Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.318 General procurement standards of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. According to § 200.320 Methods of procurement to be followed of 2 CFR Part 200, when the value of the procurement for property or services under a federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a nonfederal entity, formal procurement methods are required.
According to § 180.300 of Subpart C - Responsibilities of Participants Regarding Transactions Doing Business With Other Persons of 2 CFR Part 180, when you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by:
(a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or
(b) Collecting a certification from that person; or
(c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person.
According to Section 3.4 Formal Solicitations of the County's Purchasing Policy, Purchases of goods and services with an estimated cost of $25,000 or more (including tax, installation, and freight), shall be made as the result of a Formal Solicitation process including but not limited to Invitations for Bids, Requests for Proposals, Requests for Qualifications, Requests for Information and any other formal solicitation method that can be completed within a timeframe that allows for the solicitation, evaluation and approval in accordance with this Section. Formal solicitations may be solicited through Purchasing’s web based system or as otherwise directed by the Purchasing Agent.
According to Section 3.5 Exceptions to Competitive Solicitation of the County's Purchasing Policy, in certain circumstances competitive solicitations may not be the most cost-effective approach for procurement. The Board of Supervisors, County Executive, or Purchasing may waive requirements for competitive solicitations in accordance with the grounds permitted by law. Key exemption categories are identified in the Purchasing Policy. Exceptions are not intended to circumvent the competitive process and related County policies and does not eliminate the need to ensure purchases are competitively priced and the terms and conditions of the purchase are in the best interests of the County. A written determination of the basis for the exception to competitive solicitation and the reason for the selection of the particular source shall be included in Purchasing’s records.
According to the County's suspension and debarment verification process, prior to entering into an applicable contract or subrecipient agreement, department will verify on SAM.gov if an entity is listed as suspended or debarred.
Condition: The County did not follow federal procurement and suspension and debarment regulation nor its purchasing policy and suspension and debarment verification procedures.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the following matters related to procurement and suspension and debarment.
Assistance Listing Number 21.027
• For one of eleven procurements, there is no written justification, documentary support, nor evidence of approval of the emergency procurement in the procurement file.
Assistance Listing Number 93.323
• For one of two procurements, the County did not maintain evidence of the suspension and debarment check before entering into the covered transaction or evidence of the review and approval of the verification check.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award not conducted in a manner providing full and open competition and other general procurement standards, as applicable. Also, noncompliance results in procurement transactions with potentially suspended or debarred entities.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-004.
Recommendation: We recommend the County design controls to ensure compliance with federal procurement and suspension and debarment regulation and its purchasing policy and suspension and debarment verification procedures. We recommend the County develop standard justification forms with approval of the noncompetitive procurement documented on the forms and the forms maintained in the procurement file. Also, we recommend the County update its purchasing policy to ensure clear, concise, and detailed suspension and debarment verification procedures.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.318 General procurement standards of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. According to § 200.320 Methods of procurement to be followed of 2 CFR Part 200, when the value of the procurement for property or services under a federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a nonfederal entity, formal procurement methods are required.
According to § 180.300 of Subpart C - Responsibilities of Participants Regarding Transactions Doing Business With Other Persons of 2 CFR Part 180, when you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by:
(a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or
(b) Collecting a certification from that person; or
(c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person.
According to Section 3.4 Formal Solicitations of the County's Purchasing Policy, Purchases of goods and services with an estimated cost of $25,000 or more (including tax, installation, and freight), shall be made as the result of a Formal Solicitation process including but not limited to Invitations for Bids, Requests for Proposals, Requests for Qualifications, Requests for Information and any other formal solicitation method that can be completed within a timeframe that allows for the solicitation, evaluation and approval in accordance with this Section. Formal solicitations may be solicited through Purchasing’s web based system or as otherwise directed by the Purchasing Agent.
According to Section 3.5 Exceptions to Competitive Solicitation of the County's Purchasing Policy, in certain circumstances competitive solicitations may not be the most cost-effective approach for procurement. The Board of Supervisors, County Executive, or Purchasing may waive requirements for competitive solicitations in accordance with the grounds permitted by law. Key exemption categories are identified in the Purchasing Policy. Exceptions are not intended to circumvent the competitive process and related County policies and does not eliminate the need to ensure purchases are competitively priced and the terms and conditions of the purchase are in the best interests of the County. A written determination of the basis for the exception to competitive solicitation and the reason for the selection of the particular source shall be included in Purchasing’s records.
