Audit 322048

FY End
2023-12-31
Total Expended
$3.06M
Findings
8
Programs
4
Organization: Healthcore Clinic, Inc. (KS)
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-09-28

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
499242 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - N
499243 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - N
499244 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - N
499245 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - N
1075684 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - N
1075685 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - N
1075686 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - N
1075687 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - N

Contacts

Name Title Type
JKBLMCE82GV4 Teresa Lovelady Auditee
3166910249 Justin Kensinger Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Note 1: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: HealthCore Clinic, Inc. has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the “Schedule”) includes the federal award activity of HealthCore Clinic, Inc., under programs of the federal government for the year ended December 31, 2023. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of HealthCore Clinic, Inc., it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, results of operations, changes in net assets, or cash flows of HealthCore Clinic, Inc.
Title: Note 4: Federal Loan Programs Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: HealthCore Clinic, Inc. has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. HealthCore Clinic, Inc. did not have any federal loan programs during the year ended December 31, 2023.
Title: Note 5: Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)(Unaudited) Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: HealthCore Clinic, Inc. has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. HealthCore Clinic, Inc. did not receive any donated PPE from a federal source during the year ended December 31, 2023.

Finding Details

Health Center Program Cluster – CFDA Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 5 H80CS33642-05-00 Program Year 2023 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests and Provisions: Sliding Fee Discounts (42 USC 254(k)(3)(g); 42 CFR sections 51c.303(g); and 42 CFR sections 56.303 (f)) Condition – Patients received a sliding fee discount that was inconsistent with the stated sliding fee discount categories under the Organization’s policy. Questioned Cost – None Contact – A sample of 25 encounters out of 36,135 total encounters were tested and 2 errors were noted where patients received an incorrect sliding fee adjustment. The sampling methodology used is not and is not intended to be statistically valid. Two patients received a sliding fee adjustment that was inconsistent with the approved policy for the proper sliding fee adjustments based on their income documentation. Effect – Sliding fee discounts were given to patients that were inconsistent with the Organization’s sliding fee discount policy. Cause – The Organization did not comply with their sliding fee policy. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Not applicable. Recommendation – We recommend management continue to ensure all personnel understand the sliding fee scale policy and adhere to the requirements and guidelines set forth in the policy. Procedures should be implemented to ensure that eligible patients receive discounts in accordance with the sliding fee scale and the Health Center Program Compliance Manual.
Health Center Program Cluster – CFDA Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 5 H80CS33642-05-00 Program Year 2023 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests and Provisions: Sliding Fee Discounts (42 USC 254(k)(3)(g); 42 CFR sections 51c.303(g); and 42 CFR sections 56.303 (f)) Condition – Patients received a sliding fee discount that was inconsistent with the stated sliding fee discount categories under the Organization’s policy. Questioned Cost – None Contact – A sample of 25 encounters out of 36,135 total encounters were tested and 2 errors were noted where patients received an incorrect sliding fee adjustment. The sampling methodology used is not and is not intended to be statistically valid. Two patients received a sliding fee adjustment that was inconsistent with the approved policy for the proper sliding fee adjustments based on their income documentation. Effect – Sliding fee discounts were given to patients that were inconsistent with the Organization’s sliding fee discount policy. Cause – The Organization did not comply with their sliding fee policy. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Not applicable. Recommendation – We recommend management continue to ensure all personnel understand the sliding fee scale policy and adhere to the requirements and guidelines set forth in the policy. Procedures should be implemented to ensure that eligible patients receive discounts in accordance with the sliding fee scale and the Health Center Program Compliance Manual.
Health Center Program Cluster – CFDA Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 5 H80CS33642-05-00 Program Year 2023 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests and Provisions: Sliding Fee Discounts (42 USC 254(k)(3)(g); 42 CFR sections 51c.303(g); and 42 CFR sections 56.303 (f)) Condition – Patients received a sliding fee discount that was inconsistent with the stated sliding fee discount categories under the Organization’s policy. Questioned Cost – None Contact – A sample of 25 encounters out of 36,135 total encounters were tested and 2 errors were noted where patients received an incorrect sliding fee adjustment. The sampling methodology used is not and is not intended to be statistically valid. Two patients received a sliding fee adjustment that was inconsistent with the approved policy for the proper sliding fee adjustments based on their income documentation. Effect – Sliding fee discounts were given to patients that were inconsistent with the Organization’s sliding fee discount policy. Cause – The Organization did not comply with their sliding fee policy. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Not applicable. Recommendation – We recommend management continue to ensure all personnel understand the sliding fee scale policy and adhere to the requirements and guidelines set forth in the policy. Procedures should be implemented to ensure that eligible patients receive discounts in accordance with the sliding fee scale and the Health Center Program Compliance Manual.
