Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
57,859
In database
Filtered Results
9,006
Matching current filters
Showing Page
160 of 361
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Active filters: § 200.303
U.S Department of Homeland Security Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) – 97.083 Management’s Response: During 2024, management worked with the Fire Department and Payroll to ensure only straight time was coded to this grant and no overtime was charged to this grant. This was a...
U.S Department of Homeland Security Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) – 97.083 Management’s Response: During 2024, management worked with the Fire Department and Payroll to ensure only straight time was coded to this grant and no overtime was charged to this grant. This was a finding in 2022 but we were not aware until the audit was completed in 2024 there was an issue the existing payroll system was not flagging. This has been corrected in in 2024 and should not be a recurring issue. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action: The reason for recurrence is the finding was communicated late in the prior year. Management will work with stakeholders so that only the allowed costs are used as the basis of the reimbursement packet. We have also created fencing around allowed costs and period of performance in our new ERP system. Management will ensure this is addressed by December 31, 2024. Responsible Official: Dr. Shelley Kneuvean Chief Financial Officer Unified Government of Wyandotte County & Kansas City KS
U.S Department of Treasury COVID 19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fisal Recovery Funds – 21.027 Management’s Response: There was a change in the position of CFO and the Unified Government did not have access to the US Treasury system for a period of time to upload the report. The UG finance team wor...
U.S Department of Treasury COVID 19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fisal Recovery Funds – 21.027 Management’s Response: There was a change in the position of CFO and the Unified Government did not have access to the US Treasury system for a period of time to upload the report. The UG finance team worked with our outside contractor to gain access; and upon getting access to the system, immediately uploaded the form. This was caused by turnover in staff and is not reoccurring. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action: The reason for recurrence is the finding was communicated late in the prior year. In concert with our ARPA consultant, we were able to combine the City & County on the portal and report timely quarterly since this initial issue in the reporting portal will ensure this is addressed by December 31, 2025. Responsible Official: Dr. Shelley Kneuvean Chief Financial Officer Unified Government of Wyandotte County & Kansas City KS
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, passed through Kansas Department of Aging Aging Cluster – ALN 93.045 – Special Programs for the Aging_Title III, Part C_Nutrition Services – 2301KSOAHD Management’s Response: The department had been using set percentage allocations for grants in the payr...
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, passed through Kansas Department of Aging Aging Cluster – ALN 93.045 – Special Programs for the Aging_Title III, Part C_Nutrition Services – 2301KSOAHD Management’s Response: The department had been using set percentage allocations for grants in the payroll system. They are working with payroll and IT to be able to do real time reporting on personnel, number of daily hours per grant. This should be implemented in 2025. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action: The reason for recurrence is the finding was communicated late in the prior year and due to transition and turnover within the department's staff. Management agrees with the stated finding and has implemented a corrective action plan. Management will ensure this is addressed by December 31, 2025. Responsible Official: Dr. Shelley Kneuvean Chief Financial Officer Unified Government of Wyandotte County & Kansas City KS
View Audit 336226 Questioned Costs: $1
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, passed through Kansas Department of Aging Aging Cluster – ALN 93.044 - Special Programs for the Aging_Title III, Part B_Grants for Supportive Services and Senior Centers - 2301KSOASS ALN 93.045 – Special Programs for the Aging_Title III, Part C_Nutrition...
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, passed through Kansas Department of Aging Aging Cluster – ALN 93.044 - Special Programs for the Aging_Title III, Part B_Grants for Supportive Services and Senior Centers - 2301KSOASS ALN 93.045 – Special Programs for the Aging_Title III, Part C_Nutrition Services – 2301KSOAHD Management’s Response: The department of aging is reviewing its current process to track spending and earmarking. A new system for compliance monitoring is planned for early 2025. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action: The reason for recurrence is the finding was communicated late in the prior year and due to transition and turnover within the department's staff. Management will put controls and processes in place to ensure earmarking is being monitored for compliance. Management will ensure this is addressed by December 31, 2025. Responsible Official: Dr. Shelley Kneuvean Chief Financial Officer Unified Government of Wyandotte County & Kansas City KS
View Audit 336226 Questioned Costs: $1
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, passed through Kansas Department of Aging Aging Cluster – ALN 93.044 - Special Programs for the Aging_Title III, Part B_Grants for Supportive Services and Senior Centers - 2301KSOASS ALN 93.045 – Special Programs for the Aging_Title III, Part C_Nutrition...
