Audit 402510

FY End
2025-09-30
Total Expended
$1.21M
Findings
4
Programs
3
Organization: BANFIELDBIO INC (WA)
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2026-05-28
Auditor: MT VIEW CPAS

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1215946 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes P
1215947 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes I
1215948 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes P
1215949 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes P

Contacts

Name Title Type
JNAJTN8L1SA4 Michael Banfield Auditee
4252969267 Otto Rabe Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal grant activity of BanfieldBio Inc (“the Company”) under programs of the federal government for the year ended September 30, 2025. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Company, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the Company. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in 48 CFR Subpart 31.2, Contracts with Commercial Organizations, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement.
See the Notes to the SEFA for chart/table
The Company has not elected to use the 15% de minimis cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance for all federal awards. The Company’s HHS grant allows for a cost rate of 40% for facilities and administrative costs.

Finding Details

Criteria: Entities may follow informal procurement methods for small purchases less than $15,000 (or $50,000 if self-certified as the micro-purchase threshold). Otherwise, entities must follow formal procurement methods except under very specific circumstances in which the recipient may use a noncompetitive procurement method (2 CFR 200.320). Formal procurement methods are competitive and require public notice. These methods may include sealed bids or proposals. Condition: Management did not document formal procurement methods used for expenditures over $15,000. Cause: Management has previously worked with several universities and research institutions and established a working relationship with them in years not subject federal audit requirements. Management believes these institutions to be fair and reasonable in cost. Effect: Contracts engaged by management did not promote fair competition and may have resulted in excessive costs. Questioned Costs: Federal award purchases beyond the micro-purchase threshold totaled $261,772. Recommendation: We recommend that management follow and document formal procurement methods for all federal award purchases over $15,000, which may include self-certifying a micro-purchase threshold up to $50,000.
Criteria: If an entity receives awards under only one program (excluding research and development (R&D)), and the program’s laws, regulations, or grant agreements do not require a financial statement audit, the entity has the alternative of having an audit made of the one program in accordance with that program’s audit requirements (e.g., a program-specific audit) instead of a Single Audit (2 CFR 200.501(c)). For R&D, a program–specific audit may be elected if all awards expended were received from the same federal agency, or the same federal agency and the same pass-through agency, and such entity(ies) approves in advance a program specific audit (2 CFR 200.501(d)). Condition: Management engaged its auditors to perform a program specific audit while receiving R&D awards from multiple federal agencies and in advance of obtaining approval from the awarding agencies. Cause: Management has difficulty receiving responses from the grant managers of their federal awards and as such, was unable to obtain approval to perform a program-specific audit as of the completion of the audit. Effect: The program-specific audit may be rejected by the federal grant authorities. Recommendation: We recommend that management engage its auditors to perform a full single audit prior to the filing deadline.