Finding 733 (2023-001)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
N
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2023
Accepted
2023-10-25

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The PHA is not consistently conducting required inspections and follow-ups for units, leading to non-compliance with Housing Quality Standards (HQS).
  • Impacted Requirements: Federal regulations mandate bi-annual inspections and timely correction of deficiencies, which the PHA has failed to document properly.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Establish a robust system for monitoring compliance and improve documentation practices to avoid potential penalties.

Finding Text

The PHA must inspect the unit leased to a family at least bi-annually to determine if the unit meets Housing Quality Standards (HQS) and the PHA must conduct quality control re‐inspections. The PHA must prepare a unit inspection report (24 CFR §§982.405, 983.103)). Units under HAP contract that fail to meet HQS, the PHA must require the owner to correct any life threatening HQS deficiencies within 24 hours after the inspections and all other HQS deficiencies within 30 calendar days or within a specified PHA‐approved extension. If the owner does not correct the cited HQS deficiencies within the specified correction period, the PHA must stop (abate) HAPs beginning no later than the first of the month following the specified correction period or must terminate the HAP contract. The owner is not responsible for a breach of HQS as a result of the family’s failure to pay for utilities for which the family is responsible under the lease or for tenant damage. For family‐caused defects, if the family does not correct the cited HQS deficiencies within the specified correction period, the PHA must take prompt and vigorous action to enforce the family obligations (24 CFR sections 982.158(d) and 982.404). We selected a sample of 6 failed inspections that occurred during the fiscal year from a population of 16 total for the year. Out of the 6 samples selected, 2 of those lacked the proper documentation of a follow up for the failed inspection within the prescibed time frame above. Controls over compliance associated with the Authority’s HQS Enforcement are inadequate to detect these errors. The Authority is non‐compliant with the federal regulations over this federal program, this could potentially result in significant operating and financial penalties. We suggest the Authority structure a system capable of properly overseeing compliance with regulations relative to these grants as well as maintaining more accurate and complete documentation of adherence to compliance. Management agrees with the audit finding.

Corrective Action Plan

Please Note: I, Shannel R. Lampkins, HCV Manager, wanted to make mention about the content of the finding, it stated during the fiscal year there was a total of 16 failed inspections. The report provided was a list of failed inspections that never passed inspection and the authority was not aware that it should have selected a more accurate report to provide for the selection. Response: The Housing Choice Voucher Program Manager, Shannel R. Lampkins, will pull a bimonthly list of failed inspections to ensure that there is a procedural follow up to both participants and landlords and that the authority will follow its own policy and HUD Regulation to enforce Housing Quality Standard under program rules and regulations.

Categories

HUD Housing Programs

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 577175 2023-001
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $5.97M
14.850 Public and Indian Housing $1.84M
14.872 Public Housing Capital Fund $1.50M