Identification of the Federal Program:
AL 10.553, 10.555 – Child Nutrition Cluster
Criteria: In accordance with 7 CFR 210.8, the Charter School is required to establish internal controls which
ensures the accuracy of meal counts prior to the submission of the monthly reimbursement claims.
Condition and Context: Internal controls over compliance are not designed and implemented in a manner
which ensures accurate reporting of meals served. The month of February 2023 was selected for testing the
underlying support for meals served compared to the meals submitted for reimbursement. In this month there
were discrepancies in the Lunch category, compared to what the Charter School submitted for reimbursement.
The error rate was fifteen percent for the West Campus Elementary School location and two percent overall.
Further, for the month of February 2023 the Charter School submitted for reimbursement less meals than their
records supported, the net difference was less than $3,000. In addition the Charter School did not file their
corrective action plan on a timely basis related to finding 2022-001 as required by SUNY.
Cause: Management did not have adequate controls in place to ensure that meal counts at the homeroom level
reconciled to the School level and claims made at the federal and state level.
Effect or Potential Effect: Errors were made in claiming process and went undetected by the Charter School.
Questioned Costs: N/A
Repeat Finding?: Yes, See finding 2022-001
Recommendation: The Charter School needs to examine their current processes and make the necessary
adjustments to become in compliance with 7 CFR 210.8. They should also ensure that this supporting
documentation is maintained for a period of three years following the final submission for reimbursement for
each fiscal year as required by 7 CFR 210.23(c). Properly designed and implemented procedures will ensure
that the Charter School remains in compliance with program requirements and is appropriately reimbursed. In
addition we recommend the Charter School submit the corrective action plan on a timely basis once a timeline
is established by SUNY.
Responsible Official’s Response:
The Rochester Schools will implement a plan which will eliminate discrepancies between meal counting at the
homeroom level, reporting at the school level, and claims made at the state and federal levels.
This implementation plan includes a heighten responsibility with data collection, multiple quality checks and
data transfer.
Auditor’s Evaluation of the Responsible Official’s Response:
Management’s response is appropriate to address the finding. If properly implemented, management’s
response would include procedures to prevent reoccurrence in the future.
Identification of the Federal Program:
AL 10.553, 10.555 – Child Nutrition Cluster
Criteria: In accordance with 7 CFR 210.8, the Charter School is required to establish internal controls which
ensures the accuracy of meal counts prior to the submission of the monthly reimbursement claims.
Condition and Context: Internal controls over compliance are not designed and implemented in a manner
which ensures accurate reporting of meals served. The month of February 2023 was selected for testing the
underlying support for meals served compared to the meals submitted for reimbursement. In this month there
were discrepancies in the Lunch category, compared to what the Charter School submitted for reimbursement.
The error rate was fifteen percent for the West Campus Elementary School location and two percent overall.
Further, for the month of February 2023 the Charter School submitted for reimbursement less meals than their
records supported, the net difference was less than $3,000. In addition the Charter School did not file their
corrective action plan on a timely basis related to finding 2022-001 as required by SUNY.
Cause: Management did not have adequate controls in place to ensure that meal counts at the homeroom level
reconciled to the School level and claims made at the federal and state level.
Effect or Potential Effect: Errors were made in claiming process and went undetected by the Charter School.
Questioned Costs: N/A
Repeat Finding?: Yes, See finding 2022-001
Recommendation: The Charter School needs to examine their current processes and make the necessary
adjustments to become in compliance with 7 CFR 210.8. They should also ensure that this supporting
documentation is maintained for a period of three years following the final submission for reimbursement for
each fiscal year as required by 7 CFR 210.23(c). Properly designed and implemented procedures will ensure
that the Charter School remains in compliance with program requirements and is appropriately reimbursed. In
addition we recommend the Charter School submit the corrective action plan on a timely basis once a timeline
is established by SUNY.
Responsible Official’s Response:
The Rochester Schools will implement a plan which will eliminate discrepancies between meal counting at the
homeroom level, reporting at the school level, and claims made at the state and federal levels.
This implementation plan includes a heighten responsibility with data collection, multiple quality checks and
data transfer.