According to the County's suspension and debarment verification process, prior to entering into an applicable contract or subrecipient agreement, department will verify on SAM.gov if an entity is listed as suspended or debarred.
Condition: The County did not follow federal procurement and suspension and debarment regulation nor its purchasing policy and suspension and debarment verification procedures.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the following matters related to procurement and suspension and debarment.
Assistance Listing Number 21.027
• For one of eleven procurements, there is no written justification, documentary support, nor evidence of approval of the emergency procurement in the procurement file.
Assistance Listing Number 93.323
• For one of two procurements, the County did not maintain evidence of the suspension and debarment check before entering into the covered transaction or evidence of the review and approval of the verification check.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award not conducted in a manner providing full and open competition and other general procurement standards, as applicable. Also, noncompliance results in procurement transactions with potentially suspended or debarred entities.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-004.
Recommendation: We recommend the County design controls to ensure compliance with federal procurement and suspension and debarment regulation and its purchasing policy and suspension and debarment verification procedures. We recommend the County develop standard justification forms with approval of the noncompetitive procurement documented on the forms and the forms maintained in the procurement file. Also, we recommend the County update its purchasing policy to ensure clear, concise, and detailed suspension and debarment verification procedures.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the non-federal entity's financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Further, the financial management system of each non-federal entity must provide accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
Condition: The County did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that the required reports were submitted.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted that the quarterly reported SF-425 reports were not submitted.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted that the required forms were not submitted.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-005.
Recommendation: We recommend the County design controls to ensure compliance with federal reporting requirements to ensure that the submitted reports are complete and accurate.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the non-federal entity's financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Further, the financial management system of each non-federal entity must provide accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
Condition: The County did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that the required reports were submitted.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted that the quarterly reported SF-425 reports were not submitted.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted that the required forms were not submitted.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-005.
Recommendation: We recommend the County design controls to ensure compliance with federal reporting requirements to ensure that the submitted reports are complete and accurate.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the non-federal entity's financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Further, the financial management system of each non-federal entity must provide accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
Condition: The County did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that the required reports were submitted.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted that the quarterly reported SF-425 reports were not submitted.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted that the required forms were not submitted.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-005.
Recommendation: We recommend the County design controls to ensure compliance with federal reporting requirements to ensure that the submitted reports are complete and accurate.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the non-federal entity's financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Further, the financial management system of each non-federal entity must provide accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
Condition: The County did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that the required reports were submitted.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted that the quarterly reported SF-425 reports were not submitted.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted that the required forms were not submitted.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-005.
Recommendation: We recommend the County design controls to ensure compliance with federal reporting requirements to ensure that the submitted reports are complete and accurate.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.318 General procurement standards of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. According to § 200.320 Methods of procurement to be followed of 2 CFR Part 200, when the value of the procurement for property or services under a federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a nonfederal entity, formal procurement methods are required.
According to § 180.300 of Subpart C - Responsibilities of Participants Regarding Transactions Doing Business With Other Persons of 2 CFR Part 180, when you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by:
(a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or
(b) Collecting a certification from that person; or
(c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person.
According to Section 3.4 Formal Solicitations of the County's Purchasing Policy, Purchases of goods and services with an estimated cost of $25,000 or more (including tax, installation, and freight), shall be made as the result of a Formal Solicitation process including but not limited to Invitations for Bids, Requests for Proposals, Requests for Qualifications, Requests for Information and any other formal solicitation method that can be completed within a timeframe that allows for the solicitation, evaluation and approval in accordance with this Section. Formal solicitations may be solicited through Purchasing’s web based system or as otherwise directed by the Purchasing Agent.
According to Section 3.5 Exceptions to Competitive Solicitation of the County's Purchasing Policy, in certain circumstances competitive solicitations may not be the most cost-effective approach for procurement. The Board of Supervisors, County Executive, or Purchasing may waive requirements for competitive solicitations in accordance with the grounds permitted by law. Key exemption categories are identified in the Purchasing Policy. Exceptions are not intended to circumvent the competitive process and related County policies and does not eliminate the need to ensure purchases are competitively priced and the terms and conditions of the purchase are in the best interests of the County. A written determination of the basis for the exception to competitive solicitation and the reason for the selection of the particular source shall be included in Purchasing’s records.
According to the County's suspension and debarment verification process, prior to entering into an applicable contract or subrecipient agreement, department will verify on SAM.gov if an entity is listed as suspended or debarred.
