Audit 371529

FY End
2025-06-30
Total Expended
$1.28M
Findings
1
Programs
1
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2025-10-30

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1161641 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes N

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.181 SUPPORTIVE HOUSING FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES $108,630 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
KAUMWZ6YZ2A9 Ling Han Auditee
6516457271 Brian Baker Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards includes the federal award activity of Universal City Supportive Housing, Inc., HUD Project No. 115-HD025-WPD, and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Universal City Supportive Housing, Inc., it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of Universal City Supportive Housing, Inc.
Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Universal City Supportive Housing, Inc. has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.
There are no HUD loans in this Project.

Finding Details

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT FINDING 2025-001: SECTION 811, ASSISTANCE LISTING NUMBER 14.181 Condition: For one of the tenant files tested, the Project was late with the tenant recertification. Criteria: The Project should recertify tenants on a timely basis. Effect: There is no financial effect on rent subsidies. Subsidy rent is adjusted in subsequent months to reflect the correct HUD subsidy. Context: A sample of tenant files was selected for testing tenant recertification. The test located one recertification that was not in compliance. The non-compliance did not have a financial effect. The details and results of the sample are as follows: Population - 20, Dollars - N/A; Sample -2, Dollars - N/A; Not in Compliance - 1, Dollars - N/A; Questioned Costs - None; Cause: The Project personnel were busy and not able to complete the recertification in a timely manner. Recommendation: Project personnel should be reminded that timely recertification is an important step in tenant management. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Project agrees with the finding. Recertification staff will be reminded to be aware of deadlines to ensure recertifications are completed in a timely manner. Total-Department of Housing and Urban Development - $0; Non-compliance code - R