Auditor’s Evaluation of the Responsible Official’s Response:
Management’s response is appropriate to address the finding. If properly implemented, management’s
response would include procedures to prevent reoccurrence in the future.
AL 84.425D – American Rescue Plan – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief, Award
Number 5891
Criteria: Requirements per part 4 section 20.001 of the Uniform Guidance state that all laborers and mechanics
employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by
federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project
(prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL).
Condition: Management had not established an adequate system of internal control over compliance with the
Special Tests and Provisions related to Wage Rate Requirements under the Elementary and Secondary School
Emergency Relief Fund.
Cause: Management did not have adequate internal controls in place to identify and comply with Wage Rate
Requirements established under part 4 section 84.425 of the Uniform Guidance.
Effect or Potential Effect: Without appropriate internal controls over compliance, non-compliance could occur
which the entity may not identify. Laborers and mechanics employed by contractors and subcontractors may
not have been paid in accordance with local prevailing wage rates. We were not able to determine if the entity
was in compliance with this compliance requirement as appropriate documentation was not requested from the
applicable contractor.
Questioned Costs: N/A
Repeat Finding?: No
Recommendation: Management should implement internal controls over Wage Rate Requirements to ensure
compliance with applicable Federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the awards received.
Responsible Official’s Response: In this particular finding, the decision was made to undertake a project using organizational reserves.
Subsequent to the project taking place additional review indicated it would qualify as permissible under the
American Rescue Plan and Federal Funding could potentially cover the project costs. The contract for the work,
however, was not further reviewed at the time. After subsequent review, it appears that the contract may not
meet the standards for Federal Funding, Management, therefore, has removed the Federal funding revenue from
it’s financial statements and has not requested funding for this project under the American Rescue Plan.
As a regular course of business, the organization does require any contracts subject to Federal funding
requirements meet Federal Funding requirements, including those requirements associated with prevailing
wages. Going forward, a comprehensive contract review will be performed for any project retroactively
deemed a potentially permissible use of Federal funds
Auditor’s Evaluation of the Responsible Official’s Response:
Management’s response is appropriate to address the finding. If properly implemented, management’s response
would include procedures to prevent reoccurrence in the future.
Identification of the Federal Program:
AL 10.553, 10.555 – Child Nutrition Cluster
Criteria: In accordance with 7 CFR 210.8, the Charter School is required to establish internal controls which
ensures the accuracy of meal counts prior to the submission of the monthly reimbursement claims.
Condition and Context: Internal controls over compliance are not designed and implemented in a manner
which ensures accurate reporting of meals served. The month of February 2023 was selected for testing the
underlying support for meals served compared to the meals submitted for reimbursement. In this month there
were discrepancies in the Lunch category, compared to what the Charter School submitted for reimbursement.
The error rate was fifteen percent for the West Campus Elementary School location and two percent overall.
Further, for the month of February 2023 the Charter School submitted for reimbursement less meals than their
records supported, the net difference was less than $3,000. In addition the Charter School did not file their
corrective action plan on a timely basis related to finding 2022-001 as required by SUNY.
Cause: Management did not have adequate controls in place to ensure that meal counts at the homeroom level
reconciled to the School level and claims made at the federal and state level.
Effect or Potential Effect: Errors were made in claiming process and went undetected by the Charter School.
Questioned Costs: N/A
Repeat Finding?: Yes, See finding 2022-001
Recommendation: The Charter School needs to examine their current processes and make the necessary
adjustments to become in compliance with 7 CFR 210.8. They should also ensure that this supporting
documentation is maintained for a period of three years following the final submission for reimbursement for
each fiscal year as required by 7 CFR 210.23(c). Properly designed and implemented procedures will ensure
that the Charter School remains in compliance with program requirements and is appropriately reimbursed. In
addition we recommend the Charter School submit the corrective action plan on a timely basis once a timeline
is established by SUNY.
Responsible Official’s Response:
The Rochester Schools will implement a plan which will eliminate discrepancies between meal counting at the
homeroom level, reporting at the school level, and claims made at the state and federal levels.
This implementation plan includes a heighten responsibility with data collection, multiple quality checks and
data transfer.
Auditor’s Evaluation of the Responsible Official’s Response:
Management’s response is appropriate to address the finding. If properly implemented, management’s
response would include procedures to prevent reoccurrence in the future.
