Finding 635384 (2022-007)

Significant Deficiency
Requirement
M
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2022
Accepted
2023-05-31
Audit: 56341
Organization: Polk County, Florida (FL)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: Polk County failed to properly identify and monitor subrecipients, leading to significant discrepancies in reported data.
  • Impacted Requirements: Compliance with 2 CFR section 200.332(a) regarding subaward identification and monitoring activities was not met.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Amend the subrecipient contract to meet compliance guidelines and conduct a risk assessment to establish a tailored monitoring schedule.

Finding Text

2022-007-Subrecipient Monitoring Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Program Name: Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number: Z1890 Award Period: March 3, 2021, through December 31, 2026 Type of Finding: ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance ? Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR section 200.332(a) notes pass-through entities such as Polk County, Florida need to ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes required information at the time of the subaward sufficient for the subrecipient to comply with federal statutes, regulation, and the terms and conditions of the award. If any of the data elements change the impact should be updated in subsequent subaward modification. 2 CFR section 200.332(b)-(f) covers required monitoring activities and management of subrecipient relationships that should be performed by the pass-through entity. Condition: During the testing of quarterly Project and Expenditure Reports submitted to the Treasury, information included for contracts and subawards was not agreeing to information reported on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). Auditors selected reported subrecipients, beneficiaries, and contractors to determine the validity of assigned category. A subrecipient is an entity that receives a subaward to carry out a project funded by Fiscal Recovery Funds on behalf of a recipient. Individuals or entities that are direct beneficiaries of a project funded by Fiscal Recovery Funds are not considered subrecipients. Households, communities, small businesses, nonprofits, and impacted industries are all potential beneficiaries of projects carried out with SLFRF funds. The terms and conditions of Federal awards flow down to subawards to subrecipients, requiring subrecipients to comply with all requirements of recipients such as the treatment of eligible uses of funds, procurement, and reporting requirements. Beneficiaries are not subject to the requirements placed on subrecipients in the Uniform Guidance. The distinction between a subrecipient and a beneficiary, therefore, is contingent upon the rationale for why a recipient is providing funds to the individual or entity. If the recipient is providing funds to the individual or entity for the purpose of carrying out a SLFRF program or project on behalf of the recipient, the individual or entity is acting as a subrecipient. Acting as a subrecipient, the individual or entity is subject to subrecipient monitoring and reporting requirements. Questioned costs: N/A Context: A statistically valid sample of 10 organizations listed on each of the quarterly Treasury reports (40 total items tested) was selected and tested against the entity-type determination criteria. In the sample of 40 entity types reported, there were twenty-three exceptions (23) which resulted in a conclusion that only one (1) Organization reported was truly a subrecipient. This subrecipient was not captured on the SEFA and the elements of monitoring were not in place. The review of the contract agreement between Polk County and this subrecipient did not meet all requirements under 2 CFR section 200.332(a). Cause: The distinction between the entity types receiving this federal funding was not fully understood by personnel. Effect: Recipients and subrecipients are the first line of defense and responsible for ensuring the SLFRF award funds are not used for ineligible purposes, and there is no fraud, waste, or abuse associated with their SLFRF award. The terms and conditions of Federal awards flow down to subawards to subrecipients, requiring subrecipients to comply with all requirements of recipients such as the treatment of eligible uses of funds, procurement, and reporting requirements. A lack of monitoring can lead to noncompliance by the subrecipient which ultimately impacts the compliance of the pass-through entity. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend an amended subrecipient contract that complies with all guidelines under 2 CFR section 200.332(a) be put into place between Polk County and the identified subrecipient. In addition, we recommend a risk assessment of this subrecipient be performed and depending on the results of the assessment, determine a planned schedule of monitoring that matches frequency and intensity that aligns with the risk assessment. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Categories

Subrecipient Monitoring Reporting

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 58934 2022-003
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 58935 2022-003
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 58936 2022-003
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 58937 2022-003
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 58938 2022-003
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 58939 2022-003
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 58940 2022-005
    Significant Deficiency
  • 58941 2022-006
    Significant Deficiency
  • 58942 2022-007
    Significant Deficiency
  • 58943 2022-004
    Significant Deficiency
  • 58944 2022-004
    Significant Deficiency
  • 635376 2022-003
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 635377 2022-003
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 635378 2022-003
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 635379 2022-003
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 635380 2022-003
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 635381 2022-003
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 635382 2022-005
    Significant Deficiency
  • 635383 2022-006
    Significant Deficiency
  • 635385 2022-004
    Significant Deficiency
  • 635386 2022-004
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $4.92M
21.023 Emergency Rental Assistance Program $3.62M
21.019 Coronavirus Relief Fund $889,844
20.219 Recreational Trails Program $488,294
14.218 Community Development Block Grants/entitlement Grants $412,342
14.231 Emergency Solutions Grant Program $382,972
45.310 Grants to States $348,351
93.563 Child Support Enforcement $287,119
93.558 Temporary Assistance for Needy Families $274,480
20.205 Highway Planning and Construction $187,572
93.958 Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services $184,346
93.959 Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse $99,548
16.738 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program $94,906
20.505 Metropolitan Transportation Planning and State and Non-Metropolitan Planning and Research $85,928
93.575 Child Care and Development Block Grant $72,683
93.498 Provider Relief Fund $70,974
15.631 Partners for Fish and Wildlife $70,956
93.556 Promoting Safe and Stable Families $39,701
14.239 Home Investment Partnerships Program $36,631
94.002 Retired and Senior Volunteer Program $31,414
97.039 Hazard Mitigation Grant $15,900
97.042 Emergency Management Performance Grants $12,329
90.404 2018 Hava Election Security Grants $7,989
16.812 Second Chance Act Reentry Initiative $5,583