Finding 960947 (2023-002)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
A
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2023
Accepted
2024-03-26
Audit: 297612
Organization: Pembroke Housing Authority (NC)
Auditor: Marcum LLP

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The Pembroke Housing Authority is not following its own policy requiring two board member signatures on checks, leading to potential unauthorized payments.
  • Impacted Requirements: Out of 770 checks processed, 387 did not comply with the dual signature policy, increasing the risk of improper disbursements.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Management should review and update authorized signatories on all accounts and ensure that all future disbursements have two valid signatures.

Finding Text

2023-002 – ACTIVITIES ALLOWED OR UNALLOWED Other Matter/Significant Deficiency U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development CFDA #: 14.871 – Housing Choice Voucher Program CRITERIA The Pembroke Housing Authority has a policy that all checks require the signature from 2 board members. The dual signature policy was established to reduce the likelihood that personnel will write improper checks to themselves or write checks to a fictitious company. By requiring two signatures, the Authority is verifying that both signers agree that the payment is proper and reasonable. CONDITION We reviewed the check images included on the bank statements for the administration account and the Section 8 account for the fiscal year and identified 370 instances where a check signature stamp was used and 17 instances where the check had only 1 signature. The check stamp used included the signature of an individual who is no longer a member of the Board. CAUSE The Authority’s controls related to reviewing and updating the authorized signatories on bank accounts was insufficient. EFFECT As a result of not following its policy, there is an increased likelihood of unauthorized disbursements being made. QUESTIONED COSTS None Identified. CONTEXT The Authority processed 770 checks from these 2 accounts of which 387 did not follow their policy regarding authorized check signers. REPEAT FINDING Not a repeat finding. RECOMMENDATION We recommend that management review the authorized signatories on all accounts, updating them if necessary, and ensure that disbursements have two valid signatures before processing the payment. AUDITEE’S RESPONSE AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See Corrective Action Plan.

Categories

HUD Housing Programs Significant Deficiency

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 384503 2023-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 384504 2023-003
    Significant Deficiency
  • 384505 2023-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 384506 2023-003
    Significant Deficiency
  • 960945 2023-002
    Significant Deficiency
  • 960946 2023-003
    Significant Deficiency
  • 960948 2023-003
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $2.27M
14.850 Public and Indian Housing $153,556
14.872 Public Housing Capital Fund $90,474