Identification of the Federal Program:
AL 10.553, 10.555 – Child Nutrition Cluster
Criteria: In accordance with 7 CFR 210.8, the Charter School is required to establish internal controls which
ensures the accuracy of meal counts prior to the submission of the monthly reimbursement claims.
Condition and Context: Internal controls over compliance are not designed and implemented in a manner
which ensures accurate reporting of meals served. The month of February 2023 was selected for testing the
underlying support for meals served compared to the meals submitted for reimbursement. In this month there
were discrepancies in the Lunch category, compared to what the Charter School submitted for reimbursement.
The error rate was fifteen percent for the West Campus Elementary School location and two percent overall.
Further, for the month of February 2023 the Charter School submitted for reimbursement less meals than their
records supported, the net difference was less than $3,000. In addition the Charter School did not file their
corrective action plan on a timely basis related to finding 2022-001 as required by SUNY.
Cause: Management did not have adequate controls in place to ensure that meal counts at the homeroom level
reconciled to the School level and claims made at the federal and state level.
Effect or Potential Effect: Errors were made in claiming process and went undetected by the Charter School.
Questioned Costs: N/A
Repeat Finding?: Yes, See finding 2022-001
Recommendation: The Charter School needs to examine their current processes and make the necessary
adjustments to become in compliance with 7 CFR 210.8. They should also ensure that this supporting
documentation is maintained for a period of three years following the final submission for reimbursement for
each fiscal year as required by 7 CFR 210.23(c). Properly designed and implemented procedures will ensure
that the Charter School remains in compliance with program requirements and is appropriately reimbursed. In
addition we recommend the Charter School submit the corrective action plan on a timely basis once a timeline
is established by SUNY.
Responsible Official’s Response:
The Rochester Schools will implement a plan which will eliminate discrepancies between meal counting at the
homeroom level, reporting at the school level, and claims made at the state and federal levels.
This implementation plan includes a heighten responsibility with data collection, multiple quality checks and
data transfer.
Auditor’s Evaluation of the Responsible Official’s Response:
Management’s response is appropriate to address the finding. If properly implemented, management’s
response would include procedures to prevent reoccurrence in the future.
AL 84.425D – American Rescue Plan – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief, Award
Number 5891
Criteria: Requirements per part 4 section 20.001 of the Uniform Guidance state that all laborers and mechanics
employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by
federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project
(prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL).
Condition: Management had not established an adequate system of internal control over compliance with the
Special Tests and Provisions related to Wage Rate Requirements under the Elementary and Secondary School
Emergency Relief Fund.
Cause: Management did not have adequate internal controls in place to identify and comply with Wage Rate
Requirements established under part 4 section 84.425 of the Uniform Guidance.
Effect or Potential Effect: Without appropriate internal controls over compliance, non-compliance could occur
which the entity may not identify. Laborers and mechanics employed by contractors and subcontractors may
not have been paid in accordance with local prevailing wage rates. We were not able to determine if the entity
was in compliance with this compliance requirement as appropriate documentation was not requested from the
applicable contractor.
Questioned Costs: N/A
Repeat Finding?: No
Recommendation: Management should implement internal controls over Wage Rate Requirements to ensure
compliance with applicable Federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the awards received.
Responsible Official’s Response: In this particular finding, the decision was made to undertake a project using organizational reserves.
Subsequent to the project taking place additional review indicated it would qualify as permissible under the
American Rescue Plan and Federal Funding could potentially cover the project costs. The contract for the work,
however, was not further reviewed at the time. After subsequent review, it appears that the contract may not
meet the standards for Federal Funding, Management, therefore, has removed the Federal funding revenue from
it’s financial statements and has not requested funding for this project under the American Rescue Plan.
As a regular course of business, the organization does require any contracts subject to Federal funding
requirements meet Federal Funding requirements, including those requirements associated with prevailing
wages. Going forward, a comprehensive contract review will be performed for any project retroactively
deemed a potentially permissible use of Federal funds
Auditor’s Evaluation of the Responsible Official’s Response:
Management’s response is appropriate to address the finding. If properly implemented, management’s response
would include procedures to prevent reoccurrence in the future.