: The following corrective actions to address the Procedural Deficiencies have all been completed, as further described below. 1. Joya’s Director of Business and Accounting (B. Judge) timely notified its independent CPA firm, Eide Bailly, which described the internal control deficiencies in its qualified opinion to its Independent Auditor’s Report on Internal Control and Compliance for the year ended June 30, 2025. The CPA firm did not qualify its separate opinion to Joya’s Audited Financial Statements for the year ended June 30, 2025. 2. In April 2025, Joya’s Director of Business and Accounting (B. Judge) sought technical guidance and approval from Joya’s board of directors and its independent CPA firm. By June 2025, Mr. Judge had updated Joya’s policies and procedures to include the required internal controls described above. 3. Joya’s Director of Business and Accounting (B. Judge) engaged MACC Estimating Group, an independent construction estimation firm in Liberty Lake, WA, to obtain an itemized cost estimate for the facility improvements funded by the grant. The independent results issued on June 24, 2025 were only 6% higher than the awarded contractor bid. Joya’s management believes this provides a reasonable market cost for its awarded project. 4. On April 18, 2025, Joya’s Director of Business and Accounting (B. Judge) emailed HRSA sta􀆯 members A. Glasser and C. Barnes, o􀆯icially notifying HRSA of its procurement policy deficiencies. HRSA (A. Glasser, Grants Management Specialist) responded via email on April 18, 2025, asking about the procurement process Joya ultimately used, and informing Joya as follows: “At this time, all HRSA conditions for award CE1HS52520 have been met, and you are free to draw down funds from document number 23CE1HS52520 in the Payment Management System. However, please ensure that the terms outlined on the Notice of Award dated 9/21/23 are followed. If you have specific questions regarding these terms, I am happy to discuss further.” Joya has received no further correspondence from HRSA on the matter. 5. Joya’s Director of Business and Accounting (B. Judge) continued to monitor its procurement process and proportional cost sharing to remain in compliance with 45 CFR Sections 75.326 to 75.335. Specifically, Joya’s Accounting Policies were updated in 2025 to include the following internal controls, as reviewed and amended from time to time: “If a purchase is funded in whole or in part by a Federal Grant, any related procurement or payment must comply with Federal Grant Procurement policies and applicable Federal Regulations under 2 CFR §§ 200.317– 200.327, including, but not limited to: • Following allowable procurement methods (micro-purchase, small purchase, sealed bids, competitive proposals, or noncompetitive proposals) • Obtaining multiple quotes when required and providing public notice requesting sealed competitive bids for expenditures over $250,000 • Avoiding conflicts of interest • Ensuring that contractors have not been suspended or debarred • Documenting the basis for selection and price reasonableness • Ensuring that Joya monitors expenditures to ensure that it maintains the appropriate proportion of Federal Share of Grant funds in proportion to the Cost Sharing/Matching Grant funds”. 6. In February 2025, Joya received a private grant in the amount of $178,000 from a private donor, which served as 96% of the required shared/matching funds Joya required for the entire Grant. These and other Joya funds are su􀆯icient to meet 100% of the required shared/matching funds.
Audit Finding: The Authority did not have sufficient internal controls to ensure that payroll expenditures submitted to FEMA were incurred within the applicable period of performance prior to submission of the project worksheet. Recommendation: The Authority’s policy and procedures should be designe...
Audit Finding: The Authority did not have sufficient internal controls to ensure that payroll expenditures submitted to FEMA were incurred within the applicable period of performance prior to submission of the project worksheet. Recommendation: The Authority’s policy and procedures should be designed to strengthen the internal controls over the review of the submissions to ensure accurate reporting as required by the Uniform Guidance. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned/taken in response to finding: 1. Enhanced Review of Period of Performance (POP): The Authority will implement a formal verification step requiring the Finance Department to confirm that all costs included in FEMA project worksheets were incurred within the approved period of performance prior to submission. This verification will specifically address payroll costs that span multiple pay periods. 2. Payroll Cost Allocation Controls: Payroll expenditures that cross fiscal periods or project periods of performance will be allocated based on actual days worked within the applicable period. Payroll reports will be reviewed to ensure that only eligible dates are included in each FEMA project. 3. Secondary Review: The Authority will require a secondary review by a finance staff member not involved in the initial preparation of the FEMA project worksheet to ensure accuracy, completeness, and compliance with FEMA eligibility requirements. 4. Correction of Identified Error: Management has corrected the duplicated payroll costs of $104,434 by removing them from the project ending June 30, 2022 and ensuring they are only reported in the project beginning July 1, 2022. Total FEMA expenditures reported on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards were adjusted accordingly. In addition, VCUHSA has voluntarily prepared a letter to VDEM to alert them of the identified issue and request assistance on next steps to return the funds that were received in error. The letter will be followed up by an email. The Finance team has also notified the CFO of both the findings of the audit and the related corrective actions. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Min Cummings, VP of Finance and Accounting, 804-827-0545 Planned completion date for corrective action plan: Notification of error to be sent to VDEM within 60 days of audit completion. All other planned actions to be implemented immediately for any future costs and expenditures.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Plan: The Authority has recognized the significant deficiency in the Housing Voucher Cluster and will implement internal control procedures that will ensure compliance with federal regulations. Sarah Parker, Executive Director, was designa...
