Audit 51317

FY End
2022-12-31
Total Expended
$763,796
Findings
18
Programs
9
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-09-20

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
45648 2022-002 Material Weakness Yes I
45649 2022-003 - - P
45650 2022-004 Material Weakness - B
45651 2022-002 Material Weakness Yes I
45652 2022-003 - - P
45653 2022-004 Material Weakness - B
45654 2022-002 Material Weakness Yes I
45655 2022-003 - - P
45656 2022-004 Material Weakness - B
622090 2022-002 Material Weakness Yes I
622091 2022-003 - - P
622092 2022-004 Material Weakness - B
622093 2022-002 Material Weakness Yes I
622094 2022-003 - - P
622095 2022-004 Material Weakness - B
622096 2022-002 Material Weakness Yes I
622097 2022-003 - - P
622098 2022-004 Material Weakness - B

Contacts

Name Title Type
K89NSPMT7NZ5 Marsha Keene-Frye Auditee
5732338390 Jeffrey C. Stroder, CPA Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The auditee used the de minimis cost rate. The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of Susanna Wesley Family Learning Center, Inc. under the programs of the federal government for the year ended December 31, 2022. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost of Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Susanna Wesley Family Learning Center, Inc., it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of Susanna Wesley Family Learning Center, Inc.
Title: Subrecipients Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The auditee used the de minimis cost rate. Susanna Wesley Family Learning Center, Inc. has not made any disbursements of federal funds to subrecipients.

Finding Details

Federal Program: U.S. Department of Justice passed through Missouri Department of Social Services: Crime Victim Assistance (16.575) Criteria: When a sub-recipient of federal awards uses federal money to acquire goods and services expected to cost more than $25,000, the sub-recipient must determine that the vendor is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government. Condition: The Organization purchased services from one vendor totaling greater than $25,000 that required the Organization to determine the vendor?s status with the federal government. The vendors were, in fact, not excluded parties, but the Organization had no consistent internal control in place to make that determination before the disbursements were made. Cause: The Organization has used this same vendor for many years and the Organization overlooked this vendor when analyzing payments. Effect: The Organization did comply with the federal compliance requirements. However, internal controls were such that noncompliance could occur and go undetected. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Actual Crime Victim Assistance expenditures totaled $329,773. Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization verify a vendor?s status by checking the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000. Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization will verify all vendors? status using the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Justice passed through Missouri Department of Social Services: Crime Victim Assistance (16.575) Criteria: Per Title 2 CFR 200.512(d), the data collection form must be submitted the earlier of 30 calendar days after the receipt of the auditors? report, or nine months after the end of the audit report. Condition: The data collection form for the audit of the year ending December 31, 2021, was due September 30, 2022 but was not submitted until February 15, 2023, 138 days late. Cause: The Organization was unable to hire an independent auditor to issue their report by the due date. Effect: The submission of the prior year audit and data collection form was not completed before the deadline. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The data collection form submission must include an attachment of the annual audit report of an independent auditor. As of September 30, 2022 the audit report was unavailable for distribution. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that all required fillings be submitted timely according to the Single Audit Act of 1984 and Title 2, U.S. Code of Federal Regulations guidelines. Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization was unable to engage an independent auditor to complete and issue their audit report before the deadline. The Organization has since engaged an independent auditor and plans to submit the data collection form on time in the future.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Justice passed through Missouri Department of Social Services: Crime Victim Assistance (16.575) Criteria: All costs allocated to grants funding should be supported by invoices, timesheets, or other documentation. In additions, all costs allocated to grant funding should be approved by the proper levels of management before the disbursement is made. Condition: Four out of forty payroll costs did not have a timesheet or other supporting documentation. Twelve of forty payroll costs did have the proper review and authorization documented. Twenty-three out of sixty-three accounts payable invoices did not have the proper level of management approval before the disbursement was made. This was a statistically valid sample. Cause: One key member of management did not follow the Organizations internal controls. Effect: Unauthorized and/or unallowable grant expenditures could be mistakenly disbursed. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Actual Crime Victim Assistance expenditures totaled $329,773. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: All disbursements of the organization should have proper approval and support before the disbursement is made. Views of Responsible Officials: The member of management responsible for overseeing the disbursements and payroll process has been terminated. The Organization has since changed its internal controls to decrease the likelihood that disbursements will be made without proper approval or support.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Justice passed through Missouri Department of Social Services: Crime Victim Assistance (16.575) Criteria: When a sub-recipient of federal awards uses federal money to acquire goods and services expected to cost more than $25,000, the sub-recipient must determine that the vendor is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government. Condition: The Organization purchased services from one vendor totaling greater than $25,000 that required the Organization to determine the vendor?s status with the federal government. The vendors were, in fact, not excluded parties, but the Organization had no consistent internal control in place to make that determination before the disbursements were made. Cause: The Organization has used this same vendor for many years and the Organization overlooked this vendor when analyzing payments. Effect: The Organization did comply with the federal compliance requirements. However, internal controls were such that noncompliance could occur and go undetected. