Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan
Management response to finding 2024-004: Review over cost transfers of subrecipient expenditures
Cluster Name: Research and Development
Federal Awarding Agency: Various
Award Name: Various
Award Number: Various
Award Years: Various
Assistance Listing T...
Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan
Management response to finding 2024-004: Review over cost transfers of subrecipient expenditures
Cluster Name: Research and Development
Federal Awarding Agency: Various
Award Name: Various
Award Number: Various
Award Years: Various
Assistance Listing Title: Various
Assistance Listing Number: Various
Pass-through entities: Various
As described in Finding 2024-004, and as a result of improper training related to the implementation of the university’s new financial system in FY22, the university lacked adequate controls to identify the proper application of indirect costs as it relates to subrecipient expenses when using the cost transfer process to make corrections. Additionally, the university failed to properly apply its policy for the classification of subawards versus direct expenditures.
As such, while cost transfers are a small percentage of overall transfer activity, an update to training materials will be made by June 2025 to educate cost transfer initiators on the proper method to use for this subset of subrecipient expenditures. Since February 2025, the Sponsor Projects Accounting (SPA) representative responsible for central office review of cost transfers now reviews to ensure that all intended grant related attributes are in effect before approving any subrecipient cost transfers. Additionally, as of February 2025, the university reinforced its policy regarding the classification of subawards versus direct expenditures with both the Procurement department and the SPA staff to ensure the proper expenditure classification is set up during the onboarding process of a contractor.
The SPA team has completed its analysis and review of all previous subrecipient cost transfers to verify and correct the improper application of indirect cost limits and expenditure classifications. As of March 2025, all subrecipient cost transfer errors have been identified and corrected, resulting in questioned costs of approximately $587,000.
Separately, this resulted in an under-recovery of $306,000 of indirect costs that were not charged to the original award. As all awards impacted are still open and active, the correcting expenditure adjustments were applied to the awards impacted that will affect future draw downs.
Contact Person: Cindy Lee, Director, Sponsored Projects Accounting, cmlee@usc.edu