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, passed through Kansas Department of Aging Aging Cluster – ALN 93.044 - Special Programs for the Aging_Title III, Part B_Grants for Supportive Services and Senior Centers - 2301KSOASS ALN 93.045 – Special Programs for the Aging_Title III, Part C_Nutrition Services – 2301KSOAHD Management’s Response: The Aging Department will begin performing risk assessments in January 2025 for all subrecipients. All subrecipients will be required to submit monthly reports as well, which will be evaluated by the Aging Department staff to ensure compliance. Additionally, our current system includes a once-a-year compliance checklist with our subgrantee and is being updated for use in first quarter of 2025. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action: The reason for recurrence is the finding was communicated late in the prior year and due to transition and turnover within the department's staff. Management will ensure this is addressed by December 31, 2025. Responsible Official: Dr. Shelley Kneuvean Chief Financial Officer Unified Government of Wyandotte County & Kansas City KS
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, passed through Kansas Department of Aging Aging Cluster – ALN 93.044 - Special Programs for the Aging_Title III, Part B_Grants for Supportive Services and Senior Centers - 2301KSOASS ALN 93.045 – Special Programs for the Aging_Title III, Part C_Nutrition...
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, passed through Kansas Department of Aging Aging Cluster – ALN 93.044 - Special Programs for the Aging_Title III, Part B_Grants for Supportive Services and Senior Centers - 2301KSOASS ALN 93.045 – Special Programs for the Aging_Title III, Part C_Nutrition Services – 2301KSOAHD Management’s Response: Procurement began performing suspension and debarment checks on all vendors/contracts funded with grants in 2024. This process was implemented in the summer of 2024 as a result of the 2022 Single Audit Finding. Due to the audit not being completed prior to the completion of 2023, this finding was unknown to management. Upon being aware procurement was not doing the checks, immediate correction was undertaken. Checks are being done and documentation maintained in the purchasing file. The language has been included in bid documents as well. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action: The reason for recurrence is the finding was communicated late in the prior year and due to transition and turnover within the department's staff. Procurement has begun the process of checking SAM.gov for debarment for potential suppliers. Also, departments have been informed of this required step for both suppliers and subrecipients. Downstream, need to evaluate if this language can be added to the contract templates. Management will ensure this is addressed by December 31, 2024. Responsible Official: Dr. Shelley Kneuvean Chief Financial Officer Unified Government of Wyandotte County & Kansas City KS
Financial Reporting and Review Process Description of the Finding: BSEDC did not have a secondary review process over the required financial reporting to Federal EDA. The lack of a secondary review process allowed for errors and omissions to go undetected, thus resulting in omission of $3,614 of loa...
Financial Reporting and Review Process Description of the Finding: BSEDC did not have a secondary review process over the required financial reporting to Federal EDA. The lack of a secondary review process allowed for errors and omissions to go undetected, thus resulting in omission of $3,614 of loan origination fee income and interest income from federal program income calculations. Planned Corrective Actions: BSEDC’s Senior Director of Finance and Director of Business Finance/Program Finance Director have implemented processes for the Senior Director of Finance to perform a secondary review of the required reporting to Federal EDA before it is submitted. Timeline for Completion: BSEDC implemented the secondary review process in October 2024 with the completion and submission of the FY24 annual report to Federal EDA. Responsible Person or Party: BSEDC’s Senior Director of Finance and Director of Business Finance/Program Finance Director are both responsible for ensuring that the secondary review is complete before submitting reporting to Federal EDA.
The School District concurs with the findings reported in Finding 2023-004 and does not dispute the details reported under the Criteria or Specific Requirement section, Condition section, and Effect section of the report. Your findings identify charging of unallowable costs that involved federal fun...
The School District concurs with the findings reported in Finding 2023-004 and does not dispute the details reported under the Criteria or Specific Requirement section, Condition section, and Effect section of the report. Your findings identify charging of unallowable costs that involved federal funds received by the School District. You noted that the unallowable costs involved payment of employment compensation to an employee on multiple dates, during times and for reasons that were suspect and unauthorized. The School District also concurs with the guidance you provide in the Recommendation section of the report. Corrective actions are already being taken, and training has already begun. The School Board will adopt appropriate policies to ensure appropriate oversight over the manner in which funding is expended for employee compensation, including situations when the sources of funding involve federal awards that obligate the School District to meet specific control requirements. Currently, the School District is reviewing all uses of federal funds, starting with Title 1, the 21st Century Center Learning Center Cohort, and the Education Stabilization Fund. The following additional corrective steps will be taken by the Superintendent: 1. All change of job assignments, program assignments and/or employee compensation must be approved by the Superintendent and memorialized in writing as evidence of approval. The Human Resources Department shall cause the necessary documentation containing the Superintendent's approval to be prepared, signed, and maintained in employee payroll and personnel records, and ensure that employee compensation is paid when owed for the appropriate amount(s). 2. The Superintendent will require the employees, supervisors, and management operating or overseeing individual programs and operations to become and remain familiar with their respective program and/or operation requirements, including those that govern which costs are allowable/authorized and steps required to demonstrate compliance. 3. In light of the Findings, the Superintendent will also identify one or more key administrative staff members who will be tasked with overseeing the use of federal funds for Title I, the 21st Center Learning Center Cohort, and the Education Stabilization Fund. 4. The Superintendent will direct staff to immediately confer with general counsel and with appropriate federal or state agency points of contact when compliance steps or obligations are unknown or require clarification. 5. Individuals compensated through federal funds shall be obligated to comply with applicable rules as a condition of employment. No staff member will have lone or sole responsibility for administering or overseeing administration and/or payment of their own compensation from federal funding sources. 6. At least twice annually, the Superintendent shall direct a review of wheterher funds have been appropriately reused for costs that are authorized and allowable. Title I, the 21st Century Center Learning Center Cohort, the Education Stablization Fund, and other programs/operations where noncompliance is known or suspected will be reviewed at least four times during the following school year, or more frequently when deemed necessary by the Superintendent. Additional program or operation areas may be identified for review through random sampling. Training on the rules governing authorized and allowable costs and expenditures of federal funds shall occur by August 12, 2024, prior to the start of the 2024-2025 school term. Training will be conducted by the Superintendent (Sam Moore), CFO (DaVona Howard), general counsel (Doug Lawrence), members of the School District's business office staff and others designated by the Superintendent.