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Actual Crime Victim Assistance expenditures totaled $329,773. Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization verify a vendor?s status by checking the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000. Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization will verify all vendors? status using the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Justice passed through Missouri Department of Social Services: Crime Victim Assistance (16.575) Criteria: Per Title 2 CFR 200.512(d), the data collection form must be submitted the earlier of 30 calendar days after the receipt of the auditors? report, or nine months after the end of the audit report. Condition: The data collection form for the audit of the year ending December 31, 2021, was due September 30, 2022 but was not submitted until February 15, 2023, 138 days late. Cause: The Organization was unable to hire an independent auditor to issue their report by the due date. Effect: The submission of the prior year audit and data collection form was not completed before the deadline. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The data collection form submission must include an attachment of the annual audit report of an independent auditor. As of September 30, 2022 the audit report was unavailable for distribution. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that all required fillings be submitted timely according to the Single Audit Act of 1984 and Title 2, U.S. Code of Federal Regulations guidelines. Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization was unable to engage an independent auditor to complete and issue their audit report before the deadline. The Organization has since engaged an independent auditor and plans to submit the data collection form on time in the future.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Justice passed through Missouri Department of Social Services: Crime Victim Assistance (16.575) Criteria: All costs allocated to grants funding should be supported by invoices, timesheets, or other documentation. In additions, all costs allocated to grant funding should be approved by the proper levels of management before the disbursement is made. Condition: Four out of forty payroll costs did not have a timesheet or other supporting documentation. Twelve of forty payroll costs did have the proper review and authorization documented. Twenty-three out of sixty-three accounts payable invoices did not have the proper level of management approval before the disbursement was made. This was a statistically valid sample. Cause: One key member of management did not follow the Organizations internal controls. Effect: Unauthorized and/or unallowable grant expenditures could be mistakenly disbursed. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Actual Crime Victim Assistance expenditures totaled $329,773. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: All disbursements of the organization should have proper approval and support before the disbursement is made. Views of Responsible Officials: The member of management responsible for overseeing the disbursements and payroll process has been terminated. The Organization has since changed its internal controls to decrease the likelihood that disbursements will be made without proper approval or support.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Justice passed through Missouri Department of Social Services: Crime Victim Assistance (16.575) Criteria: When a sub-recipient of federal awards uses federal money to acquire goods and services expected to cost more than $25,000, the sub-recipient must determine that the vendor is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government. Condition: The Organization purchased services from one vendor totaling greater than $25,000 that required the Organization to determine the vendor?s status with the federal government. The vendors were, in fact, not excluded parties, but the Organization had no consistent internal control in place to make that determination before the disbursements were made. Cause: The Organization has used this same vendor for many years and the Organization overlooked this vendor when analyzing payments. Effect: The Organization did comply with the federal compliance requirements. However, internal controls were such that noncompliance could occur and go undetected. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Actual Crime Victim Assistance expenditures totaled $329,773. Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization verify a vendor?s status by checking the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000. Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization will verify all vendors? status using the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Justice passed through Missouri Department of Social Services: Crime Victim Assistance (16.575) Criteria: Per Title 2 CFR 200.512(d), the data collection form must be submitted the earlier of 30 calendar days after the receipt of the auditors? report, or nine months after the end of the audit report. Condition: The data collection form for the audit of the year ending December 31, 2021, was due September 30, 2022 but was not submitted until February 15, 2023, 138 days late. Cause: The Organization was unable to hire an independent auditor to issue their report by the due date. Effect: The submission of the prior year audit and data collection form was not completed before the deadline. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The data collection form submission must include an attachment of the annual audit report of an independent auditor. As of September 30, 2022 the audit report was unavailable for distribution. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that all required fillings be submitted timely according to the Single Audit Act of 1984 and Title 2, U.S. Code of Federal Regulations guidelines. Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization was unable to engage an independent auditor to complete and issue their audit report before the deadline. The Organization has since engaged an independent auditor and plans to submit the data collection form on time in the future.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Justice passed through Missouri Department of Social Services: Crime Victim Assistance (16.575) Criteria: All costs allocated to grants funding should be supported by invoices, timesheets, or other documentation. In additions, all costs allocated to grant funding should be approved by the proper levels of management before the disbursement is made. Condition: Four out of forty payroll costs did not have a timesheet or other supporting documentation. Twelve of forty payroll costs did have the proper review and authorization documented. Twenty-three out of sixty-three accounts payable invoices did not have the proper level of management approval before the disbursement was made. This was a statistically valid sample. Cause: One key member of management did not follow the Organizations internal controls. Effect: Unauthorized and/or unallowable grant expenditures could be mistakenly disbursed. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Actual Crime Victim Assistance expenditures totaled $329,773. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: All disbursements of the organization should have proper approval and support before the disbursement is made. Views of Responsible Officials: The member of management responsible for overseeing the disbursements and payroll process has been terminated. The Organization has since changed its internal controls to decrease the likelihood that disbursements will be made without proper approval or support.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Justice passed through Missouri Department of Social Services: Crime Victim Assistance (16.575) Criteria: When a sub-recipient of federal awards uses federal money to acquire goods and services expected to cost more than $25,000, the sub-recipient must determine that the vendor is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government. Condition: The Organization purchased services from one vendor totaling greater than $25,000 that required the Organization to determine the vendor?s status with the federal government. The vendors were, in fact, not excluded parties, but the Organization had no consistent internal control in place to make that determination before the disbursements were made. Cause: The Organization has used this same vendor for many years and the Organization overlooked this vendor when analyzing payments. Effect: The Organization did comply with the federal compliance requirements. However, internal controls were such that noncompliance could occur and go undetected. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Actual Crime Victim Assistance expenditures totaled $329,773. Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization verify a vendor?s status by checking the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000. Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization will verify all vendors? status using the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Justice passed through Missouri Department of Social Services: Crime Victim Assistance (16.575) Criteria: Per Title 2 CFR 200.512(d), the data collection form must be submitted the earlier of 30 calendar days after the receipt of the auditors? report, or nine months after the end of the audit report. Condition: The data collection form for the audit of the year ending December 31, 2021, was due September 30, 2022 but was not submitted until February 15, 2023, 138 days late. Cause: The Organization was unable to hire an independent auditor to issue their report by the due date. Effect: The submission of the prior year audit and data collection form was not completed before the deadline. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The data collection form submission must include an attachment of the annual audit report of an independent auditor. As of September 30, 2022 the audit report was unavailable for distribution. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that all required fillings be submitted timely according to the Single Audit Act of 1984 and Title 2, U.S. Code of Federal Regulations guidelines. Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization was unable to engage an independent auditor to complete and issue their audit report before the deadline. The Organization has since engaged an independent auditor and plans to submit the data collection form on time in the future.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Justice passed through Missouri Department of Social Services: Crime Victim Assistance (16.575) Criteria: All costs allocated to grants funding should be supported by invoices, timesheets, or other documentation. In additions, all costs allocated to grant funding should be approved by the proper levels of management before the disbursement is made. Condition: Four out of forty payroll costs did not have a timesheet or other supporting documentation. Twelve of forty payroll costs did have the proper review and authorization documented. Twenty-three out of sixty-three accounts payable invoices did not have the proper level of management approval before the disbursement was made. This was a statistically valid sample. Cause: One key member of management did not follow the Organizations internal controls. Effect: Unauthorized and/or unallowable grant expenditures could be mistakenly disbursed. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Actual Crime Victim Assistance expenditures totaled $329,773. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: All disbursements of the organization should have proper approval and support before the disbursement is made. Views of Responsible Officials: The member of management responsible for overseeing the disbursements and payroll process has been terminated. The Organization has since changed its internal controls to decrease the likelihood that disbursements will be made without proper approval or support.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Justice passed through Missouri Department of Social Services: Crime Victim Assistance (16.575) Criteria: When a sub-recipient of federal awards uses federal money to acquire goods and services expected to cost more than $25,000, the sub-recipient must determine that the vendor is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government. Condition: The Organization purchased services from one vendor totaling greater than $25,000 that required the Organization to determine the vendor?s status with the federal government. The vendors were, in fact, not excluded parties, but the Organization had no consistent internal control in place to make that determination before the disbursements were made. Cause: The Organization has used this same vendor for many years and the Organization overlooked this vendor when analyzing payments. Effect: The Organization did comply with the federal compliance requirements. However, internal controls were such that noncompliance could occur and go undetected. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Actual Crime Victim Assistance expenditures totaled $329,773. Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization verify a vendor?s status by checking the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000. Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization will verify all vendors? status using the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Justice passed through Missouri Department of Social Services: Crime Victim Assistance (16.575) Criteria: Per Title 2 CFR 200.512(d), the data collection form must be submitted the earlier of 30 calendar days after the receipt of the auditors? report, or nine months after the end of the audit report. Condition: The data collection form for the audit of the year ending December 31, 2021, was due September 30, 2022 but was not submitted until February 15, 2023, 138 days late. Cause: The Organization was unable to hire an independent auditor to issue their report by the due date. Effect: The submission of the prior year audit and data collection form was not completed before the deadline. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The data collection form submission must include an attachment of the annual audit report of an independent auditor. As of September 30, 2022 the audit report was unavailable for distribution. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that all required fillings be submitted timely according to the Single Audit Act of 1984 and Title 2, U.S. Code of Federal Regulations guidelines. Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization was unable to engage an independent auditor to complete and issue their audit report before the deadline. The Organization has since engaged an independent auditor and plans to submit the data collection form on time in the future.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Justice passed through Missouri Department of Social Services: Crime Victim Assistance (16.575) Criteria: All costs allocated to grants funding should be supported by invoices, timesheets, or other documentation. In additions, all costs allocated to grant funding should be approved by the proper levels of management before the disbursement is made. Condition: Four out of forty payroll costs did not have a timesheet or other supporting documentation. Twelve of forty payroll costs did have the proper review and authorization documented. Twenty-three out of sixty-three accounts payable invoices did not have the proper level of management approval before the disbursement was made. This was a statistically valid sample. Cause: One key member of management did not follow the Organizations internal controls. Effect: Unauthorized and/or unallowable grant expenditures could be mistakenly disbursed. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Actual Crime Victim Assistance expenditures totaled $329,773. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: All disbursements of the organization should have proper approval and support before the disbursement is made. Views of Responsible Officials: The member of management responsible for overseeing the disbursements and payroll process has been terminated. The Organization has since changed its internal controls to decrease the likelihood that disbursements will be made without proper approval or support.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Justice passed through Missouri Department of Social Services: Crime Victim Assistance (16.575) Criteria: When a sub-recipient of federal awards uses federal money to acquire goods and services expected to cost more than $25,000, the sub-recipient must determine that the vendor is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government. Condition: The Organization purchased services from one vendor totaling greater than $25,000 that required the Organization to determine the vendor?s status with the federal government. The vendors were, in fact, not excluded parties, but the Organization had no consistent internal control in place to make that determination before the disbursements were made. Cause: The Organization has used this same vendor for many years and the Organization overlooked this vendor when analyzing payments. Effect: The Organization did comply with the federal compliance requirements. However, internal controls were such that noncompliance could occur and go undetected. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Actual Crime Victim Assistance expenditures totaled $329,773. Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization verify a vendor?s status by checking the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000. Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization will verify all vendors? status using the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Justice passed through Missouri Department of Social Services: Crime Victim Assistance (16.575) Criteria: Per Title 2 CFR 200.512(d), the data collection form must be submitted the earlier of 30 calendar days after the receipt of the auditors? report, or nine months after the end of the audit report. Condition: The data collection form for the audit of the year ending December 31, 2021, was due September 30, 2022 but was not submitted until February 15, 2023, 138 days late. Cause: The Organization was unable to hire an independent auditor to issue their report by the due date. Effect: The submission of the prior year audit and data collection form was not completed before the deadline. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The data collection form submission must include an attachment of the annual audit report of an independent auditor. As of September 30, 2022 the audit report was unavailable for distribution. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that all required fillings be submitted timely according to the Single Audit Act of 1984 and Title 2, U.S. Code of Federal Regulations guidelines. Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization was unable to engage an independent auditor to complete and issue their audit report before the deadline. The Organization has since engaged an independent auditor and plans to submit the data collection form on time in the future.
Federal Program: U.S. Department of Justice passed through Missouri Department of Social Services: Crime Victim Assistance (16.575) Criteria: All costs allocated to grants funding should be supported by invoices, timesheets, or other documentation. In additions, all costs allocated to grant funding should be approved by the proper levels of management before the disbursement is made. Condition: Four out of forty payroll costs did not have a timesheet or other supporting documentation. Twelve of forty payroll costs did have the proper review and authorization documented. Twenty-three out of sixty-three accounts payable invoices did not have the proper level of management approval before the disbursement was made. This was a statistically valid sample. Cause: One key member of management did not follow the Organizations internal controls. Effect: Unauthorized and/or unallowable grant expenditures could be mistakenly disbursed. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Actual Crime Victim Assistance expenditures totaled $329,773. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: All disbursements of the organization should have proper approval and support before the disbursement is made. Views of Responsible Officials: The member of management responsible for overseeing the disbursements and payroll process has been terminated. The Organization has since changed its internal controls to decrease the likelihood that disbursements will be made without proper approval or support.