Audit 291395

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$854,075
Findings
120
Programs
5
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2024-02-21

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
369899 2022-001 Material Weakness - P
369900 2022-002 Material Weakness - L
369901 2022-003 Material Weakness - C
369902 2022-004 Material Weakness - C
369903 2022-005 Material Weakness - P
369904 2022-006 Material Weakness - L
369905 2022-007 Material Weakness - C
369906 2022-008 Material Weakness - P
369907 2022-009 Material Weakness - A
369908 2022-010 Material Weakness - B
369909 2022-011 Material Weakness - P
369910 2022-012 Material Weakness - B
369911 2022-013 Material Weakness - P
369912 2022-014 Material Weakness - B
369913 2022-015 Material Weakness - C
369914 2022-001 Material Weakness - P
369915 2022-002 Material Weakness - L
369916 2022-003 Material Weakness - C
369917 2022-004 Material Weakness - C
369918 2022-005 Material Weakness - P
369919 2022-006 Material Weakness - L
369920 2022-007 Material Weakness - C
369921 2022-008 Material Weakness - P
369922 2022-009 Material Weakness - A
369923 2022-010 Material Weakness - B
369924 2022-011 Material Weakness - P
369925 2022-012 Material Weakness - B
369926 2022-013 Material Weakness - P
369927 2022-014 Material Weakness - B
369928 2022-015 Material Weakness - C
369929 2022-001 Material Weakness - P
369930 2022-002 Material Weakness - L
369931 2022-003 Material Weakness - C
369932 2022-004 Material Weakness - C
369933 2022-005 Material Weakness - P
369934 2022-006 Material Weakness - L
369935 2022-007 Material Weakness - C
369936 2022-008 Material Weakness - P
369937 2022-009 Material Weakness - A
369938 2022-010 Material Weakness - B
369939 2022-011 Material Weakness - P
369940 2022-012 Material Weakness - B
369941 2022-013 Material Weakness - P
369942 2022-014 Material Weakness - B
369943 2022-015 Material Weakness - C
369944 2022-001 Material Weakness - P
369945 2022-002 Material Weakness - L
369946 2022-003 Material Weakness - C
369947 2022-004 Material Weakness - C
369948 2022-005 Material Weakness - P
369949 2022-006 Material Weakness - L
369950 2022-007 Material Weakness - C
369951 2022-008 Material Weakness - P
369952 2022-009 Material Weakness - A
369953 2022-010 Material Weakness - B
369954 2022-011 Material Weakness - P
369955 2022-012 Material Weakness - B
369956 2022-013 Material Weakness - P
369957 2022-014 Material Weakness - B
369958 2022-015 Material Weakness - C
946341 2022-001 Material Weakness - P
946342 2022-002 Material Weakness - L
946343 2022-003 Material Weakness - C
946344 2022-004 Material Weakness - C
946345 2022-005 Material Weakness - P
946346 2022-006 Material Weakness - L
946347 2022-007 Material Weakness - C
946348 2022-008 Material Weakness - P
946349 2022-009 Material Weakness - A
946350 2022-010 Material Weakness - B
946351 2022-011 Material Weakness - P
946352 2022-012 Material Weakness - B
946353 2022-013 Material Weakness - P
946354 2022-014 Material Weakness - B
946355 2022-015 Material Weakness - C
946356 2022-001 Material Weakness - P
946357 2022-002 Material Weakness - L
946358 2022-003 Material Weakness - C
946359 2022-004 Material Weakness - C
946360 2022-005 Material Weakness - P
946361 2022-006 Material Weakness - L
946362 2022-007 Material Weakness - C
946363 2022-008 Material Weakness - P
946364 2022-009 Material Weakness - A
946365 2022-010 Material Weakness - B
946366 2022-011 Material Weakness - P
946367 2022-012 Material Weakness - B
946368 2022-013 Material Weakness - P
946369 2022-014 Material Weakness - B
946370 2022-015 Material Weakness - C
946371 2022-001 Material Weakness - P
946372 2022-002 Material Weakness - L
946373 2022-003 Material Weakness - C
946374 2022-004 Material Weakness - C
946375 2022-005 Material Weakness - P
946376 2022-006 Material Weakness - L
946377 2022-007 Material Weakness - C
946378 2022-008 Material Weakness - P
946379 2022-009 Material Weakness - A
946380 2022-010 Material Weakness - B
946381 2022-011 Material Weakness - P
946382 2022-012 Material Weakness - B
946383 2022-013 Material Weakness - P
946384 2022-014 Material Weakness - B
946385 2022-015 Material Weakness - C
946386 2022-001 Material Weakness - P
946387 2022-002 Material Weakness - L
946388 2022-003 Material Weakness - C
946389 2022-004 Material Weakness - C
946390 2022-005 Material Weakness - P
946391 2022-006 Material Weakness - L
946392 2022-007 Material Weakness - C
946393 2022-008 Material Weakness - P
946394 2022-009 Material Weakness - A
946395 2022-010 Material Weakness - B
946396 2022-011 Material Weakness - P
946397 2022-012 Material Weakness - B
946398 2022-013 Material Weakness - P
946399 2022-014 Material Weakness - B
946400 2022-015 Material Weakness - C

Contacts

Name Title Type
PN8JADJ2DGZ1 Will Eberle Auditee
8022799069 Robin Barnett Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Vermont Association for Mental Health and Addiction Recovery, Inc. did not elect to use the 10 percent de minimis direct cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance because indirect costs were allowed under the federal awards. The accompanying schedule of federal awards includes the federal award activity of Vermont Association for Mental Health and Addiction Recovery, Inc. under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2022. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Vermont Association for Mental Health and Addiction Recovery, Inc., it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of Vermont Association for Mental Health and Addicition Recovery, Inc.
Title: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Vermont Association for Mental Health and Addiction Recovery, Inc. did not elect to use the 10 percent de minimis direct cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance because indirect costs were allowed under the federal awards. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement.

Finding Details

Criteria: Journal entries should have the proper documentation and supporting backup Condition: Journal entries did not have proper documentation to support the entry. Journal entries were not approved by management or board. Cause: Unknown Effect: Without proper backup for adjustments made to the trial balance, it would be easy for material amounts of improper recognition to occur. Recommendation: The Company should implement a system for recording journal entries and the necessary backup for those journal entries. Management Response: The Company is working on developing a system of documenting journal entries, with proper back-up and support. They have hired a CPA to handle their bookkeeping going forward.
The Company does not have the experience and training needed to – ‐ Prepare all its year end reconciliations and journal entries and prepare financial statements, complete with notes, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Accordingly, the Town is unable to, and has not established internal controls over the preparation of year-end reconciliations and journal entries and the preparation of the financial statements. ‐ Select and apply accounting principles that are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Accordingly, the Town is unable to, and has not established, internal controls over the selection and application of accounting principles. Criteria - Under SAS 115, an internal control deficiency exists when management does not possess the financial expertise to prepare end reconciliations and prepare financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Condition: Management lack the expertise to prepare the financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Cause: Unknown Effect: Because management lacks expertise in financial accounting and reporting, there is more than a remote likelihood that a misstatement of the entity’s financial statements that is more than inconsequential will not be prevented or detected under the provisions of SAS 115.
During the course of our audit it was noted that grant reimbursement request is not being conducted timely. Criteria: Grant reimbursements should be requested timely. This also makes calculating expenditures related to possible single audits to be reconciled. Condition: Management was not requesting grant reimbursement timely when expenditures were incurred. Cause: Unknown Effect: Makes it very difficult for cash flow and revenue recognition to be completed timely and accurately.
– During the course of our audit it was noted that payroll timesheets and grant allocation was not being follow properly. Time for employees was allocated to grants based on budget/scheduled time rather than actual time via a timesheet. Management could not justify time spent to specific grants by specific employees. The Company also could not support multiple invoices requested for review for audit evidence. Criteria: Grants require time to be allocated to them based on specific time spent rather than budget. Grants require backup for reimbursement. Condition: No timesheets were kept or approved Effect: Grant compliance was not followed.