View Audit 334940 Questioned Costs: $1
The Agency agrees with this finding. As part of the subaward review process, the Chief Financial Officer will ensure that first tier subawards are checked to see if FFATA reporting is needed based on the award amount. If FFATA reporting is required, the Chief Financial Officer will assign this tas...
The Agency agrees with this finding. As part of the subaward review process, the Chief Financial Officer will ensure that first tier subawards are checked to see if FFATA reporting is needed based on the award amount. If FFATA reporting is required, the Chief Financial Officer will assign this task to the Assistant Director for Financial Compliance to ensure that reporting is completed to the FFATA Reporting System FSRS.
The Agency agrees with this finding. As part of the subaward review process, the Chief Financial Officer will ensure that first tier subawards are checked to see if FFATA reporting is needed based on the award amount. If FFATA reporting is required, the Chief Financial Officer will assign this tas...
The Agency agrees with this finding. As part of the subaward review process, the Chief Financial Officer will ensure that first tier subawards are checked to see if FFATA reporting is needed based on the award amount. If FFATA reporting is required, the Chief Financial Officer will assign this task to the Assistant Director for Financial Compliance to ensure that reporting is completed to the FFATA Reporting System FSRS.
View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management will monitor the review and approval procedures for reporting to ensure that reports are signed off to indicated and document that review and approval has been made.
View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management will monitor the review and approval procedures for reporting to ensure that reports are signed off to indicated and document that review and approval has been made.
The Business and Finance Department at ANHC has mandated, from all departments at ANHC, an approval form for all “Autopay” transactions to be signed by the ED immediately.
The Business and Finance Department at ANHC has mandated, from all departments at ANHC, an approval form for all “Autopay” transactions to be signed by the ED immediately.
Management Response #2023-009: Due to the staff shortages and turnover the Corporation did not have adequate personnel or infrastructure in place to monitor costs in order to calculate and determine Corrective Action Plan: The Finance Team will develop overall operational costs reports to calculate...
Management Response #2023-009: Due to the staff shortages and turnover the Corporation did not have adequate personnel or infrastructure in place to monitor costs in order to calculate and determine Corrective Action Plan: The Finance Team will develop overall operational costs reports to calculate and support a new rate. The proposed rate will be submitted for approval. This will allow us to ensure the calculation for indirect costs and documentation supporting the indirect cost pool conform to the current regulations. Responsible Party: Tamara Barnes, CFO
Finding 515490 (2023-129)
Significant Deficiency 2023
Cluster Name: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Assistance listing numbers and names: Northern Arizona University 84.007 Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants 84.033 Federal Work-Study 84.038 Federal Perkins Loan Program—Federal Capital Contributions 84.063 Federal Pell Grant Progra...
