Finding 9404 (2023-001)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
L
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2023
Accepted
2024-01-22

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: Management lacked a system to ensure compliance with federal wage rate requirements for construction contracts funded by the American Rescue Plan.
  • Impacted Requirements: Contractors may not have paid laborers according to local prevailing wage rates, violating Uniform Guidance regulations.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Implement internal controls to verify compliance with wage rate requirements and conduct thorough contract reviews for federal funding eligibility.

Finding Text

AL 84.425D – American Rescue Plan – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief, Award Number 5891 Criteria: Requirements per part 4 section 20.001 of the Uniform Guidance state that all laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL). Condition: Management had not established an adequate system of internal control over compliance with the Special Tests and Provisions related to Wage Rate Requirements under the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund. Cause: Management did not have adequate internal controls in place to identify and comply with Wage Rate Requirements established under part 4 section 84.425 of the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect: Without appropriate internal controls over compliance, non-compliance could occur which the entity may not identify. Laborers and mechanics employed by contractors and subcontractors may not have been paid in accordance with local prevailing wage rates. We were not able to determine if the entity was in compliance with this compliance requirement as appropriate documentation was not requested from the applicable contractor. Questioned Costs: N/A Repeat Finding?: No Recommendation: Management should implement internal controls over Wage Rate Requirements to ensure compliance with applicable Federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the awards received. Responsible Official’s Response: In this particular finding, the decision was made to undertake a project using organizational reserves. Subsequent to the project taking place additional review indicated it would qualify as permissible under the American Rescue Plan and Federal Funding could potentially cover the project costs. The contract for the work, however, was not further reviewed at the time. After subsequent review, it appears that the contract may not meet the standards for Federal Funding, Management, therefore, has removed the Federal funding revenue from it’s financial statements and has not requested funding for this project under the American Rescue Plan. As a regular course of business, the organization does require any contracts subject to Federal funding requirements meet Federal Funding requirements, including those requirements associated with prevailing wages. Going forward, a comprehensive contract review will be performed for any project retroactively deemed a potentially permissible use of Federal funds Auditor’s Evaluation of the Responsible Official’s Response: Management’s response is appropriate to address the finding. If properly implemented, management’s response would include procedures to prevent reoccurrence in the future.

Corrective Action Plan

Responsible Official’s Response: In this particular finding, the decision was made to undertake a project using organizational reserves. Subsequent to the project taking place additional review indicated it would qualify as permissible under the American Rescue Plan and Federal Funding could potentially cover the project costs. The contract for the work, however, was not further reviewed at the time. After subsequent review, it appears that the contract may not meet the standards for Federal Funding, Management, therefore, has removed the Federal funding revenue from it’s financial statements and has not requested funding for this project under the American Rescue Plan. As a regular course of business, the organization does require any contracts subject to Federal funding requirements meet Federal Funding requirements, including those requirements associated with prevailing wages. Going forward, a comprehensive contract review will be performed for any project retroactively deemed a potentially permissible use of Federal funds

Categories

Special Tests & Provisions HUD Housing Programs Internal Control / Segregation of Duties

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 9402 2023-002
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 9403 2023-002
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 585844 2023-002
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 585845 2023-002
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 585846 2023-001
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund $3.91M
84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies $2.03M
10.555 National School Lunch Program $1.98M
10.553 School Breakfast Program $974,781
84.367 Improving Teacher Quality State Grants $227,870
84.282 Charter Schools $189,901
84.424 Student Support and Academic Enrichment Program $117,951
84.411 Investing in Innovation (i3) Fund $2,100