Criteria: Boards are required to meeting a regularly to provide guidance and support to management Condition: There were no board meeting prior to August 5, 2022 or other documentation of board exercising their fiduciary responsibility to oversee the Company’s operations. Effect: Little to no board oversight.
Criteria: The Rural Behavioral Health Workforce Coordinating Centers – Northern Border Region grant award requires a SF-424a and an annual Federal Financial Report (FFR). A data collection form is required to be filed within 9 months after year end. Condition: No documentation was available to determine that the SF-424a or annual Federal Financial Report (FFR) for the year ended June 30, 2022 has been filed. The data collection form was not filed within 9 months after year end. Cause: There were no procedures in place for timely filing of reports or retention polices for grant reporting. Effect: Without documentation for reporting and untimely filing of the data collection form, the Company is not in compliance with the reporting requirements.
Criteria: The Company is required to hold documentation of each drawdown of grant revenue. Condition: Management could not provide documentation of the drawdowns of grant revenue. Effect: Lack of documentation of draw down approval and evidence of reimbursement.
Criteria: The financial statements and Schedule of Federal Awards required material adjustments in order for an opinion to be issued. Condition: Many accounts required material adjustments to comply with GAAP. Effect: The financial statements and Schedule of Federal Awards had multiple errors that required material adjustments
Criteria: The financial statements require adequate backup and support. Condition: Management did not have adequate support/documentation for audit procedures. Effect: During the course of the audit multiple items required took substantial time to locate and provide to the auditors for audit backup and support. This required multiple delays in the audit and ultimately resulted in a disclaimer of opinion
Condition: Prior to November 14, 2022, invoices paid did not require documentation of approval. The former executive director paid invoices with no review or approval. Invoices to support the expenditures was not consistently retained. Criteria: Internal controls should be in place to provide that expenditures are only paid after they are reviewed and approved. Invoices or other documentation should be retained to support expenditures. Cause: There were no procedures in place to require authorization of expenditures or filing of invoices to support expenditures. Effect: Because of the failure to require approval and the lack of documentation to support expenditures, there is more than a remote possibility that material misstatements could occur without detection. Because of the failure to retain evidence for expenses, it wasn’t possible to issue an opinion about the existence and carrying amount of expenses.
Criteria: Proper segregation of duties should be impamented to prevent various duties to be completed without review Condition: The Company operates a small office limiting the ability for segregation of duties to be in place. Many of the accounting functions are performed by one employee with the review of a second employee. A deficiency will occur when staffs are away for vacation, sick days and other events which cause various duties to be completed without review. Effect: Lack of segregation of duties
Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse (Recovery Support and Training – CFDA #96.959; Passed thru State of Vermont Department of Health Grant #403420-08911 Grant period – Year ended June 30, 2022, Vermont Alcohol and Drug Information Clearinghouse – CFDA #93.959; Passed thru the State of Vermont Department of Health Grant #03420-08889 – Year ended June 30, 2022, Rural Behavioral Health Workforce Coordinating Centers – Northern Border Region – CFDA #93.912; Grant #1 U2SRH43523-01-00 – Year ended August 31, 2022) Criteria: Allowable cost criteria in 2 CFR part 200 require federal payments to be made for payroll based on actual time allocated. Activities allowed Condition: The Company could not provide any back-up for the allocated time requested for reimbursement of payroll. Cause:Proper timesheets were not kept. Effect: The federal grant was incorrectly charged without support. Questioned Costs: $405,190 Context: The Company was audited by the Office of Inspector General for Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration programs. Multiple infractions were noted.
Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse (Recovery Support and Training – CFDA #96.959; Passed thru State of Vermont Department of Health Grant #403420-08911 Grant period – Year ended June 30, 2022, Vermont Alcohol and Drug Information Clearinghouse – CFDA #93.959; Passed thru the State of Vermont Department of Health Grant #03420-08889 – Year ended June 30, 2022 Material Weaknesses in Internal Control over Compliance: See findings 2022-2, 2022-3, 2022-4, 2022-5, 2022-7, and 2022-9
Rural Behavioral Health Workforce Coordinating Centers – Northern Border Region – CFDA #93.912; Grant #1 U2SRH43523-01-00 – Year ended August 31, 2022) Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance: See findings 2022-2, 2022-3, 2022-4, 2022-5, 2022-6, 2022-7, 2022-9, 2022-10
Rural Behavioral Health Workforce Coordinating Centers – Northern Border Region – CFDA #93.912; Grant #1 U2SRH43523-01-00 – Year ended August 31, 2022) Criteria: According to 2 CFR section 200.305(b), non-federal entities must minimize the time elapsed between the transfer of federal funds and disbursement by the non-federal entity for direct program costs. Condition: Drawdown reports were not available for testing and financial reports weren’t available to determine that the time elapsed between the transfer of federal funds and disbursement by the non-federal entity for direct program costs was minimized. Effect: The entity may not be in compliance with the cash management requirements. Questioned Costs: $0 Context: There was a significant amount of turnover within the organization. Due to the turnover and the lack of record retention policies and procedures, records of drawdowns and documentation to support compliance with cash management requirements couldn’t be located. On November 14, 2022, the Company adopted new records management policies and procedures.
Criteria: Journal entries should have the proper documentation and supporting backup Condition: Journal entries did not have proper documentation to support the entry. Journal entries were not approved by management or board. Cause: Unknown Effect: Without proper backup for adjustments made to the trial balance, it would be easy for material amounts of improper recognition to occur. Recommendation: The Company should implement a system for recording journal entries and the necessary backup for those journal entries. Management Response: The Company is working on developing a system of documenting journal entries, with proper back-up and support. They have hired a CPA to handle their bookkeeping going forward.
The Company does not have the experience and training needed to – ‐ Prepare all its year end reconciliations and journal entries and prepare financial statements, complete with notes, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Accordingly, the Town is unable to, and has not established internal controls over the preparation of year-end reconciliations and journal entries and the preparation of the financial statements. ‐ Select and apply accounting principles that are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Accordingly, the Town is unable to, and has not established, internal controls over the selection and application of accounting principles. Criteria - Under SAS 115, an internal control deficiency exists when management does not possess the financial expertise to prepare end reconciliations and prepare financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Condition: Management lack the expertise to prepare the financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Cause: Unknown Effect: Because management lacks expertise in financial accounting and reporting, there is more than a remote likelihood that a misstatement of the entity’s financial statements that is more than inconsequential will not be prevented or detected under the provisions of SAS 115.
During the course of our audit it was noted that grant reimbursement request is not being conducted timely. Criteria: Grant reimbursements should be requested timely. This also makes calculating expenditures related to possible single audits to be reconciled. Condition: Management was not requesting grant reimbursement timely when expenditures were incurred. Cause: Unknown Effect: Makes it very difficult for cash flow and revenue recognition to be completed timely and accurately.
– During the course of our audit it was noted that payroll timesheets and grant allocation was not being follow properly. Time for employees was allocated to grants based on budget/scheduled time rather than actual time via a timesheet. Management could not justify time spent to specific grants by specific employees. The Company also could not support multiple invoices requested for review for audit evidence. Criteria: Grants require time to be allocated to them based on specific time spent rather than budget. Grants require backup for reimbursement. Condition: No timesheets were kept or approved Effect: Grant compliance was not followed.
Criteria: Boards are required to meeting a regularly to provide guidance and support to management Condition: There were no board meeting prior to August 5, 2022 or other documentation of board exercising their fiduciary responsibility to oversee the Company’s operations. Effect: Little to no board oversight.
Criteria: The Rural Behavioral Health Workforce Coordinating Centers – Northern Border Region grant award requires a SF-424a and an annual Federal Financial Report (FFR). A data collection form is required to be filed within 9 months after year end. Condition: No documentation was available to determine that the SF-424a or annual Federal Financial Report (FFR) for the year ended June 30, 2022 has been filed. The data collection form was not filed within 9 months after year end. Cause: There were no procedures in place for timely filing of reports or retention polices for grant reporting. Effect: Without documentation for reporting and untimely filing of the data collection form, the Company is not in compliance with the reporting requirements.
