Audit 26879

FY End
2022-12-31
Total Expended
$2.23M
Findings
4
Programs
4
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-07-04
Auditor: Uhy LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
30710 2022-001 - - E
30711 2022-002 - - E
607152 2022-001 - - E
607153 2022-002 - - E

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
93.558 Temporary Assistance for Needy Families $1.83M Yes 2
93.575 Child Care and Development Block Grant $248,693 - 0
10.558 Child and Adult Care Food Program $108,374 - 0
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $46,951 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
MJLMUEG9UZW6 Jeff Cook Auditee
3147542795 Jody Lurk Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. No federal awards were expended in the form of noncash assistance. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The Agency has elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance on the Alternatives to Abortion Program.

Finding Details

Finding No. 2022-001 ? Alternative to Abortion Program ? CFDA No. 93.558; Grant No. 1701MOTA Criteria and Condition: The Alternatives to Abortion program requires eligibility criteria including the client to be at or below 185 percent of federal poverty level based on the client or family income and the woman must be carrying an unborn child or children and chooses to carry the unborn child(ren) to term instead of having an abortion. Context: A test of 36 files revealed inadequate documentation surrounding verification of income. 2 of the 36 case files reviewed did not have documentation to support income eligibility. In June 2022, the Agency was audited by the Missouri Department of Social Services (oversight agency) and their report indicated documentation issues surrounding eligibility related to income verification. In July 2022, the Agency had responded with corrective action plans that included a revised eligibility form to address income verification. Cause: The case workers are required to re-verify income; however, they did not always maintain adequate documentation in the file. The Agency communicated in its corrective action plan with the oversight agency. Questioned Cost: $-0- Effect: The lack of documentation could lead to ineligible participants entering into the program. Recommendation: We recommend management ensures all documentation is received and retained through strict following of the tracking checklist for newly eligible participants that documents the proof of pregnancy, income, residency, and lack of involvement with other Alternative to Abortions providers. Classification: Compliance finding and control deficiency in internal controls View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and the recommended procedures have been implemented. Supervisors will ensure that all client files have proof of eligibility during quarterly file reviews.
Finding No. 2022-002 ? Alternative to Abortion Program ? CFDA No. 93.558; Grant No. 1701MOTA Criteria and Condition: The Alternatives to Abortion program requires eligibility criteria including the client to be at or below 185 percent of federal poverty level based on the client or family income and the woman must be carrying an unborn child or children and chooses to carry the unborn child(ren) to term instead of having an abortion. Context: A test of 36 files revealed inadequate documentation surrounding the re-verification of income at the time of birth. The clients program eligibility must be determined upon entry into the program and again upon the birth of the child(ren). 2 of the 36 case files reviewed did not have documentation to support the re-confirmation of income eligibility upon the birth of the child(ren). Cause: The case workers are required to re-verify income; however, they did not always maintain adequate documentation in the file. The Agency communicated in its corrective action plan with the oversight agency. Questioned Cost: $-0- Effect: The lack of documentation could lead to ineligible participants continuing in the program after becoming ineligible. Recommendation: We recommend management ensures all documentation is received and retained through strict following of the tracking checklist for newly eligible participants that documents the proof of pregnancy, income, residency, and lack of involvement with other Alternatives to Abortion providers and then re-confirmed and documented upon the birth of the child(ren). Classification: Compliance finding and control deficiency in internal controls View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and the recommended procedures have been implemented. Supervisors will ensure that necessary proofs are obtained and documented.
Finding No. 2022-001 ? Alternative to Abortion Program ? CFDA No. 93.558; Grant No. 1701MOTA Criteria and Condition: The Alternatives to Abortion program requires eligibility criteria including the client to be at or below 185 percent of federal poverty level based on the client or family income and the woman must be carrying an unborn child or children and chooses to carry the unborn child(ren) to term instead of having an abortion. Context: A test of 36 files revealed inadequate documentation surrounding verification of income. 2 of the 36 case files reviewed did not have documentation to support income eligibility. In June 2022, the Agency was audited by the Missouri Department of Social Services (oversight agency) and their report indicated documentation issues surrounding eligibility related to income verification. In July 2022, the Agency had responded with corrective action plans that included a revised eligibility form to address income verification. Cause: The case workers are required to re-verify income; however, they did not always maintain adequate documentation in the file. The Agency communicated in its corrective action plan with the oversight agency. Questioned Cost: $-0- Effect: The lack of documentation could lead to ineligible participants entering into the program. Recommendation: We recommend management ensures all documentation is received and retained through strict following of the tracking checklist for newly eligible participants that documents the proof of pregnancy, income, residency, and lack of involvement with other Alternative to Abortions providers. Classification: Compliance finding and control deficiency in internal controls View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and the recommended procedures have been implemented. Supervisors will ensure that all client files have proof of eligibility during quarterly file reviews.
Finding No. 2022-002 ? Alternative to Abortion Program ? CFDA No. 93.558; Grant No. 1701MOTA Criteria and Condition: The Alternatives to Abortion program requires eligibility criteria including the client to be at or below 185 percent of federal poverty level based on the client or family income and the woman must be carrying an unborn child or children and chooses to carry the unborn child(ren) to term instead of having an abortion. Context: A test of 36 files revealed inadequate documentation surrounding the re-verification of income at the time of birth. The clients program eligibility must be determined upon entry into the program and again upon the birth of the child(ren). 2 of the 36 case files reviewed did not have documentation to support the re-confirmation of income eligibility upon the birth of the child(ren). Cause: The case workers are required to re-verify income; however, they did not always maintain adequate documentation in the file. The Agency communicated in its corrective action plan with the oversight agency. Questioned Cost: $-0- Effect: The lack of documentation could lead to ineligible participants continuing in the program after becoming ineligible. Recommendation: We recommend management ensures all documentation is received and retained through strict following of the tracking checklist for newly eligible participants that documents the proof of pregnancy, income, residency, and lack of involvement with other Alternatives to Abortion providers and then re-confirmed and documented upon the birth of the child(ren). Classification: Compliance finding and control deficiency in internal controls View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and the recommended procedures have been implemented. Supervisors will ensure that necessary proofs are obtained and documented.