Audit 1371

FY End
2023-03-31
Total Expended
$9.32M
Findings
2
Programs
3
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2023-10-25

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
733 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - N
577175 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - N

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $5.97M Yes 1
14.850 Public and Indian Housing $1.84M - 0
14.872 Public Housing Capital Fund $1.50M - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
MVK8KLU9WBM5 Jerri Hacker Auditee
7652889242 Chad Porter Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule presents the expenditures incurred (and related awards received) by the Muncie Housing Authority (the Authority) that are reimbursable under federal programs of federal agencies providing financial assistance awards. For the purpose of this schedule, only the portion of the program expenditures reimbursable with such federal funds is reported in the accompanying schedule. Program expenditures in excess of the maximum federal reimbursement authorized or the portion of the program expenditures that were funded with local or other nonfederal funds are excluded from the accompanying schedule. This schedule also only includes the amounts expended by the Authority, none of the amount expended, if any, by the blend or discretely present component units have been included. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Authority has not elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed in the Uniform Guidance, section 414.

Finding Details

The PHA must inspect the unit leased to a family at least bi-annually to determine if the unit meets Housing Quality Standards (HQS) and the PHA must conduct quality control re‐inspections. The PHA must prepare a unit inspection report (24 CFR §§982.405, 983.103)). Units under HAP contract that fail to meet HQS, the PHA must require the owner to correct any life threatening HQS deficiencies within 24 hours after the inspections and all other HQS deficiencies within 30 calendar days or within a specified PHA‐approved extension. If the owner does not correct the cited HQS deficiencies within the specified correction period, the PHA must stop (abate) HAPs beginning no later than the first of the month following the specified correction period or must terminate the HAP contract. The owner is not responsible for a breach of HQS as a result of the family’s failure to pay for utilities for which the family is responsible under the lease or for tenant damage. For family‐caused defects, if the family does not correct the cited HQS deficiencies within the specified correction period, the PHA must take prompt and vigorous action to enforce the family obligations (24 CFR sections 982.158(d) and 982.404). We selected a sample of 6 failed inspections that occurred during the fiscal year from a population of 16 total for the year. Out of the 6 samples selected, 2 of those lacked the proper documentation of a follow up for the failed inspection within the prescibed time frame above. Controls over compliance associated with the Authority’s HQS Enforcement are inadequate to detect these errors. The Authority is non‐compliant with the federal regulations over this federal program, this could potentially result in significant operating and financial penalties. We suggest the Authority structure a system capable of properly overseeing compliance with regulations relative to these grants as well as maintaining more accurate and complete documentation of adherence to compliance. Management agrees with the audit finding.
The PHA must inspect the unit leased to a family at least bi-annually to determine if the unit meets Housing Quality Standards (HQS) and the PHA must conduct quality control re‐inspections. The PHA must prepare a unit inspection report (24 CFR §§982.405, 983.103)). Units under HAP contract that fail to meet HQS, the PHA must require the owner to correct any life threatening HQS deficiencies within 24 hours after the inspections and all other HQS deficiencies within 30 calendar days or within a specified PHA‐approved extension. If the owner does not correct the cited HQS deficiencies within the specified correction period, the PHA must stop (abate) HAPs beginning no later than the first of the month following the specified correction period or must terminate the HAP contract. The owner is not responsible for a breach of HQS as a result of the family’s failure to pay for utilities for which the family is responsible under the lease or for tenant damage. For family‐caused defects, if the family does not correct the cited HQS deficiencies within the specified correction period, the PHA must take prompt and vigorous action to enforce the family obligations (24 CFR sections 982.158(d) and 982.404). We selected a sample of 6 failed inspections that occurred during the fiscal year from a population of 16 total for the year. Out of the 6 samples selected, 2 of those lacked the proper documentation of a follow up for the failed inspection within the prescibed time frame above. Controls over compliance associated with the Authority’s HQS Enforcement are inadequate to detect these errors. The Authority is non‐compliant with the federal regulations over this federal program, this could potentially result in significant operating and financial penalties. We suggest the Authority structure a system capable of properly overseeing compliance with regulations relative to these grants as well as maintaining more accurate and complete documentation of adherence to compliance. Management agrees with the audit finding.