Criteria: The Company is required to hold documentation of each drawdown of grant revenue. Condition: Management could not provide documentation of the drawdowns of grant revenue. Effect: Lack of documentation of draw down approval and evidence of reimbursement.
Criteria: The financial statements and Schedule of Federal Awards required material adjustments in order for an opinion to be issued. Condition: Many accounts required material adjustments to comply with GAAP. Effect: The financial statements and Schedule of Federal Awards had multiple errors that required material adjustments
Criteria: The financial statements require adequate backup and support. Condition: Management did not have adequate support/documentation for audit procedures. Effect: During the course of the audit multiple items required took substantial time to locate and provide to the auditors for audit backup and support. This required multiple delays in the audit and ultimately resulted in a disclaimer of opinion
Condition: Prior to November 14, 2022, invoices paid did not require documentation of approval. The former executive director paid invoices with no review or approval. Invoices to support the expenditures was not consistently retained. Criteria: Internal controls should be in place to provide that expenditures are only paid after they are reviewed and approved. Invoices or other documentation should be retained to support expenditures. Cause: There were no procedures in place to require authorization of expenditures or filing of invoices to support expenditures. Effect: Because of the failure to require approval and the lack of documentation to support expenditures, there is more than a remote possibility that material misstatements could occur without detection. Because of the failure to retain evidence for expenses, it wasn’t possible to issue an opinion about the existence and carrying amount of expenses.
Criteria: Proper segregation of duties should be impamented to prevent various duties to be completed without review Condition: The Company operates a small office limiting the ability for segregation of duties to be in place. Many of the accounting functions are performed by one employee with the review of a second employee. A deficiency will occur when staffs are away for vacation, sick days and other events which cause various duties to be completed without review. Effect: Lack of segregation of duties
Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse (Recovery Support and Training – CFDA #96.959; Passed thru State of Vermont Department of Health Grant #403420-08911 Grant period – Year ended June 30, 2022, Vermont Alcohol and Drug Information Clearinghouse – CFDA #93.959; Passed thru the State of Vermont Department of Health Grant #03420-08889 – Year ended June 30, 2022, Rural Behavioral Health Workforce Coordinating Centers – Northern Border Region – CFDA #93.912; Grant #1 U2SRH43523-01-00 – Year ended August 31, 2022) Criteria: Allowable cost criteria in 2 CFR part 200 require federal payments to be made for payroll based on actual time allocated. Activities allowed Condition: The Company could not provide any back-up for the allocated time requested for reimbursement of payroll. Cause:Proper timesheets were not kept. Effect: The federal grant was incorrectly charged without support. Questioned Costs: $405,190 Context: The Company was audited by the Office of Inspector General for Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration programs. Multiple infractions were noted.
Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse (Recovery Support and Training – CFDA #96.959; Passed thru State of Vermont Department of Health Grant #403420-08911 Grant period – Year ended June 30, 2022, Vermont Alcohol and Drug Information Clearinghouse – CFDA #93.959; Passed thru the State of Vermont Department of Health Grant #03420-08889 – Year ended June 30, 2022 Material Weaknesses in Internal Control over Compliance: See findings 2022-2, 2022-3, 2022-4, 2022-5, 2022-7, and 2022-9
Rural Behavioral Health Workforce Coordinating Centers – Northern Border Region – CFDA #93.912; Grant #1 U2SRH43523-01-00 – Year ended August 31, 2022) Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance: See findings 2022-2, 2022-3, 2022-4, 2022-5, 2022-6, 2022-7, 2022-9, 2022-10
Rural Behavioral Health Workforce Coordinating Centers – Northern Border Region – CFDA #93.912; Grant #1 U2SRH43523-01-00 – Year ended August 31, 2022) Criteria: According to 2 CFR section 200.305(b), non-federal entities must minimize the time elapsed between the transfer of federal funds and disbursement by the non-federal entity for direct program costs. Condition: Drawdown reports were not available for testing and financial reports weren’t available to determine that the time elapsed between the transfer of federal funds and disbursement by the non-federal entity for direct program costs was minimized. Effect: The entity may not be in compliance with the cash management requirements. Questioned Costs: $0 Context: There was a significant amount of turnover within the organization. Due to the turnover and the lack of record retention policies and procedures, records of drawdowns and documentation to support compliance with cash management requirements couldn’t be located. On November 14, 2022, the Company adopted new records management policies and procedures.
Criteria: Journal entries should have the proper documentation and supporting backup Condition: Journal entries did not have proper documentation to support the entry. Journal entries were not approved by management or board. Cause: Unknown Effect: Without proper backup for adjustments made to the trial balance, it would be easy for material amounts of improper recognition to occur. Recommendation: The Company should implement a system for recording journal entries and the necessary backup for those journal entries. Management Response: The Company is working on developing a system of documenting journal entries, with proper back-up and support. They have hired a CPA to handle their bookkeeping going forward.
The Company does not have the experience and training needed to – ‐ Prepare all its year end reconciliations and journal entries and prepare financial statements, complete with notes, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Accordingly, the Town is unable to, and has not established internal controls over the preparation of year-end reconciliations and journal entries and the preparation of the financial statements. ‐ Select and apply accounting principles that are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Accordingly, the Town is unable to, and has not established, internal controls over the selection and application of accounting principles. Criteria - Under SAS 115, an internal control deficiency exists when management does not possess the financial expertise to prepare end reconciliations and prepare financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Condition: Management lack the expertise to prepare the financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Cause: Unknown Effect: Because management lacks expertise in financial accounting and reporting, there is more than a remote likelihood that a misstatement of the entity’s financial statements that is more than inconsequential will not be prevented or detected under the provisions of SAS 115.
During the course of our audit it was noted that grant reimbursement request is not being conducted timely. Criteria: Grant reimbursements should be requested timely. This also makes calculating expenditures related to possible single audits to be reconciled. Condition: Management was not requesting grant reimbursement timely when expenditures were incurred. Cause: Unknown Effect: Makes it very difficult for cash flow and revenue recognition to be completed timely and accurately.
– During the course of our audit it was noted that payroll timesheets and grant allocation was not being follow properly. Time for employees was allocated to grants based on budget/scheduled time rather than actual time via a timesheet. Management could not justify time spent to specific grants by specific employees. The Company also could not support multiple invoices requested for review for audit evidence. Criteria: Grants require time to be allocated to them based on specific time spent rather than budget. Grants require backup for reimbursement. Condition: No timesheets were kept or approved Effect: Grant compliance was not followed.
Criteria: Boards are required to meeting a regularly to provide guidance and support to management Condition: There were no board meeting prior to August 5, 2022 or other documentation of board exercising their fiduciary responsibility to oversee the Company’s operations. Effect: Little to no board oversight.
Criteria: The Rural Behavioral Health Workforce Coordinating Centers – Northern Border Region grant award requires a SF-424a and an annual Federal Financial Report (FFR). A data collection form is required to be filed within 9 months after year end. Condition: No documentation was available to determine that the SF-424a or annual Federal Financial Report (FFR) for the year ended June 30, 2022 has been filed. The data collection form was not filed within 9 months after year end. Cause: There were no procedures in place for timely filing of reports or retention polices for grant reporting. Effect: Without documentation for reporting and untimely filing of the data collection form, the Company is not in compliance with the reporting requirements.
Criteria: The Company is required to hold documentation of each drawdown of grant revenue. Condition: Management could not provide documentation of the drawdowns of grant revenue. Effect: Lack of documentation of draw down approval and evidence of reimbursement.