Condition: The County did not follow federal procurement and suspension and debarment regulation nor its purchasing policy and suspension and debarment verification procedures.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the following matters related to procurement and suspension and debarment.
Assistance Listing Number 21.027
• For one of eleven procurements, there is no written justification, documentary support, nor evidence of approval of the emergency procurement in the procurement file.
Assistance Listing Number 93.323
• For one of two procurements, the County did not maintain evidence of the suspension and debarment check before entering into the covered transaction or evidence of the review and approval of the verification check.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award not conducted in a manner providing full and open competition and other general procurement standards, as applicable. Also, noncompliance results in procurement transactions with potentially suspended or debarred entities.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-004.
Recommendation: We recommend the County design controls to ensure compliance with federal procurement and suspension and debarment regulation and its purchasing policy and suspension and debarment verification procedures. We recommend the County develop standard justification forms with approval of the noncompetitive procurement documented on the forms and the forms maintained in the procurement file. Also, we recommend the County update its purchasing policy to ensure clear, concise, and detailed suspension and debarment verification procedures.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.318 General procurement standards of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. According to § 200.320 Methods of procurement to be followed of 2 CFR Part 200, when the value of the procurement for property or services under a federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a nonfederal entity, formal procurement methods are required.
According to § 180.300 of Subpart C - Responsibilities of Participants Regarding Transactions Doing Business With Other Persons of 2 CFR Part 180, when you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by:
(a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or
(b) Collecting a certification from that person; or
(c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person.
According to Section 3.4 Formal Solicitations of the County's Purchasing Policy, Purchases of goods and services with an estimated cost of $25,000 or more (including tax, installation, and freight), shall be made as the result of a Formal Solicitation process including but not limited to Invitations for Bids, Requests for Proposals, Requests for Qualifications, Requests for Information and any other formal solicitation method that can be completed within a timeframe that allows for the solicitation, evaluation and approval in accordance with this Section. Formal solicitations may be solicited through Purchasing’s web based system or as otherwise directed by the Purchasing Agent.
According to Section 3.5 Exceptions to Competitive Solicitation of the County's Purchasing Policy, in certain circumstances competitive solicitations may not be the most cost-effective approach for procurement. The Board of Supervisors, County Executive, or Purchasing may waive requirements for competitive solicitations in accordance with the grounds permitted by law. Key exemption categories are identified in the Purchasing Policy. Exceptions are not intended to circumvent the competitive process and related County policies and does not eliminate the need to ensure purchases are competitively priced and the terms and conditions of the purchase are in the best interests of the County. A written determination of the basis for the exception to competitive solicitation and the reason for the selection of the particular source shall be included in Purchasing’s records.
According to the County's suspension and debarment verification process, prior to entering into an applicable contract or subrecipient agreement, department will verify on SAM.gov if an entity is listed as suspended or debarred.
Condition: The County did not follow federal procurement and suspension and debarment regulation nor its purchasing policy and suspension and debarment verification procedures.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the following matters related to procurement and suspension and debarment.
Assistance Listing Number 21.027
• For one of eleven procurements, there is no written justification, documentary support, nor evidence of approval of the emergency procurement in the procurement file.
Assistance Listing Number 93.323
• For one of two procurements, the County did not maintain evidence of the suspension and debarment check before entering into the covered transaction or evidence of the review and approval of the verification check.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award not conducted in a manner providing full and open competition and other general procurement standards, as applicable. Also, noncompliance results in procurement transactions with potentially suspended or debarred entities.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-004.
Recommendation: We recommend the County design controls to ensure compliance with federal procurement and suspension and debarment regulation and its purchasing policy and suspension and debarment verification procedures. We recommend the County develop standard justification forms with approval of the noncompetitive procurement documented on the forms and the forms maintained in the procurement file. Also, we recommend the County update its purchasing policy to ensure clear, concise, and detailed suspension and debarment verification procedures.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.318 General procurement standards of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. According to § 200.320 Methods of procurement to be followed of 2 CFR Part 200, when the value of the procurement for property or services under a federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a nonfederal entity, formal procurement methods are required.
According to § 180.300 of Subpart C - Responsibilities of Participants Regarding Transactions Doing Business With Other Persons of 2 CFR Part 180, when you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by:
(a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or
(b) Collecting a certification from that person; or
(c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person.
