Finding 968056 (2023-001)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
C
Questioned Costs
$1
Year
2023
Accepted
2024-04-01
Audit: 302069
Organization: City of El Cajon (CA)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The City submitted reimbursement requests that included total project costs instead of the correct portion for each funding source, leading to an overpayment of $31,869.
  • Impacted Requirements: The financial management system failed to adequately track and report the source and application of funds as required by CFR 200.302.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Implement a review process for reimbursement requests to ensure they reflect the correct amounts before submission to the granting agency.

Finding Text

Federal Program: Highway Safety Improvement Program, Assistance Listing Number 20.205 Criteria: Per CFR 200.302, the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally-funded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures, income and interest and be supported by source documentation. Condition: During our procedures over the matching compliance requirement, we reviewed reimbursement requests and noted that the amount requested for reimbursement did not agree to the expenditures listed in the City’s expenditure detail. This is because the City implemented a cost sharing/split approach for total project costs where total costs were to be split by various funding sources. The City would account for this by recording each funding source’s portion of the costs in their system as projects were split up by expense and funding source strings. Reimbursement requests were supposed to be submitted based on each funding source’s portion of the costs. The amounts actually requested for reimbursement on the request included total project costs instead of the programs’ specified portion of the project cost resulting in an overpayment. As a result, the City’s records would not identify the proper application of program funds as there is no expenditure to agree to the funds that were overpaid. Cause: Due to the decentralized nature of the reimbursement request process, the reimbursement requests are not reviewed prior to submission to the granting agency. Effect: The City could potentially fund the same expenditures under multiple grants and jeopardize future grant funding due to program noncompliance. Questioned Costs: $31,869. This amount was determined by totaling the overpayments identified. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of two reimbursement requests were selected for testing which account for $39,389 of federal program expenditures. Recommendation: We recommend the City implement a review process to ensure that reimbursement requests are submitted for the appropriate amounts. Management’s Response: See Corrective Action Plan.

Categories

Questioned Costs Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 391614 2023-001
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $3.20M
14.218 Community Development Block Grants/entitlement Grants $2.51M
20.205 Highway Planning and Construction $1.71M
97.067 Homeland Security Grant Program $114,783
14.239 Home Investment Partnerships Program $90,006
20.600 State and Community Highway Safety $61,940
16.922 Equitable Sharing Program $53,674
16.742 Paul Coverdell Forensic Sciences Improvement Grant Program $52,033
16.738 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program $35,962
20.608 Minimum Penalties for Repeat Offenders for Driving While Intoxicated $29,264