Criteria: The financial statements and Schedule of Federal Awards required material adjustments in order for an opinion to be issued. Condition: Many accounts required material adjustments to comply with GAAP. Effect: The financial statements and Schedule of Federal Awards had multiple errors that required material adjustments
Criteria: The financial statements require adequate backup and support. Condition: Management did not have adequate support/documentation for audit procedures. Effect: During the course of the audit multiple items required took substantial time to locate and provide to the auditors for audit backup and support. This required multiple delays in the audit and ultimately resulted in a disclaimer of opinion
Condition: Prior to November 14, 2022, invoices paid did not require documentation of approval. The former executive director paid invoices with no review or approval. Invoices to support the expenditures was not consistently retained. Criteria: Internal controls should be in place to provide that expenditures are only paid after they are reviewed and approved. Invoices or other documentation should be retained to support expenditures. Cause: There were no procedures in place to require authorization of expenditures or filing of invoices to support expenditures. Effect: Because of the failure to require approval and the lack of documentation to support expenditures, there is more than a remote possibility that material misstatements could occur without detection. Because of the failure to retain evidence for expenses, it wasn’t possible to issue an opinion about the existence and carrying amount of expenses.
Criteria: Proper segregation of duties should be impamented to prevent various duties to be completed without review Condition: The Company operates a small office limiting the ability for segregation of duties to be in place. Many of the accounting functions are performed by one employee with the review of a second employee. A deficiency will occur when staffs are away for vacation, sick days and other events which cause various duties to be completed without review. Effect: Lack of segregation of duties
Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse (Recovery Support and Training – CFDA #96.959; Passed thru State of Vermont Department of Health Grant #403420-08911 Grant period – Year ended June 30, 2022, Vermont Alcohol and Drug Information Clearinghouse – CFDA #93.959; Passed thru the State of Vermont Department of Health Grant #03420-08889 – Year ended June 30, 2022, Rural Behavioral Health Workforce Coordinating Centers – Northern Border Region – CFDA #93.912; Grant #1 U2SRH43523-01-00 – Year ended August 31, 2022) Criteria: Allowable cost criteria in 2 CFR part 200 require federal payments to be made for payroll based on actual time allocated. Activities allowed Condition: The Company could not provide any back-up for the allocated time requested for reimbursement of payroll. Cause:Proper timesheets were not kept. Effect: The federal grant was incorrectly charged without support. Questioned Costs: $405,190 Context: The Company was audited by the Office of Inspector General for Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration programs. Multiple infractions were noted.
Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse (Recovery Support and Training – CFDA #96.959; Passed thru State of Vermont Department of Health Grant #403420-08911 Grant period – Year ended June 30, 2022, Vermont Alcohol and Drug Information Clearinghouse – CFDA #93.959; Passed thru the State of Vermont Department of Health Grant #03420-08889 – Year ended June 30, 2022 Material Weaknesses in Internal Control over Compliance: See findings 2022-2, 2022-3, 2022-4, 2022-5, 2022-7, and 2022-9
Rural Behavioral Health Workforce Coordinating Centers – Northern Border Region – CFDA #93.912; Grant #1 U2SRH43523-01-00 – Year ended August 31, 2022) Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance: See findings 2022-2, 2022-3, 2022-4, 2022-5, 2022-6, 2022-7, 2022-9, 2022-10
Rural Behavioral Health Workforce Coordinating Centers – Northern Border Region – CFDA #93.912; Grant #1 U2SRH43523-01-00 – Year ended August 31, 2022) Criteria: According to 2 CFR section 200.305(b), non-federal entities must minimize the time elapsed between the transfer of federal funds and disbursement by the non-federal entity for direct program costs. Condition: Drawdown reports were not available for testing and financial reports weren’t available to determine that the time elapsed between the transfer of federal funds and disbursement by the non-federal entity for direct program costs was minimized. Effect: The entity may not be in compliance with the cash management requirements. Questioned Costs: $0 Context: There was a significant amount of turnover within the organization. Due to the turnover and the lack of record retention policies and procedures, records of drawdowns and documentation to support compliance with cash management requirements couldn’t be located. On November 14, 2022, the Company adopted new records management policies and procedures.
Criteria: Journal entries should have the proper documentation and supporting backup Condition: Journal entries did not have proper documentation to support the entry. Journal entries were not approved by management or board. Cause: Unknown Effect: Without proper backup for adjustments made to the trial balance, it would be easy for material amounts of improper recognition to occur. Recommendation: The Company should implement a system for recording journal entries and the necessary backup for those journal entries. Management Response: The Company is working on developing a system of documenting journal entries, with proper back-up and support. They have hired a CPA to handle their bookkeeping going forward.
The Company does not have the experience and training needed to – ‐ Prepare all its year end reconciliations and journal entries and prepare financial statements, complete with notes, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Accordingly, the Town is unable to, and has not established internal controls over the preparation of year-end reconciliations and journal entries and the preparation of the financial statements. ‐ Select and apply accounting principles that are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Accordingly, the Town is unable to, and has not established, internal controls over the selection and application of accounting principles. Criteria - Under SAS 115, an internal control deficiency exists when management does not possess the financial expertise to prepare end reconciliations and prepare financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Condition: Management lack the expertise to prepare the financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Cause: Unknown Effect: Because management lacks expertise in financial accounting and reporting, there is more than a remote likelihood that a misstatement of the entity’s financial statements that is more than inconsequential will not be prevented or detected under the provisions of SAS 115.
During the course of our audit it was noted that grant reimbursement request is not being conducted timely. Criteria: Grant reimbursements should be requested timely. This also makes calculating expenditures related to possible single audits to be reconciled. Condition: Management was not requesting grant reimbursement timely when expenditures were incurred. Cause: Unknown Effect: Makes it very difficult for cash flow and revenue recognition to be completed timely and accurately.
– During the course of our audit it was noted that payroll timesheets and grant allocation was not being follow properly. Time for employees was allocated to grants based on budget/scheduled time rather than actual time via a timesheet. Management could not justify time spent to specific grants by specific employees. The Company also could not support multiple invoices requested for review for audit evidence. Criteria: Grants require time to be allocated to them based on specific time spent rather than budget. Grants require backup for reimbursement. Condition: No timesheets were kept or approved Effect: Grant compliance was not followed.
Criteria: Boards are required to meeting a regularly to provide guidance and support to management Condition: There were no board meeting prior to August 5, 2022 or other documentation of board exercising their fiduciary responsibility to oversee the Company’s operations. Effect: Little to no board oversight.
Criteria: The Rural Behavioral Health Workforce Coordinating Centers – Northern Border Region grant award requires a SF-424a and an annual Federal Financial Report (FFR). A data collection form is required to be filed within 9 months after year end. Condition: No documentation was available to determine that the SF-424a or annual Federal Financial Report (FFR) for the year ended June 30, 2022 has been filed. The data collection form was not filed within 9 months after year end. Cause: There were no procedures in place for timely filing of reports or retention polices for grant reporting. Effect: Without documentation for reporting and untimely filing of the data collection form, the Company is not in compliance with the reporting requirements.
Criteria: The Company is required to hold documentation of each drawdown of grant revenue. Condition: Management could not provide documentation of the drawdowns of grant revenue. Effect: Lack of documentation of draw down approval and evidence of reimbursement.
Criteria: The financial statements and Schedule of Federal Awards required material adjustments in order for an opinion to be issued. Condition: Many accounts required material adjustments to comply with GAAP. Effect: The financial statements and Schedule of Federal Awards had multiple errors that required material adjustments
Criteria: The financial statements require adequate backup and support. Condition: Management did not have adequate support/documentation for audit procedures. Effect: During the course of the audit multiple items required took substantial time to locate and provide to the auditors for audit backup and support. This required multiple delays in the audit and ultimately resulted in a disclaimer of opinion
Condition: Prior to November 14, 2022, invoices paid did not require documentation of approval. The former executive director paid invoices with no review or approval. Invoices to support the expenditures was not consistently retained. Criteria: Internal controls should be in place to provide that expenditures are only paid after they are reviewed and approved. Invoices or other documentation should be retained to support expenditures. Cause: There were no procedures in place to require authorization of expenditures or filing of invoices to support expenditures. Effect: Because of the failure to require approval and the lack of documentation to support expenditures, there is more than a remote possibility that material misstatements could occur without detection. Because of the failure to retain evidence for expenses, it wasn’t possible to issue an opinion about the existence and carrying amount of expenses.