Cluster Name: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Assistance listing numbers and names: Northern Arizona University 84.007 Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants 84.033 Federal Work-Study 84.038 Federal Perkins Loan Program—Federal Capital Contributions 84.063 Federal Pell Grant Programs 84.268 Federal Direct Student Loans 84.379 Teacher Education Assistance for College and Higher Education Grants (TEACH Grants) 93.364 Nursing Student Loans 93.925 Scholarships for Health Professions Students from Disadvantaged Backgrounds—Scholarships for Disadvantaged Students (SDS) Agency: Northern Arizona University (NAU) Name of contract person and title: Bradley Miner, NAU Associate Vice President and Comptroller Anticipated Completion Date June 30, 2024 Agency’s Response: Concur The University agrees with this finding and although it relies on the Federal agencies for valid identity verification, the University has already taken significant corrective action to proactively monitor and detect fraudulent student identities. The University has various internal controls, system fraud controls, and integrity measures in place as required or identified as industry best-practice to mitigate and prevent the increasing sophistication of fraudulent activity. In academic year 2023 the University had 282 online students selected for Verification by the Department of Education (ED). The 8 isolated fraud instances were the only identified fraud cases. The University receives valid identity verification checks from the Department of Education (ED) as an input for creating student profiles. Additionally, the University works with administrative agencies and leverages FAFSA checks conducted by Social Security Administration (SSA), Department of Veteran Affairs (VA), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS), Department of Defense (DOD), Department of Justice (DOJ). Financial Aid does not disburse until enrollment verification is complete. 1. The University has reviewed prior fiscal years to determine if additional fraudulently enrolled students received student financial assistance, and if fraudulent loans and awards were awarded. The University conducted an in-depth analysis of multiple qualitative attributes of students receiving financial assistance. This analysis identified high risk students receiving loans and awards. Students in this population were required to complete V4 verification. 2. The University implemented anti-fraud measures as an alternative to automated student Internet Protocol (IP) verification. During the analysis to identify fraudulently enrolled students, the University identified programs at high-risk for fraudulent activity. As a proactive fraudulent activity identification measure, the University will require all students in high-risk programs, with active FAFSAs to submit and complete V4 identity verification. This anti-fraud measure will identify fraudulently enrolled students prior to the disbursement of student financial assistance including loans and awards. 3. The University has put in to place a number of additional verification measures and detective controls to validate online student identities and check for repetitive information and trends. The University is conducting feasibility studies to determine if the suggested guidance for Internet Protocol student verification abides by certain security and privacy standards and policies. Additionally, the University has concern with fraudsters ability to mask Internet Protocols by deploying Virtual Private Networks (VPNs). This renders the advanced protocols ineffective. As a compensating control, the University will begin selecting 5% of online students for V4 verification. Random sampling of online students for identity verification provides enhanced detective measures to combat the risk of identity theft for use in financial aid fraud. Additionally, the University put in place several upfront measures to detect repetitive information and trends to identify potentially fraudulent activity. Detective monitoring reporting identifies duplicate deposit information, redundant student email information, and duplicate student address information. The Department will continue to utilize these successful anti-fraud measures to proactively identify fraudulent student identities. 4. The University will continue its efforts working with law enforcement agencies to recover improper payments for fraudulent claims it paid due to identity theft, to the extent practicable. The University worked with law enforcement agencies to investigate the fraud. At the conclusion of the investigation $138,135 has been repaid. The University will continue to partner with federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies and financial institutions across the country to recover losses and aggressively pursue legal action against perpetrators of fraud.
Assistance listing numbers and program names: 84.425D COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund—Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund 84.425R COVID-19 - Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2021 – Emergency Assistance to Non-Public Schools (CRSSA EAN...
Assistance listing numbers and program names: 84.425D COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund—Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund 84.425R COVID-19 - Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2021 – Emergency Assistance to Non-Public Schools (CRSSA EANS) Agency: Arizona Department of Education (ADE) Name of contact persons and titles: Michelle Udall, ADE Associate Superintendent Dr. Sarka White, ADE Deputy Associate Superintendent Anticipated completion date: November 30, 2024 Agency’s response: Concur ESSER Reporting will be validated by at least 2 people before submitting to U.S. Department of Education. This validation will include the reconciliation of data from the LEA to ADE's report. ADE is finalizing policies and procedures for validating the data prior to submission. ADE has already begun implementing a reconciliation system to ensure accurate reporting in the EANS annual performance report. This system tracks obligations by category, expenses, and appropriate earmarking of nonpublic schools (e.g., DUNS/UEI, grades served). ADE is finalizing general policies and procedures for how this data is compiled, interpreted, and reported based on the initial implementation and corrections of the EANS program.
Finding 515367 (2023-104)
Significant Deficiency 2023
Assistance listing number and program name: 84.425C COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund –Governor’s Emergency Education Relief (GEER) Fund Agency: Arizona Governor’s Office of Strategic Planning and Budgeting (Office) Name of contact person and title: Sarah Brown, Director Anticipated completion...
Assistance listing number and program name: 84.425C COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund –Governor’s Emergency Education Relief (GEER) Fund Agency: Arizona Governor’s Office of Strategic Planning and Budgeting (Office) Name of contact person and title: Sarah Brown, Director Anticipated completion date: May 1, 2025 Agency’s response: Concur Corrective Action Plan: The Office agrees with this finding and will begin to take corrective action to bring the program fully into compliance with FFATA reporting requirements under federal and state guidelines. The Office previously reported staff turnover for key personnel directly responsible for preparing, submitting, and reviewing FFATA reporting (i.e., 100 percent turnover). After reviewing supporting documentation and consulting with the U.S. Department of Education, the Office has determined that staff misinterpreted the reporting guidance. The Office understood the reporting did not require submissions on subawards made by another state agency. The Office did report the awards made to that respective state agency but did not include the agency subawards. The Office is working with the state agency to collect subaward data required for accurate reporting. During fiscal year 2025, the Office took significant corrective action to improve FFATA reporting. This corrective action plan includes the following: • FFATA Reporting Reconciliation—The Office will review, correct, and/or resubmit any inaccurately reported information, including subawards. • Annual Performance Reporting (APR) Reconciliation—The Office is unable to amend and resubmit the fiscal year 2022 APR per guidance from the U.S. Department of Education - Education Stabilization Fund Reporting Helpdesk. The reporting portal is unable to accept any revisions for fiscal year 2022. The Office will review any current reporting and ensure subaward data is included. • Update Written Procedures—The Office will update its written procedures to incorporate a process for reviewing federal guidance on a schedule aligned with federal reporting windows as applicable. • Ongoing Training—Office staff now attend ongoing internal and external training to improve their understanding of compliance requirements, identify noncompliance, and actively reduce the risks of reporting errors. As of this date, the Office has allocated sufficient resources to comply with the award terms and program requirements by establishing a Grants Compliance and Reporting Team dedicated to performing necessary FFATA reporting procedures. The Office is committed to ongoing staff training, improved internal reporting processes, and ensuring the State’s stakeholders and the public have access to transparent and timely information about all federal award spending decisions on the USAspending.gov website as federal laws and regulations require.
