Audit 302069

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$7.86M
Findings
2
Programs
10
Organization: City of El Cajon (CA)
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-04-01

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
391614 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - C
968056 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - C

Contacts

Name Title Type
GUANBKQWK6J3 Luca Gonzales Auditee
6194411543 Brianna Schultz Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the SEFA are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the SEFA, if any, represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The City did not elect to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) includes the federal awards activity of the City of El Cajon (the City) under federal programs of federal government for the year ended June 30, 2023. The information in this SEFA is presented in accordance with Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the SEFA presents only a selected portion of the operations of the City, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position or fund balance, or cash flows of the City.

Finding Details

Federal Program: Highway Safety Improvement Program, Assistance Listing Number 20.205 Criteria: Per CFR 200.302, the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally-funded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures, income and interest and be supported by source documentation. Condition: During our procedures over the matching compliance requirement, we reviewed reimbursement requests and noted that the amount requested for reimbursement did not agree to the expenditures listed in the City’s expenditure detail. This is because the City implemented a cost sharing/split approach for total project costs where total costs were to be split by various funding sources. The City would account for this by recording each funding source’s portion of the costs in their system as projects were split up by expense and funding source strings. Reimbursement requests were supposed to be submitted based on each funding source’s portion of the costs. The amounts actually requested for reimbursement on the request included total project costs instead of the programs’ specified portion of the project cost resulting in an overpayment. As a result, the City’s records would not identify the proper application of program funds as there is no expenditure to agree to the funds that were overpaid. Cause: Due to the decentralized nature of the reimbursement request process, the reimbursement requests are not reviewed prior to submission to the granting agency. Effect: The City could potentially fund the same expenditures under multiple grants and jeopardize future grant funding due to program noncompliance. Questioned Costs: $31,869. This amount was determined by totaling the overpayments identified. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of two reimbursement requests were selected for testing which account for $39,389 of federal program expenditures. Recommendation: We recommend the City implement a review process to ensure that reimbursement requests are submitted for the appropriate amounts. Management’s Response: See Corrective Action Plan.
Federal Program: Highway Safety Improvement Program, Assistance Listing Number 20.205 Criteria: Per CFR 200.302, the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally-funded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures, income and interest and be supported by source documentation. Condition: During our procedures over the matching compliance requirement, we reviewed reimbursement requests and noted that the amount requested for reimbursement did not agree to the expenditures listed in the City’s expenditure detail. This is because the City implemented a cost sharing/split approach for total project costs where total costs were to be split by various funding sources. The City would account for this by recording each funding source’s portion of the costs in their system as projects were split up by expense and funding source strings. Reimbursement requests were supposed to be submitted based on each funding source’s portion of the costs. The amounts actually requested for reimbursement on the request included total project costs instead of the programs’ specified portion of the project cost resulting in an overpayment. As a result, the City’s records would not identify the proper application of program funds as there is no expenditure to agree to the funds that were overpaid. Cause: Due to the decentralized nature of the reimbursement request process, the reimbursement requests are not reviewed prior to submission to the granting agency. Effect: The City could potentially fund the same expenditures under multiple grants and jeopardize future grant funding due to program noncompliance. Questioned Costs: $31,869. This amount was determined by totaling the overpayments identified. Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of two reimbursement requests were selected for testing which account for $39,389 of federal program expenditures. Recommendation: We recommend the City implement a review process to ensure that reimbursement requests are submitted for the appropriate amounts. Management’s Response: See Corrective Action Plan.