According to Section 3.4 Formal Solicitations of the County's Purchasing Policy, Purchases of goods and services with an estimated cost of $25,000 or more (including tax, installation, and freight), shall be made as the result of a Formal Solicitation process including but not limited to Invitations for Bids, Requests for Proposals, Requests for Qualifications, Requests for Information and any other formal solicitation method that can be completed within a timeframe that allows for the solicitation, evaluation and approval in accordance with this Section. Formal solicitations may be solicited through Purchasing’s web based system or as otherwise directed by the Purchasing Agent.
According to Section 3.5 Exceptions to Competitive Solicitation of the County's Purchasing Policy, in certain circumstances competitive solicitations may not be the most cost-effective approach for procurement. The Board of Supervisors, County Executive, or Purchasing may waive requirements for competitive solicitations in accordance with the grounds permitted by law. Key exemption categories are identified in the Purchasing Policy. Exceptions are not intended to circumvent the competitive process and related County policies and does not eliminate the need to ensure purchases are competitively priced and the terms and conditions of the purchase are in the best interests of the County. A written determination of the basis for the exception to competitive solicitation and the reason for the selection of the particular source shall be included in Purchasing’s records.
According to the County's suspension and debarment verification process, prior to entering into an applicable contract or subrecipient agreement, department will verify on SAM.gov if an entity is listed as suspended or debarred.
Condition: The County did not follow federal procurement and suspension and debarment regulation nor its purchasing policy and suspension and debarment verification procedures.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the following matters related to procurement and suspension and debarment.
Assistance Listing Number 21.027
• For one of eleven procurements, there is no written justification, documentary support, nor evidence of approval of the emergency procurement in the procurement file.
Assistance Listing Number 93.323
• For one of two procurements, the County did not maintain evidence of the suspension and debarment check before entering into the covered transaction or evidence of the review and approval of the verification check.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award not conducted in a manner providing full and open competition and other general procurement standards, as applicable. Also, noncompliance results in procurement transactions with potentially suspended or debarred entities.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-004.
Recommendation: We recommend the County design controls to ensure compliance with federal procurement and suspension and debarment regulation and its purchasing policy and suspension and debarment verification procedures. We recommend the County develop standard justification forms with approval of the noncompetitive procurement documented on the forms and the forms maintained in the procurement file. Also, we recommend the County update its purchasing policy to ensure clear, concise, and detailed suspension and debarment verification procedures.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.318 General procurement standards of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. According to § 200.320 Methods of procurement to be followed of 2 CFR Part 200, when the value of the procurement for property or services under a federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a nonfederal entity, formal procurement methods are required.
According to § 180.300 of Subpart C - Responsibilities of Participants Regarding Transactions Doing Business With Other Persons of 2 CFR Part 180, when you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by:
(a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or
(b) Collecting a certification from that person; or
(c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person.
According to Section 3.4 Formal Solicitations of the County's Purchasing Policy, Purchases of goods and services with an estimated cost of $25,000 or more (including tax, installation, and freight), shall be made as the result of a Formal Solicitation process including but not limited to Invitations for Bids, Requests for Proposals, Requests for Qualifications, Requests for Information and any other formal solicitation method that can be completed within a timeframe that allows for the solicitation, evaluation and approval in accordance with this Section. Formal solicitations may be solicited through Purchasing’s web based system or as otherwise directed by the Purchasing Agent.
According to Section 3.5 Exceptions to Competitive Solicitation of the County's Purchasing Policy, in certain circumstances competitive solicitations may not be the most cost-effective approach for procurement. The Board of Supervisors, County Executive, or Purchasing may waive requirements for competitive solicitations in accordance with the grounds permitted by law. Key exemption categories are identified in the Purchasing Policy. Exceptions are not intended to circumvent the competitive process and related County policies and does not eliminate the need to ensure purchases are competitively priced and the terms and conditions of the purchase are in the best interests of the County. A written determination of the basis for the exception to competitive solicitation and the reason for the selection of the particular source shall be included in Purchasing’s records.
According to the County's suspension and debarment verification process, prior to entering into an applicable contract or subrecipient agreement, department will verify on SAM.gov if an entity is listed as suspended or debarred.
Condition: The County did not follow federal procurement and suspension and debarment regulation nor its purchasing policy and suspension and debarment verification procedures.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the following matters related to procurement and suspension and debarment.
Assistance Listing Number 21.027
• For one of eleven procurements, there is no written justification, documentary support, nor evidence of approval of the emergency procurement in the procurement file.
Assistance Listing Number 93.323
• For one of two procurements, the County did not maintain evidence of the suspension and debarment check before entering into the covered transaction or evidence of the review and approval of the verification check.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award not conducted in a manner providing full and open competition and other general procurement standards, as applicable. Also, noncompliance results in procurement transactions with potentially suspended or debarred entities.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-004.