Assistance listing number and program name: 84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies 84.367 Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants (formerly Improving Teacher Quality State Grants) 84.425D COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund-Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESS...
Assistance listing number and program name: 84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies 84.367 Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants (formerly Improving Teacher Quality State Grants) 84.425D COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund-Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund 84.425U COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - American Rescue Plan - Elementary and Secondary Schools Emergency Relief (ARP ESSER) Fund Agency: Arizona Department of Education (ADE) Name of contact persons and titles: Nicole Von Prisk, ADE Deputy Associate Superintendent of Grants Management Matt McClary, ADE Compliance Officer Anticipated completion date: October 30, 2024 Agency’s response: Concur Arizona Department of Education has worked in cooperation with our vendor to correct outdated SQL queries that were identified and returning only approved grant award amounts rather than all awarded amounts, regardless of approval status. We will ensure that the original award amounts are being queried and, in return, reported within the FFATA Subaward Reporting System (FSRS). Additionally, through the reconciliation process each month, correct award amounts will align with corresponding Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN). We have implemented an automated monthly reporting workflow/schedule which will help ensure required FFATA reporting is submitted timely. This process automation helps prompt monthly FFATA reporting uploads by leveraging office tools that are readily available and ensures monthly upload deadlines are met by automatically scheduling the task and requiring follow-up by the assignee. In January of 2024 the staff assigned to FFATA uploads changed again (for the fourth time in a year) and at that point a new staff member assumed responsibility for FFATA uploads. As numerous corrections needed were discovered through the reconciliation process, new reports were uploaded. Some of these were original uploads for entities that were missing FSRS information altogether and some were corrections to previously uploaded yet incorrect information. With each monthly upload, a new date was being captured and while some of the information was new entity award information, not all of the information being updated was untimely. This has been a long and arduous process, and we look forward to not having continued FFATA findings, as we are making progress to correcting award information for all federal grants moving forward from this point. Our Compliance Officer reconciles the current FSRS award information monthly with our Lead Grants Coordinator or our Deputy Associate Superintendent. Any missing or duplicate information is corrected prior to the FSRS upload.
Assistance listing numbers and program names: 84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies 84.367 Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants (formerly Improving Teacher Quality State Grants) Agency: Arizona Department of Education (ADE) Name of contact person and title: Dr. Sarka White, AD...
Assistance listing numbers and program names: 84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies 84.367 Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants (formerly Improving Teacher Quality State Grants) Agency: Arizona Department of Education (ADE) Name of contact person and title: Dr. Sarka White, ADE Deputy Associate Superintendent Anticipated completion date: December 15, 2024 Agency’s response: Concur The Arizona Department of Education (ADE) has already begun implementing a program to ensure accurate and quality programmatic monitoring for all ESEA programs which specifically requires LEAs to meet 100% of the requirements of all statutorily required items to be monitored regardless of CMO affiliation. This development of programmatic monitoring will design a system of integrity to allow each LEA to have unique monitoring findings and ensure they are treated as all other LEAs regardless of management status. The Arizona Department of Education (ADE) is finalizing all program policies and procedures along with field training and staff training on how this program is implemented. ADE began providing an assurance document to charters in May 2024 which asks the charters to assure that if they do business with a CMO, the CMO does not have fiscal or operational authority for the LEA. The charter is asked to submit to ADE a copy of their organizational chart, along with the assurances document. Grants Management has created a new user role in the Grants Management Enterprise (GME) system, called the LEA Contracted Update role. This role allows a CMO person the access to perform fiscal tasks for which they have been contracted but does not hold the final submit or approve capacity, that must be reserved for authorized employees of the LEA. Grants Management has provided the placeholder for the assurance and organizational chart in the LEA Document Library, along with the communication to eligible entities (charters in this case). Individual program areas within ADE who review and approve funding applications will be responsible for verifying the assurances have been signed and uploaded and only authorized people at the LEA are actioning funding applications in GME prior to the program area giving director approval to the application.