Criteria: Proper segregation of duties should be impamented to prevent various duties to be completed without review Condition: The Company operates a small office limiting the ability for segregation of duties to be in place. Many of the accounting functions are performed by one employee with the review of a second employee. A deficiency will occur when staffs are away for vacation, sick days and other events which cause various duties to be completed without review. Effect: Lack of segregation of duties
Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse (Recovery Support and Training – CFDA #96.959; Passed thru State of Vermont Department of Health Grant #403420-08911 Grant period – Year ended June 30, 2022, Vermont Alcohol and Drug Information Clearinghouse – CFDA #93.959; Passed thru the State of Vermont Department of Health Grant #03420-08889 – Year ended June 30, 2022, Rural Behavioral Health Workforce Coordinating Centers – Northern Border Region – CFDA #93.912; Grant #1 U2SRH43523-01-00 – Year ended August 31, 2022) Criteria: Allowable cost criteria in 2 CFR part 200 require federal payments to be made for payroll based on actual time allocated. Activities allowed Condition: The Company could not provide any back-up for the allocated time requested for reimbursement of payroll. Cause:Proper timesheets were not kept. Effect: The federal grant was incorrectly charged without support. Questioned Costs: $405,190 Context: The Company was audited by the Office of Inspector General for Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration programs. Multiple infractions were noted.
Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse (Recovery Support and Training – CFDA #96.959; Passed thru State of Vermont Department of Health Grant #403420-08911 Grant period – Year ended June 30, 2022, Vermont Alcohol and Drug Information Clearinghouse – CFDA #93.959; Passed thru the State of Vermont Department of Health Grant #03420-08889 – Year ended June 30, 2022 Material Weaknesses in Internal Control over Compliance: See findings 2022-2, 2022-3, 2022-4, 2022-5, 2022-7, and 2022-9
Rural Behavioral Health Workforce Coordinating Centers – Northern Border Region – CFDA #93.912; Grant #1 U2SRH43523-01-00 – Year ended August 31, 2022) Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance: See findings 2022-2, 2022-3, 2022-4, 2022-5, 2022-6, 2022-7, 2022-9, 2022-10
Rural Behavioral Health Workforce Coordinating Centers – Northern Border Region – CFDA #93.912; Grant #1 U2SRH43523-01-00 – Year ended August 31, 2022) Criteria: According to 2 CFR section 200.305(b), non-federal entities must minimize the time elapsed between the transfer of federal funds and disbursement by the non-federal entity for direct program costs. Condition: Drawdown reports were not available for testing and financial reports weren’t available to determine that the time elapsed between the transfer of federal funds and disbursement by the non-federal entity for direct program costs was minimized. Effect: The entity may not be in compliance with the cash management requirements. Questioned Costs: $0 Context: There was a significant amount of turnover within the organization. Due to the turnover and the lack of record retention policies and procedures, records of drawdowns and documentation to support compliance with cash management requirements couldn’t be located. On November 14, 2022, the Company adopted new records management policies and procedures.
Criteria: Journal entries should have the proper documentation and supporting backup Condition: Journal entries did not have proper documentation to support the entry. Journal entries were not approved by management or board. Cause: Unknown Effect: Without proper backup for adjustments made to the trial balance, it would be easy for material amounts of improper recognition to occur. Recommendation: The Company should implement a system for recording journal entries and the necessary backup for those journal entries. Management Response: The Company is working on developing a system of documenting journal entries, with proper back-up and support. They have hired a CPA to handle their bookkeeping going forward.
The Company does not have the experience and training needed to – ‐ Prepare all its year end reconciliations and journal entries and prepare financial statements, complete with notes, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Accordingly, the Town is unable to, and has not established internal controls over the preparation of year-end reconciliations and journal entries and the preparation of the financial statements. ‐ Select and apply accounting principles that are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Accordingly, the Town is unable to, and has not established, internal controls over the selection and application of accounting principles. Criteria - Under SAS 115, an internal control deficiency exists when management does not possess the financial expertise to prepare end reconciliations and prepare financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Condition: Management lack the expertise to prepare the financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Cause: Unknown Effect: Because management lacks expertise in financial accounting and reporting, there is more than a remote likelihood that a misstatement of the entity’s financial statements that is more than inconsequential will not be prevented or detected under the provisions of SAS 115.
During the course of our audit it was noted that grant reimbursement request is not being conducted timely. Criteria: Grant reimbursements should be requested timely. This also makes calculating expenditures related to possible single audits to be reconciled. Condition: Management was not requesting grant reimbursement timely when expenditures were incurred. Cause: Unknown Effect: Makes it very difficult for cash flow and revenue recognition to be completed timely and accurately.
– During the course of our audit it was noted that payroll timesheets and grant allocation was not being follow properly. Time for employees was allocated to grants based on budget/scheduled time rather than actual time via a timesheet. Management could not justify time spent to specific grants by specific employees. The Company also could not support multiple invoices requested for review for audit evidence. Criteria: Grants require time to be allocated to them based on specific time spent rather than budget. Grants require backup for reimbursement. Condition: No timesheets were kept or approved Effect: Grant compliance was not followed.
Criteria: Boards are required to meeting a regularly to provide guidance and support to management Condition: There were no board meeting prior to August 5, 2022 or other documentation of board exercising their fiduciary responsibility to oversee the Company’s operations. Effect: Little to no board oversight.
Criteria: The Rural Behavioral Health Workforce Coordinating Centers – Northern Border Region grant award requires a SF-424a and an annual Federal Financial Report (FFR). A data collection form is required to be filed within 9 months after year end. Condition: No documentation was available to determine that the SF-424a or annual Federal Financial Report (FFR) for the year ended June 30, 2022 has been filed. The data collection form was not filed within 9 months after year end. Cause: There were no procedures in place for timely filing of reports or retention polices for grant reporting. Effect: Without documentation for reporting and untimely filing of the data collection form, the Company is not in compliance with the reporting requirements.
Criteria: The Company is required to hold documentation of each drawdown of grant revenue. Condition: Management could not provide documentation of the drawdowns of grant revenue. Effect: Lack of documentation of draw down approval and evidence of reimbursement.
Criteria: The financial statements and Schedule of Federal Awards required material adjustments in order for an opinion to be issued. Condition: Many accounts required material adjustments to comply with GAAP. Effect: The financial statements and Schedule of Federal Awards had multiple errors that required material adjustments
Criteria: The financial statements require adequate backup and support. Condition: Management did not have adequate support/documentation for audit procedures. Effect: During the course of the audit multiple items required took substantial time to locate and provide to the auditors for audit backup and support. This required multiple delays in the audit and ultimately resulted in a disclaimer of opinion
Condition: Prior to November 14, 2022, invoices paid did not require documentation of approval. The former executive director paid invoices with no review or approval. Invoices to support the expenditures was not consistently retained. Criteria: Internal controls should be in place to provide that expenditures are only paid after they are reviewed and approved. Invoices or other documentation should be retained to support expenditures. Cause: There were no procedures in place to require authorization of expenditures or filing of invoices to support expenditures. Effect: Because of the failure to require approval and the lack of documentation to support expenditures, there is more than a remote possibility that material misstatements could occur without detection. Because of the failure to retain evidence for expenses, it wasn’t possible to issue an opinion about the existence and carrying amount of expenses.
Criteria: Proper segregation of duties should be impamented to prevent various duties to be completed without review Condition: The Company operates a small office limiting the ability for segregation of duties to be in place. Many of the accounting functions are performed by one employee with the review of a second employee. A deficiency will occur when staffs are away for vacation, sick days and other events which cause various duties to be completed without review. Effect: Lack of segregation of duties
Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse (Recovery Support and Training – CFDA #96.959; Passed thru State of Vermont Department of Health Grant #403420-08911 Grant period – Year ended June 30, 2022, Vermont Alcohol and Drug Information Clearinghouse – CFDA #93.959; Passed thru the State of Vermont Department of Health Grant #03420-08889 – Year ended June 30, 2022, Rural Behavioral Health Workforce Coordinating Centers – Northern Border Region – CFDA #93.912; Grant #1 U2SRH43523-01-00 – Year ended August 31, 2022) Criteria: Allowable cost criteria in 2 CFR part 200 require federal payments to be made for payroll based on actual time allocated. Activities allowed Condition: The Company could not provide any back-up for the allocated time requested for reimbursement of payroll. Cause:Proper timesheets were not kept. Effect: The federal grant was incorrectly charged without support. Questioned Costs: $405,190 Context: The Company was audited by the Office of Inspector General for Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration programs. Multiple infractions were noted.
Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse (Recovery Support and Training – CFDA #96.959; Passed thru State of Vermont Department of Health Grant #403420-08911 Grant period – Year ended June 30, 2022, Vermont Alcohol and Drug Information Clearinghouse – CFDA #93.959; Passed thru the State of Vermont Department of Health Grant #03420-08889 – Year ended June 30, 2022 Material Weaknesses in Internal Control over Compliance: See findings 2022-2, 2022-3, 2022-4, 2022-5, 2022-7, and 2022-9
Rural Behavioral Health Workforce Coordinating Centers – Northern Border Region – CFDA #93.912; Grant #1 U2SRH43523-01-00 – Year ended August 31, 2022) Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance: See findings 2022-2, 2022-3, 2022-4, 2022-5, 2022-6, 2022-7, 2022-9, 2022-10
Rural Behavioral Health Workforce Coordinating Centers – Northern Border Region – CFDA #93.912; Grant #1 U2SRH43523-01-00 – Year ended August 31, 2022) Criteria: According to 2 CFR section 200.305(b), non-federal entities must minimize the time elapsed between the transfer of federal funds and disbursement by the non-federal entity for direct program costs. Condition: Drawdown reports were not available for testing and financial reports weren’t available to determine that the time elapsed between the transfer of federal funds and disbursement by the non-federal entity for direct program costs was minimized. Effect: The entity may not be in compliance with the cash management requirements. Questioned Costs: $0 Context: There was a significant amount of turnover within the organization. Due to the turnover and the lack of record retention policies and procedures, records of drawdowns and documentation to support compliance with cash management requirements couldn’t be located. On November 14, 2022, the Company adopted new records management policies and procedures.
Criteria: Journal entries should have the proper documentation and supporting backup Condition: Journal entries did not have proper documentation to support the entry. Journal entries were not approved by management or board. Cause: Unknown Effect: Without proper backup for adjustments made to the trial balance, it would be easy for material amounts of improper recognition to occur. Recommendation: The Company should implement a system for recording journal entries and the necessary backup for those journal entries. Management Response: The Company is working on developing a system of documenting journal entries, with proper back-up and support. They have hired a CPA to handle their bookkeeping going forward.
The Company does not have the experience and training needed to – ‐ Prepare all its year end reconciliations and journal entries and prepare financial statements, complete with notes, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Accordingly, the Town is unable to, and has not established internal controls over the preparation of year-end reconciliations and journal entries and the preparation of the financial statements. ‐ Select and apply accounting principles that are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Accordingly, the Town is unable to, and has not established, internal controls over the selection and application of accounting principles. Criteria - Under SAS 115, an internal control deficiency exists when management does not possess the financial expertise to prepare end reconciliations and prepare financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Condition: Management lack the expertise to prepare the financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Cause: Unknown Effect: Because management lacks expertise in financial accounting and reporting, there is more than a remote likelihood that a misstatement of the entity’s financial statements that is more than inconsequential will not be prevented or detected under the provisions of SAS 115.
During the course of our audit it was noted that grant reimbursement request is not being conducted timely. Criteria: Grant reimbursements should be requested timely. This also makes calculating expenditures related to possible single audits to be reconciled. Condition: Management was not requesting grant reimbursement timely when expenditures were incurred. Cause: Unknown Effect: Makes it very difficult for cash flow and revenue recognition to be completed timely and accurately.
– During the course of our audit it was noted that payroll timesheets and grant allocation was not being follow properly. Time for employees was allocated to grants based on budget/scheduled time rather than actual time via a timesheet. Management could not justify time spent to specific grants by specific employees. The Company also could not support multiple invoices requested for review for audit evidence. Criteria: Grants require time to be allocated to them based on specific time spent rather than budget. Grants require backup for reimbursement. Condition: No timesheets were kept or approved Effect: Grant compliance was not followed.
Criteria: Boards are required to meeting a regularly to provide guidance and support to management Condition: There were no board meeting prior to August 5, 2022 or other documentation of board exercising their fiduciary responsibility to oversee the Company’s operations. Effect: Little to no board oversight.
Criteria: The Rural Behavioral Health Workforce Coordinating Centers – Northern Border Region grant award requires a SF-424a and an annual Federal Financial Report (FFR). A data collection form is required to be filed within 9 months after year end. Condition: No documentation was available to determine that the SF-424a or annual Federal Financial Report (FFR) for the year ended June 30, 2022 has been filed. The data collection form was not filed within 9 months after year end. Cause: There were no procedures in place for timely filing of reports or retention polices for grant reporting. Effect: Without documentation for reporting and untimely filing of the data collection form, the Company is not in compliance with the reporting requirements.
Criteria: The Company is required to hold documentation of each drawdown of grant revenue. Condition: Management could not provide documentation of the drawdowns of grant revenue. Effect: Lack of documentation of draw down approval and evidence of reimbursement.
Criteria: The financial statements and Schedule of Federal Awards required material adjustments in order for an opinion to be issued. Condition: Many accounts required material adjustments to comply with GAAP. Effect: The financial statements and Schedule of Federal Awards had multiple errors that required material adjustments
Criteria: The financial statements require adequate backup and support. Condition: Management did not have adequate support/documentation for audit procedures. Effect: During the course of the audit multiple items required took substantial time to locate and provide to the auditors for audit backup and support. This required multiple delays in the audit and ultimately resulted in a disclaimer of opinion
Condition: Prior to November 14, 2022, invoices paid did not require documentation of approval. The former executive director paid invoices with no review or approval. Invoices to support the expenditures was not consistently retained. Criteria: Internal controls should be in place to provide that expenditures are only paid after they are reviewed and approved. Invoices or other documentation should be retained to support expenditures. Cause: There were no procedures in place to require authorization of expenditures or filing of invoices to support expenditures. Effect: Because of the failure to require approval and the lack of documentation to support expenditures, there is more than a remote possibility that material misstatements could occur without detection. Because of the failure to retain evidence for expenses, it wasn’t possible to issue an opinion about the existence and carrying amount of expenses.
Criteria: Proper segregation of duties should be impamented to prevent various duties to be completed without review Condition: The Company operates a small office limiting the ability for segregation of duties to be in place. Many of the accounting functions are performed by one employee with the review of a second employee. A deficiency will occur when staffs are away for vacation, sick days and other events which cause various duties to be completed without review. Effect: Lack of segregation of duties
Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse (Recovery Support and Training – CFDA #96.959; Passed thru State of Vermont Department of Health Grant #403420-08911 Grant period – Year ended June 30, 2022, Vermont Alcohol and Drug Information Clearinghouse – CFDA #93.959; Passed thru the State of Vermont Department of Health Grant #03420-08889 – Year ended June 30, 2022, Rural Behavioral Health Workforce Coordinating Centers – Northern Border Region – CFDA #93.912; Grant #1 U2SRH43523-01-00 – Year ended August 31, 2022) Criteria: Allowable cost criteria in 2 CFR part 200 require federal payments to be made for payroll based on actual time allocated. Activities allowed Condition: The Company could not provide any back-up for the allocated time requested for reimbursement of payroll. Cause:Proper timesheets were not kept. Effect: The federal grant was incorrectly charged without support. Questioned Costs: $405,190 Context: The Company was audited by the Office of Inspector General for Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration programs. Multiple infractions were noted.
Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse (Recovery Support and Training – CFDA #96.959; Passed thru State of Vermont Department of Health Grant #403420-08911 Grant period – Year ended June 30, 2022, Vermont Alcohol and Drug Information Clearinghouse – CFDA #93.959; Passed thru the State of Vermont Department of Health Grant #03420-08889 – Year ended June 30, 2022 Material Weaknesses in Internal Control over Compliance: See findings 2022-2, 2022-3, 2022-4, 2022-5, 2022-7, and 2022-9
Rural Behavioral Health Workforce Coordinating Centers – Northern Border Region – CFDA #93.912; Grant #1 U2SRH43523-01-00 – Year ended August 31, 2022) Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance: See findings 2022-2, 2022-3, 2022-4, 2022-5, 2022-6, 2022-7, 2022-9, 2022-10
Rural Behavioral Health Workforce Coordinating Centers – Northern Border Region – CFDA #93.912; Grant #1 U2SRH43523-01-00 – Year ended August 31, 2022) Criteria: According to 2 CFR section 200.305(b), non-federal entities must minimize the time elapsed between the transfer of federal funds and disbursement by the non-federal entity for direct program costs. Condition: Drawdown reports were not available for testing and financial reports weren’t available to determine that the time elapsed between the transfer of federal funds and disbursement by the non-federal entity for direct program costs was minimized. Effect: The entity may not be in compliance with the cash management requirements. Questioned Costs: $0 Context: There was a significant amount of turnover within the organization. Due to the turnover and the lack of record retention policies and procedures, records of drawdowns and documentation to support compliance with cash management requirements couldn’t be located. On November 14, 2022, the Company adopted new records management policies and procedures.
Criteria: Journal entries should have the proper documentation and supporting backup Condition: Journal entries did not have proper documentation to support the entry. Journal entries were not approved by management or board. Cause: Unknown Effect: Without proper backup for adjustments made to the trial balance, it would be easy for material amounts of improper recognition to occur. Recommendation: The Company should implement a system for recording journal entries and the necessary backup for those journal entries. Management Response: The Company is working on developing a system of documenting journal entries, with proper back-up and support. They have hired a CPA to handle their bookkeeping going forward.
The Company does not have the experience and training needed to – ‐ Prepare all its year end reconciliations and journal entries and prepare financial statements, complete with notes, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Accordingly, the Town is unable to, and has not established internal controls over the preparation of year-end reconciliations and journal entries and the preparation of the financial statements. ‐ Select and apply accounting principles that are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Accordingly, the Town is unable to, and has not established, internal controls over the selection and application of accounting principles. Criteria - Under SAS 115, an internal control deficiency exists when management does not possess the financial expertise to prepare end reconciliations and prepare financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Condition: Management lack the expertise to prepare the financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Cause: Unknown Effect: Because management lacks expertise in financial accounting and reporting, there is more than a remote likelihood that a misstatement of the entity’s financial statements that is more than inconsequential will not be prevented or detected under the provisions of SAS 115.
During the course of our audit it was noted that grant reimbursement request is not being conducted timely. Criteria: Grant reimbursements should be requested timely. This also makes calculating expenditures related to possible single audits to be reconciled. Condition: Management was not requesting grant reimbursement timely when expenditures were incurred. Cause: Unknown Effect: Makes it very difficult for cash flow and revenue recognition to be completed timely and accurately.
– During the course of our audit it was noted that payroll timesheets and grant allocation was not being follow properly. Time for employees was allocated to grants based on budget/scheduled time rather than actual time via a timesheet. Management could not justify time spent to specific grants by specific employees. The Company also could not support multiple invoices requested for review for audit evidence. Criteria: Grants require time to be allocated to them based on specific time spent rather than budget. Grants require backup for reimbursement. Condition: No timesheets were kept or approved Effect: Grant compliance was not followed.
Criteria: Boards are required to meeting a regularly to provide guidance and support to management Condition: There were no board meeting prior to August 5, 2022 or other documentation of board exercising their fiduciary responsibility to oversee the Company’s operations. Effect: Little to no board oversight.
Criteria: The Rural Behavioral Health Workforce Coordinating Centers – Northern Border Region grant award requires a SF-424a and an annual Federal Financial Report (FFR). A data collection form is required to be filed within 9 months after year end. Condition: No documentation was available to determine that the SF-424a or annual Federal Financial Report (FFR) for the year ended June 30, 2022 has been filed. The data collection form was not filed within 9 months after year end. Cause: There were no procedures in place for timely filing of reports or retention polices for grant reporting. Effect: Without documentation for reporting and untimely filing of the data collection form, the Company is not in compliance with the reporting requirements.
Criteria: The Company is required to hold documentation of each drawdown of grant revenue. Condition: Management could not provide documentation of the drawdowns of grant revenue. Effect: Lack of documentation of draw down approval and evidence of reimbursement.
Criteria: The financial statements and Schedule of Federal Awards required material adjustments in order for an opinion to be issued. Condition: Many accounts required material adjustments to comply with GAAP. Effect: The financial statements and Schedule of Federal Awards had multiple errors that required material adjustments
Criteria: The financial statements require adequate backup and support. Condition: Management did not have adequate support/documentation for audit procedures. Effect: During the course of the audit multiple items required took substantial time to locate and provide to the auditors for audit backup and support. This required multiple delays in the audit and ultimately resulted in a disclaimer of opinion
Condition: Prior to November 14, 2022, invoices paid did not require documentation of approval. The former executive director paid invoices with no review or approval. Invoices to support the expenditures was not consistently retained. Criteria: Internal controls should be in place to provide that expenditures are only paid after they are reviewed and approved. Invoices or other documentation should be retained to support expenditures. Cause: There were no procedures in place to require authorization of expenditures or filing of invoices to support expenditures. Effect: Because of the failure to require approval and the lack of documentation to support expenditures, there is more than a remote possibility that material misstatements could occur without detection. Because of the failure to retain evidence for expenses, it wasn’t possible to issue an opinion about the existence and carrying amount of expenses.
Criteria: Proper segregation of duties should be impamented to prevent various duties to be completed without review Condition: The Company operates a small office limiting the ability for segregation of duties to be in place. Many of the accounting functions are performed by one employee with the review of a second employee. A deficiency will occur when staffs are away for vacation, sick days and other events which cause various duties to be completed without review. Effect: Lack of segregation of duties
Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse (Recovery Support and Training – CFDA #96.959; Passed thru State of Vermont Department of Health Grant #403420-08911 Grant period – Year ended June 30, 2022, Vermont Alcohol and Drug Information Clearinghouse – CFDA #93.959; Passed thru the State of Vermont Department of Health Grant #03420-08889 – Year ended June 30, 2022, Rural Behavioral Health Workforce Coordinating Centers – Northern Border Region – CFDA #93.912; Grant #1 U2SRH43523-01-00 – Year ended August 31, 2022) Criteria: Allowable cost criteria in 2 CFR part 200 require federal payments to be made for payroll based on actual time allocated. Activities allowed Condition: The Company could not provide any back-up for the allocated time requested for reimbursement of payroll. Cause:Proper timesheets were not kept. Effect: The federal grant was incorrectly charged without support. Questioned Costs: $405,190 Context: The Company was audited by the Office of Inspector General for Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration programs. Multiple infractions were noted.
Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse (Recovery Support and Training – CFDA #96.959; Passed thru State of Vermont Department of Health Grant #403420-08911 Grant period – Year ended June 30, 2022, Vermont Alcohol and Drug Information Clearinghouse – CFDA #93.959; Passed thru the State of Vermont Department of Health Grant #03420-08889 – Year ended June 30, 2022 Material Weaknesses in Internal Control over Compliance: See findings 2022-2, 2022-3, 2022-4, 2022-5, 2022-7, and 2022-9
Rural Behavioral Health Workforce Coordinating Centers – Northern Border Region – CFDA #93.912; Grant #1 U2SRH43523-01-00 – Year ended August 31, 2022) Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance: See findings 2022-2, 2022-3, 2022-4, 2022-5, 2022-6, 2022-7, 2022-9, 2022-10
Rural Behavioral Health Workforce Coordinating Centers – Northern Border Region – CFDA #93.912; Grant #1 U2SRH43523-01-00 – Year ended August 31, 2022) Criteria: According to 2 CFR section 200.305(b), non-federal entities must minimize the time elapsed between the transfer of federal funds and disbursement by the non-federal entity for direct program costs. Condition: Drawdown reports were not available for testing and financial reports weren’t available to determine that the time elapsed between the transfer of federal funds and disbursement by the non-federal entity for direct program costs was minimized. Effect: The entity may not be in compliance with the cash management requirements. Questioned Costs: $0 Context: There was a significant amount of turnover within the organization. Due to the turnover and the lack of record retention policies and procedures, records of drawdowns and documentation to support compliance with cash management requirements couldn’t be located. On November 14, 2022, the Company adopted new records management policies and procedures.