Health Center Program Cluster – CFDA Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 5 H80CS33642-05-00 Program Year 2023 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests and Provisions: Sliding Fee Discounts (42 USC 254(k)(3)(g); 42 CFR sections 51c.303(g); and 42 CFR sections 56.303 (f)) Condition – Patients received a sliding fee discount that was inconsistent with the stated sliding fee discount categories under the Organization’s policy. Questioned Cost – None Contact – A sample of 25 encounters out of 36,135 total encounters were tested and 2 errors were noted where patients received an incorrect sliding fee adjustment. The sampling methodology used is not and is not intended to be statistically valid. Two patients received a sliding fee adjustment that was inconsistent with the approved policy for the proper sliding fee adjustments based on their income documentation. Effect – Sliding fee discounts were given to patients that were inconsistent with the Organization’s sliding fee discount policy. Cause – The Organization did not comply with their sliding fee policy. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Not applicable. Recommendation – We recommend management continue to ensure all personnel understand the sliding fee scale policy and adhere to the requirements and guidelines set forth in the policy. Procedures should be implemented to ensure that eligible patients receive discounts in accordance with the sliding fee scale and the Health Center Program Compliance Manual.
Health Center Program Cluster – CFDA Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 5 H80CS33642-05-00 Program Year 2023 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests and Provisions: Sliding Fee Discounts (42 USC 254(k)(3)(g); 42 CFR sections 51c.303(g); and 42 CFR sections 56.303 (f)) Condition – Patients received a sliding fee discount that was inconsistent with the stated sliding fee discount categories under the Organization’s policy. Questioned Cost – None Contact – A sample of 25 encounters out of 36,135 total encounters were tested and 2 errors were noted where patients received an incorrect sliding fee adjustment. The sampling methodology used is not and is not intended to be statistically valid. Two patients received a sliding fee adjustment that was inconsistent with the approved policy for the proper sliding fee adjustments based on their income documentation. Effect – Sliding fee discounts were given to patients that were inconsistent with the Organization’s sliding fee discount policy. Cause – The Organization did not comply with their sliding fee policy. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Not applicable. Recommendation – We recommend management continue to ensure all personnel understand the sliding fee scale policy and adhere to the requirements and guidelines set forth in the policy. Procedures should be implemented to ensure that eligible patients receive discounts in accordance with the sliding fee scale and the Health Center Program Compliance Manual.
Health Center Program Cluster – CFDA Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 5 H80CS33642-05-00 Program Year 2023 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests and Provisions: Sliding Fee Discounts (42 USC 254(k)(3)(g); 42 CFR sections 51c.303(g); and 42 CFR sections 56.303 (f)) Condition – Patients received a sliding fee discount that was inconsistent with the stated sliding fee discount categories under the Organization’s policy. Questioned Cost – None Contact – A sample of 25 encounters out of 36,135 total encounters were tested and 2 errors were noted where patients received an incorrect sliding fee adjustment. The sampling methodology used is not and is not intended to be statistically valid. Two patients received a sliding fee adjustment that was inconsistent with the approved policy for the proper sliding fee adjustments based on their income documentation. Effect – Sliding fee discounts were given to patients that were inconsistent with the Organization’s sliding fee discount policy. Cause – The Organization did not comply with their sliding fee policy. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Not applicable. Recommendation – We recommend management continue to ensure all personnel understand the sliding fee scale policy and adhere to the requirements and guidelines set forth in the policy. Procedures should be implemented to ensure that eligible patients receive discounts in accordance with the sliding fee scale and the Health Center Program Compliance Manual.
Health Center Program Cluster – CFDA Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 5 H80CS33642-05-00 Program Year 2023 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests and Provisions: Sliding Fee Discounts (42 USC 254(k)(3)(g); 42 CFR sections 51c.303(g); and 42 CFR sections 56.303 (f)) Condition – Patients received a sliding fee discount that was inconsistent with the stated sliding fee discount categories under the Organization’s policy. Questioned Cost – None Contact – A sample of 25 encounters out of 36,135 total encounters were tested and 2 errors were noted where patients received an incorrect sliding fee adjustment. The sampling methodology used is not and is not intended to be statistically valid. Two patients received a sliding fee adjustment that was inconsistent with the approved policy for the proper sliding fee adjustments based on their income documentation. Effect – Sliding fee discounts were given to patients that were inconsistent with the Organization’s sliding fee discount policy. Cause – The Organization did not comply with their sliding fee policy. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Not applicable. Recommendation – We recommend management continue to ensure all personnel understand the sliding fee scale policy and adhere to the requirements and guidelines set forth in the policy. Procedures should be implemented to ensure that eligible patients receive discounts in accordance with the sliding fee scale and the Health Center Program Compliance Manual.
Health Center Program Cluster – CFDA Nos. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. 5 H80CS33642-05-00 Program Year 2023 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests and Provisions: Sliding Fee Discounts (42 USC 254(k)(3)(g); 42 CFR sections 51c.303(g); and 42 CFR sections 56.303 (f)) Condition – Patients received a sliding fee discount that was inconsistent with the stated sliding fee discount categories under the Organization’s policy. Questioned Cost – None Contact – A sample of 25 encounters out of 36,135 total encounters were tested and 2 errors were noted where patients received an incorrect sliding fee adjustment. The sampling methodology used is not and is not intended to be statistically valid. Two patients received a sliding fee adjustment that was inconsistent with the approved policy for the proper sliding fee adjustments based on their income documentation. Effect – Sliding fee discounts were given to patients that were inconsistent with the Organization’s sliding fee discount policy. Cause – The Organization did not comply with their sliding fee policy. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Not applicable. Recommendation – We recommend management continue to ensure all personnel understand the sliding fee scale policy and adhere to the requirements and guidelines set forth in the policy. Procedures should be implemented to ensure that eligible patients receive discounts in accordance with the sliding fee scale and the Health Center Program Compliance Manual.