Audit 352443

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$3.48M
Findings
2
Programs
5
Organization: Wisconsin Literacy, INC (WI)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-04-02

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
553805 2024-002 Material Weakness - M
1130247 2024-002 Material Weakness - M

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
93.268 Immunization Cooperative Agreements $1.73M Yes 0
93.566 Statewide Esl & Literacy Proficiency Services $1.17M Yes 1
93.558 Temporary Assistance for Needy Families $344,530 - 0
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $203,408 - 0
17.259 Wia Youth Activities $24,269 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
EJ4LL4J41MW7 Jake Gorges Auditee
6082571655 Kirsten Houghton Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance and the Guide, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The auditee did use the de minimis cost rate. The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards (the Schedule) includes the federal and state grant award activity of Wisconsin Literacy, Inc. under programs of the federal government and state agencies for the year ending June 30, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), and the Department of Health Services Audit Guide, 2018 revision (the Guide). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Wisconsin Literacy, Inc., it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of Wisconsin Literacy, Inc.
Title: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance and the Guide, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The auditee did use the de minimis cost rate. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance and the Guide, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement.
Title: Indirect Cost Rate Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance and the Guide, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The auditee did use the de minimis cost rate. Wisconsin Literacy, Inc. has elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

Criteria: Internal controls over subrecipient monitoring should be in place to ensure cost reimbursement requests only include allowable costs. Statement of condition: WL did not require subrecipient organizations to submit evidence of costs incurred and submitted for reimbursement. As a result, WL did not review or approve all costs incurred by subrecipient organizations prior to submitting the costs for reimbursement from the Wisconsin Department of Children and Families. Cause: The Wisconsin Department of Children and Families did not require supporting documentation to be submitted as part of the reimbursement request. WL did not require supporting evidence for costs from subrecipient organizations since they were not required for the reimbursement request. Effect: Since not all subrecipient expenses were obtained and reviewed timely, the organization’s system of internal control over compliance may not timely detect and correct disallowed costs being charged to the program. Questioned costs: There were no questioned costs. Views of responsible officials: WL agrees with the finding and has implemented the recommendations to improve its systems to evaluate and monitor internal controls over subrecipient monitoring. Context: Since not all subrecipient expenses were obtained and reviewed timely, the organization’s system of internal control over compliance may not timely detect and correct disallowed costs being charged to the program. Recommendation: We recommend obtaining evidence to support the costs submitted by the subrecipient. We also recommend policies and procedures over subrecipient costs to be updated to clearly document who is responsible for reviewing, what is to be reviewed, and how and where to document the review. The policies and procedures should also document who is responsible for maintaining records of the subrecipient costs and where those records are to be retained.
Criteria: Internal controls over subrecipient monitoring should be in place to ensure cost reimbursement requests only include allowable costs. Statement of condition: WL did not require subrecipient organizations to submit evidence of costs incurred and submitted for reimbursement. As a result, WL did not review or approve all costs incurred by subrecipient organizations prior to submitting the costs for reimbursement from the Wisconsin Department of Children and Families. Cause: The Wisconsin Department of Children and Families did not require supporting documentation to be submitted as part of the reimbursement request. WL did not require supporting evidence for costs from subrecipient organizations since they were not required for the reimbursement request. Effect: Since not all subrecipient expenses were obtained and reviewed timely, the organization’s system of internal control over compliance may not timely detect and correct disallowed costs being charged to the program. Questioned costs: There were no questioned costs. Views of responsible officials: WL agrees with the finding and has implemented the recommendations to improve its systems to evaluate and monitor internal controls over subrecipient monitoring. Context: Since not all subrecipient expenses were obtained and reviewed timely, the organization’s system of internal control over compliance may not timely detect and correct disallowed costs being charged to the program. Recommendation: We recommend obtaining evidence to support the costs submitted by the subrecipient. We also recommend policies and procedures over subrecipient costs to be updated to clearly document who is responsible for reviewing, what is to be reviewed, and how and where to document the review. The policies and procedures should also document who is responsible for maintaining records of the subrecipient costs and where those records are to be retained.