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Plan: The Authority has recognized the significant deficiency in the Housing Voucher Cluster and will implement internal control procedures that will ensure compliance with federal regulations. Sarah Parker, Executive Director, was designated to be responsible for implementing this corrective action by March 31, 2026.
Finding Summary: The County did not have adequate controls to ensure Special Tests and Provisions requirements were met. The critical information reported did not have the required “Description of Work Performed” included on the reports. Corrective Action Plan: Eureka County will fill in all boxes o...
Finding Summary: The County did not have adequate controls to ensure Special Tests and Provisions requirements were met. The critical information reported did not have the required “Description of Work Performed” included on the reports. Corrective Action Plan: Eureka County will fill in all boxes on the grant report when being submitted to the Nevada Division of Emergency Management. Responsible Individual: Jayme Halpin, Assistant Public Works Director Anticipated Completion Date: Eureka County will amend the past quarterly reports and any future quarterly reports to reflect actual work performed on the report. This will be completed by January 29, 2026.
Finding Summary: The County did not have adequate internal controls to ensure reporting requirements were met. The critical information reported did not reconcile to supporting documentation related to reimbursement amounts, for one report out of three tested reports. Corrective Action Plan: Eureka ...
Finding Summary: The County did not have adequate internal controls to ensure reporting requirements were met. The critical information reported did not reconcile to supporting documentation related to reimbursement amounts, for one report out of three tested reports. Corrective Action Plan: Eureka County will submit quarterly reports which reflect the actual reimbursement received during that quarter. Responsible Individual: Jayme Halpin, Assistant Public Works Director Anticipated Completion Date: Public Works will correct the quarterly reports with the State Department of Conservation and Natural Resources to ensure the reports reflect actual revenue received during the quarter being reported. This will be completed by January 29, 2026.
Finding Summary: Procurement processes required for acquiring goods and services were not followed. Procedures were not followed to maintain documentation regarding obtaining suspension and debarment documentation on covered transactions. Corrective Action Plan: Eureka County has implemented a grant...
Finding Summary: Procurement processes required for acquiring goods and services were not followed. Procedures were not followed to maintain documentation regarding obtaining suspension and debarment documentation on covered transactions. Corrective Action Plan: Eureka County has implemented a grant checklist which will require departments who receive grant funds to check the suspension and debar list prior to any contractors being awarded a bid for services. Responsible Individual: Jeb Rowley, Public Works Director Anticipated Completion Date: Grant Checklist was prepared and disbursed to all departments on December 19, 2025.
2025-001 – Direct Costs-Compensation Grantor: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - Aids Activity and Coordinating Office (AACO), National Institute of Health Award Name: High Impact HIV Prevention and Surveillance Programs, Research and Development Assistance Listing Number: 93.940, 93.838 A...
2025-001 – Direct Costs-Compensation Grantor: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - Aids Activity and Coordinating Office (AACO), National Institute of Health Award Name: High Impact HIV Prevention and Surveillance Programs, Research and Development Assistance Listing Number: 93.940, 93.838 Assistance Listing Title: HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based, Lung Diseases Award Year: July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2025 Award Numbers: CP4043 and CP5043 (2220536), 1OT2HL161847-01 Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management acknowledges the finding related to delayed effort report certification. We recognize the importance of timely and accurate effort reporting as well as ensuring compliance with federal and institutional requirements. Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute has implemented a new Effort Compensation Compliance system for effective July 1, 2025. This new system will enhance monitoring of timely effort certifications through automated reminders and greater transparency. With this implementation, training and reference materials will be provided to all personnel involved in effort reporting to ensure they understand the importance of timely certification and the potential impact of delays on grant compliance.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Grange Acres Nonprofit (Phase II) respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended June 30, 2025. Name and address of independent public accounting firm: Maner Costerisan, P.C. 2425 E. Grand River Ave, Suite 1 Lansing, MI 4...
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Grange Acres Nonprofit (Phase II) respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended June 30, 2025. Name and address of independent public accounting firm: Maner Costerisan, P.C. 2425 E. Grand River Ave, Suite 1 Lansing, MI 48912 Audit period: July 1, 2024 – June 30, 2025 The finding from the June 30, 2025 schedule of findings and questions costs is discussed below. The finding is numbered consistent with the number assigned in the schedule. Finding Number 2025-001 – Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Major Federal Program Compliance: Special Tests and Provisions: - Replacement Reserve Requirements Recommendation: The Project should deposit $429 into the replacement reserve account. Additionally, procedures should be followed to ensure management identifies the need for required deposits. Action Taken: The Project has deposited the underfunded amount and will review future HUD communications to identify replacement reserve funding requirements.
