Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
48,653
In database
Filtered Results
7,124
Matching current filters
Showing Page
36 of 285
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Active filters: Questioned Costs
This was an oversight as it was thought that the automatic transfers were set-up but never properly effectuated. Additionally the catch-up contribution from the prior year was misleading as it seemed the account had increased. The catch-up contribution for 2024 was made immediately when the contro...
This was an oversight as it was thought that the automatic transfers were set-up but never properly effectuated. Additionally the catch-up contribution from the prior year was misleading as it seemed the account had increased. The catch-up contribution for 2024 was made immediately when the controller noticed this during year end close.
View Audit 357074 Questioned Costs: $1
Three different people were in the role of accounts payable during the year causing added strain to proper invoice review. This position has since been filled and the importance of reviewing invoices for proper allocation has been communicated. Additionally, all inaccurate charges were corrected.
Three different people were in the role of accounts payable during the year causing added strain to proper invoice review. This position has since been filled and the importance of reviewing invoices for proper allocation has been communicated. Additionally, all inaccurate charges were corrected.
View Audit 357074 Questioned Costs: $1
Corrective Action Plan Finding: Finding 2024-002-Internal Controls Inadequate for Disbursements-Allowable Costs Condition: Good internal controls should be in place to make sure that disbursements are for eligible payments, are correctly classified, and are timely paid. Good controls ensure that ...
Corrective Action Plan Finding: Finding 2024-002-Internal Controls Inadequate for Disbursements-Allowable Costs Condition: Good internal controls should be in place to make sure that disbursements are for eligible payments, are correctly classified, and are timely paid. Good controls ensure that there is proper, documented review of all of these functions. Records should be maintained in an order that is conducive to efficient and timely summarizing by the outside fee accounting firm. Unaudited financial statements should be produced on a timely basis, and reviewed timely by the board of commissioners. Corrective Action Planned We will comply with the auditor’s suggestions. Person responsible for corrective action: Jedidiah Jackson, E.D. Telephone: (985) 785-2601 St. Charles Parish Housing Authority Fax: (985) 785-6238 200 Boutte Estates Dr. Boutte, LA 70039 Anticipated Completion Date- September 30, 2025
View Audit 356963 Questioned Costs: $1
Item 2024‐001 – Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Requirements (Repeat) Recommendation: 2 CFR 200.303 requires the non-Federal entity to “(a) establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing t...
Item 2024‐001 – Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Requirements (Repeat) Recommendation: 2 CFR 200.303 requires the non-Federal entity to “(a) establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.” 2 CFR 200.326 and 29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction (DOL Regulations) require the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls). We recommend the strengthening of controls to ensure the prevailing wage rate clauses are included in the contracts and that certified payrolls are received for each week in which construction work is performed. The Chief School Financial Officer, Linda Harper, should review documentation for inclusion of the prevailing wage rate clauses in construction contracts as part of the bid process prior to expenditures being made. She should also review all invoices received from contractors and subcontractors to ensure that the certified payroll information is received for all weeks for which construction work is performed. Action Taken: Management has reviewed the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.303 and 2 CFR 200.326 relating to wage rate requirements and agrees with the recommendation. Management has already communicated with all current contractors and subcontractors regarding the wage rate requirements for contracts in progress and has implemented additional procedures for future projects effective October 1, 2024. These additional procedures include the Chief School Financial Officer (CSFO), Linda Harper, reviewing all proposed construction contracts for inclusion of the prevailing wage rate clause as part of the bid process prior to expenditures being made. The CSFO will also review all invoices received from contractors and subcontractors to ensure that the certified payroll information is received for all weeks for which construction work is performed.
View Audit 356950 Questioned Costs: $1
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (UNAUDITED) Name of Auditee: Union Congregational Church Homes, Inc. HUD Project No.: 023-35372 Audit Firm: Kahn, Litwin, Renza & Co., Ltd. Period Covered by the Audit: Year ended December 31, 2024 Corrective Action Plan Prepared By: Name: Ronald Gates Position: Executive Dire...
