Finding 947575 (2023-001)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
N
Questioned Costs
$1
Year
2023
Accepted
2024-02-28
Audit: 292760
Organization: Southwest Baptist University (MO)
Auditor: Forvis LLP

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: Two students did not have their Title IV funds return calculations completed on time, leading to incorrect fund returns to the Department of Education.
  • Impacted Requirements: Compliance with Title IV regulations requires timely calculations of earned aid upon student withdrawal, as outlined in 34 CFR Sections 668.22(a)(1)-(3).
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Implement a robust review policy for return of funds calculations, ensuring accuracy and timely processing to prevent future compliance issues.

Finding Text

Federal Agency Program – U.S. Department of Education, Student Financial Assistance Cluster, Federal Pell Grant Program, Assistance Listing Number 84.063; Federal Direct Loan Program, Assistance Listing Number 84.268 Program Year - June 1, 2022 – May 31, 2023 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Special Tests – Return of Title IV Funds – When a recipient of Title IV grant or loan assistance withdraws from an institution during a payment period or period of enrollment in which the recipient began attendance, the institution must determine the amount of Title IV aid earned by the student as of the student’s withdrawal date. If the total amount of Title IV assistance earned by the student is less than the amount that was disbursed to the student on his or her behalf as of the date of the institution’s determination that the student withdrew, the difference must be returned to the Title IV programs as outlined in this section and no additional disbursements may be made to the student for the payment period or period of enrollment (34 CFR Sections 668.22(a)(1)-(3)). Condition – During our testing, we noted two students who should have a return of funds calculation completed and submitted but it did not occur (at time of testing). Questioned Costs – $28,000 Context – During our testing, it was noted that the University does have a process in place to ensure return of calculations are being performed, but there was a break-down in the communication process during the year. Of a sample of ten return of funds tested from a population of 61 performed during the examination period, two calculations were not performed at time of fieldwork. Our sample was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. Cause – The process of communicating a withdrawal to the party responsible for the refund did not occur. Effect – The University returned the incorrect amount of funds to the Department of Education. Identification as a Repeat Finding – N/A Recommendation – We recommend that the University has a policy in place to review the return of funds calculation and ensure that the calculation is accurate according to the regulations to be diligent in performing secondary reviews to endure the calculations are performed correctly. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action – Due to previous manual processes and significant staffing turnover in the Accounting and Financial Aid areas, this summer, we discovered some of the R2T4 calculations were missed. Once this was discovered, we went back through and ensured all the withdrawal calculations were done and funds returned, even though they were outside the compliance timeframe. While testing the return of Title IV funds from a sample, FORVIS noted that two students did not have a refund calculation completed in a timely manner. These findings had been discovered by SBU and corrected, and funds were returned earlier, but they were still outside the compliance timeframe, which required an audit finding. To address these issues, SBU employees have taken the following corrective measures: 1. We reworked the reporting process for withdrawals. All withdrawals now go to the Associate Provost regardless of campus or program. They are then processed by the Registrar’s Office and placed in a shared drive. Once there, they are reviewed weekly by the Financial Aid Office, and R2T4s are completed in a timely manner. This process no longer relies on a member of the Accounting Office to notify Financial Aid of a withdrawal. 2. R2T4 requests are completed by one Financial Aid staff member and verified and processed by another to ensure accuracy and reliability. 3. We have implemented an administrative withdrawal process to give campus and program directors the ability and authority to withdraw students who are no longer in attendance to limit the number of all Fs at the end of the semester.

Categories

Questioned Costs Student Financial Aid Reporting Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking Special Tests & Provisions

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 371132 2023-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 371133 2023-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 371134 2023-002
    Material Weakness
  • 947574 2023-001
    Significant Deficiency
  • 947576 2023-002
    Material Weakness

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
84.268 Federal Direct Student Loans $15.98M
84.063 Federal Pell Grant Program $3.18M
84.038 Federal Perkins Loan Program $1.58M
93.364 Nursing Student Loans $800,741
93.264 Nurse Faculty Loan Program (nflp) $536,139
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund $526,903
84.033 Federal Work-Study Program $254,811
84.007 Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants $187,502