View Audit 333243 Questioned Costs: $1
Assistance listing number and program name: 84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Agency: Arizona Department of Education (ADE) Name of contact person and title: Tim McCain, ADE Chief Financial Officer Chris Brown, ADE Business Officer of Education Programs Anticipated completion date:...
Assistance listing number and program name: 84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Agency: Arizona Department of Education (ADE) Name of contact person and title: Tim McCain, ADE Chief Financial Officer Chris Brown, ADE Business Officer of Education Programs Anticipated completion date: January 2025 Agency’s response: Concur • ADE is working on standardizing fiscal efficiency by adopting uniform guidelines that monitor obligations and expenditures. These guidelines outline available resources and determine allocation amounts within federal awards and earmark expiration dates within programs. • ADE is also working on standardizing how funds may be reallocated to ensure that no funds are at risk of reverting to USED. Specifically, school improvement funds are now also tracked as part of Title I allocation and reallocation process. This will ensure funds are earmarked and obligated in a timely fashion (i.e., in the period of performance). This item is planned to be completed by January 2025.
Assistance listing numbers and program names: 84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies 84.367 Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants (formerly Improving Teacher Quality State Grants) Agency: Arizona Department of Education (ADE) Name of contact person and title: Nicole Von Prisk, A...
Assistance listing numbers and program names: 84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies 84.367 Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants (formerly Improving Teacher Quality State Grants) Agency: Arizona Department of Education (ADE) Name of contact person and title: Nicole Von Prisk, ADE Deputy Associate Superintendent of Grants Management Matt McClary, ADE Compliance Officer Anticipated completion date: April 2025 Agency’s response: Concur • Tech team supervisor will have someone from that team put eyes on the initial generated report to compare results to prior year, looking at total number of LEAs, then greenlighting the initial report for the Tech Director and the Fiscal Director to review. • Once the Fiscal and Tech Directors receive the report, they will be responsible for sampling the data that populated into the report, by looking at overall numbers who Pass, Pass with Exception, or Fail and doing a comparison for analysis to prior year summary results. They will conduct a random sampling, comparing totals to latest AFR totals, to ensure amounts populated correctly. Once random sampling has been completed, it will be sent to Deputy Associate Superintendent for final checks. • Deputy Associate Superintendent will give final approval to move to public display of data, after confirmation of completeness and accuracy of data populated.
View Audit 333243 Questioned Costs: $1
Assistance listing numbers and program names: 84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies 84.367 Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants (formerly Improving Teacher Quality State Grants) Agency: Arizona Department of Education (ADE) Name of contact person and title: Dr. Sarka White, AD...
Assistance listing numbers and program names: 84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies 84.367 Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants (formerly Improving Teacher Quality State Grants) Agency: Arizona Department of Education (ADE) Name of contact person and title: Dr. Sarka White, ADE Deputy Associate Superintendent Chris Brown, Business Officer of Education Programs Anticipated completion date: February 2025 Agency’s response: Concur • The Arizona Department of Education (ADE) has already begun to document and execute practices addressing the recommendations issued by the auditor's office. • ADE has already drafted a comprehensive policies and procedures document outlining eligibility, duties, and responsibilities with individuals who oversee and double-check the work. This document was created and refined by reviewing other states’ procedures, federal technical assistance groups, communications with the Title federal program office at the United States Department of Education, and internal procedures in other units. • The Title I unit has been restructured to have an operations team with multiple staff members overseeing data quality and internal controls for allocations. This updated structure ensures that multiple individuals are involved in the allocation process. Staffing for this should be completed by February 2025. • The updated processes include entity management to determine when charter LEAs open and operate each year. Now, other systems validate this information instead of copying the information from the prior year. As such, this item has already been completed. • Finally, the department will follow up with the United States Department of Education (USED) regarding recalculating the fiscal year 2023 and the six ineligible LEAs for Title II funds to determine feasible processes and resolutions to each audit recommendation.
View Audit 333243 Questioned Costs: $1
Assistance listing number and program name: 21.027 COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Agency: Arizona Department of Economic Security (DES) Name of contact person and title: Jim Whallon, DES Deputy CFO Anticipated completion date: June 30, 2026 Agency’s response: Concur Th...