Recommendation: We recommend the County design controls to ensure compliance with federal procurement and suspension and debarment regulation and its purchasing policy and suspension and debarment verification procedures. We recommend the County develop standard justification forms with approval of the noncompetitive procurement documented on the forms and the forms maintained in the procurement file. Also, we recommend the County update its purchasing policy to ensure clear, concise, and detailed suspension and debarment verification procedures.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the non-federal entity's financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Further, the financial management system of each non-federal entity must provide accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
Condition: The County did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that the required reports were submitted.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted that the quarterly reported SF-425 reports were not submitted.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted that the required forms were not submitted.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-005.
Recommendation: We recommend the County design controls to ensure compliance with federal reporting requirements to ensure that the submitted reports are complete and accurate.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the non-federal entity's financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Further, the financial management system of each non-federal entity must provide accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
Condition: The County did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that the required reports were submitted.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted that the quarterly reported SF-425 reports were not submitted.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted that the required forms were not submitted.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-005.
Recommendation: We recommend the County design controls to ensure compliance with federal reporting requirements to ensure that the submitted reports are complete and accurate.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the non-federal entity's financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Further, the financial management system of each non-federal entity must provide accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
Condition: The County did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that the required reports were submitted.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted that the quarterly reported SF-425 reports were not submitted.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted that the required forms were not submitted.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-005.
Recommendation: We recommend the County design controls to ensure compliance with federal reporting requirements to ensure that the submitted reports are complete and accurate.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the non-federal entity's financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Further, the financial management system of each non-federal entity must provide accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
Condition: The County did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that the required reports were submitted.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted that the quarterly reported SF-425 reports were not submitted.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted that the required forms were not submitted.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-005.
Recommendation: We recommend the County design controls to ensure compliance with federal reporting requirements to ensure that the submitted reports are complete and accurate.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs of 2 CFR Part 200, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the nonfederal entity in order to be allowable under federal awards. According to § 200.430 Compensation—personal services of 2 CFR Part 200, costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees:
(1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the nonfederal entity consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities;
(2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a nonfederal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of federal statute, where applicable; and
(3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, when applicable.
According to § 200.431 Compensation-fringe benefits of 2 CFR Part 200, except as provided elsewhere in these principles, the costs of fringe benefits are allowable provided that the benefits are reasonable and are required by law, nonfederal entity-employee agreement, or an established policy of the nonfederal entity.
Condition: The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs nor an established written policy for compensation-personal services and fringe benefits.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the County charged various types of salaries and benefits to the grants. The County does not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. Specific to compensation-personal services and fringe benefits, there is not an established written policy for us to test that personnel costs charged to grants conform to, follows an appointment in accordance with, and are required by an established policy of the County.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in potential unallowable costs charged to grants.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the County establish written procedures for determining the allowability of costs to include a written policy regarding the charging of personnel costs to grants.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials.
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.318 General procurement standards of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. According to § 200.320 Methods of procurement to be followed of 2 CFR Part 200, when the value of the procurement for property or services under a federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a nonfederal entity, formal procurement methods are required.
According to § 180.300 of Subpart C - Responsibilities of Participants Regarding Transactions Doing Business With Other Persons of 2 CFR Part 180, when you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by:
(a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or
(b) Collecting a certification from that person; or
(c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person.
According to Section 3.4 Formal Solicitations of the County's Purchasing Policy, Purchases of goods and services with an estimated cost of $25,000 or more (including tax, installation, and freight), shall be made as the result of a Formal Solicitation process including but not limited to Invitations for Bids, Requests for Proposals, Requests for Qualifications, Requests for Information and any other formal solicitation method that can be completed within a timeframe that allows for the solicitation, evaluation and approval in accordance with this Section. Formal solicitations may be solicited through Purchasing’s web based system or as otherwise directed by the Purchasing Agent.
According to Section 3.5 Exceptions to Competitive Solicitation of the County's Purchasing Policy, in certain circumstances competitive solicitations may not be the most cost-effective approach for procurement. The Board of Supervisors, County Executive, or Purchasing may waive requirements for competitive solicitations in accordance with the grounds permitted by law. Key exemption categories are identified in the Purchasing Policy. Exceptions are not intended to circumvent the competitive process and related County policies and does not eliminate the need to ensure purchases are competitively priced and the terms and conditions of the purchase are in the best interests of the County. A written determination of the basis for the exception to competitive solicitation and the reason for the selection of the particular source shall be included in Purchasing’s records.