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (UNAUDITED) Name of Auditee: Union Congregational Church Homes, Inc. HUD Project No.: 023-35372 Audit Firm: Kahn, Litwin, Renza & Co., Ltd. Period Covered by the Audit: Year ended December 31, 2024 Corrective Action Plan Prepared By: Name: Ronald Gates Position: Executive Director Telephone No.: (781) 335-2667 A. Current Findings on the Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Finding 2024-001: Unauthorized Distribution of Project Funds a. Comments on Finding and Recommendations: Management concurs with the finding and agrees with the recommendation. b. Actions Taken or Planned: Management concurs with the finding. On March 11, 2025, the Organization transferred $118,186 from its entity cash account into the Project’s operating account. On March 27, 2025, the Organization transferred $14,681 from its entity cash account to the Project’s property insurance escrow deposits account. Supporting documentation for these transfers will be furnished to HUD upon request. Name of Responsible Person: Ronald Gates, Executive Director Projected Implementation Date: March 11, 2025 and March 27, 2025
View Audit 356732 Questioned Costs: $1
Management Views and Corrective Action Plan Year Ending December 31, 2024 Finding 2024-002 – Non-Compliance with Financial Need Requirements for Subsidized Direct Loans Grantor: U.S. Department of Education Program: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Assistance Listing#: 84.268 Award T...
Management Views and Corrective Action Plan Year Ending December 31, 2024 Finding 2024-002 – Non-Compliance with Financial Need Requirements for Subsidized Direct Loans Grantor: U.S. Department of Education Program: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Assistance Listing#: 84.268 Award Titles: Federal Direct Student Loan Program Award Years: 7/2023 – 6/2026 Management agrees with the finding and proposes the following corrective action plan: Corrective Action Plan The incomplete installation of a student information system (PeopleSoft) update resulted in certain EFCs not prorating correctly. The incomplete system update that created this issue has been corrected. Moving forward, all PeopleSoft updates will be reviewed upon completion by Jesus Garcia, PeopleSoft project manager, to ensure all steps have been finalized as expected. Additionally, with the implementation of the 2024–25 FAFSA Simplification Act, prorated EFCs are no longer applicable. As such, this issue will not recur in future processing cycles. Timing The incomplete PeopleSoft update was corrected in March 2024. PeopleSoft updates are done every quarter and will be reviewed upon completion by Jesus Garcia. Because the 2024-25 FAFSA Simplification Act eliminated the use of prorated EFCs in this process there will be no further action taken. Sincerely, S. Christopher Reitz Director of Financial Services and Controller creitz@ensign.edu 801-524-8109
View Audit 356621 Questioned Costs: $1
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Continuum of Care – Assistance Listing No. 14.267 Recommendation: We recommend that management review the procurement, suspension and debarment requirements for federal programs as well as the organization's policies related to these requirements. Manage...
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Continuum of Care – Assistance Listing No. 14.267 Recommendation: We recommend that management review the procurement, suspension and debarment requirements for federal programs as well as the organization's policies related to these requirements. Management should ensure that such practices are being followed to comply with federal requirements. We also recommend that all current vendors in use are assessed and considered for compliance with procurement, suspension and debarment practices. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Policy review & update: Completed a comprehensive review of federal procurement, suspension and debarment requirements and revised the organization’s policies to align with those standards. Vendor assessment: Screened all active vendors against the SAM .gov exclusion list; documented results and removed or remediated any non-compliant relationships. Training & communication: Held mandatory training for procurement, finance and compliance teams on the updated policies and federal requirements. Ongoing monitoring: Established process to communicate exclusions to senior management to ensure continuous adherence. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Christine Simiriglia, President & CEO Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2025
View Audit 356518 Questioned Costs: $1
We acknowledge that system configuration errors in the Student Financial Aid Department resulted in the disbursement of federal direct student loans exceeding aggregate loan limits for three students. The University reimbursed the over-awarded funds to the Department of Education in February 2025 an...