Assistance listing number and program name: 21.027 COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Agency: Arizona Department of Economic Security (DES) Name of contact person and title: Jim Whallon, DES Deputy CFO Anticipated completion date: June 30, 2026 Agency’s response: Concur The Department of Economic Security will address the audit recommendations as follows: 1. Perform required monitoring of its subrecipients and their compliance with the award terms and program requirements. The Department will revise its agency-wide policies and procedures related to single audit requirements for pass-through entities to include guidance regarding how to establish effective subrecipient monitoring procedures. The Department will also offer additional subrecipient monitoring guidance for programs administered by divisions with existing subrecipient monitoring findings. 2. Properly classify and report subrecipient expenditures on the State’s SEFA. The Department will revise its procedures related to single audit requirements to include steps detailing the instructions for classifying and reporting subrecipient expenditures on the State’s SEFA. The updated procedures will include actions needed to be taken to ensure each pass-through relationship is appropriately determined and that every subrecipient relationship is communicated to the staff responsible for compiling the State’s SEFA. 3. Develop, implement, and train all divisions on entity-wide written subrecipient-monitoring policies and procedures requiring all divisions to: a. Assess the risk of each subrecipient’s noncompliance and carry out monitoring activities based on those risk assessments such as reviewing financial and performance reports, providing training or technical assistance on program-related matters, and performing on-site reviews, selective audits, and/or other monitoring procedures. b. Verify subrecipients receive timely single audits, if required; follow up on and ensure that corrective action is taken on any audit findings that could potentially affect the program; and issue management decisions for any audit findings pertaining to the federal award. c. Maintain documentation of monitoring procedures demonstrating they were performed, including the monitoring procedures’ results and any Department actions taken, if appropriate. In addition to the revisions in policy and procedures outlined in Recommendation #1 above, the Department will train staff responsible for administering compliance requirements for pass-through entities. This training will include instructions to formulate a risk assessment, review controls related to compliance requirements, review timely single audit submittal, follow up on audit findings, issue management decisions for findings, and maintain adequate documentation of monitoring procedures. The training will be provided to all staff responsible for administering programs with pass-through entities. 4. Allocate sufficient resources, such as staffing, to comply with the award terms and program requirements, and designate individuals within each division to perform necessary subrecipient-monitoring procedures. The Department will conduct analyses to determine resources needed, including staffing, to ensure compliance with applicable requirements. For example, the Department will assess the efficiency of its subrecipient-monitoring procedures, estimate future workloads, determine staffing needed to meet those workloads, and assign sufficient staff the responsibility for ensuring compliance with each requirement outlined in the federal award. The Department will also ensure the staff responsible for administering the compliance requirements prioritize this responsibility and communicate anticipated compliance deficiencies to management. 5. Update the form it uses to determine whether other parties receiving program monies have the role of a subrecipient or contractor to include guidance for how to determine each characteristic of a subrecipient and contractor relationship and require a conclusion to be documented. In addition, train staff to properly complete the form and perform supervisory reviews of it. The Department will revise its Contractor/Subrecipient Determination form to clearly identify the final determination of a pass-through entity. The Department will also provide guidance to accompany the form that shows how to determine each characteristic of a subrecipient and contractor as well as how to make the final determination regarding the contractor versus subrecipient relationship. The Department will then provide training to staff responsible for using this form as part of the training outlined in Recommendation #3 above.
View Audit 333243 Questioned Costs: $1
Assistance listing number and program name: 21.027 COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Agency: Arizona Governor’s Office of Strategic Planning and Budgeting (Office) Name of contact person and title: Sarah Brown, Director Anticipated completion date: February 28, 2025 Agency...
Assistance listing number and program name: 21.027 COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Agency: Arizona Governor’s Office of Strategic Planning and Budgeting (Office) Name of contact person and title: Sarah Brown, Director Anticipated completion date: February 28, 2025 Agency’s response: Concur The Office agrees with this finding and will begin to take corrective action to bring the program fully into compliance with SLFRF Federal grant reporting requirements. The Office recognizes the importance of transparency in utilizing Federal grants and has taken significant corrective action to resolve any inaccuracies in Federal grant reporting. The Office has implemented specific actions to ensure reporting inaccuracies and program expenditure understatements/overstatements do not occur. During fiscal year 2025, the Office is taking corrective action to improve SLFRF reporting, including the following: • Award Reconciliation—The Office has conducted a comprehensive review and extensive reconciliation of all awards to identify reporting inaccuracies. • Expenditure Reconciliation—The Office staff responsible for preparing the SLFRF quarterly reports is completing the reconciliation of all expenditures to the State’s accounting records, which are the official expenditures made for the program. • Enhanced Reporting Mechanisms—The Office will review, correct, and/or resubmit any inaccurately reported information. The staff responsible for preparing the SLFRF quarterly reports is no longer reconciling to the Office’s internal grants-management system. • Update Written Procedures—Based on the comprehensive review noted in the response above, the Office is working to develop improved reporting procedures to ensure accurate submission of grant expenditure data. This may include revised standardized templates, improved guidelines, and enhanced communication channels to improve reporting accuracy. • Ongoing Training—Office staff now attend ongoing internal and external training to improve their understanding of compliance requirements, identify noncompliance, and actively reduce the risks of reporting errors. The Office will continue to strengthen internal controls to prevent similar issues from occurring in the future. This will involve strengthening oversight, providing additional training to staff members in reporting processes, and implementing regular quality assurance checks. As of this date, the Office has allocated sufficient resources to comply with the award terms and program reporting requirements by establishing a new Grants Technology and Data team dedicated to the oversight of performing necessary SLFRF program reporting procedures.