Finding Summary: 2 CFR Part 200 (Uniform Guidance) requires that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award. Eide Bailly noted two out of five reimbursement requests had no evidence of approval. Responsible Individuals: Samantha Nance, City C...
Finding Summary: 2 CFR Part 200 (Uniform Guidance) requires that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award. Eide Bailly noted two out of five reimbursement requests had no evidence of approval. Responsible Individuals: Samantha Nance, City Clerk Corrective Action Plan: Create a checklist for all reimbursement request procedures to include prepared by and approved by signatures with every request. Anticipated Completion Date: Immediately
Finding Summary: 2 CFR Part 200 (Uniform Guidance) requires contracts to include Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Contract Terms and Conditions as specified by EPA regulations. Eide Bailly noted contract tested was missing the required DBE Contract Terms and Conditions. Responsible Individual...
Finding Summary: 2 CFR Part 200 (Uniform Guidance) requires contracts to include Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Contract Terms and Conditions as specified by EPA regulations. Eide Bailly noted contract tested was missing the required DBE Contract Terms and Conditions. Responsible Individuals: Samanthat Nance, City Clerk Corrective Action Plan: Create a checklist for bid documents and bid contracts to be utilized going forward for all bid work. Anticipated Completion Date: Immediately
Condition: Certain expenditures were included in drawdowns in which the disbursement of funds did not occur within 3 business days per PMS guidelines. Corrective Action Taken or Planned: Management will better monitor cash reserves and ensure the Organization is complying with PMS guidelines. Manage...
Condition: Certain expenditures were included in drawdowns in which the disbursement of funds did not occur within 3 business days per PMS guidelines. Corrective Action Taken or Planned: Management will better monitor cash reserves and ensure the Organization is complying with PMS guidelines. Management is also working on a plan to build operating reserves and expand funding sources to assist in the Organization’s ability to navigate funding lapses. Anticipated Date of Completion: September 30, 2026 Name of Contact Person: Amanda Whitlock, Chief Executive Officer Management Response: Management concurs with the finding
Finding 2025-001: Capital Fund Program – Cash Management Reference to Audit Report: Auditors noted that the Authority did not comply with HUD’s 3‑day rule for expenditure of drawdowns. Cause: Invoices were not fully verified before requesting drawdowns. Effect: Funds were drawn down before being pay...
Finding 2025-001: Capital Fund Program – Cash Management Reference to Audit Report: Auditors noted that the Authority did not comply with HUD’s 3‑day rule for expenditure of drawdowns. Cause: Invoices were not fully verified before requesting drawdowns. Effect: Funds were drawn down before being payable, resulting in noncompliance with HUD cash management rules. Corrective Action Plan: -Implement an invoice verification checklist prior to drawdowns. -Require dual sign‑off by the Executive Director and Director of Administration/Finance. -Adopt a drawdown timing policy to ensure funds are requisitioned only when invoices are ready for payment. -Maintain a drawdown log and conduct quarterly compliance reviews. Responsible Parties: -Executive Director – oversight and approval. -Director of Administration/Finance – verification and processing. Timeline: -30 days: Checklist and dual sign‑off implemented. -60 days: Staff training completed. -Ongoing: Quarterly reviews. Questioned Costs: None. Management Views: Management agrees.
Finding 2025-002: Housing Choice Voucher Program – Utility Allowance Reference to Audit Report: Auditors found that utility allowances on HUD Form 50058 were not consistently calculated in accordance with Section 242 of the 2014 Appropriations Act. Cause: Software errors and inconsistent application...
Finding 2025-002: Housing Choice Voucher Program – Utility Allowance Reference to Audit Report: Auditors found that utility allowances on HUD Form 50058 were not consistently calculated in accordance with Section 242 of the 2014 Appropriations Act. Cause: Software errors and inconsistent application of procedures. Effect: Tenant payments and Housing Assistance Payments (HAP) were incorrectly calculated. Corrective Action Plan: -Work with software vendor to correct calculation errors. -Conduct a review of tenant files and make adjustments where necessary. -Update internal procedures to require verification of utility allowance at annual reexaminations. -Provide refresher training to program staff. -Perform quarterly spot checks of HUD Form 50058 entries. Responsible Parties: -Executive Director – oversight and compliance. -Program Manager – staff training, file review, and monitoring. Timeline: -30 days: Correct software issue and begin file review. -60 days: Complete file review and training. -Ongoing: Quarterly monitoring. Questioned Costs: None. Management Views: Management agrees. Conclusion The College Park Authority acknowledges both findings and has established corrective action plans with clear responsibilities, timelines, and monitoring procedures to ensure compliance with HUD regulations and prevent recurrence.
« 1 209 210 212 213 2191 »