We acknowledge that system configuration errors in the Student Financial Aid Department resulted in the disbursement of federal direct student loans exceeding aggregate loan limits for three students. The University reimbursed the over-awarded funds to the Department of Education in February 2025 and adjusted the affected students' accounts accordingly. To address these deficiencies and ensure compliance with aggregate loan limits, the University has reviewed the financial aid management system to identify and correct configuration errors. Furthermore, the University will assign an independent reviewer to monitor loan disbursements monthly, ensuring they remain within aggregate loan limits and promptly addressing any discrepancies.
View Audit 356516 Questioned Costs: $1
Management Response: Management concurs with the finding and will reconcile the College’s disbursement records with the federal COD system and correct all errors on a monthly basis.
Management Response: Management concurs with the finding and will reconcile the College’s disbursement records with the federal COD system and correct all errors on a monthly basis.
View Audit 356480 Questioned Costs: $1
Management Response: Going forward, all students who withdraw from the College will be forwarded to the financial aid team to review whether a student is still eligible for the full funding of the specific semester in question or whether funding needs to be returned based on the withdrawal date. If ...
Management Response: Going forward, all students who withdraw from the College will be forwarded to the financial aid team to review whether a student is still eligible for the full funding of the specific semester in question or whether funding needs to be returned based on the withdrawal date. If it is deemed that funds need to be returned, the Bursar will provide the financial aid team with a copy of the student charges for that period and the Registrar will provide proof of the withdrawal date and the financial aid team will determine the amount of funding that needs to be returned. Financial aid will then complete the return through the student's account and notify the Controller and VP of Finance and Administration to process the return to G5.
View Audit 356480 Questioned Costs: $1
Corrective Action Plan Prepared by: Name: John Renner Position: Chief Financial & Administrative Officer, United Church Homes, Inc. Telephone Number: 317-281-8794 A. Current Findings on the Schedule of Findings, Questioned Costs, and Recommendations Finding No. 2024-001 A. Comments on the...
Corrective Action Plan Prepared by: Name: John Renner Position: Chief Financial & Administrative Officer, United Church Homes, Inc. Telephone Number: 317-281-8794 A. Current Findings on the Schedule of Findings, Questioned Costs, and Recommendations Finding No. 2024-001 A. Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation: Management agrees with the finding and will reimburse the replacement reserve account when funds are available. B. Action Taken or Planned on the Finding: Management will deposit the funds into the replacement reserve when available.
View Audit 356468 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 2024‐007: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency Name: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Section 223 Demonstration Programs to Improve Community Mental Health Services Federal Financial Assistance Listing Number: 93.829 Finding Summary: The Organizat...
Finding 2024‐007: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency Name: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Section 223 Demonstration Programs to Improve Community Mental Health Services Federal Financial Assistance Listing Number: 93.829 Finding Summary: The Organization did not have a written procurement policy that was consistent with Federal, State, local, and tribal laws and regulations. In addition, the Organization entered into a contract with a vendor for services without obtaining quotes from other vendors. Responsible Individuals: Joshua Duame, Fractional CFO Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Management will implement a written procurement, suspension and debarment policy that meets Federal, State, local, and tribal laws and regulations. We also recommend that management review this policy regularly to confirm that it meets the requirements and that all transactions follow this policy. Anticipated Completion Date: 6/1/2025
View Audit 356459 Questioned Costs: $1
Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS – Assistance Listing No. 14.241 Recommendation: We recommend the Organization design controls to ensure the payroll data is reviewed prior to being paid out and the support is reviewed in detail when submitting to the grantor for reimbursement. Explanation...
Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS – Assistance Listing No. 14.241 Recommendation: We recommend the Organization design controls to ensure the payroll data is reviewed prior to being paid out and the support is reviewed in detail when submitting to the grantor for reimbursement. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Aids Taskforce of Greater Cleveland, Inc. will continue to review payroll as internal controls state and ensure accurate reporting. Control with payroll should be coordinated with payroll department ensuring duplicate payroll is not being processed and approved. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Simpson Huggins Planned completion date for corrective action plan: December 31, 2025 If the Oversight Agency has questions regarding this plan, please call Simpson Huggins 216-621-0766
View Audit 356447 Questioned Costs: $1
Indirect Cost Calculations and Documentation – Assistance Listing No. 14.231 Recommendation: Management should develop a process whereby indirect costs for federal grants are supported by a system of internal controls which provides reasonable assurance that the allocation calculated is accurate, al...
Indirect Cost Calculations and Documentation – Assistance Listing No. 14.231 Recommendation: Management should develop a process whereby indirect costs for federal grants are supported by a system of internal controls which provides reasonable assurance that the allocation calculated is accurate, allowable, and properly calculated, and supported. This process should be documented by a sign-off and date of both the preparer and the reviewer prior to the submission of the voucher during the monthly voucher process. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned in response to finding: We are currently revising our allocation methodology to ensure all calculations are accurate and well-documented, and we are training staff to consistently apply the update approach. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Bo Gasic, CFO Planned completion date for corrective action plan: Immediately
View Audit 356328 Questioned Costs: $1
New management has taken over and will make the delinquent deposit to the replacement reserve of $3,000 and establish transfers for the monthly deposit amount.
New management has taken over and will make the delinquent deposit to the replacement reserve of $3,000 and establish transfers for the monthly deposit amount.
View Audit 356323 Questioned Costs: $1
The remaining required Residual Receipts deposit was deposited in February 2024. New management has taken over and will ensure any required deposits are made on time.
The remaining required Residual Receipts deposit was deposited in February 2024. New management has taken over and will ensure any required deposits are made on time.
View Audit 356323 Questioned Costs: $1
Response/Views: We agree with the finding. Corrective Action Planned: We will get at least two quotes for any contracts entered into over $10,000 when using Federal funds. This has been communicated to those responsible for entering into contracts. Reason for the Recurrence: Contracts were already b...
Response/Views: We agree with the finding. Corrective Action Planned: We will get at least two quotes for any contracts entered into over $10,000 when using Federal funds. This has been communicated to those responsible for entering into contracts. Reason for the Recurrence: Contracts were already being entered into for this year when the finding was discovered in the prior year audit. Corrective actions have since taken place. Anticipated Completion Date: Immediately going forward. Contact Pcrsoii (s,): Ashley Montgomery
View Audit 356249 Questioned Costs: $1
CONDITION: During my review of Aliquippa School District’s compliance with the requirements of the Public School Code and the Uniform Guidance for procurement of goods and services, the District was unable to provide documentation or other evidence that 1) competitive bidding was performed for the p...
CONDITION: During my review of Aliquippa School District’s compliance with the requirements of the Public School Code and the Uniform Guidance for procurement of goods and services, the District was unable to provide documentation or other evidence that 1) competitive bidding was performed for the purchases of goods or services over $22,500 and 2) a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold ($250,000), or 3) the vendor met the requirements of a ‘sole source provider’ with documentation to support such designation, for the following vendor –– Beaver Valley Intermediate Unit ($332,200). CRITERIA: As specified in 2 CFR 200. 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the District must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, small purchase procedures per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) for acquisitions between the micro-purchase threshold (currently $10,000) and the simplified acquisition threshold (current $250,000), price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate. Per 24 PA Statue 8.807.1, there should be three quotes that are either written or well documented. Furthermore, Section 2 CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance details five (5) circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. MANAGEMENT’S CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN: Management will review and update as necessary, it’s current procurement policies and procedures to ensure compliance with all applicable sections of the Uniform Guidance, in specific, Sections 2 CFR 200.318(i), 200.320(a)(2)(i) and Section CFR 200.324(a) of the Uniform Guidance regarding the requirement to perform a cost or price analysis for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold ($250,000), as well as 24 PS 8.807.1. In specific, these procedures will include 1) obtaining all relevant information pertaining to procurements involving federal assistance from any cooperative purchasing group, 2) obtaining quotations from three qualified providers where applicable and documenting those results, and 3) properly document purchases using federal assistance when the vendor meets the criteria as a sole source provider. These three (3) updated procedures will be implemented during the remaining months of the 2024-2025 fiscal year, and all subsequent years, for future purchases where applicable.