Assistance listing numbers and program names: 21.027 COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds 84.425C COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund –Governor’s Emergency Education Relief (GEER) Fund Agency: Arizona Governor’s Office of Strategic Planning and Budgeting (Office) Name of c...
Assistance listing numbers and program names: 21.027 COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds 84.425C COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund –Governor’s Emergency Education Relief (GEER) Fund Agency: Arizona Governor’s Office of Strategic Planning and Budgeting (Office) Name of contact person and title: Sarah Brown, Director Anticipated completion date: July 31, 2025 Agency’s response: Concur During fiscal year 2024, the Office took significant corrective action to improve subrecipient monitoring by developing and implementing a comprehensive subrecipient monitoring plan. This plan includes the following: • Financial Report-Reimbursement Requests—The Office reviews the grantee's financial reports to ensure costs align with the approved budget, program objectives, and federal cost principles. • Performance Reports—The Office reviews the submission of programmatic reports. The timelines for submission and frequency of the programmatic activity reports are defined in the terms and conditions of each award. The program activity reports document that all program requirements are being satisfactorily fulfilled. Grantee outreach is conducted when performance activity is lagging. Grantee check-ins and/or additional milestones are set to ensure goals are met. The Office may amend or terminate the grant award if sufficient progress is lacking. • Single Audit Reports—The Office confirms any required Single Audits and reviews a copy of the most recent report. • A Single Audit Questionnaire is distributed to grantees annually to confirm if the entity is subject to this federal audit requirement. • The Office also reviews total payments issued to an entity by the Office in the prior year to confirm if disbursements met the audit threshold. • The Office requests grantees submit their Single Audit Reporting Package (SARP) with any findings and the required Corrective Action Plan. In addition, the Office collects SARPs from the federal clearinghouse. • The Office reviews SARPs for any findings and conducts follow-up monitoring of CAPs that impact any grant funding managed by the Office. Management decisions are issued to grantees as required for specific grant findings. • Risk Assessment (RA)—The Office conducts a Risk Assessment (RA) of grantees when applying for grants to inform the grant award decision and possible grantee oversight or restrictions. Additionally, the Office conducts an annual RA of any grantee currently awarded funding. • The RA contains a self-assessment for the grantee to complete and an internal review conducted by the Office. Scores from both are weighted and used to calculate the overall risk score for each grantee as high, medium, and low risk. • The Office utilizes the RA results to prioritize high-risk grantees, which are reviewed through a desk or on-site monitoring. Medium-risk grantees will receive additional support and be referred to our Compliance and Reporting team for further review if additional concerns arise. Office staff now attend ongoing internal and external training to improve their understanding of compliance requirements, identify noncompliance, and actively reduce the risks of waste, fraud, and abuse of federal dollars through our subrecipient monitoring process. The Office has developed and implemented processes for requirements such as single audit review and corrective action follow-up, risk assessment, and subrecipient monitoring to address the specific findings. During the time frame corresponding to this audit finding, the pace and volume of grants management administrative duties required to be executed exceeded staffing capacity, contributing to the findings noted. As of this date, the Office has achieved stability in both manager and staff positions. In addition, the Office has allocated sufficient resources to comply with the award terms and program requirements by establishing a Grants Compliance and Reporting Team dedicated to performing necessary subrecipient monitoring procedures. Furthermore, the Office has implemented all recommendations and would like to specifically highlight efforts to work with subrecipients to resolve the potential disallowed costs of $1,903,858 of program monies that may have been spent in violation of its federal award terms by conducting on-site monitoring visits, desk reviews, and facilitating subrecipient technical assistance. OSPB is committed to continuing these efforts.
View Audit 333243 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 515214 (2023-108)
Significant Deficiency 2023
Assistance listing number and program name: 21.023 COVID-19 - Emergency Rental Assistance Program Agency: Arizona Department of Economic Security (DES) Name of contact person and title: Leanna DeKing, DES Policy Planning Project Manager Anticipated completion date: June 30, 2025 Agency’s Response: ...
Assistance listing number and program name: 21.023 COVID-19 - Emergency Rental Assistance Program Agency: Arizona Department of Economic Security (DES) Name of contact person and title: Leanna DeKing, DES Policy Planning Project Manager Anticipated completion date: June 30, 2025 Agency’s Response: Concur The Department of Economic Security will address the audit recommendations as follows: The Department will ensure program costs are properly recorded in the financial system during the period of performance and only obligated costs are spent during the liquidation period. Closeout activities, such as direct administrative costs, will be obligated prior to the end of the award period and spent within the liquidation period, or 120 calendar days after the period of performance ends. The Department will allocate sufficient resources to perform essential grant closeout functions to help prevent inappropriate charges. The Department will also update existing grant closeout procedures to require a review and approval of grant expenditures during the liquidation period to ensure they are allowable and properly obligated prior to the period of performance end date.
« 1 158 159 161 162 361 »