Criteria: Journal entries should have the proper documentation and supporting backup Condition: Journal entries did not have proper documentation to support the entry. Journal entries were not approved by management or board. Cause: Unknown Effect: Without proper backup for adjustments made to the trial balance, it would be easy for material amounts of improper recognition to occur. Recommendation: The Company should implement a system for recording journal entries and the necessary backup for those journal entries. Management Response: The Company is working on developing a system of documenting journal entries, with proper back-up and support. They have hired a CPA to handle their bookkeeping going forward.
The Company does not have the experience and training needed to – ‐ Prepare all its year end reconciliations and journal entries and prepare financial statements, complete with notes, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Accordingly, the Town is unable to, and has not established internal controls over the preparation of year-end reconciliations and journal entries and the preparation of the financial statements. ‐ Select and apply accounting principles that are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Accordingly, the Town is unable to, and has not established, internal controls over the selection and application of accounting principles. Criteria - Under SAS 115, an internal control deficiency exists when management does not possess the financial expertise to prepare end reconciliations and prepare financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Condition: Management lack the expertise to prepare the financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Cause: Unknown Effect: Because management lacks expertise in financial accounting and reporting, there is more than a remote likelihood that a misstatement of the entity’s financial statements that is more than inconsequential will not be prevented or detected under the provisions of SAS 115.
During the course of our audit it was noted that grant reimbursement request is not being conducted timely. Criteria: Grant reimbursements should be requested timely. This also makes calculating expenditures related to possible single audits to be reconciled. Condition: Management was not requesting grant reimbursement timely when expenditures were incurred. Cause: Unknown Effect: Makes it very difficult for cash flow and revenue recognition to be completed timely and accurately.
– During the course of our audit it was noted that payroll timesheets and grant allocation was not being follow properly. Time for employees was allocated to grants based on budget/scheduled time rather than actual time via a timesheet. Management could not justify time spent to specific grants by specific employees. The Company also could not support multiple invoices requested for review for audit evidence. Criteria: Grants require time to be allocated to them based on specific time spent rather than budget. Grants require backup for reimbursement. Condition: No timesheets were kept or approved Effect: Grant compliance was not followed.
Criteria: Boards are required to meeting a regularly to provide guidance and support to management Condition: There were no board meeting prior to August 5, 2022 or other documentation of board exercising their fiduciary responsibility to oversee the Company’s operations. Effect: Little to no board oversight.
Criteria: The Rural Behavioral Health Workforce Coordinating Centers – Northern Border Region grant award requires a SF-424a and an annual Federal Financial Report (FFR). A data collection form is required to be filed within 9 months after year end. Condition: No documentation was available to determine that the SF-424a or annual Federal Financial Report (FFR) for the year ended June 30, 2022 has been filed. The data collection form was not filed within 9 months after year end. Cause: There were no procedures in place for timely filing of reports or retention polices for grant reporting. Effect: Without documentation for reporting and untimely filing of the data collection form, the Company is not in compliance with the reporting requirements.
Criteria: The Company is required to hold documentation of each drawdown of grant revenue. Condition: Management could not provide documentation of the drawdowns of grant revenue. Effect: Lack of documentation of draw down approval and evidence of reimbursement.
Criteria: The financial statements and Schedule of Federal Awards required material adjustments in order for an opinion to be issued. Condition: Many accounts required material adjustments to comply with GAAP. Effect: The financial statements and Schedule of Federal Awards had multiple errors that required material adjustments
Criteria: The financial statements require adequate backup and support. Condition: Management did not have adequate support/documentation for audit procedures. Effect: During the course of the audit multiple items required took substantial time to locate and provide to the auditors for audit backup and support. This required multiple delays in the audit and ultimately resulted in a disclaimer of opinion
Condition: Prior to November 14, 2022, invoices paid did not require documentation of approval. The former executive director paid invoices with no review or approval. Invoices to support the expenditures was not consistently retained. Criteria: Internal controls should be in place to provide that expenditures are only paid after they are reviewed and approved. Invoices or other documentation should be retained to support expenditures. Cause: There were no procedures in place to require authorization of expenditures or filing of invoices to support expenditures. Effect: Because of the failure to require approval and the lack of documentation to support expenditures, there is more than a remote possibility that material misstatements could occur without detection. Because of the failure to retain evidence for expenses, it wasn’t possible to issue an opinion about the existence and carrying amount of expenses.
Criteria: Proper segregation of duties should be impamented to prevent various duties to be completed without review Condition: The Company operates a small office limiting the ability for segregation of duties to be in place. Many of the accounting functions are performed by one employee with the review of a second employee. A deficiency will occur when staffs are away for vacation, sick days and other events which cause various duties to be completed without review. Effect: Lack of segregation of duties
Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse (Recovery Support and Training – CFDA #96.959; Passed thru State of Vermont Department of Health Grant #403420-08911 Grant period – Year ended June 30, 2022, Vermont Alcohol and Drug Information Clearinghouse – CFDA #93.959; Passed thru the State of Vermont Department of Health Grant #03420-08889 – Year ended June 30, 2022, Rural Behavioral Health Workforce Coordinating Centers – Northern Border Region – CFDA #93.912; Grant #1 U2SRH43523-01-00 – Year ended August 31, 2022) Criteria: Allowable cost criteria in 2 CFR part 200 require federal payments to be made for payroll based on actual time allocated. Activities allowed Condition: The Company could not provide any back-up for the allocated time requested for reimbursement of payroll. Cause:Proper timesheets were not kept. Effect: The federal grant was incorrectly charged without support. Questioned Costs: $405,190 Context: The Company was audited by the Office of Inspector General for Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration programs. Multiple infractions were noted.
Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse (Recovery Support and Training – CFDA #96.959; Passed thru State of Vermont Department of Health Grant #403420-08911 Grant period – Year ended June 30, 2022, Vermont Alcohol and Drug Information Clearinghouse – CFDA #93.959; Passed thru the State of Vermont Department of Health Grant #03420-08889 – Year ended June 30, 2022 Material Weaknesses in Internal Control over Compliance: See findings 2022-2, 2022-3, 2022-4, 2022-5, 2022-7, and 2022-9
Rural Behavioral Health Workforce Coordinating Centers – Northern Border Region – CFDA #93.912; Grant #1 U2SRH43523-01-00 – Year ended August 31, 2022) Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance: See findings 2022-2, 2022-3, 2022-4, 2022-5, 2022-6, 2022-7, 2022-9, 2022-10
Rural Behavioral Health Workforce Coordinating Centers – Northern Border Region – CFDA #93.912; Grant #1 U2SRH43523-01-00 – Year ended August 31, 2022) Criteria: According to 2 CFR section 200.305(b), non-federal entities must minimize the time elapsed between the transfer of federal funds and disbursement by the non-federal entity for direct program costs. Condition: Drawdown reports were not available for testing and financial reports weren’t available to determine that the time elapsed between the transfer of federal funds and disbursement by the non-federal entity for direct program costs was minimized. Effect: The entity may not be in compliance with the cash management requirements. Questioned Costs: $0 Context: There was a significant amount of turnover within the organization. Due to the turnover and the lack of record retention policies and procedures, records of drawdowns and documentation to support compliance with cash management requirements couldn’t be located. On November 14, 2022, the Company adopted new records management policies and procedures.