View Audit 356222 Questioned Costs: $1
CONDITION: During my review of Aliquippa School District’s compliance with the requirements of the Public School Code and the Uniform Guidance for procurement of goods and services, the District was unable to provide documentation or other evidence that either 1) three price or rate quotations for t...
CONDITION: During my review of Aliquippa School District’s compliance with the requirements of the Public School Code and the Uniform Guidance for procurement of goods and services, the District was unable to provide documentation or other evidence that either 1) three price or rate quotations for the purchase of goods between $10,000 and $22,500, and services between $10,000 and $250,000 were obtained, 2) competitive bidding was performed for the purchases of goods over $22,500 or 3) the vendor met the requirements of a ‘sole source provider’ with documentation to support such designation, for the following vendors: Voyager Sopris Learning ($49,117) and Questeq ($70,549). CRITERIA: As specified in 2 CFR 200 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the District must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, small purchase procedures per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) for acquisitions between the micro-purchase threshold (currently $10,000) and the simplified acquisition threshold (current $250,000), price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate. Per 24 PA Statue 8.807.1, there should be three quotes that are either written or well documented and over $22,500 formal bidding procedures must be utilized. Furthermore, Section 2 CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance details five (5) circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. MANAGEMENT’S CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN: Management will review and update as necessary, it’s current procurement policies and procedures to ensure compliance with all applicable sections of the Uniform Guidance, in specific, Sections 2 CFR 200.318(i) and 200.320(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance, as well as 24 PS 8.807.1. In specific, these procedures will include 1) obtaining all relevant information pertaining to procurements involving federal assistance from any cooperative purchasing group, 2) obtaining quotations from three qualified providers where applicable and documenting those results, and 3) properly document purchases using federal assistance when the vendor meets the criteria as a sole source provider. These three (3) updated procedures will be implemented during the remaining months of the 2023-2024 fiscal year, and all subsequent years, for future purchases where applicable.
View Audit 356222 Questioned Costs: $1
Noncompliance with Reporting Requirements
Noncompliance with Reporting Requirements
View Audit 356195 Questioned Costs: $1
The Organization’s agreements carry with them certain periodic reporting requirements that are due either 15 days following the close of each month, or 30 days following the close of each quarter.
The Organization’s agreements carry with them certain periodic reporting requirements that are due either 15 days following the close of each month, or 30 days following the close of each quarter.
View Audit 356195 Questioned Costs: $1
Condition: Four instances were noted of late reporting or a lack of support indicating when a report was filed.
Condition: Four instances were noted of late reporting or a lack of support indicating when a report was filed.
View Audit 356195 Questioned Costs: $1
Known Questioned Costs: None
Known Questioned Costs: None
View Audit 356195 Questioned Costs: $1
Likely Questioned Costs: None
Likely Questioned Costs: None
View Audit 356195 Questioned Costs: $1
Context: As part of our testing of the monthly reporting requirements for ALN 93.959, we noted four instances in which a required monthly report was either submitted after the required deadline or no support was provided to indicate when or if the required monthly report was submitted.
Context: As part of our testing of the monthly reporting requirements for ALN 93.959, we noted four instances in which a required monthly report was either submitted after the required deadline or no support was provided to indicate when or if the required monthly report was submitted.
View Audit 356195 Questioned Costs: $1
« 1 34 35 37 38 285 »