According to the County's suspension and debarment verification process, prior to entering into an applicable contract or subrecipient agreement, department will verify on SAM.gov if an entity is listed as suspended or debarred.
Condition: The County did not follow federal procurement and suspension and debarment regulation nor its purchasing policy and suspension and debarment verification procedures.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the following matters related to procurement and suspension and debarment.
Assistance Listing Number 21.027
• For one of eleven procurements, there is no written justification, documentary support, nor evidence of approval of the emergency procurement in the procurement file.
Assistance Listing Number 93.323
• For one of two procurements, the County did not maintain evidence of the suspension and debarment check before entering into the covered transaction or evidence of the review and approval of the verification check.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award not conducted in a manner providing full and open competition and other general procurement standards, as applicable. Also, noncompliance results in procurement transactions with potentially suspended or debarred entities.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-004.
Recommendation: We recommend the County design controls to ensure compliance with federal procurement and suspension and debarment regulation and its purchasing policy and suspension and debarment verification procedures. We recommend the County develop standard justification forms with approval of the noncompetitive procurement documented on the forms and the forms maintained in the procurement file. Also, we recommend the County update its purchasing policy to ensure clear, concise, and detailed suspension and debarment verification procedures.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials
Criteria or specific requirement: According to § 200.303 Internal controls of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award.
According to § 200.318 General procurement standards of 2 CFR Part 200, the nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. According to § 200.320 Methods of procurement to be followed of 2 CFR Part 200, when the value of the procurement for property or services under a federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a nonfederal entity, formal procurement methods are required.
According to § 180.300 of Subpart C - Responsibilities of Participants Regarding Transactions Doing Business With Other Persons of 2 CFR Part 180, when you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by:
(a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or
(b) Collecting a certification from that person; or
(c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person.
According to Section 3.4 Formal Solicitations of the County's Purchasing Policy, Purchases of goods and services with an estimated cost of $25,000 or more (including tax, installation, and freight), shall be made as the result of a Formal Solicitation process including but not limited to Invitations for Bids, Requests for Proposals, Requests for Qualifications, Requests for Information and any other formal solicitation method that can be completed within a timeframe that allows for the solicitation, evaluation and approval in accordance with this Section. Formal solicitations may be solicited through Purchasing’s web based system or as otherwise directed by the Purchasing Agent.
According to Section 3.5 Exceptions to Competitive Solicitation of the County's Purchasing Policy, in certain circumstances competitive solicitations may not be the most cost-effective approach for procurement. The Board of Supervisors, County Executive, or Purchasing may waive requirements for competitive solicitations in accordance with the grounds permitted by law. Key exemption categories are identified in the Purchasing Policy. Exceptions are not intended to circumvent the competitive process and related County policies and does not eliminate the need to ensure purchases are competitively priced and the terms and conditions of the purchase are in the best interests of the County. A written determination of the basis for the exception to competitive solicitation and the reason for the selection of the particular source shall be included in Purchasing’s records.
According to the County's suspension and debarment verification process, prior to entering into an applicable contract or subrecipient agreement, department will verify on SAM.gov if an entity is listed as suspended or debarred.
Condition: The County did not follow federal procurement and suspension and debarment regulation nor its purchasing policy and suspension and debarment verification procedures.
Questioned costs: None
Context: During our testing, we noted the following matters related to procurement and suspension and debarment.
Assistance Listing Number 21.027
• For one of eleven procurements, there is no written justification, documentary support, nor evidence of approval of the emergency procurement in the procurement file.
Assistance Listing Number 93.323
• For one of two procurements, the County did not maintain evidence of the suspension and debarment check before entering into the covered transaction or evidence of the review and approval of the verification check.
Cause: Management oversight.
Effect: The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award not conducted in a manner providing full and open competition and other general procurement standards, as applicable. Also, noncompliance results in procurement transactions with potentially suspended or debarred entities.
Repeat Finding: This audit finding was reported in the prior year in finding 2022-004.
Recommendation: We recommend the County design controls to ensure compliance with federal procurement and suspension and debarment regulation and its purchasing policy and suspension and debarment verification procedures. We recommend the County develop standard justification forms with approval of the noncompetitive procurement documented on the forms and the forms maintained in the procurement file. Also, we recommend the County update its purchasing policy to ensure clear, concise, and detailed suspension and debarment verification procedures.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement from responsible officials